Real-World Registry on the Pharmacotherapy of Multiple Myeloma and Associated Renal and Pulmonary Impairments in the Greater Gulf Region: Protocol for a Retrospective Real-World Data Study

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second-most common cancer among hematological malignancies. Patients with active disease may experience several comorbidities, including renal insufficiency and asthma, which may lead to treatment failure. The treatment of relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM) has been associated with multiple factors, causing a decline in progression-free survival as well as overall survival with subsequent lines of therapy. Data about the characteristics of this group of patients in the Greater Gulf region are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study is to describe the disease characteristics and various treatment approaches or regimens used in the management of patients with RRMM in the Greater Gulf region.

METHODS

We will conduct a regional, retrospective study collecting real-world and epidemiological data on patients with MM in countries of the Greater Gulf region. Medical records will be used to obtain the required data. Around 150 to 170 patients' records are planned to be retrospectively reviewed over 6 months without any cross-sectional or prospective intervention. Cases will be collected from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, and Qatar. Descriptive as well as analytical statistics will be performed on the extracted data. The calculated sample size will allow us to estimate the percentages of RRMM cases with acceptable precision while complying with the challenges in light of data scarcity. We will obtain a comprehensive description of the demographic profile of patients with MM; treatment outcomes; the proportion of patients with MM with renal impairment and asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or both at the time of diagnosis and any subsequent point; and data related to treatment lines, regimens, and MM-associated morbidities.

RESULTS

Patient medical records were reviewed between June 2022 and January 2023 for eligibility and data extraction. A total of 148 patients were eligible for study inclusion, of whom 64.2% (n=95) were male and 35.8% (n=53) were female. The study is currently in its final stages of data analysis. The final manuscript is expected to be published in 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MM is a predominant hematological disease, data on its prevalence and patients' characteristics in the Greater Gulf region are scarce. Therefore, this study will give us real-world insights into disease characteristics and various management approaches of patients with MM in the Greater Gulf region.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/49861.

A genetic variant study of bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in Chinese multiple myeloma patients

Background

Bortezomib results in peripheral neuropathy (PN) in approximately 50% of patients, during multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, a complication known as Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy (BIPN). The drug response varies among individuals. Genetic factor may play an important role in BIPN.

Methods

A next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel containing 1659 targets from 233 genes was used to identify risk variants for developing BIPN in 204 MM patients who received bortezomib therapy. mRNA expression of MTHFR and ALDH1A1 in 62 peripheral blood samples was detected by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Serum homocysteine (Hcy) levels were detected in 40 samples by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA).

Results

Compared with the non-BIPN group (n = 89), a total of 8 significantly associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified in the BIPN group (n = 115): MTHFR (rs1801131, rs1801133, rs17421511), EPHX1 (rs1051740), MME (rs2016848), ALDH1A1 (rs6151031), HTR7 (rs1935349) and CYP2A6 (rs8192720). The mRNA expression level of MTHFR in newly diagnosed patients with peripheral neuritis after treatment (NP group) was lower than that of newly diagnosed patients without peripheral neuritis after treatment (NnP group) (1.70 ± 0.77 vs. 2.81 ± 0.97, p= 0.009). Serum Hcy levels were significantly higher in BIPN group than in non-BIPN group (11.66 ± 1.79 μmol/L vs. 8.52 ± 3.29 μmol/L, p= 0.016) and healthy controls (11.66 ± 1.79 μmol/L vs. 8.55 ± 2.13 μmol/L, p≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

CYP2A6, EPHX1, MTHFR, ALDH1A1, HTR7, MME and BIPN are linked in Chinese MM patients. BIPN is more likely to occur in patients with lower MTHFR mRNA expression, which might result in higher serum Hcy levels.

Comparison of antibody-based immunotherapeutics for malignant hematological disease in an experimental murine model

