Complement activity and complement regulatory gene mutations are associated with thrombosis in APS and CAPS

Pediatric antiphospholipid syndrome: is it the same as an adult?

IMPORTANCE

Antiphospholipid syndrome in neonates and children is a rare, but in some cases life-threatening condition with arterial and/or venous thrombosis and/or non-thrombotic neurological, skin, ophthalmological and other manifestations.

OBSERVATIONS

This review highlights the available information about the features of pediatric APS, including the rare catastrophic form, the differences between pediatric and adult APS, and the role of genetic thrombophilia in APS manifestation.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The clinical manifestations and treatment options for APS in children may differ from those in adults, and prescribing therapy can be challenging due to the unique clinical and morphological characteristics of the pediatric patient. Pediatric APS may be a predictor of the development of certain autoimmune diseases and classic manifestations of APS in adulthood, therefore, a revision of the existing criteria for the diagnosis and treatment of APS in children is necessary.

Case report: Timing of eculizumab treatment in catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a life-threatening condition of small-vessel thrombosis with acute multiple-organ involvement and visceral damage. In this report, we present a case of a patient with CAPS who is refractory to conventional therapy. For the first time in a patient with CAPS, marked C5b-9 formation was demonstrated on microvascular endothelial cells, suggesting the usefulness of therapeutic complement inhibition in this setting. Eculizumab, a C5-blocking monoclonal antibody, is remarkably effective in the treatment of different forms of thrombotic microangiopathy by controlling complement system hyperactivation. It halted the "thrombotic storm" and promptly achieved full recovery of thrombocytopenia. However, kidney function did not recover, possibly because eculizumab was administered too late. Conceivably, the timing of treatment is crucial to achieving disease remission before irreversible structural damage occurs in target organs, thereby preventing their complete functional recovery.

Antiphospholipid syndrome in children

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in children is a rare disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In comparison with APS in adults, pediatric APS has a more severe presentation with frequent recurrences of thrombotic events and a higher probability of life-threatening catastrophic APS. Nonthrombotic manifestations are also more common in the pediatric age group and can precede thrombosis. New classification criteria have been introduced recently and have not yet been assessed in pediatric patients with APS. In addition to anticoagulation drugs, other novel therapies have emerged including the use of B cell and complement inhibitors, especially in catastrophic APS. The purpose of this review is to provide a broad overview of aPL-related clinical manifestations in pediatric patients based on the analysis of published cohorts and data from the international pediatric APS registry. We also aim to illustrate APS in infants caused by transplacentally transferred maternal aPL, which is very rarely associated with acute thrombotic events in the perinatal period and more frequently with long-term neurodevelopmental abnormalities.

Management of Anticoagulation and Antifibrinolytics in Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder that presents with hypercoagulability and results in a lab artifact of prolonged PTT. The most severe form is catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (CAPS), which manifests as rapidly progressing thromboses in multiple organ systems leading to multi-organ ischemia. The mainstay management CAPS is anticoagulation and systemic corticosteroids. Antifibrinolytic agents have previously been thought to be relatively contraindicated in CAPS due to the pro-thrombotic nature of the disease; the complex coagulation profile of CAPS can make it difficult to assess the risks and benefits of antifibrinolytic therapy. Also, should a patient with CAPS require cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for surgery, it poses a unique challenge in providing appropriate anticoagulation in the setting of prolonged ACT. We present a case of a 32-year-old postpartum female with CAPS requiring heart transplant who safely received intraoperative antifibrinolytic therapy and was successfully anticoagulated during CPB after perioperative plasmapheresis.

Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Management Practices

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by blood clots and pregnancy complications due to antiphospholipid antibodies. Catastrophic APS (CAPS), a severe variant, leads to multiorgan failure and is often fatal. Pathogenesis involves antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI), which trigger endothelial cell (EC) activation, cytokine release, and a prothrombotic state. Infections, surgeries, and other triggers can precipitate CAPS, leading to widespread microthromboses and systemic inflammatory responses. CAPS predominantly affects younger patients and those with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with a high mortality rate, though recent treatment advances have improved survival. Diagnosing CAPS involves identifying clinical manifestations, including rapid organ involvement and small vessel occlusions, confirmed by histopathology and high antiphospholipid antibody levels. The CAPS registry data indicate that commonly affected organs include kidneys, lungs, central nervous system, and the heart, with a high prevalence of lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL). Current management strategies focus on therapeutic anticoagulation, immunosuppressive therapies like corticosteroids, and adjunct treatments such as plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Early use of glucocorticoids and combination therapy has significantly improved outcomes. In life-threatening cases, especially with microangiopathy, experts recommend performing plasma exchange (PE). Patients with associated autoimmune conditions or refractory cases may receive cyclophosphamide (CY) and rituximab while considering PE for treatment. Maintenance of anticoagulation with an appropriate international normalized ratio (INR) is crucial to prevent recurrence. This article reviews the pathogenesis and epidemiology of CAPS. It also examines the current management strategies, and discusses the challenges and controversies associated with these strategies. It hereafter offers recommendations for future management and outlines directions for further research.

Myocardial Involvement in Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome during Pregnancy or Puerperium: A Case of a Young Breastfeeding Woman and Literature Review

Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome (CAPS) is a rare complication that can occur in patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). CAPS occurs even more rarely during pregnancy/puerperium and pregnant patients, even less likely to show cardiac involvement without signs of damage on ultrasound and angiography with non-obstructive coronary arteries. We present a case of a 26-year-old breastfeeding woman, the youngest described with CAPS and acute myocardial infarction, whose diagnosis was made with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). A literature review of pregnant patients with similar problems was performed. There are diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties in treating these patients. CMRI demonstrated a transmural late enhancement area. A combination of therapies led to rapid clinical improvement. CMRI is an underused tool that reaffirms the pathophysiology of CAPS and leads clinicians to the possibility of a diffuse thrombotic process. CAPS involves more organs with high mortality rates. CMRI could be optimized in order to reach an early diagnosis and the most effective treatment. This study provides real-world evidence of the feasibility of MRI in a primary care setting during pregnancy/puerperium. Evidence from this study may influence future APS screening and inform policymakers regarding the use of leading MRI technology in the detection of the thrombotic process in a primary care setting.

