Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial

Effect of centralization and regionalization of pancreatic surgery on resection rates and survival

BACKGROUND

Centralization of pancreatic surgery in the Netherlands has been ongoing since 2011. The aim of this study was to assess how centralization has affected the likelihood of resection and survival of patients with non-metastatic pancreatic head and periampullary cancer, diagnosed in hospitals with and without pancreatic surgery services.

METHODS

An observational cohort study was performed on nationwide data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (2009-2017), including patients diagnosed with non-metastatic pancreatic head or periampullary cancer. The period of diagnosis was divided into three time intervals: 2009-2011, 2012-2014 and 2015-2017. Hospital of diagnosis was classified as a pancreatic or non-pancreatic surgery centre. Analyses were performed using multivariable logistic and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

In total, 10 079 patients were included, of whom 3114 (30.9 per cent) were diagnosed in pancreatic surgery centres. Between 2009-2011 and 2015-2017, the number of patients undergoing resection increased from 1267 of 3169 (40.0 per cent) to 1705 of 3566 (47.8 per cent) (P for trend < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, in 2015-2017, unlike the previous periods, patients diagnosed in pancreatic and non-pancreatic surgery centres had a similar likelihood of resection (odds ratio 1.08, 95 per cent c.i. 0.90 to 1.28; P = 0.422). In this period, however, overall survival was higher in patients diagnosed in pancreatic surgery than in those diagnosed in non-pancreatic surgery centres (hazard ratio 0.92, 95 per cent c.i. 0.85 to 0.99; P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

After centralization of pancreatic surgery, the resection rate for patients with pancreatic head and periampullary cancer diagnosed in non-pancreatic surgery centres increased and became similar to that in pancreatic surgery centres. Overall survival remained higher in patients diagnosed in pancreatic surgery centres.

Predicting Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Pancreatectomy Using Wearable Technology and Machine Learning: Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and although pancreatectomy is currently the only curative treatment, it is associated with significant morbidity.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of wearable telemonitoring technologies to predict treatment outcomes using patient activity metrics and machine learning.

Methods

In this prospective, single-center, single-cohort study, patients scheduled for pancreatectomy were provided with a wearable telemonitoring device to be worn prior to surgery. Patient clinical data were collected and all patients were evaluated using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator (ACS-NSQIP SRC). Machine learning models were developed to predict whether patients would have a textbook outcome and compared with the ACS-NSQIP SRC using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.

Results

Between February 2019 and February 2020, 48 patients completed the study. Patient activity metrics were collected over an average of 27.8 days before surgery. Patients took an average of 4162.1 (SD 4052.6) steps per day and had an average heart rate of 75.6 (SD 14.8) beats per minute. Twenty-eight (58%) patients had a textbook outcome after pancreatectomy. The group of 20 (42%) patients who did not have a textbook outcome included 14 patients with severe complications and 11 patients requiring readmission. The ACS-NSQIP SRC had an AUROC curve of 0.6333 to predict failure to achieve a textbook outcome, while our model combining patient clinical characteristics and patient activity data achieved the highest performance with an AUROC curve of 0.7875.

Conclusions

Machine learning models outperformed ACS-NSQIP SRC estimates in predicting textbook outcomes after pancreatectomy. The highest performance was observed when machine learning models incorporated patient clinical characteristics and activity metrics.

Preoperative misdiagnosis of pancreatic and periampullary cancer in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: A multicentre retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Whereas neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy is increasingly used in pancreatic cancer, it is currently not recommended for other periampullary (non-pancreatic) cancers. This has important implications for the relevance of the preoperative diagnosis for pancreatoduodenectomy. This retrospective multicentre cohort study aimed to determine the frequency of clinically relevant misdiagnoses in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or other periampullary cancer.

METHODS

Data from all consecutive patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy between 2014 and 2018 were obtained from the prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. The preoperative diagnosis as concluded by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting was compared with the final postoperative diagnosis at pathology to determine the rate of clinically relevant misdiagnosis (defined as missed pancreatic cancer or incorrect diagnosis of pancreatic cancer).

RESULTS

In total, 1244 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy of whom 203 (16%) had a clinically relevant misdiagnosis preoperatively. Of all patients with a final diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, 13% (87/679) were preoperatively misdiagnosed as distal cholangiocarcinoma (n = 41, 6.0%), ampullary cancer (n = 27, 4.0%) duodenal cancer (n = 16, 2.4%), or other (n = 3, 0.4%). Of all patients with a final diagnosis of periampullary (non-pancreatic) cancer, 21% (116/565) were preoperatively incorrectly diagnosed as pancreatic cancer. Accuracy of preoperative diagnosis was 84% for pancreatic cancer, 71% for distal cholangiocarcinoma, 73% for ampullary cancer and 73% for duodenal cancer. A prediction model for the preoperative likelihood of pancreatic cancer (versus other periampullary cancer) prior to pancreatoduodenectomy demonstrated an AUC of 0.88.

DISCUSSION

This retrospective multicentre cohort study showed that 16% of patients have a clinically relevant misdiagnosis that could result in either missing the opportunity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer or inappropriate administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with non-pancreatic periampullary cancer. A preoperative prediction model is available on www.pancreascalculator.com.

Increasing neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio following radiation is a poor prognostic factor and directly correlates with splenic radiation dose in pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has been correlated with clinical outcomes in many cancers. We investigated whether the delta-NLR (ΔNLR) following radiation therapy (RT) could predict achieving surgical resection and the overall survival (OS) of patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), and whether the splenic radiation dose impacted ΔNLR.

METHODS/MATERIALS

101 patients with biopsy-proven BRPC or LAPC who received induction chemotherapy followed by RT were retrospectively enrolled. Following contouring of spleens, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for splenic dosimetric parameters were calculated. Pre- and post-RT complete blood counts (CBC) within two weeks were recorded. Delta (Δ) values were calculated by subtracting the post-RT value from the pre-RT value. Cox regression survival analysis for pre and postradiation CBC values and OS was performed. Receiver operating curves (ROC) were generated and optimal cutoff points for highest sensitivity and specificity were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS were generated.

RESULTS

On univariate Cox regression analysis, the only significant CBC value associated with OS was ΔNLR (HR 1.06, CI 1.03-1.09, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, ΔNLR, age, and completed resection all significantly predicted for worse OS (p < 0.05). ΔNLR significantly predicted achieving surgical resection (p = 0.04) and the optimal cutoff point for ΔNLR was 2.5. Patients with ΔNLR < 2.5 had significantly longer OS (log rank p = 0.046). Spleen radiation dose parameters were all significantly higher in patients with a ΔNLR ≥ 2.5. Optimal radiation cutoff points to predict a ΔNLR ≥ 2.5 were splenic Dmean of 308 cGy and V5 of 10.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with BRPC or LAPC who have received induction chemotherapy, elevated ΔNLR after RT significantly predicts worse OS and decreased odds of achieving resection. Furthermore, ΔNLR is correlated with higher splenic doses, suggesting the spleen may be an important organ at risk.

Radiotherapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreas Cancer: When and Why?

