The indications, rationale, and results of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation in the treatment of prostatic cancer: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center results

The role of androgen deprivation therapy prior to radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) are prone to have worse pathological features, resulting in early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). There is an urgent need to develop novel treatment strategies for this group of patients to optimize their outcomes. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review of the role of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) followed by RP in HRPCa patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a systematic review of the following databases, MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinical Trial.gov; between January 2007 and August 2023, following the PRISMA guidelines.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

After screening and deduplication, we included ten studies from an initial pool of 1275. The risk of bias was low in observational studies but ranged from moderate to low in controlled trials. Five studies utilized traditional androgen deprivation treatments (ADT), revealing favorable pathological outcomes but inconsistency in evaluating oncological results. Additionally, four studies focused on RP combined with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) in the NHT setting, all showing primarily positive pathological outcome, with no clear evidence of an oncological benefit. Limited long-term follow-up data and a shortage of randomized controlled trials were evident among all the studies included in this review, regardless of the type of hormonal treatment used.

CONCLUSIONS

Different hormonal treatments, including traditional ADT and ARPIs, yield positive pathology outcomes. Oncological evidence remains limited, echoing older findings predating ARPIs. Definitive conclusions require longer follow-ups and precise patient selection. Currently, insufficient evidence support ARPIs' superiority over conventional therapy before RP.

Genitourinary tumors

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) has made many notable contributions to the scientific understanding and care of patients with common urologic cancers. Many of the advances represented paradigm shifts in management and established new standards of care. This review highlights the surgical procedures and treatment strategies originated and pioneered by urologic surgeons and colleagues at MSK during the past 50 years.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer

Patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with curative intent are at an increased risk of biochemical recurrence, metastatic progression and cancer-related death compared with patients treated for low-risk or intermediate-risk disease. Thus, these patients often need multimodal therapy to achieve complete disease control. Over the past two decades, multiple studies on the use of neoadjuvant treatment have been performed using conventional androgen deprivation therapy, which comprises luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists or antagonists and/or first-line anti-androgens. However, despite results from these studies demonstrating a reduction in positive surgical margins and tumour volume, no benefit has been observed in hard oncological end points, such as cancer-related death. The introduction of potent androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs), such as abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide, has led to a renewed interest in using neoadjuvant hormonal treatment in high-risk prostate cancer. The addition of ARSIs to androgen deprivation therapy has demonstrated substantial survival benefits in the metastatic castration-resistant, non-metastatic castration-resistant and metastatic hormone-sensitive settings. Intuitively, a similar survival effect can be expected when applying ARSIs as a neoadjuvant strategy in high-risk prostate cancer. Most studies on neoadjuvant ARSIs use a pathological end point as a surrogate for long-term oncological outcome. However, no consensus yet exists regarding the ideal definition of pathological response following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and pathologists might encounter difficulties in determining pathological response in hormonally treated prostate specimens. The neoadjuvant setting also provides opportunities to gain insight into resistance mechanisms against neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and, consequently, to guide personalized therapy.

Sequential Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Newly Diagnosed High-risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Enzalutamide is Predictive of Therapeutic Response

PURPOSE

For high-risk prostate cancer, standard treatment options include radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Despite definitive therapy, many patients will have disease recurrence. Imaging has the potential to better define characteristics of response and resistance. In this study, we evaluated prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) before and after neoadjuvant enzalutamide plus ADT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Men with localized intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer underwent a baseline mpMRI and mpMRI-targeted biopsy followed by a second mpMRI after 6 months of enzalutamide and ADT prior to RP. Specimens were sectioned in the same plane as mpMRI using patient-specific 3D-printed molds to permit mpMRI-targeted biopsies to be compared with the same lesion from the RP. Specimens were analyzed for imaging and histologic correlates of response.

RESULTS

Of 39 patients enrolled, 36 completed imaging and RP. Most patients (92%) had high-risk disease. Fifty-eight lesions were detected on baseline mpMRI, of which 40 (69%) remained measurable at 6-month follow-up imaging. Fifty-five of 59 lesions (93%) demonstrated >50% volume reduction on posttreatment mpMRI. Three of 59 lesions (5%) demonstrated growth in size at follow-up imaging, with two lesions increasing more than 3-fold in volume. On whole-mount pathology, 15 patients demonstrated minimal residual disease (MRD) of <0.05 cc or pathologic complete response. Low initial mpMRI relative tumor burden was most predictive of MRD on final pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Low relative lesion volume at baseline mpMRI was predictive of pathologic response. A subset of patients had limited response. Selection of patients based on these metrics may improve outcomes in high-risk disease.

The role of chemotherapy and new targeted agents in the management of primary prostate cancer

While early treatment of primary prostate cancer is very effective, the incidence of primary prostate cancer continues to rise and therefore the detection of men with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer and their subsequent management is becoming increasingly important. There continues to be no molecularly-targeted or chemotherapeutic options with proven, statistically significant survival benefit in this setting. However, there are indications that further risk stratification using molecular features could potentially help distinguish indolent from aggressive prostate cancer, ultimately providing biological markers that could guide a more personalised approach to therapy selection.

Intense androgen-deprivation therapy with abiraterone acetate plus leuprolide acetate in patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer: results of a randomized phase II neoadjuvant study

PURPOSE

Cure rates for localized high-risk prostate cancers (PCa) and some intermediate-risk PCa are frequently suboptimal with local therapy. Outcomes are improved by concomitant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with radiation therapy, but not by concomitant ADT with surgery. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa; leuprolide acetate) does not reduce serum androgens as effectively as abiraterone acetate (AA), a prodrug of abiraterone, a CYP17 inhibitor that lowers serum testosterone (< 1 ng/dL) and improves survival in metastatic PCa. The possibility that greater androgen suppression in patients with localized high-risk PCa will result in improved clinical outcomes makes paramount the reassessment of neoadjuvant ADT with more robust androgen suppression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A neoadjuvant randomized phase II trial of LHRHa with AA was conducted in patients with localized high-risk PCa (N = 58). For the first 12 weeks, patients were randomly assigned to LHRHa versus LHRHa plus AA. After a research prostate biopsy, all patients received 12 additional weeks of LHRHa plus AA followed by prostatectomy.

RESULTS

The levels of intraprostatic androgens from 12-week prostate biopsies, including the primary end point (dihydrotestosterone/testosterone), were significantly lower (dehydroepiandrosterone, Δ(4)-androstene-3,17-dione, dihydrotestosterone, all P < .001; testosterone, P < .05) with LHRHa plus AA compared with LHRHa alone. Prostatectomy pathologic staging demonstrated a low incidence of complete responses and minimal residual disease, with residual T3- or lymph node-positive disease in the majority.

