Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes among individuals with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases tested between March 1 and Nov 22, 2021, in Ontario, Canada: a population-based analysis

Background

We estimated COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes among individuals with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in Ontario, Canada.

Methods

In this population-based analysis, we used a test-negative design across four immune-mediated inflammatory disease population-based cohorts, comprising individuals with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease. We identified all SARS-CoV-2 tests done in these populations between March 1 and Nov 22, 2021 (a period in which there was rapid uptake of vaccines, and the alpha [B.1.1.7] and delta [B.1.617.2] SARS-CoV-2 variants were predominantly circulating in Canada) and separately assessed outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalisation due to COVID-19 and death due to COVID-19) for each disease group. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the effectiveness of one, two, and three doses of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2 [Pfizer–BioNTech], or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) among individuals at the time of SARS-CoV-2 testing.

Findings

Between March 1 and Nov 22, 2021, we identified 2127 (5·9%) test-positive cases among 36 145 individuals (26 476 [73·2%] were female and 9669 [26·8%] were male) with rheumatoid arthritis tested, 476 (6·1%) test-positive cases among 7863 individuals (4130 [52·5%] were female and 3733 [47·5%] were male) with ankylosing spondylitis tested, 3089 (6·5%) test-positive cases among 47 199 individuals (26 062 [55·2%] were female and 21 137 [44·8%] were male) with psoriasis tested, and 1702 (5·4%) test-positive cases among 31 311 individuals (17 716 [56·6%] were female and 13 595 [43·4%] were male) with inflammatory bowel disease tested. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness of two doses against infection was 83% (95% CI 80–86) in those with rheumatoid arthritis, 89% (83–93) among those with ankylosing spondylitis, 84% (81–86) among those with psoriasis, and 79% (74–82) among those with inflammatory bowel disease. After two vaccine doses, effectiveness against infection generally peaked 31–60 days after vaccination and waned gradually with each additional month. Vaccine effectiveness against severe outcomes after two doses was 92% (95% CI 88–95) in those with rheumatoid arthritis, 97% (83–99) among those with ankylosing spondylitis, 92% (86–95) among those with psoriasis, and 94% (88–97) among those with inflammatory bowel disease. Vaccine effectiveness after a third dose against infection was similar to or higher than after the second dose (ranging from 76% [47–89] to 96% [72–99]), although due to a paucity of events, estimates could not be calculated for some subgroups for severe outcomes.

Interpretation

Two vaccine doses were found to be highly effective against both SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease during the study period. Research is needed to determine the durability of effectiveness of three doses over time, particularly against emerging variants.

Funding

Public Health Agency of Canada

A Population-Based Study Evaluating Retention in Rheumatology Care Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective

The study objective was to assess adherence to system‐level performance measures measuring retention in rheumatology care and disease modifying anti‐rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

We used a validated health administrative data case definition to identify individuals with RA in Ontario, Canada, between 2002 and 2014 who had at least 5 years of potential follow‐up prior to 2019. During the first 5 years following diagnosis, we assessed whether patients were seen by a rheumatologist yearly and the proportion dispensed a DMARD yearly (in those aged ≥66 for whom medication data were available). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the odds of remaining under rheumatologist care.

Results

The cohort included 50,883 patients with RA (26.1% aged 66 years and older). Over half (57.7%) saw a rheumatologist yearly in all 5 years of follow‐up. Sharp declines in the percentage of patients with an annual visit were observed in each subsequent year after diagnosis, although a linear trend to improved retention in rheumatology care was seen over the study period (P < 0.0001). For individuals aged 66 years or older (n = 13,293), 82.1% under rheumatologist care during all 5 years after diagnosis were dispensed a DMARD annually compared with 31.0% of those not retained under rheumatology care. Older age, male sex, lower socioeconomic status, higher comorbidity score, and having an older rheumatologist decreased the odds of remaining under rheumatology care.

Conclusion

System‐level improvement initiatives should focus on maintaining ongoing access to rheumatology specialty care. Further investigation into causes of loss to rheumatology follow‐up is needed.

COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake among individuals with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases in Ontario, Canada between December 2020 and October 2021: A population-based analysis

OBJECTIVE

We assessed COVID-19 vaccine uptake among individuals with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) and the Ontario general population.

METHODS

We studied all residents 16 years and older who were alive and enrolled in Ontario's universal health insurance plan as of December 14, 2020 when vaccination commenced (n=12,435,914). Individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (PsO), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were identified using established disease-specific case definitions applied to health administrative data. Vaccination status was extracted from the provincial COVaxON registry. Weekly cumulative proportions of first and second doses up until October 3, 2021 were expressed as the vaccinated percentage of each disease group, and compared to the general Ontario population, and stratified by age.

RESULTS

By October 3, 2021, the cumulative percentage with at least one dose was 82.1% for the general population, 88.9% for RA, 87.4% for AS, 90.6% for PsA, 87.3% for PsO, and 87.0% for IBD. There was also a higher total cumulative percentage with two doses among IMIDs (83.8-88.2%) vs the general population (78.0%). The difference was also evident when stratifying by age. Individuals with IMIDs in the youngest age group initially had earlier uptake than the general population but remain the lowest age group with two doses (70.6% in the general population vs. 73.7-79.2% across IMID groups).

CONCLUSION

While implementation of COVID-19 vaccination programs has differed globally, these Canadian estimates are the first to reassuringly show higher COVID-19 vaccine uptake among individuals with IMIDs.

Expectations and educational needs of rheumatologists, rheumatology fellows and patients in the field of precision medicine in Canada, a quantitative cross-sectional and descriptive study

Background

Precision medicine, as a personalized medicine approach based on biomarkers, is a booming field. In general, physicians and patients have a positive attitude toward precision medicine, but their knowledge and experience are limited. In this study, we aimed at assessing the expectations and educational needs for precision medicine among rheumatologists, rheumatology fellows and patients with rheumatic diseases in Canada.

Methods

We conducted two anonymous online surveys between June and August 2018, one with rheumatologists and fellows and one with patients assessing precision medicine expectations and educational needs. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results

45 rheumatologists, 6 fellows and 277 patients answered the survey. 78% of rheumatologists and fellows and 97.1% of patients would like to receive training on precision medicine. Most rheumatologists and fellows agreed that precision medicine tests are relevant to medical practice (73.5%) with benefits such as helping to determine prognosis (58.9%), diagnosis (79.4%) and avoid treatment toxicity (61.8%). They are less convinced of their usefulness in helping to choose the most effective treatment and to improve patient adherence (23.5%). Most patients were eager to take precision medicine tests that could predict disease prognosis (92.4%), treatment response (98.1%) or drug toxicity (93.4%), but they feared potential negative impacts like loss of insurability (62.2%) and high cost of the test (57.5%).

Conclusions

Our study showed that rheumatologists and patients in Canada are overall interested in getting additional precision medicine education. Indeed, while convinced of the potential benefits of precision medicine tests, most physicians don’t feel confident in their abilities and consider their training insufficient to incorporate them into clinical practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-021-00222-2.

Immunosuppression and COVID-19 infection in British Columbia: Protocol for a linkage study of population-based administrative and self-reported survey data

Introduction

Cases of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continue to spread around the world even one year after the declaration of a global pandemic. Those with weakened immune systems, due to immunosuppressive medications or disease, may be at higher risk of COVID-19. This includes individuals with autoimmune diseases, cancer, transplants, and dialysis patients. Assessing the risk and outcomes of COVID-19 in this population has been challenging. While administrative databases provide data with minimal selection and recall bias, clinical and behavioral data is lacking. To address this, we are collecting self-reported survey data from a randomly selected subsample with and without COVID-19, which will be linked to administrative health data, to better quantify the risk of COVID-19 infection associated with immunosuppression.

