1
|
Nowicka-Matus K, Friborg J, Hansen C, Bernsdorf M, Elstrøm U, Farhadi M, Grau C, Eriksen J, Johansen J, Nielsen M, Holm A, Samsøe E, Sibolt P, Smulders B, Jensen K. Acute toxicities in proton therapy for head and neck cancer - A matched analysis of the DAHANCA 35 feasibility study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 48:100835. [PMID: 39189000 PMCID: PMC11345689 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose As preparation for a national randomized study comparing proton radiotherapy to photon radiotherapy, DAHANCA 35, we performed a non-randomized pilot study to investigate patient selection, logistics, planning, and treatment delivery. With the present study, as a comprehensive safety analysis, we want to compare toxicity during and up to two months after therapy to a historically matched group of patients treated with photon radiotherapy. Materials and methods 62 patients treated with protons were matched to 124 patients who received photon treatment outside a protocol. Available data were retrieved from the DAHANCA database. Patients were matched on treatment centre, concurrent chemotherapy, tumour site, stage, p16 status for oropharynx cancers. Selection of patients for proton therapy was based on comparative treatment plans with a NTCP reduction for dysphagia and xerostomia at six months. Results Baseline characteristics between groups were well balanced, except for the type of drug used concurrently; more photon patients received Carboplatin (21.2 % vs 5.8 %, p = 0.01). Proton therapy was associated with significantly less weight loss at the end of treatment, mean weight loss of 3 % for protons and 5 % for photons (p < 0.001). There were more grade 3 skin reactions and grade 3 mucositis after proton treatment compared with photons at the end of treatment, Risk Ratio (RR) 1.9 (95 % CI: 1.01-3.5, p = 0.04) and RR 1.5 (95 % CI: 1.3-1.7, p < 0.001), respectively. All differences resolved at follow up two months after treatment. There were no significant differences between groups on opioid use, use of feeding tubes, or hospitalization during the observation period. Conclusion Proton treatment resulted in excess objective mucositis and dermatitis, which was transient and did not seem to negatively influence weight or treatment compliance and intensity. Selection bias was likely especially since NTCP models were used for selection of proton treatment and photon treated patients were matched manually. We are currently including patients in a randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Nowicka-Matus
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Dept of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - J. Friborg
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Dept of Oncology, Rigshospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - C.R. Hansen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - M. Bernsdorf
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Dept of Oncology, Rigshospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - U.V. Elstrøm
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - M. Farhadi
- Dept of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - C. Grau
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Dept of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - J.G. Eriksen
- Dept of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Dept of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - J. Johansen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Dept of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - M.S. Nielsen
- Dept of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - A. Holm
- Dept of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - E. Samsøe
- Dept of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - P. Sibolt
- Dept of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - B. Smulders
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Dept of Oncology, Rigshospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - K. Jensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Margalit DN, Anker CJ, Aristophanous M, Awan M, Bajaj GK, Bradfield L, Califano J, Caudell JJ, Chapman CH, Garden AS, Harari PM, Helms A, Lin A, Maghami E, Mehra R, Parker L, Shnayder Y, Spencer S, Swiecicki PL, Tsai JC, Sher DJ. Radiation Therapy for HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:398-425. [PMID: 39078350 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is a distinct disease from other head and neck tumors. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on the critical decisions in its curative treatment, including both definitive and postoperative radiation therapy (RT) management. METHODS ASTRO convened a task force to address 5 key questions on the use of RT for management of HPV-associated OPSCC. These questions included indications for definitive and postoperative RT and chemoradiation; dose-fractionation regimens and treatment volumes; preferred RT techniques and normal tissue considerations; and posttreatment management decisions. The task force did not address indications for primary surgery versus RT. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS Concurrent cisplatin is recommended for patients receiving definitive RT with T3-4 disease and/or 1 node >3 cm, or multiple nodes. For similar patients who are ineligible for cisplatin, concurrent cetuximab, carboplatin/5-fluorouracil, or taxane-based systemic therapy are conditionally recommended. In the postoperative setting, RT with concurrent cisplatin (either schedule) is recommended for positive surgical margins or extranodal extension. Postoperative RT alone is recommended for pT3-4 disease, >2 nodes, or a single node >3 cm. Observation is conditionally recommended for pT1-2 disease and a single node ≤3 cm without other risk factors. For patients treated with definitive RT with concurrent systemic therapy, 7000 cGy in 33 to 35 fractions is recommended, and for patients receiving postoperative RT without positive surgical margins and extranodal extension, 5600 to 6000 cGy is recommended. For all patients receiving RT, intensity modulated RT over 3-dimensional techniques with reduction in dose to critical organs at risk (including salivary and swallowing structures) is recommended. Reassessment with positron emission tomography-computed tomography is recommended approximately 3 months after definitive RT/chemoradiation, and neck dissection is recommended for convincing evidence of residual disease; for equivocal positron emission tomography-computed tomography findings, either neck dissection or repeat imaging is recommended. CONCLUSIONS The role and practice of RT continues to evolve for HPV-associated OPSCC, and these guidelines inform best clinical practice based on the available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle N Margalit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's/Dana-Farber Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Christopher J Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Michalis Aristophanous
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Musaddiq Awan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Gopal K Bajaj
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Joseph Califano
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, California
| | - Jimmy J Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Christina H Chapman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul M Harari
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Amanda Helms
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Alexander Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ellie Maghami
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Ranee Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Maryland Medical School and Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Yelizaveta Shnayder
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Sharon Spencer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Paul L Swiecicki
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - David J Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kumar W, Yadav V, Kaur J, Gupta R, Agrawal A, Suri K, Mishra A, Dhameliya A. Concomitant Boost With Six Fractions of Radiation a Week in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study. Cureus 2024; 16:e67916. [PMID: 39328631 PMCID: PMC11425766 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Radiation therapy plays a significant role in the radical treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancers. Studies have shown the radiobiological advantage of accelerated chemoradiation over conventional chemoradiation as it reduces the chances of accelerated repopulation and decreases overall treatment time. This study aimed to assess the response and toxicities of accelerated concomitant chemoradiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. Methods A total of 51 patients were enrolled and treated with accelerated concomitant chemoradiation, receiving one fraction of radiation per day, six fractions per week, with the sixth fraction as a boost on Saturdays, with weekly concurrent cisplatin at 40 mg/m2. Patients were followed up till six months after treatment completion. Radiological investigation was done to assess response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.128, and acute toxicities were assessed according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Results The median follow-up period was six months; 28 patients (62.22%) had a complete response and 17 (37.78%) had a partial response at six months post-completion of the treatment. The maximum acute toxicities developed at the completion of treatment. Grade III and IV mucositis developed in 14 patients (31.11%) and grade III dermatitis developed in one patient (2.22%), without any grade IV dermatitis during the total duration of treatment. The toxicities were manageable, and most of them resolved after three months of treatment completion. Conclusions Accelerated concomitant chemoradiation with six fractions of radiation in a week led to a decrease in overall treatment time. Of note, 62.22% of patients had complete remission, with manageable acute mucositis and dermatitis, which resolved in 82% and 67%, respectively within three months of treatment completion. However, further studies involving larger samples and longer follow-ups are needed for this regimen to be established as the standard of care in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winsome Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND
| | - Vikas Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND
| | - Jaspreet Kaur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND
| | - Ratika Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND
| | - Anu Agrawal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND
| | - Kapil Suri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND
| | - Akhilesh Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND
| | - Ankit Dhameliya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kiș AM, Buzatu R, Chisavu L, Poenaru M, Borza C, Iftode A, Sarau OS, Dehelean CA, Ardelean S. Time-to-Treatment Delays and Their Prognostic Implications in Pharyngeal Cancer-An Exploratory Analysis in Western Romania. Clin Pract 2024; 14:1270-1284. [PMID: 39051297 PMCID: PMC11270176 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14040103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 06/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosis and treatment for pharyngeal cancer are decisive in determining prognosis. Diagnosis delays are frequent, representing a significant cause of avoidable mortality, and an important factor in subpar survival across the continuous HNC care delivery. METHODS The present study represents a retrospective analysis of medical records from Western Romania, which included 180 patients, to evaluate the impact of time-to-treatment delay on patients diagnosed with pharyngeal cancer. The data analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method R (version 3.6.3) packages, including tidyverse, final-fit, mcgv, survival, stringdist, janitor, and Hmisc. RESULTS The mean days from diagnosis until the end of treatment were higher for the nasopharynx group. Cox regression analysis regarding diagnosis to treatment duration categories showed an increased risk mortality by 3.11 times (95%CI: 1.51-6.41, p = 0.0021) with a Harrell's C-index of 0.638 (95%CI: 0.552-0.723). The hypopharynx and oropharynx locations increased risk mortality by 4.59 (95%CI: 1.55-13.55) and 5.49 times (95%CI: 1.79-16.81) compared to the nasopharynx location. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study led to the conclusion that it seems there is a trend of mortality risk for oropharynx and hypopharynx cancers due to delays in the time to treatment over 70 days, standing as a basis for further research as there is an imperative need for prospective multicenter studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreea Mihaela Kiș
- Faculty of Pharmacy, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania; (A.M.K.); (A.I.); (C.A.D.)
- Research Center for Pharmaco-Toxicological Evaluations, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Roxana Buzatu
- Department of Dental Aesthetics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Lazar Chisavu
- Department of Nephrology, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania;
| | - Marioara Poenaru
- Department of ENT, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania;
| | - Claudia Borza
- Department of Functional Sciences–Pathophysiology, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania;
- Centre for Translational Research and Systems Medicine, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Andrada Iftode
- Faculty of Pharmacy, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania; (A.M.K.); (A.I.); (C.A.D.)
- Research Center for Pharmaco-Toxicological Evaluations, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Oana Silvana Sarau
- Department of Hematology, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania;
| | - Cristina Adriana Dehelean
- Faculty of Pharmacy, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timișoara, Romania; (A.M.K.); (A.I.); (C.A.D.)
