Rotational Thromboelastometry Findings Are Associated with Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolic Complications after Hip Fracture Surgery

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism is a common complication after hip fractures. However, there are no reliable laboratory assays to identify patients at risk for venous thromboembolic (VTE) events after major orthopaedic surgery.

QUESTION/PURPOSES

(1) Are rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) findings associated with the presence or development of symptomatic VTE after hip fracture surgery? (2) Were any other patient factors associated with the presence or development of symptomatic VTE after hip fracture surgery? (3) Which ROTEM parameters were the most accurate in terms of detecting the association of hypercoagulability with symptomatic VTE?

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted over a 13-month period. In all, 354 patients with femoral neck and peritrochanteric fractures who underwent hip hemiarthoplasty or cephallomedullary nailing were assessed for eligibility. Of those, 99% (349 of 354) were considered eligible for the study, 1% (3 of 354) of patients were excluded due to coagulation disorders, and another 1% (2 of 354) were excluded because they died before the postoperative ROTEM analysis. An additional 4% (13 of 354) of patients were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 3 months, leaving 95% (336 of 354) for analysis. A ROTEM analysis was performed in all patients at the time of their hospital admission, within hours of the injury, and on the second postoperative day. The patients were monitored for the development of symptoms indicative of VTE, and the gold standard tests for diagnosing VTE, such as CT pulmonary angiography or vascular ultrasound, were selectively performed only in symptomatic patients and not routinely in all patients. Therefore, this study evaluates the association of ROTEM with only clinically evident VTE events and not with all VTE events. ROTEM results did not affect the clinical surveillance of the study group and the decision for further work up. To determine whether ROTEM findings were associated with the presence or development of symptomatic VTE, ROTEM parameters were compared between patients with and without symptomatic VTE. To establish whether any other patient factors were associated with the presence or development of symptomatic VTE after hip fracture surgery, clinical parameters and conventional laboratory values were also compared between patients with and without symptomatic VTE. Finally, to determine which ROTEM parameters were the most accurate in terms of detecting the association of hypercoagulability with symptomatic VTE, the area under the curve (AUC) for certain cut off values of ROTEM parameters was calculated.

RESULTS

We found several abnormal ROTEM values to be associated with the presence or development of symptomatic VTE. The preoperative maximum clot firmness was higher in patients with clinically evident VTE than in patients without these complications (median [interquartile range] 70 mm [68 to 71] versus 65 mm [61 to 68]; p < 0.001). The preoperative clot formation time was lower in patients with clinically evident VTE than those without clinically evident VTE (median 61 seconds [58 to 65] versus 70 seconds [67 to 74]; p < 0.001), and also the postoperative clot formation time was lower in patients with clinically evident VTE than those without these complications (median 52 seconds [49 to 59] versus 62 seconds [57 to 68]; p < 0.001). Increased BMI was also associated with clinically evident VTE (odds ratio 1.26 [95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.53]; p < 0.001). We found no differences between patients with and without clinically evident VTE in terms of age, sex, smoking status, comorbidities, and preoperative use of anticoagulants. Lastly, preoperative clot formation time demonstrated the best performance for detecting the association of hypercoagulability with symptomatic VTE (AUC 0.89 [95% CI 0.81 to 0.97]), with 81% (95% CI 48% to 97%) sensitivity and 86% (95% CI 81% to 89%) specificity for clot formation time ≤ 65 seconds.

CONCLUSION

ROTEM's performance in this preliminary study was promising in terms of its association with symptomatic VTE. This study extended our earlier work by demonstrating that ROTEM has a high accuracy in detecting the level of hypercoagulability that is associated with symptomatic VTE. However, until its performance is validated in a study that applies a diagnostic gold standard (such as venography, duplex/Doppler, or chest CT) in all patients having ROTEM to confirm its performance, ROTEM should not be used as a regular part of clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, diagnostic study.

The Prognostic Performance of Rotational Thromboelastometry for Excessive Bleeding and Increased Transfusion Requirements in Hip Fracture Surgeries

BACKGROUND

 Hip fracture surgeries are associated with considerable blood loss, while the perioperative coagulopathy is associated with the bleeding risk of these patients. We aimed to evaluate the ability of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to detect patients at high risk for excessive bleeding and increased transfusion requirements.