CONCLUSION

LHRHa plus AA treatment suppresses tissue androgens more effectively than LHRHa alone. Intensive intratumoral androgen suppression with LHRHa plus AA before prostatectomy for localized high-risk PCa may reduce tumor burden.

Preoperative therapy for localized prostate cancer: a comprehensive overview

At the 2012 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, two studies of preoperative systemic therapy for localized prostate cancer garnered significant attention. In the first, investigators evaluated various permutations of conventional hormonal therapies prior to prostatectomy, with detailed biomarker studies focused on tissue androgens. In the second, investigators assessed the novel CYP17 lyase inhibitor abiraterone prior to prostatectomy. Both studies provide a wealth of biological information, but the question remains - will preoperative systemic therapy ultimately be incorporated into clinical algorithms for prostate cancer? Herein, the existing literature for both preoperative hormonal and chemotherapeutic approaches is reviewed. We performed a MEDLINE search of published prospective and retrospective clinical studies assessing preoperative systemic therapy for prostate cancer from 1982 onwards, revealing a total of 75 publications meeting these criteria. Of these, 55 possessed a number of patients (i.e., greater than 10) deemed worth of the current analysis. Beyond outlining these datasets, we discuss the relevance of clinical and pathologic endpoints in assessing preoperative therapy.

Morphological changes induced by androgen blockade in normal prostate and prostatic carcinoma

Maximal androgen blockade (MAB), combining a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist and a pure or non-steroidal anti-androgen, induces significant morphologic changes in the prostate. The tumor volume, density, capsular penetration, and surgical margin involvement are strongly reduced following such treatment. On histology, normal prostate tissue and tumor undergo marked atrophy and shrinkage. Although residual cancer cells are readily identifiable in most cases, they may often be sparse and easily overlooked. The increased Gleason score apparent after MAB is most likely related to fragmentation of acinar structures, and grading is not recommended following MAB. Residual cancer cells show features of lower activity and increased apoptosis. Such therapy-induced changes may be reversible, although occasional clones of cancer cells are apparently not affected and have probably developed resistance. Finally, MAB leads to marked but reversible morphologic changes and reduction in prevalence and extent of prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia (PIN). Monotherapy using a variety of agents causes comparable but often less extensive changes.

Usefulness of hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha in evaluating the prostatic adenocarcinoma viability following neoadjuvant hormone therapy

BACKGROUND

In prostatic adenocarcinomas (PAs), the androgen up-regulates hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha). It has been reported that the regulation of HIF-1 alpha would become a therapeutic strategy for PAs. This study was designed to elucidate whether or not HIF-1 alpha expression would be associated with PA recurrence after neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT).

METHODS

The 50 radical prostatectomy specimens after NHT were examined as well as needle biopsy specimens before NHT using immunohistochemistry for HIF-1 alpha.

RESULTS

The therapeutic effects of 50 cases with NHT were assessed as good (20 cases) or poor (30 cases). The recurrence of PA monitored by the serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) levels occurred in 21 cases (42%). The hypoxic status was evaluated to be divided into two categories: weak (16 cases) or strong (34 cases). The recurrence ratio was 30% (6/20) of cases with good response and 50% (15/30) of cases with poor response (p<0.05). HIF-1 alpha expression profiles were as follows: recurrent cases, weak, 19% (4/21); strong, 81% (17/21) (p<0.05); and non-recurrent cases, weak, 41% (12/29); strong, 59% (17/29) (NS). Compared to PAs with weak HIF-1 alpha expression, PAs with strong HIF-1 alpha expression showed higher PSA levels (12.1 ng/mL vs. 25.0 ng/mL, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

HIF-1 alpha is expected to be useful for detection of the viability of PAs after NHT and also for prediction of their clinical outcome. In addition, the expression may contribute to histological identification of the carcinoma cells.

Neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy: Where have we been? Where are we going?

Prostate cancer is curable only when treated at an early stage, when the tumor is still localized to the prostate gland. However, even in apparent cases of clinically localized disease, unsuspected extracapsular disease may significantly increase the risk of primary treatment failure. This risk is especially high if the patient has > or =1 of the following risk factors: a serum prostate-specific antigen level of >20 ng/ml, a Gleason score of >7, locally advanced disease (clinical stage T3/T4), and extensive disease on prostate biopsy. Various regimens of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, or both have produced mixed results and, in general, have not significantly influenced the rate of disease relapse (as defined by prostate-specific antigen level) in high-risk patients with localized prostate cancer. In addition, anti-angiogenic agents, gene therapy, molecular targeting agents, and other promising new therapies have been investigated in a neoadjuvant setting with limited results. Therefore, this patient population continues to pose a therapeutic dilemma for physicians.

A Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Prostatectomy Plus Endocrine Therapy versus External Beam Radiotherapy Plus Endocrine Therapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Results at Median Follow-up of 102 Months

BACKGROUND

To investigate the optimal treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer, a prospective randomized trial was conducted to compare radical prostatectomy plus endocrine therapy versus external beam radiotherapy plus endocrine therapy.

METHODS

One hundred patients with T2b-3N0M0 prostate cancer were enrolled and 95 were evaluated. Of 95 cases, 46 underwent radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection and 49 were treated with external beam radiation by linear accelerator with 40-50 Gy to the whole pelvis and 20-Gy boost to the prostatic area. For all patients, endocrine therapy was initiated 8 weeks before surgery or radiotherapy and continued thereafter. The long-term outcome and morbidity were examined.

RESULTS

Median follow-up period was 102 months. At 10 years overall survival rates in the surgery group were better than the radiation group (76.2% versus 71.1% for biochemical progression-free rates; P=0.25, 83.5% versus 66.1% for clinical progression-free rates; P=0.14, 85.7% versus 77.1% for cause-specific survival rates; P=0.06, and 67.9% versus 60.9% for overall survival rates; P=0.30), although none of them reached statistical significance. Erectile dysfunction was recognized in almost all patients as a result of continuous endocrine therapy. Incontinence requiring more than one pad per day was observed more frequently in the surgery group than the radiation group (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, when combined with endocrine therapy, either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy demonstrated favorable long-term outcomes. The radiation dose of 60-70 Gy might not be enough for the local treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with locally confined prostate cancer: association of prostatic citrate and metabolic atrophy with time on hormone deprivation therapy, PSA level, and biopsy Gleason score

