551
|
Olkhov-Mitsel E, Lu FI, Gagliardi A, Plotkin A. Gynecologic pathology services in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 32:918-923. [PMID: 34815269 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS) offers multidisciplinary conferences to underserved communities. Mentor pathologists have become an integral part of these tumor boards, as pathology services in low-to-middle-income countries are often inadequate and disjointed. The IGCS Pathology Working Group conducted a survey to assess barriers to quality pathology services in low-to-middle-income countries and identified potential solutions. METHODS A 69-question cross-sectional survey assessing different aspects of pathology services was sent to 15 IGCS Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) training sites in Africa, Asia, Central America, and the Caribbean. Local gynecologic oncologists distributed the survey to their pathology departments for review. The responses were tabulated in Microsoft Excel. RESULTS Responses were received from nine training sites: five sites in Africa, two in Asia, one in Central America, and one in the Caribbean. There were no pathologists with subspecialty training in gynecologic pathology. Most (7/9, 78%) surveyed sites indicated that they have limited access to online education and knowledge transfer resources. Of the eight sites that responded to the questions, 50% had an electronic medical system and 75% had a cancer registry. Synoptic reporting was used in 75% of the sites and paper-based reporting was predominant (75%). Most (6/7, 86%) laboratories performed limited immunohistochemical stains on site. None of the sites had access to molecular testing. CONCLUSIONS Initial goals for collaboration with local pathologists to improve diagnostic pathology in low- and middle-income countries could be defining minimal gross, microscopic, and reporting pathology requirements, as well as wisely designed educational programs intended to mentor local leaders in pathology. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaternia Olkhov-Mitsel
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fang-I Lu
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Plotkin
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
552
|
Cuijpers ACM, Coolsen MME, Schnabel RM, Lubbers T, van der Horst ICC, van Santen S, Olde Damink SWM, van de Poll MCG. Self-perceived recovery and quality of life in elderly patients surviving ICU-admission for abdominal sepsis. J Intensive Care Med 2021; 37:970-978. [PMID: 34756128 PMCID: PMC9136475 DOI: 10.1177/08850666211052460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Concern for loss of physical performance and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) may raise doubts regarding the meaningfulness of an Intensive Care (ICU) admission in elderly patients. We evaluated self-perceived long-term recovery and satisfaction in elderly surviving an abdominal sepsis related ICU-admission and related this to objective measures of HRQoL. Methods A cross-sectional survey study was performed in all ICU-survivors with age ≥70 admitted with abdominal sepsis. HRQoL, frailty and self-perceived long-term recovery were measured using the EQ-5D-3L, Groningen Frailty Indicator, and a self-developed questionnaire, respectively. Results Of 144 patients admitted, 48 were alive at follow up (2.42 [0.92; 3.83] years), and 29 (60%) returned the survey. Eleven patients out of 29 (38%) recovered to baseline functioning, and reported higher HRQoL compared to unrecovered patients (0.861 [0.807; 1.000] and 0.753 [0.499; 0.779] respectively, p=0.005). Of the unrecovered patients, 53% were satisfied with their functioning, and 94% were willing to return to ICU. Conclusions Mortality in elderly patients with abdominal sepsis is high and ICU-admission should be weighed carefully. However, despite substantial functional decline in survivors, it does not necessarily cause self-perceived unsatisfactory functioning, poor HRQoL and unwillingness to receive life-sustaining therapy again. Caution is advised to use an anticipated loss of functioning as an argument to deny an ICU-admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne C M Cuijpers
- 82246Department of surgery - Maastricht University Medical Centre, , Maastricht, the Netherlands.,82246Department of Intensive Care Medicine - Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,199236School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW) - Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marielle M E Coolsen
- 82246Department of surgery - Maastricht University Medical Centre, , Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ronny M Schnabel
- 82246Department of Intensive Care Medicine - Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Tim Lubbers
- 82246Department of surgery - Maastricht University Medical Centre, , Maastricht, the Netherlands.,199236School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW) - Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Iwan C C van der Horst
- 82246Department of Intensive Care Medicine - Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,199236Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) - Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne van Santen
- 82246Department of Intensive Care Medicine - Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- 82246Department of surgery - Maastricht University Medical Centre, , Maastricht, the Netherlands.,385783School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM) - Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of General, 39058Visceral and Transplantation Surgery - RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marcel C G van de Poll
