Discriminant Analysis of the Prognostic Factors for Hearing Outcomes in Patients with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

BACKGROUND

This study aims to determine and assess prognostic variables that might affect the hearing result in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss following intratympanic steroid injection.

METHODS

In total, 190 patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss received intratympanic steroid injection. Two hearing indices (recovery and nonrecovery) will be analyzed as dependent variables; patient's age, time period between the onset of hearing loss and treatment, initial level of hearing (hearing loss pre), type of audiogram curve (upsloping, downsloping, and flat), presence of vertigo, presence of tinnitus, and diabetes) will be analyzed as prognostic factor variables.

RESULTS

Recovery was seen in 72% of the patients. Different preinjection audiogram curves and hearing grades had a significant effect on recovery, absence of vestibular symptoms and no diabetic history were noted to have a good prognosis. Delay in treatment by more than 30 days from the onset of hearing loss was associated with a worse prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss associated with late treatment plan more than 1 month, presence of vertigo, diabetes, and profound prehearing loss were negative prognostic factors. Whereas age, gender, and presence of tinnitus did not affect prognosis. More stable response was obtained when intratympanic steroids were added within 1 month after diagnosis, and the patient presented with mild or moderate hearing loss grade, flat or downsloping pure tone audiometery curve, and absence of vertigo and nondiabetic with significantly good results.

Urgency in the Treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is considered an otolaryngologic emergency that must be treated within 72 hours. Failure to treat within that time frame typically results in permanent hearing loss. Here, we present a case of SSNHL confirmed by an audiogram that was treated as eustachian tube dysfunction. Aggressive management measures started at follow-up failed to improve the hearing loss. This case demonstrates the need for early recognition and ENT referral for SSNHL.

Effects of Oral Steroids Combined with Postauricular Steroid Injection on Patients with Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Delaying Intervention: A Retrospective Analysis

Background

In the otology clinic, we often receive some sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) patients accompanied by annoying tinnitus, who usually visited over three weeks after the onset. Nevertheless, due to the high treatment cost and relatively low cure rate, there are still great disputes about hospitalization or not for these patients. Aim: This study aimed to perform a retrospective analysis for analyzing the efficacy of treatment with oral steroids combined with postauricular steroid injection in patients with delaying effective treatment.

Material/Methods

A total of 157 eligible SSNHL patients with delaying effective treatment over three weeks were enrolled in this study. According to different treatment methods of oral steroids with or without postauricular steroid injection, these patients were divided into three groups: PO (prednisone oral) group, PSI (prednisone oral and postauricular steroid injection) group, and PII (prednisone oral and postauricular lidocaine injection) group. The changes in level of hearing, mean subjective tinnitus loudness, and side effects were analyzed in the three groups.

Results

Hearing improvement and tinnitus remission were all observed in three groups after treatment. Compared with PO and PII groups, those patients in PSI groups had more improvement in level of hearing and mean subjective tinnitus. The level of tinnitus loudness was statistically significantly correlated with the level of PTA both before treatment and after treatment.

Conclusion

Oral steroids combined with postauricular steroid injection should be employed for treatment of SSNHL patients with delaying effective treatment over three weeks.

Development and validation for multifactor prediction model of sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Background

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a global problem threatening human health. Early and rapid diagnosis contributes to effective treatment. However, there is a lack of effective SSNHL prediction models.

Methods

A retrospective study of SSNHL patients from Fujian Geriatric Hospital (the development cohort with 77 participants) was conducted and data from First Hospital of Putian City (the validation cohort with 57 participants) from January 2018 to December 2021 were validated. Basic characteristics and the results of the conventional coagulation test (CCT) and the blood routine test (BRT) were then evaluated. Binary logistic regression was used to develop a prediction model to identify variables significantly associated with SSNHL, which were then included in the nomogram. The discrimination and calibration ability of the nomogram was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis both in the development and validation cohorts. Delong's test was used to calculate the difference in ROC curves between the two cohorts.

