Will artificial intelligence chatbots replace clinical pharmacologists? An exploratory study in clinical practice

PURPOSE

Recently, there has been a growing interest in using ChatGPT for various applications in Medicine. We evaluated the interest of OpenAI chatbot (GPT 4.0) for drug information activities at Toulouse Pharmacovigilance Center.

METHODS

Based on a series of 50 randomly selected questions sent to our pharmacovigilance center by healthcare professionals or patients, we compared the level of responses from the chatbot GPT 4.0 with those provided by specialists in pharmacovigilance.

RESULTS

Chatbot answers were globally not acceptable. Responses to inquiries regarding the assessment of drug causality were not consistently precise or clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSION

The interest of chatbot assistance needs to be confirmed or rejected through further studies conducted in other pharmacovigilance centers.

Costs associated with adverse drug reactions in an older population admitted to hospital: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

This study examines healthcare costs associated with adverse drug reactions (ADR) in an older population admitted acutely to an Irish tertiary hospital.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study involving older persons admitted to hospital with and without an ADR. Data was collected at baseline, during hospitalisation and post-discharge. Participants provided information on healthcare resource use three months before admission (baseline) and three months after discharge (follow-up). For each healthcare resource, unit costs were derived and applied. The average cost (standard deviation (SD)) associated with the hospital admission for the ADR and non-ADR are presented. In addition, baseline and follow-up care costs were compared using difference-in-difference analysis and presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Costs by preventability and severity of ADR are also presented.

RESULTS

A total of n = 230 participants were included (n = 93 ADR and n = 137 without ADR). The average cost associated with hospital admission for an ADR was €9538 (SD €10442) and €9828 (SD €11770) for non-ADR. The additional follow-up costs (difference-in-difference) associated with the ADR was estimated at €2047 (95% CI: -€889 to €4983). The mean incremental follow-up cost of definite preventable ADRs was estimated at €1648 (95% CI: -€4310 to €7605), possible preventable ADRs €2259 (95 CI: -€1194 to €5712) and unavoidable ADRs €1757 (95% CI: -€3377 to €6890). The mean incremental follow-up cost associated with moderate severe ADRs was estimated at €1922 (95% CI: -€1088 to €4932) and €3580 (95% CI: -€4898 to €12,058) for severe ADRs.  CONCLUSION: ADRs leading to hospital admission are associated with modest incremental healthcare costs during and three months after admission. Severe and possibly preventable ADRs were associated with higher costs.

Patient-reported reactogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccinations vs. comparator vaccinations: a comparative observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

In the course of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, multiple vaccines were developed. Little was known about reactogenicity and safety in comparison to established vaccines, e.g. influenza, pneumococcus, or herpes zoster. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare self-reported side effects in persons vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 with the incidence of side effects in persons receiving one of the established vaccines.

METHODS

A longitudinal observational study was conducted over a total of 124 days using web-based surveys. Persons receiving either a vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 or one of the established vaccines (comparator group) were included. In the first questionnaire (short-term survey), 2 weeks after vaccination, mainly local and systemic complaints were evaluated. The long-term survey (42 days after vaccination) and follow-up survey (124 weeks after vaccination) focused on medical consultations for any reason. Multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the influence of the vaccine type (SARS-CoV-2 vs. comparator) and demographic factors.

RESULTS

In total, data from 16,636 participants were included. Self-reported reactogenicity was lowest in the comparator group (53.2%) and highest in the ChAdOx1 group (85.3%). Local reactions were reported most frequently after mRNA-1273 (73.9%) and systemic reactions mainly after vector-based vaccines (79.8%). Almost all SARS-CoV-2 vaccines showed increased odds of reporting local or systemic reactions. Approximately equal proportions of participants reported medical consultations. None in the comparator group suspected a link to vaccination, while this was true for just over one in 10 in the mRNA-1273 group. The multivariate analysis showed that people with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were not more likely to report medical consultations; patients who had received a regimen with at least one ChAdOx1 were even less likely to report medical consultations. Younger age, female gender and higher comorbidity were mostly associated with higher odds of medical consultations.

CONCLUSION

The rate of adverse reactions after established vaccinations was roughly comparable to previous studies. Two weeks after vaccination, participants in the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination group reported more local and systemic local reactions than participants in the comparator group. In the further course, however, there were no higher odds of medical consultations in either of the two groups. Thus, altogether, we assume comparable safety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS-ID DRKS00025881 and DRKS-ID DRKS00025373.

