Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of carvedilol in patients with moderate to severe heart failure. The PRECISE Trial. Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Carvedilol on Symptoms and Exercise

BACKGROUND

Carvedilol has improved the symptomatic status of patients with moderate to severe heart failure in single-center studies, but its clinical effects have not been evaluated in large, multicenter trials.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 278 patients with moderate to severe heart failure (6-minute walk distance, 150 to 450 m) and a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 0.35 at 31 centers. After an open-label, run-in period, each patient was randomly assigned (double-blind) to either placebo (n = 145) or carvedilol (n = 133; target dose, 25 to 50 mg BID) for 6 months, while background therapy with digoxin, diuretics, and an ACE inhibitor remained constant. Compared with placebo, patients in the carvedilol group had a greater frequency of symptomatic improvement and lower risk of clinical deterioration, as evaluated by changes in the NYHA functional class (P = .014) or by a global assessment of progress judged either by the patient (P = .002) or by the physician (P < .001). In addition, treatment with carvedilol was associated with a significant increase in ejection fraction (P < .001) and a significant decrease in the combined risk of morbidity and mortality (P = .029). In contrast, carvedilol therapy had little effect on indirect measures of patient benefit, including changes in exercise tolerance or quality-of-life scores. The effects of the drug were similar in patients with ischemic heart disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy as the cause of heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that, in addition to its favorable effects on survival, carvedilol produces important clinical benefits in patients with moderate to severe heart failure treated with digoxin, diuretics, and an ACE inhibitor.

Lidocaine and nisoldipine attenuate almokalant-induced dispersion of repolarization and early afterdepolarizations in vitro

INTRODUCTION

Treatment with Class III antiarrhythmic agents may lead to increased dispersion of repolarization and early afterdepolarizations (EADs), which are both likely substrates for torsades de pointes. Recent studies in vivo have shown that the prevalence of proarrhythmias induced by Class III agents may be reduced by Na(+)- or Ca(2+)-blocking agents. In the present study, tentative mechanisms for this protective effect were investigated in vitro.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Transmembrane action potentials were recorded simultaneously from rabbit isolated ventricular muscle (VM) and Purkinje fibers (PF). At a basic cycle length (BCL) of 500 msec, the Class III agent almokalant (0.1 microM) increased the dispersion by prolonging the action potential duration (APD) significantly more in the PF (33% +/- 4.2%, n = 18) than in the VM (17% +/- 5.9%, n = 18, P < 0.05). In six of the preparations, addition of 1, 5, and 25 microM lidocaine reduced the almokalant-induced prolongation in a concentration-dependent manner mainly in the PF, thereby decreasing the dispersion. At 5 microM lidocaine, the remaining prolongation was 7% +/- 12.2% (P < 0.05 vs time controls) in the PF and 14% +/- 6.4% in the VM, respectively. In six other preparations, the addition of 0.01, 0.05, and 0.25 microM nisoldipine did not reduce the almokalant-induced prolongation in the PF and VM, but attenuated the spike-and-dome appearance of the action potential in the PF. In separate experiments performed at a BCL of 1000 msec, EADs developed in 2 of 6 and 5 of 6 PF during superfusion with almokalant (0.3 and 1 microM, respectively) at an APD of 828 +/- 41.4 msec. In six separate preparations pretreated with lidocaine (5 microM), the almokalant-induced prolongation in the PF was less pronounced and EADs were not observed. Pretreatment with nisoldipine (0.05 microM) did not influence the response to almokalant, and in 4 of 6 preparations the APD exceeded 1000 msec. Despite this extensive prolongation, EADs did not appear.

CONCLUSION

At concentrations that did not affect the APD in the VM but reduced the APD in the PF, lidocaine suppressed almokalant-induced dispersion and the development of EADs. Nisoldipine, on the other hand, inhibited almokalant-induced EADs directly. Hence, the primary APD-prolonging effect of a Class III agent may be preserved, but the risk of proarrhythmias reduced, during concomitant treatment with low concentrations of a Na(+)- or Ca(2+)-blocking agent.

Cardiac arrest after esmolol administration: a review of acute beta-blocker toxicity

An 11-year-old, 25-kg girl with congenital myelomeningocele was scheduled for posterior spinal fusion because of progressive scoliosis. After induction of general anesthesia and administration of a standard dose of intravenous esmolol hydrochloride, her cardiac rhythm progressed to asystole. Although given ephedrine, epinephrine, and atropine sulfate, the patient's normal heart rhythm could not be restored until calcium chloride was administered. A review of the medical literature indicates that the optimal treatment for acute beta-blocker toxicity is intravenous glucagon. Calcium administration should also be considered. Acute esmolol toxicity may be self-limiting because of its extremely short half-life.

The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group

BACKGROUND

Controlled clinical trials have shown that beta-blockers can produce hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement in chronic heart failure, but the effect of these drugs on survival has not been determined.

METHODS

We enrolled 1094 patients with chronic heart failure in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, stratified program, in which patients were assigned to one of the four treatment protocols on the basis of their exercise capacity. Within each of the four protocols patients with mild, moderate, or severe heart failure with left ventricular ejection fractions < or = 0.35 were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (n = 398) or the beta-blocker carvedilol (n = 696); background therapy with digoxin, diuretics, and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor remained constant. Patient were observed for the occurrence death or hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons during the following 6 months, after the beginning (12 months for the group with mild heart failure).

RESULTS

The overall mortality rate was 7.8 percent in the placebo group and 3.2 percent in the carvedilol group; the reduction in risk attributable to carvedilol was 65 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 39 to 80 percent; P < 0.001). This finding led the Data and Safety Monitoring Board to recommend termination of the study before its scheduled completion. In addition, as compared with placebo, carvedilol therapy was accompanied by a 27 percent reduction in the risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular causes (19.6 percent vs. 14.1 percent, P = 0.036), as well as a 38 percent reduction in the combined risk of hospitalization or death (24.6 percent vs, 15.8 percent, P < 0.001). Worsening heart failure as an adverse reaction during treatment was less frequent in the carvedilol than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Carvedilol reduces the risk or death as well as the risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular causes in patients with heart failure who are receiving treatment with digoxin, diuretics, and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor.

