Salvage of failed total ankle arthroplasty with fusion using structural allograft and internal fixation

Five-Year Results of the Salto XT Revision Ankle Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The treatment of failed ankle replacements is debated, and little is published about the medium- and long-term results of revision implants. We wanted to examine prosthesis survival and physical function at least 5 years after insertion of the Salto XT revision prosthesis.

METHODS

All consecutive patients operated with a Salto XT revision prosthesis underwent clinical and radiologic examinations preoperatively and after 3, 12, 24, and 60 months. Complications and reoperations are described, and changes in patient-reported outcome measures and clinical scores are reported.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were operated with a Salto XT revision prosthesis between March 2014 and March 2017. Three of these were revised (1 to a fusion and 2 to a new prosthesis), and 3 patients were reoperated with screw removal. A concurrent subtalar fusion was performed on 13 patients, and there was 1 case of likely nonunion after these procedures, but no reoperations. The mean AOFAS score increased from 39.2 (95% CI 30.8-47.5) preoperatively to 75.1 (95% CI 67.3-82.9) after 5 years, and the mean improvement was 34.2 points (95% CI 23.8-44.6). Mean EQ-5D increased from 0.36 (95% CI 0.30-0.42) preoperatively to 0.74 (95% CI 0.64-0.85) after 5 years, an improvement of 0.34 (95% CI 0.19-0.49). Radiolucent lines were present in all but 3 patients. Five-year prosthesis survival was 93% (83.6-100).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to present medium-term results of this implant. We found good improvement in outcome scores and good implant survival, but also a high prevalence of radiolucent lines.

Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using a Novel Modular Fixed-Bearing Revision Ankle System

INTRODUCTION

Large bone defects such as those encountered after failed total ankle replacement have previously been a relative contraindication to revision ankle replacement due to inadequate bone stock. We describe our experience and patient reported outcomes with a modular ankle replacement system with tibial and talar augments.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series analysis of patients who underwent a total ankle replacement using the INVISION system across 2 centers between 2016 and 2022. Patients completed the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), and EQ-5D pre-operatively and then post-operatively at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years. Medical records were reviewed for complications and re-operations. X-rays were reviewed for lucencies and alignment.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients were included in the study; 14 men and 3 women with an average age at the time of surgery of 67.9 years (range 56-80 years). The average follow-up post-operatively was 40.5 months (range 7-78) at the time of this study. The indication for surgery was revision of failed total ankle replacement (TAR) in 16 and revision of failed ankle fusion in 1. An augmented tibia was used in 13, an augmented talus in 13, and both augmented tibia and talus in 9 cases. There were no early surgical complications. One patient required debridement and implant retention for late deep infection. No implants have been revised. The average MOXFQ score improved by 19.3 points at most recent follow-up. The average AOS score improved by 25.2 points.

CONCLUSION

The early results of a modular augmented ankle arthroplasty system have shown satisfactory patient outcomes with a low complication and re-operation rate and present another option for patients with larger bone defects. This is a small series, and a larger series with long-term follow-up would be beneficial.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: Case series.

Outcomes of Revision Total Ankle Replacement

The objective of this study is to provide an up-to-date review of the outcomes of revision total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Relevant studies published over the last decade were reviewed. Twelve studies were included. At a median follow-up of 4 years, the median survival and reoperation rates were 86% and 16%, respectively. Significant postoperative improvements in patient-reported outcome measures were recorded in 6 studies. Significant improvement in alignment was documented in 1 study only. Revision TAA is a safe procedure that can produce good outcomes. Nevertheless, data relating to long-term outcome are still limited in quantity and duration.

Revision of total ankle arthroplasty: Survival and medium-term functional results

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to analyze the results and survivorship of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) revision surgery with standard (Salto Talaris®) or revision (Salto Talaris XT®) implants.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and December 2017, all patients undergoing TAA revision at our hospital were included. Indications for revision, type of surgery performed, improvement in function assessed with the AOFAS score, occurrence of complications and implant survival at last follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the end, 25 TAA patients who had undergone revision (11 unipolar, 14 bipolar) were included. The mean follow-up time was 5.1 ± 1.9 years. At the last follow-up, function was improved compared to the preoperative AOFAS score (51.3 ± 17.5 vs. 83.5 ± 10.1; p < .001), but not plantar flexion (17.5 ± 5.7 vs. 15.4 ± 7.1; p = 0.28) or dorsal flexion (7 ± 5.6 vs. 8.3 ± 4.9; p = 0.3). Complications occurred in six patients (24 %) that led to reoperation: three infections, one lateral impingement, one implant malposition, and one hindfoot alignment disorder. At the last follow-up, implant survival was 96 %, but the probability of survival without reoperation was 78.7 ± 8.5 % at 4 years.

CONCLUSION

TAA revision by arthroplasty is feasible, produces good functional results in the medium term, but has a high risk of complications. The challenge of revision TAA is managing the loss of bone stock and anchoring the new implants.

Total Ankle Replacement Infections: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Periprosthetic infection (PJI) after TAR is a serious complication, often requiring further surgery, including revision arthroplasty, conversion to ankle arthrodesis, or even amputation. This systematic review aims to summarize the current evidence on the management of TAR PJI and provide a comprehensive overview of this topic, especially from an epidemiologic point of view. Three different databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched for relevant articles, and further references were obtained by cross-referencing. Seventy-one studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on cases of TAR PJI. A total of 298 PJIs were retrieved. The mean incidence of PJI was 3.8% (range 0.2-26.1%). Furthermore, 53 (17.8%) were acute PJIs, whereas most of them (156, 52.3%) were late PJIs. Most of the studies were heterogeneous regarding the treatment protocols used, with a two-stage approach performed in most of the cases (107, 35.9%). While the prevalence of ankle PJI remains low, it is potentially one of the most devastating complications of TAR. This review highlights the lack of strong literature regarding TAR infections, thus highlighting a need for multicentric studies with homogeneous data regarding the treatment of ankle PJI to better understand outcomes.

The use of a 3D printed titanium implant for arthrodesis in the management of large osseous defects in the ankle

BACKGROUND

Large osseous defects (LOD) in the ankle occur because of multiple aetiologies. Advancement in 3-dimensional (3D) printing technologies has led to the use of custom implants and instrumentation their management. A 3D printed patient-specific porous titanium cage which allows for peripheral osteo-integration and autogenous bone-grafting could be an ideal implant in these cases.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a multi-centre, multi-surgeon consecutive cohort of patients requiring either TTC or AA for a large osseous defect between June 2019 - August 2020. A custom titanium prosthesis was 3D-printed according to CT measurements for implantation.

RESULTS

Mean follow up was 19.5 months (range 12-24 months). Plain radiographs and CT scans at 12 months confirmed osseointegration (stability) in 11of 13 patients (84%). Two patients developed late infection, one requiring revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

3D-Printed titanium implants in the management of LODs in the ankle offer a comparable success rate to other reported procedures, with unlimited geometric possibilities in the design allowing for accurate length correction. Their structural stability may offer an advantage over conventional bone graft techniques and limits the amount of bone-graft required.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

LOE III.