Results

Thrombin time (TT), red blood cell (RBC), and granulocyte-lymphocyte ratio (GLR) were found to be associated with the diagnosis of SSNHL. A prediction nomogram was constructed using these three predictors. The AUC in the development and validation cohorts was 0.871 (95% CI: 0.789-0.953) and 0.759 (95% CI: 0.635-0.883), respectively. Delong's test showed no significant difference in the ROC curves between the two groups (D = 1.482, p = 0.141).

Conclusion

In this study, a multifactor prediction model for SSNHL was established and validated. The factors included in the model could be easily and quickly accessed, which could help physicians make early diagnosis and clinical treatment decisions.

The association of genetic polymorphisms in protocadherin 15 with sudden sensorineural hearing loss in a Chinese population

BACKGROUND

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a multifactorial disease, and its etiology is still unknown. SSNHL may be caused by environmental factors and genetic changes. PCDH15 is associated with susceptibility to hearing loss. The relationship between PCDH15 and SSNHL remains unknown.

METHODS

In this study, the potential association between PCDH15 polymorphism and SSNHL in Chinese population was evaluated. Two single nucleotide polymorphisms PCDH15-rs7095441 and rs11004085 in 195 SSNHL patients and 182 healthy controls were determined by TaqMan technology.

RESULTS

In Chinese population, the TT genotype and T allele of rs7095441 are associated with increased susceptibility to SSNHL. The relationships between rs7095441 and the degree of hearing loss were analyzed, and TT genotype increased the risk of hearing loss. Among SSNHL patients, patients with TT genotype of rs7095441 have an increased risk of vertigo.

CONCLUSION

This study found that the TT genotype of SNP rs7095441 can increase the risk of SSNHL in Chinese population.

Corrigendum: COVID-19 and sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.883749.].

Effect of Herpes Zoster Treatment and Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using National Health Insurance Claims Data of South Korea

Background and objectives: Herpes zoster (HZ) is caused by the reactivation of a pre-existing latent varicella zoster virus, which is one of the viruses that causes hearing loss, and hearing loss may occur due to a systemic immune response even if it does not invade the auditory nerve. This study aimed to determine the correlation between sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in older adult patients who received HZ treatment. Materials and Methods: We used the cohort data of patients aged 60 years and above (n = 624,646) between 2002 and 2015 provided by the National Health Insurance Service. The patients were divided into two groups: those who were diagnosed with HZ between 2003 and 2008 (group H, n = 36,121) and those who had not been diagnosed with HZ between 2002 and 2015 (group C, n = 584,329). Results: In the main model (adjusted HR = 0.890, 95% CI = 0.839-0.944, p < 0.001) adjusted for sex, age, and income, and the full model (adjusted HR = 0.894, 95% CI = 0.843-0.949, p < 0.001) adjusted for all comorbidities, group H had a lower risk of SSNHL than group C. Conclusions: This study showed that patients who received HZ treatment had a lower incidence of SSNHL within five years after diagnosis.

The management of sudden sensorineural hearing loss during COVID-19 pandemic

<b>Introduction:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic constituted a significant challenge for healthcare systems. Epidemiological restrictions led to deferral of healthcare and influenced the variety of symptoms reported by patients suffering from Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.</br></br> <b>Aim:</b> The aim of the study was to compare the duration of treatment implementation and symptoms reported by patients suffering from SSNHL before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</br></br> <b>Material and methods:</b> Patients admitted to the Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute for SSNHL treatment were included in a survey conducted between 01.10.2021-31.12.2021. Questions on symptoms reported, chronic conditions, timeframe between first symptoms and implementation of pharmacotherapy, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy were included in the survey. The results were compared with data obtained by the Team between 01.2017-12.2019.</br></br> <b>Results:</b> 34 patients (19 females, 15 males) of the average age of 46.3 who participated in the survey indicated a significantly delayed implementation of pharmacotherapy and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in comparison to population from before the pandemic (12.08 vs. 5.41 [days]; 17.5 vs. 8.29 [days]). The survey also showed differences in the number of symptoms reported.</br></br> <b>Discussion:</b> The differences in time of implementation of SSNHL treatment could have been related to pandemic restrictions which contributed to longer queueing for health benefits and fear of contact with health service. Differences in symptomatology point towards SARS-CoV-2 as a pathogenetic factor of SSNHL.</br></br> <b>Conclusions:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic significantly influenced the treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. The study demonstrated a diverse symptomatology of SSNHL before and during the pandemic.