- Research Center for Pharmaco-Toxicological Evaluations, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Simona Ardelean
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Vasile Goldiș” Western University, 86 Liviu Rebreanu, 310045 Arad, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huynh TTM, Falk RS, Hellebust TP, Dale E, Astrup GL, Hjermstad MJ, Malinen E, Bjordal K, Kiserud CE, Herlofson BB, Nome R, Amdal CD. Chronic fatigue in long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110231. [PMID: 38518958 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is lack of evidence on chronic fatigue (CF) following radiotherapy (RT) in survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC). We aimed to compare CF in HNC survivors > 5 years post-RT with a reference population and investigate factors associated with CF and the possible impact of CF on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). MATERIAL AND METHODS In this cross-sectional study we included HNC survivors treated in 2007-2013. Participants filled in patient-reported outcome measures and attended a one-day examination. CF was measured with the Fatigue Questionnaire and compared with a matched reference population using t-tests and Cohen's effect size. Associations between CF, clinical and RT-related factors were investigated using logistic regression. HRQoL was measured with the EORTC Quality of Life core questionnaire. RESULTS The median age of the 227 HNC survivors was 65 years and median time to follow-up was 8.5 years post-RT. CF was twice more prevalent in HNC survivors compared to a reference population. In multivariable analyses, female sex (OR 3.39, 95 % CI 1.82-6.31), comorbidity (OR 2.17, 95 % CI 1.20-3.94) and treatment with intensity-modulated RT (OR 2.13, 95 % CI 1.16-3.91) were associated with CF, while RT dose parameters were not. Survivors with CF compared to those without, had significantly worse HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS CF in HNC survivors is particularly important for female patients, while specific factors associated with RT appear not to play a role. The high CF prevalence in long-term HNC survivors associated with impaired HRQoL is important information beneficial for clinicians and patients to improve patient follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuy-Tien Maria Huynh
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | | | - Taran Paulsen Hellebust
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Einar Dale
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin Bjordal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Bente Brokstad Herlofson
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild Nome
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Delphin Amdal
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lorini L, Bossi P, Psyrri A, Bonomo P. Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) driven oropharyngeal cancer in current or previous heavy smokers: should we look for a different treatment paradigm? Front Oncol 2024; 14:1383019. [PMID: 38651143 PMCID: PMC11033308 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1383019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Human papillomavirus Virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has increased in incidence in recent decades and represents a heterogeneous disease entity in the context of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC), in terms of disease prognosis. Treatment of locoregionally advanced OSCC is mainly based on concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Given the younger age of patients, if compared with HPV-negative counterparts, and the high cure rates, the acute- and long-term toxicity in survivors represents a field of interest. However, patient selection for de-escalation trials remains a major challenge due to the lack of robust validated prognostic indicators within the HPV-associated OSCC. Discussion The impact of smoking status on HPV-associated OSCC prognosis has been demonstrated in the majority of studies. However, the magnitude of the association is unclear due to variability in smoking metrics and study outcomes. Smoking status has been identified as a potential confounding factor in HPV-positive de-escalation trials. Smokers with HPV-positive OSCC have a worse prognosis in most studies than non-smokers and may require different and more aggressive therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Lorini
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Amanda Psyrri
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2(nd) Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Haidari, Athens, Greece
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen HMN, Anzela A, Hetherington E, Buddle N, Vignarajah D, Hogan D, Fowler A, Forstner D, Chua B, Gowda R, Min M. A proposed framework for the implementation of head and neck cancer treatment at a new cancer center from a radiation oncology perspective. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2024; 20:168-179. [PMID: 37186498 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Establishing a new head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment center requires multidisciplinary team management and expertise. To our knowledge, there are no clear recommendations or guidelines in the literature for the commencement of HNC radiation therapy (RT) at a new cancer center. We propose a novel framework outlining the necessary components required to set-up a new radiation therapy HNC treatment. METHODS We reviewed the infrastructure and methodology in the commencement of HNC radiation therapy in our cancer care center and invited several external, experienced metropolitan head and neck radiation oncologists to develop a novel consensus guideline that may be used by new RT centers to treat HNC. Recommendations were presented to our internal and external staff specialists using a survey questionnaire with ratings utilized to determine consensus using pre-defined thresholds as per the American Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines Methodology Manual. CONCLUSION This consensus recommendation aims to improve RT utilization whilst advocating for optimal patient outcomes by presenting a framework for new radiation therapy centers ready to step up and manage the treatment of head and neck cancer patients. We propose these evidence-based consensus guidelines endorsed by external HNC radiation oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hon Ming N Chen
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Anzela Anzela
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, Australia
| | - Ebony Hetherington
- Adem Crosby Cancer Centre, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Australia
| | - Nicole Buddle
- Adem Crosby Cancer Centre, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Australia
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Dinesh Vignarajah
- Adem Crosby Cancer Centre, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Australia
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David Hogan
- Adem Crosby Cancer Centre, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Australia
| | - Allan Fowler
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Dion Forstner
- GenesisCare, St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Benjamin Chua
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Raghu Gowda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Myo Min
- Adem Crosby Cancer Centre, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Australia
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Health, University of Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Arora C, Sharma N, Kapoor A, Pandya TN. A comparative study of the treatment outcome of moderately accelerated radiation fractionation (with concurrent chemotherapy in daily dosing) to conventional chemo-radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancers: Supportive in a resource constrained environment. Indian J Cancer 2024; 61:262-272. [PMID: 38090961 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_155_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 09/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In our country, head and neck cancers account for about a third of all cancers. Moreover, the patients typically present in advanced stages, which entails intensive multimodality therapy; but there is not much scope for improved survival outcomes. In view of this, a study was conducted to know the effects of treatment intensification, wherein moderately accelerated fractionation radiotherapy was given to patients presenting with advanced cancer of head and neck. This treatment was further intensified by accompanying radiation with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy in daily doses. The control arm received the current standard therapy of conventional fractionation radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin chemotherapy. METHODS The primary objective of the study was to determine the prospect of tumor control (TC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). The secondary objective was to study acute toxicity and late toxicity of the highest grade in both treatment groups. The study was conducted on a total of 60 patients who presented with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The 30 patients in the control group received conventional fractionated radiotherapy (five fractions per week) with weekly cisplatin chemotherapy (40 mg/m 2 ), whereas the remaining 30 in the study group received moderately accelerated radiotherapy (six fractions per week with same treatment field) along with daily cisplatin chemotherapy (6 mg/m 2 ) with a reduction in treatment time by 1 week. RESULTS The overall response to therapy assessed as TC, DFS, and OS was compared, and no statistically significant difference between the two treatment arms was observed. However, the mean overall treatment time was reduced in the study group to 45 days as compared with 49 days in the control group ( P = 0.001). The acute toxicities of xerostomia ( P = 0.057) and skin ( P = 0.052) and late toxicity of aspiration/laryngeal toxicity ( P = 0.002) were higher in grade and number in the study group with accelerated fractionation. CONCLUSIONS Hence, the study results suggest that it is a feasible option to combine the therapeutic benefits of accelerated fractionation radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. There is a significant decrease in the overall treatment time and a considerable reduction in the load on the resource-constrained healthcare system. It would be equitable to point out that higher grade of few toxicities in the acceleration arm are likely due to doses to organs at risk being intensified with accelerated fractionation, which can now be delivered in a controlled manner with the latest high precision techniques, resulting in improved toxicity profile and quality of life which is the way forward for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chhavi Arora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Army Hospital R and R, New Delhi, India
| | - Neelam Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Army Hospital R and R, New Delhi, India
- Commanding Officer, Military Hospital Abohar, Punjab, India
| | - Amul Kapoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Army Hospital R and R, New Delhi, India
- Commandant Military Hospital Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Tejas N Pandya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Army Hospital R and R, New Delhi, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Command Hospital (Eastern Command), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Malik NH, Fu R, Hainc N, Noel CW, de Almeida JR, Hosni A, Huang SH, Yu E, Dzioba A, Leung A, Mangat A, MacNeil D, Nichols AC, Hiremath SB, Chakraborty S, Jooya A, Gaudet M, Johnson-Obaseki S, Whelan J, Forghani R, Hier MP, Morand G, Sultanem K, Dort J, Lysack J, Matthews W, Nakoneshny S, Gill G, Globerman A, Kerr P, Maralani P, Karam I, Eskander A. Tumor volumes in T3 supraglottic cancers treated with radiotherapy in the modern era: A study of the Canadian Head & Neck Collaborative Research Initiative. Head Neck 2024; 46:561-570. [PMID: 38116716 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the association of primary tumor volume (TV) with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in T3 N0-3M0 supraglottic cancers treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study involving 239 patients diagnosed with T3 N0-3M0 supraglottic cancers between 2002 and 2018 from seven regional cancer centers in Canada. Clinical data were obtained from the patient records. Supraglottic TV was measured by neuroradiologists on diagnostic imaging. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival probabilities, and a restricted cubic spline Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to analyze TV associations with OS and DFS. RESULTS Mean (SD) of participants was 65.2 (9.4) years; 176 (73.6%) participants were male. 90 (38%) were N0, and 151 (64%) received concurrent systemic therapy. Mean TV (SD) was 11.37 (12.11) cm3 . With mean follow up (SD) of 3.28 (2.60) years, 2-year OS was 72.7% (95% CI 66.9%-78.9%) and DFS was 53.6% (47.4%-60.6%). Increasing TV was associated (per cm3 increase) with worse OS (HR, 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, p < 0.01) and DFS (HR, 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Increasing primary tumor volume is associated with worse OS and DFS in T3 supraglottic cancers treated with IMRT, with no clear threshold. The findings suggest that patients with larger tumors and poor baseline laryngeal function may benefit from upfront laryngectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nauman H Malik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rui Fu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicolin Hainc
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher W Noel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John R de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ali Hosni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shao Hui Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eugene Yu
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Agnieszka Dzioba
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Leung
- Department of Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arvindpaul Mangat
- Department of Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle MacNeil
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony C Nichols
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shivaprakash B Hiremath
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Santanu Chakraborty
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alborz Jooya
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc Gaudet
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan Whelan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Reza Forghani
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael P Hier
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Grégoire Morand
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Khalil Sultanem
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Joseph Dort
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - John Lysack
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Wayne Matthews
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven Nakoneshny
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gia Gill
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Adam Globerman
- Department of Radiology, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Paul Kerr
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Pejman Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Irene Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Antoine Eskander
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Salama V, Humbert-Vidan L, Godinich B, Wahid KA, ElHabashy DM, Naser MA, He R, Mohamed ASR, Sahli AJ, Hutcheson KA, Gunn GB, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Moreno AC. Comparison of Machine Leaning Models for Prediction of Acute Pain Severity and On-Treatment Opioid Utilization in Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy: Exploratory Analysis from a Large-Scale Retrospective Cohort. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.02.06.24302341. [PMID: 38370746 PMCID: PMC10871386 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.06.24302341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Background Acute pain is a common and debilitating symptom experienced by oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer (OC/OPC) patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT). Uncontrolled pain can result in opioid overuse and increased risks of long-term opioid dependence. The specific aim of this exploratory analysis was the prediction of severe acute pain and opioid use in the acute on-treatment setting, to develop risk-stratification models for pragmatic clinical trials. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 900 OC/OPC patients treated with RT during 2017 to 2023. Clinical data including demographics, tumor data, pain scores and medication data were extracted from patient records. On-treatment pain intensity scores were assessed using a numeric rating scale (0-none, 10-worst) and total opioid doses were calculated using morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) conversion factors. Analgesics efficacy was assessed based on the combined pain intensity and the total required MEDD. ML models, including Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting Model (GBM) were developed and validated using ten-fold cross-validation. Performance of models were evaluated using discrimination and calibration metrics. Feature importance was investigated using bootstrap and permutation techniques. Results For predicting acute pain intensity, the GBM demonstrated superior area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) (0.71), recall (0.39), and F1 score (0.48). For predicting the total MEDD, LR outperformed other models in the AUC (0.67). For predicting the analgesics efficacy, SVM achieved the highest specificity (0.97), and best calibration (ECE of 0.06), while RF and GBM achieved the same highest AUC, 0.68. RF model emerged as the best calibrated model with ECE of 0.02 for pain intensity prediction and 0.05 for MEDD prediction. Baseline pain scores and vital signs demonstrated the most contributed features for the different predictive models. Conclusion These ML models are promising in predicting end-of-treatment acute pain and opioid requirements and analgesics efficacy in OC/OPC patients undergoing RT. Baseline pain score, vital sign changes were identified as crucial predictors. Implementation of these models in clinical practice could facilitate early risk stratification and personalized pain management. Prospective multicentric studies and external validation are essential for further refinement and generalizability.
Collapse
|
11
|
Naceur A, Bienvenue C, Romano P, Chilian C, Carrier JF. Extending deterministic transport capabilities for very-high and ultra-high energy electron beams. Sci Rep 2024; 14:2796. [PMID: 38307920 PMCID: PMC11226718 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-51143-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Focused Very-High Energy Electron (VHEE, 50-300 MeV) and Ultra-High Energy Electron (UHEE, > 300 MeV) beams can accurately target both large and deeply seated human tumors with high sparing properties, while avoiding the spatial requirements and cost of proton and heavy ion facilities. Advanced testing phases are underway at the CLEAR facilities at CERN (Switzerland), NLCTA at Stanford (USA), and SPARC at INFN (Italy), aiming to accelerate the transition to clinical application. Currently, Monte Carlo (MC) transport is the sole paradigm supporting preclinical trials and imminent clinical deployment. In this paper, we propose an alternative: the first extension of the nuclear-reactor deterministic chain NJOY-DRAGON for VHEE and UHEE applications. We have extended the Boltzmann-Fokker-Planck (BFP) multigroup formalism and validated it using standard radio-oncology benchmarks, complex assemblies with a wide range of atomic numbers, and comprehensive irradiation of the entire periodic table. We report that [Formula: see text] of water voxels exhibit a BFP-MC deviation below [Formula: see text] for electron energies under [Formula: see text]. Additionally, we demonstrate that at least [Formula: see text] of voxels of bone, lung, adipose tissue, muscle, soft tissue, tumor, steel, and aluminum meet the same criterion between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. For water, the thorax, and the breast intra-operative benchmark, typical average BFP-MC deviations of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were observed at [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively. By irradiating the entire periodic table, we observed similar performance between lithium ([Formula: see text]) and cerium ([Formula: see text]). Deficiencies observed between praseodymium ([Formula: see text]) and einsteinium ([Formula: see text]) have been reported, analyzed, and quantified, offering critical insights for the ongoing development of the Evaluated Nuclear Data File mode in NJOY.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Naceur
- École Polytechnique, SLOWPOKE Nuclear Reactor Laboratory, Nuclear Engineering Institute, Montréal, H3T1J4, Canada.