METHODS

 We conducted a prospective observational study of 221 patients who underwent hip fracture surgeries. ROTEM analysis was performed preoperatively and immediately postoperatively. Blood loss parameters including blood loss volume, number of transfused red blood cell (RBC) units, and drop in hemoglobin levels were recorded. ROTEM parameters were compared between patients with and without excessive bleeding, and between patients with and without increased transfusion requirements (i.e., ≥2 RBC units).

RESULTS

 The postoperative FIBTEM MCF value ≤15 mm had 66.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.7-74.1%) sensitivity and 92.0% (95% CI: 80.7-97.7%) specificity to prognose excessive bleeding, and preoperative FIBTEM MCF value ≤15 mm had 80.4% (95% CI: 73.5-86.2%) sensitivity and 91.2% (95% CI: 80.7-97.0%) specificity to prognose increased transfusion requirements. Preoperative FIBTEM MCF ≤11 mm and postoperative FIBTEM MCF ≤15 mm were associated with considerably increased risks of excessive bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 44.8, 95% CI: 16.5-121.3, p < 0.001; and OR: 23.0, 95% CI: 7.8-67.0, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

 ROTEM parameters demonstrated high prognostic accuracy for excessive bleeding and increased transfusion requirements. This can enable implementation of blood sparing strategies in high-risk patients, while blood banks could be better prepared to ensure adequate blood supply.

Comparative Performance of Four Established Neonatal Disease Scoring Systems in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality and the Potential Role of Thromboelastometry

BACKGROUND

To compare the prognostic accuracy of the most commonly used indexes of mortality over time and evaluate the potential of adding thromboelastometry (ROTEM) results to these well-established clinical scores.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 473 consecutive term and preterm critically-ill neonates. On the first day of critical illness, modified Neonatal Multiple Organ Dysfunction (NEOMOD) scoring system, Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP II), Perinatal extension of SNAP (SNAPPE), and SNAPPE II, were calculated and ROTEM standard extrinsically activated (EXTEM) assay was performed simultaneously. Time-to-event methodology for competing-risks was used to assess the performance of the aforementioned indexes in predicting in-hospital mortality over time. Time-dependent receiver operator characteristics curves for censored observation were compared across indexes. The addition of EXTEM parameters to each index was tested in terms of discrimination capacity.

RESULTS

The modified NEOMOD score performed similarly to SNAPPE. Both scores performed significantly better than SNAP II and SNAPPE II. Amplitude recorded at 10 min (A10) was the EXTEM parameter most strongly associated with mortality (A10 < 37 mm vs. ≥37 mm; sHR = 5.52; p < 0.001). Adding A10 to each index apparently increased the prognostic accuracy in the case of SNAP II and SNAPPE II. However, these increases did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Although the four existing indexes considered showed good to excellent prognostic capacity, modified NEOMOD and SNAPPE scores performed significantly better. Though larger studies are needed, adding A10 to well-established neonatal severity scores not including biomarkers of coagulopathy might improve their prediction of in-hospital mortality.

Clinical Outcomes in the Second versus First Pandemic Wave in Italy: Impact of Hospital Changes and Reorganization

The region of Lombardy was the epicenter of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Emergency Hospital 19 (EH19) was built in the Milan metropolitan area during the pandemic’s second wave as a facility of Humanitas Clinical and Research Center (HCRC). The present study aimed to assess whether the implementation of EH19 was effective in improving the quality of care of COVID-19 patients during the second wave compared with the first one. The demographics, mortality rate, and in-hospital length of stay (LOS) of two groups of patients were compared: the study group involved patients admitted at HCRC and managed in EH19 during the second pandemic wave, while the control group included patients managed exclusively at HCRC throughout the first wave. The study and control group included 903 (56.7%) and 690 (43.3%) patients, respectively. The study group was six years older on average and had more pre-existing comorbidities. EH19 was associated with a decrease in the intensive care unit admission rate (16.9% vs. 8.75%, p < 0.001), and an equal decrease in invasive oxygen therapy (3.8% vs. 0.23%, p < 0.001). Crude mortality was similar but overlap propensity score weighting revealed a trend toward a potential small decrease. The adjusted difference in LOS was not significant. The implementation of an additional COVID-19 hospital facility was effective in improving the overall quality of care of COVID-19 patients during the first wave of the pandemic when compared with the second. Further studies are necessary to validate the suggested approach.

