Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in NRG Oncology RTOG 0436: a phase III trial evaluating the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation for esophageal cancer treated without surgery

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

NRG/RTOG 0436 evaluated cetuximab added to chemoradiation (CRT) for non-operative esophageal cancer management. PRO objectives assessed improvement in the FACT-Esophageal cancer subscale (ECS), version 4, with cetuximab, and if improved ECS correlated with clinical complete response (cCR).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients were randomized to cisplatin/paclitaxel/radiation ± cetuximab. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, with a 420 patient target, which also provided 82% power to detect ≥ 15 increase in the proportion of cetuximab patients with ECS improvement from baseline to 6-8 weeks post-CRT; α = 0.05, using a χ2 test. Improvement in ECS and its Swallowing and Eating Indices (SI, EI) was defined as 5, 4 and 2 point increases, respectively, from baseline to 6-8 weeks post-CRT. Univariate logistic regression assessed if cCR was associated with improved ECS.

RESULTS

This study was stopped early for not meeting a pre-specified OS endpoint and did not show survival benefit. Of 420 planned patients, 344 enrolled and 281 consented to PROs. ECS was completed by 261 (93%) at baseline, 173 (66%) 6-8 weeks post-CRT, and 117 (64%) at 1 year. At 6-8 weeks, patients receiving CRT + Cetuximab didn't have improved ECS; they experienced a lower proportion of improvement compared to standard CRT (37% vs. 53%; P = 0.04). The proportion of CRT patients with improvement in SI was 9% higher than with cetuximab, but not statistically significant (39% vs. 30%, P = 0.22). There was no association between treatment and EI. When examining ECS scores at 1 year by cCR vs. residual disease, a higher proportion of cCR patients improved, but not statistically significant (48% vs. 45%, P = 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of cetuximab to CRT for the nonoperative management of esophageal cancer did not improve PROs.

Mental health outcomes in a population-based cohort of patients with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated mental health disorders comprehensively among patients with prostate cancer on long-term follow-up. The primary aim of our study was to assess the incidence of mental health disorders among patients with prostate cancer compared with a general population cohort. A secondary aim was to investigate potential risk factors for mental health disorders among patients with prostate cancer.

METHODS

Cohorts of 18 134 patients with prostate adenocarcinomas diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 and 73470 men without cancer matched on age, birth state, and follow-up time were identified. Mental health diagnoses were identified from electronic health records and statewide health-care facilities data. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

The hazard ratios for mood disorders, including depression, among prostate cancer survivors increased for all follow-up periods compared with the general population. The hazard ratios for any mental illness increased with Hispanic, Black, or multiple races; people who were underweight or obese; those with advanced prostate cancer; and those undergoing their first course cancer treatment. We also observed statistically significantly increased hazard ratios for mental health disorders among patients with lower socioeconomic status (P < .0001) and increasing duration of androgen-deprivation therapy (P = .0348). Prostate cancer survivors had a 61% increased hazard ratio for death with a depression diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Prostate cancer diagnosis was associated with a higher risk of mental health disorders compared with the general population, which was observed as long as 10-16 years after cancer diagnosis. Providing long-term mental health support may be beneficial to increasing life expectancy for patients with prostate cancer.

Regulatory mechanisms to create healthier environments: planning appeals and hot food takeaways in England

AIMS

To explore existing regulatory mechanisms to restrict hot food takeaway (HFT) outlets through further understanding processes at local and national levels.

METHODS

The Planning Appeals Portal was utilised to identify recent HFT appeal cases across England between December 2016 and March 2020. Eight case study sites were identified using a purposive sampling technique and interviews carried out with 12 professionals involved in planning and health to explore perceptions of and including factors that may impact on the HFT appeal process. Additionally, documents applicable to each case were analysed and a survey completed by seven Local Authority (LA) health professionals. To confirm findings, interpretation meetings were conducted with participants and a wider group of planning and public health professionals, including a representative from the Planning Inspectorate.

RESULTS

Eight case study sites were identified, and 12 interviews conducted. Participants perceived that LAs would be better able to work on HFT appeal cases if professionals had a good understanding of the planning process/the application of local planning policy and supplementary planning documents; adequate time and capacity to deal with appeals cases; access to accurate, robust, and up to date information; support and commitment from elected members and senior management; good lines of communication with local groups/communities interested in the appeal; information and resources that are accessible and easy to interpret across professional groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Communication across professional groups appeared to be a key factor in successfully defending decisions. Understanding the impact of takeaway outlets on health and communities in the long term was also important. To create a more robust appeals case and facilitate responsiveness, professionals involved in an appeal should know where to locate current records and statistical data. The enthusiasm of staff and support from senior management/elected officials will play a significant role in driving these agendas forward.