- CRCHUM, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, H2L4M1, Canada.
| | - Charles Bienvenue
- École Polytechnique, Engineering Physics Department, Biomedical Engineering Institute, Montréal, H3T1J4, Canada
| | - Paul Romano
- Computational Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 60439, USA
| | - Cornelia Chilian
- École Polytechnique, SLOWPOKE Nuclear Reactor Laboratory, Nuclear Engineering Institute, Montréal, H3T1J4, Canada
| | - Jean-François Carrier
- Department of Physics, Université de Montréal, Montréal, H3T1J4, Canada
- CRCHUM, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, H2L4M1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Navran A, Al-Mamgani A, Elzinga H, Kessels R, Vens C, Tesselaar M, van den Brekel M, de Haan R, van Triest B, Verheij M. Phase I feasibility study of Olaparib in combination with loco-regional radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 44:100698. [PMID: 38021094 PMCID: PMC10654000 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose PARP-inhibitors have potent radiosensitizing properties in pre-clinical models. To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the PARP-inhibitor Olaparib in combination with radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer, a single institutional phase-I dose escalation trial was initiated. Patients and methods The starting dose of Olaparib was 25 mg BID, combined with radiotherapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions). The MTD was defined as the highest dose-level at which not more than 20 % of patients experience dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) or as the highest reached dose in the absence of DLT's. Results One week Olaparib-only treatment (25 mg QD) was administered to all patients prior to the start of radiotherapy. In dose-level I, Olaparib (25 mg BID) was combined with accelerated radiotherapy (70 Gy in 6 weeks). Because of DLT's in 3 of the 4 treated patients (acute tracheotomy 5 and 7 months and osteoradionecrosis 7 months after treatment), the Olaparib dose was de-escalated to 25 mg QD, and combined with conventional radiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks) (dose-level II). There were no DLT's observed in 5 patients treated within dose-level II. After a median follow-up of 60 months, the 4-year LRC and OS rates were 77.8 % and 88.9 %, respectively. Conclusion Olaparib 25 mg QD combined with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy was well tolerated and identified as the MTD while severe DLT's were observed when Olaparib 25 mg BID was combined with accelerated radiation. This combination might be further explored in future Olaparib dose escalation studies in patients with locally-advanced HNSCC unfit for cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Navran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Abrahim Al-Mamgani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester Elzinga
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob Kessels
- Department of Biomerics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Conchita Vens
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margot Tesselaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel van den Brekel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rosemarie de Haan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Baukelien van Triest
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel Verheij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Limkin E, Blanchard P, Lacas B, Bourhis J, Parmar M, Licitra L, Le QT, Yom SS, Fortpied C, Langendijk J, Vermorken JB, Bernier J, Overgaard J, Harris J, Pignon JP, Auperin A. Season of radiotherapy and outcomes of head & neck cancer patients in the MACH-NC & MARCH meta-analyses. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:110011. [PMID: 37956890 PMCID: PMC11253287 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A single institution retrospective study suggested that head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) during "dark" season (fall/winter) may have better outcomes than those treated during "light" season (spring/summer), possibly secondary to seasonal variations in cell cycle progression. We investigated the impact of season of RT in two large, multi-institutional, prospective datasets of randomized trials. METHODS Individual patient data from the MACH-NC and MARCH meta-analyses were analyzed. Dark season was defined as mid-radiotherapy date during fall or winter and light the reverse, using equinoxes to separate the two periods. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoint was locoregional failure (LRF). The effect of season was estimated with a Cox model stratified by trial and adjusted on sex, tumor site, stage, and treatment. Planned sensitivity analyses were performed on patients treated around solstices, who received "complete radiotherapy", patients treated with concomitant radio-chemotherapy and on trials performed in Northern countries. RESULTS 11320 patients from 33 trials of MARCH and 6276 patients from 29 trials of MACH-NC were included. RT during dark season had no benefit on PFS in the MARCH (hazard ratio[HR]: 1.01 [95%CI 0.97;1.05],p=0.72) or MACH-NC dataset (HR:1.00 [95%CI 0.94;1.06],p=1.0. No difference in LRF was observed in the MARCH (HR:1.00 [95%CI 0.94;1.06,p=0.95) or MACH-NC dataset (HR:0.99 [95%CI 0.91; 1.07],p=0.77). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results. CONCLUSION Season of RT had no impact on PFS or LRF in two large databases of HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Limkin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France; Oncostat U1018 INSERM, Labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France.
| | - Benjamin Lacas
- Oncostat U1018 INSERM, Labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France; CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mahesh Parmar
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Tumori Milan and University of Milan, Italy
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jean-Pierre Pignon
- Oncostat U1018 INSERM, Labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anne Auperin
- Oncostat U1018 INSERM, Labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Heyda A, Księżniak-Baran D, Wygoda A, Składowski K. Low Post-Treatment Quality of Life and the High Incidence of Pain Are Common and Significantly Exacerbated in Depressed Head and Neck Patients Treated with Definitive Accelerated Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:79. [PMID: 38201507 PMCID: PMC10777976 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The goal of this study is to evaluate psychological tolerance and health-related quality of life (QOL) in head and neck (HN) cancer patients treated with definitive accelerated radiotherapy (DART). (2) Methods: 76 recurrence-free patients eligible for the study, who were treated with DART in the CAIR-2 phase III clinical study (median of follow-up = 47 months), completed EORTC QLQ-C30 with the H&N35 module, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Visual-Analog Scales (VAS) of pain in HN and the neck/arm areas. (3) Results: The most dominant symptoms measured with QLQ-C30 were as follows: fatigue (44/100), sleeplessness (39/100), financial problems (38/100) and pain (32/100). Within the H&N35, the highest scores were reported on the subscales of sticky saliva (60/100), mouth dryness (65/100) and increased intake of painkillers (50/100). Pain (VAS) was reported by 87% (HN area) and 78% (shoulder area) of the patients, with a mean score of 3/10. One-third of the patients reported depressive moods (HADS ≥ 15 points) with an average score of 12.5/42 p. The depressed group, who smoked more as compared to the non-depressed group before DART (96% vs. 78%) and required steroids treatment (85% vs. 58%) during DART, also scored significantly worse on 23 of the 35 subscales of QLQ-C30 and H&N35 and experienced more intense pain (VAS). Women and less-advanced patients scored better in several aspects of quality of life. (4) Conclusions: Patients treated with DART struggle with low quality of life and persistent treatment-related symptoms including constant pain. HNC survivors, especially those who are depressed, may require additional psychosocial, rehabilitation and medical intervention programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicja Heyda
- 1st Radiation and Clinical Oncology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Branch, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Adrian G, Gebre-Medhin M, Nilsson P. Importance of tumor volume, overall treatment time and fractionation sensitivity for p16-positive and p16-negative oropharyngeal tumors. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1375-1383. [PMID: 37682690 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2251084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Analyses of clinical outcomes following radiotherapy (RT) have advanced our understanding of fundamental radiobiological characteristics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Low fractionation sensitivity appears to be a common feature, as well as susceptibility to changes in overall treatment time (OTT). Large tumors should be harder to cure if a successful RT requires the sterilization of all clonogenic cells. Congruently, primary tumor volume has proven to be an important parameter. However, most findings come from an era when p16-negative HNSCC was the dominant tumor type. HPV-associated, p16-positive, oropharyngeal tumors (OPSCC) are more radiosensitive and have better outcome. The current study aims to investigate the role of primary tumor volume, OTT and estimate α/ β -ratio for p16-positive OPSCC, and to quantify the differences in radiosensitivity depending on p16-status. METHODS A cohort of 523 patients treated with RT was studied using a tumor control probability (TCP)-model that incorporates primary tumor volume (V) raised to an exponent c, OTT and α/ β -estimation. The significance of V was also investigated in Cox-regression models. RESULTS In the p16-positive cohort (n = 433), the volume exponent c was 1.44 (95%CI 1.06-1.91), compared to 0.90 (0.54-1.32) for p16-negative tumors (n = 90). Hazard ratios per tumor volume doubling were 2.37 (1.72-3.28) and 1.83 (1.28-2.62) for p16-positive and p16-negative, respectively. The estimated α/ β -ratio was 9.7 Gy (-2.3-21.6), and a non-significant daily loss of 0.30 Gy (-0.17-0.92) was found. An additional dose of 6.8 Gy (interquartile range 4.8-9.1) may theoretically counteract the more radioresistant behavior of p16-negative tumors. CONCLUSION Primary tumor volume plays a crucial role in predicting local tumor response, particularly in p16-positive OPSCC. The estimated α/β-ratio for p16-positive oropharyngeal tumors aligns with previous HNSCC studies, whereas the impact of prolonged OTT was slightly less than previously reported. The differences in radiosensitivity depending on p16-status were quantified. The findings should be validated in independent cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Adrian
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maria Gebre-Medhin
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Per Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brunt AM, Haviland JS, Wheatley DA, Sydenham MA, Bloomfield DJ, Chan C, Cleator S, Coles CE, Donovan E, Fleming H, Glynn D, Goodman A, Griffin S, Hopwood P, Kirby AM, Kirwan CC, Nabi Z, Patel J, Sawyer E, Somaiah N, Syndikus I, Venables K, Yarnold JR, Bliss JM. One versus three weeks hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer treatment: the FAST-Forward phase III RCT. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-176. [PMID: 37991196 PMCID: PMC11017153 DOI: 10.3310/wwbf1044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background FAST-Forward aimed to identify a 5-fraction schedule of adjuvant radiotherapy delivered in 1 week that was non-inferior in terms of local cancer control and as safe as the standard 15-fraction regimen after primary surgery for early breast cancer. Published acute toxicity and 5-year results are presented here with other aspects of the trial. Design Multicentre phase III non-inferiority trial. Patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast (pT1-3pN0-1M0) after breast conservation surgery or mastectomy randomised (1 : 1 : 1) to 40 Gy in 15 fractions (3 weeks), 27 Gy or 26 Gy in 5 fractions (1 week) whole breast/chest wall (Main Trial). Primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast tumour relapse; assuming 2% 5-year incidence for 40 Gy, non-inferiority pre-defined as < 1.6% excess for 5-fraction schedules (critical hazard ratio = 1.81). Normal tissue effects were assessed independently by clinicians, patients and photographs. Sub-studies Two acute skin toxicity sub-studies were undertaken to confirm safety of the test schedules. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients with grade ≥ 3 acute breast skin toxicity at any time from the start of radiotherapy to 4 weeks after completion. Nodal Sub-Study patients had breast/chest wall plus axillary radiotherapy testing the same three schedules, reduced to the 40 and 26 Gy groups on amendment, with the primary endpoint of 5-year patient-reported arm/hand swelling. Limitations A sequential hypofractionated or simultaneous integrated boost has not been studied. Participants Ninety-seven UK centres recruited 4096 patients (1361:40 Gy, 1367:27 Gy, 1368:26 Gy) into the Main Trial from November 2011 to June 2014. The Nodal Sub-Study recruited an additional 469 patients from 50 UK centres. One hundred and ninety and 162 Main Trial patients were included in the acute toxicity sub-studies. Results Acute toxicity sub-studies evaluable patients: (1) acute grade 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity reported in 40 Gy/15 fractions 6/44 (13.6%); 27 Gy/5 fractions 5/51 (9.8%); 26 Gy/5 fractions 3/52 (5.8%). (2) Grade 3 common toxicity criteria for adverse effects toxicity reported for one patient. At 71-month median follow-up in the Main Trial, 79 ipsilateral breast tumour relapse events (40 Gy: 31, 27 Gy: 27, 26 Gy: 21); hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) versus 40 Gy were 27 Gy: 0.86 (0.51 to 1.44), 26 Gy: 0.67 (0.38 to 1.16). With 2.1% (1.4 to 3.1) 5-year incidence ipsilateral breast tumour relapse after 40 Gy, estimated absolute differences versus 40 Gy (non-inferiority test) were -0.3% (-1.0-0.9) for 27 Gy (p = 0.0022) and -0.7% (-1.3-0.3) for 26 Gy (p = 0.00019). Five-year prevalence of any clinician-assessed moderate/marked breast normal tissue effects was 40 Gy: 98/986 (9.9%), 27 Gy: 155/1005 (15.4%), 26 Gy: 121/1020 (11.9%). Across all clinician assessments from 1 to 5 years, odds ratios versus 40 Gy were 1.55 (1.32 to 1.83; p < 0.0001) for 27 Gy and 1.12 (0.94-1.34; p = 0.20) for 26 Gy. Patient and photographic assessments showed higher normal tissue effects risk for 27 Gy versus 40 Gy but not for 26 Gy. Nodal Sub-Study reported no arm/hand swelling in 80% and 77% in 40 Gy and 26 Gy at baseline, and 73% and 76% at 24 months. The prevalence of moderate/marked arm/hand swelling at 24 months was 10% versus 7% for 40 Gy compared with 26 Gy. Interpretation Five-year local tumour incidence and normal tissue effects prevalence show 26 Gy in 5 fractions in 1 week is a safe and effective alternative to 40 Gy in 15 fractions for patients prescribed adjuvant local radiotherapy after primary surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Future work Ten-year Main Trial follow-up is essential. Inclusion in hypofractionation meta-analysis ongoing. A future hypofractionated boost trial is strongly supported. Trial registration FAST-Forward was sponsored by The Institute of Cancer Research and was registered as ISRCTN19906132. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 09/01/47) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 25. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Murray Brunt
- School of Medicine, University of Keele and University Hospitals of North Midlands, Staffordshire, UK
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Joanne S Haviland
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Duncan A Wheatley
- Department of Oncology, Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Mark A Sydenham
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - David J Bloomfield
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK
| | - Charlie Chan
- Women's Health Clinic, Nuffield Health Cheltenham Hospital, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Suzy Cleator
- Department of Oncology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Ellen Donovan
- Centre for Vision, Speech and Signal Processing, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Helen Fleming
- Clinical and Translational Radiotherapy Research Group, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
| | - David Glynn
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Susan Griffin
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Penelope Hopwood
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Anna M Kirby
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Cliona C Kirwan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Zohal Nabi
- RTQQA, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, UK
| | - Jaymini Patel
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Elinor Sawyer
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Navita Somaiah
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Isabel Syndikus
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Clatterbridge Hospital NHS Trust, Cheshire, UK
| | | | - John R Yarnold
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK and Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Judith M Bliss