Ethnic Differences in the Smoking-related Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The association between smoking and inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] relies on old meta-analyses including exclusively non-Jewish White populations. Uncertainty persists regarding the role of smoking in other ethnicities.

METHODS

We systematically searched Medline/PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for studies examining tobacco smoking and the risk of developing IBD, ie, Crohn's disease [CD] or ulcerative colitis [UC]. Two authors independently extracted study data and assessed each study's risk of bias. We examined heterogeneity and small-study effect, and calculated summary estimates using random-effects models. Stratified analyses and meta-regression were employed to study the association between study-level characteristics and effect estimates. The strength of epidemiological evidence was assessed through prespecified criteria.

RESULTS

We synthesised 57 studies examining the smoking-related risk of developing CD and UC. Non-Jewish White smokers were at increased risk of CD (29 studies; relative risk [RR]: 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.69‒2.24; moderate evidence). No association was observed in Asian, Jewish. and Latin-American populations [11 studies; RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.83-1.13], with no evidence of heterogeneity across these ethnicities. Smokers were at reduced risk of UC [51 studies; RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.48-0.64; weak evidence] irrespectively of ethnicity; however, cohort studies, large studies, and those recently published showed attenuated associations.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis did not identify any increased risk of CD in smokers in ethnicities other than non-Jewish Whites, and confirmed the protective effect of smoking on UC occurrence. Future research should characterise the genetic background of CD patients across different ethnicities to improve our understanding of the role of smoking in CD pathogenesis.

The Safety and Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Oncology Patients Undergoing Endoprosthetic Reconstruction and a ROTEM-Based Evaluation of Their Hemostatic Profile: A Pilot Study

Simple Summary

Tranexamic acid can be an effective and safe way to reduce perioperative bleeding following an endoprosthetic reconstruction of a lower limb after a bone tumor resection. Tranexamic acid does not result in a complete shutdown of the fibrinolysis, supporting its safe use without increasing the risk of thromboembolic complications.

Abstract

Background: An endoprosthetic reconstruction in musculoskeletal oncology patients is associated with significant blood loss. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) for these patients and to assess any changes in their hemostatic profile using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed including 61 patients with primary or metastatic bone tumors who underwent surgery. Group A (n = 30) received both intravenous and local TXA whereas Group B (n = 31) was the control group. The primary outcomes were perioperative blood loss and blood unit transfusions and the secondary outcomes included the incidence of thromboembolic complications and a change in blood coagulability as reflected by ROTEM parameters. Results: The median difference in blood loss between the two groups was 548.5 mL, indicating a 29.2% reduction in the 72 h blood loss following TXA administration (p < 0.001). TXA also led to a reduced transfusion of 1 red blood cell (RBC) unit per patient (p < 0.001). The two groups had similar rates of thromboembolic complications (p = 0.99). The antifibrinolytic properties of TXA were confirmed by the significantly higher INTEM, FIBTEM and EXTEM LI60 (p < 0.001, p = 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively) values in the TXA group. Conclusion: Tranexamic acid was associated with a significant reduction in perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements without a complete shutdown of the fibrinolysis. Larger studies are warranted to assess the frequency of these outcomes in musculoskeletal oncology patients.

The Procoagulant Effect of COVID-19 on the Thrombotic Risk of Patients with Hip Fractures Due to Enhanced Clot Strength and Fibrinolysis Shutdown

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with hip fractures is associated with increased incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hemostatic alterations of COVID-19 that are associated with a higher thrombotic risk using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed including 20 COVID-19 patients with hip fractures. To compare the coagulopathy of patients with mild COVID-19 and hip fractures with the coagulopathy associated with each of these two conditions separately, we used two previously recruited groups of patients; 198 hip fracture patients without COVID-19 and 21 COVID-19 patients without hip fractures. The demographics, clinical parameters, conventional coagulation parameters and ROTEM findings of the three groups were analyzed and compared. Results: COVID-19 hip fracture patients had higher amplitude of clot firmness at 10 min (p < 0.001), higher alpha angle (p < 0.001), higher lysis index at 60 min (p < 0.001), and shorter clot formation time (p < 0.001) than non-COVID-19 hip fracture patients, indicating increased clot strength and impaired fibrinolysis due to COVID-19. The value of lysis index at 60 min (99%) in COVID-19 patients with hip fractures was consistent with fibrinolysis shut down. Multivariable linear regression analysis further confirmed that COVID-19 resulted in increased amplitude of clot firmness at 10 min (p < 0.001), increased maximum clot firmness (p < 0.001), increased lysis index at 60 min (p < 0.001) and increased alpha angle (p < 0.001), but significantly shortened clot formation time (p < 0.001). Discussion: The higher thrombotic risk in COVID-19 patients with hip fractures is characterized by increased clot strength and fibrinolysis shutdown, as shown by ROTEM findings. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the need for modification of thromboprophylaxis to balance the hemostatic derangements of COVID-19 patients with hip fractures.

