Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cancer: a combined analysis

Renal cell carcinoma: Current status and emerging therapies

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for about 3% of all adult malignancies and its incidence is increasing. Smoking, obesity, and end-stage renal disease are important risk factors. Localized RCC may be cured with surgical excision. However, over one-third of patients eventually develop metastatic disease. While chemotherapy and radiation therapy are relatively ineffective for RCC, immunotherapy modestly extends survival and may lead to tumor regression and long-term survival in a small minority of patients. Recently, research into the pathology of genetic syndromes associated with RCC has led to remarkable advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of sporadic RCC. Rational therapeutic agents developed from this understanding have established new treatment paradigms for this disease.

Angiogenesis and other markers for prediction of survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains a clinical challenge. Factors predicting any benefit of different therapies would therefore be useful. Angiogenesis is important in tumor progression and the development of metastases. The aim of this study in patients with distant metastases at diagnosis was to evaluate possible outcome information obtained with a number of soluble angiogenic variables in serum.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Serum samples were taken at diagnosis from 120 consecutive patients with metastatic RCC who were operated on with radical nephrectomy. Different clinicopathological variables and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGFR-1), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and erythropoietin levels in serum were compared with the clinical course.

RESULTS

The median survival time for all patients was 9 months. Six patients (5%) died during the postoperative period, all of whom had a performance status (PS) of 2 or 3. None of the angiogenic factors (VEGF, VEGFR-1, bFGF, erythropoietin) gave any prognostic information, except that VEGF was associated with survival (p = 0.0234) in patients with a good PS. A number of other variables gave prognostic information in univariate analysis but, after multivariate analysis, only PS (p = 0.002), the number of metastatic sites (p = 0.003) and capsule invasion (p = 0.017) remained as independent predictive factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Among predictive factors, only PS, the number of metastatic sites and capsule invasion independently predicted survival in patients with metastatic RCC, while soluble angiogenic factors in serum gave no prognostic information. Nephrectomy in patients with metastatic RCC remains controversial but long-term survival can be achieved in selected patients, especially those with a good PS.

Multimodal approaches in the management of locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma: combining surgery and systemic therapies to improve patient outcome

Patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma are at high risk of metastatic relapse following surgery. Patients with metastatic disease have a poor prognosis and few systemic therapy options. Radiation, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, vaccines, and immunotherapy have all been tested as adjuvant therapy without benefit. Neoadjuvant therapy in the metastatic setting holds promise as a new treatment paradigm. It can serve as a litmus test to allow proper patient selection for aggressive surgical intervention and may provide limited downstaging of primary tumors in selected cases. It can also provide a histologic assessment of the effect of targeted therapy. Application of this paradigm may have merit in the locally advanced setting as well. Effective adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma remains elusive. The benefit of new targeted therapies has yet to be tested in this setting. Neoadjuvant strategies that integrate aggressive surgical intervention with systemic therapy may hold promise as a treatment paradigm.

Renal cell carcinoma guideline

OBJECTIVES

The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guideline Group for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) prepared this guideline to help urologists assess the evidence-based management of RCC and to incorporate the guideline recommendations into their clinical practice.

METHODS

The recommendations provided in the current guideline are based on a systematic literature search using MedLine, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and publications and review articles.

RESULTS

A limited number of prospective randomised studies are available with high-level evidence. Most publications concerning RCC are based on retrospective analyses, including some larger multicentre validation studies and well-designed controlled studies.

CONCLUSIONS

It must be stressed that the current guideline contains information for the treatment of an individual patient according to a standardised general approach. Updated recommendations concerning diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up can improve the clinical handling of patients with RCC.

Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is It Still Imperative in the Era of Targeted Therapy?