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Balchander D, Shorbaji K, Cabrera CI, Hoying D, Clancy K, Fowler N, Thuener JE, Lavertu P, Pan Q, Teknos TN, Rezaee RP, Li S, Tamaki A. Prognostic significance of time trends in treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol 2023; 44:103966. [PMID: 37481899 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the impact of demographic, clinical, and management variables on time to treatment initiation (TTI) and overall survival (OS). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective chart review. MATERIALS AND METHODS Medical records of patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer from 2018 to 2020 were reviewed. Univariate linear and Cox-regressions identified predictors of TTI and OS. Kaplan Meier (KM) curves assessed the difference in survival by diagnostic year and TTI. RESULTS 381 patients met eligibility criteria. Median TTI was 35.0 days (IQR: 25.0-49.0). Only 10.8 % of all patients reported any treatment delay, with TTI exceeding 90 days found in 3.7 % of patients. TTI increased with African American race (p = 0.02), ED referrals (p = 0.02), and direct admission status (p = 0.01). When compared to treatment with surgery alone, TTI was shorter in patients undergoing surgery with adjuvant radiation (p = 0.02), adjuvant chemoradiation (p = 0.04), and salvage surgery (p = 0.04). Univariate Cox-regressions found smoking (p = 0.01), direct admission status (p = 0.02), increased duration of symptoms (p = 0.02), placement of PEG tubes (p < 0.01) and tracheostomies (p < 0.01), combination treatment (p < 0.01), and surgery with adjuvant chemoradiation treatment (p = 0.01) to increase mortality risk. Disease characteristics, including tumor size (p < 0.01), presence of nodal disease (p = 0.02), and late-stage disease (p < 0.01), increased mortality risk. TTI and diagnostic year did not impact survival. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis determined several demographic, referral, and treatment factors impacted TTI. However, increased TTI did not impact survival. Characteristics consistent with advanced disease worsened OS. Despite the pandemic burden, patients diagnosed in 2020 showed no difference in short-term survival compared to prior years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Khaled Shorbaji
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Claudia I Cabrera
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David Hoying
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kate Clancy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nicole Fowler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jason E Thuener
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pierre Lavertu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Quintin Pan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Theodoros N Teknos
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rod P Rezaee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shawn Li
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Akina Tamaki
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ma X, Liang X, Yao M, Gao Y, Luo Q, Li X, Yu Y, Sun Y, Cheng MHY, Chen J, Zheng G, Shi J, Wang F. Myoglobin-loaded gadolinium nanotexaphyrins for oxygen synergy and imaging-guided radiosensitization therapy. Nat Commun 2023; 14:6187. [PMID: 37794000 PMCID: PMC10550994 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41782-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gadolinium (Gd3+)-coordinated texaphyrin (Gd-Tex) is a promising radiosensitizer that entered clinical trials, but temporarily fails largely due to insufficient radiosensitization efficacy. Little attention has been given to using nanovesicles to improve its efficacy. Herein, Gd-Tex is transformed into building blocks "Gd-Tex-lipids" to self-assemble nanovesicles called Gd-nanotexaphyrins (Gd-NTs), realizing high density packing of Gd-Tex in a single nanovesicle and achieving high Gd-Tex accumulation in tumors. To elucidate the impact of O2 concentration on Gd-Tex radiosensitization, myoglobin (Mb) is loaded into Gd-NTs (Mb@Gd-NTs), resulting in efficient relief of tumor hypoxia and significant enhancement of Gd-Tex radiosensitization, eventually inducing the obvious long-term antitumor immune memory to inhibit tumor recurrence. In addition to Gd3+, the versatile Mb@Gd-NTs can also chelate 177Lu3+ (Mb@177Lu/Gd-NTs), enabling SPECT/MRI dual-modality imaging for accurately monitoring drug delivery in real-time. This "one-for-all" nanoplatform with the capability of chelating various trivalent metal ions exhibits broad clinical application prospects in imaging-guided radiosensitization therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaotu Ma
- Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China
- Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, 100191, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Xiaolong Liang
- Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Third Hospital, 100191, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Meinan Yao
- Medical Isotopes Research Center and Department of Radiation Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Basic Medical Sciences, International Cancer Institute, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Yu Gao
- Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Qi Luo
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, 510005, Guangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoda Li
- Medical and Health Analysis Center, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Yue Yu
- Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Yining Sun
- Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Miffy H Y Cheng
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Tronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Juan Chen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Tronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Gang Zheng
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Tronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Tronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
| | - Jiyun Shi
- Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China.
| | - Fan Wang
- Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China.
- Medical Isotopes Research Center and Department of Radiation Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Basic Medical Sciences, International Cancer Institute, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, P. R. China.
- Guangzhou National Laboratory, 510005, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Koi L, Bitto V, Weise C, Möbius L, Linge A, Löck S, Yaromina A, Besso MJ, Valentini C, Pfeifer M, Overgaard J, Zips D, Kurth I, Krause M, Baumann M. Prognostic biomarkers for the response to the radiosensitizer nimorazole combined with RCTx: a pre-clinical trial in HNSCC xenografts. J Transl Med 2023; 21:576. [PMID: 37633930 PMCID: PMC10464469 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04439-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor hypoxia is associated with resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), nimorazole, an oxygen mimic, combined with radiotherapy (RT) enabled to improve loco-regional control (LRC) in some patients with hypoxic tumors but it is unknown whether this holds also for radiochemotherapy (RCTx). Here, we investigated the impact of nimorazole combined with RCTx in HNSCC xenografts and explored molecular biomarkers for its targeted use. METHODS Irradiations were performed with 30 fractions in 6 weeks combined with weekly cisplatin. Nimorazole was applied before each fraction, beginning with the first or after ten fractions. Effect of RCTx with or without addition of nimorazole was quantified as permanent local control after irradiation. For histological evaluation and targeted gene expression analysis, tumors were excised untreated or after ten fractions. Using quantitative image analysis, micromilieu parameters were determined. RESULTS Nimorazole combined with RCTx significantly improved permanent local control in two tumor models, and showed a potential improvement in two additional models. In these four models, pimonidazole hypoxic volume (pHV) was significantly reduced after ten fractions of RCTx alone. Our results suggest that nimorazole combined with RCTx might improve TCR compared to RCTx alone if hypoxia is decreased during the course of RCTx but further experiments are warranted to verify this association. Differential gene expression analysis revealed 12 genes as potential for RCTx response. When evaluated in patients with HNSCC who were treated with primary RCTx, these genes were predictive for LRC. CONCLUSIONS Nimorazole combined with RCTx improved local tumor control in some but not in all HNSCC xenografts. We identified prognostic biomarkers with the potential for translation to patients with HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Koi
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Verena Bitto
- Division of Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Division of Radiooncology / Radiobiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- HIDSS4Health - Helmholtz Information and Data Science School for Health, Karlsruhe/Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Corina Weise
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lisa Möbius
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Annett Linge
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ala Yaromina
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - María José Besso
- Division of Radiooncology / Radiobiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Chiara Valentini
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Manuel Pfeifer
- Institute of Legal Medicine, Medizinische Fakultät, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Daniel Zips
- Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ina Kurth
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Division of Radiooncology / Radiobiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Division of Radiooncology / Radiobiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Huynh TTM, Aass HCD, Falk RS, Astrup GL, Helland Å, Bjøro T, Bjordal K, Dale E, Hellebust TP, Herlofson BB, Malinen E, Kiserud CE, Osnes T, Amdal CD. Associations between patient-reported late effects and systemic cytokines in long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:1082-1093. [PMID: 36350483 PMCID: PMC9643919 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01273-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment may lead to late effects and impaired health-related quality of life of survivors. Knowledge on long-term late effects after radiotherapy (RT) and potential underlying biological mechanisms is lacking. We assessed the prevalence of xerostomia, dysphagia, and chronic fatigue (CF) in HNC survivors ≥ 5 years post-RT, and examined associations between pro-inflammatory cytokines and late effects. METHODS In a cross-sectional study, 263 HNC survivors treated between 2007 and 2013 were enrolled. They completed validated questionnaires assessing xerostomia and dysphagia (the EORTC QLQ-H&N35), and CF (the Fatigue Questionnaire), and underwent blood sampling and clinical examination. Pro-inflammatory cytokines were analyzed in 262 survivors and 100 healthy age- and gender-matched controls. RESULTS Median time since treatment was 8.5 years. The proportions of survivors reporting xerostomia, dysphagia, and CF were 58%, 31%, and 33%, respectively, with a preponderance of females. We found no significant associations between IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, TARC, TNF, or ENA-78 and the three late effects. The odds of having elevated levels of IL-6 and IP-10 were significantly higher in the survivors compared to the controls. CONCLUSIONS More than one-third of long-term HNC survivors experienced xerostomia, dysphagia, and CF. Persistent inflammation, with elevated systemic cytokines, was not associated with these late effects, although HNC survivors had higher levels of some cytokines than the controls. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS This study provides new knowledge on late effects that can serve as grounds for informing patients with HNC about risk of late effects more than 5 years after RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T T M Huynh
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Post Box 4950, NO-0424, NydalenOslo, Norway.
| | - H C D Aass
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - R S Falk
- Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - G L Astrup
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Post Box 4950, NO-0424, NydalenOslo, Norway
| | - Å Helland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Post Box 4950, NO-0424, NydalenOslo, Norway
| | - T Bjøro
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - K Bjordal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - E Dale
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Post Box 4950, NO-0424, NydalenOslo, Norway
| | - T P Hellebust
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - B B Herlofson
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - E Malinen
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - C E Kiserud
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Post Box 4950, NO-0424, NydalenOslo, Norway
| | - T Osnes
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - C D Amdal
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Post Box 4950, NO-0424, NydalenOslo, Norway
- Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Das SM, Roy N, Singh D, Sardar PK, Das S. A Comparative Prospective Study Between Conventional Chemo-Radiotherapy and Pure Accelerated Radiotherapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Cureus 2023; 15:e42206. [PMID: 37602000 PMCID: PMC10439807 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The established standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but the optimum radiotherapy schedule for best disease control and acceptable toxicity is still evolving. Tumor control probability decreases with each day's prolongation of treatment time. Shortening the overall treatment time of radiation by pure accelerated radiotherapy may be a good option. MATERIAL AND METHODS One hundred and sixty-five patients with histopathologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were included in the study and were assigned into two groups from January 2017 to June 2019. The total dose of 70 Gy was given, 2 Gy/fraction/day. Treatment was given five days a week (conventional radiotherapy) and six days a week (pure accelerated radiotherapy). Both groups received weekly concurrent injections of cisplatin. RESULTS The stage (p=0.006) and fractionation of radiation (p=0.018) were the independent factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS). There was a statistically significant difference (p=0.019) in the recurrence of patients in different fractionation schedules. The median DFS was 39 months with a 95% CI of 31.44 - 46.55. One- and three-year DFS was 51% and 8.5% respectively in the five fractions/week schedule arm while 54.5% and 9.5% respectively in the six fractions/week schedule group. CONCLUSION Pure accelerated radiotherapy is more efficacious in terms of disease control with comparable mildly increased acute side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumana M Das
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radha Gobinda (RG) Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, IND
| | - Niladri Roy
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, IND
| | - Dharmendra Singh
- Department of Radiotherapy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Deoghar, IND
| | | | - Siddhartha Das
- Department of Physiology, Diamond Harbour Government Medical College, Diamond Harbour, IND
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Caudell JJ, Torres-Saavedra PA, Rosenthal DI, Axelrod RS, Nguyen-Tan PF, Sherman EJ, Weber RS, Galvin JM, El-Naggar AK, Konski AA, Echevarria MI, Dunlap NE, Shenouda G, Singh AK, Beitler JJ, Garsa A, Bonner JA, Garden AS, Algan O, Harris J, Le QT. Long-Term Update of NRG/RTOG 0522: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Concurrent Radiation and Cisplatin With or Without Cetuximab in Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:533-543. [PMID: 36549347 PMCID: PMC10247515 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The combination of cisplatin and radiation or cetuximab and radiation improves overall survival of patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck carcinoma. NRG Oncology conducted a phase 3 trial to test the hypothesis that adding cetuximab to radiation and cisplatin would improve progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition stage T2 N2a-3 M0 or T3-4 N0-3 M0 were accrued from November 2005 to March 2009 and randomized to receive radiation and cisplatin without (arm A) or with (arm B) cetuximab. Outcomes were correlated with patient and tumor features. Late reactions were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3). RESULTS Of 891 analyzed patients, 452 with a median follow-up of 10.1 years were alive at analysis. The addition of cetuximab did not improve PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.26; P = .74), with 10-year estimates of 43.6% (95% CI, 38.8- 48.4) for arm A and 40.2% (95% CI, 35.4-45.0) for arm B. Cetuximab did not reduce locoregional failure (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.95-1.53; P = .94) or distant metastasis (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.54-1.14; P = .10) or improve overall survival (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.16; P = .36). Cetuximab did not appear to improve PFS in either p16-positive oropharynx (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.87-1.93) or p16-negative oropharynx or nonoropharyngeal primary (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.73-1.21). Grade 3 to 4 late toxicity rates were 57.4% in arm A and 61.3% in arm B (P = .26). CONCLUSIONS With a median follow-up of more than 10 years, this updated report confirms the addition of cetuximab to radiation therapy and cisplatin did not improve any measured outcome in the entire cohort or when stratifying by p16 status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimmy J Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
| | - Pedro A Torres-Saavedra
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Surger, and Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rita S Axelrod
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Eric J Sherman
- Head and Neck Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY
| | - Randal S Weber
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Surger, and Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - James M Galvin