Cancer progression and tumor hypercoagulability: a platelet perspective

Venous thromboembolism, which is common in cancer patients and accompanies or even precedes malignant tumors, is known as cancer-related thrombosis and is an important cause of cancer- associated death. At present, the exact etiology of the elevated incidence of venous thrombosis in cancer patients remains elusive. Platelets play a crucial role in blood coagulation, which is intimately linked to the development of arterial thrombosis. Additionally, platelets contribute to tumor progression and facilitate immune evasion by tumors. Tumor cells can interact with the coagulation system through various mechanisms, such as producing hemostatic proteins, activating platelets, and directly adhering to normal cells. The relationship between platelets and malignant tumors is also significant. In this review article, we will explore these connections.

Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Pregnancy: Current Understanding and Management Strategies

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) represents a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by microvascular thrombosis and end-organ damage. Pregnancy-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (p-TMA) has emerged as a distinct clinical entity with unique diagnostic challenges. Identifying the specific form of p-TMA is critical for appropriate and timely management. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the various forms of thrombotic microangiopathies associated with pregnancy, highlighting our current understanding of their pathophysiology and the evolving landscape of diagnosis and treatment for each.

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: Lessons from the "CAPS Registry"

The catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a rare life-threatening clinical condition that represents the most severe clinical presentation of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). It was first described in 1992 in a group of patients that presented with multiorgan involvement and microangiopathic features of APS. Most of the current knowledge of CAPS comes from the analysis of all cases collected at the "CAPS Registry" that was created in 2000 to perform studies on this condition. Most cases are triggered by a prothrombotic situation that leads to a multiorgan thrombosis and a cytokine storm. The analysis of cases included in the "CAPS Registry" has shown that the triple therapy with anticoagulation, glucocorticoids, and plasma exchange and/or intravenous immunoglobulins is associated to a better prognosis of CAPS. The improvement of the knowledge allowed a decrease from the 50% mortality rate reported in the first series to 25-30% in the most recent publications.

An Intestinal Microbiome Intervention Affects Biochemical Disease Activity in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Background  The origin of autoantibodies in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is unknown. The gut microbiome contributes to autoimmunity and contains peptide homologues to the main APS autoantigen, which affect disease activity in animal models. Alteration of the gut microbiota with vancomycin diminishes disease activity in mice but no data on the effect of gut microbiota alteration in APS patients are available to date. Objective  To evaluate whether the gut microbiome affects disease activity in human APS. Methods  This was a pre-post design intervention study in APS patients with stable disease and no gastrointestinal comorbidity. Subjects received oral vancomycin, 500 mg four times daily for 7 days, previously shown to alter gut microbiota composition without systemic effects. Disease activity was assessed at four time points by measuring a panel of clinical phenotype-related biomarkers: antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs), complement and inflammation markers, and hemostatic parameters. The primary outcome was the composite of the biomarker panel determined by multilevel principal component analysis. Results  A total of 15 subjects completed the study. The primary outcome, the first principal component of the biomarker panel data, was significantly different after 7 days of vancomycin treatment ( p  = 0.03), but not at day 42. APLA titers were unaffected. Unexpectedly, 4 out of 15 patients were negative for APLAs at baseline. In a post-hoc analysis, there was a prolonged effect for subjects with positive antibodies at baseline ( p  = 0.03). In subjects with negative APLAs at baseline, the intervention showed no effect. Conclusion  The intestinal microbiome affects the biochemical disease activity in APS patients. The mechanism is yet unknown but appears to be APS-specific.

Antiphospholipid Patients Admitted in the Intensive Care Unit: What Must The Rheumatologist Know?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare systemic autoimmune disorder that can escalate into a 'thrombotic storm' called the catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS), frequently requiring ICU admission for multiple organ failure. This review aims to offer insight and recent evidence on critically-ill APS patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The CAPS classification criteria define this condition as the involvement of at least three organs/systems/tissues within less than a week, caused by small vessel thrombosis, in patients with elevated antiphospholipid antibodies levels. These criteria do not encompass the full spectrum of critically-ill thrombotic APS patients and they need to be cautiously used for the bedside diagnosis of CAPS. Thrombocytopenia is the laboratory hallmark of CAPS, sometimes dropping below 20G/L, but a complete thrombotic microangiopathy pattern is infrequent. Anticoagulation is the pivotal treatment for APS and CAPS, associated with improved outcome. Triple therapy - the combination of anticoagulation, high-dose corticosteroids, and either plasma exchange or intravenous immunoglobulins - remains the standard treatment for CAPS patients. Eculizumab, an anti-C5 monoclonal antibody, may be useful in refractory patients. Despite significant progress, CAPS mortality rate remains high. Its diagnosis and management are complex, requiring a close multidisciplinary cross talk between APS specialists and intensivists.

