Statin Use and Long-Term Mortality after Rectal Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

The current study aimed to assess the association between regular statin therapy and postoperative long-term all-cause and cancer-specific mortality following curative surgery for rectal cancer. The hypothesis was that statin exposure would be associated with better survival.

METHODS

Patients with stage I-III rectal cancer undergoing surgical resection with curative intent were extracted from the nationwide, prospectively collected, Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register (SCRCR) for the period from January 2007 and October 2016. Patients were defined as having ongoing statin therapy if they had filled a statin prescription within 12 months before and after surgery. Cox proportional hazards models were employed to investigate the association between statin use and postoperative five-year all-cause and cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 10,743 patients who underwent a surgical resection with curative intent for rectal cancer. Twenty-six percent (n = 2797) were classified as having ongoing statin therapy. Statin users had a considerably decreased risk of all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.73, p < 0.001) and cancer-specific (adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.47-0.75, p < 0.001) mortality up to five years following surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use was associated with a lower risk of both all-cause and rectal cancer-specific mortality following curative surgical resections for rectal cancer. The findings should be confirmed in future prospective clinical trials.

Preadmission Statin Therapy and Clinical Outcome in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: An Italian Multicenter Observational Study

ABSTRACT

Statin therapy has been recently suggested as possible adjuvant treatment to improve the clinical outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of preadmission statin therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and to investigate its potential association with acute distress respiratory syndrome (ARDS) at admission and in-hospital mortality. We retrospectively recruited 467 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the emergency department of 10 Italian hospitals. The study population was divided in 2 groups according to the ARDS diagnosis at admission and in-hospital mortality. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the risk of ARDS at admission and death during hospitalization among patients with COVID-19. A competing risk analysis in patients taking or not statins before admission was also performed. ARDS at admission was reported in 122 cases (26.1%). There was no statistically significant difference for clinical characteristics between patients presenting with and without ARDS. One hundred seven patients (18.5%) died during the hospitalization; they showed increased age (69.6 ± 13.1 vs. 66.1 ± 14.9; P = 0.001), coronary artery disease (23.4% vs. 12.8%; P = 0.012), and chronic kidney disease (20.6% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.018) prevalence; moreover, they presented more frequently ARDS at admission (48.6% vs. 19.4%; P < 0.001). At multivariable regression model, statin therapy was not associated neither with ARDS at admission nor with in-hospital mortality. Preadmission statin therapy does not seem to show a protective effect in severe forms of COVID-19 complicated by ARDS at presentation and rapidly evolving toward death.

Postoperative Myocardial Injury in Patients Classified as Low Risk Preoperatively Is Associated With a Particularly Increased Risk of Long-Term Mortality After Noncardiac Surgery

Background

Prior studies have shown an association between myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) and all‐cause mortality in patients following noncardiac surgery. However, the association between preoperative risk assessments, Revised Cardiac Risk Index and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and postoperative troponin elevations and long‐term mortality is unknown.

Methods and Results

A retrospective chart review identified 548 patients who had a troponin I level drawn within 14 days of noncardiac surgery that required an overnight hospital stay. Patients aged 40 to 80 years with at least 2 cardiovascular risk factors were included, while those with trauma, pulmonary embolism, and neurosurgery were excluded. Kaplan–Meier survival and odds ratio (OR) with sensitivity/specificity analysis were performed to assess the association between preoperative risk and postoperative troponin elevation and all‐cause mortality at 1 year. Overall, 69%/31% were classified as low‐risk/high‐risk per the Revised Cardiac Risk Index and 66%/34% per American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Comparing the low‐risk versus high‐risk groups, preoperative risk assessment was not associated with either postoperative troponin elevation or 1‐year mortality. MINS portended a 1‐year mortality of OR, 3.9 (95% CI, 2.44–6.33) in the total population. Patients classified as low risk preoperatively with MINS had the highest risk of 1‐year mortality (OR, 9.6; 95% CI, 4.27–24.38), with a low prevalence of statin use.