Rotational Thromboelastometry in Neonates Admitted to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Large Cross-sectional Study

The aim of the present study was to assess the coagulation profile in neonatal critical illness using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), and to investigate its association with disease severity and its potential prognostic role in this clinical setting. Over a period of 67 months (July 2014-February 2020) 423 critically ill neonates with confirmed or suspected sepsis, perinatal hypoxia, or respiratory distress syndrome, hospitalized in our neonatal intensive care unit were included in the study. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were recorded on admission day and arterial blood was analyzed on ROTEM analyzer using the standard extrinsically activated rotational thromboelastometry assay (EXTEM). Neonatal illness severity scores (Modified NEOMOD [Neonatal Multiple Organ Dysfunction] and SNAPPE [Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal Extension]) were calculated at the same time as ROTEM analysis. Mortality during in-hospital stay was the main outcome measure. Multivariable analyses showed that a 10 mm decrease in EXTEM clot amplitude recorded at 10 minutes (A10) is significantly associated with a higher mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33-2.08). Higher modified NEOMOD (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.26-1.47) and higher SNAPPE scores (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.08) were also associated with increased mortality. The CT and A10 variables demonstrated the best prognostic performance among the EXTEM parameters for mortality (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.69-0.86 and AUC = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.66-0.85, respectively), showing an optimal cut-off CT ≥63 seconds and A10 ≤37 mm. Using optimal cut-off values of the EXTEM parameters for prediction of mortality, neonates with CT ≥63 seconds were 7.4 times more likely to die (OR = 7.40, 95% CI: 3.50-15.65), while neonates with A10 ≤37 mm were 5.8 times more likely to die (OR = 5.88, 95% CI: 2.94-12.50). An EXTEM hypocoagulable profile on disease onset was shown to be an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in neonatal critical illness.

TNF Inhibitors and Risk of Malignancy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The association between tumour necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi] and malignancy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is not well understood. Our aim was to systematically evaluate the impact of TNFi use on risk of malignancy in IBD patients in daily clinical practice.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Embase and Scopus until March 1, 2020 for observational cohort studies on adult IBD patients reporting malignancy occurrence and TNFi use.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies [20 retrospective and eight prospective] were included, involving 298 717 IBD patients. Mean age at inclusion ranged from 28 to >65 years. Mean follow-up varied from 7 to 80 months. Infliximab was the most frequently used TNFi [13/28 studies, 46.4%], followed by adalimumab [3/28, 10.7%], while both infliximab and adalimumab were evaluated in five studies [17.8%]. In total, 692 malignancies were diagnosed in IBD patients treated with TNFi, accounting for an overall occurrence of 1.0%. The most frequent malignancies were non-melanoma skin cancers [123/692, 17.8%], digestive malignancies [120/692, 17.3%] and haematological malignancies [106/692, 15.3%]. The association between TNFi and malignancy was evaluated in 11 studies [39.3%]: no significant association was found in ten studies, while an increased risk of lymphoma in patients exposed to TNFi was reported in one study.

CONCLUSION

TNFi treatment is not associated with an increased risk of malignancy in IBD patients in real-life settings. Further large studies are needed to assess the prognosis of patients exposed to TNFi and risk of recurrence or new cancers in subjects with personal malignancy history.

