Real-World Outcomes of EKOS Ultrasound-Enhanced Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Limb Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-enhanced catheter-directed thrombolysis (UET) using the Ekosonic® Endovascular System device for acute, peripheral arterial ischemia has been purported in clinical trials to accelerate the fibrinolytic process to reduce treatment time and lytic dosage. We aim to describe outcomes of UET in a real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing UET for acute limb ischemia at a single institution. Data collected included patient demographics, procedural details, and 30-day and 1-year outcomes. The primary endpoints for analysis were major adverse limb events (MALEs; reintervention and/or amputation) and mortality within 30-days and 1-year. Secondary endpoints included technical success, use of adjunctive therapies, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients (mean age 67.4 ± 14.9 years; 25% women) underwent UET for acute limb ischemia between 2014 and 2018. The Rutherford Acute Limb Ischemia Classification was Rutherford (R) 1 in 56.3%, R2a in 31.3%, and R2b in 12.5%. Etiology was thrombosis of native artery in 12.5% of patients, prosthetic bypass in 31.3%, autogenous bypass in 6.3%, and stented native vessel in 50.0%. Mean duration of thrombolytic therapy was 22.2 ± 11.3 hr, and mean tissue plasminogen activator dose was 24.5 ± 15.3 mg. MALEs occurred in 16.7% of patients within the first 30 days and 38.9% experienced a MALE by 1 year. Limb salvage at 30 days and 1 year was 93.8% and 87.5%, respectively. Ipsilateral reintervention was required in 12.5% of patients within 30 days and 37.5% of patients within 1 year. Overall mortality was 6.2% at 30 days and 13.5% at 1 year. In-line flow to the foot was re-established in 90.6% of patients, with a significant improvement in preoperative to postoperative ankle-brachial index (0.31 ± 0.29 vs. 0.78 ± 0.34, P < 0.001) and number of patent tibial runoff vessels (1.31 ± 1.20 vs. 1.96 ± 0.86, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in revascularization success between occluded vessel types. All but one patient required adjunctive therapy such as further thromboaspiration, stenting, or balloon angioplasty. Major bleeding complications occurred in 3 patients (9.4%), including 1 intracranial hemorrhage (3.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

UET with the EKOS device demonstrates acceptable real-world outcomes in the treatment of acute limb ischemia. UET is generally safe and effective at re-establishing in-line flow to yield high limb salvage rates. However, UET is associated with a high rate of reintervention. Further investigation is needed into specific predictors of limb salvage and need for reintervention, as well as cost-efficacy of this technology compared with that of traditional methods.

In-hospital outcome of peripheral vascular intervention in dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease patients

BACKGROUND

The impact of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) outcome remains incompletely elucidated.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the outcome of PVI in dialysis patients with those with normal kidney function.

METHODS

Using weighted data from the National Inpatient Sample database between 2002 and 2014, we identified all peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients aged ≥18 years that underwent PVI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine in-hospital outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1,186,192 patients who underwent PVI, 1,066,830 had normal kidney function (89.9%) and 119,362 had ESRD requiring dialysis (10.1%). Critical limb ischemia was more prevalent in dialysis patients (63.2 vs. 34.0%, p < .001). Compared with normal kidney function group, ESRD requiring dialysis was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (1.5 vs. 4.2%, adjusted OR: 2.13 [95% CI: 2.04-2.23]) and longer length of hospital stay (median 3 days, Interquartile range [IQR] (0-6) vs. 7 days, IQR (4-18); p < .001). Dialysis patients had higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; 14.3 vs. 9.8%, p < .001) and net adverse cardiovascular events (composite of MACE, major bleeding, or vascular complications; 40.8 vs. 29.1%, p < .001). ESRD patients less frequently underwent open bypass (5.6 vs. 8.5%, p < .001) and more frequently had major amputation (10.3 vs. 3.0%, p < .001) compared with normal kidney function group.

CONCLUSION

PAD patients on dialysis who underwent PVI have higher rates of mortality and adverse outcomes as compared to those with normal kidney function.

Association between Preoperative Indications and Outcomes after Major Lower Extremity Amputation

Despite aggressive limb salvage techniques, lower extremity amputation (LEA) is frequently performed. Major indications for LEA include ischemia and uncontrolled infection (UI). A review of the national Vascular Quality Initiative amputation registry was performed to analyze the influence of indication on outcomes after LEA. Retrospective review of the Vascular Quality Initiative LEA registry (2012-2017) identified all above- and below-knee amputations. Outcome measures included 30-day mortality, return to operating room (OR), postoperative myocardial infarctions, and postoperative SSI. Indications for surgery included ischemic rest pain, ischemic tissue loss (TL), acute limb ischemia (ALI), UI, and neuropathic TL. A total of 6701 patients met the inclusion criteria. The indications for surgery included TL (49.0%), UI (31.7%), ALI (8.0%), rest pain (6.6%), and neuropathic TL (2.3%). Patients with ALI had the highest 30-day mortality (12.0%) compared with TL (6.6%) and UI (6.4%) [P < 0.001]. The highest rate of return to OR occurred in the UI group (12.6%) [P < 0.001]. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with UI have significantly higher rates of return to OR, whereas those with ALI have a 30-day mortality twice as high as other indications (both P < 0.001). These data can inform expectations after LEA based on the indications for surgery.

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Clinical Practice for Below-the-Knee, Popliteal, and Crural Artery Lesions Causing Critical Limb Ischemia: 1-Year Results from the Spanish Luminor Registry

BACKGROUND

Luminor is a new drug-coated angioplasty balloon, which is approved by the European Conformity market. The aim of the present study is to analyze the 1-year results, in terms of effectiveness and safety, of the Luminor® 14/14M and 35 drug-coated balloons (iVascular, Sant Vicenç dels Horts, Barcelona, Spain) in a special cohort of critical limb ischemia (CLI) of the Luminor registry.

