Using Wearable Sensors to Measure Goal Achievement in Older Veterans with Dementia

Aligning treatment with patients' self-determined goals and health priorities is challenging in dementia care. Wearable-based remote health monitoring may facilitate determining the active participation of individuals with dementia towards achieving the determined goals. The present study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using wearables to assess healthcare goals set by older adults with cognitive impairment. We present four specific cases that assess (1) the feasibility of using wearables to monitor healthcare goals, (2) differences in function after goal-setting visits, and (3) goal achievement. Older veterans (n = 17) with cognitive impairment completed self-report assessments of mobility, then had an audio-recorded encounter with a geriatrician and wore a pendant sensor for 48 h. Follow-up was conducted at 4-6 months. Data obtained by wearables augments self-reported data and assessed function over time. Four patient cases illustrate the utility of combining sensors, self-report, notes from electronic health records, and visit transcripts at baseline and follow-up to assess goal achievement. Using data from multiple sources, we showed that the use of wearable devices could support clinical communication, mainly when patients, clinicians, and caregivers work to align care with the patient's priorities.

Pharmacist Identification of Older Patients’ Priorities in a Home-Based Primary Care Program

Background Patient Priorities Care (PPC) aims to identify and integrate patient goals and preferences into health care decision-making to provide more personalized care for multimorbid older individuals. Home-based primary care (HBPC) is a model of care delivery that supports aging in place. HBPC-integrated pharmacists can identify patient priorities and communicate with the team to ensure care is aligned with what matters most. Objectives Evaluate patients’ perceptions of having priorities identification conversations with the pharmacist; identify the value domains represented by patients’ health outcome goals. Setting HBPC program at a large family medicine practice where pharmacists are core members of the interdisciplinary team. Intervention Pharmacists led priorities identification conversations for patients newly enrolled in HBPC. Care preferences and health outcome goals were documented in the medical record and communicated during HBPC team meetings. Design This was a prospective, observational study of HBPC enrollees. After the priorities identification conversation, a three-question survey was administered to identify patients’ perceptions of the conversation and interaction with the pharmacist. Health outcome goals and care preference statements were reviewed to determine with which value domain(s) they most aligned. Descriptive statistics were used for results analysis. Results Pharmacists led conversations with 30 participants. Average overall satisfaction with the conversation was 4.6 on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = least, 5 = most satisfied). Ninety-three percent of patients felt it was appropriate to have a pharmacist lead these conversations. Ninety-seven percent believed it was important/very important to discuss their values and goals with their health care team. The predominant value domains represented were Managing Health (43%) and Functioning (40%). Conclusion Patients were mostly satisfied with having PPC conversations and felt it was appropriate for a pharmacist to lead these conversations. Managing health conditions and preserving function were the most frequent value domains associated with patients’ goals and care preferences.

Palliative Care Impact on COVID-19 Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

CONTEXT

Patients with severe respiratory failure from COVID-19 refractory to conventional therapies may be treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). ECMO requirement is associated with high mortality and prolonged hospital course. ECMO is a high-resource intervention with significant burdens placed on caregivers and families with limited data on the integration of palliative care consultation (PCC).

OBJECTIVES

To explore the role of standard vs. automatic PCC in the management of COVID patients on ECMO.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all COVID patients on ECMO admitted from March 2020 to May 2021 at a large volume academic medical center with subsequent analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-six (54.2%) received PCC of which 42% of consults were automatically initiated. PCC at any point in admission was associated with longer duration on ECMO (24.5 vs. 37 days; P < 0.05). Automatic PCC resulted in more family meetings than standard PCC (0 vs. 3; P < 0.05) and appears to trend with reduced time on ECMO, shorter length of stay, and higher DNAR rates at death, though results were not significant. Decedents not receiving PCC had higher rates of no de-escalation of interventions at time of death (31% vs. 11%), indicating full intensive care measures continued through death.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with COVID-19 receiving ECMO, PCC may be associated with a shift to DNAR status particularly with automatic PCC. There may be a further impact on length of stay, duration of time on ECMO and care plan at end of life.

Two mental models of integrated care for advanced liver disease: qualitative study of multidisciplinary health professionals

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this paper is to present two divergent mental models of integrated advanced liver disease (AdvLD) care among 26 providers who treat patients with AdvLD.

SETTING

3 geographically dispersed United States Veterans Health Administration health systems.