Enzalutamide-Induced Acute Maculopapular Rash in Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer: First Case Report from a Tertiary Cancer Care Center of North India

Enzalutamide is a new potent inhibitor of the signaling pathway for the androgen receptor with a half-life of 5.8 days. It has been on the market for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer since November 2013. We report a case of acute generalized exanthematous maculopapular rash induced by enzalutamide. In summary, newer androgen receptor blockers have a propensity to cause skin related adverse effects. Most common among these are apalutamide. Enzalumatamide, per se, is a safe drug and has not been associated frequently in causing maculopapular rash. Few cases has been reported. In all these cases, the drug was discontinued and 2nd line therapy was instituted. In this report, Enzalutamide was withheld for 10 days and anti-histaminics was instituted. After a full recovery, Enzalutamide was reinstituted in treatment. A 62-year-old male patient with no significant medical history, was diagnosed in March 2020 with metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma. Baseline PSA was 456 ng/ml. PSMA PET scan showed evidence of multiple bony metastasis. He was started on Degarelix subcutaneous injection with oral abiraterone initially. PSA level showed initial decreasing trend till September 2021 followed by sudden increase. Intramuscular Injection leuprolide was started and initial responses were good followed by later rise of PSA from January. Tab Xtandi (Enzalutamide) was added to the regimen from 31.1.22. Three days after starting enzalutamide treatment, the patient experienced an acute skin reaction. It is about of the plaques covered with widespread millimetric non-follicular papules. Enzalutamide was stopped after appearance of rashes to avoid further serious adverse effects. Anti-histaminics were started. Complete resolution of skin lesions occurred within 10 days. Tab Enzalutamide was reinstituted on 11th day after stoppage and on complete resolution of skin resolutions. According to the CTCAE 5.0 criteria, these skin rash was graded as grade 2. In view of evidence in literature and clinical improvement after stoppage, the acute drug reaction was attributed to enzalutamide. Uro oncologist can be confronted with adverse skin drug reactions attributable to new therapeutic molecules. The slow resolution of symptoms seems be due to the long half-life of enzalutamide. It should not be withdrawn from therapy owing to these effects. Rather, it should be with stopped for 10-14 days. Basic treatment with anti-histaminics or topical steroids may be enough to warranty the resolution of symptoms, and the drug (Enzalutamide) can be continued thereafter.

Analyses of Dupilumab-Related Ocular Adverse Drug Reactions Using the WHO's VigiBase

INTRODUCTION

Dupilumab is a drug that inhibits the action of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 and is a potent therapeutic drug for allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis. Although its use has been associated with significant ocular adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the IL-4 and IL-13 inhibition may also have favorable therapeutic effects. The aim of this study was to determine the disease spectrum in which the use of dupilumab may have been associated with an increase or decrease of ocular ADRs.

METHODS

We searched the World Health Organization's VigiBase for ADRs associated with the use of dupilumab for data up to 12 June 2022. The number of all ADRs that were retrieved was compared with the number of ocular ADRs associated with the use of dupilumab. Disproportionate reporting was assessed by calculating the information component (IC) values and odds ratios.

RESULTS

Since the introduction of dupilumab, 100,267 ADRs have been reported. Of all the ADRs associated with dupilumab, 28,522 ADRs were ocular complications, and it ranked fourth in the ocular complications by organ level. By assessments of the IC for age ≤ 44 years, the most significantly associated ADRs were dry eye followed by blepharitis including eyelid crusting and dryness and conjunctivitis. Crusting and dryness of the eyelids were the most significant ADRs for all age groups. Other ocular ADRs reported include meibomian gland dysfunction, keratitis, glaucoma, and retinal disorders. In contrast, periorbital edema, neuro-ophthalmic disorders, optic neuritis, and macular edema were significantly reduced by the use of dupilumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab-related ADRs included an increase or decrease of various ocular disorders. The results indicate that dupilumab also has potential therapeutic effects.

