Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with oral anticoagulants: population based retrospective cohort study

To treat or not to treat: a comparative effectiveness analysis of oral anticoagulant outcomes among U.S. nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation are at high risk for ischemic stroke, but most are not treated with anticoagulants. This study compared the effectiveness and safety between oral anticoagulant (OAC) users and non-users.

METHODS

We conducted a new-user retrospective cohort study by using Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments linked with Medicare claims. The participants were Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation residing in US nursing homes between 2011 and 2016, aged ≥ 65 years. The primary outcomes were occurrence of an ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (effectiveness), occurrence of intracranial or extracranial bleeding (safety) and net clinical outcome (effectiveness or safety outcomes). Secondary outcomes included total mortality and a net clinical and mortality outcome. Cox proportional hazards and Fine and Grey models estimated multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and sub-distribution hazard ratios (sHRs).

RESULTS

Outcome rates were low (effectiveness: OAC: 0.86; non-users: 1.73; safety: OAC: 2.26; non-users: 1.75 (per 100 person-years)). OAC use was associated with a lower rate of the effectiveness outcome (sHR: 0.69; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.61-0.77), higher rates of the safety (sHR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.58-1.84) and net clinical outcomes (sHR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.13-1.28) lower rate of all-cause mortality outcome (sHR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.59-0.61), and lower rate of the net clinical and mortality outcome (sHR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.59-0.61). Warfarin users, but not DOAC users, had a higher rate of the net clinical outcome versus OAC non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the benefits of treatment with OACs to prevent ischemic strokes and increase longevity, while highlighting the need to weigh apparent benefits against elevated risk for bleeding. Results were consistent with net favorability of DOACs versus warfarin.

Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in Stroke

Gastrointestinal (GI) complications are seen in over 50% of ischemic stroke survivors; the most common complications are dysphagia, constipation, and GI bleeding. The bidirectional relationship of the gut-brain axis and stroke has recently gained traction, wherein stroke contributes to gut dysbiosis (alterations in the normal host intestinal microbiome) and gut dysbiosis perpetuates poor functional neurologic outcomes in stroke. It is postulated that the propagation of proinflammatory cells and gut metabolites (including trimethylamine N-oxide and short-chain fatty acids) from the GI tract to the central nervous system play a central role in gut-brain axis dysfunction. In this review, we discuss the known GI complications in acute ischemic stroke, our current knowledge from experimental stroke models for gut-brain axis dysfunction in stroke, and emerging therapeutics that target the gut-brain axis.

Management of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critical Care Transport

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a relatively common and life-threatening condition encountered by critical care transport crews. It is of paramount importance that transport crews understand the underlying pathophysiology of variceal and nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding as well as the nuanced management of this patient population. This article reviews the current clinical evidence on initial resuscitation, medical management, and advanced invasive therapies (such as balloon tamponade devices) that transport crews should be familiar with to manage these patients. In addition, we present a novel method of continuous balloon pressure monitoring of balloon tamponade devices that is applicable to the transport environment.

Warfarin Is Associated With Higher Rates of Upper But Not Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding Compared with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Population-Based Propensity-Weighted Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

While overall gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) rates have been extensively compared between warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), it is still unclear whether upper and lower GIB rates differ between these types of drugs. This study aimed to compare upper and lower GIB rates between warfarin and DOACs in a nationwide cohort.

METHODS

Data on all patients in Iceland who received a prescription for oral anticoagulation from 2014 to 2019 were collected and their personal identification numbers linked to the electronic medical record system of the National University Hospital of Iceland and the 4 regional hospitals in Iceland. Inverse probability weighting was used to yield balanced study groups and rates of overall, major, upper, and lower GIB were compared using Cox regression. All GIB events were manually confirmed by chart review.

RESULTS

Warfarin was associated with higher rates of upper GIB (1.7 events per 100 person-years vs 0.8 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-3.59) but similar rates of lower GIB compared with DOACs. Specifically, warfarin was associated with higher rates of upper GIB compared with apixaban (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.35-5.13), dabigatran (5.47; 95% CI, 1.87-16.05), and rivaroxaban (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.00-3.05). Warfarin was associated with higher rates of major GIB compared with apixaban (2.3 events per 100 person-years vs 1.5 events per 100 person-years; HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.06-3.05), but otherwise overall and major GIB rates were similar in warfarin and DOAC users.

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin was associated with higher rates of upper but not overall or lower GIB compared with DOACs. Warfarin was associated with higher rates of major GIB compared with apixaban.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding Due to NOACs Use: Exploring the Molecular Mechanisms

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are drugs approved for the prevention and treatment of many thromboembolic cardiovascular conditions as a safer alternative to warfarin. We reviewed studies published in PubMed^®, UpToDate^®, Web of Science^®, and Cochrane^® about NOACs' risks and benefits in patients requiring anticoagulation, with a focus on gastrointestinal bleeding and on molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the risk of bleeding in patients treated with them. Apixaban resulted in a lower rate of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban. However, data reported that gastrointestinal bleeding in patients treated with NOACs was less severe compared to warfarin. Studies show promising results on the increased and widespread use of NOACs in patients who require anticoagulation (for example-in case of atrial fibrillation or high risk of venous thromboembolism), reporting an overall lower risk of major bleeding events. The profile of NOACs was more effective and secure compared to warfarin, but a more careful medical prescription is required in patients who are at high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding on Oral Anticoagulation: What is Currently Known

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is the most common type of bleeding occurring in patients on oral anticoagulation. A meta-analysis of the landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with atrial fibrillation demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were associated with higher GIB rates compared to warfarin. However, significant heterogeneity existed between studies. While rivaroxaban, high-dose dabigatran, and high-dose edoxaban were associated with higher GIB rates than warfarin, GIB rates were similar between warfarin users and both apixaban and low-dose dabigatran users. Additionally, previous observational studies have yielded conflicting reports on whether GIB rates differ between warfarin and DOACs. Meta-analyses of observational studies demonstrated that warfarin is associated with lower rates of GIB compared to rivaroxaban, similar or lower rates compared to dabigatran, and higher rates compared to apixaban. Importantly, no RCT has compared individual DOACs directly and due to the different selection criteria of the initial RCTs, indirect comparisons between DOACs using these studies are unreliable. The best available information of comparisons between individual DOACs is therefore limited to observational studies. There is mounting evidence that suggests that rivaroxaban is associated with a higher risk of GIB compared to other DOACs. Finally, GIB induced by oral anticoagulation may have some positive aspects. Interestingly, there are studies that indicate oral anticoagulation facilitates colorectal cancer detection. Furthermore, results from RCTs and observational studies suggest that warfarin may even decrease the incidence of cancer.

Update on the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common emergency presentation requiring prompt resuscitation and management. Peptic ulcers are the most common cause of the condition. Thorough initial management with a structured approach is vital with appropriate intravenous fluid resuscitation and use of a restrictive transfusion threshold of 7-8 g/dL. Pre-endoscopic scoring tools enable identification of patients at high risk and at very low risk who might benefit from specific management. Endoscopy should be carried out within 24 h of presentation for patients admitted to hospital, although optimal timing for patients at a higher risk within this period is less clear. Endoscopic treatment of high risk lesions and use of subsequent high dose proton pump inhibitors is a cornerstone of non-variceal bleeding management. Variceal haemorrhage results in higher mortality than non-variceal haemorrhage and, if suspected, antibiotics and vasopressors should be administered urgently, before endoscopy. Oesophageal variceal bleeding requires endoscopic band ligation, whereas bleeding from gastric varices requires thrombin or tissue glue injection. Recurrent bleeding is managed by repeat endoscopic treatment. If uncontrolled bleeding occurs, interventional radiological embolisation or surgery is required for non-variceal bleeding or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement for variceal bleeding.