PARTICIPANTS

26 professionals (20 women and 6 men) participated, including 9 (34.6%) gastroenterology, hepatology, and transplant physicians, 2 (7.7%) physician assistants, 7 (27%) nurses and nurse practitioners, 3 (11.5%) social workers and psychologists, 4 (15.4%) palliative care providers and 1 (3.8%) pharmacist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews of providers caring for patients with AdvLD. We used framework analysis to identify two divergent mental models of integrated AdvLD care. These models vary in timing of initiating various constituents of care, philosophy of integration, and supports and resources needed to achieve each model.

RESULTS

Clinicians described integrated care as an approach that incorporates elements of curative care, symptom and supportive care, advance care planning and end-of-life services from a multidisciplinary team. Analysis revealed two mental models that varied in how and when these constituents are delivered. One mental model involves sequential transitions between constituents of care, and the second mental model involves synchronous application of the various constituents. Participants described elements of teamwork and coordination supports necessary to achieve integrated AdvLD care. Many discussed the importance of having a multidisciplinary team integrating supportive care, symptom management and palliative care with liver disease care.

CONCLUSIONS

Health professionals agree on the constituents of integrated AdvLD care but describe two competing mental models of how these constituents are integrated. Health systems can promote integrated care by assembling multidisciplinary teams, and providing teamwork and coordination supports, and training that facilitates patient-centred AdvLD care.

Inpatient palliative care use by patients with sickle cell disease: a retrospective cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a highly morbid condition notable for recurrent hospitalisations due to vaso-occlusive crises and complications of end organ damage. Little is known about the use of inpatient palliative care services in adult patients with SCD. This study aims to evaluate inpatient palliative care use during SCD-related hospitalisations overall and during terminal hospitalisations. We hypothesise that use of palliative care is low in SCD hospitalisations.

DESIGN

A retrospective cross-sectional study using data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2017 was conducted.

SETTING

US hospitals from 47 states and the District of Columbia.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients >18 years old hospitalised with a primary or secondary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) or ICD-10-CM diagnosis of SCD were included.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Palliative care service use (documented by ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes V66.7 and Z51.5).

RESULTS

987 555 SCD-related hospitalisations were identified, of which 4442 (0.45%) received palliative care service. Palliative care service use increased at a rate of 9.2% per year (95% CI 5.6 to 12.9). NH-black and Hispanic patients were 33% and 53% less likely to have palliative care services compared with NH-white patients (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.99 and OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.84). Female patients (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.76), Medicaid use (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.78), rural (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.79) and urban non-teaching hospitals (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.80) each had a lower likelihood of palliative care services use.

CONCLUSION

Use of palliative care during SCD-related hospitalisations is increasing but remains low. Disparities associated with race and gender exist for use of palliative care services during SCD-related hospitalisation. Further studies are needed to guide evidence-based palliative care interventions for more comprehensive and equitable care of adult patients with SCD.

The chosen and the unchosen: How eligibility for liver transplant influences the lived experiences of patients with advanced liver disease

Advanced liver disease is often uncurable and fatal. Liver transplant is the only curative option for patients with advanced, irreversible liver disease, but the need for new livers far exceeds the supply. Patients with the greatest need as well as the greatest likelihood of benefit, based on a complex array of biomedical and psychosocial considerations, are prioritized for transplant. The opportunity to receive a life-saving surgery no doubt has enormous consequences for patients and their healthcare providers, as does the absence of that opportunity. But these consequences are poorly characterized, especially for patients deemed poor candidates for liver transplant. Through in-depth interviews with patients living with advanced liver disease and the providers who care for them, we explore how eligibility status affects illness experiences, including patients' interactions with clinicians, knowledge about their disease, expectations for the future, and efforts to come to terms with a life-limiting illness. We describe how the clinical and social requirements needed to secure eligibility for liver transplant lend themselves to a clinical and cultural logic that delineates "worthy" and "unworthy" patients. We describe how providers and candidates discuss the possibility of moral redemption for such patients through transplant surgeries, a discourse notably absent among patients not eligible for transplant.

Analysis of an Antibiotic Stewardship Program for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System

IMPORTANCE

Antibiotic stewardship for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is an important quality improvement target. Understanding how to implement successful antibiotic stewardship interventions is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement stewardship intervention on reducing unnecessary urine cultures and antibiotic use in patients with ASB.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This interrupted time series quality improvement study was performed at the acute inpatient medical and long-term care units of 4 intervention sites and 4 comparison sites in the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system from October 1, 2017, through April 30, 2020. Participants included the clinicians who order or collect urine cultures and who order, dispense, or administer antibiotics. Clinical outcomes were measured in all patients in a study unit during the study period. Data were analyzed from July 6, 2020, to May 24, 2021.