ABSTRACT

Antibody-based immunotherapies have revolutionized leukemia and lymphoma treatment, with animal studies being crucial in evaluating effectiveness and side effects. By targeting the evolutionary conserved Slamf7 immune receptor, which is naturally expressed by the murine multiple myeloma cell line MPC-11, we have developed a syngeneic mouse model for direct comparison of 3 immunotherapies: monoclonal antibodies (mAb), bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells (CART), all targeting Slamf7. Slamf7-BiTE is a bispecific single-chain antibody consisting of α-Slamf7 and α-CD3 Fv fragments joined through a Gly-Ser linker, and Slamf7-CART comprises the α-Slamf7 Fv fragment fused to the msCD8α transmembrane and msCD28, 4-1BB, and CD3ζ intracellular signaling domains. Slamf7-BiTE and Slamf7-CART effectively killed MPC-11 cells in vitro, independently of Slamf7-mediated inhibitory signaling by self-ligation. After chimerizing the constant region of the rat-anti-mouse Slamf7 antibody to mouse Fc-immunoglobulin G2a for enhanced effector functions, Slamf7-mAb triggered antigen-specific antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity by binding to Fcγ receptor IV. In vivo, all 3 immunotherapies showed antitumor effects against Slamf7-expressing targets. Unlike Slamf7-mAb, Slamf7-BiTE led to considerable side effects in test animals, including weight loss and general malaise, which were also observed to a lesser extent after Slamf7-CART infusion. In allogeneic transplant, Slamf7-BiTE and Slamf7-CART maintained activity compared with the nontransplant setting, whereas Slamf7-mAb displayed enhanced antimyeloma activity. In summary, our model faithfully replicates treatment efficacy and side effects detected after human immunotherapy. It aids in developing and improving immunotherapies and may help devise novel approaches to mitigate undesired effects in steady state and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Daratumumab-based quadruplet therapy for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with high cytogenetic risk

In the MASTER study (NCT03224507), daratumumab+carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-KRd) demonstrated promising efficacy in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). In GRIFFIN (NCT02874742), daratumumab+lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) improved outcomes for transplant-eligible NDMM. Here, we present a post hoc analysis of patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs; del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], t[14;20], or gain/amp[1q21]). Among 123 D-KRd patients, 43.1%, 37.4%, and 19.5% had 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs. Among 120 D-RVd patients, 55.8%, 28.3%, and 10.8% had 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs. Rates of complete response or better (best on study) for 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs were 90.6%, 89.1%, and 70.8% for D-KRd, and 90.9%, 78.8%, and 61.5% for D-RVd. At median follow-up (MASTER, 31.1 months; GRIFFIN, 49.6 months for randomized patients/59.5 months for safety run-in patients), MRD-negativity rates as assessed by next-generation sequencing (10-5) were 80.0%, 86.4%, and 83.3% for 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs for D-KRd, and 76.1%, 55.9%, and 61.5% for D-RVd. PFS was similar between studies and superior for 0 or 1 versus ≥2 HRCAs: 36-month PFS rates for D-KRd were 89.9%, 86.2%, and 52.4%, and 96.7%, 90.5%, and 53.5% for D-RVd. These data support the use of daratumumab-containing regimens for transplant-eligible NDMM with HCRAs; however, additional strategies are needed for ultra-high-risk disease (≥2 HRCAs). Video Abstract.

TRIM33 loss in multiple myeloma is associated with genomic instability and sensitivity to PARP inhibitors

Deletions of chromosome 1p (del(1p)) are a recurrent genomic aberration associated with poor outcome in Multiple myeloma (MM.) TRIM33, an E3 ligase and transcriptional co-repressor, is located within a commonly deleted region at 1p13.2. TRIM33 is reported to play a role in the regulation of mitosis and PARP-dependent DNA damage response (DDR), both of which are important for maintenance of genome stability. Here, we demonstrate that MM patients with loss of TRIM33 exhibit increased chromosomal instability and poor outcome. Through knockdown studies, we show that TRIM33 loss induces a DDR defect, leading to accumulation of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and slower DNA repair kinetics, along with reduced efficiency of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Furthermore, TRIM33 loss results in dysregulated ubiquitination of ALC1, an important regulator of response to PARP inhibition. We show that TRIM33 knockdown sensitizes MM cells to the PARP inhibitor Olaparib, and this is synergistic with the standard of care therapy bortezomib, even in co-culture with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). These findings suggest that TRIM33 loss contributes to the pathogenesis of high-risk MM and that this may be therapeutically exploited through the use of PARP inhibitors.

