Sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial of maintenance sunitinib versus placebo after chemotherapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: scientific rationale and study design

Systemic chemotherapy is the primary treatment modality for patients with advanced urothelial cancer. However, despite a high initial response rate, durable responses are rare. Angiogenesis has been shown to be important in the development and progression of urothelial cancer. Sunitinib, an oral, multi-targeted, small-molecule inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases, is known to inhibit angiogenesis and therefore might decrease progression of urothelial cancer. This phase II trial was designed to investigate the role of sunitinib as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer. The specific hypothesis of this trial is that sunitinib will decrease progression rates in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who have obtained stable disease or better after standard chemotherapy.

Advances in the systemic therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive thoracic malignancy associated with exposure to asbestos, and its incidence is anticipated to increase during the first half of this century. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment, yet sufficiently robust evidence to substantiate the current standard of care has emerged only in the past 5 years. This Review summarizes the evidence supporting the clinical activity of chemotherapy, discusses the use of end points for its assessment and examines the influence of clinical and biochemical prognostic factors on the natural history of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Early-phase clinical trials of second-line and novel agents are emerging from an increased understanding of mesothelioma cell biology. Coupled with high-quality translational research, such developments have real potential to improve the outlook of patients at a time of increasing incidence.

Using Molecular Biology to Develop Drugs for Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Renal cell carcinoma is a disease marked by a unique biology which has governed it's long history of poor response to conventional cancer treatments. The discovery of the signaling pathway activated as a result of inappropriate constitutive activation of the hypoxia inducible factors (HIF), transcription factors physiologically and transiently stabilized in response to low oxygen, has provided a primary opportunity to devise treatment strategies to target this oncogenic pathway. OBJECTIVE: A review of the molecular pathogenesis of renal cell cancer as well as molecularly targeted therapies, both those currently available and those in development, will be provided. In addition, trials involving combination or sequential targeted therapy are discussed. METHODS: A detailed review of the literature describing the molecular biology of renal cell cancer and novel therapies was performed and summarized. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Therapeutics targeting angiogenesis have provided the first class of agents which provide clinical benefit in a large majority of patients and heralded renal cell carcinoma as a solid tumor paradigm for the development of novel therapeutics. Multiple strategies targeting this pathway and now other identified pathways in renal cell carcinoma provide numerous potential opportunities to make major improvements in treating this historically devastating cancer.

Sunitinib for advanced renal cell cancer

Renal cell cancer has been refractory to drug therapy in the large majority of patients. Targeted agents including sunitinib have been intensively evaluated in renal cell cancer over the past 5 years. Sunitinib is an oral small molecule inhibitor of several targets including multiple tyrosine kinase receptors of the angiogenesis pathway. This review surveys the rationale, development, validation, and clinical use of sunitinib that received conditional approval for use in North America and Europe in 2006. In patients with the clear-cell subtype of renal cell cancer and metastatic disease with good or moderate prognostic factors for survival, sunitinib 50 mg for 4 weeks of a 6-week cycle provides superior surrogate and patient-reported outcomes when compared with interferon-alfa, the previous commonly used first-line drug. Overall survival has not yet shown improvement over interferon and is problematic because of patient crossover from the control arm to sunitinib at disease progression. Toxicity is significant but manageable with experienced monitoring. Sunitinib therapy is an important step forward for this condition. High cost and limited efficacy support the ongoing search for further improved therapy.

Oligosaccharides as anti-angiogenic agents

BACKGROUND

Several studies of drugs that inhibit tumour angiogenesis have shown improvements in the survival of cancer patients, thus validating angiogenesis as a clinically relevant target. Both intracellular and extracellular approaches have shown promising results in clinical situations.

OBJECTIVES

To compare and contrast oligosaccharide therapies and other anti-angiogenic compounds for their benefits and toxicity.

METHODS

Analysis of the relevant literature including presentations at recent conferences.

RESULTS

Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are orally available but have a broad spectrum of activity which is associated with toxicity. Antibodies are associated with different toxicities, however, they are administered parenterally. Oligosaccharides that act as competitive inhibitors of heparan sulfate (HS) are in the early and late phases of clinical development. The advantage of oligosaccharides should be that they can be designed to target several angiogenic molecules, that they are relatively safe and that they can be administered subcutaneously at home. The key questions concerning their development focus on whether compounds with sufficient affinity and relative specificity can be generated, whether they are active at doses that do not perturb the coagulation cascade to a clinically dangerous level, whether the synthetic routes are scalable and, whether the current Phase III trials will yield positive results.