Torsades de pointes induced by transesophageal atrial stimulation after administration of almokalant

This case-report describes a patient who developed a torsades de pointes tachycardia after infusion of almokalant, a selective class III antiarrhythmic agent. The patient was studied with transesophageal atrial stimulation because of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. After a base-line procedure during which an orthodromic tachycardia was induced and pace-terminated, almokalant was given intravenously. The corrected QT interval was markedly prolonged despite similar plasma concentration compared to the rest of the studied patients. During the continued pacing protocol several episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia was observed after pacing induced pauses. A sustained orthodromic tachycardia with left bundle branch morphology was induced, and another almokalant infusion was given. At a plasma concentration of approximately 252 nmol/l the corrected QT interval was further prolonged to 680 ms and the patient developed a torsades de pointes tachycardia after a pacing induced pause. The tachycardia degenerated into ventricular fibrillation that required immediate defibrillation. One week later the patient underwent ablation of the accessory pathway. The QT interval was in the absence of preexcitation normal, and programmed electrical stimulation did not reveal any ventricular arrhythmias. Further studies will have to be performed to clarify whether an early and marked QT interval prolongation, such as observed in this patient, will be useful in identifying patients prone for proarrhythmias in relation to therapy with selective class III drugs.

[Balanced beta--alpha-blocker treatment with carvedilol in mild-moderate arterial hypertension]

The search for the ideal antihypertensive drug is ongoing. Carvedilol is a new beta-adrenoceptor antagonist which also causes peripheral vasodilation primarily via alpha 1-adrenergic blockade. Twenty patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and previous intolerance and side effects to other antihypertensive drugs were studied. After initial baseline assessment, patients received 25 mg carvedilol orally q.d. The treatment lasted 60 days. In our study carvedilol was well tolerated and no important side effect was recorded. Blood pressure decreased significantly to normal values, without orthostatic blood pressure decreases. Heart rate decreased significantly too, but no significant bradycardia was induced. No negative effects on serum lipids and no clinical evidence of increase in peripheral resistance were observed. Ventricular arrhythmia on Holter monitoring were significantly reduced after treatment with carvedilol.

Quality of life in hypertensive patients treated with either carvedilol or enalapril

An important aspect of antihypertensive drug treatment is quality of life (QL) which should at least not be negatively affected. In this study, the QL during treatment with carvedilol (C), a beta-blocker with vasodilating properties due to alpha-1-receptor blockade, was compared to that of enalapril (E) in patients who had responded to the treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 95-115 mmHg) were randomised to receive either E(n = 119) of C(n = 129) in a double-blind multicenter study. The starting doses were 12.5 (C) and 10 (E) mg with doubling of the dose if necessary at 3-week intervals. If insufficient blood pressure (BP) control was found at 50 mg C or 40 mg E, 12.5 mg of hydrochlorothiazide was added. After having reached the goal BP the patients entered a 5-months maintenance period. General well-being was evaluated by the "Göteborg Quality of Life Questionnaire".

RESULTS

Equally many patients in the respective treatment groups responded at the different dose levels. Diastolic BP after 5 months in the maintenance period was similar on C and E, respectively. For most items, QL was not affected by the treatments. An increased incidence of cough was perceived in the E group (p < 0.001). None of the C treated patients reported frequent cough at the end of the study compared with 12% of E treated patients.

CONCLUSION

C and E had similar BP lowering effects. Neither treatment seemed to affect the patients QL adversely. Cough, although seldom leading to withdrawal from the therapy, may be more common than is commonly recognised during treatment with ACE-inhibitors.

[Beta-blockers and heart failure--a critical view]

Recently, several randomised controlled studies have demonstrated improvement in survival of patients with non ischemic cardiomyopathy (Bisoprolol, Metoprolol, Carvedilol) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (Carvedilol). It is not quite clear, whether the observed difference in mortality after beta-blockade on top of diuretics, digitalis and ACE-inhibitors is due to some as yet unknown pathophysiological changes. Certainly, beta-blocking agents have an established efficacy in arrhythmia. Irrespective of the acknowledged benefit in survival, one should note, that the risk reduction in mortality by 65% by Carvedilol has to be viewed critically-as the risk reductions in several other large scale trials. If the mortality in the group receiving digitalis, diuretics and ACE-inhibitors was 7.8%, the mortality after addition of Carvedilol was 3.2%. This means a difference of 4.6%. If however, percent from percent is calculated, than the risk reduction amounts to 65%. One can easily understand, why this larger latter, number usually is being published.

[Value of beta-blocker therapy in treatment of coronary heart disease and sudden cardiac death with special reference to carvedilol]

Beta-blocking agents are well established in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. Synergistic effects on mortality, myocardial ischemia, the risk for myocardial (re-)infarction and, as most recently shown, on sudden cardiac death form the basis for the convincing prognostic impact of these agents. The present paper is directed to summarize the clinical evidence for the therapeutic benefit of beta-blocking agents in post-infarction patients, to characterize subgroups of patients who will benefit most from such a therapeutic intervention and to discuss the present impact of newer beta-blocking agents, such as carvedilol which beside its effects on beta-1 and beta-2 receptors exerts potent vasodilating properties via an alpha-1 receptor blockade.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the long-term efficacy of carvedilol in patients with severe chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have shown that beta-adrenergic blocking drugs are effective and well tolerated in patients with mild to moderate heart failure, but the utility and safety of these drugs in patients with advanced disease have not been evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 56 patients with severe chronic heart failure into a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the vasodilating beta-blocker carvedilol. All patients had advanced heart failure, as evidenced by a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.16 +/- 0.01 and a mean maximal oxygen consumption of 13.6 +/- 0.6 mL.kg-1.min-1 despite digitalis, diuretics, and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (if tolerated). After a 3-week, open-label, up-titration period, 49 of the 56 patients were assigned (in a double-blind fashion using a 2:1 randomization) to receive either carvedilol (25 mg BID, n = 33) or matching placebo (n = 16) for 14 weeks, while background therapy remained constant. Hemodynamic and functional variables were measured at the start and end of the study. Compared with the placebo group, patients in the carvedilol group showed improved cardiac performance, as reflected by an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (P = .005) and stroke volume index (P = .010) and a decrease in pulmonary wedge pressure, mean right atrial pressure, and systemic vascular resistance (P = .003, .002, and .017, respectively). In addition, compared with placebo, patients treated with carvedilol benefited clinically, as shown by an improvement in symptom scores (P = .002), functional class (P = .013), and submaximal exercise tolerance (P = .006). The combined risk of death, worsening heart failure, and life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia was lower in the carvedilol group than in the placebo group (P = .028), but carvedilol-treated patients had more dizziness and advanced heart block.