Methods and analysis

Using administrative and laboratory data from British Columbia (BC), Canada, we established a population-based case-control study of all individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Each case was matched to 40 randomly selected individuals from two control groups: individuals who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., negative controls) and untested individuals from the general population (i.e., untested controls). We will contact 1000 individuals from each group to complete a survey co-designed with patient partners. A conditional logistic regression model will adjust for potential confounders and effect modifiers. We will examine the odds of COVID-19 infection according to immunosuppressive medication or disease type. To adjust for relevant confounders and effect modifiers not available in administrative data, the survey will include questions on behavioural variables that influence probability of being tested, acquiring COVID-19, and experiencing severe outcomes.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has received approval from the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board [H20-01914]. Findings will be disseminated through scientific conferences, open access peer-reviewed journals, COVID-19 research repositories and dissemination channels used by our patient partners.

Has the incidence of total joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis decreased in the era of biologics use? A population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) was associated with reduced incidences of total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Using a population-based cohort in British Columbia, Canada, RA and OA patients diagnosed between 1995-2007 were divided into semi-annual cohorts according to diagnosis date. For each cohort, we calculated 8-year incidence rates of THA and TKA. We compared levels and trends of THA/TKA incidence in RA/OA patients diagnosed during pre-bDMARDs (1995-2001) and post-bDMARDs (2003-2007) periods using interrupted time-series analysis, adjusting for baseline characteristics. Adjusted 8-year TJA incidence estimated for RA/OA cohorts diagnosed five years after bDMARDs introduction were compared with expected rates assuming no bDMARDs introduction, based on extrapolation of pre-bDMARDs trends.

RESULTS

We identified 60,227 RA and 288,260 OA incident cases. For cohorts diagnosed pre-bDMARDs, 8-year THA/TKA incidence rates increased over time in both RA and OA. For cohorts diagnosed post-bDMARDs, these rates decreased over time in RA but continued to increase for OA. For RA, differences between the post- and pre-bDMARDs secular trends in incidence rates were -0.49 (p = 0.002) for THA and -0.36 (p = 0.003) for TKA, compared to + 0.40 (p = 0.006) and +0.54 (p < 0.001), respectively, for OA. For RA cohorts diagnosed five years after bDMARDs introduction, 8-year incidence were 26.9% and 12.6% lower for THA and TKA, respectively, than expected rates. In contrast, corresponding rates in OA were higher by 11.7% and 16.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Arthritis onset after bDMARDs introduction is associated with a significant reduction in THA/TKA incidence in RA, but not in OA. The reduction reflects a significant improvement in RA treatment during the biological era.

Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation

Objective

Balanced scorecards (BSCs) were developed in the early 1990s in corporate settings as a strategic performance management tool that emphasised measurement from multiple perspectives. Since their introduction, BSCs have been adapted for a variety of industries, including to healthcare settings. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the application of BSCs in healthcare.

Methods

Medline, Embase and CINHAL databases were searched using keywords and medical subject headings for ‘balanced scorecard’ and related terms from 1992 to 17/04/2020. Title and abstract screening and full text review were conducted in duplicate by two reviewers. Studies describing the development and/or implementation of a BSC in a healthcare setting were included. Data were abstracted using pilot-tested forms and reviewed for key themes and findings.

Results

8129 records were identified and 841 underwent a full text review. 87 articles were included. Over 26 countries were represented and the majority of BSCs were applied at a local level (54%) in hospital settings (41%). While almost all discussed Kaplan and Norton’s original BSC (97%), only 69% described alignment with a strategic plan. Patients/family members were rarely involved in development teams (3%) which typically were comprised of senior healthcare leaders/administrators. Only 21% of BSCs included perspectives using identical formatting to the original BSC description. Lessons learnt during development addressed three main themes: scorecard design, stakeholder engagement and feasibility.

Conclusions

BSC frameworks have been used in various healthcare settings but frequently undergo adaptation from the original description in order to suit a specific healthcare context. Future BSCs should aim to include patients/families to promote patient-centred healthcare systems. Considering the heterogeneity evident in development approaches, methodological guidance in this area is warranted.

POS0303 PREVENTION OF CHRONIC DISEASES DUE TO INFLAMMATION IN INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS: RESULTS OF A DELPHI PROCESS TO SELECT CARE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD (EMR) INTERVENTION

Background:

Inflammatory arthritis (IA) predisposes patients to several chronic conditions including cardiovascular diseases (CVD), diabetes (DM), osteoporosis (OP) and infections, likely due to systemic effects of inflammation. Studies have found that patients with IA often receive suboptimal care for screening and managing these conditions.

