Trend of circulating CD34+ cells in patients with myelofibrosis: Association with spleen response during ruxolitinib treatment

We evaluated CD34⁺ cells in a single-centre series of 49 consecutive patients with myelofibrosis (MF) at baseline and during ruxolitinib therapy and examined any association with spleen response. The median (range) absolute number of circulating CD34⁺ cells was 0.0835 (0.001-1.528) × 10⁹ /L at diagnosis, and 0.123 (0.002-1.528) × 10⁹ /L at ruxolitinib start. With the exception of a transient increase after 3 months of ruxolitinib therapy, a progressive reduction in CD34⁺ cells count was documented, down to a minimum of 0.063 × 10⁹ /L after 36 months. We then assessed the association between spleen diameter expressed as the distance from the left costal margin (outcome) and log(CD34⁺ ) cells count using random-intercept and random slope multivariable regression models to take into account within subject correlation: after adjusting for time and ruxolitinib dosage, we estimated a 0.7 cm increase (95% confidence interval 0.2-1.2, p = 0.003) in spleen length for each unit increase in log(CD34⁺ ) cells count (× 10⁹ /L). Although our study has some limitations, mainly related to its retrospective design, our approach may introduce a reproducible and simple tool that could facilitate the assessment of spleen response more objectively in patients with MF treated with ruxolitinib.

Ruxolitinib Alleviates Inflammation, Apoptosis, and Intestinal Barrier Leakage in Ulcerative Colitis via STAT3

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory disorder of the colonic mucosa with increasing prevalence and limited management. Ruxolitinib is a new anti- JAK/STAT3 biologic agent that has shown potential in protecting against colitis.

METHODS

We first constructed an in vivo UC model and an in vitro colonic epithelial cell inflammation model. Ruxolitinib was administered via gavage in mice. After treatment, colon tissues, cells, and cell lysates were collected and prepared for histological evaluation, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence staining, quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling staining, and cytokine analysis. STAT3 expression was silenced and overexpressed via small interfering RNA and overexpression plasmid transfection, respectively, and quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was used to examine the downstream effects.

RESULTS

Ruxolitinib administration significantly alleviated colitis both in vivo and in vitro, as manifested by reduced body weight loss, shortened colon lengths, relieved disease activity (measured by the disease activity index), and prolonged survival. A mechanistic study showed that ruxolitinib attenuated nuclear factor kappa B-induced inflammation, reduced apoptosis, and ameliorated epithelial barrier leakage, and thereby reduced colitis activity in vivo. STAT3 knockdown partially reversed the protective effect of ruxolitinib against colitis, while STAT3 overexpression exaggerated the reductions in proinflammatory cytokine levels upon ruxolitinib treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that ruxolitinib alleviates colitis by inhibiting nuclear factor kappa B-related inflammation and apoptosis in addition to restoring epithelial barrier function via STAT3, providing a new strategy for UC treatment.

Assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis patients in a real-life setting: An Italian MYNERVA Project

BACKGROUND

Incorporating real-world data in the drug development process allows the improvement of health outcomes by providing better representation of actual patterns of drug safety and efficacy.

AIMS AND METHODS

Here, we present the results of a retroprospective, observational real-life study of 154 patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib in a real-life setting in seven Italian centers of the MYNERVA project.

RESULTS

Median drug exposure was 29 (range, 3-98) months. Discontinuation rate was 27% after a median time of 13 (range, 3-61). While hematological toxicities were in line with previous findings, infections occurred frequently, representing a not negligible cause of discontinuation and death. Anemia, symptoms, and spleen responses were obtained at any time in 23%, 91%, and 68% of patients, respectively; most patients achieved their responses by week 24. Larger splenomegaly and delayed treatment initiation correlated with lower spleen response at 24 weeks. Spleen response was associated with a superior overall survival, regardless of DIPSS. Of interest, both achievement and loss of spleen response had prognostic implications.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Overall, our findings provide insights on the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in a real-world, multicenter cohort of Italian MF patients.

Insights from a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm with coexisting BCR-ABL1 fusion gene, CALR, and TET2 mutations treated with nilotinib and ruxolitinib

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) with concurrent BCR-ABL1 fusion gene and CALR mutation are especially rare. We report a patient with coexisting BCR-ABL1 fusion gene, CALR, and TET2 mutations who was treated with the combination of the second-generation TKI nilotinib and JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib.

