101
|
Mavaddat N, Michailidou K, Dennis J, Lush M, Fachal L, Lee A, Tyrer JP, Chen TH, Wang Q, Bolla MK, Yang X, Adank MA, Ahearn T, Aittomäki K, Allen J, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Antonenkova NN, Arndt V, Aronson KJ, Auer PL, Auvinen P, Barrdahl M, Beane Freeman LE, Beckmann MW, Behrens S, Benitez J, Bermisheva M, Bernstein L, Blomqvist C, Bogdanova NV, Bojesen SE, Bonanni B, Børresen-Dale AL, Brauch H, Bremer M, Brenner H, Brentnall A, Brock IW, Brooks-Wilson A, Brucker SY, Brüning T, Burwinkel B, Campa D, Carter BD, Castelao JE, Chanock SJ, Chlebowski R, Christiansen H, Clarke CL, Collée JM, Cordina-Duverger E, Cornelissen S, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Czene K, Daly MB, Devilee P, Dörk T, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Dumont M, Durcan L, Dwek M, Eccles DM, Ekici AB, Eliassen AH, Ellberg C, Engel C, Eriksson M, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Figueroa J, Fletcher O, Flyger H, Försti A, Fritschi L, Gabrielson M, Gago-Dominguez M, Gapstur SM, García-Sáenz JA, Gaudet MM, Georgoulias V, Giles GG, Gilyazova IR, Glendon G, Goldberg MS, Goldgar DE, González-Neira A, Grenaker Alnæs GI, Grip M, Gronwald J, Grundy A, Guénel P, Haeberle L, Hahnen E, Haiman CA, Håkansson N, Hamann U, Hankinson SE, Harkness EF, Hart SN, He W, Hein A, Heyworth J, Hillemanns P, Hollestelle A, Hooning MJ, Hoover RN, Hopper JL, Howell A, Huang G, Humphreys K, Hunter DJ, Jakimovska M, Jakubowska A, Janni W, John EM, Johnson N, Jones ME, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Jung A, Kaaks R, Kaczmarek K, Kataja V, Keeman R, Kerin MJ, Khusnutdinova E, Kiiski JI, Knight JA, Ko YD, Kosma VM, Koutros S, Kristensen VN, Krüger U, Kühl T, Lambrechts D, Le Marchand L, Lee E, Lejbkowicz F, Lilyquist J, Lindblom A, Lindström S, Lissowska J, Lo WY, Loibl S, Long J, Lubiński J, Lux MP, MacInnis RJ, Maishman T, Makalic E, Maleva Kostovska I, Mannermaa A, Manoukian S, Margolin S, Martens JWM, Martinez ME, Mavroudis D, McLean C, Meindl A, Menon U, Middha P, Miller N, Moreno F, Mulligan AM, Mulot C, Muñoz-Garzon VM, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Neven P, Newman WG, Nielsen SF, Nordestgaard BG, Norman A, Offit K, Olson JE, Olsson H, Orr N, Pankratz VS, Park-Simon TW, Perez JIA, Pérez-Barrios C, Peterlongo P, Peto J, Pinchev M, Plaseska-Karanfilska D, Polley EC, Prentice R, Presneau N, Prokofyeva D, Purrington K, Pylkäs K, Rack B, Radice P, Rau-Murthy R, Rennert G, Rennert HS, Rhenius V, Robson M, Romero A, Ruddy KJ, Ruebner M, Saloustros E, Sandler DP, Sawyer EJ, Schmidt DF, Schmutzler RK, Schneeweiss A, Schoemaker MJ, Schumacher F, Schürmann P, Schwentner L, Scott C, Scott RJ, Seynaeve C, Shah M, Sherman ME, Shrubsole MJ, Shu XO, Slager S, Smeets A, Sohn C, Soucy P, Southey MC, Spinelli JJ, Stegmaier C, Stone J, Swerdlow AJ, Tamimi RM, Tapper WJ, Taylor JA, Terry MB, Thöne K, Tollenaar RAEM, Tomlinson I, Truong T, Tzardi M, Ulmer HU, Untch M, Vachon CM, van Veen EM, Vijai J, Weinberg CR, Wendt C, Whittemore AS, Wildiers H, Willett W, Winqvist R, Wolk A, Yang XR, Yannoukakos D, Zhang Y, Zheng W, Ziogas A, Dunning AM, Thompson DJ, Chenevix-Trench G, Chang-Claude J, Schmidt MK, Hall P, Milne RL, Pharoah PDP, Antoniou AC, Chatterjee N, Kraft P, García-Closas M, Simard J, Easton DF. Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes. Am J Hum Genet 2019; 104:21-34. [PMID: 30554720 PMCID: PMC6323553 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 560] [Impact Index Per Article: 112.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Stratification of women according to their risk of breast cancer based on polygenic risk scores (PRSs) could improve screening and prevention strategies. Our aim was to develop PRSs, optimized for prediction of estrogen receptor (ER)-specific disease, from the largest available genome-wide association dataset and to empirically validate the PRSs in prospective studies. The development dataset comprised 94,075 case subjects and 75,017 control subjects of European ancestry from 69 studies, divided into training and validation sets. Samples were genotyped using genome-wide arrays, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected by stepwise regression or lasso penalized regression. The best performing PRSs were validated in an independent test set comprising 11,428 case subjects and 18,323 control subjects from 10 prospective studies and 190,040 women from UK Biobank (3,215 incident breast cancers). For the best PRSs (313 SNPs), the odds ratio for overall disease per 1 standard deviation in ten prospective studies was 1.61 (95%CI: 1.57-1.65) with area under receiver-operator curve (AUC) = 0.630 (95%CI: 0.628-0.651). The lifetime risk of overall breast cancer in the top centile of the PRSs was 32.6%. Compared with women in the middle quintile, those in the highest 1% of risk had 4.37- and 2.78-fold risks, and those in the lowest 1% of risk had 0.16- and 0.27-fold risks, of developing ER-positive and ER-negative disease, respectively. Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that this PRS was well calibrated and predicts disease risk accurately in the tails of the distribution. This PRS is a powerful and reliable predictor of breast cancer risk that may improve breast cancer prevention programs.
