Efficacy and safety of 3-day azithromycin versus 5-day moxifloxacin for the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Antibiotic therapy is of clinical benefit in certain patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). In this randomised, investigator-blinded, multicentre trial, azithromycin (500mg once a day (qd) for 3 days) was compared with moxifloxacin (400mg qd for 5 days) for the treatment of outpatients with AECB (forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) >35%). Of 342 patients randomised to either treatment, 169 received azithromycin and 173 received moxifloxacin. The mean age in the azithromycin and moxifloxacin groups was 56.4 years and 55.5 years, respectively. In the intent-to-treat analysis, clinical success rates for azithromycin and moxifloxacin were comparable at Days 10-12 (90% versus 90%, respectively) and Days 22-26 (81% versus 82%, respectively). Among patients who were culture-positive at baseline for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis or Haemophilus parainfluenzae, clinical efficacy for azithromycin versus moxifloxacin at Days 10-12 was 93% versus 84%, respectively, and at Days 22-26 it was 89% versus 73%, respectively. The incidence of at least one treatment-related adverse event (AE) in the azithromycin and moxifloxacin groups was 18.3% and 19.1%, respectively. The most common AEs were diarrhoea, nausea, abdominal pain and vaginitis. Most treatment-related AEs were of mild or moderate severity, with no serious treatment-related AEs. One subject in the moxifloxacin group discontinued treatment owing to a treatment-related AE (precordial pain and dry throat). Compliance with both regimens was >90%. Three-day azithromycin and 5-day moxifloxacin demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety for the treatment of AECB in outpatients.

A randomized open study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Cambodia

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PQP) with that of a 3-day regimen of mefloquine and artesunate (MAS3) for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Cambodia.

METHOD

Randomized open-label non-inferiority study over 64 days.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-four patients were included in the study. The polymerase chain reaction genotyping-adjusted cure rates on day 63 were 97.5% (95% confidence interval, CI, 93.8-99.3) for DHA-PQP and 97.5% (95% CI, 93.8-99.3) for MAS3, P = 1. There were no serious adverse events, but significantly more episodes of vomiting (P = 0.03), dizziness (P = 0.002), palpitations (P = 0.04), and sleep disorders (P = 0.03) reported in the MAS3 treatment group, consistent with the side-effect profile of mefloquine.

CONCLUSIONS

DHA-PQP was as efficacious as MAS3, but much better tolerated, making it more appropriate for use in a routine programme setting. This highly efficacious, safe and more affordable fixed-dose combination could become the treatment of choice for Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia.

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus artesunate-amodiaquine: superior efficacy and posttreatment prophylaxis against multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria

BACKGROUND

Antimalarial drug resistance is now well established in both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. In southern Papua, Indonesia, where both strains of plasmodia coexist, we have been conducting a series of studies to optimize treatment strategies.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized trial that compared the efficacy and safety of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP) with artesunate-amodiaquine (AAQ). The primary end point was the overall cumulative parasitological failure rate at day 42.

RESULTS

Of the 334 patients in the evaluable patient population, 185 were infected with P. falciparum, 80 were infected with P. vivax, and 69 were infected with both species. The overall parasitological failure rate at day 42 was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36%-53%) for AAQ and 13% (95% CI, 7.2%-19%) for DHP (hazard ratio [HR], 4.3; 95% CI, 2.5-7.2; P<.001). Rates of both recrudescence of P. falciparum infection and recurrence of P. vivax infection were significantly higher after receipt of AAQ than after receipt of DHP (HR, 3.4 [95% CI, 1.2-9.4] and 4.3 [95% CI, 2.2-8.2], respectively; P<.001). By the end of the study, AAQ recipients were 2.95-fold (95% CI, 1.2- to 4.9-fold) more likely to be anemic and 14.5-fold (95% CI, 3.4- to 61-fold) more likely to have carried P. vivax gametocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

DHP was more effective and better tolerated than AAQ against multidrug-resistant P. falciparum and P. vivax infections. The prolonged therapeutic effect of piperaquine delayed the time to P. falciparum reinfection, decreased the rate of recurrence of P. vivax infection, and reduced the risk of P. vivax gametocyte carriage and anemia.

