Consistent PLAG1 and HMGA2 abnormalities distinguish carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma from its de novo counterparts

Carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma (CA ex-PA) is a malignant salivary gland tumor that arises in association with pleomorphic adenoma (PA). Both PA and CA ex-PA have a broad spectrum of histology, and distinction from their histologic mimics may be difficult based on morphology alone. PLAG1 and HMGA2 abnormalities are the most common genetic events in both PA and CA ex-PA; however, the use of PLAG1 and HMGA2 as adjunct molecular tests has not been well established. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for PLAG1 and HMGA2 was performed on 22 CA ex-PA (10 myoepithelial carcinomas [MECAs], 10 salivary duct carcinomas [SDCs], 1 carcinoma with squamoglandular features, and 1 mixed MECA-adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified), 20 de novo carcinomas (11 MECAs and 9 SDCs), 16 PAs, and 11 PA-histologic mimics. All except 3 CAs ex-PA (86%) were positive for PLAG1 or HMGA2 rearrangements/amplifications. In contrast, 18 (90%) of 20 de novo carcinomas lacked abnormalities in PLAG1 or HMGA2 (P < .01). PLAG1 or HMGA2 rearrangements were identified in 6 (67%) of 9 hypocellular myxoid PAs and in 2 (29%) of 7 cellular PAs. Furthermore, all morphologic mimics of PA were negative for PLAG1 or HMGA2. PLAG1 and HMGA2 rearrangements are the most common genetic events in CA ex-PA regardless of the histologic subtype. Unlike CA ex-PA, de novo carcinomas were negative for PLAG1 and HMGA2. Interestingly, rearrangements of PLAG1/HMGA2 were identified in most hypocellular PAs but only in a small subset of cellular PAs. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for PLAG1 or HMGA2 can be used to distinguish between PA and CA ex-PA and their morphologic mimics.

Identification of genomic alterations in pancreatic cancer using array-based comparative genomic hybridization

Background

Genomic aberration is a common feature of human cancers and also is one of the basic mechanisms that lead to overexpression of oncogenes and underexpression of tumor suppressor genes. Our study aims to identify frequent genomic changes in pancreatic cancer.

Materials and Methods

We used array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) to identify recurrent genomic alterations and validated the protein expression of selected genes by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Sixteen gains and thirty-two losses occurred in more than 30% and 60% of the tumors, respectively. High-level amplifications at 7q21.3–q22.1 and 19q13.2 and homozygous deletions at 1p33–p32.3, 1p22.1, 1q22, 3q27.2, 6p22.3, 6p21.31, 12q13.2, 17p13.2, 17q21.31 and 22q13.1 were identified. Especially, amplification of AKT2 was detected in two carcinomas and homozygous deletion of CDKN2C in other two cases. In 15 independent validation samples, we found that AKT2 (19q13.2) and MCM7 (7q22.1) were amplified in 6 and 9 cases, and CAMTA2 (17p13.2) and PFN1 (17p13.2) were homozygously deleted in 3 and 1 cases. AKT2 and MCM7 were overexpressed, and CAMTA2 and PFN1 were underexpressed in pancreatic cancer tissues than in morphologically normal operative margin tissues. Both GISTIC and Genomic Workbench software identified 22q13.1 containing APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B as the only homozygous deletion region. And the expression levels of APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B were significantly lower in tumor tissues than in morphologically normal operative margin tissues. Further validation showed that overexpression of PSCA was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, and overexpression of HMGA2 was significantly associated with invasive depth of pancreatic cancer.

Conclusion

These recurrent genomic changes may be useful for revealing the mechanism of pancreatic carcinogenesis and providing candidate biomarkers.

RKIP inhibits gastric cancer cell survival and invasion by regulating the expression of HMGA2 and OPN

The objective of this study was to explore the mechanism via which Raf kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP) suppresses the invasion of gastric cancer cells and promote apoptosis, with an attempt to provide evidences for the application of RKIP in treating gastric cancer. The recombinant plasmid pcDNA3.1-RKIP or RKIP-shRNA was transfected into the gastric cancer cell line SGC-7901 using liposome. Then, the messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expressions of RKIP, HMGA2, and OPN were detected using qPCR and Western blotting. The effects of HMGA2 on the proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion of SGC-7901 cells were detected using flow cytometry and Transwell assay. To further explore the regulatory effect of PKIP on the biological activities of HMGA2, we over-expressed or knock down RKIP and HMGA2 simultaneously and detected its effects on the proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion of SGC-7901 cells. As shown by qPCR and Western blotting, after over-expression of RKIP in SGC-7901 cells, the mRNA and protein expressions of RKIP significantly increased (P < 0.01), whereas the mRNA and protein expressions of HMGA2 and OPN significantly decreased (P < 0.01). In contrast, the transfection of RKIP-shRNA in the SGC-7901 cells resulted in opposite results. After over-expression of HMGA2 in SGC-7901 cells, the protein expression of HMGA2 significantly increased (P < 0.01); however, it significantly decreased after the transfection of HMGA2-shRNA (P < 0.01). As shown by Transwell assay and flow cytometry, After the over-expression of HMGA2 in SGC-7901 cells, the (G2 + S) phase fraction significantly increased (P < 0.01); also, the percentage of the apoptotic cells significantly declined (P < 0.05) and the number of invasive cells significantly increased (P < 0.05). However, the interference of the expression of HMGA2 resulted in opposite results. The simultaneous over-expression of RKIP and HMGA2 in SGC-7901 cells or the simultaneous interference of RKIP and HMGA2 showed no significant difference with the control group in terms of (G2 + S) phase fraction, percentage of apoptotic cells, and number of invasive cells (P > 0.05). In conclusion, RKIP can inhibit the survival and invasion of gastric cancer cells and promote apoptosis, possibly by regulating the expression of HMGA2 or OPN.

Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in African Americans provides insights into the genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is more prevalent in African Americans than in Europeans. However, little is known about the genetic risk in African Americans despite the recent identification of more than 70 T2D loci primarily by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in individuals of European ancestry. In order to investigate the genetic architecture of T2D in African Americans, the MEta-analysis of type 2 DIabetes in African Americans (MEDIA) Consortium examined 17 GWAS on T2D comprising 8,284 cases and 15,543 controls in African Americans in stage 1 analysis. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) association analysis was conducted in each study under the additive model after adjustment for age, sex, study site, and principal components. Meta-analysis of approximately 2.6 million genotyped and imputed SNPs in all studies was conducted using an inverse variance-weighted fixed effect model. Replications were performed to follow up 21 loci in up to 6,061 cases and 5,483 controls in African Americans, and 8,130 cases and 38,987 controls of European ancestry. We identified three known loci (TCF7L2, HMGA2 and KCNQ1) and two novel loci (HLA-B and INS-IGF2) at genome-wide significance (4.15 × 10(-94) Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Black or African American/genetics
• Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/genetics
• Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/pathology
• Genome-Wide Association Study
• HLA-B27 Antigen/genetics
• HMGA2 Protein/genetics
• Humans
• KCNQ1 Potassium Channel/genetics
• Mutant Chimeric Proteins/genetics
• Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
• Transcription Factor 7-Like 2 Protein/genetics