Collapse
|
102
|
Rizzolo P, Silvestri V, Bucalo A, Zelli V, Valentini V, Catucci I, Zanna I, Masala G, Bianchi S, Spinelli AM, Tommasi S, Tibiletti MG, Russo A, Varesco L, Coppa A, Calistri D, Cortesi L, Viel A, Bonanni B, Azzollini J, Manoukian S, Montagna M, Radice P, Palli D, Peterlongo P, Ottini L. Contribution of MUTYH Variants to Male Breast Cancer Risk: Results From a Multicenter Study in Italy. Front Oncol 2018; 8:583. [PMID: 30564557 PMCID: PMC6288482 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Inherited mutations in BRCA1, and, mainly, BRCA2 genes are associated with increased risk of male breast cancer (MBC). Mutations in PALB2 and CHEK2 genes may also increase MBC risk. Overall, these genes are functionally linked to DNA repair pathways, highlighting the central role of genome maintenance in MBC genetic predisposition. MUTYH is a DNA repair gene whose biallelic germline variants cause MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) syndrome. Monoallelic MUTYH variants have been reported in families with both colorectal and breast cancer and there is some evidence on increased breast cancer risk in women with monoallelic variants. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether MUTYH germline variants may contribute to MBC susceptibility. To this aim, we screened the entire coding region of MUTYH in 503 BRCA1/2 mutation negative MBC cases by multigene panel analysis. Moreover, we genotyped selected variants, including p.Tyr179Cys, p.Gly396Asp, p.Arg245His, p.Gly264Trpfs*7, and p.Gln338His, in a total of 560 MBC cases and 1,540 male controls. Biallelic MUTYH pathogenic variants (p.Tyr179Cys/p.Arg241Trp) were identified in one MBC patient with phenotypic manifestation of adenomatous polyposis. Monoallelic pathogenic variants were identified in 14 (2.5%) MBC patients, in particular, p.Tyr179Cys was detected in seven cases, p.Gly396Asp in five cases, p.Arg245His and p.Gly264Trpfs*7 in one case each. The majority of MBC cases with MUTYH pathogenic variants had family history of cancer including breast, colorectal, and gastric cancers. In the case-control study, an association between the variant p.Tyr179Cys and increased MBC risk emerged by multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR) = 4.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17-17.58; p = 0.028]. Overall, our study suggests that MUTYH pathogenic variants may have a role in MBC and, in particular, the p.Tyr179Cys variant may be a low/moderate penetrance risk allele for MBC. Moreover, our results suggest that MBC may be part of the tumor spectrum associated with MAP syndrome, with implication in the clinical management of patients and their relatives. Large-scale collaborative studies are needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
|
103
|
Burke LJ, Sevcik J, Gambino G, Tudini E, Mucaki EJ, Shirley BC, Whiley P, Parsons MT, De Leeneer K, Gutiérrez‐Enríquez S, Santamariña M, Caputo SM, Santana dos Santos E, Soukupova J, Janatova M, Zemankova P, Lhotova K, Stolarova L, Borecka M, Moles‐Fernández A, Manoukian S, Bonanni B, Edwards SL, Blok MJ, van Overeem Hansen T, Rossing M, Diez O, Vega A, Claes KB, Goldgar DE, Rouleau E, Radice P, Peterlongo P, Rogan PK, Caligo M, Spurdle AB, Brown MA. BRCA1 and BRCA2 5' noncoding region variants identified in breast cancer patients alter promoter activity and protein binding. Hum Mutat 2018; 39:2025-2039. [PMID: 30204945 PMCID: PMC6282814 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Revised: 09/01/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The widespread use of next generation sequencing for clinical testing is detecting an escalating number of variants in noncoding regions of the genome. The clinical significance of the majority of these variants is currently unknown, which presents a significant clinical challenge. We have screened over 6,000 early-onset and/or familial breast cancer (BC) cases collected by the ENIGMA consortium for sequence variants in the 5' noncoding regions of BC susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, and identified 141 rare variants with global minor allele frequency < 0.01, 76 of which have not been reported previously. Bioinformatic analysis identified a set of 21 variants most likely to impact transcriptional regulation, and luciferase reporter assays detected altered promoter activity for four of these variants. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that three of these altered the binding of proteins to the respective BRCA1 or BRCA2 promoter regions, including NFYA binding to BRCA1:c.-287C>T and PAX5 binding to BRCA2:c.-296C>T. Clinical classification of variants affecting promoter activity, using existing prediction models, found no evidence to suggest that these variants confer a high risk of disease. Further studies are required to determine if such variation may be associated with a moderate or low risk of BC.
Collapse
|
104
|
Serrano D, Gandini S, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Feroce I, Johansson H, Macis D, Aristarco V, Bonanni B, DeCensi A. Quality of Life in a Randomized Breast Cancer Prevention Trial of Low-Dose Tamoxifen and Fenretinide in Premenopausal Women. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2018; 11:811-818. [PMID: 30352838 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-18-0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Menopausal symptoms are the main reason for withdrawal in tamoxifen prevention trials. Here, we present Menopause Quality of Life (MenQoL) assessment within a randomized 2 × 2 phase II clinical trial of low-dose tamoxifen and the synthetic retinoid fenretinide. A total of 235 premenopausal women at higher risk for breast cancer were randomized to either tamoxifen 5 mg daily, fenretinide 200 mg daily, their combination, or placebo. Climacteric symptoms were investigated using the MenQoL questionnaire which was self-administered at each visit for 2 years of treatment and for 1 year of follow-up. CYP2D6 was genotyped in subjects taking tamoxifen to study the association with menopausal symptoms. The MenQoL effect size analysis showed no statistically significant difference among the four treatment arms for all four domains (vasomotor, physical, psychosocial, and sexual). Vasomotor symptoms only slightly increased under tamoxifen, with a score at year two of 1.45, 1.21, 0.58, and 1.17 in the combined, tamoxifen, fenretinide, and placebo arms, respectively. Compared with the slow metabolizers, a higher percentage of subjects with CYP2D6 extensive metabolizer genotype complained of a ≥3 score in the vasomotor, psychosocial, and sexual domain in the tamoxifen arms (P value = 0.01, 0.007, and 0.007, respectively). QoL in premenopausal or perimenopausal women was not significantly worsened by low-dose tamoxifen or fenretinide. Our findings suggest that a low dose of tamoxifen may increase its acceptability for breast cancer prevention.
Collapse
|
105
|
Chiappa A, Andreoni B, Dionigi R, Spaggiari L, Foschi D, Polvani G, Orecchia R, Fazio N, Pravettoni G, Cossu ML, Galetta D, Venturino M, Ferrari C, Macone L, Crosta C, Bonanni B, Biffi R. A rationale multidisciplinary approach for treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: Accurate review of management and perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 132:161-168. [PMID: 30447922 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Revised: 09/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer of the esophagus and of gastroesophageal junction can be cured, even if with lacking cure rate. Different approaches have been developed, mostly when carcinoma has loco-regional pattern. Multimodality therapy showed a survival rate superior than 10% if compared to a single approach. This is a systematic review, carried to assess the following matters: Which therapeutic opportunities are available? Who could benefit of them? Which adverse reactions could possibly verify? How can physicians definitely choose the proper strategy? Which is the role of surgery? We mean to give either General Practitioner or specialists clear and efficient updates about current treatment of this tumour, starting from physical examination. Four eminent guidelines were consulted for our study: Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care, NCCN, Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre and Esmo.
Collapse
|
106
|
Forman D, Bauld L, Bonanni B, Brenner H, Brown K, Dillner J, Kampman E, Manczuk M, Riboli E, Steindorf K, Storm H, Espina C, Wild CP. Time for a European initiative for research to prevent cancer: A manifesto for Cancer Prevention Europe (CPE). J Cancer Policy 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2018.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
107
|
Cazzaniga M, Bonanni B. Relationship Between Metabolic Disorders and Breast Cancer Incidence and Outcomes. Is There a Preventive and Therapeutic Role for Berberine? Anticancer Res 2018; 38:4393-4402. [PMID: 30061203 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The association between obesity/overweight and carcinogenesis is a recognized highly complex and still partially unknown process. Nevertheless, these conditions are frequently related with several pathological states such as chronic inflammation, presence of dyslipidemia and insulin-resistance (metabolic disorders) which are now accepted features contributing to the increased hormonal-dependent cancer risk. Breast cancer incidence and outcome is strictly related to metabolic disorders. Thus, managing these emerging risk factors, should be a new and optimal strategy in breast cancer prevention and therapy. Unfortunately, the agents able to interfere with metabolic disorders, produce often light or serious side-effects and consequently their compliance and efficacy are weak. Some nutraceutical compounds seem to be an ideal option with the same activity and effectiveness to ordinary agents but with minor side effects. Berberine, an extraordinary medicinal herb, has been proven to have many clinical pharmacological effects, including lowering of blood glucose, increasing insulin sensitivity, and correcting lipid metabolism disorders. It has a comparable therapeutic effect to common drugs. It acts contemporarily on hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia and insulin resistance without their related side effects and could be a real alternative in healthy high risk or affected breast cancer patients with metabolic disorders. This commentary examines the pathophysiology of metabolic disorders and its relationship to breast cancer. Moreover, it evaluates the possible role of berberine in the clinical practice.