- 82246Department of surgery - Maastricht University Medical Centre, , Maastricht, the Netherlands.,82246Department of Intensive Care Medicine - Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,385783School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM) - Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
553
|
Harley A, Schlapbach LJ, Lister P, Massey D, Gilholm P, Johnston ANB. Knowledge translation following the implementation of a state-wide Paediatric Sepsis Pathway in the emergency department- a multi-centre survey study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1161. [PMID: 34702256 PMCID: PMC8547904 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07128-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several health care systems internationally have implemented protocolised sepsis recognition and treatment bundles for children to improve outcomes, as recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Successful implementation of clinical pathways is challenging and dependent on nurse engagement. There is limited data on knowledge translation during implementation of sepsis quality improvement programs. Methods This cross-sectional, multicentre observational survey study evaluated knowledge and perceptions of Emergency Department nurses in relation to the recognition, escalation and management of paediatric sepsis following implementation of a sepsis pathway. The study was conducted between September 2019 and March 2020 across 14 Emergency Departments in Queensland, Australia. The primary outcome was a sepsis knowledge score. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to identify factors impacting nurses’ perceptions of recognition, escalation and management of paediatric sepsis and their association with knowledge. Using a logistic mixed effects model we explored associations between knowledge, identified factors and other clinical, demographic and hospital site variables. Results In total, 676 nurses responded to the survey and 534 were included in the analysis. The median knowledge score was 57.1% (IQR = 46.7–66.7), with considerable variation observed between sites. The exploratory factor analysis identified five factors contributing to paediatric sepsis recognition, escalation and management, categorised as 1) knowledge and beliefs, 2) social influences, 3) beliefs about capability and skills delivering treatment, 4) beliefs about capability and behaviour and 5) environmental context. Nurses reported strong agreement with statements measuring four of the five factors, responding lowest to the factor pertaining to capability and skills delivering treatment for paediatric sepsis. The factors knowledge and beliefs, capability and skills, and environmental context were positively associated with a higher knowledge score. Years of paediatric experience and dedicated nurse funding for the sepsis quality improvement initiative were also associated with a higher knowledge score. Conclusion Translation of evidence to practice such as successful implementation of a sepsis care bundle, relies on effective education of staff and sustained uptake of protocols in daily practice. Our survey findings identify key elements associated with enhanced knowledge including dedicated funding for hospitals to target paediatric sepsis quality improvement projects. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07128-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Harley
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. .,Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, QLD, Brisbane, Australia. .,Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
| | - Luregn J Schlapbach
- Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, QLD, Brisbane, Australia.,Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Paula Lister
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia.,School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Debbie Massey
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Patricia Gilholm
- Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, QLD, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Amy N B Johnston
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
554
|
Cragg WJ, McMahon K, Oughton JB, Sigsworth R, Taylor C, Napp V. Clinical trial recruiters' experiences working with trial eligibility criteria: results of an exploratory, cross-sectional, online survey in the UK. Trials 2021; 22:736. [PMID: 34689802 PMCID: PMC8542410 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05723-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eligibility criteria are a fundamental element of clinical trial design, defining who can and who should not participate in a trial. Problems with the design or application of criteria are known to occur and pose risks to participants' safety and trial integrity, sometimes also negatively impacting on trial recruitment and generalisability. We conducted a short, exploratory survey to gather evidence on UK recruiters' experiences interpreting and applying eligibility criteria and their views on how criteria are communicated and developed. METHODS Our survey included topics informed by a wider programme of work at the Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, on assuring eligibility criteria quality. Respondents were asked to answer based on all their trial experience, not only on experiences with our trials. The survey was disseminated to recruiters collaborating on trials