Fusion after a failed primary total ankle arthroplasty

Aims

When a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) fails, it can be converted to a fusion or a revision arthroplasty. Despite the increasing numbers of TAAs being undertaken, there is little information in the literature about the management of patients undergoing fusion following a failed TAA. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the survival of fusions following a failed TAA using a large dataset from the National Joint Registry (NJR).

Methods

A data linkage study combined NJR and NHS Digital data. Failure of a TAA was defined as a fusion, revision to a further TAA, or amputation. Life tables and Kaplan-Meier graphs were used to record survival. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to compare the rates of failure.

Results

A total of 131 patients underwent fusion as a salvage procedure following TAA. Their mean age was 65.7 years (SD 10.6) and 73 (55.7%) were male. The mean follow-up was 47.5 months (SD 27.2). The mean time between TAA and fusion was 5.3 years (SD 2.7). Overall, 32 (24.4%) underwent reoperations other than revision and 29 (22.1%) failed. Of these 24 (18.3%) underwent revision of the fusion and five (3.8%) had a below-knee amputation. No patients underwent conversion to a further TAA. Failure usually occurred in the first three postoperative years with one-year survival of fusion being 96.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90.7 to 98.3) and three-year survival in 69 patients being 77.5% (95% CI 68.3 to 84.4).

Conclusion

Salvage fusion after a failed TAA shows moderate rates of failure and reoperations. Nearly 25% of patients required revision within three years. This study is an extension of studies using the same methodology reporting the failure rates and risk factors for failure, which have recently been published, and also one reporting the outcome of revision TAA for a failed primary TAA, using the same methodology, which will shortly be published.

The Ankle Joint: Management of Significant Bone Loss with Arthrodesis

Segmental bone loss of the distal tibia and/or talus presents a challenge to successful reconstruction for the foot and ankle surgeon. When conservative care has been exhausted, multiple surgical treatment options are available including bone transport, bulk allografts, bulk autografts, titanium cages, and external fixation techniques. The primary goals of surgical correction include restoration of limb length as well as a plantigrade, stable lower extremity.

Republication of "Total Ankle Replacement Conversion to Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Bulk Femoral Head Allograft and Pseudoelastic Intramedullary Nail Providing Sustained Joint Compression"

Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is commonly performed to salvage a failed total ankle replacement. These salvage procedures are complicated by significant bone loss from the ankle replacement and are associated with low patient satisfaction. Here, we describe 2 cases of patients who presented with a failed total ankle replacement and underwent arthrodesis using a bulk femoral head allograft and a novel pseudoelastic intramedullary nail. The intramedullary nail contains an internal pseudoelastic element that adapts to bone resorption and settling allowing for compression to be maintained at the arthrodesis sites throughout healing. In the first case, a 65-year-old woman with a failed total ankle replacement underwent TTC arthrodesis. The second case involved an obese 53-year-old woman who had previously undergone 2 total ankle replacement procedures that resulted in unsuccessful outcomes. In both cases, union was demonstrated on computed tomographic scan by 6 months. At 2 years postsurgery, both patients were satisfied with the procedure. These cases provide preliminary evidence that tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a pseudoelastic IM nail and structural allograft is an appropriate treatment for failed total ankle replacements. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic, case series.

Ten-Year Follow-Up of a Customized Total Talar Prosthesis for Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Case Report

CASE

A 74-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis had undergone total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) for severe ankle joint destruction at our hospital 14 years earlier. Radiographs of the ankle revealed displacement of the tibial component and subsidence of the talar component. Revision TAA was performed using a customized alumina ceramic total talar prosthesis.

CONCLUSION

The 10-year outcome of revision TAA with a total talar prosthesis was satisfactory, with no postoperative complications, such as displacement of the tibial component, dislocation of alumina ceramic artificial talus, or progression of degenerative changes in the talonavicular and subtalar joints.

Management of Periprosthetic Bone Cysts After Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Modern improvements in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) have increased the performance of this procedure for treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. A common finding after TAA is the formation of periprosthetic bone cysts, which can be clinically silent or result in TAA failure. The exact cause of periprosthetic bones cysts has not been established, but major theories are related to osteolysis secondary to implant wear, micromotion, and stress shielding. Treatment can be nonoperative with clinical observation for small, asymptomatic cysts. Large, progressive, and symptomatic cysts often merit surgical treatment with debridement and grafting, revision TAA, or salvage arthrodesis.

Improved Pain and Function After TTC Fusion With a Custom Cage

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional custom cages can be used to treat complex ankle and hindfoot pathology and bone loss with potentially better patient satisfaction and higher fusion rates than tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion alone or in combination with bulk femoral head allograft. Yet there is limited literature to support this procedure. The purpose of this study is to objectively quantify the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients undergoing patient-specific 3D-printed custom cage implantation to fill large defects around the ankle joint region as part of a limb-salvaging TTC fusion.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 21 patients (mean age 59.3 years) who underwent custom cage implantation with a TTC retrograde fusion nail by a single surgeon for massive bone loss of the ankle and hindfoot. Patient charts were reviewed for pain and functional outcomes, complications, and various demographics, including number of previous surgeries to the ipsilateral ankle. Mean follow-up was 32 months. All 21 patients had preoperative and postoperative pain and function scores available for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 20 (95.2%) of the 21 patients had their cage in situ at final follow-up. Overall, with the numbers available, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) activities of daily living subscale, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) mental and physical health scores significantly improved from preoperative to final follow-up. However, when compared to the overall US population of age-matched 55- to 64-year-old individuals, patients still remained relatively disabled. There were 2 failures, one of which required amputation and the other was treated nonoperatively with bracing.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, in this relatively small, single-surgeon series, we found that 3D-printed custom cage technology offered a viable option for complex TTC fusion procedures performed in the presence of significant bone loss, with good fusion rates, however relatively modest improvement in functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Revision tibiotalar arthrodesis with posterior iliac autograft after failed arthroplasty: A matched comparative study with primary ankle arthrodeses

INTRODUCTION

Tibiotalar arthrodeses performed after failed ankle arthroplasties are known to be complex procedures with often disappointing functional outcomes. This study reports the results of a revision technique using a posterior iliac crest autograft.

HYPOTHESES

We hypothesized that: (1) revision tibiotalar arthrodeses (RTTAs) had functional outcomes which were similar to those of a reference cohort of primary tibiotalar arthrodeses (TTAs) and that (2) the union rate was satisfactory.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study compared 16 RTTAs performed for failed arthroplasties that caused pain and a functional disability (4 aseptic loosening, 4 massive progressive periprosthetic cysts, 5 malpositioning of implants, and 3 cases of unexplained mechanical pain) with a series of 16 primary TTAs performed for painful ankle osteoarthritis. The groups were matched at a 1:1 ratio for age, sex, side and body mass index. The preoperative workup included a physical exam, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, weight bearing radiographs, CT and SPECT scans. Outcomes were assessed both clinically (AOFAS score) and radiographically (X-rays and scans). The mean duration of the procedure (DP), average length of stay (LOS), fusion and complication rates, and time to union were also compared.