Conclusions

Current preoperative risk stratification tools do not prognosticate the risk of postoperative troponin elevation and all‐cause mortality at 1 year. Interestingly, patients classified as low risk preoperatively with MINS had a markedly higher 1‐year mortality risk compared with the general population, and most of them are not taking a statin. Our results suggest that evaluating preoperatively low‐risk patients for MINS presents an opportunity for prognostication, risk reclassification, and initiating therapies such as statins to mitigate long‐term risk.

Coronary Calcium Risk Score and Cardiovascular Risk

The association between the presence of coronary artery calcium (CAC) and the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been appreciated for decades. In this review, we critically appraise the role of CAC based on computerized tomography in contemporary risk stratification. Available evidence suggests that the measurement of CAC is a useful modality in many patients for more precise risk stratification and prognostic determination. Whether newer CAC score incorporating extra coronary calcification will add incremental value, especially for stroke and other non-coronary vascular outcomes, needs a prospective study.

Prospective evaluation of lipid management following acute coronary syndrome in non-Western countries

Background

Half the global burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is concentrated in the Asia‐Pacific (APAC) region.

Hypothesis

Suboptimal control of low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) may play a large role in the burden of CVD in APAC and non‐Western countries.

Methods

The Acute Coronary Syndrome Management (ACOSYM) registry is a multinational, multicenter, prospective observational registry designed to evaluate LDL‐C control in patients within 6 months after hospitalization following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event across nine countries.

Results

Overall, 1581 patients were enrolled, of whom 1567 patients met the eligibility criteria; 80.3% of the eligible patients were men, 46.1% had ST‐elevation myocardial infarction, and 39.5% had non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction. Most (1245; 79.5%) patients were discharged on a high‐intensity statin. During the follow‐up, only 992 (63.3%) patients had at least one LDL‐C measurement; of these, 52.9% had persistently elevated LDL‐C (>70 mg/dl). The patients not discharged on a high‐dose statin were more likely (OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.1–4.8) to have an LDL‐C above the 70 mg/dl LDL‐C target compared with those who were discharged on a high‐dose statin.

Conclusion

Our real‐world registry found that a third or more of post‐ACS patients did not have a repeat LDL‐C follow‐up measurement. In those with an LDL‐C follow‐up measurement, more than half (52.9%) were not achieving a <70 mg/dl LDL‐C goal, despite a greater uptake of high‐intensity statin therapy than has been observed in recent evidence. This demonstrates the opportunity to improve post‐ACS lipid management in global community practice.

Clinical Pharmacist Outreach to Increase Statin Use for Patients with Cardiovascular Disease in a Safety-Net Healthcare System

BACKGROUND

Statin Therapy for Patients with Cardiovascular Disease (SPC) is a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Star measure added to Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage) plans in 2019 to incentivize statin use for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The measure assesses statin dispensing and adherence in patients with atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD). Clinical pharmacists are well-positioned to affect positively a health system's performance on the SPC measure.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of telephone outreach by clinical pharmacists on moderate- or high-intensity statin prescribing in patients with ASCVD.

METHODS

Patients in managed care health plans who meet the SPC measure criteria and are not currently receiving a moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy were contacted by a clinical pharmacist through telephone outreach. If appropriate, they were prescribed a statin by a clinical pharmacist. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who meet the SPC measure classification and had 1 confirmed prescription fill for a moderate- or high-intensity statin after intervention by a clinical pharmacist.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were identified for review and outreach, of whom 35 (41.7%) met the SPC measure criteria. Of these 35 patients, 16 (45.7%) were female and the mean age was 66 years. A total of 22 (62.9%) patients agreed to a statin prescription, and 16 (72.7%) of these patients picked up the prescription within 10 days of prescribing. An additional 4 patients, for a total of 20 (57.1%) of the 35 eligible patients, were eventually dispensed a statin. Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) vendor data available after the intervention showed a larger SPC measure population than was captured with the health plan's internal report. HEDIS data showed an increase in statin prescribing for patients meeting the SPC measure classification from 24.7% to 56.6% during the study period (P <.001). The mean time spent per patient for chart review and/or outreach by the clinical pharmacist was 27.7 (standard deviation, 9) minutes.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that clinical pharmacists who conduct a telephonic population health intervention can achieve a high rate of success in initiating a moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy in patients with ASCVD.