run at our trials unit, and via other mailing lists and social media. The quantitative responses were descriptively analysed, with inductive analysis of free-text responses to identify themes. RESULTS A total of 823 eligible respondents participated. In total, 79% of respondents reported finding problems with eligibility criteria in some trials, and 9% in most trials. The main themes in the types of problems experienced were criteria clarity (67% of comments), feasibility (34%), and suitability (14%). In total, 27% of those reporting some level of problem said these problems had led to patients being incorrectly included in trials; 40% said they had led to incorrect exclusions. Most respondents (56%) reported accessing eligibility criteria mainly in the trial protocol. Most respondents (74%) supported the idea of recruiter review of eligibility criteria earlier in the protocol development process. CONCLUSIONS Our survey corroborates other evidence about the existence of suboptimal trial eligibility criteria. Problems with clarity were the most often reported, but the number of comments on feasibility and suitability suggest some recruiters feel eligibility criteria and associated assessments can hinder recruitment to trials. Our proposal for more recruiter involvement in protocol development has strong support and some potential benefits, but questions remain about how best to implement this. We invite other trialists to consider our other suggestions for how to assure quality in trial eligibility criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Cragg
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Kathryn McMahon
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Jamie B Oughton
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Rachel Sigsworth
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Christopher Taylor
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Vicky Napp
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
555
|
Plagg B, Flarer H, Conca A, Wiedermann CJ, Engl A, Piccoliori G, Mairhofer S, Barbieri V, Eisendle K. Who Is Watching the Children? A Quantitative Analysis of Strategies for Reconciling Work and Parenting during Lockdown in Northern Italy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:11174. [PMID: 34769693 PMCID: PMC8583403 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: In their efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19, most countries closed schools and kindergartens. To date, little is known about the strategies of working families reconciling work and parenting during repeated lockdown situations. (2) Methods: We performed a quantitative survey of working parents in Italy during a week of 'hard lockdown' in February/March 2021. (3) Results: 3725 voluntary adult participants from different households responded. Though officially not allowed, 53.4% of all participants sought help from people outside the nuclear family to bridge the situation, mostly the grandparents (79%; n = 1855). Overall, parental coping strategies included alternating working-childcare-turns with their partner (35%, n = 1316), working early in the morning or during nighttime (23%; n = 850), or leaving the children unattended (25%, n = 929). (4) Conclusions: The closure of schools/kindergartens forcefully shifts the responsibility for childcare onto the nuclear family, where new strategies arose, including health-damaging models of alternating work-childcare-shifts, 'illegal' involvement of third parties from outside the nuclear family, as well as neglect of age-related childcare. Our findings underline that working families need additional support strategies during repeated closure of childcare institutions to be able to reduce contact and minimize secondary damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Plagg
- Institute of General Practice and Public Health, Provincial College for Health Professions Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; (H.F.); (C.J.W.); (A.E.); (G.P.); (V.B.); (K.E.)
- Faculty of Education, Free University of Bolzano Bozen, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
| | - Heidi Flarer
- Institute of General Practice and Public Health, Provincial College for Health Professions Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; (H.F.); (C.J.W.); (A.E.); (G.P.); (V.B.); (K.E.)
| | - Andreas Conca
- Department of Psychiatry, Bolzano Central Hospital, 39100 Bolzano, Italy;
| | - Christian J. Wiedermann
- Institute of General Practice and Public Health, Provincial College for Health Professions Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; (H.F.); (C.J.W.); (A.E.); (G.P.); (V.B.); (K.E.)
- Department of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and HTA, University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, 6060 Hall in Tyrol, Austria
| | - Adolf Engl
- Institute of General Practice and Public Health, Provincial College for Health Professions Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; (H.F.); (C.J.W.); (A.E.); (G.P.); (V.B.); (K.E.)
| | - Giuliano Piccoliori
- Institute of General Practice and Public Health, Provincial College for Health Professions Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; (H.F.); (C.J.W.); (A.E.); (G.P.); (V.B.); (K.E.)
| | - Sigrid Mairhofer
- Department of Applied Social Sciences, Munich University of Applied Sciences, 80335 München, Germany;
| | - Verena Barbieri
- Institute of General Practice and Public Health, Provincial College for Health Professions Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; (H.F.); (C.J.W.); (A.E.); (G.P.); (V.B.); (K.E.)