INTERVENTION

Case-based teaching on how to apply an evidence-based algorithm to distinguish urinary tract infection and ASB. The intervention was implemented through external facilitation by a centralized coordinating center, with a site champion at each intervention site serving as an internal facilitator.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Urine culture orders and days of antibiotic therapy (DOT) and length of antibiotic therapy in days (LOT) associated with urine cultures, standardized by 1000 bed-days, were obtained from the VA's Corporate Data Warehouse.

RESULTS

Of 11 299 patients included, 10 703 (94.7%) were men, with a mean (SD) age of 72.6 (11.8) years. The decrease in urine cultures before and after the intervention was not significant in intervention sites per segmented regression analysis (-0.04 [95% CI, -0.17 to 0.09]; P = .56). However, difference-in-differences analysis comparing intervention with comparison sites found a significant reduction in the number of urine cultures ordered by 3.24 urine cultures per 1000 bed-days (P = .003). In the segmented regression analyses, the relative percentage decrease of DOT in the postintervention period at the intervention sites was 21.7% (P = .007), from 46.1 (95% CI, 28.8-63.4) to 37.0 (95% CI, 22.6-51.4) per 1000 bed-days. The relative percentage decrease of LOT in the postintervention period at the intervention sites was 21.0% (P = .001), from 36.7 (95% CI, 23.2-50.2) to 29.6 (95% CI, 18.2-41.0) per 1000 bed-days.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this quality improvement study suggest that an individualized intervention for antibiotic stewardship for ASB was associated with a decrease in urine cultures and antibiotic use when implemented at multiple sites via external and internal facilitation. The electronic health record database-derived outcome measures and centralized facilitation approach are both suitable for dissemination.

Comparison of Collaborative Goal Setting With Enhanced Education for Managing Diabetes-Associated Distress and Hemoglobin A1c Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Type 2 diabetes is a prevalent and morbid condition. Poor engagement with self-management can contribute to diabetes-associated distress and hinder diabetes control.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of Empowering Patients in Chronic Care (EPICC), an evidence-based intervention to improve diabetes-associated distress and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels after the intervention and after 6-month maintenance.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This hybrid (implementation-effectiveness) randomized clinical trial was performed in Veterans Affairs clinics across Illinois, Indiana, and Texas from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2017. Participants included adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c level >8.0%) who received primary care during the prior year in participating clinics. Data collection was completed on November 30, 2018, and data analysis was completed on June 30, 2020. All analyses were based on intention to treat.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants in EPICC attended 6 group sessions based on a collaborative goal-setting theory led by health care professionals. Clinicians conducted individual motivational interviewing sessions after each group. Usual care was enhanced (EUC) with diabetes education.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome consisted of changes in HbA1c levels after the intervention and during maintenance. Secondary outcomes included the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, and Lorig Self-efficacy Scale. Secondary implementation outcomes included reach, adoption, and implementation (number of sessions attended per patient).

RESULTS

A total of 280 participants with type 2 diabetes (mean [SD] age, 67.2 [8.4] years; 264 men [94.3]; 134 non-Hispanic White individuals [47.9%]) were equally randomized to EPICC or EUC. Participants receiving EPICC had significant postintervention improvements in HbA1c levels (F1, 252 = 9.12, Cohen d = 0.36 [95% CI, 0.12-0.59]; P = .003) and DDS (F1, 245 = 9.06, Cohen d = 0.37 [95% CI, 0.13-0.60]; P = .003) compared with EUC. During maintenance, differences between the EUC and EPICC groups remained significant for DDS score (F1, 245 = 8.94, Cohen d = 0.36 [95% CI, 0.12-0.59]; P = .003) but not for HbA1c levels (F1, 252 = 0.29, Cohen d = 0.06 [95% CI, -0.17 to 0.30]; P = .60). Improvements in DDS scores were modest. There were no differences between EPICC and EUC in improvements after intervention or maintenance for either adherence or self-efficacy. Among all 4002 eligible patients, 280 (7.0%) enrolled in the study (reach). Each clinic conducted all planned EPICC sessions and cohorts (100% adoption). The EPICC group participants attended a mean (SD) of 4.34 (1.98) sessions, with 54 (38.6%) receiving all 6 sessions.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

A patient-empowerment approach using longitudinal collaborative goal setting and motivational interviewing is feasible in primary care. Improvements in HbA1c levels after the intervention were not sustained after maintenance. Modest improvements in diabetes-associated distress after the intervention were sustained after maintenance. Innovations to expand reach (eg, telemedicine-enabled shared appointments) and sustainability are needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01876485.