The role of (chemo) radiation in the perioperative management of patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is controversial. Herein, we review and interpret existing data relating to the ability of (chemo) radiation to "downstage" pancreatic tumors, delay recurrence, and prolong patients' survival. In sum, the evidence suggests that while neoadjuvant (chemo) radiation may impact pathologic metrics favorably, it rarely converts anatomically unresectable tumors to resectable ones. And while data do support the ability of (chemo)radiation to delay cancer progression, its ability to prolong longevity has not been confirmed. It is possible that (chemo)radiation is effective in prolonging the survival of select patients, but to date, this cohort remains undefined due to heterogeneity in both the populations studied and the regimens used to treat them. Based on our interpretation of existing data, we currently administer neoadjuvant and adjuvant (chemo)radiation selectively to patients with localized pancreatic cancer who we consider at highest risk for local progression. We may also use it as an alternative to pancreatectomy in patients who are poor candidates for surgery. Ultimately, the role of (chemo)radiation in these settings is evolving. Better studies of patients most likely to benefit from its local effects are necessary to clearly define its place within the perioperative treatment algorithms used for patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

Efficacy of Perioperative Chemotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Clinical outcomes after curative treatment of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) remain suboptimal. To assess the potential of early control of systemic disease with multiagent perioperative chemotherapy, we conducted a prospective trial.

Objective

To determine 2-year overall survival (OS) using perioperative chemotherapy for resectable PDA.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a randomized phase 2 trial of perioperative chemotherapy with a pick-the-winner design. It was conducted across the National Clinical Trials Network, including academic and community centers all across the US. Eligibility required patients with Zubrod Performance Score of 0 or 1, confirmed tissue diagnosis of PDA, and resectable disease per Intergroup criteria.

Interventions

Perioperative (12 weeks preoperative, 12 weeks postoperative) chemotherapy with either fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX, arm 1) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (arm 2).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was 2-year overall survival (OS), using a pick-the-winner design; for 100 eligible patients, accrual up to 150 patients was planned to account for cases deemed ineligible at central radiology review.

Results

From 2015 to 2018, 147 patients were enrolled; 43 patients (29%) had ineligible disease, beyond resectability criteria, at central radiology review. There were 102 eligible and evaluable patients, 55 in arm 1 and 47 in arm 2, of whom the median (range) age was 66 (44-76) and 64 (46-76) years, respectively; 36 patients (65%) in arm 1 and 24 (51%) in arm 2 were men. In arm 1, 34 (62%) had Zubrod Performance Score of 0, while in arm 2, 31 (66%) did; and 44 (80%) in arm 1 and 39 (83%) in arm 2 had head tumors. Of 102 patients, 84% and 85% completed preoperative chemotherapy, 73% and 70% underwent resection, and 49% and 40% completed all treatment. Adverse events were expected hematologic toxic effects, fatigue, and gastrointestinal toxicities. Two-year OS was 47% (95% CI, 31%-61%) for arm 1 and 48% (95% CI, 31%-63%) for arm 2; median OS was 23.2 months (95% CI, 17.6-45.9 months) and 23.6 months (95% CI, 17.8-31.7 months). Neither arm's 2-year OS estimate was significantly higher than the a priori threshold of 40%. Median disease-free survival after resection was 10.9 months in arm 1 and 14.2 months in arm 2.

Conclusions and Relevance

This phase 2 randomized clinical trial did not demonstrate an improved OS with perioperative chemotherapy, compared with historical data from adjuvant trials in resectable pancreatic cancer. Two-year OS was 47% with mFOLFIRINOX and 48% with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for all eligible patients starting treatment for resectable PDA. The trial also demonstrated adequate safety and high resectability rates with perioperative chemotherapy, and challenges in quality control for resectability criteria.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02562716.

[Radiologic Evaluation for Resectability of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma]

Imaging studies play an important role in the detection, diagnosis, assessment of resectability, staging, and determination of patient-tailored treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Recently, for patients diagnosed with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancers, it is recommended to consider curative-intent surgery following neoadjuvant or palliative therapy, if possible. This review covers how to interpret imaging tests and what to consider when assessing resectability, diagnosing distant metastasis, and re-assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant or palliative therapy.

Pancreatic cancer in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: Which one is the lesser of two evils?

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains one of the deadliest malignancies affecting the older population. We are experiencing a paradigm shift in the treatment of pancreatic cancer in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Utilizing neoadjuvant treatment and further conducting a safe surgery while protecting patients in a controlled environment can improve oncological outcomes. On the other hand, an optimal oncologic procedure performed in a hazardous setting could shorten patient survival if recovery is complicated by COVID-19 infection. We believe that oncological treatment protocols must adapt to this new health threat, and pancreatic cancer is not unique in this regard. Although survival may not be as optimistic as most other malignancies, as caregivers and researchers, we are committed to innovating and reshaping the treatment algorithms to minimize morbidity and maximize survival as caregivers and researchers.

A Clinically Applicable 24-Protein Model for Classifying Risk Subgroups in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas using Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometry

PURPOSE

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) subtypes have been identified using various methodologies. However, it is a challenge to develop classification system applicable to routine clinical evaluation. We aimed to identify risk subgroups based on molecular features and develop a classification model that was more suited for clinical applications.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We collected whole dissected specimens from 225 patients who underwent surgery at Seoul National University Hospital [Seoul, Republic of Korea (South)], between October 2009 and February 2018. Target proteins with potential relevance to tumor progression or prognosis were quantified with robust quality controls. We used hierarchical clustering analysis to identify risk subgroups. A random forest classification model was developed to predict the identified risk subgroups, and the model was validated using transcriptomic datasets from external cohorts (N = 700), with survival analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 24 protein features that could classify the four risk subgroups associated with patient outcomes: stable, exocrine-like; activated, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. The "stable" risk subgroup was characterized by proteins that were associated with differentiation and tumor suppressors. "Exocrine-like" tumors highly expressed pancreatic enzymes. Two high-risk subgroups, "activated" and "ECM remodeling," were enriched in terms such as cell cycle, angiogenesis, immunocompetence, tumor invasion metastasis, and metabolic reprogramming. The classification model that included these features made prognoses with relative accuracy and precision in multiple cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

We proposed PDAC risk subgroups and developed a classification model that may potentially be useful for routine clinical implementations, at the individual level. This clinical system may improve the accuracy of risk prediction and treatment guidelines.See related commentary by Thakur and Singh, p. 3272.

Intention to treat outcomes among patients with pancreatic cancer treated using International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery recommended pathways for resectable and borderline resectable disease

BACKGROUND

The International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery recommends upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer or borderline resectable-venous (BR-V) disease and neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) among those with arterial involvement (BR-A or locally advanced, LA). Though neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is a promising strategy, outcomes are rarely reported on intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. This study presents ITT outcomes where pathways to surgery were in line with International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery guidelines.

METHODS

Patients recommended for potentially curative treatment with PDAC between 2012 and 2017 (n = 345) were classified as resectable, BR-A/BR-V or LA, according to NCCN criteria. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were resection rates, positive margins and toxicity among patients receiving NAT.