CONCLUSIONS

Saccharides represent a novel and exciting therapeutic approach that targets a spectrum of angiogenic molecules that cannot be inhibited through established drug development programmes.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and anti-angiogenic therapies in kidney cancer

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous disease as reflected in its presentation and clinical course, pathological subtypes, nuclear grades and molecular biology. Emerging data indicate that renal tumors express a variety of molecular tumor markers and unique patterns of gene expression. Clinically the disease behaves quite heterogeneously, with courses ranging from indolent to highly aggressive. Surgical monotherapy or as part of a multimodal approach remains the standard of care for most cases of RCC. Radical or partial nephrectomy is associated with a 5-year cancer specific survival (CSS) of 85-97% for pT1 tumors. Unfortunately, 20% of patients have either locally advanced or node positive (N+) RCC while another 22% have metastatic RCC (mRCC) at presentation. Unlike the outcomes in early localized disease, survival rates for N+ patients are poor and patients with mRCC are rarely cured despite aggressive multimodal therapy. Classic cytotoxic chemotherapy has repeatedly been shown to have little effect and only 5-20% of patients with mRCC respond to immunologic agents such as interferon and/or interleukin. Cytoreductive nephrectomy with systemic immunotherapy is associated with few cures with median survivals of 12-24 months. Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular origins and pathways of RCC have led to the development of more effective targeted therapies. Here we review the molecular pathways that define the pertinent therapeutic targets in RCC and the clinical data for these new and promising agents.

Renal cell carcinoma: new developments in molecular biology and potential for targeted therapies

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) affects 38,000 individuals in the U.S. yearly. Seventy-five percent of cases are clear-cell carcinomas, and a majority is driven by dysfunction of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene. VHL loss of function and other non-VHL pathways leading to RCC share aberrant activation of the hypoxic response, such as upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and consequent neoangiogenesis. Metastatic RCC has been notoriously resistant to therapy. For decades, its treatment has been based on nephrectomy and limited use of toxic and often inefficient immunotherapy with interleukin-2 or interferon-alpha. However, new biologic agents are beginning to break the resistance barrier. Small-molecule multikinase inhibitors that target VEGF receptors (sunitinib and sorafenib) have a favorable toxicity profile and can prolong time to progression and preserve quality of life when used in newly diagnosed or previously treated patients. The anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab enhances the response rate and prolongs disease control when added to interferon-alpha. Temsirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, prolongs the survival duration of patients with poor-risk disease. Despite three new drugs being approved for RCC in the past 2 years, responses are mostly partial and of limited duration. Multiple new drugs and drug combinations are undergoing clinical trials and will likely impact the treatment of RCC in future years. Compounds found to be active in the metastatic setting are now being tried in earlier stage disease in an attempt to improve curability. However, no method has yet been validated to predict patient response to these newer treatments.

Review: side effects of approved molecular targeted therapies in solid cancers

Major advances have been achieved in the field of biologically based therapies for cancer in the last few years, and some of the recently approved molecular-targeted therapies are now being used in daily clinical practice. These molecular targets are also expressed in normal cells, which explains the different grades of toxicity, resulting from the disruption of normal cellular function. In general, targeted molecular therapies have good toxicity profiles, but some patients are exquisitely sensitive to these drugs and can develop particular and severe toxicities. In this article, we review the toxicity and safety of various small molecules and monoclonal antibodies used in solid tumors, with discussion of the pathophysiology, correlation with response, and strategies for prevention and management.

Pazopanib, a potent orally administered small-molecule multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor for renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The recent approvals of sunitinib, sorafenib and temsirolimus have revolutionized the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Pazopanib (GW-786034) is a second-generation multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor against VEGFR-1, 2 and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-alpha, PDGFR-beta and c-kit.

OBJECTIVE

Data supporting the development of pazopanib for RCC are reviewed.

METHODS

Preclinical and clinical data available for pazopanib are presented.