Developing an Interprofessional Health Care Improvement Portfolio: Results From a Consensus Panel Process

The increased focus on professional-led, continuous health care improvement has not produced formalized processes for identifying, recognizing, and rewarding excellence in quality improvement. Moreover, the team-based nature of improvement requires a mechanism to document interprofessional contributions. In 2018, the authors created a health care improvement portfolio to document and demonstrate individual impact for the purpose of promotion. A draft portfolio was developed from a review of the literature and publicly available quality improvement and educational portfolios. The portfolio was further refined through a 2-round, modified Delphi consensus process with a panel of interprofessional experts across North America. In the first round, 35 panelists gave feedback through open-ended comments on the design and content of the portfolio. In the second round, 34 panelists rated the comprehensiveness and clarity of the portfolio on a scale of 1-9 (1 = lowest, 9 = highest) and provided comments. Consensus was defined as an average score over 8.0. Panelists in the second round achieved consensus, with average scores of 8.4 in comprehensiveness and 8.3 in clarity (range, 6-9). The finalized portfolio includes the following sections: personal statement; health care improvement training and certification; leadership and administrative roles; health care improvement project activities; health care improvement coaching, teaching, and curricular activities; health care improvement honors, awards, and recognitions; and supporting documents. The portfolio facilitates the documentation of health care professionals' contributions to and impact in health care improvement and covers the breadth of interprofessional health care improvement (i.e., projects, leadership, education, scholarship). The portfolio can be tailored to an individual's area of specific expertise. While this portfolio was originally developed for interprofessional faculty at academic institutions, the content and structure of the portfolio are easily adapted for health care providers in other health care settings.

Prognosis conversations in advanced liver disease: A qualitative interview study with health professionals and patients

Advanced Liver Disease (AdvLD) is common, morbid, and associated with high likelihood of death. Patients may not fully understand their prognosis and are often unprepared for the course of illness. Little is known about how and when to deliver prognosis-related information to patients with AdvLD, who should participate, and what should be discussed. We conducted in-depth interviews with a multi-profession sample of Hepatology clinicians and patients with AdvLD. Participants were drawn from three geographically diverse facilities (New England, Texas, California). We used inductive and deductive qualitative data analysis approaches to identify themes related to AdvLD prognosis discussions. Thematic analysis focused on content, timing, and participants’ roles in prognosis discussions. In total, 31 patients with AdvLD and 26 multi-profession clinicians completed interviews. Most participants provided a broad conceptualization of prognosis beyond predictions of survival, including expectations about illness course, ways to manage or avoid complications and a need to address patients’ emotions. Patients favored initiating discussions early in the AdvLD course and welcomed a multi-profession approach to conducting discussions. Clinicians favored a larger role for specialty physicians. All participants recognized that AdvLD prognosis discussions occur infrequently and favored a structured, standardized approach to broadly discussing prognosis. Patients with AdvLD and their clinicians favored a multifaceted approach to prognosis conversations including discussions of life expectancy, predictions about likely course of liver disease, and expected changes in function and capabilities over time. Structured and early prognosis discussions should be part of routine AdvLD care.

Testing the Impact of a Collaborative, Goal-Setting, and Behavioral Telehealth Intervention on Diabetes Distress: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background:Diabetes distress is underrecognized and associated with poor outcomes. This study tested whether a 12-month collaborative, goal-setting, and behavioral telehealth intervention reduced diabetes distress levels.Methods:This is a secondary analysis of the Healthy Outcomes through Patient Empowerment (HOPE) study that included individuals (N = 225) with uncontrolled diabetes and depression living at least 20 miles from a Veteran's Affairs medical center. Participants were randomized to HOPE (intervention) or Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) with education. We evaluated diabetes distress levels as measured by the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Questionnaire and its four subscales (emotional, diabetes management, social, and treatment distress) at baseline, 6, and 12 months.Results:Between-group analysis revealed greater improvements in HOPE versus EUC for: 6-month PAID total score (p = 0.04), emotional (p = 0.03), and social (p = 0.04) subscales; 12-month PAID total score (p = 0.07) and emotional subscale (p = 0.07). Within-group comparisons showed larger effect sizes for HOPE compared with EUC: 12-month PAID total scores (0.82 vs. 0.54), 6-month emotional burden (0.54 vs. 0.31), and 6-month (0.32 vs. 0.08) and 12-month (0.41 vs. 0.12) social burdens. Repeated-measures analysis evaluating treatment group and time trended toward improvement in PAID overall for HOPE compared with EUC participants, but was not statistically significant (β = 6.96; SE = 4.35; p = 0.13).Discussion:Clinically meaningful reductions in PAID overall and the emotional and social subscales were observed in HOPE compared with EUC participants.Conclusion:Further evaluation of diabetes telehealth interventions that include other facets related to diabetes distress, including treatment, diabetes management, social, and emotional burdens, is warranted. Clinical Trial Number. NCT01572389; Clinical Trial Registry. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01572389.