Complement Biosensors Identify a Classical Pathway Stimulus in Complement-Mediated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

Complement-mediated hemolytic uremic syndrome (CM-HUS) is a thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by germline variants or acquired antibodies to complement proteins and regulators. Building upon our prior experience with the modified Ham (mHam) assay for ex vivo diagnosis of complementopathies, we have developed an array of cell-based complement "biosensors'' by selective removal of complement regulatory proteins (CD55 and CD59, CD46, or a combination thereof) in an autonomously bioluminescent HEK293 cell line. These biosensors can be used as a sensitive method for diagnosing CM-HUS and monitoring therapeutic complement blockade. Using specific complement pathway inhibitors, this model identifies IgM-driven classical pathway stimulus during both acute disease and in many patients during clinical remission. This provides a potential explanation for ~50% of CM-HUS patients who lack an alternative pathway "driving" variant and suggests at least a subset of CM-HUS is characterized by a breakdown of IgM immunologic tolerance.

Key Points

CM-HUS has a CP stimulus driven by polyreactive IgM, addressing the mystery of why 40% of CM-HUS lack complement specific variantsComplement biosensors and the bioluminescent mHam can be used to aid in diagnosis of CM-HUS and monitor complement inhibitor therapy.

Rethinking antiphospholipid syndrome to guide future management and research

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) consists of thrombotic, non-thrombotic and obstetric clinical manifestations developing in individuals with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Although researchers have made progress in characterizing different clinical phenotypes of aPL-positive people, the current approach to clinical management is still mostly based on a 'one size fits all' strategy, which is derived from the results of a limited number of prospective, controlled studies. With the 2023 publication of the ACR-EULAR APS classification criteria, it is now possible to rethink APS, to lay the groundwork for subphenotyping through novel pathophysiology-informed approaches, and to set a future APS research agenda guided by unmet needs in clinical management.

Antiphospholipid antibody carriers and patients with quiescent antiphospholipid syndrome show persistent subclinical complement activation

OBJECTIVES

Complement activation has been advocated as one mechanism by which aPLs can induce thrombosis. In patients with catastrophic APS or re-thrombosis, enhanced complement activation has been shown, even in the quiescent phase of the disease. We aimed to assess complement activation and to investigate its association with clinical variables in aPL-positive patients with a favourable disease course.

METHODS

Subjects with at least two consecutive positive aPL results obtained ≥12 weeks apart were enrolled. They were subjects without a history of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity (aPL carriers), patients with pregnancy morbidity alone, i.e. obstetric APS patients (OAPS patients), and/or patients with arterial, venous, or small-vessel thrombotic APS (TAPS patients); for enrolment, all patients were required to have been free of symptoms for ≥2 years. Patients affected with systemic autoimmune diseases were excluded. Healthy age- and sex-matched subjects were included as controls. Plasma C5a and C5b-9 levels were assessed by commercially available ELISA assays. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test and Spearman's correlation were applied.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven OAPS patients, 38 TAPS patients, 42 aPL carriers and 30 healthy subjects were enrolled. The median C5a and C5b-9 levels were significantly higher in quiescent aPL-positive patients (OAPS, TAPS, aPL carriers) compared with controls: C5a ng/ml 10.61 [interquartile range (IQR) 6.87-15.46] vs 4.06 (2.66-7.35), P < 0.001; C5b-9 ng/ml 283.95 (175.8-439.40) vs 165.90 (124.23-236.8), P < 0.001. Similar C5a and C5b-9 levels were observed in OAPS and TAPS patients and aPL carriers. A positive correlation between the median C5b-9 levels and the number of aPL-positive tests was found (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The persistence of aPL antibodies is associated with a persistent subclinical activation of the complement cascade.

An immunogenomic exome landscape of triple positive primary antiphospholipid patients

Primary antiphospholipid syndrome is characterized by thrombosis and autoantibodies directed against phospholipids or associated proteins. The genetic etiology of PAPS remains unknown. We enrolled 21 patients with thromboembolic events associated to lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin and anti β2 glycoprotein1 autoantibodies. We performed whole exome sequencing and a systematic variant-based analysis in genes associated with thrombosis, in candidate genes previously associated with APS or inborn errors of immunity. Data were compared to public databases and to a control cohort of 873 non-autoimmune patients. Variants were identified following a state-of-the-art pipeline. Enrichment analysis was performed by comparing with the control cohort. We found an absence of significant HLA bias and genetic heterogeneity in these patients, including when testing combinations of rare variants in genes encoding for proteins involved in thrombosis and of variants in genes linked with inborn errors of immunity. These results provide evidence of genetic heterogeneity in PAPS, even in a homogenous series of triple positive patients. At the individual scale, a combination of variants may participate to the breakdown of B cell tolerance and to the vessel damage.

Targeting the tissue factor coagulation initiation complex prevents antiphospholipid antibody development

ABSTRACT

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in primary or secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are a major cause for acquired thrombophilia, but specific interventions preventing autoimmune aPL development are an unmet clinical need. Although autoimmune aPL cross react with various coagulation regulatory proteins, lipid-reactive aPL, including those derived from patients with COVID-19, recognize the endolysosomal phospholipid lysobisphosphatidic acid presented by the cell surface-expressed endothelial protein C receptor. This specific recognition leads to complement-mediated activation of tissue factor (TF)-dependent proinflammatory signaling and thrombosis. Here, we show that specific inhibition of the TF coagulation initiation complex with nematode anticoagulant protein c2 (NAPc2) prevents the prothrombotic effects of aPL derived from patients with COVID-19 in mice and the aPL-induced proinflammatory and prothrombotic activation of monocytes. The induction of experimental APS is dependent on the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase complex, and NAPc2 suppresses monocyte endosomal reactive oxygen species production requiring the TF cytoplasmic domain and interferon-α secretion from dendritic cells. Latent infection with murine cytomegalovirus causes TF cytoplasmic domain-dependent development of persistent aPL and circulating phospholipid-reactive B1 cells, which is prevented by short-term intervention with NAPc2 during acute viral infection. In addition, treatment of lupus prone MRL-lpr mice with NAPc2, but not with heparin, suppresses dendritic-cell activation in the spleen, aPL production and circulating phospholipid-reactive B1 cells, and attenuates lupus pathology. These data demonstrate a convergent TF-dependent mechanism of aPL development in latent viral infection and autoimmune disease and provide initial evidence that specific targeting of the TF initiation complex has therapeutic benefits beyond currently used clinical anticoagulant strategies.