Adverse Health Outcomes among Rural and Urban Breast Cancer Survivors: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Limited population-based studies have focused on breast cancer survivors in rural populations. We sought to evaluate the risk of adverse health outcomes among rural and urban breast cancer survivors and to evaluate potential predictors for the highest risk outcomes.

METHODS

A population-based cohort of rural and urban breast cancer survivors diagnosed between 1997 and 2017 was identified in the Utah Cancer Registry (UCR). Rural breast cancer survivors were matched on year (±1 year) and age at cancer diagnosis (±1 year) with up to 5 urban breast cancer survivors (2,359 rural breast cancer survivors; 11,748 urban breast cancer survivors). Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate HRs with 99% confidence intervals (CI) for adverse health outcomes overall, within 5 years, and >5 years after cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Compared with urban breast cancer survivors, rural breast cancer survivors had a 39% (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.02-1.65) higher risk of heart failure (HF) within the 5 years of follow-up. Overall, there was no increase in the risk of other evaluated adverse health outcomes. A higher baseline body mass index and Charlson Comorbidity Index, family history of cardiovascular diseases, family history of breast cancer, and advanced cancer stage were risk factors for HF for rural and urban breast cancer survivors, with similar levels of HF risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Rural residence was associated with an increased risk of HF among breast cancer survivors.

IMPACT

Our study highlights the need for primary preventive strategies for rural cancer survivors at risk of heart failure.

Adverse health outcomes among rural prostate cancer survivors: A population-based study

INTRODUCTION

Rural cancer survivors experience considerable health disparities compared to urban cancer survivors for cancer treatment and survival. The objective of our study was to investigate the risk of developing diseases for rural compared to urban prostate cancer survivors in Utah.

METHODS

We identified a cohort of 3575 rural prostate cancer survivors and 17,778 urban prostate cancer survivors from the Utah Cancer Registry. The Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals for diseases in major body systems among rural compared to urban prostate cancer survivors at > 1-5 years and > 5 years after prostate cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Rural residence was associated with an increased risk of diseases of the respiratory system at > 5 years (HR: 1.16, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.32) after cancer diagnosis compared to urban residence among prostate cancer survivors in Utah. Decreased risks were observed in infectious and parasitic diseases, diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, diseases of the nervous system and sense organs, and diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue for rural prostate cancer survivors between 1 and 5 years after cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Rural prostate cancer survivors in Utah were somewhat healthier compared to urban prostate cancer survivors. Further studies are needed to confirm whether these associations are also supported for rural prostate cancer survivors in other regions of the U.S.

Risk-Adapted Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) for Breast Cancer: A Novel Analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have shown that risk-adapted intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk breast cancer patients is a safe alternative to whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT). The risk-adapted strategy allows additional WBRT for predefined high-risk pathologic characteristics discovered on final histopathology. The greater the percentage of patients receiving WBRT, the lower the recurrence rate. The risk-adapted strategy, although important and necessary, can make IORT appear better than it actually is.

METHODS

Risk-adapted IORT was used to treat 1600 breast cancers. They were analyzed by the intention-to-treat method and per protocol to better understand the contribution of IORT with and without additional whole-breast treatment. Any ipsilateral breast tumor event was considered a local recurrence.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 63 months, local recurrence differed significantly between the patients who received local treatment and those who received whole-breast treatment. For 1393 patients the treatment was local treatment alone. These patients experienced 79 local recurrences and a 5-year local recurrence probability of 5.95 %. For 207 patients with high-risk final histopathology, additional whole-breast treatment was administered. They experienced two local recurrences and a 5-year local recurrence probability of 0.5 % (p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-breast treatment works well at reducing local recurrence, and it is a totally acceptable and necessary addition to IORT as part of a risk-adapted program. However, the more whole-breast treatment that is given, the more it dilutes the original plan of simplifying local treatment and the less we understand exactly what IORT contributes to local control as a stand-alone treatment.