Phase 1 study combining elotuzumab with autologous stem cell transplant and lenalidomide for multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after induction therapy improves disease-free survival for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). While the goal of ASCT is to render a minimal disease state, it is also associated with eradication of immunosuppressive cells, and we hypothesize that early introduction of immunotherapy post-ASCT may provide a window of opportunity to boost treatment efficacy.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 1 clinical trial to investigate the application of autologous lymphocyte infusion and anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibody, elotuzumab, after ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM previously treated with induction therapy. In addition to CD34+ stem cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were harvested prior to transplant and infused on day 3 after stem cell infusion to accelerate immune reconstitution and provide autologous natural killer (NK) cells that are essential to the mechanism of elotuzumab. Elotuzumab was administered starting on day 4 and then every 28 days after until 1 year post-ASCT. Cycles 4-12 were administered with standard-of-care lenalidomide maintenance.

RESULTS

All subjects were evaluated for safety, and 13 of 15 subjects completed the treatment protocol. At 1 year post-ASCT, the disease status of enrolled subjects was as follows: five stringent complete responses, one complete response, six very good partial responses, one partial response, and two progressive diseases. The treatment plan was well tolerated, with most grade 3 and 4 AEs being expected hematologic toxicities associated with ASCT. Correlative analysis of the immune microenvironment demonstrated a trend toward reduced regulatory T cells during the first 3 months post-transplant followed by an increase in NK cells and monocytes in patients achieving a complete remission.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase 1 clinical trial demonstrates that early introduction of immunotherapy after ASCT is well tolerated and shows promising disease control in patients with MM, accompanied by favorable changes in the immune microenvironment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02655458.

Indisulam synergizes with melphalan to inhibit Multiple Myeloma malignancy via targeting TOP2A

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most prevalent hematologic malignancy which remains uncurable. Numerous drugs have been discovered to inhibit MM cells. Indisulam, an aryl sulfonamide, has a potent anti-myeloma activity in vitro and in vivo. This study aims to explore the new mechanism of indisulam and investigate its potential use in combination with melphalan. We examined DNA damage in MM cells through various methods such as western blotting (WB), immunofluorescence, and comet assay. We also identified the role of topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A) using bioinformatic analyses. The impact of indisulam on the RNA and protein levels of TOP2A was investigated through qPCR and WB. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were assessed using CCK-8 assays, Annexin V/PI assays and WB. We predicted the synergistic effect of the combination treatment based on calculations performed on a website, and further explored the effect of indisulam in combination with melphalan on MM cell lines and xenografts. RNA sequencing data and basic experiments indicated that indisulam caused DNA damage and inhibited TOP2A expression by decreasing transcription and promoting degradation via the proteasome pathway. Functional experiments revealed that silencing TOP2A inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis and DNA damage. Finally, Indisulam/melphalan combination treatment demonstrated a strong synergistic anti-tumor effect compared to single-agent treatments in vitro and in vivo. These findings suggest that combination therapies incorporating indisulam and melphalan have the potential to enhance treatment outcomes for MM.

CD8 effector T cells enhance teclistamab response in BCMA-exposed and -naïve multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT

Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)- and CD3-targeting bispecific antibody, is an effective novel treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM), but efficacy in patients exposed to BCMA-directed therapies and mechanisms of resistance have yet to be fully delineated. We conducted a real-world retrospective study of commercial teclistamab, capturing both clinical outcomes and immune correlates of treatment response in a cohort of patients (n = 52) with advanced R/RMM. Teclistamab was highly effective with an overall response rate (ORR) of 64%, including an ORR of 50% for patients with prior anti-BCMA therapy. Pretreatment plasma cell BCMA expression levels had no bearing on response. However, comprehensive pretreatment immune profiling identified that effector CD8+ T-cell populations were associated with response to therapy and a regulatory T-cell population associated with nonresponse, indicating a contribution of immune status in outcomes with potential utility as a biomarker signature to guide patient management.

A novel small molecule inhibitor of CD73 triggers immune-mediated multiple myeloma cell death

CD73 is the key ectoenzyme involved in the generation of AMP-derived adenosine, which contributes to immunosuppression in the MM BM milieu. Blocking CD73 activity with a potent, selective, orally bioavailable CD73 inhibitor ORIC-533 decreases adenosine generation, overcomes immune suppression, and restores immune cell-mediated MM cell lysis. Based on these preclinical studies, a multi-center clinical trial of ORIC-533 has been initiated in patients with relapsed refractory MM (NCT05227144).