In the era before cytokine therapy, controversy existed about the need for cytoreductive nephrectomy in treating patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In 1978, Dekernion showed that nephrectomy alone had no effect on survival. During this period, removal of the malignant kidney was confined to palliative therapy in some settings of metastatic RCC, such as pain related to the kidney mass, intractable hematuria, erythrocytosis, uncontrolled hypertension, or poorly controlled hypercalcemia. When interleukin-2 was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1992, the role of nephrectomy was reexamined. After a decade of controversy, two randomized controlled studies established that cytoreductive surgery has a role in properly selected patients and offers a survival advantage when done before cytokine therapy. Unfortunately, the mechanisms underlying this benefit remain poorly understood. Immunotherapy may work best when there is a small volume of cancer present, and removing a large primary tumor may prevent the seeding of additional metastases. Data have also suggested that primary tumors were capable of producing immunosuppressive compounds that might decrease the efficacy of immunotherapy. Another hypothesis suggested that removing the kidney altered the acid/base status of the patient to such an extent that the growth of the tumor was hindered. With the emergence in 2006 of two targeted agents for advanced renal cell carcinoma, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy has re-emerged as a source of controversy. Although evidence-based medical practice suggests a role for nephrectomy before the use of targeted agents, the arguments for and against this practice will be weighed.

Evolving principles of surgical management and prognostic factors for outcome in renal cell carcinoma

The generally accepted principles for the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were first described more than 30 years ago. Since then, much has changed in the understanding of the basic biology and genetics of kidney cancer. Improvements in cross-sectional imaging has allowed for more accurate preoperative clinical staging of renal tumors, and the necessity of completing all the components of the radical nephrectomy have been questioned. Surgical techniques have also evolved, and technology has advanced to make possible new methods of managing renal tumors. The TNM staging system is currently the most extensively used system to provide prognostic information for RCC. However, data published in the last few years has led to significant controversies as to whether further revisions are needed and whether improvements can be made with the introduction of new, more accurate and predictive prognostic factors. Furthermore, the recent discovery of molecular tumor markers are expected to revolutionize the staging of RCC and lead to the development of new therapies based on molecular targeting. This review will examine the evolving principles in the surgical management of RCC as well as provide an update on current staging modalities and prognostic factors.

The role of nephron sparing surgery for metastatic (pM1) renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Studies have demonstrated increased time to progression when cytoreductive nephrectomy is performed for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We evaluated the role of nephron sparing surgery in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected all patients with pM1 renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing surgery or radical nephrectomy, and all patients with pM0 renal cell carcinoma undergoing nephron sparing surgery for solitary kidney from 1970 to 2002 from the Mayo Clinic Nephrectomy Registry.

RESULTS

We identified 16 patients who underwent nephron sparing surgery for pM1 renal cell carcinoma. Solitary kidney was present in 12, 3 had bilateral synchronous disease and 1 had elective nephron sparing surgery. Cancer specific survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 81%, 49% and 49%, respectively. We identified 404 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for pM1 renal cell carcinoma. Cancer specific survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 51%, 21% and 13%, respectively. The pM1 nephron sparing surgery for solitary kidney cases were more likely to have early (33% vs 10%, p = 0.009) or late (50% vs 19%, p = 0.018) complications compared with pM1 radical nephrectomy cases. There were no significant differences in early (p = 0.475) or late (p = 0.350) complications between pM1 nephron sparing surgery cases and 139 pM0 nephron sparing surgery cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer specific survival rates in pM1 nephron sparing surgery cases were comparable to pM1 radical nephrectomy cases. Although there were differences in early and late complications between the pM1 nephron sparing surgery and pM1 radical nephrectomy groups, there were no differences when compared with imperative pM0 nephron sparing surgery cases. This study demonstrates that nephron sparing surgery can achieve adequate cytoreductive therapy while preserving renal function, with postoperative complication rates similar to those of pM0 nephron sparing surgery cases.

[Palliative and supportive therapy in cases of renal cell carcinoma]

At the time of diagnosis, 25-30% of all patients with renal cell carcinoma already present with metastatic disease. Furthermore, 20-30% of patients with renal cell carcinoma will have progressive disease despite radical nephrectomy with complete tumor resection. In this review, we discuss the current therapeutic options for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: These include palliative radical nephrectomy, surgery of metastasis, tumor embolisation and medical treatment options (e.g. immunotherapy, chemotherapy and targeted therapy), as well as supportive pain treatment.

Role of Cytokine Therapy in 2006 and Beyond for Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer

Metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) has a long history as a disease with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Immunotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment since the 1980s, and there have been a number of largely phase II studies examining various schedules of interferon-alpha and interleukin-2 based treatments. With the development of molecular targeted drugs the armentarium against mRCC has significantly expanded and cytokine treatments should be only directed at those most likely to benefit with durable remissions and prolonged survival.