The Expression Levels of MicroRNAs Differentially Expressed in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Patients' Serum Are Unchanged for up to 12 Months after Hearing Loss Onset

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is an acquired idiopathic hearing loss. Serum levels of small, non-coding RNAs and microRNAs (miRNAs) miR-195-5p/-132-3p/-30a-3p/-128-3p/-140-3p/-186-5p/-375-3p/-590-5p are differentially expressed in SSNHL patients within 28 days of hearing loss onset. This study determines if these changes persist by comparing the serum miRNA expression profile of SSNHL patients within 1 month of hearing loss onset with that of patients 3-12 months after hearing loss onset. We collected serum from consenting adult SSNHL patients at presentation or during clinic follow-up. We matched patient samples drawn 3-12 months after hearing loss onset (delayed group, n = 9 patients) by age and sex to samples drawn from patients within 28 days of hearing loss onset (immediate group, n = 14 patients). We compared the real-time PCR-determined expression levels of the target miRNAs between the two groups. We calculated the air conduction pure-tone-averaged (PTA) audiometric thresholds in affected ears at the initial and final follow-up visits. We undertook inter-group comparisons of hearing outcome status and initial and final PTA audiometric thresholds. There was no significant inter-group difference in miRNA expression level, hearing recovery status and initial and final affected ear PTA audiometric thresholds.

Association between Chronic Kidney Disease and Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Studies Using ICD-10 Codes in a National Health Screening Cohort

This study aims to investigate the association between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) using a population-based cohort study. We used data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort. Participants were selected based on diagnosis and treatment codes, and CKD participants were 1:4 matched with control participants. Covariates, including demographic and lifestyle factors, and comorbidities were considered in the analysis. We calculated the incidence rate and hazards ratio of SSNHL. A total of 16,713 CKD participants and 66,852 matched controls were enrolled. The CKD group had a higher incidence rate of SSNHL compared to the control group at 2.16 and 1.74 per 1000 person-years, respectively. The CKD group exhibited a higher risk for SSNHL compared to the control group with adjusted HR 1.21. In the subgroup analysis, the presence of cardiovascular risk factors was associated with a diminished effect of CKD on the risk of developing SSNHL. This study provides strong evidence of an association between CKD per se and an increased risk of SSNHL even after adjusting for various demographic and comorbidity factors. The findings suggest that CKD patients may require more comprehensive monitoring for hearing loss.

Systemic Steroids for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Disorders: An Evidence-Based Primer for Clinicians

OBJECTIVE

To offer pragmatic, evidence-informed guidance on the use of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) for common otolaryngologic disorders.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation clinical practice guidelines.

REVIEW METHODS

A comprehensive search of published literature through November 2021 was conducted on the efficacy of SCS, alone or in combination with other treatments, for managing disorders in otolaryngology and the subdisciplines. Clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials, when available, were preferentially retrieved. Interventions and outcomes of SCS use were compiled to generate summary tables and narrative synthesis of findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence on the effectiveness of SCS varies widely across otolaryngology disorders. High-level evidence supports SCS use for Bell's palsy, sinonasal polyposis, and lower airway disease. Conversely, evidence is weak or absent for upper respiratory tract infection, eustachian tube dysfunction, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, adenotonsillar hypertrophy, or nonallergic rhinitis. Evidence is indeterminate for acute laryngitis, acute pharyngitis, acute sinusitis, angioedema, chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps, Ménière's disease, postviral olfactory loss, postoperative nerve paresis/paralysis, facial pain, and sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinicians should bring an evidence-informed lens to SCS prescribing to best counsel patients regarding the risks, anticipated benefits, and limited data on long-term effects. Alternate routes of corticosteroid administration-such as sprays, drops, inhalers, and intralesional injections-may be preferable for many disorders, particularly those that are self-limited or require a prolonged duration of therapy. Prudent use of SCS reduces the risk of medication-related adverse effects. Clinicians who are conversant with high-level evidence can achieve optimal outcomes and stewardship when prescribing SCS.

Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients With Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The interruption of vascular supply to the inner ear is one of several proposed etiologies of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). The increased presence of cardiovascular risk factors may predispose patients to SSNHL through this pathway. This systematic review and meta-analysis studies the presence of cardiovascular risk factors in patients diagnosed with SSNHL.

DATA SOURCES

Databases included PubMed/Medline, OVID, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

Inclusion criteria included studies featuring SSNHL patients presenting with 1+ cardiovascular risk factors. Exclusion criteria included case reports and studies without outcome measures. Two investigators independently reviewed all manuscripts and performed quality assessments using validated tools.

RESULTS

Of 532 identified abstracts, 27 studies met inclusion criteria (19 case-control, 4 cohorts, 4 case series). Of these, 24 underwent meta-analysis encompassing a total of 77,566 patients (22,620 SSNHL patients, 54,946 matched controls). The mean age was 50.43 years. SSNHL patients were more likely to have concomitant diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.61 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31, 1.99; p < .00001]) and hypertension (OR 1.5 [95% CI: 1.16, 1.94; p = .002]). An increased standard mean difference of total cholesterol of 11.09 mg/dL (95% CI; 3.51, 18.67; p = .004) was noted in the SSNHL group compared with the controls. No significant differences in smoking, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, or body mass index were detected.

CONCLUSION

Patients presenting with SSNHL have a significantly higher risk of concomitant diabetes, hypertension, and higher total cholesterol in comparison to matched controls. This may indicate a higher cardiovascular risk profile in this population. More prospective and matched cohort studies are needed to understand the role of cardiovascular risk factors in SSNHL.

Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Is Related to Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, endothelial progenitor cells, and sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

METHODS

The number of endothelial progenitor cells and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 levels collected from peripheral blood samples were measured and compared between sudden sensorineural hearing loss group and control group.

RESULTS

The number of endothelial progenitor cells was reduced in sudden sensorineural hearing loss group compared to control group (38.88 ± 10.73 in sudden sensorineural hearing loss group vs. 77.14 ± 8.56 in control group, P <.01). The lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 level was markedly increased in sudden sensorineural hearing loss group compared to control group (244.94 ± 59.547 in sudden sensorineural hearing loss group vs. 189.00 ± 50.987 in control group, P <.05).

CONCLUSION

The number of endothelial progenitor cells was decreased and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 levels were increased in sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients. Changes in the number of endothelial progenitor cells and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 levels may be involved in the pathogenesis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Could the Audiometric Criteria for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Miss Vestibular Schwannomas?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the likelihood of missing a vestibular schwannoma (VS) diagnosis in patients who present with a sudden hearing loss (SHL) that does not meet the most accepted audiometric criteria for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) (a decrease of ≥30 dB at three consecutive frequencies).

METHODS

All adult patients (>18 years) diagnosed with SHL of any severity in a tertiary care referral medical center between 2015 and 2020 and who underwent an MRI scan to rule out VS were included. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate the difference between the rate of VS among patients with an initial audiogram, which met the abovementioned criteria, and those who did not. Other audiometric criteria for SNHL were also evaluated (≥10 dB at ≥2 frequencies and ≥ 15 dB at one frequency).

RESULTS

Of the 332 patients included in the study, 152 met the audiometric criteria for SSNHL, and 180 did not. Both groups had a similar VS rate (8.6% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.914). Similar results were found when other audiometric criteria for asymmetric SNHL were analyzed. In a subgroup analysis of patients with VS-associated SSNHL, neither the tumor size nor the Koos classification was associated with any of the audiometric criteria systems.

CONCLUSION

There should be a high index of suspicion for the presence of VS in patients with an SHL of any severity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:670-675, 2023.