Digital Biomarkers of Cognitive Frailty: The Value of Detailed Gait Assessment Beyond Gait Speed

BACKGROUND

Cognitive frailty (CF), defined as the simultaneous presence of cognitive impairment and physical frailty, is a clinical symptom in early-stage dementia with promise in assessing the risk of dementia. The purpose of this study was to use wearables to determine the most sensitive digital gait biomarkers to identify CF.

METHODS

Of 121 older adults (age = 78.9 ± 8.2 years, body mass index = 26.6 ± 5.5 kg/m2) who were evaluated with a comprehensive neurological exam and the Fried frailty criteria, 41 participants (34%) were identified with CF and 80 participants (66%) were identified without CF. Gait performance of participants was assessed under single task (walking without cognitive distraction) and dual task (walking while counting backward from a random number) using a validated wearable platform. Participants walked at habitual speed over a distance of 10 m. A validated algorithm was used to determine steady-state walking. Gait parameters of interest include steady-state gait speed, stride length, gait cycle time, double support, and gait unsteadiness. In addition, speed and stride length were normalized by height.

RESULTS

Our results suggest that compared to the group without CF, the CF group had deteriorated gait performances in both single-task and dual-task walking (Cohen's effect size d = 0.42-0.97, p < 0.050). The largest effect size was observed in normalized dual-task gait speed (d = 0.97, p < 0.001). The use of dual-task gait speed improved the area under the curve (AUC) to distinguish CF cases to 0.76 from 0.73 observed for the single-task gait speed. Adding both single-task and dual-task gait speeds did not noticeably change AUC. However, when additional gait parameters such as gait unsteadiness, stride length, and double support were included in the model, AUC was improved to 0.87.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that gait performances measured by wearable sensors are potential digital biomarkers of CF among older adults. Dual-task gait and other detailed gait metrics provide value for identifying CF above gait speed alone. Future studies need to examine the potential benefits of gait performances for early diagnosis of CF and/or tracking its severity over time.

Evaluating older adults with cognitive dysfunction: A qualitative study with emergency clinicians

BACKGROUND

Evaluating older adults with cognitive dysfunction in emergency departments (EDs) requires obtaining collateral information from sources other than the patient. Understanding the challenges emergency clinicians face in obtaining collateral information can inform development of interventions to improve geriatric emergency care and, more specifically, detection of ED delirium. The objective was to understand emergency clinicians' experiences obtaining collateral information on older adults with cognitive dysfunction, both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

From February to May 2021, we conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 22 emergency physicians and advanced practice providers from two urban academic hospitals and one community hospital in the Northeast United States. Interviews lasted 10-20 min and were digitally recorded and transcribed. Interview transcripts were analyzed for dominant themes using a combined deductive-inductive approach. Responses regarding experiences before and during the pandemic were compared.

RESULTS

Five major challenges emerged regarding (1) availability of caregivers, (2) reliability of sources, (3) language barriers, (4) time constraints, and (5) incomplete transfer documentation. Participants perceived all challenges, but those relating to transfer documentation were amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Emergency clinicians' perspectives can inform efforts to support caregiver presence at bedside and develop standardized communication tools to improve recognition of delirium and, more broadly, geriatric emergency care.

Enhancing Access to Yoga for Older Male Veterans After Cancer: Examining Beliefs About Yoga

Background

Yoga is an effective clinical intervention for cancer survivors. Most studies of the positive effects of yoga on cancer patients report on predominantly middle-aged women with breast cancer. Less is known about the use of yoga in older adults, veterans, and those from diverse racial or ethnic backgrounds.