| | - Klaus Eisendle
- Institute of General Practice and Public Health, Provincial College for Health Professions Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; (H.F.); (C.J.W.); (A.E.); (G.P.); (V.B.); (K.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
556
|
The Experience of Virtual Interviews in Resident Selection: A Survey of Program Directors in Surgery. J Surg Res 2021; 270:208-213. [PMID: 34706297 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND MATCH 2021 was short of the classic "in-person" component. Herein, we assess the impact of virtual interviews (VIs) on resident selection, from the perspectives of program directors (PDs) across all surgical specialties. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey-based study of ACGME-accredited US residency program directors (PDs) of all surgical specialties. The survey was designed based on a review of relevant literature and inquired about the strengths, limitations, and overall utility of VIs. RESULTS A total of 365 PDs responded to our survey. Almost all respondents (90%) found VIs to be less expensive than in-person interviews, while only 34% agree that VIs were less time-consuming. Only a median of 5% of interviews was complicated by technical difficulties. Most PDs found it more challenging to assess applicants' fit (75%), personality and communication skills (71%), and commitment to specialty (60%). Only 14% found VIs to be overall better for assessing residency applicants. In future cycles, most PDs are planning to host both virtual and in-person interviews (57%), while 35% and 8% will host exclusive in-person and virtual interviews, respectively. CONCLUSIONS VIs are a novel way of dealing with the restrictions imposed by COVID-19. Despite their cost and time benefit, they present particular challenges in evaluating residency applicants. A combination of both virtual and in-person interviews will likely be implemented in the coming cycles.
Collapse
|
557
|
Solomon AJ, Kaisey M, Krieger SC, Chahin S, Naismith RT, Weinstein SM, Shinohara RT, Weinshenker BG. Multiple sclerosis diagnosis: Knowledge gaps and opportunities for educational intervention in neurologists in the United States. Mult Scler 2021; 28:1248-1256. [PMID: 34612110 PMCID: PMC9189717 DOI: 10.1177/13524585211048401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background: Few studies have addressed the results of educational efforts concerning
proper use of McDonald criteria (MC) revisions outside multiple sclerosis
(MS) subspecialty centers. Neurology residents and MS subspecialist
neurologists demonstrated knowledge gaps for core elements of the MC in a
recent prior study. Objective: To assess comprehension and application of MC core elements by non-MS
specialist neurologists in the United States who routinely diagnose MS. Methods: Through a cross-sectional study design, a previously developed survey
instrument was distributed online. Results: A total of 222 neurologists completed the study survey. Syndromes atypical
for MS were frequently incorrectly considered “typical” MS presentations.
Fourteen percent correctly identified definitions of both “periventricular”
and “juxtacortical” lesions and 2% correctly applied these terms to 9/9
images. Twenty-four percent correctly identified all four central nervous
system (CNS) regions for satisfaction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
dissemination in space. In two presented cases, 61% and 71% correctly
identified dissemination in time (DIT) was not fulfilled, and 85% and 86%
subsequently accepted nonspecific historical symptoms without objective
evidence for DIT fulfillment. Conclusion: The high rate of knowledge deficiencies and application errors of core
elements of the MC demonstrated by participants in this study raise pressing
questions concerning adequacy of dissemination and educational efforts upon
publication of revisions to MC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Solomon
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Marwa Kaisey
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stephen C Krieger
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Salim Chahin
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Robert T Naismith
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sarah M Weinstein
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
558
|
Fernández‐Penny FE, Jolkovsky EL, Shofer FS, Hemmert KC, Valiuddin H, Uspal JE, Sands NA, Abella BS. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among patients in two urban emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med 2021; 28:1100-1107. [PMID: 34403539 PMCID: PMC8441923 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 08/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Background Widespread vaccination is an essential component of the public health response to the COVID‐19 pandemic, yet vaccine hesitancy remains pervasive. This prospective survey investigation aimed to measure the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy in a patient cohort at two urban emergency departments (EDs) and characterize underlying factors contributing to hesitancy. Methods Adult ED patients with stable clinical status (Emergency Severity Index 3–5) and without active COVID‐19 disease or altered mental status were considered for participation. Demographic elements were collected as well as reported barriers/concerns related to vaccination and trusted sources of health information. Data were collected in person via a survey instrument proctored by trained research assistants. Results A total of 1,555 patients were approached, and 1,068 patients completed surveys (completion rate = 68.7%). Mean (±SD) age was 44.1 (±15.5) years (range = 18–93 years), 61% were female, and 70% were Black. A total of 31.6% of ED patients reported vaccine hesitancy. Of note, 19.7% of the hesitant cohort were health care workers. In multivariable regression analysis, Black race (odds ratio [OR] = 4.