Outpatient management of Post-COVID syndrome - single center experience

BACKGROUND

COVID patients continue to experience unremitting symptoms that extend far beyond the initial illness. While there is rapid accumulation of data on acute COVID treatment in hospitalized patients, little is known regarding post-COVID management.

OBJECTIVES

To describe our center's experience treating post-COVID sub-syndromes encountered in Post-COVID Lung Clinic.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data on 98 post-COVID patients evaluated in our clinic between 07/01/2020-12/31/2022. We encountered three distinct post-COVID subtypes: 1) respiratory complaints associated with increased O2 requirements and abnormal CT findings (post-COVID interstitial lung disease [ILD]), 2) respiratory complaints associated with tachycardia (post-COVID dyspnea-tachycardia syndrome [DTS]). Post-COVID ILD patients (n = 28) received steroids in combination with cell cycle inhibitor (mycophenolate mofetil-MMF). Post-COVID DTS patients (n = 16) were treated with metoprolol. 3) A third, undifferentiated group presented with mild respiratory complaints and normal spirometry (n = 17) and was followed in clinic without initiation of a specific treatment.

RESULTS

In treated post-COVID ILD patients, mean oxygen requirements at rest (1.96 ± 1.79 L/NC) decreased to 0.89 ± 1.29 L/NC at 6 months follow-up, p = 0.005. In patients with post-COVID DTS, mean heart rate at rest decreased (98 ± 15 bpm to 79 ± 11 bpm) at 6 months follow-up, p = 0.023. 60 % of patients reported an improvement in exertional dyspnea.

CONCLUSIONS

Our descriptive study presents a single center outpatient COVID-19 clinic experience. We encountered 3 post-COVID sub-syndromes and describe their treatments: post-COVID interstitial lung disease [ILD] treated with a novel regimen of MMF and steroids, post COVID dyspnea-tachycardia syndrome [DTS] treated with metoprolol, and a third subgroup with mild undifferentiated symptoms without specific treatment.

Serious Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using Diltiazem With Apixaban or Rivaroxaban

Importance

Diltiazem, a commonly prescribed ventricular rate-control medication for patients with atrial fibrillation, inhibits apixaban and rivaroxaban elimination, possibly causing overanticoagulation.

Objective

To compare serious bleeding risk for new users of apixaban or rivaroxaban with atrial fibrillation treated with diltiazem or metoprolol.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older with atrial fibrillation who initiated apixaban or rivaroxaban use and also began treatment with diltiazem or metoprolol between January 1, 2012, and November 29, 2020. Patients were followed up to 365 days through November 30, 2020. Data were analyzed from August 2023 to February 2024.

Exposures

Diltiazem and metoprolol.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a composite of bleeding-related hospitalization and death with recent evidence of bleeding. Secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, major ischemic or hemorrhagic events (ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, intracranial or fatal extracranial bleeding, or death with recent evidence of bleeding), and death without recent evidence of bleeding. Hazard ratios (HRs) and rate differences (RDs) were adjusted for covariate differences with overlap weighting.

Results

The study included 204 155 US Medicare beneficiaries, of whom 53 275 received diltiazem and 150 880 received metoprolol. Study patients (mean [SD] age, 76.9 [7.0] years; 52.7% female) had 90 927 person-years (PY) of follow-up (median, 120 [IQR, 59-281] days). Patients receiving diltiazem treatment had increased risk for the primary outcome (RD, 10.6 [95% CI, 7.0-14.2] per 1000 PY; HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.13-1.29]) and its components of bleeding-related hospitalization (RD, 8.2 [95% CI, 5.1-11.4] per 1000 PY; HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.13-1.31]) and death with recent evidence of bleeding (RD, 2.4 [95% CI, 0.6-4.2] per 1000 PY; HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.05-1.34]) compared with patients receiving metoprolol. Risk for the primary outcome with initial diltiazem doses exceeding 120 mg/d (RD, 15.1 [95% CI, 10.2-20.1] per 1000 PY; HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.19-1.39]) was greater than that for lower doses (RD, 6.7 [95% CI, 2.0-11.4] per 1000 PY; HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.04-1.24]). For doses exceeding 120 mg/d, the risk of major ischemic or hemorrhagic events was increased (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.02-1.27]). Neither dose group had significant changes in the risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism or death without recent evidence of bleeding. When patients receiving high- and low-dose diltiazem treatment were directly compared, the HR for the primary outcome was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.02-1.26).

Conclusions and Relevance

In Medicare patients with atrial fibrillation receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban, diltiazem was associated with greater risk of serious bleeding than metoprolol, particularly for diltiazem doses exceeding 120 mg/d.

Comparison of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the FDC of telmisartan + bisoprolol with telmisartan + metoprolol succinate ER combination therapy for stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension: A double-blind, multicentric, phase-III clinical study

AIM

The present study compared the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of the new fixed-dose combination (FDC) of telmisartan 40 mg + bisoprolol 5 mg (TBP) tablets with the existing comparator FDC telmisartan 40 mg + metoprolol succinate ER 50 mg (TMS) tablets in patients with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension.