Leishmania Infection during Ruxolitinib Treatment: The Cytokines-Based Immune Response in the Setting of Immunocompromised Patients

Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/2 inhibitor that has revolutionized the approach to myelofibrosis. On the one side, this drug can rapidly improve the symptoms related to the hematological disease; on the other side, the inhibition of JAK1/2 can lead to immunosuppression which may increase the risk of infections, due to a change in the cytokine balance in favor of anti-inflammatory cytokines, to direct inhibition of immune cells, and to the suppression in the production of specific antibodies. In this patient setting, much is known about possible viral and bacterial infections, while little is reported in the literature concerning parasitic infections, specifically leishmaniasis. Leishmania is a parasitic infection that can cause serious problems in immunosuppressed patients. The parasite can invade the bloodstream and cause a wide range of symptoms, including fever, weight loss, and anemia. In severe cases, it can lead to multi-organ failure and, rapidly, death. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are essential especially for these patients, unable to respond adequately. In this case and the following review of the existing literature, the cytokine kinetics and the production of specific anti-Leishmania antibodies represent characteristic aspects capable of providing a more in-depth understanding of the mechanisms underlying these complex clinical cases in an immunocompromised patient.

Ruxolitinib does not completely abrogate the functional capabilities of TLR4/9 ligand-activated NK cells

Introduction

Natural killer (NK) cells are lymphocytes from the innate immune system part of the first defense barrier against infected and transformed cells, representing 5%-15% of peripheral blood lymphocytes. The cytotoxic capacity of NK cells is controlled by a balance between inhibitory and activating NK receptors expressed on their surface, which recognize and interact with the ligands on stressed cells. The cytokines involved in NK cell activation, proliferation, survival, and cytotoxicity are signaled mainly through the Janus kinase and signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins (JAK/STAT) pathway. NK cells are also activated in response to pathogens through Toll-like receptors (TLRs) expressed on their surface. Ruxolitinib is a specific JAK1/2 inhibitor approved for treating myelofibrosis and for steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (SR-GvHD).

Methods

Purified NK cells from healthy donors were stimulated with two TOLL-like receptor ligands, LPS and CpG, in the presence of different concentrations of Ruxolitinib.

Results

This study showed the effects of ruxolitinib on TLR4 and TLR9 ligand-activated NK cells from healthy donors. Ruxolitinib did not completely inhibit STAT3 phosphorylation and had a moderate effect on NK cell cytokine activation via the TLR pathway. Only the highest doses of ruxolitinib led to a decrease in the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor α, interferon-γ, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1β. The cytotoxic capacity of stimulated NK cells versus K562, SEM, and MV-4-11 cell lines was reduced by increasing doses of ruxolitinib, but it was not completely abolished and we observed no major changes in degranulation capacity. Phenotypic changes were observed in activated NK cells in the presence of ruxolitinib. In a small cohort of pediatric patients treated with ruxolitinib for SR-GvHD, we observed no decrease in NK cell counts; however, further prospective studies with larger cohorts are necessary to confirm this finding.

Discussion

In summary, our results showed that the functional capabilities and phenotype of NK cells activated through TLR4/9 agonists were not completely abolished by the inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathway by ruxolitinib.

A case of pachydermaperiostosis with myelofibrosis and treatment with ruxolitinib

Pachydermaperiostosis (PDP) is a rare condition of connective tissue presenting with abnormal skin and skeletal findings that usually occur as a complication of an underlying disease, especially malignancies. We described a case of a patient with severe transfusion-dependent anemia and both skin and joint findings, diagnosed as PDP. The haematological assessment revealed myelofibrosis as the underlying disease, and treatment with ruxolitinib as the first-line choice was given by skipping hydroxyurea due to pancytopenia. The patient got benefits in arthralgia and amelioration of pancytopenia and a reduced spleen volume was observed, despite the negative result for JAK2 gene mutation. This is the first case of ruxolitinib being used in PDP with myelofibrosis, and it highlights the importance of evaluating PDP as not just a skin and joint problem but a result of systemic disease and individual-based treatment.