This study was undertaken to determine respective associations between prostatic citrate or metabolic atrophy (no detectable citrate, choline, and creatine) at magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and time on hormone-deprivation therapy, serum PSA, and biopsy Gleason score. Clinical data, histopathology reports and PSA levels of 36 patients on hormone-deprivation therapy (age, 64+/-9 years, pre-therapeutic biopsy Gleason sum, median 6, range 3-8, antiandrogens only, n=3, LHRH-analogues only, n=4, combined hormone-deprivation therapy, n=29, duration, 27+/-19 weeks) for locally confined prostate cancer (PCA) were retrospectively correlated with findings in the peripheral zone of the prostate at 3D-MRS (endorectal coil, PRESS, TR 1,000 ms, TE 130 ms). The results show that citrate was usually detected after 13 weeks or less of hormone-deprivation therapy (10/12 vs. 6/24 patients, chi-square-test, p=0.002). All patients with PSA levels exceeding 0.20 ng/ml had detectable metabolites (citrate, n=12, choline without citrate, n=6), while 9/18 patients with PSA 0.20 ng/ml or less showed metabolic atrophy (Fisher-exact-test, p=0.001). There were no significant associations between citrate, metabolic atrophy, pre-therapeutic PSA, and biopsy Gleason sum, respectively. It has been concluded that hormone-deprivation therapy for locally confined PCA has not reached its full deprivation potential after 13 weeks. MRS detects prostate metabolism in patients with PSA exceeding 0.20 ng/ml after hormone-deprivation therapy.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in the treatment of prostate cancer

In 1979, the first prostate cancer patient was treated with a GnRH agonist at the Laval University Medical Center in Quebec City, Canada, thus rapidly leading to the worldwide replacement of surgical castration and high doses of estrogens. The discovery of medical castration with GnRH agonists was soon followed by fundamental changes in the endocrine therapy of prostate cancer. Most importantly, the excellent tolerance accompanying the treatment with GnRH agonists has been a key factor that permitted a series of studies demonstrating a major reduction in the death rate from prostate cancer ranging from 31 to 87% at 5 yr of follow-up in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. In fact, a one third reduction in prostate cancer deaths has been calculated in the metaanalysis of all available studies. The general acceptance of this discovery by patients and physicians is illustrated by world sales above 3.0 billion U.S. dollars in 2003. Although extremely efficient in achieving complete medical castration and well tolerated, with no other side effects than the expected hypoandrogenicity, GnRH agonists should not be administered alone. In fact, shortly after discovery of the castration effects of GnRH agonists, we observed that approximately 50% of androgens remain in the prostate after castration, thus leading to the recognition of the role of adrenal dehydroepiandrosterone as an important source of the androgens synthesized locally in the prostate and in many peripheral target tissues. We therefore developed combined androgen blockade (CAB), whereby the androgens of both testicular and adrenal origins are blocked simultaneously at start of treatment with the combination of a GnRH agonist to block the testis and a pure antiandrogen to block the action of the androgens produced locally. CAB, first used in advanced metastatic disease, has been the first treatment shown to prolong life in prostate cancer. Most interestingly, in 2002, we made the observation that CAB alone given continuously for 6.5 yr or more leads to cure of the disease in at least 90% of cases, thus suggesting that androgen blockade combining a GnRH agonist and a pure antiandrogen could well be the most efficient treatment of localized prostate cancer, and thus offering the possibility of practically eliminating death from prostate cancer.

Neoadjuvant therapy: an emerging concept in oncology

Neoadjuvant therapy, an adjunctive therapy given before the main therapy, has become an integral part of modem multidisciplinary cancer management. Organized by the primary organ involved by cancer, this review summarizes the outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy for common malignant solid tumors, based on large, randomized, controlled trials. In locally advanced rectal, laryngeal, and breast cancer, neoadjuvant therapy enables organ preservation; however, it does not improve overall survival when compared with definitive treatment followed by adjuvant therapy. In locally advanced bladder and cervical cancer, patients who undergo neoadjuvant therapy before radical surgery appear to have better survival than those receiving definitive therapy alone; however, it is unclear if the neoadjuvant approach will be superior to definitive therapy followed by adjuvant therapy. To date, the survival benefits of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable non-small cell lung, esophageal, gastric, and prostate cancer remains under investigation.

Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy After Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy: An Apparently Safe and Effective Procedure

OBJECTIVE

In an effort to determine the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in patients who have received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT), our initial series of 65 patients undergoing successful LRP was analyzed, specifically comparing 5 patients who received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy to 60 who did not.

METHODS

From March 2000 to March 2002, 68 patients were scheduled for LRP. Three cases, none post-NHT, were converted to open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Clinical and pathologic data were recorded on the remaining 65 patients, 5 of who had received NHT. Forty-two bilateral and 16 unilateral nerve sparing LRP were performed in the non-NHT cohort, and 3 bilateral and 1 unilateral nerve sparing LRP in the NHT cohort.

RESULTS

The mean patient age, preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, and biopsy grade were similar for the NHT and the non-NHT LRP cohorts. The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) and serum hemoglobin decrease (preoperative to postoperative day 1) were lower in the NHT cohort than the non-NHT cohort: 160 mL and 2.4 g/dL vs. 317 mL and 3.1 g/dL, respectively. The mean operative time and hospital stay were similar: 5.7 hours and 2.4 days for the NHT cohort and 5.8 hours and 2.8 days for the non-NHT cohorts. As expected, the mean prostate weight was lower for the NHT cohort: 36.8 g vs. 46.5 g. All NHT cohort tumors were pathologic stage pT2, with negative margins. Eleven (18%) of the non-NHT cohort had pathologic T3 (10 patients) or T4 (1 patient) tumors and 10 (17%) specimens had a positive surgical margin. Four of 5 (80%) NHT cohort and 21 of 25 (84%) non-NHT cohort patients are continent (no pad use) 3 to 6 months postsurgery. One NHT cohort patient (20%) and 20 (33%) non-NHT cohort patients had an elevated drain fluid creatinine 24 hours postoperatively. There were no other complications in the NHT cohort. All 5 NHT cohort patients have no evidence of recurrent disease, whereas 2 non-NHT cohort patients (3.3%) have developed PSA recurrence. No NHT patient and only 1 non-NHT patient received a blood transfusion postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

LRP appears to be a safe and efficacious procedure in patients who have received NHT. Perioperative morbidity of NHT patients undergoing LRP appears equivalent to non-NHT patients, with slightly lower EBL, hemoglobin decrease, urinary extravasation, positive margin, and complication rates.

Late toxicity following conventional radiotherapy for prostate cancer: analysis of the EORTC trial 22863

Late toxicity and other serious adverse events (SAE) were analysed in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 22863. The study evaluated the value of adjuvant endocrine treatment for locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. From 1987 to 1995, 415 patients were randomised. There was long-term toxicity information for 377 patients (91%). Median age was 70 years (range 50-80 years). Median follow-up for late toxicity was 42 months (range 3-136 months). Toxicity was graded according to a modified Radiotherapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. Other late SAE, that was not classified as severe treatment toxicity, but were still life-threatening, were also assessed. There were 72 patients with grade 2, 10 patients with grade 3 and 4 patients with grade 4 toxicity. There were 20 patients with other late SAE, who were grouped according to their relationship to treatment; likely related (n = 1), unrelated (n = 7) and not assessable (n = 12). Although four treatment-related deaths (1%) occurred, grade 3 or 4 late complications were less than 5%.