RESULTS

At surgery, the resection rates were 78% (172/221), 65% (35/54) and 54% (21/39) for those with resectable, BR-V and BR-A/LA disease, respectively (P < 0.0001). The median survival of those resected in the BR-A/LA cohort was 31 months. However, on an ITT basis, there was no significant difference in survival between resectable, BR-V and BR-A/LA disease (median: 19 versus 15 versus 19 months; P = 0.585). On review, some 31 (44%) patients of the BR-A/LA cohort either did not receive or did not complete NAT.

CONCLUSION

To realize benefits of NAT, more patients need to complete NAT and to undergo resection. Upfront resection for BR-V disease is associated with equivalent outcomes to upfront surgery for resectable disease or NAT for BR-A/LA disease. Strategies to increase the proportion of patients who complete NAT and undergo resection are needed.

The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatic Cancer Staging in the Era of Neoadjuvant Therapy and Personalised Medicine

Precise staging of pancreatic cancer is crucial for treatment choice. In clinical practice, this includes the TNM staging and determination of tumour resectability, based on a multimodality imaging workup. International guidelines recommend multi-detector computed tomography (CT), with a dedicated pancreatic protocol, as the first-line tool for TNM staging and evaluation of tumour-vessel relationships. In non-metastatic disease upon initial CT assessment, both magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) may add relevant information, potentially changing treatment sequence. EUS may have distinct advantages in pancreatic cancer diagnosis and staging when compared with other modalities, being particularly valuable in the determination of portal venous confluence involvement (particularly in small and ill-defined/isoattenuating tumours on CT), in locoregional nodal staging and in the detection of ascites. As we step forward to a more frequent use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to personalised medicine, the importance of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) also increases. The recent availability of third-generation biopsy needles significantly increased the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided tissue acquisition, providing diagnostic cell blocks in approximately 95% of cases with only two dedicated passes and allowing ancillary testing, such as immunohistochemistry and molecular profiling of the tumour. In this article, the authors present an updated perspective of the place of EUS and EUS-FNB in the staging algorithm of pancreatic cancer. Data supporting the increasing role of neoadjuvant therapy and the importance of a patient-tailored treatment selection, based on tumoural subtyping and molecular profiling, are also discussed.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with decreased lymph node ratio in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratio (LNR) and margin status have prognostic significance in pancreatic cancer. Herein we examined the pathologic and clinical outcomes in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent treatment between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2017 were included. Sequential patients in the BRPC group were compared to a propensity score matched cohort of patients with radiographically resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent upfront surgical resection. The BRPC group was also compared to sequential patients with radiographically resectable pancreatic cancer who required vein resection (VR) during upfront surgery.

RESULTS

There were 50 patients in the BRPC group, 50 patients in the matched control group, and 38 patients in the VR group. Negative margins (R0) were seen in 72%, 64%, and 34% of the BRPC, control, and VR groups, respectively (P = 0.521 for BRPC vs. control; P = 0.002 for BRPC vs. VR), with 24% of the BRPC group requiring a vascular resection. Nodal stage was N0 in 64%, 20%, and 18% of the BRPC, control, and VR groups, respectively (P < 0.001 for BRPC vs. control or VR). When nodal status was stratified into four groups (N0, or LNR ≤ 0.2, 0.2-0.4, ≥ 0.4), the BRPC group had a more favorable distribution (P < 0.001). The median overall survival were 28.8, 38.6, and 19.0 months for the BRPC, control, and VR groups, respectively (log-rank P = 0.096).

CONCLUSIONS

NAT in BRPC was associated with more R0 and N0 resections and lower LNR compared to patients undergoing upfront resection for resectable disease.

Reshaping preoperative treatment of pancreatic cancer in the era of precision medicine

This review summarises the recent evidence on preoperative therapeutic strategies in pancreatic cancer and discusses the rationale for an imminent need for a personalised therapeutic approach in non-metastatic disease. The molecular diversity of pancreatic cancer and its influence on prognosis and treatment response, combined with the failure of 'all-comer' treatments to significantly impact on patient outcomes, requires a paradigm shift towards a genomic-driven approach. This is particularly important in the preoperative, potentially curable setting, where a personalised treatment allocation has the substantial potential to reduce pancreatic cancer mortality.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer is Associated with Improved Survival for Patients with Low-Risk Pathology

BACKGROUND

With limited evidence, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AT) after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NT) and surgical resection for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is debated. Guidelines recommend 6 months of AT for patients receiving NT. However, the patient-derived benefit from additional AT remains unknown.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2015 was used to identify patients undergoing NT. The chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify differences between those receiving only NT and those receiving NT and AT. Survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard ratio model was applied to the entire cohort and to subgroups with differing lymph node ratios (LNRs), tumor sizes, grades, and surgical margin statuses.

RESULTS

Of the 3897 patients who received NT, 36.7 % received additional AT. Analysis of the entire cohort showed that associated survival was significantly improved with NT and AT compared with NT alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the survival benefit of additional AT remained significant for those with negative nodal disease, an LNR lower than 0.15, low-grade histology, and negative margin status. Overall survival did not differ between those receiving NT only and those receiving NT and AT in the group with an LNR of 0.15 or higher, high-grade histology, and positive margins.

CONCLUSION

This study identified an increasing trend in the use of AT after NT and showed an associated survival benefit for subgroups with low-risk pathologic features. These results suggest that the addition of AT after NT likely beneficial for these subgroups.

Clinical impact of preoperative tumour contact with superior mesenteric-portal vein in patients with resectable pancreatic head cancer

INTRODUCTION

The NCCN classification of resectability in pancreatic head cancer does not consider preoperative radiological tumour ≤ 180° contact with portal vein/superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) as a negative prognostic feature. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether this factor is associated with higher rate of incomplete resection and poorer survival.

METHODS

All patients considered for pancreatic resection between 2012 and 2017 at two Spanish referral centres were included. Patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) according to NCCN classification were excluded. Preoperative CT scans were reviewed by dedicated radiologists to identify radiologic tumour contact with PV/SMV.

RESULTS

Out of 302, 71 patients were finally included in this study. Twenty-two (31%) patients showed tumour-PV/SMV contact (group 1) and 49 (69%) did not show any contact (group 2). Patients in group 1 showed a statistically significantly higher rate of R1 and R1-direct margins compared with group 2 (95 vs 28% and 77 vs 10%) and lower median survival (24 vs 41 months, p = 0.02). Preoperative contact with PV/SMV, lymph node metastases, R1-direct margin and NO adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with disease-specific survival at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative radiological tumour contact with PV/SMV in patients with NCCN resectable PDAC is associated with high rate of pathologic positive margins following surgery and poorer survival.

What Should Guide the Performance of Venous Resection During Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Venous Contact?