Diagnosis and Management of Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome and the Potential Impact of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a rare and life-threatening condition characterized by the persistence of antiphospholipid antibodies and occurrence of multiple vascular occlusive events. CAPS currently remains a diagnostic challenge and requires urgent treatment. The diagnosis of CAPS is made difficult by classification criteria used as diagnostic criteria in clinical practice, knowledge derived from retrospective data and case reports, confounding clinical and biological features, and its rapid onset and mortality. The absence of prospective studies of CAPS limits the strength of evidence for guideline treatment protocols. This comprehensive review summarizes the current understanding of the disease, and discusses how the 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria impact the definition and therapeutic management of CAPS, which is considered the most severe form of APS. The correct integration of 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria is poised to facilitate CAPS diagnosis, particularly in critical situations, offering a promising avenue for improved outcomes.

Eculizumab therapy and complement regulation in a case of resistant catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a life-threatening form of antiphospholipid syndrome characterised by diffuse arterial and venous thrombosis, in the presence of positive antiphospholipid antibodies. The multiple sites of thrombosis in small, medium and large vessels progress to multiorgan failure, accounting for the high mortality rate associated with CAPS. Unregulated complement activation is increasingly recognised as critical to the pathogenesis of CAPS. Early diagnosis is essential to initiate prompt life-saving treatment with the triple therapy of anticoagulation, immunosuppression and either plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin. Among other immunosuppressive agents, eculizumab, a complement inhibitor has demonstrated efficacy in treatment-resistant cases.We report an instructive case of a woman presenting with both clinical and laboratory findings consistent with primary CAPS, resistant to initial treatment and responsive to eculizumab, with emphasis on genetic testing and implications for future therapy.

Antiphospholipid syndrome pathogenesis in 2023: an update of new mechanisms or just a reconsideration of the old ones?

Antibodies against phospholipid (aPL)-binding proteins, in particular, beta 2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI), are diagnostic/classification and pathogenic antibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). β2GPI-aPL recognize their target on endothelium and trigger a pro-thrombotic phenotype which is amplified by circulating monocytes, platelets and neutrophils. Complement activation is required as supported by the lack of aPL-mediated effects in animal models when the complement cascade is blocked. The final result is a localized clot. A strong generalized inflammatory response is associated with catastrophic APS, the clinical variant characterized by systemic thrombotic microangiopathy. A two-hit hypothesis was suggested to explain why persistent aPL are associated with acute events only when a second hit allows antibody/complement binding by modulating β2GPI tissue presentation. β2GPI/β2GPI-aPL are also responsible for obstetric APS, being the molecule physiologically present in placental/decidual tissues. Additional mechanisms mediated by aPL with different characteristics have been reported, but their diagnostic/prognostic value is still a matter of research.

What we know and what we don't know about catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a severe condition with high mortality. Since its description in 1992, an important effort has been made to improve and disseminate knowledge on CAPS. Most of our current knowledge comes from the studies performed using the CAPS Registry, a database created in 2000 to gather as many cases as possible in order to better define this disease. It has demonstrated that this condition has multiple faces and is often triggered by a precipitating factor that leads to a thrombotic microangiopathy and cytokine storm involving almost any organ of the body. Analysis of the CAPS Registry has also shown that patients receiving anticoagulation, glucocorticoids and plasma exchange and/or IVIG have a better prognosis. However, there are still many unresolved questions. In this review we summarize what is known and what is still a matter of research in this condition.

Platelets and Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterised by thrombosis and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL): lupus anticoagulant and/or IgG/IgM anti-β2-glycoprotein I and anticardiolipin antibodies. APS carries significant morbidity for a relatively young patient population from recurrent thrombosis in any vascular bed (arterial, venous, or microvascular), often despite current standard of care, which is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Platelets have established roles in thrombosis at any site, and platelet hyperreactivity is clearly demonstrated in the pathophysiology of APS. Together with excess thrombin generation, platelet activation and aggregation are the common end result of all the pathophysiological pathways leading to thrombosis in APS. However, antiplatelet therapies play little role in APS, reserved as a possible option of low dose aspirin in addition to VKA in arterial or refractory thrombosis. This review outlines the current evidence and mechanisms for excessive platelet activation in APS, how it plays a central role in APS-related thrombosis, what evidence for antiplatelets is available in clinical outcomes studies, and potential future avenues to define how to target platelet hyperreactivity better with minimal impact on haemostasis.

Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Unlike classic APS, CAPS causes multiple microthrombosis due to an increased inflammatory response, known as a "thrombotic storm". CAPS typically develops after infection, trauma, or surgery and begins with the following symptoms: fever, thrombocytopenia, muscle weakness, visual and cognitive disturbances, abdominal pain, renal failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Although the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in the blood is one of the diagnostic criteria, the level of these antibodies can fluctuate significantly, which complicates the diagnostic process and can lead to erroneous interpretation of rapidly developing symptoms. Triple therapy is often used to treat CAPS, which includes the use of anticoagulants, plasmapheresis, and high doses of glucocorticosteroids and, in some cases, additional intravenous immunoglobulins. The use of LMWH is recommended as the drug of choice due to its anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant properties. CAPS is a multifactorial disease that requires not only an interdisciplinary approach but also highly qualified medical care, adequate and timely diagnosis, and appropriate prevention in the context of relapse or occurrence of the disease. Improved new clinical protocols and education of medical personnel regarding CAPS can significantly improve the therapeutic approach and reduce mortality rates.