METHODOLOGY

The multicentric, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative, prospective, phase-III clinical study involved 264 subjects with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension from 10 centres across India. The selected subjects were randomized into two groups: group A received the TMS and group B received the new FDC TBP. The primary endpoint was the mean change in seated systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) and seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) from baseline to week 12 in both the control and study arms. The secondary endpoint was achieving the target of SeSBP <140 mmHg and SeDBP <90 mmHg from baseline to week 12 in both groups. Safety and tolerability parameters were evaluated in both groups based on adverse effects (AEs) reported by the patients and the physician.

RESULTS

Both treatment groups exhibited a reduction in BP after 2 weeks of treatment, which was sustained until 12 weeks. The mean change in SeSBP and SeDBP at weeks 2, 6, and 12 compared to the previous visit showed statistical significance (p < 0.001) in all cases for both groups A and B. The mean changes in SeSBP and SeDBP from baseline to study end were numerically higher in group B than in group A. The mean difference in SeSBP from baseline to study end was significantly higher in group B compared to group A (p = 0.029). By week 12, 88.28 % and 89.84 % of subjects in group B achieved SeSBP <140 mmHg and SeDBP <90 mmHg respectively, while 86.71 % and 91.40 % of subjects in group A achieved the same targets. Reported AEs were mostly mild to moderate in both treatment groups, and no serious AEs or deaths were reported. Tolerability was rated as 'excellent' by 93.75 % of subjects in group B and 91.40 % of subjects in group A.

CONCLUSION

Both the new FDC TBP and the existing comparator TMS combination therapy have comparable efficacy, tolerability, and safety for the management of stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension.

TRIAL REGISTRY NAME

Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI) TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: CTRI/2021/11/037,926 PROTOCOL NO: MLBTL/05/2021 PROTOCOL URL: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=62069&EncHid=&userName=bisoprolol.

Beta-Blockers after Myocardial Infarction and Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Most trials that have shown a benefit of beta-blocker treatment after myocardial infarction included patients with large myocardial infarctions and were conducted in an era before modern biomarker-based diagnosis of myocardial infarction and treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention, antithrombotic agents, high-intensity statins, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system antagonists.

METHODS

In a parallel-group, open-label trial performed at 45 centers in Sweden, Estonia, and New Zealand, we randomly assigned patients with an acute myocardial infarction who had undergone coronary angiography and had a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 50% to receive either long-term treatment with a beta-blocker (metoprolol or bisoprolol) or no beta-blocker treatment. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause or new myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

From September 2017 through May 2023, a total of 5020 patients were enrolled (95.4% of whom were from Sweden). The median follow-up was 3.5 years (interquartile range, 2.2 to 4.7). A primary end-point event occurred in 199 of 2508 patients (7.9%) in the beta-blocker group and in 208 of 2512 patients (8.3%) in the no-beta-blocker group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.16; P = 0.64). Beta-blocker treatment did not appear to lead to a lower cumulative incidence of the secondary end points (death from any cause, 3.9% in the beta-blocker group and 4.1% in the no-beta-blocker group; death from cardiovascular causes, 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively; myocardial infarction, 4.5% and 4.7%; hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, 1.1% and 1.4%; and hospitalization for heart failure, 0.8% and 0.9%). With regard to safety end points, hospitalization for bradycardia, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, hypotension, syncope, or implantation of a pacemaker occurred in 3.4% of the patients in the beta-blocker group and in 3.2% of those in the no-beta-blocker group; hospitalization for asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 0.6% and 0.6%, respectively; and hospitalization for stroke in 1.4% and 1.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent early coronary angiography and had a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%), long-term beta-blocker treatment did not lead to a lower risk of the composite primary end point of death from any cause or new myocardial infarction than no beta-blocker use. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; REDUCE-AMI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03278509.).

Napex acupoint thread-embedding combined with metoprolol tartrate tablet for prophylactic treatment of migraine without aura: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To observe the efficacy of napex acupoint thread-embedding combined with metoprolol tartrate tablet for prophylactic treatment of migraine without aura, and to compare its efficacy with simple napex acupoint thread-embedding and simple metoprolol tartrate tablet.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients with migraine without aura were randomized into a combination group (35 cases, 5 cases dropped out), a thread-embedding group (35 cases, 4 cases dropped out) and a western medication group (35 cases, 2 cases dropped out). In the thread-embedding group, napex acupoint thread-embedding was applied at bilateral Fengchi (GB 20) and points of 1.5 cun nearby to the lower edge of spinous process of cervical 2. In the western medication group, metoprolol tartrate tablet was given orally, 12.5 mg a time, twice a day. In the combination group, napex acupoint thread-embedding combined with oral metoprolol tartrate tablet was delivered. The treatment of 8 weeks was required in the 3 groups. The days of headache attacks, frequency of headache attacks, headache severity (visual analogue scale [VAS] score) and the migraine specific quality of life questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ) score were observed during baseline period (4 weeks before treatment to before treatment), observation period (1-4 weeks and 5-8 weeks in treatment) and follow-up period (1-4 weeks after treatment completion) respectively, the proportions of the days of headache attacks/frequency of headache attacks relieved by 50% were calculated, and the safety was evaluated in the 3 groups.

