Financial Toxicities Persist for Cancer Survivors Irrespective of Current Cancer Status: An Analysis of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

This study estimates the out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures for different cancer types among survivors with current vs no current cancer condition and across sex, which is understudied in the literature. This is a cross-sectional study of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data for 2009-2018 where the primary outcome was the average per year OOP expenditure incurred by cancer survivors. Of 189 285 respondents, 15 010 (7.93%) were cancer survivors; among them, 46.28% had a current cancer condition. Average per year OOP expenditure for female survivors with a current condition of breast cancer ($1730), lung cancer ($1679), colon cancer ($1595), melanoma ($1783), non-Hodgkin lymphoma ($1656), nonmelanoma/other skin cancer (NMSC, $2118) and two or more cancers ($2310) were significantly higher than that of women with no history of cancer ($853, all P < .05). Similarly, average per year OOP expenditure for male survivors with a current condition of prostate cancer ($1457), lung cancer ($1131), colon cancer ($1471), melanoma ($1474), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma ($1653), NMSC ($1789), and bladder cancer ($2157) were significantly higher compared with the men with no history of cancer ($621, all P < .05). These differences persisted in survivors with no current cancer condition for breast cancer among women; prostate, lung, colon, and bladder cancer among men; and melanoma, NMSC, and two or more cancers among both sexes. OOP expenditure varied across cancer types and by sex for survivors with and without a current cancer condition. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions for cancer survivors.

Neuropathic pain prevalence and risk factors in head and neck cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Neuropathic pain (NP) is a debilitating symptom among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors although few large studies report its prevalence and associated risk factors.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey assessing demographic, behavioral, and clinical risk factors for NP. NP was assessed using the Self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs pain scale (S-LANSS).

RESULTS

Forty-five percent (227/505) reported having pain including 13.7% (69/505) who were positive for S-LANSS. Reported pain sites were in the regions of the head and oral cavity (46.2%) and neck and throat (41.5%). Despite a higher self-reported use of analgesic medication (NP+ = 41.2%; NP- = 27.4%; p = 0.020) and alternative pain therapies (NP+ = 19.1%; NP- = 8.4%; p = 0.009), severe pain was more prevalent among those with NP (N+ = 23.2%; NP- = 13.3%; p = 0.004). Adjusted for opioid medications, ethnicity/race, age, surgery, depression, and comorbidities were risk factors for NP.

CONCLUSION

NP remains prevalent in HNC survivors highlighting the importance of routine pain surveillance.

Healthcare Provider Recommendations and Observed Changes in HPV Vaccination Acceptance during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Healthcare provider (HCP) recommendation of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is crucial for HPV vaccination acceptance and uptake. It is unclear to what extent the disruptive effect of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the recommendation and acceptance of HPV vaccination. HCPs practicing in Texas were invited to complete an online survey between January and April 2021. This population-based survey examined the association between HPV vaccination recommendation by HCPs and their observed changes in HPV vaccination acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the total 715 HCPs included in this study, 13.9% reported a decrease, 8.7% reported an increase, and 77.5% reported no change in HPV vaccination acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared to the HCPs who never/sometimes recommend HPV vaccination, those who often/always recommend HPV vaccination were less likely to observe a decrease (12.3% vs. 22.1%) and more likely to observe an increase in HPV vaccination (9.1% vs. 6.2%), during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, those who provided recommendations often/always had 46% (odds ratio: 0.54; 95%CI: 0.30–0.96) lower odds of reporting a decrease in HPV vaccination acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study adds to prior evidence of the positive influence of provider recommendations on HPV vaccination acceptance despite the disruptive effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer prevention services.

Short-form adaptive measure of financial toxicity from the Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) study: Derivation using modern psychometric techniques

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate advanced psychometric properties of the 15-item Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) measure of financial toxicity for cancer patients.

METHODS

We surveyed 515 cancer patients in the greater Houston metropolitan area using ENRICh from March 2019 to March 2020. We conducted a series of factor analyses alongside parametric and non-parametric item response theory (IRT) assessments using Mokken analysis and the graded response model (GRM). We utilized parameters derived from the GRM to run a simulated computerized adaptive test (CAT) assessment.

RESULTS

Among participants, mean age was 58.49 years and 278 (54%) were female. The initial round factor analysis results suggested a one-factor scale structure. Negligible levels of differential item functioning (DIF) were evident between eight items. Three items were removed due to local interdependence (Q3>+0.4). The original 11-point numerical rating scale did not function well, and a new 3-point scoring system was implemented. The final 12-item ENRICh had acceptable fit to the GRM (p<0.001; TLI = 0.94; CFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.09; RMSR = 0.06) as well as good scalability and dimensionality. We observed high correlation between CAT version scores and the 12-item measure (r = 0.98). During CAT, items 2 (money you owe) and 4 (stress level about finances) were most frequently administered, followed by items 1 (money in savings) and 5 (ability to pay bills). Scores from these four items alone were strongly correlated with that of the 12-item ENRICh (r = 0.96).