Collapse
|
108
|
Macis D, Sestak I, Aristarco V, Johansson H, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Decensi A, Bonanni B, Cuzick J, Gandini S. Abstract 4216: Adiponectin, leptin and breast cancer in high risk postmenopausal women: Results from a nested case-control study. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-4216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Obesity is a risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer (BC) and evidence supports the pivotal role of adipokines in the association between obesity and BC. In the present study, we aim to investigate the role of adiponectin and leptin as independent risk markers for postmenopausal BC in a prospective nested case-control study within the cohort of women from the International Breast cancer Intervention prevention Study II (IBIS-II). Methods and Results: In the IBIS-II Prevention trial, 3864 healthy postmenopausal women at increased risk for BC were randomized to receive 1 mg/day oral anastrozole or matching placebo for 5 years. We measured serum adiponectin and leptin at baseline and 12-months in 119 cases and 336 controls in the placebo arm, and 57 cases and 165 controls in the anastrozole arm. We performed the adipokines measurements on the automated immunoassay platform ELLA (ProteinSimple, Biotechne). Baseline characteristics (age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and oophorectomy) were not different between cases and controls in both trial arms, except for hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use (38.7% of cases vs 51.5% of controls) and hysterectomy (25.2% of cases vs 37.5% of controls) in the placebo arm. We did not observe any statistically significant difference in adiponectin and leptin at baseline between cases and controls in both trial arms. When we considered the change in adiponectin levels between baseline and 12-months of follow-up, we observed a borderline significant higher proportion of BC cases in subjects with a decrease in adiponectin (36.4%) compared to subjects with an increase in adiponectin (25.7%). The multivariate Cox model indicated that women on placebo with a decrease in adiponectin between baseline and 12-months had a 36% significant increased risk in BC (HR=0.64; CI 0.42-0.98; adjusted for age, BMI, previous HRT use, smoking, oophorectomy, hysterectomy). Changes in leptin were not significantly associated with BC incidence overall. However, the multivariate Cox model for the anastrozole arm, indicated a significant higher BC risk for women with the highest increase (>10 ng/ml) vs the lowest decrease (<-10 ng/ml) in leptin: HR=4.45; CI 1.08-18.30; adjusted for age, BMI, previous HRT use, smoking, oophorectomy, hysterectomy. Conclusion: Our results did not support a prognostic role of baseline adiponectin and leptin levels in postmenopausal BC development. However, we observed an increased BC risk in women with a 12-month adiponectin decrease and leptin increase. These data suggest further investigations of changes of adiponectin and leptin levels as attractive targets for BC prevention in postmenopausal women at high risk for BC.
Citation Format: Debora Macis, Ivana Sestak, Valentina Aristarco, Harriet Johansson, Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga, Andrea Decensi, Bernardo Bonanni, Jack Cuzick, Sara Gandini. Adiponectin, leptin and breast cancer in high risk postmenopausal women: Results from a nested case-control study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4216.
Collapse
|
109
|
Corso G, Figueiredo J, La Vecchia C, Veronesi P, Pravettoni G, Macis D, Karam R, Lo Gullo R, Provenzano E, Toesca A, Mazzocco K, Carneiro F, Seruca R, Melo S, Schmitt F, Roviello F, De Scalzi AM, Intra M, Feroce I, De Camilli E, Villardita MG, Trentin C, De Lorenzi F, Bonanni B, Galimberti V. Hereditary lobular breast cancer with an emphasis on E-cadherin genetic defect. J Med Genet 2018; 55:431-441. [PMID: 29929997 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Revised: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Recent studies have reported germline CDH1 mutations in cases of lobular breast cancer (LBC) not associated with the classical hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome. A multidisciplinary workgroup discussed genetic susceptibility, pathophysiology and clinical management of hereditary LBC (HLBC). The team has established the clinical criteria for CDH1 screening and results' interpretation, and created consensus guidelines regarding genetic counselling, breast surveillance and imaging techniques, clinicopathological findings, psychological and decisional support, as well as prophylactic surgery and plastic reconstruction. Based on a review of current evidence for the identification of HLBC cases/families, CDH1 genetic testing is recommended in patients fulfilling the following criteria: (A) bilateral LBC with or without family history of LBC, with age at onset <50 years, and (B) unilateral LBC with family history of LBC, with age at onset <45 years. In CDH1 asymptomatic mutant carriers, breast surveillance with clinical examination, yearly mammography, contrast-enhanced breast MRI and breast ultrasonography (US) with 6-month interval between the US and the MRI should be implemented as a first approach. In selected cases with personal history, family history of LBC and CDH1 mutations, prophylactic mastectomy could be discussed with an integrative group of clinical experts. Psychodecisional support also plays a pivotal role in the management of individuals with or without CDH1 germline alterations. Ultimately, the definition of a specific protocol for CDH1 genetic screening and ongoing coordinated management of patients with HLBC is crucial for the effective surveillance and early detection of LBC.
Collapse
|
110
|
Corso G, De Scalzi A, Feroce I, Veronesi P, Bonanni B, Galimberti V. Clinical criteria revision for hereditary lobular breast cancer associated with E-cadherin germline mutations. Per Med 2018; 15:153-155. [PMID: 29745790 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2017-0083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
111
|
Rebbeck TR, Friebel TM, Friedman E, Hamann U, Huo D, Kwong A, Olah E, Olopade OI, Solano AR, Teo SH, Thomassen M, Weitzel JN, Chan TL, Couch FJ, Goldgar DE, Kruse TA, Palmero EI, Park SK, Torres D, van Rensburg EJ, McGuffog L, Parsons MT, Leslie G, Aalfs CM, Abugattas J, Adlard J, Agata S, Aittomäki K, Andrews L, Andrulis IL, Arason A, Arnold N, Arun BK, Asseryanis E, Auerbach L, Azzollini J, Balmaña J, Barile M, Barkardottir RB, Barrowdale D, Benitez J, Berger A, Berger R, Blanco AM, Blazer KR, Blok MJ, Bonadona V, Bonanni B, Bradbury AR, Brewer C, Buecher B, Buys SS, Caldes T, Caliebe A, Caligo MA, Campbell I, Caputo S, Chiquette J, Chung WK, Claes KB, Collée JM, Cook J, Davidson R, de la Hoya M, De Leeneer K, de Pauw A, Delnatte C, Diez O, Ding YC, Ditsch N, Domchek SM, Dorfling CM, Velazquez C, Dworniczak B, Eason J, Easton DF, Eeles R, Ehrencrona H, Ejlertsen B, Engel C, Engert S, Evans DG, Faivre L, Feliubadaló L, Ferrer SF, Foretova L, Fowler J, Frost D, Galvão HCR, Ganz PA, Garber J, Gauthier-Villars M, Gehrig A, Gerdes AM, Gesta P, Giannini G, Giraud S, Glendon G, Godwin AK, Greene MH, Gronwald J, Gutierrez-Barrera A, Hahnen E, Hauke J, Henderson A, Hentschel J, Hogervorst FB, Honisch E, Imyanitov EN, Isaacs C, Izatt L, Izquierdo A, Jakubowska A, James P, Janavicius R, Jensen UB, John EM, Joseph V, Kaczmarek K, Karlan BY, Kast K, Kim SW, Konstantopoulou I, Korach J, Laitman Y, Lasa A, Lasset C, Lázaro C, Lee A, Lee MH, Lester J, Lesueur F, Liljegren A, Lindor NM, Longy M, Loud JT, Lu KH, Lubinski J, Machackova E, Manoukian S, Mari V, Martínez-Bouzas C, Matrai Z, Mebirouk N, Meijers-Heijboer HE, Meindl A, Mensenkamp AR, Mickys U, Miller A, Montagna M, Moysich KB, Mulligan AM, Musinsky J, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Ngeow J, Nguyen HP, Niederacher D, Nielsen HR, Nielsen FC, Nussbaum RL, Offit K, Öfverholm A, Ong KR, Osorio A, Papi L, Papp J, Pasini B, Pedersen IS, Peixoto A, Peruga N, Peterlongo P, Pohl E, Pradhan N, Prajzendanc K, Prieur F, Pujol P, Radice P, Ramus SJ, Rantala J, Rashid MU, Rhiem K, Robson M, Rodriguez GC, Rogers MT, Rudaitis V, Schmidt AY, Schmutzler RK, Senter L, Shah PD, Sharma P, Side LE, Simard J, Singer CF, Skytte AB, Slavin TP, Snape K, Sobol H, Southey M, Steele L, Steinemann D, Sukiennicki G, Sutter C, Szabo CI, Tan YY, Teixeira MR, Terry MB, Teulé A, Thomas A, Thull DL, Tischkowitz M, Tognazzo S, Toland AE, Topka S, Trainer AH, Tung N, van Asperen CJ, van der Hout AH, van der Kolk LE, van der Luijt RB, Van Heetvelde M, Varesco L, Varon-Mateeva R, Vega A, Villarreal-Garza C, von Wachenfeldt A, Walker L, Wang-Gohrke S, Wappenschmidt B, Weber BHF, Yannoukakos D, Yoon SY, Zanzottera C, Zidan J, Zorn KK, Hutten Selkirk CG, Hulick PJ, Chenevix-Trench G, Spurdle AB, Antoniou AC, Nathanson KL. Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Hum Mutat 2018; 39:593-620. [PMID: 29446198 PMCID: PMC5903938 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Revised: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The prevalence and spectrum of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been reported in single populations, with the majority of reports focused on White in Europe and North America. The Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) has assembled data on 18,435 families with BRCA1 mutations and 11,351 families with BRCA2 mutations ascertained from 69 centers in 49 countries on six continents. This study comprehensively describes the characteristics of the 1,650 unique BRCA1 and 1,731 unique BRCA2 deleterious (disease-associated) mutations identified in the CIMBA database. We observed substantial variation in mutation type and frequency by geographical region and race/ethnicity. In addition to known founder mutations, mutations of relatively high frequency were identified in specific racial/ethnic or geographic groups that may reflect founder mutations and which could be used in targeted (panel) first pass genotyping for specific populations. Knowledge of the population-specific mutational spectrum in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could inform efficient strategies for genetic testing and may justify a more broad-based oncogenetic testing in some populations.