CONCLUSIONS

Carvedilol produces clinical and hemodynamic improvement in patients who have severe heart failure despite treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

QT interval of the ECG, heart rate and arterial pressure during anaesthetic induction: comparative effects of alfentanil and esmolol

In a double-blind study the effect of esmolol and alfentanil on the QT interval of the ECG corrected by the heart rate (QTc), heart rate and arterial pressure during anaesthetic induction was studied in 59 oxycodone- and atropine-premedicated ASA class I-(II) patients with a mean age of 26 yr (range 15-50 yr). The patients were randomly allocated to one of the four groups: saline, esmolol 2 mg.kg-1, esmolol 3 mg.kg-1 or alfentanil 0.03 mg.kg-1. Both doses of esmolol prevented the prolongation of the QTc interval after thiopental and suxamethonium, but not after laryngoscopy and intubation. Alfentanil prevented the prolongation of the QTc interval following thiopental, suxamethonium and laryngoscopy but not after intubation. Esmolol did not prevent the increase in the heart rate and arterial pressure in response to laryngoscopy and intubation. No cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and intubation occurred in the patients treated with alfentanil. No cardiac arrhythmias occurred in the esmolol 3 mg.kg-1 group, whereas the frequency of ventricular ectopic beats was 40% in the saline group and 13-20% in the other groups.

Effect of almokalant, a selective potassium channel blocker, on the termination and inducibility of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias: a study in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Almokalant PSVT Study Group

Almokalant is a newly developed selective blocker of the delayed outward K+ current and exhibits the electrophysiological properties of a class III antiarrhythmic agent. In a Scandinavian multicenter, placebo-controlled trial, the antiarrhythmic efficacy of almokalant was investigated in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: 87 patients with mean age of 50 +/- 14 years (range 21-71 years), with reciprocating tachycardia due to either Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome (n = 58) or atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) (n = 29) were studied with transesophageal atrial stimulation. After a baseline procedure, during which sustained tachycardia was induced and overdrive terminated, tachycardia was reinduced and an intravenous (i.v.) infusion of either placebo or almokalant (aiming at a pseudoequilibrium plasma level of 20, 50, 100, or 150 nM) (Cpl 20-Cpl 150), was administered. Each patient was studied at two Cpl. Thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to either placebo+almokalant at Cpl 20 or Cpl 20 + Cpl 50; 26 patients were studied openly at Cpl 50 + Cpl 100, and 22 were studied openly at Cpl 100 + Cpl 150 almokalant. The antiarrhythmic efficacy was assessed as the ability to terminate induced tachycardia and to suppress inducibility: The proportion of patients in which the tachycardia was terminated was placebo 3 of 20 (15%); Cpl 20, 7 of 36 (19%): Cpl 50, 10 of 36 (28%); Cpl 100, 14 of 35 (40%); and Cpl 150, 5 of 9 (56%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Carvedilol, a novel multiple action antihypertensive agent with antioxidant activity and the potential for myocardial and vascular protection

Carvedilol is a vasodilating, beta-adrenoceptor antagonist currently marketed for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Carvedilol acts to reduce total peripheral resistance by blocking peripheral vascular alpha 1-adrenoceptors, thereby producing systemic arterial vasodilation, while at the same time inhibiting reflex tachycardia through the blockade of myocardial beta-adrenoceptors. In addition to its established efficacy and safety as an antihypertensive agent, carvedilol has been shown to produce significant cardioprotection in experimental animal models of acute myocardial infarction, with the most dramatic effect being observed in the pig model of myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion, where the reduction in infarct size reached 91%. Recent pharmacological studies have revealed additional novel properties of carvedilol which may account for the marked protection produced by the drug in the ischaemic myocardium and which may also result in protection against other chronic pathological processes, such as atherosclerosis and acute vascular injuries. The latter arise from surgical procedures, such as percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting. Specifically, carvedilol, as well as some of its hydroxylated metabolites, are potent antioxidants. In physicochemical, biochemical and cellular assays, carvedilol and several of its metabolites prevent lipid peroxidation and the depletion of endogenous antioxidants, such as vitamin E and glutathione. Moreover, carvedilol and its metabolites prevent the oxidation of LDL to oxidized LDL, the latter being directly cytotoxic and known to activate monocytes/macrophages and to stimulate foam cell formation. In addition, carvedilol was found to inhibit both rat and human vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Vasodilating beta-blockers in heart failure

Carvedilol is a non-selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with vasodilating properties which has been shown to be effective in the management both of hypertension and of stable angina pectoris. In order to explore its wider efficacy in patients with manifest heart failure, a preliminary study was performed in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris accompanied by abnormal left ventricular wall motion, but without overt heart failure (mean ejection fraction < 40%). Six patients were given carvedilol 25 mg b.i.d. for 2 weeks followed by 50 mg b.i.d. for a further 2 weeks according to a single-blind placebo-controlled protocol. At the end of the 4 week period of treatment, in four patients left ventricular wall motion was improved, in two it was unchanged, and in none was there any deterioration; mean ejection fraction increased from 40 to 48%. These results prompted a further study in 17 patients with chronic ischaemic heart failure. The haemodynamic and clinical responses to intravenous carvedilol followed by the oral drug (50 mg b.i.d.) for 8 weeks were studied. There was an improvement in all haemodynamic variables, although postural hypotension necessitated withdrawing two patients, and clinical deterioration was evident in two others. The beneficial effects of carvedilol were considered to be related to the combined reduction in afterload and inhibition of neurohumeral activation. These results have been confirmed in placebo-controlled, double-blind studies.

Phase I study of RP 49532A, a new protein-synthesis inhibitor, in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors

Giroline (RP 49532A) is a new protein-synthesis inhibitor with broad antitumor activity in experimental models. In the present phase I study, Giroline was given by 24-h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks at doses ranging from 3 to 15 mg/m2 to 12 patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. The dose-limiting toxic effects were delayed hypotension and severe asthenia. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 15 mg/m2. Transient nausea and vomiting during infusion were reported at all dose levels. Mild reversible prolongation of prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time was observed in most patients at dose levels above 3 mg/m2. No antitumor activity was observed. The toxicity profile of Giroline precludes further evaluation in cancer patients.