CONCLUSION

These CAT and 4-item versions provide options for quick screening in clinical practice and low-burden assessment in research.

Genetic variants in CYP2B6 and HSD17B12 associated with risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA) metabolism-related genes play an important role in the development of cancers. We assessed the associations of genetic variants in genes involved in the metabolism of PAHs and TSNA with risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in European populations using two published genome-wide association study datasets. In the single-locus analysis, we identified two SNPs (rs145533669 and rs35246205) in CYP2B6 to be associated with risk of SCCHN (P = 1.57 × 10-4 and .004, respectively), two SNPs (EPHX1 rs117522494 and CYP2B6 rs145533669) to be associated with risk of oropharyngeal cancer (P = .001 and .004, respectively), and one SNP (rs4359199 in HSD17B12) to be associated with risk of oral cancer (P = .006). A significant interaction effect was found between rs4359199 and drinking status on risks of SCCHN and oropharyngeal cancer (P < .05). eQTL and sQTL analyzes revealed that two SNPs (CYP2B6 rs35246205 and HSD17B12 rs4359199) were correlated with alternative splicing or mRNA expression levels of the corresponding genes in liver cells (P < .05 for both). In silico functional annotation suggested that these two SNPs may regulate mRNA expression by affecting the binding of transcription factors. Results from phenome-wide association studies presented significant associations between these genes and risks of other cancers, smoking behavior and alcohol dependence (P < .05). Thus, our study provided some insight into the underlying genetic mechanism of head and neck cancer, which warrants future functional validation.

Cross-ancestry genome-wide meta-analysis of 61,047 cases and 947,237 controls identifies new susceptibility loci contributing to lung cancer

To identify new susceptibility loci to lung cancer among diverse populations, we performed cross-ancestry genome-wide association studies in European, East Asian and African populations and discovered five loci that have not been previously reported. We replicated 26 signals and identified 10 new lead associations from previously reported loci. Rare-variant associations tended to be specific to populations, but even common-variant associations influencing smoking behavior, such as those with CHRNA5 and CYP2A6, showed population specificity. Fine-mapping and expression quantitative trait locus colocalization nominated several candidate variants and susceptibility genes such as IRF4 and FUBP1. DNA damage assays of prioritized genes in lung fibroblasts indicated that a subset of these genes, including the pleiotropic gene IRF4, potentially exert effects by promoting endogenous DNA damage.

HPV Vaccination Uptake, Hesitancy and Refusal: Observations of Healthcare Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic

HPV vaccination is highly effective at preventing several types of cancer; however, vaccine uptake is suboptimal. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted participation in preventive measures such as HPV vaccination. To assess changes and barriers to HPV vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a statewide cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Texas. Specifically, we evaluated changes observed by HCPs regarding HPV vaccination i) hesitancy, ii) refusal, and iii) uptake, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Decreases in HPV vaccination uptake were reported by 19.3% of HCPs whereas, increased HPV vaccination hesitancy and refusal were reported by 17.1% and 14.8% of HCPs in Texas, respectively. The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on HPV vaccination. Our study identified barriers to HPV vaccination that are unique to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract 435: COVID-19 & cancer prevention in Texas: Reasons cited for HPV vaccination hesitancy and refusal during the pandemic

Background: HPV vaccination is highly effective at preventing several squamous cell carcinomas. However, the uptake of this vaccine remains sub-optimal in the US, with further exacerbation of this poor uptake during the pandemic. This study aims to describe changes and barriers to HPV vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic as observed by healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the state of Texas.

Methods: Data for this study were derived from a statewide cross-sectional survey of HCPs in the state of Texas (n=1283). Survey instruments were developed at MD Anderson Cancer Center, and reviewed by its IRB. Survey frequencies were used to estimate for the proportional distribution of changes as observed by HCPs regarding HPV vaccination i) uptake ii) hesitancy and iii) refusal during the COVID-19 pandemic. HCPs who observed increases in vaccination hesitancy or refusal, were then asked for the reasons cited by their patients. Survey frequencies were then used to determine the proportional distribution of the reasons cited for HPV vaccination hesitancy and refusal during the pandemic. All statistical analysis were conducted using R version 3.5.2.

Results: Overall, 730 HCPs responded to the study questions of interest. A predominant proportion of respondents were employed in group practice settings or university teaching/affiliated hospitals. About 20% of HCPs in Texas observed decreases in HPV vaccination uptake. Observed increments in HPV vaccination hesitancy and refusal were reported by 17.1% and 14.8% of HCPs, respectively. Among HCPs who observed increased hesitancy and refusal, difficulties in scheduling clinic visit during the pandemic and fear of contracting corona virus during the clinic visit were the most cited reasons.