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.62 to 6.85) and younger age (age 18–24 years—OR = 4.57, 95% CI = 2.66 to 7.86; age 25–35 years—OR = 5.71, 95% CI = 3.71 to 8.81) were independently associated with hesitancy, to a greater degree than level of education (high school education or less—OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.23 to 4.19). Hesitant patients were significantly less likely to trust governmental sources of vaccine information than nonhesitant patients (39.6% vs. 78.9%, p < 0.001); less difference was noted in the domain of trust toward friends/family (51.1% vs. 61.0%, p = 0.004). Hesitant patients also reported perceived vaccine safety concerns and perceived insufficient research. Conclusions Vaccine hesitancy is common among ED patients and more common among Black and younger patients, independent of education level. Hesitant patients report perceived safety concerns and low trust in government information sources but less so friends or family. This suggests that strategies to combat hesitancy may need tailoring to specific populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eliana L. Jolkovsky
- Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Frances S. Shofer
- Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Keith C. Hemmert
- Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Hisham Valiuddin
- Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Julie E. Uspal
- Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Nathaniel A. Sands
- Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- Penn Acute Research Collaboration University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Benjamin S. Abella
- Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- Penn Acute Research Collaboration University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| |
Collapse
|
559
|
Shawahna R. Knowledge, attitude, and use of protective measures against COVID-19 among nurses: a questionnaire-based multicenter cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs 2021; 20:163. [PMID: 34493274 PMCID: PMC8422377 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-021-00689-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background During this pandemic, nurses have always been on the frontline and are probably the first healthcare providers to interact with patients presenting with symptoms of COVID-19. The main aim of this multicenter study was to assess knowledge, attitude, and use of protective measures against COVID-19 among nurses across the Occupied Palestinian Territory (oPt) during the ongoing pandemic. Methods This was a questionnaire-based multicenter cross-sectional study that was conducted in the period between October 2020 to December 2020. The study tool tested knowledge (8-item), attitude (2-item), and use of protective measures against COVID-19 (3-item) among nurses. Associations between nurses’ characteristics and their knowledge, attitude, and use of protective measures were investigated using Student’s t-test, Analysis of Variance, and Pearson’s correlations. To control potentially confounding variables, predictors of higher knowledge, attitude, and use of protective measures were identified using multiple regression analyses. Results The study tool was complete by 455 nurses. The mean of knowledge, attitude, and use of protective measures scores were 75.7% (SD:12.4%), 75.1% (SD: 17.7%), and 91.6% (SD: 18.2%), respectively. Multiple linear regression models showed that high knowledge was predicted by being female (p-value = 0.004) and self-rating social status as high (p-value = 0.005). Higher attitude was predicted by being female (p-value = 0.005), self-rating academic achievements as high (p-value = 0.007), and having contracted COVID-19 (p-value = 0.001). Higher use of protective measures was predicted by self-rating academic achievements as high (p-value = 0.010). Conclusion Findings of this study suggested that nurses in the oPt had high knowledge, relatively optimistic attitude, and appropriately used protective measures against COVID-19 during the ongoing pandemic. Knowledge, attitude, and use of protective measures among nurses should continuously be updated as information unfold during the ongoing pandemic. More efforts are still needed to ensure protection of healthcare providers including nurses from contracting COVID-19. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-021-00689-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramzi Shawahna
- Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Building: 19, Office: 1340, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine. .,An-Najah BioSciences Unit, Centre for Poisons Control, Chemical and Biological Analyses, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
| |
Collapse
|
560
|
Rouse R, Regan J. Psychological impact of COVID-19 on speech and language therapists working with adult dysphagia: A national survey. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2021; 56:1037-1052. [PMID: 34331499 PMCID: PMC8441712 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Speech and language therapists (SLTs) working with dysphagia have had to radically alter diagnostic and rehabilitation services during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, hereafter referred to as coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Given the aerosol-generating procedures inherent in swallow assessment and interventions, these SLTs have also been particularly susceptible to virus exposure. AIMS To investigate the psychological impact of COVID-19 on SLTs working with adult dysphagia across the Republic of Ireland and to identify the personal and professional factors associated with depression, anxiety, stress and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To explore SLT perspectives regarding their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS & PROCEDURES A cross-sectional 34-item online survey was developed and piloted. The survey collected demographic details and professional factors and it incorporated the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). The survey also sought SLT perspectives regarding their experiences during the pandemic. It was distributed to Irish SLT managers, the Irish Association of Speech and Language Therapists (IASLT) and the Irish Dysphagia Special Interest Group (SIG) for dissemination. OUTCOMES & RESULTS A total of 94 SLTs working with adults with dysphagia across Ireland responded. In total, 60% of respondents screened positive for depression, anxiety, stress and/or PTSD. Based on the DASS-21, 38% screened positive for depression (mean score = 8.0; SD = 6.3), 36% screened positive for anxiety (mean score = 6.5; SD = 6.0), and 49% screened positive for stress (mean score = 15.4; SD = 6.9). A total of 26% of respondents screened positive for PTSD (mean IES-R total score = 22.6; SD = 16.0). Factors associated with depression, anxiety, stress and PTSD were young age (p = 0.002), limited clinical experience (p = 0.01) and not living with children (p = 0.02). A thematic analysis of SLT perspectives identified four main themes: 'fear of COVID-19 infection and transmission', 'uncertainty regarding policies and procedures', 'changes in SLT roles and responsibilities' and 'increased workload'. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS This study highlights the psychological impact of COVID-19 on SLTs working with adults with dysphagia in Ireland and identifies SLTs who are at risk of depression, anxiety, stress and PTSD during the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings may assist employers to identify staff who require psychological support and long-term follow-up during this pandemic and any future health emergencies. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject Depression, anxiety, stress and PTSD are prevalent among nurses and other healthcare professionals internationally as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated factors have been identified in previous research. Despite this, no research has been conducted to establish the psychological impact of the first surge of COVID-19 on SLTs working with dysphagia in relation to depression, anxiety, stress and PTSD and the associated factors. What this paper adds to existing knowledge A total of 60% of SLTs working with adults with dysphagia in this survey presented with depression, anxiety, stress and/or PTSD. Associated personal and professional factors amongst respondents included young age, limited clinical experience and not living with children. The perspectives of SLTs on their experiences during the first surge of COVID-19 are also explored. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The findings from this study may assist SLT managers to identify SLTs who are at a higher risk of depression, anxiety, stress and PTSD to ensure appropriate support can be provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Rouse
- Department of Clinical Speech & Language StudiesTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Julie Regan
- Speech and Language Pathology Department of Clinical Speech and Language StudiesTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
| |
Collapse
|
561
|
Abiodun MT, Eki-Udoko FE. Evaluation of Paediatric Critical Care Needs and Practice in Nigeria: Paediatric Residents' Perspective. Crit Care Res Pract 2021; 2021:2000140. [PMID: 34513090 PMCID: PMC8426102 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2000140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a dire need for paediatric critical care (PCC) services, but their availability in tertiary hospitals in Nigeria is not well defined. OBJECTIVE We evaluated self-reported PCC practice, resources, and perceived challenges in various zones of the country, using paediatric residents' perspective. METHODS This is a descriptive cross-sectional survey, carried out at an Intensive Course in Paediatrics at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Participants' PCC practice and perceived adequacy of PCC resources and services were assessed using a 100 mm uncalibrated visual analogue scale (VAS). A comparison between northern and southern zones was done. A 2-sided p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS A total of 143 residents participated in the study, 37.1% of them were male, and 62.9% were female. Their mean age was 34.6 ± 3.2 years. They were mainly (86.7%) from federal institutions across the country. Less than a half (46.7%) of the trainees attended to critically ill children daily, but only 4 out of every 10 respondents stated that such severely ill children survived till hospital discharge; 12.1% of the trainees had PICUs in their institutions. Financial constraints hindered PICU admissions. PCC staff were relatively fewer in northern zones than southern zones (p < 0.05). Their perceived adequacy of PCC equipment and services were low (VAS scores 32.7 ± 2.6 and 30.9 ± 2.8, respectively) with a strong positive correlation between the two measurements (r = 0.839; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION There is an unmet need for PCC practice in Nigerian tertiary hospitals with a resultant low survival rate of critically ill children. PCC training curricula and improved critical care resources are desirable in the setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moses Temidayo Abiodun
- Paediatric Emergency & Critical Care Division, Department of Child Health, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, & School of Medicine, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