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Adel K El-Naggar
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Surger, and Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Andre A Konski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chester County Hospital/University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Neal E Dunlap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, KY
| | - George Shenouda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Canada
| | - Anurag K Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | - Adam Garsa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center LAPS, Los Angeles, CA
| | - James A Bonner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL
| | - Adam S Garden
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Surger, and Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ozer Algan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Jonathan Harris
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Embring A, Onjukka E, Mercke C, Lax I, Berglund A, Friesland S. Dose Escalation of Oropharyngeal Cancer: Long-Time Follow-Up and Side Effects. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092580. [PMID: 37174046 PMCID: PMC10177133 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Previous studies on dose-escalated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer have shown mixed results, and it is not established which patients would benefit from dose escalation. Further, while dose escalation does not appear to increase late toxicity, this needs to be confirmed with longer follow-up. In this study, we analysed treatment outcome and toxicity in 215 patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with dose-escalated radiotherapy (>72 Gy, EQD2, α/β = 10 Gy, boost by brachytherapy or simultaneous integrated boost) and a matched cohort of 215 patients treated with standard dose external-beam radiotherapy (68 Gy) between 2011 and 2018 at our institution. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 77.8% (72.4-83.6) and 73.7% (67.8-80.1) in the dose-escalated and standard dose group, respectively (p = 0.24). Median follow-up was 78.1 (49.2-98.4) and 60.2 (38.9-89.4) months in the dose-escalated and standard dose groups, respectively. Grade ≥3 osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and late dysphagia were more common in the dose-escalated group compared to the standard dose group, with 19 (8.8%) vs. 4 (1.9%) patients developing grade ≥3 ORN (p = 0.001), and 39 (18.1%) vs. 21 (9.8%) patients developing grade ≥3 dysphagia (p = 0.01). No predictive factors to help select patients for dose-escalated radiotherapy were found. However, the remarkably good OS in the dose-escalated cohort, despite a predominance of advanced tumour stages, encourages further attempts to identify such factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Embring
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska Institute, Department of Oncology-Pathology, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Onjukka
- Karolinska Institute, Department of Oncology-Pathology, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Claes Mercke
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska Institute, Department of Oncology-Pathology, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingmar Lax
- Karolinska Institute, Department of Oncology-Pathology, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Berglund
- Epistat Epidemiology and Statistics Consulting, 75655 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Signe Friesland
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska Institute, Department of Oncology-Pathology, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sharma R, Vats S, Seam R, Gupta M, Negi RR, Fotedar V, Singh K. A Comparison of the Toxicities in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiation. Cureus 2023; 15:e38362. [PMID: 37266055 PMCID: PMC10230179 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the objective and patient-reported toxicities of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT) and concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIAL In this prospective study, 46 patients with histologically proven stage III-IVA head and neck cancer were randomly assigned to receive either concurrent chemoradiation to a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks with concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2 IV weekly; control arm) or accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost radiotherapy (study arm) to a dose of 67.5 Gy in 40 fractions in five weeks. Acute toxicity was evaluated using RTOG toxicity criteria. The assessment was done weekly after initiation of treatment, at the first follow-up (six weeks), and at three months. The four main patient-reported symptoms of pain, hoarseness of voice, dryness of mouth, and loss of taste were also compared between the two groups to assess patient quality of life during treatment. RESULTS The mean treatment duration was 37 days in the CBRT arm and 49 days in the CRT arm. Treatment-related interruptions were less in the study group,17.3% in the study, and 27.2% in the control with insignificant P-value. Grade III laryngeal toxicity was significantly higher in the study group (P=0.029). Other acute grade I-III toxicities (pharyngeal, skin, mucositis, and salivary) were comparable in both CRT and CBRT arms. Grade IV toxicities were seen only in the CBRT arm but were resolved at the first follow-up. Haematological toxicities and renal toxicities were significantly higher in the CRT arm, with significant P-values of 0.0004 and 0.018, respectively. CONCLUSION In patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, concomitant boost radiotherapy is well tolerated with acceptable local toxicity and minimal systemic toxicity as compared to conventional chemoradiation. It is a feasible option for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer not fit for concurrent chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritu Sharma
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Government Medical College and Hospital, Mandi, IND
| | - Siddharth Vats
- Department of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, IND
| | - Rajeev Seam
- Department of Radiotherapy, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institiute of Medical Sciences and Research, Ambala, IND
| | - Manish Gupta
- Department of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, IND
| | - Ratti R Negi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Government Medical College and Hospital, Mandi, IND
| | - Vikas Fotedar
- Department of Radiotherapy, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, IND
| | - Kaalindi Singh
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Government Medical College and Hospital, Mandi, IND
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Reinders FC, de Ridder M, Doornaert PA, P.J. Raaijmakers C, Philippens ME. Individual elective lymph node irradiation for the reduction of complications in head and neck cancer patients (iNode): A phase-I feasibility trial protocol. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100574. [PMID: 36686561 PMCID: PMC9852485 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The long-term complication rate in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients caused by radiotherapy (RT) can be decreased by restricting elective neck irradiation (ENI) from large adjacent lymph node levels to only individual elective lymph nodes. The primary objective of this study is to treat the first HNSCC patients with individual elective lymph node irradiation by means of a Magnetic Resonance-linac (MR-linac) in order to assess the feasibility. Methods and analysis In this phase I feasibility study, 20 patients will be included with histologically proven cT2-4N0-1M0 HNSCC originating from the oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx, planned for treatment with primary radiotherapy and bilateral elective neck irradiation (ENI). Patients will be treated with 35 fractions in six weeks, according to the DAHANCA schedule. Individual lymph nodes inside the conventional lymph node levels will be categorized in low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk based on cytology, histology and imaging parameters. Low-risk and intermediate-risk lymph nodes will irradiated in 20 and 23 fractions respectively, with a fraction dose of 2 Gy (=40/46 Gy EQD2). The high-risk lymph nodes and the primary tumor will be irradiated in 35 fractions of 2 Gy (=70 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2)). To limit treatment burden, 20 fractions will be applied on the MR-linac. The last 15 fractions (sequential boost at the primary tumor, intermediate-risk and high-risk lymph nodes) will be applied on a conventional linear accelerator. The main study endpoint is the percentage of fractions that are successfully completed on the MR-linac. Ethics and dissemination With individual elective lymph node irradiation we expect less toxicity and a better quality of life for HNSCC patients. However, as the treatment time on the MR-linac will be longer (30-45 vs 15 min per fraction) we need to examine if patients can endure this new treatment concept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris C.J. Reinders
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mischa de Ridder
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Malik NH, Fu R, Hainc N, Noel CW, de Almeida JR, Hosni A, Hui Huang S, Yu E, Dzioba A, Leung A, Mangat A, MacNeil D, Nichols AC, Hiremath SB, Chakraborty S, Jooya A, Gaudet M, Johnson-Obaseki S, Whelan J, Forghani R, Hier MP, Morand G, Sultanem K, Dort J, Lysack J, Matthews W, Nakoneshny S, Gill G, Globerman A, Kerr P, Maralani P, Karam I, Eskander A. Association of Primary Tumor Volume With Survival in Patients With T3 Glottic Cancer Treated With Radiotherapy: A Study of the Canadian Head & Neck Collaborative Research Initiative. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:103-109. [PMID: 36480193 PMCID: PMC9857688 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Importance The association of primary tumor volume with outcomes in T3 glottic cancers treated with radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy remains unclear, with some evidence suggesting worse locoregional control in larger tumors. Objective To evaluate the association of primary tumor volume with oncologic outcomes in patients with T3 N0-N3 M0 glottic cancer treated with primary (chemo)radiotherapy in a large multi-institutional study. Design, Setting, and Participants This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study involved 7 Canadian cancer centers from 2002 to 2018. Tumor volume was measured by expert neuroradiologists on diagnostic imaging. Clinical and outcome data were extracted from electronic medical records. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes were assessed with marginal Cox regression. Laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was modeled as a secondary analysis. Patients diagnosed with cT3 N0-N3 M0 glottic cancers from 2002 to 2018 and treated with curative intent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with or without chemotherapy. Overall, 319 patients met study inclusion criteria. Exposures Tumor volume as measured on diagnostic imaging by expert neuroradiologists. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were OS and DFS; LFS was assessed as a secondary analysis, and late toxic effects as an exploratory analysis determined before start of the study. Results The mean (SD) age of participants was 66 (12) years and 279 (88%) were men. Overall, 268 patients (84%) had N0 disease, and 150 (47%) received concurrent systemic therapy. The mean (SD) tumor volume was 4.04 (3.92) cm3. With a mean (SD) follow-up of 3.85 (3.04) years, there were 91 (29%) local, 35 (11%) regional, and 38 (12%) distant failures. Increasing tumor volume (per 1-cm3 increase) was associated with significantly worse adjusted OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11) and DFS (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07). A total of 62 patients (19%) underwent laryngectomies with 54 (87%) of these within 800 days after treatment. Concurrent systemic therapy was associated with improved LFS (subdistribution HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53-0.76). Conclusions and Relevance Increasing tumor volumes in cT3 glottic cancers was associated with worse OS and DFS, and systemic therapy was associated with improved LFS. In absence of randomized clinical trial evidence, patients with poor pretreatment laryngeal function or those ineligible for systemic therapy may be considered for primary surgical resection with postoperative radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nauman H. Malik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rui Fu
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicolin Hainc
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Christopher W. Noel
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John R. de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre–University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ali Hosni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shao Hui Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eugene Yu
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Agnieszka Dzioba
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Leung
- Department of Radiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arvindpaul Mangat
- Department of Radiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle MacNeil
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony C. Nichols
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shivaprakash B. Hiremath
- Department of Radiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Santanu Chakraborty
- Department of Radiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alboorz Jooya
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Marc Gaudet
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jonathan Whelan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Reza Forghani
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
| | - Michael P. Hier
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Grégoire Morand
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Khalil Sultanem
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Joseph Dort
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - John Lysack
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Wayne Matthews
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven Nakoneshny
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gia Gill
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Adam Globerman
- Department of Radiology, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Paul Kerr
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Pejman Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Irene Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Antoine Eskander
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ferris RL, Westra W. Oropharyngeal Carcinoma with a Special Focus on HPV-Related Squamous Cell Carcinoma. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PATHOLOGY 2023; 18:515-535. [PMID: 36693202 PMCID: PMC11227657 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-031521-041424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC) has one of the most rapidly increasing incidences of any cancer in high-income countries. The most recent (8th) edition of the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system separates HPV-OPSCC from its HPV-negative counterpart to account for the improved prognosis seen in the former. Indeed, owing to its improved prognosis and greater prevalence in younger individuals, numerous ongoing trials are examining the potential for treatment deintensification as a means to improve quality of life while maintaining acceptable survival outcomes. Owing to the distinct biology of HPV-OPSCCs, targeted therapies and immunotherapies have become an area of particular interest. Importantly, OPSCC is often detected at an advanced stage, highlighting the need for diagnostic biomarkers to aid in earlier detection. In this review, we highlight important advances in the epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, and clinical management of HPV-OPSCC and underscore the need for a progressive understanding of the molecular basis of this disease toward early detection and precision care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - William Westra
- Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Feasibility of Using Wearables for Home Monitoring during Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer-Results from the OncoWatch 1.0 Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020422. [PMID: 36672370 PMCID: PMC9857313 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Consumer wearables allow objective health data monitoring, e.g., of physical activity and heart rate, which might change over a cancer treatment course. Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) receiving radiotherapy (RT) with curative intent typically experience side effects such as pain, decreased appetite, and dehydration, which may lead to hospitalizations. Therefore, health data monitoring could be important to understand a patient’s condition outside the hospital. The OncoWatch 1.0 study investigated the feasibility of using smartwatches for patients with HNC receiving RT. Methods: This study was a prospective, single-cohort feasibility study. The inclusion criteria were patients ≥ 18 years of age who planned to receive curatively intended radiotherapy for HNC. Consenting patients were asked to wear a smartwatch during RT and until two weeks after the end of RT. The primary endpoint was adherence. The secondary endpoints were data acquisition and variations in heart rate and physical activity. Results: Ten patients were included, with a median age of 62 years and eight males. The adherence rate for wearing the watch >12 h/d over the study period was 31%. The data acquisition rate was 61%. Conclusions: Although the primary endpoint was not reached, new knowledge has been established, including the secure data setup and key points that need to be addressed in future studies.