Tolerance and effects of almokalant, a new selective Ik blocking agent, on ventricular repolarization and on sino-atrial and atrioventricular nodal function in the heart: a study in healthy, male volunteers utilizing transesophageal atrial stimulation

Almokalant, (4-(3-ethyl(3-propylsulfinyl)propyl)amino)-2-hydroxy-propoxy)- benzonitrile), is a newly developed Ik channel blocker that exhibits pure class III effects. Using a noninvasive approach with transesophageal atrial stimulation (TAS), we wished to identify the dose of almokalant, given as an intravenous bolus infusion, that prolonged ventricular repolarization in the healthy human heart to an extent of potential clinical interest. Furthermore, we defined the electrophysiological effects of this dose on the heart, as well as the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerance throughout a wide dosing range. In the titration part, increasing doses were given to identify the dose that produced a reproducible QTend prolongation of approximately 20%. This dose (12.8 mumol) was then given in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over fashion. In the double-blind part, almokalant significantly prolonged the QTend intervals during sinus rhythm and during TAS at 100 beats/min and increased the effective refractory period of the atria (AERP). There was no alteration in either the cardiac conduction (PQ and QRS), or blood pressure (BP) sinus node function, or the ERP of the atrioventricular (AV) node. Therefore, almokalant exhibited pure class III effects with no signs of beta-blockade or unwanted hemodynamic effects. The plasma concentration-time curve showed a biexponential decrease with a terminal half-life (t1/2) of approximately 3 h. There was a large interindividual variation in the plasma concentration at the end of infusion, Cmax. This variability diminished considerably 60 min after infusion, and the pharmacokinetic characteristics studied appeared to be proportional to the dose. The drug was well tolerated, and the only side effect noted was a brief metallic taste after a dose of 25.6 mumol. Corresponding to high plasma peak values, T-wave morphology changes of short duration were observed, sometimes with the development of pronounced, biphasic T waves.

Clinical evaluation of bevantolol hydrochloride in patients with severe hypertension. The Cooperative Study Group on Bevantolol in Japan

The clinical efficacy and safety of bevantolol hydrochloride, a newly developed beta-blocker, used in combination with other types of antihypertensive agents, were evaluated in patients with severe hypertension by multicenter open-label trials. A total of 28 patients were studied at 20 medical centers. Four patients (14.3%) were excluded for some reasons, and the remaining 24 patients (22 outpatients and 2 inpatients) were analyzed. Following the initiation of therapy, blood pressure decreased from 181 +/- 15 (SD)/114 +/- 3 mmHg to 170 +/- 17/102 +/- 8 mmHg (p < 0.01) on the 14th day of the therapy and gradually lowered further thereafter. At the end of the trial (8th week), blood pressure was stabilized at the level of 160 +/- 14/96 +/- 10 mmHg. The antihypertensive efficacy rated by the changes in mean blood pressure was 79.2% (19/24). Pulse rate decreased slightly but significantly from 75 +/- 10 beats/min to 70 +/- 7 (p < 0.05) on the 14th day of the therapy and stabilized at the similar level thereafter. As abnormal laboratory data were detected in 3 patients and 1 patient complained of a mild headache, the safety ratio was 83.3% (20/24 patients). When the usefulness was assessed in terms of antihypertensive efficacy and safety profiles, bevantolol hydrochloride was considered useful in 75.0% of the patients studied. In conclusion, bevantolol hydrochloride, used in combination with other classes of antihypertensive agents, appears to be an excellent drug for the management of patients with severe hypertension.

Antihypertensive treatment with a vasodilating beta-blocker, carvedilol, in chronic hemodialysis patients

Carvedilol is an antihypertensive agent which displays unselective beta-blocking, alpha 1-blocking and antioxidant properties. It is primarily metabolized by the liver and excreted via the biliary system. The compound is highly lipophilic and strongly bound to plasma proteins. Consequently, there is no elimination during hemodialysis. The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic profile of carvedilol titrated to effect were investigated in an open clinical trial in 15 long-term hemodialysis patients with arterial hypertension over a period of 12 weeks. The drug was administered only on days without dialysis. After a wash-out phase of one week, carvedilol was started in a dose of 12.5 mg per day. All 15 patients were titrated according to the antihypertensive effect to a daily dose of 25 mg of carvedilol. Carvedilol was effective in lowering blood pressure in hemodialysis patients (RR systolic: 170 +/- 11 vs. 144 +/- 9 mmHg; RR diastolic: 98 +/- 10 vs. 85 +/- 10 mmHg). The pharmacokinetic parameters of carvedilol and its active metabolite M2, assessed in 12 of the 15 patients, were not influenced by the lack of renal function or intermittend haemodialysis. In particular, there was no accumulation of carvedilol or its metabolite M2. In terms of side effects, three patients had to be withdrawn from the trial, because of hypoglycemia (n = 1), insufficient blood pressure control (n = 1) and prolonged hypotension (n = 1). Taken together, these results indicate that carvedilol is a safe and efficacious antihypertensive agent which can be used in patients maintained by maintenance dialysis treatment.

Effect of long-term therapy with nipradilol on esophageal varices in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Results of a multicenter open study

The effect of long-term administration of nipradilol (NIP, Hypadil Kowa, CAS 81486-22-8), a beta-blocker with a vasodilatory action, on esophageal varices was studied in 66 patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. Administration of NIP (6-12 mg/d) for 3-12 months produced progressive improvement of endoscopic findings over time (30% for C, 25% for F, and 40% for the R-C sign after 12 months). At the last examination (mean: 9 +/- 4 months), the improvement rates were 16.7%, 16.7% and 22.7%, respectively. No significant relationship was found between endoscopic improvement and the Child-Pugh score or the dose of NIP. Gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in five patients: one had bleeding esophageal varices, three had bleeding gastric varices, and one had a bleeding gastric ulcer. The systolic blood pressure was decreased significantly (4.6-12.3%) at 2 weeks as well as 1 and 2 months, and the heart rate showed a significant decrease throughout the study (10-18.4%). With the exception of the patients who had gastrointestinal bleeding, no symptoms of decompensation appeared, and there was no deterioration of laboratory parameters including ammonia. Adverse effects occurred in about 10% of the patients, most of which were related to bradycardia and/or hypotension, and they improved when the drug was withdrawn or the dose reduced. These results suggest that long-term administration of NIP is useful in the treatment of esophageal varices.