Determining the association of rurality and cardiovascular disease among prostate cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Rural disparities in prostate cancer survivorship and cardiovascular disease remain. Prostate cancer treatment also contributes to worse cardiovascular disease outcomes. Our objective was to determine whether rural-urban differences in cardiovascular outcomes contribute to disparities in prostate cancer survivorship.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from the Utah Population Database. Rural and urban prostate cancer survivors were matched by diagnosis year and age. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios for cardiovascular disease (levels 1-3) based on rural-urban classification, while controlling for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. We identified 3,379 rural and 16,253 urban prostate cancer survivors with a median follow-up of 9.3 years.

RESULTS

Results revealed that rural survivors had a lower risk of hypertension (HR 0.90), diseases of arteries (HR 0.92), and veins (HR 0.92) but a higher risk of congestive heart failure (HR 1.17). Interactions between level 2 cardiovascular diseases and rural/urban status, showed that diseases of the heart had a distinct between-group relationship for all-cause (P = 0.005) and cancer-specific mortality (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed complex relationships between rural-urban status, cardiovascular disease, and prostate cancer. Rural survivors were less likely to be diagnosed with screen-detected cardiovascular disease but more likely to have heart failure. Further, the relationship between cardiovascular disease and survival was different between rural and urban survivors. It may be that our findings underscore differences in healthcare access where rural patients are less likely to be screened for preventable cardiovascular disease and have worse outcomes when they have a major cardiovascular event.

Delay in Time to Oncologic Therapies for Patients with Positive COVID-19 Test

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

For several cancers, delays between diagnosis and initiation of treatment has important clinical implications, often affecting trial eligibility, treatment intention, and oncologic outcomes. The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic placed an extraordinary strain on the United States healthcare system, and its effect on oncologic patterns of care has yet to be established. We hypothesize that patients who received a new cancer diagnosis and subsequently tested positive for COVID-19 had delayed oncologic treatment compared to those who did not test positive for COVID-19.

MATERIALS/METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients who were diagnosed and treated for any of 10 common malignancies from 2019-2020. Included disease sites were head and neck, esophagus, rectum, anus, lung, breast, cervix, uterus, prostate, and primary brain. Those who tested positive for COVID-19 between time of diagnosis and first oncologic treatment (including surgery, radiation, or systemic therapy) were compared to those who did not test positive for COVID-19. COVID-19 positivity was assessed using a new variable in the NCDB, "SARSCOV2_POS," which captures whether patients received a positive COVID-19 test via reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction testing in inpatient, outpatient, or emergency room settings in 2020. Duration in days from cancer diagnosis to time to first treatment (TTFT) was analyzed using two-sample t-tests, with significance level of p<0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 1,503,127 patients were identified for analysis. Of these, 7,340 (0.5%) tested positive for COVID-19 between diagnosis and start of treatment. Initial treatment was most commonly surgery (55.3%), followed by systemic therapy (17.4%) and radiation (12.7%). Overall, median TTFT was 55 days [interquartile range (IQR) 31-91] for the COVID-19 group versus 34 days (IQR 15-56) for the non-COVID-19 group (p <0.01). Subgroup analysis of the 10 individual sites of disease revealed statistically significant delays in each, with greatest absolute difference in median TTFT in prostate (31.5 days; 95.5 versus 64.0) and greatest relative difference in brain (>700%, 28.5 versus 4.0).

CONCLUSION

In the first year of the pandemic, patients who tested positive for COVID-19 between oncologic diagnosis and initial management experienced significant delays in initiation of cancer-directed therapy compared to those who did not test positive for COVID-19, with median increase in TTFT of 21 days. Additional follow-up is needed to evaluate the clinical impact of these delays, as well as change in patterns of care in later years of the pandemic.

Comparing Active Surveillance and Watchful Waiting With Radical Treatment Using Machine Learning Models Among Patients With Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

In 2021, 59.6% of low-risk patients with prostate cancer were under active surveillance (AS) as their first course of treatment. However, few studies have investigated AS and watchful waiting (WW) separately. The objectives of this study were to develop and validate a population-level machine learning model for distinguishing AS and WW in the conservative treatment group, and to investigate initial cancer management trends from 2004 to 2017 and the risk of chronic diseases among patients with prostate cancer with different treatment modalities.

METHODS

In a cohort of 18,134 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2017, 1,926 patients with available AS/WW information were analyzed using machine learning algorithms with 10-fold cross-validation. Models were evaluated using performance metrics and Brier score. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios for chronic disease risk.