Objectives:

This is the first phase of a study which will develop and pilot test automated EMR reminders for family physicians. The reminders will prompt family physicians to screen for and address risk factors for these conditions. We conducted a Delphi process to select care recommendations to be addressed by the EMR reminders.

Methods:

We conducted a review of current BC, Canadian and international guidelines for screening and addressing risk factors for CVD, DM, OP and infection. A list of 22 care recommendations, including their level of evidence and risks/benefits of implementation, was reviewed by a panel of six family physicians, three rheumatologists and three IA patients, in a three-round online modified Delphi process. Panelists rated each care recommendation, using 9-point scales, on 1) their clinical importance, 2) their likelihood of improving outcomes, and 3) implementation feasibility. Results were discussed in an online forum. Panelists then rated slightly revised care recommendations, modified based on feedback from the discussion. Care recommendations were retained if the median rating was ≥7 with no disagreement as defined by the RAND/UCLA Method handbook.

Results:

A list of 15 care recommendations was selected by the Delphi process for EMR integration, including recommendations that address CVD risk assessment (1), hypertension screening (1), DM screening (2), fracture risk assessment (1), BMD testing (1), osteoporosis prevention (1) and treatment (1) with bisphosphonates, preventing infections through immunization (2), minimizing steroids (1) and hepatitis screening (1), screening for hydroxychloroquine retinal toxicity (1), and counselling for lifestyle modifications (2). We excluded 7 recommendations which addressed lipid testing (1), BMD testing in steroid users (1), immunizations (2), weight management (1), and DMARD laboratory test monitoring (2). Recommendations were excluded on the basis of importance (1) or feasibility (6).

Conclusion:

The results of the Delphi process will inform the development of reminders, integrated in EMRs, that will support family physicians in their efforts to engage IA patients in addressing risk factors for chronic diseases related to inflammation. We hope to improve the prevention of these diseases, which represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality for people with inflammatory arthritis.

Acknowledgements:

Iman Sheriff’s work on this project was funded by the CRA summer studentship programme. Dr. Lacaille is supported by the Mary Pack Chair in Arthritis Research from UBC and The Arthritis Society of Canada. Thank you to all who participated in the Delphi survey.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Arthritis liaison: a First Nations community-based patient care facilitator

INTRODUCTION

Arthritis is a leading cause of disability in First Nations communities and is often accompanied by other chronic diseases. Existing care models prioritize accessibility to specialty care for treatment, whereas patient-centred approaches support broader health goals.

METHODS

A patient care facilitator model of care, termed "arthritis liaison," was developed with the community to support culturally relevant patient-centred care plans. Following a one-year-long intervention, we report on the feasibility and acceptability of this care model from the perspectives of patients and health care providers.

RESULTS

The arthritis liaison served as a bridge between the clinicians and patients, and fostered continuity, helping patients receive coordinated care within the community.

POS1427 NATIONAL BURDEN OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN CANADA 1990-2017: FINDINGS FROM THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE STUDY 2017

Background:

According to the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017, over 120,000 individuals currently have rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Canada, yet a study that evaluates the combined effect of RA on the longevity and quality of life in the country is lacking.

Objectives:

The objectives of this study are three: 1) to describe burden of RA levels and trends from 1990-2017 using GBD data, 2) to describe age and sex differences, and 3) to compare Canada RA burden to other countries.

Methods:

We obtained publicly available data from GBD Study 2017 from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation interactive visualization tool (http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare). Disease burden indicators include prevalence, mortality, years of life lost (YLLs), years lived with disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Estimates were presented as non age-standardized and age-standardized rates per 100,000 population. GBD estimated prevalence using published literature, survey data, patient records, and health insurance claims, and mortality using cause of death ensemble modelling technique. YLLs measure premature death calculated as the sum of each death multiplied by the standard life expectancy at each age. YLDs measure amount of time in a year an individual lives with a short- or long-term health condition, calculated by combining prevalence with disability weights for each age/sex/year. DALYs were calculated as the sum of YLLs and YLDs. DALYs for Canada were compared to DALYs of countries with similar socio-demographic index (SDI) values. SDI combines income per capita, average educational attainment, and fertility rates. Data were analysed by DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression tool.