Nicardipine may impair glucose metabolism in hypertensive diabetic patients

The respective effects of 6 month's administration of beta-blockers (atenolol, metoprolol, carteolol and arotinolol), calcium-channel blockers (nicardipine, diltiazem) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril) on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were evaluated in hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), using a retrospective method. NIDDM patients with stable HbA1c and body weight were selected for this study. The following results were obtained. (1) The administration of nicardipine or beta-blockers significantly elevated HbA1c levels. (2) The administration of diltiazem or enalapril did not have any influence on HbA1c levels. These findings suggest that not only beta-blocker but nicardipine (dihydropyridine type calcium-channel blocker) may cause deterioration in glucose metabolism in NIDDM patients.

A risk-benefit assessment of carvedilol in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders

Carvedilol is a nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking vasodilator drug that may be a promising new agent in the management of cardiovascular disease. The rationale for the development of agents of this type is that the alpha-blocking component may overcome the direct vasoconstrictor consequence of beta 2-blockade, whilst the beta-blocker component may inhibit the reflex tachycardia that occurs following alpha-blockade. In clinical trials published to date, carvedilol has been demonstrated to be effective as an antihypertensive agent as monotherapy and also as additional therapy in those patients whose blood pressure cannot be controlled on other standard agents. It is also effective in the management of angina. Carvedilol has beneficial haemodynamic effects in patients with congestive heart failure. beta-Blocker vasodilator drugs of this type may be particularly useful in this condition as the vasodilator component of the drug may overcome the initial negative inotropy of the beta-blocker. In addition, carvedilol possess potentially useful pharmacological actions. In particular, the drug has antimitogenic and free radical scavenging effects that may make it a useful therapy in the long term management of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Its metabolic profile is also favourable, presumably on the basis of its alpha-blocking properties. Thus, beta 2-mediated adverse effects on peripheral vascular tone, glycaemic control and lipid status appear to be offset by the alpha-blocking property of the drug. Carvedilol thus far appears to be well tolerated, with postural dizziness the major adverse effect, especially in the elderly. As with nonselective beta-blockers, carvedilol is contraindicated in patients with asthma.

[Anti-ischemia effects of gallopamil and esmolol in an intra-individual comparison in patients with coronary heart disease]

To compare the hemodynamic, antiischemic, metabolic, and neurohumoral effects of intravenous esmolol (beta 1 blocking agent) and gallopamil (verapamil-like calcium channel blocker), 14 patients with angiographically proven CAD and reproducible ST segment depression were studied at rest and during exercise under control conditions and after an intravenous bolus injection of esmolol (0.5 mg/kg/1 min, followed by an infusion with 0.2 mg/kg/min) or gallopamil (0.025 mg/kg/3 min). In contrast to gallopamil, esmolol significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (175.7 vs. 160 mm Hg) and heart rate (107.4 vs. 96.9 min-1) during exercise as well as cardiac output (11.57 vs. 9.38 l/min) and significantly enhanced systemic vascular resistance both at rest (1241 vs. 1479 dynes.s.cm-5) and during exercise (805 vs. 947 dynes.s.cm-5). On the other hand, exercise filling pressures and lactate levels (3.66 vs. 3.05 mmol/l) were significantly reduced by gallopamil only. Thus, the significant improvement of exercise tolerance by both esmolol and gallopamil is based on different mechanisms of action: esmolol improves myocardial ischemia by appreciably reducing myocardial oxygen consumption, whereas gallopamil primarily improves oxygen supply and ventricular performance. Plasma catecholamines, atrial natriuretic factor, and aldosterone levels as well as plasma renin activity were identically influenced by esmolol and gallopamil, respectively. A reflex activation of the sympathetic system did not occur.

Safety of esmolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy who had relative contraindications to beta-blocker therapy

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to evaluate the safety of esmolol in 114 patients treated with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction who also had relative contraindications to beta-blockade, and the predictive value of patient tolerance to esmolol and subsequent patient tolerance of oral beta-blocker therapy.

PATIENTS

One hundred and fourteen patients with myocardial infarction documented by enzyme concentrations and electrocardiographic changes who also had relative contraindications to beta-blockade.

METHODS

Esmolol was initiated during acute myocardial infarction for myocardial ischemia (n = 88), hypertension (n = 13), or supraventricular tachycardia (n = 13). Relative contraindications to beta-blocker therapy included either active signs/symptoms of left ventricular dysfunction or a history of congestive heart failure (n = 40), a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma (n = 31), bradycardia (HR < 60 beats/min; n = 18), peripheral vascular disease (n = 15), or hypotension (systolic BP < 100 mm Hg; n = 14).

RESULTS

During initial esmolol dose titration, 69 patients tolerated 300 micrograms/kg/min, 12 patients tolerated 200 micrograms/kg/min, 17 patients tolerated 100 micrograms/kg/min, and 16 patients tolerated 50 micrograms/kg/min. Twenty-eight patients (25 percent) developed dose-limiting adverse effects during esmolol maintenance infusions. Sixteen patients required esmolol dose reduction and 12 required esmolol discontinuation. Adverse effects reversed within 30-45 minutes following dose reduction or discontinuation. The 86 patients who tolerated esmolol infusions without dose reduction or drug discontinuation were subsequently treated with oral beta-blockers. Eleven of these patients (13 percent) developed adverse effects requiring oral beta-blocker discontinuation. Nine of these patients had tolerated only 50 micrograms/kg/min of esmolol, and the other 2 patients had tolerated only 100 micrograms/kg/min.

CONCLUSIONS

Esmolol can be used safely in most patients treated with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction who have relative contraindications to beta-blockers. Tolerance to higher maintenance doses of esmolol is a good predictor of subsequent outcome with oral beta-blocker therapy.