RESULTS

Logistic regression models achieved a test area under the receiver operating curve of 0.73, F-score of 0.79, accuracy of 0.71, and Brier score of 0.29, demonstrating good calibration, precision, and recall values. We noted a sharp increase in AS use between 2004 and 2016 among patients with low-risk prostate cancer and a moderate increase among intermediate-risk patients between 2008 and 2017. Compared with the AS group, radical treatment was associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality but higher risks of Alzheimer disease, anemia, glaucoma, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension.

CONCLUSION

A machine learning approach accurately distinguished AS and WW groups in conservative treatment in this decision analytical model study. Our results provide insight into the necessity to separate AS and WW in population-based studies.

The Implications of Treatment Delays in Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Cholangiocarcinoma Patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to understand factors associated with timing of adjuvant therapy for cholangiocarcinoma and the impact of delays on overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with non-metastatic bile duct cancer from 2004 to 2015 were analyzed. Patients were included only if they underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (RT). Patients who underwent neoadjuvant or palliative treatments were excluded. Pearson's chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the distribution of demographic, clinical, and treatment factors. After propensity score matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting, OS was compared between patients initiating therapy past various time points using Kaplan Meier analyses and doubly robust estimation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

In total, 7,733 of 17,363 (45%) patients underwent adjuvant treatment. The median time to adjuvant therapy initiation was 59 days (interquartile range 45-78 days). Age over 65, black and Hispanic race, and treatment with RT alone were associated with later initiation of adjuvant treatment. Patients with larger tumors and high-grade disease were more likely to initiate treatment early. After propensity score weighting, there was an OS decrement to initiation of treatment beyond the median of 59 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified characteristics that are related to the timing of adjuvant therapy in patients with biliary cancers. There was an OS decrement associated with delays beyond the median time point of 59 days. This finding may be especially relevant given the treatment delays seen as a result of COVID-19.

Adipose Tissue Distribution and Body Mass Index (BMI) Correlation With Daily Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) Shifts of Abdominal Radiation Therapy Patients

Purpose There are several studies suggesting a correlation between image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) setup errors and body mass index (BMI). However, abdominal fat content has visceral and subcutaneous components, which may affect setup errors differently. This study aims to analyze a potential workflow for characterizing adipose content and distribution in the region of the target that would allow a quickly calculated metric of abdominal fat content to stratify these patients. Methods IGRT shift data was retrospectively tabulated from daily fan-beam CT-on-rails pre-treatment alignment for 50 abdominal radiation therapy (RT) patients, and systematic and random errors in the daily setup were characterized by tabulating average and standard deviations of shift data for each patient and looking at differences for different distributions of adipose content. Visceral and subcutaneous fat content were defined by visceral fat area (VFA) and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) using a region-growing algorithm to contour adipose tissue on CT simulation scans. All contours were created for a single slice at the treatment isocenter, on which the VFA and SFA were calculated. A log-rank test was used to test trends in shifts over quartiles of adiposity. Results VFA ranged from 1.9-342.8c m², and SFA from 11.8-756.0 cm². The standard definition (SD) of random error (σ) in the lateral axis for Q1 vs. Q4 VFA was 0.10cm vs. 0.29cm, 0.12cm vs. 0.28cm for SFA, and 0.12cm vs. 0.31cm for BMI. The percentage of longitudinal shifts greater than 10mm for Q1 vs. Q4 VFA was 0% vs. 9%, 2% vs. 19% for SFA, and 0% vs. 20% for BMI. Statistically significant trends in shifts vs. the BMI quartile were seen for both pitch and the longitudinal direction, as well as for pitch corrections vs. the VFA quartile. Conclusion Within this dataset, abdominal cancer patients showed statistically significant trends in shift probability vs. BMI and VFA. Also, patients in the upper quartiles of all adiposity metrics showed an increased SD of σ in the lateral direction and increased shifts over 10 mm in the longitudinal direction. However, despite these relationships, neither VFA nor SFA offered discernible advantages in their relationship to shift uncertainty relative to BMI.

Association of Radiotherapy Duration With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated in NRG Oncology Trials: A Secondary Analysis of NRG Oncology Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

For many types of epithelial malignant neoplasms that are treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), treatment prolongation and interruptions have an adverse effect on outcomes.