Results:

In Canada, RA mortality (mortality and YLLs) improved over time, with a steeper decline after the year 2002. However, the population burden of quality of life (YLDs and DALYs) increased due to increasing prevalence. The disease burden was higher in females (prevalence, mortality, YLLs, YLDs, DALYs), and DALY rates were higher among older populations. Compared to other countries, Canada had greater improvement in mortality and YLLs over time and had a lower age-standardized DALYs rate compared to countries of similar SDI values. A weak association was found between global age-standardized DALYs and SDI (R2 = 0.0138).

Conclusion:

RA is a major public health challenge. Canada fares better than other countries with regards to national RA burden. Early identification and management are critical to reducing the overall burden of RA in Canada, especially in women. More data from multiple provincial RA databases would increase the accuracy of our estimates for Canada.

References:

[1]Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, et al. The global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1316-1322. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204627

[2]Myasoedova E, Davis JM 3rd, Crowson CS, Gabriel SE. Epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis: rheumatoid arthritis and mortality. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2010;12(5):379-385. doi:10.1007/s11926-010-0117-y

[3]Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Hoy D, et al. Global, regional and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis 1990-2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2017. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(11):1463-1471. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215920

Acknowledgements:

Nejat Hassen is supported by a grant from the Canadian Institute of Health Research. Dr. Diane Lacaille is supported by the Mary Pack Chair in Arthritis Research from the University of British Columbia and The Arthritis Society of Canada.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0298 UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS IDENTIFY BARRIERS AND PROPOSE SOLUTIONS FOR SELF-MANAGING ARTHRITIS AND CHRONIC CONDITIONS

Background:

Underserved populations, such as ethnic minorities, low-income adults, and Indigenous people living with arthritis are more likely to have lower health literacy, higher rates of multi-morbidity, and face challenges in accessing care1-3. Self-management support (SMS) can help to mitigate the impacts of living with arthritis4. However, we require a more in-depth understanding of the daily barriers underserved communities face in living with arthritis in order to develop effective SMS that can meaningfully improve well-being and quality of life.

Objectives:

The study objective was to bring together underserved people living with arthritis to identify common barriers they face in taking care of their conditions in daily life, and to identify their solutions to the identified challenges.

Methods:

A team of researchers from several universities, nurse practitioners, physicians, policy makers, an arthritis consumer-patient leader and our community partners (Multi-lingual Orientation Service Association for Immigrant Communities and the Portland Hotel Society Community Services Society) engaged in a Community-based Participatory and Concept Mapping (CM) study5-7 where participants from underserved communities identified major barriers they face in managing arthritis, agreed on key themes that emerged, and determined priorities for actions. This involved three key CM activities: 1) brainstorming ideas; 2) sorting and rating ideas; and 3) analyzing and interpreting concept maps8. Data was collected through face-to-face interviews and prioritized and interpreted in workshop settings.

Results:

Sixty-three individuals who were ethnic minorities, immigrants, refugees, low-income, over 65, and/or housing insecure and living with arthritis identified 35 common barriers and made recommendations in the areas of financial difficulties, social services, access to health services, quality of health services, lack of knowledge, and mental health. Additional funding has been sought through Community-University Engagement Support Funding to enable our community partners to prioritize the recommendations in their communities, and to develop mechanisms for implementation using already existing community structures, processes, and services.

Conclusion:

Persons living with arthritis in diverse underserved communities face significant health and social inequities, including lack of access to basic life necessities such as food, housing, employment, and safety, which creates barriers to self-managing arthritis and other chronic conditions in daily life. SMS for these communities needs to address these social and environmental barriers shaping capacity for self-management, and ultimately, quality of life and well-being.

References:

[1]Ackerman I, Busija L. Access to self-management education, conservative treatment and surgery for arthritis according to socioeconomic status. Best Pr Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(5):561–83.

[2]Shadmi E. Multimorbidity and equity in health. Int J Equity Heal. 2013;12(59):59.