Assessment of knowledge and practice of cardiovascular nurses regarding warfarin

BACKGROUND

Despite new anticoagulants' developments, warfarin is still one of the most commonly used medicines, particularly in the cardiovascular system. One of the significant challenges with warfarin is the prevalence of dangerous side effects such as bleeding and drug and food interactions, which can negatively affect patients if not adequately controlled. As health-care team members, nurses have a crucial role in prescribing this medicine and educating patients. In this regard, this study was conducted to determine the knowledge and practice of nurses working in the cardiovascular wards regarding warfarin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional, descriptive study, knowledge and practice of 239 nurses working in the cardiovascular wards of teaching hospitals affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences have been investigated using European Cardiovascular Nurses Knowledge questionnaire on anticoagulants and the checklist for high-risk drugs safety instructions. The sampling was performed through the stratified sampling method with proportional allocation. Data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 16 through descriptive and inferential statistics (independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation coefficient) (Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

The mean scores of knowledge (18.51 ± 3.87) and practice (10.53 ± 2.12) were slightly higher than the median, and the lowest mean score was related to knowledge on drug interactions (7.62). The practice had a statistically significant relationship with knowledge (P < 0.001). Regarding demographic variables, there was a statistically significant relationship between nurses' knowledge and the education level (P = 0.009) and nurses' practice and age (P = 0.022), work experience (P = 0.032), and work experience in cardiovascular wards (P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of this study, the knowledge of nurses working in the cardiovascular wards about warfarin was not sufficient, and their practice was of poor quality. Nurses' lack of knowledge and improper practice can jeopardize drug safety in patients and cause serious side effects such as bleeding. Proper training of nursing students and nurses about warfarin as a high-risk drug, its side effects, and drug-food interactions, and the emphasis on patient education in patients receiving this medicine can effectively reduce the incidence of side effects.

Expert Opinion on the Use of Novel Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation for the Primary Care Setting in India: A Literature Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, is linked with substantial morbidity and mortality due to accompanying risk of stroke and thromboembolism. Patients with AF are at a five-fold higher risk of suffering from a stroke. Anticoagulation therapy, with either vitamin K antagonists or novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), is a standard approach to reduce the risk. Consultant physicians (CPs) in India are the primary point of contact for the majority of patients before they approach a specialist. The CPs may face challenges in screening and diagnosing AF patients. The apprehensions associated with managing AF patients with anticoagulants, further add to the challenges of a CP. This review aimed to identify the key decision points for the CPs to diagnose AF and initiate anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF) and bring to the table a simplified recommendation supported by expert opinion and guidelines for stroke prevention in NVAF patients.

Over-the-Scope Clip Applications as First-Line Therapy in the Treatment of Upper Non-variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding, Perforations, and Fistulas

Background

The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) is an innovative device and has been successfully used in endoscopic treatment, however, there is a lack of clinical data from China. The aim of this study is to investigate the OTSC applications in the treatment of upper non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding (UNVGIB), perforations, and fistulas in China.

Methods

In total, 80 patients were treated with one OTSC respectively as first-line therapy in our endoscopy center between January 2016 and November 2020. Among them, 41 patients had UNVGIB, 34 patients had perforations, and five patients had fistulas. The technical and clinical success rates were used to assess the efficacy of OTSC on the above diseases. In addition, we compared the hemostatic efficacy of OTSC with the standard endoscopic therapy in ulcer bleeding and Dieulafoy's lesion by propensity score matching analysis.

Results

In general, the OTSCs were applied successfully in all patients and achieved 100% (80/80) technical success. The clinical success of all patients was 91.3% (73/80). Among 41 patients with UNVGIB, the clinical success was 85.4% (35/41); 6 patients presented with recurrence. For patients of Dieulafoy's lesion and under antithrombotic therapy, we found that OTSC treatment had both efficient and reliable hemostasis effects. In addition, according to the characteristics of ulcers, site of bleeding lesion, and Blatchford score, all patients received similar and reliable clinical success rates. After propensity score matching, we found that OTSC treatment had low rebleeding rates when compared with standard endoscopic therapy in both Dieulafoy's lesion (15.0 vs 30.0%) and ulcer bleeding (17.6 vs 29.4%). Among 34 patients with perforations, the clinical success was 100% (34/34). Among five patients with fistulas, only one patient failed in maintaining the OTSC before esophageal fistula healing, and the clip achieved an overall clinical success of 80% (4/5).

Conclusion

The OTSC represents a safe and effective endoscopic therapy for UNVGIB, perforations, and fistulas as first-line treatment, especially for Dieulafoy's lesion or patients under antithrombotic therapy for UNVGIB, etc. However, OTSC application in these specific lesions or patients lacks adequate evidence as first-line treatment. Therefore, further larger sample and multi-center clinical trials are required to improve its indications in clinical treatment.

Association of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) and Warfarin With Haemorrhagic Risk by Applying Correspondence Analysis to Data From the Italian Pharmacovigilance Database - A Case Study

Introduction: Post-marketing data on the risks associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are conflicting and only few studies evaluated a comparison between each different DOAC. Real-world data from pharmacovigilance databases can help to better define the safety profile of each DOAC and warfarin. However, Correspondence Analysis (CA) could represent a useful tool in this context. Objective: In the attempt to assess the usefulness of CA as a signal detection pharmacovigilance tool, we applied this method to the Italian Pharmacovigilance Database (RNF, Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza), by comparing with disproportionality analysis on warfarin and DOACs. Methods: Study based on AEs sent to RNF by Campania Region from 2008 to 2021, in which warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban or rivaroxaban were reported as suspected drug. AEs were clustered into three Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs): Central Nervous System Haemorrhages and Conditions (CNSH), GastroIntestinal Perforation, Ulceration, Obstruction or Haemorrhages (GIPUOH) and other Haemorrhages (HH). Non-haemorrhagic AEs were included in a fourth cluster (nHH). Results: We retrieved 1,161 reports: 41.5% are associated to warfarin, 21.0% to dabigatran, 17.8% to rivaroxaban, 13.9% to apixaban and 5.8% to edoxaban. No significant differences in age distribution were observed. Results of CA showed that dabigatran and warfarin have the highest contribution (44.910 and 47.656, respectively) to the inertia of Dimension 1 as well as apixaban and dabigatran to the inertia of Dimension 2 (53.768 and 30.488, respectively). Edoxaban and rivaroxaban showed a negligible total contribution. CA biplot showed positive associations between warfarin and HH, apixaban and CNSH and dabigatran and nHH. Conclusion: Results seem to confirm that DOACs are not interchangeable. Apixaban was surprisingly associated with a higher risk of cerebral haemorrhage. As expected, our data support the better safety profile of DOACs than warfarin in terms of skin and respiratory tract hemorrhagic risks. Finally, we showed how CA could play a complementary role in analyzing data from pharmacovigilance databases.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding: a Cardiologist's Point of View

Oral anticoagulant therapy is widely used in different patients for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events: in atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, acute coronary syndrome, in the early postoperative period after orthopedic surgery. Nowadays it is possible to use vitamin K antagonists (warfarin) as well as direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC): dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban. The mai complication of any anticoagulant therapy is bleeding (gastrointestinal, intracranial, etc.), which seriously limits its usage. In this review the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) associated with oral anticoagulants intake was analyzed according to the results of both large randomized and postregistration trials. Furthermore, the effect of age on the risk of GIB development is discussed, and also aspects of the pathophysiology of gastrointestinal mucosa lesions in patients taking DOAC are considered.

Reappraisal of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Recent observational studies have compared effectiveness and safety profiles between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, the confounders may exist due to the nature of clinical practice-based data, thus potentially influencing the reliability of results. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the effect of NOACs with warfarin based on the propensity score-based observational studies vs. randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

Methods: Articles included were systematically searched from the PubMed and EMBASE databases until March 2021 to obtain relevant studies. The primary outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleeding. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the outcomes were extracted and then pooled by the random-effects model.