[Significance of neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy]

Neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy should increase survival in patients. This is necessary especially in patients with adverse prognostic factors for locally advanced disease, because in this stage radical prostatectomy as the only treatment results in a significantly reduced rate of progression-free survival. The aim of neoadjuvant therapy protocols is to increase local tumor control because of possible downstaging effects of the tumor and to improve systemic control because of elimination of circulating tumor cells and possible micrometastases. This review discusses the present and future aspects of neoadjuvant therapies in detail. The neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy results in a significant downstaging that does not translate into prolonged disease-free survival. This observation was made for short-term (3 months) and long-term (8 months) hormonal therapy. Therefore, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy has only a cosmetic effect on the pathological results and should not be advocated any more. Newer protocols have shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy or hormone chemotherapy is feasible. The results obtained in non-randomized trials with small numbers of patients do not allow analyzing the efficacy of these protocols. Theoretically, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially a taxane-based protocol, which has shown efficacy in hormone-refractory disease, could improve disease outcome. Clinical trials are underway to prove this hypothesis. In the future, new therapeutic strategies could also be used in the neoadjuvant setting. It can only be speculated if antibody protocols or gene therapy will be used in this respect. In conclusion, there is no standard neoadjuvant protocol prior to radical prostatectomy. Whether chemotherapy will set a new standard for care has to be elucidated by the ongoing clinical trials.

Use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy to prevent or delay recurrence of prostate cancer in patients undergoing surgical treatment for prostate cancer

There have been improvements in the outcome of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. However, some patients treated with radical prostatectomy will have clinical or biochemical progression. These men are at increased risk of dying of their disease. Identification of patients with adverse features at the time of radical prostatectomy may permit the use of additional multimodality therapies to improve outcomes. Whether this additional multimodality therapy should be administered in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting remains controversial. Further, whether a patient at increased risk for progression after radical prostatectomy requires additional therapy before the development of documented progression remains controversial. This article reviews the potential multimodality approaches to prevent or delay recurrence of prostate cancer in patients undergoing surgical treatment for prostate cancer.

Phase I/II clinical trials of carbon ion therapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Heavy ion beams possess high linear energy transfer components and a prominent Bragg peak in the human body, resulting in higher relative biological effectiveness and improved dose distribution. To establish heavy ion therapy techniques for the treatment of prostate cancer, phase I/II clinical trials were initiated.

METHODS

For 96 patients with T1b-T3 prostate cancer, three carbon ion beams were used to irradiate the prostate and seminal vesicles (20 times/5 weeks) with or without endocrine therapy. Radiation dose was expressed in GyE which was initially thought to be equivalent to photon dose. Total dose was gradually increased from 54 to 72 GyE.

RESULTS

Carbon ion therapy was completed in 20 cases of T1b/T1c/T2aN0M0 as monotherapy, in 8 cases of T2b/T3pN0M0 with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, and in 68 cases of T2b/T3N0/pN1M0 with neoadjuvant and adjuvant endocrine therapy. Median observation period was 47 months. Grade 3 late radiation morbidity of rectum and/or bladder/urethra developed in one and five cases who received 66 and 72 GyE of radiation, respectively. After these adverse effects were observed, total dose was decreased to 66 GyE and the radiation field was coned down during the treatment course. At 5 years, overall, cause-specific, clinical recurrence-free, and biochemical recurrence-free survival rates were 87.7, 94.9, 90.0, and 82.6%, respectively. Local control was achieved in all patients except one patient who received 54 GyE of radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic techniques of carbon ion therapy have been established for patients with prostate cancer. Carbon ion therapy may exert excellent effect to the tissues of prostate cancer.

Long-term followup of a randomized trial of 0 versus 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

In 1992 we initiated a national randomized prospective trial of 3 months of cyproterone acetate before radical prostatectomy compared to prostatectomy alone. Initial results indicated a 50% decrease in the rate of positive surgical margins. This decrease did not translate into a difference in prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression at 3 years. This report is on the long-term outcome (median followup 6 years) of this cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized, open label trial compared 100 mg cyproterone acetate 3 times daily for 3 months before surgery to surgery alone. Randomization occurred between January 1993 and April 1994. Patients were stratified according to clinical stage, baseline serum PSA and Gleason sum. A total of 213 patients were accrued. Biochemical progression was defined as 2 consecutive detectable PSAs (greater than 0.2 ng/ml) at least 4 weeks apart, re-treatment or death from prostate cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 34 (33.6%) patients undergoing surgery only and 42 (37.5%) patients given neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) had biochemical recurrence during the median followup of 6 years. Despite the significant pathological down staging in this study, there was no significant difference in number of patients with no evidence of biochemical disease (bNED) survival (p = 0.732). A bNED survival benefit favoring NHT was seen in men with a baseline PSA greater than 20 (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

After 6 years of followup there was no overall benefit with 3 months of NHT. Improved bNED survival was seen in the highest risk PSA group (PSA greater than 20). The possibility that high risk patients may benefit from NHT warrants further investigation.

Pathological effects of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy help predict progression of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

It is not clear whether pathological changes following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) prior to radical prostatectomy have any value as predictors of progression in prostate cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a study of 100 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy following NHT. We used the Japanese general rule as the criterion to assess the biochemical recurrence rate and pathological changes after NHT.

RESULTS

In terms of preoperative risk factors, the probability of recurrence was significantly higher for patients with more than 20 ng/mL of pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or a Gleason score of 7 or higher for biopsy specimens. We defined these pretreatment findings as high-risk factors. Among 65 patients with high-risk factors, patients with a post-NHT pathological effect of grade 3 according to the Japanese general rule showed no recurrence, whereas patients with a grade 0 had a poor prognosis. Patients with a PSA nadir 0.5 ng/mL or less tended to have a better prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Despite preoperative high-risk factors, patients showing good pathological effects after NHT tend to have a favorable prognosis after radical prostatectomy. Therefore; assessment of the pathological effects of NHT using the Japanese general rule as the criterion proved to be useful for the prediction of biochemical recurrence.

Neoadjuvant flutamide monotherapy for locally confined prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

We compared the clinical effects and impact on quality of life (QOL) of patients who received a 3-month course of flutamide monotherapy before radical prostatectomy with those who received a 3-month course of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist monotherapy.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer were enrolled in this study (19, flutamide; 18, LHRH agonist). The rates of change of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and testosterone levels, downsizing of prostate volume, the rate of organ confined disease, adverse effects and perioperative scores measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Prostate Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-P) and the Sapporo Medical University Sexual Function Questionnaire (SMUF) were analyzed.