Improving Outcomes with Novel Therapies for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Renal Cell Carcinoma

With the approval of sunitinib and sorafenib, 2 new multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the natural history and prognosis of patients with this disease has significantly improved. These drugs were approved based upon clinical data demonstrating robust, unprecedented response rates in one case and dramatic prolongation of progression-free survival in the other. In both cases, these results were seen in study patients in whom standard therapy had failed and who, on average, carried substantial disease burden. Important challenges today include integrating these therapies with other standard therapeutic options and into other advanced-stage RCC patient populations. This article addresses current data and practice patterns regarding the clinical use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced-stage RCC, including dose modifications and alternative dosing, the current role of debulking nephrectomy, and use in patients with indolent disease. Finally, a summary of the more common side effects and management strategies for these is also discussed. Ultimately, more clinical data is needed to address the chronic use of these agents alone, in combination with other agents, with radiation therapy, and in sequence.

Place de la néphrectomie dans la prise en charge des cancers du rein métastatiques

Metastatic kidney cancer is still a devastating disease but it represents a very heterogeneous situation. Some patients will have a median survival limited to some months, while others will live several years. If the initial diagnosis of kidney cancer at metastatic stage is quite uncommon, it raises the question of whether or not performing initial nephrectomy. The point was long debated as it was suggested that initial nephrectomy could result in a spontaneous metastase regression and protect against local complications (hematuria, local pain,...). Today, nephrectomy must not be systematic, as effective alternative treatments are often available. Furthermore spontaneous postoperative metastasis regression is unusual. Two recent prospective randomized trials clarified the impact of initial nephrectomy. It is now accepted that initial surgery prior to systemic immunotherapy results in 30% survival benefit. However this procedure should only be considered for highly selected cases: patients in otherwise good condition (ECOG 0-1), macroscopically complete local resection, no supra-hepatic caval thrombus, and patients suitable for systemic immunotherapy treatment. Several questions remain unanswered, such as lymph node dissection to be performed, and its real survival impact. Furthermore the definition of "suitable" patients for immunotherapy has to be clarified, based on the recent results from the Percy Quatro study. It would probably be more effective to consider only patients with an expected good survival benefit using immunotherapy, such as those classified as "good prognosis" based on the CRECY criteria. Finally the development of new drugs, targeting mainly the angiogenic pathway may lead to different future indications in this setting.

Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

OBJECTIVES

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) is an integral component in treating patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Critics of CN argue that perioperative morbidity or postoperative disease progression may preclude patients from receiving systemic therapy. Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy (LCN) may allow for reduced morbidity and may increase the likelihood of patients receiving systemic therapy.

METHODS

From April 2001 to March 2005, 38 patients underwent LCN at our institution. We evaluated perioperative parameters such as demographics, blood loss, operative time, complications, follow-up time, interval to systemic therapy, and survival. A contemporary open cytoreductive surgery group was evaluated for comparison.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 62 years (range 41 to 82). Most patients had a performance status of 1 or less. The median operative time was 188 minutes, and the median blood loss was 175 mL. All specimens were removed intact. The median tumor size was 8 cm (range 3.5 to 14). The median hospitalization was 3 days. Two major (5.7%) and four minor (11.4%) complications occurred, but no perioperative mortality. Postoperatively, 97.4% of patients were eligible for, or received, systemic therapy at a median of 41 days. The overall median survival was 18.1 months. In contrast to open CN, LCN resulted in decreased blood loss and hospital stay, with no differences in complications, operative time, or interval to systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

LCN is a safe and effective surgical approach for select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Our results have indicated that with proper patient selection, LCN is feasible, morbidity is minimized, and systemic therapy is delivered in a timely fashion.

Targeted Approaches for Treating Advanced Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma

The mainstay of any curative treatment in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is surgery. In the case of metastatic disease at presentation, a radical nephrectomy is recommended to good performance status patients prior to the start of cytokine treatment. Interferon (IFN)-a offers in a small but significant percentage of patients advantage in overall survival. Interleukin (IL)-2-based therapy gives similar survival rates. To date, hormonal therapy and chemotherapy do not have a proven impact on survival. Recent insights demonstrate that the majority of clear cell RCC harbor abnormalities of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene. This gene plays a key role in the stimulation of angiogenesis by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in this highly vascularized tumor. This opens interesting new treatment strategies including blockade of VEGF with the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (Avastin) and inhibition of VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases with small oral molecules such as sunitinib (SU11248, Sutent) or PTK787. Likewise, inhibition of the Raf kinase pathway with oral sorafenib (Bay 43-9006, Nexavar) or inhibition of the mTOR pathway with intravenous CCI-779 are under investigation. Preliminary clinical results with all these compounds are promising, and the results of ongoing first-line phase III studies will become available in the next years.