[3]Foster M, Kendall E, Dickson P, Chaboyer W, Hunter B, Gee T. Participation and chronic disease self-management: are we risking inequitable resource allocation? Aust J Prim Health. 2003;9(3):132–40.

[4]Brady T, Anderson L, Kobau R. Chronic disease self-management support: public health perspectives. Front Public Heal. 2015;2(234).

[5]Trochim W. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Progr Plann. 1989;12(1):1–16.

[6]Anderson L, Day K, Vandenberg A. Using a concept map as a tool for strategic planning: the healthy brain initiative. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(5):A117.

[7]Petrucci C, Quinlan K. Bridging the research practice gap: concept mapping as a mixed methods strategy in practice-based research and evaluation. J Soc Serv Res. 2007;34(2):25–42.

[8]Kane M, Trochim W. Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2007.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

A Population-Based Approach to Reporting System-Level Performance Measures for Rheumatoid Arthritis Care

OBJECTIVE

To operationalize and report on nationally endorsed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) performance measures (PMs) using health administrative data for British Columbia (BC), Canada.

METHODS

All patients with RA in BC ages ≥18 years were identified between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2009 using health administrative data and followed until December 2014. PMs tested include: the percentage of incident patients with ≥1 rheumatologist visit within 365 days; the percentage of prevalent patients with ≥1 rheumatologist visit per year; the percentage of prevalent patients dispensed disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy; and time from RA diagnosis to DMARD therapy. Measures were reported on patients seen by rheumatologists, and in the total population.

RESULTS

The cohort included 38,673 incident and 57,922 prevalent RA cases. The percentage of patients seen by a rheumatologist within 365 days increased over time (35% in 2000 to 65% in 2009), while the percentage of RA patients under the care of a rheumatologist seen yearly declined (79% in 2001 to 39% in 2014). The decline was due to decreasing visit rates with increasing follow-up time rather than calendar effect. The percentage of RA patients dispensed a DMARD was suboptimal over follow-up (37% in 2014) in the total population but higher (87%) in those under current rheumatologist care. The median time to DMARD in those seen by a rheumatologist improved from 49 days in 2000 to 23 days in 2009, with 34% receiving treatment within the 14-day benchmark.

CONCLUSION

This study describes the operationalization and reporting of national PMs using administrative data and identifies gaps in care to further examine and address.

Ten-year risk of cerebrovascular accidents in incident rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based study of trends over time

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate secular trends in 10-year risk of incident cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), in incident RA relative to the general population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of a population-based incident cohort with RA onset from 1997 to 2004 in British Columbia, Canada, with matched general population controls (2:1), using administrative health data. RA and general population cohorts were divided according to year of RA onset, defined according to the first RA visit of the case definition. Incident CVA was defined as the first CVA occurring within 10 years from the first RA visit. Secular trend was assessed using delayed-entry Cox models with a two-way interaction term between the year of RA onset and indicator of RA vs general population. Linear, quadratic and spline functions of year of RA onset were compared with assess non-linear effects. The model with the lowest Akaike Information Criterion was selected.

RESULTS

Overall, 23 545 RA and 47 090 general population experienced 658 and 1220 incident CVAs, respectively. A spline Cox model with a knot at year of onset 1999 was selected. A significant decline in risk of CVA was observed in individuals with RA onset after 1999 [0.90 (0.86, 0.95); P = 0.0001]. The change in CVA risk over time differed significantly in RA with onset from 1999 onwards compared with the general population (P-value of interaction term = 0.03), but not before 1999 (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that people with RA onset from 1999 onwards, had a significantly greater decline in 10-year risk of CVA compared with the general population.

Cross-sectional survey on physician burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic in Vancouver, Canada: the role of gender, ethnicity and sexual orientation

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of physician burnout during the pandemic and differences by gender, ethnicity or sexual orientation.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey (August-October in 2020) of internal medicine physicians at two academic hospitals in Vancouver, Canada.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Physician burnout and its components, emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation and personal accomplishment were measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory.