Mental Health and Perceived Access to Care among People Who Inject Drugs in Athens, Greece

Poor mental health among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive people who inject drugs (PWID) may contribute to stigma, and together they act as barriers to medical care. This analysis aims to examine factors associated with the mental health of PWID and their network contacts, and the association of poor mental health with the experience of HIV-related stigmatizing events, with HIV-related social support, and with perceived access to care. Data were collected during the Transmission Reduction Intervention Project (TRIP) conducted in Athens, Greece (2013-2015). PWID (n = 292; n = 122 HIV-positive) were interviewed both at baseline and follow-up. Items of depression, anxiety, and general positive affect subscales of the Mental Health Inventory were used to explore the psychological distress and well-being of participants at follow-up. Items of the Access to Care Scale were used to evaluate perceived access to medical care at baseline and follow-up. Linear regression showed that unemployment was positively related to depression (β = 1.49, p = 0.019), while injecting drug use was a risk factor for a low general positive affect score (β = -3.21, p = 0.015). Poor mental health was not linked to HIV-related stigma or social support. Positive perception of access to care was associated in multivariable analyses with low depression (β = -0.22, p = 0.049). The perceived access to care score improved from baseline to follow-up (p = 0.019) and HIV-positive participants had a higher score than HIV-negative participants. Future interventions should include targets to improve the mental well-being of participants, reduce psychosocial distress, and minimize perceived barriers to accessing medical care.

Safety of S1P Modulators in Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators are approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and are under development for other immune-mediated conditions; however, safety concerns have arisen.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the safety profile of S1P modulators in patients with multiple sclerosis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, psoriasis, and systemic lupus erythematosus.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January, 1990 through 1 April, 2020. We also performed a manual review of conference databases from 2017 through 2020. The primary outcome was the occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events. We also estimated the occurrence of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, malignancy, bradycardia, atrio-ventricular block, and macular edema. We performed a meta-analysis of controlled studies to assess the risks of such events.

RESULTS

We identified 3843 citations; of these, 26 studies were finally included, comprising 9604 patients who were exposed to a sphingosine-1-phosphate modulator. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed an increased risk in herpes zoster infection [risk ratio, 1.75 (95% confidence interval 1.09-2.80)], bradycardia [2.64 (1.77-3.96)], and atrio-ventricular block [1.73 (1.03-2.91)] among subjects exposed to sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators as compared with a placebo or an active comparator.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an increased risk of herpes zoster infection, and transient cardiovascular events among patients treated with sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020172575.

Confounding and bias in observational studies in inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-epidemiological study

BACKGROUND

Observational research concerning inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is highly susceptible to spurious findings because of confounding and bias.

AIM

To investigate how these issues were reported in this research field.

METHODS

We identified and appraised a random sample of 160 observational studies concerning IBD published in high-impact gastroenterology journals and the most respected specialty journals of the condition. We applied a standardised methodology to assess how confounding and bias were reported and discussed, and investigated the association between yearly citations and study characteristics using mixed-effect multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS

The authors of 67 out of 160 articles (41.9%) mentioned confounding, and in 89 cases (55.6%) reported any bias. Although most authors applied strategies to minimise confounding or bias (n = 139; 86.9%) and acknowledged at least one unadjusted confounder (n = 116; 72.5%), a minority commented about whether the main findings could have been affected (n = 60; 37.5%). Very few authors (n = 7; 4.4%) called for caution in interpreting the results in the discussion. Reporting of confounding and bias was particularly lacking for case-control studies, those not using routinely collected data, those employing laboratory analyses as the primary method of assessment and studies investigating non-modifiable exposures. In adjusted analyses, mentioning or alluding to confounding was positively associated with yearly citations (P = 0.010), whereas calling for a cautious interpretation of the findings was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Reporting of confounding is inadequate and its acknowledgement is often neglected in interpreting high-impact observational research in IBD. These results encourage a more careful evaluation of the consequences of confounding and bias.

Milan ultrasound criteria are accurate in assessing disease activity in ulcerative colitis: external validation

Introduction

The aim of this study was to provide an external validation of bowel ultrasound (US) predictors of activity in ulcerative colitis (UC) and quantitative Milan Ultrasound Criteria (MUC).

Methods

Forty‐three consecutive patients with UC (16 in endoscopic remission and 27 with endoscopic activity) underwent bowel US and colonoscopy in a tertiary referral inflammatory bowel disease unit.