Results: A total of 20 propensity score-based observational studies and 4 RCTs were included. Compared with warfarin, dabigatran (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.71–0.96]), rivaroxaban (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.75–0.85]), apixaban (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.65–0.86]), and edoxaban (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.60–0.83]) were associated with a reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism, whereas dabigatran (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.65–0.87]), apixaban (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.56–0.67]), and edoxaban (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.45–0.74]) but not rivaroxaban (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.84–1.00]) were significantly associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding based on the observational studies. Furthermore, the risk of major bleeding with dabigatran 150 mg was significantly lower in observational studies than that in the RE-LY trial, whereas the pooled results of observational studies were similar to the data from the corresponding RCTs in other comparisons.

Conclusion: Data from propensity score-based observational studies and NOAC trials consistently suggest that the use of four individual NOACs is non-inferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in AF patients.

Rivaroxaban Is Associated With Higher Rates of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Than Other Direct Oral Anticoagulants : A Nationwide Propensity Score-Weighted Study

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) rates for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin have been extensively compared. However, population-based studies comparing GIB rates among different DOACs are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates of GIB among apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban.

DESIGN

Nationwide population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland and the 4 regional hospitals in Iceland.

PATIENTS

New users of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban from 2014 to 2019.

MEASUREMENTS

Rates of GIB were compared using inverse probability weighting, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and Cox regression.

RESULTS

In total, 2157 patients receiving apixaban, 494 patients receiving dabigatran, and 3217 patients receiving rivaroxaban were compared. For all patients, rivaroxaban had higher overall rates of GIB (3.2 vs. 2.5 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.42 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.93]) and major GIB (1.9 vs. 1.4 events per 100 person-years; HR, 1.50 [CI, 1.00 to 2.24]) compared with apixaban. Rivaroxaban also had higher GIB rates than dabigatran, with similar point estimates, although the CIs were wider and included the possibility of a null effect. When only patients with atrial fibrillation were included, rivaroxaban was associated with higher rates of overall GIB than apixaban (HR, 1.40 [CI, 1.01 to 1.94]) or dabigatran (HR, 2.04 [CI, 1.17 to 3.55]). Dabigatran was associated with lower rates of upper GIB than rivaroxaban in both analyses.

LIMITATIONS

Unmeasured confounding and small subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban was associated with higher GIB rates than apixaban and dabigatran regardless of treatment indication.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Icelandic Centre for Research and Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland.

Risk factors and one-year mortality in patients with direct oral anticoagulant-associated gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Risk factors and mortality in patients with DOACs-associated gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) are not completely defined. Aims of this study were to identify risk factors for bleeding and evaluate one-year mortality in patients with DOACs-associated GIB.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study. Cases were patients with DOACs-associated GIB admitted to the Perugia Hospital, Italy between 2013 and 2019. Controls were derived from the prospective database of patients with DOACs referred to the ambulatory service. Cases and controls were matched by a 1:2 ratio for type and dose of DOAC, indication for anticoagulation and gender. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify risk factors. Hazard Ratio with 95% confidence interval was used to calculate mortality.

RESULTS

We included 324 patients, of which 108 with DOACs-associated GIB. Mean age was 81.9 ± 7.2 years and 78.9 ± 8.7 years, respectively. The most frequent indication for anticoagulation was atrial fibrillation. Reduced doses of DOACs were prescribed in 186 patients (56.4%). At multivariable analysis, active cancer (OR:7.26; 95%CI 3.10-16.96), renal impairment (OR:4.26; 95%CI 1.98-9.17), bleeding predisposition (OR:3.66; 95%CI 2.00-6.68), COPD (OR:2.12; 95%CI 1.08-4.16) and uncontrolled hypertension (OR:1.86; 95%CI 1.07-3.23) were found to be predictors for DOACs-associated GIB. Adjusted one-year mortality was significantly higher in patients who experienced GIB compared with those who did not experience GIB (OR: 7.04; 95%CI 3.82-14.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Predictors of DOACs-associated GIB included active cancer, renal impairment, bleeding predisposition, COPD and uncontrolled hypertension. The adjusted one-year-mortality was significantly increased in patients with DOACs-associated GIB in comparison to DOACs patients without GIB.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Direct Oral Anticoagulants among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Risk, Prevention, Management, and Quality of Life

A significant problem for patients undergoing oral anticoagulation therapy is gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), a problem that has become increasingly urgent following the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Furthermore, in recent years a greater focus has been placed on the quality of life (QOL) of patients on long-term oral anticoagulant therapy, which necessitates changes in lifestyle, as well as posing an increased risk of bleeding without producing objective symptomatic relief. Here, we examine current evidence linked to GIB associated with oral anticoagulants, with a focus on randomized control trials, meta-analyses, and postmarketing observational studies. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran (especially the 150-mg bis-in-die dose) appeared to be linked to an increased risk of GIB. The risk of GIB was also greater when edoxaban was used, although this was dependent on the dose. Apixaban did not pose a higher risk of GIB in comparison with warfarin. We provided a summary of current knowledge regarding GIB risk factors for individual anticoagulants, prevention strategies that lower the risk of GIB and management of DOAC therapy after a GIB episode.

Association of antidiabetic therapies with lower extremity amputation, mortality and healthcare cost from a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Taiwan

We compared risks of clinical outcomes, mortality and healthcare costs among new users of different classes of anti-diabetic medications. This is a population-based, retrospective, new-user design cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database between May 2, 2015 and September 30, 2017. An individual was assigned to a medication group based on the first anti-diabetic prescription on or after May 1, 2016: SGLT-2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists or older agents (metformin, etc.). Clinical outcomes included lower extremity amputation, peripheral vascular disease, critical limb ischemia, osteomyelitis, and ulcer. We built three Cox proportional hazards models for clinical outcomes and mortality, and three regression models with a log-link function and gamma distribution for healthcare costs, all with propensity-score weighting and covariates. We identified 1,222,436 eligible individuals. After adjustment, new users of SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with 73% lower mortality compared to those of DPP-4 inhibitors or users of older agents, while 36% lower total costs against those of GLP-1 agonists. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of lower extremity amputation across medication groups. Our study suggested that SGLT-2 inhibitors is associated with lower mortality compared to DPP 4 inhibitors and lower costs compared to GLP-1 agonists.

The interplay between gastrointestinal and cardiovascular diseases: a narrative review focusing on the clinical perspective

Both cardiovascular and gastrointestinal disorders represent considerable health burden on community clinics and hospitals with overwhelming economic cost. An overlap in the occurrence of these disorders is encountered in daily practice. Both affect each other in bidirectional manner through several mechanisms including altered hemodynamics, systemic inflammation, bacterial overgrowth and interactions and adverse effects of medications. In addition, to the known overlap in the symptoms occurrence of upper gastrointestinal tract diseases and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Awareness of this interplay and its clinical manifestations optimizes patient management, and could prevent catastrophic consequences and even save lives. In this review, we highlighted the clinical aspects of this bidirectional association between gastrointestinal and CVDs aiming to shed light on this topic and improve patients' care.

Assessing Safety of Direct Thrombin Inhibitors, Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors and Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Nation-Wide Propensity Score Matched Cohort from Sweden

Purpose

To evaluate associations between first-time use of direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists and bleeding risk or mortality in the elderly with atrial fibrillation in a real-world setting in Sweden.