METHODS

Luminor is phase IV, nonrandomized, prospective, observational, and multicenter clinical study. The present study includes patients with CLI to analyze the effectiveness, in terms of primary patency, and the safety defined by the major adverse effects: any cause mortality, major amputation, and/or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Both femoropopliteal and below-the-knee infrapopliteal lesions were treated. All the end points were assessed after the procedure, at 30 days, 6 and 12 months thereafter.

RESULTS

About 148 patients (101 males; mean age, 73.2 ± 11.4 years) with CLI were included. About 83.3% were classified as Rutherford's class 5. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 71.6%; hypertension, hyperlipidemia, renal insufficiency, and coronary disease were present in 87.2%, 57.4%, 29.7%, and 39.2% of the sample, respectively. The average follow-up was 11.2 ± 3.27 months. The primary patency and the freedom of clinically driven TLR, at 1 year, were 87.7% and 92.1%, respectively. Survival and freedom from major amputations were 85.1% and 84.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Even with a very sick population, the results at 12 months are highly satisfactory with reference to survival, freedom from amputation, patency, and the absence of reintervention.

Risk stratification for low extremity amputation in critical limb ischemia patients who have undergone endovascular revascularization: A survival tree analysis

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are a heterogeneous population and differ in risk of mortality and low extremity amputation (LEA), which complicates clinical decision-making. This study aimed to develop a simple risk scale using decision tree methodology to guide physicians in managing critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients who will benefit from endovascular therapy (EVT).A total of 736 patients with CLI, Rutherford classification (RC) stage ≥4, and prior successful EVT were included. Variables significantly associated with LEA by univariate analysis (P < .05) were selected and put into classification tree analysis using the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model with a dependent variable, amputation, and depth of tree = 3. Four risk groups were generated according to the order of amputation rate. The amputation-free survival (AFS) times between groups were compared using the Kaplan-Meier curve with the log-rank test.Patients were classified as high risk for amputation (G4) (WBC counts ≥10,000/μl, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥130.337); intermediate risk group 1 (G3) (WBC < 10,000/μl and RC stage before EVT > 5); intermediate risk group 2 (G2) (WBC count ≥ 10,000/μl, and PLR < 130.337) and low-risk group (G1) (WBC < 10,000/μl, RC before EVT ≤ 5). G2, G3, and G4 risk groups had shorter AFS time (range, 58.7 to 65.5 months) than the G1 risk group (100 months) (P < .05). Risk of LEA was significantly higher in the G4, G3, and G2 groups than in the G1 group (P ≤ .05). The G4 group had the highest risk of amputation (odds ratio = 6.84, P < .001).This simple risk scale model can help healthcare professionals more easily identify and appropriately treat patients with CLI who are at different levels of risk for LEA following endovascular revascularization.

Endovascular-First Treatment Is Associated With Improved Amputation-Free Survival in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Critical limb ischemia remains a difficult disease to treat, with limited level one data. The BEST-CLI trial (Best Endovascular vs Best Open Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia) is attempting to answer whether initial treatment with open surgical bypass or endovascular therapy improves outcomes, although it remains in enrollment. This study aims to compare amputation-free survival and reintervention rates in patients treated with initial open surgical bypass or endovascular intervention for ischemic ulcers of the lower extremities.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using California nonfederal hospital data linked to statewide death data, all patients with lower extremity ulcers and a diagnosis of peripheral artery disease who underwent a revascularization procedure from 2005 to 2013 were identified. Propensity scores were formulated from baseline patient characteristics. Inverse probability weighting was used with Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine amputation-free survival and time to reintervention for open versus endovascular treatment. Mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to adjust for patient ability to manage their disease and hospital revascularization volume. A total of 16 800 patients were identified. Open surgical bypass was the initial treatment in 5970 (36%) while 10 830 (64%) underwent endovascular interventions. Patients in the endovascular group were slightly younger compared with the open group (70 versus 71 years, ±12 years; P<0.001). Endovascular-first patients were more likely to have comorbid renal failure (36% versus 24%), coronary artery disease (34% versus 32%), congestive heart failure (19% versus 15%), and diabetes mellitus (65% versus 58%; all P values <0.05). After inverse propensity weighting as well as adjustment for patient ability to manage their disease and hospital revascularization experience, open surgery first was associated with a worse amputation-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.13-1.20) with no difference in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-1.11). Endovascular first was associated with higher rates of reintervention (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.14-1.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with critical limb ischemia have multiple comorbidities, and initial surgical bypass is associated with poorer amputation-free survival compared with an endovascular-first approach, perhaps due to increased severity of wounds at the time of presentation.

Below-the-ankle arterial disease severely impairs the outcomes of diabetic patients with ischemic foot ulcers

AIM

To evaluate the impact of below-the-ankle (BTA) arterial disease in people with ischemic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

METHODS

Patients with ischemic DFUs treated by a pre-set limb salvage protocol including peripheral revascularization were included. They were divided in two groups according to the involvement of BTA arteries (BTA+) or not (BTA-). Not healing, minor amputation, major amputation and mortality have been evaluated as primary outcome. Revascularization failure has been evaluated as secondary outcome.