Discussion: Findings of the index study suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on HPV vaccination in Texas. Results identify perceived barriers to HPV vaccination unique to the pandemic. With the pandemic still ongoing, amid the emergence of novel strains with heightened virulence, despite the presence of highly effective FDA-approved vaccines, findings of this study provides useful insight for public health interventions, as well as to guide physician-patient interactions around HPV vaccination.

Citation Format: Onyema Chido-Amajuoyi, Mala Pande, Robert Yu, Sanjay Shete. COVID-19 & cancer prevention in Texas: Reasons cited for HPV vaccination hesitancy and refusal during the pandemic [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 435.

Abstract 2209: HPV non-vaccination due to safety concerns/side effects: Variations in vaccination intentions by Parent-Child Gender, National Immunization Survey - Teen, 2010 - 2019

Background: Gender-generated disparities in HPV vaccination uptake have the potential to further perpetuate existing disparities in HPV-associated cancers. This study examines the influence of parent-child gender on intent to not vaccinate against HPV due to safety/side effect concerns.

Methods: Study data was from the National Immunization Survey-Teen (2010 - 2019). Weighted prevalence of intention to refuse HPV vaccination due to safety/side effect concerns were stratified by parent-child gender. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to examine for associations between intentions to refuse HPV vaccination due to safety concern/side effects and parent-child gender.

Results: Over the study period, intentions to refuse HPV vaccination due to safety concerns rose among all parent-child gender pairings but was highest among respondent mothers when pertaining to their unvaccinated daughters. Results revealed statistically significant increased likelihood of having intentions to refuse HPV vaccination due to safety concerns among all parent-child combinations, compared to father-son pairs. These odds were consistently highest among mother-daughter pairs; 9.25 times more likely (95% CI: 6.34-13.51) than father-son pairs in 2010. In 2019, compared to father - son pairs, fathers were 1.94 (95% CI: 1.21-3.12) times more likely to report intention to not vaccinate against HPV for their daughters; while mothers were 2.23 (95% CI: 1.57-3.17) times more likely to report intentions to refuse HPV vaccination for their sons; and 2.87 (95% CI: 2.02-4.07) more likely for their daughters.

Conclusions: Intentions to refuse HPV vaccination due to safety concern/side effects varied by gender of the responding parent and pertinent child. Study findings are persistent and constantly increased over a 10-year period. Interventions aimed at correcting gender-based misperceptions, as well as to counter misinformation about the safety of the HPV vaccine are warranted.

Citation Format: Onyema Chido-Amajuoyi, rajesh talluri, Inimfon Jackson, Sahil Shete, Joel Fokom Domgue, Sanjay Shete. HPV non-vaccination due to safety concerns/side effects: Variations in vaccination intentions by Parent-Child Gender, National Immunization Survey - Teen, 2010 - 2019 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2209.

Association of hearing loss and tinnitus symptoms with health-related quality of life among long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the association of hearing loss and tinnitus with overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among long-term oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors.

METHODS

This study included OPC survivors treated between 2000 and 2013 and surveyed from September 2015 to July 2016. Hearing loss and tinnitus were measured by asking survivors to rate their "difficulty with hearing loss and/or ringing in the ears" from 0 (not present) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine). Hearing loss and tinnitus scores were categorized as follows: 0 for none, 1-4 for mild, and 5-10 for moderate to severe. The primary outcome was the mean score of MD nderson Symptom Inventory Head & Neck module interference component as a HRQoL surrogate dichotomized as follows: 0 to 4 for none to mild and 5 to 10 for moderate to severe interference.

RESULTS

Among 880 OPC survivors, 35.6% (314), reported none, 39.3% (347) reported mild, and 25.1% (221) reported moderate to severe hearing loss and tinnitus. On multivariable analysis, mild (OR, 5.83; 95% CI; 1.48-22.88; p = 0.012) and moderate (OR, 30.01; 95% CI; 7.96-113.10; p < 0.001) hearing loss and tinnitus were associated with higher odds of reporting moderate to severe symptom interference scores in comparison to no hearing loss and tinnitus. This association of hearing dysfunction was consistent with all domains of HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide preliminary evidence to support the need for continued audiological evaluations and surveillance to detect hearing dysfunction, to allow for early management and to alleviate the long-term impact on QoL.

A multicenter study of clinical impact of variant of uncertain significance reclassification in breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer susceptibility genes