Collapse
|
112
|
Colombo M, Lòpez‐Perolio I, Meeks HD, Caleca L, Parsons MT, Li H, De Vecchi G, Tudini E, Foglia C, Mondini P, Manoukian S, Behar R, Garcia EBG, Meindl A, Montagna M, Niederacher D, Schmidt AY, Varesco L, Wappenschmidt B, Bolla MK, Dennis J, Michailidou K, Wang Q, Aittomäki K, Andrulis IL, Anton‐Culver H, Arndt V, Beckmann MW, Beeghly‐Fadel A, Benitez J, Boeckx B, Bogdanova NV, Bojesen SE, Bonanni B, Brauch H, Brenner H, Burwinkel B, Chang‐Claude J, Conroy DM, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Czene K, Devilee P, Dörk T, Eriksson M, Fasching PA, Figueroa J, Fletcher O, Flyger H, Gabrielson M, García‐Closas M, Giles GG, González‐Neira A, Guénel P, Haiman CA, Hall P, Hamann U, Hartman M, Hauke J, Hollestelle A, Hopper JL, Jakubowska A, Jung A, Kosma V, Lambrechts D, Le Marchand L, Lindblom A, Lubinski J, Mannermaa A, Margolin S, Miao H, Milne RL, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Olson JE, Peterlongo P, Peto J, Pylkäs K, Sawyer EJ, Schmidt MK, Schmutzler RK, Schneeweiss A, Schoemaker MJ, See MH, Southey MC, Swerdlow A, Teo SH, Toland AE, Tomlinson I, Truong T, van Asperen CJ, van den Ouweland AM, van der Kolk LE, Winqvist R, Yannoukakos D, Zheng W, Dunning AM, Easton DF, Henderson A, Hogervorst FB, Izatt L, Offitt K, Side LE, van Rensburg EJ, EMBRACE S, HEBON S, McGuffog L, Antoniou AC, Chenevix‐Trench G, Spurdle AB, Goldgar DE, de la Hoya M, Radice P. The BRCA2 c.68-7T > A variant is not pathogenic: A model for clinical calibration of spliceogenicity. Hum Mutat 2018; 39:729-741. [PMID: 29460995 PMCID: PMC5947288 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Revised: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Although the spliceogenic nature of the BRCA2 c.68-7T > A variant has been demonstrated, its association with cancer risk remains controversial. In this study, we accurately quantified by real-time PCR and digital PCR (dPCR), the BRCA2 isoforms retaining or missing exon 3. In addition, the combined odds ratio for causality of the variant was estimated using genetic and clinical data, and its associated cancer risk was estimated by case-control analysis in 83,636 individuals. Co-occurrence in trans with pathogenic BRCA2 variants was assessed in 5,382 families. Exon 3 exclusion rate was 4.5-fold higher in variant carriers (13%) than controls (3%), indicating an exclusion rate for the c.68-7T > A allele of approximately 20%. The posterior probability of pathogenicity was 7.44 × 10-115 . There was neither evidence for increased risk of breast cancer (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.86-1.24) nor for a deleterious effect of the variant when co-occurring with pathogenic variants. Our data provide for the first time robust evidence of the nonpathogenicity of the BRCA2 c.68-7T > A. Genetic and quantitative transcript analyses together inform the threshold for the ratio between functional and altered BRCA2 isoforms compatible with normal cell function. These findings might be exploited to assess the relevance for cancer risk of other BRCA2 spliceogenic variants.
Collapse
|
113
|
Ghoussaini M, Edwards SL, Michailidou K, Nord S, Cowper-Sal Lari R, Desai K, Kar S, Hillman KM, Kaufmann S, Glubb DM, Beesley J, Dennis J, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Dicks E, Guo Q, Schmidt MK, Shah M, Luben R, Brown J, Czene K, Darabi H, Eriksson M, Klevebring D, Bojesen SE, Nordestgaard BG, Nielsen SF, Flyger H, Lambrechts D, Thienpont B, Neven P, Wildiers H, Broeks A, Van't Veer LJ, Rutgers EJT, Couch FJ, Olson JE, Hallberg E, Vachon C, Chang-Claude J, Rudolph A, Seibold P, Flesch-Janys D, Peto J, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Gibson L, Nevanlinna H, Muranen TA, Aittomäki K, Blomqvist C, Hall P, Li J, Liu J, Humphreys K, Kang D, Choi JY, Park SK, Noh DY, Matsuo K, Ito H, Iwata H, Yatabe Y, Guénel P, Truong T, Menegaux F, Sanchez M, Burwinkel B, Marme F, Schneeweiss A, Sohn C, Wu AH, Tseng CC, Van Den Berg D, Stram DO, Benitez J, Pilar Zamora M, Perez JIA, Menéndez P, Shu XO, Lu W, Gao YT, Cai Q, Cox A, Cross SS, Reed MWR, Andrulis IL, Knight JA, Glendon G, Tchatchou S, Sawyer EJ, Tomlinson I, Kerin MJ, Miller N, Haiman CA, Henderson BE, Schumacher F, Le Marchand L, Lindblom A, Margolin S, Teo SH, Yip CH, Lee DSC, Wong TY, Hooning MJ, Martens JWM, Collée JM, van Deurzen CHM, Hopper JL, Southey MC, Tsimiklis H, Kapuscinski MK, Shen CY, Wu PE, Yu JC, Chen ST, Alnæs GG, Borresen-Dale AL, Giles GG, Milne RL, McLean C, Muir K, Lophatananon A, Stewart-Brown S, Siriwanarangsan P, Hartman M, Miao H, Buhari SABS, Teo YY, Fasching PA, Haeberle L, Ekici AB, Beckmann MW, Brenner H, Dieffenbach AK, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Swerdlow A, Ashworth A, Orr N, Schoemaker MJ, García-Closas M, Figueroa J, Chanock SJ, Lissowska J, Simard J, Goldberg MS, Labrèche F, Dumont M, Winqvist R, Pylkäs K, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Brauch H, Brüning T, Koto YD, Radice P, Peterlongo P, Bonanni B, Volorio S, Dörk T, Bogdanova NV, Helbig S, Mannermaa A, Kataja V, Kosma VM, Hartikainen JM, Devilee P, Tollenaar RAEM, Seynaeve C, Van Asperen CJ, Jakubowska A, Lubinski J, Jaworska-Bieniek K, Durda K, Slager S, Toland AE, Ambrosone CB, Yannoukakos D, Sangrajrang S, Gaborieau V, Brennan P, McKay J, Hamann U, Torres D, Zheng W, Long J, Anton-Culver H, Neuhausen SL, Luccarini C, Baynes C, Ahmed S, Maranian M, Healey CS, González-Neira A, Pita G, Rosario Alonso M, Álvarez N, Herrero D, Tessier DC, Vincent D, Bacot F, de Santiago I, Carroll J, Caldas C, Brown MA, Lupien M, Kristensen VN, Pharoah PDP, Chenevix-Trench G, French JD, Easton DF, Dunning AM. Publisher Correction: Evidence that breast cancer risk at the 2q35 locus is mediated through IGFBP5 regulation. Nat Commun 2018; 9:16193. [PMID: 29633761 PMCID: PMC5898457 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5999.