PCSK9 Levels and Metabolic Profiles in Elderly Subjects with Different Glucose Tolerance under Statin Therapy

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) degrades low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) receptors, and thus regulates the LDL-C levels in the circulation. Type 2 diabetics often have elevated LDL-C levels. However, the functions of PCSK9 in patients with alterations of glu-cose metabolism and statin therapy are still unclear. Method: we investigated a large cohort of 608 subjects, born in 1945 in Oulu, Finland (Oulu Cohort 1945). We studied the effects of PSCK9 lev-els with different glucose tolerances (normal glucose tolerance (NGT), prediabetes (PreDM) or type 2 diabetes (T2D)) with and without statin medication, and analyzed clinical data, NMR metabolomics and PCSK9 plasma levels. Results: PCSK9 plasma levels did not significantly differ between the three groups. Statin therapy significantly increased the PCSK9 levels in NGT, PreDM and T2D groups compared with subjects with no statins. In the NGT group, negative associations between PCSK9 and LDL-C, intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol (IDL-C), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), total cholesterol and LDL and IDL triglycerides were observed under statin medication. In contrast, in the PreDM and T2D groups, these associa-tions were lost. Conclusions: our data suggest that in subjects with abnormal glucose metabolism and statin therapy, the significant PCSK9-mediated effects on the lipid metabolites are lost com-pared to NGT subjects, but statins reduced the LDL-C and VLDL-C levels.

Performance of Guideline Recommendations for Prevention of Myocardial Infarction in Young Adults

BACKGROUND

The 2018 cholesterol guidelines of the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) changed 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) eligibility criteria for primary prevention to include multiple risk enhancers and novel intensive lipid-lowering therapies for secondary prevention.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine how guideline changes affected identification for preventive therapy in young adults with premature myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

The study identified adults presenting with first MI at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina. Statin therapy eligibility was determined using the 2013 ACC/AHA and 2018 AHA/ACC guidelines criteria. The study also determined potential eligibility for intensive lipid-lowering therapies (very high risk) under the 2018 AHA/ACC guidelines, by assessing the composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or stroke rates in adults considered "very high risk" versus not.

RESULTS

Among 6,639 patients with MI, 41% were <55 years of age ("younger"), 35% were 55 to 65 years of age ("middle-aged"), and 24% were 66 to 75 years of age ("older"). Younger adults were more frequently smokers (52% vs. 38% vs. 22%, respectively) and obese (42% vs. 34% vs. 31%, respectively), with metabolic syndrome (21% vs. 19% vs. 17%, respectively) and higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (117 vs. 107 vs. 103 mg/dl, respectively) (p trend <0.01 for all). Pre-MI, fewer younger adults met guideline indications for 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy than middle-aged and older adults. The 2018 guideline identified fewer younger adults eligible for statin therapy at the time of their MI than the 2013 guideline (46.4% vs. 56.7%; p < 0.01). Younger patients less frequently met very high-risk criteria for intensive secondary prevention lipid-lowering therapy (28.3% vs. 40.0% vs. 81.4%, respectively; p < 0.01). Over a median 8 years of follow-up, very high-risk criteria were associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in individuals <55 years of age (hazard ratio: 2.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.82 to 2.41; p < 0.001), as was the case in older age groups (p interaction = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Most younger patients with premature MI are not identified as statin candidates before their event on the basis of the 2018 guidelines, and most patients with premature MI are not recommended for intensive post-MI lipid management.

Treatment and Predictors of Recurrent Internal Carotid Artery In-Stent Restenosis

PURPOSE

We aimed to examine the effectiveness of different therapeutic options for and to identify the possible risk factors of recurrent internal carotid artery (ICA) in-stent restenosis (ISR).