Is There an Association between Concurrent Epstein-Barr Virus Infection and Sudden Hearing Loss?-A Case-Control Study in an East Asian Population

Viral infection serves as the crucial etiology for the development of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). We aimed to investigate whether there is an association between concurrent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and SSNHL in an East Asian population. Patients who were older than 18 years of age and met the criteria of sudden hearing loss without an identifiable etiology were enrolled from July 2021 until June 2022, followed by the serological testing of IgA antibody responses against EBV-specific early antigen (EA) and viral capsid antigen (VCA) with an indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA) and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of EBV DNA in serum before the treatment was initiated. After the treatment for SSNHL, post-treatment audiometry was performed to record the treatment response and degree of recovery. Among the 29 patients included during enrollment, 3 (10.3%) had a positive qPCR result for EBV. In addition, a trend of poor recovery of hearing thresholds was noted for those patients with a higher viral PCR titer. This is the first study to use real-time PCR to detect possible concurrent EBV infection in SSNHL. Our study demonstrated that approximately one-tenth of the enrolled SSNHL patients had evidence of concurrent EBV infection, as reflected by the positive qPCR test results, and a negative trend between hearing gain and the viral DNA PCR level was found within the affected cohort after steroid therapy. These findings indicate a possible role for EBV infection in East Asian patients with SSNHL. Further larger-scale research is needed to better understand the potential role and underlying mechanism of viral infection in the etiology of SSNHL.

Clinical Profiles and Prognoses of Adult Patients with Full-Frequency Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Combination Therapy

We aimed to characterize the clinical profiles and short-term outcomes of adult patients with full-frequency idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) treated uniformly with combination therapy, and to determine the prognostic predictors for the combination therapy. A total of 131 eligible cases hospitalized in our department from January 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All enrolled cases received a standardized combination therapy employing intravenous methylprednisolone, batroxobin, and Ginkgo biloba extract during the 12 days of hospitalization. The clinical and audiometric profiles were compared between recovered patients and their unrecovered counterparts. The overall recovery rate was 57.3% in the study. Accompanying vertigo (odds ratio = 0.360, p = 0.006) and body mass index (BMI, odds ratio = 1.158, p = 0.016) were two independent predictors of hearing outcomes of the therapy. The male gender and cigarette-smoking history were marginally associated with good hearing prognosis (p = 0.051 and 0.070, respectively). Patients with BMI ≥ 22.4 kg/m² had a better chance of hearing recovery (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Accompanying vertigo and low BMI (<22.4 kg/m²) were independently associated with poor prognosis for full-frequency ISSNHL in combination therapy. Male gender and cigarette-smoking history might be considered positive effects on hearing prognosis.

Glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) genetic polymorphisms and the outcomes of sudden sensorineural hearing loss

BACKGROUND

The glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) encodes the receptor to which cortisol and other glucocorticoids bind. Steroids in either oral, intratympanic, or intravascular forms are the treatment of choice for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), but the outcome varies. The outcomes of SSNHL have been investigated for related factors, including age, initial hearing loss severity and pattern, vertigo, genetic variations, and the time between onset and treatment. The objective of the present study was to analyze the association of genetic polymorphisms of NR3C1 with the outcomes of SSNHL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a comparison study of 93 cases with a poor outcome (control) and 100 cases with a good outcome (case) in SSNHL patients. Six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected. The genotypes were determined using TaqMan technology.

RESULTS

The heterozygous AT genotype of rs17100289 was associated with a poor outcome in comparison with the major homozygous AA genotype after adjustments for age and sex (OR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.26-0.95; P = 0.035) in SSNHL patients. The CT genotype of rs4912912 was also associated with a poor outcome compared with the major homozygous TT genotype after the adjustments (OR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.24-0.92; P = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that NR3C1 genetic polymorphisms may influence the outcomes of SSNHL.

The Optimized Protocol of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy For Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the optimal protocol of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) according to various treatment settings for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).