10512

Background: Up to 10% of all cancers are attributable to germline mutations and identifying mutation carriers is critical for cancer prevention. Clinical interpretation of genetic test results is complicated by variants of uncertain significance (VUS) with unknown impact on health, which can be clarified through reclassification. However, there is little empirical evidence regarding VUS reclassification in oncology care settings, including the prevalence and outcomes of reclassification, racial/ethnic differences, and the proportion of patients who undergo cancer preventive healthcare management as a result of VUS reclassification. Methods: Retrospective analysis of persons carrying VUS (with or without an accompanying pathogenic or likely pathogenic [P/LP] variant) in breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer genes who underwent genetic counseling at four geographically dispersed cancer care settings (in Texas, Florida, Ohio, and New Jersey) between 2013 and 2019, and followed until 2020. Results: Among 2,715 individuals, 3,261 VUS and 313 P/LP variants were reported and 11% (300/2,715) had a P/LP in addition to VUS. In total, 8.1% of all individuals with VUS experienced reclassifications, 87.1% of which were downgraded to benign or likely benign and 12.9% were upgraded to P/LP. Reclassification rates varied significantly among cancer care settings from 4.81% to 20.19% (overall p < 0.001). The reclassification pattern across genes suggests that VUS in most genes underwent reclassification at a rate proportional to their prevalence in the overall sample and occurred commonly in ATM, BRCA2, BRCA1, and CHEK2. Compared to their prevalence in the sample, reclassification rates were higher for Blacks (13.6% vs 19.0%), lower for Asians (6.3% vs 3.5%), and proportional for Whites and Hispanics. Median time to reclassification decreased steadily between 2014 and 2019 from 3.08 to 0.91 years. Overall, 11.3% of all reclassified VUS resulted in clinically actionable findings and 4.6% subsequently changed individuals’ clinical managements including prophylactic surgeries and intensive screenings for cancer prevention and early detection. Conclusions: In this large multisite study, VUS reclassification changed clinical management for 0.4% of all individuals. VUS reclassification may alter clinical management, has implications for precision cancer prevention, and highlights the need for standardized clinical practice guidelines and policies for returning reclassified results to patients.

Are beliefs about the importance of genetics for cancer prevention and early detection associated with high risk cancer genetic testing in the U.S. Population?

Public attitudes towards germline genetic testing for inherited cancers have been found to be generally positive. Past research demonstrated that diverse causal beliefs and contextual factors are associated with uptake of genetic testing. However, it is unclear how beliefs about genetically informed cancer prevention and early detection ultimately shape testing behaviors. We used data from the National Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5 Cycle 4) to evaluate these beliefs and the relationship between beliefs related to cancer genetics and participation in cancer genetic testing. Overall, 5.24% of the total weighted sample underwent cancer genetic testing, of whom 70.5% (n = 141) had no personal history of cancer, whereas others had a personal diagnosis of breast, ovarian, or colorectal cancer (23.0%), or other cancers (6.5%). In adjusted multivariable analysis, testing was positively associated with personal history of breast, ovarian, or colorectal cancer (OR = 28.37, 95% CI: 10.19–79.04), female sex (OR = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.41–6.26), having high cancer worry (OR = 4.78, 95%: 2.19–10.45), and negatively associated with being Hispanic (OR = 0.37, 95%: 0.16–0.86) or non-Hispanic Asian (OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04–0.33). Belief in the importance of genetics for early detection of cancer was associated with testing (OR = 18.03, 95% CI: 4.07–79.79), whereas belief in the importance of genetics for cancer prevention was not. The association between testing and belief about the importance of genetics for early detection of cancer, but not cancer prevention, is a surprising finding that warrants further research. Better understanding of these beliefs and their potential impact on test uptake may inform population genetic testing efforts.

Immune-related adverse events and symptom burden in patients with melanoma receiving adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor

TPS12147

Background: Adjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is approved for melanoma, but immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remain a challenge. Although acute toxicities are well defined, long-term AEs and impact on quality of life (QOL) are undetermined. Available data derived from clinical trials involve highly selected populations and do not reflect real world experience. Additionally, trials measure outcomes only at predetermined endpoints, and symptoms may vary throughout the course of therapy. Moreover, the pathogenesis of irAEs and symptoms remains poorly understood. We hypothesize that AEs and sustained inflammation induced by adjuvant ICIs increase symptom burden and negatively impact function and QOL in a subset of patients (pts), and elevated expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and T cell signatures during therapy correlate with toxicity and symptom burden. Our preliminary data identified i) interleukin-6/Th-17 pathway as a possible mediator of irAEs, ii) immune reactivity and increases in inflammatory cytokines are associated with symptom burden in cancer survivors, and iii) prioritized 30 genetic markers conferring risk for irAEs in ICI-treated melanoma pts. Methods: This is a prospective longitudinal cohort study to evaluate potential toxicity/symptom burden and immune correlates in melanoma pts receiving adjuvant ICIs (NCT04990726). A total of 240 pts will be enrolled. Eligibility criteria: age ≥18 years (yrs), surgically resected stage II, III, or IV melanoma, initiating adjuvant nivolumab or pembrolizumab, no prior systemic therapy for melanoma, and no prior autoimmune diseases. Patients will be assessed at baseline (before ICI infusion) and every 3 months (mos) up to 2 yrs or until attrition or death. The primary endpoint is the incidence rate of any irAEs at 12 mos. Demographics, personal/family history, comorbidities, tumor history/stage, prior therapies, performance status, concurrent medications, and other factors that play a role in pts perceptions of disease are collected. At each visit, pts undergo a clinical evaluation to assess potential irAEs, new comorbidities, and tumor recurrence. Patient-reported outcomes of fatigue, depression, sleep disturbance, and QOL are collected at each visit to assess changes from baseline up to 2 yrs. In addition to standard methods of data collection at pre-specified times, we leverage mobile technology to capture symptoms and AEs in real time. Longitudinal blood samples will characterize pts immune signatures from baseline up to 2 yrs to evaluate their association with irAEs, symptom burden, and QOL, and to compare the genotype of pts with and without irAEs. To characterize the effect of adjuvant ICI on bone health, eligible pts are evaluated by whole body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and at 12 mos as an exploratory aim. The study is currently active, and 27 pts are enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04990726.