Collapse
|
29
|
Uttam AK, Yadav AK, Jalota S, Singh R, Malik S, Arya AK. A prospective randomized comparative study to evaluate the effect of palliative hypo-fractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy versus hypo-fractionated radiotherapy alone in advanced and unresectable head and neck cancer with no metastasis. Ecancermedicalscience 2023; 17:1541. [PMID: 37138956 PMCID: PMC10151081 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction A short duration, palliative radiotherapy schedule for locally advanced and unresectable head and neck cancer (LAUHNC) was evaluated in terms of palliation of cancer-related symptoms and acute toxicities. Aims and objectives The aim of the study was to compare the role and feasibility of hypo-fractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy and hypo-fractionated radiotherapy in LAUHNC. Materials and methods All the patients included in this study of LAUHNC were not fit for curative treatment. These patients are assessed on the basis of quality of life (QOL), tumour response, toxicities, and relief in symptoms. QOL was assessed on the basis of University of Washington QOL questionnaire version 4 before and after treatment. Patients are divided into two arms, Arm A patients received 40 Gy in ten fractions concurrent cisplatin 50 mg/m2 with weekly and Arm B patients received 40 Gy in ten fractions. To assess the tumour response response evaluation criteria in solid tumours criteria were used. Results A total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study, with 20 patents in both arms. Three patients defaulted during treatment and one patient died during treatment. A total of 36 patients completed treatment. Before treatment common complaints was distressing pain in primary site, and difficulty in chewing and swallowing. After treatment there was reduction of pain and improvement in swallowing in both arms. Overall QOL improvement in Arm A (28.89 ± 18.44 to 46.67 ± 15.34) and in Arm B (31.11 ± 15.68 to 43.33 ± 15.72). Neither of the arms experienced grade IV mucositis and skin reaction. Conclusion Toxicity in the form of mucositis and dermatitis was higher in the concurrent hypo-fractioned arm compared to the only hypo-fractionated radiotherapy arm during the treatment and in follow up period. The QOL in both individual arms showed statistically significant results, however when the QOL of both the arms was compared, the results were not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arun Kumar Yadav
- Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra 282003, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Shreya Jalota
- Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra 282003, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Renu Singh
- Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra 282003, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Shivani Malik
- Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra 282003, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ashok Kumar Arya
- Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra 282003, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schanne DH, Koch A, Elicin O, Giger R, Medová M, Zimmer Y, Aebersold DM. Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Radiotherapy-A Systematic Review. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123288. [PMID: 36552043 PMCID: PMC9775486 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Radiotherapy is a mainstay in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment but is mostly applied without stratification by molecular diagnostics. Development of reliable biomarkers may have the potential to improve radiotherapy (RT) efficacy and reduce toxicity. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the field of biomarkers in HNSCC treated by RT. Methods: Pubmed and EMBASE were searched independently by two researchers following pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Z curves were generated to investigate publication bias. OncoKB was used for identification of druggable targets. Results: 134 manuscripts remained for data extraction. 12% of tumors were AJCC/UICC stage I-II and 82% were stage III-IV. The most common biomarkers were proteins (39%), DNA (14%) and mRNA (9%). Limiting analysis to prospective data and statistically significant results, we found three potentially druggable targets: ERCC2, PTCH1 and EGFR. Regarding data quality, AJCC/UICC stage was missing in 32% of manuscripts. 73% of studies were retrospective and only 7% were based on prospective randomized trials. Z-curves indicated the presence of publication bias. Conclusion: An abundance of potential biomarkers in HNSCC is available but data quality is limited by retrospective collection, lack of validation and publication bias. Improved study design and reporting quality might accelerate successful development of personalized treatments in HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel H. Schanne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 28, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
- Correspondence:
| | - Alexander Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 28, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roland Giger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michaela Medová
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 28, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Yitzhak Zimmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 28, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rønn Hansen C, Price G, Field M, Sarup N, Zukauskaite R, Johansen J, Eriksen JG, Aly F, McPartlin A, Holloway L, Thwaites D, Brink C. Larynx cancer survival model developed through open-source federated learning. Radiother Oncol 2022; 176:179-186. [PMID: 36208652 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Federated learning has the potential to perfrom analysis on decentralised data; however, there are some obstacles to survival analyses as there is a risk of data leakage. This study demonstrates how to perform a stratified Cox regression survival analysis specifically designed to avoid data leakage using federated learning on larynx cancer patients from centres in three different countries. METHODS Data were obtained from 1821 larynx cancer patients treated with radiotherapy in three centres. Tumour volume was available for all 786 of the included patients. Parameter selection among eleven clinical and radiotherapy parameters were performed using best subset selection and cross-validation through the federated learning system, AusCAT. After parameter selection, β regression coefficients were estimated using bootstrap. Calibration plots were generated at 2 and 5-years survival, and inner and outer risk groups' Kaplan-Meier curves were compared to the Cox model prediction. RESULTS The best performing Cox model included log(GTV), performance status, age, smoking, haemoglobin and N-classification; however, the simplest model with similar statistical prediction power included log(GTV) and performance status only. The Harrell C-indices for the simplest model were for Odense, Christie and Liverpool 0.75[0.71-0.78], 0.65[0.59-0.71], and 0.69[0.59-0.77], respectively. The values are slightly higher for the full model with C-index 0.77[0.74-0.80], 0.67[0.62-0.73] and 0.71[0.61-0.80], respectively. Smoking during treatment has the same hazard as a ten-years older nonsmoking patient. CONCLUSION Without any patient-specific data leaving the hospitals, a stratified Cox regression model based on data from centres in three countries was developed without data leakage risks. The overall survival model is primarily driven by tumour volume and performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Rønn Hansen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Gareth Price
- Radiotherapy department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Field
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nis Sarup
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ruta Zukauskaite
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jesper Grau Eriksen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Farhannah Aly
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia; Southwest Sydney Clinical Campus, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew McPartlin
- Radiotherapy department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Lois Holloway
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia; Southwest Sydney Clinical Campus, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carsten Brink
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fekadu A, Rick TJ, Tigeneh W, Kantelhardt EJ, Incrocci L, Jemal A. Clinicopathology and Treatment Patterns of Head and Neck Cancers in Ethiopia. JCO Glob Oncol 2022; 8:e2200073. [PMID: 35939776 PMCID: PMC9470133 DOI: 10.1200/go.22.00073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Head and neck cancers are the third most common cancers treated with radiation in Ethiopia. There is, however, a lack of published data on clinical and pathological characteristics and treatment patterns of head and neck cancers in the country. The objective of the study was to assess clinical and pathological characteristics and treatment patterns of head and neck cancers at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, which housed the only radiotherapy facility in Ethiopia during the study period. Curative radiation dosing for #headandneck #cancer in #Ethiopia is challenged by the limitations of 2D radiation and long wait times. @JCOGO_ASCO
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adugna Fekadu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Tara J. Rick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Luca Incrocci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance and Health Service Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Shiao JC, Holt D, Ladbury C, Gao D, Jones B, Karam SD, Amini A. The role of concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus radiation alone in T1-3N0 HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2022; 130:105907. [PMID: 35605559 PMCID: PMC9947859 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of curative intent concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) vs radiation (RT) alone for T1-T3N0 HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC). METHODS The NCDB was queried for patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 with cT1-3N0M0 OPSCC treated with definitive RT or CCRT. Univariable analysis (UVA) and multivariable analysis (MVA) Cox regression analysis was performed with OS as the endpoint. Propensity score matching (PSM) 1:1 was performed. Interaction test to assess heterogeneity of treatment effect. RESULTS A total of 2830 patients were queried. On MVA, CCRT was associated with improved OS for T3N0 tumors (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.39-0.63) but not for T1N0 (HR 1.43; 95% CI 0.99-2.07) and T2N0 (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.75-1.13). For T3 patients, CCRT improved OS for HPV-negative (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.31-0.59) and HPV-positive tumors (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.61). After PSM, CCRT was not statistically different to RT for patients with T1-2N0 HPV-negative tumors (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.85-1.43; p = 0.48) and T1-2N0 HPV-positive tumors (HR 1.15; 95% CI 0.79-1.68; p = 0.45). After PSM, CCRT improved OS compared to RT alone for patients with T3N0 HPV-negative (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.31-0.59; p < 0.01) and HPV-positive tumors (HR 0.39; 95 %CI 0.25-0.61; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS CCRT is associated with improved OS in HPV-positive and HPV-negative T3N0 OPSCC. RT alone vs. CCRT demonstrated similar OS for T1-T2N0 OPSCC for both HPV negative and HPV positive tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay C. Shiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Douglas Holt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Colton Ladbury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Dexiang Gao
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Bernard Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Sana D. Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Co-registration of radiotherapy planning and recurrence scans with different imaging modalities in head and neck cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 23:80-84. [PMID: 35844257 PMCID: PMC9284447 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Head and neck magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography co-registration. Validation of planning and recurrence scan co-registration separated in time. Mean distances to agreement for regions of interest/normal tissue were tolerable.
MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scans are frequently used in follow-up after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. With the overall aim of enabling MRI-based pattern of failure analysis, this study evaluated the accuracy of recurrence MRI (rMRI) deformable co-registration with planning CT (computed tomography)-scans (pCT). Uncertainty of anatomical changes between pCT and rMRI was assessed by similarity metric analyses of co-registered image structures from 19 patients. Average mean distance to agreement and Dice similarity coefficient performed adequately. Our findings provide proof of concept for reliable co-registration of pCT and rMRI months to years apart for MRI-based pattern of failure analysis.
Collapse
|
35
|
Escalating a Biological Dose of Radiation in the Target Volume Applying Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Head and Neck Region Tumours. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10071484. [PMID: 35884789 PMCID: PMC9313164 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The treatment of head and neck tumours is a complicated process usually involving surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic treatment. Despite the multidisciplinary approach, treatment outcomes are still unsatisfactory, especially considering malignant tumours such as squamous cell carcinoma or sarcoma, where the frequency of recurrence has reached 50% of cases. The implementation of modern and precise methods of radiotherapy, such as a radiosurgery boost, may allow for the escalation of the biologically effective dose in the gross tumour volume and improve the results of treatment. Methods: The administration of a stereotactic radiotherapy boost can be done in two ways: an upfront boost followed by conventional radio(chemo)therapy or a direct boost after conventional radio(chemo)therapy. The boost dose depends on the primary or nodal tumour volume and localization regarding the organs at risk. It falls within the range of 10–18 Gy. Discussion: The collection of detailed data on the response of the disease to the radiosurgery boost combined with conventional radiotherapy as well as an assessment of early and late toxicities will contribute crucial information to the prospective modification of fractionated radiotherapy. In the case of beneficial findings, the stereotactic radiosurgery boost in the course of radio(chemo)therapy in patients with head and neck tumours will be able to replace traditional techniques of radiation, and radical schemes of treatment will be possible for future development.
Collapse
|
36
|
Brand DH, Kirby AM, Yarnold JR, Somaiah N. How Low Can You Go? The Radiobiology of Hypofractionation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:280-287. [PMID: 35260319 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Hypofractionated radical radiotherapy is now an accepted standard of care for tumour sites such as prostate and breast cancer. Much research effort is being directed towards more profoundly hypofractionated (ultrahypofractionated) schedules, with some reaching UK standard of care (e.g. adjuvant breast). Hypofractionation exerts varying influences on each of the major clinical end points of radiotherapy studies: acute toxicity, late toxicity and local control. This review will discuss these effects from the viewpoint of the traditional 5 Rs of radiobiology, before considering non-canonical radiobiological effects that may be relevant to ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy. The principles outlined here may assist the reader in their interpretation of the wealth of clinical data presented in the tumour site-specific articles in this special issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D H Brand
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A M Kirby
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J R Yarnold
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Somaiah
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Jensen KH, Vogelius IR, Bernsdorf M, Gothelf A, Kristensen CA, Maare C, Andersen E, Specht L, Friborg J. Early non-cancer mortality risk prediction after curative-intent radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2022; 171:1-6. [PMID: 35395275 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), curative-intent radiotherapy (RT)andchemoradiotherapy (CRT)areassociated with substantial acute morbidity and 5-10% of patients die within 180 days of treatment initiation.Mostof these early deaths occur without HNSCCrecurrence or progression andmay therefore be preventable to some extent.We developed a prediction tool to estimate the risk of non-HNSCC mortality occurring within the first 180 days followingRT/CRT initiation. METHODS Patients with HNSCC treated with RT/CRT, including postoperative RT/CRT, at Rigshospitalet or Herlev Hospitals between 2010-2017 were identified in the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA) database. Predictor variables included age, stage, performance status, tumor subsite including p16 status, comorbidity, postoperative status, smoking and pre-treatment albumin levels. The 180-day non-HNSCCmortality risk was estimated by combining cause-specific Cox regression models. RESULTS We included 2209 patients.The 180-daynon-HNSCCmortality rate was 4.4% and almostone third (31.6%) of non-HNSCCdeathswere caused by pneumonia.After internal model validation, the area under the receiver operating curve was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66-0.81) and calibration was good for risk predictions ranging from 0-20%. CONCLUSION We developed a prediction tool to estimate the 180-day non-HNSCC mortality risk. This tool can be used to select high-risk patients for supportive interventions aiming to improve survival rates, and is availablefor interactive use at https://emriskpred.shinyapps.io/EMNED_App/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mogens Bernsdorf
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Anita Gothelf
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | | | - Christian Maare
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Elo Andersen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Jeppe Friborg
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abel E, Silander E, Nordström F, Olsson C, Brodin NP, Nyman J, Björk-Eriksson T, Hammerlid E. Fatigue in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: a prospective study of patient-reported outcomes and their association with radiation dose to the cerebellum. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100960. [PMID: 35847551 PMCID: PMC9280038 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although fatigue is a known side effect in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) receiving radiation therapy, knowledge regarding long-term fatigue and dose-response relationships to organs at risk is scarce. The aim of this prospective study was to analyze patient-reported fatigue in patients with HNC receiving radiation therapy and to explore any possible association with organ-at-risk doses. Methods and Materials Patients with HNC referred for curative radiation therapy were eligible for inclusion in the study. To assess patient-reported fatigue, quality of life questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-FA12) were distributed before treatment and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after the start of treatment. Mean dose (Dmean) and near maximum dose (D2%) of the cerebellum and brain stem were evaluated in relation to baseline-adjusted fatigue scores at 3 months. Results One hundred twenty-six patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy between 2008 and 2010 were available for final analysis. Female sex and age <60 years were associated with higher fatigue at baseline, whereas patients also treated with chemotherapy had reduced physical and emotional fatigue at 6 months. Physical fatigue (QLQ-FA12 scale) increased from baseline up to 3 months (29 vs 59; P < .0001) but showed no difference compared with baseline from 1 to 5 years. Emotional fatigue was significantly lower at 5 years compared with baseline (14 vs 28; P < .0001). Patients with cerebellum Dmean > 3.5 Gy had higher mean physical fatigue scores at 3 months (38 vs 27; P = .036). Conclusions Although there is a significant increase in fatigue scores for patients with HNC up to 1 year after radiation therapy, this study showed a return to baseline levels at 5 years. A possible association was found between physical fatigue and a higher mean dose to the cerebellum.