Objective

To analyze the association between RT duration and outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer who were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study was an unplanned, post hoc secondary analysis of 3 prospective, multi-institutional phase 3 randomized clinical trials (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 8501, RTOG 9405, and RTOG 0436) of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored NRG Oncology (formerly the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, RTOG, and Gynecologic Oncology Group). Enrolled patients with nonmetastatic esophageal cancer underwent definitive CRT in the trials between 1986 and 2013, with follow-up occurring through 2014. Data analyses were conducted between March 2022 to February 2023.

Exposures

Treatment groups in the trials used standard-dose RT (50 Gy) and concurrent chemotherapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The outcomes were local-regional failure (LRF), distant failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable models were used to examine the associations between these outcomes and both RT duration and interruptions. Radiotherapy duration was analyzed as a dichotomized variable using an X-Tile software to choose a cut point and its median value as a cut point, as well as a continuous variable.

Results

The analysis included 509 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [57-70] years; 418 males [82%]; and 376 White individuals [74%]). The median (IQR) follow-up was 4.01 (2.93-4.92) years for surviving patients. The median cut point of RT duration was 39 days or less in 271 patients (53%) vs more than 39 days in 238 patients (47%), and the X-Tile software cut point was 45 days or less in 446 patients (88%) vs more than 45 days in 63 patients (12%). Radiotherapy interruptions occurred in 207 patients (41%). Female (vs male) sex and other (vs White) race and ethnicity were associated with longer RT duration and RT interruptions. In the multivariable models, RT duration longer than 45 days was associated with inferior DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.77; P = .04). The HR for OS was 1.33, but the results were not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.99-1.77; P = .05). Radiotherapy duration longer than 39 days (vs ≤39 days) was associated with a higher risk of LRF (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.65; P = .01). As a continuous variable, RT duration (per 1 week increase) was associated with DFS failure (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.28; P = .03). The HR for LRF 1.13, but the result was not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.99-1.28; P = .07).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this study indicated that in patients with esophageal cancer receiving definitive CRT, prolonged RT duration was associated with inferior outcomes; female patients and those with other (vs White) race and ethnicity were more likely to have longer RT duration and experience RT interruptions. Radiotherapy interruptions should be minimized to optimize outcomes.

Initial results of a phase 2 pilot study of radium-223 and radiotherapy in untreated hormone-naïve men with oligometastatic prostate cancer to bone

156

Background: We hypothesized that treatment with Radium-223 (Ra223) and to ≤5 sites of bony metastases (mets) could safely delay the time to start androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and maintain quality of life (QoL). Methods: 20 men previously treated with surgery, radiation, or both for M0 PCa later developed ≤5 bone-only mets were eligible for this prospective trial. Inclusion: testosterone ≥ 100 ng/dL and mets on conventional bone scan, validated by a CT, MRI, or PET/CT. Exclusion: LHRH therapies after initial treatment, or N1 disease at diagnosis of bone mets. Therapy was 6 cycles of Ra223 and SBRT (30 Gy in 5 fractions between cycles 1-2). Bone scan was performed at baseline and q3 months. PSA was evaluated monthly during the Ra223 course, and q3 months after. Therapeutic effectiveness was defined as ≥20% of patients meeting the primary endpoint of freedom from ADT (FFAdt) use at 15 months. Discontinuation of study therapy occurred if: PSA rise > 10% if baseline PSA >20ng/ml, PSA>20 if baseline PSA <20 ng/ml, radiographic progression or a skeletal-related event (SRE). All endpoints were timed from the Cycle 1 radium date. Patients were followed for 2 years. Clinically significant changes in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were defined as >1/2 standard deviation from the mean baseline value and were censored after the time of ADT use. Continuous and categorical covariates were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum and Pearson’s Chi2 tests, respectively, and univariate Cox regression. Statistical significance was considered at P<0.05. Results: The median number of Ra223 cycles was 6. 6 patients had <6 cycles (range 2-5) due to progression. FFAdt at 15 and 24 Months was 49.5% and 38.5%, respectively (p<0.001). The median time to ADT was 14.8 months. There were no significant changes from baseline in any PRO QoL domain (physical functioning, anxiety, depression, fatigue, satisfaction with participation in social roles, sleep disturbance, and pain interference). There were 2 patients with Grade 3 SREs (bone fracture, pain). Grade 2+ events attributed as possible or likely to Ra-223 were seen in 4 patients (bone pain, fatigue, fracture, decreased WBC count, and other). Grade 2+ events attributed as possible or likely to EBRT were seen in 2 patients and included fatigue and other pain. were noted for age, baseline PSA, days from primary treatment, NCCN risk group, TNM stage, ISUP grade group, BMI, or # of lesions in those who met or failed the primary endpoint (all p>0.05). Conclusions: First-line use of Ra223 and SBRT to oligomets in hormone-naïve men in this prospective pilot study resulted in a significant delay in ADT use compared to historical control, is well tolerated, and maintains QoL. Clinical trial information: NCT03304418 .