Factors associated with adherence to remote patient monitoring for early detection of dehydration risk during radiation treatment for head and neck cancer

6076

Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) may improve the early detection and mitigation of cancer treatment-related complications, health-related outcomes and quality of life. RPM’s success may depend, in part, on patients’ adherence to remote monitoring protocols. However, factors that influence adherence to RPM are largely unknown. Daily blood pressure/pulse (BP/P), weight, and electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) were monitored remotely in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiation treatment (RT) to identify dehydration risk. We evaluated potential factors associated with RPM adherence. Methods: During RT (average 6 to 7 weeks), participants were asked to take daily (Monday-Friday) measures of BP/P and weight using Bluetooth-enabled devices and to complete daily ePROs using a mobile tablet application (app). Data were provided to their physicians for daily review. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck (MDASI-HN) was completed at baseline and end of RT, and 6-8 weeks post-RT completion. The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) was completed at baseline and 6-8 weeks post-RT completion. A device usability survey measuring perceived usefulness of RPM was completed at the end of RT. Adherence to daily monitoring was recorded objectively. Longitudinal analyses compared the relationship between demographic, clinical, and PRO data and monitoring adherence. Results: Participants (n = 169) were 80% male, 87% White, and 91% married. Overall adherence to monitoring BP/P, weight, and ePROs was 83%, 82% and 74%, respectively. Greater HN-specific symptom severity and interference was associated with decreased adherence to daily monitoring of BP/P, weight, and ePROs (P< 0.021). Higher PAM scores were associated with higher adherence to daily monitoring of BP/P only (p = 0.006). Participants reported modest levels of perceived usefulness of RPM across four categories: symptom management, early problem detection, illness monitoring by healthcare provider, and feeling of security during RT. Only a single item indicating perceived feeling of security was associated with greater adherence to daily monitoring of blood pressure/pulse (p = 0.032) and weight (p = 0.007). Conclusions: A benefit of frequent RPM may be early detection and mitigation of symptoms during RT for HNC, however, increasing symptom burden experienced during treatment may interfere with adherence to daily monitoring. Better adherence may be attributed to patients perceiving a sense of security from daily monitoring and may suggest a potentially important value that patients gain from RPM. Understanding factors that impact patient adherence to RPM may help improve acceptability and clinical utility of RPM in oncology. Clinical trial information: NCT02253238.

Alleviating breathlessness in patients with cancer with dexamethasone (ABCD): A parallel-group, double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT)

12112

Background: Systemic corticosteroids are commonly prescribed for palliation of dyspnea in patients with cancer; however, evidence to support their use is limited. A small RCT suggested that dexamethasone may be efficacious. In this confirmatory RCT, we compared the effect of high dose dexamethasone and placebo on dyspnea in patients with cancer. Methods: This NCI-funded, multi-site, double-blind, parallel group RCT enrolled ambulatory patients with cancer, age ≥18, dyspnea ≥4/10 and randomly assigned them to receive dexamethasone 8 mg orally every 12 hours for 7 days followed by 4 mg orally every 12 hours for 7 days or matching placebo capsules. Permuted block randomization (block size = 6, 2:1) was conducted, stratified by baseline dyspnea and study site. Patients, research staff and clinicians were blinded. The primary outcome was change in average dyspnea intensity assessed with a 0-10 numeric rating scale (0 = none, 10 = worst) between baseline and day 7. Secondary outcomes included the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and adverse effects (CTCAE v4.02). Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted with linear models to compare between groups. The planned sample size of 201 patients provided 80% power to detect a mean difference of 1.0 between treatment groups with a two-sided α of 5%, assuming a standard deviation of 2.0 and 15% attrition. (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03367156). Results: Between 1/11/2017 and 4/23/2021, we enrolled 149 patients and 128 received the blinded study interventions (dexamethasone n = 85, placebo n = 43). Enrollment was terminated early by the Data Safety Monitoring Board when futility criterion was met in pre-planned interim analysis. The mean change in dyspnea NRS intensity between baseline and day 7 was -1.6 (95% CI -2, -1.2) in the dexamethasone group and -1.6 (95% CI -2.3, -0.9) in the placebo group, with no significant between-group difference (mean 0, 95% CI -0.8, 0.7; P = 0.91). Secondary analyses showed that the dexamethasone group had a significantly better ESAS appetite (mean difference -1.2, 95% CI -2.2, -0.1; P = 0.03) and well being (mean -1, 95% CI -1.8, -0.2; P = 0.02), and worse ESAS anxiety (mean 1.1, 95% CI 0.3, 1.9; P = 0.01) and depression (mean 0.9, 95% CI 0.1, 1.7; P = 0.02) compared to placebo. Similar magnitude of changes in dyspnea and ESAS symptoms were observed by day 14. Adverse effects were reported more frequently in the dexamethasone group (any grade): insomnia (38% v. 12%), neuropsychiatric symptoms (31% vs. 7%), infections (21% v. 12%), dyspepsia (26% v. 12%), edema (18% v. 9%), hiccups (12% v. 7%), flushing (9% v. 5%) and respiratory distress (6% v. 0%). More patients in the dexamethasone group required hospitalization within 30 d of last study medication (25% vs. 7%, P = 0.02). Conclusions: High dose dexamethasone did not improve dyspnea in patients with cancer more than placebo and was associated with more adverse events. Clinical trial information: NCT03367156.