| | - Fidelis E. Eki-Udoko
- Paediatric Emergency & Critical Care Division, Department of Child Health, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, & School of Medicine, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
562
|
Shawahna R, Jaber M, Yahya N, Jawadeh F, Rawajbeh S. Are medical students in Palestine adequately trained to care for individuals with autism spectrum disorders? A multicenter cross-sectional study of their familiarity, knowledge, confidence, and willingness to learn. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 21:424. [PMID: 34376162 PMCID: PMC8356397 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02865-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical students are the future workforce of physicians in primary, secondary, tertiary, and highly specialized care centers. The present study was undertaken to assess familiarity, knowledge, confidence, of medical students with regard to autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). METHODS This multicenter study was conducted in a cross-sectional design among medical students in the 3 main universities in Palestine. In addition to the sociodemographic and academic details, the questionnaire measured familiarity (8-items), knowledge (12-items), confidence and willingness to learn (5-items) with regard to ASDs. RESULTS The questionnaire was completed by309 medical students (response rate = 77.3 %). The median familiarity, knowledge, and confidence scores were 50 % (42.5 %, 57.5 %), 50 % (41.7 %, 66.7 %), and 60.0 % (54.0 %, 68.0 %), respectively. There was a positive moderate correlation between familiarity and knowledge scores (Spearman's rho = 0.29, p-value < 0.001) and familiarity and confidence scores (Spearman's rho = 0.34, p-value < 0.001). Medical students who have received a course on autism were 3.08-fold (95 % C.I. of 1.78-5.31) more likely to score ≥ 50 % on the familiarity items compared to those who did not receive a course. The medical students who were in their clinical academic stage, who received a course on ASDs, and those who interacted with individuals with ASDs were 2.36-fold (95 % C.I. of 1.34-4.18), 2.66-fold (95 % C.I. of 1.52-4.65), and 2.59-fold (95 % C.I. of 1.44-4.63) more likely to score ≥ 50 % on the knowledge items. Medical students who reported high satisfaction with their social life were 2.84-fold (95 % C.I. of 1.15-7.00) more likely to score ≥ 50 % on the confidence items. CONCLUSIONS The present study identified considerable awareness and knowledge gaps among medical students with regard to ASDs. Medical students in this study reported low confidence in their ability to provide healthcare services to individuals with ASDs. Appropriately designed educational interventions might improve familiarity, knowledge, and confidence of medical students. More studies are still needed to investigate if such interventions can improve healthcare services for individuals with ASDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramzi Shawahna
- Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, New Campus, Building: 19, Office: 1340, Nablus, Palestine.
- An-Najah BioSciences Unit, Centre for Poisons Control, Chemical and Biological Analyses, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
| | - Mohammad Jaber
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
- An-Najah National University Hospital, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Nourhan Yahya
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Firdaous Jawadeh
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Shahd Rawajbeh
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| |
Collapse
|
563
|
Gelderblom ME, Van Lieshout LAM, Piek JMJ, De Hullu JA, Hermens RPMG. Patients' and professionals' perspectives on implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy: a mixed-method study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:736. [PMID: 34303378 PMCID: PMC8310584 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06767-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To prevent ovarian cancer, several international societies have issued guidelines which recommend to discuss opportunistic salpingectomy with women undergoing pelvic surgery after completion of childbearing. The opportunistic salpingectomy refers to the additional removal of Fallopian tubes during pelvic surgery for another indication to reduce the risk of developing ovarian cancer. These recommendations emphasize the importance of counselling on benefits and risks of opportunistic salpingectomy but offer no guidance on their implementation in daily practice. The lack of a tailored implementation strategy has resulted in a wide variation in current practice. To reduce this practice variation, we identified influencing factors on implementing opportunistic salpingectomy from patients' and professionals' perspectives. METHODS We conducted a mixed-method study between 2019 and 2020 throughout the Netherlands. In a qualitative phase, we conducted interviews with gynecologic patients (N = 11) and their professionals (N = 20) to explore barriers and facilitators, using an interview guide. In the quantitative phase, we quantified these barriers and facilitators among patients who underwent a hysterectomy or sterilization and were counselled on the opportunistic salpingectomy (N = 77), and members of the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (N = 204), using questionnaires. For both phases, barriers and facilitators were classified into the following domains: innovation, patient, healthcare professional, social setting, organization, and economic and political context. RESULTS For patients, main barriers were lack of knowledge about: the existence of the opportunistic salpingectomy (45%), size of the surgery (44%) and its associated possible