Survival outcomes for patients with T3N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottis treated with definitive radiation alone versus chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

Given the poor lymphatics of the glottis, we evaluated omission of chemotherapy in patients treated definitely for T3N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the glottis.

METHODS

We performed survival analysis of patients with T3N0M0 SCC of the glottis identified in the National Cancer Database treated with radiation alone versus chemoradiation.

RESULTS

A total of 3785 patients were identified. Patients age ≥70 and those with comorbidities were less likely to receive chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% CI [0.25-0.37] and 0.48 [0.31-0.76], respectively). Five-year OS was lower in patients treated with radiation versus chemoradiation (33.8% [30.3%-37.2%] vs. 58.0% [55.8%-60.0%]). In patients <70 with no comorbidities this difference persisted (51.0% [44.5%-57.0%] versus 66.7% [64.0%-69.3%]).

CONCLUSION

Overall survival was higher in patients treated with chemoradiation compared to radiation alone, even when controlling for age and comorbidities. Radiotherapy with chemotherapy omission is not appropriate in patients with T3N0M0 SCC of the glottis.

The Clinical Significance of Maximum Tumor Diameter on MRI in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy or Definitive Radiotherapy for Locoregional Prostate Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Maximum tumor diameter (MTD) on pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to further risk stratify for men with prostate cancer (PCa) prior to definitive local therapy. We aim to evaluate the prognostic impact of radiographic maximum tumor diameter (MTD) in men with localized prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From a single-center retrospective cohort of men receiving definitive treatment for PCa (radical prostatectomy [RP] or radiotherapy [RT]) with available pretreatment MRI, we conducted univariable and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models for progression using clinical variables including age, NCCN risk group, radiographic extracapsular extension (ECE), radiographic seminal vesical invasion (SVI), and MTD. RP and RT cohorts were analyzed separately. Covariates were used in a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis and progression-free survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and groups were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

The cohort included 631 patients (n = 428 RP, n = 203 RT). CART analysis identified 4 prognostic groups for patients treated with RP and 2 prognostic groups in those treated with RT. In the RP cohort, NCCN low/intermediate risk group patients with MTD>=15 mm had significantly worse PFS than those with MTD <= 14 mm, and NCCN high-risk patients with radiographic ECE had significantly worse PFS than those without ECE. In the RT cohort, PFS was significantly worse in the cohort with MTD >= 23 mm than those <= 22 mm.

CONCLUSION

Radiographic MTD may be a useful prognostic factor for patients with locoregional prostate cancer. This is the first study to illustrate that the importance of pretreatment tumor size may vary based on treatment modality.

Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities in Delay to Initiation of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Delays in initiation of radiotherapy may contribute to inferior oncologic outcomes that are more commonly observed in minoritized populations in the United States. We aimed to examine inequities associated with delayed initiation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried to identify the 10 cancer sites most commonly treated with IMRT. Interval to initiation of treatment (IIT) was broken into quartiles for each disease site, with the 4th quartile classified as delayed. Multivariable logistic regression for delayed IIT was performed for each disease site using clinical and demographic covariates. Differences in magnitude of delay between subsets of patients stratified by race and insurance status were evaluated using two-sample t-tests.

RESULTS

Among patients (n = 350,425) treated with IMRT between 2004 and 2017, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and Asian patients were significantly more likely to have delayed IIT with IMRT for nearly all disease sites compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. NHB, Hispanic, and Asian patients had significantly longer median IIT than NHW patients (NHB 87 days, P < .01; Hispanic 76 days, P < .01; Asian 74 days, P < .01; and NHW 67 days). NHW, Hispanic, and Asian patients with private insurance had shorter median IIT than those with Medicare (P < .01); however, NHB patients with private insurance had longer IIT than those with Medicare (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Delays in initiation of IMRT in NHB, Hispanic, and Asian patients may contribute to the known differences in cancer outcomes and warrant further investigation, particularly to further clarify the role of different insurance policies in delays in advanced modality radiotherapy.