RESULTS

During the observation period and the follow-up period, the days of headache attacks, frequency of headache attacks and headache VAS scores in the 3 groups were reduced compared with those of the baseline period (P<0.05). During the observation period and the follow-up period, the days of headache attacks and the frequency of headache attacks in the combination group were lower than those in the thread-embedding group and the western medication group (P<0.05); during the observation period (1-4 weeks in treatment), the headache VAS scores in the combination group and the thread-embedding group were lower than that in the western medication group (P<0.05); during the observation period (5-8 weeks in treatment) and the follow-up period, the headache VAS scores in the combination group were lower than those in the thread-embedding group and the western medication group (P<0.05). During the observation period and the follow-up period, the scores of role restriction, role prevention and emotion function of MSQ in the combination group were increased compared with those of the baseline period (P<0.05); during the observation period (5-8 weeks in treatment) and the follow-up period, the role prevention scores of MSQ in the thread-embedding group and the western medication group were increased compared with those of the baseline period (P<0.05); during the follow-up period, the emotion function scores of MSQ in the thread-embedding group and the western medication group were increased compared with those of the baseline period (P<0.05). During the observation period and the follow-up period, the scores of role restriction, role prevention and emotion function of MSQ in the combination group were higher than those in the thread-embedding group and the western medication group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the proportions of the days of headache attacks/frequency of headache attacks relieved by 50% among the 3 groups (P>0.05), and there were no serious adverse reactions in the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Napex acupoint thread-embedding combined with metoprolol tartrate tablet, simple napex acupoint thread-embedding and simple metoprolol tartrate tablet all can reduce the days of headache attacks and the frequency of headache attacks, relieve headache severity and improve the quality of life in patients with migraine without aura. Napex acupoint thread-embedding combined with metoprolol tartrate tablet has a better effect.

Effect of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol on Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Intervention Therapy

Carvedilol can inhibit inflammation, vasoconstriction, and oxidative stress, which play important roles in the development and progression of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). To the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated the potential effect of carvedilol on the prevalence of CIN after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The present study aimed to determine whether carvedilol use is associated with the development of CIN. A total of 319 patients (mean age, 59.2 ± 12.4 years; 77.7% male) with ACS who underwent urgent PCI at our institution between May 2019 and May 2022 were included prospectively. Overall, 100 and 219 patients were assigned to the carvedilol and metoprolol groups, respectively. The prevalence of CIN was significantly lower in the carvedilol group (6.0%) than in the metoprolol group (18.3%; P = .003). Multivariate analysis revealed that carvedilol use (odds ratio [OR] .250, 95% confidence interval [CI] .092-.677, P = .006), amount of contrast agent (OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.000-1.008, P = .031), and admission estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR .978, 95% CI 0.960-.995, P = .014) were independently associated with the development of CIN. The use of carvedilol may be a promising option for the prevention of CIN in patients with ACS undergoing urgent PCI.

Metoprolol for prevention of bucking at orotracheal extubation: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Respiratory responses to extubation can cause serious postoperative complications. Beta-blockers, such as metoprolol, can interfere with the cough pathway. However, whether metoprolol can effectively control respiratory reflexes during extubation remains unclear. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous metoprolol in attenuating respiratory responses to tracheal extubation.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center located in Brasília, Brazil. Recruitment: June 2021 to December 2021.

SAMPLE

222 patients of both sexes with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III aged 18-80 years. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous metoprolol 5 mg IV or placebo at the end of surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who developed bucking secondary to endotracheal tube stimulation of the tracheal mucosa during extubation. Secondary outcomes included coughing, bronchospasm, laryngospasm, Mean Blood Pressure (MAP), and Heart Rate (HR) levels.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seven participants were included in the final analysis: 102 in the metoprolol group and 105 in the placebo group. Patients who received metoprolol had a significantly lower risk of bucking (43.1% vs. 64.8%, Relative Risk [RR = 0.66], 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI 0.51-0.87], p = 0.003). In the metoprolol group, 6 (5.9%) patients had moderate/severe coughing compared with 33 (31.4%) in the placebo group (RR = 0.19; 95% CI 0.08-0.43, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Metoprolol reduced the risk of bucking at extubation in patients undergoing general anesthesia compared to placebo.

Which should you choose for post operative atrial fibrillation, carvedilol or metoprolol? A systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common arrhythmic complication following cardiac surgery. Current guidelines suggest beta-blockers for the prevention of POAF. In comparing metoprolol succinate with carvedilol, the later has sparked interest in its usage as an important medication for POAF prevention.