RESULTS

At the mean follow-up of 30 months (range, 12-88) for the RTTA group and 59 months (range, 23-94) for the TTA group (p=.001), the AOFAS score increased from 27 to 70.8 points (p<.001) and from 29.8 to 76.2 points (p<.001), respectively; values were similar at the last follow-up (p=.442). Both groups had similar fusion (94%) and complication rates (12%). The DP was 196.9±33.6min (range, 179-213) vs. 130±28.4min (range, 118-141) (p<.001) and the LOS was 3.8 days (range, 2-6) vs. 3.9 days (range, 2-6) (p<.445) for both groups (RTTA vs. TTA).

CONCLUSION

This RTTA technique using a posterior iliac crest allograft for filling bone defects was validated by the quality of the functional outcomes obtained.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; Comparative retrospective study.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using the INBONE II Prosthesis

BACKGROUND

The literature on the outcome of revision total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) remains limited. In this study, we aimed to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision TAA at a high-volume center in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of 28 patients who underwent 29 revision TAAs using the INBONE II Total Ankle System (Wright Medical Technology/Stryker). Demographic, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome measure data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean duration from primary TAA to revision was 87.5 months (range, 16 to 223 months). The main indication for the revision was aseptic loosening after the primary TAA (83%). Additional procedures were required in 76% of ankles. At a mean follow-up of 40 months (range, 24 to 60 months), the infection rate was 7%, the reoperation rate was 7%, and the implant survival rate was 97%. A significant postoperative improvement in the radiographic component alignment measures was observed. The subsidence, loosening, and heterotopic ossification rates in this study were comparable with those in other reports and did not influence the clinical outcome. A significant improvement was observed in the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in all domains and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) in 3 domains at 24 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision TAA using the INBONE II prosthesis was associated with good short-term survival and improvement in postoperative scores at 2 years. Maintenance of the postoperatively improved alignment was documented at the follow-up. The results of this study support the notion that revision TAA is a satisfactory option for failed primary TAA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The outcomes of revision surgery for a failed ankle arthroplasty

Aims

Revision rates for ankle arthroplasties are higher than hip or knee arthroplasties. When a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) fails, it can either undergo revision to another ankle replacement, revision of the TAA to ankle arthrodesis (fusion), or amputation. Currently there is a paucity of literature on the outcomes of these revisions. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the outcomes of revision TAA with respect to surgery type, functional outcomes, and reoperations.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Cochrane reviews were searched for relevant papers. Papers analyzing surgical treatment for failed ankle arthroplasties were included. All papers were reviewed by two authors. Overall, 34 papers met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed.

Results

Six papers analyzed all-cause reoperations of revision ankle arthroplasties, and 14 papers analyzed failures of conversion of a TAA to fusion. It was found that 26.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.4% to 40.1%) of revision ankle arthroplasties required further surgical intervention and 13.0% (95% CI 4.9% to 23.4%) of conversion to fusions; 14.4% (95% CI 8.4% to 21.4%) of revision ankle arthroplasties failed and 8% (95% CI 4% to 13%) of conversion to fusions failed.

Conclusion

Revision of primary TAA can be an effective procedure with improved functional outcomes, but has considerable risks of failure and reoperation, especially in those with periprosthetic joint infection. In those who undergo conversion of TAA to fusion, there are high rates of nonunion. Further comparative studies are required to compare both operative techniques. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):596–606.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis with Structural Allograft for Management of Large Osseous Defects of the Hindfoot and Ankle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Large osseous defects of the hindfoot and ankle pose a surgical challenge. Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis utilizing a structural allograft may be required to fill the osseous void, preserve limb length and achieve fusion. Several authors have reported small case series on this topic, however outcomes have varied and no systematic review of this data has been published to date. The primary aim of this study is to report rates of osseous union, limb salvage and complications in patients undergoing TTC arthrodesis with a structural allograft. A total of 11 publications were identified that met the inclusion criteria. One hundred seventy-five patients were included with a weighted mean age of 60.5 (range 50-72) years and follow-up period of 29.7 (range 3-62) months. Femoral head allograft was the most commonly utilized structural graft and a retrograde intramedullary nail was the most common fixation construct. Results demonstrated an overall union rate of 67.4%, limb salvage rate of 92.5% and complication rate of 26.6%. Allograft-related complications were rare with an allograft fracture rate of 0.1% and allograft collapse rate of 1.2%. There was no significant difference in union rate when using a retrograde intramedullary nail versus a plate construct (p = .9148). TTC arthrodesis with use of a structural allograft is a viable treatment option for limb salvage when faced with complex hindfoot and ankle pathology involving large osseous defects. Despite high rates of radiographic nonunion, this approach can provide patients with a stable and functional limb while avoiding amputation.

One-stage tibial deformity correction and ankle arthrodesis for ankle osteoarthritis and tibial malalignment after low tibial osteotomy

Introduction

There are no reports on one-stage corrective tibial opening wedge osteotomy and arthrodesis for osteoarthritis of the ankle and tibial malalignment after distal tibial osteotomy.

Presentation of case

The patient was a 70-year-old woman who presented with complaints of ankle pain and lower limb deformity after tibial osteotomy performed for ankle arthritis 17–18 years earlier. Clinical examination revealed marked swelling around the ankle joint and pain and tenderness at the joint line. Imaging showed tibial malalignment and severe osteoarthritic changes in the ankle. The patient had valgus deformity of 21° and recurvatum deformity of 4°. In two months, she admitted to Department of Orthopedics at Tokushima University Hospital in Japan and we performed one-stage corrective tibial opening wedge osteotomy and ankle arthrodesis with an anterolateral plate through a lateral longitudinal incision. After removal of the previous implants, the remaining articular cartilage and osteophytes were removed from the tibial and talar surfaces. After debridement of the talar trochlea and tibial plateau, the center of rotation and angular deformity of the tibia was cut transversely and a 1-cm bone graft obtained from the removed fibula was inserted into the osteotomy site, which decreased the tibial malalignment. An anterolateral locking plate was inserted over the anterior and lateral sides of the tibia, and the ankle was fused using 2 cannulated screws.

Discussion

The patient wore an above-knee splint for 6 weeks to avoid weight-bearing followed by gradual weightbearing with a brace thereafter. Osseous fusion was achieved after about 3.5 months. Radiographs obtained at the 2-year follow-up visit showed complete union of the tibia and talus. Full correction of valgus and recurvatum deformity was achieved, and the patient was able to perform daily activities with almost no pain.