RESULTS

At radical prostatectomy, pathological variables were not significantly different in the two groups. Serum testosterone level was significantly higher (mean 359.2 compared to 10.5, P < 0.001), complete response rate of PSA (13% compared to 57%, P = 0.028) and rate of downsizing of prostate volume (mean, -17.7% compared to -35.4%, P = 0.038) were significantly lower in the flutamide group than in the LHRH group. After neoadjuvant hormone therapy, the scores on the sexual problem domain of EORTC-P (P = 0.033) and sexual desire score of SMUF (P = 0.021) were significantly higher in the flutamide group than in the LHRH group. At a median follow-up of 34 months after prostatectomy, biochemical failure-free survival rate in the flutamide group did not differ from that in the LHRH group.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that flutamide monotherapy can be an acceptable modality as an option for neoadjuvant hormone therapy.

The role of caveolin-1 in androgen insensitive prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We summarize the literature regarding androgen insensitive prostate cancer and caveolin-1. Caveolin-1 is a major structural component of caveolae, membrane micro-domains known to have important roles in signal transduction and lipid transport.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of the literature relevant to androgen insensitive caveolin-1 and prostate cancer included the first published report in 1998 through those published in March 2002.

RESULTS

Caveolin-1 expression is increased in primary and metastatic human prostate cancer with highest levels observed after androgen ablation therapy. Recent studies have documented that caveolin-1 is secreted by prostate cancer cells and can be detected in the serum of men with prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The results presented in this review establish that caveolin-1 is an autocrine/paracrine factor associated with androgen insensitive prostate cancer. They show the potential for caveolin-1 as a biomarker therapeutic target for this important malignancy.

Emerging role of adjuvant hormonal therapy

Recent years have seen a downward shift in the most common disease stage at diagnosis and in the age of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Although younger men with clinically localized disease are generally offered radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy, such treatment does not always produce a cure. Adjuvant hormonal therapy (medical or surgical castration) has been shown to extend progression-free survival in both the radiotherapy and surgical settings, and overall survival benefits have also been demonstrated in some studies. However, castration is associated with sexual dysfunction that may be unacceptable, particularly among younger patients. The ongoing bicalutamide (Casodex; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE) Early Prostate Cancer program is evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of bicalutamide 150 mg as immediate therapy, either alone or as an adjuvant to therapy of curative intent, in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. This is the largest clinical trial program in prostate cancer treatment to date, comprising 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with a total of 8113 patients. At median follow-up period of 3 years and after 922 progression events, the bicalutamide group had a significant reduction of 42% in the risk of objective progression compared with patients who received placebo plus standard care. The risk of prostate-specific antigen progression was also significantly reduced by 59%. As expected, gynecomastia and breast pain were the most frequently reported side effects of bicalutamide therapy. A longer follow-up period will determine whether the reduced risk of progression will translate into cause-specific and overall survival benefit for these patients.

Acute toxicity of conventional radiation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer in EORTC trial 22863

OBJECTIVES

We analysed the acute toxicity observed in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomised trial 22863 comparing conventional external irradiation with or without an agonist analogue of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in high-risk prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

Four hundred five patients that received a dose of at least 30 Gy were considered evaluable for acute toxicity assessment. Toxicity was grouped in a few categories: general, genito-urinary, and lower gastro-intestinal. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the World Health Organisation (WHO) toxicity score and grouping together toxicity scores in different bimodal and trimodal groups.

RESULTS

Overall, our data show that age, previous surgery and irradiation dose are important predictive factors for acute toxicity, but not the use of combined hormone therapy. Fifteen percent of patients suffered of moderate to severe acute toxicity (WHO G3-G4). Life threatening toxicity was observed in six cases (1.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of toxicity combining in different groups the original five scores scale produced conflicting results similar to those commonly reported in literature. Interpretation of the role of pre-treatment factors with uneven distribution in the study requires careful evaluation. These data obtained with conventional curative irradiation of high-risk prostate cancer patients are proposed for comparison with results achieved using modern state-of-the-art irradiation techniques.

Effects of complete androgen blockade for 12 and 24 weeks on the pathological stage and resection margin status of prostate cancer

AIMS

To compare the pathological stage and surgical margin status in patients undergoing either immediate radical prostatectomy or 12 and 24 weeks of neoadjuvant hormonal treatment (NHT) in a prospective, randomised study.

METHODS

Whole mount sections of 393 radical prostatectomy specimens were evaluated: 128 patients had immediate surgery, 143 were treated for 12 weeks and 122 for 24 weeks with complete androgen blockade.

RESULTS

Histopathology revealed organ confined tumours in 40.4% of patients with clinical stage B disease in the immediate surgery group, whereas 12 and 24 weeks of NHT increased the number of organ confined tumours to 54.6% and 64.8%, respectively. Among patients with clinical stage C tumours, pathological staging found organ confined disease in 10.4%, 31.4%, and 61.2% in the immediate surgery, 12 weeks of NHT, and 24 weeks of NHT groups, respectively. Preoperative NHT caused a significant decrease in positive margins both in patients with clinical stage B and C disease. The extent of margin involvement was not influenced by preoperative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant androgenic suppression is effective in reducing both the pathological stage and the positive margin rate in patients with stage B and C prostatic cancer undergoing radical surgery. Some beneficial effects are evident in those patients treated for 24 weeks, and it is reasonable to assume that the optimal duration of NHT is longer than three months.

Contemporary identification of patients at high risk of early prostate cancer recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To develop a model that will identify a contemporary cohort of patients at high risk of early prostate cancer recurrence (greater than 50% at 36 months) after radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized disease. Data from this model will provide important information for patient selection and the design of prospective randomized trials of adjuvant therapies.

METHODS

Proportional hazards regression analysis was applied to two patient cohorts to develop and cross-validate a multifactorial predictive model to identify men with the highest risk of early prostate cancer recurrence. The model and validation cohorts contained 904 and 901 men, respectively, who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy at Johns Hopkins Hospital. This model was then externally validated using a cohort of patients from the Mayo Clinic.

RESULTS

A model for weighted risk of recurrence was developed: R(W)'=lymph node involvement (0/1)x1.43+surgical margin status (0/1)x1.15+modified Gleason score (0 to 4)x0.71+seminal vesicle involvement (0/1)x0.51. Men with an R(W)' greater than 2.84 (9%) demonstrated a 50% biochemical recurrence rate (prostrate-specific antigen level greater than 0.2 ng/mL) at 3 years and thus were placed in the high-risk group. Kaplan-Meier analyses of biochemical recurrence-free survival demonstrated rapid deviation of the curves based on the R(W)'. This model was cross-validated in the second group of patients and performed with similar results. Furthermore, similar trends were apparent when the model was externally validated on patients treated at the Mayo Clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model that successfully stratifies patients on the basis of their risk of early prostate cancer recurrence.