METHODS

We considered randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and retrospective studies that evaluated the efficacy of carvedilol versus metoprolol for the prevention of POAF. After literature search, data extraction, and quality evaluation, pooled data were analyzed using either the fixed-effect or random-effect model using Review Manager 5.3. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the bias of included studies. The incidence of POAF was the primary endpoint, while mortality rate and bradycardia were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

In meta-analysis 5 RCTs and 2 retrospective studies with a total of 1000 patients were included. The overall effect did not favor the carvedilol over metoprolol groups in terms of mortality rate [risk ratio 0.45, 95 % CI (0.1-1.97), P=0.29] or incidence of bradycardia [risk ratio 0.63, 95 % CI (0.32-1.23), P=0.17]. However, the incidence of POAF was lower in patients who received carvedilol compared to metoprolol [risk ratio 0.54, 95 % CI (0.42-0.71), P < 0.00001].

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, carvedilol may minimize the occurrence of POAF more effectively than metoprolol. To definitively establish the efficacy of carvedilol compared to metoprolol and other beta-blockers in the prevention of POAF, a large-scale, well-designed randomized controlled trials are required.

Mechanism-Based Inactivation of CYP2D6 by Phellopterin and Related Drug-Drug Interaction with Metoprolol

Phellopterin (PLP) is a linear furanocoumarin widely found in citrus fruits and herbal medicines. The study aims to comprehensively investigate the mechanism of inhibition of CYP2D6 enzyme activity by PLP and its alteration of metoprolol pharmacokinetics. PLP was found to irreversibly inhibit CYP2D6 in time-, concentration-, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-dependent manners. Coincubation with quinidine, which is a competitive inhibitor of CYP2D6, attenuated this time-dependent inhibition. Glutathione (GSH) and catalase/superoxide dismutase failed to reverse the PLP-induced CYP2D6 inactivation. GSH trapping experiments provided strong evidence that PLP metabolic activation produces epoxide or γ-ketoaldehyde intermediates. In addition, pretreatment with PLP resulted in significant increases in Cmax and area under curve of plasma metoprolol in rats.

Intravenous Diltiazem Versus Metoprolol in Acute Rate Control of Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter and Rapid Ventricular Response: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or atrial flutter (AFL) with rapid ventricular response (RVR) is a condition that often requires urgent treatment. Although guidelines have recommendations regarding chronic rate control therapy, recommendations on the best choice for acute heart rate (HR) control in RVR are unclear.

METHODS

A systematic search across multiple databases was performed for studies evaluating the outcome of HR control (defined as HR less than 110 bpm and/or 20% decrease from baseline HR). Included studies evaluated AF and/or AFL with RVR in a hospital setting, with direct comparison between intravenous (IV) diltiazem and metoprolol and excluded cardiac surgery and catheter ablation patients. Hypotension (defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg) was measured as a secondary outcome. Two authors performed full-text article review and extracted data, with a third author mediating disagreements. Random effects models utilizing inverse variance weighting were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test.

RESULTS

A total of 563 unique titles were identified through the systematic search, of which 16 studies (7 randomized and 9 observational) were included. In our primary analysis of HR control by study type, IV diltiazem was found to be more effective than IV metoprolol for HR control in randomized trials (OR 4.75, 95% CI 2.50-9.04 with I2 = 14%); however, this was not found for observational studies (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.80 with I2 = 55%). In an analysis of observational studies, there were no significant differences between the two drugs in odds of hypotension (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.51-2.45 with I2 = 18%).

CONCLUSION

While there was a trend toward improved HR control with IV diltiazem compared with IV metoprolol in randomized trials, this was not seen in observational studies, and there was no observed difference in hypotension between the two drugs.

Improved Cardiac Performance and Decreased Arrhythmia in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Non-β-Blocking R-Enantiomer Carvedilol

BACKGROUND

Hypercontractility and arrhythmia are key pathophysiologic features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the most common inherited heart disease. β-Adrenergic receptor antagonists (β-blockers) are the first-line therapy for HCM. However, β-blockers commonly selected for this disease are often poorly tolerated in patients, where heart-rate reduction and noncardiac effects can lead to reduced cardiac output and fatigue. Mavacamten, myosin ATPase inhibitor recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, has demonstrated the ability to ameliorate hypercontractility without lowering heart rate, but its benefits are so far limited to patients with left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction, and its effect on arrhythmia is unknown.

METHODS

We screened 21 β-blockers for their impact on myocyte contractility and evaluated the antiarrhythmic properties of the most promising drug in a ventricular myocyte arrhythmia model. We then examined its in vivo effect on LV function by hemodynamic pressure-volume loop analysis. The efficacy of the drug was tested in vitro and in vivo compared with current therapeutic options (metoprolol, verapamil, and mavacamten) for HCM in an established mouse model of HCM (Myh6R403Q/+ and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes from patients with HCM (MYH7R403Q/+).