Laparoscopic versus Open Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is growing evidence of the benefit of cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to immunotherapy in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). We compared the outcomes of patients with metastatic RCC undergoing laparoscopic and open cytoreductive nephrectomy prior to systemic therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 27 patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic RCC between 2000 and 2004, 16 laparoscopically and 11 by an open approach. Patients with inferior vena-caval tumor thrombus were excluded from analysis. The two groups were comparable with regard to tumor size, clinical stage, and performance status. Surgical, pathologic, and perioperative characteristics and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The laparoscopic technique was associated with reduced blood loss (149 v 1135 mL; P = 0.03), transfusion rate and quantity (13% v 55%; P = 0.03; 0.13 v 2.0 units of packed red blood cells; P = 0.007), shorter time to oral intake (1.2 v 2.7 days; P < 0.001), and shorter hospitalization (3.6 v 6.8 days; P < 0.001) compared with open nephrectomy. No significant differences were observed with respect to pathologic stage, operative time, complications, fraction receiving subsequent systemic therapy, time to systemic therapy, or survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy is associated with reduced morbidity and hospital stay compared with open surgery. There was no increase in complications, and the ability to proceed with subsequent systemic therapy was maintained in the majority of patients. The laparoscopic approach can be considered in patients with metastatic RCC as part of a cytoreductive and systemic-therapy regimen.

Long-term outcomes of the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma

It has been 35 years since the radical nephrectomy was standardized by the work of Robson et al. (J Urol 101:297-301, 1969). Despite being based on a retrospective review of only 88 cases operated upon over a span of 15 years, this publication was an important milestone in the attempt to create uniformity in the staging of Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and the measurement of surgical outcomes for RCC. Although this manuscript forms the basis for our contemporary measurement of the long-term results of RCC surgery and set the standard to which the entire subsequent literature was compared, contemporary research subsequently has questioned many of Robson's conclusions regarding RCC. In Robson's era, the majority of patients presented with large, symptomatic tumors, pre-operative staging was imprecise, and many patients had locally advanced disease at the time of surgery: of the 88 patients in Robson's series, 75% were managed through a thoracoabdominal incision. Since that time, advances in renal imaging and clinical staging have led to the increased detection of incidental, lower stage, organ-confined tumors more amendable to expanded surgical options. Surgical techniques have evolved and technological advances have made possible new methods of managing renal tumors in situ that have emphasized a transition from radical to less extirpative approaches. In addition, understanding of the basic biology and genetics of kidney cancer has led to improved prognostication and the development of effective immunotherapies for advanced disease. The current concepts and long-term outcomes of the surgical management of RCC will be reviewed to help elucidate some of these changes, from the evolution of open to laparoscopic to percutaneous, from radical to partial to ablative approaches.

Interferon alpha for the treatment of advanced renal cancer

This paper is an overview on the place of IFN-alpha in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC). After a presentation of MRCC and the mode of action of IFN-alpha, the results of studies including IFN-alpha alone or in combination with IL-2, chemotherapy and other biological modifiers are presented. Finally, new trends for new drugs, including antiangiogenic therapies, are discussed.

Interferon alpha 2b as medical selection for nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a consecutive study