The long-term effects of metoprolol and epanolol on tissue-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 in patients with ischaemic heart disease

This double-blind, randomized parallel group study investigated the effect of 6 months beta-adrenoceptor antagonist therapy with either metoprolol (beta 1-selective without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity [ISA]) or epanolol (beta 1-selective with ISA) on markers of endogenous fibrinolysis in 20 patients with chronic stable angina receiving concurrent treatment with nifedipine. Neither drug had an effect on tissue-type plasminogen activator or plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1). A significant correlation between fasting insulin and PAI-1 has previously been described and was confirmed in this study. The group treated with metoprolol showed a significant rise in fasting insulin after 6 months with no change in PAI-1. This suggests that the previously described link between these two may not be causal.

Acute systemic and antiischemic effects of epanolol in patients with coronary artery disease

Antiischemic effects of beta 1-blocking agents are based on intrinsic negative inotropic and chronotropic properties. Partial beta 1-agonistic activity, although useful in preserving cardiac function, may counteract such antiischemic properties by modulating the intrinsic negative cardiac effects of beta-blockade. To investigate the acute hemodynamic and antiischemic profile of epanolol, a cardioselective beta 1-antagonist and partial agonist, 20 patients with left coronary artery disease underwent two incremental atrial pacing tests, 45 minutes before (APST I) and 15 minutes after (APST II) 4 mg intravenous epanolol, administered over 5 minutes. Additional measurements were carried out at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 minutes after epanolol, at basal and fixed heart rates. Epanolol immediately reduced heart rate with a maximum of 10% at 15 minutes and decreased contractility (Vmax) by 7% (both p < .05), whereas cardiac output fell temporarily by 9% (p < .05). Other hemodynamic parameters did not change, except for a significant 11% reduction in myocardial oxygen demand. Despite comparable pacing conditions, both the double product and contractility decreased significantly less during APST II, resulting in a 17% lower myocardial oxygen consumption (p < .05). Myocardial ischemia was markedly reduced, indicated by normalization of lactate metabolism [lactate extraction 16 +/- 7% vs. -7 +/- 8% (APST I)], less ST depression (21%), and modulation of LV end-diastolic pressure postpacing (all p < .05 vs. APST I), whereas angina was absent or less in 14 patients. None of the patients reported an adverse effect. Thus, under resting conditions intravenous epanolol induces moderate, short-lasting negative chronotropic and inotropic effects, but does not alter cardiac pump function or vascular resistance, reflecting its additional beta 1-agonistic properties. Alternatively, during pacing it still reduces ischemia through negative inotropic effects and diminishes myocardial oxygen demand, reflecting its beta 1-antagonistic profile.

Comparison of a new vasodilating beta-blocker, carvedilol, with atenolol in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension

Carvedilol is a new cardiovascular compound with the combined pharmacologic properties of nonselective beta-blockade and vasodilation. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and antihypertensive efficacy of 25 to 50 mg carvedilol once daily with 50 to 100 mg atenolol once daily in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. This was a multicenter study conducted in Europe. After a single-blind placebo run-in phase, 325 eligible patients with stable hypertension were randomized to receive 25 mg carvedilol once daily (161 patients) or 50 mg atenolol (164 patients) in a double-blind 8-week treatment phase. After 4 weeks, the dosage was doubled if there was inadequate response. The primary index of efficacy (response) was the reduction of mean sitting diastolic blood pressure to 90 mg Hg or less (normalized) or by at least 10 mm Hg from baseline. At each of three to six run-in phase visits and after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of treatment, sitting blood pressure and heart rate at trough were measured in triplicate, and body weight, adverse experiences, compliance, and use of concomitant medications were assessed. Laboratory tests, including fasting serum lipids, and electrocardiograms were also monitored during the trial. After 8 weeks of treatment, response rates in the carvedilol and atenolol treatment groups were 75% and 82%, respectively. Compared to baseline, the mean sitting blood pressure was significantly (P < .05) reduced by carvedilol from 165/104 mm Hg to 147/89 mm Hg. With atenolol, mean sitting blood pressure was significantly (P < .05) reduced from 167/104 mm Hg to 150/90 mm Hg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Esmolol tilt testing with esmolol withdrawal for the evaluation of syncope in the young

BACKGROUND

Head-upright tilt (HUT) testing is valuable in evaluating syncope. Isoproterenol is used to increase sensitivity. However, isoproterenol is contraindicated or dangerous in undiagnosed heart disease and produces false-positives. We introduced esmolol withdrawal during esmolol HUT, hypothesizing that (1) acute withdrawal of the ultrashort-acting beta-blocker induces beta-adrenergic effects by unmasking endogenous catecholamines and may provoke syncope with fewer risks, and (2) response to esmolol/esmolol withdrawal may predict effective therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with unexplained recurrent syncope/presyncope (7 to 35 years old, known heart disease or arrhythmia in 14) underwent 2 to 4 HUT tests (60 degrees, 49 minutes): (1) baseline, (2) esmolol (500 micrograms/kg plus 50 micrograms.kg-1.min-1), (3) esmolol withdrawal (HUT continued after esmolol stopped), and (4) isoproterenol if tests 1 through 3 were negative and isoproterenol was not contraindicated. A positive test reproduced symptoms with hypotension or bradycardia, requiring recumbency for recovery. Twenty-five had positive tests, and 11 had negative tests. In 5, only the baseline test was positive; in 15, esmolol/esmolol withdrawal tests were also positive, with 3 in whom esmolol withdrawal was positive although negative at baseline. Two isoproterenol tilts were positive. Esmolol withdrawal and isoproterenol tilts had the highest initial heart rate and similar maximal heart rate increment. Only isoproterenol caused hypertension. One isoproterenol test was false-positive, with hypertension-induced arterial baroreflex. Treatment was beta-blockers (8), Na/fludrocortisone (9), both (6), and DDD pacemakers (2). Esmolol/esmolol withdrawal accurately predicted therapeutic response in 15; isoproterenol predicted therapeutic response in none.

CONCLUSIONS

Esmolol withdrawal tilt testing is preferable to isoproterenol for provocative testing of syncope in the young, and it appears to be safer. Esmolol withdrawal testing has clinical utility before invasive testing as a first-line investigation for syncope in patients with or without heart disease.

The use of esmolol to attenuate the haemodynamic response when extubating patients following cardiac surgery--a double-blind controlled study

We have assessed the cardiovascular changes associated with emergence from anaesthesia, reversal of neuromuscular blockade and extubation in a group of 14 patients immediately after coronary artery bypass graft surgery had been completed. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either esmolol 500 micrograms.kg-1 over 1 min followed by 100 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 or placebo starting prior to reversal. Significant hypertension and tachycardia occurred in the placebo group, whilst these changes were prevented by the administration of esmolol.