METHODS

Forty-six ICA ISRs, which were reintervened at least once, were retrospectively analyzed regarding clinical and imaging characteristics, as well as invasive treatment type (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA] with a plain balloon, PTA with a drug-eluting balloon [DEB], re-stenting) used.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 29.5 months (IQR, 8.5-52.8 months) in patients who underwent reintervention for ICA ISR. Stent occlusion occurred in 3 patients (6.5%). One ISR recurrence was noted in 10 patients (21.7%); reintervention was carried out in 7 cases (7/10 [70%]; PTA, N = 5; PTA with a DEB, N = 1; re-stenting, N = 1), while 3 patients (3/10; 30%) received best medical treatment. Two ISR recurrences were observed in 3 patients (6.5%); all of them underwent reintervention (PTA, N = 1; PTA with a DEB, N = 2). Three ISR recurrences were seen in 1 patient (2.2%), who was treated with PTA. No recurrence was observed in those patients, who had DEB treatment. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed statin therapy to be a protective factor against recurrent ISR (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.84; P = .029).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that PTA with a DEB is the most effective for the treatment of recurrent ISR, and confirms the importance of statin use in patients who have had a carotid reintervention.

Usefulness of statins in end-stage renal disease

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is considered an independent risk factor of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. This review highlights atherosclerotic risk, lipid metabolism alterations, and four studies on the use of statins in ESRD-two of which showed a statistically significant effect of statins on the primary endpoints and two of which did not. Since effects were seen with higher doses of statins, further research is needed on the protective effects of intermediate to higher doses of statins in ESRD patients.

Drugs in Context Editorial: Review of 2020 and what lies ahead in therapeutic interventions

The year 2020 was dominated by the COVID-19 pandemic, bringing with it unprecedented advancements in the fields of healthcare and therapeutic interventions as well as in vaccine and drug development. Nevertheless, several other advancements in various fields of medicine also deserve attention. Herein, the Senior Editors of Drugs in Context provide us with their expert opinion on the events of 2020 and what lies ahead in 2021.

The Effect of Long-Term Atorvastatin Therapy on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness of Children With Dyslipidemia

Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) has been proposed as an early marker of subclinical atherosclerosis in high risk children. Children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia have greater cIMT than matched healthy controls or their unaffected siblings. Statin therapy may delay the progression of cIMT, although long-term studies in children are scarce. We evaluated the effect of atorvastatin treatment on cIMT in children with dyslipidemia. We studied 81 children/adolescents, 27 with severe dyslipidemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] ≥190 mg/dL) and 54 sex- and age-matched healthy controls; LDL-C ≤ 130 mg/dL and lipoprotein (a), Lp(a), ≤30 mg/dL. In the children with dyslipidemia, cIMT was measured twice, before and on treatment (18.2 ± 7.7 months). Anthropometric data, a full lipid profile, liver, kidney, and thyroid function were evaluated. Males with dyslipidemia had a greater cIMT than male controls after adjustment for other factors (P = .049). In addition, a nonstatistically significant decrease in cIMT was observed after treatment (P = .261). Treatment with atorvastatin resulted in a significantly improved lipid profile. Females with dyslipidemia had a significantly thinner cIMT than males. Children with normal and high Lp(a) levels had similar cIMT values. In conclusion, treatment with atorvastatin had a beneficial effect on the lipid profile and cIMT progression in children with severe dyslipidemia.

Statins: HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors as Potential Anticancer Agents against Malignant Neoplasms in Women

Statins, also known as HMG-CoA inhibitors, are a class of bioactive small molecules that efficiently reduce the levels of cholesterol, and therefore are commonly used to manage and prevent various cardiovascular diseases. With respect to their original medical indications, statins are currently in the group of the most prescribed drugs worldwide. Of note is that statins are perceived actually rather as agents that have pleiotropic activities; in addition to their inhibitory activity on the production of endogenous cholesterol. Statins may also affect cell proliferation, angiogenesis and/or migration (metastasis) of different cancer cells, and play a positive role in the chemoprevention of cancer, thus being the excellent candidates to be repurposed in oncology. Particularly intriguing in this context seems to be the promising role of statins on both the incidence and course of common malignant neoplasms in women. In this article, we review and discuss the effect of the use of statins in the treatment of three types of cancer, i.e., breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer, with the highest mortality among gynecological cancers.

Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Initiating Statin Therapy After Index Revascularization In Patients With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Background An increasing number of patients with a peripheral arterial occlusive disease were put on statins during the past years. This study assessed whether statin therapy was effective and safe for these new users. Methods and Results Using health insurance claims data from Germany's second-largest insurance fund, BARMER, we identified patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease who had index revascularization between 2008 and 2018 without prior statin therapy. We compared patients with and without statin therapy in addition to antithrombotics during the first quarter after discharge (new users versus nonusers). Outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and incident major amputation for effectiveness and incident diabetes mellitus and incident myopathy for safety. Propensity score matching was used to balance the study groups. All analyses were stratified into patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and intermittent claudication. A total of 22 208 patients (mean age 71.1 years and 50.3% women) were included in the study. In 10 922 matched patients, statin initiation was associated with lower all-cause mortality (chronic limb-threatening ischemia: hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.68-0.84]; intermittent claudication: HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70-0.92]), lower risk of major amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93) and lower risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.92) in patients with intermittent claudication during 5 years of follow-up. Safety outcomes did not differ among the study groups. Conclusions Initiating statin therapy in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease after index revascularization is efficient and safe with an effect size comparable to earlier studies. Awareness campaigns for evidence-based optimal pharmacological treatment among patients are recommended.

Statins Versus Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors- Are We Doing Better? A Systematic Review on Treatment Disparity

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a significant contributor to mortality in America. A common risk factor of CAD is hyperlipidemia. Treatment guidelines of hyperlipidemia are well established. Statins are the cornerstone of treating hyperlipidemia. New medications such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9 inhibitors) have also illustrated significant results in treating hyperlipidemia. While multiple studies exemplify the disparities in statin and PCSK9 inhibitors utilization to reduce CAD mortality and risk factors, there are no systematic reviews to validate these disparities. We conducted a search on PubMed, including Medline and PubMed Central, and Google Scholar. For this analysis, we selected articles published between 2000 and 2020 and those that fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Based on the type of study, we performed appropriate quality assessments and deleted studies with a score of less than seven or with a high risk of biases. The search strategy resulted in 322 studies. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, we included 20 articles in the analysis of this review. This systematic review demonstrates that non-white races and women were less likely to receive the correct, clinically indicated, therapy for hyperlipidemia. A multi-faceted approach is required to solve this inequality in healthcare.

Impact of lipid levels and high-intensity statins on vein graft patency after CABG: Midterm results of the ACTIVE trial

BACKGROUND

High-dose atorvastatin did not improve 1-year vein graft patency in the recent Aggressive Cholesterol Therapy to Inhibit Vein Graft Events trial. However, it remains unknown whether high-intensity statins may impact graft disease in the years that follow.

METHODS

In the trial, patients (N = 173) were randomized to receive atorvastatin 10 or 80 mg for 1 year after coronary bypass surgery (CABG). Beyond 1 year, the choice of statin was left to the patient's physician. In this study of participants who agreed to follow-up (N = 76), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels were measured and graft patency was assessed 3 years after surgery.

RESULTS

The rate of vein graft disease 3 years after surgery was not significantly reduced with atorvastatin 80 mg during the first postoperative year or the use of open-label high-intensity statin thereafter (p = NS). However, a trend was observed between higher LDL levels during the first postoperative year and a greater incidence of vein graft disease at 3 years (p = .12). Among patients who had LDL levels more than 90 mg/dl in the first year after CABG, 38.5% had vein graft disease at 3 years, compared to 19.0% for those with LDL levels less than 90 mg/dl (p = .15). Higher mean LDL levels during the first postoperative year were associated with a higher rate of vein disease 3 years after surgery both at the graft level (p = .03) and at the patient level (p = .03) in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher LDL levels during the first postoperative year were associated with significantly greater vein graft disease 3 years after CABG.