Collapse

Grants

• R01 DK078616 NIDDK NIH HHS
• HHSN268201100012C NHLBI NIH HHS
• UL1RR025005 NCRR NIH HHS
• N02-HL-6-4278 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL071025 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01-HL-088215 NHLBI NIH HHS
• UL1 RR033176 NCRR NIH HHS
• U01 HG007417 NHGRI NIH HHS
• U01-HG-004610 NHGRI NIH HHS
• U01DK057303 NIDDK NIH HHS
• R01 HL103612 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268201100009I NHLBI NIH HHS
• UL1 TR000445 NCATS NIH HHS
• U01 DK057304 NIDDK NIH HHS
• 32105-6 PHS HHS
• N01-HC-45205 NHLBI NIH HHS
• UL1RR033176 NCRR NIH HHS
• UL1TR000124 NCATS NIH HHS
• Z01-AG000513 NIA NIH HHS
• Z01 AG000513 Intramural NIH HHS
• M01-RR-01346 NCRR NIH HHS
• N01HC45204 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL061210 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01-HC-05187 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01-HL-071252 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HL59684 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL56266 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL120393 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL087698 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL046380 NHLBI NIH HHS
• S06GM008016-380111 NIGMS NIH HHS
• R01 HL071251 NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01DK57304 NIDDK NIH HHS
• R01 DK070941 NIDDK NIH HHS
• R01-HL-071258 NHLBI NIH HHS
• UL1 TR000150 NCATS NIH HHS
• UL1RR025741 NCRR NIH HHS
• G12 MD007597 NIMHD NIH HHS
• HHSC268200782096C PHS HHS
• R01HL59367 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268201100010C NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01 DK057298 NIDDK NIH HHS
• R01 HL071259 NHLBI NIH HHS
• UL1 RR025005 NCRR NIH HHS
• UL1-RR-025005 NCRR NIH HHS
• HL071025-01A1 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HL47902 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268201100008C NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01 HL080295 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01 AG062101 NIA NIH HHS
• S06GM008016-320107 NIGMS NIH HHS
• HL060894 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01-HC-48047 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01-DK-8925601 NIDDK NIH HHS
• U01 DK057295 NIDDK NIH HHS
• HHSN268201100005G NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL071252 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01HC48049 NHLBI NIH HHS
• Z01 HG200362 Intramural NIH HHS
• HL085251 NHLBI NIH HHS
• Z01HG200362 NHGRI NIH HHS
• M01RR00080 NCRR NIH HHS
• NHGRI T32-HG002536 PHS HHS
• HHSN268201100008I NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01HC45205 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HL047890 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL087660 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01CA92447 NCI NIH HHS
• U01 DK057300 NIDDK NIH HHS
• R01 HL059367 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268201100007C NHLBI NIH HHS
• HL62985 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HL105756 NHLBI NIH HHS
• P30 CA68485 NCI NIH HHS
• HHSN268200800007C NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01-HL-071250 NHLBI NIH HHS
• MC_UU_12015/1 Medical Research Council
• HS08365 AHRQ HHS
• NIH HL 46380 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01HC95169 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01AG62101 NIA NIH HHS
• HL061210 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL085251 NHLBI NIH HHS
• 32118 PHS HHS
• UL1-RR-024156 NCRR NIH HHS
• U01 HL120393 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 CA092447 NCI NIH HHS
• 42107-26 PHS HHS
• 32115 PHS HHS
• HHSN268201100011I NHLBI NIH HHS
• P30 DK079637 NIDDK NIH HHS
• HHSN268201100011C NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL086694 NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01 HG004603 NHGRI NIH HHS
• UL1 RR024156 NCRR NIH HHS
• HL047887 NHLBI NIH HHS
• DP3 DK094311 NIDDK NIH HHS
• N01-HC-45204 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL071250 NHLBI NIH HHS
• T32 HG002536 NHGRI NIH HHS
• U01 DK057303 NIDDK NIH HHS
• N01-HC-95159 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268201300048C NHLBI NIH HHS
• 1R01AG032098-01A1 NIA NIH HHS
• UL1 RR025741 NCRR NIH HHS
• R01 HL087652 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01-HC-95095 NHLBI NIH HHS
• M01-RR000052 NCRR NIH HHS
• HL087652 NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01HG004609 NHGRI NIH HHS
• UL1 TR000124 NCATS NIH HHS
• N01 AG062106 NIA NIH HHS
• HL58625-01A1 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268200625226C PHS HHS
• U01 HG004402 NHGRI NIH HHS
• R01-HL-071251 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01HC55222 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 DK075681 NIDDK NIH HHS
• HL120393 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01HC85086 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N02HL64278 NHLBI NIH HHS
• M01-RR-000080 NCRR NIH HHS
• R01 HL060944 NHLBI NIH HHS
• 32100-2 PHS HHS
• 24152 PHS HHS
• 32119 PHS HHS
• U01HG004402 NHGRI NIH HHS
• U01 DK057249 NIDDK NIH HHS
• R01 AG032098 NIA NIH HHS
• N01-HC-48050 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL105756 NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01 HG004609 NHGRI NIH HHS
• M01-RR-00425 NCRR NIH HHS
• U01 HG004599 NHGRI NIH HHS
• U01 HL047902 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268201100006C NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268201300049C NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01-HC-45134 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 DK066358 NIDDK NIH HHS
• 42129-32 PHS HHS
• M01-RR-00827-29 NCRR NIH HHS
• P30 DK063491 NIDDK NIH HHS
• R01 HL071051 NHLBI NIH HHS
• K99 DK081350 NIDDK NIH HHS
• RC1 HL100185 NHLBI NIH HHS
• P20 MD006899 NIMHD NIH HHS
• R01-HL-071259 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL062985 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01HC95095 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01HL087641 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268201200036C NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 DK084350 NIDDK NIH HHS
• N01-HC-95169 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HL087660 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268201100005I NHLBI NIH HHS
• RC1 HL100245 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01 AG062103 NIA NIH HHS
• U01 NS041588 NINDS NIH HHS
• U01DK057298 NIDDK NIH HHS
• R01-HL-071205 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HL047889 NHLBI NIH HHS
• M01 RR000052 NCRR NIH HHS
• N01-HC-48049 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HL060944 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01HC95159 NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01DK057300 NIDDK NIH HHS
• NR0224103 NINR NIH HHS
• N01 HC045134 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268201300047C NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01-HL-087700 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268201300050C NHLBI NIH HHS
• 32108-9 PHS HHS
• N01HC65226 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01-DK-075681 NIDDK NIH HHS
• U01 HL072518 NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01 DK078616 NIDDK NIH HHS
• 098395 Wellcome Trust
• HL087698 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL080295 NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01 DK057329 NIDDK NIH HHS
• MC_PC_U127592696 Medical Research Council
• P30 CA068485 NCI NIH HHS
• HHSN268200782096C NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL088215 NHLBI NIH HHS
• M01 RR010284 NCRR NIH HHS
• M01 RR000425 NCRR NIH HHS
• M01-RR-07122 NCRR NIH HHS
• M01 RR007122 NCRR NIH HHS
• U01DK57292 NIDDK NIH HHS
• R01 HL059684 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HL100245 NHLBI NIH HHS
• M01 RR07122 NCRR NIH HHS
• N01HC48050 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01HC85082 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01HC05187 NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01 HG006378 NHGRI NIH HHS
• N01HC48047 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01HC85083 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HHSN268201100005C NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL071205 NHLBI NIH HHS
• DK063491 NIDDK NIH HHS
• HHSN268201100009C NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01DK57329 NIDDK NIH HHS
• R01 DK053591 NIDDK NIH HHS
• M01 RR000997 NCRR NIH HHS
• UL1 TR001120 NCATS NIH HHS
• HHSN268201100007I NHLBI NIH HHS
• Wellcome Trust
• HHSN268201300046C NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01-HC-95100 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01AG62103 NIA NIH HHS
• U01 HG004610 NHGRI NIH HHS
• U01DK070657 NIDDK NIH HHS
• R01-HL-071051 NHLBI NIH HHS
• HL080295 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HS008365 AHRQ HHS
• N01AG62106 NIA NIH HHS
• U01-HG-004608 NHGRI NIH HHS
• N01-WH-22110 WHI NIH HHS
• 32122 PHS HHS
• U01DK057249 NIDDK NIH HHS
• U01 DK057292 NIDDK NIH HHS
• N01CO12400 NCI NIH HHS
• N01HC85079 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N02-HL-64278 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL060894 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 AG023629 NIA NIH HHS
• HL100185 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01 HL087641 NHLBI NIH HHS
• 2M01RR010284 NCRR NIH HHS
• 44221 PHS HHS
• HL103612 NHLBI NIH HHS
• M01 RR000827 NCRR NIH HHS
• M01 RR000080 NCRR NIH HHS
• R01 HL087700 NHLBI NIH HHS
• N01HC85080 NHLBI NIH HHS
• 32111-13 PHS HHS
• AG023629 NIA NIH HHS
• R01 HL071258 NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01 HG004608 NHGRI NIH HHS
• R56 AG023629 NIA NIH HHS
• M01-RR-00997 NCRR NIH HHS
• N01WH22110 WHI NIH HHS
• N01-CO-12400 NCI NIH HHS
• U01 DK070657 NIDDK NIH HHS
• U01DK57295 NIDDK NIH HHS
• N01HC48048 NHLBI NIH HHS
• M01 RR001346 NCRR NIH HHS
• N01-HC-65226 NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01HL72518 NHLBI NIH HHS
• U01-HG-04599 NHGRI NIH HHS
• N01HC85081 NHLBI NIH HHS
• R01HL086694 NHLBI NIH HHS