Paradoxical activation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells by ruxolitinib in vitro and in vivo

Introduction

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by an aberrant cytokine network that can support tumor growth by triggering janus kinase (JAK)/STAT pathways. Targeting cytokine-signaling should then be a rational therapeutic strategy but the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib failed to control and seemingly accelerated the disease in clinical trials.

Methods

The effect of ruxolitinib on primary human CLL cells was studied in vitro and in vivo.

Results

Ruxolitinib increased phosphorylation of IRAK4, an important toll-like receptor (TLR)- signaling intermediate, in circulating CLL cells in vitro. It also enhanced p38 and NFKB1 phosphorylation while lowering STAT3 phosphorylation in CLL cells activated with TLR-7/8 agonists and IL-2. Among the cytokines made by activated CLL cells, high levels of IL-10 contributed strongly to STAT3 phosphorylation and inhibited TLR7 activity. Ruxolitinib limited TLR-mediated IL10 transcription and markedly reduced IL-10 production in vitro. It also decreased blood levels of IL-10 while increasing TNFα along with phospho-p38 expression and gene sets associated with TLR-activation in CLL cells in vivo. The bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib decreased IL-10 production in vitro but, in contrast to ruxolitinib, blocked initial IL10 transcription induced by TLR-signaling in vitro, decreased TNFα production, and deactivates CLL cells in vivo.

Discussion

These findings suggest the possible benefits of inhibiting growth factors with JAK inhibitors in CLL are outweighed by negative effects on potential tumor suppressors such as IL-10 that allow unrestrained activation of NFκB by drivers such as TLRs. Specific inhibition of growth-promoting cytokines with blocking antibodies or infusing suppressive cytokines like IL-10 might be better strategies to manipulate cytokines in CLL.

Randomized phase II clinical trial of ruxolitinib plus simvastatin in COVID19 clinical outcome and cytokine evolution

Background

Managing the inflammatory response to SARS-Cov-2 could prevent respiratory insufficiency. Cytokine profiles could identify cases at risk of severe disease.

Methods

We designed a randomized phase II clinical trial to determine whether the combination of ruxolitinib (5 mg twice a day for 7 days followed by 10 mg BID for 7 days) plus simvastatin (40 mg once a day for 14 days), could reduce the incidence of respiratory insufficiency in COVID-19. 48 cytokines were correlated with clinical outcome.

Participants

Patients admitted due to COVID-19 infection with mild disease.

Results

Up to 92 were included. Mean age was 64 ± 17, and 28 (30%) were female. 11 (22%) patients in the control arm and 6 (12%) in the experimental arm reached an OSCI grade of 5 or higher (p = 0.29). Unsupervised analysis of cytokines detected two clusters (CL-1 and CL-2). CL-1 presented a higher risk of clinical deterioration vs CL-2 (13 [33%] vs 2 [6%] cases, p = 0.009) and death (5 [11%] vs 0 cases, p = 0.059). Supervised Machine Learning (ML) analysis led to a model that predicted patient deterioration 48h before occurrence with a 85% accuracy.

Conclusions

Ruxolitinib plus simvastatin did not impact the outcome of COVID-19. Cytokine profiling identified patients at risk of severe COVID-19 and predicted clinical deterioration.

Trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04348695.

JAK inhibitors differentially modulate B cell activation, maturation and function: A comparative analysis of five JAK inhibitors in an in-vitro B cell differentiation model and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of several immune-mediated diseases (IMIDs) including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis and are in clinical trials for numerous other IMIDs. However, detailed studies investigating the effects of different JAK inhibitors on B cells are missing. Within this study, we therefore aimed to characterize the effect of JAK inhibition on the B cell compartment.

Methods

To this end, we investigated the B cell compartment under JAK inhibition and compared the specific effects of the different JAK inhibitors tofacitinib (pan-JAK), baricitinib (JAK1/2), ruxolitinib (JAK1/2), upadacitinib (JAK1/2) as well as filgotinib (selective JAK1) on in-vitro B cell activation, proliferation, and class switch recombination and involved pathways.