Treatment practices and lipid profile of patients with acute coronary syndrome: results from a tertiary care hospital

Background: Considering the increasing burden of cardiovascular risk factors and recent advances on the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), we studied the epidemiological characteristics and treatment strategies of patients presenting with ACS. We also evaluated the lipid profile and attainment of lipid goals in a 'real world' clinical setting.Methods: This was a substudy of IDEAL-LDL (Motivational interviewing to support low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) therapeutic goals and lipid-lowering therapy compliance in patients with acute coronary syndromes), a single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial. Baseline data from a total of 357 ACS patients were gathered using standardised methods.Results: Median age of patients was 60 years and 81.2% were males. Arterial hypertension and smoking were the most prevalent risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were heavier smokers, but were younger and exercised more compared to those with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Conversely, more NSTE-ACS patients had arterial hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus. One-fifth of ACS patients was treated conservatively without a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A combination of statin, dual antiplatelet therapy and beta-blockers were prescribed to 79.6% of patients upon discharge. A renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor and a beta-blocker were prescribed to 67.3 and 91.8% of patients with LVEF ≤40%, respectively. Of patients with prior history of CAD, 63.1%, 71.4% and 58.3% received regularly statins, antiplatelets and beta-blocker treatment, respectively. Only 22.3% of these CAD patients had an optimal LDL-C of <70 mg/dl at admission.Conclusions: In hospitalised patients with ACS, management practices differed by ACS type and discharge medication was, mostly, in line with the latest guidelines. However, medication adherence and lipid lowering goals of secondary CAD prevention were largely unachieved.

Is race or ethnicity associated with under-utilization of statins among women in the United States: The study of women's health across the nation

Background

Rates of statin use among minority women are unclear.

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that statin use would vary by race/ethnicity with lower rates among minority women compared with Whites.

Methods

Data from the study of women's health across the nation, a multiethnic cohort of women collected between 2009 to 2011 were used to examine reported statin use by race/ethnicity and risk profile. Multivariable logistic modeling was performed to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of statin treatment.

Results

Of the 2399 women included, 234 had a diagnosis of atherosclerotic disease (ASCVD), 254 were diabetic (without ASCVD), 163 had an LDL ≥190 mg/dL, and 151 had a 10 year ASCVD pooled risk score ≥7.5%. Statins were used by 49.6% of women with CVD; 59.8% of women with diabetes without known ASCVD; 42.3% of women with an LDL ≥190 mg/dL; and 19.9% of women with an ASCVD risk ≥7.5%. Rates of statin use were 43.8% for women with ≥ two prior ASCVD events and 69.4% for women with ≥ one prior ASCVD event plus multiple high‐risk conditions. Among women eligible for statins, Black women had a significantly reduced adjusted odds of being on a statin (OR 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36‐0.78) compared with White women.

Conclusions

In this cohort of multiethnic women, rates of statin use among women who would benefit were low, with Black women having lower odds of statin use than White women.

Atorvastatin Has a Dose-Dependent Beneficial Effect on Kidney Function and Associated Cardiovascular Outcomes: Post Hoc Analysis of 6 Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Kidney function decreases during the lifetime, and this decline is a powerful predictor of both kidney and cardiovascular outcomes. Statins lower cardiovascular risk, which may relate to beneficial effects on kidney function. We studied whether atorvastatin influences kidney function decline and assessed the association between individual kidney function slopes and cardiovascular outcome.

Methods and Results

Data were collected from 6 large atorvastatin cardiovascular outcome trials conducted in patients not selected for having kidney disease. Slopes of serum creatinine reciprocals representing measures of kidney function change ([mg/dL]⁻¹/y), were analyzed in 30 621 patients. Based on treatment arms, patients were categorized into 3 groups: placebo (n=10 057), atorvastatin 10 mg daily (n=12 763), and 80 mg daily (n=7801). To assess slopes, mixed‐model analyses were performed for each treatment separately, including time in years and adjustment for study. These slopes displayed linear improvement over time in all 3 groups. Slope estimates for patients randomized to placebo or atorvastatin 10 mg and 80 mg were 0.009 (0.0008), 0.011 (0.0006), and 0.014 (0.0006) (mg/dL)⁻¹/y, respectively. A head‐to‐head comparison of atorvastatin 10 and 80 mg based on data from 1 study (TNT [Treating to New Targets]; n=10 001) showed a statistically significant difference in slope between the 2 doses (P=0.0009). From a Cox proportional hazards model using slope as a predictor, a significant (P<0.0001) negative association between kidney function and cardiovascular outcomes was found.

Conclusions

In patients at risk of or with cardiovascular disease, atorvastatin improved kidney function over time in a dose‐dependent manner. In the 3 treatment groups, kidney function improvement was strongly associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00327418; NCT00147602; NCT00327691.