OBJECTIVE

Up to 25% of the patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nephrectomy and interferon alpha-2b (IFN-alpha) will progress rapidly at metastatic sites and undergo needless surgery for an asymptomatic primary. We reversed the timing of surgery and immunotherapy and evaluated the role of initial IFN-alpha as selection for nephrectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with mRCC and the primary in-situ received initial IFN-alpha for 8 weeks (2 weeks 5x3x10(6)IU/wk; 2 weeks 5x6x10(6)IU/wk; 2 weeks 5x9x10(6)IU/wk and 2 weeks 3x9x10(6)IU/wk). Patients with either partial remission (PR) or stable disease (SD) underwent nephrectomy followed by IFN-alpha maintenance at 3x9x10(6)IU/wk. Patients were evaluated with regard to age, sex, metastatic sites, morbidity, response, nephrectomy rate, time to progression and survival.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients received 2 months of preoperative IFN-alpha; 3 stopped during the 2 months period due to progressive disease (PD). Eight patients developed either a PR (n=3) or SD (n=5) at metastatic sites and underwent nephrectomy. Survival at 1 year is 50% (4/8 patients). Median progression-free survival was 6 months (3-17 months). Two of the 3 patients with PR developed a CR after 2 months maintenance following surgery. Eight patients with PD did not undergo surgery and had a median survival of 4 months (range 1-8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Absence of progression at metastatic sites following IFN-alpha with the primary tumor in place may be used as selection for nephrectomy in patients with an intermediate prognosis. Currently, a randomized study is underway to assess the role of initial versus delayed nephrectomy in combination with IFN-alpha with regard to morbidity and survival.

Renal cell carcinoma: Current status and future prospects

The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing. Despite improvements in the management of localized RCC, most patients are diagnosed with advanced RCC, which is often refractory and associated with a poor prognosis. Although surgery is the only curative treatment for localized RCC, improved diagnostic methods facilitating early detection and characterization of renal tumors have enabled more effective use of less invasive treatments. Adrenal-sparing radical total nephrectomy, and laparoscopic radical and total nephrectomy are increasingly being performed in preference to radical nephrectomy. However, standard treatments for advanced RCC are largely unsuccessful. Radiotherapy is often used to control symptoms associated with RCC in patients unsuitable for surgery. Immunotherapy with cytokines is the standard systemic treatment for advanced RCC, and is associated with prolonged survival in a subset of patients, but is generally poorly tolerated. An increased knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology of RCC has resulted in the identification of molecular pathways involved in tumor growth. Promising new agents designed to target these pathways are in development.

Review: Milstein Award lecture: interferons and cancer: where from here?

Interferons (IFNs) remain the most broadly active cytokines for cancer treatment, yet ones for which the full potential is not reached. IFNs have impacted positively on both quality and quantity of life for hundreds of thousands of cancer patients with chronic leukemia, lymphoma, bladder carcinoma, melanoma, and renal carcinoma. The role of the IFN system in malignant pathogenesis continues to enhance understanding of how the IFN system may be modulated for therapeutic advantage. Reaching the full potential of IFNs as therapeutics for cancer will also result from additional understanding of the genes underlying apoptosis induction, angiogenesis inhibition, and influence on immunologic function. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of IFNs occurred less than 20 years ago; after 40 years, third-generation products of early cytotoxics, such as 5- fluorouracil (5FU), are beginning to reach clinical approval. Thus, substantial potential exists for additional application of IFNs and IFN inducers as anticancer therapeutics, particularly when one considers that their pleiotropic cellular and molecular effects have yet to be fully defined.

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: technique, complications, and outcomes

PURPOSE

To report the safety, technical success, and effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation for renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records and imaging studies of 29 consecutive patients (18 men, 11 women; mean age, 65 +/- 2.62 years) with 30 renal tumors (mean diameter, 3.5 +/- 0.24 cm) who underwent percutaneous RF ablation at their institution from September 2001 to March 2004. All procedures were performed with computed tomography guidance with general anesthesia, and all patients were admitted to the hospital for overnight observation. Technical success, complications, and their management were recorded. Technique effectiveness was assessed by imaging and clinical follow up.

RESULTS

Overall, 88 overlapping ablations were performed (mean, 2.6 +/- 0.16 ablations per tumor per session) in 34 sessions. There were four major complications (12%). Three patients had gross hematuria and urinary obstruction, all were successfully treated. One patient had persistent anterior abdominal wall weakness. There were also two minor complications (6%) without significant clinical sequelae. One patient had gross hematuria which resolved spontaneously, another patient had transient paresthesia of the anterior abdominal wall. There were no significant changes in renal function after RF ablation. The intent of RF ablation was eradication of the primary tumor in 27 patients and treatment of gross hematuria in the other two. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Follow-up images were available for 26 patients. The primary tumor was completely ablated in 23 of 24 patients (96%) in whom eradication of the primary tumor was attempted (follow up period: mean, 10 months, median 7 months). The two patients treated for hematuria remained asymptomatic for 6 and 27 months each.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous RF ablation for renal tumors is safe and well tolerated. High technical success rates are expected. Early reports of the technique's effectiveness are promising.