Complete surgical resection, most often associated with perioperative chemotherapy, is the only way to offer a chance of cure for patients with pancreatic cancer. One of the most important factors in determining survival outcome that can be influenced by the surgeon is the R0 resection. However, the proximity of mesenteric vessels in cephalic pancreatic tumors, especially the mesenterico-portal venous axis, results in an increased risk of vein involvement and/or the presence of malignant cells in the venous bed margin. A concomitant venous resection can be performed to decrease the risk of a positive margin. Given the additional technical difficulty that this implies, many surgeons seek a path between the tumor and the vein, hoping for the absence of tumor infiltration into the perivascular tissue on pathologic analysis, particularly in cases with administration of neoadjuvant therapy. The definition of optimal surgical margin remains a subject of debate, but at least 1 mm is an independent predictor of survival after pancreatic cancer surgical resection. Although preoperative radiologic assessment is essential for accurate planning of a pancreatic resection, intraoperative decision-making with regard to resection of the mesenterico-portal vein in tumors with a venous contact remains unclear and variable. Although venous histologic involvement and perivascular infiltration are not accurately predictable preoperatively, clinicians must examine the existing criteria and normograms to guide their surgical management according to the integration of new imaging techniques, preoperative chemotherapy use, tumor biology and molecular histopathology, and surgical techniques.

Pancreatectomy with Vascular Resection After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX: Who Survives More Than a Year After Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Experienced pancreatic surgeons, for whom complexity is not an issue, must decide at the end of neoadjuvant therapy whether to continue or discontinue surgery, when pancreatectomy with vascular resection is planned in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to determine preoperative factors that can predict short postoperative survival in such situations.

METHODS

Overall, 105 patients with borderline or locally advanced PDAC received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (followed by chemoradiation in 22% of patients) and underwent pancreatectomy with segmental venous and/or arterial resection at two high-volume centers. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of < 1 year after surgery for patients who did not die from the surgery.

RESULTS

Tumors were classified as borderline in 78% of cases and locally advanced in 22% of cases. Mean CA19-9 at diagnosis was 934 U/mL, which significantly decreased to 213 U/mL (p < 0.01) after a median of six cycles of FOLFIRINOX. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed most often (76%). The vast majority of patients underwent venous resection (92%), and a simultaneous arterial resection was performed in 16 patients (15%). The severe morbidity rate and 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 21%, 8.5%, and 10.4%, respectively. The median OS after surgery was 23 months. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative CA19-9 ≥ 450 U/mL was the only preoperative factor independently associated with OS of < 1 year (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

The preoperative CA19-9 value should be considered in the clinical decision-making process when complex vascular resection is required.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Operable Pancreatic Cancer: Both Honey and Milk (but No Bread?)

Pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis. Resection is the best option for cure, supported by multimodal therapy to treat the systemic disease. While adjuvant therapy has become standard in those who are fit and who can tolerate the given regimen, the concept of perioperative (neoadjuvant) therapy is building momentum. The concepts of “borderline” and “locally advanced” have changed the previous dichotomized “resectable/non-resectable” into subcategories for which new algorithms have emerged, with neoadjuvant therapy discussed both for upfront resectable pancreatic cancer, for those deemed borderline resectable, and as “induction or conversion” therapy for locally advanced disease. The purpose of this invited commentary is to discuss some of the changing paradigms in multimodal therapy for operable pancreatic cancer. The PREOPANC trial presented randomized data on the role of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline cancers, but new questions have emerged. The role of combination therapy in the preoperative setting is discussed in the light of this trial. FOLFIRINOX has emerged as the most potent treatment regimen in the metastatic and adjuvant setting, but with no level I data to support neoadjuvant use yet. Several trials are ongoing to arrive at the best answer.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Survival Analysis Supporting Use in Patients with High-Risk Disease

BACKGROUND

Upfront surgery is the current standard for resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) despite high treatment failure with this approach. We sought to examine the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) as an alternative strategy for this population.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with resectable ICC undergoing curative-intent surgery (2006-2014). Utilization trends were examined and survival estimates between NAC and upfront surgery were compared; propensity score-matched models were used to examine the association of NAC with overall survival (OS) for all patients and risk-stratified cohorts. Models accounted for clustering within hospitals, and results represent findings from a complete-case analysis.

RESULTS

Among 881 patients with ICC, 8.3% received NAC, with no changes over time (Cochran-Armitage p = 0.7). Median follow-up was 50.9 months, with no difference in unadjusted survival with NAC versus upfront surgery (median OS 51.8 vs. 35.6 months, and 5-year OS rates of 38.2% vs. 36.6%; log rank p = 0.51), and no survival benefit in the propensity score-matched analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.54-1.11; p = 0.16). However, for patients with stage II-III disease, NAC was associated with a trend towards improved survival (median OS of 47.6 months vs. 25.9 months, and 5-year OS rates of 34% vs. 25.7%; log-rank p = 0.10) and a statistically significant survival benefit in the propensity score-matched analysis. (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

NAC is associated with improved OS over upfront surgery in patients with resectable ICC and high-risk of treatment failure. These data support the need for prospective studies to examine NAC as an alternative strategy to improve OS in this population.

Dose-escalated simultaneously integrated boost photon or proton therapy in pancreatic cancer in an in-silico study: Gastrointestinal organs remain critical

•

Robustly optimized proton plans (rMFO-IMPT) with simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) were clinically applicable.

•

Gastrointestinal organs reached critical dose values in rMFO-IMPT, VMAT and Tomotherapy techniques.

•

rMFO-IMPT significantly reduced the low and intermediate dose to organs at risk.

•

No clinically significant differences on results depending on tumor location or surgical status were observed.

Purpose

To compare the dosimetric results of an in-silico study among intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton (IMPT) treatment techniques using a dose-escalated simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) approach in locally recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer patients.

Material and methods

For each of 15 locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients, a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a Tomotherapy (TOMO), and an IMPT treatment plan was optimized on free-breathing treatment planning computed tomography (CT) images. For the photon treatment plans, doses of 66 Gy and 51 Gy, both as SIB in 30 fractions, were prescribed to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and to the planning target volume (PTV), respectively. For the proton plans, a dose prescription of 66 Gy(RBE) to the GTV and of 51 Gy(RBE) to the clinical target volume (CTV) was planned. For each SIB-treatment plan, doses to the targets and OARs were evaluated and statistically compared.

Results

All treatment techniques reached the prescribed doses to the GTV and CTV or PTV. The stomach and the bowel, in particular the duodenum and the small bowel, were found to be frequently exposed to doses exceeding 50 Gy, irrespective of the treatment technique. For doses below 50 Gy, the IMPT technique was statistically significant superior to both IMRT techniques regarding decreasing dose to the OARs, e.g. volume of the bowel receiving 15 Gy (V_15Gy) was reduced for IMPT compared to VMAT (p = 0.003) and TOMO (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

With all photon and proton techniques investigated, the radiation dose to gastrointestinal OARs remained critical when treating patients with unresectable locally recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer using a dose-escalated SIB approach.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma is Associated with Lower Post-Pancreatectomy Readmission Rates: A Population-Based Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Despite neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) being increasingly utilized and possibly associated with improved oncological outcomes, the impact of NAC on textbook outcomes following pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains debated.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database of patients undergoing resection of non-metastatic PDAC from 2004 to 2016 was performed. Propensity score matching was used to account for treatment selection bias in patients with and without NAC (noNAC). A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to analyze the association of NAC with length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of 7975 (11%) NAC patients and 65,338 (89%) noNAC patients, 2911 NAC and 2911 noNAC patients remained in the cohort after matching. Clinicopathologic and demographic variables were well-balanced after matching. After matching, NAC was associated with significantly lower rates of 30-day readmission (5.5% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.006), which remained after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.92; p = 0.006). There were no significant differences in LOS and 30- and 90-day mortality in patients receiving NAC and noNAC. Stratified analyses by surgery type (i.e. pancreaticoduodenectomy [PD] and distal pancreatectomy [DP]) demonstrated consistent results.