Two fixed-dose artemisinin combinations for drug-resistant falciparum and vivax malaria in Papua, Indonesia: an open-label randomised comparison

BACKGROUND

The burden of Plasmodium vivax infections has been underappreciated, especially in southeast Asia where chloroquine resistant strains have emerged. Our aim was to compare the safety and efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine with that of artemether-lumefantrine in patients with uncomplicated malaria caused by multidrug-resistant P falciparum and P vivax.

METHODS

774 patients in southern Papua, Indonesia, with slide-confirmed malaria were randomly assigned to receive either artemether-lumefantrine or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and followed up for at least 42 days. The primary endpoint was the overall cumulative risk of parasitological failure at day 42 with a modified intention-to-treat analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, trial number 00157833.

FINDINGS

Of the 754 evaluable patients enrolled, 466 had infections with P falciparum, 175 with P vivax, and 113 with a mixture of both species. The overall risk of failure at day 42 was 43% (95% CI 38-48) for artemether-lumefantrine and 19% (14-23) for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (hazard ratio=3.0, 95% CI 2.2-4.1, p<0.0001). After correcting for reinfections, the risk of recrudescence of P falciparum was 4.4% (2.6-6.2) with no difference between regimens. Recurrence of vivax occurred in 38% (33-44) of patients given artemether-lumefantrine compared with 10% (6.9-14.0) given dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (p<0.0001). At the end of the study, patients receiving dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine were 2.0 times (1.2-3.6) less likely to be anaemic and 6.6 times (2.8-16) less likely to carry vivax gametocytes than were those given artemether-lumefantrine.

INTERPRETATION

Both dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and artemether-lumefantrine were safe and effective for the treatment of multidrug-resistant uncomplicated malaria. However, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine provided greater post-treatment prophylaxis than did artemether-lumefantrine, reducing P falciparum reinfections and P vivax recurrences, the clinical public-health importance of which should not be ignored.

Real-life treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis with moxifloxacin or macrolides: a comparative post-marketing surveillance study in general practice

OBJECTIVE

To compare the real-life treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECBs) using moxifloxacin tablets or one of the oral macrolides azithromycin, clarithromycin or roxithromycin in terms of symptom relief, time until improvement and cure, overall efficacy and tolerability.

METHODS

This prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study included out-patients with AECB whose last exacerbation was treated with a macrolide. The current AECB was treated either with moxifloxacin or with one of the macrolides azithromycin, clarithromycin or roxithromycin. Data were obtained on the patient's characteristics, disease and treatment history, the course of the current AECB including time to improvement and cure, and the final assessments of efficacy and tolerability. All adverse events were recorded in patients treated with moxifloxacin; for patients receiving macrolides, only drug-related adverse events were reported.

RESULTS

464 physicians treated 904 patients with moxifloxacin and 846 patients with one of the macrolides. Age, sex and body mass index were well matched between the two treatment groups. However, more moxifloxacin than macrolide patients presented with a generally bad condition (62.8% vs 48.6%). About 42% of patients in both groups had had chronic bronchitis for 1-5 years, and about 27% for 5-10 years. The mean number of AECBs in the previous 12 months was 2.7 and 2.6, respectively. Moxifloxacin was administered to most patients for 5 (43.8%) or 7 days (42.4%). Patients in the macrolide group were treated in most cases with clarithromycin 500 mg for 4-7 days, roxithromycin 300 mg for 6-7 days or azithromycin 500 mg for 3 days. Physicians assessed overall efficacy and tolerability as 'very good' or 'good' in 96.1% and 98.1%, respectively, of moxifloxacin-treated patients and in 67.5% and 91.7%, respectively, of macrolide-treated patients. The mean duration until improvement and cure of AECB was 3.2 days (+/- SD 1.5) and 6.2 days (+/- 2.6) in moxifloxacin-treated patients compared with 4.5 days (+/- 1.8) and 7.5 days (+/- 3.0) in macrolide-treated patients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study conducted under real-life treatment conditions in patients with AECBs who were previously treated with a macrolide showed faster symptom relief and higher recovery rates with moxifloxacin compared with macrolides. The two treatment groups had comparably good safety and tolerability profiles.

