Biliary emergencies: pancreatitis, cholangitis, and more

The most common cause of acute pancreatitis is gallstones, although many other etiological factors have been identified. The management of the initial episode depends on the severity of the attack and the etiology. In most patients, acute pancreatitis has a benign, self-limited course. However, in the minority who develop infected pancreatic necrosis the mortality can reach 25%. The early assessment of severity and aggressive management of these patients is critical. The roles of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, surgical intervention, enteral feeding and use of antibiotics in acute pancreatitis are discussed in this article. Finally, the origin of recurrent acute pancreatitis is discussed, with particular reference to conditions such as pancreas divisum and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction whose role in the development of acute pancreatitis is controversial, and to hereditary or familial pancreatitis.

[Common bile duct stones and their complications]

At the time of cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis, 7-20% of patients have common bile duct stones. Nearly one third of them are asymptomatic. Routine cholangiography during cholecystectomy allows the diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones during the same operation. Selective indication for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones based on the positive predictive value of indicators limits treatment to symptomatic cases. No single indicator is however completely accurate in predicting common bile duct stones and the natural history of asymptomatic cases is uncertain. Endoscopic stone extraction preceding cholecystectomy is not superior to one-stage surgical treatment. Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones are feasible laparoscopically. Complications of common bile duct stones are cholangitis and acute pancreatitis; if severe, they require specific therapeutic approaches.

Emergency endoscopy

The need for emergency endoscopy is a matter of debate. The time interval for emergency procedures remains to be defined. Most authors propose a time span of 24 h as emergency time, while some define a period of 72 h (especially in acute pancreatitis). Several studies have shown a possible benefit for a select group of patients. Four main indications are established for emergency endoscopy: acute gastrointestinal bleeding (variceal and nonvariceal), acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholangitis. In the case of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, emergency endoscopy enables exact diagnosis and appropriate therapy, and provides important prognostic information. There is some evidence that emergent endoscopic injection therapy improves clinical outcome and reduces mortality in patients with acute ulcer bleeding. Patients do not benefit if endoscopy is performed only as a diagnostic procedure. Controversial results were published recently for emergency endoscopy in acute biliary pancreatitis. There is good evidence that emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is helpful in patients with severe pancreatitis and stone impaction if performed within the first 24 h after onset of symptoms. However, emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is not beneficial for patients with mild pancreatitis if performed later than 72 h (or 24 h) after onset of symptoms. There is a limited number of well established evidence-based indications for emergency endoscopy. Some other indications are still a matter of debate, and controversial opinions have been published.

Post-infantile giant cell hepatitis in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis

In post-infancy, multinucleated giant cell hepatitis is rare. Various conditions and diseases associated with post-infantile giant cell hepatitis have been described, but the pathogenesis remains unknown. In this paper we review the case reports of four patients (3 male, 1 female; aged 22 to 32 years) with primary sclerosing cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis. The follow-up ranges from five to seven years. All patients showed cholestasis and repeated elevation of hepatic transaminases. Patients with viral infections, metabolic disorders and toxic influences were excluded. Histopathology of liver tissue in all four patients revealed giant cell formation with up to 20 nuclei in 20-70% of all hepatocytes. Post-infantile giant cell hepatitis was defined histopathologically. The clinical course of all four patients markedly improved after immunosuppressive treatment. Further improvement was observed with the addition of ursodeoxycholic acid. Follow-up liver biopsies during treatment showed reduced inflammation and a decreased number of giant cells. One patient, who initially was admitted to the hospital with liver cirrhosis died five years later due to a sepsis. The clinical course of the other three patients remained stable during the observation period, and no progression of liver fibrosis was recorded as long as immunosuppressive treatment was continued. Cholestasis and autoimmunity seem to be two important mechanisms triggering hepatic giant cell formation in post-infancy. In the reported cases long-lasting cholestasis in primary sclerosing cholangitis together with features of autoimmune hepatitis seem to have triggered the formation of syncytial hepatic giant cells.

Intramural rupture of the esophagus: a rare complication associated with nasobiliary catheter placement

Intramural rupture of the esophagus developed after short-term nasobiliary catheter placement in an 87-year-old female with choledocholithiasis and suppurative cholangitis. Endoscopy revealed bleeding accompanied by circumferential disruption of the mucosa along the lower third of the esophagus. Withdrawal of the catheter and conservative treatment resulted in recovery of the lesion and relief of symptoms. This rare complication should be kept in mind during the placement of nasobiliary catheter.

[Mirizzi's syndrome]

Six cases of Mirizzi syndrome are reported. The syndrome consists of a special anatomical variant of the cystic duct, which has a low opening but runs side-by-side with the common bile duct, associated with entrapment of a gallstone in the cystic duct or the neck of the gallbladder, partial or total obstruction of the hepatic duct by the stone and by inflammatory lesions, and recurrent cholangitis. Clinical signs are non-specific and suggest at first sight an obstructive jaundice. Pre-operative morphological examination seldom provide a diagnosis before surgery. In the most typical cases ultrasonography shows dilatation of the upper biliary tract with narrowing of the hepatic duct below the dilatation, due to a stone located outside the common bile duct. Opacification of the biliary tract by endoscopic retrograde catheterization of the papilla duodeni or by transparietohepatic puncture give suggestive images (non-opacification of the cystic duct, narrowing of the hepatic duct opposite the extrinsic compression, with overlying dilatation), but these images are not specific. The per-operative diagnosis is difficult owing to the inflammatory lesions, and a diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma may be envisaged. Cholecystectomy with recanalization of the cystic duct suppresses the extrinsic compression and helps the inflammatory lesions to regress. However, opening and draining the common bile duct is often necessary.