Mental health disorders are more common in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and may negatively impact overall survival

BACKGROUND

Long-term mental health outcomes were characterized in patients who were diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and risk factors for the development of mental health disorders were identified.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with HL between 1997 and 2014 were identified in the Utah Cancer Registry. Each patient was matched with up to five individuals from a general population cohort identified within the Utah Population Database, a unique source of linked records that includes patient and demographic data.

RESULTS

In total, 795 patients who had HL were matched with 3575 individuals from the general population. Compared with the general population, patients who had HL had a higher risk of any mental health diagnosis (hazard ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-2.00). Patients with HL had higher risks of anxiety, depression, substance-related disorders, and suicide and intentional self-inflicted injuries compared with the general population. The main risk factor associated with an increased risk of being diagnosed with mental health disorders was undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with a hazard ratio of 2.06 (95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.76). The diagnosis of any mental health disorder among patients with HL was associated with a detrimental impact on overall survival; the 10-year overall survival rate was 70% in patients who had a mental health diagnosis compared with 86% in those patients without a mental health diagnosis (p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had HL had an increased risk of various mental health disorders compared with a matched general population. The current data illustrate the importance of attention to mental health in HL survivorship, particularly for patients who undergo therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Efficacy and safety of esophagectomy via left thoracic approach versus via right thoracic approach for middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a multicenter randomized clinical trial (NST1501)

Background

Left thoracic approach (LTA) has been a favorable selection in surgical treatment for esophageal cancer (EC) patients in China before minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is popular. This study aimed to demonstrate whether right thoracic approach (RTA) is superior to LTA in the surgical treatment of middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC).

Methods

Superiority clinical trial design was used for this multicenter randomized controlled two-parallel group study. Between April 2015 and December 2018, cT1b-3N0-1M0 TESCC patients from 14 centers were recruited and randomized by a central stratified block randomization program into LTA or RTA groups. All enrolled patients were followed up every three months after surgery. The software SPSS 20.0 and R 3.6.2. were used for statistical analysis. Efficacy and safety outcomes, 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

Results

A total of 861 patients without suspected upper mediastinal lymph nodes (umLN) were finally enrolled in the study after 95 ineligible patients were excluded. 833 cases (98.7%) were successfully followed up until June 1, 2020. Esophagectomies were performed via LTA in 453 cases, and via RTA in 408 cases. Compared with the LTA group, the RTA group required longer operating time (274.48±78.92 vs. 205.34±51.47 min, P<0.001); had more complications (33.8% vs. 26.3% P=0.016); harvested more lymph nodes (LNs) (23.61±10.09 vs. 21.92±10.26, P=0.015); achieved a significantly improved OS in stage IIIa patients (67.8% vs. 51.8%, P=0.022). The 3-year OS and DFS were 68.7% and 64.3% in LTA arm versus 71.3% and 63.7% in RTA arm (P=0.20; P=0.96).

Conclusions

Esophagectomies via both LTA and RTA can achieve similar outcomes in middle or lower TESCC patients without suspected umLN. RTA is superior to LTA and recommended for the surgical treatment of more advanced stage TESCC due to more complete lymphadenectomy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02448979.

Abstract 36: Treatment patterns in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients over 65 years of age

Background: Older patients (&gt;65 years) are frequently under-represented in clinical trials that determine cancer treatment guidelines. We sought to characterize treatment patterns among older patients and identify factors for receipt of non-standard of care (SOC) treatment.

Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to describe treatment patterns in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients (2004-2017) over 65 years of age. Patients with metastatic disease and non-adenocarcinoma histology were excluded. SOC therapy was defined as any recommended treatment option listed within site- and stage-specific National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Clinicodemographic characteristics and treatment patterns were compared between colon and rectal cancer patients by ten-year age-groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with receipt of treatment, by tumor site and stage.