CONCLUSION

Receipt of NAC in PDAC patients undergoing DP or PD is associated with lower readmission rates and does not otherwise compromise short-term outcomes. These data reaffirm the safety of strategies incorporating NAC and is important to consider when devising policies aimed at quality improvement in achieving textbook outcomes.

Amsterdam International Consensus Meeting: tumor response scoring in the pathology assessment of resected pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy

Histopathologically scoring the response of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to neoadjuvant treatment can guide the selection of adjuvant therapy and improve prognostic stratification. However, several tumor response scoring (TRS) systems exist, and consensus is lacking as to which system represents best practice. An international consensus meeting on TRS took place in November 2019 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Here, we provide an overview of the outcomes and consensus statements that originated from this meeting. Consensus (≥80% agreement) was reached on a total of seven statements: (1) TRS is important because it provides information about the effect of neoadjuvant treatment that is not provided by other histopathology-based descriptors. (2) TRS for resected PDAC following neoadjuvant therapy should assess residual (viable) tumor burden instead of tumor regression. (3) The CAP scoring system is considered the most adequate scoring system to date because it is based on the presence and amount of residual cancer cells instead of tumor regression. (4) The defining criteria of the categories in the CAP scoring system should be improved by replacing subjective terms including "minimal" or "extensive" with objective criteria to evaluate the extent of viable tumor. (5) The improved, consensus-based system should be validated retrospectively and prospectively. (6) Prospective studies should determine the extent of tissue sampling that is required to ensure adequate assessment of the residual cancer burden, taking into account the heterogeneity of tumor response. (7) In future scientific publications, the extent of tissue sampling should be described in detail in the "Materials and methods" section.

Essential updates 2018/2019: Current topics in the surgical treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is highly malignant. While cancers in other organs have shown clear improvements in 5-year survival, the 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is approximately 10%. Early relapse and metastasis are not uncommon, making it difficult to achieve an acceptable prognosis even after complete surgical resection of the pancreas. Studies have been performed on various treatments to improve the prognosis of PDAC, and multidisciplinary approaches including non-surgical treatments have led to gradual improvement. In the present literature review, we have described the significance of anatomical and biological resectability criteria, the concept of R0 resection in surgical treatment, the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery, the remarkable development of perioperative chemotherapy, the effectiveness of conversion surgery for unresectable PDAC, and ongoing challenges in PDAC treatment. We also provide an essential update on these subjects by focusing on recent trends and topics.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Propensity-Matched Analysis of Postoperative Complications Using ACS-NSQIP

BACKGROUND

The use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increasing. While there is an association between NAT and improved post-pancreatectomy complication rates in limited patient populations, the strength of the relationship and its applicability to a broader and modern pancreatectomy cohort remains unclear.

METHODS

We used the 2014-2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project to evaluate NAT use for PDAC patients undergoing pancreatectomy. We also used propensity score matching techniques to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes, including clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) and delayed gastric emptying (DGE), between patients selected for NAT versus upfront surgery.

RESULTS

Patients receiving NAT were more likely to undergo vascular resections (33% vs. 16%, p < 0.001), have perioperative transfusions (18% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), and undergo longer procedures. Rates of CR-POPF (6%, vs. 10%, p < 0.001), DGE (11% vs. 13%, p = 0.016), postoperative percutaneous drainage (9% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), and SSI (15% vs. 18%, p < 0.001) were lower for patients selected for NAT. The association of NAT with CR-POPF remained statistically significant (adjusted odds ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.42-0.66) after adjustment for operative technique, gland texture, and need for vascular resection for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, but not for patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Among PDAC patients undergoing resection, selection for NAT is associated with fewer CR-POPFs, postoperative procedural interventions, and infectious complications, particularly for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. These associations should be considered in discussions of multidisciplinary treatment sequencing for patients with PDAC.

Pure and Hybrid Deep Learning Models can Predict Pathologic Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy may improve survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, determining response to therapy is difficult. Artificial intelligence allows for novel analysis of images. We hypothesized that a deep learning model can predict tumor response to NAC.

METHODS

Patients with pancreatic cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy prior to pancreatoduodenectomy were identified between November 2009 and January 2018. The College of American Pathologists Tumor Regression Grades 0-2 were defined as pathologic response (PR) and grade 3 as no response (NR). Axial images from preoperative computed tomography scans were used to create a 5-layer convolutional neural network and LeNet deep learning model to predict PRs. The hybrid model incorporated decrease in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) of 10%. Accuracy was determined by area under the curve.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided between PR (333 images) and NR (443 images). The pure model had an area under the curve (AUC) of .738 (P < .001), whereas the hybrid model had an AUC of .785 (P < .001). CA19-9 decrease alone was a poor predictor of response with an AUC of .564 (P = .096).

CONCLUSIONS

A deep learning model can predict pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and the model is improved with the incorporation of decreases in serum CA19-9. Further model development is needed before clinical application.

Adjuvant Pancreatic Cancer Management: Towards New Perspectives in 2021

Adjuvant chemotherapy is currently used in all patients with resected pancreatic cancer who are able to begin treatment within 3 months after surgery. Since the recent publication of the PRODIGE 24 trial results, modified FOLFIRINOX has become the standard-of-care in the non-Asian population with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma following surgery. Nevertheless, there is still a risk of toxicity, and feasibility may be limited in heavily pre-treated patients. In more frail patients, gemcitabine-based chemotherapy remains a suitable option, for example gemcitabine or 5FU in monotherapy. In Asia, although S1-based chemotherapy is the standard of care it is not readily available outside Asia and data are lacking in non-Asiatic patients. In patients in whom resection is not initially possible, intensified schemes such as FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-nabpaclitaxel have been confirmed as options to enhance the response rate and resectability, promoting research in adjuvant therapy. In particular, should oncologists prescribe adjuvant treatment after a long sequence of chemotherapy +/- chemoradiotherapy and surgery? Should oncologists consider the response rate, the R0 resection rate alone, or the initial chemotherapy regimen? And finally, should they take into consideration the duration of the entire sequence, or the presence of limited toxicities of induction treatment? The aim of this review is to summarize adjuvant management of resected pancreatic cancer and to raise current and future concerns, especially the need for biomarkers and the best holistic care for patients.

Margin negative resection and pathologic downstaging with multiagent chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in patients with localized pancreas cancer: A national cancer database analysis

Purpose

Margin-negative (R0) resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Pre-operative multi-agent chemotherapy alone (MAC) or MAC followed by pre-operative radiotherapy (MAC + RT) may be used to improve resectability and potentially survival. However, the optimal pre-operative regimen is unknown.

Methods

Patients with non-metastatic PDAC from 2006 to 2016 who received pre-operative MAC or MAC + RT before oncologic resection were identified in the National Cancer Database. Univariable and multivariable (MVA) associates with R0 resection were identified with logistic regression, and survival was analyzed secondarily with the Kaplan Meier method and Cox regression analysis.