Results

While B cell phenotyping of RA patients showed an increase in marginal zone (MZ) B cells under JAK inhibition, comparison with healthy donors revealed that the relative frequency of MZ B cells was still lower compared to healthy controls. In an in-vitro model of T-cell-independent B cell activation we observed that JAK1/2 and selective JAK1 inhibitor treatment led to a dose-dependent decrease of total B cell numbers. We detected an altered B cell differentiation with a significant increase in MZ-like B cells and an increase in plasmablast differentiation in the first days of culture, most pronounced with the pan-JAK inhibitor tofacitinib, although there was no increase in immunoglobulin secretion in-vitro. Notably, we further observed a profound reduction of switched memory B cell formation, especially with JAK1/2 inhibition. JAK inhibitor treatment led to a dose-dependent reduction of STAT3 expression and phosphorylation as well as STAT3 target gene expression and modulated the secretion of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines by B cells.

Conclusion

JAK inhibition has a major effect on B cell activation and differentiation, with differential outcomes between JAK inhibitors hinting towards distinct and unique effects on B cell homeostasis.

Efficacy and safety of different JAK inhibitors in the treatment of alopecia areata: a network meta-analysis

Background

Alopecia areata (AA) is an immune disease characterized by non-scarring hair loss. With the widespread application of JAK inhibitors in immune-related diseases, attention is being given to their role in the treatment of AA. However, it is unclear which JAK inhibitors have a satisfactory or positive effect on AA. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different JAK inhibitors in the treatment of AA.

Methods

The network meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. We included randomized controlled trials as well as a small number of cohort studies. The differences in efficacy and safety between the treatment and control groups were compared.

Results

Five randomized controlled trials, two retrospective studies, and two prospective studies involving 1689 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. In terms of efficacy, oral baricitinib and ruxolitinib significantly improved the response rate of patients compared to placebo [MD = 8.44, 95% CI (3.63, 19.63)] and [MD = 6.94, 95% CI, (1.72, 28.05)],respectively. Oral baricitinib treatment significantly improved the response rate compared to non-oral JAK inhibitor treatment [MD=7.56, 95% CI (1.32,43.36)]. Oral baricitinib, tofacitinib, and ruxolitinib treatments significantly improved the complete response rate compared to placebo [MD = 12.21, 95% CI (3.41, 43.79)], [MD = 10.16, 95% CI (1.02, 101.54)], and [MD = 9.79, 95% CI, (1.29, 74.27)], respectively. In terms of safety, oral baricitinib, tofacitinib, and ruxolitinib treatments significantly reduced treatment-emergent adverse event rates compared with conventional steroid treatment [MD = 0.08, 95% CI (0.02, 0.42)], [MD = 0.14, 95% CI (0.04, 0.55)], and [MD = 0.35, 95% CI, (0.14, 0.88)], respectively.

Conclusion

Oral baricitinib and ruxolitinib are excellent options for the treatment of AA owing to their good efficacy and safety profiles. In contrast, non-oral JAK inhibitors do not appear to have satisfactory efficacy in treating AA. However, further studies are required to verify the optimal dose of JAK inhibitors for AA therapy.

Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Ph-neg chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: results from the EPICOVIDEHA registry

Background

Patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) typically incur high rates of infections and both drugs and comorbidities may modulate infection risk.

Objectives

The present study aims to assess the effect of immunosuppressive agents on clinical outcomes of MPN patients affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Design

This is an observational study.

Methods

We specifically searched and analyzed MPN patients collected by EPICOVIDEHA online registry, which includes individuals with hematological malignancies diagnosed with COVID-19 since February 2020.

Results

Overall, 398 patients with MPN were observed for a median of 76 days [interquartile range (IQR): 19-197] after detection of SARS-CoV2 infection. Median age was 69 years (IQR: 58-77) and 183 individuals (46%) had myelofibrosis (MF). Overall, 121 patients (30%) of the whole cohort received immunosuppressive therapies including steroids, immunomodulatory drugs, or JAK inhibitors. Hospitalization and consecutive admission to intensive care unit was required in 216 (54%) and 53 patients (13%), respectively. Risk factors for hospital admission were identified by multivariable logistic regression and include exposure to immunosuppressive therapies [odds ratio (OR): 2.186; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.357-3.519], age ⩾70 years, and comorbidities. The fatality rate was 22% overall and the risk of death was independently increased by age ⩾70 years [hazard ratio (HR): 2.191; 95% CI: 1.363-3.521], previous comorbidities, and exposure to immunosuppressive therapies before the infection (HR: 2.143; 95% CI: 1.363-3.521).