In vitro and in vivo antileishmanial efficacy of a new nitrilquinoline against Leishmania donovani

The in vitro activity of a new analogue of 2-alkenylquinoline (2-nitrilquinoline or NQ) against Leishmania donovani was compared to oral reference drug miltefosine (HePC). IC(50) of NQ was found at 38.6 microM against promastigotes and 2.4 microM against intramacrophage amastigotes. In vivo evaluation in the L. donovani Balb/c mice model indicated that oral treatments at 12.5 and 25 mg/kg for 10 consecutive days significantly reduced the parasite burden in the liver by 68.9 and 68.5%, respectively. This activity was similar to those of HePC at 7.5 mg/kg for 10 days which reduced the parasite burden in liver by 72.5%. The present study shows the positive contribution of a nitril substitute being added into the alkenyl chain branched at the 2-position of the quinoline ring to the antileishmanial activity. In addition, any apparent toxicological disorder was observed during the experiments.

Arrhythmias associated with fluoroquinolone therapy

Fluoroquinolones are widely used and well tolerated antibacterial agents. However, prolongation of the QT interval is an adverse effect associated with the use of fluoroquinolones. According to the available case reports and clinical studies, moxifloxacin carries the greatest risk of QT prolongation from all available quinolones in clinical practice and it should be used with caution in patients with predisposing factors for Torsades de pointes (Tdp). Although gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and ofloxacin are associated with a lower risk of QT prolongation compared with moxifloxacin, they should also be used with caution in patients with risk factors for QT prolongation. Ciprofloxacin appears to be associated with the lowest risk for QT prolongation and the lowest rate of Tdp. The overall risk of Tdp is small with the use of fluoroquinolones. Clinicians can minimise that risk by avoiding prescriptions of multiple medications associated with QT interval prolongation, especially in high-risk patients.

Safety of prophylactic intracameral moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution in cataract surgery patients

PURPOSE

To determine the safety of prophylactic intracameral moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution (Vigamox) in patients having cataract surgery.

SETTING

American Eye Center, Manila, Philippines.

METHODS

Preoperative and 1-month postoperative anterior chamber reaction, corneal endothelial cell density, and corneal thickness were assessed in 65 eyes that had cataract surgery with intracameral moxifloxacin. All eyes received 0.1 mL intracameral moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution containing 500 mug of moxifloxacin as the last step of phacoemulsification. Different ophthalmologists conducted the postoperative evaluation in an observer-masked fashion. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

All 65 eyes completed the study. The mean age was 69.5 years +/- 9.13 (SD) (range 48 to 84 years). All eyes had a postoperative best corrected visual acuity of 20/30 or better. All eyes had trace to +2 cells and flare anterior chamber reaction only on the first day after surgery. The mean endothelial cell count was 2491.52 cells/mm(2) preoperatively and 2421.58 cells/mm(2) postoperatively. The mean difference was 70 cells/mm(2), which not statistically significant (P = .737). The increase of 17.80 microm in postoperative pachymetry 1 month after surgery was not statistically significant (P>.65).

CONCLUSION

Intracameral Vigamox 0.5 mg/mL appeared to be nontoxic in terms of visual rehabilitation, anterior chamber reaction, pachymetry, and corneal endothelial cell density.

Dofequidar fumarate (MS-209) in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil for patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of dofequidar plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) therapy in comparison with CAF alone, in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer. Dofequidar is a novel, orally active quinoline derivative that reverses multidrug resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients were treated with six cycles of CAF therapy: 28 days/cycle, with doxorubicin (25 mg/m2) and fluorouracil (500 mg/m2) administered on days 1 and 8 and cyclophosphamide (100 mg orally [PO]) administered on day 1 through 14. Patients received dofequidar (900 mg PO) 30 minutes before each dose of doxorubicin. Primary end point was overall response rate (ORR; partial or complete response). In total, 221 patients were assessable.