Effects of long-term therapy with arotinolol on blood pressure and renal function in hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure

The effects on blood pressure and renal function of long-term treatment with the alpha- and beta-blocker arotinolol at a dose of 20 mg/day were studied in 10 hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure. Patients received low-protein therapy in which the protein and phosphorus intakes were controlled at a certain level. The average duration of arotinolol treatment was 18.4 months. A significant decrease in blood pressure was seen after the second month of treatment, and this effect continued up to the 20th month. The progression rates of renal failure (creatinine clearance/month) before and after treatment were -0.377 +/- 0.344 and -0.164 +/- 0.172 ml/min/month, respectively. No side effects attributable to the drug were observed. These findings indicate that arotinolol has a stable antihypertensive effect and no adverse effects on renal function. Arotinolol appears to be a useful drug in the long-term treatment of hypertension in patients with chronic renal failure.

Clinical experience with carvedilol

Clinical experience indicates that carvedilol, a beta-blocker with vasodilating properties, is effective as once daily monotherapy in both young and elderly hypertensives. Titration is simple to an effective dosage, and response rates appear to be equivalent to those noted with other monotherapeutic agents presently recommended as initial therapy in hypertension. The drug is well tolerated by the majority of patients. No significant metabolic changes have been noted with carvedilol in short-term studies. Additional research is ongoing to determine the long-term effectiveness of this new antihypertensive agent.

European experience with artex: the Tertatolol International Multicentre Study (TIMS)

The Tertatolol International Multicentre Study (TIMS) was aimed at assessing the efficacy and acceptability of 5 mg tertatolol (T) once daily over a 1-year period. The study was carried out in 230 patients (96 men, 134 women, mean age 51.5 +/- 0.7 years) with uncomplicated mild-to-moderate hypertension. After a 1-month placebo run-in period followed by a 1-month double blind placebo-controlled period, 213 patients entered and 166 completed the 1-year open period. A diuretic (D) was added if blood pressure (BP) was inadequately controlled with tertatolol alone. After 1 year, 88.5% of patients were controlled (sitting diastolic BP < or = 90 mmHg): 56.3% on single therapy (T) and 32.2% on dual therapy (T+D), respectively. After a 1-month double-blind period, the incidence of emergent symptoms was not significantly different between the placebo group and the tertatolol group. This low incidence was also observed over the 1-year period, side effects leading to the discontinuation of the treatment in 9.1% of the cases. In patients whose creatinine level was initially higher than 100 mumol/l, tertatolol significantly decreased creatinine level in the single but not in the dual therapy group. This study confirms that tertatolol is an efficient and well-tolerated antihypertensive drug, which improves renal function.

Overview of clinical safety and efficacy of tertatolol

Tertalolol is a noncardioselective beta-blocker, devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Its renal vasodilating properties have been demonstrated both in animals and in man. The beta-blocking activity of tertatolol was assessed on the reduction of heart rate at submaximal exercise. The oral dose of 5 mg was optimal, leading to a significant reduction of diastolic blood pressure throughout 24 h. The efficacy was confirmed in mid- and long-term studies. In mid-term, randomized controlled studies, versus beta-blockers, the antihypertensive efficacy of tertatolol 5 mg was comparable to that of acebutolol 400 mg but of earlier onset, and comparable to that of atenolol 100 mg. Its efficacy was confirmed in 3 long-term studies. In the first study, tertatolol 5 mg alone or combined with a diuretic and, if necessary, dihydralazine, controlled 93.6% of patients (supine DBP < 90 mm Hg). 72.7% of patients were controlled with tertatolol alone, 16.4% with tertatolol plus diuretic, and 4.5% with tertatolol plus diuretic and dihydralazine. In a second study, 88.5% of patients were controlled, 56.3% with tertatolol alone and 32.2% with tertatolol plus diuretic. In the third study, 88.8% of patients were controlled after 1 year treatment, 66.1% with tertatolol alone and 22.7% with tertatolol plus diuretic. The overall clinical safety was excellent: only 6.6% of the 2,706 patients treated for 1 year withdrew from the study because of side effects. In patients followed for 1 year, side effects were rare, transient and mostly of mild severity. Biochemical surveillance did not show any adverse metabolic effects of tertatolol. Conversely, in two long-term studies, creatinine and cholesterol levels decreased significantly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Assessment of bronchial effects following topical administration of butylamino-phenoxy-propanol-acetate, an oculoselective beta-adrenoceptor blocker in asthmatic subjects

1. Butylamino-phenoxy-propanol-acetate (BPPA) is a new topical oculoselective beta-adrenoceptor blocker for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in man. Its potency on the airways of normal subjects was identical with that of placebo. A study was carried out to determine the potential of BPPA to cause bronchoconstriction in mild asthmatics (FEV1 greater than or equal to 60% predicted) with normal IOP. 2. Twelve nonsmoking outpatients who bronchoconstricted to 0.25 or 0.50% of timolol eye drops (fall in FEV1 23.33 +/- 1.20% (mean +/- s.e. mean), range 16-30) were investigated in this double-masked, randomized, 3-period, crossover study. On three different occasions six incremental concentrations of BPPA (range: 0.1-2%; maximum cumulative concentration 4%), timolol (0.1-1%; 2%), and placebo were administered bilaterally until bronchoconstriction (decrease in FEV1 greater than or equal to 20% and in specific airway conductance (sGaw) greater than or equal to 35% simultaneously) or the maximum cumulative concentration was reached. 3. Airway response was measured as change in FEV1 and sGaw and dose-response curves to timolol, BPPA and placebo were performed. IOP was measured 3 h after the highest concentration of each study day. 4. Timolol caused dose-dependent falls in FEV1 and sGaw as well as clinical symptoms of respiratory distress in all subjects. The median cumulative concentrations of timolol required to decrease FEV1 by 20% and sGaw by 35% were 0.98% and 1.53%. Neither placebo (P greater than 0.05) nor BPPA (P greater than 0.05) caused a significant change in sGaw. A fall in FEV1 by 20% not accompanied by a simultaneous fall in sGaw by 35% was found in four subjects following BPPA and in five subjects following placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effects of beta blockade with (epanolol) and without (atenolol) intrinsic sympathomimetic activity in stable angina pectoris