Collapse
|
114
|
Johansson H, Gandini S, Aristarco V, Macis D, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Serrano D, Pruneri G, Lazzeroni M, Viale G, Toesca A, Rajasekaran A, Bonanni B, DeCensi A. Abstract P4-08-05: Impact of common polymorphisms of CYP19A1 and UGT2B17 gene deletion on early endocrine-responsive postmenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p4-08-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Polymorphisms of genes involved in estrogen production have been linked to breast cancer risk, prognosis and treatment response. Polymorphisms of the aromatase gene CYP19A1 influence its activity. The UGT2B17 catalyzes glucuronic acid transfer to a variety of substrates, including steroids and drugs like the aromatase inhibitor exemestane. We investigated the impact of two variants of CYP19A1 (rs10046, rs4646) and the UGT2B17 gene deletion on disease outcome in 125 postmenopausal women operated for ER-positive primary breast cancer enrolled in a randomized pre-surgical trial.
Patients Briefly, upon informed consent, postmenopausal patients with ER-positive breast cancer (stage T1–2, N0–1, M0) eligible for surgery were randomized to receive either exemestane (25 mg/day), or celecoxib (800 mg/day), or placebo for 6 weeks prior to surgery at the European Institute of Oncology (2004-2008). Exemestane showed a significant 10% absolute reduction in Ki67 labeling index compared to the other two arms. Serum and whole blood was taken at baseline and the day before surgery and stored at -80°C until assayed.
Methods DNA was extracted from blood by QIAamp DNA Blood Kits. The CYP19A1 rs1004/rs46466 were analyzed by Taqman genotyping assays in real-time PCR. The UGT2B17 deletion was estimated by copy number assay (Lifetechnologies). Serum estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1) levels were measured by gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry detection (GS-MS/MS) after liquid-liquid extraction. The lower limit of quantitation were 0.625 pg/mL for estradiol and 1.56 pg/mL for estrone. The association of genetic polymorphisms with “any event” was assessed by the Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounders.
Results The genetic polymorphisms did not deviate from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P-value >0.41) and minor allele frequency of rs10046 (A/G), rs4646 (C/A), and UGT2B17Del were 0.45, 0.22, and 0.31, respectively. The rs10046 A and rs4646 C alleles were associated with higher estrogen levels. Carriers of rs10046 AA had median levels of 7.57 pg/ml E2 and 35.9 pg/mL E1 versus 3,9 pg/mL E2 and 27.4 E1 pg/mL in CA/AA genotypes (P<0.003). Carriers of rs4646 CC had 5.6 pg/ml E2 and 30.45 pg/mL E1 versus 3,95 pg/mL E2 and 27.4 E1 pg/mL in CA/AA genotypes (P=0.05 only for E1). After 6 weeks treatment with exemestane, we observed steeper decreases in estrogen levels in the rs10046 AA/rs4646 CC carriers (P=0.02 for E2). After a median follow-up of 7 years we found that women carrying at least one SNP of rs10046 and one SNP of rs4646 had a better prognosis compared with women carrying homozygote wt SNPs (HR=0.44; 95% CI: 0.2-0.99 P=0.049). Similarly, the UGT2B17 deletion was associated with a better prognosis (HR= 0.43; 95% CI: 0.19-0.97; P=0.0439). There was no interaction with pre-surgical or adjuvant treatment.
Conclusions Our analysis confirms previous findings of an association of CYP19A1 rs10046/rs4646 with estrogen levels in postmenopausal women. Interestingly, the carriers of the variants associated with lower estrogen levels at diagnosis had better prognosis. Further genomic profiling in larger trials aimed to enhance tailored treatment efficacy in endocrine-responsive postmenopausal breast cancer are warranted.
Citation Format: Johansson H, Gandini S, Aristarco V, Macis D, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Serrano D, Pruneri G, Lazzeroni M, Viale G, Toesca A, Rajasekaran A, Bonanni B, DeCensi A. Impact of common polymorphisms of CYP19A1 and UGT2B17 gene deletion on early endocrine-responsive postmenopausal breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-05.
Collapse
|
115
|
Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Gandini S, Serrano D, Lazzeroni M, Pruneri G, Varricchio C, Cazzaniga M, Leonardi MC, Galimberti V, Viale G, De Censi A, Bonanni B. Abstract P4-15-06: Low dose tamoxifen lowers recurrences after mastectomy for in situ neoplasia. Ten-year results of a monoinstitutional study. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p4-15-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
There is no agreement upon the need of a preventive treatment after breast mastectomy for in situ neoplasia. Low-dose tamoxifen (5 mg/day) has comparable antiproliferative effect than the standard dose of 20 mg/day in biomarker trials and has been shown to halve ipsilateral recurrence in a large cohort of postmenopausal ER positive DCIS treated with breast conserving surgery (Guerrieri-Gonzaga et al., Int J Cancer 2016).
Here we investigated the effect of low dose tamoxifen in patients treated with mastectomy for an in situ neoplasia and followed-up in a single Institution for a median of 10 years.
Our cohort consists of 404 consecutive premenopausal (n=281) or postmenopausal (n=123) women who underwent unilateral mastectomy at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO), with or without nipple preservation, between 1996 and 2011. Patients had a diagnosis of pure LCIS (n=12) or ER positive (ER>1%) DCIS (n=363) or both (n=29) and were treated with tamoxifen 5 mg/day (n=162) or no treatment (n=242) upon medical judgment, patient preference and/or clinical trial assignment. The main subject and tumor characteristics are reported in table 1.
Patient and tumor characteristics No tam (n=242)Low dose tam (n=162)P-valueMedian age, years (IQR)46 (41, 54)47 (42, 51)0.65Premenopausal status (n, %)160 (66)121 (75)0.07Median BMI (kg/m2, IQR)22 (20, 25)22 (20, 24)0.7Breast cancer family history (%)29320.44Histology (LCIS, DCIS, both; %)4/92/42/86/120.01Grading (G1,G2,G3;%)11/59/2918/61/200.04Median ER (%, IQR)90 (70, 95)90 (80, 95)0.005Median PgR (%, IQR)40 (5, 80)68 (25, 90)0.0002Median Ki67 (%, IQR)15 (10, 23)14 (10, 20)0.03Radiotherapy (n, %)95 (39)76 (47)0.13
After a median follow-up of 10 years (range 4-21 years) and a median low dose tamoxifen treatment of 4.9 years (IQR 2.7, 5.0), a total of 85 events were observed (28 in situ, 40 invasive breast cancers, 3 metastatic diseases, 12 other primary cancers, 2 deaths). A total of 36 ipsilateral breast events (23 versus 13 in the no tam versus tam group, respectively), 32 contralateral breast events (22 versus 10 in the no tam versus tam, respectively) and 17 other events (11 versus 6 in the no tam versus tam, respectively) occurred. Overall, eleven deaths (3%) occurred and no endometrial cancers were observed. A time-dependent competing risk model was applied for tamoxifen use and we have shown that low-dose tamoxifen was associated with a 48% reduction on all breast events (adjusted HR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.31–0.88, p=0.01), adjusting for radiotherapy and age.
Although limited by the observational nature of the study, we show for the first time that treatment with low dose tamoxifen is effective and safe in women who underwent mastectomy for non-invasive breast neoplasms and should be taken into consideration as a risk reduction strategy for premenopausal and postmenopausal women with breast intraepithelial neoplasia.
Citation Format: Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Gandini S, Serrano D, Lazzeroni M, Pruneri G, Varricchio C, Cazzaniga M, Leonardi MC, Galimberti V, Viale G, De Censi A, Bonanni B. Low dose tamoxifen lowers recurrences after mastectomy for in situ neoplasia. Ten-year results of a monoinstitutional study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-15-06.