Risk factors of first thrombosis in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVE

There is limited evidence on long-term thrombosis risk in patients with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS). This study aimed to investigate the clinical features and risk factors associated with the first thrombosis in patients with isolated OAPS.

METHODS

Data from patients with isolated OAPS were collected. All patients were followed up until the first thrombotic event during or after delivery or until the end of the study. Logistic regression analysis identified independent risk factors associated with the first thrombosis in patients with isolated OAPS.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 186 patients with OAPS. During a mean 5.4-year follow-up, 11 (5.9%) patients experienced thrombotic events. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed that triple-positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs, OR=11.662, 95% CI=2.117 to 64.243, p=0.005) and hypocomplementemia (OR=9.047, 95% CI=1.530 to 53.495, p=0.015) were identified as independent risk factors for the first thrombosis in OAPS, after adjustment for low-dose aspirin and hydroxychloroquine.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple-positive aPLs and hypocomplementemia are risk factors for the first thrombosis in patients with OAPS.

Complement biomarkers in the antiphospholipid syndrome - Approaches to quantification and implications for clinical management

Complement is a major driver of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and a promising therapeutic target in refractory and catastrophic APS. Complement testing in APS is largely limited to research settings, and reliable, rapid-turnaround biomarkers are needed to predict those at risk for adverse clinical outcomes and most likely to benefit from complement inhibition. We review complement biomarkers and their association with thrombosis and obstetric outcomes, including: (i) complement proteins and activation fragments in the fluid phase; (ii) assays that evaluate complement on cell membranes (e.g. in vivo cell-bound complement fragments, hemolytic assays, and ex vivo 'functional' cell-based assays, and (iii) sequencing of complement genes. Current studies highlight the inconsistencies in testing both between studies and various aPL/APS subgroups, suggesting that either cell-based testing or multiplex panels employing a combination of biomarkers simultaneously may be most clinically relevant. Standardization of complement assays is needed to ensure reproducibility and establish clinically relevant applications.

Anti-phospholipid autoantibodies in human diseases

Anti-phospholipid autoantibodies are a group of antibodies that can specifically bind to anionic phospholipids and phospholipid protein complexes. Recent studies have reported elevated serum anti-phospholipid autoantibody levels in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, metabolic disorders, malaria, SARS-CoV-2 infection, obstetric diseases and cardiovascular diseases. However, the underlying mechanisms of anti-phospholipid autoantibodies in disease pathogenesis remain largely unclear. Emerging evidence indicate that anti-phospholipid autoantibodies modulate NETs formation, monocyte activation, blockade of apoptotic cell phagocytosis in macrophages, complement activation, dendritic cell activation and vascular endothelial cell activation. Herein, we provide an update on recent advances in elucidating the effector mechanisms of anti-phospholipid autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of various diseases, which may facilitate the development of potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of anti-phospholipid autoantibody-related disorders.

Complement and platelets: prothrombotic cell activation requires membrane attack complex-induced release of danger signals

Complement activation in the diseases paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) results in cytolysis and fatal thrombotic events, which are largely refractory to anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet therapy. Anticomplement therapy, however, efficiently prevents thrombotic events in PNH and aHUS, but the underlying mechanisms remain unresolved. We show that complement-mediated hemolysis in whole blood induces platelet activation similarly to activation by adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP). Blockage of C3 or C5 abolished platelet activation. We found that human platelets failed to respond functionally to the anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a. Instead, complement activation did lead to prothrombotic cell activation in the whole blood when membrane attack complex (MAC)-mediated cytolysis occurred. Consequently, we demonstrate that ADP receptor antagonists efficiently inhibited platelet activation, although full complement activation, which causes hemolysis, occurred. By using an established model of mismatched erythrocyte transfusions in rats, we crossvalidated these findings in vivo using the complement inhibitor OmCI and cobra venom factor. Consumptive complement activation in this animal model only led to a thrombotic phenotype when MAC-mediated cytolysis occurred. In conclusion, complement activation only induces substantial prothrombotic cell activation if terminal pathway activation culminates in MAC-mediated release of intracellular ADP. These results explain why anticomplement therapy efficiently prevents thromboembolisms without interfering negatively with hemostasis.

Forecasting the Future of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Prospects and Challenges

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune condition affecting young patients, primarily women, negatively impacting their quality of life. APS is under-recognized and underdiagnosed and can have devastating results if untreated, mainly due to uncontrolled thrombosis. Research in the past decades has led to several breakthroughs with important implications for clinical practice. Here, we summarize the state of APS diagnosis, treatment, pathophysiology, and research directions that hold promise for advancing diagnosis and treatment.