Conclusion

We reported a rare case of ankle osteoarthritis and tibial malalignment that was successfully treated with one-stage corrective tibial opening wedge osteotomy and ankle arthrodesis using an anterolateral plate via a transfibular approach.

•

Ankle osteoarthritis and malalignment can be followed by osteotomy.

•

One-stage ankle arthrodesis and deformity correction should be considered.

•

Anterolateral plate was useful for arthrodesis and correction.

Three-Dimensional Printed Cage in Patients With Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Using a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail: Early Outcomes

Introduction. Segmental bone loss in the hindfoot hinders the chance of successful outcomes. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis is a reliable option; nevertheless, the risk of nonunion is high. Three-dimensional (3D) printed titanium implants offer a strong scaffold that can be customized and has demonstrated encouraging healing rates. In this study, we described the clinical outcomes and the radiologic union rate of a case series of patients with hindfoot arthrodesis, using a retrograde intramedullary nail associated to a 3D printed titanium cage. Methods. Seven patients undergoing hindfoot arthrodesis, using a retrograde intramedullary nail associated to a custom 3D printed titanium cage, were included. Demographic data were collected. Functional outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score and the Visual Analogue Scale for pain. Hindfoot alignment and radiographic union were evaluated using weight-bearing radiographs and computed tomography scan, respectively. Results. A total of 6 (85%) patients had more than 50% bony bridging. Only 1 patient underwent below knee amputation due to recurrence of chronic osteomyelitis. Two additional patients had minor complications. Conclusion. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using customized titanium cages for patients with large bone defects has shown a high rate of union in those at risk of nonunion. However, further research with larger series is needed.Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Case series.

Evaluating and Managing the Painful Total Ankle Replacement

The number of total ankle replacements (TARs) performed in the United States has dramatically increased in the past 2 decades due to improvements in implant design and surgical technique. Yet as the prevalence of TAR increases, so does the likelihood of encountering complications and the need for further surgery. Patients with new-onset or persistent pain after TAR should be approached systematically to identify the cause: infection, fracture, loosening/subsidence, cysts/osteolysis, impingement, and nerve injury. The alignment of the foot and ankle must also be reassessed, as malalignment or adjacent joint pathology can contribute to pain and failure of the implant. Novel advanced imaging techniques, including single-photon emission computed tomography and metal-subtraction magnetic resonance imaging, are useful and accurate in identifying pathology. After the foot and ankle have been evaluated, surgeons can also consider contributing factors such as pathology outside the foot/ankle (eg, in the knee or the spine). Treatment of the painful TAR is dependent on etiology and may include debridement, bone grafting, open reduction and internal fixation, realignment of the foot, revision of the implants, arthrodesis, nerve repair/reconstruction/transplantation surgery, or, in rare cases, below-knee amputation.Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion or review.

Use of Three-dimensional Titanium Trusses for Arthrodesis Procedures in Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Retrospective Case Series

Periarticular osseous defects pose a challenge when considering arthrodesis. Failure to restore the cubic content of bone can result in shortening and malalignment, as well as subsequent biomechanical issues. This study reports on 12 patients treated with patient-specific 3-D printed (7) and prefabricated titanium trusses (5). Twelve consecutive patients were treated for osseous defects of the forefoot, hindfoot, and ankle with patient-specific, 3D printed or prefabricated manufacturer titanium trusses. Seven were customized, patient-specific 3D printed trusses (4WEB, Frisco, Texas) and 5 were prefabricated manufacturer titanium trusses. All patients had a minimum of 6 months of clinical and radiographic follow-up. and no patients were lost to follow-up. Seven of the 12 patients had a computed tomography (CT) scan performed following surgery. Successful limb or ray salvage was achieved in 11 of 12 patients (91.7%). Six of 7 patients (85.7%) with a postoperative CT scan, went on to complete radiographic consolidation across all arthrodesis sites. The remaining 5 patients showed complete consolidation across the arthrodesis sites on plain film radiographs. Complications included one patient with a residual midfoot deformity that required a subsequent midfoot osteotomy in order to obtain a plantigrade foot following successful tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis, and a below knee amputation in one patient who underwent revision TTC arthrodesis to salvage avascular necrosis of the talus that developed following the index procedure. Eleven of 12 patients undergoing arthrodesis demonstrated successful union with both customized, patient-specific 3D printed and prefabricated manufacturer titanium trusses on CT scans or radiographs. The average follow-up was 14 months. Reports on traditional methods of addressing periarticular defects in patients requiring arthrodesis show mixed results and relatively high complication rates. Custom, 3D printed and prefabricated titanium truss technology offers an alternative to traditional methods for large, periarticular osseous defects.

Two-Staged Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Surgery with Primary Total Ankle Arthroplasty System: A Case Report

CASE

Case of a 2-staged revision surgical technique for the treatment of an aseptic total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) loosening: first surgery: removal of the loosened and painful TAA Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement, with exclusion of infection, and reconstruction of the large bone defect (bone-defect downsizing surgery); proof of successful ankle bone reconstruction by CT-scan imaging; second surgery: implantation of a primary VANTAGE TAA (ankle reconstruction with new primary TAA).

CONCLUSION

The present case shows the management of a failed TAA with bone defect by performing a 2-step surgical approach: removal of loosened TAA with simultaneous bone stock restoration and then implantation of a new primary TAA. This concept is a possible alternative to a post-TAA ankle arthrodesis or to the use of a TAA revision system.

Damage patterns in polyethylene fixed bearings of retrieved total ankle replacements

INTRODUCTION

Poor long-term outcomes continue to hinder the universal adoption of total ankle replacements (TAR) for end stage arthritis. In the present study, polyethylene inserts of TARs retrieved at revision surgery were analyzed for burnishing, scratching, mechanical damage, pitting, and embedded particles.

METHODS

Fourteen retrieved polyethylene inserts from a fixed bearing total ankle replacement design currently in clinical use were analyzed. Duration of time in vivo was between 11.5 months and 120.1 months. Three investigators independently graded each articular surface in quadrants for five features of damage: burnishing, scratching, mechanical damage, pitting, and embedded particles.

RESULTS

No correlation was found for burnishing between the anterior and posterior aspects (p = 0.47); however, scratching and pitting were significantly higher on the posterior aspect compared to the anterior aspect (p < 0.03). There was a high correlation between burnishing and in vivo duration of the implant (anterior: R = 0.67, p = 0.01, posterior: R = 0.68, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The higher concentration of posterior damage on these polyethylene inserts suggested that prosthesis-related (design) or surgeon-related (technique) factors might restrict the articulation of the implant. The resulting higher stresses in the posterior articular surfaces may have contributed to the failure of retrieved implants Keywords: Retrieval, Polyethylene Damage, Total Ankle Replacement.