Patients and Methods

The study population comprises first-time users, above age 60, of dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, or warfarin, with first atrial fibrillation occurrence within 6 months before dispensing (2012–2016). Outcomes were gastrointestinal, any, or intracranial bleeding, and mortality. Exposure started at first dispensing of a study drug. Follow-up continued until outcome, end of drug supply, dispensing of another study drug, death or end of study (December 2016). We conducted a propensity score matched, nationwide register-based cohort study including three treatment groups: direct thrombin inhibitors, direct factor Xa inhibitors and vitamin K antagonists, each compared to the other two, focusing on subgroups of age and sex. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores provided hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

The matched study populations consisted of 7,264 patients for the direct thrombin inhibitors vs vitamin K antagonists comparison, 12,566 patients for the direct factor Xa inhibitors vs vitamin K antagonists comparison and 6,606 patients for the direct factor Xa inhibitors vs direct thrombin inhibitors comparison, in total 26,436 patients. Numerically high, but imprecise, hazard ratios for gastrointestinal bleeding were observed for women aged 75–80, 80–85, or above 85 years, eg 6.00 (1.02, 113.47) for direct thrombin inhibitors vs vitamin K antagonists. For both sexes, numerically high hazard ratios for any bleeding were observed in ages 80–85, or above 85 years, eg 2.90 (1.01, 10.41) for direct thrombin inhibitors vs vitamin K antagonists. Numerically high HRs for intracranial bleeding were observed for women aged 75–80 or 80–85 years, eg 2.70 (0.65, 18.19) for direct factor Xa inhibitors vs vitamin K antagonists. Excess mortality was observed in both sexes, across age groups, for naive and experienced anticoagulant users.

Conclusion

The observed increased gastrointestinal bleeding risk in first-time users of direct thrombin inhibitors or direct factor Xa inhibitors is consistent with previous studies. The possible risk of excess mortality merits further studies.

Integrating E-Prescribing and Pharmacy Claims Data for Predictive Modeling: Comparing Costs and Utilization of Health Plan Members Who Fill Their Initial Medications with Those Who Do Not

BACKGROUND

Nonfilling of prescribed medications is a worldwide problem of serious concern. Studies of health care costs and utilization associated with medication nonadherence frequently rely on claims data and usually focus on patients with specific conditions. Past studies also have little agreement on whether higher medication costs associated with higher adherence can reduce downstream health care consumption.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) compare the characteristics between people with and without complete medication initiations from a general population and (b) quantify the effect of medication initiation on health care utilization and expenditures with propensity score weighting.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using 2012 and 2013 electronic health records (EHR) and insurance claims data from an integrated health care delivery network. We included 43,097 eligible primary care patients in the study. Annual medication fill rates of initial prescriptions in 2012 were defined as the number of filled prescriptions from claims divided by the number of e-prescriptions from EHRs, while excluding all refills. A claim was considered filled if (a) EHR and claims records were from the same drug class; (b) claims occurred between the date of a current EHR order and that of the next EHR order of the same class; and (c) the maximum fill rate was 100%. The 6 annual outcomes included total costs, medical costs, pharmacy costs, being a high-cost "outlier" (in top 5%), having 1 or more hospitalizations, and having 1 or more emergency department (ED) visits. Individuals were classified as either having completed all medication initiations (100% annual filling rate for initiations) or not. We used propensity score weighting to control for baseline differences between complete and incomplete initial fillers. We adopted linear and logistic regressions to model costs and binary utilization indicators for the same year (concurrently) and next year (prospectively).

RESULTS

Approximately 42% of the study sample had complete medication initiations (100% filling rate), while the remaining 58% had incomplete initiations. Individuals who fully filled initial prescriptions had lower comorbidity burden and consumed fewer health care resources. After applying propensity score weighting and controlling for variables such as the number of prescription orders, patients with complete medication initiations had lower overall and medical costs, concurrently and prospectively (e.g., $751 and $252 less for annual total costs). Complete medication initiation fillers were also less likely to have concurrent health care utilization (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.68-0.90 for hospitalization; OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.72-0.82 for ED admissions) but no difference in prospective utilization other than for ED visits (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying the subpopulation of patients with incomplete medication initiations (i.e., filling less than 100% of initial prescriptions) is a pragmatic approach for population health management programs to align resources and potentially contain cost and utilization.

DISCLOSURES

No outside funding supported this study. This study applied the Adjusted Clinical Group (ACG) case-mix/risk adjustment methodology, developed at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Although ACGs are an important aspect of this study, the goal of the study was not to directly assess or evaluate the methodology. The Johns Hopkins University receives royalties for nonacademic use of software based on the ACG methodology. Chang, Kharrazi, and Weiner receive a portion of their salary support from this revenue. Chang is also a part-time consultant for Monument Analytics, a health care consultancy whose clients include the life sciences industry, as well as plaintiffs in opioid litigation. Alexander is past Chair of FDA's Peripheral and Central Nervous System Advisory Committee; has served as a paid advisor to IQVIA; is a co-founding Principal and equity holder in Monument Analytics; and is a member of OptumRx's National P&T Committee. These arrangements have been reviewed and approved by Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

What gastroenterologists should know about direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants are being increasingly used in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism, due to their improved efficacy/ safety ratio, a predictable anticoagulant effect without need for routine coagulation monitoring, and fewer food and drug interactions compared with vitamin K antagonists. Gastrointestinal bleeding remains a serious complication, whose management is challenging for gastroenterologists due to the lack of a standardized clinical approach. Clinical experience on periendoscopic management of these drugs is still limited and there is a paucity of clinical data supporting guidelines recommendations', and this ultimately turns out in different, unsubstantiated and potentially harmful practices of patient management. Present study will provide a thorough revision on the risk of GI bleeding for DOAC therapy and the identification of patient risk factors to individualize treatment. Moreover, the approach to management of DOACs in case of bleeding complications is discussed, and an algorithm of different strategies in presence or not of plasma level measurement is proposed. Finally the periendoscopic management for elective procedures will be reviewed, at the light of the guideline recommendations and new evidences from observational studies.

Evaluation of risk factors and drug adherence in the occurrence of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation

Background:

Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients are at high risk of developing a stroke and anticoagulant medications are generally prescribed to prevent stroke in AF population.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate stroke risk factors among hospitalized patients with AF and to assess the level of adherence to medications in AF patients and their relation with stroke.

Methods:

This is a case-control study conducted between June 1^st, 2018 and December 31^th, 2018 among AF patients admitted to seven tertiary Lebanese hospitals. Data were collected using a standardized questionnaire. Adherence to medications was assessed using the Lebanese Medication Adherence Scale-14. Odds ratios (OR) expressed the strength of association between the independent variables and the dependent variable and were estimated using unconditional logistic regression adjusted for confounding factors. P<0.05 determined statistical significance.

Results:

In total, 174 cases of AF patients were included with 87 cases and 87 controls. The risk of stroke among AF significantly increased with the presence of a history of hypertension, aOR 16.04 (95%CI, 2.27-113.37; p=0.005), history of coronary heart disease/myocardial infarction, and history of obesity. Anticoagulant medication significantly decreased the risk of stroke among AF patients, aOR 0.27 (95%CI, 0.07-0.98; P=0.047). High adherence to medications was significantly associated with a reduced risk of stroke, aOR 0.04 (95%CI, 0.01-0.23; p<0.001).

Conclusions:

Having a history of hypertension is one of the strongest risk factors for stroke among AF patients in Lebanon. While anticoagulant medication use was associated with a reduced risk for stroke, high adherence to medications is critical for stroke prevention. Public health interventions are needed to tackle low-adherence to medication and prevent stroke among AF patients.

Major bleeding risk associated with oral anticoagulant in real clinical practice. A multicentre 3-year period population-based prospective cohort study

AIMS

The objective was to compare major bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; per type and dose) with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), irrespective of indication, using real-world data.

METHODS

A population-based prospective cohort study, using the French national health data system (SNIIRAM), identified 47 469 adults living within 5 well-defined geographical areas, who were new users of oral anticoagulants in the period 2013-2015: 20 205 VKA users, 19 579 rivaroxaban users, 4225 dabigatran users and 3460 apixaban users. From all emergency departments within these areas, clinical data for all adults referred for bleeding was collected and medically validated. The databases were linked for common key variables. The main outcome measure was major bleeding: intracranial haemorrhage, major gastrointestinal bleeding and other major bleeding events. Hazard ratios were derived from adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. We used propensity score weighting as a sensitivity analysis, with separate analyses according to indications (atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism).