RESULTS

ORR was 42.6% for CAF compared with 53.1% for dofequidar + CAF, a 24.6% relative improvement and 10.5% absolute increase (P = .077). There was a trend for prolonged progression-free survival (PFS; median 241 days for CAF v 366 days for dofequidar + CAF; P = .145). In retrospectively defined subgroups, significant improvement in PFS in favor of dofequidar was observed in patients who were premenopausal, had no prior therapy, and were stage IV at diagnosis with an intact primary tumor. Except for neutropenia and leukopenia, there was no statistically significant excess of grade 3/4 adverse events compared with CAF. Treatment with dofequidar did not affect the plasma concentration of doxorubicin.

CONCLUSION

Dofequidar + CAF was well tolerated and is suggested to have efficacy in patients who had not received prior therapy.

Safety and efficacy of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine (Artekin®) for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Rwandan children

In Rwanda, amodiaquine+sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (AQ+SP) is the current first-line treatment for malaria, introduced in 2001 as an interim strategy before the future deployment of an artemisinin-based combination treatment (ACT). Dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine (DHA-PQP) is a new co-formulated and well tolerated ACT increasingly used in Southeast Asia where it has proved to be highly effective against Plasmodium falciparum malaria. We tested the efficacy, safety and tolerability of DHA-PQP in children with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. A randomised, open trial was carried out in 2003-2004. Seven hundred and sixty-two children aged 12-59 months with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria were randomly allocated to one of the following treatments: amodiaquine+artesunate; AQ+SP; or DHA-PQP. Patients were followed-up until Day 28 after treatment. Adverse events and clinical and parasitological outcomes were recorded. Children treated with DHA-PQP or AQ+AS had a significantly higher cure rate compared with those treated with amodiaquine+sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (95.2% and 92.0% vs. 84.7%, respectively). Parasite clearance was significantly faster in children treated with DHA-PQP and AQ+AS compared with those treated with amodiaquine+sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine. The frequency of adverse events was significantly lower in patients treated with DHA-PQP than in those treated with combinations containing amodiaquine. A 3-day treatment with DHA-PQP proved to be efficacious with a good safety and tolerability profile and could be a good candidate for the next first-line treatment.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of montelukast in children aged 3 to 6 months

The single-dose population estimate of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(pop)) from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), and time to C(max) (t(max)) of montelukast 4-mg oral granules were investigated in infants aged 3 to 6 months. Montelukast concentrations were quantitated after a single 4-mg dose of montelukast oral granules. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a population-based approach with a nonlinear mixed-effect, 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for the AUC(pop) ratio (3 to 6 months/6 to 24 months) were determined. Safety and tolerability were assessed. Montelukast 4-mg oral granules in children 3 to 6 months of age yielded systemic exposure (AUC(pop) = 3644.3 +/- 481.5 ng x h/mL) similar to that observed in children aged 6 to 24 months (3226.6 +/- 250.0 ng x h/mL). Systemic exposure after a 4-mg dose of montelukast as oral granules is similar in children aged 3 to 6 months and 6 to 24 months.

Man versus machine: is there an optimal method for QT measurements in thorough QT studies?

Electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings from 3 placebo-controlled thorough QT healthy volunteer studies were used to compare QT intervals obtained by manual measurement with those generated by ECG machines. The effect of the positive control was compared to placebo at each time point for data obtained from both sources. Both manual and automated techniques consistently demonstrated statistically significant prolongation of QTcF with the positive controls. The proportion of outlier values was small for both methods. The pairwise comparison between manual and automated uncorrected QT intervals demonstrated clear differences, with intervals derived from one machine on average 16 to 19 milliseconds shorter and from the other 7 milliseconds longer than the manually measured QT intervals, but these differences disappeared when analyzing QT change from baseline. Both manual and automated, commercially available QT algorithms demonstrated small statistically significant effects on the QTc interval induced by positive controls.