Conclusion

COVID-19 infection led to a particularly dismal outcome in MPN patients receiving immunosuppressive agents or reporting multiple comorbidities. Therefore, specific preventive strategies need to be tailored for such individuals.

Plain language summary

EPICOVIDEHA registry reports inferior outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) incur high rates of infections during the course of their disease.The present study was aimed at assessing which patient characteristics predicted a worse outcome of SARS-COV-2 infection in individuals with MPN.To pursue this objective, the researchers analyzed the data collected by EPICOVIDEHA, an international online registry, which includes individuals with hematological malignancies diagnosed with COVID-19 since February 2020.The database provided clinical data of 398 patients with MPN incurring COVID-19:Patients were mostly elderly (median age was 69 years);Forty-six percent of them were affected by myelofibrosis, which is the most severe MPN;Moreover, 32% were receiving immunosuppressive therapies (JAK inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib, steroids, or immunomodulatory IMID drugs, such as thalidomide) before COVID-19.Hospitalization was required in 54% of the patients, and the risk of being hospitalized for severe COVID-19 was independently predicted byOlder age;Comorbidities;Exposure to immunosuppressive therapies.Overall, 22% of MPN patients deceased soon after COVID-19 and the risk of death was independently increased over twofold byOlder age;Comorbidities;Exposure to immunosuppressive therapies before the infection.In conclusion, COVID-19 infection led to a particularly dismal outcome in MPN patients receiving immunosuppressive agents, including JAK inhibitors, or reporting multiple comorbidities. Therefore, specific preventive strategies need to be tailored for such individuals.

Case report: Ruxolitinib plus dexamethasone as first-line therapy in haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a cytokine-driven inflammatory syndrome caused by uncontrolled hypersecretion of inflammatory cytokines. Conventional first-line treatment for HLH included HLH-94 and HLH-2004 regimens. However, quite a few patients do not respond to treatment or cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy. We reported two cases of HLH, one caused by natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma and another associated with missense variants in the perforin 1 gene. They both received the ruxolitinib plus dexamethasone protocol and had a rapid response to treatment without obvious adverse effects. Our report indicates that treatment with ruxolitinib plus dexamethasone might be a potential option for HLH, and clinical trials warrant further investigation. In addition, the detection of HLH-related genes is necessary for the identification of late-onset familial HLH in certain settings.

Combined IFN-γ and JAK inhibition to treat hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in mice

BACKGROUND

Familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory disease caused by genetic defects in the granule-mediated cytotoxic pathway. Success of hematopoietic cell transplantation, the only cure, is correlated with the extent of disease control before transplantation. Unfortunately, disease refractoriness and toxicities to standard chemotherapy-based regimens are fatal in a fraction of patients. Novel targeted immunotherapies, such as IFN-γ blocking antibodies or ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, are promising but only partially effective at controlling disease.

OBJECTIVE

We asked whether combinations of cytokine-targeted therapies, using antibodies or JAK inhibitor, work synergistically to counteract HLH.

METHODS

Genetically predisposed mice were infected and treated with distinct combinations of immunotherapies. Disease outcome was monitored and compared to monotherapies.

RESULTS

We showed that inhibiting IL-6 or IL-18 signaling in combination with IFN-γ blockade or ruxolitinib did not increase disease control compared to anti-IFN-γ antibodies or ruxolitinib monotherapies. In contrast, clinically relevant doses of ruxolitinib combined with low doses of anti-IFN-γ blocking antibodies corrected cytopenias, prevented overt neutrophilia, limited cytokinemia, and resolved HLH immunopathology and symptomatology.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that IFN-γ blockade and ruxolitinib act synergistically to suppress HLH progression. This supports the use of combined cytokine-targeted therapies as a bridge to hematopoietic cell transplantation in severe familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

Case Report: Infectious prophylaxis in hematological malignancies

Patients with hematological malignancies and past serological evidence of hepatitis B are at risk for HBV reactivation. In myeloproliferative neoplasms, continuous treatment with the JAK 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib confers a moderate risk of reactivation (1-10%); nevertheless, no prospective randomized data are available to strongly recommend HBV prophylaxis in these patients. Here, we report a case of primary myelofibrosis and past serological evidence of HBV infection, treated with ruxolitinib and concomitant lamivudine, developing HBV reactivation due to premature withdrawal of prophylaxis. This case underlines the potential need for persistent HBV prophylaxis in the setting of ruxolitinib treatment.