RESULTS

Compared to VKAs, high and low-dose DOACs were associated with a reduced risk of intracranial haemorrhage (adjusted hazard ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.82 and 0.54, 0.26-1.12 respectively), and a reduced risk of other major bleeding events (0.41, 0.29-0.58 and 0.41, 0.22-0.79 respectively), irrespective of duration and indication. Neither DOAC dose evidenced any significant difference from VKAs in terms of risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding.

CONCLUSION

There is a clear benefit of using DOACs with regard to intracranial haemorrhage. The study provides new insight into major gastrointestinal and other major bleeding events.

Uptake of direct oral anticoagulants in primary care: an ecological and economic study

Background

Clinical trials indicate that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are as effective as warfarin at preventing ischaemic stroke. It is unclear, however, whether relative changes in DOAC uptake have affected clinical and economic outcomes in practice.

Aim

To investigate variations in DOAC uptake and the relationship with hospital admissions and cost.

Design & setting

An ecological study using electronic administrative records from England, April 2012 to March 2017.

Method

Multivariable regression was used to model practice variation in DOAC prescribing, and the relationship with clinical and economic outcomes.

Results

In quarter 1 of 2017, 55.0% of the 2 695 262 patients dispensed an anticoagulant were given a DOAC. There was a two-fold difference in odds of dispensing DOACs between clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) between those with the highest and lowest usage of these drugs. Increases in the relative uptake of DOACs were not associated with hospital admissions for ischaemic stroke (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.00; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.999 to 1.001), nor gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeds (IRR = 1.001; 95% CI = 1.000 to 1.002). In 2017, quarter 1, CCGs spent £9247 (inter-quartile range £7751 to £10 853) per 1000 patients on anticoagulants. The marginal effect of a 5% increase in DOAC uptake was associated with a £17.95 (£8.75 to £27.15) increase in total costs, per 1000 patient population.

Conclusion

There were significant differences in the relative uptake of DOACs across practices, with greater costs but no reduction in hospital admissions in those with higher levels of dispensing. Findings indicate that clinical and economic benefits of DOACs identified by clinical trials are not realised in practice.

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and the Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk in Real-World Studies

In the present study, we aimed to provide evidence from high-quality real world studies for a comprehensive and rigorous analysis on the gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) risk for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PUBMED, and of 286 records screened, we included data from 11 high-quality real-world studies, coordinated by independent research groups over the last 3 years, that reported major GIB events in patients given NOACs or vitamin K antagonists for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The lowest risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was with apixaban compared with warfarin (hazard ratio (HR) for GIB for apixaban ranging between 0.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34 to 0.59) and 1.13 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.63)). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of GI bleeding than dabigatran ((HR ranging between 0.39 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.58) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.18)) or rivaroxaban ((HR ranging between 0.33 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.49) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.62 to 1.08)). The results of our study confirm a low or a similar risk for major GIB between patients receiving apixaban or dabigatran compared with warfarin, and apixaban appears to be associated with the lowest risk of GIB.

Real World Outcomes Associated with Idarucizumab: Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Idarucizumab reverses the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, but few comparative studies have reported on clinical outcomes with idarucizumab.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine the effect of idarucizumab on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a nationally representative sample of hospitals in the United States. The study population included adults ≥ 18 years who were hospitalized for dabigatran-associated major bleeding between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. We compared idarucizumab-exposed patients to the unexposed group. Our primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

We included 266 exposed and 1345 non-exposed participants across 271 hospitals. Among participants with gastrointestinal bleeding, there was no statistically significant difference in the odds of in-hospital mortality [9/153 (5.9%) vs 37/1124 (3.3%); adjusted odds ratio = 1.39, 95% confidence interval 0.51-3.45] between the idarucizumab-exposed and non-exposed groups. Among participants with intracranial bleeding, there was an excess of in-hospital mortality [13/112 (11.6%) vs 6/217 (2.8%)] associated with idarucizumab exposure, but limitations include sparse data and the inability to rule out residual confounding or confounding by disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Among a large nationally representative sample of adult patients with dabigatran-associated major bleeding in the United States, we found no difference in in-hospital mortality among patients with gastrointestinal bleeding associated with idarucizumab exposure. An excess risk of in-hospital mortality associated with idarucizumab exposure among participants with intracranial bleeding deserves further exploration.

Risk of Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding With New vs Conventional Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is controversy over whether use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) associates with increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) compared with conventional therapies (such as vitamin K antagonists or anti-platelet agents). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials and high-quality real-world studies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov Website databases (through Oct 12, 2018) for randomized controlled trials and high-quality real-world studies that reported major GIB events in patients given NOACs or conventional therapy. Relative risks (RRs) for randomized controlled trials and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for real-world studies were calculated separately using random-effects models.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 43 randomized controlled trials (183,752 patients) and 41 real-world studies (1,879,428 patients). The pooled major rates of GIB for patients on NOACs (1.19%) vs conventional treatment (0.92%) did not differ significantly (RR from randomized controlled trials, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.91-1.31 and aHR from real-world studies, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94-1.10; P_interaction=.52). Rivaroxaban, but not other NOACs, was associated with an increased risk for major GIB (RR from randomized controlled trials, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.17-1.65 and aHR from real-world studies, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.23; P_interaction = .06). Analyses of subgroups, such as patients with different indications, dosage, or follow-up time, did not significantly affect results. Meta-regression analysis failed to detect any potential confounding to impact the primacy outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies, we confirmed that there is no significant difference in risk of major GIB between patients receiving NOACs vs conventional treatment. Rivaroxaban users had a 39% increase in risk for major GIB.

Thirty-day mortality in atrial fibrillation patients with gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department: differences between direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin users

More clinical data are required on the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Although patients treated with warfarin and DOACs have a similar risk of bleeding, short-term mortality after a gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) episode in DOAC-treated patients has not been clarified. The objective of this study was to assess differences in 30-day mortality in patients treated with DOACs or warfarin admitted to the emergency department (ED) for GIB. This was a multicentre retrospective study conducted over 2 years. The study included patients evaluated at three different EDs for GIB. The baseline characteristics were included. Subsequently, we assessed the differences in past medical history and clinical data between the two study groups (DOAC and warfarin users). Differences between the two groups were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Among the 284 patients presenting GIB enrolled in the study period, 39.4% (112/284) were treated with DOACs and 60.6% (172/284) were treated with warfarin. Overall, 8.1% (23/284) of patients died within 30 days. Among the 172 warfarin-treated patients, 8.7% (15/172) died within 30 days from ED evaluation. In the 112 DOAC-treated patients, the mortality rate was 7.1% (8/112). The Cox regression analysis, adjusted for possible clinical confounders, and the Kaplan-Meier curves did not outline differences between the two treatment groups. The present study shows no differences between DOACs and warfarin in short-term mortality after GIB.

Survival Impact and Clinical Predictors of Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Bloodstream Infection

PURPOSE

The impact of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) on outcomes of patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) has not been studied. We aim to evaluate the risk factors and survival impact of GIB on the outcome of BSI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted prospectively at National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. Patients aged ≥18 years for who BSI was confirmed by blood cultures were enrolled and followed for 90 days. Risk factors of GIB were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. The survival impact of GIB on BSI was evaluated with the Cox proportional hazards model with inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

Of the 1034 patients with BSI, 79 (7.64%) developed acute GIB. We identified 5 independent predictors of GIB. Patients with BSI complicated with GIB had an increased 90-day mortality compared to patients without GIB (hazard ratio 1.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.14, 2.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrointestinal bleeding had an adverse impact on the short-term survival in patients with BSI. The clinical predictors may help identify patients who may benefit from active prevention and treatment of GIB.