Recent advances and future perspectives of T-cell engagers in lymphoid malignancies

Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are monoclonal antibodies that simultaneously bind to a specific antigen on tumors and CD3 on T cells, leading to T cell activation and subsequent tumor cell lysis. Several CD20 × CD3 BsAbs are being developed for B-cell lymphomas. Furthermore, multiple clinical trials to evaluate BsAbs for the treatment of multiple myeloma, with targets including BCMA, GPRC5D and FcRH5, are ongoing. Emerging evidence suggests promising efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoid malignancies, showing an overall response rate of 50-60%, with complete response rates of 30-40% for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma and 60-70% for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Their toxicity profiles are generally consistent with other T-cell redirecting therapies, including cytokine release syndrome, which may be mitigated with several strategies, such as step-up dosing, pre-mediation with glucocorticoids and a subcutaneous route of administration, and very rare neurotoxicity. Several clinical trials evaluated BsAbs in combination with other agents or in earlier lines of treatment, including in front-line settings. BsAbs have the potential to change the treatment paradigm of lymphoid malignancies in the coming years; however, longer follow-ups are required to assess the durability of responses to these agents. We herein provide an overview of the findings of recent clinical trials on BsAbs, including mechanisms of action, safety profiles, and efficacy, and discuss the role of BsAbs in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas and multiple myeloma.

Efficacy and safety of idecabtagene vicleucel in patients with relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma not meeting the KarMMa-1 trial eligibility criteria: A real-world multicentre study

Ide-cel received approval for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma based on the results of the KarMMa-1 trial. However, patients with significant comorbidities, aggressive disease and prior B-cell maturation antigen-directed therapy (BCMA-DT) were excluded. This retrospective study evaluated real-world outcomes of patients who did not meet the KarMMa-1 eligibility criteria and were treated with standard of care (SOC) ide-cel. A total of 69 patients from three US centres who did not meet the KarMMa-1 criteria underwent ide-cel infusion. The main reasons for trial ineligibility included baseline grade 3-4 cytopenia (39%), prior BCMA-DT (26%), renal impairment (19%) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 (14.5%). Cytokine-release syndrome occurred in 81% vs. 84%, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 28% vs. 18% of SOC versus KarMMa-1 patients, respectively. Early infection (≤8 weeks post-infusion) and severe infection rates were 42% vs. 49% and 30% vs. 22% for the SOC versus KarMMa-1 cohorts, respectively. Grade 3-4 cytopenias for SOC versus KarMMa-1 cohorts were: neutropenia (87% vs. 89%), anaemia (51% vs. 60%) and thrombocytopenia (65% vs. 52%). Overall response rate was higher for the SOC cohort (93% vs. 73%), as was the complete response or better rate (48% vs. 33%). However, median progression-free survival and overall survival were comparable between the two groups. Our findings support broadening the inclusion criteria of future trials evaluating ide-cel.

Metformin and chidamide synergistically suppress multiple myeloma progression and enhance lenalidomide/bortezomib sensitivity

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a common hematological malignancy, and patients with MM are recommended to take immunomodulatory drugs such as lenalidomide along with proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib to extend survival. However, drug resistance influences the efficacy of treatment for MM. In our study, we found that metformin and chidamide both suppressed MM cell growth in a concentration- and time-dependent way (p < .001). Moreover, combined therapy with metformin and chidamide exhibited enhanced inhibition of the growth of MM cells compared with monotherapy (p < .05). Additionally, the triple-drug combination of metformin and chidamide with lenalidomide or bortezomib was used to stimulate the MM cells, and the results revealed that metformin and chidamide treatment sensitized MM cells to lenalidomide and bortezomib. As a result, the apoptosis (p < .001) together with cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase (p < .05) was stimulated by lenalidomide and bortezomib, and showed significant elevation in the triple-drug combination group compared with the lenalidomide or bortezomib treatment alone group (p < .05). Furthermore, the impacts of different drugs on glycolysis in MM cells were examined. We found that metformin and chidamide combined treatment significantly promoted glucose uptake and reduced energy production in MM cells treated with lenalidomide and bortezomib (p < .001), suggesting that metformin and chidamide affected glycolysis in MM cells and enhanced the sensitivity of lenalidomide and bortezomib in MM by regulating glucose metabolism. In conclusion, metformin and chidamide synergistically hindered MM cell growth and sensitized cells to lenalidomide/bortezomib. The findings of this study might provide novel clues to improve MM therapy.

Pomalidomide combined with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide in combination treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

METHODS

Published clinical trials were searched in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE to February 2023. The literature was screened and evaluated according to the inclusion criteria, and the data were analyzed by a random effect model. Overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and full grade or ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were the outcomes.