RESULTS

We identified that carvedilol, a β-blocker not commonly used in HCM, suppresses contractile function and arrhythmia by inhibiting RyR2 (ryanodine receptor type 2). Unlike metoprolol (a β1-blocker), carvedilol markedly reduced LV contractility through RyR2 inhibition, while maintaining stroke volume through α1-adrenergic receptor inhibition in vivo. Clinically available carvedilol is a racemic mixture, and the R-enantiomer, devoid of β-blocking effect, retains the ability to inhibit both α1-receptor and RyR2, thereby suppressing contractile function and arrhythmias without lowering heart rate and cardiac output. In Myh6R403Q/+ mice, R-carvedilol normalized hyperdynamic contraction, suppressed arrhythmia, and increased cardiac output better than metoprolol, verapamil, and mavacamten. The ability of R-carvedilol to suppress contractile function was well retained in MYH7R403Q/+ iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

R-enantiomer carvedilol attenuates hyperdynamic contraction, suppresses arrhythmia, and at the same time, improves cardiac output without lowering heart rate by dual blockade of α1-adrenergic receptor and RyR2 in mouse and human models of HCM. This combination of therapeutic effects is unique among current therapeutic options for HCM and may particularly benefit patients without LV outflow tract obstruction.

IL-6 translation is a therapeutic target of human cytokine release syndrome

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapies have achieved remarkable success for treating hematologic malignancies, yet are often accompanied by severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Here, an accidental clinical observation raised the possibility that metoprolol, an FDA-approved β1 adrenergic receptor blocker widely used for cardiovascular conditions, may alleviate CAR T-induced CRS. Metoprolol effectively blocked IL-6 production in human monocytes through unexpected mechanisms of action of targeting IL-6 protein translation but not IL6 mRNA expression. Mechanistically, metoprolol diminished IL-6 protein synthesis via attenuating eEF2K-eEF2 axis-regulated translation elongation. Furthermore, an investigator-initiated phase I/II clinical trial demonstrated a favorable safety profile of metoprolol in CRS management and showed that metoprolol significantly alleviated CAR T-induced CRS without compromising CAR T efficacy. These results repurposed metoprolol, a WHO essential drug, as a potential therapeutic for CRS and implicated IL-6 translation as a mechanistic target of metoprolol, opening venues for protein translation-oriented drug developments for human inflammatory diseases.

Effects of Moracizine Combined with Metoprolol on Hemodynamic Indices of the Left Atrium and Quality of Life in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Drugs are the first choice of treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), but there is currently a lack of efficient drug treatment options. The aim of this study was to investigate a combination drug treatment plan which may serve as a reference for the treatment of AF.

METHODS

A total of 316 AF patients admitted to Jiaozhou Central Hospital in Qingdao from October 2020 to October 2022 were selected for this retrospective study. They were divided into a control group (CG, metoprolol, n = 156) and an observation group (OG, moracizine combined with metoprolol, n = 160) based on the treatment they received. The CG and OG groups were compared for clinical efficacy, occurrence of AF, cardiac output (CO), cardiac indexes (CI), stroke volume (SV), stroke indexes (SI) and improvement in QOL.

RESULTS

The OG had a better effective rate of treatment, higher levels of CO, CI, SV and SI, and higher QOL scores compared to the CG, as well as a lower AF recurrence rate and AF burden (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Moracizine combined with metoprolol is an effective treatment for AF patients. This drug combination was found to reduce the AF recurrence rate and burden in AF patients, and to improve their hemodynamic indices and QOL.

Preemptive Pharmacogenetic-Guided Metoprolol Management for Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery: The Preemptive Pharmacogenetic-Guided Metoprolol Management for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery Pilot Trial

OBJECTIVES

To test the hypothesis that implementation of a cytochrome P-450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype-guided perioperative metoprolol administration will reduce the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF), the authors conducted the Preemptive Pharmacogenetic-Guided Metoprolol Management for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery pilot study.

DESIGN

Clinical pilot trial.

SETTING

Single academic center.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-three cardiac surgery patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were classified as normal, intermediate, poor, or ultrarapid metabolizers after testing for their CYP2D6 genotype. A clinical decision support tool in the electronic health record advised providers on CYP2D6 genotype-guided metoprolol dosing. Using historical data, the Bayesian method was used to compare the incidence of postoperative AF in patients with altered metabolizer status to the reference incidence. A logistic regression analysis was performed to study the association between the metabolizer status and postoperative AF while controlling for the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia AF Risk Index. Of the 73 patients, 30% (n = 22) developed postoperative AF; 89% (n = 65) were normal metabolizers; 11% (n = 8) were poor/intermediate metabolizers; and there were no ultrarapid metabolizer patients identified. The estimated rate of postoperative AF in patients with altered metabolizer status was 30% (95% CI 8%-60%), compared with the historical reference incidence (27%). In the risk-adjusted analysis, there was insufficient evidence to conclude that modifying metoprolol dosing based on poor/intermediate metabolizer status was associated significantly with the odds of postoperative AF (odds ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.15-4.55, p = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

A CYP2D6 genotype-guided metoprolol management was not associated with a reduction of postoperative AF after cardiac surgery.

Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Among Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients

BACKGROUND

Both selective and nonselective beta-blockers are used to treat patients with heart failure (HF). However, the data on the association of beta-blocker type with risk of atrial arrhythmia and ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in HF patients with a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are limited.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the effect of metoprolol vs carvedilol on the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) and VA in HF patients with an ICD.