Results: Of the 498,285 patients who met inclusion criteria, 47% were 65-75 years while 15% were &gt;85 years old (median age: 76 years). The majority were non-Hispanic White (88%), female (52%), Medicare insured (86%), colon cancer patients (76%) with a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 0 (63%). Significant differences in treatment patterns by age were observed; for e.g., 11% of stage I colon cancer patients &gt;85 years of age did not receive SOC surgical treatment but rather received radiation-only treatment compared to only 2% patients 65-75 years of age who received radiation-only treatment. In logistic regression analyses adjusted for diagnosis year, sex, race/ethnicity, CCI, insurance, income, education, hospital type, treatment facility, rurality, and geographic region, older patients were more likely to receive non-SOC treatments for colon cancer stage I [OR(95% CI) for 76-85 years 1.31(1.23,1.40); &gt;85 years 3.41(3.17,3.66)], stage II-III [OR(95% CI) for 76-85 years 1.96(1.92,2.01); &gt;85 years 3.50(3.40,3.60)], rectal cancer stage I [OR(95% CI) for 76-85 years 2.06(1.89,2.24); &gt;85 years 6.36(5.77,7.02)], and stage II-III [OR(95% CI) for 76-85 years 2.14(2.07,2.22); &gt;85 years 9.02(8.33,9.77)] compared to 65-75 year old patients. Other predictors of receiving non-SOC treatments for both colon and rectal cancers included Black race (p&lt;0.001), CCI &gt;3 (p&lt;0.001), lack of insurance (p&lt;0.001), and treatment at a community cancer clinic (p&lt;0.001).

Discussion: Compared to 65-75 year-old stage I-III colorectal cancer patients, older patients at all disease stages are more likely to not receive SOC treatment. Other predictors for receiving non-SOC treatment are Black race, presence of comorbidities, lack of insurance, and treatment at a community cancer clinic. Future observational and randomized studies are needed to define the optimal treatment paradigms in older colorectal cancer patients, identify and address disparities, and better support these patients.

Citation Format: Sheetal Hardikar, Christopher R. Weil, Shane Lloyd, Jessica N. Cohan, Mark A. Supiano, Jennifer Ose, Anita R. Peoples, Sumati V. Gupta, Kaitlyn Pelletier, Martine Extermann, Erin M. Siegel, David Shibata, Cornelia M. Ulrich. Treatment patterns in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients over 65 years of age [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 36.

NEXT: A single-arm, phase 2, open-label study of adjuvant nivolumab after completion of chemo-radiation therapy in patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer

506

Background: Nivolumab has known efficacy as adjuvant therapy after radical cystectomy in localized muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We are evaluating the efficacy of nivolumab adjuvant to definitive chemo-radiation therapy (CRT) in MIBC. Methods: In the NEXT study, we are currently enrolling patients with localized MIBC undergoing standard CRT. Participants are started on nivolumab 480 mg IV every 4 weeks (up to 12 doses) within 90 days of completion of CRT. Cystoscopic and scan-based assessments are done every 3 months for the first two years (yrs). The primary endpoint is failure-free survival (FFS) at 2 yrs from the start of CRT, with failure defined as local or systemic disease recurrence. Secondary endpoints include toxicity and quality of life (QOL) assessments. We have planned correlative studies on peripheral blood and tumor tissue. We performed a protocol-defined interim safety and efficacy analysis to assess the 6-month FFS rate with CRT and adjuvant nivolumab. Results: From 8/03/2017 to 9/28/2021, 20 patients were enrolled at two centers; median age is 76 yrs, clinical stage range is T2-T4b, N0-N+, M0; the median number of nivolumab cycles is 6.5, and the median follow-up is 8.9 months. The estimated 6-month FFS rate is 88.2% (95% CI 74.2% - 100%). Disease has progressed in 9 patients, of which 4 have local bladder recurrence (T1 in 3/4) and 5 have distant metastases. The estimated median FFS is 17.1 months (95% CI 8.71 months - infinity). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) are noted in 3/20 patients (15%): elevated transaminases, diarrhea, and polymyalgia rheumatica. Grade 3 radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) AEs occurred in 2 patients. QOL measures are serially evaluable in 13 patients for the first 3 months of adjuvant nivolumab, and are stable in the domains of disease-related physical symptoms, treatment side effects, and function/well-being, while are significantly improved (p=0.023) in the domain of disease-related emotional symptoms. Conclusions: In this first report of the role of immunotherapy adjuvant to CRT for localized bladder cancer, adjuvant nivolumab is well tolerated and has promising efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT03171025.