Pathogenesis, Evaluation, and Management of Osteolysis Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Periprosthetic osteolysis is a common occurrence after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and poses many challenges for the foot and ankle surgeon. Osteolysis may be asymptomatic and remain benign, or it may lead to component instability and require revision or arthrodesis. In this article, we present a current and comprehensive review of osteolysis in TAA with illustrative cases. We examine the basic science principles behind the etiology of osteolysis, discuss the workup of a patient with suspected osteolysis, and present a review of the evidence of various management strategies, including grafting of cysts, revision TAA, and arthrodesis.Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using an Intramedullary-Referencing Implant

BACKGROUND

Treatment of failed total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is challenging. Limited literature is available on options and outcomes of revision arthroplasty despite failure rates ranging from 10% to 23% within 10 years after primary TAA. This study reports the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision TAA using a fixed-bearing, intramedullary-referencing implant.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 18 consecutive revision TAA cases between 2008-2015 using an intramedullary-referencing, fixed-bearing, 2-component total ankle system. Demographic and radiographic data were collected preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the most recent follow-up. Functional outcome data were collected immediately postoperatively and at mean follow-up 47.5 months.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients underwent revision TAA, with 77.8% (14/18) implant survival. Index revision was performed most commonly for aseptic talar subsidence (55.6%) or implant loosening (tibia, 29.4%; talus, 58.9%). Following revision, 22.2% (4/18) patients required reoperation at a mean 57.3 (39-86) months. Osteolysis of the tibia, talus, and fibula was present preoperatively in 66.7% (12/18), 38.9% (7/18), and 38.9% (7/18) of patients, respectively, with progression of osteolysis in 27.8% (5/18), 11.1% (2/18) and 11.1% (2/18) of patients, respectively. Subsidence of the tibial and talar revision components was observed in 38.9% (7/18) and 55.6% (10/18) of patients, respectively. The median American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 74.5 (26-100) and Foot Function Index (FFI) score 10.2 (0-50.4).

CONCLUSION

Early results of intramedullary-referencing revision TAA demonstrated good patient-reported outcomes with maintenance of radiographic parameters at mean follow-up of 47.5 months. Aseptic talar subsidence or loosening were the main postoperative causes of reoperation. Revision arthroplasty utilizing an intramedullary-referencing implant was a viable option for the failed TAA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Midterm Results of Radiographic and Functional Outcomes After Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Bulk Femoral Head Allograft

Background: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis implementing adjunctive allografts is a method of limb salvage for patients with complex hindfoot osseous deficits, though outcome results are limited. The purposes of this study were to assess functional and radiographic outcomes after TTC arthrodesis with femoral head allograft and retrospectively identify prognostic factors. Methods: The authors reviewed 24 TTC arthrodesis procedures with bulk femoral head allografts performed by a single surgeon from 2004 to 2016. Radiographic union at the ankle and subtalar joints along with stability of the allograft were assessed. Patients who had clinically successful arthrodeses were contacted to score the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Activities of Daily Living (FAAM-ADL) questionnaire, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and Short Form-12 (SF-12) at a mean of 58.0 months (range, 28-102) postoperatively. Results: Complete radiographic union of involved joints was achieved in 15 patients (63%) and in 75% (36/48) of all joints; 21 ankles (88%) were assessed to be radiographically stable at final follow-up. Three patients (13%) underwent revision arthrodesis at a mean of 18.9 months postoperatively, and 21 patients (88%) did not require additional surgery as of final follow-up. Patients significantly improved to a mean FAAM-ADL score of 71.5 from 36.3 (P < .001). The mean VAS for pain significantly improved from 77.2 to 32.9 (P < .001). Male sex (P = .08) and a lateral operative approach (P = .03) both resulted in worse outcomes. Conclusion: Use of a femoral head allograft with TTC arthrodesis can offer improved functional scores and sustained radiographic outcomes.Level of Evidence: Level IV: Case series.

Ankle Arthrodesis With Anterior Plate Fixation in Patients at High Risk for Nonunion

Between January 1, 2011, and January 1, 2017, an orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon performed tibiotalar arthrodesis on 221 patients. Thirty-two were included in this study. Inclusion criteria included patients with at least one risk factor for nonunion and/or malunion, isolated anterior ankle arthrodesis with plate fixation, patients older than 18, and a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Risk factors were avascular necrosis of the talus, severe segmental bone defect, smoking, inflammatory arthropathy, coronal deformity greater than 15°, diabetes mellitus, septic nonunion, failed ankle arthrodesis, and body mass index greater than 35. Functional outcome questionnaires (Ankle Osteoarthritis Score [AOS] and Foot Function Index [FFI]) were collected at the latest visit or by phone. Twenty-six (26/32, 81.2%) patients included in the study had computed tomography images available for review at an average of 3.2 months after surgery. The rate of successful arthrodesis was 93.8% (30/32) at an average of 78 days. Overall, 14 patients (14/32, 43.8%) developed a postoperative complication, including 1 patient that had a delayed nonunion and 2 patients that proceeded to nonunion. Twenty-three patients (23/32, 71.9%) completed the functional outcome questionnaires at an average of 26.8 months. Mean AOS and FFI scores improved significantly postoperatively (P < .001). Sagittal tibiotalar and coronal tibiotalar alignment improved significantly in patients with severe preoperative deformity (P < .001). Tibiotalar arthrodesis with anterior plate fixation in a high-risk cohort results in high union rates and significantly improved functional outcomes. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level IV: Prospective, comparative trial.

The "Ball in Basket" Technique for Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) in severe bone deficit represents a complex challenge for expert orthopedic surgeons also. This study aims to illustrate a surgical technique, defined as “ball in basket”, that facilitates the fitting of the structural bone graft (femoral head from bone bank) and its placement, in order to fill the bone gap during instrumented arthrodesis. The proposed technique includes the preparation of the recipient bone surfaces with acetabular convex reamers and of concave reamers to shape the bone graft from bone bank. This preparation guarantees a maximum congruence of the bone surfaces and a greater stability of the bone graft during the placement of the fixation devices to optimize the bone fusion and to provide a good patient clinical outcome. The preliminary results obtained for two patients, initially presenting with severe anatomical deformity associated with severe bone gap, are described. Patients underwent clinical and radiographic follow-up evaluations (respectively at 4 and 30 months of follow-up) showing radiographic healing and good functional recovery. The results are encouraging, although long-term studies and a wider cohort of patients are necessary to consider this technique a reliable aid in case of severe bone deficit. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Ankle Arthrodesis With Structural Grafts Can Work for the Salvage of Failed Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Background. Treatment options after failed total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) are limited. This study reports midterm outcomes and radiographic results in a single-surgeon group of patients who have undergone ankle arthrodesis with intramedullary nail fixation and structural allograft augmentation following failed TAA. Methods. A retrospective review on patients who underwent failed TAA revision with structural femoral head allograft and intramedullary tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nail fixation was completed. Foot Function Index (FFI), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) outcome scores, and radiographs were obtained at each visit with 5-year follow-up. Results. Five patients were followed to an average of 5.2 years (range 4.7-5.6). Enrollment FFI was 34.82 (range 8.82-75.88); at midterm follow-up it was 20.42 (range 0-35.38). Enrollment AOFAS scores averaged 66.6 (range 61-77); at midterm follow-up it was 70.33 (range 54-88). Radiographs showed union in 4 of 5 patients at enrollment and 2 of 3 patients at midterm. Conclusions. Utilization of TTC fusion with femoral head allograft is a salvage technique that can produce a functional limb salvage. Our results show continued improvement in patient-reported outcomes, with preservation of limb length and reasonable union rate. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level II: Prospective, comparative trial.