METHODS

A 112 patients with SSNHL were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients were treated with systemic steroid therapy, intratympanic steroid therapy, and HBOT. According to the pressure and duration of HBOT (10 sessions in total), the patients were divided into three groups: group 1, 2.5 atmospheres absolute (ATA) for 1 h; group 2, 2.5 ATA for 2 h; and group 3, 1.5 ATA for 1 h. The pure-tone average (PTA), word discrimination score (WDS), and mean gain were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients completed the 3-month follow-up, and 6 patients were excluded. Differences among groups were found in PTA, WDS, and mean gain. In the post-hoc analysis, group 3 had significantly lower WDS and mean gain than groups 1 and 2; however, group 2 showed no significant differences from group 1. The proportion of patients with hearing recovery after treatment was significantly higher in group 1 (57.6%) and group 2 (58.8%) than in group 3 (31.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

When HBOT (10 sessions) was combined with corticosteroids as the initial therapy for SSNHL, a higher pressure (1.5 ATA vs. 2.5 ATA) provided better treatment results; however, increasing the duration (1 h vs. 2 h) under 2.5 ATA did not result in a significant difference. Therefore, HBOT for SSNHL may be performed at 2.5 ATA for 1 h in 10 sessions. Laryngoscope, 133:383-388, 2023.

Audiometry-Confirmed Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Incidence among COVID-19 Patients and BNT162b2 Vaccine Recipients

OBJECTIVE

To compare sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) incidence rates over the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak and the COVID-19 vaccination campaign periods to pre-COVID-19 periods.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Secondary hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients >12 years with auditory-confirmed SSNHL were enrolled. COVID-19 status and BNT162 inoculation records ≤28 days before SSNHL diagnosis were retrieved. Patients were categorized according to their date of presentation over four equal periods: 1) July 2018-April 2019 (first prepandemic period), 2) May 2019-February 2020 (second prepandemic period), 3) March 2020-December 2020 (COVID-19 outbreak), and 4) January 2021-October 2021 (BNT162b2 vaccinations campaign).

INTERVENTIONS

Pre- and post-COVID-19 emergence; BNT162b2 vaccine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated to compare SSNHL cases during the COVID-19 and vaccination periods with pre-COVID-19 periods.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients with SSNHL over the four periods, 1 had COVID-19 and 8 were vaccinated. The annual SSNHL incidence was 12.87, 12.28, 13.45, and 19.89 per 100,000 over periods 1 to 4, respectively. SSNHL incidence over the third period was not significantly different than the first/second periods (IRR = 1.045, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.629-1.85, ρ = 0.788, and IRR = 1.095, 95% CI = 0.651-1.936, ρ = 0.683, respectively), whereas SSNHL incidence rate over the fourth period was higher (IRR = 1.545, 95% CI = 0.967-2.607, ρ = 0.068, and IRR = 1.619, 95% CI = 1-2.73, ρ = 0.05, respectively). SSNHL incidence in vaccine recipients was lower than prepandemic unvaccinated patients (IRR = 0.584, 95% CI =0.464-1.67, ρ = 0.984, and IRR = 0.612, 95% CI =0.48-1.744, ρ = 0.92, respectively).

CONCLUSION

There were fewer SSNHL cases during the first COVID-19 months. Although the SSNHL rate over the COVID-19 vaccination campaign increased, it was not higher for patients who received the BNT162b2 vaccine.

Inflammatory Indicators in Peripheral Blood in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Patients With Different Audiogram Shapes

Objective: A retrospective study was conducted to explore the immune-inflammatory responses in sudden sensorineural hearing Loss (SSNHL) patients with different audiogram shapes. Methods: One hundred and ten inpatients with SSNHL were assigned to 4 subgroups according to the audiogram shape and treated with systemic methylprednisolone. The numbers of white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, and monocytes were counted. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were calculated and statistically analyzed. Results: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, MLR, and systemic immune index (SII) of SSNHL patients were significantly higher than the control group, while PLR was not statistically significant. There were no statistical differences in NLR, PLR, MLR, and SII among the 4 subgroups. Conclusion: Immune-inflammatory response may be a common pathogenesis in all SSNHL patients with different audiogram shapes. The predictive value of these hematologic markers needs further research in the future.