Novel treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The mainstay of any curative treatment in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is surgery. In case of metastatic disease at presentation a radical nephrectomy is recommended to good performance status patients prior to start of interferon-alfa treatment. Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) offers in a small but significant percentage of patients advantage in overall survival; interleukin-2 (IL-2) based therapy gives similar survival rates. To date hormonal and chemotherapy do not have a proven impact on survival. The recent new insights in the molecular biology of clear RCC has revealed a key-role for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the stimulation of angiogenesis in this highly vascularized tumour. This opens interesting new treatment strategies including: blockage of VEGF with the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab and inhibition of VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases (with small oral molecules such as SU11248 or PTK787). Likewise, inhibition of the Raf kinase pathway (with oral Bay 43-9006) or inhibition of the mTOR pathway (with i.v. CCI-779) are under investigation. Preliminary clinical results with all these compounds are interesting and the results of ongoing phase III studies will become available in the next years.

Novel treatment strategies in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) is highly resistant to cytotoxic agents or hormones and is currently mainly treated with cytokine-based therapy. Transient responses and moderate survival advantages have been achieved in a subset of patients with these aspecific biological response modifiers. Side-effects are considerable, especially with high-dose interleukin (IL)-2. Efforts made in the field of specific immunotherapy have focused on optimization of dendritic cell vaccination and on administration of monoclonal antibodies, either cold (unconjugated) or hot (radioactively labeled). Furthermore, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is able to induce remissions but, regrettably, is related to substantial morbidity and mortality. Neutralization of the biological activity of some immunosuppressive cytokines produced by RCC (IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) with monoclonal antibodies is currently under investigation. Insights gained into the processes and pathways underlying carcinogenesis have led to the development of new treatment strategies. These treatments can be used for clear cell RCC, since they focus on blocking gene products that are upregulated by mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau gene. Specific strategies include anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody (bevacizumab) or inhibition of its receptor kinases (oral SU11248 or PTK787), or targeting the Raf kinase pathway (by BAY 43-9006) or the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway (by CCI-779). Early clinical results are promising, but their place in the treatment of RCC has to be determined.

Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Although more than a decade of experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy indicates it is an alternative to open surgery for localized renal-cell carcinoma (RCC), the long-term oncologic effectiveness of this procedure remains to be established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A thorough MEDLINE and PubMed literature research on long-term outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed, and all pertinent articles were reviewed in detail. This review was formulated on the current cancer indication, the oncologic basis, the oncologic efficacy, and the longterm oncologic effectiveness of the procedure, including laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy, with regard to metastasis, port-site tumor recurrence, and the relation to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Furthermore, the authors' previous report on the intermediate-term efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was updated.

RESULTS

With increasing experience, the indications for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy continue to expand. There were many reports of intermediate-term, two reports of long-term, and our up-to-date outcomes analyzing the management of localized RCC that showed effective cancer control with no statistically significant difference between laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy in the true 5- and 10-year survival analysis.

CONCLUSION

Long-term data, critical in the evaluation of any treatment for cancer, are currently available with respect to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized RCC.

Surgery for metastatic renal cell cancer

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) often presents in its metastatic form, or progresses after curative treatment. While the management of metastatic RCC has historically been mainly surgical, contemporary approaches often incorporate systemic immunotherapy. This review examines the current indications and scope of surgical treatment of patients with metastatic RCC. Surgery is sometimes indicated for symptom palliation at either the primary or secondary sites. However, other less invasive therapies may be equally effective, and should be considered carefully. Cytoreductive surgery prior to immunotherapy appears to confer a survival advantage, but only selected patients are suitable for this treatment regimen. Primary immunotherapy followed by surgical removal of the tumour in partial responders is an alternative treatment strategy, which has not yet been evaluated as in randomized trials. As immunotherapy develops further, the precise timing and role of surgery in multimodality treatment will need to be carefully evaluated. Occasionally, the complete surgical excision of metastases, and the primary tumour, if present, is feasible and this may prolong survival. Empirically, it would seem that such patients should also be treated with adjuvant immunotherapy, as eventual relapse is frequent. Surgery with the aim of inducing spontaneous tumour regression is not justifiable, given the rarity of this phenomenon.