The Impact of Statin Therapy on the Survival of Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer

Statins are 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors that may play an important role in the evolution of cancers, due to their effects on cancer cell metabolism. Statins affect several potential pathways, including cell proliferation, angiogenesis, apoptosis and metastasis. The number of trials assessing the putative clinical benefits of statins in cancer is increasing. Currently, there are several trials listed on the global trial identifier website clinicaltrials.gov. Given the compelling evidence from these trials in a variety of clinical settings, there have been calls for a clinical trial of statins in the adjuvant gastrointestinal cancer setting. However, randomized controlled trials on specific cancer types in relation to statin use, as well as studies on populations without a clinical indication for using statins, have elucidated some potential underlying biological mechanisms, and the investigation of different statins is probably warranted. It would be useful for these trials to incorporate the assessment of tumour biomarkers predictive of statin response in their design. This review summarizes the recent preclinical and clinical studies that assess the application of statins in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers with particular emphasize on their association with cancer risk.

Association of Statin Use and Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background Statins may reduce mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) through prevention of atherosclerotic events or pleiotropic effects. However, the competing mortality risks in TAVR patients may dilute any positive effect of statins. We sought to understand the association of statin use with post-TAVR mortality. Methods and Results We included high- or intermediate-surgical risk patients who underwent TAVR as a part of the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) II and Sapien 3 trials and registries. Outcomes included 2-year all-cause, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality. We used propensity score matching to generate matched pairs between those discharged on a statin and those not on a statin after TAVR. Bias was explored with falsification end points (urinary infection, hip fracture). Among 3956 patients who underwent TAVR, we matched 626 patients on a statin with 626 patients not on a statin at discharge. Among matched patients, statin use was associated with lower risk of all-cause (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% CI 0.49-0.87, P=0.001), cardiovascular (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.96, P=0.030), and noncardiovascular mortality (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.99, P=0.045) compared with no statin use. The survival curves diverged within 3 months and continued to separate over a median follow-up of 2.1 years. The falsification end points were similar among groups (urinary infection, P=0.66; hip fracture, P=0.64). Conclusions In an observational, propensity-matched analysis of TAVR patients, statin use was associated with lower rates of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality compared with no statin use. Given the early emergence of the apparent protective effect of statins, this result may be driven either by pleiotropic effects or by residual confounding despite propensity-matching methodology.

Patient-Reported Reasons for Declining or Discontinuing Statin Therapy: Insights From the PALM Registry

Background

Many adults eligible for statin therapy for cardiovascular disease prevention are untreated. Our objective was to investigate patient‐reported reasons for statin underutilization, including noninitiation, refusal, and discontinuation.

Methods and Results

This study included the 5693 adults recommended for statin therapy in the PALM (Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management) registry. Patient surveys evaluated statin experience, reasons for declining or discontinuing statins, and beliefs about statins and cardiovascular disease risk. Overall, 1511 of 5693 adults (26.5%) were not on treatment. Of those not on a statin, 894 (59.2%) reported never being offered a statin, 153 (10.1%) declined a statin, and 464 (30.7%) had discontinued therapy. Women (relative risk: 1.22), black adults (relative risk: 1.48), and those without insurance (relative risk: 1.38) were most likely to report never being offered a statin. Fear of side effects and perceived side effects were the most common reasons cited for declining or discontinuing a statin. Compared with statin users, those who declined or discontinued statins were less likely to believe statins are safe (70.4% of current users vs. 36.9% of those who declined and 37.4% of those who discontinued) or effective (86.3%, 67.4%, and 69.1%, respectively). Willingness to take a statin was high; 67.7% of those never offered and 59.7% of patients who discontinued a statin would consider initiating or retrying a statin.

Conclusions

More than half of patients eligible for statin therapy but not on treatment reported never being offered one by their doctor. Concern about side effects was the leading reason for statin refusal or discontinuation. Many patients were willing to reconsider statin therapy if offered.