Laboratory and demographic predictors of functional assay positive status in suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated immune response against platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin anticoagulants. A priori identification of patients at-risk for HIT remains elusive and a number of risk factors have been identified, but these associations and their effect sizes have limited validation in large cohorts of suspected HIT patients. The aim of this study was to investigate existing anti-PF4/heparin antibody thresholds and model the relationship of demographic variables and anti-PF4/heparin antibody levels with functional assay positivity across multiple institutions in the absence of detailed clinical data. In a large collection of suspected HIT patients (n = 8904), we tested for associations between laboratory and demographic variables and functional assay positive status as well as anti-PF4/heparin antibody levels. We also tested for correlation between IgG-specific and polyspecific (IgG/IgA/IgM) anti-PF4/heparin antibody values and their ability to predict functional assay positive status using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Logistic regression identified increasing anti-PF4/heparin antibody OD levels (OR = 51.84 [37.27-74.34], p < 2.0 × 10-16) and female sex (OR = 1.47 [1.19-1.82], p = 3.5 × 10-4) as risk factors for positive functional assay in the largest cohort with consistent effect sizes in two other cohorts. In a subset of 1175 patients, polyspecific and IgG-specific anti-PF4/heparin antibody values were heterogeneous (mean coefficient of variation = 31.9 %), but strongly correlated (rho = 0.878; p < 2 × 10-16) with similar prediction of functional assay positivity (polyspecific AUROC = 0.976 and IgG-specific AUROC = 0.980). Thus, we recapitulate previously identified risk factors of functional assay positivity, providing precise effect sizes in a large observational population of suspected HIT patients. Our data reinforce the necessity of functional assay confirmation and suggest that, despite heterogeneity, polyspecific and IgG-specific anti-PF4/heparin antibody assays predict functional assay positive status similarly, even in the absence of 4Ts scores and detailed clinical data.

Use of overactive bladder anticholinergic medications associated with falls leading to emergency department visits: results from the ADRED study

PURPOSE

Drug intake might be a modifiable factor for the individual fall-risk of older adults, and anticholinergic properties of drugs need to be considered. This study is aimed at analyzing the association of older adults' individual anticholinergic load with particular focus on use of overactive bladder anticholinergic medications with falls in multi-medicated patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases of the prospective, observational, multi-center study on adverse drug reactions leading to emergency departments (ADRED study) between 2015 and 2018 in Germany were analyzed comparing the exposure of overactive bladder anticholinergic medications on the chance to present with a fall with patients without exposure. Logistic regression analysis was used adjusting for pre-existing conditions, drug exposure, and the individual anticholinergic burden by drug use. To this end, a combination of seven expert-based anticholinergic rating scales was used.

RESULTS

The anticholinergic burden was higher in patients with overactive bladder anticholinergic medications (median 2 [1; 3]) compared to not taking drugs of interest. Presenting with a fall was associated with overactive bladder anticholinergic medications (odds ratio (OR) 2.34 [95% confidence interval 1.14-4.82]). The use of fall-risk increasing drugs was likewise associated (OR 2.30 [1.32-4.00]). The anticholinergic burden itself seemed not to be associated with falls (OR 1.01 [0.90-1.12]).

CONCLUSIONS

Although falls occur multifactorial in older adults and confounding by indication cannot be ruled out, the indication for a drug treatment should be decided with caution when other, non-pharmacological treatment options have been tried.

GERMAN CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER

DRKS-ID: DRKS00008979, registration date 01/11/2017.

Severe hepatotoxicity during treatment with capmatinib

INTRODUCTION

Capmatinib is a mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) inhibitor authorized for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET exon 14 skipping mutation treatment in adult patients.

CASE REPORT

We report a case of an elderly female with a diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping mutation who developed a severe hepatotoxicity after 7 weeks under treatment with capmatinib.

MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME

Capmatinib was immediately discontinued. Hepatotoxicity is included as "warning and precautions" in the product information sheet. The patient was admitted with severe acute hepatitis, secondary hypocoagulability and acute deterioration of renal function. She experienced a rapid worsening with a fatal outcome three days after admission. The causal relationship between capmatinib and the appearance of hepatotoxicity was determined as probable according to Naranjo's modified Karch and Lasagna's imputability algorithm.

DISCUSSION

The recognition and diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are often difficult and delayed. Molecularly targeted agents require careful assessment of liver function both prior to and during therapy. Capmatinib hepatotoxicity is an infrequent but severe adverse drug reaction (ADR). Prescribing information includes recommendations about liver function monitoring. The main approachment for DILI is the removal of the causative agent. Detection and communication of ADRs to the Pharmacovigilance Systems have special relevance for novel drugs, with little data in real life setting.