Ankle fusion after failed ankle replacement in rheumatic and non-rheumatic patients

BACKGROUND

With longer follow-up, survival rate of total ankle replacements (TAR) diminishes. It is therefore important to have a reliable fall-back option in case of failed TAR. Revision arthroplasty is often impossible because of loss of bonestock or infection. Conversion to ankle fusion is then indicated. We investigated the clinical, radiographic and patient reported results for fusion after failed TAR in a consecutive group of patients. We concentrated on the influence of inflammatory joint disease (IJD) on union rate.

METHODS

Patient files and radiographic images of 46 consecutive patients (47 ankles) were reviewed. There were 22 patients with IJD. Fixation methods included; anterior plating, blade plate fixation, intramedullary nailing, compression screws and external fixation. Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) were used to determine patient related outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty out of 47 ankles (85%) Fused. Union rate in the non-IJD group (96%) was significantly higher compared to the IJD-group (73%, p=0.04). Revisions and complications were more frequent in the IJD group, but numbers were too small to detect a significant difference. Mean PROM scores were: FAOS-symptoms; 68.5, FAOS-pain; 70.3, FAOS-QoL; 43.7, FAOS-ADL; 68.1 and FAAM-ADL; 52.1, with no significant difference between IJD and non-IJD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IJD-patients have a higher nonunion rate after ankle fusion for failed TAR. However, patient reported outcome is not significantly different between the two groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective cohort.

Complications and results of the arthrodesis after total ankle arthroplasty failure: a retrospective monocentric study of 12 cases

INTRODUCTION

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has the objective to maintain the range of motion of the tibiotarsal joint and to preserve the nearby joints. However, the complication rate and failures remain quite high after TAA. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the improvement in the functional scores of the tibiotarsal arthrodesis after TAA failure. The secondary objective was to assess the specific complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This monocentric retrospective series includes 12 patients (nine men, three women, average age 52.5 years) operated between 2003 and 2018. An iliac graft was used in all cases. The arthrodesis was stabilized either by screws or by retrograde nailing.

RESULTS

The reoperation was due to painful malleolar conflicts or loosening. The AOFAS score increased from 38/100 to 67/100 (51-86) post-operatively. The fusion was acquired at 3.7 months (3-6) except in two cases.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The 83% primary fusion rate is in the low average of the literature and 92% fusion rate in the high average after reoperation. All patients were improved even in two non-unions. The results of this study confirm that the arthrodesis after TAA failure is a reliable alternative to the TAA replacement. However, they are lower than those after a first-line arthrodesis.

Revision of Failed Total Ankle Replacement With a Custom 3-Dimensional Printed Talar Component With a Titanium Truss Cage: A Case Presentation

An innovative technique is presented for salvage of a failed total ankle replacement resulting from talar subsidence with the use of a custom 3-dimensional printed articulating talar component with a titanium truss cage. This introduces a better alternative to an ankle arthrodesis with which ankle joint function and range of motion may be preserved.

Distal tibial distraction osteogenesis-an alternative approach to addressing limb length discrepancy with concurrent hindfoot and ankle reconstruction

Background

Limb length discrepancy (LLD) in the setting of concurrent hindfoot and ankle deformity poses an added level of complexity to the reconstructive surgeon. Regardless of etiology, a clinically significant LLD poses additional challenges without a forthright and validated solution. The purpose of the current study is to determine whether reconstructive hindfoot and ankle surgery with concurrent lengthening through a distal tibial corticotomy is comparable to other treatment alternatives in the literature.

Patients and methods

A retrospective review of hindfoot and ankle deformity correction utilizing Ilizarov circular external fixation with concurrent distal tibial distraction osteogenesis from July 2009 to September 2014 was conducted.

Results

This study included 19 patients with a mean age of 47.47 ± 13.36 years with a mean follow up of 576.13 ± 341.89 days. The mean preoperative LLD was 2.70 ± 1.22 cm and the mean operatively induced LLD was 2.53 ± 0.59 cm. The mean latency period was 9.33 ± 3.47 days and distraction rate was 0.55 ± 0.16 mm/day. The mean distraction length was 2.14 ± 0.83 cm and mean duration of external fixation was 146.42 ± 58.69 days. The time to union of all hindfoot and ankle fusions was 121.00 ± 25.66 days with an overall fusion rate of 85.71%.

Conclusions

The successful treatment of hindfoot and ankle deformity correction in the setting of LLD using the technique of a distal tibial corticotomy and distraction osteogenesis is reported and illustrates an additional treatment technique with comparable measured outcomes to those previously described. We urge that each patient presentation be evaluated with consideration of all described approaches and associated literature to determine the current best reconstructive approach as future studies may validate or replace the accepted options at present.

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with distal tibial allograft for massive bone deficits in the ankle

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of distal tibial structural allograft to obtain a stable TTC fusion.

METHODS

Retrospectively, ten patients were carried out with a minimum one year follow-up. The median age was 72 (33-81). The median BMI was 28 (24-33). Indications for TTC arthrodesis included failed total ankle arthroplasty (n=7 patients), prior nonunion (n=2 patients), and a trauma injury.

RESULTS

Union rate was 80%. The median initial height of the distal tibial allograft was 19mm (14-24mm). In seven cases the allograft did not lose height. The AOFAS score median was 69 (31-84). SF-12 median physical component was 39 (30-53), and 59 (23-62) for mental component. The VAS median was 2 (0-8).

CONCLUSIONS

TTC using distal tibial allograft shows a lower rate of collapse than other structural grafts and provides a fusion rate higher or in accordance with the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Revision Surgery for Metal Component Failure in Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Background:

Metal component failure in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is difficult to treat. Traditionally, conversion to an arthrodesis has been advocated. Revision TAA surgery has become more common with availability of revision implants and refinement of bone-conserving primary implants. The goal of this study was to analyze the clinical results and patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing revision total ankle arthroplasty.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data on 52 patients with a mean age of 63.5 ± 9.6 years who had developed loosening or collapse of major metal components following primary TAA. These patients were compared to a case-matched control group of 52 primary TAAs performed at the host institution with a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Cases of isolated polyethylene exchange, infection, or extra-articular realignment procedures were excluded. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, Short Form 36 (SF-36), Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), and pain scores were prospectively collected. Clinical data was collected through review of the electronic medical record to identify reasons for clinical failure, where clinical failure was defined as second revision or conversion to arthrodesis or amputation.