Randomized Phase II/III Trial of Interferon Alfa-2a With and Without 13-cis-Retinoic Acid in Patients With Progressive Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Group (EORTC 30951)

Purpose

A randomized phase II/III trial was conducted to determine whether combination treatment with 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-CRA) plus interferon alfa-2a (IFN-α-2a) was superior to IFN-α-2a alone in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Patients and Methods

Three hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned to treatment with IFN-α-2a plus 13-CRA or to IFN-α-2a alone. IFN-α-2a was given daily subcutaneously, starting at a dose of 3 million units (MU). The dose was escalated every 7 days from 3 to 9 MU by increments of 3 MU. Patients randomly assigned to combination therapy received oral 13-CRA 1 mg/kg/d plus IFN-α-2a.

Results

Median time to progression was 5.1 months for patients treated with the combination and 3.4 months for patients on IFN-α-2a alone (P = .008). Progression-free survival rates at 6 months were 43% for patients receiving combined therapy and 30% for patients on IFN-α-2a, and at 12 months, 27% and 17%, respectively. Median overall survival was 17.3 months for patients on IFN-α-2a and 13-CRA, and 13.2 months for patients treated with IFN-α-2a (P = .048). Twenty-two percent of the patients receiving the combination stopped treatment due to toxicity, as compared with 16% on IFN-α-2a.

Conclusion

Progression-free and overall survival for patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with IFN-α-2a plus 13-CRA were significantly longer compared with patients on IFN-α-2a alone (P = .007 and P = .048, respectively). Improvement in efficacy in the combination arm was accompanied by increased, though not serious, toxicity.

[Role of nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Experience of the Department of Urology Juan Canalejo Hospital]

OBJECTIVES

We expose our experience in nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and also show complications, evolution and survival of these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performe a retrospective review of renal cell carcinoma treated at our service in the period between January 1st 1991 and December 31st 2002. We only studied those which presented in a metastatic pattern (31), and divide these in two groups: the ones which were nephrectomized and those which were not. We try to showw the differences between the two groups in order of status performance (E.C.O.G.), associated morbidity and median survival. In the first group we also study complications of surgery and treatment that patients underwent.

RESULTS

we performed nephrectomy in 19 cases, all of them E.C.O.G. 0-1. Median postoperative stay was 12 days, and complication rate was 11.5%. Of these patients, 45% underwent some type of systemic treatment, and median survival was 31 months. We didn't performed nephrectomy in 12 patients, of which 9 were E.C.O.G. 2-3. Associated co-morbidity was higher in this group. Only in three patients any treatment was offered always with palliative reason. Median survival was 3.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In those patients with good performance status this approach does not represent more morbility nor mortality than in non-metastatic patients, and that is a cornerstone in their management. We also make a literature review in which we see the last pathways in the management of these patients, and that show the needing for a combined approach both quirurgical and inmunotherapical. We have review with special interest the studie's conclusions of SWOG and EORTC groups.

Does More Aggressive Therapy Improve Outcomes in the Treatment of Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

Concurrent chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy currently offers the best treatment strategy in stage IIIA/IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. However, inadequate radiation dose may be a contributing factor in the resultant lack of adequate control of local disease. Hypothetically, radiation doses that are higher than "standard" (eg, 60 Gy) might increase patient morbidity without improving cure rates, and data from a University of North Carolina phase I/II trial suggested that at least 74 Gy can be given safely to patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, with a trend toward improved survival. Also, clinical data indicate that the cytoprotective agent amifostine (Ethyol; MedImmune Inc, Gaithersburg, MD) can be used to reduce esophagitis (and possibly pneumonitis) in patients treated with conventional radiation doses. Finally, a phase III clinical trial is proposed to: (1) test the hypothesis that higher radiation doses lead to a survival advantage in non-small cell lung cancer patients; and (2) discern the value of amifostine as a cytoprotective agent in the high-radiation dose range.