Efficacy and Safety of Torcetrapib, a Novel Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitor, in Individuals With Below-Average High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of torcetrapib, a cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, in subjects with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels.

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests HDL-C is atheroprotective. A proven mechanism for increasing the level of HDL-C is the inhibition of CETP.

METHODS

A total of 162 subjects with below-average HDL-C (men <44 mg/dl; women <54 mg/dl) who were not taking lipid-modifying therapy were randomized to double-blind treatment with torcetrapib 10, 30, 60, or 90 mg/day or placebo ( approximately 30 subjects per group).

RESULTS

The percent change from baseline to Week 8 with torcetrapib (least-squares mean difference from placebo) was dose-dependent and ranged from 9.0% to 54.5% for HDL-C (p < or = 0.0001 for 30 mg and higher doses) and from 3.0% to -16.5% for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (p < 0.01 for 90-mg dose). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering was less in subjects with higher (>150 mg/dl) versus lower levels of baseline triglycerides; at 60 mg, the change in LDL-C was 0.1% versus -22.2% (p < 0.0001), respectively. Particle size for both HDL and LDL increased with torcetrapib. There were no dose-related increases in the frequency of adverse events. Significant blood pressure increases were noted in 2 of 140 subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Torcetrapib resulted in substantial dose-dependent elevations in HDL-C, accompanied by moderate decreases in LDL-C at the higher doses. Torcetrapib was generally well tolerated.

Efficacy and Safety of Torcetrapib, a Novel Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitor, in Individuals With Below-Average High-Density LipoproteinCholesterolLevelsonaBackgroundofAtorvastatin

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of torcetrapib in patients with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels receiving background atorvastatin.

BACKGROUND

Elevating HDL-C levels may reduce the residual cardiovascular risk that is observed in patients treated with statin therapy. Torcetrapib (a cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor) increases HDL-C and decreases low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).

METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial. Patients with below-average HDL-C (men <44 mg/dl; women <54 mg/dl) who were eligible for statin therapy according to National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines or who had LDL-C >130 mg/dl at screening entered an 8-week run-in period with atorvastatin 20 mg/day before randomization (n = 174) to torcetrapib 10, 30, 60, or 90 mg/day or placebo for 8 weeks. Atorvastatin was continued during treatment with torcetrapib.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks, the percent change from baseline with torcetrapib (least-squares mean difference from placebo) ranged from 8.3% to 40.2% for HDL-C (p < or = 0.0001 for 30-mg and higher doses) and from 0.6% to -18.9% for LDL-C (p < 0.01 for 60-mg and 90-mg doses). Particle size for both HDL and LDL increased with torcetrapib. The incidence of all-causality and treatment-related adverse events was similar across placebo and torcetrapib treatment groups with no evidence of a dose-related response. In some treatment groups, small increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

In statin-eligible patients, torcetrapib plus background atorvastatin resulted in substantial, dose-dependent increases in HDL-C, accompanied by additional decreases in LDL-C beyond those seen with atorvastatin alone. Torcetrapib plus atorvastatin was generally well tolerated.

Tolérance cardiaque de la moxifloxacine: expérience clinique issue d'une large étude observationnelle française en pratique médicale usuelle (étude IMMEDIAT)

BACKGROUND

Moxifloxacin (Izilox) is prescribed for bacterial respiratory tract infections. ECG analysis done in clinical trials showed a mean QT prolongation at 6 ms that could lead to Torsades de Pointe. However, Izilox was well tolerated during clinical trials. To confirm the correct safety profile of Izilox in a large sample of patients, a French PMS study - MMEDIAT - was carried out in usual medical practice.