Collapse
|
116
|
De Censi A, Cazzaniga M, Gandini S, Casadio C, Chiapparini L, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Macis D, Veronesi P, Bonanni B. Abstract P3-10-02: Presence of atypia in ductal lavage and risk of subsequent breast cancer in a prospective study. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p3-10-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Atypical hyperplasia is considered a nearly obligate precursor of breast cancer and is associated with a higher risk of developing breast cancer (BC). Attempts to improve early detection of breast cancer and to provide individualized breast cancer risk assessment would greatly benefit from sampling cellular material from the target tissue. Ductal lavage (DL) is a minimally invasive technique which provides adequate material to detect atypical cells in mammary ducts. However, long term data of the association between atypia from ductal lavage and BC risk are lacking. We studied the prevalence of atypia in DL in different risk categories and its ability to predict BC development in women at risk. Methods: From March 2000 to July 2012 we performed DL in a consecutive series of 348 women with median age of 45 years (range 19-74) at increased BC risk based on the following characteristics: 5 yrs Gail model > 1.66% or > 10% probability of BRCA mutation (n = 155), history of contralateral BC (CBC, n = 161), presence of a BRCA pathogenic variant (n = 32). We analyzed the presence of atypical cells in the baseline specimen of ductal lavage and in repeated lavage and observed their evolution during follow-up. Results: The procedure was safe and well tolerated in most women, with pain and disconfort preventing the procedure in 5.4% of subjects. Overall, 126 (36%) women had atypia at baseline, with a prevalence of 32%, 39%, and 41% in the Gail, CBC and BRCA groups, respectively (p = 0.38). The overall prevalence of atypia considering all visits was 44% (range 36-51). After a median follow up of 6 years, cumulative BC events were 8% in women without atypia versus 14% in those with atypia (log-rank p = 0.08). In the highest risk groups (CBC and BRCA pathogenic variants), the number of BC events was 16 (21%) in women with atypia versus 11 (10%) in women without atypia (p = 0.02 after adjustment for age). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that cytologic atypia in the fluid obtained by DL predicts subsequent BC in women at increased risk, providing individual risk assessment. The reversal of atypia in DL should be evaluated as a surrogate biomarker of BC therapeutic prevention.
Supported by: Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), Lega Italina per la Lotta contro i Tumori (LILT), AVON Foundation for Women.
Citation Format: De Censi A, Cazzaniga M, Gandini S, Casadio C, Chiapparini L, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Macis D, Veronesi P, Bonanni B. Presence of atypia in ductal lavage and risk of subsequent breast cancer in a prospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-02.
Collapse
|
117
|
Bondavalli D, Malvestiti F, Pensotti V, Feroce I, Bonanni B. BRCA1 homozygous unclassified variant in a patient with non-Fanconi anemia: A case report. Oncol Lett 2018; 15:3329-3332. [PMID: 29435075 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.7711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The present case report discusses a woman affected by chronic lymphatic leukemia and breast cancer with a familial history of breast cancer; suspected to be hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome. The patient underwent BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing. Sequencing of BRCA1 revealed the presence of the variant of unknown significance (VUS) c.3082C>T (p.Arg1028Cys) at homozygous state, whereas no mutations were detected in BRCA2. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification confirmed the presence of two alleles. Although consanguineity between her parents was reported, which therefore supported the molecular data, her clinical phenotype was not suggestive of typical Fanconi anemia (FA), particularly of a BRCA1-linked FA. In the two cases reported in the literature, carriers of biallelic BRCA1 mutation present a severe and quite typical phenotype. For this reason, the patient was offered a diepoxybutane test, where neither complex rearrangements nor multiradial formation were detected. We were therefore inclined to consider that BRCA1 VUS as of little clinical significance.
Collapse
|
118
|
Corso G, Bonanni B, Veronesi P, Galimberti V. Mutual exclusion of CDH1 and BRCA germline mutations in the pathway of hereditary breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018; 297:1067-1068. [PMID: 29397440 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4705-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
119
|
Villarini A, Pasanisi P, Traina A, Mano MP, Bonanni B, Panico S, Scipioni C, Galasso R, Paduos A, Simeoni M, Bellotti E, Barbero M, Macellari G, Venturelli E, Raimondi M, Bruno E, Gargano G, Fornaciari G, Morelli D, Seregni E, Krogh V, Berrino F. Lifestyle and Breast Cancer Recurrences: The DIANA-5 Trial. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 98:1-18. [DOI: 10.1177/030089161209800101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Aims and Background The DIANA (Diet and Androgens)-5 study is a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a diet based on Mediterranean and macrobiotic recipes and principles, associated with moderate physical activity, in reducing additional breast cancer events in women with early stage invasive breast cancer at high risk of recurrence because of metabolic or endocrine milieu. The intervention is expected to reduce serum insulin and sex hormones, which were associated with breast prognosis in previous studies. Methods Between 2008 and 2010, the study randomly assigned 1208 patients to an intensive diet and exercise intervention or to a comparison group, to be followed-up through 2015. General lifestyle recommendations for the prevention of cancer are given to both groups, and the intervention group is being offered a comprehensive lifestyle intervention, including cooking classes, conferences, common meals and exercise sessions. Adherence assessments occurred at baseline and at 12 months and are planned at 36 and 60 months. They include food frequency diaries, anthropometric measures, body fat distribution assessed with impedance scale, one week registration of physical activity with a multisensor arm-band monitor, metabolic and endocrine blood parameters. Outcome breast cancer events are assessed through self report at semi annual meetings or telephone interview and are validated through medical record verification. Results The randomized groups were comparable for age (51.8 years), proportion of ER-negative tumors (22%), axillary node metastasis (42%), reproductive variables, tobacco smoking, blood pressure, anthropometric measurements and hormonal and metabolic parameters. Conclusions DIANA-5 has the potential to establish whether a Mediterranean-macrobiotic lifestyle may reduce breast cancer recurrences. We will assess evidence of effectiveness, first by comparing the incidence of additional breast cancer events (local or distant recurrence, second ipsilateral or contralateral cancer) in the intervention and in the control group, by an intention-to-treat analysis, and second by analyzing the incidence of breast cancer events in the total study population by compliance assessment score.
Collapse
|
120
|
Noonan S, Pasa A, Fontana V, Caviglia S, Bonanni B, Costa A, Smith SG, Peccatori F, DeCensi A. A Survey among Breast Cancer Specialists on the Low Uptake of Therapeutic Prevention with Tamoxifen or Raloxifene. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2018; 11:38-43. [PMID: 29061559 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-17-0162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Revised: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
With this survey, we aimed to address the reasons why physicians are reluctant to prescribe breast cancer-preventive therapy with the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM) tamoxifen or raloxifene despite a strong evidence of efficacy. A self-administered 5-point Likert questionnaire was given during breast cancer meetings in Europe or sent via email to rank the importance of 10 predefined reasons for low uptake of SERMs for breast cancer therapeutic prevention. Analyses tested the associations between the stated reasons and physician characteristics such as gender, age, country of work, and specialty. Of 246 delivered questionnaires, 27 were incomplete and were excluded from analysis. Overall, there was a small variability in response scores, with a tendency for physicians to give moderate importance (score = 3) to all 10 statements. However, the top five reasons were: the expected greater preventive effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors (70.3% with score >3), difficulty applying current risk models in clinical practice (69.9%), the lack of clarity on the most appropriate physician for prevention advice (68.4%), the lack of reliable short-term biomarkers of effectiveness (67.5%), and the lack of commercial interest in therapeutic prevention (66.0%). The lack of reliable short-term biomarkers showed a tendency to discriminate between medical oncologists and other breast specialists (OR = 2.42; 95% CI, 0.93-6.25). This survey highlights the complexity of prescribing decisions among physicians in this context. Coupled with the known barriers among eligible women, these data may help to identify strategies to increase uptake of breast cancer therapeutic prevention. Cancer Prev Res; 11(1); 38-43. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
|
121
|
Pruneri G, Lazzeroni M, Bagnardi V, Tiburzio GB, Rotmensz N, DeCensi A, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Vingiani A, Curigliano G, Zurrida S, Bassi F, Salgado R, Van den Eynden G, Loi S, Denkert C, Bonanni B, Viale G. The prevalence and clinical relevance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:321-328. [PMID: 28426105 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a robust prognostic adjunct in invasive breast cancer, but their clinical role in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has not been ascertained. Patients and methods We evaluated the prevalence and clinical relevance of TILs in a well annotated series of 1488 consecutive DCIS women with a median follow-up of 8.2 years. Detailed criteria for TILs evaluation were pre-defined involving the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group. TILs percentage was considered both as a continuous and categorical variable. Levels of TILs were examined for their associations with ipsilateral breast event (IBE), whether in situ or invasive. Results Of the 1488 patients with DCIS under study, 35.1% had <1%, 58.3% 1-49% and 6.5% ≥50% peri-ductal stromal lymphocytes. The interobserver agreement in TILs evaluation, measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.96 (95% CI 0.95-0.97). At univariable analysis, clinical factors significantly associated with TILs (P ≤0.001) were intrinsic subtype, grade, necrosis, type of surgery. Her-2 positive DCIS were more frequently associated with TILs (24% of patients with TILs ≥50%), followed by the triple negative (11%), Luminal B/Her-2 positive (9%) and Luminal A/B subtypes (1%) (P < 0.0001). We did not find any association between TILs as a continuous variable and the risk of IBEs. Likewise, when patients were stratified by TILs percentage (<1%, between 1% and 49.9%, and ≥50%), no statistically significant association was observed (10-year cumulative incidence of IBEs: 19%, 17.3%, and 18.7% respectively, P = 0.767). Conclusion TILs occur more frequently in the Her-2 positive DCIS. Although we did not find a significant association between TILs and the 10-year risk of IBE, our data suggest that immunotherapies might be considered in subsets of DCIS patients.