Optimization of Pharmacotherapy with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: the Need to Choose the Right Dosage Regimen

In recent years, there has been a persistent trend towards the more frequent prescription of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists due to the extensive body of evidence showing their high safety and efficacy, which in some cases exceed those of warfarin, and also by reason of there is no necessity for regular monitoring of international normalized ratio. However, the question of the reasonable and rational prescription of DOACs becomes relevant, including issues of their dosing, especially as a result of increasing in the number of patients with a complex cardiovascular risk profile and multimorbidity. In these terms, apixaban stands high among the DOAC class, and its high efficacy and safety both in full dose and reasonably reduced dosage has been proved, including older patients, patients with chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, with history of acute coronary syndrome and individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. This DOAC has strict indications to reduce the dose, they are specified in the drug label, and in such cases a reduced dose should be prescribed, in these clinical conditions the effectiveness and safety of apixaban is also proven. The favorable apixaban pharmacokinetic properties, consisting in low renal clearance, lack of clinically relevant interaction with food and the linear smooth effect on the blood coagulation components without episodes of hypo- and hypercoagulation, are the most important components of high efficacy and safety of this DOAC. The optimal efficacy and safety coupling of apixaban is reflected in the exclusively high patients’ adherence to the treatment confirmed by evidence-based medicine data, and therefore there is no necessity for additional procedures to maintain adherence. All the aforementioned facts allow us to recommend apixaban for widespread use in patients requiring anticoagulant therapy for optimal prevention of systemic thromboembolism and minimizing the associated risk of bleeding.

Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common medical emergency, with a reported mortality of 2-10%. Patients identified as being at very low risk of either needing an intervention or death can be managed as outpatients. For all other patients, intravenous fluids as needed for resuscitation and red cell transfusion at a hemoglobin threshold of 70-80 g/L are recommended. After resuscitation is initiated, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the prokinetic agent erythromycin may be administered, with antibiotics and vasoactive drugs recommended in patients who have cirrhosis. Endoscopy should be undertaken within 24 hours, with earlier endoscopy considered after resuscitation in patients at high risk, such as those with hemodynamic instability. Endoscopic treatment is used for variceal bleeding (for example, ligation for esophageal varices and tissue glue for gastric varices) and for high risk non-variceal bleeding (for example, injection, thermal probes, or clips for lesions with active bleeding or non-bleeding visible vessel). Patients who require endoscopic therapy for ulcer bleeding should receive high dose proton pump inhibitors after endoscopy, whereas those who have variceal bleeding should continue taking antibiotics and vasoactive drugs. Recurrent ulcer bleeding is treated with repeat endoscopic therapy, with subsequent bleeding managed by interventional radiology or surgery. Recurrent variceal bleeding is generally treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. In patients who require antithrombotic agents, outcomes appear to be better when these drugs are reintroduced early.

Safety of direct oral anticoagulants in real-world clinical practice: translating the trials to everyday clinical management

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be regarded as some of the most successful innovations in recent times. These drugs which were specifically developed to overcome the challenges posed by warfarin did just that and in the process, have changed the outlook towards stroke prevention with anticoagulation. The decade of experience with these drugs that has resulted in the availability of large scale data on their safety profile has aided this. Areas covered: This review examines existing real-world studies (RWS) and their interpretation to better appreciate how they either complement or contradict findings from the hallmark trials. Specific focus has been made on the safety of DOACs, on their risks of major bleeding, intra-cranial haemorrhage (ICH), gastro-intestinal (GI) bleeding and all-cause mortality compared to warfarin and each other. DOAC use in the elderly and other sub-groups are briefly discussed. Expert opinion: Results for safety outcomes according to 'real world evidence' (RWE) are in-keeping with randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and currently, all 4 DOACs have been deemed at least as effective as warfarin, while demonstrating superiority in some aspects. While real world studies act as a complementary source of knowledge, traditional RCTs remain the gold standard for determining cause-effect relationships.

Previous Use of Antithrombotic Agents Reduces Mortality and Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With High-risk Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Anti-thrombotic agents are risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). However, few studies have evaluated their effects on patient outcomes. We assessed the effects of anti-thrombotic agents on outcomes of patients with high-risk UGIB.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 619 patients with acute UGIB (defined by hematemesis, coffee-ground vomit or melena) who required intervention and underwent endoscopy at 8 centers in North America, Asia, and Europe, from March 2014 through March 2015. We collected data recorded on use of anti-thrombotic agents, clinical features, and laboratory test results to calculate AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and full Rockall scores. We also collected and analyzed data on co-morbidities, endoscopic findings, blood transfusion, interventional radiology results, surgeries, length of hospital stay, rebleeding, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 619 patients who required endoscopic therapy, data on use of anti-thrombotic agents was available for 568; 253 of these patients (44%) used anti-thrombotic agents. Compared to patients not taking anti-thrombotic agents, patients treated with anti-thrombotics were older (P < .001), had a higher mean American Society of Anesthesiologists classification score (P < .0001), had a higher mean Rockall score (P < .0001), a higher mean AIMS65 score (P < .0001), and more frequently bled from ulcers (P < .001). There were no differences between groups in sex, systolic blood pressure, level of hemoglobin at hospital admission, frequency of malignancies, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, need for surgery or interventional radiology, number of rebleeding events, or requirement for transfusion. All-cause mortality was lower in patients who took anti-thrombotic drugs (11 deaths, 4%) than in patients who did not (37 deaths, 12%) (P = .002); this was due to lower bleeding-related mortality in patients taking anti-thrombotic drugs (3 deaths, 1%) than in patients who were not (19 deaths, 6%) (P = .003). Patients taking anti-thrombotic drugs had mean hospital stays of 6.9 days (95% CI, 2-23 days) compared to 7.9 days for non-users of anti-thrombotic agents (95% CI, 2-26 days) (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being older, with higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, AIMS65, and Rockall scores, patients who have UGIB that requires endoscopic therapy and take anti-thrombotic drugs have lower mortality due to GI bleeding and shorter hospital stays, with similar rates of rebleeding, surgery, and transfusions, compared with those not taking anti-thrombotic drugs.

International Consensus on Guiding Recommendations for Management of Patients with Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs Induced Gastropathy-ICON-G

Introduction

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), one of the most commonly used medications worldwide, are frequently associated with gastrointestinal adverse events. Primary care physicians often face the challenge of achieving adequate pain relief with NSAIDs, while keeping their adverse events to a minimum. This is especially true when long-term use of NSAIDs is required such as in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. To help primary care physicians deal with such challenges more effectively, a panel of expert gastroenterologists came together with the aim of developing practice recommendations.

Methods

A modified ‘Delphi’ process was used to reach consensus and develop practice recommendations. Twelve gastroenterologists from nine countries provided their expert inputs to formulate the recommendations. These recommendations were carefully developed taking into account existing literature, current practices, and expert opinion of the panelists.

Results

The expert panel developed a total of fifteen practice recommendations. Following are the key recommendations: NSAIDs should be prescribed only when necessary; before prescribing NSAIDs, associated modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors should be considered; H. pylori infection should be considered and treated before initiating NSAIDs; patients should be properly educated regarding NSAIDs use; patients who need to be on long-term NSAIDs should be prescribed a gastroprotective agent, preferably a proton pump inhibitor and these patients should be closely monitored for any untoward adverse events.

Conclusion/clinical significance

These practice recommendations will serve as an important tool for primary care physicians and will guide them in making appropriate therapeutic choices for their patients.

How to cite this article: Hunt R, Lazebnik LB, Marakhouski YC, Manuc M, Ramesh GN, Aye KS, Bordin DS, Bakulina NV, Iskakov BS, Khamraev AA, Stepanov YM, Ally R, Garg A. International Consensus on Guiding Recommendations for Management of Patients with Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Induced Gastropathy-ICON-G. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol, 2018;8(2):148-160.