METHODS

This prospective observational uncontrolled and monitored study was conducted in 13,578 patients with respiratory tract infection and treated with moxifloxacin 400 mg daily (duration: 5 to 10 days in accordance to the Market Authorization). Any clinical event being potentially a surrogate of a ventricular rhythm disorder ("critical event") were collected and analyzed by a Scientific Committee in charge to determine the potential cardiac origin of the reported event and to establish a causal relationship with the treatment.

RESULTS

Among 13,578 patients, 1046 adverse events (678 patients [5%]) were reported, including 854 drug related events (564 patients [4.15%]). Of these 1046 adverse events, 95 (62 patients [0.46%]) were serious. A total of 189 critical adverse events (159 patients [1.2%]) were reviewed by the Scientific Committee. After analysis, 34 adverse events (28 patients [0.21%]) were assessed from potential cardiac origin. Of these 34 adverse events, 25 (19 patients [0.14%]) were assessed as drug-related: palpitations [13 patients], tachycardia [4 patients], malaise [4 patients], vertigo [3 patients] and pallor [1 patient]. All adverse events were transient and had favourable outcome.

CONCLUSION

This PMS study confirmed that Izilox is well-tolerated in usual medical practice, in adequation with the safety data obtained in clinical trials.

Long-term moxifloxacin in complicated tuberculosis patients with adverse reactions or resistance to first line drugs

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To test safety and tolerability of long-term moxifloxacin in resistant tuberculosis (TB) patients and patients with intolerance to first line anti-TB drugs.

DESIGN

Clinical evaluation of adverse events (AEs) during prolonged moxifloxacin treatment.

SETTING

TB Unit of the Regional TB Reference Center, Villa Marelli Institute, Niguarda Ca'Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Patients treated with moxifloxacin, 400 mg orally once daily for TB in the Villa Marelli Institute from January 2001 to December 2003 were enrolled.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were treated with moxifloxacin at the Villa Marelli Institute in the study period, for multidrug resistant (MDR) TB (14, 36.8%), for intolerance to first line anti-TB drugs (9, 23.7%), for combined resistance and intolerance to first line anti-TB drugs (12, 31.6%), other reasons (3, 7.9%). The mean duration of moxifloxacin treatment was 6.3 +/- 5.2 months. Twelve (31.6%) patients reported at least an AE due to moxifloxacin, mostly gastrointestinal (8, 21.0%), general (5, 13.2%) and central nervous system (3, 7.9%) AEs. In 4 (10.5%) patients the drug was withdrawn for major AEs; no irreversible or fatal events were recorded. Most of the patients (31, 81.6%) reported a treatment success, even if the success rate was lower in MDR TB patients (8/14, 51.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that a large proportion of patients experienced at least an AE due to moxifloxacin, the drug resulted safe in the long-term administration for complicated TB cases.

A randomized open-label comparative study of montelukast versus theophylline added to inhaled corticosteroid in asthmatic children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are widely used in combination with other classes of drugs for treatment of childhood asthma. The efficacy and the safety of montelukast added to low-dose ICS therapy were compared with those of sustained-release theophylline added to low-dose ICS therapy in asthmatic children in the present study.

METHODS

Following the 2-week run-in period, 6-to 14-year old patients receiving treatment with ICSs were randomized to treatment for 4 weeks with either montelukast 5 mg once daily or sustained release theophylline 5-8 mg/kg (dry syrup) or 100-200 mg (tablet) twice daily. Patients also received a fixed dose of ICS throughout the run-in and treatment periods. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in peak expiratory flow (PEF) at Week 2.

RESULTS

A significant increase in morning PEF was observed in the add-on montelukast group as compared with the add-on theophylline group at Week 2 (change from baseline of 22.8 L/minvs. 8.7 L/min; p = 0.041 for between-group difference) and at Week 4 (31.0 L/minvs. 9.8 L/min; p = 0.012). A significant increase in evening PEF was observed in the add-on montelukast group as compared with the add-on theophylline group at Week 4 (24.7 L/minvs. 8.7 L/min; p = 0.027). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in incidences of clinical and laboratory adverse experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that montelukast added to low-dose ICS is an effective and safe option for the treatment of asthma in children.