Collapse
|
122
|
Guo Q, Burgess S, Turman C, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Lush M, Abraham J, Aittomäki K, Andrulis IL, Apicella C, Arndt V, Barrdahl M, Benitez J, Berg CD, Blomqvist C, Bojesen SE, Bonanni B, Brand JS, Brenner H, Broeks A, Burwinkel B, Caldas C, Campa D, Canzian F, Chang-Claude J, Chanock SJ, Chin SF, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Cybulski C, Czene K, Darabi H, Devilee P, Diver WR, Dunning AM, Earl HM, Eccles DM, Ekici AB, Eriksson M, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Figueroa J, Flesch-Janys D, Flyger H, Gapstur SM, Gaudet MM, Giles GG, Glendon G, Grip M, Gronwald J, Haeberle L, Haiman CA, Hall P, Hamann U, Hankinson S, Hartikainen JM, Hein A, Hiller L, Hogervorst FB, Holleczek B, Hooning MJ, Hoover RN, Humphreys K, Hunter DJ, Hüsing A, Jakubowska A, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Kaaks R, Kabisch M, Kataja V, Knight JA, Koppert LB, Kosma VM, Kristensen VN, Lambrechts D, Le Marchand L, Li J, Lindblom A, Lindström S, Lissowska J, Lubinski J, Machiela MJ, Mannermaa A, Manoukian S, Margolin S, Marme F, Martens JWM, McLean C, Menéndez P, Milne RL, Marie Mulligan A, Muranen TA, Nevanlinna H, Neven P, Nielsen SF, Nordestgaard BG, Olson JE, Perez JIA, Peterlongo P, Phillips KA, Poole CJ, Pylkäs K, Radice P, Rahman N, Rüdiger T, Rudolph A, Sawyer EJ, Schumacher F, Seibold P, Seynaeve C, Shah M, Smeets A, Southey MC, Tollenaar RAEM, Tomlinson I, Tsimiklis H, Ulmer HU, Vachon C, van den Ouweland AMW, Van’t Veer LJ, Wildiers H, Willett W, Winqvist R, Zamora MP, Chenevix-Trench G, Dörk T, Easton DF, García-Closas M, Kraft P, Hopper JL, Zheng W, Schmidt MK, Pharoah PDP. Body mass index and breast cancer survival: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46:1814-1822. [PMID: 29232439 PMCID: PMC5837506 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is increasing evidence that elevated body mass index (BMI) is associated with reduced survival for women with breast cancer. However, the underlying reasons remain unclear. We conducted a Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate a possible causal role of BMI in survival from breast cancer. Methods We used individual-level data from six large breast cancer case-cohorts including a total of 36 210 individuals (2475 events) of European ancestry. We created a BMI genetic risk score (GRS) based on genotypes at 94 known BMI-associated genetic variants. Association between the BMI genetic score and breast cancer survival was analysed by Cox regression for each study separately. Study-specific hazard ratios were pooled using fixed-effect meta-analysis. Results BMI genetic score was found to be associated with reduced breast cancer-specific survival for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cases [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.11, per one-unit increment of GRS, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.22, P = 0.03). We observed no association for ER-negative cases (HR = 1.00, per one-unit increment of GRS, 95% CI 0.89-1.13, P = 0.95). Conclusions Our findings suggest a causal effect of increased BMI on reduced breast cancer survival for ER-positive breast cancer. There is no evidence of a causal effect of higher BMI on survival for ER-negative breast cancer cases.
Collapse
|
123
|
Milne RL, Kuchenbaecker KB, Michailidou K, Beesley J, Kar S, Lindström S, Hui S, Lemaçon A, Soucy P, Dennis J, Jiang X, Rostamianfar A, Finucane H, Bolla MK, McGuffog L, Wang Q, Aalfs CM, Adams M, Adlard J, Agata S, Ahmed S, Ahsan H, Aittomäki K, Al-Ejeh F, Allen J, Ambrosone CB, Amos CI, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Antonenkova NN, Arndt V, Arnold N, Aronson KJ, Auber B, Auer PL, Ausems MGEM, Azzollini J, Bacot F, Balmaña J, Barile M, Barjhoux L, Barkardottir RB, Barrdahl M, Barnes D, Barrowdale D, Baynes C, Beckmann MW, Benitez J, Bermisheva M, Bernstein L, Bignon YJ, Blazer KR, Blok MJ, Blomqvist C, Blot W, Bobolis K, Boeckx B, Bogdanova NV, Bojesen A, Bojesen SE, Bonanni B, Børresen-Dale AL, Bozsik A, Bradbury AR, Brand JS, Brauch H, Brenner H, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Brewer C, Brinton L, Broberg P, Brooks-Wilson A, Brunet J, Brüning T, Burwinkel B, Buys SS, Byun J, Cai Q, Caldés T, Caligo MA, Campbell I, Canzian F, Caron O, Carracedo A, Carter BD, Castelao JE, Castera L, Caux-Moncoutier V, Chan SB, Chang-Claude J, Chanock SJ, Chen X, Cheng TYD, Chiquette J, Christiansen H, Claes KBM, Clarke CL, Conner T, Conroy DM, Cook J, Cordina-Duverger E, Cornelissen S, Coupier I, Cox A, Cox DG, Cross SS, Cuk K, Cunningham JM, Czene K, Daly MB, Damiola F, Darabi H, Davidson R, De Leeneer K, Devilee P, Dicks E, Diez O, Ding YC, Ditsch N, Doheny KF, Domchek SM, Dorfling CM, Dörk T, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Dubois S, Dugué PA, Dumont M, Dunning AM, Durcan L, Dwek M, Dworniczak B, Eccles D, Eeles R, Ehrencrona H, Eilber U, Ejlertsen B, Ekici AB, Eliassen AH, Engel C, Eriksson M, Fachal L, Faivre L, Fasching PA, Faust U, Figueroa J, Flesch-Janys D, Fletcher O, Flyger H, Foulkes WD, Friedman E, Fritschi L, Frost D, Gabrielson M, Gaddam P, Gammon MD, Ganz PA, Gapstur SM, Garber J, Garcia-Barberan V, García-Sáenz JA, Gaudet MM, Gauthier-Villars M, Gehrig A, Georgoulias V, Gerdes AM, Giles GG, Glendon G, Godwin AK, Goldberg MS, Goldgar DE, González-Neira A, Goodfellow P, Greene MH, Alnæs GIG, Grip M, Gronwald J, Grundy A, Gschwantler-Kaulich D, Guénel P, Guo Q, Haeberle L, Hahnen E, Haiman CA, Håkansson N, Hallberg E, Hamann U, Hamel N, Hankinson S, Hansen TVO, Harrington P, Hart SN, Hartikainen JM, Healey CS, Hein A, Helbig S, Henderson A, Heyworth J, Hicks B, Hillemanns P, Hodgson S, Hogervorst FB, Hollestelle A, Hooning MJ, Hoover B, Hopper JL, Hu C, Huang G, Hulick PJ, Humphreys K, Hunter DJ, Imyanitov EN, Isaacs C, Iwasaki M, Izatt L, Jakubowska A, James P, Janavicius R, Janni W, Jensen UB, John EM, Johnson N, Jones K, Jones M, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Kaaks R, Kabisch M, Kaczmarek K, Kang D, Kast K, Keeman R, Kerin MJ, Kets CM, Keupers M, Khan S, Khusnutdinova E, Kiiski JI, Kim SW, Knight JA, Konstantopoulou I, Kosma VM, Kristensen VN, Kruse TA, Kwong A, Lænkholm AV, Laitman Y, Lalloo F, Lambrechts D, Landsman K, Lasset C, Lazaro C, Le Marchand L, Lecarpentier J, Lee A, Lee E, Lee JW, Lee MH, Lejbkowicz F, Lesueur F, Li J, Lilyquist J, Lincoln A, Lindblom A, Lissowska J, Lo WY, Loibl S, Long J, Loud JT, Lubinski J, Luccarini C, Lush M, MacInnis RJ, Maishman T, Makalic E, Kostovska IM, Malone KE, Manoukian S, Manson JE, Margolin S, Martens JWM, Martinez ME, Matsuo K, Mavroudis D, Mazoyer S, McLean C, Meijers-Heijboer H, Menéndez P, Meyer J, Miao H, Miller A, Miller N, Mitchell G, Montagna M, Muir K, Mulligan AM, Mulot C, Nadesan S, Nathanson