Collapse

MicroRNA-146b promotes myogenic differentiation and modulates multiple gene targets in muscle cells

MicroRNAs are established as crucial modulators of skeletal myogenesis, but our knowledge about their identity and targets remains limited. In this study, we have identified microRNA-146b (miR-146b) as a novel regulator of skeletal myoblast differentiation. Following up on a previous microRNA profiling study, we establish that the expression of miR-146b is up-regulated during myoblast differentiation in vitro and muscle regeneration in vivo. Inhibition of miR-146b led to reduced myoblast differentiation, whereas overexpression of miR-146b enhanced differentiation. Computational prediction combined with gene expression information has revealed candidates for miR-146b targets in muscles. Among them, the expression of Smad4, Notch1, and Hmga2 are significantly suppressed by miR-146b overexpression in myocytes. In addition, expression levels of Smad4, Notch1 and Hmga2 are decreased during myoblast differentiation and muscle regeneration, inversely correlating to the levels of miR-146b. Importantly, inhibition of endogenous miR-146b prevents the down-regulation of Smad4, Notch1 and Hmga2 during differentiation. Furthermore, miR-146b directly targets the microRNA response elements (MREs) in the 3'UTR of those genes as assessed by reporter assays. Reporters with the seed regions of MREs mutated are insensitive to miR-146b, further confirming the specificity of targeting. In conclusion, miR-146b is a positive regulator of myogenic differentiation, possibly acting through multiple targets.

Generation and characterisation of a canine EGFP-HMGA2 prostate cancer in vitro model

The architectural transcription factor HMGA2 is abundantly expressed during embryonic development. In several malignant neoplasias including prostate cancer, high re-expression of HMGA2 is correlated with malignancy and poor prognosis. The let-7 miRNA family is described to regulate HMGA2 negatively. The balance of let-7 and HMGA2 is discussed to play a major role in tumour aetiology. To further analyse the role of HMGA2 in prostate cancer a stable and highly reproducible in vitro model system is precondition. Herein we established a canine CT1258-EGFP-HMGA2 prostate cancer cell line stably overexpressing HMGA2 linked to EGFP and in addition the reference cell line CT1258-EGFP expressing solely EGFP to exclude EGFP-induced effects. Both recombinant cell lines were characterised by fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry. The proliferative effect of ectopically overexpressed HMGA2 was determined via BrdU assays. Comparative karyotyping of the derived and the initial CT1258 cell lines was performed to analyse chromosome consistency. The impact of the ectopic HMGA2 expression on its regulator let-7a was analysed by quantitative real-time PCR. Fluorescence microscopy and immunocytochemistry detected successful expression of the EGFP-HMGA2 fusion protein exclusively accumulating in the nucleus. Gene expression analyses confirmed HMGA2 overexpression in CT1258-EGFP-HMGA2 in comparison to CT1258-EGFP and native cells. Significantly higher let-7a expression levels were found in CT1258-EGFP-HMGA2 and CT1258-EGFP. The BrdU assays detected an increased proliferation of CT1258-HMGA2-EGFP cells compared to CT1258-EGFP and native CT1258. The cytogenetic analyses of CT1258-EGFP and CT1258-EGFP-HMGA2 resulted in a comparable hyperdiploid karyotype as described for native CT1258 cells. To further investigate the impact of recombinant overexpressed HMGA2 on CT1258 cells, other selected targets described to underlie HMGA2 regulation were screened in addition. The new fluorescent CT1258-EGFP-HMGA2 cell line is a stable tool enabling in vitro and in vivo analyses of the HMGA2-mediated effects on cells and the development and pathogenesis of prostate cancer.

Mir-23b and miR-130b expression is downregulated in pituitary adenomas

MicroRNA (miRNA) deregulation plays a critical role in tumorigenesis. miR-23b and miR-130b are induced by thyrotropin in thyroid cells in a cAMP-dependent manner. The aim of our work has been to investigate the possible role of miR-23b and miR-130b in pituitary tumorigenesis. We have analyzed their expression in a panel of pituitary adenomas (PAs) including GH and NFPA adenomas. We report that miR-23b and miR-130b are drastically reduced in GH, gonadotroph and NFPA adenomas in comparison with normal pituitary gland. Interestingly, the overexpression of miR-23b and miR-130b inhibits cell proliferation arresting the cells in the G1 and G2 phase of the cell cycle, respectively. Moreover, we demonstrate that miR-23b and miR-130b target HMGA2 and cyclin A2 (CCNA2) genes, respectively. Finally, downregulation of miR-23b and miR-130b expression is associated with increased levels of their respective targets in human PAs. These findings suggest that miR-23b and miR-130b downregulation may contribute to pituitary tumorigenesis.