Localized prostate cancer: effect of hormone deprivation therapy measured by using combined three-dimensional 1H MR spectroscopy and MR imaging: clinicopathologic case-controlled study

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy of combined magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and three-dimensional (3D) proton MR spectroscopic imaging in localizing prostate cancer to a sextant of the gland in patients receiving hormone deprivation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging examinations were performed in 16 hormone-treated patients and 48 nontreated matched control patients before radical prostatectomy and step-section histopathologic analysis. At MR imaging, cancer presence within the peripheral zone was assessed on a per sextant basis by two readers. At 3D MR spectroscopic imaging, cancer was identified by using (choline plus creatine)-to-citrate ratios at cutoff values of 2 and 3 SDs above mean normal peripheral zone values. Data were compared by using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the ability of combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging to localize prostate cancer in treated versus control patients. For MR imaging alone, the sensitivity and specificity were 91% and 48% (reader 1) and 75% and 60% (reader 2) in treated patients versus 79% and 60% (reader 1) and 84% and 43% (reader 2) in control patients. For 3D MR spectroscopic imaging alone (>3 SDs cutoff), higher specificity (treated, 80%; controls, 73%) but lower sensitivity (treated, 56%; controls, 53%) was attained. In treated patients, high sensitivity or specificity (up to 92%) was achieved when either or both modalities indicated cancer.

CONCLUSION

When performed within 4 months after initiating hormone deprivation therapy, combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging had the same accuracy in localizing prostate cancer as in nontreated patients.

Time-dependent effects of hormone-deprivation therapy on prostate metabolism as detected by combined magnetic resonance imaging and 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging

Combined MRI and 3D spectroscopic imaging (MRI/3D-MRSI) was used to study the metabolic effects of hormone-deprivation therapy in 65 prostate cancer patients, who underwent either short, intermediate, or long-term therapy, compared to 30 untreated control patients. There was a significant time-dependent loss of the prostatic metabolites choline, creatine, citrate, and polyamines during hormone-deprivation therapy, resulting in the complete loss of all observable metabolites (total metabolic atrophy) in 25% of patients on long-term therapy. The amount and time-course of metabolite loss during therapy significantly differed for healthy and malignant tissues. Citrate levels decreased faster than choline and creatine levels during therapy, resulting in an increase in the mean (choline + creatine)/citrate ratio with duration of therapy. Due to a loss of all MRSI detectable citrate, this ratio could not be used to identify cancer in 69% of patients on long-term therapy. In the absence of citrate, however, residual prostate cancer could still be detected by elevated choline levels (choline/creatine ratio > or =1.5), or the presence of only choline in the proton spectrum. The loss of citrate and the presence of total metabolic atrophy correlated roughly with decreasing serum prostatic specific antigen levels with increasing therapy. In summary, MRI/3D-MRSI provided both a measure of residual cancer and a time-course of metabolic response following hormone-deprivation therapy. Magn Reson Med 46:49-57, 2001.

Lymph node-positive prostate cancer: evaluation of the results of the combination of androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of patients with pathologic stage IV prostate cancer treated with androgen ablation plus external-beam radiation therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients treated between August 1986 and February 1995 with androgen ablation plus radiation therapy for stage IV (T1-4 N1 M0) adenocarcinoma of the prostate were selected for outcome analysis in this retrospective study. Bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 56 patients (93%). The 4 remaining patients had pelvic adenopathy on computed tomography, which was confirmed histologically in all patients. The median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 28.8 ng/mL (mean, 55 ng/ mL; range, 0.1-428 ng/mL). All patients received radiation therapy to the prostate, and 29 (48%) had pelvic node radiation. Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology criteria of 3 successive increases in the PSA level.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration for surviving patients was 101.1 months (range, 20-134 months). Biochemical failure with (in 2 patients) or without (in 10 patients) clinically evident disease relapse was noted in 12 patients (20%). Four additional patients (7%) had clinical relapse without biochemical failure. Local recurrences were observed in 6 patients (10%), and this clinical impression was confirmed by biopsy in 4 patients. Thirteen patients (22%) died of causes related to prostate cancer. The biochemical relapse-free, clinical disease-free, overall, and cause-specific survival rates at 5 years were 82%, 84%, 76%, and 80%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This observational case series of patients treated with the combination of external-beam radiation therapy and permanent androgen ablation for pathologic stage IV prostate cancer suggests that the addition of androgen deprivation therapy to radiation therapy may improve disease outcome. In the absence of randomized trial results, these observations may be beneficial in clinical decision making.

Neoadjuvant androgen ablation in localized carcinoma of the prostate

BACKGROUND

An increased awareness of prostate cancer has led to a rise in the detection of this disease at a clinically localized stage at presentation. This article discusses the role of neoadjuvant hormonal ablation at this earlier stage to decrease tumor bulk and thus enhance survival.

METHODS

Outcomes from each primary modality for localized treatment of prostate cancer with and without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAAD) are reviewed.

RESULTS

Survival benefit using NAAD has not yet been demonstrated from prostatectomy. Long-term hormonal deprivation provides an improved time to progression and has decreased distant metastatic and biochemical failure for poor-risk patients undergoing external-beam radiation. The toxicities of brachytherapy can be decreased with NAAD.

CONCLUSIONS

NAAD with radical prostatectomy is considered to be investigational. The duration of NAAD needs to be delineated for poor-prognosis patients who are treated with external-beam radiation therapy, but the approach improves the local toxicity of brachytherapy.

Effects of androgen deprivation on prostatic morphology and vascular permeability evaluated with mr imaging

PURPOSE

To assess magnetic resonance (MR) measures of vascular permeability of prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation and to correlate these with morphologic appearances and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MR examinations in 56 consecutive patients with prostate cancer were performed before and after luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog treatment. T2-weighted and contrast medium-enhanced T1-weighted MR images were obtained. Pre- and posttreatment comparisons of morphologic features, glandular volume, and enhancement-related parameters (capillary permeability, leakage space, gadolinium accumulation) were made.

RESULTS

Fifty-five tumors were seen before treatment; 42, after treatment. Signal intensity in the peripheral zone and seminal vesicles decreased on T2-weighted images in 42 (75%) and 25 (45%) patients, respectively. Median volume in tumor decreased by 65% (95% CI: 55%, 76%); in central gland, by 30% (95% CI: 25%, 35%). Reductions in tumor permeability (P <.001) and changes in washout patterns were observed (P <.001). Tumor permeability reductions coincided with a decrease in serum PSA levels in 91% of patients. A weak correlation between tumor permeability and volume change was seen (r = 0.55, P =.04). Reductions in peripheral zone (P <.001) and central gland (P =.009) permeability were noted.