RESULTS

This study included 31 clinical trials, which included 4776 patients. The pooled ORR of the doublet regimens was 33.3% (95%CI: 27-39%) and the triplet regimens was 66% (95%CI: 58-74%). Among the 25 included studies, the median PFS was 8.29 months (95%CI: 7.27-9.31), and nine studies reported median OS of 19.43 months (95%CI: 14.56-24.30). In terms of safety, the most common hematologic AEs of grade ≥ 3 were neutropenia (41%) and anemia (20%); Non-hematologic AEs were pneumonia (14%) and infection/febrile neutropenia (14%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pomalidomide combined treatment regimens have shown good clinical efficacy, especially in pomalidomide + dexamethasone combined with other drugs. In terms of safety, it's important to pay attention to the likelihood of hematological adverse events when used clinically.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42023420644.

Busulfan, melphalan and carfilzomib high-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

The standard of care for fit, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients includes induction therapy followed by consolidative high-dose chemotherapy with melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant (AHSCT). Intensified preparative regimens, such as busulfan and melphalan (BuMel), have shown promise to lengthen progression-free survival (PFS). We previously reported that the addition of bortezomib to BuMel improved PFS compared to melphalan alone in CIBMTR-matched controls. We now integrate the second-generation protease inhibitor, carfilzomib, before and after BuMel (BuMelCar) in a phase I/II trial with carfilzomib. Patients with NDMM, relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) and those failing prior AHSCT were eligible. Primary end-points were safety and tolerability. Secondary end-points included minimal residual disease negativity rates, PFS and OS. The study enrolled 19 patients. 73% were high risk either due to R-ISS III status, adverse genetics or relapsed after prior AHSCT. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of carfilzomib was determined to be 36 mg/m2. Noted grade 3 toxicities were febrile neutropenia (79%), mucositis (21%) and diarrhoea (16%). The 2-year PFS for the whole cohort and MTD was 89% and 100% respectively. 80% of all patients and 82% of patients in the MTD cohort achieved MRD negativity. Further studies regarding this regimen are planned.

A structured oral chemotherapy teaching tool to improve adherence in adults with multiple myeloma: A pilot randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Many of the newer treatments for adults with newly-diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) are orally administered. Adherence is a challenge, and little is known about strategies to optimize adherence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-seven patients initiating orally-administered anti-myeloma therapy were enrolled and randomized in a pilot study to receive either standard of care teaching or the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Oral agent Teaching Tool (MOATT), a structured teaching tool. Adherence was measured electronically with a Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) cap. Optimal adherence was defined as an adherence rate of ≥90% over the six months study duration. Patients completed surveys regarding cancer therapy satisfaction and self-efficacy for medication management at one month and six months following the initiation of treatment in both arms.

RESULTS

The mean adherence of patients over six months was 86.9%; 43.9% of the cohort were classified as non-adherent using the 90% threshold of adherence. Mean adherence was similar among standard of care teaching (87.9%) versus the MOATT intervention tool (85.6%) as was cancer therapy satisfaction and self-efficacy for medication management.

DISCUSSION

In our pilot, the MOATT tool was not found to be feasible or acceptable. There were no preliminary differences noted between standard of care teaching versus the structured MOATT teaching tool with regards to overall adherence rates, cancer therapy satisfaction, or self-efficacy in medication management. Overall adherence rates were suboptimal in our study. Future research should work to identify aspects of educational interventions which are effective, and investigate different strategies which can be used to supplement patient education and potentially optimize medication adherence in patients with MM.

Aponermin: First Approval

Aponermin () is a recombinant circularly permuted human tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) developed by Beijing Sunbio Biotech (a wholly owned subsidiary of Wuhan Hiteck Biological Pharma CO., LTD) for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Aponermin binds to and activates the death receptors 4 and/or 5 on tumour cells, triggering intracellular caspase reactions and inducing apoptosis, thereby exerting antitumor effects. In November 2023, aponermin in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone received its first approval in China for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of aponermin leading to this first approval for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

A patient with minimal myeloma treatment who survived for 20 years

Not available.

Carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (KdD) vs. lenalidomide-sparing pomalidomide-containing triplet regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: an indirect treatment comparison

Nearly all patients with multiple myeloma eventually relapse or become refractory to treatment. Lenalidomide is increasingly administered in the frontline until disease progression or intolerance to therapy, resulting in the need for highly effective, lenalidomide-sparing options. In this study, carfilzomib plus daratumumab and dexamethasone were evaluated against lenalidomide-sparing, pomalidomide-containing triplets using matching-adjusted indirect comparison in the absence of head-to-head data. The analyses utilized long-term follow-up data from the CANDOR study (NCT03158688). Treatment with carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.60 [95% confidence interval: 0.37, 0.88])vs. pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone, and numerically longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.77 [95% confidence interval: 0.50, 1.08]) vs. daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and previous lenalidomide exposure, the majority of whom were lenalidomide refractory. Carfilzomib plus daratumumab and dexamethasone offers a highly effective, lenalidomide-sparing treatment option for this population.

A real-world retrospective-prospective analysis of efficacy and safety of combined ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: The northern Italy experience

INTRODUCTION

Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IRd) have been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on the results of the TOURMALINE-MM1.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective-prospective analysis of 106 RRMM patients (pts) treated with IRd in 21 centers in Northern Italy, with the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IRd in real life.

RESULTS

At IRd initiation, 34% of pts were aged ≥75 (median 72.5), 8.5% had an ECOG performance status ≥2, 54.7% of evaluable pts carried high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities [del17p and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16) and/or 1 g gain/amp], 60.2% had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy (pLoT), 57.5% were lenalidomide (Len)-exposed (including both Len-sensitive and Len-refractory pts), and 22% were Len-refractory. Main G ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were thrombocytopenia (16%) and neutropenia (12.3%). G ≥3 non-hematologic AEs included infections (9.4%) and GI toxicity (diarrhea 5.7%, hepatotoxicity 2.8%), VTE, skin rash, and peripheral neuropathy were mainly G1-2. The overall response rate was 56.4% (≥VGPR 30%). With a median follow-up of 38 m, median PFS (mPFS) was 16 m and the 1-year OS rate was 73%. By subgroup analysis, an extended PFS was observed for pts achieving ≥VGPR (mPFS 21.2 m), time from diagnosis to IRd ≥5 years (26.2 m), 1 pLoT (34.4 m), Len-naïve (NR), age ≥70 (20 m). In pts exposed to Len, non-refractory in any prior line and immediately prior to IRd, mPFS was 16 and 18 m, respectively. An inferior PFS was seen in Len-refractory pts (4.6 m). By multivariate analysis, independent predictors of PFS were age ≥70 (HR 0.6), time from diagnosis ≥5 years (HR 0.32), refractoriness to Len in any prior line (HR 3.33), and immediately prior (HR 4.31).

CONCLUSION

IRd might be effective and safe in RRMM pts with an indolent disease, in early lines of treatment, and who proved Len-sensitive, independent of age, and cytogenetic risk.

Selinexor for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE

Multiple myeloma cells resist standard therapies due to overexpression of the transport protein, exportin 1. Selinexor is a novel drug that targets the Exportin 1 protein in these cells.

DATA SOURCE

A comprehensive search was done, and data showing the efficacy and safety of selinexor in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma was collected using PubMed, Google Scholar, and clincialtrials.gov.

DATA SUMMARY

Results from the clinical trials STORM, BOSTON, and STOMP were included. Parts I and II of the STORM trial revealed a progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.7 and 3.7 months, a median duration of response of 6.2 and 4.4 months, and an overall survival of 7.3 and 8.4 months, respectively. BOSTON trial's SVd arm (selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone) had a median follow-up period of 13.2 months and an mPFS of 13.93 months. The Vd arm (bortezomib and dexamethasone) had a median follow-up duration of 16.5 months and an mPFS of 9.46 months. The STOMP trial is still active and has limited data available. The SKd arm (selinexor, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone) reported an overall response rate of 66.7% in patients with triple refractory multiple myeloma, and 82% in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. The SPd arm (selinexor, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone) shows an overall response rate of 54.30% in pomalidomide naïve-nonrefractory, 35.70% in pomalidomide refractory and 60% in those dosed at RP2D. SRd arm (selinexor, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) shows an overall response rate of 91.7% in lenalidomide naïve and 12.5% in lenalidomide refractory patients. SVd (selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone) arm reported an overall response rate of 63% in all patients while the SDd arm (selinexor, daratumumab, and dexamethasone) showed an overall response rate of 73%.

CONCLUSION

To improve the outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, it is critical to develop new therapies, assess potential therapeutic synergies, and overcome drug resistance by determining the efficacy of multiple myeloma therapies across multiple disease subgroups.