disadvantages (37%). In addition, patients attributed their reluctance to concerns about the removal of healthy organs (46%). For professionals, main barriers were: patients' lack of knowledge of the size of surgery (85%) and its associated possible disadvantages (77%), the gap in evidence on long term risks and benefits (43%), the lack of feasibility in certain patients and during vaginal surgery (66%). Both patients (41%) and professionals (67%) identified the need for counselling material as facilitator. CONCLUSION To reduce the variety in care regarding opportunistic salpingectomy, consensus and uniform counselling is needed. Including the opportunistic salpingectomy in gynecological guidelines and a decision aid for counselling could serve as tools to facilitate implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malou E Gelderblom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Laura A M Van Lieshout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and gynecology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen M J Piek
- Department of Obstetrics and gynecology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne A De Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Department of IQ Health Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
564
|
Survey Research: A Reporting Guideline for the Journal of Trauma Nursing. J Trauma Nurs 2021; 28:215-218. [PMID: 34210938 DOI: 10.1097/jtn.0000000000000598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
565
|
Parker AM, Akhlaghi N, Malik AM, Friedman LA, Mantheiy E, Albert K, Glover M, Dong S, Lavezza A, Seltzer J, Needham DM. Perceived barriers to early goal-directed mobility in the intensive care unit: Results of a quality improvement evaluation. Aust Crit Care 2021; 35:219-224. [PMID: 34154913 PMCID: PMC8683568 DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A multicentre randomised trial demonstrated improved outcomes for intensive care unit (ICU) patients using early, goal-directed mobility implemented by nurses. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to evaluate barriers to nursing mobility, using a validated survey, during an ongoing quality improvement (QI) project (2019) in a medical ICU and determine changes from the pre-QI (2017) baseline. METHODS Nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical technicians completed the 26-item Patient Mobilization Attitudes and Beliefs Survey for the ICU (PMABS-ICU). An overall score and three subscale scores (knowledge, attitudes, behaviour), each ranging from 0 to 100, were calculated; higher scores indicated greater barriers. RESULTS Seventy-five (93% response rate) nurses, eight (100%) nurse practitioners and physician assistants, and 11 (100%) clinical technicians completed the PMABS-ICU. For all respondents (N = 94), the mean (standard deviation) overall PMABS-ICU score was 32 (8) and the knowledge, attitudes and behaviour subscale scores were 22 (11), 33 (11), and 34 (8), respectively. Among all respondents completing the survey in both 2017 and 2019 (N = 46), there was improvement in the mean (95% confidence interval) overall score [-3.1 (-5.8, -0.5); p = .022] and in the knowledge [-5.1 (-8.9, -1.3); p = .010] and attitudes [-3.9 (-7.3, -0.6); p = .023] subscale scores. Among all respondents (N = 48) taking the PMABS-ICU for the first time in 2019 compared with those taking the survey before the QI project in 2017 (N = 99), there was improvement in the mean (95% confidence interval) overall score [-3.8 (-6.5, -1.1); p = .007] and in the knowledge [-6.9 (-11.0, -2.7); p = .001] and attitude [-4.3 (-8.1, -0.5); p = .027] subscale scores. CONCLUSIONS Using a validated survey administered to ICU nurses and other staff, before and during a structured QI project, there was a decrease in perceived barriers to mobility. Reduced barriers among those taking the survey for the first time during the QI project compared with those taking the survey before the QI project suggests a positive culture change supporting early, goal-directed mobility implemented by nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M Parker
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Outcomes After Surgery and Critical Illness Research Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Narges Akhlaghi
- Outcomes After Surgery and Critical Illness Research Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Albahi M Malik
- Outcomes After Surgery and Critical Illness Research Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lisa Aronson Friedman
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Outcomes After Surgery and Critical Illness Research Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Earl Mantheiy
- Outcomes After Surgery and Critical Illness Research Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelsey Albert
- Outcomes After Surgery and Critical Illness Research Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mary Glover
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Nursing, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sherry Dong
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Nursing, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Annette Lavezza
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jason Seltzer
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dale M Needham
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Outcomes After Surgery and Critical Illness Research Group, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
566
|
Latour JM, Tume LN. How to do and report survey studies robustly: A helpful mnemonic SURVEY. Nurs Crit Care 2021; 26:313-314. [PMID: 34053156 DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jos M Latour
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth
| | - Lyvonne N Tume
- School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|