Collapse
|
39
|
Campbell G, Glazer TA, Kimple RJ, Bruce JY. Advances in Organ Preservation for Laryngeal Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2022; 23:594-608. [PMID: 35303749 PMCID: PMC9405127 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-022-00945-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT At the University of Wisconsin, all treatment of head and neck cancer patients begins with discussion at our multi-disciplinary tumor board. Most patients with T4 disease, with existing laryngeal dysfunction, considered unlikely to complete definitive CRT or who have a high risk of persistent aspiration after non-operative management undergo total laryngectomy. A laryngeal sparing approach is attempted on most other patients. Radiotherapy is delivered over 6.5 weeks, preferably with concurrent weekly cisplatin. If the patient is hesitant of chemotherapy or has contraindications to cisplatin, concurrent cetuximab may be offered. Patients treated with RT alone are often treated to the same dose, but via an accelerated schedule by adding a 6th fraction per week. The 6th fraction is given by delivering two treatments at least 6 h apart on a weekday of the patient's choosing. We consider the following to be major risk factors for clinically significant weight loss during treatment: a 10% or greater loss of weight in the 6 months prior to starting treatment, delivery of concurrent cisplatin, and treatment of the bilateral neck with radiation. Patients who have 2-3 of these characteristics are often given gastrostomy tubes prophylactically. Patients are seen 2 weeks after completion of therapy, and then every 3 months after completion for 2 years. A CT neck and PET-CT are performed at the first 3-month visit. They are seen twice in year three, and then yearly until years 5-7. At each of these visits, we have a low threshold to present the patient at our multidisciplinary tumor board for consideration of salvage laryngectomy if there are signs of progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham Campbell
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Tiffany A Glazer
- Department of Surgery - Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA
| | - Randall J Kimple
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA
| | - Justine Yang Bruce
- Department of Medicine - Medical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. .,University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer in the era of chemoradiation therapy. Auris Nasus Larynx 2022; 49:535-546. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2022.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
41
|
Qiao C, Qiao T, Yang S, Liu L, Zheng M. SNHG17/miR-384/ELF1 axis promotes cell growth by transcriptional regulation of CTNNB1 to activate Wnt/β-catenin pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Gene Ther 2022; 29:122-132. [PMID: 33531646 DOI: 10.1038/s41417-021-00294-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Increasing evidence proved the abnormal expression of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in various human malignancies, including oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Nevertheless, limited explorations concern the role of lncRNA small nucleolar RNA host gene 17 (SNHG17) in OSCC. Herein, SNHG17 was disclosed to be remarkably upregulated in OSCC cell lines and promoted OSCC cell growth. Further mechanistic studies, including DNA/RNA pull down, RIP, ChIP, and luciferase reporter gene assays, were conducted. It was confirmed that Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway was involved in the SNHG17-mediated OSCC cell growth. Moreover, E74 like ETS transcription factor 1 (ELF1) was identified as the transcription activator of CTNNB1 (β-catenin mRNA) in OSCC. Inspired by competing for endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) network, we were pleasantly surprised to find that SNHG17 and ELF1 functioned as ceRNAs in OSCC via competitively binding to microRNA-384 (miR-384). By using rescue assays, we revealed that SNHG17 facilitated OSCC cell growth through modulating miR-384/ELF1 axis. Importantly, we certified that ELF1 was indispensable for SNHG17-affected OSCC progression. Collectively, it can be concluded that SNHG17/miR-384/ELF1 axis contributed to OSCC cell growth via promoting CTNNB1 expression, thus activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunyan Qiao
- Department of Pathology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China.
| | - Tianyi Qiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Clinical Medical College and Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| | - Shihui Yang
- Department of Dental Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| | - Lili Liu
- Department of Pathology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| | - Mengdan Zheng
- Department of Pathology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, Jilin, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Elad S, Yarom N, Zadik Y, Kuten-Shorrer M, Sonis ST. The broadening scope of oral mucositis and oral ulcerative mucosal toxicities of anticancer therapies. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:57-77. [PMID: 34714553 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Oral mucositis (OM) is a common, highly symptomatic complication of cancer therapy that affects patients' function, quality of life, and ability to tolerate treatment. In certain patients with cancer, OM is associated with increased mortality. Research on the management of OM is ongoing. Oral mucosal toxicities are also reported in targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. The objective of this article is to present current knowledge about the epidemiology, pathogenesis, assessment, risk prediction, and current and developing intervention strategies for OM and other ulcerative mucosal toxicities caused by both conventional and evolving forms of cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Elad
- Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Noam Yarom
- Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
- School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yehuda Zadik
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Michal Kuten-Shorrer
- Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen T Sonis
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Primary Endpoint Solutions, Waltham, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Trivella M, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Dorée C, Hébert PC. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 12:CD002042. [PMID: 34932836 PMCID: PMC8691808 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002042.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal haemoglobin threshold for use of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in anaemic patients remains an active field of research. Blood is a scarce resource, and in some countries, transfusions are less safe than in others because of inadequate testing for viral pathogens. If a liberal transfusion policy does not improve clinical outcomes, or if it is equivalent, then adopting a more restrictive approach could be recognised as the standard of care. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review update was to compare 30-day mortality and other clinical outcomes for participants randomised to restrictive versus liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion thresholds (triggers) for all clinical conditions. The restrictive transfusion threshold uses a lower haemoglobin concentration as a threshold for transfusion (most commonly, 7.0 g/dL to 8.0 g/dL), and the liberal transfusion threshold uses a higher haemoglobin concentration as a threshold for transfusion (most commonly, 9.0 g/dL to 10.0 g/dL). SEARCH METHODS We identified trials through updated searches: CENTRAL (2020, Issue 11), MEDLINE (1946 to November 2020), Embase (1974 to November 2020), Transfusion Evidence Library (1950 to November 2020), Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index (1990 to November 2020), and trial registries (November 2020). We checked the reference lists of other published reviews and relevant papers to identify additional trials. We were aware of one trial identified in earlier searching that was in the process of being published (in February 2021), and we were able to include it before this review was finalised. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised trials of surgical or medical participants that recruited adults or children, or both. We excluded studies that focused on neonates. Eligible trials assigned intervention groups on the basis of different transfusion schedules or thresholds or 'triggers'. These thresholds would be defined by a haemoglobin (Hb) or haematocrit (Hct) concentration below which an RBC transfusion would be administered; the haemoglobin concentration remains the most commonly applied marker of the need for RBC transfusion in clinical practice. We included trials in which investigators had allocated participants to higher thresholds or more liberal transfusion strategies compared to more restrictive ones, which might include no transfusion. As in previous versions of this review, we did not exclude unregistered trials published after 2010 (as per the policy of the Cochrane Injuries Group, 2015), however, we did conduct analyses to consider the differential impact of results of trials for which prospective registration could not be confirmed. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified trials for inclusion and extracted data using Cochrane methods. We pooled risk ratios of clinical outcomes across trials using a random-effects model. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We conducted predefined analyses by clinical subgroups. We defined participants randomly allocated to the lower transfusion threshold as being in the 'restrictive transfusion' group and those randomly allocated to the higher transfusion threshold as being in the 'liberal transfusion' group. MAIN RESULTS A total of 48 trials, involving data from 21,433 participants (at baseline), across a range of clinical contexts (e.g. orthopaedic, cardiac, or vascular surgery; critical care; acute blood loss (including gastrointestinal bleeding); acute coronary syndrome; cancer; leukaemia; haematological malignancies), met the eligibility criteria. The haemoglobin concentration used to define the restrictive transfusion group in most trials (36) was between 7.0 g/dL and 8.0 g/dL. Most trials included only adults; three trials focused on children. The included studies were generally at low risk of bias for key domains including allocation concealment and incomplete outcome data. Restrictive transfusion strategies reduced the risk of receiving at least one RBC transfusion by 41% across a broad range of clinical contexts (risk ratio (RR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.66; 42 studies, 20,057 participants; high-quality evidence), with a large amount of heterogeneity between trials (I² = 96%). Overall, restrictive transfusion strategies did not increase or decrease the risk of 30-day mortality compared with liberal transfusion strategies (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.15; 31 studies, 16,729 participants; I² = 30%; moderate-quality evidence) or any of the other outcomes assessed (i.e. cardiac events (low-quality evidence), myocardial infarction, stroke, thromboembolism (all high-quality evidence)). High-quality evidence shows that the liberal transfusion threshold did not affect the risk of infection (pneumonia, wound infection, or bacteraemia). Transfusion-specific reactions are uncommon and were inconsistently reported within trials. We noted less certainty in the strength of evidence to support the safety of restrictive transfusion thresholds for the following predefined clinical subgroups: myocardial infarction, vascular surgery, haematological malignancies, and chronic bone-marrow disorders. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Transfusion at a restrictive haemoglobin concentration decreased the proportion of people exposed to RBC transfusion by 41% across a broad range of clinical contexts. Across all trials, no evidence suggests that a restrictive transfusion strategy impacted 30-day mortality, mortality at other time points, or morbidity (i.e. cardiac events, myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia, thromboembolism, infection) compared with a liberal transfusion strategy. Despite including 17 more randomised trials (and 8846 participants), data remain insufficient to inform the safety of transfusion policies in important and selected clinical contexts, such as myocardial infarction, chronic cardiovascular disease, neurological injury or traumatic brain injury, stroke, thrombocytopenia, and cancer or haematological malignancies, including chronic bone marrow failure. Further work is needed to improve our understanding of outcomes other than mortality. Most trials compared only two separate thresholds for haemoglobin concentration, which may not identify the actual optimal threshold for transfusion in a particular patient. Haemoglobin concentration may not be the most informative marker of the need for transfusion in individual patients with different degrees of physiological adaptation to anaemia. Notwithstanding these issues, overall findings provide good evidence that transfusions with allogeneic RBCs can be avoided in most patients with haemoglobin thresholds between the range of 7.0 g/dL and 8.0 g/dL. Some patient subgroups might benefit from RBCs to maintain higher haemoglobin concentrations; research efforts should focus on these clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L Carson
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Simon J Stanworth
- John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Systematic Review Initiative, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, UK
| | - Jane A Dennis
- Cochrane Injuries Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Nareg Roubinian
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Dean A Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Darrell Triulzi
- The Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Carolyn Dorée
- Systematic Review Initiative, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul C Hébert
- Centre for Research, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wennerberg J, Gebre-Medhin M, Nilsson P, Brun E, Kjellén E, Carlwig K, Reizenstein J, Kristiansson S, Söderkvist K, Wahlgren M, Zackrisson B. Results from a prospective, randomised study on (accelerated) preoperative versus (conventional) postoperative radiotherapy in treatment of patients with resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity - The ARTSCAN 2 study. Radiother Oncol 2021; 166:26-32. [PMID: 34793864 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE An earlier prospective randomised multicentre study (ARTSCAN) in head and neck cancer patients that compared conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CF) with accelerated radiotherapy (AF) was inconclusive. In the subgroup of oral cavity squamous cell cancer (OCSCC) a large absolute, but not statistically significant, difference in local control was seen in favour of AF. This difference was more pronounced in resectable tumours. The finding raised the hypothesis that AF could be beneficial for OCSCC patients. In addition, the longstanding controversy on pre- or postoperative radiotherapy was addressed. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with OCSCC, judged to withstand and likely benefit from combined therapy, were recruited. Subjects were randomised to either preoperative AF with 43 fractions given as a concomitant boost with two fractions/day to the tumour bearing volume to a total dose of 68 Gy in 4.5 weeks followed by surgery, or primary surgery with postoperative CF, total dose 60 or 66 Gy in 6-7 weeks. For patients whose tumours had high-risk features, 66 Gy and concomitant cisplatin was prescribed. RESULTS 250 patients were randomised. Median follow-up was 5 years for locoregional control (LRC) and 9 years for overall survival (OS). There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment arms regarding LRC and OS. LRC at five years was 73% (95% CI, 65-82) in preoperative AF and 78% (95% CI, 70-85) in postoperative CF. Toxicity was more pronounced in preoperative AF. CONCLUSION This study does not support that AF prior to surgery improves outcome in oral cavity cancer compared with postoperative CF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Wennerberg
- Department of ORL, Head & Neck Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Maria Gebre-Medhin
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Per Nilsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Eva Brun
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Kjellén