RESULTS

The study group was composed of 272 patients, 120 (44.1%) belonging to BTA+ group and 152 (55.9%) to BTA-. After 1 year of follow-up the outcomes for BTA+ and BTA- were respectively: not healing (40.8 vs 17.8%, p < 0.0001), minor amputation (80.8 vs 20.4%, p < 0.0001), major amputation (18.3 vs 6.6%, p = 0.002), mortality (16.7% vs 10.5%, p = 0.001). The rate of revascularization failure was respectively 38.3 vs 11.2%, p < 0.0001. At the multivariate analysis BTA arterial disease resulted an independent predictor of not healing [OR 3.5 (CI 95% 2.3-6.1) p = 0.0001], minor amputation [OR 3.1 (1.5-5.9) p < 0.0001] and revascularization failure [OR 3.5 (1.9-6.3) p = 0.0001]. BTA+ patients with successful BTA revascularization showed lower rate of not healing (37.8 vs 89.1%) p < 0.0001, minor amputation (74.3 vs 91.3%) p = 0.002 and major amputation (8.1 vs 34.8%) p = 0.0003 in comparison to patients with unsuccessful BTA revascularization.

CONCLUSION

BTA arterial disease severely impairs the outcomes of diabetics with ischemic foot ulcers. BTA revascularization reduces the rate of not healing, minor and major amputation.

Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with mortality, amputation, and impaired quality of life. These Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG) are focused on definition, evaluation, and management of CLTI with the goals of improving evidence-based care and highlighting critical research needs. The term CLTI is preferred over critical limb ischemia, as the latter implies threshold values of impaired perfusion rather than a continuum. CLTI is a clinical syndrome defined by the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in combination with rest pain, gangrene, or a lower limb ulceration >2 weeks duration. Venous, traumatic, embolic, and nonatherosclerotic etiologies are excluded. All patients with suspected CLTI should be referred urgently to a vascular specialist. Accurately staging the severity of limb threat is fundamental, and the Society for Vascular Surgery Threatened Limb Classification system, based on grading of Wounds, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) is endorsed. Objective hemodynamic testing, including toe pressures as the preferred measure, is required to assess CLTI. Evidence-based revascularization (EBR) hinges on three independent axes: Patient risk, Limb severity, and ANatomic complexity (PLAN). Average-risk and high-risk patients are defined by estimated procedural and 2-year all-cause mortality. The GVG proposes a new Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS), which involves defining a preferred target artery path (TAP) and then estimating limb-based patency (LBP), resulting in three stages of complexity for intervention. The optimal revascularization strategy is also influenced by the availability of autogenous vein for open bypass surgery. Recommendations for EBR are based on best available data, pending level 1 evidence from ongoing trials. Vein bypass may be preferred for average-risk patients with advanced limb threat and high complexity disease, while those with less complex anatomy, intermediate severity limb threat, or high patient risk may be favored for endovascular intervention. All patients with CLTI should be afforded best medical therapy including the use of antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and glycemic control agents, as well as counseling on smoking cessation, diet, exercise, and preventive foot care. Following EBR, long-term limb surveillance is advised. The effectiveness of nonrevascularization therapies (eg, spinal stimulation, pneumatic compression, prostanoids, and hyperbaric oxygen) has not been established. Regenerative medicine approaches (eg, cell, gene therapies) for CLTI should be restricted to rigorously conducted randomizsed clinical trials. The GVG promotes standardization of study designs and end points for clinical trials in CLTI. The importance of multidisciplinary teams and centers of excellence for amputation prevention is stressed as a key health system initiative.

Readmissions to an alternate hospital in patients undergoing vascular intervention for claudication and critical limb ischemia associated with significantly higher mortality

BACKGROUND

Hospital readmissions with 30 days after vascular surgical interventions have been associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost. Readmission rates, now a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services quality measure, have been studied in databases that have excluded certain payer types and states and have not accounted for readmission to a hospital different from that of the index admission. More accurate and nationally representative data are needed, because this fragmentation of care could lead to flawed conclusions. The purpose of the present study was to examine the incidence and risk factors for readmission to a nonindex hospital for patients admitted for claudication or critical limb ischemia (CLI). We also examined how this disruption of patient care affects mortality.

METHODS

The 2013 to 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for all patients admitted for claudication or CLI who had undergone angioplasty, lower extremity bypass, or aortobifemoral bypass. The outcomes of interest were 30- and 365-day readmission rates to any hospital, 30- and 365-day readmission rates to a nonindex hospital, and mortality rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for readmission to a nonindex hospital. The most common readmission diagnoses and diagnosis-related groups were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 92,769 patients had been admitted with peripheral vascular disease (33,055 with claudication and 59,714 with CLI). The 30- and 365-day readmission rate was 8.97% and 21.49% and 19.26% and 40.36%, for claudication and CLI, respectively. Of the 30- and 365-day readmissions, 20.47% and 24.92% had occurred at a nonindex hospital, respectively. Significantly higher mortality rates were found for patients with 30- or 365-day readmissions to different hospitals (odds ratio, 1.4 and 1.8, respectively). Multivariable analysis revealed that procedural indication and angioplasty are not significant risk factors for readmission to a different hospital. However, female sex, length of stay >7 days, and Charlson Comorbidity Index >3 remained significant risk factors for nonindex readmissions. The most common disease groups for nonindex readmission were "septicemia and disseminated infections" (6.5%), "heart failure" (6.4%), "other vascular procedures" (6.1%), and "amputation of lower limb except toes" (4.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Previously unreported, ≥1 in 4 readmissions after lower extremity vascular procedures for peripheral vascular disease will occur at a nonindex hospital. This fragmentation of care is associated with increased mortality and has serious implications for guiding outcome and quality measures. With a sizeable portion of patients missed by current metrics, concern exists that providers are using flawed data. Further study into social- and patient-specific risk factors might provide methods to prevent these readmissions and improve outcomes in this difficult patient population.