RESULTS

The response rate was 38% (n=302/803 respondents, 49% women,). The prevalence of burnout was 68% (emotional exhaustion 63%, depersonalisation 39%) and feeling low personal accomplishment 22%. In addition, 21% reported that they were considering quitting the profession or had quit a position. Women were more likely to report emotional exhaustion (OR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.07 to 3.73, p=0.03) and feeling low personal accomplishment (OR 2.26, 95% CI: 1.09 to 4.70, p=0.03) than men. Visible ethnic minority physicians were more likely to report feeling lower personal accomplishment than white physicians (OR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.28 to 2.55, p=0.001). There was no difference in emotional exhaustion or depersonalisation by ethnicity or sexual orientation. Physicians who reported that COVID-19 affected their burnout were more likely to report any burnout (OR: 3.74, 95% CI: 1.99 to 7.01, p<0.001) and consideration of quitting or quit (OR: 3.20, 95% CI: 1.34 to 7.66, p=0.009).

CONCLUSION

Burnout affects 2 out of 3 internal medicine physicians during the pandemic. Women, ethnic minority physicians and those who feel that COVID-19 affects burnout were more likely to report components of burnout. Further understanding of factors driving feelings of low personal accomplishment in women and ethnic minority physicians is needed.

The risk and trend of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a general population-based study

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the overall risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among patients newly diagnosed with RA compared with the general population without RA; and to estimate the risk trends of VTE, PE and DVT after RA diagnosis up to 5 years compared with the general population.

METHODS

Using previously validated RA case definition, we conducted a matched cohort study using the population-based administrative health database from the province of British Columbia, Canada. We calculated incidence rates (IRs) and fully adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the risk of VTE, DVT and PE after RA index date.

RESULTS

Among 39 142 incident RA patients (66% female, mean age 60), 1432, 543 and 1068 developed VTE, PE and DVT, respectively. IRs for the RA cohort were 3.79, 1.43 and 2.82 per 1000 person-years vs 2.70, 1.03 and 1.94 per 1000 person-years for the non-RA cohort. After adjusting for VTE risk factors, the HRs (95% CI) were 1.28 (1.20, 1.36), 1.25 (1.13, 1.39) and 1.30 (1.21, 1.40) for VTE, PE and DVT, respectively. The fully adjusted HRs for VTE during the first five years after RA diagnosis were 1.60, 1.47, 1.40, 1.30 and 1.28, respectively. A similar trend was shown in PE.

CONCLUSION

This population-based study demonstrates that RA patients have an increased risk of VTE, PE and DVT after diagnosis compared with the general population. This risk is independent of traditional VTE risk factors and is highest during the first year after RA diagnosis, then progressively declined.

Strategies for developing and implementing a rheumatoid arthritis healthcare quality framework: a thematic analysis of perspectives from arthritis stakeholders

OBJECTIVES

To obtain stakeholder perspectives to inform the development and implementation of a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) healthcare quality measurement framework.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using thematic analysis of focus groups and interviews.

SETTING

Arthritis stakeholders from across Canada including healthcare providers, persons living with RA, clinic managers and policy leaders were recruited for the focus groups and interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-four stakeholders from nine provinces.

INTERVENTIONS

Qualitative researchers led each focus group/interview using a semistructured guide; the digitally recorded data were transcribed verbatim. Two teams of two coders independently analysed the transcripts using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Perspectives on the use of different types of measurement frameworks in healthcare were obtained. In particular, stakeholders advocated for the use of existing healthcare frameworks over frameworks developed in the business world and adapted for healthcare. Persons living with RA were less familiar with specific measurement frameworks, however, they had used existing online public forums for rating their experience and quality of healthcare provided. They viewed a standardised framework as potentially useful for assisting with monitoring the care provided to them individually. Nine guiding principles for framework development and 13 measurement themes were identified. Perceived barriers identified included access to data and concerns about how measures in the framework were developed and used. Effective approaches to framework implementation included having sound knowledge translation strategies and involving stakeholders throughout the measurement development and reporting process. Clinical models of care and health policies conducive to outcome measurement were highlighted as drivers of successful measurement initiatives.

CONCLUSION

These important perspectives will be used to inform a healthcare quality measurement framework for RA.