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Kristin Carlwig
- Department of ORL, Head & Neck Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | | | | | - Karin Söderkvist
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Sweden
| | - Magnus Wahlgren
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Otolaryngology Umeå University, Sweden
| | - Björn Zackrisson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Vasiliadou I, Noble D, Hartley A, Moleron R, Sanghera P, Urbano TG, Schipani S, Gujral D, Foran B, Bhide S, Haridass A, Nathan K, Michaelidou A, Sen M, Geropantas K, Joseph M, O'Toole L, Griffin M, Pettit L, Chambers J, Jankowska P, De Winton E, Goranova R, Singh N, Shah K, Kong Conceptualisation A. A multi-centre survey reveals variations in the standard treatments and treatment modifications for head and neck cancer patients during Covid-19 pandemic. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 30:50-59. [PMID: 34226880 PMCID: PMC8242198 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid changes to the practice of head and neck oncology in UK. There was a delay between the onset of the pandemic and the release of guidelines from cancer societies and networks, leading to a variable response of individual centres. This survey was conducted to assess the pre-Covid-19 pandemic standard of practice for head and neck oncology patients and the treatment modifications introduced during the first wave of the pandemic in UK. METHODOLOGY The UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) Head and Neck Clinical Studies Group initiated a multi-centre survey using questionnaire to investigate the effect on feeding tube practice, radiotherapy (RT) fractionation and volumes, use of chemotherapy in the neo-adjuvant, concurrent and palliative setting, the use of immunotherapy in the palliative setting, access to radiology and histopathology services, and availability of surgical procedures. RESULTS 30 centres were approached across UK; 23 (76.7%) centres responded and were included in the survey. There were differences in the standard practices in feeding tube policy, RT dose and fractionation as well as concurrent chemotherapy use. 21 (91%) participating centres had at least one treatment modification. 15 (65%) centres initiated a change in radical RT; changing to either a hypofractionation or acceleration schedule. For post-operative RT 10 centres (43.5%) changed to a hypofractionation schedule. 12 (52.2%) centres stopped neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for all patients; 13 (56.5%) centres followed selective omission of chemotherapy in concurrent chemo-radiotherapy patients, 17 (73.9%) centres changed first-line chemotherapy treatment to pembrolizumab (following NHS England's interim guidance) and 8 (34.8%) centres stopped the treatment early or offered delays for patients that have been already on systemic treatment. The majority of centres did not have significant changes associated with surgery, radiology, histopathology and dental screening. CONCLUSION There are variations in the standard of practice and treatment modifications for head and neck cancer patients during Covid-19 pandemic. A timely initiative is required to form a consensus on head and neck cancer management in the UK and other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Noble
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Hartley
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Paul Sanghera
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Dorothy Gujral
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bernie Foran
- Weston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Shree Bhide
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kannon Nathan
- Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone and Canterbury, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mehmet Sen
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mano Joseph
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Laura Pettit
- Lingen Davie Cancer Centre, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ketan Shah
- Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bloodstream infections in head and neck cancer patients after curative-intent radiotherapy: a population-based study from the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group database. Br J Cancer 2021; 125:458-464. [PMID: 34017084 PMCID: PMC8329195 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01430-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) may become immunocompromised. In this population-based study, we aimed to investigate the risk factors, microbiological aetiologies, prognosis and impact on early non-cancer mortality of bloodstream infections (BSIs) after RT/CRT. METHODS Patients with HNSCC of the pharynx, larynx and oral cavity treated with curative-intent RT/CRT in Denmark between 2010 and 2017 and subsequent BSI episodes occurring within 18 months of RT/CRT initiation were identified in national registries. RESULTS We included 5674 patients and observed 238 BSIs. Increasing age, stage and performance status were significantly associated with an elevated BSI risk, while sex, smoking and high-grade mucositis were not. Human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients had a decreased risk. Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 34% of episodes occurring during the first 3 months. The 30-day post-BSI mortality rate was 26% (95% confidence interval: 19-32) and BSIs were involved in 10% of early non-cancer deaths. CONCLUSION The risk of BSI development is associated with several patient- and disease-related factors and BSIs contribute considerably to early non-cancer mortality. Empiric antibiotic treatment regimens should prioritise coverage for S. aureus when treating suspected systemic infection in this population.
Collapse
|
47
|
Chemoradiotherapy but Not Radiotherapy Alone for Larynx Preservation in T3. Considerations from a German Observational Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143435. [PMID: 34298650 PMCID: PMC8306673 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary For advanced laryngeal carcinoma, primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (pCRT or pRT) is used as an alternative to total laryngectomy (TL) to preserve a functional larynx. For advanced laryngeal cancer (T4), poorer survival has been reported after nonsurgical treatment. Is there a need to fear worse survival in moderately advanced tumors (T3)? The outcomes after pRT, pCRT, or surgery were evaluated in 121 patients with T3 laryngeal cancers. pCRT and TL with risk-adopted adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (TL ± a(C)RT) yielded results without a significant survival difference. However, after pRT alone, survival was significantly poorer than after TL ± a(C)RT. Thus, according to our data and supported by the literature, pCRT instead of pRT alone is recommended for T3 laryngeal cancers. According to the literature, this recommendation also applies to bulky tumors (6–12 mm), vocal cord fixation, at least minimal cartilage infiltration, and advanced N stage. TL ± a(C)RT instead of larynx preservation should be considered if any of these factors is present and chemotherapy is prohibited; in cases with a tumor volume > 12 mm, severe forms of vocal cord fixation or cartilage infiltration; or when the patient needs a feeding tube or a tracheotomy before the onset of therapy. Abstract For advanced laryngeal cancers, after randomized prospective larynx preservation studies, nonsurgical therapy has been applied on a large scale as an alternative to laryngectomy. For T4 laryngeal cancer, poorer survival has been reported after nonsurgical treatment. Is there a need to fear worse survival also in T3 tumors? The outcomes of 121 T3 cancers treated with pCRT, pRT alone, or surgery were evaluated in an observational cohort study in Germany. In a multivariate Cox regression of the T3 subgroup, no survival difference was noted between pCRT and total laryngectomy with risk-adopted adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (TL ± a(C)RT) (HR 1.20; 95%-CI: 0.57–2.53; p = 0.63). However, survival was significantly worse after pRT alone than after TL ± a(C)RT (HR 4.40; 95%-CI: 1.72–11.28, p = 0.002). A literature search shows that in cases of unfavorable prognostic markers (bulky tumors of 6–12 ccm, vocal cord fixation, minimal cartilage infiltration, or N2–3), pCRT instead of pRT is indicated. In cases of pretreatment dysphagia or aspiration requiring a feeding tube or tracheostomy, gross or multiple cartilage infiltration, or tumor volume > 12 ccm, outcomes after pCRT were significantly worse than those after TL. In these cases, and in cases where pCRT is indicated but the patient is not suitable for the addition of chemotherapy, upfront total laryngectomy with stage-appropriate aRT is recommended even in T3 laryngeal cancers.
Collapse
|
48
|
Re-Irradiation for Head and Neck Cancer: Cumulative Dose to Organs at Risk and Late Side Effects. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133173. [PMID: 34202135 PMCID: PMC8269009 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Local recurrences of head and neck cancer are unfortunately common and can be difficult to treat. The treatment is challenging, partly due to the location, with several important organs in the head and neck area, but also because recurrence often occurs in an area already treated with radiotherapy. It has been shown that repeat radiotherapy, re-irradiation, can offer long-lasting tumor control and sometimes even cure in selected patients. However, there is a risk of normal tissue close to the tumor being damaged by high cumulative doses of radiotherapy. In this study, we aim to establish levels of cumulative dose to specific organs that could be considered reasonably safe to deliver at re-irradiation without causing high rates of severe side effects. Increased knowledge in dose–response relationships in re-irradiation for head and neck cancer will facilitate a tailored treatment for the individual patient. Abstract Re-irradiation in head and neck cancer is challenging, and cumulative dose constraints and dose/volume data are scarce. In this study, we present dose/volume data for patients re-irradiated for head and neck cancer and explore the correlations of cumulative dose to organs at risk and severe side effects. We analyzed 54 patients re-irradiated for head and neck cancer between 2011 and 2017. Organs at risk were delineated and dose/volume data were collected from cumulative treatment plans of all included patients. Receiver–operator characteristics (ROC) analysis assessed the association between dose/volume parameters and the risk of toxicity. The ROC-curve for a logistic model of carotid blowout vs. maximum doses to the carotid arteries showed AUC = 0.92 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.00) and a cut-off value of 119 Gy (sensitivity 1.00/specificity 0.89). The near-maximum dose to bones showed an association with the risk of osteoradionecrosis: AUC = 0.74 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.95) and a cut-off value of 119 Gy (sensitivity 1.00/specificity 0.52). Our analysis showed an association between cumulative dose to organs at risk and the risk of developing osteoradionecrosis and carotid blowout, and our results support the existing dose constraint for the carotid arteries of 120 Gy. The confirmation of these dose–response relationships will contribute to further improvements of re-irradiation strategies.
Collapse
|
49
|
Wærsted S, Andersen E, Bentzen J. Treatment outcomes in patients with supraglottic laryngeal cancer: a single centre study. Acta Otolaryngol 2021; 141:649-655. [PMID: 34028322 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2021.1910729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx (SCCSL) in Denmark has changed in several ways from the year 2000 to 2014, including the introduction of IMRT radiation technique and the addition of concurrent chemotherapy (CRT), as well as systematic reduction in waiting times until treatment initiation. AIM/OBJECTIVES Our aim is to investigate the effect of the abovementioned factors on overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LC) for SCCSL patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective cohort study with data from the DAHANCA database. We used the Kaplan-Meier and Cumulative Incidence plots as well as Cox regression analysis. RESULTS We found a statistically significant improvement of the 5-year OS of 19.3 percentage points (pp). Cox regression found LC was not improved in patients receiving CRT compared to radiotherapy (RT) alone. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE Introduction of CRT treatment for head and neck cancers in general is known to improve LC. We could not demonstrate this effect for SCCSL specifically, as our results were not statistically significant on this point. OS was significantly improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stian Wærsted
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Elo Andersen
- Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jens Bentzen
- Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Van den Bosch L, van der Laan HP, van der Schaaf A, Oosting SF, Halmos GB, Witjes MJH, Oldehinkel E, Meijer TWH, van den Hoek JGM, Steenbakkers RJHM, Langendijk JA. Patient-Reported Toxicity and Quality-of-Life Profiles in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Definitive Radiation Therapy or Chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:456-467. [PMID: 34048816 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy is an effective but burdensome treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). We aimed to characterize the severity and time pattern of patient-reported symptoms and quality of life in a large cohort of patients with HNC treated with definitive radiation therapy, with or without systemic treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 859 patients with HNC treated between 2007 and 2017 prospectively completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Cancer module (QLQ-HN35) and Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) at regular intervals during and after treatment for up to 5 years. Patients were classified into 3 subgroups: early larynx cancer, infrahyoideal cancer, and suprahyoideal cancer. Outcome scales of both questionnaires were quantified per subgroup and time point by means of average scores and the frequency distribution of categorized severity (none, mild, moderate, and severe). Time patterns and symptom severity were characterized. Toxicity profiles were compared using linear mixed model analysis. Additional toxicity profiles based on age, human papillomavirus status, treatment modality, smoking status, tumor site, and treatment period were characterized as well. RESULTS The study population consisted of 157 patients with early larynx cancer, 304 with infrahyoideal cancer, and 398 with suprahyoideal cancer. The overall questionnaire response rate was 83%. Generally, the EORTC QLQ-HN35 symptoms reported showed a clear time pattern, with increasing scores during treatment followed by a gradual recovery in the first 2 years. Distinct toxicity profiles were seen across subgroups (P < .001), with generally less severe symptom scores in the early larynx subgroup. The EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning, quality-of-life, and general symptoms reported showed a less evident time pattern and less pronounced differences in mean scores between subgroups, although differences were still significant (P < .001). Differences in mean scores were most pronounced for role functioning, appetite loss, fatigue, and pain. CONCLUSIONS We established patient-reported toxicity and quality-of-life profiles that showed different patterns for 3 subgroups of patients with HNC. These profiles provide detailed information on the severity and persistence of various symptoms as experienced by patients during and after definitive radiation therapy. These profiles can be used to inform treatment of future patients and may serve as a benchmark for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Van den Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans Paul van der Laan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen van der Schaaf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoukje F Oosting
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gyorgy B Halmos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Max J H Witjes
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin Oldehinkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke W H Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna G M van den Hoek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roel J H M Steenbakkers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|