Utility of skin perfusion pressure values with the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification system

OBJECTIVE

The addition of skin perfusion pressure (SPP) might enhance the predictive value of the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the SPP for each WIfI classification stage among patients with foot wounds by cross-referencing the results of prospectively monitored limb outcomes and to derive the SPP criteria that could be combined with other measurements to grade ischemia for the WIfI classification.

METHODS

From July 2015 to June 2017, patients with foot wounds that met the WIfI classification criteria were prospectively enrolled. We assessed the limbs using the WIfI ischemia grade without measuring the transcutaneous oxygen pressure but measured the SPP. After monitoring for 1 year, the predictability of the WIfI stages was analyzed according to whether the limbs had not healed (unchanged or worsened wounds, minor or major amputation, all-cause death) or had healed (improved or healed wounds) by comparing stages 1 and 2 with stages 3 and 4. We also statistically analyzed the SPP values that could be the boundary values between each ischemia grade and reevaluated the predictability of the WIfI stages with the boundary SPP values.

RESULTS

We enrolled a total of 91 limbs for 76 patients (mean age, 70.5 ± 12.0 years). The mean SPP values stratified by ischemia grade 0 to 3 were 52.1, 41.1, 27.1, and 18.8 mm Hg, respectively (an SPP of <30 mm Hg indicates severe ischemia). After monitoring for 1 year, 19 of 48 limbs in stage 1 and 2 and 35 of 43 in stage 3 and 4 were in the nonhealed group and 29 limbs in stage 1 and 2 and 8 limbs in stage 3 and 4 were in the healed group. The SPP boundary values between each ischemia (I) grade were calculated as 45 mm Hg for I-0/I-1, 35 for I-1/I-2, and 25 for I-2/I-3. When jointly using the boundary SPP values, the ischemia grade changed for 23 limbs, altering the distribution of the WIfI stages and limb outcomes: 11 of 38 limbs in stage 1 and 2 and 43 of 53 in stage 3 and 4 were transferred to the nonhealed group. The sensitivity, efficiency, and negative predictive value of WIfI staging improved when staging with SPP: from 65% to 80%, 70% to 77%, and 60% to 71%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The SPP boundary values that could be used with ischemia grade in the WIfI classification were identified as 45, 35, and 25 mm Hg. The addition of SPP could improve the accuracy of the evaluation.

The Role of Delirium and Other Risk Factors on Mortality in Elderly Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Major Lower Limb Amputation

BACKGROUND

Delirium in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) is associated with increased mortality. The main goal of this study was to investigate the association between delirium and mortality in patients undergoing major lower limb amputation for CLI. In addition, other risk factors associated with mortality were analyzed.

METHODS

An observational cohort study was conducted including all patients aged ≥70 years with CLI undergoing a major lower limb amputation between January 2014 and July 2017. Delirium was scored using the Delirium Observation Screening Score in combination with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Risk factors for mortality were analyzed by calculating hazard ratios using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

In total, 95 patients were included; of which, 29 (31%) patients developed a delirium during admission. Delirium was not associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-1.73; P = 0.84). Variables independently associated with an increased risk of mortality were age (HR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.1), cardiac history (HR 3.3; 95% CI 1.8-6.1), current smoking (HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.6-5.5), preoperative anemia (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.1-7.2), and living in a nursing home (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.4).

CONCLUSION

Delirium was not associated with an increased mortality risk in elderly patients with CLI undergoing a major lower limb amputation. Factors related to an increased mortality risk were age, cardiac history, current smoking, preoperative anemia, and living in a nursing home.

Small Saphenous Vein and Arm Vein as Bypass Grafts for Upper Extremity Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Bypass in the upper extremity is a rare procedure mainly performed for chronic ischemia, trauma, or hemodialysis access complications. Feasibility and success of use of the arm vein and small saphenous vein (SSV) for autologous vein bypass have been reported in peripheral artery bypass procedures. There are very few reports on the use of alternative veins in upper extremity bypass. We report our experience with arm vein and SSV as a graft source in upper extremity arterial disease.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a consecutively collected case series in an academic tertiary referral center from January 2010 to February 2018. Study end points were primary patency, secondary patency, limb salvage, and survival.

RESULTS

In total, 47 patients were treated with upper extremity bypass either using the SSV (n = 17) or arm veins (n = 30). Indications were either acute (n = 12) or chronic ischemia (n = 35) caused by acute (n = 8) and chronic (n = 9) trauma, sequela of iatrogenic interventions (n = 4), peripheral artery disease (n = 14), thrombangiitis obliterans (n = 3), and dialysis-access-related complications (n = 9). An arm vein was used in 30 and the SSV in 17 patients. Primary patency after 12 months was 87% with the SSV and 75% with an arm vein (P = 0.8) and 63% and 75% after 36 months (P = 0.9). Secondary patency were 100% with an arm vein and 100% with the SSV after 36 months (P = 0.4). One patient had to undergo major amputation and 2 minor amputations.

CONCLUSIONS

Arm vein revascularization using the primarily arm vein or SSV as a bypass conduit can be performed with reasonable mortality and morbidity rates and provide good results comparable with the greater saphenous vein.