A Clinical Pharmacist-led Approach on Reducing Drug Related Problems Among Patients with Neurological Disorders: An Interventional Study

Background

Neurological disorders are common in the general population and the majority of patients have other chronic diseases, necessitating the use of multiple medications, which increases the incidence of drug-related problems (DRPs). Studies from different countries discovered an average of 0.29-1.45 DRPs per patient admitted into the neurology unit.

Objectives

To identify common DRPs and to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist's interventions in resolving the identified DRPs in patients with neurological disorders.

Methods

A prospective interventional study was conducted in the Department of Neurology in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Southern India, for a period of six months. Patients aged ≥18 years and had been hospitalized for >24 h, were intensively monitored until discharge for the occurrence of any DRPs and pharmacist interventions were provided. The identified DRPs were classified according to Hepler and Strand's Classification.

Results

A total of 310 prescriptions were reviewed, of which 174 patients (mean age 45.93 ± 2.49 years) experienced at least one DRP during their hospital stay. The average DRP per patient was found to be 1.75, with drug-drug interactions [254 (83%)] being the predominant DRPs, followed by adverse drug reactions [13 (4%)], and drug duplications [9 (3%)]. Most of the drug-drug interactions were pharmacokinetic [144 (56.69%)]. Hyponatremia [2 (15%)]; and nausea and vomiting [2 (15%)] were most commonly reported ADRs. All 306 DRPs involved active clinical pharmacist intervention, of which [275 (89.87%)] of pharmacists' interventions were accepted, which led to modification of the therapy.

Conclusion

Monitoring the use of drugs allowed the clinical pharmacist to detect DRPs and to suggest interventions that promote rational drug prescribing, therapy optimization and enhanced patient safety.

French pharmacovigilance survey of casirivimab - imdevimab monoclonal antibodies in coronavirus disease (COVID-19)

INTRODUCTION

Casirivimab and imdevimab (Ronapreve®) are two recombinant human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that bind to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein, preventing the virus from entering cells. In March 2021, this drug was granted emergency use authorisation (EUA) in France for early treatment of COVID-19 in patients at increased risk of progression to severe COVID-19. In August/September 2021, the indication was expanded to COVID-19 prevention (pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis) and treatment of hospitalised patients requiring non-invasive oxygen therapy. The aim of the study was to better describe the adverse drug reaction (ADR) profile and detect safety signals of this new drug used in COVID-19 treatment.

METHODS

We described ADR profile with casirivimab/imdevimab reported as suspect/interacting drug to the French pharmacovigilance network and the pharmaceutical company between 17/03/2021 and 30/06/2022. Data presented correspond to the 2 periods of the pharmacovigilance survey: the first carried out by the pharmaceutical company for curative and prophylactic uses and the second by Toulouse university regional pharmacovigilance center (RPVC).

RESULTS

A total of 384 reports were analysed and 256 were "serious". ADR profile was comparable between the 2 periods and between curative and prophylactic use, corresponding to expected ADRs such as infusion-related reactions and hypersensitivity, inefficiencies or worsened infections and deaths. Two potential pharmacovigilance signals were also studied: acute pulmonary oedemas and sudden deaths.

DISCUSSION

No pharmacovigilance signal emerged from this 15 months French pharmacovigilance survey. Moreover data from published studies are also reassuring. This pharmacovigilance survey was the first one for the new version of EUA and with a new ADR reporting process i.e. declaration to the RPVC instead of the pharmaceutical company. Casirivimab/imdevimab is no longer used in France today but we continue to monitor this drug for any future evidence of resurgent activity on a new variant of Sars-CoV-2.

Drug allergy knowledge, attitude, and practice: A survey among doctors and pharmacists in public health facilities of Sabah, Malaysia

Background

Given the deficits in allergists and testing capacity, the diagnosis of drug allergy is largely dependent on the clinician's and pharmacist's judgment. The ability to recognize drug allergies and respond appropriately is crucial to patient safety. Currently, there is a void in the evidence that limits the ability to recommend comprehensive and swift improvements on this front.

Objective

This study thus aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice toward drug allergy among doctors and pharmacists working in public healthcare facilities in Sabah, Malaysia.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 24 hospitals and 11 clinics in Sabah. A validated Drug Allergy Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Questionnaire was adapted from a published study and developed on an online survey platform. The questionnaire was distributed to all listed eligible respondents via email and personal messenger service.