Results

An MUC score >6.2 discriminated patients with active versus non‐active UC with a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66–0.96), specificity of 0.94 (95% CI 0.70–0.99) and an area under the curve of 0.902 (95% CI 0.772–0.971) in complete agreement with the derivation study.

Conclusion

The external validation of MUC confirms that it is an accurate tool for assessing disease activity in patients with UC.

The Brain-Gut Axis: Psychological Functioning and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

The brain-gut axis represents a complex bi-directional system comprising multiple interconnections between the neuroendocrine pathways, the autonomous nervous system and the gastrointestinal tract. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic, relapsing-remitting inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract with a multifactorial etiology. Depression and anxiety are prevalent among patients with chronic disorders characterized by a strong immune component, such as diabetes mellitus, cancer, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and IBD. Although psychological problems are an important aspect of morbidity and of impaired quality of life in patients with IBD, depression and anxiety continue to be under-diagnosed. There is lack of evidence regarding the exact mechanisms by which depression, anxiety and cognitive dysfunction may occur in these patients, and whether psychological disorders are the result of disease activity or determinants of the IBD occurrence. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the role of the brain-gut axis in the psychological functioning of patients with IBD, and discuss current preclinical and clinical data on the topic and therapeutic strategies potentially useful for the clinical management of these patients. Personalized pathways of psychological supports are needed to improve the quality of life in patients with IBD.

Validation of the Red Flags Index for Early Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease: A Prospective Observational IG-IBD Study Among General Practitioners

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic delay >12 months is frequent in Crohn's disease [CD]. Recently, the International Organization for Inflammatory Bowel Disease [IO-IBD] developed a tool to identify early CD and reduce diagnostic delay. Subjects with an index ≥8 are more likely to have suspected CD (odds ratio [OR] 205, p <0.0001). We aimed to validate this questionnaire at the community level in patients seen by the general practitioners [GPs] in two large areas of Lombardy, Italy.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients referring to the GP were screened. The GPs administered the Red Flags [RF] questionnaire to the eligible patients. All patients were referred to the nearest participating centre to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of CD. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values [PPV, NPV] of the RF index [RFI] were calculated. Patients lost to follow-up after the first gastroenterological visit were analysed using a non-responder imputation, assuming they were negative for CD diagnosis.

RESULTS

From November 2016 to November 2019, 112 patients were included. A total of 66 subjects [59%] completed the study after the first gastroenterological visit. The prevalence of CD was 3.6% in the study population [4/112]. The RF index had 50% sensitivity, 58% specificity, 4% PPV, and 97% NPV. A combined diagnostic strategy with faecal calprotectin [FC] [RFI ≥8 and/or FC >250 ng/g] resulted in significantly improved accuracy: sensitivity 100% [29-100%], specificity 72% [55-85%], PPV = 21% [5-51%], NPV = 100% [88-100%].

CONCLUSIONS

The RF Index combined with FC is a valid tool to identify patients with high probability of having CD at early stage.

Higher coagulation activity in hip fracture patients: A case-control study using rotational thromboelastometry

INTRODUCTION

Trauma-induced coagulopathy has been extensively investigated in the multitrauma setting, but only sparsely following moderate orthopedic trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in the hemostatic profile of patients with hip fractures, using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM).

METHODS

198 patients with hip fractures who underwent surgery were included in the study. A matched group of 52 healthy individuals was also enrolled. Demographics, conventional laboratory assays, and ROTEM parameters were recorded and compared between patients and healthy adults. The preoperative and postoperative ROTEM values of fractured patients were also compared.

RESULTS

The conventional coagulation assays were similar for the 2 groups. However, several ROTEM parameters including EXTEM MCF (P < .001), EXTEM alpha angle (P < .001), INTEM MCF (P < .001), INTEM A10 (P < .001), and INTEM alpha angle (P < .001) significantly differed between the 2 groups indicating a higher coagulation potential following hip fractures. Also, fractured patients had significantly lower INTEM and EXTEM CT values (P = .008 and P = .012, respectively) and significantly lower INTEM and EXTEM CFT values (P < .001). Adjusted analysis for confounders further confirmed the direct relationship between hip fracture and higher coagulation activity. Last, INTEM CT and CFT significantly decreased (P = .008 and P < .001, respectively), while INTEM MCF, A10, and alpha angle significantly increased (P < .001) postoperatively, indicating that surgery further increases the coagulation potential.