CONCLUSION

Androgen deprivation decreases tumor volume and vascular permeability and impairs detection of prostate cancers. Use of MR estimates of permeability may be an additional way of assessing prostatic tumor response to antiandrogen treatment.

Effect of complete androgen blockade on pathologic stage and resection margin status of prostate cancer: progress pathology report of the Italian PROSIT study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the pathologic stage and surgical margin status in patients undergoing either immediate radical prostatectomy or surgery preceded by 3 or 6 months of neoadjuvant hormonal treatment (NHT) in a prospective, randomized study.

METHODS

Four hundred thirty-one men with prostate cancer were enrolled in the Italian randomized prospective PROSIT study. The whole-mount sectioning technique was used. By May 1999, the reviewing pathologist had evaluated 303 specimens. One hundred seven patients were untreated before radical prostatectomy was performed, and 114 and 82 patients had been treated for 3 and 6 months, respectively, with complete androgen blockade.

RESULTS

Pathologic organ-confined disease was found in 63.1% of patients with clinical Stage B disease treated with 6 months of NHT versus 61.0% after 3 months of NHT and 37.5% after immediate surgery. Among patients with clinical Stage C tumors, pathologic staging found organ-confined disease in 62.5%, 32.1%, and 11.1% of patients after 6 months of NHT, 3 months of NHT, and immediate surgery, respectively. Three months of NHT produced a significant increase in negative margins both in patients with clinical Stage B and C disease, but the addition of another 3 months of treatment did not significantly improve this result. A lower degree of benefit was observed in patients with clinical Stage C tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that complete androgen blockade before surgery is beneficial in men with clinical Stage B disease. The effects are more pronounced after 6 months of NHT than after 3 months.

Prediction of organ-confined disease by prostate-specific antigen nadir after neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

It is not clear whether or not serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy (neoadjuvant therapy) have any value in the prediction of the final pathologic stage.

METHODS

We conducted a study on 49 patients who underwent retropubic radical prostatectomy following neoadjuvant therapy for clinical stage T1c, T2, and T3a prostate cancer. We evaluated progression-free survival based on the PSA failure rate and the predictive value of the PSA nadir after neoadjuvant therapy and other clinical factors to determine the most important predictor of organ confinement.

RESULTS

Of the 49 patients, 30 had organ-confined disease. Of 31 patients without adjuvant therapy after surgery, the PSA failure-free rates at 2 years were 81.6 and 34.3% in the subset of organ-confined disease and non-organ-confined disease, respectively (P= 0.0031). Of the 18 patients with adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy after surgery, the PSA failure-free rate at 2 years was 100% and 59.7% in patients with organ-confined disease and non-organ-confined disease, respectively. Baseline PSA (P=0.037), PSA nadir (P<0.0001) and PSA density (P=0.003) significantly correlated with organ confinement. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the PSA nadir was the only independent predictor of organ confinement (P = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a trend that the patients with non organ-confined disease had a higher probability of PSA failure than did the patients with organ-confined disease. The PSA nadir after neoadjuvant therapy was the strongest predictor of organ confinement. The predictive value of the serum PSA nadir should be validated in well-designed larger population-based studies.

[Predictive factors of locally advanced disease in patients with prostatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant hormone therapy and radical prostatectomy]

AIM

To analyze the predictors of local adverse pathological findings (positive surgical margins and seminal involvement) in prostate cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonotherapy and radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied seventy-eight patients treated with neoadjuvant androgen blockade prior to radical prostatectomy between 1995 and 1998. Age, PSA, prostate volume determined by transrectal ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging, clinical stage, Gleason score, duration of blockade, pathological stage and tumoral volume were analyzed.

RESULTS

34.6% of patients (27/78) had adverse pathology (odds: 0.53). No significant differences were found in age, PSA, prostate volume, duration of blockade and Gleason score between organ-confined and locally advanced patients. Differences were found in tumor volume (p = 0.0001) but this was not different in order to positive or negative digital rectal examination (p = 0.5334). The efficacy for predicting pathological adverse findings was represented by ROC curves (PSA: 0.628, clinical stage: 0.612 and Gleason score: 0.545). Predictive table of extracapsular disease for different PSA levels, clinical stage and Gleason score were developed. No variable predicted positive margins in logistic regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical variables do not predict locally advanced disease in prostate cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant androgen blockade. This is associated with higher tumor volumes. The probability of positive margins or seminal involvement increases with PSA level and Gleason score.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy and risk of prostate specific antigen failure

PURPOSE

To date there is little information on the long-term effect of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on prostate cancer progression. We performed a prospective study to determine whether patients with prostate cancer receiving neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy (hormonal therapy group) have a lower risk of prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure than those treated with radical prostatectomy alone (prostatectomy group). We also evaluated whether type of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and duration were associated with the risk of PSA failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We followed 680 men initially treated for prostate cancer with radical prostatectomy between January 1988 and December 1997 at our university hospital. Of the patients 292 received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Median followup was 38 months. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and PSA failure (greater than 0.3 ng./ml.) controlling for age, clinical stage, grade, initial PSA and adjuvant therapies.

RESULTS

Surgical margins were positive less often in the hormonal therapy (25%) than the prostatectomy (47%) group (p = 0.0001). PSA failure was observed in 163 patients and the 5-year failure rate was 33%. No difference in risk of PSA failure was observed overall between the hormonal therapy and prostatectomy groups (hazards ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.30). Treatments with antiandrogen alone for any duration, and those combining antiandrogen and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue for 3 months or less were not associated with improved survival. However, patients receiving combined therapy for more than 3 months had a significantly lower risk of PSA failure than those treated with radical prostatectomy alone (hazards ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged neoadjuvant hormonal therapy combining antiandrogen and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue may improve disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy.