HMGA2, the architectural transcription factor high mobility group, is expressed in the developing and mature mouse cochlea

Hmga2 protein belongs to the non-histone chromosomal high-mobility group (HMG) protein family. HMG proteins have been shown to function as architectural transcription regulators, facilitating enhanceosome formation on a variety of mammalian promoters. Hmga2 are expressed at high levels in embryonic and transformed cells. Terminally differentiated cells, however, have been reported to express only minimal, if any, Hmga2. Our previous affymetrix array data showed that Hmga2 is expressed in the developing and adult mammalian cochleas. However, the spatio-temporal expression pattern of Hmga2 in the murine cochlea remained unknown. In this study, we report the expression of Hmga2 in developing and adult cochleas using immunohistochemistry and quantitative real time PCR analysis. Immunolabeling of Hmga2 in the embryonic, postnatal, and mature cochleas showed broad Hmga2 expression in embryonic cochlea (E14.5) at the level of the developing organ of Corti in differentiating hair cells, supporting cells, in addition to immature cells in the GER and LER areas. By postnatal stage (P0–P3), Hmga2 is predominantly expressed in the hair and supporting cells, in addition to cells in the LER area. By P12, Hmga2 immunolabeling is confined to the hair cells and supporting cells. In the adult ear, Hmga2 expression is maintained in the hair and supporting cell subtypes (i.e. Deiters’ cells, Hensen cells, pillar cells, inner phalangeal and border cells) in the cochlear epithelium. Using quantitative real time PCR, we found a decrease in transcript level for Hmga2 comparable to other known inner ear developmental genes (Sox2, Atoh1, Jagged1 and Hes5) in the cochlear epithelium of the adult relative to postnatal ears. These data provide for the first time the tissue-specific expression and transcription level of Hmga2 during inner ear development and suggest its potential dual role in early differentiation and maintenance of both hair and supporting cell phenotypes.

Correlated expression of HMGA2 and PLAG1 in thyroid tumors, uterine leiomyomas and experimental models

In pleomorphic adenomas of the salivary glands (PASG) recurrent chromosomal rearrangements affecting either 8q12 or 12q14∼15 lead to an overexpression of the genes of the genuine transcription factor PLAG1 or the architectural transcription factor HMGA2, respectively. Both genes are also affected by recurrent chromosomal rearrangements in benign adipocytic tumors as e. g. lipomas and lipoblastomas. Herein, we observed a strong correlation between the expression of HMGA2 and PLAG1 in 14 benign and 23 malignant thyroid tumors. To address the question if PLAG1 can be activated by HMGA2, the expression of both genes was quantified in 32 uterine leiomyomas 17 of which exhibited an overexpression of HMGA2. All leiomyomas with HMGA2 overexpression also revealed an activation of PLAG1 in the absence of detectable chromosome 8 abnormalities affecting the PLAG1 locus. To further investigate if the overexpression of PLAG1 is inducible by HMGA2 alone, HMGA2 was transiently overexpressed in MCF-7 cells. An increased PLAG1 expression was observed 24 and 48 h after transfection. Likewise, stimulation of HMGA2 by FGF1 in adipose tissue-derived stem cells led to a simultaneous increase of PLAG1 mRNA. Altogether, these data suggest that HMGA2 is an upstream activator of PLAG1. Accordingly, this may explain the formation of tumors as similar as lipomas and lipoblastomas resulting from an activation of either of both genes by chromosomal rearrangements.

Polyamines are oncometabolites that regulate the LIN28/let-7 pathway in colorectal cancer cells

Polyamine metabolism is a highly coordinated process that is essential for normal development and neoplastic growth in mammals. Although polyamine metabolism is a validated pathway for prevention of carcinogenesis, the mechanisms by which polyamines elicit their tumorigenic effects are poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the role of polyamine metabolism in colon cancer by screening a non-coding RNA (ncRNA) platform to identify polyamine responsive signaling nodes. We report that multiple non-coding RNAs are altered by polyamine depletion including induction of microRNA (miRNA) let-7i, a member of the tumor suppressive let-7 family. The let-7 family targets several RNAs for translational repression, including the growth-associated transcription factor HMGA2 and is negatively regulated by the pluripotency factor LIN28. Depletion of polyamines using difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) or genetic knockdown of the polyamine-modified eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A isoforms 1 and 2 (eIF5A1/2) resulted in robust reduction of both HMGA2 and LIN28. Locked nucleic acid (LNA) oligonucleotides targeting the seed region of the let-7 family rescued the expression of HMGA2, but not LIN28, in both DFMO-treated and eIF5A1/2 knockdown cultures. Our findings suggest that polyamines are oncometabolites that influence specific aspects of tumorigenesis by regulating pluripotency associated factors, such as LIN28, via an eIF5A-dependent but let-7-independent mechanism while the expression of proliferation-related genes regulated by let-7, such as HMGA2, is mediated through microRNA mediated repression. Therefore, manipulating polyamine metabolism may be a novel method of targeting the LIN28/let-7 pathway in specific disease states.

Shortening of the 3' untranslated region: an important mechanism leading to overexpression of HMGA2 in serous ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Oncofetal protein high-mobility-group AT-hook protein 2 (HMGA2) is reactivated in serous ovarian cancer (SOC) and its overexpression correlates with poor prognosis. To explore the mechanism, we investigated whether HMGA2 could avoid microRNA regulation due to gene truncation or 3' UTR shortening by alternative polyadenylation.

METHODS

Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to evaluate the abundance of different regions of HMGA2 mRNA in 46 SOC samples. Rapid amplification of cDNA 3' ends (3' RACE) and Southern blotting were used to confirm the shortening of 3' untranslated region (UTR). 5' RACE and Southern blotting were used to prove the mRNA decay.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the ratio of the stable coding region to the fragile region was observed between SOC and control normal fallopian tubes, indicating that the HMGA2 gene is not truncated in SOC. Varying degrees of 3' UTR shortening in SOC samples were observed by comparing the abundance of the proximal region and distal region of the HMGA2 3' UTR. The ratio of the proximal to the distal region of the 3' UTR correlated significantly with expression of the HMGA2 coding region in SOC (r = 0.579, P < 0.01). Moreover, although the abundance of the HMGA2 coding region varied, all samples, including the very low expressed samples, exhibit relatively high levels of the proximal 3' UTR region, suggesting a dynamic decay of HMGA2 mRNA from the 5' end. The shortening of 3' UTR and the decay from the 5' end were confirmed by 3' RACE, 5' RACE and subsequent Southern blotting.