Results

A total of 549 doctors and pharmacists responded, with an overall response rate of 18.2%. The total mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 8.3 (SD, 1.98), 18.9 (SD, 2.55), and 17.3 (SD, 4.4), respectively. It was found that pharmacists performed significantly poorer than both medical officers (mean score difference = -0.5; P = 0.006) and specialists (mean score difference = -0.9; P = 0.020) in the knowledge domain. As the time in service doubles, the knowledge score increases significantly by 0.3 (P = 0.015).

Conclusion

Knowledge, attitude, and practice on drug allergy among doctors and pharmacists in Sabah were poor. It is thus timely for advanced educational programs on drug allergy to be formalized and implemented.

Drug-induced delusion: A comprehensive overview of the WHO pharmacovigilance database

INTRODUCTION

A number of prescribed medicines have been reported in cases of drug-induced delusion, such as dopaminergic agents or psychostimulants. But to this day, most studies are based on a limited number of cases and focus on a few drug classes, so a clear overview of this topic remains difficult. To address this issue, we provide in this article a comprehensive analysis of drug-induced delusion, based on the World Health Organization (WHO) pharmacovigilance database.

METHODS

We performed a disproportionality analysis of this database using the information component (IC). The IC compares observed and expected values to find associations between drugs and delusion, using disproportionate Bayesian reporting. An IC0.25 (lower end of the IC 95% credibility interval) > 0 is considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Here we present an analysis of 4559 suspected drug-induced delusion reports in the WHO pharmacovigilance database. These results identified 66 molecules statistically associated with delusion and an extensive analysis of confounding factors and coprescriptions was performed, using full database as background with an IC0.25 > 0. The main drug classes involved were antidepressants, antiepileptics, dopaminergic agents, opioids, antiinfective agents, benzodiazepines, anti-dementia drugs and psychostimulants.

CONCLUSION

These results will help clinicians identify potential suspected drugs associated with delusion and decide which drug to discontinue and eventually lead to a re-evaluation of drug labels for some molecules.

Intensive care drug therapy and its potential adverse effects on blood pressure and heart rate in critically ill children

BACKGROUND

Owing to complex treatment, critically ill children may experience alterations in their vital parameters. We investigated whether such hemodynamic alterations were temporally and causally related to drug therapy.

METHODS

In a university pediatric intensive care unit, we retrospectively analyzed hemodynamic alterations defined as values exceeding the limits set for heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). For causality assessment, we used the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Center (WHO-UMC) system, which categorizes the probability of causality as "certain," "probable," "possible," and "unlikely."

RESULTS

Of 315 analyzed patients with 43,200 drug prescriptions, 59.7% experienced at least one hemodynamic alteration; 39.0% were affected by increased HR, 19.0% by decreased HR, 18.1% by increased BP, and 16.2% by decreased BP. According to drug information databases, 83.9% of administered drugs potentially lead to hemodynamic alterations. Overall, 88.3% of the observed hemodynamic alterations had a temporal relation to the administration of drugs; in 80.2%, more than one drug was involved. Based on the WHO-UMC system, a drug was rated as a "probable" causing factor for only 1.4% of hemodynamic alterations. For the remaining alterations, the probability ratings were lower because of multiple potential causes, e.g., several drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Critically ill children were frequently affected by hemodynamic alterations. The administration of drugs with potentially adverse effects on hemodynamic parameters is often temporally related to hemodynamic alterations. Hemodynamic alterations are often multifactorial, e.g., due to administering multiple drugs in rapid succession; thus, the influence of individual drugs cannot easily be captured with the WHO-UMC system.

Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are a diverse group of reactions mediated by the immune system after exposure to a drug. The Gell and Coombs classification divides immunologic DHRs into 4 major pathophysiologic categories based on immunologic mechanism. Anaphylaxis is a Type I hypersensitivity reaction that requires immediate recognition and treatment. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are a group of dermatologic diseases that result from a Type IV hypersensitivity process and include drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptom (DRESS) syndrome, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Other types of reactions are slow to develop and do not always require rapid treatment. Emergency physicians should have a good understanding of these various types of drug hypersensitivity reactions and how to approach the patient regarding evaluation and treatment.

Erythema multiforme reactions following Pfizer/BioNTech (tozinameran) vaccination: two case-reports with positive rechallenge and review of the literature

AIM

Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) is a COVID-19 vaccine with a reassuring safety profile. The main adverse reactions are mild local reactions. Cutaneous reactions are generally minor. The most common cutaneous reaction reported was a local injection-site reaction.