Major bleeding with antithrombotic agents: a 2012-2015 study using the French nationwide Health Insurance database linked to emergency department records within five areas - rationale and design of SACHA study

Bleeding represents the most recognized and feared complications of antithrombotic drugs including oral anticoagulants. Previous studies showed inconsistent results on the safety profile. Among explanations, bleeding definition could vary and classification bias exists related to the lack of medical evaluation. To quantify the risk of major haemorrhagic event and event-free survival associated with antithrombotic drugs (vitamin K antagonist [VKA], non-VKA anticoagulant [NOAC], antiplatelet agent, parenteral anticoagulant) in 2012-2015, we linked the French nationwide Health Insurance database (SNIIRAM) with a local 'emergency database' (clinical and biological data collected in clinical records). In the VKA-NOAC comparison, a Cox regression analysis will be used to estimate the hazard ratio of major haemorrhagic event adjusted on gender, modified HAS-BLED score and comorbidities. A distinction on the type of major haemorrhagic event (intracranial, gastrointestinal and other haemorrhagic events) was made. We present here the study protocol and the database linkage results. Using six linkage keys, among 3 837 557 hospital visits identified in SNIIRAM, 5264 have been matched with a major haemorrhagic event identified in the 'emergency database', thus clinically confirmed. The 1090 unmatched haemorrhagic events could be explained by the fact that patients were not extracted in the SNIIRAM database (patients living in accommodation establishment with internal use of pharmacy, military people with specific insurance…). We showed the value of SNIIRAM enrichment with a clinical database, a necessary step to categorize haemorrhagic events by a clinically relevant definition and medical validation; it will allow to estimate more accuracy each type of haemorrhagic event.

Benefit of Capsule Endoscopy in the Setting of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients Above Age 65

Background

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common indication for a capsule endoscopy (CE), which is often offered after a negative bidirectional endoscopy. Since malignancy is a concern in the older population with IDA, upper and lower endoscopic exams are typically performed. If these tests are negative, CE may be offered to evaluate the small intestine. However, choosing the ideal candidates who are most likely to benefit from a CE study is challenging.

Aims

The goal of this study was to assess the outcomes for CE in patients with IDA over age 65 and assess which factors are more likely to contribute to a positive CE yield.

Methods

A retrospective review of all CE studies at St. Paul's Hospital from January 2010 to June 2016 was conducted after ethics approval. Inclusion criteria included the following: age >65, hemoglobin <120 g/L, serum ferritin <70 μg/L, and at least one high-quality complete EGD/colonoscopy performed before CE. Variables to assess factors that are more likely to contribute to a positive capsule yield included use of anticoagulation medications, NSAIDs, PPIs, transfusion burden and cardiac disease. A Chi-Square test was then used to determine clinical predictive factors of a positive and negative study.

Results

There were 1149 CE studies that were reviewed, of which 130 CE studies met inclusion criteria. Fifty-one studies (40.6%) had positive findings, and from this group, 30 (58.8%) recommended active intervention (i.e., EGD, n = 8; colonoscopy, n = 12; push enteroscopy, n = 3; double-balloon [DB] enteroscopy, n = 2; small bowel resection, n = 3; escalation of Crohn's therapy, n = 2), while 21 (41.2%) were managed supportively, typically with iron supplementation. Most negative studies (73 of 79) recommended supportive therapy (other recommendations included hematological workup, n = 3; hiatal hernia repair, n = 1; proton-pump inhibitors [PPI] initiation, n = 1; stop donating blood, n = 1).A history of cardiac disease had a significant association with positive findings (0.54 versus 0.33, P = 0.001). Conversely, a known history of low ferritin levels (0.84 versus 0.68, P = 0.046) and a known history of hiatal hernia (0.25 versus 0.08, P = 0.012) were associated with a negative study.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the clinical yield of CE in IDA in patients above age 65 is relatively low. The majority of all CE studies recommended supportive therapy or repeat endoscopic exams (EGD/colonoscopy) of areas previously assessed and lesions missed. Provided that initial endoscopic exams were thorough and Crohn's disease management was optimized, the overall rate of changing management significantly was low at five of 130 studies (two DB enteroscopies and three resections) or 3.8%. Clinical factors focusing on cardiac history, ferritin levels and the presence of a hiatal hernia may be of utility to predict benefit of CE. Emphasis on these data may help select more appropriate patients for capsule endoscopy.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Adults With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

All evidence regarding benefits and harms of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention has not been appraised yet.

STUDY QUESTION

What are the comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?

DATA SOURCES

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and observational studies were identified in several databases in October 2018.

STUDY DESIGN

Rapid review with evidence appraisal using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group approach.

RESULTS

Two direct RCTs (23,021 patients) suggest that rivaroxaban is noninferior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism (pooled relative risk [RR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.24), reduces risk of hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.59, 95% CI, 0.38-0.92), fatal bleeding (RR 0.49, 95% CI, 0.31-0.76), and cardiac arrest (RR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.25-0.82, 2 RCTs), but increases risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.46, 95% CI, 1.19-1.78). In observational studies, rivaroxaban is associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke (RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.77-0.99, 222,750 patients), acute myocardial infarction (RR 0.61, 95% CI, 0.48-0.78, 73,739 patients), and intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.64, 95% CI, 0.45-0.92, 197,506 patients) but higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.30, 95% CI, 1.19-1.42, 188,968 patients) and higher risk of mortality when compared with warfarin in European studies (RR 1.19, 103,270 patients in the UK; RR 2.02, 22,358 patients in Denmark) but lower risk of mortality in Taiwan (RR 0.58, 40,000 patients). Network meta-analyses and observational studies suggest that rivaroxaban is associated with higher risk of bleeding when compared with apixaban (RR 2.14, 72,586 patients), dabigatran (RR 1.24, 67,102 patients), and edoxaban (RR 1.32, 71,683 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Research on the long-term comparative effectiveness, safety, and effects on quality of life between rivaroxaban and other novel oral anticoagulants is urgently needed.

Patient characteristics and bleeding events in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with apixaban or vitamin K antagonists: real-world evidence from Italian administrative databases

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of major bleeding among two cohorts of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients newly initiating a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or apixaban in a real-world setting in Italy. Patients & methods: A retrospective study using a large administrative database of Italian local health units was performed, using data from ten local health units and patients were included from the date of new initiation of apixaban or VKAs from January 2012 to June 2015. Results: Risk of major bleeding was calculated using an adjusted Cox regression model. Compared with VKA, apixaban had a significantly lower risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio = 0.44 [95% CI: 0.12–0.97]). Conclusion: In this analysis, apixaban was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding compared with VKA.

Oral anticoagulant use in cardiovascular disorders: a perspective on present and potential indications for rivaroxaban

BACKGROUND

Four non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been approved for use in various cardiovascular indications. The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban are now increasingly used in clinical practice. For some of these agents, available data from real-world studies support the efficacy and safety data in phase III clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to summarize the current status of trials and observational studies of oral anticoagulant use over the spectrum of cardiovascular disorders (excluding venous thrombosis), provide a reference source beyond stroke prevention for atrial fibrillation (AF) and examine the potential for novel applications in the cardiovascular field.

METHODS

We searched the recent literature for data on completed and upcoming trials of oral anticoagulants with a particular focus on rivaroxaban.

RESULTS

Recent data in specific patient subgroups, such as patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation or cardioversion, have led to an extended approval for rivaroxaban, whereas the other NOACs have ongoing or recently completed trials in this setting. However, there are unmet medical needs for several arterial thromboembolic-related conditions, including patients with: AF and acute coronary syndrome, AF and coronary artery disease undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease, implanted cardiac devices, and embolic stroke of unknown source.

CONCLUSION

NOACs may provide alternative treatment options in areas of unmet need, and numerous studies are underway to assess their benefit-risk profiles in these settings.