Methods

We examined strategies to enhance access to yoga in older veterans after cancer, focusing on education (study 1) and intervention (study 2). Study 1 included 110 participants with a median (SD) age of 64.9 (9.4) years who were mostly male (99%) cancer survivors who were interviewed 12 months after their cancer diagnosis. Study 2 included 28 participants with a median (SD) age of 69.2 (10.9) years who were mostly male (96%) cancer survivors who participated in a yoga program within 3 years of their cancer diagnosis. Standardized interviews assessed interest in and barriers to yoga while self-reporting assessed health-related quality of life and beliefs about yoga.

Results

In study 1, interest in yoga increased from 5.5 to 31.8% (χ ² = 22.25, P < .001) following education. In open-ended questions 4 themes related to negative beliefs or barriers emerged: lack of knowledge or skepticism, disinterest or dislike, physical health barriers, and logistical barriers. In study 2, beliefs were more positive following intervention for expected benefits (t = 4.44, P < .001), discomfort (t = 4.92, P < .001), and social norms (t = 4.38, P < .001) related to yoga. Physical function improved after participation in a yoga class, especially for those with higher beliefs in yoga prior to class. Age was not associated with beliefs about yoga in either sample.

Conclusions

A portion of older veterans who are cancer survivors were interested in yoga but faced access barriers. Implications for practice and research include increasing knowledge about yoga benefits and addressing physical health and logistical barriers to enhance access to yoga for older veterans.

Value of Interprofessional Education: The VA Quality Scholars Program

ABSTRACT

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) has been shown to improve healthcare quality and patient safety; however, formal interprofessional education (IPE) training is insufficient. The VA Quality Scholars (VAQS) program exists to develop interprofessional leaders and scholars in healthcare improvement. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of integrating interprofessional healthcare learners and designing an interprofessional curriculum for the national VAQS program. VAQS alumni (graduates from 2001 to 2017) across eight national sites (n = 102 [53.1%]) completed a web-based survey to assess alumni perceptions of IPC skill development during the program and IPC skill utilization in their careers. Alumni from 2009 and earlier were physicians; alumni after 2009 came from diverse health professional backgrounds. Overall, IPC and teamwork was identified as the most used skill (n = 82, 70%) during their career. When comparing the pre-IPE period and the post-IPE period, post-IPE alumni identified IPC and teamwork as the area of greatest skill development (n = 38). Integrating interprofessional trainees and robust IPE curricula enhanced an established and successful quality improvement (QI) training program. VAQS alumni endorsed the importance of IPC skills during their careers. The VAQS program is an example of how health professionals can successfully learn IPC skills in healthcare QI.

Mentored implementation to initiate a diabetes program in an underserved community: a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Community clinics often face pragmatic barriers, hindering program initiation and replication of controlled research trial results. Mentoring is a potential strategy to overcome these barriers. We piloted an in-person and telehealth mentoring strategy to implement the Telehealth-supported, Integrated Community Health Workers (CHWs), Medication-access, group visit Education (TIME) program in a community clinic.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Participants (n=55) were low-income Latino(a)s with type 2 diabetes. The study occurred in two, 6-month phases. Phase I provided proof-of-concept and an observational experience for the clinic team; participants (n=37) were randomized to the intervention (TIME) or control (usual care), and the research team conducted TIME while the clinic team observed. Phase II provided mentorship to implement TIME, and the research team mentored the clinic team as they conducted TIME for a new single-arm cohort of participants (n=18) with no previous exposure to the program. Analyses included baseline to 6-month comparisons of diabetes outcomes (primary outcome: hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)): phase I intervention versus control, phase II (within group), and research-run (phase I intervention) versus clinic-run (phase II) arms. We also evaluated baseline to 6-month CHW knowledge changes.

RESULTS

Phase I: compared with the control, intervention participants had superior baseline to 6-month improvements for HbA1c (mean change: intervention: -0.73% vs control: 0.08%, p=0.016), weight (p=0.044), target HbA1c (p=0.035), hypoglycemia (p=0.021), medication non-adherence (p=0.0003), and five of six American Diabetes Association (ADA) measures (p<0.001-0.002). Phase II: participants had significant reductions in HbA1c (mean change: -0.78%, p=0.006), diastolic blood pressure (p=0.004), body mass index (0.012), weight (p=0.010), medication non-adherence (p<0.001), and six ADA measures (p=0.007-0.005). Phase I intervention versus phase II outcomes were comparable. CHWs improved knowledge from pre-test to post-tests (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A novel, mentored approach to implement TIME into a community clinic resulted in improved diabetes outcomes. Larger studies of longer duration are needed to fully evaluate the potential of mentoring community clinics.