CASE STUDY

Here we present 2 cases of erythema multiform (EM) following BNT162b2 vaccination with positive rechallenge. The 1st case was about a 51-year-old woman who developed 5 days after the 1st dose of the mRNA Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) a macular, erythematous, round-shaped lesions on the hands, knees and soles. She experienced a positive rechallenge one month later. In the 2nd case, a 55-year-old man presented 6 days following the 2nd shot of the mRNA Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2), targetoid eruption on the upper and lower members. The patient reported that he had the same skin lesions in ankles and soles few days following the 1st shot of the same vaccine.

CONCLUSION

Few cases of EM following COVID-19 vaccination were reported in the literature and positive rechallenge in only one case. Rechallenge was not performed in most cases. Our two cases are particular because of the positive rechallenge in both patients. This is the gold standard to confirm that the vaccine was the culprit agent in inducing EM.

Phenytoin-induced dyskinesia: a case report

BACKGROUND

Dyskinesia is a movement disorder categorized by involuntary movement of muscle. Although dyskinesia can be brought on by taking medications, it can also be a symptom of a variety of diseases. Antiepileptic drug-induced involuntary movements have been well researched. Rare reports have been made for dyskinesia, a type of dystonia caused by phenytoin. The mechanism of its occurrence must be succinctly studied.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 53-year-old Asian patient taking phenytoin (100 mg twice daily) experienced symptoms of perioral muscle involuntary movement, impaired speech, and generalized tremors and was admitted to the hospital. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed significant development of encephalomalacia and porencephaly. The serum phenytoin levels were in the toxic range (33 g/ml). These were suggestive of phenytoin-induced dyskinesia. Levetiracetam and clonazepam were initiated, and the patient showed significant improvement in the symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This case presented a substantial reference value for the differential diagnosis and treatment prognosis of phenytoin-induced dyskinesia. The phenytoin-induced dyskinesia in this patient was successfully reversed with prompt identification and treatment. According to the case study's findings, such people may benefit from periodic therapeutic drug monitoring.

Defining the awareness and attitude of the clinicians through pharmacovigilance in Turkey

BACKGROUND

Pharmacovigilance (PV) is the activities and scientific studies conducted to detect, evaluate, understand or prevent adverse reactions and other drug-related problems.

AIM

To define the awareness and experiences of the clinicians on PV and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in Turkey.

METHODS

The study was cross-sectional and analytical. Data were obtained through a questionnaire. The questionnaire was sent via e-mail. The survey was sent to 2030 physicians and 670 participated.

RESULTS

The most appropriate definition of PV was correctly defined by 53.9% of the participants. The most important goal of PV was correctly defined by 54.9% of the participants, and 27.3% of the participants were aware of the Turkish Pharmacovigilance Center. Nonsurgical physicians had better PV knowledge than surgical physicians. A total of 80.9% of the physicians who encountered ADRs, filled in the ADR notification form, and 8.8% received training on how to fill in the form. PV knowledge of the clinicians was not sufficient. Although half of the physicians encountered ADRs, the rates of seeing and filling in the ADR form were low.

CONCLUSION

Few of the physicians followed the current information about PV. The results provide more comprehensive data on PV practices and ADR reporting at a national level.

Defining the awareness and attitude of the clinicians through pharmacovigilance in Turkey

BACKGROUND

Pharmacovigilance (PV) is the activities and scientific studies conducted to detect, evaluate, understand or prevent adverse reactions and other drug-related problems.

AIM

To define the awareness and experiences of the clinicians on PV and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in Turkey.

METHODS

The study was cross-sectional and analytical. Data were obtained through a questionnaire. The questionnaire was sent via e-mail. The survey was sent to 2030 physicians and 670 participated.

RESULTS

The most appropriate definition of PV was correctly defined by 53.9% of the participants. The most important goal of PV was correctly defined by 54.9% of the participants, and 27.3% of the participants were aware of the Turkish Pharmacovigilance Center. Nonsurgical physicians had better PV knowledge than surgical physicians. A total of 80.9% of the physicians who encountered ADRs, filled in the ADR notification form, and 8.8% received training on how to fill in the form. PV knowledge of the clinicians was not sufficient. Although half of the physicians encountered ADRs, the rates of seeing and filling in the ADR form were low.

CONCLUSION

Few of the physicians followed the current information about PV. The results provide more comprehensive data on PV practices and ADR reporting at a national level.