The role of C5a receptors in autoimmunity

The complement system is an essential component of the innate immune response and plays a vital role in host defense and inflammation. Dysregulation of the complement system, particularly involving the anaphylatoxin C5a and its receptors (C5aR1 and C5aR2), has been linked to several autoimmune diseases, indicating the potential for targeted therapies. C5aR1 and C5aR2 are seven-transmembrane receptors with distinct signaling mechanisms that play both partially overlapping and opposing roles in immunity. Both receptors are expressed on a broad spectrum of immune and non-immune cells and are involved in cellular functions and physiological processes during homeostasis and inflammation. Dysregulated C5a-mediated inflammation contributes to autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, antiphospholipid syndrome, and others. Therefore, targeting C5a or its receptors may yield therapeutic innovations in these autoimmune diseases by reducing the recruitment and activation of immune cells that lead to tissue inflammation and injury, thereby exacerbating the autoimmune response. Clinical trials focused on the inhibition of C5 cleavage or the C5a/C5aR1-axis using small molecules or monoclonal antibodies hold promise for bringing novel treatments for autoimmune diseases into practice. However, given the heterogeneous nature of (systemic) autoimmune diseases, there are still several challenges, such as patient selection, optimal dosing, and treatment duration, that require further investigation and development to realize the full therapeutic potential of C5a receptor inhibition, ideally in the context of a personalized medicine approach. Here, we aim to provide a brief overview of the current knowledge on the function of C5a receptors, the involvement of C5a receptors in autoimmune disorders, the molecular mechanisms underlying C5a receptor-mediated autoimmunity, and the potential for targeted therapies to modulate their activity.

Complement therapeutics are coming of age in rheumatology

The complement system was described over 100 years ago, and it is well established that activation of this pathway accompanies the great majority of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. In addition, over three decades of work in murine models of human disease have nearly universally demonstrated that complement activation is upstream of tissue injury and the engagement of pro-inflammatory mechanisms such as the elaboration of cytokines and chemokines, as well as myeloid cell recruitment and activation. With that background, and taking advantage of advances in the development of biologic and small-molecule therapeutics, the creation and clinical evaluation of complement therapeutics is now rapidly expanding. This article reviews the current state of the complement therapeutics field, with a focus on their use in diseases cared for or consulted upon by rheumatologists. Included is an overview of the activation mechanisms and components of the system, in addition to the mechanisms by which the complement system interacts with other immune system constituents. The various therapeutic approaches to modulating the system in rheumatic and autoimmune diseases are reviewed. To understand how best to clinically assess the complement system, methods of its evaluation are described. Finally, next-generation therapeutic and diagnostic advances that can be envisioned for the future are discussed.

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome immediately after coronary angiography: the unexpected complication

A 44-year-old woman with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) presented to our institution with suspected non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Shortly after coronary angiography, she developed diplopia, hypotension and chest pain with inferior ST elevation in 12-lead ECG. According to multidisciplinary evaluation, she promptly underwent systemic thrombolysis, with clinical and haemodynamic improvement. Eventually, a diagnosis of catastrophic APS was made, with multiorgan ischemic involvement confirmed by blood examinations and multimodal imaging techniques. A pluridisciplinary approach was central to define optimal medical therapy and in-hospital management that lead to clinical condition improvement at discharge. In this case, catastrophic APS was triggered or worsened by catheters insertion and invasive manoeuvres within the arterial lumen during coronary angiography. Recognizing catastrophic APS and its potential triggers, can be helpful to deliver prompt and accurate medical assistance. Moreover, in APS patients undergoing coronary angiography, preventive strategies are important to prevent possible unfavourable evolution in catastrophic APS.

An update on the biologics for the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity with the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Although anticoagulation is the primary treatment for APS, it fails in approximately 20-30% of obstetric APS cases and more than 30% of thrombotic APS cases. Therefore, there is a need for new, targeted treatments beyond anticoagulants. Biologics, such as rituximab and eculizumab, have been recommended for refractory catastrophic APS. This review focuses on the recent advancements in the pathogenesis of APS and explores the potential of targeted treatments, including eculizumab, rituximab, belimumab, daratumumab, obinutuzumab, and anti-TNF-α antibodies, for APS management.

High-throughput sequencing technology facilitates the discovery of novel biomarkers for antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by arterial and venous thrombosis and/or morbid pregnancy, accompanied by persistent antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) positivity. However, due to the complex pathogenesis of APS and the large individual differences in the expression of aPL profiles of patients, the problem of APS diagnosis, prognosis judgment, and risk assessment may not be solved only from the antibody level. It is necessary to use new technologies and multiple dimensions to explore novel APS biomarkers. The application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology in diseases with a high incidence of somatic mutations, such as genetic diseases and tumors, has been very mature. Thus, we try to know the research and application progress of APS by NGS technology from genome, transcriptome, epigenome and other aspects. This review will describe the related research of NGS technology in APS and provide more reference for the deep understanding of APS-related screening markers and disease pathogenesis.

Overview on the Link Between the Complement System and Auto-Immune Articular and Pulmonary Disease

Complement system (CS) dysregulation is a key factor in the pathogenesis of different autoimmune diseases playing a central role in many immune innate and adaptive processes. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by ta breach of self-tolerance leading to a synovitis and extra-articular manifestations. The CS is activated in RA and seems not only to mediate direct tissue damage but also play a role in the initiation of RA pathogenetic mechanisms through interactions with citrullinated proteins. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents the most common extra-articular manifestation that can lead to progressive fibrosis. In this review, we focused on the evidence of CS dysregulation in RA and in ILD, and highlighted the role of the CS in both the innate and adaptive immune responses in the development of diseases, by using idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as a model of lung disease. As a proof of concept, we dissected the evidence that several treatments used to treat RA and ILD such as glucocorticoids, pirfenidone, disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, targeted biologics such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitors, rituximab, tocilizumab, and nintedanib may act indirectly on the CS, suggesting that the CS might represent a potential therapeutic target in these complex diseases.

How to approach acute thrombosis and thrombocytopenia

Acute thrombosis and thrombocytopenia pose challenges to the clinician. Thrombocytopenia is naturally viewed as a risk factor for bleeding, and an association with acute thrombosis appears paradoxical. It presents typically as a medical emergency and requires treatment to be started before having confirmatory results. This review supports the attending clinician to recognise and manage conditions that are part of the thrombotic thrombocytopenic syndrome through four illustrative clinical cases. Common themes linking the underlying pathology and treatment are explored to highlight the continued relevance of this rare, but often devastating, presentation.

Epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism, that consists of the interrelated conditions deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is an under-appreciated vascular disease. In Western regions, approximately 1 in 12 individuals will be diagnosed with venous thromboembolism in their lifetime. Rates of venous thromboembolism are lower in Asia, but data from other regions are sparse. Numerous risk factors for venous thromboembolism have been identified, which can be classified as acute or subacute triggers (provoking factors that increase the risk of venous thromboembolism) and basal or acquired risk factors (which can be modifiable or static). Approximately 20% of individuals who have a venous thromboembolism event die within 1 year (although often from the provoking condition), and complications are common among survivors. Fortunately, opportunities exist for primordial prevention (prevention of the development of underlying risk factors), primary prevention (management of risk factors among individuals at high risk of the condition) and secondary prevention (prevention of recurrent events) of venous thromboembolism. In this Review, we describe the epidemiology of venous thromboembolism, including the incidence, risk factors, outcomes and opportunities for prevention. Meaningful health disparities exist in both the incidence and outcomes of venous thromboembolism. We also discuss these disparities as well as opportunities to reduce them.

Mitigating Serious Adverse Events in Gene Therapy with AAV Vectors: Vector Dose and Immunosuppression

Gene transfer with high doses of adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors has resulted in serious adverse events and even death of the recipients. Toxicity could most likely be circumvented by repeated injections of lower and less toxic doses of vectors. This has not been pursued as AAV vectors induce potent neutralizing antibodies, which prevent cell transduction upon reinjection of the same vector. This review discusses different types of immune responses against AAV vectors and how they offer targets for the elimination or inhibition of vector-specific neutralizing antibodies. Such antibodies can be circumvented by using different virus serotypes for sequential injections, they can be removed by plasmapheresis, or they can be destroyed by enzymatic degradation. Antibody producing cells can be eliminated by proteasome inhibitors. Drugs that inhibit T-cell responses, B-cell signaling, or presentation of the vector's antigens to B cells can prevent or reduce induction of AAV-specific antibodies. Combinations of different approaches and drugs are likely needed to suppress or eliminate neutralizing antibodies, which would then allow for repeated dosing. Alternatively, novel AAV vectors with higher transduction efficacy are being developed and may allow for a dose reduction, although it remains unknown if this will completely address the problem of high-dose adverse events.

Hematological manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome: Going beyond thrombosis

Thrombotic complications are a hallmark of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). These vascular - arterial, venous, and/or small vessel - complications are well described and known to hematologists and healthcare providers caring for patients with this disease. In this review, we shed light on other hematological manifestations of the disease, including bleeding, thrombocytopenia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and thrombotic microangiopathy syndromes. While these manifestations are not bona fide clinical criteria for the diagnosis of APS, they frequently interact and contribute to the complexity of clinical management of APS.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: advances in diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thrombo-inflammatory disease propelled by circulating autoantibodies that recognize cell surface phospholipids and phospholipid binding proteins. The result is an increased risk of thrombotic events, pregnancy morbidity, and various other autoimmune and inflammatory complications. Although antiphospholipid syndrome was first recognized in patients with lupus, the stand alone presentation of antiphospholipid syndrome is at least equally common. Overall, the diagnosis appears to affect at least one in 2000 people. Studies of antiphospholipid syndrome pathogenesis have long focused on logical candidates such as coagulation factors, endothelial cells, and platelets. Recent work has shed light on additional potential therapeutic targets within the innate immune system, including the complement system and neutrophil extracellular traps. Vitamin K antagonists remain the mainstay of treatment for most patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome and, based on current data, appear superior to the more targeted direct oral anticoagulants. The potential role of immunomodulatory treatments in antiphospholipid syndrome management is receiving increased attention. As for many systemic autoimmune diseases, the most important future direction is to more precisely identify mechanistic drivers of disease heterogeneity in pursuit of unlocking personalized and proactive treatments for patients.

Immune Thrombocytopenia Could be an Independent Clinical Phenotype of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with persistent positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) hardly develop thrombosis but share many similar characteristics with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study consecutively enrolling thrombocytopenic patients with continuous positive aPLs. Patients developing thrombotic events are classified as the APS group. Then we compare the clinical characteristics and prognosis between aPLs carriers and patients with APS.

RESULTS

This cohort included 47 thrombocytopenic patients with continuous positive aPLs and 55 with diagnosed primary APS. The proportion of smoking and hypertension are higher in the APS group (p = 0.03, 0.04, 0.03, respectively). The platelet count of aPLs carriers at admission was lower than APS patients [26 × 10⁹/l (9 × 10⁹/l, 46 × 10⁹/l) vs. 64 × 10⁹/l (24 × 10⁹/l, 89 × 10⁹/l), p = 0.0002]. Triple aPLs positivity is more common in primary APS patients with thrombocytopenia [24 (51.1%) vs. 40 (72.7%), p = 0.04]. Regarding the treatment response, the complete response (CR) rate is similar between aPLs carriers and primary APS patients with thrombocytopenia (p = 0.2). Nonetheless, the proportion of response, no response, and relapse differed significantly between the two groups [13 (27.7%) vs. 4 (7.3%), p < 0.0001; 5 (10.6%) vs. 8 (14.5%), p < 0.0001; 5 (10.6%) vs. 8 (14.5%), p < 0.0001, respectively]. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, primary APS patients had significantly more thrombotic events than aPLs carriers (p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of other high-risk factors for thrombosis, thrombocytopenia could be an independent and long-lasting clinical phenotype of APS.