RESULTS

Preclinical evaluation has revealed excellent anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activity in several mouse models. A Phase II clinical trial of pazopanib in untreated or cytokine/bevacizumab pretreated RCC has demonstrated promising activity accompanied by a favorable toxicity profile. A placebo-controlled Phase III trial is ongoing in untreated or cytokine-treated patients with RCC. Ongoing trials are further evaluating pazopanib in a variety of other malignancies.

Surgical management of large renal tumors

In addition to an increased occurrence of small, localized, incidentally discovered renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), there has been an upward trend in the incidence of advanced renal tumors per unit of population and in disease mortality worldwide. As radical nephrectomy remains the standard of care in treating localized RCC, this manuscript focuses on surgical approaches. We defined 'large renal tumors' as those greater than 7 cm or those with venous involvement. We discuss operative strategies in both open and laparoscopic surgery as well as approaches to special circumstances, including patients with tumor thrombus and the indications for nephron-sparing surgery in patients with greater than T2 RCC. The literature pertaining to controversial areas such as preoperative renal artery embolization and the clinical utility of metastectomy and cytoreductive therapy are also reviewed. The theoretical basis and potential applications of neoadjuvant therapy for larger renal tumors is examined as well.

Treatment of metastatic renal cancer with capsid-modified oncolytic adenoviruses

Renal cancer is a common and deadly disease that lacks curative treatments when metastatic. Here, we have used oncolytic adenoviruses, a promising developmental approach whose safety has recently been validated in clinical trials. Although preliminary clinical efficacy data exist for selected tumor types, potency has generally been less than impressive. One important reason may be that expression of the primary receptor, coxsackie-adenovirus receptor, is often low on many or most advanced tumors, although not evaluated in detail with renal cancer. Here, we tested if fluorescence-assisted cell sorting could be used to predict efficacy of a panel of infectivity-enhanced capsid-modified marker gene expressing adenoviruses in renal cancer cell lines, clinical specimens, and subcutaneous and orthotopic murine models of peritoneally metastatic renal cell cancer. The respective selectively oncolytic adenoviruses were tested for killing of tumor cells in these models, and biodistribution after locoregional delivery was evaluated. In vivo replication was analyzed with noninvasive imaging. Ad5/3-Delta24, Ad5-Delta24RGD, and Ad5.pK7-Delta24 significantly increased survival of mice compared with mock or wild-type virus and 50% of Ad5/3-Delta24 treated mice were alive at 320 days. Because renal tumors are often highly vascularized, we investigated if results could be further improved by adding bevacizumab, a humanized antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody. The combination was well tolerated but did not improve survival, suggesting that the agents may be best used in sequence instead of together. These results set the stage for clinical testing of oncolytic adenoviruses for treatment of metastatic renal cancer currently lacking other treatment options.

Cutaneous reactions related to systemic immunomodulators and targeted therapeutics

The arrival of targeted therapeutics into the oncology clinic, while enthusiastically anticipated, introduced the oncologist to dermatologic events that can pose challenging management issues. The dermatologic effects of these targeted agents appear to be more frequent than those with cytotoxic therapy and are not uniform; that is, different agents have distinct dermatologic toxicities. Interestingly, dermatologic toxicity may correlate with antitumor activity with some of these targeted agents. The correlation of rash with response and survival in particular mandates the development of effective and appropriate management strategies. The nature and challenges of the dermatologic events observed to date with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, multikinase inhibitors, proteosome inhibitors, BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and immunomodulatory drugs will be addressed in this review.

Small Molecules: Big Changes in the Cancer Treatment Paradigm

Small molecules, a growing class of targeted therapies, have flourished over the last decade. With increased knowledge on molecular cell signaling, targeted therapy has been refined to targeting molecular targets upstream from the nucleus that are key players in the communication system that regulates cancer cell growth. This article reviews the mechanisms of small molecules with a particular emphasis on tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as well as the literature that supports the current clinical use in the treatment of a variety of solid and hematological malignancies.