The CHA₂DS₂-VASc Score Predicts Major Bleeding in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Who Take Oral Anticoagulants

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at a substantial risk of ischemic stroke. The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score predicts the risk of thromboembolism, but its role in predicting major bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulants is unclear. Methods: We used the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan to identify patients with AF from 2010 to 2016. They were divided into four groups according to the oral anticoagulants. The outcomes were ischemic stroke/systemic thromboembolism, and major bleeding. Results: A total of 279,776 patients were identified. Ischemic stroke or systemic embolism events were observed in 1.73%, 3.62%, 4.36%, and 5.02% of the patients in the apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and warfarin groups, respectively. Major bleeding was recorded in 1.18%, 2.66%, 3.23%, and 4.70% of the patients in the apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and warfarin groups, respectively. The highest rates for both ischemic stroke and bleeding events occurred in the patients with a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of five or more. Conclusion: Non-valvular AF patients with high CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores are susceptible to both systemic thromboembolism and major bleeding. The trend was consistently observed in patients who took non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or warfarin. NOACs might be potentially more effective in reducing overall events.

Risk Controlling of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Comorbid Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases

The issues of prevention of thromboembolic complications (TE) in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are of leading importance. Recently, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), previously known as new oral anticoagulants are used in the treatment and prevention of TE in patients with AF. A lot of data has been accumulated, in which the NOACs indications have been revised. As a result, the updating has been done in the Recommendations of European Society of Cardiology (2016), the project of Russian Society of Cardiology Guidelines (2017), as well as in the new Recommendations of the European Heart Rhythm Association (2018). At the same time, the issues of prevention ща hemorrhagic complications, especially gastrointestinal bleeding, remain unresolved. Currently, there are no clinical guidelines on the use of NOACs from the standpoint of prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding, as well as definition of the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in the treatment of NOACs. The authors analyze the recommended algorithms for the evaluation of the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in NOACs using.

Association Between Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Lower Extremity Amputation Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

IMPORTANCE

Results of clinical trials suggest that canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor for treating type 2 diabetes, may be associated with lower extremity amputation.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the association between the use of oral medication for type 2 diabetes and 5 outcomes (lower extremity amputation, peripheral arterial disease, critical limb ischemia, osteomyelitis, and ulcer).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data on new users between September 1, 2012, and September 30, 2015. The study focused on 2.0 million commercially insured individuals and used propensity score weighting to balance baseline differences among groups. Sensitivity analyses varied statistical models, assessed the effect of combining dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists as a single referent group, adjusted for baseline use of older oral agents, and included people with baseline amputation.

EXPOSURES

New use of SGLT-2 inhibitors alone, DPP-4 inhibitors alone, GLP-1 agonists alone, or other antidiabetic agents (sulfonylurea, metformin hydrochloride, or thiazolidinediones).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Foot and leg amputation, defined by validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes.

RESULTS

Among 2.0 million potentially eligible individuals, a total of 953 906 (516 046 women and 437 860 men; mean [SD] age, 51.8 [10.9] years) were included in the final analyses, including 39 869 new users of SGLT-2 inhibitors (4.2%), 105 023 new users of DPP-4 inhibitors (11.0%), and 39 120 new users of GLP-1 agonists (4.1%). The median observation time ranged from 99 days for new users of GLP-1 agonists to 127 days for those using metformin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones, while the crude incident rates ranged from 4.90 per 10 000 person-years for those using metformin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones to 10.53 per 10 000 person-years for new users of SGLT-2 inhibitors. After propensity score weighting and adjustment for demographics, severity of diabetes, comorbidities, and medications, there was a nonstatistically significant increased risk of amputation associated with new use of SGLT-2 inhibitors compared with DPP-4 inhibitors (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.85-2.67) and GLP-1 agonists (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.64-3.36). New use of SGLT-2 inhibitors was statistically significantly associated with amputation compared with sulfonylureas, metformin, or thiazolidinediones (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.19-3.77). These results persisted in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Use of SGLT-2 inhibitors may be associated with increased risk of amputation compared with some oral treatments for type 2 diabetes. Further observational studies are needed with extended follow-up and larger sample sizes.

Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the associations between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and risks of bleeding, ischaemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and all cause mortality compared with warfarin.

DESIGN

Prospective open cohort study.

SETTING

UK general practices contributing to QResearch or Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

PARTICIPANTS

132 231 warfarin, 7744 dabigatran, 37 863 rivaroxaban, and 18 223 apixaban users without anticoagulant prescriptions for 12 months before study entry, subgrouped into 103 270 patients with atrial fibrillation and 92 791 without atrial fibrillation between 2011 and 2016.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Major bleeding leading to hospital admission or death. Specific sites of bleeding and all cause mortality were also studied.

RESULTS

In patients with atrial fibrillation, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.79) and intracranial bleeding (0.40, 0.25 to 0.64); dabigatran was associated with a decreased risk of intracranial bleeding (0.45, 0.26 to 0.77). An increased risk of all cause mortality was observed in patients taking rivaroxaban (1.19, 1.09 to 1.29) or on lower doses of apixaban (1.27, 1.12 to 1.45). In patients without atrial fibrillation, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (0.60, 0.46 to 0.79), any gastrointestinal bleeding (0.55, 0.37 to 0.83), and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (0.55, 0.36 to 0.83); rivaroxaban was associated with a decreased risk of intracranial bleeding (0.54, 0.35 to 0.82). Increased risk of all cause mortality was observed in patients taking rivaroxaban (1.51, 1.38 to 1.66) and those on lower doses of apixaban (1.34, 1.13 to 1.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, apixaban was found to be the safest drug, with reduced risks of major, intracranial, and gastrointestinal bleeding compared with warfarin. Rivaroxaban and low dose apixaban were, however, associated with increased risks of all cause mortality compared with warfarin.

The role of oral anticoagulants in epistaxis

Purpose

The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify the impact of oral anticoagulants on epistaxis with the focus on new oral anticoagulants.

Methods

The study was conducted at the Department  for Ear- Nose- and Throat (ENT), Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University Munich, Germany. All patients presenting in 2014 with the diagnosis of epistaxis to a specialized ENT accident and emergency department were identified and analyzed in clinical data and medication.

Results

600 adult cases, with a median age of 66.6 years were identified with active bleeding. 66.8% of all cases were anticoagulated. Classic oral anticoagulants (COAC) were three times more common in patients than new-generation oral anticoagulants (NOAC). Recurrent bleeding was significantly associated with oral anticoagulants (OAC) (p = 0.014) and bleeding location was most often anterior (p = 0.006). In contrast, severe cases, which required surgery or embolization were significantly more likely in non-anticoagulated middle-aged patients with posterior bleedings (p < 0.05). In our epistaxis cohort, OAC were highly overrepresented (40%) when compared to the general German population (1%) but COAC as well as NOAC played only a minor role in severe courses of epistaxis.

Conclusion

Oral anticoagulation, especially with new-generation drugs, is not associated with more complicated and severe courses of epistaxis, but rather with recurrent bleeding. One should keep this information in mind when triaging the patient in the emergency room and when planning further procedures.

Choosing a particular oral anticoagulant and dose for stroke prevention in individual patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: part 2

The choice of oral anticoagulant (OAC) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) may be influenced by individual clinical features or by patterns of risk factors and comorbidities. We reviewed analyses of subgroups of patients from trials of vitamin K antagonists vs. non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention in AF with the aim to identify patient groups who might benefit from a particular OAC more than from another. In addition, we discuss the timing of initiation of anticoagulation. In the second of a two-part review, we discuss the use of NOAC for stroke prevention in the following subgroups of patients with AF: (vii) secondary stroke prevention in patients after stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), (viii) patients with acute stroke requiring thrombolysis or thrombectomy, (ix) those initiating or restarting OAC treatment after stroke or TIA, (x) those with renal impairment on dialysis, (xi) the elderly, (xii) those at high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, and (xiii) those with hypertension. In addition, we discuss adherence and compliance. Finally, we present a summary of treatment suggestions. In specific subgroups of patients with AF, evidence supports the use of particular NOACs and/or particular doses of anticoagulant. The appropriate choice of treatment for these subgroups will help to promote optimal clinical outcomes.