Assessment of relative tumor burden in patients with clinical T1c prostate cancer treated with either external beam or radical prostatectomy

The choice between external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or retropubic radical prostatectomy (RPX) as potentially curative treatment for localized carcinoma of the prostate gland (CaP) has not been delineated in randomized studies. Both treatments are more effective if tumor burden is low. We sought to compare these two treatments in patients who had clinical stage T1c (cT1c) lesions and who were thought to have limited tumor burdens pretreatment. Sixty cT1c patients referred to the Department of Radiation Oncology received 66 Gy in 33 sessions of EBRT to localized prostate ports and 59 cT1c patients had RPX. No neoadjuvant nor early adjuvant therapies were prescribed. Radiotherapy success was defined biochemically as a nonrising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of +/- 1.5 ng/ml. RPX success required a postoperative PSA that was undetectable (PSA <0.2 ng/ml by the Hybritech or Abbott IMx technics). Analysis for nonrising posttreatment PSA levels was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Mantel-Haenszel methods were used to determine odds ratios for treatment groups adjusting for potential confounders. We ultimately assessed the relative tumor burden by histologic examination of the RPX specimens. The two treatment groups, although not randomized, were statistically similar in biopsy Gleason Scores, transrectal ultrasonography calculated gland volumes, number of positive biopsy cores, and estimated amount of cancer identified on initial biopsies. Pathologic stage T3 was identified in 25% of RPX patients. Fifty to 60% of RPX specimens histologically had substantial tumor burden and by inference also the EBRT patients. At a median follow-up (F/U) of 36 months, 76% of RPX patients maintained an undetectable PSA, whereas 62% of EBRT patients had a PSA < 1.5 ng/ml at a median F/U of 29 months. The pretreatment PSA values significantly affected EBRT patients' risk of a rising posttreatment PSA level. Twenty-four months after treatment, RPX patients were 3.7 times more likely to maintain a nonrising PSA level (RPX patients posttreatment PSA < 0.2 ng/ml), than EBRT patients (posttreatment PSA < or = 1.5 ng/ml) (p = 0.006). Sixty-six gray in 33 sessions to localized EBRT ports is not sufficiently aggressive therapy for one third or more of patients with cT1c CaP. RPX alone is insufficient therapy for one fourth of cT1c patients. Analysis of the RPX specimens showed that many cT1c tumors have a significant tumor burden. Selection methodologies to separate out patients who require more than conventional dose or type of radiotherapy or more than RPX as monotherapy are needed. Pretreatment PSA and number of positive biopsies may assist this selection process.

Long-term results of a randomized trial for the treatment of Stages B2 and C prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiation therapy with a common endocrine therapy in both modalities

OBJECTIVES

To improve the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer (Stages B2 and C), a prospective randomized trial was conducted to compare radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy with the combination of endocrine therapy in both modalities.

METHODS

One hundred patients were enrolled and 95 were evaluated. Forty-six patients underwent radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection, and 49 were treated with radiation by linear accelerator with 40 to 50 Gy to the whole pelvis and a 20-Gy boost to the prostatic area. For all patients, endocrine therapy was initiated 8 weeks before surgery or radiation, and continued thereafter. The living patients were asked to respond to a quality-of-life questionnaire.

RESULTS

The follow-up period ranged from 6.0 to 94.4 months (median 58.5). The progression-free and cause-specific survival rates at 5 years were 90.5% and 96.6% in the surgery group and 81.2% and 84.6% in the radiation group, respectively. The surgery group had better progression-free and cause-specific survival rates (P = 0.044 and 0.024, respectively). More patients in the surgery group complained of urinary incontinence. The questionnaire revealed that quality of life was less disturbed in the radiation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical prostatectomy combined with endocrine therapy may contribute to the survival benefit of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. External beam radiotherapy in combination with endocrine therapy can be used in selected patients because of its low morbidity.

Effect of total androgen ablation on pathologic stage and resection limit status of prostate cancer. Initial results of the Italian PROSIT study

The likelihood of finding organ-confined untreated prostate cancer (PCa) by pathological examination at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) is only 50% in patients with clinically organ-confined disease. In addition, tumour is present at the resection margin in approximately 30% of clinical T2 (clinical stage B) cases. The issue of clinical "understaging" and of resection limit positivity have led to the development of novel management practices, including "neoadjuvant" hormonal therapy (NHT). The optimal duration of NHT is unknown. We undertook the present analysis to evaluate the effect of NHT on pathologic stage of PCa and resection limit status in patients with prostate cancer and treated with total androgen ablation either for three or six months before RP. Between January 1996 and February 1998, 259 men with prostate cancer underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic node dissection in the 26 centres participating in the Italian randomised prospective PROSIT study. Whole mount sectioning of the complete RP specimens was adopted in each centre for accurately evaluating the pathologic stage and resection limit status. By February 1998, haematoxylin and eosin stained sections from 155 RP specimens had been received and evaluated by the reviewing pathologist (RM). 64 cases had not been treated with total androgen ablation (e.g. NHT) before RP was performed, whereas 58 and 33 had been treated for three and six months, respectively. 114 patients were clinical stage B whereas 41 were clinical stage C. After three months of total androgen ablation, pathological stage B was more prevalent among patients with clinical B tumours, compared with untreated patients (57% in treated patients vs. 36% in untreated). The percentage of cancers with negative margins was statistically significantly greater in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy than those treated with immediate surgery alone (69% vs. 42%, respectively). After six months of NHT therapy the proportion of patients with pathological stage B (67% vs. 36%, respectively) and negative margins was greater than after 3 months (92% vs. 42%, respectively). For clinical C tumours, the prevalence of pathological stage B and negative margins in the patients treated for either 3 or 6 months was not as high as in the clinical B tumours, when compared with the untreated group (pathological stage B: 31% and 33% vs. 6% in the clinical C cases, respectively. Negative margins: 56% and 67% vs. 31%, respectively). The initial results of this study suggest that total androgen ablation before RP is beneficial in men with clinical stage B because of the significant pathological downstaging and decrease in the number of positive margins in the RP specimens. These two effects are more pronounced after six months of NHT than after three months of therapy. The same degree of beneficial effects are not observed in clinical C tumours.

Early results of radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy for prostate cancer with or without preoperative androgen deprivation. The Prostate Cancer Study Group

BACKGROUND

The effects of preoperative androgen deprivation were explored in the patients who received radical prostatectomy and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS

Stage A2, B or C prostate cancers were randomized to one of two groups: (i) group I (n=90), who received androgen deprivation (leuploride and chlormadinone acetate) for 3 months preoperatively followed by radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy (leuploride only); and (ii) group II (n=86), who underwent the surgery followed by 3 month androgen deprivation and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy. The effects of preoperative androgen deprivation on clinical relapse (serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) > 1.98 ng/mL, local recurrence or distant metastasis) and PSA relapse (PSA >0.2ng/mL) were evaluated at 2 years after randomization.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in clinical or PSA relapse-free survival and quality of life measures between the two groups, although relapses occurred significantly more frequently in patients who had more advanced stages, higher pretreatment PSA values or lower histologic differentiation in either group. Subgroup analysis indicated that clinical relapse-free survival in stage C cancer tended to be better in patients with preoperative androgen deprivation than in those patients without it (P< 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative androgen deprivation may be beneficial for stage C prostate cancer patients receiving radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy over the 2 year observation period. A longer follow up is needed to clarify the exact extent of benefit in terms of survival and quality of life.