CONCLUSION

A higher coagulation activity following hip fractures and surgical treatment can be detected by ROTEM shortly after the injury, even when this is undetectable by conventional coagulation assays.

The haemostatic profile in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulant therapy: An observational study

Hypercoagulability and thrombosis remain a challenge in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections. Our aim is to investigate the hemostatic profile of critically ill COVID-19 patients on therapeutic anticoagulant treatment.Forty one patients were enrolled into the study. We recruited 11 consecutive, COVID-19, patients who received therapeutic anticoagulant treatment on intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Disease severity indexes, biochemical, hematological and haemostatic parameters, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity and extrinsically activated rotational thromboelastometry assay (EXTEM) were recorded on days 1, 3, 7. We also enrolled 9 ICU non-COVID-19, 21 non-ICU COVID-19 patients and 20 healthy blood donors as control populations.Critically ill COVID-19 patients demonstrated a more hypercoagulable and hypofibrinolytic profile related to those with COVID-19 mild illness, based on EXTEM amplitude at 10 min (A10), maximum clot firmness (MCF) and lysis index at 60 min (LI60) variables (p = 0.020, 0.046 and 0.001, respectively). Similarly, a more hypercoagulable state was detected in COVID-19 ICU patients related to non-COVID-19 ICU patients based on A10 and MCF parameters (p = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). On the contrary, ETP and EXTEM (clotting time) CT values were similar between patients with severe and mild form of the COVID-19 infection, probably due to anticoagulant treatment given.Critically ill COVID-19 patients showed a hypercoagulable profile despite the therapeutic anticoagulant doses given. Due to the small sample size and the study design, the prognostic role of the hypercoagulability in this clinical setting remains unknown and further research is required in order to be assessed.

Macrophage expression and prognostic significance of the long pentraxin PTX3 in COVID-19

Long pentraxin 3 (PTX3) is an essential component of humoral innate immunity, involved in resistance to selected pathogens and in the regulation of inflammation^1-3. The present study was designed to assess the presence and significance of PTX3 in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)^4-7. RNA-sequencing analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, single-cell bioinformatics analysis and immunohistochemistry of lung autopsy samples revealed that myelomonocytic cells and endothelial cells express high levels of PTX3 in patients with COVID-19. Increased plasma concentrations of PTX3 were detected in 96 patients with COVID-19. PTX3 emerged as a strong independent predictor of 28-d mortality in multivariable analysis, better than conventional markers of inflammation, in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The prognostic significance of PTX3 abundance for mortality was confirmed in a second independent cohort (54 patients). Thus, circulating and lung myelomonocytic cells and endothelial cells are a major source of PTX3, and PTX3 plasma concentration can serve as an independent strong prognostic indicator of short-term mortality in COVID-19.

The role of ROTEM variables based on clot elasticity and platelet component in predicting bleeding risk in thrombocytopenic critically ill neonates

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to investigate the role of thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters, including maximum clot elasticity (MCE) and platelet component (PLTEM MCE and PLTEM MCF), in early prediction of bleeding events in thrombocytopenic critically ill neonates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This single-center, prospective cohort study included 110 consecutive thrombocytopenic neonates with sepsis, suspected sepsis, or hypoxia. On the first day of disease onset, ROTEM EXTEM and FIBTEM assays were performed and the neonatal bleeding assessment tool was used for the evaluation of bleeding events.

RESULTS

Most EXTEM and FIBTEM ROTEM parameters significantly differed between neonates with (n = 77) and without bleeding events (n = 33). Neonates with bleeding events had significantly lower PLTEM MCE and PLTEM MCF values compared to those without bleeding events (P < .001). Platelet count was found to be strongly positively correlated with EXTEM A5 (Spearman's rho = 0.61, P < .001) and A10 (rho = 0.64, P < .001). EXTEM A10 demonstrated the best prognostic performance (AUC = 0.853) with an optimal cutoff value (≤37 mm) (sensitivity = 91%, specificity = 76%) for prediction of bleeding events in thrombocytopenic neonates.

CONCLUSIONS

EXTEM A5 and EXTEM A10 were found to be strong predictors of hemorrhage, compared to most ROTEM variables quantifying clot elasticity and platelet component in thrombocytopenic critically ill neonates.