Combination of surgery and immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The treatment of choice for non-disseminated renal cell cancer (RCC) is surgery. However, the 5-year survival rates for all stages do not exceed 60%, even in contemporary series. Further improvement will most likely have to await the development of a more effective systemic therapy and the application of combined treatment modalities to counter the relatively high number of patients presenting with advanced stages. Whereas textbook belief up to the 1990s suggested refraining from surgical antitumor-therapy in the case of metastatic RCC, current strategies clearly advocate debulking tumor nephrectomy in the context of modern immunotherapies. This dramatic change of attitude stemmed from two randomized phase III trials conducted by EORTC and SWOG, including a combined analysis of both studies, in which cytoreductive tumor nephrectomy conveyed a significant survival benefit over immunotherapy alone. Concepts and progress in this field appear to be of major interest for modern oncologic urologists following the advent of immunotherapeutic strategies that require surgical intervention at some stage of the treatment cascade.

[Therapy for systemic urothelial cancer recurrence]

Detailed data on treating systemic recurrences of urothelial cancer after radical cystectomy and/or radical upper tract surgery are sparse. This review describes the data available from two large clinical phase III trials, one on systemic chemotherapy for metastatic/inoperable urothelial cancer and the other on adjuvant systemic chemotherapy after radical cystectomy for locally advanced bladder cancer. In addition, an overview of contemporary series on metastasectomy for urothelial cancer with palliative as well as curative intent is presented. The impact of therapeutic options for the treatment of systemic urothelial cancer recurrences such as radiotherapy, surgery or systemic first and second line therapy represented by conventional chemotherapy and contemporary target therapy are discussed.

Best Practice No 180. Nephrectomy for renal tumour; dissection guide and dataset

Renal tumours constitute 2.5% of all malignancies and are among the 10 most common malignancies in the UK. Most of these are renal cell carcinomas (RCC) of various subtypes. Although historically RCC has been shown to be resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, recent data suggest that the use of biological treatments, such as adjuvants, may be beneficial in patients with disease that has progressed at the time of presentation. The accurate diagnosis, staging, and grading of RCC is now a crucial element in optimal patient management. There are data to support the importance of histological type, tumour size, stage (especially patterns of extrarenal spread), and grade in determining outcome, and these data have been used to develop the published classification (Heidelberg/Rochester), staging (TNM), and grading (Fuhrman) systems. This article describes a dissection and histological sampling protocol that has been shown to increase the yield of staging information, a guide to histological classification and grading, and finally a minimum dataset for the completion of a satisfactory pathology report.

Surgical intervention in patients with metastatic renal cancer: current status of metastasectomy and cytoreductive nephrectomy

It is estimated that in 2004 there will be 35,700 new cases of, and 12,480 deaths from, kidney cancer in the US. Since 1950 there has been a 126% increase in the incidence of renal cancer and a 36.5% increase in annual associated mortality. In the past two decades, our understanding of tumors arising from the renal cortex has dramatically expanded owing to advances in cytogenetics and histopathological reclassification. It is now known that renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a family of neoplasms that possess unique molecular and cytogenetic defects, with 90% of metastases emanating from conventional clear cell carcinoma subtype. In addition to advancing our understanding of RCC, improved abdominal imaging technology has caused a migration of tumor stage and alteration of surgical strategies, with tumors commonly being diagnosed at an earlier stage. Despite these advances, the prognosis for patients with metastatic RCC is poor. Studies that examine combinations of surgery and systemic therapy aim to improve survival in this high-risk group.

Debulking Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cancer

Up to one third of patients with renal cell carcinoma will present with metastatic disease, and 20 to 40% of those with clinically localized disease will eventually be found to have metastatic involvement. Prognosis continues to be guarded for this population, with a 2-year survival of only 10 to 30%. Although advances are being made in the medical management of renal cell carcinoma, the role of surgery in the treatment algorithm is also being additionally refined. Palliative surgery either via nephrectomy or metastasectomy has a role in certain well-selected patients. There are also data to support total metastasectomy at the time of either nephrectomy or recurrence in a small subset of patients with minimal, resectable metastases. More controversial is the idea of cytoreductive nephrectomy as an adjunct to immunotherapy. Recent phase III trials indicate that nephrectomy may play an important role in management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in conjunction with cytokine-based immunotherapy. Nephrectomy is also an essential component of tumor-based vaccine and adoptive immunotherapy protocols and may play a role in other novel therapies.