CONCLUSION

Heterogeneous 3' UTR lengths render HMGA2 susceptible to different levels of negative regulation by microRNAs, which represents an important mechanism of HMGA2 reactivation in SOC.

Permanent activation of HMGA2 in lipomas mimics its temporal physiological activation linked to the gain of adipose tissue

OBJECTIVE

In this study the activation of HMGA2 and overexpression by FGF1-driven stimulation of adipose tissue derived stem cells (ADSCs) in adipose tissue tumors were analyzed. In addition, the expression of HMGA2 and PPAR-gamma mRNA were quantified in canine subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue from normal and overweight purebred dogs.

DESIGN AND METHODS

ADSCs and adipose tissue explants stimulated with FGF1 followed by gene expression analyses of HMGA2 and p14(Arf) using Western-blot and qRT-PCR. Furthermore, canine subcutaneous white adipose tissue (WAT) were analyzed by qRT-PCR for their expression of HMGA2 and PPAR-gamma.

RESULTS

ADSCs and adipose tissue explants are able to execute a HMGA2 response upon FGF1 stimulation. FGF1 enhances proliferation of ADSCs by a HMGA2-dependent mechanism. In lipomas increase of HMGA2 is accompanied by increased expression of p14(Arf) . Furthermore, a significantly elevated level of HMGA2 in overweight dogs and a negative correlation between the expression of HMGA2 and PPAR-gamma in subcutaneous cWAT were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that WAT contains cells that as essential part of adipogenesis up-regulate HMGA2 resulting from growth factor stimulation. In subgroups of lipoma, constitutive activation of HMGA2 due to rearrangements replaces the temporal response triggered by growth factors.

HMGA2 and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

HMGA2, the High Mobility Group A2 gene, plays a very important role in fetal development and carcinogenesis. As an oncofetal gene, it is upregulated in tumors of both epithelial and mesenchymal tissue origin. Chromosomal translocations of HMGA2 are common in mesenchymal tumors, whereas the regulatory mechanisms of HMGA2 in malignant epithelial tumors are much more complex. As an architectural transcription factor, it is involved in multiple biological pathways by targeting different downstream genes in different cancers. HMGA2 is upregulated in both the early and late stages of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) and, according to The Cancer Genomic Atlas, is among a signature of genes overexpressed in ovarian cancer. Recent identification of miR-182 as a mediator of BRCA1 and HMGA2 deregulation in ovarian cancer cells may guide us toward a better understanding of the roles of HMGA2 in ovarian carcinogenesis. In this article, we will review recent developments and findings related to HMGA2, including its regulation, oncogenic properties, major functional pathways associated with the tumorigenesis of HGSOC, and its potential role as a biomarker for clinical application.

HMGA2 expression in the PC-3 prostate cancer cell line is autonomous of growth factor stimulation

BACKGROUND

High-mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA2) protein acts as an oncofoetal transcriptional regulator. In mesenchymal tissues, its expression can be induced by a variety of growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF1) and platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) as well as by foetal bovine serum (FBS), thus enhancing proliferation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To examine these effects in epithelial malignancies, we used the PC-3 prostate cancer cell line for assaying proliferation and HMGA2 expression in response to incubation with growth factors and FBS. The HMGA2 locus was investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) for loss, amplification or re-arrangement.

RESULTS

PC-3 is a cell line that moderately overexpresses HMGA2. None of the growth factors nor FBS caused significantly increased expression of HMGA2. In contrast, a significantly augmented proliferation rate was observed when applying FGF1 or PDGF-BB for 12 h.

CONCLUSION

HMGA2 is expressed independently of external stimuli, whereas proliferation stimulated by growth factors is independent of further elevated HMGA2 expression.

HMGA2/TET1/HOXA9 signaling pathway regulates breast cancer growth and metastasis

The ten-eleven translocation (TET) family of methylcytosine dioxygenases initiates demethylation of DNA and is associated with tumorigenesis in many cancers; however, the mechanism is mostly unknown. Here we identify upstream activators and downstream effectors of TET1 in breast cancer using human breast cancer cells and a genetically engineered mouse model. We show that depleting the architectural transcription factor high mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA2) induces TET1. TET1 binds and demethylates its own promoter and the promoter of homeobox A (HOXA) genes, enhancing its own expression and stimulating expression of HOXA genes including HOXA7 and HOXA9. Both TET1 and HOXA9 suppress breast tumor growth and metastasis in mouse xenografts. The genes comprising the HMGA2-TET1-HOXA9 pathway are coordinately regulated in breast cancer and together encompass a prognostic signature for patient survival. These results implicate the HMGA2-TET1-HOX signaling pathway in the epigenetic regulation of human breast cancer and highlight the importance of targeting methylation in specific subpopulations as a potential therapeutic strategy.