Experience of the management of coronary artery bypass graft only on moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation: A single-center retrospective study

To summary the impact of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) only on patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation and survival.We retrospectively analyzed 109 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) complicated by moderate mitral regurgitation, from January, 2008 to December, 2014, in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery at the No. 2 Hospital of Jilin University undergoing off pump CABG only. Preoperative clinical characteristics, complications after surgery, and outcome (survivor or death) were assessed. We observed the degree of mitral valve regurgitation, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular and left atrial size, left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) preoperative, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, postoperative 10 days before discharge, and 6 months and longer after surgery. The statistical data were processed by SPSS 19 software with computer; statistical significant difference with P < .05.Overall in-hospital mortality was 2.75% (3 patients). Patients had lower mean LVEF in the postoperative compared with the preoperative period, but all the patients had higher LVEF since 6 months than preoperative period (P < .001). Compared with the preoperative dates, postoperative valvular regurgitation, left ventricular and atrial size and LVEDV postoperative 10 days before discharge, 6 months and more longer after surgery reduced significantly (P < .001). Rapid atrial fibrillation occurred in 19 cases during perioperative and returned to normal before discharge. The symptom of angina was disappeared in all patients before discharge. The mean follow-up time was 60.16 ± 17.98 months (range 36-96 months). Two patients died of major adverse cardiac events including heart failure and ventricular fibrillation. Three patients died of lung cancer, and 2 patients died of stroke during the longer follow-up.Off-pump CABG can be performed safely in patients with CAD complicated by moderate mitral regurgitation. The efficacy of CABG only is well demonstrated by the significant improvement of LVEF and NYHA functional class, and by the decrease of left ventricular and atrial size, LVEDV, and mitral regurgitation grade.

The AtRial Cardiopathy and Antithrombotic Drugs In prevention After cryptogenic stroke randomized trial: Rationale and methods

RATIONALE

Recent data suggest that a thrombogenic atrial substrate can cause stroke in the absence of atrial fibrillation. Such an atrial cardiopathy may explain some proportion of cryptogenic strokes.

AIMS

The aim of the ARCADIA trial is to test the hypothesis that apixaban is superior to aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke in subjects with cryptogenic ischemic stroke and atrial cardiopathy.

SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATE

1100 participants.

METHODS AND DESIGN

Biomarker-driven, randomized, double-blind, active-control, phase 3 clinical trial conducted at 120 U.S. centers participating in NIH StrokeNet.

POPULATION STUDIED

Patients ≥ 45 years of age with embolic stroke of undetermined source and evidence of atrial cardiopathy, defined as ≥ 1 of the following markers: P-wave terminal force >5000 µV × ms in ECG lead V1, serum NT-proBNP > 250 pg/mL, and left atrial diameter index ≥ 3 cm/m2 on echocardiogram. Exclusion criteria include any atrial fibrillation, a definite indication or contraindication to antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, or a clinically significant bleeding diathesis. Intervention: Apixaban 5 mg twice daily versus aspirin 81 mg once daily. Analysis: Survival analysis and the log-rank test will be used to compare treatment groups according to the intention-to-treat principle, including participants who require open-label anticoagulation for newly detected atrial fibrillation.

STUDY OUTCOMES

The primary efficacy outcome is recurrent stroke of any type. The primary safety outcomes are symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and major hemorrhage other than intracranial hemorrhage.

DISCUSSION

ARCADIA is the first trial to test whether anticoagulant therapy reduces stroke recurrence in patients with atrial cardiopathy but no known atrial fibrillation.

Procalcitonin Is a Prognostic Marker of Hospital Outcomes in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia and Diabetic Foot Infection

AIM

To evaluate the prognostic role of procalcitonin (PCT) in patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) and critical limb ischemia (CLI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group was composed of diabetic patients with DFI and CLI. All patients were treated according to a preset limb salvage protocol which includes revascularization, wound debridement, antibiotic therapy, and offloading. Inflammatory markers, including PCT, were evaluated at admission. Only positive values of PCT, greater than 0.5 ng/ml, were considered. Hospital outcomes were categorized as limb salvage (discharge with preserved limb), major amputation (amputation above the ankle), and mortality.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were included. The mean age was 67.3 ± 11.4 years, 80.7% were male, 95.1% had type 2 diabetes, and the mean diabetes duration was 20.5 ± 11.1 with a mean HbA1c of 67 ± 16 mmol/mol. 66/86 (76.8%) of patients had limb salvage, 7/86 (8.1%) had major amputation, and 13/86 (15.1%) died. Patients with positive PCT baseline values in comparison to those with normal values showed a lower rate of limb salvage (30.4 versus 93.6%, p = 0.0001), a higher rate of major amputation (13 versus 6.3%, p = 0.3), and a higher rate of hospital mortality (56.5 versus 0%, p < 0.0001). At the multivariate analysis of independent predictors found at univariate analysis, positive PCT was an independent predictor of major amputation [OR 3.3 (CI 95% 2.0-5.3), p = 0.0001] and mortality [OR 4.1 (CI 95% 2.2-8.3), p < 0.0001].

DISCUSSION

Positive PCT at admission increased the risk of major amputation and mortality in hospital patients with DFI and CLI.

Peroneal bypass versus endovascular peroneal intervention for critical limb ischemia

OBJECTIVE

The peroneal artery is a well-established target for bypass in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of peroneal artery revascularization in terms of wound healing and limb salvage in patients with CLI.

METHODS

Patients presenting between 2006 and 2013 with CLI (Rutherford 4-6) and isolated peroneal runoff were included in the study. They were divided into patients who underwent bypass to the peroneal artery and those who underwent endovascular peroneal artery intervention. Demographics, comorbidities, and follow-up data were recorded. Wounds were classified by Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection (WIfI) score. The primary outcome was wound healing; secondary outcomes included mortality, major amputation, and patency.