Beta blockade constitutes efficient therapy for stable angina pectoris. The effects of lowering blood pressure and heart rate with such treatment are not always desired. Epanolol is a beta 1-selective partial agonist with minor effects on blood pressure and heart rate at rest. Atenolol is a pure beta 1-selective antagonist with more pronounced effects on blood pressure and heart rate at rest. The effects of epanolol, 200 mg o.d., and atenolol, 100 mg o.d., were compared in 173 middle-aged patients with stable angina pectoris in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group-controlled study for one year. No significant differences were shown in angina attack rate, nitrate consumption, or exercise performance. Resting heart rate and blood pressure were significantly lower on atenolol. Epanolol tended to be better tolerated than atenolol, as shown by visual analogue scales of well-being, activity, energy, and warm extremities, further supported by fewer reports on possible adverse reactions. In conclusion, epanolol appears to be as effective as atenolol and better tolerated in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Antihypertensive profile of carvedilol

The spectrum of demands on an antihypertensive agent is constantly increasing. It is not only supposed to reduce blood pressure, but also to have a certain profile with regard to pathophysiology, hemodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety, and clinical applicability. Carvedilol is a new beta-blocking agent without ISA, which causes vasodilation primarily through an alpha 1-blockade. It combines the positive effects of alpha 1- and beta-blockade; the negative properties are offset by each other. It not only provides theoretical advantages, but also shows a favourable hemodynamic profile and is effective and safe. Advantages in both primary and secondary prevention can be expected. It can be administered once daily, is well suited to patient needs, and can be combined with other hypertensive drugs. It also exerts a favorable influence on many secondary diseases. The compelling advantages of the drug make it an important addition to our armamentarium for the treatment of arterial hypertension as a first-line drug.

Carvedilol and the kidney

Antihypertensive drugs have differing effects on renal hemodynamics, tubular function, plasma electrolytes, and hormonal responses. Nonselective beta-blockers without intrinsic sympathomimetic activities, such as propranolol, have been reported to reduce renal blood flow and to cause a modest decrease in glomerular filtration rate. Carvedilol is a new multiple action agent displaying nonselective beta-blockade without intrinsic sympathicomimetic activity, alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade (probably responsible for its vasodilator activity), and possibly also calcium antagonist properties. The presence of these different pharmacodynamic properties results in a different effect on the kidney as compared with, e.g., propranolol. In the dog, intrarenal infusion of carvedilol resulted in a renal vasodilator response with preservation of renal blood flow and without inducing sodium retention; in contrast, propranolol induced a renal vasoconstrictor response and sodium retention in this model. A renal vasodilator response to carvedilol was also reported in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and in DOCA-salt SHR. In contrast to labetalol, i.v. infusion of hypotensive doses of carvedilol in conscious SHR did not cause sodium retention. Carvedilol was effective in controlling hypertension and preserving renal function in a rat model of progressive hypertensive renal disease. In patients with essential hypertension, carvedilol was reported to reduce renal vascular resistance in the presence of reduced perfusion pressure, allowing for normal renal autoregulation of renal blood flow. Although a small reduction in glomerular filtration rate was seen after acute administration, renal function was preserved during chronic treatment. It is concluded from these studies that renal perfusion and renal function are well maintained during acute and chronic treatment with carvedilol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of casual, ambulatory and self-measured blood pressure in a study of nitrendipine vs bisoprolol

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a single morning dose of either 10 mg bisoprolol (n = 26) or 20 mg nitrendipine (n = 27) were investigated. Blood pressure was measured by three techniques: (1) Casual blood pressure 24 h after the dose; (2) ambulatory 24-h whole-day monitoring; and (3) self-recorded blood pressure in the morning 24 h after the dose (6-8 a.m.) and in the evening (6-8 p.m.). After 4 weeks of therapy bisoprolol had produced a highly significant reduction in blood pressure as assessed by causal, ambulatory day- and night-time monitoring, and self-measured morning and evening readings. Bisoprolol was significantly more effective than nitrendipine, which did not induce a significant reduction in the ambulatory night-time recordings. Whole-day ambulatory blood pressure profiles showed an antihypertensive effect of bisoprolol throughout the entire 24-h period. 24-h blood pressure curves after nitrendipine demonstrated a markedly shorter duration of action, with no reduction in early morning blood pressure. Adverse effects and tolerability of the two drugs were comparable. The average changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure after bisoprolol and nitrendipine in 2-h periods of ambulatory monitoring (6-8 a.m. and 6-8 p.m.) and self-measured blood pressure (6-8 a.m. and 6-8 p.m.) showed a good agreement between ambulatory and self-measured blood pressure determinations with no significant difference between the methods. The results show that 24 h antihypertensive efficacy was more pronounced for bisoprolol than for nitrendipine at the doses studied.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of bisoprolol versus atenolol in stable exercise-induced angina pectoris: a Multicenter International Randomized Study of Angina Pectoris (MIRSA)

Bisoprolol 10 mg and atenolol 100 mg once daily were compared regarding efficacy and safety in stable effort angina in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Efficacy was evaluated with angina pectoris diaries and bicycle exercise tests. Spontaneously mentioned complaints and side effects were recorded at each visit. In 11 centers, 147 patients completed the study; 76 received bisoprolol 10 mg, and 71 received atenolol 100 mg. After 12 weeks, weekly anginal attack rate was reduced significantly (p less than 0.05) with bisoprolol (5 +/- 0.5 to 2 +/- 0.6) and with atenolol (4 +/- 0.4 to 1 +/- 0.2). Peak exercise capacity (in W x min) increased significantly (p less than 0.05) with bisoprolol (772 +/- 47 to 878 +/- 52) and with atenolol (891 +/- 46 to 986 +/- 53). Rate pressure product (RPP) at peak exercise (in beats/min x mm Hg) decreased significantly (p less than 0.05) with both bisoprolol (25,003 +/- 692 to 20,116 +/- 637) and atenolol (26,544 +/- 557 to 21,603 +/- 576) (all values are mean +/- SE). The differences between the groups were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences regarding nature and incidence of adverse events between the groups. Thus, bisoprolol 10 mg once daily and atenolol 100 mg once daily are equipotent in their effects on stable effort angina. Both regimens were comparable with respect to incidence and nature of side effects.