RASSF6 expression in adipocytes is down-regulated by interaction with macrophages

Macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue is associated with obesity and the crosstalk between adipocytes and infiltrated macrophages has been investigated as an important pathological phenomenon during adipose tissue inflammation. Here, we sought to identify adipocyte mRNAs that are regulated by interaction with infiltrated macrophages in vivo. An anti-inflammatory vitamin, vitamin B6, suppressed macrophage infiltration into white adipose tissue and altered mRNA expression. We identified >3500 genes whose expression is significantly altered during the development of obesity in db/db mice, and compared them to the adipose tissue mRNA expression profile of mice supplemented with vitamin B6. We identified PTX3 and MMP3 as candidate genes regulated by macrophage infiltration. PTX3 and MMP3 mRNA expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes was up-regulated by activated RAW264.7 cells and these mRNA levels were positively correlated with macrophage number in adipose tissue in vivo. Next, we screened adipose genes down-regulated by the interaction with macrophages, and isolated RASSF6 (Ras association domain family 6). RASSF6 mRNA in adipocytes was decreased by culture medium conditioned by activated RAW264.7 cells, and RASSF6 mRNA level was negatively correlated with macrophage number in adipose tissue, suggesting that adipocyte RASSF6 mRNA expression is down-regulated by infiltrated macrophages in vivo. Finally, this study also showed that decreased RASSF6 expression up-regulates mRNA expression of several genes, such as CD44 and high mobility group protein HMGA2. These data provide novel insights into the biological significance of interactions between adipocytes and macrophages in adipose tissue during the development of obesity.

MicroRNA-98 sensitizes cisplatin-resistant human lung adenocarcinoma cells by up-regulation of HMGA2

This study was done to explore the role of microRNA-98 (miR-98) in cisplatin sensitization in human lung adenocarcinoma cell line. Differential expressions of miRNAs were analysed between cisplatin-resistant human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549/DDP and its parental cell A549 by miRNAs microarray, of which 14 miRNAs were showed to be significantly (>2-fold) up-regulated and 8 miRNAs had marked down-regulation (<0.5-fold) in A549/DDP cells compared with in A549 cells. MiR-98, a member in the let-7 family, acts as a negative regulator in the expression of HMGA2 (high mobility group A2) oncogene, and it has been shown to have a nearly 3-fold decrease in A549/DDP cells. We found that elevated expression of miR-98 led to a higher sensitivity of A549/DDP cells to cisplatin, and the protein level of HMGA2, was clearly up-regulated in both A549/DDP and A549 cells by miR-98. Moreover, both Bcl-XL and Bcl-2, were down-regulated in the Pre-miR-98(TM) transfectants cells. We for the first time demonstrated that the expression of miR-98 increases cells spontaneous apoptosis and sensitizes cells to cisplatin at least in part via HMGA2 up-regulation. Our findings provided insight into some specific miRNAs in lung cancer as potential therapeutic targets.

Effect of silencing of high mobility group A2 gene on gastric cancer MKN-45 cells

AIM: To investigate the effect of high mobility group A2 (HMGA2) gene silencing on gastric cancer MKN-45 cells in vitro.

METHODS: HMGA2 short hairpin RNA (shRNA) expression plasmids were constructed, including a pair of random scrambled sequences. Human gastric cancer cell line MKN-45 cells were divided into three groups: blank control group (non-transfected cells), transfected group (cells transfected with HMGA2 shRNA recombinant plasmid) and scrambled sequence group (transfected with random scrambled plasmid). Cells were transfected with HMGA2 shRNA recombinant plasmids and scrambled plasmid in vitro, and the cells transfection efficiency was assayed by fluorescence microscopy. The HMGA2 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression was detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, gastric cancer cells apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry, cell proliferation was detected by methyl thiazol tetrazolium, and the protein expression of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase B (Akt), P27, caspase-9 and B-cell leukemia/lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) were analyzed by Western blotting.

RESULTS: Compared with the blank control group and the scrambled sequence group, the levels of HMGA2 mRNA and protein expression in the transfected group were significantly reduced (P < 0.05). The relative HMGA2 mRNA expression levels of the blank control group, transfected group and scrambled sequence group were 0.674 ± 0.129, 0.374 ± 0.048 and 0.689 ± 0.124, respectively. The relative HMGA2 protein expression levels of the blank control group, transfected group and scrambled sequence group were 0.554 ± 0.082, 0.113 ± 0.032 and 0.484 ± 0.123, respectively. Moreover, transfection with the scrambled sequence had no effect on the expression of HMGA2. After being transfected with shRNA for 24, 48 and 72 h, the cell apoptotic rates of the transfected group were 21.65% ± 0.28%, 39.98% ± 1.82% and 24.51% ± 0.93%, respectively, which significantly higher than those of blank control group (4.72% ± 1.34%, 5.83% ± 0.13% and 5.22% ± 1.07%) and scrambled sequence group (4.28% ± 1.33%, 7.87% ± 1.43% and 6.71% ± 0.92%). After 24, 48 and 72 h, the cell proliferation inhibition rates in the transfected group were 31.57% ± 1.17%, 39.45% ± 2.07% and 37.56% ± 2.32%, respectively; the most obvious cell proliferation inhibition appeared at 48 h after transfection. Compared with the blank control group and scrambled sequence group, after transfection of shRNA for 72 h, the protein expression levels of PI3K (0.042 ± 0.005 vs 0.069 ± 0.003, 0.067 ± 0.05), Akt (0.248 ± 0.004 vs 0.489 ± 0.006, 0.496 ± 0.104) and Bcl-2 (0.295 ± 0.084 vs 0.592 ± 0.072, 0.594 ± 0.109) were significantly reduced. The protein expression levels of P27 (0.151 ± 0.010 vs 0.068 ± 0.014, 0.060 ± 0.013) and caspase-9 (0.136 ± 0.042 vs 0.075 ± 0.010, 0.073 ± 0.072) were significantly upregulated.

CONCLUSION: HMGA2 shRNA gene silencing induces apoptosis and suppresses proliferation of MKN-45 cells.

Common variant in the HMGA2 gene increases susceptibility to nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic metabolic disorder associated with devastating microvascular complications. Genome-wide association studies have identified more than 60 genetic variants associated with type 2 diabetes and/or glucose and insulin traits, but their role in the progression of diabetes is not established. The aim of this study was to explore whether these variants were also associated with the development of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We studied 28 genetic variants in 2,229 patients with type 2 diabetes from the local Malmö Scania Diabetes Registry (SDR) published during 2007-2010. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) was defined as micro- or macroalbuminuria and/or end-stage renal disease. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was assessed using the MDRD-4 formula. Replication genotyping of rs1531343 was performed in diabetic (Steno type 2 diabetes [n = 345], Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland [Go-DARTS] [n = 784]) and non-diabetic (Malmö Preventive Project [n = 2,523], Botnia study [n = 2,247]) cohorts.

RESULTS

In the SDR, HMGA2 single-nucleotide polymorphism rs1531343 was associated with DN (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.20, 1.87, p = 0.00035). In the combined analysis totalling 3,358 patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 1,233 cases, n = 2,125 controls), carriers of the C-allele had a 1.45-fold increased risk of developing nephropathy (95% CI 1.20, 1.75, p = 0.00010). Furthermore, the risk C-allele was associated with lower eGFR in patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 2,499, β ± SEM, -3.7 ± 1.2 ml/min, p = 0.002) and also in non-diabetic individuals (n = 17,602, β ± SEM, -0.008 ± 0.003 ml/min (log( e )), p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

These data demonstrate that the HMGA2 variant seems to be associated with increased risk of developing nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes and lower eGFR in both diabetic and non-diabetic individuals and could thus be a common denominator in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and kidney complications.

[Construction of let-7d expression vector and its inhibitory effect on HMGA2 and ras expression in human ovarian cancer cells in vitro]

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the role of let-7d in regulating the biological behavior of ovarian cancer cells and their expressions of HMGA2 and ras proteins.

METHODS

The pre-let-7d sequence was synthesized and inserted into pcDNA6.2GW/EmGFPmiR and transfected into ovarian cancer IGROV1 cells to cause pre-let-7d overexpression. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR was employed to examine the expression levels of let-7d miRNA and HMGA2 mRNA, and Western blotting was performed to detect the expressions of HMGA2 and ras protein in the transfected cells. The effect of pcDNA6.2GW-let-7d transfection on IGROV1 cell proliferation was determined using MTT assay and the cell apoptosis rate was measured using flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The eukaryotic expression vector containing the target gene let-7d was successfully constructed and transfected into IGROV1 cells. The transfected cells showed a marked reduction of HMGA2 expression but a less obvious down-regulation of ras expression. Transfection with pcDNA6.2GW-let-7d to suppress the expression of HMGA2 caused alterations of the phenotype of IGROV1 cells shown by a reduced proliferative activity and increased cell apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Let-7d plays an important role in altering the malignant cell phenotype of ovarian cancer IGROV1 cells by regulating the expression of HMGA2.

Expression analysis of MIR182 and its associated target genes in advanced ovarian carcinoma

BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations are common and the hallmarks of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. We found that MIR182, a negative BRCA1 regulator, is significantly overexpressed in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. To examine whether overexpression of MIR182 and its target genes, including BRCA1, HMGA2 (high-mobility group A2), FOXO3 and MTSS1, are associated with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma tumor types and clinical outcome, we studied MIR182 by in situ hybridization and its target gene expression by immunohistochemistry in 117 cases of advanced ovarian cancer. We found that high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma had significantly higher MIR182 (P=0.0003) and HMGA2 (P=0.04) expression, and significantly lower BRCA1 (P<0.0001) and FOXO3 (P<0.001) expression than normal controls. MIR182 is significantly correlated with MTSS1 expression (r=0.31; P<0.001), whereas other target genes did not show a significant correlation with MIR182, indicating a complicated regulatory mechanisms of these genes in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Among the examined MIR182 target genes, only HMGA2 was significantly associated with serous type carcinomas (P<0.01), ascites (P<0.01) and high death rate (P=0.02). FOXO3 expression was associated with lower-stage disease (P=0.04) and solid growth pattern (P=0.03). MIR182 expression is significantly higher in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma than in fallopian tubes.

[Overexpression of high mobility group A2 and its correlation with microRNA let-7 family in serous ovarian cancers]

OBJECTIVE

To examine the expression of high mobility group A2 (HMGA2), P53 and let-7 family microRNA, to investigate the correlation of HMGA2 and let-7, and to compare the HMGA2 and P53 expressions in human serous ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry assay was used to examine the expressions of HMGA2 and P53 in 50 paraffin-embedded tissue specimens of human serous ovarian cancer and 4 normal fallopian tube tissues. HMGA2 mRNA and let-7 family microRNA were detected by real time fluorescent quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in the corresponding frozen tissues.

RESULTS

HMGA2 and P53 were immuno-positive in 70% (35/50) and 78% (39/50) of the ovarian cancer tissues, respectively. HMGA2 was weakly expressed in the ciliated cells, but negative in the secretary cells of the fallopian tube. There was a tendency that the expression of HMGA2 increased with higher pathological grade of the ovarian cancer, but no correlation was observed between the HMGA2 overexpression and clinical stages. HMGA2 mRNA was detected in all the ovarian cancer samples, and its expression level was higher than that of the normal fallopian tube tissues in 72% (36/50) of the ovarian cancer samples. The expression of HMGA2 mRNA was much higher in more malignant SKOV3.ipl cells than in its corresponding SKOV3 cells. All let-7 family members were detectable in all ovarian cancer samples, and their expression were inversely correlated with HMGA2 mRNA expression (r=-0.305,P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

HMGA2 can be a biomarker complement to P53, and its high expression has an inclination of more malignancy. The downregulation of let-7 is, but not the only mechanism of HMGA2 overexpression in serous ovarian cancer.