RESULTS

There were 200 limbs with peroneal bypass and 138 limbs with endovascular peroneal intervention included, with mean follow-up of 24.0 ± 26.3 and 14.5 ± 19.1 months, respectively (P = .0001). The two groups were comparable in comorbidities, with the exception of the endovascular group's having more patients with cardiac and renal disease and diabetes mellitus but fewer patients with smoking history. Based on WIfI criteria, ischemia scores were worse in bypass patients, but wound and foot infection scores were worse in endovascular patients. Perioperatively, bypass patients had higher rates of myocardial infarction (4.5% vs 0%; P = .012) and incisional complications (13.0% vs 4.4%; P = .008). At 12 months, the bypass group compared with the endovascular group had better primary patency (47.9% vs 23.4%; P = .002) and primary assisted patency (63.6% vs 42.2%; P = .003) and a trend toward better secondary patency (74.2% vs 63.5%; P = .11). There were no differences in the rate of wound healing (52.6% vs 37.7% at 1 year; P = .09) or freedom from major amputation (81.5% vs 74.7% at 1 year; P = .37). In a multivariate analysis, neuropathy was associated with improved wound healing, whereas WIfI wound score, cancer, chronic renal insufficiency, and smoking were associated with decreased wound healing. Treatment modality was not a significant predictor (P = .15).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular peroneal artery intervention results in poorer primary and primary assisted patency rates than surgical bypass to the peroneal artery but provides similar wound healing and limb salvage rates with a lower rate of complications. In appropriately selected patients, endovascular intervention to treat the peroneal artery is a low-risk intervention that may be sufficient to heal ischemic foot wounds.

Gene therapy for peripheral arterial disease

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), caused by narrowing of the arteries in the limbs, is increasing in incidence and prevalence as our population is ageing and as diabetes is becoming more prevalent. PAD can cause pain in the limbs while walking, known as intermittent claudication, or can be more severe and cause pain while at rest, ulceration, and ultimately gangrene and limb loss. This more severe stage of PAD is known as 'critical limb ischaemia'. Treatments for PAD include medications that help to reduce the increased risk of cardiovascular events and help improve blood flow, as well as endovascular or surgical repair or bypass of the blocked arteries. However, many people are unresponsive to medications and are not suited to surgical or endovascular treatment, leaving amputation as the last option. Gene therapy is a novel approach in which genetic material encoding for proteins that may help increase revascularisation is injected into the affected limbs of patients. This type of treatment has been shown to be safe, but its efficacy, especially regarding ulcer healing, effects on quality of life, and other symptomatic outcomes remain unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of gene therapy for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched Cochrane CENTRAL, the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, CINAHL, and AMED, along with trials registries (all searched 27 November 2017). We also checked reference lists of included studies and systematic reviews for further studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised and quasi-randomised studies that evaluated gene therapy versus no gene therapy in people with PAD. We excluded studies that evaluated direct growth hormone treatment or cell-based treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, performed quality assessment, and extracted data from the included studies. We collected pertinent information on each study, as well as data for the outcomes of amputation-free survival, ulcer healing, quality of life, amputation, all-cause mortality, ankle brachial index, symptom scores, and claudication distance.

MAIN RESULTS

We included in this review a total of 17 studies with 1988 participants (evidence current until November 2017). Three studies limited their inclusion to people with intermittent claudication, 12 limited inclusion to people with varying levels of critical limb ischaemia, and two included people with either condition. Study investigators evaluated many different types of gene therapies, using different protocols. Most studies evaluated growth factor-encoding gene therapy, with six studies using vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-encoding genes, four using hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-encoding genes, and three using fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-encoded genes. Two studies evaluated hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) gene therapy, one study used a developmental endothelial locus-1 gene therapy, and the final study evaluated a stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) gene therapy. Most studies reported outcomes after 12 months of follow-up, but follow-up ranged from three months to two years.Overall risk of bias varied between studies, with many studies not providing sufficient detail for adequate determination of low risk of bias for many domains. Two studies did not utilise a placebo control, leading to risk of performance bias. Several studies reported in previous protocols or in their Methods sections that they would report on certain outcomes for which no data were then reported, increasing risk of reporting bias. All included studies reported sponsorships from corporate entities that led to unclear risk of other bias. The overall quality of evidence ranged from moderate to very low, generally as the result of heterogeneity and imprecision, with few or no studies reporting on outcomes.Evidence suggests no clear differences for the outcomes of amputation-free survival, major amputation, and all-cause mortality between those treated with gene therapy and those not receiving this treatment (all moderate-quality evidence). Low-quality evidence suggests improvement in complete ulcer healing with gene therapy (odds ratio (OR) 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 4.59; P = 0.04). We could not combine data on quality of life and can draw no conclusions at this time regarding this outcome (very low-quality evidence). We included one study in the meta-analysis for ankle brachial index, which showed no clear differences between treatments, but we can draw no overall association (low-quality evidence). We combined in a meta-analysis pain symptom scores as assessed by visual analogue scales from two studies and found no clear differences between treatment groups (very low-quality evidence). We carried out extensive subgroup analyses by PAD classification, dosage schedule, vector type, and gene used but identified no substantial differences.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-quality evidence shows no clear differences in amputation-free survival, major amputation, and all-cause mortality between those treated with gene therapy and those not receiving gene therapy. Some evidence suggests that gene therapy may lead to improved complete ulcer healing, but this outcome needs to be explored with improved reporting of the measure, such as decreased ulcer area in cm², and better description of ulcer types and healing. Further standardised data that are amenable to meta-analysis are needed to evaluate other outcomes such as quality of life, ankle brachial index, symptom scores, and claudication distance.