METHODS

This study pooled primary prevention ICD recipients from 5 landmark ICD trials (MADIT-II, MADIT-CRT, MADIT-RIT, MADIT-RISK, and RAID). Fine and Gray multivariate regression models, stratified by study, were used to evaluate the risk of ATA, inappropriate ICD shocks, and fast VA (defined as ventricular tachycardia ≥200 beats/min or ventricular fibrillation) by beta-blocker type.

RESULTS

Among 4,194 patients, 2,920 (70%) were prescribed carvedilol and 1,274 (30%) metoprolol. The cumulative incidence of ATA at 3.5 years was 11% in patients treated with carvedilol vs 15% in patients taking metoprolol (P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that carvedilol treatment was associated with a 35% reduction in the risk of ATA (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53-0.81; P < 0.001) when compared to metoprolol, and with a corresponding 35% reduction in the risk of inappropriate ICD shocks (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47-0.89; P = 0.008). Carvedilol vs metoprolol was also associated with a 16% reduction in the risk of fast VA. However, these findings did not reach statistical significance (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.70-1.02; P = 0.085).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggests that HF patients with ICDs on carvedilol treatment experience a significantly lower risk of ATA and inappropriate ICD shocks when compared to treatment with metoprolol.

Transportability of two heart failure trials to a disease registry using individual patient data

OBJECTIVES

Randomized controlled trials are the gold-standard for determining therapeutic efficacy, but are often unrepresentative of real-world settings. Statistical transportation methods (hereafter transportation) can partially account for these differences, improving trial applicability without breaking randomization. We transported treatment effects from two heart failure (HF) trials to a HF registry.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Individual-patient-level data from two trials (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET), comparing carvedilol and metoprolol, and digitalis investigation group trial (DIG), comparing digoxin and placebo) and a Scottish HF registry were obtained. The primary end point for both trials was all-cause mortality; composite outcomes were all-cause mortality or hospitalization for COMET and HF-related death or hospitalization for DIG. We performed transportation using regression-based and inverse odds of sampling weights (IOSW) approaches.

RESULTS

Registry patients were older, had poorer renal function and received higher-doses of loop-diuretics than trial participants. For each trial, point estimates were similar for the original and IOSW (e.g., DIG composite outcome: OR 0.75 (0.69, 0.82) vs. 0.73 (0.64, 0.83)). Treatment effect estimates were also similar when examining high-risk (0.64 (0.46, 0.89)) and low-risk registry patients (0.73 (0.61, 0.86)). Similar results were obtained using regression-based transportation.

CONCLUSION

Regression-based or IOSW approaches can be used to transport trial effect estimates to patients administrative/registry data, with only moderate reductions in precision.

The influence of metoprolol in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To focus on evaluating the clinical influence of metoprolol on sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SICM).

METHODS

A total of 90 patients with SICM was enrolled from December 2018 to February 2021 and divided into 2 groups according to the use of metoprolol during hospitalization in Suzhou Municipal Hospital in Suzhou, China. We compared them with the cardiac function, sequential organ failure assessment score, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Between the 2 groups, the oxygenation indices and Glasgow coma scale in the metoprolol group were higher on the first day of treatment, with Glasgow coma scale higher on the third day of treatment. However, the doses of norepinephrine in patients with metoprolol showed no significant differences with the control group. The all-causemortality at 28 days in the metoprolol group was lower, and the time of removing from ventilator support as well as the number of failured organs also significantly differed between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Metoprolol can reduce the 28-day mortality and shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation in SICM. It can also reduce the number of organ failures and improve the oxygenation index and Glasgow coma scale of these patients. Meanwhile, metoprolol did not affect the norepinephrine dose in patients with SICM.

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Benefit of β-Blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction

Beta blockers are uniformly recommended for all patients after myocardial infarction (MI), including those with diabetes mellitus (DM). This study assesses the impact of β-blocker type and dosing on survival in patients with DM after MI. A cohort of 6,682 patients in the Outcomes of Beta-blocker Therapy After Myocardial INfarction registry were discharged after MI. In this cohort, 2,137 patients had DM (32%). Beta-blocker dose was indexed to the target daily dose used in randomized clinical trials and reported as percentage. Dosage groups were: no β blocker, >0% to 12.5%, >12.5% to 25%, >25% to 50%, and >50% of the target dose. The overall mean discharge β-blocker dose in patients with DM was 42.7 ± 34.1% versus 35.9 ± 27.4% in patients without DM (p <0.0001). Patients with DM were prescribed carvedilol at a higher rate than those without DM (27.8% vs 19.6%). The 3-year mortality estimates were 24.4% and 12.8% for patients with DM versus without DM (p <0.0001), respectively, with an unadjusted hazard ratio = 1.820 (confidence interval 1.587 to 2.086, p <0.0001). Patients with DM in the >12.5% to 25% dose category had the highest survival rates, whereas patients in the >50% dose had the lowest survival rate among patients discharged on β blockers (p <0.0001). In the multivariable analysis among patients with DM after MI, all β-blocker dose categories demonstrated lower mortality than no therapy; however, only the >12.5% to 25% dose had a statistically significant hazard ratio 0.450 (95% confidence interval 0.224 to 0.907, p = 0.025). In patients with DM, there was no statistically significant difference in 3-year mortality among those treated with metoprolol versus carvedilol. In conclusion, our analysis in patients with DM after MI suggested a survival benefit from β-blocker therapy, with no apparent advantage to high- versus low-dose β-blocker therapy; although, physicians tended to prescribe higher doses in patients with DM. There was no survival benefit for carvedilol over metoprolol in patients with DM.