High Frequency of Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Metastatic Renal Carcinoma Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor

OBJECTIVES

To report the high incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between October 2005 and December 2006, 67 patients with metastatic RCC were treated with sorafenib or sunitinib at the Montpellier Cancer Center in compassionate access programs. The medical records of five (7%) patients who died of ICH during therapy were reviewed retrospectively. Four of them had known brain metastases. Previous radiation therapy had been indicated in two patients. Two patients had a history of hypertension. Death from ICH occurred in the first 2 wk following the onset of treatment. Three other patients with brain metastases who received sorafenib or sunitinib during the same period did not experience ICH.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of fatal ICH in RCC patients with brain metastases treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the VEGFR seems high. Prospective clinical trials will be necessary for assessing the true incidence and predictive factors related to this toxicity.

Multicenter, phase II trial of sunitinib in previously treated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Aberrant vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) signaling have been shown to play a role in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pathogenesis and are associated with decreased survival. We evaluated the clinical activity and tolerability of sunitinib malate (SU11248), an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks the activity of receptors for VEGF and PDGF, as well as related tyrosine kinases in patients with previously treated, advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC for whom platinum-based chemotherapy had failed received 50 mg/d of sunitinib for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of no treatment in 6-week treatment cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

Of the 63 patients treated with sunitinib, seven patients had confirmed partial responses, yielding an ORR of 11.1% (95% CI, 4.6% to 21.6%). An additional 18 patients (28.6%) experienced stable disease of at least 8 weeks in duration. Median progression-free survival was 12.0 weeks (95% CI, 10.0 to 16.1 weeks), and median overall survival was 23.4 weeks (95% CI, 17.0 to 28.3 weeks). Therapy was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Sunitinib has promising single-agent activity in patients with recurrent NSCLC, with an ORR similar to that of currently approved agents and an acceptable safety profile. Further evaluation in combination with other targeted agents and chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC is warranted.

Phase 2 study of ABT-510 in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Angiogenesis is a characteristic of renal cell carcinoma. ABT-510 is an angiogenesis inhibitor that mimics the antiangiogenic properties of thrombospondin-1. This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of ABT-510 in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable renal cell carcinoma were randomized to treatment with one of two doses of ABT-510, self-administered s.c. twice daily in 28-day treatment periods without intervening rest periods. End points were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, overall survival, and toxicity.

RESULTS

The objective response rate was 4% in the 10 mg twice daily group, and there were two unconfirmed PRs in the 100 mg twice daily group. Respective median PFS was 4.2 and 3.3 months, with a 6-month PFS of 39% and 32%. Median overall survival was 27.8 months (10 mg twice daily) and 26.1 months (100 mg twice daily). The most frequent adverse events were injection site reactions (84%), fatigue (50%), headache (20%), and nausea (19%). The incidence of treatment-related, grade 3/4 adverse events was low and included three bleeding episodes (gastrointestinal hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, and hemoptysis) and one thrombotic event (deep vein thrombosis). No deaths were attributed to ABT-510.

CONCLUSIONS

There was little evidence of clinical activity for ABT-510, and further evaluation as a single agent for treating advanced renal cell carcinoma is not warranted. The evidence of a favorable safety profile may justify further evaluation in combination therapy.

Current status of antivascular therapy and targeted treatment in the clinic

Antivascular and targeted therapy are now an integrated part of the treatment of myelogenous leukemias, GIST tumours, B-cell lymphomas and breast cancer. In various malignancies improved responses and prolongation of survival for several months is regularly reported. The progress in this field is relevant for hyperthermia. Heat has among other effects documented antivascular effects, and can be considered as one of the established methods in the field based on several randomised phase III studies. Hyperthermia should be considered for combination with other antiangiogenic agents.

Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4 antibody) causes regression of metastatic renal cell cancer associated with enteritis and hypophysitis

The inhibitory receptor CTLA4 has a key role in peripheral tolerance of T cells for both normal and tumor-associated antigens. Murine experiments suggested that blockade of CTLA4 might have antitumor activity and a clinical experience with the blocking antibody ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma did show durable tumor regressions in some patients. Therefore, a phase II study of ipilimumab was conducted in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer with a primary end point of response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Two sequential cohorts received either 3 mg/kg followed by 1 mg/kg or all doses at 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (with no intention of comparing cohort response rates). Major toxicities were enteritis and endocrine deficiencies of presumed autoimmune origin. One of 21 patients receiving the lower dose had a partial response. Five of 40 patients at the higher dose had partial responses (95% confidence interval for cohort response rate 4% to 27%) and responses were seen in patients who had previously not responded to IL-2. Thirty-three percent of patients experienced a grade III or IV immune-mediated toxicity. There was a highly significant association between autoimmune events (AEs) and tumor regression (response rate=30% with AE, 0% without AE). CTLA4 blockade with ipilimumab induces cancer regression in some patients with metastatic clear cell renal cancer, even if they have not responded to other immunotherapies. These regressions are highly associated with other immune-mediated events of presumed autoimmune origin by mechanisms as yet undefined.