JAK inhibitors in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Objective

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) is characterized by excessive and inappropriate production of proinflammatory cytokines. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) can block the downstream pathway of many cytokines. The use of JAKi in SJIA or macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) has only been described in a limited number of case reports. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and potential adverse effects of JAKi in SJIA patients.

Methods

Patients with SJIA who received JAKi and underwent at least one assessment of efficacy and safety after JAKi initiation were eligible for this study. Data were collected retrospectively from inpatient or outpatient medical records at JAKi initiation, at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, after disease flare, after JAKi discontinuation, or at the last follow-up.

Results

Ten patients with SJIA were included in the study. At the start of JAKi treatment, all patients presented with active disease; five showed variable adverse effects secondary to glucocorticoids. Seven patients received tofacitinib (one later switched to ruxolitinib). Of these, only two patients showed a complete response of persistent arthritis associated with tocilizumab; tofacitinib was used without a biological DMARD only in two patients, together with MTX, showing a partial response; three patients were nonresponders. Four patients with SJIA-related MAS or persistent hyperferritinemia were treated with ruxolitinib. Ruxolitinib allowed a good response on MAS parameters in three of them. All these four patients required an adjunction or switch to canakinumab later. The median decrease in the daily glucocorticoid dose between JAKi initiation and the last follow-up was 90.6% in patients with complete remission and 77.4% in other patients. Three patients discontinued glucocorticoid treatment after the introduction of JAKi. Severe adverse events, notably serious infection or thrombosis, were not observed during JAKi treatment.

Conclusion

JAKi may be an alternative or adjuvant agent for SJIA patients, especially in those with persistently active disease, glucocorticoid-related adverse reactions, or SJIA-MAS.

Ruxolitinib as an Effective Treatment for Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Secondary to SARS-Cov-2 Infection: A Case Report

Background

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome. SARS-CoV-2 infection can induce secondary HLH, as described in previous case reports, but diagnosis and treatment are challenging.

Case Study

We described an older male patient diagnosed with HLH related to previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Fever was the only clinical manifestation initially but deterioration in clinical condition and laboratory parameters was observed during hospitalization. He responded poorly to classical therapy but was successfully treated with ruxolitinib.

Conclusion

Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of HLH secondary to mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and take timely therapeutic measures to inhibit an inflammatory factor storm. Ruxolitinib is a potential choice for COVID-19 related HLH.

Review of Ruxolitinib for Treatment of Non-Segmental Vitiligo

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of topical ruxolitinib for treatment of nonsegmental vitiligo.

DATA SOURCES

Literature published between January 1983 and October 2022 was reviewed from MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant articles in English and data from clinical trials were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In 2 phase II trials, treatment with ruxolitinib cream showed significant improvements in Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) scores compared with controls. The 1.5% concentration applied twice daily showed the best results after 52 weeks, with 50% VASI improvement in 58% of patients, 75% VASI improvement in 52% of patients, and 90% VASI improvement in 33% of patients. In 2 phase III trials, more patients achieved at least 75% improvement in facial VASI at 24 weeks (primary endpoint; trial 1: 29.9%, trial 2: 29.9%) than controls (trial 1: 7.5% [P < 0.0001], trial 2: 12.9% [P < 0.01]). Common adverse effects were erythema, pruritus, and acne; all events were mild.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON TO EXISTING DRUGS

This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety data regarding topical ruxolitinib for vitiligo. Ruxolitinib is associated with significant clinical improvements with low bioavailability and minimal adverse effects compared with conventional topical steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, phototherapy, and depigmentation agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Ruxolitinib cream is the first therapy approved by the Food and Drug Administration for repigmentation of nonsegmental vitiligo. Clinicians should consider these benefits when recommending treatment as conventional therapies may be time-intensive and carry greater risks of adverse effects.