In-hospital versus postdischarge major adverse events within 30 days following lower extremity revascularization

OBJECTIVE

Studies using hospital discharge data likely underestimate postoperative morbidity and mortality after lower extremity revascularization because they fail to capture postdischarge events. However, the degree of underestimation and the timing of postdischarge complications are not well-characterized.

METHODS

We used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program procedure-targeted vascular databases from 2011 to 2015 to tabulate 30-day adverse events (in hospital and after discharge) for lower extremity bypass (LEB) and percutaneous vascular interventions (PVIs) performed for claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

RESULTS

A total of 14,125 patients underwent lower extremity revascularization, 8909 patients (63%) with LEB and 5216 (37%) with PVI. For CLTI, total 30-day mortality was similar between PVI and LEB (2.3% vs 2.1%; P = .61), but in-hospital deaths only accounted for 43% of PVI mortality and only 65% of LEB mortality (P ≤ .001). Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 2.9% of PVI patients and 4.6% of LEB patients (P < .001), with postdischarge events accounting for 37% of PVI events and 18% of LEB (P ≤ .001). Although the 30-day reoperation rates were 14% for PVI and 18% for LEB (P < .001), almost one-half occurred after discharge (PVI 46% vs LEB 44%; P = .55). Any postoperative major adverse events (MAEs) occurred in 22% of patients after PVI and 31% after LEB, with more than one-half occurring after discharge (PVI 56% vs LEB 53%; P = .17). For claudicants, total 30-day mortality was 0.4% for PVI and 0.7% for LEB (P = .32), with the vast majority of events occurring after discharge (PVI 90% vs LEB 50%; P = .049). The 30-day reoperation rates were 5.2% for PVI and 8.0% for LEB (P < .001), with more than one-half occurring after discharge (PVI 63% vs LEB 53%; P = .09). Any MAEs occurred in 7.0% of patients after PVI and 17% after bypass, with the majority occurring after discharge (PVI 65% vs LEB 63%; P = .66).

CONCLUSIONS

Most MAEs occur less frequently after PVI than LEB. However, a significant number of major of adverse events after lower extremity revascularization occur after leaving the hospital, especially after PVI, which may overestimate its benefits compared with LEB if only in-hospital data are evaluated. These data demonstrate the importance of reporting 30-day rather than in-hospital outcomes when evaluating postoperative adverse events.

Comparison of the flexible parametric survival model and Cox model in estimating Markov transition probabilities using real-world data

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Markov micro-simulation models are being increasingly used in health economic evaluations. An important feature of the Markov micro-simulation model is its ability to consider transition probabilities of heterogeneous subgroups with different risk profiles. A survival analysis is generally performed to accurately estimate the transition probabilities associated with the risk profiles. This study aimed to apply a flexible parametric survival model (FPSM) to estimate individual transition probabilities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data were obtained from a cohort study investigating ischemic stroke outcomes in Western China. In total, 585 subjects were included in the analysis. To explore the goodness of fit of the FPSM, we compared the estimated hazard ratios and baseline cumulative hazards, both of which are necessary to the calculate individual transition probabilities, and the Markov micro-simulation models constructed using the FPSM and Cox model to determine the validity of the two Markov micro-simulation models and cost-effectiveness results.

RESULTS

The flexible parametric proportional hazards model produced hazard ratio and baseline cumulative hazard estimates that were similar to those obtained using the Cox proportional hazards model. The simulated cumulative incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke and 5-years cost-effectiveness of Incremental cost-effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) were also similar using the two approaches. A discrepancy in the results was evident between the 5-years cost-effectiveness and the 10-years cost-effectiveness of ICERs, which were approximately 0.9 million (China Yuan) and 0.5 million (China Yuan), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The flexible parametric survival model represents a good approach for estimating individual transition probabilities for a Markov micro-simulation model.

Surgery versus thrombolysis for initial management of acute limb ischaemia

BACKGROUND

Both peripheral arterial thrombolysis and surgery can be used in the management of peripheral arterial ischaemia. Much is known about the indications, risks, and benefits of thrombolysis. However, whether thrombolysis works better than surgery for initial management of acute limb ischaemia remains unknown. This is the second update of the review first published in 2002.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether thrombolysis or surgery is the more effective technique in the initial management of acute limb ischaemia due to thromboembolism.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist (CIS) searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, CINAHL, AMED, and clinical trials registries up to 7 May 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled studies comparing thrombolysis and surgery for initial treatment of acute limb ischaemia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Agreement was reached by consensus. We performed analyses using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified no new studies for this update. We included five trials with a total of 1292 participants; agents used for thrombolysis were recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and urokinase. Trials were generally of moderate methodological quality. The quality of evidence according to GRADE was generally low owing to risk of bias (lack of blinding), imprecision in estimates, and heterogeneity.Trial results showed no clear differences in limb salvage, amputation, or death at 30 days (odds ratio (OR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 2.55, 4 studies, 636 participants; OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.85, 3 studies, 616 participants; OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.14, 4 studies, 636 participants, respectively), and we rated the evidence as low, low, and moderate quality, respectively. Trial results show no clear differences for any of the three outcomes at six months or one year between initial surgery and initial thrombolysis. A single study evaluated vessel patency, so no overall association could be determined (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.76, 20 participants; very low-quality evidence). Evidence of increased risk of major haemorrhage (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.79 to 5.78, 4 studies, 1070 participants; low-quality evidence) and distal embolisation (OR 31.68, 95% CI 6.23 to 161.07, 3 studies, 678 participants; very low-quality evidence) was associated with thrombolysis treatment at 30 days, and there was no clear difference in stroke (OR 5.33, 95% CI 0.95 to 30.11, 5 studies, 1180 participants; low-quality evidence). Participants treated by initial thrombolysis had a greater reduction in the level of intervention required, compared with a pre-intervention prediction, at 30 days (OR 9.06, 95% CI 4.95 to 16.56, 2 studies, 502 participants). None of the included studies evaluated time to thrombolysis as an outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no evidence in favour of either initial thrombolysis or initial surgery as the preferred option in terms of limb salvage, amputation, or death at 30 days, six months, or one year. Low-quality evidence suggests that thrombolysis may be associated with higher risk of haemorrhagic complications and ongoing limb ischaemia (distal embolisation). The higher risk of complications must be balanced against risks of surgery in each individual case. Trial results show no statistical difference in stroke, but the confidence interval is very wide, making it difficult to interpret whether this finding is clinically important. We used GRADE criteria to assess the quality of the evidence as generally low. We downgraded quality owing to risk of bias, imprecision, and heterogeneity between included studies.

Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Ischemic Stroke and High-Risk TIA

BACKGROUND

Combination antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin may reduce the rate of recurrent stroke during the first 3 months after a minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). A trial of combination antiplatelet therapy in a Chinese population has shown a reduction in the risk of recurrent stroke. We tested this combination in an international population.

METHODS

In a randomized trial, we assigned patients with minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA to receive either clopidogrel at a loading dose of 600 mg on day 1, followed by 75 mg per day, plus aspirin (at a dose of 50 to 325 mg per day) or the same range of doses of aspirin alone. The dose of aspirin in each group was selected by the site investigator. The primary efficacy outcome in a time-to-event analysis was the risk of a composite of major ischemic events, which was defined as ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from an ischemic vascular event, at 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 4881 patients were enrolled at 269 international sites. The trial was halted after 84% of the anticipated number of patients had been enrolled because the data and safety monitoring board had determined that the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin was associated with both a lower risk of major ischemic events and a higher risk of major hemorrhage than aspirin alone at 90 days. Major ischemic events occurred in 121 of 2432 patients (5.0%) receiving clopidogrel plus aspirin and in 160 of 2449 patients (6.5%) receiving aspirin plus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.95; P=0.02), with most events occurring during the first week after the initial event. Major hemorrhage occurred in 23 patients (0.9%) receiving clopidogrel plus aspirin and in 10 patients (0.4%) receiving aspirin plus placebo (hazard ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.87; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA, those who received a combination of clopidogrel and aspirin had a lower risk of major ischemic events but a higher risk of major hemorrhage at 90 days than those who received aspirin alone. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; POINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00991029 .).

Preventing Major Amputations in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the risks of lower extremity amputation associated with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and discusses current therapies that can prevent amputation in CLI.

RECENT FINDINGS

CLI remains an under-recognized condition associated with high rates of major amputation and disparities in care. Optimal medical therapy can reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and limb events, but revascularization combined with close wound care remains the cornerstone of amputation prevention. Endovascular revascularization has become more common over time and has been associated with a reduction in amputation rates. Ongoing clinical trials will help inform best practices for revascularization strategies and techniques. Vascular care is inconsistent across the USA, with significant variation in access to care revascularization rates and rates of major amputation. Major amputation can be prevented in patients with CLI when optimal medical therapy, lifestyle modification, and revascularization are provided in a multidisciplinary setting.

Treatment of infrapopliteal post-PTA dissection with tack implants: 12-month results from the TOBA-BTK study

OBJECTIVES

The Tack implant is designed for focal, minimal metal management of dissections. This study evaluated Tacks for treating postpercutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) dissection in patients with below-the-knee (BTK) arterial occlusive disease.

BACKGROUND

PTA is the most commonly used endovascular treatment for patients with occlusive disease of the BTK vessels. Post-PTA dissection is a significant clinical problem that results in poor outcomes, but currently there are limited treatment options for managing dissections.

METHODS

This prospective, single-arm study evaluated patients with CLI and BTK lesions; 11.4% were Rutherford category (RC) 4 and 88.6% were RC 5. BTK occlusive disease was treated with standard PTA and post-PTA dissections were treated with Tack placement. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of major adverse limb events (MALE) and perioperative death (POD) at 30 days. Other endpoints included: device success; procedure success (vessel patency in the absence of MALE); freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR); primary patency; and changes in RC. Data through 12 months are presented.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of 35 (91.4%) patients had post-PTA dissection and successful deployment of Tacks. Procedural success was achieved in 34/35 (97.1%) patients with no MALEs at 30 days. The 12-month patency rate was 78.4% by vessel, 77.4% by patient, and freedom from CD-TLR was 93.5%. Significant (P < .0001) improvement from baseline was observed in RC (75% of patients improved 4 or 5 steps).

CONCLUSION

Tack implant treatment of post-PTA dissection was safe and effective for treatment of BTK dissections and resulted in reasonable 12-month patency and low rates of CD-TLR.

Critical limb ischemia: current challenges and future prospects

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is considered the most severe pattern of peripheral artery disease. It is defined by the presence of chronic ischemic rest pain, ulceration or gangrene attributable to the occlusion of peripheral arterial vessels. It is associated with a high risk of major amputation, cardiovascular events and death. In this review, we presented a complete overview about physiopathology, diagnosis and holistic management of CLI. Revascularization is the first-line treatment, but several challenging cases are not treatable by conventional techniques. Unconventional techniques for the treatment of complex below-the-knee arterial disease are described. Furthermore, the state-of-the-art on gene and cell therapy for the treatment of no-option patients is reported.