Renal cell cancer

Metastatic renal cell cancer has traditionally been treated with interferon and interleukin-2. An improved understanding of the biology of renal cancer has engendered novel targeted therapeutic agents that have altered the natural history of this disease. The vascular endothelial growth factor and its related receptor and the mammalian target of rapamycin signal transduction pathway in particular have been utilized as therapeutic targets. Sunitinib malate, sorafenib tosylate, temsirolimus, and bevacizumab/interferon alfa have improved clinical outcomes in randomized trials. Other antiangiogenic agents have also demonstrated activity in early studies. Given the availability of multiple treatment options, several questions emerge as to how to integrate these new therapies into the management of metastatic renal cell cancer. Recently reported and planned clinical trials will help clarify the role of these agents. The future of therapy for renal cancer appears promising owing to the efficacy of these novel agents.

Renal epithelial neoplasms: diagnostic applications of gene expression profiling

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common form of kidney cancer in adults. RCC is a significant challenge for pathologic diagnosis and clinical management. The primary approach to diagnosis is by light microscopy, using the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system, which defines histopathologic tumor subtypes with distinct clinical behavior and underlying genetic mutations. However, light microscopic diagnosis of RCC subtypes can be difficult due to variable histology, morphologic features shared by tumor subtypes, and a growing frequency of small tumor biopsies with limited morphologic information. In addition to these diagnostic problems, the clinical behavior of RCC is highly variable, and therapeutic response rates are poor. Few clinical assays are available to predict outcome in RCC or correlate behavior with histology. Therefore, novel RCC classification systems based on gene expression should be useful for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Recent microarray studies have shown that renal tumors are characterized by distinct gene expression profiles, which can be used to discover novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Here, we review clinical features of kidney cancer, the WHO classification system, and the growing role of molecular classification for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of this disease.

Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition is a valid therapeutic approach in renal cell carcinoma. Therefore, an investigation of the combination treatment of the humanised anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab with interferon alfa was warranted.

METHODS

In a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase III trial, 649 patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma were randomised to receive interferon alfa-2a (9 MIU subcutaneously three times weekly) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks; n=327) or placebo and interferon alfa-2a (n=322). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and safety. An interim analysis of overall survival was prespecified after 250 deaths. On the basis of new second-line therapies that became available while the trial was in progress, which could have confounded analyses of overall survival data, we agreed with regulatory agencies that the pre-planned final analysis of progression-free survival would be acceptable for regulatory submission. The protocol was amended to allow the study to be unblinded at this point. The final analysis of progression-free survival is reported here. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with centerwatch.com, number BO17705E.

FINDINGS

325 patients in the bevacizumab plus interferon alfa group and 316 in the placebo plus interferon alfa group received at least one dose of study treatment. At the time of unblinding, 230 progression events had occurred in the bevacizumab plus interferon alfa group and 275 in the control group; there were 114 deaths in the bevacizumab plus interferon alfa group and 137 in the control group. Median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer in the bevacizumab plus interferon alfa group than it was in the control group (10.2 months vs 5.4 months; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.75; p=0.0001). Increases in progression-free survival were seen with bevacizumab plus interferon alfa irrespective of risk group or whether reduced-dose interferon alfa was received. Deaths due to adverse events were reported in eight (2%) patients who received one or more doses of bevacizumab and seven (2%) of those who did not receive the drug. Only three deaths in the bevacizumab arm were considered by investigators to be possibly related to bevacizumab. The most commonly reported grade 3 or worse adverse events were fatigue (40 [12%] patients in the bevacizumab group vs 25 [8%] in the control group) and asthenia (34 [10%] vs 20 [7%]).