Results

4,599 patients were identified (MAC: 3,109, MAC + RT: 1,490). Compared to those receiving MAC, patients receiving MAC + RT were more likely to have cT3-4 disease (76% vs 64%, p < 0.001) and cN + disease (33% vs 29%, p = 0.010), but were less likely to have ypT3-4 disease (59% vs 74%, p < 0.001) and ypN + disease (32% vs 55%, p < 0.001) and more likely to have a pathologic complete response (5% vs 2%, p < 0.001) and R0 resection (86% vs 80%, p < 0.001). On MVA, MAC + RT (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.33-1.89, p < 0.001), evaluation at an academic center (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.56, p < 0.001), and female sex (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.23-1.67, p < 0.001) were associated with higher odds of R0 resection, while cT3-4 disease (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96, p = 0.013) was associated with lower odds of R0 resection.

Conclusion

For patients with localized PDAC who receive pre-operative MAC, the addition of pre-operative RT was associated with improved rates of R0 resection and pathologic response.

Survival benefit with adjuvant radiotherapy after resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity-matched National Cancer Database analysis

BACKGROUND

No convincing evidence for the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) exists, especially for lower-risk (margin- or node-negative) disease. Hence, the association of adjuvant RT on survival after surgical resection of dCCA was compared with no adjuvant RT (noRT).

METHODS

Using National Cancer Database data from 2004 to 2016, patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for nonmetastatic dCCA were identified. Patients with neoadjuvant RT and chemotherapy and survival <6 months were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to account for treatment-selection bias. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was then used to analyze the association of adjuvant RT with survival.

RESULTS

Of 2162 (34%) adjuvant RT and 4155 (66%) noRT patients, 1509 adjuvant RT and 1509 noRT patients remained in the cohort after matching. The rates of node-negative disease (N0), node-positive disease (N+), and unknown node status (Nx) were 39%, 51%, and 10%, respectively. After matching, adjuvant RT was associated with improved survival (median, 29.3 vs 26.8 months; P < .001), which remained after multivariable adjustment (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.93; P < .001). Multivariable interaction analyses showed this benefit was seen irrespective of nodal status (N0: HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.89; P < .001; N+: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.89; P < .001) and margin status (R0: HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.67; P < .001; R1: HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96; P = .007). Stratified analyses by nodal and margin status demonstrated consistent results.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant RT after dCCA resection was associated with a survival benefit in patients, even in patients with margin- or node-negative resections. Adjuvant RT should be considered routinely irrespective of margin and nodal status after resection for dCCA.

LAY SUMMARY

Adjuvant radiotherapy after resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma was associated with a survival benefit in patients, even in patients with margin-negative or node-negative resections. Adjuvant radiotherapy should be considered routinely irrespective of margin and nodal status after resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Photon versus carbon ion irradiation: immunomodulatory effects exerted on murine tumor cell lines

While for photon radiation hypofractionation has been reported to induce enhanced immunomodulatory effects, little is known about the immunomodulatory potential of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). We thus compared the radio-immunogenic effects of photon and carbon ion irradiation on two murine cancer cell lines of different tumor entities. We first calculated the biological equivalent doses of carbon ions corresponding to photon doses of 1, 3, 5, and 10 Gy of the murine breast cancer cell line EO771 and the OVA-expressing pancreatic cancer cell line PDA30364/OVA by clonogenic survival assays. We compared the potential of photon and carbon ion radiation to induce cell cycle arrest, altered surface expression of immunomodulatory molecules and changes in the susceptibility of cancer cells to cytotoxic T cell (CTL) mediated killing. Irradiation induced a dose-dependent G2/M arrest in both cell lines irrespective from the irradiation source applied. Likewise, surface expression of the immunomodulatory molecules PD-L1, CD73, H2-Db and H2-Kb was increased in a dose-dependent manner. Both radiation modalities enhanced the susceptibility of tumor cells to CTL lysis, which was more pronounced in EO771/Luci/OVA cells than in PDA30364/OVA cells. Overall, compared to photon radiation, the effects of carbon ion radiation appeared to be enhanced at higher dose range for EO771 cells and extenuated at lower dose range for PDA30364/OVA cells. Our data show for the first time that equivalent doses of carbon ion and photon irradiation exert similar immunomodulating effects on the cell lines of both tumor entities, highlighted by an enhanced susceptibility to CTL mediated cytolysis in vitro.

Nationwide compliance with a multidisciplinary guideline on pancreatic cancer during 6-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Compliance with national guidelines on pancreatic cancer management could improve patient outcomes. Early compliance with the Dutch guideline was poor. The aim was to assess compliance with this guideline during six years after publication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nationwide guideline compliance was investigated for three subsequent time periods (2012-2013 vs. 2014-2015 vs. 2016-2017) in patients with pancreatic cancer using five quality indicators in the Netherlands Cancer Registry: 1) discussion in multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT), 2) maximum 3-week interval from final MDT to start of treatment, 3) preoperative biliary drainage when bilirubin >250 μmol/L, 4) use of adjuvant chemotherapy, and 5) chemotherapy for inoperable disease (non-metastatic and metastatic).

RESULTS

In total, 14 491 patients were included of whom 2290 (15.8%) underwent resection and 4561 (31.5%) received chemotherapy. Most quality indicators did not change over time: overall, 88.8% of patients treated with curative intent were discussed in a MDT, 42.7% were treated with curative intent within the 3-week interval, 62.7% with a resectable head tumor and bilirubin >250 μmol/L underwent preoperative biliary drainage, 57.2% received chemotherapy after resection, and 36.6% with metastatic disease received chemotherapy. Only use of chemotherapy for non-metastatic, non-resected disease improved over time (23.4% vs. 25.6% vs. 29.7%).

CONCLUSION

Nationwide compliance to five quality indicators for the guideline on pancreatic cancer management showed little to no improvement during six years after publication. Besides critical review of the current quality indicators, these outcomes may suggest that a nationwide implementation program is required to increase compliance to guideline recommendations.

Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiation in Localized Pancreatic Cancer: A Case-Control Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). It is unknown whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is more effective than chemotherapy (NCRT vs. NAC). We aim to compare pathological and survival outcomes of NCRT and NAC in patients with PDAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single-center analysis of PDAC patients treated with NCRT or NAC followed by resection between December 2008 and December 2018 was performed. Average treatment effect (ATE) was estimated after case-control matching using Mahalanobis distance nearest-neighbor matching. Inverse probability weighted estimates (IPWE)-based ATE was estimated for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among the 418 patients (mean age 66.8 years, 51% female) included in the study, 327 received NAC and 91 received NCRT. NCRT patients had higher rates of locally advanced disease, number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles, more chemotherapy regimen crossover (gemcitabine and 5-FU based), and were more likely to undergo open surgical procedures and/or vascular resection (all p < 0.05). After matched analysis, NCRT was associated with a significant reduction in lymph node positive disease [ATE = (-)0.24, p = 0.007] and lymphovascular invasion [ATE = (-)0.20, p = 0.02]. While NCRT was associated with significantly improved DFS by 9.5 months (p = 0.006), it did not affect OS by IPWE-based ATE after adjusting for adjuvant therapy (ATE = 5.5 months; p = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

Compared with NAC alone, NCRT is associated with improved pathologic surrogates and disease-free survival, but not overall survival in patients with PDAC.