Dexamethasone Effect on Sudden Hearing Loss is Validated in Stress-induced Animal Models: Hypothetical Study

BACKGROUND

Stress could be a contributing cause of sudden hearing loss. This study intended to develop an animal model of stress-induced sudden hearing loss and to evaluate the effects of dexamethasone.

METHODS

Two stress models (I and II) for rats were designed using various stressors and modified by adjusting the stress protocol to increase the threshold significantly. For the stress model with a significant increase in threshold after stress exposure, changes in cortisol levels according to stress exposure were measured. The threshold shift and the change in the cellular structure associated with stress exposure and dexamethasone administration were analyzed.

RESULTS

While hearing thresholds increased only at 16 kHz in rats of stress model I (n=10), the thresholds increased at 16 and 32 kHz in rats of stress model II (n=16). Cortisol level increased after stress exposure (P = .015) in stress model II. Among stress model II rats (stress only and stress+dexamethasone groups), the threshold shift at 16 kHz significantly decreased 1 day after dexamethasone injection in the stress+dexamethasone group (n=8). Histologically, the cochlear cellularity of the stress+dexamethasone group was more compact than that of the stressonly group (n=8).

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary study presented the development of an animal model of stress-induced sudden hearing loss and the positive results of steroids in terms of hearing recovery.

Comorbidities and laboratory changes of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a review

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is defined as an abrupt hearing loss of more than 30 dB in three contiguous frequencies within 72 h. It is an emergency disease requiring immediate diagnosis and treatment. The incidence of SSNHL in Western countries' population is estimated between 5 and 20 per 1,00,000 inhabitants. The etiology of SSNHL remains unknown. Due to the uncertainty of the cause of SSNHL, at present, no specific treatment targets the cause of SSNHL, resulting in poor efficacy. Previous studies have reported that some comorbidities are risk factors for SSNHL, and some laboratory results may provide some clues for the etiology of SSNHL. Atherosclerosis, microthrombosis, inflammation, and the immune system may be the main etiological factors for SSNHL. This study confirms that SSNHL is a multifactorial disease. Some comorbidities, such as virus infections, are suggested to be the causes of SSNHL. In summary, by analyzing the etiology of SSNHL, more targeting treatments should be used to achieve a better effect.

Efficacy of intratympanic or postauricular subperiosteal corticosteroid injection combined with systemic corticosteroid in the treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A prospective randomized study

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intratympanic or postauricular subperiosteal glucocorticoid injection combined with systemic glucocorticoid in the treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).

Methods

This study is a prospective randomized controlled study. This study included unilateral SSNHL patients who were hospitalized in our department between January 2020 and June 2021. Patients were randomly divided into three groups (groups A, B, and C). Patients in group A were treated with an intratympanic corticosteroid injection combined with systemic corticosteroid treatment, and patients in group B received a postauricular corticosteroid injection combined with systemic corticosteroid treatment. Patients in group C (control group) were treated with systemic corticosteroid alone. The case number of groups A, B, and C was 311, 375, and 369, respectively.

Results

There was no significant difference in gender distribution, the proportion of left and right affected ears, and the average interval from onset to treatment among the three groups (P > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in their average age, distribution of audiogram type, and hearing loss levels among them (P < 0.01). Our study shows that there was no significant difference in average hearing threshold improvement before and after treatment in the three groups (P > 0.05). Regarding the complications, in group A, 33 patients (10.6%) had a transient vertigo attack during tympanic injection, which lasted for ~1-3 min. In group B, 20 patients (6.43%) complained of pain at the injection site, which disappeared after 1-3 days. No other complications occurred in all the other patients.

Conclusion

The addition of intratympanic or postauricular corticosteroid to systemic steroids did not result in a significant effect on hearing recovery in SSNHL. No obvious complications occur in SSNHL patients treated with intratympanic injection or postauricular injection of corticosteroid.