KL, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Nevelsteen I, Niederacher D, Nielsen SF, Nordestgaard BG, Norman A, Nussbaum RL, Olah E, Olopade OI, Olson JE, Olswold C, Ong KR, Oosterwijk JC, Orr N, Osorio A, Pankratz VS, Papi L, Park-Simon TW, Paulsson-Karlsson Y, Lloyd R, Pedersen IS, Peissel B, Peixoto A, Perez JIA, Peterlongo P, Peto J, Pfeiler G, Phelan CM, Pinchev M, Plaseska-Karanfilska D, Poppe B, Porteous ME, Prentice R, Presneau N, Prokofieva D, Pugh E, Pujana MA, Pylkäs K, Rack B, Radice P, Rahman N, Rantala J, Rappaport-Fuerhauser C, Rennert G, Rennert HS, Rhenius V, Rhiem K, Richardson A, Rodriguez GC, Romero A, Romm J, Rookus MA, Rudolph A, Ruediger T, Saloustros E, Sanders J, Sandler DP, Sangrajrang S, Sawyer EJ, Schmidt DF, Schoemaker MJ, Schumacher F, Schürmann P, Schwentner L, Scott C, Scott RJ, Seal S, Senter L, Seynaeve C, Shah M, Sharma P, Shen CY, Sheng X, Shimelis H, Shrubsole MJ, Shu XO, Side LE, Singer CF, Sohn C, Southey MC, Spinelli JJ, Spurdle AB, Stegmaier C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Sukiennicki G, Surowy H, Sutter C, Swerdlow A, Szabo CI, Tamimi RM, Tan YY, Taylor JA, Tejada MI, Tengström M, Teo SH, Terry MB, Tessier DC, Teulé A, Thöne K, Thull DL, Tibiletti MG, Tihomirova L, Tischkowitz M, Toland AE, Tollenaar RAEM, Tomlinson I, Tong L, Torres D, Tranchant M, Truong T, Tucker K, Tung N, Tyrer J, Ulmer HU, Vachon C, van Asperen CJ, Van Den Berg D, van den Ouweland AMW, van Rensburg EJ, Varesco L, Varon-Mateeva R, Vega A, Viel A, Vijai J, Vincent D, Vollenweider J, Walker L, Wang Z, Wang-Gohrke S, Wappenschmidt B, Weinberg CR, Weitzel JN, Wendt C, Wesseling J, Whittemore AS, Wijnen JT, Willett W, Winqvist R, Wolk A, Wu AH, Xia L, Yang XR, Yannoukakos D, Zaffaroni D, Zheng W, Zhu B, Ziogas A, Ziv E, Zorn KK, Gago-Dominguez M, Mannermaa A, Olsson H, Teixeira MR, Stone J, Offit K, Ottini L, Park SK, Thomassen M, Hall P, Meindl A, Schmutzler RK, Droit A, Bader GD, Pharoah PDP, Couch FJ, Easton DF, Kraft P, Chenevix-Trench G, García-Closas M, Schmidt MK, Antoniou AC, Simard J. Identification of ten variants associated with risk of estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer. Nat Genet 2017; 49:1767-1778. [PMID: 29058716 PMCID: PMC5808456 DOI: 10.1038/ng.3785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 221] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Most common breast cancer susceptibility variants have been identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of predominantly estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease. We conducted a GWAS using 21,468 ER-negative cases and 100,594 controls combined with 18,908 BRCA1 mutation carriers (9,414 with breast cancer), all of European origin. We identified independent associations at P < 5 × 10-8 with ten variants at nine new loci. At P < 0.05, we replicated associations with 10 of 11 variants previously reported in ER-negative disease or BRCA1 mutation carrier GWAS and observed consistent associations with ER-negative disease for 105 susceptibility variants identified by other studies. These 125 variants explain approximately 16% of the familial risk of this breast cancer subtype. There was high genetic correlation (0.72) between risk of ER-negative breast cancer and breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers. These findings may lead to improved risk prediction and inform further fine-mapping and functional work to better understand the biological basis of ER-negative breast cancer.
Collapse
|
124
|
Jiao X, Aravidis C, Marikkannu R, Rantala J, Picelli S, Adamovic T, Liu T, Maguire P, Kremeyer B, Luo L, von Holst S, Kontham V, Thutkawkorapin J, Margolin S, Du Q, Lundin J, Michailidou K, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Dennis J, Lush M, Ambrosone CB, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Antonenkova NN, Arndt V, Beckmann MW, Blomqvist C, Blot W, Boeckx B, Bojesen SE, Bonanni B, Brand JS, Brauch H, Brenner H, Broeks A, Brüning T, Burwinkel B, Cai Q, Chang-Claude J, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Deming-Halverson SL, Devilee P, dos-Santos-Silva I, Dörk T, Eriksson M, Fasching PA, Figueroa J, Flesch-Janys D, Flyger H, Gabrielson M, García-Closas M, Giles GG, González-Neira A, Guénel P, Guo Q, Gündert M, Haiman CA, Hallberg E, Hamann U, Harrington P, Hooning MJ, Hopper JL, Huang G, Jakubowska A, Jones ME, Kerin MJ, Kosma VM, Kristensen VN, Lambrechts D, Le Marchand L, Lubinski J, Mannermaa A, Martens JW, Meindl A, Milne RL, Mulligan AM, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Peto J, Pylkäs K, Radice P, Rhenius V, Sawyer EJ, Schmidt MK, Schmutzler RK, Seynaeve C, Shah M, Simard J, Southey MC, Swerdlow AJ, Truong T, Wendt C, Winqvist R, Zheng W, Benitez J, Dunning AM, Pharoah PD, Easton DF, Czene K, Hall P, Lindblom A. PHIP - a novel candidate breast cancer susceptibility locus on 6q14.1. Oncotarget 2017; 8:102769-102782. [PMID: 29262523 PMCID: PMC5732689 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 08/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Most non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families have no identified genetic cause. We used linkage and haplotype analyses in familial and sporadic breast cancer cases to identify a susceptibility locus on chromosome 6q. Two independent genome-wide linkage analysis studies suggested a 3 Mb locus on chromosome 6q and two unrelated Swedish families with a LOD >2 together seemed to share a haplotype in 6q14.1. We hypothesized that this region harbored a rare high-risk founder allele contributing to breast cancer in these two families. Sequencing of DNA and RNA from the two families did not detect any pathogenic mutations. Finally, 29 SNPs in the region were analyzed in 44,214 cases and 43,532 controls from BCAC, and the original haplotypes in the two families were suggested as low-risk alleles for European and Swedish women specifically. There was also some support for one additional independent moderate-risk allele in Swedish familial samples. The results were consistent with our previous findings in familial breast cancer and supported a breast cancer susceptibility locus at 6q14.1 around the PHIP gene.
Collapse
|
125
|
Slavin TP, Maxwell KN, Lilyquist J, Vijai J, Neuhausen SL, Hart SN, Ravichandran V, Thomas T, Maria A, Villano D, Schrader KA, Moore R, Hu C, Wubbenhorst B, Wenz BM, D'Andrea K, Robson ME, Peterlongo P, Bonanni B, Ford JM, Garber JE, Domchek SM, Szabo C, Offit K, Nathanson KL, Weitzel JN, Couch FJ. Erratum: Author Correction: The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk. NPJ Breast Cancer 2017; 3:44. [PMID: 29119134 PMCID: PMC5673936 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-017-0046-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/s41523-017-0024-8.].
Collapse
|