Identification of adverse drug reactions that may be related to pharmacogenetics in a public hospital in the South of Brazil

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are of great concern in clinical practice. Pharmacogenetics can identify individuals and groups at increased risk of developing ADRs, enabling treatment adjustments to improve outcomes. The study aimed to determine the prevalence of ADRs related to drugs with pharmacogenetic evidence level 1A in a public hospital in Southern Brazil.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

ADR information was collected from the pharmaceutical registries from 2017 to 2019. Drugs that have pharmacogenetic evidence level 1A were selected. Public genomic databases were used to estimate the genotypes/phenotypes frequency.

RESULTS

During the period, 585 ADRs were spontaneously notified. Most were moderate (76.3%), whereas severe reactions accounted for 33.8%. Additionally, 109 ADRs caused by 41 drugs presented pharmacogenetic evidence level 1A, representing 18.6% of all notified reactions. Depending on the drug-gene pair, up to 35% of individuals from Southern Brazil could be at risk of developing ADRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Relevant amount of ADRs were related to drugs with pharmacogenetic recommendations on drug labels and/or guidelines. Genetic information could guide and improve clinical outcomes, decreasing ADR incidence and reducing treatment costs.

Influence of Educational Intervention on Awareness and Attitude of Nursing Students Towards Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting During Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Background and Objectives

Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is a major concern of the pharmacovigilance program of India and has deteriorated further with the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Imparting the knowledge of pharmacovigilance among nursing students would significantly enhance patient care. Hence, this study was framed to evaluate the effect of an educational intervention on awareness and attitude of ADR reporting among nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and Methods

A quasi-experimental pretest-post-test study was conducted among nursing students of a tertiary care hospital in South India. The students were asked to fill out a validated questionnaire to assess Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on ADR reporting, before and after the educational intervention. Knowledge and attitude results were analysed using Mc Nemar's test.

Results

A total of 135 nursing students attended the educational intervention and completed pretest and post-test questionnaires. Around 130 (96.3%) and 107 (79.3%) students were aware of pharmacovigilance and ADR monitoring center following the intervention. Median (interquartile range) of knowledge scores before and after the intervention were 3 (2-3) and 5 (3-7), respectively. Overall knowledge score of ADR reporting significantly improved after the intervention. Sixty two (45.9%) students agreed that ADR reporting would enhance patient safety. ADR reporting was practised by 52 (38.5%) participants. Nearly, 107 (79.3%) students were interested to participate in similar pharmacovigilance training programs.

Conclusion

Educational intervention in pharmacovigilance improved the cognitive and affective domains of pharmacovigilance in nursing students. Periodic training programs are essential for sustained behavioural change in students.

Jordanians' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding adverse drug reactions reporting

Objectives

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the general public knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) reporting and pharmacovigilance in Jordan.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted between July 16, 2022, and July 30, 2022, in Jordan. During the study period, an electronic survey consisting of 4 sections was administered to a convenience sample of Jordanians (aged 18 or above) using 2 social media platforms (Facebook and WhatsApp). Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the predictors of ADRs reporting by the participants.

Results

A total of 441 participants completed the survey. The majority of the participants (67.6%) were females, 53.1% between 26 and 45 years old. Almost all participants (96.3%) were always aware of the indication of the medications they take, the time and frequency (87.8%), and the duration of medications (84.4%). Nearly one-third of the participants (37.4%) asked about their medications' ADRs. However, the drug information leaflet was the most frequently used source of ADR information (33.3%). The majority of responders believed that both healthcare providers and consumers should report ADRs (93.4% and 80.3%, respectively). Only one-quarter of respondents (27.2%) believed that consumers could directly report ADRs through the Jordan pharmacovigilance program. The majority of patients who had experienced ADRs (70.3%) were aware that ADRs should be reported, and among them, 91.9% had reported the ADRs to healthcare providers. Furthermore, few participants (8.1%) reported it to the Jordan National Pharmacovigilance Centre (JNCP). Linear regression revealed that none of the demographic characteristics (age, gender, education, job, and social status) were affecting public reporting practice of the ADRs (P > 0.05 for all).

Conclusion

Respondents showed fair knowledge about adverse drug reactions and their reporting. However, there is a need to initiate educational activities and intervention programs to raise awareness about the JNPC, which will have a positive impact on public health and ensure safe medication use in Jordan.