See Editorial by Braun

Baseline, delta, and achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and cardiovascular risk in patients on statin therapy: A post-hoc resampling mediation analysis of treating new targets [TNT] trial

Clinical guidelines for monitoring low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after statin therapy do not clearly define the clinical roles of baseline LDL-C, ΔLDL-C, and achieved LDL-C according to statin intensity. We performed post-hoc analysis of the Treating to New Target (TNT) study to evaluate individual LDL-C parameters after statin therapy. Primary outcome was the risk for total major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We use resampling multilevel mediation analysis to analyze complex relationships among LDL-C parameters based on similar statin intensities. Tertiles for resample A (matched baseline LDL-C; distinct achieved LDL), resample B (matched ΔLDL-C; distinct baseline LDL-C), and resample C (matched achieved LDL-C; distinct ΔLDL-C) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard ratios. In original data analysis, the incidence of MACE was reduced in those with lower achieved LDL-C in total, low, and high intensity statin users (hazard ratios [HRs] = 0.990, 0.992, 0.992; respectively; all P-values < .001). In mediation analysis, resample A showed consistently high incidence for MACE in the middle tertile (HR = 1.237; 95% confidential interval [CI] = 1.008-1.517; P-value = .041) and highest tertile (HR = 1.275; 95% CI = 1.021-1.592; P-value = .032) compared to the lowest tertile. However, resamples B and C did not show consistent differences. Similarly, no consistent statistical difference in MACE according to statin intensity. Lower achieved LDL-C decreased MACE in participants with a similar baseline LDL-C after statin therapy. However, the change in absolute values of ΔLDL-C and achieved LDL-C should be interpreted in an individualized manner due to their complex collinearity, and statin intensity should also be taken into consideration.

Prevalence of Coronary Artery Calcification on Pre-Atrial Fibrillation Ablation CT Pulmonary Venograms and its Impact on Selection for Statin Therapy

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) shares many risk factors with atrial fibrillation (AF). Obtaining computed tomography images of the pulmonary veins (CTPV) before AF ablation procedures is common and can incidentally detect coronary artery calcification (CAC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of CAC on pre-ablation CTPV, the frequency of CAC reporting on CTPV reports, and its impact on statin therapy among patients hospitalized for AF procedures. We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients undergoing CTPV and AF procedures from October 2016 to December 2017 in a single-center tertiary hospital. The patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed. The CAC presence on CTPV was visually assessed. The severity was classified qualitatively. The statin therapy status was evaluated using the patient’s admission and discharge medication lists. A total of 638 subjects were included in our study, with 34.5% female. The mean age was 63.3 ± 10.8 years. CAC was detected in 70.1% of all patients, and in 58.1% of patients without a history of ASCVD. When present, CAC was documented in 92.6% of the clinical CTPV reports. While coronary artery atherosclerosis was present in a majority of AF patients, and its presence was widely reported, it was not associated with increased statin therapy at discharge.

From Subclinical Atherosclerosis to Plaque Progression and Acute Coronary Events: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

It has been believed that most acute coronary events result from the rupture of mildly stenotic plaques, based on studies in which angiographic information was available from many months to years before the event. However, serial studies in which angiographic data were available from the past as also within 1 to 3 months of myocardial infarction have clarified that nonobstructive lesions progressively enlarged relatively rapidly before the acute event occurred. Noninvasive computed tomography angiography imaging data have confirmed that lesions that did not progress voluminously over time rarely led to events, regardless of the extent of luminal stenosis or baseline high-risk plaque morphology. Therefore, plaque progression could be proposed as a necessary step between early, uncomplicated atherosclerosis and plaque rupture. On the other hand, it has been convincingly demonstrated that intensive lipid-lowering therapy (to a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of <70 mg/dl) halts plaque progression. Given the current ability to noninvasively detect the presence of early atherosclerosis, the importance of plaque progression in the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction, and the efficacy of maximum lipid-lowering therapy, it has been suggested that plaque progression is a modifiable step in the evolution of atherosclerotic plaque. A personalized approach based on the detection of early atherosclerosis can trigger the necessary treatment to prevent plaque progression and hence plaque instability. Therefore, this approach can redefine the traditional paradigm of primary and secondary prevention based on population-derived risk estimates and can potentially improve long-term outcomes.