Multi-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves response and survival in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer

Background

We sought to examine the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), single agent (SA) or multi-agent (MA) chemotherapy, and chemoradiation (NCRT) on response and survival in pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Utilizing the National Cancer Database, we identified patients who underwent resection of the pancreatic head for adenocarcinoma [2006-2013]. Overall survival (OS) analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable cox proportional hazard models (MVA) and propensity score matching (PSM) were developed to identify predictors of survival. For upfront surgery (UFS), OS was limited to receipt of adjuvant treatment.

Results

We identified 26,563 patients who underwent pancreatic head resection: UFS =23,877, NCRT =1,482, and NCT =1,204. MA-NCT was utilized in 77% and after PSM, 52%. There was improved R0 resections and 30-day mortality associated with neoadjuvant therapy compared to UFS. Overall response rate to neoadjuvant therapy was 24%. The highest response rate seen with MA-NCRT. Response rates for SA-NCT, MA-NCT, SA-NCRT, and MA-NCRT were 11.5%, 18.1%, 27.5%, and 33.1% (P=0.01). However, OS was improved with neoadjuvant therapy regardless of response compared to UFS (P=0.03). After PSM, the median OS for UFS, SA-NCT, MA-NCT, SA-NCRT, and MA-NCRT was 21.9, 21.5, 29.8, 25.3, and 25.8 months in all patients (P=0.001). MVA after PSM demonstrated that only MA-NCT was associated with decreased mortality while increasing age, higher Charlson-Deyo index, N1, higher grade, tumor size, and positive margins were associated with higher mortality.

Conclusions

There was improved OS associated with MA-NCT in pancreatic cancer patients compared to UFS with adjuvant therapy. OS was improved regardless of response to therapy.

Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Therapy and Upfront Resection for Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: An Instrumental Variable Analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly being used in the management of patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, there is a lack of evidence regarding the benefit among these patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) in PDAC patients with resectable disease treated with NAT or upfront resection through instrumental variable (IV) analysis.

DESIGN

A national cohort study of resectable PDAC patients in the National Cancer Data Base (2007-2015) treated with either upfront surgery or resection after NAT. Using multivariable modeling and IV methods, OS was compared between those treated with NAT and upfront resection. The IV was hospital-level NAT utilization in the most recent year prior to treatment.

RESULTS

The cohort included 16,666 patients (14,012 upfront resection; 2654 NAT) treated at 779 hospitals. Among those treated with upfront resection, 59.9% received any adjuvant therapy. NAT patients had higher median (27.9 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 26.2-29.1) and 5-year OS (24.1%, 95% CI 21.9-26.3%) compared with those treated with upfront surgery (median 21.2 months, 95% CI 20.7-21.6; 5-year survival 20.9%, 95% CI 20.1-21.7%). After multivariable modeling, NAT was associated with an approximately 20% decrease in the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.84), and this effect was magnified in the IV analysis (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.47-0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resectable PDAC, NAT is associated with improved survival relative to upfront resection. Given the benefits of multimodality therapy and the challenges in receiving adjuvant therapy, consideration should be given to treating all PDAC patients with NAT.

Does Major Pancreatic Surgery Have Utility in Nonagenarians with Pancreas Cancer?

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to define the role of surgery and assess different therapies for nonagenarians with localized, nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients ≥ 90 years of age with nonmetastatic, localized PDAC from 2004-2016. Postoperative mortality was assessed at 30 and 90 days in patients receiving pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy. Overall survival (OS) was compared between three treatment groups: surgery alone, chemotherapy alone, and chemoradiation (chemoRT) alone.

RESULTS

Of 380,524 patients with PDAC, 98 patients ≥ 90 years of age underwent curative-intent resection; 55% were female and 75% had a Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score of 0. A total of 17% received postoperative chemotherapy, 51.1% had poorly differentiated tumors with a median tumor size of 3 cm, 55.1% had positive lymph nodes, and 19.4% had positive resection margins. Postoperative median length of stay was 11 days. Postoperative 30- and 90-day mortality was 10.0% and 18.9%, respectively. Median OS for the surgery alone group was 11.6 months compared with 20.4 months in those receiving adjuvant therapy (p = 0.01). Among nonoperative PDAC patients, median OS in patients receiving chemotherapy only (n = 207) was 7.2 months, while chemoRT only (n = 100) was similar to surgery only (11 versus 11.6 months, p = 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Even in well-selected nonagenarians, pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy carries a high mortality rate. While adjuvant therapy after resection provides the best survival, it is seldom achieved, and chemoRT alone affords identical survival statistics as surgery alone. These data suggest it is reasonable to consider chemoRT as initial therapy, then reassess candidacy for resection if performance status allows.

Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Treatment

Importance

The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant combination treatment with folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) is unclear.

Objective

To assess the association of adjuvant chemotherapy with overall survival (OS) in patients after pancreatic cancer resection and neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX treatment.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2018. An existing cohort of patients undergoing resection of pancreatic cancer after FOLFIRINOX was updated and expanded for the purpose of this study. All consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic surgery after at least 2 cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy for nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer were retrospectively identified from institutional databases. Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer were eligible for this study. Patients with in-hospital mortality or who died within 3 months after surgery were excluded.

Exposures

The association of adjuvant chemotherapy with OS was evaluated in different subgroups including interaction terms for clinicopathological parameters with adjuvant treatment in a multivariable Cox model. Overall survival was defined as the time starting from surgery plus 3 months (moment eligible for adjuvant therapy), unless mentioned otherwise.

Results

We included 520 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 61 [53-66] years; 279 [53.7%] men) from 31 centers in 19 countries. The median number of neoadjuvant cycles of FOLFIRINOX was 6 (interquartile range, 5-8). Overall, 343 patients (66.0%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 68 (19.8%) received FOLFIRINOX, 201 (58.6%) received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, 14 (4.1%) received capecitabine, 45 (13.1%) received a combination or other agents, and 15 (4.4%) received an unknown type of adjuvant chemotherapy. Median OS was 38 months (95% CI, 36-46 months) after diagnosis and 31 months (95% CI, 29-37 months) after surgery. No survival difference was found for patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy vs those who did not (median OS, 29 vs 29 months, univariable hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77-1.28; P = .93). In multivariable analysis, only the interaction term for lymph node stage with adjuvant therapy was statistically significant: In patients with pathology-proven node-positive disease, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved survival (median OS, 26 vs 13 months; multivariable HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.22-0.75]; P = .004). In patients with node-negative disease, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival (median OS, 38 vs 54 months; multivariable HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.35-2.10; P = .73).

Conclusions and Relevance

These results suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and resection of pancreatic cancer was associated with improved survival only in patients with pathology-proven node-positive disease. Future randomized studies should be conducted to confirm this finding.