Genetic susceptibility to patient-reported xerostomia among long-term oropharyngeal cancer survivors

Genetic susceptibility for xerostomia, a common sequela of radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer, is unknown. Therefore, to identify genetic variants associated with moderate to severe xerostomia, we conducted a GWAS of 359 long-term oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survivors using 579,956 autosomal SNPs. Patient-reported cancer treatment-related xerostomia was assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. Patient response was dichotomized as moderate to severe or none to mild symptoms. In our study, 39.2% of OPC survivors reported moderate to severe xerostomia. Our GWAS identified eight SNPs suggestively associated with higher risk of moderate to severe xerostomia in six genomic regions (2p13.3, rs6546481, Minor Allele (MA) = A, ANTXR1, P = 4.3 × 10-7; 5p13.2-p13.1, rs16903936, MA = G, EGFLAM, P = 5.1 × 10-6; 4q21.1, rs10518156, MA = G, SHROOM3, P = 7.1 × 10-6; 19q13.42, rs11882068, MA = G, NLRP9, P = 1.7 × 10-5; 12q24.33, rs4760542, MA = G, GLT1D1, P = 1.8 × 10-5; and 3q27.3, rs11714564, MA = G, RTP1, P = 2.9 × 10-5. Seven SNPs were associated with lower risk of moderate to severe xerostomia, of which only one mapped to specific genomic region (15q21.3, rs4776140, MA = G, LOC105370826, a ncRNA class RNA gene, P = 1.5 × 10-5). Although our small exploratory study did not reach genome-wide statistical significance, our study provides, for the first time, preliminary evidence of genetic susceptibility to xerostomia. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of genetic susceptibility to xerostomia.

Active surveillance of chemotherapy-related symptom burden in ambulatory cancer patients via the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcomes and sensor-enabled vital signs capture: protocol for a decentralised feasibility pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has emerged as a potential avenue for optimising the management of symptoms in patients undergoing chemotherapy. However, RPM is a complex, multilevel intervention with technology, workflow, contextual and patient experience components. The purpose of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of RPM protocol implementation with respect to decentralised recruitment, patient retention, adherence to reporting recommendations, RPM platform usability and patient experience in ambulatory cancer patients at high risk for chemotherapy-related symptoms.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol describes a single-arm decentralised feasibility pilot study of technology-enhanced outpatient symptom management system in patients with gastrointestinal and thoracic cancer receiving chemotherapy and cancer care at a single site (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas). An anticipated total of 25 patients will be recruited prior to the initiation of chemotherapy and provided with a set of validated questionnaires at enrollment and after our 1-month feasibility pilot trial period. Our intervention entails the self-reporting of symptoms and vital signs via a HIPAA-compliant, secure tablet interface that also enables (1) the provision of self-care materials to patients, (2) generation of threshold alerts to a dedicated call-centre and (3) videoconferencing. Vital sign information (heart rate, blood pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation, weight and temperature) will be captured via Bluetooth-enabled biometric monitoring devices which are integrated with the tablet interface. Protocolised triage and management of symptoms will occur in response to the alerts. Feasibility and acceptability metrics will characterise our recruitment process, protocol adherence, patient retention and usability of the RPM platform. We will also document the perceived effectiveness of our intervention by patients.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been granted approval by the institutional review board of MD Anderson Cancer Center. We anticipate dissemination of our pilot and subsequent effectiveness trial results via presentations at national conferences and peer-reviewed publications in the relevant medical journals. Our results will also be made available to cancer survivors, their caregivers and hospital administration.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCI202107464.