Pharmacogenomic markers of metoprolol and α-OH-metoprolol concentrations: a genome-wide association study

Aim: Few genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been conducted to identify predictors of drug concentrations. The authors therefore sought to discover the pharmacogenomic markers involved in metoprolol pharmacokinetics. Patients & methods: The authors performed a GWAS of a cross-sectional study of 993 patients from the Montreal Heart Institute Biobank taking metoprolol. Results: A total of 391 and 444 SNPs reached the significance threshold of 5 × 10-8 for metoprolol and α-OH-metoprolol concentrations, respectively. All were located on chromosome 22 at or near the CYP2D6 gene, encoding CYP450 2D6, metoprolol's main metabolizing enzyme. Conclusion: The results reinforce previous findings of the importance of the CYP2D6 locus for metoprolol concentrations and confirm that large biobanks can be used to identify genetic determinants of drug pharmacokinetics at a GWAS significance level.

Beta1-receptor blockade attenuates atherosclerosis progression following traumatic brain injury in apolipoprotein E deficient mice

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with cardiovascular mortality in humans. Enhanced sympathetic activity following TBI may contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis. The effect of beta1-adrenergic receptor blockade on atherosclerosis progression induced by TBI was studied in apolipoprotein E deficient mice. Mice were treated with metoprolol or vehicle following TBI or sham operation. Mice treated with metoprolol experienced a reduced heart rate with no difference in blood pressure. Six weeks following TBI, mice were sacrificed for analysis of atherosclerosis. Total surface area and lesion thickness, analyzed at the level of the aortic valve, was found to be increased in mice receiving TBI with vehicle treatment but this effect was ameliorated in TBI mice receiving metoprolol. No effect of metoprolol on atherosclerosis was observed in mice receiving only sham operation. In conclusion, accelerated atherosclerosis following TBI is reduced with beta-adrenergic receptor antagonism. Beta blockers may be useful to reduce vascular risk associated with TBI.

A predictive model of response to metoprolol in children and adolescents with postural tachycardia syndrome

BACKGROUND

The present work was designed to explore whether electrocardiogram (ECG) index-based models could predict the effectiveness of metoprolol therapy in pediatric patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS).

METHODS

This study consisted of a training set and an external validation set. Children and adolescents with POTS who were given metoprolol treatment were enrolled, and after follow-up, they were grouped into non-responders and responders depending on the efficacy of metoprolol. The difference in pre-treatment baseline ECG indicators was analyzed between the two groups in the training set. Binary logistic regression analysis was further conducted on the association between significantly different baseline variables and therapeutic efficacy. Nomogram models were established to predict therapeutic response to metoprolol. The receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration, and internal validation were used to evaluate the prediction model. The predictive ability of the model was validated in the external validation set.

RESULTS

Of the 95 enrolled patients, 65 responded to metoprolol treatment, and 30 failed to respond. In the responders, the maximum value of the P wave after correction (Pcmax), P wave dispersion (Pd), Pd after correction (Pcd), QT interval dispersion (QTd), QTd after correction (QTcd), maximum T-peak-to-T-end interval (Tpemax), and T-peak-to-T-end interval dispersion (Tped) were prolonged (all P < 0.01), and the P wave amplitude was increased (P < 0.05) compared with those of the non-responders. In contrast, the minimum value of the P wave duration after correction (Pcmin), the minimum value of the QT interval after correction (QTcmin), and the minimum T-peak-to-T-end interval (Tpemin) in the responders were shorter (P < 0.01, < 0.01 and < 0.01, respectively) than those in the non-responders. The above indicators were screened based on the clinical significance and multicollinearity analysis to construct a binary logistic regression. As a result, pre-treatment Pcmax, QTcmin, and Tped were identified as significantly associated factors that could be combined to provide an accurate prediction of the therapeutic response to metoprolol among the study subjects, yielding good discrimination [area under curve (AUC) = 0.970, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.942-0.998] with a predictive sensitivity of 93.8%, specificity of 90.0%, good calibration, and corrected C-index of 0.961. In addition, the calibration curve and standard curve had a good fit. The accuracy of internal validation with bootstrap repeated sampling was 0.902. In contrast, the kappa value was 0.769, indicating satisfactory agreement between the predictive model and the results from the actual observations. In the external validation set, the AUC for the prediction model was 0.895, and the sensitivity and specificity were 90.9% and 95.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A high-precision predictive model was successfully developed and externally validated. It had an excellent predictive value of the therapeutic effect of metoprolol on POTS among children and adolescents.