Clinical trial registration

[chictr.org.cn], registration number: ChiCTR2100048762.

Characteristics and prognostic analysis of simultaneous bilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Objective

To evaluate the clinical characteristics of simultaneous bilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss (Si-BSSNHL) as well as its prognostic factors.

Methods

Patients with Si-BSSNHL who were admitted to the Department of Otology Medicine between December 2018 and December 2021 were enrolled in the case group. Propensity score matching (PSM) for sex and age was used to select the control group, which included people who had unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss (USSNHL) during the same time period. Hearing recovery, audiological examinations, vestibular function assessments, laboratory tests, and demographic and clinical manifestations were analyzed for intergroup comparisons. Binary logistic regressions were used for both univariate and multivariate analyses of Si-BSSNHL prognostic factors.

Results

Before PSM, the Si-BSSNHL and USSNHL groups differed significantly (p < 0.05) in terms of time from onset to treatment, initial pure-tone average (PTA), final PTA, hearing gain, audiogram curve type, proportion of tinnitus, high-density lipoprotein level, homocysteine level, and effective rate. After PSM, significant differences were also observed in time from onset to treatment, initial PTA, final PTA, hearing gain, total and indirect bilirubin levels, homocysteine level, and effective rate between the two groups (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the classification of therapeutic effects between the two groups (p < 0.001). For prognostic analysis, the audiogram curve type was significantly different between the effective group and the ineffective groups of Si-BSSNHL (p = 0.01), in which the sloping type was an independent risk factor for the prognosis of the right ear in Si-SSNHL (95% confidence interval, 0.006-0.549, p = 0.013).

Conclusion

Patients with Si-BSSNHL had mild deafness, elevated total and indirect bilirubin and homocysteine levels, and poorer prognosis than those with USSNHL. Audiogram curve type was linked to the therapeutic effect of Si-BSSNHL, and the sloping type was an independent risk factor for a poor prognosis in the right ear of Si-SSNHL.

Short-term effects of intravenous batroxobin in treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a propensity score-matched study

Background

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) can cause great panic in patients. Whether it is advantageous to add intravenous batroxobin in the treatment of SSNHL remains to be determined. This study aimed to compare the short-term efficacy of therapy combined with intravenous batroxobin and that without intravenous batroxobin in SSNHL patients.

Methods

This retrospective study harvested the data of SSNHL patients hospitalized in our department from January 2008 to April 2021. The hearing levels on the admitted day (before treatment) and the discharge day were considered pre-treatment hearing and post-treatment hearing, respectively. The hearing gain was the difference value of pre-treatment hearing and post-treatment hearing. We used Siegel's criteria and the Chinese Medical Association of Otolaryngology (CMAO) criteria to evaluate hearing recovery. The complete recovery rate, overall effective rate, and hearing gain at each frequency were considered outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance the baseline characteristics between the batroxobin group and the non-batroxobin group. Sensitivity analysis was carried out in flat-type and total-deafness SSNHL patients.

Results

During the study period, 657 patients with SSNHL were admitted to our department. Among them, a total of 274 patients met the enrolled criteria of our study. After PSM, 162 patients (81 in each group) were included in the analysis. Once the hospitalized treatment was completed, the patients would be discharged the next day. Logistic regression analysis of the propensity score-matched cohort indicated that both the complete recovery rates [Siegel's criteria, OR: 0.734, 95% CI: 0.368-1.466, p = 0.381; CMAO criteria, OR: 0.879, 95% CI: 0.435-1.777, p = 0.720] and the overall effective rates [Siegel's criteria and CMAO criteria, OR: 0.741, 95% CI: 0.399-1.378, p = 0.344] were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. Sensitivity analysis has shown similar results. For flat-type and total-deafness SSNHL patients, no significant difference was found in post-treatment hearing gain at each frequency between the two groups after PSM.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in short-term hearing outcomes between treatment with batroxobin and treatment without batroxobin in SSNHL patients by Siegel's and CMAO criteria after PSM. Future studies for better therapy regimens of SSNHL are still needed.