TKTL1 as a Prognostic Marker in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Its Correlation with FDG-PET-CT

INTRODUCTION

Glucose metabolism in cancer cells differs from noncancerous cells. The expression of transketolase-like protein 1 (TKTL1), a key enzyme in the glucose metabolism of cancer cells, predicts poor prognosis in several cancer types. We studied TKTL1 as a prognostic tool and whether TKTL1 expression correlates with 18F-FDG-PET-CT among patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

This retrospective study examined two PDAC patient cohorts: 168 patients operated on at Helsinki University Hospital between 2001 and 2011, and 20 patients with FDG-PET-CT results available from the Auria Biobank. We used immunohistochemistry for TKTL1 expression, combining results with clinicopathological data.

RESULTS

Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was slightly but not significantly better in patients with a high versus low TKTL1 expression, with DSS of 28.0 versus 17.3%, respectively (p = 0.123). TKTL1 served as a marker of a better prognosis in patients over 65 years old (p = 0.012) and among those with TNM class M1 (p = 0.018), stage IV disease (p = 0.027), or perivascular invasion (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that TKTL1 cannot be used as a prognostic factor in PDAC with the exception of elderly patients and those with advanced disease. The correlation of TKTL1 with 18F-FDG-PET-CT requires further study in a larger patient cohort.

Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for early-stage left-sided pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A propensity-matched analysis from a national cohort of distal pancreatectomies

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for early-stage distal pancreas adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Previous studies focused on adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas or dealt with borderline and locally advanced tumors of the body and tail.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of the National Cancer Database between 2006 and 2015. A propensity-matched analysis was performed to compare overall survival estimates between NAT and upfront resection (UR) groups.

RESULTS

A total of 5003 distal pancreatectomies for PDAC were identified, of whom 408 (9%) received NAT. After 1:1 matching, 353 NAT patients were compared with 353 UR patients. NAT was associated with lower 90-day mortality. There were no differences in the number of lymph nodes retrieved, or length of stay. With matching, the NAT group had higher median overall survival compared with UR (33.0 vs. 27.0 months; p = 0.009) and adjusted overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval = 0.51-0.77; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The receipt of NAT followed by distal pancreatectomy for early-stage distal PDAC is associated with improved overall survival compared with UR. This study supports the use of NAT in the multimodal therapy paradigm of early-stage adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas.

The treatment sequence may matter in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for early stage pancreatic cancer in the era of modern chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for early stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the era of modern chemotherapy.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2010-2016) was queried for patients with clinical stage 0-2 pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Patients who underwent up-front pancreatoduodenectomy were propensity matched to patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Postoperative outcomes, pathologic outcomes, and overall survival were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 2036 patients were in each group. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with shorter length of stay, lower 30-day readmission rate, and lower 30 and 90-day mortality rates (all p < 0.05). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with lower rates of positives nodes and positive resection margins (all p < 0.0001). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with longer survival (26.8 vs. 22.1months, p < 0.0001). Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy had the longest OS, followed by neoadjuvant + surgery, surgery + adjuvant therapy, and surgery alone (29.8 vs. 25.6 vs. 23.9 vs. 13.1 months; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved postoperative outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and overall survival in patients with early stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in all patients with early stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Soluble Compounds Released by Hypoxic Stroma Confer Invasive Properties to Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by abundant stroma and a hypoxic microenvironment. Pancreatic stellate cells (PSC) are activated by hypoxia and promote excessive desmoplasia, further contributing to the development of hypoxia. We aimed to explore how hypoxia and stroma interact to contribute to invasive growth in PDAC. [¹⁸F]HX4 PET/CT was found to be a feasible non-invasive method to assess tumor hypoxia in 42 patients and correlated with HIF1α immunohistochemistry in matched surgical specimens. [¹⁸F]HX4 uptake and HIF1α were strong prognostic markers for overall survival. Co-culture and medium transfer experiments demonstrated that hypoxic PSCs and their supernatant induce upregulation of mesenchymal markers in tumor cells, and that hypoxia-induced stromal factors drive invasive growth in hypoxic PDACs. Through stepwise selection, stromal MMP10 was identified as the most likely candidate responsible for this. In conclusion, hypoxia-activated PSCs promote the invasiveness of PDAC through paracrine signaling. The identification of PSC-derived MMP10 may provide a lead to develop novel stroma-targeting therapies.

Impact of facility type on survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for small pancreatic adenocarcinoma (≤ 2 cm)

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that even small pancreatic cancers are associated with poor survival. The role of facility type on survival in this setting is unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was utilized. Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm in Academic/Research Cancer Programs (ACPs) were compared to Non-Academic Cancer Programs (NACPs).

RESULTS

A total of 4672 patients were identified. Surgery at ACPs was associated with a lower rate of positive margins (14% vs 17%,P < .0001) and a higher rate of lymphadenectomy ≥15 nodes (49.6% vs 36.3%,P < .0001). Over 75% of the ACPs facilities were high volume vs 25.5% among NACPs. There was no difference in the odds of delivering chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting between ACPs and NACPs. The median survival at ACPs was 29.4 months vs 25.7 months at NACPs (Log-rank test:P < .0001). ACPs were associated with improved survival, adjusted Hazard Ratio: 0.88, 95%CI:0.81-0.96.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatoduodenectomy for small pancreatic cancers at ACPs is associated with improved survival compared to NACPs.

Efficacy and safety of systemic induction therapy in initially unresectable locally advanced intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

According to international guidelines, induction therapy may be considered in selected patients with initially unresectable locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. The criteria for (un)resectability in cholangiocarcinoma varies between studies and no consensus-based agreement is available about these criteria. By performing a systematic literature review, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of systemic induction therapy in initially unresectable locally advanced perihilar (pCCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and summarize resectability criteria used across studies.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane library to identify studies on systemic induction therapy in locally advanced pCCA and/or iCCA. The primary outcome was resection rate (RR) after induction therapy and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Ten studies with a total of 1167 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Among these patients, 334 (28.6%) were treated with systemic induction therapy. Across the studies, different types of chemotherapy regimens were administered (e.g., gemcitabine (based) chemotherapy and 5-FU (based) chemotherapy). Only six studies provided sufficient data and were used to analyze pooled (radical) resection rates. After induction therapy, 94 patients (39.2%) underwent a resection, of which R0 resections (22.9%). Pooled data on OS showed, better OS for chemotherapy plus resection versus chemotherapy only (pooled HR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.19-0.50; P value < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Adequately selected patients with locally advanced pCCA or iCCA may benefit from induction therapy followed by surgical resection. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted.

The Immune Microenvironment in Pancreatic Cancer

The biology of solid tumors is strongly determined by the interactions of cancer cells with their surrounding microenvironment. In this regard, pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, PDAC) represents a paradigmatic example for the multitude of possible tumor-stroma interactions. PDAC has proven particularly refractory to novel immunotherapies, which is a fact that is mediated by a unique assemblage of various immune cells creating a strongly immunosuppressive environment in which this cancer type thrives. In this review, we outline currently available knowledge on the cross-talk between tumor cells and the cellular immune microenvironment, highlighting the physiological and pathological cellular interactions, as well as the resulting therapeutic approaches derived thereof. Hopefully a better understanding of the complex tumor-stroma interactions will one day lead to a significant advancement in patient care.