Metoprolol Mitigates Ischemic Heart Remodeling and Fibrosis by Increasing the Expression of AKAP5 in Ischemic Heart

The harm of heart failure mainly causes patients to develop dyspnea, fatigue, fluid retention, and other symptoms, which impair patients' activity tolerance and lead to a dramatic decrease in patients' quality of life. The purpose of this study was to verify whether metoprolol regulates AKAP5 expression and test the role of AKAP5 postinjury in mitigating cardiac infarction-associated tissue remodeling and fibrosis. Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats underwent coronary artery ligation (CAL), which was followed immediately with metoprolol daily. And western blot and coimmunoprecipitation experiments were performed to detect the expression of related proteins in the sham-operated group, model group, and drug-treated group. HW/BW ratio and cardiac expression of COL1 and COL3 were increased in rats following CAL compared with shams. Treatment with metoprolol postinjury was associated with a decrease in HW/BW ratio and COL1/COL3 expression compared to uncontrolled rats. CAL resulted in decreased cardiac AKAP5 expression compared to the control group, while metoprolol treatment restored levels compared to baseline shams. Cardiac expression levels of NFATc3/p-NFATc3 and GATA4 were modest at baseline and increased with injury, whereas metoprolol suppressed gene expression to below injury-associated changes. Immunoprecipitation indicated that AKAP5 could bind and regulate PP2B. In summary, we know that metoprolol alleviates ischemic cardiac remodeling and fibrosis, and the mechanism of alleviating remodeling may improve cardiac AKAP5 expression and AKAP5-PP2B interaction.

Lung Function and the Risk of Exacerbation in the β-Blockers for the Prevention of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Trial

Rationale: The BLOCK COPD (β-Blockers for the Prevention of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) study found that metoprolol was associated with a higher risk of severe exacerbation. Objectives: To determine the mechanism underlying these results, we compared changes in lung function over the course of the study between treatment groups and evaluated whether baseline bronchodilator response or early reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) or forced vital capacity (FVC) was associated with exacerbation risk. Methods: We compared changes in lung function (FEV1 and FVC) over the treatment period between treatment groups using linear mixed-effect models. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between baseline bronchodilator responsiveness (FEV1, FVC, and combined FEV1 and FVC), early post-randomization (14 d) change in lung function, and the interaction between treatment assignment and these measures with risk of any or severe or very severe exacerbations. Negative binomial models were used to evaluate the relationship between bronchodilator responsiveness, the interaction between bronchodilator responsiveness and treatment assignment, and exacerbation rate. Results: Over the 336-day treatment period, individuals in the metoprolol group had a significantly greater decrease in logarithmic FEV1 from baseline to visit on Day 28 than individuals in the placebo group. Individuals in the metoprolol group had a significantly greater decrease in FVC from baseline to visits on Days 14 and 28, and also a significantly greater decrease in logarithmic FVC from baseline to visits on Days 42 and 112 than individuals in the placebo group. There were no associations between early lung function reduction or interactions between lung function reduction and treatment assignment and time to any or severe or very severe exacerbations. There were no interactions between treatment arm and baseline bronchodilator responsiveness measures on risk or rate of exacerbations. However, those with baseline FVC bronchodilator responsiveness had a higher rate of severe or very severe exacerbations (adjusted rate ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.48). Conclusions: Metoprolol was associated with reduced lung function during the early part of the treatment period, but these effects were modest and did not persist. Early lung function reduction and baseline bronchodilator responsiveness did not interact with the treatment arm to predict exacerbations; however, baseline FVC bronchodilator responsiveness was associated with a 60% higher rate of severe or very severe exacerbations. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02587351).

Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction in the Community

BACKGROUND

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) dramatically improves outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Our goal was to examine GDMT use in community patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a population-based, retrospective cohort study of all Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with newly diagnosed HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%) 2007-2017. We excluded patients with contraindications to medication initiation. We examined the use of beta-blockers, HF beta-blockers (metoprolol succinate, carvedilol, bisoprolol), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIS), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in the first year after HFrEF diagnosis. We used Cox models to evaluate the association of being seen in an HF clinic with the initiation of GDMT. From 2007 to 2017, 1160 patients were diagnosed with HFrEF (mean age 69.7 years, 65.6% men). Most eligible patients received beta-blockers (92.6%) and ACEis/ARBs/ARNIs (87.0%) in the first year. However, only 63.8% of patients were treated with an HF beta-blocker, and few received MRAs (17.6%). In models accounting for the role of an HF clinic in initiation of these medications, being seen in an HF clinic was independently associated with initiation of new GDMT across all medication classes, with a hazard ratio (95% CI) of 1.54 (1.15-2.06) for any beta-blocker, 2.49 (1.95-3.20) for HF beta-blockers, 1.97 (1.46-2.65) for ACEis/ARBs/ARNIs, and 2.14 (1.49-3.08) for MRAs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based study, most patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF received beta-blockers and ACEis/ARBs/ARNIs. GDMT use was higher in patients seen in an HF clinic, suggesting the potential benefit of referral to an HF clinic for patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF.