The Cost-Effectiveness of Basiliximab Induction in “Old-to-Old” Kidney Transplant Programs: Bayesian Estimation, Simulation, and Uncertainty Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Markov models are employed in economic analyses to evaluate all possible expectations in a dilemna. The introduction of a new clinical protocol (Basiliximab induction with calcineurin-sparing protocols) for a group of kidney transplant recipients receiving organs from marginal donors was validated with a Markov simulation model, demonstrating the usefulness of combining simulation with Bayesian estimation methods for analysis of cost-effectiveness data collected alongside a clinical trial. We sought to determine whether calcineurin-sparing protocols using anti-interleukin-2/antibody induction (Simulect) would show a beneficial effect on initial kidney function and reduce transplantation costs upon admission, clinical incidences, graft function, and complications during the first month after transplant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) was used to estimate a system of generalized linear models relating costs and outcomes to a kidney transplant process affected by treatment under alternative therapies. The Markov simulation model was established following three chains: a calcineurin-free regimen with Basiliximab induction (chain A); a calcineurin-sparing protocol with Basiliximab induction (chain B); and a conventional immunosuppressive regimen (chain C). The MCMC draws were used as parameters in simulations that yielded inferences about the relative cost-effectiveness of the novel therapy under a variety of scenarios. After designing the Markov chain and cohorts, 31 patients from the "old-to-old" program were assigned; eight to chain A; eight to chain B; and 15 to chain C. A year after transplantation a cost-benefit study was performed guided by the three branches of the Markov model.

RESULTS

The Markov model showed a benefit of induction therapies in elderly patients. A cost-benefit model showed that after a year, there was a clear benefit from calcineurin-free plus Basiliximab induction therapies, with a slight benefit from calcineurin-sparing protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Markov models are extremely useful when introducing new clinical therapies. The approach allows flexibility in assessing treatment using various premises and quantifies the global effect of parametric uncertainty on a decision maker's confidence to adopt one therapy over another. In our transplant program, a cost-effective analysis of outcomes in old patients using the Markov model showed a clear benefit of calcineurin-sparing protocols with Basixilimab induction.

Efficacy and safety of basiliximab in kidney transplantation

The efficacy and safety of basiliximab, in combination with different maintenance regimens, are extensively addressed in the available literature. Basiliximab reduces the incidence of acute rejection, allows a safe reduction of steroid dosage, and is associated with economic savings, although there is substantially no proof that basiliximab prolongs either patient or graft survival. Initial basiliximab administration entails a low-risk and is associated with fewer adverse events than T cell depleting agents. However, life-threatening reactions were reported following re-exposure to basiliximab in recipients who lost graft function early after transplantation and, therefore, discontinued all immunosuppressive agents.

The Pathologic Impact of Tacrolimus on Protocol Biopsy in Renal Transplant Patients With Basiliximab-Based Immunosuppression

Forty-two ESRD patients underwent renal transplantation using basiliximab (mean age: 30.6 +/- 18.6 years at transplantation; male: 50%; ESRD duration: 51.6 +/- 13.0 months) between February, 2000 and July, 2003. All patients had a protocol biopsy on the day of transplant, on discharge from the hospital (35.5 +/- 13.2 days), and at 1 year after transplant. The immunosuppression included a calcineurin inhibitor, basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and methylprednisolone. While 16 patients used tacrolimus (FK group: 29.4 +/- 16.6 years old), 26 patients used cyclosporine (CsA group: 31.4 +/- 20.1 years old). Protocol biopsies were graded according to the Banff 97 classification. The incidence of acute rejection episodes within 1 year was greater in the CsA (15%) than the FK group (6%). Serum creatinine at hospital discharge was similar (CsA: 1.01 +/- 0.59 mg/dL, FK: 0.97 +/- 0.49, p = .18); however creatinine at 1 year differed significantly (CyA: 1.22 +/- 0.88 mg/dL, FK: 0.92 +/- 0.39, P = .03). There was a trend toward an increase in the score of interstitial inflammations in the CsA group, while it remained constant in the FK cohort (P = .05 at 1 year between the two groups). Other pathologic scores (t, ci, ct, cv, ah) did not differ between the groups at 1 year. Although there were no differences in the demographics between the two groups, there were several trends toward better renal function in the FK group.

Long-term evaluation of basiliximab induction therapy in live donor kidney transplantation: a five-year prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The long-term evaluation of basiliximab induction therapy has not been addressed yet. We aim to evaluate its long-term effects in living related donor kidney transplantation.

METHODS

100 adult recipients with their first kidney allograft were randomized into two treatment groups--one group received basiliximab and the second served as a control. All patients received a maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, cyclosporine microemulsion and azathioprine) and were closely followed for 5 years.

RESULTS

Basiliximab significantly reduced the proportion of patients who experienced an acute rejection in the first year (18/50) when compared to the control group (31/50) and in 5 years (27/50) when compared to (36/50) the controls. The cumulative steroid dose used throughout the study was significantly lower in the basiliximab group. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable between the two treatment groups. There was no significant difference in patients and graft survival; 5-year patient and graft survival were 100 and 86% for basiliximab, and 96 and 88% for the control group respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although routine basiliximab induction significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection, its beneficial long-term effects on graft function and patient and graft survival are not yet evident.

Regimen of Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression With Basiliximab, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and Low-Dose Steroid Reduces Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplants

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection is a major problem in kidney transplantation. To reduce its likelihood, we investigated the efficacy and safety of an immunosuppressive regimen including tacrolimus, basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and low-dose steroids.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients, including 14 pediatric patients, were enrolled in this study. The mean age at the time of transplantation was 33.5 years, and the mean observation period was 8.2 months. The mean trough concentrations of FK at 1, 6, and 12 months posttransplant were 10.2, 6.6, and 6.0 ng/mL, respectively.

RESULTS

All recipients survived without graft loss. The cumulative incidence of acute rejection in adults was 2.3% and 8.4% at 6 and 12 months posttransplant, respectively. Of the adverse events, 11 recipients (19.3%) were positive for CMV antigenemia or had CMV infections. Four recipients (7.0%) exhibited mild hyperglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our immunosuppressive regimen demonstrated favorable results, reducing the incidence of acute rejection without causing severe adverse events, especially in adults.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of newer immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation: a systematic review and modelling study

OBJECTIVES

To examine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the newer immunosuppressive drugs for renal transplantation: basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate (mofetil and sodium) and sirolimus.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases. Industry submissions. Current Clinical Trials register. Cochrane Collaboration Renal Disease Group.

REVIEW METHODS

The review followed the InterTASC standards. Each of the five company submissions to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) contained cost-effectiveness models, which were evaluated by using a critique covering (1) model checking, (2) a detailed model description and (3) model rerunning.

RESULTS

For induction therapy, three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) found that daclizumab significantly reduced the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection and patient survival at 6 months/1 year compared with placebo, but not compared with the monoclonal antibody OKT3. There was no significant gain in patient survival or graft loss at 3 years. The incidence of side-effects with daclizumab reduced compared to OKT3. Eight RCTs found that basiliximab significantly improved 6-month/1-year biopsy-confirmed acute rejection compared to placebo, but not compared to either ATG or OKT3. There was no significant gain in either 1-year patient survival or graft loss. The incidence of side-effects with basiliximab was not significantly different compared to OKT3/ATG. For initial/maintenance therapy, 13 RCTs found that tacrolimus reduced the 6-month/1-year incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection compared to ciclosporin. There was no significant improvement in either 1-year or long-term (up to 5 years) graft loss or patient survival. The acute rejection benefit of tacrolimus over ciclosporin appeared to be equivalent for Sandimmun and Neoral. There were important differences in the side-effect profile of tacrolimus and ciclosporin. Seven RCTs found that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduced the incidence of acute rejection. There was no significant difference in patient survival or graft loss at 1-year or 3-year follow-up. There appeared to be differences in the side-effect profiles of MMF and azathioprine (AZA). No RCTs comparing MMF with AZA were identified. One RCT compared mycophenolate sodium (MPS) to MMF and reported no difference between the two drugs in 1-year acute rejection rate, graft survival, patient survival or side-effect profile. Two RCTs suggest that addition of sirolimus to a ciclosporin-based initial/maintenance therapy reduces 1-year acute rejections in comparison to a ciclosporin (Neoral) dual therapy alone and substituting azathioprine with sirolimus in initial/maintenance therapy reduces the incidence of acute rejection. Graft and patient survival were not significantly different with either sirolimus regimen. Adding sirolimus increases the incidence of side-effects. The side-effect profiles of azathioprine and sirolimus appear to be different. For the treatment of acute rejection, three RCTs suggested that both tacrolimus and MMF reduce the incidence of subsequent acute rejection and the need for additional drug therapy. Only one RCT and one subgroup analysis in children (<18 years) were identified comparing ciclosporin to tacrolimus and sirolimus, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The newer immunosuppressant drugs (basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus and MMF) consistently reduced the incidence of short-term (1-year) acute rejection compared with conventional immunosuppressive therapy. The independent use of basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus and MMF was associated with a similar absolute reduction in 1-year acute rejection rate (approximately 15%). However, the effects of these drugs did not appear to be additive (e.g. benefit of tacrolimus with adjuvant MMF was 5% reduction in acute rejection rate compared with 15% reduction with adjuvant AZA). Thus, the addition of one of these drugs to a baseline immunosuppressant regimen was likely to affect adversely the incremental cost-effectiveness of the addition of another. The trials did not assess how the improvement in short-term outcomes (e.g. acute rejection rate or measures of graft function), together with the side-effect profile associated with each drug, translated into changes in patient-related quality of life. Moreover, given the relatively short duration of trials, the impact of the newer immunosuppressants on long-term graft loss and patient survival remains uncertain. The absence of both long-term outcome and quality of life from trial data makes assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness on the newer immunosuppressants contingent on modelling based on extrapolations from short-term trial outcomes. The choice of the most appropriate short-term outcome (e.g. acute rejection rate or measures of graft function) for such modelling remains a matter of clinical and scientific debate. The decision to use acute rejection in the meta-model in this report was based on the findings of a systematic review of the literature of predictors of long-term graft outcome. Only a very small proportion of the RCTs identified in this review assessed patient-focused outcomes such as quality of life. Since immunosuppressive drugs have both clinical benefits and specific side-effects, the balance of these harms and benefits could best be quantified through future trials using quality of life measures. The design of future trials should be considered with a view to the impact of drugs on particular renal transplant groups, particularly higher risk individuals and children. Finally, there is a need for improved reporting of methodological details of future trials, such as the method of randomisation and allocation concealment. A number of issues exist around registry data, for example the use of multiple drug regimens and the need to assess the long-term outcomes. An option is the use of observational registry data including, if possible, prospective data on all consecutive UK renal transplant patients. Data capture for each patient should include immunosuppressant regimens, clinical and patient-related outcomes and patient demographics.

Basiliximab-chimeric anti-IL2-R monoclonal antibody in pediatric liver transplantation: comparative study

Basiliximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the alpha subunit (CD(25)) of the interleukin-2 receptor of activated T lymphocytes. The advantage of basiliximab in organ transplantation is the reduce possibility to calcineurin inhibitor dosages to avoid nephrotoxicity. Basiliximab has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in renal transplant recipients; however, the results are uncertain in liver transplantation (LT). The objective of this investigation was to assess the effect of basiliximab to prevent AR in the first 6 months after pediatric LT. From March 2000 to October 2001, 32 recipients of a primary orthotopic cadaveric or living donor LT were given basiliximab by intravenous bolus injection on the day of transplantation (day 0) and on day 4. Four children who received one dose were excluded from the study. The rate and the intensity of AR episodes, the incidence of chronic rejection, serum creatinine level, incidence of infections, adverse side effects, and daily oral dosage of cyclosporine (Neoral) to maintain the target blood level of 850 to 1000 mg/dL at C2, 2 hours after the administration, were analyzed in the remaining 28 recipients. Results were compared to those obtained from a matched historical group (n = 28) of similar age, weight, and hepatic diseases distribution. None of the analyzed parameters was statistically significant (P >.05) except for the daily oral dose of cyclosporine (7 to 13 mg/kg/dose, P <.05). In our series, the addition of basiliximab to the immunosuppressive therapy did not reduce the incidence of AR in pediatric LT.

Problems of cyclosporine absorption profiling using C2-monitoring

The present study sought to validate the concept of C2 monitoring in 41 de-novo transplant patients treated with microemulsion of cyclosporine, mycophenolatesodium, steroids and basiliximab.

RESULTS

After 6 months patient and graft survival was 98%, rejection rate was 19%. In the first week only a few patients achieved the suggested C2 levels (19% > 1500, 50% > 1200 ng/ml) despite an increased cyclosporine (CsA) dose. After 14 days 63% of patients reached C2 > 1500 ng/ml (83% C2 > 1200) despite decreased CsA dose. 35% of patients had intermittent high C0 (> 300) and low C2 (< 800), suggesting poor and/or slow absorption. Most of them suffered from CsA toxicity. There was a significant (p < 0.05) change of absorption as measured by C2/C0 leading to an increase of C2/dose.

CONCLUSIONS

C2 monitoring may be useful to better estimate the CsA exposure in individual patients; however our results indicate some limitations of the current concept of C2 monitoring. Despite increase of dosage many patients do not reach the proposed levels. A significant proportion of patients are poor and/or slow absorbers. CsA toxicity may not be detected by C2 monitoring alone. With the use of basiliximab and mycophenolatesodium lower target levels seem to be sufficient.

Efficacy of basiliximab induction therapy in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: a rapid steroid withdrawal protocol

INTRODUCTION

We have performed ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) kidney transplantation (KT) to alleviate the severe organ shortage in our country. Induction therapy with basiliximab, a monoclonal anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody, is known to be effective in reducing the incidence of acute rejection (AR) after ABO-compatible KT. However, the efficacy of basiliximab in ABO-i KT is still unknown. In this study, we evaluated the effect of basiliximab to decrease overall maintenance immunosuppression (a steroid withdrawal protocol) and to improve the outcome of ABO-i KT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 2002 and May 2003, 14 adult patients underwent ABO-i KT from living donors with cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppression. There were seven men and seven women of mean age 48 +/- 10 years. Three of the 12 cases were second KT. Three sessions of plasmapheresis were performed to remove anti-AB antibodies before KT. Splenectomy was performed in all patients. Immunosuppression consisted of methylprednisolone (MP), CsA, and mycophenolate mofetil, in addition to antibody induction with basiliximab. MP was completely withdrawn on postoperative day 14.

RESULTS

In 3 of 14 recipients, MP was restarted because of AR or a suspicion of AR. Both patient and graft survivals were 100%. The incidence of biopsy-proven AR was 14% (2/14). There was no adverse effect related to the antibody therapy.

CONCLUSION

The use of basiliximab induction therapy may eliminate the need for steroid maintenance therapy without increasing AR risk, even among ABO-i KT recipients. We conclude that basiliximab provides safe and effective induction immunosuppression in ABO-i KT recipients.

Basiliximab (Simulect) in Renal Transplantation With High Risk for Delayed Graft Function

BACKGROUND

Basiliximab (Simulect) is effective in reducing episodes of acute rejection in renal transplantation. Delayed graft function (DGF) predisposes to acute rejection and shortens graft survival. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of basiliximab in renal transplantation recipients at high risk for DGF.

METHODS

We studied 87 patients (mean age, 59 years), 42 of whom received basiliximab, 20 mg before transplantation and 20 mg on day 4. This cohort was compared with 45 patients without basiliximab. All received cyclosporine (51%) or tacrolimus (49%), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. DGF was defined as the requirement for dialysis within the first week after transplantation or failure to improve preexisting renal function. High-risk factors for DGF were cold ischemia time, recipient and donor age, non-heart-beating donor, HLA matching, and panel reactive antibody (PRA).

RESULTS

The incidence of DGF was 18 (43%) in the basiliximab group versus 28 (62%) in the other patients (P = .07). When allografts from non-heart-beating donors were excluded, this incidence was 14 (38%) in the basiliximab group versus 28 (62%) in the other patients (P = .04). Regression analysis showed basiliximab to be a protective factor: 0.26 (range, 0.09-0.76). Basiliximab was well tolerated, and complications were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Basiliximab reduced the incidence of DGF in patients who received a high-risk allograft. It was well tolerated, and no adverse events were reported. The use of basiliximab may be considered in patients receiving an allograft who are at high risk for DGF.

Graft Function, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, and Sex Hormones in Renal Transplant Recipients on an Immunosuppressive Regimen of Everolimus, Reduced Dose of Cyclosporine, and Basiliximab

A prospective, randomized trial evaluated the combination of everolimus of 1.5 or 3 mg/d with steroids, basiliximab, and low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) adjusted by C2 monitoring in 256 renal transplant recipients. CsA C2 target levels, initially set at 600 ng/mL, were tapered over time posttransplant. The median serum creatinine concentrations were 130 mumol/L in both sirolimus groups (1.5 and 3 mg/d) at 6 months. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred in 13.7% and 15.1% of patients in the 1.5 and 3 mg/d groups, respectively. The incidence of BPAR was significantly higher among patients with everolimus trough levels < 3 ng/mL. Posttransplant diabetes mellitus occurred rarely, and blood pressure control appeared favorable; however, serum cholesterol levels were increased by approximately 50%, and serum triglycerides by approximately 100%. Serum testosterone concentrations increased after renal transplantation in both everolimus groups. Concentration-controlled everolimus therapy combined with low-dose CsA provides effective protection against rejection with good renal function and safety profiles.

Airway cellular response to two different immunosuppressive regimens in lung transplant recipients

A number of new immunosuppressive drugs have become available in transplant medicine. We investigated the effects of two different immunosuppressive protocols on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cellular characteristics in 34 lung transplant recipients who were treated with anti-thymocyte globulin induction therapy, cyclosporine, azathioprine (AZA), and prednisolone (regimen I), compared with 17 recipients receiving basiliximab induction, tacrolimus, AZA, and prednisolone (regimen II). We performed bronchoalveolar lavages between 15 and 40 d post-transplantation, in stable clinical condition and no acute rejection, cytomegalovirus, and/or respiratory tract infection. The regimen II treatment was associated with a significantly lower percentage lavage fluid lymphocytes than with regimen I. The CD4/CD8 ratio was significantly higher with regimen II than with regimen I: 1.56 (range 0.41-2.16) and 0.33 (0.04-0.95) respectively; p < 0.001, mainly because of a lower percentage CD8(+) cells with regimen II: 25% (12-51) vs. regimen I: 60% (34-77); p < 0.001. The percentage CD4(+) CD25(+) cells appeared lower with regimen II: 21% (10-88) vs. regimen I: 50% (0-87); p = 0.04. Overall survival was similar between the groups, whereas a beneficial trend in freedom of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome was observed with regimen II. Airway lymphocyte subtypes are affected by the immunosuppressive protocol used. This observation should be taken into account when studying transplant recipients, and may contribute to our understanding of alloreactive airway disease.

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with valganciclovir in African-American renal allograft recipients based on donor/recipient serostatus

There is a paucity of data examining the efficacy of valganciclovir (VGC) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in kidney transplant patients, particularly with regard to utilization of a risk-stratified dosing regimen. Eighty adult African-American (AA) renal allograft recipients transplanted from November 3, 2001 to May 28, 2003 and followed for 22 +/- 8 months received VGC once daily for 90 d post-transplant dosed according to donor/recipient (D/R) serostatus: high risk (D+/R-) received 900 mg (n = 12); moderate risk (D+/R+, D-/R+) received 450 mg (n = 60); and low risk (D-/R-) received no prophylaxis (n = 8). Thymoglobulin or basiliximab was used for induction, and mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and either tacrolimus or sirolimus for maintenance immunosuppression. Only six patients (7.5%) developed symptomatic CMV infection diagnosed by pp65 antigenemia, three in the high-risk (25%) and three in the moderate-risk (5%) group (p = 0.02). All patients were on tacrolimus for at least 3 months prior to diagnosis. There were no cases of tissue-invasive disease, resistance to treatment, or recurrence. D+/R- serostatus was the only significant independent predictor for CMV infection using multivariate analysis (odds ratio 10.5; p = 0.04). Thymoglobulin induction was not associated with CMV infection. None of 43 patients who were exposed to sirolimus for >30 d developed CMV infection, vs. six of 37 who were not (p = 0.006). We conclude that VGC dosed according to D/R serostatus provides safe and effective CMV prophylaxis in AA renal allograft recipients.

Induction Therapy with Basiliximab versus Thymoglobulin in African-American Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that the use of antilymphocyte induction therapy in African-American (AA) renal transplant recipients reduces the risk of acute rejection (AR) and improves graft survival. It is not clear whether the efficacy of basiliximab (BSX) is different from that of Thymoglobulin (ATG) in this regard.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the effect of induction therapy with BSX versus ATG in 88 AA renal allograft recipients receiving transplants at our center between July 2001 and June 2003 and followed for 19+/-7 months. All patients were maintained on mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and either tacrolimus or sirolimus. Study endpoints included patient and graft survival, graft function, and incidence of AR and cytomegalovirus infection. Regression models were used to evaluate the independent effect of each induction agent on these endpoints.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients received ATG, and 52 received BSX. The groups were comparable with regard to donor race and age, and recipient sex, body mass index, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching, and hepatitis C virus serostatus. The ATG group was younger, more likely to receive retransplant, had longer duration of end-stage renal disease and higher panel reactive antibody, and was less likely to receive live-donor organs. However, after adjusting for all these variables, graft outcomes, as well as renal function, were comparable between the two induction groups. We found that the degree of HLA mismatch, delayed graft function, and AR were the only significant predictors of graft loss.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that the choice of induction agent may not have a major impact on graft outcomes in AA renal-allograft recipients.

Multicenter, randomized study of the effectiveness of basiliximab in avoiding addition of steroids to cyclosporine a monotherapy in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Steroid therapy is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and well-documented adverse effects, but two thirds of patients initiated on monotherapy with cyclosporine A (CsA) microemulsion require addition of steroids.

METHODS

In this 12-month randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, 108 renal transplant recipients were randomized and received basiliximab (n=52) or placebo (n=56) to assess whether basiliximab reduces the need for addition of steroids or other adjunctive immunosuppressive drugs to CsA monotherapy.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint of the study (requirement for additional immunosuppression at 12 months posttransplant) occurred significantly less frequently with basiliximab (54%) than placebo (73%) (P=0.046). By the end of the study, 25% of basiliximab-treated patients were receiving maintenance steroids versus 61% of placebo-treated patients (P=0.0006). During the trial, 33% of basiliximab-treated patients received oral steroids at some time compared with 61% of placebo-treated patients (P=0.004). The proportion of patients experiencing biopsy-proven rejection was not significantly different between the basiliximab (29%) and placebo (43%) groups (P=0.16). Median serum creatinine at 12 months was 141 mumol/L with basiliximab and 164 mumol/L with placebo (not significant). One-year graft and patient survivals were 88% and 98% for basiliximab and 88% and 96% for placebo (not significant), respectively. Adverse events were similar in the basiliximab and placebo treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that the addition of basiliximab significantly reduces the need to modify the initial treatment regimen in patients scheduled to receive steroid-free CsA therapy, suggesting that basiliximab induction may be useful as a strategy in other steroid-avoidance regimens.

Comparative Study of Clinical Outcome in Kidney Transplantation Between Early Steroid Withdrawal Protocol Using Basiliximab, Calcineurin Inhibitor, and Mycophenolate Mofetil and Triple Regimen Consisting of Calcineurin Inhibitor, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and Steroid

AIMS

Effect of early steroid withdrawal protocol using basiliximab in kidney transplantation (KTx) on the clinical outcomes was investigated as compared with triple regimen.

METHODS

Kidney transplant patients in group 1 (n = 62) were treated with 8 mg/kg of cyclosporine (CsA), 2000 mg of MMF, two bolus IV injections of 20 mg of basiliximab and 500 mg of methylprednisolone (MP) rapidly tapered and withdrawn at 14 postoperative days (POD). Group 2 (n = 56) was treated with same dose of CsA and MMF, and 250 mg of MP tapered and continued. Acute rejection (AR) episodes were treated with MP pulse therapy followed by muromonab CD3 (OKT3) in case of steroid-resistant rejection.

RESULTS

In 46 of 62 cases (74.2%) in group 1, steroid was successfully withdrawn at 13.7 +/- 1.7 POD. Graft survival at 3, 6, and 12 months in group 1 was 100%, 100%, and 98.4% (one death with functioning graft), and 100%, 98.2%, and 96.4% in group 2, respectively. The incidence of AR was 12.9% for group 1 and 42.9% for group 2, among which 21 cases in group 2 were treated with ALG or OKT3; no patient needed ALG or OKT3 in group 1. Fifteen cases in group 1 and 13 cases in group 2 developed CMV antigenemia, among which febrile episode was exhibited in 3 cases (4.8%) in group 1 and 5 cases (8.9%) in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Early steroid withdrawal protocol using basiliximab is promising for reducing the incidence of AR (especially steroid-resistant rejection), CMV diseases, and steroid-related complications.

Decrease of CD4+CD25+ T Cells in Peripheral Blood After Liver Transplantation: Association With Immunosuppression

CD25 (IL-2 receptor alpha-chain) marks a population of CD4-positive T cells with a suppressor phenotype. These CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells can suppress both effector T cells and antigen-presenting cells and have been identified as a principle regulator of tolerance in experimental transplantation models. In the setting of human liver transplantation, however, little is known about the dynamics of these cells in relation to rejection, tolerance, and immunosuppression. In the current study we determined CD4+CD25+ T cell in blood of liver transplant recipients using flow cytometry and investigated a possible link with immunosuppressive therapies. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of 27 liver transplant patients (pretransplantation and 12 months posttransplantation) and 16 healthy controls were included. We found that the percentages of CD25+ cells within the CD4 T-cell population was significantly reduced in more than two-thirds of patients 1 year after transplantation. Also the total percentage of CD4-positive T cells declined significantly within this period, making the absolute reduction of regulatory T cells after transplantation even more profound. Comparing PBMC samples of patients and healthy controls revealed an increased percentage of CD4+ T cells in the patients before transplantation, probably related to the chronic liver illness. The reduction in CD4+CD25+ T cells after transplantation was similar for different immunosuppression regiments. All patients, however, received calcineurin inhibitors, suggesting a possible suppressive effect of this therapy on regulatory T-cell levels in peripheral blood. Currently, assays for regulatory T-cell activity are used to further support this hypothesis.

Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin: A Postoperative Risk Factor for Sirolimus-Treated Renal Transplant Patients?

AIMS

Randomized controlled studies suggest an increased incidence of perioperative wound complications among sirolimus-treated renal transplant patients. The present study analyzed the effect of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) on these postoperative complications.

METHODS

Four hundred and twelve renal transplants were performed and managed postoperatively at two University-affiliated hospitals between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2003. The patients received corticosteroids and Sirolimus, with delayed introduction of cyclosporine when the serum creatinine had decreased below 2.5 mg/dL. Two groups of patients were discriminated: group 1 received Basiliximab 20 mg on day 0 and day 4 (n = 283); group 2 recipients with a high panel of reactive antibody (PRA > 20%) and retransplant patients received rATG for induction (n = 129) for a maximum of 2 weeks postoperatively. The incidence of rejection was 14.5% for group 1 vs. 8.5% for group 2 patients. To avoid confounding variable associated with the rejection treatment, any patient with rejection was excluded for statistical analysis, as were patients with follow- up less than 30 days. The final study group for analysis included 350 patients: 235 with Basiliximab induction (group 1) and 115 rATG induction (group 2). The mean follow-up was 21.8 +/- 11 months. Differences in the incidences of postoperative hernia, wound infections, or lymphoceles requiring any form of drainage were analyzed for statistical significance using the chi-square test.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with wound complications was 26.0% versus 39.1% (P < .025) for group 1 versus group 2, respectively. Incisional hernias occurred in 10.6% versus 18.3% patients (P < .05), wound infections in 11.1% versus 16.5% (P = NS), and lymphoceles in 10.6% versus 15.9% (P = NS) for the two groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

rATG-induced renal transplants recipients treated with sirolimus, cyclosporine, and steroids show a significantly increased incidence of postoperative incisional hernias and a trend toward a greater number of lymphocele and wound infection complications.

Open-Label, Multicenter Study on the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Simulect in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Triple Therapy With Cyclosporin, Mycophenolate, and Corticosteroids

INTRODUCTION

Basiliximab is a monoclonal antibody directed to the interleukin-2 receptor. Several studies have demonstrated both its efficacy and safety. Even with the use of polyclonal antibodies in renal pediatric transplant recipients, the local incidence of steroid-resistant rejections has been close to 10% of the total incidence of acute rejection episodes (AREs). An open, multicenter prospective study was performed to assess the safety tolerability, and efficacy of induction with basiliximab in renal pediatric transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate, and steroids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients (8 boys) of mean age 11.9 +/- 4.5 years and body weight 32 +/- 15 kg received cadaveric (n = 7) or living (n = 11) donor grafts. Simulect was administered on days 0 and 4. Efficacy was assessed by the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). Safety assessment consisted of a description of the adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Six BPAR (Banff I and II) occurred in 5, (27.7%) children all of which were steroid responsive. Creatinine levels at day 7 and months 3, 6, and 12 were 1.6 +/- 1.5 mg/dL, 1.0 +/- 0.4 mg/dL, 1.0 +/- 0.5 mg/dL, and 1.0 +/- 0.4 mg/dL, respectively. Schwartz calculation at 12 months was 71 +/- 15 mL/1.73 m2 AEs were hypertension (12), anemia (9), abdominal pain (8), metabolic acidosis (8), nausea (7), diarrhea (2), gingival hypertrophy (2), hirsutism (2), lymphocele (2), and infections (15). No deaths, graft losses, PTLDs, or malignancies were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

No steroid-resistant AREs, were observed in this pediatric group using basiliximab. The Schwartz calculation at 12 months was 71 +/- 15 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Cyclosporine-Sparing Effect of Basiliximab in Renal Transplant Recipients With Mycophenolate Mofetil

Basiliximab added to a maintenance regimen consisting of cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil was studied for its effectiveness in allowing early steroid withdrawal in renal transplantation. Furthermore, the cyclosporine-sparing effects between groups with and without basiliximab induction therapy were compared.

PATIENTS

Between September 2001 and June 2003, 90 patients underwent renal transplants with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, namely, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone, (group 1; n = 25). During the latter half of the study basiliximab was administered during the induction phase (group 2; n = 65). In group 2, steroids were completely withdrawn on postoperative day 14 in 57 patients.

RESULTS

The incidence of acute rejection was significantly higher among group 1 patients (P = .005). The incidence of steroid-resistant rejection in group 1 patients was significantly higher (P = .025). At each time point cyclosporine levels in group 1 patients were significantly higher (P < .01). The incidence of infection was comparable between the groups. Patient and graft survival rates in group 1 were 100% and 100%; in group 2, they were 99% and 99%, respectively. In group 2, steroids were discontinued in 57 patients with permanent withdrawal achieved in 32 patients (56%).

CONCLUSION

The use of basiliximab, together with mycophenolate mofetil allowed for a significant reduction in the cyclosporine dose without increasing the risk of acute rejection. Although further follow-up is necessary to confirm the effect, this regimen may attenuate cyclosporine nephrotoxicity thereby affecting the long-term outcomes of renal transplantation.

Everolimus and basiliximab permit suppression by human CD4+CD25+ cells in vitro

Immunosuppressive drugs are essential for the prevention of acute transplant rejection but some may not promote long-term tolerance. Tolerance is dependent on the presence and regulatory function of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells in a number of animal models. The direct effects of immunosuppressive drugs on CD4(+)CD25(+) cells, particularly those that interfere with IL-2 signaling are uncertain. We studied the effects of the rapamycin derivative everolimus and the anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody basiliximab on the regulatory capacity of human CD4(+)CD25(+) cells in vitro. Both drugs permitted the suppression of proliferation and IFN-gamma secretion by CD4(+)CD25(-) cells responding to allogeneic and other polyclonal stimuli; CTLA-4 expression was abolished on CD4(+)CD25(+) cells without compromising their suppressive ability. Everolimus reduced IFN-gamma secretion by CD4(+)CD25(-) cells before the anti-proliferative effect: this is a novel finding. Exogenous IL-2 and IL-15 could prevent the suppression of proliferation by CD4(+)CD25(+) cells and the drugs could not restore suppression. By contrast, suppression of IFN-gamma secretion was only slightly impeded with the exogenous cytokines. Finally, CD4(+)CD25(+) cells were more resistant than CD4(+)CD25(-) cells to the pro-apoptotic action of the drugs. Together these data suggest that CD4(+)CD25(+) cells may still exert their effects in transplant patients taking immunosuppression that interferes with IL-2 signaling.

induction with basiliximab

North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) reports have shown anti-T cell antibody, OKT3, to be deleterious in pediatric renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Unlike OKT3, basiliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody to the alpha subunit of the interleukin-2 receptor on activated T-lymphocytes. We sought to examine the outcome of MMF with or without basiliximab induction therapy in pediatric renal transplantation. Between January 1998, and June 2001, 49 pediatric renal transplants were performed at our center and 41 met the criteria for this study. We retrospectively analyzed the records of 25 patients who received MMF, Prednisone, CSA or TAC, alone (group I) and 16 patients who received MMF, CSA or TAC, and Prednisone in combination with basiliximab (group II). The two groups were similar with respect to recipient or donor age, gender, ethnicity, donor source (LD vs. CAD), cold ischemia time, and primary diagnosis. The basiliximab group had a shorter follow up period because of its more recent addition to our pediatric immunosuppression protocol, 12.9 +/- 5.9 months vs. 35.5 +/- 7.2 months for group I (p < 0.0001). At 6 months, the acute rejection rate was 16% (group I) compared with 25% (group II) (p = 0.689). The patient and graft survival at 6 and 12 months were 100% respectively for both groups. Basiliximab was well tolerated without significant adverse events. At 6 months, there was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of urinary tract infection or cytomegalovirus infection. These data suggest that in the short-term, MMF with or without basiliximab induction therapy appears to yield excellent and statistically similar outcomes. However, further controlled studies are necessary to verify these findings as well as to define the role of basiliximab in MMF-treated pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Use of basiliximab and cyclosporine in heart transplant patients with pre-operative renal dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The combined use of basiliximab and cyclosporine in heart transplantation is under investigation. In this study we sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of basiliximab and delayed initiation of cyclosporine in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing heart transplantation.

METHODS

Seven patients (Group A) with renal dysfunction (creatinine > or =200 micromol/liter) received induction therapy with basiliximab. Seven patients (Group B) with renal dysfunction comprised the control group and received induction therapy with rabbit anti-thymocyte serum. Cyclosporine was initiated 5 days post-transplant in Group A and within 5 days post-transplant in Group B.

RESULTS

All patients were alive at the end of the 6-month follow-up. In Group A, mean pre-transplant creatinine was 243 +/- 48 micromol/liter, at 1 week post-transplant was 180 +/- 39 micromol/liter (p = 0.02), at 1 month was 166 +/- 57 micromol/liter (p = 0.019), at 3 months was 182 +/- 25 micromol/liter (p = 0.01) and at 6 months was 179 +/- 45 micromol/liter (p = 0.024). In Group B, mean pre-transplant creatinine was 242 +/- 41 micromol/liter, at 1 week was 140 +/- 35 micromol/liter (p = 0.0003), at 1 month was 143 +/- 38 mumol/liter (p = 0.0005), at 3 months was 138 +/- 37 micromol/liter (p = 0.0003) and at 6 months was 154 +/- 30 micromol/liter (p = 0.0006). There were no differences in renal dysfunction between both groups at 1 week (p = 0.069), 1 month (p = 0.39) or 6 months (p = 0.24) post-HT. Fewer episodes of cellular rejection were identified in Group B within the 6-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of induction therapy either with basiliximab or rabbit anti-thymocyte serum in patients with pre-operative renal dysfunction confers renal protection early and up to 6 months post-transplant. Delayed initiation of cyclosporine might be considered to provide additional renal protection.

Renal transplantation in adolescents

Renal transplantation remains the goal for the pediatric patient with end-stage renal disease. Recent advances in technology and immunosuppression have greatly enhanced patient and graft survival, while reducing significant complications. However, transplantation of adolescents is still fraught with the potential for serious problems. The increased risk of graft loss, late acute rejection, and incomplete rejection reversal observed in the adolescent age group demands further investigation. Lack of adherence to immunosuppression regimens may be an important contributory factor. Strategies to address the unique concerns of this high-risk population, including the use of a multidisciplinary team, are essential to improving outcomes.

A multicenter pilot study of early (4-day) steroid cessation in renal transplant recipients under simulect, tacrolimus and sirolimus

This study presents the first prospective multicenter study assessing sirolimus-based immunosuppression with early (4-day) corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) in renal transplantation. Immunosuppression included: anti-IL-2 receptor antibody and tacrolimus/sirolimus. Inclusion criteria included adult primary recipients. Exclusion criteria included: (i) African Americans, (ii) current PRA >50%, (iii) multiple organ transplants, (iv) WBC < 3000 cells/microL and (v) fasting hypercholesterolemia/hypertriglyceridemia. The primary endpoints were acute rejection and the proportion of patients off corticosteroids. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled: mean age of 49.7 +/- 12 years. Transplants included: cadaveric (26%) and living donor (74%). Patient and graft survival were 100%. Biopsy proven acute rejection occurred in 13%; presumptive rejection in 10.5%. Banff grades included: IA (seven patients), IB (one patient), IIA (one patient) and IIB (one patient). Renal function at 1 year: serum creatinine (1.18 +/- 0.06 mg/dL). Mean weight gain was minimal at 1 year: 3 +/- 2 kg/patient. Mild increases in total, LDL and HDL cholesterol were observed and new antilipid agent use occurred in 26 patients. In conclusion, early CSWD under tacrolimus/sirolimus-based immunosuppression in selected, low-risk renal transplant recipients provides: (i) excellent patient and graft survival, (ii) good renal function, (iii) reduced hyperlipidemia and antilipid agent use and (iv) low acute rejection rates.

One-year results of basiliximab induction and tacrolimus associated with sequential steroid and MMF treatment in pediatric kidney transplant recipient

We report the 1-year results with a triple immunosuppressive regimen in pediatric recipients of a first kidney transplant, in order to evaluate its safety and efficacy in the prevention of acute rejection and in the reduction of steroid side effects. The immunosuppression is as follows: (i) basiliximab (20 mg if body weight >30 kg; 10 mg if < 30 kg) is given pretransplant and at day 4; (ii) tacrolimus (Tac) is administered in order to obtain blood trough levels of 10-20 and 5-10 ng/ml during and after the first 2 months post-transplant, respectively; (iii) steroids are tapered during the first 6 months and then replaced by mycophenolate mofetil (depending on previous rejection episodes, infection status and the result of a routine biopsy) at a dosage of 4-600 mg/m(2) body surface area. Fifty-three children (median age 13 years, range 2-20) have entered this protocol. One-year patient and kidney survival are 100% and 94% respectively. During the first year a total of nine rejections in seven patients (13% of the cohort study) occurred, all but one responsive to steroids. Renal function was satisfactory throughout the first year (mean CrCl was 63.8 +/- 18 and 60.9 +/- 15.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at 6 and 12 months respectively). Subclinical signs of rejection were absent in more than 80% of biopsies (grade I Banff) at 6 months (n = 47); at the 12th month biopsy (n = 42) score I was stable in 20 patients (16 after stopping steroids) and had worsened in eight biopsies (six after stopping steroids). Major complications were insulin-dependent diabetes in three (5.6%) children with the need of insulin for a mean of 3 months; transient hyperglycemia (11 patients), treated with a dietary regimen, symptomatic viral infections (in 11 patients: two parvovirus B19, three cytomegalovirus and two Epstein-Barr virus systemic infections, three interstitial pneumonia, two BK nephritis). Tac doses more than 0.3-0.4 mg/kg/day are at significantly higher risk of viral infection. In conclusion, this immunosuppressive regimen is associated with a low percentage of clinical (13%) and subclinical rejections, but with a relatively high number of infections, prevented by a reduction in Tac doses (<0.3 mg/kg/day) during the first 2 months after transplantation. The assessment of steroid withdrawal needs a longer follow-up.

A pilot study of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and steroid avoidance immunosuppressive protocol among living donor kidney transplant recipients

Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNIs) and Corticosteroids have been the main immunosuppressive agents in solid organ transplantation. Many studies have confirmed the positive impacts of withdrawal/avoidance of these agents, separately, on their side effect profiles. A pilot study was performed avoiding both agents among low-immunological-risk living donor kidney transplant recipients at a single center. Seventeen recipients were maintained on the double avoidance protocol during the study period beginning July 2002 through December 2003. Three rejection episodes occurred (out of ten) among related donor kidney recipients and six episodes (out of seven) among unrelated donor kidney recipients. Although most of the rejections were reversed with a short course of corticosteroids, the protocol was revised to exclude the unrelated donor kidney recipients. There were higher incidences of wound complications among recipients who received the initial loading dose of Sirolimus. Double avoidance of CNIs and corticosteroids is possible in living donor kidney transplant recipients with an acceptable incidence of rejection. Proper management of the side effects of Sirolimus could further minimize the incidence of rejection. A multi-center randomized study is recommended in order to recognize the benefits of avoiding CNIs and corticosteroids in renal transplant recipients.

Promise of Neoral C2, basiliximab, and everolimus in lung transplantation

Immunosuppressive therapy to prevent rejection of allografts is continually evolving in terms of development of new medications and the application of established ones. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding monitoring blood cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) levels 2 hours postdose (C2), as well as the relatively new immunosuppressants basiliximab and everolimus, with a particular view to lung transplantation. C2 monitoring appears to have merit over the traditional method of trough-level monitoring. Based on short-term studies in various solid organ transplant systems, C2 seems better able to predict the area under the time-concentration curve for Neoral, a benefit that extends to improved clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to verify the robustness of clinical improvement, particularly in lung transplant recipients. Basiliximab and everolimus target stages of the immune response distinct from that targeted by Neoral. Studies conducted to date in various solid organ transplant systems suggest that use of Neoral concomitantly with one or both of these drugs provides enhanced protection from allograft rejection while improving the tolerability of immunosuppressive therapy. If these results are confirmed in lung transplant patients, improvements in lung transplantation outcomes are to be expected.

Double-Blind Comparison of Hepatitis C Histological Recurrence Rate in HCV+ Liver Transplant Recipients Given Basiliximab+Steroids or Basiliximab+Placebo, in addition to Cyclosporine and Azathioprine

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence in HCV+ liver transplant recipients is almost inevitable and may be promoted by immunosuppression. We compared the amount of liver damage with regard to usage of steroids and basiliximab.

METHODS

A total of 140 HCV+ adult liver transplant recipients were randomly allocated to basiliximab + steroids or basiliximab + placebo (plus cyclosporine and azathioprine). Primary endpoint: hepatitis C histological recurrence (liver damage as for Ishak grading score >or=8 by biopsy at 12 months); secondary endpoints: treatment failure (death, graft loss, patient withdrawal), biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), treated acute rejection (tAR), allograft and patient survival rates at 12 months.

RESULTS

Any significant difference has been observed in the 12-month hepatitis C histological recurrence rate (41.2% basiliximab + steroids, 37.5% basiliximab + placebo, P = 0.354). The treatment failure rate was significantly higher in basiliximab + steroids (28.8%) than in basiliximab + placebo (15.6%), P = 0.03; the combination test for the evaluation of the joint hypothesis resulted in a borderline nonsignificant overall result (P = 0.059). BPAR rate was significantly lower in the group treated with steroids (24.3% basiliximab + steroids, 39.4% basiliximab + placebo, P = 0.04), while the tAR rate was similar (29.7% basiliximab + steroids and 37.9% basiliximab + placebo). Any significant differences in 1-year graft and patient survival rates have been observed (72.9% and 84.8% basiliximab+steroids; 81.5% and 89.0% basiliximab + placebo).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that steroid-free therapy is associated with a significantly lower treatment failure rate, although histological recurrence rate of hepatitis C is similar in the two groups. This benefit is not offset by an evident increase in graft rejection rate requiring treatment.

Campath-1H in renal transplantation: The University of Wisconsin experience

BACKGROUND

Immune cell depletion is known to prevent renal allograft rejection and injury. We evaluated the humanized monoclonal antibody Campath-1H (alemtuzumab; ILEX Oncology, San Antonio, Texas) in renal transplant recipients for its safety and efficacy in preventing rejection when used in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, and low-dose steroid therapy.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-six consecutive renal allograft recipients received 2 doses of Campath-1H antibody on days 0 and 1. Outcomes were compared to patients who received an anti-CD25 antibody (n=799), Thymoglobulin (n=160), or other antibody treatment (n=156) in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, and higher dose steroids.

RESULTS

The Campath-1H group overall experienced less rejection than the other 3 groups (P=.037). Patients with delayed graft function experienced less rejection with Campath-1H than control groups (P=.0096) and improved graft survival (P=.0119). There was no difference in infection or malignancies between the 4 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Campath-1H was well tolerated in renal transplant patients and led to significant reductions in incidence of rejection. Patients with delayed graft function experienced significantly improved graft survival.

Use of simulect can reduce the incidence of acute rejection and demonstrates with superior 3-year patient and graft survival rates in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection is a major cause of graft loss in renal transplantation. Because the highest risk for acute rejection is in the first month posttransplantation, improved prophylaxis could be most beneficial in this period. Simulect administration provides 30 to 45 days of immunoprophylaxis against acute rejection during the critical period after transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the incidence of acute rejection episodes and the safety and tolerability of Simulect plus Neoral immunosuppression. Patient and graft survival rates up to 3 years posttransplantation were evaluated.

METHOD

Forty-one transplant recipients received Simulect by intravenous infusion of an initial 20-mg dose on the day of renal transplantation and a second 20-mg dose on day 4 posttransplant. All renal recipients received immunosuppression with Neoral and steroid.

RESULTS

There were eight cases (19.5%) of acute rejection within 1 year. The rejection episodes were easily reversed with steroid pulse therapy in seven patients except for graft loss. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year graft survival rates were 95%, 93%, and 88%, respectively. Overall, the 3-year patient survival rate was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulect in combination with Neoral and steroid-reduced the incidence of acute rejection without an increase in adverse events. The low incidence and severity of acute rejection may have led to the superior 3-year patient and graft survival rates in renal transplantation.

Third dose of basiliximab in pediatric renal transplantation

Antibody induction therapy is frequently used in pediatric renal transplantation to reduce risk of early rejection. We previously reported lower rates of human herpes virus type 6 (HHV-6) reactivation in patients receiving monoclonal antibody induction with basiliximab, compared to patients receiving antithymocyte globulin/antilymphocyte globulin treatment. Subclinical rejection events were still present in many patients in the first 6 months after transplantation. This prompted a third dose of basiliximab to be administered at day 21 in addition to the standard two doses given immediately prior to transplantation and on day 4. No significant reduction of subclinical rejections was noted in the 11 patients receiving triple dosing of basiliximab. Two patients developed an allergic reaction responsive to intravenous fluids, steroids, and antihistamines with full resolution within 30 minutes of administration. There was no increase in de novo infection or reactivation of HHV-6 or Epstein-Barr virus in this group compared to patients receiving two doses of basiliximab. The goal of reduction of early subclinical rejection events was not achieved with the third dosing of basiliximab in this initial group of pediatric renal transplant patients. However, 63.6% of patients receiving triple basiliximab remained free of clinical and/or subclinical rejection for the first 6 months posttransplant compared to only 36.4% remaining rejection-free for the same interval in the group who received the conventional two doses of basiliximab.

Bipolar electrocoagulation for clipless division of left renal vein branches during laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy

We present our experience of using the bipolar electrocautery for division of the left renal vein branches in laparoscopic right living donor nephrectomy. This has been performed in 160 cases with no complications related to the technique. The absence of laparoscopic clips allows easier and safer placement of the endostaple.

Rapid steroid withdrawal in hepatitis C virus-positive kidney transplant recipients

The effects of rapid steroid withdrawal (SW) on kidney transplantation (KT) outcome were investigated in 12 HCV+ patients in a prospective cohort study. These results were compared with 17 HCV+ patients who received KT in the prior 2 yr and treated with a standard prednisone taper protocol. SW patients received only 6 d of steroid treatment after transplantation. Eleven received Thymoglobulin and one Basiliximab induction treatment along with a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil. Patient and graft survival was 92% in SW group (median follow-up 12 months, range 6-17), and 92 and 82% in the historic control group respectively (median follow-up 21 months, range 11-27). In the SW and control group, acute rejection rates were 9 and 18%, and mean creatinine levels at last follow-up 1.30 +/- 0.36 and 1.68 +/- 0.58 mg/dL respectively. Only two SW patients had an increase in liver function tests during follow-up (18%), compared with six patients in the control group (43%). This study demonstrates that rapid SW is safe for HCV+ KT recipients, without an increase in acute rejection episodes or liver function abnormalities in the short term.

Cost-minimization study comparing Simulect vs. Thymoglobulin in renal transplant induction

PURPOSE

Based on the data of clinical trial CHI-F-02 comparing the efficacy and safety of basiliximab (Simulect) vs. anti-thymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) in renal transplant induction, we carried out an economic evaluation.

METHOD

This pharmacoeconomic study was a cost-minimization study, i.e. given the equivalent efficacy of the products, the strategy that minimized the cost of care was considered better. The cost of care was analyzed from the hospital perspective.

MATERIAL

This 'piggyback' study of 100 patients estimated the direct medical costs incurred over 6 months of use of two strategies for renal transplant induction therapy. Direct medical costs are those of utilized medical resources: medications, hospital stays, dialysis, and physician visits and investigations not scheduled in the protocol.

RESULTS

In the Simulect arm, significant reductions were found in the initial hospital stay duration and number of infectious episodes. Therefore, although the average cost of treatment was slightly higher with Simulect) than with Thymoglobulin (2964 vs. 2298 Euros), the cost of the initial hospitalization was significantly lower in the Simulect arm (10 907 vs. 11 967 Euros; p = 0.02). Furthermore the mean cost of infectious episodes was significantly lower in the Simulect arm (1056 vs. 1790 Euros, p = 0.03). Cytomegalovirus infection accounted for a significantly smaller proportion of this cost in the Simulect arm than in the Thymoglobulin arm (30% vs. 53%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed direct medical cost savings of 1159 Euros per patient in the Simulect arm, which more than compensated for the higher price of this immunosuppressive drug.

Sequential protocols using basiliximab versus antithymocyte globulins in renal-transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and steroids

BACKGROUND

Sequential anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG)/cyclosporine immunosuppression has two main advantages: delayed introduction of the nephrotoxic drug cyclosporine and prevention of acute rejection. Basiliximab, a recently developed chimeric monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes the minor subpopulation of activated T lymphocytes, has been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection when used with cyclosporine introduced on day 1.

METHODS

This open, randomized, multicenter study was undertaken to compare the safety and efficacy of ATG versus basiliximab induction therapy (IT) with delayed introduction of cyclosporine for microemulsion (Neoral) in 105 low immunologic risk renal-transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and steroids.

RESULTS

One-year patient and graft survival rates were 98.1% and 94.2%, respectively, in the basiliximab group (n = 52), and 98.1% and 96.2% in the ATG group (n = 53). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was comparable (basiliximab 9.6%, ATG 9.4%), as were key parameters of renal function, notably serum creatinine levels, time-to-nadir serum creatinine, and the number of patients requiring posttransplantation dialysis (basiliximab 28.8%, ATG 30.2%). However, significantly fewer patients in the basiliximab group experienced cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia, and this without any significant difference in any other key safety parameters (including the incidences of serum sickness, fever, lymphoma, and infections in general).

CONCLUSIONS

Both ATG and basiliximab, when used for IT in a sequential protocol, are equally effective in terms of graft and patient survival as well as at preventing acute rejection. However, basiliximab is associated with a lower incidence of certain key adverse events, namely CMV infection, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia.

Liver transplantation without steroid induction in HIV-infected patients

Until recently, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was considered an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation in Spain. We present the first 4 cases of liver transplantation (LT) carried out in our center in patients infected with HIV and coinfected by the hepatitis C virus (HCV), immunosuppressed with cyclosporine A (CyA) and basiliximab, but without steroids. The 4 patients were male, with a mean age of 38.25 +/- 4.5 years. Mean time of HIV infection was 114 +/- 62.3 months and all patients were receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). HCV genotypes of the 4 patients were 4, 1b, 1b, and 1a. Two patients were classified as Child-Turcotte-Pugh C (10 and 11 points), 1 was B (8 points), and the patient with hepatocellular carcinoma was A (5 points). Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab and monotherapy with CyA. There were no postoperative infections. With a follow-up of 17 +/- 8 months, all patients are alive. There was only 1 acute rejection episode, and this was solved with steroid pulses. Three patients showed HCV recurrence with enzymatic and histological changes and were treated with interferon and ribavirin. One patient had negative HCV-ribonucleic acid after 6 months of treatment. In conclusion, HIV infection should not be considered an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation. The evolution of this type of patients will probably depend on the HCV infection. Immunosuppression without steroids may reduce opportunistic infection.

The Selective Use of Basiliximab Versus Thymoglobulin in Combination with Sirolimus for Cadaveric Renal Transplant Recipients at Low Risk Versus High Risk for Delayed Graft Function

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that the use of basiliximab together with sirolimus permits a window of recovery from delayed graft function before the introduction of reduced-dose cyclosporine. The present study reviews our experience with the substitution of thymoglobulin for basiliximab as induction therapy for recipients at increased risk for early acute rejection episodes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 145 cadaveric renal allograft recipients who received either basiliximab (n=115) or thymoglobulin (n=30) in combination with sirolimus and prednisone, followed by delayed introduction of reduced doses of cyclosporine. Recipients were stratified as high immune responders if they were African American, a retransplant recipient, or a recipient with a panel-reactive antibody greater than 50%. All other recipients were considered low immune responders.

RESULTS

Basiliximab-treated high immune responders exhibited a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes (26%) than either basiliximab-treated low immune responders (10%, P=0.04) or thymoglobulin-treated high immune responders (3%, P=0.01). The median time to initiation of cyclosporine was 12 days; cyclosporine was initiated when the serum creatinine level was 2.5 mg/dL or less. Patients with early return of renal function displayed a lower incidence of acute rejection episodes than those with later recovery of function (P=0.003). High immune responders treated with basiliximab expressed a higher mean serum creatinine level at 3 months (P<0.01), 6 months (P=0.02) and 12 months (P=0.01) than either low immune responders treated with basiliximab or high immune responders treated with thymoglobulin.

CONCLUSION

A strategy combining sirolimus with basiliximab for low-immunologic risk recipients and thymoglobulin for high-risk recipients leads to prompt recovery of renal function with a low risk of acute rejection episodes.

Efficacy and Safety of Basiliximab with a Tacrolimus-Based Regimen in Liver Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Induction with monoclonal antibodies for prevention of acute cellular rejection (ACR) may avoid many of the adverse events associated with polyclonal antibodies. Basiliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha-chain of the interleukin 2 receptor (CD25), has been extensively evaluated as an induction therapy for kidney transplant recipients, more frequently in combination with a cyclosporine-based regimen. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of basiliximab in combination with a tacrolimus-based regimen after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive liver transplants (47 cadaveric donors; 3 living donors) were analyzed. All patients received two 20-mg doses of basiliximab (days 0 and 4 after transplantation) followed by tacrolimus (0.15 mg/kg/day; 10-15 ng/mL target trough levels) and a tapered dose regimen of steroids. Follow-up ranged from 404 to 1,364 days after transplantation (mean 799.89 days, SD+/-257.37; median 796 days).

RESULTS

A total of 88% of patients remained rejection-free during follow-up with an actuarial rejection-free probability of 75% within 3 months. The actuarial patient survival rate at 3 years was 88%, and the graft survival rate was 75%. Twelve (24%) patients experienced one episode of sepsis, requiring temporary reduction of immunosuppressive therapy. There were no immediate side effects associated with basiliximab and no evidence of cytomegalovirus infection or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Basiliximab in combination with a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen is effective in reducing episodes of ACR and increasing ACR-free survival after liver transplantation. In addition, basiliximab does not increase the incidence of adverse effects or infections.

Epithelial cell polarity and improved early outcomes in delayed graft function: a pilot study of polyclonal vs monoclonal antibodies

BACKGROUND

Polyclonal antibody preparations contain antibodies that bind not only to molecules on circulating lymphocytes but also to other sites that bear similar antigens. We hypothesized that this extra-antibody effect would increase the number of intact tubular epithelial cells in organs at high risk for delayed graft function (DGF).

METHODS

We used immunohistochemistry to examine serial biopsy samples (time 0 and 7-10 days after transplantation) in 18 kidney transplant recipients with DGF. These individuals received either polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte sera or a monoclonal humanized anti-CD25 antibody as induction immunosuppression. We also examined their early clinical course over 6 months.

RESULTS

Individuals treated with the polyclonal preparation demonstrated greater preservation of kidney epithelial cell polarity manifested by more intense and more localized basolateral distribution of E-cadherin (P = 0.016), beta-catenin (P = 0.008) and Na-K ATPase (P = 0.02). These individuals were also more likely to maintain greater estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) at follow-up than patients treated with an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (6 month eGFR polyclonal: 55.5+/-7.12 ml/min vs monoclonal: 43.33+/-6.48 ml/min; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Though a pilot study, these data suggest that a purified polyclonal antibody preparation may help conserve functional kidney mass during DGF with potential benefits on transplant function overall.

The role of anti-IL-2 receptor in high-risk kidney transplant patients

Anti-IL-2 receptor has been proved to be effective in reducing the rate of acute rejection in kidney transplantation and also improving both the rate of graft and patient survival. In this study, we retrospectively review the role of anti-IL-2 receptor as induction immunosuppression in immunologically high-risk kidney transplant patient compared with normally low-risk patients.

METHODS

From January 1999 to December 2002, we performed 246 kidney transplantations in two transplant centers in Bangkok. These were divided into two groups: group 1, high-risk group containing 50 patients who had one of the following criteria: (1) high panel reactive antibody (>50%); (2) retransplantation; (3) marginal donor (with expectancy of delayed graft function); (4) spouse donor; (5) >4 HLA mismatch. All group 1 patients receive anti-IL-2 receptor as induction immunosuppression (either Basiliximab (n = 27) or Daclizumab (n = 23).) Group 2 consisted of the control group of 196 patients with normal immunological risk. The following data of both groups were collected and analyzed: patient demography, type of donor, acute rejection incidence, severity, and time.

RESULTS

In this study, the anti-IL-2 receptors are 27 cases of Basiliximab and 23 cases of Daclizumab. The rates of acute rejection are not significantly different in both groups, namely, 46 of 194 (23.7%) in group 2 compared with 10 of 50 (20%) episodes in group 1 (P = .602). All rejections in both groups responded to pulse steroid treatment. The mortality rate and rate of graft failure were also not significantly different, i.e., 6 of 196 (3.1%) vs 2 of 50 (4.0%) (P = .666) and 7 of 196 (3.6%) vs 3 of 50 (6.0%) (P = .429) in low risk group versus high risk group, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probabilities of acute rejection free, patient survival rate, and graft survival rate also showed no difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of anti-IL-2 receptor antibodies as induction immunosuppression in immunologically high-risk patients results in the same rate of acute rejection, severity of acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival as recipients with normal immunological risk.

Results of kidney transplantation in patients receiving MMF- or MMF and basiliximab-containing immunosuppression

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a more potent immunosuppressive drug than azathioprine or mizoribine in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) and steroids. Recently, basiliximab (BA), an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist, has become available in Japan. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an extremely low CsA dose immunosuppressive protocol with MMF versus MMF plus BA after renal transplantation (RTx).

PATIENTS

Between September 2001 and March 2003, we performed 79 RTx with CsA-based immunosuppression, including nine from cadavers and 70 from living donors with 15 ABO-incompatible RTx. Immunosuppression consisted of methylprednisolone (MP), CsA and MMF (group 1; n = 24) versus added BA during the induction phase (group 2; n = 55). In group 2, MP was withdrawn on postoperative day 14. Supplementary MP, muromonab-CD3, or gusperimus was administered if rejection was suspected clinically or diagnosed by biopsy.

RESULTS

The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) was significantly higher among group 1 than group 2 patients (P < .05). CsA C2 levels in group 1 were significantly higher than group 2 at each time (P < .01). The incidence of infection was comparable. Patient and graft survival rates in group 1 were 100% and 100%; in group 2, they were 98% and 98%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The short-term results of RTx were favorable in both the MMF, and the MMF plus BA immunosuppression. In addition, BA significantly reduced the number of AR episodes. Early steroid withdrawal in recipients receiving BA induction was not associated with an increased risk of AR.

Historical controlled trial of OKT3 versus basiliximab induction therapy in simultaneous pancreas-renal transplantation

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients are at high immunological risk of rejection. Antibody induction is beneficial but lymphocyte-depleting therapy is associated with a high incidence of side-effects. We performed a historical controlled trial to compare OKT3 versus anti-CD25 antibody (basiliximab) induction therapy with regard to patient, kidney and pancreas survival, as well as to examine for any differences in acute rejection, graft function, and infective complications. Twenty-eight consecutive SPK transplants were performed at the Monash Medical Centre between December 1997 and November 2001. Anti CD3 monoclonal antibody (OKT3) was used prior to March 2000 (n = 12) and basiliximab was used after (n = 16), both in combination with cyclosporin, mycophenolate, and prednisolone. A retrospective comparison of outcomes was performed. At 6 months, patient (100 vs 100%), kidney (91.7 vs 91.7%) and pancreas (75 vs 83.3%) survival were similar in the OKT3 and basiliximab groups, respectively. A minority of subjects in each group remained free from rejection (42% basiliximab vs 25% on OKT3, P = NS). Renal function was superior in the basiliximab group (mean calculated creatinine clearance 79.4 +/- 11.9 vs 54.5 +/- 15.9 mL/min for basiliximab vs OKT3, P < 0.001). The incidence of major opportunistic infection was lower in basiliximab-treated patients (9 vs 50% in the OKT3 group, P = 0.033). Basiliximab was associated with similar 6-month patient, kidney and pancreas survival, superior renal function and less opportunistic infection as compared with OKT3 induction therapy in SPK transplants. Basiliximab is at least as effective and is safer than OKT3 for induction therapy in SPK transplantation.

Use of fenoldopam to control renal dysfunction early after liver transplantation

With the aim of assessing whether fenoldopam can help to preserve renal function after liver transplantation, we randomized 140 consecutive recipients with comparable preoperative renal function to receive fenoldopam 0.1 microg/kg/minute (group F, 46 patients), dopamine 3 microg/kg/minute (group D, 48 patients), or placebo (group P, 46 patients) from the time of anesthesia induction to 96 hours postoperatively. There were no differences between the groups in intraoperative urinary output or furosemide administration (both P =.1). Daily recordings made during the first 4 postoperative days revealed no significant differences in urinary output (P =.1), serum creatinine (P =.5), the incidence of renal insufficiency (P =.7), the need for loop diuretics (P =.9) or vasoactive drugs (P =.8). In comparison with preoperative levels, creatinine clearance at the end of the study in the patients receiving fenoldopam remained substantially unchanged, whereas it decreased by 39 and 12.3%, respectively, in the subjects receiving placebo or dopamine (P <.001); blood cyclosporine A (CsA) levels were similar in the 3 groups (P =.1). Three subjects died in the intensive care unit (1 in each group, P =.9), 2 of them had renal failure. In conclusion, our results confirm the inefficacy of dopamine in preventing or limiting early renal dysfunction after liver transplantation, and suggest that fenoldopam may preserve creatinine clearance by counterbalancing the renal vasoconstrictive effect of CsA, as it has been reported in previous experimental studies.

Early adequate mycophenolic acid exposure is associated with less rejection in kidney transplantation

This study examines the importance of early mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure in the cyclosporine- and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-treated kidney transplant population. We prospectively evaluated 94 first solitary kidney transplant patients treated with cyclosporine (Neoral), MMF, and prednisone. Basiliximab was also given to 72 recipients. MPA exposure was measured by HPLC using a limited sampling estimate of 12 h area under the curve (AUC [0-12]) within the first week. Efficacy was determined by the occurrence of acute rejection and toxicity by the need to reduce MMF doses within the first 3 months post-transplantation. Acute rejection was observed in 14 (15%) and MMF toxicity in 27 (29%). Receiver operator curve analysis shows that MPA AUC [0-12] on day 3 was predictive of efficacy (c = 0.72, p = 0.007) but not toxicity (c = 0.57, p = 0.285). A separate analysis of only patients on basiliximab shows that the MPA AUC [0-12] on day 3 was also predictive of efficacy (c = 0.80, p = 0.01). Therefore early adequate exposure to MPA by day 3 is associated with low acute rejection but cannot predict toxicity. Adequate MPA exposure is also important with basiliximab induction therapy.

Meta-analysis of basiliximab for immunoprophylaxis in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Basiliximab is a high-affinity chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha-chain of the interleukin (IL)-2 receptor. Individual studies have shown that it is highly effective in preventing acute rejection and causes no measurable incremental toxicity. However, incorporation of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis into routine practice depends upon the demonstration of benefit across treatment regimens and quantitation of the treatment effect.

METHODS

This study employed a meta-analysis to examine the clinical benefit of basiliximab. Parameter estimates were derived from four randomised prospective double-blind studies conducted in 93 renal transplant centres in 18 countries. A total of 1185 adult primary allograft recipients were randomised within the centres to receive either basiliximab 20mg intravenously on days 0 and 4 or placebo, in addition to double or triple immunosuppression consisting of cyclosporin-microemulsion (Neoral((R))The use of tradenames is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.), corticosteroids, and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Key clinical events included patient and graft survival, graft rejection and complications. Analysis was performed using a variable model; odds ratios and the numbers needed to treat (NNT) to benefit or to harm one patient were calculated for each principal outcome at 6 or 12 months post-transplant.

RESULTS

Basiliximab reduced the relative risk (RR) and absolute risk (AR) of clinical and biopsy-proven acute graft rejection across all treatment regimens. The overall RR of clinical acute graft rejection was decreased by 35% in patients receiving basiliximab. AR was reduced by 15.6% (pooled incidence: 28.8% vs 44.4%, p < 0.0001), and the NNT for efficacy was six. The reduction in RR of biopsy-proven rejection was similar (32%) with an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 11.7% (pooled incidence: 25.1% vs 36.8%, p < 0.0001) and NNT of nine over 6 months. There was a concomitant reduction in the risk of graft loss which did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.14). The RR of graft loss was reduced by 26% with an AR reduction of 2.3% (pooled incidence: 6.4% vs 8.7%) and an NNT of 42 over 6 months. The risk of death was unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab produces a significant reduction in the RR and AR of clinical and biopsy-proven acute graft rejection with a trend towards a concomitant reduction in the risk of graft loss. The magnitude of protection provided by basiliximab, the fact that it is observed across treatment regimens and the safety of this therapy are arguments for its routine use in renal transplantation.