Results:

The identified causes of failure of primary TAA were aseptic loosening of both components (42%), talar component subsidence/loosening (36%), coronal talar subluxation (12%), tibial loosening (8%), and talar malrotation (2%). Thirty-one patients (59.5%) underwent revision of all components, 20 (38.5%) just the talar and polyethylene components, and one (2%) the tibial and polyethylene components. The average time to revision was 5.5 years ± 5.4 with a follow-up of 3.1 years ± 1.5 after revision. Eleven (21.2%) revision arthroplasties required further surgery: 6 required conversion to arthrodesis and 5 required second revision TAA. Pain scores, SF-36 scores, SMFA scores, and AOFAS Hindfoot scores all improved after revision surgery but never reached the same degree of improvement seen after primary TAA.

Conclusions:

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of revision ankle arthroplasty after metal component failure significantly improved after surgery, although the recovery time was longer. In this series, 21.2% of revision TAAs required a second revision TAA or arthrodesis surgery. Various prostheses performed similarly when used for revision surgery. Revision TAA can offer significant improvements postoperatively.

Level of Evidence:

Level III, therapeutic.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis for Severe Talar Avascular Necrosis

Severe talar avascular necrosis has many etiologies and can cause bone loss/hindfoot deformity. Tibiotalar calcaneal arthrodesis is a salvage procedure after severe talar avascular necrosis. Large bone voids can present significant challenges. Modest successes have been reported with structural block allograft tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using either plate and screws, intramedullary nail fixation, or a combination. The advent of 3-dimensional printed titanium trusses has given surgeons another option for filling voids and providing structural support to prevent collapse. Although these options expand the armamentarium, treating surgeons must adhere to principles of arthrodesis: stable constructs, thorough joint surface preparation, and correction of deformity.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Before and After Primary and Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND:

Studies examining the clinical outcomes of revision total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) are sparse. Revision TAA surgery has become more common with availability of revision implants and refinement of bone-conserving primary implants. In this study, patient-reported results and clinical outcomes were analyzed for a cohort of patients who underwent both primary and revision TAA at a single high-volume institution.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data on 29 patients with failed primary total ankle arthroplasty. Cases of isolated polyethylene exchange, infection, or extra-articular realignment procedures were excluded. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and clinical results were reviewed in this longitudinal study.

RESULTS:

Fifteen patients (51.7%) underwent revision of just the talar and polyethylene components while 13 patients (44.8%) underwent revision of all components. The most common cause was talar subsidence (51.7%). The average time to revision was 3.9 years with a follow-up of 3.2 years after revision, and 3 (10.3%) revision arthroplasties required further surgery; 2 required conversion to arthrodesis and 1 required second revision TAA. Improvements in PROs were better after primary than revision TAA.

CONCLUSIONS:

Clinical and patient-reported results of revision ankle arthroplasty after metal component failure improved significantly but never reached the improvements seen after primary ankle arthroplasty. In our series, 10.3% of revision TAAs required a second revision TAA or arthrodesis surgery.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE:

Therapeutic Level III, comparative series.

Total Ankle Replacement Conversion to Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Bulk Femoral Head Allograft and Pseudoelastic Intramedullary Nail Providing Sustained Joint Compression

Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is commonly performed to salvage a failed total ankle replacement. These salvage procedures are complicated by significant bone loss from the ankle replacement and are associated with low patient satisfaction. Here, we describe 2 cases of patients who presented with a failed total ankle replacement and underwent arthrodesis using a bulk femoral head allograft and a novel pseudoelastic intramedullary nail. The intramedullary nail contains an internal pseudoelastic element that adapts to bone resorption and settling allowing for compression to be maintained at the arthrodesis sites throughout healing. In the first case, a 65-year-old woman with a failed total ankle replacement underwent TTC arthrodesis. The second case involved an obese 53-year-old woman who had previously undergone 2 total ankle replacement procedures that resulted in unsuccessful outcomes. In both cases, union was demonstrated on computed tomographic scan by 6 months. At 2 years postsurgery, both patients were satisfied with the procedure. These cases provide preliminary evidence that tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a pseudoelastic IM nail and structural allograft is an appropriate treatment for failed total ankle replacements.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV, therapeutic, case series.

Staged Treatment of Infected Tibiotalar Fusion Using a Combination Antibiotic Spacer and Antibiotic-Coated Intramedullary Nail

Pilon fractures are notoriously difficult injuries to treat. The current published data on salvage procedures after failed pilon fractures includes both total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and tibiotalar fusion, each with its own specific indications. However, no acceptable treatment algorithm addressing the complications of these limb salvage procedures is available. We present the case of a 23-year-old patient, who sustained a complex pilon fracture after a motor vehicle accident. The patient was referred to our institution after an initial fixation attempt, followed by subsequent failed TAA, which was complicated by an infected fusion attempt. We describe a staged treatment approach to clearing the infection and obtaining the final fusion goals.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Bulk Talar Allograft for Treatment of Talar Osteonecrosis

Talar body osteonecrosis can be a devastating, painful condition that is difficult to manage surgically when conservative treatments have failed. With early disease, nonoperative treatments can prolong the need for operative correction in the young patient. Later stage disease with extensive involvement may require a tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis to retain functionality of the limb. This situation frequently requires a structural bone graft. Using the technique described in this article, the void resulting from collapse of the talar body is filled with talar allograft, which offers a more anatomic and structurally rigid construct than previously described methods using an allograft femoral head. We have found this technique to be more resilient and successful than other methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, expert opinion.

Revision of failed total ankle arthroplasty to a hindfoot fusion

Aims

The aim of this study was to present a series of patients with aseptic failure of a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) who were treated with fusion of the hindfoot using a nail.

Patients and Methods

A total of 23 TAAs, in 22 patients, were revised for aseptic loosening and balloon osteolysis to a hindfoot fusion by a single surgeon (NH) between January 2012 and August 2014. The procedure was carried out without bone graft using the Phoenix, Biomet Hindfoot Arthrodesis Nail. Preoperative investigations included full blood count, CRP and ESR, and radiological investigations including plain radiographs and CT scans. Postoperative plain radiographs were assessed for fusion. When there was any doubt, CT scans were performed.

Results

The mean follow-up was 13.9 months (4.3 to 37.2). Union occurred at the tibiotalar joint in 22 ankles (95.6%) with one partial union. Union occurred at the subtalar joint in 20 ankles (87%) of cases with two nonunions. The nail broke in one patient with a subtalar nonunion and revision was undertaken. The only other noted complication was one patient who suffered a stress fracture at the proximal aspect of the nail, which was satisfactorily treated conservatively.

Conclusion

This study represents the largest group of patients reported to have undergone revision TAA to fusion of the hindfoot with good results Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:475–9.