Long-term effect of ancient Ayurvedic Agnikarma therapy on heel pain associated with calcaneal spur: A case report

We report the therapeutic effect of ancient Ayurvedic Agnikarma therapy on severe heel pain due to calcaneal spur. The patient, female, 34 years of age, presented with localized, severe and intermittent heel pain which increased with physical activities such as walking or running. A lateral X-ray revealed a large, well-defined bony projection at the base of calcaneus in both the heels. Agnikarma is an ancient Indian Ayurvedic surgical treatment for pain associated with ligament, joints and bones. It involves first- or second-degree burn (thermal cauterization) delivered precisely to the site of pain by using a specialized tool namely Shalaka, made up of five metals. Agnikarma provides instant, long-term and sustainable relief from chronic or acute pain by balancing the local vata and kapha doshas without any side effects. In the present case, Agnikarma treatment was administered for three consecutive weeks and the heel pain was rated on the Pain Analog Scale at each follow-up for up to three years. The patient reported a decrease in pain at each follow-up. No concomitant treatment was given for heel pain during the follow-up period. Agnikarma can have incredible benefits in the management of acute or chronic disorders of joints, ligaments and bones. Further, Agnikarma therapy is cost-effective and does not require hospitalization of the patient.

Blood-Based Biomarker Panel for Personalized Lung Cancer Risk Assessment

PURPOSE

To investigate whether a panel of circulating protein biomarkers would improve risk assessment for lung cancer screening in combination with a risk model on the basis of participant characteristics.

METHODS

A blinded validation study was performed using prostate lung colorectal ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial data and biospecimens to evaluate the performance of a four-marker protein panel (4MP) consisting of the precursor form of surfactant protein B, cancer antigen 125, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cytokeratin-19 fragment in combination with a lung cancer risk prediction model (PLCO_m2012) compared with current US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening criteria. The 4MP was assayed in 1,299 sera collected preceding lung cancer diagnosis and 8,709 noncase sera.

RESULTS

The 4MP alone yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.82) for case sera collected within 1-year preceding diagnosis and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.76) among the entire specimen set. The combined 4MP + PLCO_m2012 model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.88) for case sera collected within 1 year preceding diagnosis. The benefit of the 4MP in the combined model resulted from improvement in sensitivity at high specificity. Compared with the USPSTF2021 criteria, the combined 4MP + PLCO_m2012 model exhibited statistically significant improvements in sensitivity and specificity. Among PLCO participants with ≥ 10 smoking pack-years, the 4MP + PLCO_m2012 model would have identified for annual screening 9.2% more lung cancer cases and would have reduced referral by 13.7% among noncases compared with USPSTF2021 criteria.

CONCLUSION

A blood-based biomarker panel in combination with PLCO_m2012 significantly improves lung cancer risk assessment for lung cancer screening.

Accounting for EGFR Mutations in Epidemiologic Analyses of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers: Examples Based on the International Lung Cancer Consortium Data

BACKGROUND

Somatic EGFR mutations define a subset of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) that have clinical impact on NSCLC risk and outcome. However, EGFR-mutation-status is often missing in epidemiologic datasets. We developed and tested pragmatic approaches to account for EGFR-mutation-status based on variables commonly included in epidemiologic datasets and evaluated the clinical utility of these approaches.

METHODS

Through analysis of the International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO) epidemiologic datasets, we developed a regression model for EGFR-status; we then applied a clinical-restriction approach using the optimal cut-point, and a second epidemiologic, multiple imputation approach to ILCCO survival analyses that did and did not account for EGFR-status.

RESULTS

Of 35,356 ILCCO patients with NSCLC, EGFR-mutation-status was available in 4,231 patients. A model regressing known EGFR-mutation-status on clinical and demographic variables achieved a concordance index of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74-0.77) in the training and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74-0.79) in the testing dataset. At an optimal cut-point of probability-score = 0.335, sensitivity = 69% and specificity = 72.5% for determining EGFR-wildtype status. In both restriction-based and imputation-based regression analyses of the individual roles of BMI on overall survival of patients with NSCLC, similar results were observed between overall and EGFR-mutation-negative cohort analyses of patients of all ancestries. However, our approach identified some differences: EGFR-mutated Asian patients did not incur a survival benefit from being obese, as observed in EGFR-wildtype Asian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We introduce a pragmatic method to evaluate the potential impact of EGFR-status on epidemiological analyses of NSCLC.

IMPACT

The proposed method is generalizable in the common occurrence in which EGFR-status data are missing.

Examining Rural-Urban Differences in Fatalism and Information Overload: Data from 12 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers

BACKGROUND

Rural populations experience a disproportionate cancer burden relative to urban populations. One possibility is that rural populations are more likely to hold counterproductive cancer beliefs such as fatalism and information overload that undermine prevention and screening behaviors.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2020, 12 U.S. cancer centers surveyed adults in their service areas using online and in-person survey instruments. Participants (N = 10,362) were designated as rural (n = 3,821) or urban (n = 6,541). All participants were 18 and older (M = 56.97, SD = 16.55), predominately non-Hispanic White (81%), and female (57%). Participants completed three items measuring cancer fatalism ("It seems like everything causes cancer," "There's not much you can do to lower your chances of getting cancer," and "When I think about cancer, I automatically think about death") and one item measuring cancer information overload ("There are so many different recommendations about preventing cancer, it's hard to know which ones to follow").