Prediction of Survival and Prognosis Migration from Gold-Standard Scores in Myelofibrosis Patients Treated with Ruxolitinib Applying the RR6 Prognostic Model in a Monocentric Real-Life Setting

The wide use of ruxolitinib, approved for treating primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF), has revolutionized the landscape of these diseases. This molecule can reduce spleen volume and constitutional symptoms, guaranteeing patients a better quality of life and survival or even a valid bridge to bone marrow transplantation. Despite a rapid response within the first 3 to 6 months of treatment, some patients fail to achieve a significant benefit or lose early response. After ruxolitinib failure, new drugs are available to provide an additional therapeutic option for these patients. However, the correct timing point for deciding on a therapy shift is still an open challenge. Recently, a clinical prognostic score named RR6 (Response to Ruxolitinib after 6 months) was proposed to determine survival after 6 months of treatment with ruxolitinib in patients affected by MF. We applied this model to a cohort of consecutive patients treated at our center to validate the results obtained in terms of median overall survival (mOS): for the low-risk class, mOS was not reached (as in the training cohort); for the intermediate-risk, mOS was 52 months (95% CI 39-106); for the high-risk, it was 33 (95% 8.5-59). Moreover, in addition to the other studies present in the literature, we evaluated how the new RR6 score could better identify primary MF patients at high risk, with a slight or no agreement compared to DIPSS, contrary to what occurs in secondary MF. Thus, we were able to confirm the predictive power of the RR6 model in our series, which might be of help in guiding future therapeutic choices.

Inhibition of JAK1,2 Prevents Fibrotic Remodeling of Pulmonary Vascular Bed and Improves Outcomes in the Rat Model of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare complication of acute pulmonary embolism with poor clinical outcomes. Therapeutic approaches to prevention of fibrotic remodeling of the pulmonary vascular bed in CTEPH are limited. In this work, we tested the hypothesis that Janus kinase 1/2 (JAK1/2) inhibition with ruxolitinib might prevent and attenuate CTEPH in a rat model. CTEPH was induced by repeated embolization of the pulmonary artery with partially biodegradable 180 ± 30 μm alginate microspheres. Two weeks after the last injection of microspheres, ruxolitinib was administered orally at doses of 0.86, 2.58, and 4.28 mg/kg per day for 4 weeks. Prednisolone (1.475 mg/kg, i.m.) was used as a reference drug. Ruxolitinib in all doses as well as prednisolone reduced pulmonary vascular wall hypertrophy. Ruxolitinib at a dose of 2.58 mg/kg and prednisolone reduced vascular wall fibrosis. Prednisolone treatment resulted in decreased right ventricular systolic pressure. Pulmonary vascular resistance was lower in the prednisolone and ruxolitinib (4.28 mg/kg) groups in comparison with the placebo group. The plasma level of brain natriuretic peptide was lower in groups receiving ruxolitinib at doses of 2.58 and 4.28 mg/kg versus placebo. This study demonstrated that JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib dose-dependently reduced pulmonary vascular remodeling, thereby preventing CTEPH formation in rats.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of alopecia areata

INTRODUCTION

Alopecia Areata (AA) is the second most common non-scarring hair loss disorder, with a prevalence of 1 in 1000 and a lifetime incidence of 2% worldwide. Data from a recent American study shows that from 68,121 patients with the diagnosis of AA, 37,995 (55.8%) were prescribed treatment for AA within a year of diagnosis, however there are still no therapies able to induce permanent remission, or treatments that guarantee hair regrowth/remissions in 100% of cases, especially in longstanding/severe AA. Recently, oral baricitinib has been approved for AA, being the first drug approved for this specific indication.

AREAS COVERED

The current review will provide a summary of current pharmacological approaches and novel therapeutics in development.

EXPERT OPINION

New and very effective drugs have become available for the treatment of severe AA, and many others are expected soon. However, even new, effective treatments are not effective in all patients and recurrence rates after treatment interruption are high. AA is a systemic disease with important impact on quality of life and should not be considered just as an aesthetic problem. Treatment of the disease should take in account and possibly also address treatment of comorbidities.

Incidental diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis by rebiopsy for epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation: A case report

Cryptococcosis is an invasive fungal infection that can occur in cancer patients. A case of pulmonary cryptococcosis in a patient treated with erlotinib + ramucirumab for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) L858R point mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer is presented. During chemotherapy, a new pulmonary nodule was found and considered progressive disease. Examination of the biopsy specimen taken to identify EGFR T790M mutation incidentally led to the diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis. Three months after taking fluconazole, chest computed tomography showed that the pulmonary nodule had shrunk. New pulmonary nodules during lung cancer treatment require careful attention, not only because of disease progression, but also because of the possibility of infection in an immunocompromised host.