Voitk AJ, Watts J. The role of cost analysis in deciding whether to provide laparoscopic cholecystectomy in remote communities.
Int J Circumpolar Health 1999;
57 Suppl 1:702-5. [PMID:
10093373]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
To review the role of cost analysis in deciding whether to provide laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a remote community, cholecystectomies for Baffin Region residents were reviewed. Actual cost was calculated using known travel costs, per diem costs, and length of stay (LOS) data. Laparoscopic cost was estimated using LOS and conversion data from the literature. Between 1992 and 1995, 72 patients from the Baffin Region had a cholecystectomy, 61 in Iqaluit and 11 in Montreal. Fifty-seven and five, respectively, were suitable candidates for laparoscopic surgery. LOS was 5.6 days in Iqaluit and 3.5 in Montreal. Annual cost was $167,465 (Canadian). Comparable laparoscopic cholecystectomy cost is $45,411, an annual saving of $122,054. Even after equipment depreciation, laparoscopy provides a calculated saving of over $100,000 a year. However, even maximal decrease in bed utilization is less than 0.5 bed per day. Such small decreases do not allow staffing reduction and, thus, most of the projected savings cannot be realized in practice. Therefore, neither costs nor savings can play a supportive role in a decision to provide laparoscopic cholecystectomy in remote communities. This decision would have to be based on other considerations.
Collapse