A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism: From Epidemiology to Pathophysiology

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the third most common cause of death worldwide. The incidence of VTE varies according to different countries, ranging from 1-2 per 1000 person-years in Western Countries, while it is lower in Eastern Countries (<1 per 1000 person-years). Many risk factors have been identified in patients developing VTE, but the relative contribution of each risk factor to thrombotic risk, as well as pathogenetic mechanisms, have not been fully described. Herewith, we provide a comprehensive review of the most common risk factors for VTE, including male sex, diabetes, obesity, smoking, Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin G20210A Gene Mutation, Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1, oral contraceptives and hormonal replacement, long-haul flight, residual venous thrombosis, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, trauma and fractures, pregnancy, immobilization, antiphospholipid syndrome, surgery and cancer. Regarding the latter, the incidence of VTE seems highest in pancreatic, liver and non-small cells lung cancer (>70 per 1000 person-years) and lowest in breast, melanoma and prostate cancer (<20 per 1000 person-years). In this comprehensive review, we summarized the prevalence of different risk factors for VTE and the potential molecular mechanisms/pathogenetic mediators leading to VTE.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Renal Allograft Recipients-A Long-Term Multicenter Analysis

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a devastating autoimmune disease and in renal transplant recipients may result in allograft thrombosis or in extra-renal manifestation, mostly venous thromboembolism. There are many non- and immune risk factors affecting renal allograft in recipients with APS. However, renal allograft outcome in recipients with APS without APS nephropathy remains unknown. Aim: The aim of the study was to assess renal allograft function and survival in recipients with APS. Methods: Retrospective, multicenter study included 19 adult renal recipients with definite APS (primary or lupus-related) from three Polish transplant centers. Renal allograft function was assessed using serum creatinine concentration (SCr1) at 3rd month post-transplant and at the end of the observation (SCr2) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated based on modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. General linear model was used to assess 12 month GFR change over time. Kaplan-Meier curves and restricted mean survival time were used for allograft survival. Matched control group consisted of 21 stable renal recipients without history of thrombosis and without anticoagulation/antiplatelet treatment. Results: The study group differs in induction therapy (p = 0.019), high-urgency procedure (p = 0.04), proteinuria (p = 0.0058), primary disease (lupus) (p < 0.0001), re-transplantation in primary APS (p = 0.0046) and shorter time since engraftment to SCr2 (p = 0.016). Primary APS was more often diagnosed post-transplant (p = 0.0005). Allograft biopsy revealed thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) with acute rejection (AR) or isolated AR vs AR or chronic rejection in controls but did not reach significance (p = 0.054). Renal allograft function was inferior in the study group but did not reach significance: mean SCr2 (mg/dL) was 2.18 ± 1.41 and 1.5 ± 0.68 in controls, respectively, p = 0.27; mean GFR2 (ml/min/1.73m2) was 39.9 ± 20.83 and 51.23 ± 19.03, respectively, p = 0.102. Renal allograft duration was inferior in patients with APS and was (in years) 11.22 ± 1.44 vs. 14.36 ± 0.42, respectively, p = 0.037, in patients with primary APS (p = 0.021), in patients with APS diagnosed post-transplant (p = 0.012) but not in lupus-related APS (p = ns). Fifteen year renal allograft survival was inferior in APS vs. controls (73,86% vs. 90.48%, respectively, p = 0.049). Conclusions: Recipients with APS are at higher risk for allograft loss due to immune and non-immune causes. Renal allograft survival was inferior in recipients with APS and renal function remains impaired but stable.

Contributions of animal models to mechanistic understandings of antibody-dependent disease and roles of the amplification loop

The complement system plays an important pathophysiologic role in human diseases associated with immune or ischemic insults. In addition to understanding the effector mechanisms that are important for the biological effects of the system, substantial efforts have gone into understanding which specific complement activation pathways generate these potent effects. These approaches include the use of gene-targeted mice and specific pathway inhibitors, as well as the integration of human disease genetic and biomarker studies. In some disease states, it is quite clear that the alternate pathway plays a unique role in the initiation of the complement system. However, although initially a widely unexpected finding, it has now been shown in many tissue-based disease models and in initial human studies that engagement of the amplification loop is also essential for tissue injury when the classical and/or lectin pathways initiate pathway activation through pathogenic autoantibodies. This review provides evidence for such a conclusion through animal models, focusing on pathogenic antibody passive transfer models but also other relevant experimental systems. These data, along with initial biomarkers and clinical trial outcomes in human diseases that are associated with pathogenic autoantibodies, suggest that targeting the alternative pathway amplification loop may have near-universal therapeutic utility for tissue-based diseases.

Differentiating and Managing Rare Thrombotic Microangiopathies During Pregnancy and Postpartum

The most common thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) of pregnancy is the well-recognized syndrome of preeclampsia with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome. However, rare TMAs, including thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, complement-mediated hemolytic-uremic syndrome, and catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, may occur during pregnancy or postpartum and present with features similar to those of preeclampsia with severe features. Early recognition and treatment of these infrequently encountered conditions are key for avoiding serious maternal morbidities with long-term sequelae and possible maternal or fetal death. Differentiating between preeclampsia with severe features and these rare TMAs is diagnostically challenging as there is significant overlap in their clinical and laboratory presentation. Given the rarity of these TMAs, high-quality evidence-based recommendations on diagnosis and management during pregnancy are lacking. Using current objective information and recommendations from working groups, this report provides practical clinical approaches to diagnose and manage these rare TMAs. This report also discusses how to manage individuals with a history of these rare TMAs who are planning to conceive. To optimize favorable outcomes, a multidisciplinary approach including obstetricians, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, hematologists, and nephrologists alongside close clinical and laboratory monitoring is vital.