RESULTS

Compared with urban residents, rural residents were more likely to believe that (i) everything causes cancer (OR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17-1.43); (ii) prevention is not possible (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.19-1.51); and (iii) there are too many different recommendations about cancer prevention (OR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13-1.41), and cancer is always fatal (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with their urban counterparts, rural populations exhibited higher levels of cancer fatalism and cancer information overload.

IMPACT

Future interventions targeting rural populations should account for higher levels of fatalism and information overload.

Risk factors associated with patient-reported fatigue among long-term oropharyngeal carcinoma survivors

BACKGROUND

The study objective is to identify risk factors associated with fatigue among long-term OPC survivors.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included disease-free OPC survivors treated curatively between 2000 and 2013 who were surveyed from September 2015 to July 2016. The outcome variable was patient-reported fatigue. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with moderate to severe fatigue.

RESULTS

Among 863 OPC survivors, 17.4% reported moderate to severe fatigue. Self-reported thyroid problems (OR: 2.01; p = 0.003), current cigarette smoking at time of survey (OR: 3.85; p = 0.001), late lower cranial neuropathy (OR: 3.44; p = 0.002), and female sex (OR: 1.91; p = 0.010) were concurrent risk factors of reporting moderate to severe fatigue. Ipsilateral intensity-modulated radiotherapy (OR: 0.18; p = 0.014) was associated with lower risk of reporting moderate to severe fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified thyroid problems, smoking, and late lower cranial neuropathy as associated with moderate to severe fatigue. These findings should be further validated in prospective studies to address fatigue among OPC survivors.

Awareness of heated tobacco products among US Adults - Health information national trends survey, 2020

Introduction: Heated Tobacco Products (HTP) have the potential to attain high uptake in the US. The current study estimated the prevalence of awareness, prevalence of use and the factors associated with awareness of HTP among US adults. Methods: This study included 3201 respondents from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5 Cycle 4 (2020). The prevalence of awareness of HTP and ever use of HTP among US adults were estimated. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify the factors associated with awareness of HTP. Results: About 15% of the adult US population were aware of HTP, while 2.2% had ever used HTP. Age between 35 and 49 years (aOR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9; p-value = 0.003), male sex (aOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.7; p-value = 0.04), lower income ($0-$9,999) (aOR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3-6.9; p-value = 0.01), smoking on some days (aOR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2-9.4; p-value = 0.02) and moderately or extremely worrying about getting cancer (aOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7; p-value = 0.03) were associated with higher odds of being aware of HTP; whereas, belief that there are so many cancer prevention recommendations, it's hard to know which ones to follow (aOR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8; p-value = 0.009) was associated with lower odds of being aware of HTP. Conclusions: A significant proportion of US adult population were aware of HTP in 2020. Given the recent high proliferation of e-cigarettes, potential health effects of the HTP products should be monitored by the regulators closely. Adequate surveillance and policy interventions are warranted in this regard.

Spatially varying effects of measured confounding variables on disease risk

BACKGROUND

The presence of considerable spatial variability in incidence intensity suggests that risk factors are unevenly distributed in space and influence the geographical disease incidence distribution and pattern. As most human common diseases that challenge investigators are complex traits and as more factors associated with increased risk are discovered, statistical spatial models are needed that investigate geographical variability in the association between disease incidence and confounding variables and evaluate spatially varying effects on disease risk related to known or suspected risk factors. Information on geography that we focus on is geographical disease clusters of peak incidence and paucity of incidence.

METHODS

We proposed and illustrated a statistical spatial model that incorporates information on known or hypothesized risk factors, previously detected geographical disease clusters of peak incidence and paucity of incidence, and their interactions as covariates into the framework of interaction regression models. The spatial scan statistic and the generalized map-based pattern recognition procedure that we recently developed were both considered for geographical disease cluster detection. The Freeman-Tukey transformation was applied to improve normality of distribution and approximately stabilize the variance in the model. We exemplified the proposed method by analyzing data on the spatial occurrence of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) with confounding variables of race and gender in North Carolina.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed the presence of spatial variability in the association between SIDS incidence and race. We differentiated spatial effects of race on SIDS incidence among previously detected geographical disease clusters of peak incidence and incidence paucity and areas outside the geographical disease clusters, determined by the spatial scan statistic and the generalized map-based pattern recognition procedure. Our analysis showed the absence of spatial association between SIDS incidence and gender.

CONCLUSION

The application to the SIDS incidence data demonstrates the ability of our proposed model to estimate spatially varying associations between disease incidence and confounding variables and distinguish spatially related risk factors from spatially constant ones, providing valuable inference for targeted environmental and epidemiological surveillance and management, risk stratification, and thorough etiologic studies of disease.