Anatomically Contoured Anterior Plating for Isolated Tibiotalar Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

We performed a systematic review of the published literature to characterize patient demographic, surgical techniques, and functional outcomes to elucidate the complication and revision rates following isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis with anatomically contoured anterior plating.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies in English, after 1990, at least 10 patients, and reporting clinical outcomes following contoured anterior plating and with follow-up of at least 80% and 1 year. Primary outcomes were fusion rate, time to fusion, return to activities, satisfaction, and functional outcome scores. Complication rates, reoperation, and revision were also extracted.

RESULTS

Eight primary studies with 164 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average sample size was 21 ± 10.0 patients and average age was 49.2 years with 61.6% male. Posttraumatic arthritis (49.4%) was the most common operative indication, followed by primary osteoarthrosis (18.9%). The average follow-up was 21.1 months. At this time, 97.6% of patients went on to uneventful union at a weighted average time of 18.7 weeks postoperatively. AOFAS scores improved significantly ( P < .05). 25% complication rate was reported with wound complication (7.9%) and hardware irritation (6.7%) most common. Overall, 21.3% of patients underwent reoperation; 4 for revision arthrodesis following nonunion.

CONCLUSION

Isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis utilizing anatomically contoured anterior plating demonstrates excellent clinical and functional outcomes at short-term follow-up. Overall, 97.6% of patients went on to fusion and functional outcomes consistently improved following surgery. Furthermore, while one-quarter of patients experienced complications, wound complications were relatively uncommon and less than one-quarter of these required surgical intervention.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: Systematic Review.

Revision of Stemmed Agility Implants

Total ankle arthroplasty has advanced rapidly in the last 20 years. Early agility implants enjoyed improved survivability compared with more archaic total ankle implants. When talar subsidence occurs, the revision options include a stemmed component to improve stability by spanning the subtalar joint. Removal and revision of these stemmed components can be difficult because of ingrowth and bone loss.

Management of Talar Component Subsidence

Component subsidence has been found to be the top complication that leads to failure of the total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). The cause of subsidence formation is unclear, and is multifactorial. Talar subsidence is more frequently met than tibial subsidence, and the subsequent big bone loss is demanding to handle. As a revision treatment option, neither a revision TAA nor a salvage ankle and/or hindfoot arthrodesis procedure is easy to perform or can obtain a definite outcome. The Salto XT can be used to treat most of the TAA systems available for use in the United States with acceptable short-term outcomes.

[Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement and conversion to ankle arthrodesis]

OBJECTIVE

To remove loosened prosthesis components, to perform augmentation, to address osseous defects, to perform neutrally aligned ankle arthrodesis, and to achieve postoperative pain relief.

INDICATIONS

Symptomatic, aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement (TAR) with/without substantial bone defect of the tibial and/or talar bone stock.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

General surgical or anesthesiological risks, periprosthetic infection, local or systemic infection, nonmanageable soft tissue problems.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Removal of both prosthesis components using the previous incision (mostly using anterior ankle approach). Careful debridement of bone stock at the tibial and talar side. Osseous augmentation of defects using autologous or homologous cancellous bone, if needed, using structural allografts.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

A soft wound dressing is used. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended. Patient mobilization starts on postoperative day 1 with 15 kg partial weight bearing using a stabilizing walking boot or cast for 6-8 weeks. Following clinical and radiographic follow-up at 6 weeks, full weight bearing is initiated gradually after progressive osseous healing has been confirmed.

RESULTS

Between January 2007 and December 2012, ankle arthrodesis was performed in 9 patients with failed TAR (6 men and 3 women, mean age 56.4 ± 7.0 years, range 47.8-66.0 years). The mean time between the initial TAR and revision surgery was 4.5 ± 2.4 years (range 1.2-7.9 years). In one patient irrigation and debridement was performed due to superficial wound infection. Another patient had a delayed osseous healing 11 months after the revision surgery.

The painful total ankle arthroplasty: a diagnostic and treatment algorithm

The last decade has seen a considerable increase in the use of in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) to treat patients with end-stage arthritis of the knee. However, the longevity of the implants is still far from that of total knee and hip arthroplasties. The aim of this review is to outline a diagnostic and treatment algorithm for the painful TAA to be used when considering revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:5-11.

Gutter Impingement in Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Gutter pain and impingement are recognized entities following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). However, little concrete information is available in the existing literature regarding the etiology, potentiating factors, treatment and prevention of gutter disease. This comprehensive monograph discusses this problem in expansive detail and provides insight to surgeons who perform TAA, such that these complications can be minimized in the future.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level V: Expert opinion.

Vascularized Pedicled Fibula Onlay Bone Graft Augmentation for Complicated Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Retrograde Intramedullary Nail Fixation: A Case Series

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis stabilized with retrograde intramedullary nail fixation is associated with a high incidence of complications. This is especially true when performed with a bulk structural allograft and poor soft tissue quality. In select high-risk limb salvage cases, we have augmented tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis procedures stabilized using retrograde intramedullary nail fixation with a vascularized pedicled fibular onlay bone graft. We present the data from 10 such procedures with a mean follow-up period of 10.9 ± 5.4 (range 6 to 20) months involving 10 patients (9 males and 1 female). The etiology was avascular osteonecrosis of the talus and/or distal tibia and a resultant large volume cavitary bone defect (8 ankles), severe equinocavovarus contracture (1 ankle), and failed total ankle replacement (1 ankle). A frozen femoral head bulk allograft was used twice, a whole frozen talus allograft once, and a freeze-dried calcaneal allograft once. The fibula was mobilized with intact musculoperiosteal perforating branches of the peroneal artery as a vascularized pedicle onlay bone graft fixated with a screw and washer construct. The mean fibular graft length was 10.2 ± 2.3 cm. The mean interval to radiographic fusion was 2.6 ± 0.6 months and to weightbearing was 3.1 ± 1.4 months. Two stable bulk allograft-host bone and fibular graft-host bone nonunions occurred after intramedullary nail hardware failure. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis augmented by vascularized pedicled fibular graft stabilized with retrograde compression intramedullary nail fixation offers a reliable option for complex salvage situations when few other options exist.

Ankle Joint Fusion With an Anatomically Preshaped Anterior Locking Plate

We present a novel fixation plate for primary ankle joint fusion. A single anatomically preshaped angular stable plate was used with an anterior approach. An excellent result with good bone consolidation was present at the 1-year follow-up examination.

Evaluation and management of the painful total ankle arthroplasty

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an increasingly popular treatment option for patients with end-stage ankle arthritis. Although improved short- and long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes have been achieved with TAA, revision surgery may be necessary in the setting of aseptic loosening, subsidence, impingement, arthrofibrosis, or infection. Factors such as patient selection, implant design, and surgical technique can all contribute to TAA failure. Treatment of patients with a painful TAA is complex and requires careful consideration of symptom history, workup, and nonsurgical and surgical treatment options. Surgical management of failed TAA includes arthrodesis, revision surgery, or below-knee amputation.