INTERPRETATION

The combination of bevacizumab with interferon alfa as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma results in a significant improvement in progression-free survival, compared with interferon alfa alone.

Sunitinib in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs)

AIMS

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms of the gut with a 5-year survival of approximately 50%. Surgery remains the treatment of choice in resectable disease, with conventional chemotherapy largely ineffective. Over 90% of GIST possesses mutations in the c-KIT oncogene, producing an overactive tyrosine kinase, which may be driving the malignant process. Imatinib inhibits the aberrant tyrosine kinase and imatinib therapy in metastatic disease has shown significant clinical benefit. However, resistance typically develops within 2 years, with the need for further therapy. This article aims to introduce the reader to a new development in cancer therapeutics.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE database to identify publications relevant to the review. References within these articles were used to expand the search. Abstracts from recent ASCO symposia were hand searched for relevant articles.

FINDINGS

Sunitinib (SU11248) is a novel multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity not only against the receptor tyrosine kinase product of c-KIT but also other cell-signalling pathways that may be relevant in GIST; FLT3, platelet-derived growth receptor (PDGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). Two Phase II trials and one Phase III trial have investigated the activity of sunitinib against imatinib-resistant GIST. Early results showed significant benefits in time to disease progression that led to licensing of the drug in America and more recently in Europe. A Phase III trial comparing dose-increased imatinib and sunitinib in progressed GIST is currently planned.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial clinical results with sunitinib are promising and suggest a future role. Further studies are needed before sunitinib can be recommended for the routine treatment of imatinib-refractory GIST.

Cardiotoxicity associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, which is approved by both US and European Commission regulatory agencies for clinical use, extends survival of patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumours, but concerns have arisen about its cardiac safety. We therefore assessed the cardiovascular risk associated with sunitinib in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all cardiovascular events in 75 patients with imatinib-resistant, metastatic, gastrointestinal stromal tumours who had been enrolled in a phase I/II trial investigating the efficacy of sunitinib. The composite cardiovascular endpoint was cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure. We also examined sunitinib's effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and blood pressure. We investigated potential mechanisms of sunitinib-associated cardiac effects by studies in isolated rat cardiomyocytes and in mice.

FINDINGS

Eight of 75 (11%) patients given repeating cycles of sunitinib in the phase I/II trial had a cardiovascular event, with congestive heart failure recorded in six of 75 (8%). Ten of 36 (28%) patients treated at the approved sunitinib dose had absolute LVEF reductions in ejection fraction (EF) of at least 10%, and seven of 36 (19%) had LVEF reductions of 15 EF% or more. Sunitinib induced increases in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and 35 of 75 (47%) individuals developed hypertension (>150/100 mm Hg). Congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction generally responded to sunitinib being withheld and institution of medical management. Sunitinib caused mitochondrial injury and cardiomyocyte apoptosis in mice and in cultured rat cardiomyocytes.

INTERPRETATION

Left ventricular dysfunction might be due, in part, to direct cardiomyocyte toxicity, exacerbated by hypertension. Patients treated with sunitinib should be closely monitored for hypertension and LVEF reduction, especially those with a history of coronary artery disease or cardiac risk factors.

Potential clinical applications of epothilones: a review of phase II studies

BACKGROUND

Epothilones are cytotoxic macrolides that share a similar mechanism of action with the taxanes but demonstrate antitumor activity in taxane-resistant settings. Six epothilones are in early clinical trials for cancer treatment.

DESIGN

This review summarizes data from phase II clinical studies of the epothilones ixabepilone (BMS-247550), patupilone (EPO906), and KOS-862. Data were identified by searches of PubMed and of the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings and the Federation of European Cancer Societies biennial conference for the period 2000-2006. Studies were included if safety and efficacy data were available for at least 10 patients with a given tumor type in a standard phase II design.

RESULTS

Epothilones have demonstrated activity in lung, ovarian, breast, prostate, and renal carcinomas and in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in phase II studies. Little or no evidence of clinical activity has been reported in studies of epothilones in other tumor types. Preliminary data indicate that epothilones can be combined safely with other cytotoxic agents such as carboplatin.

CONCLUSIONS

The epothilones may play a role as an alternative to taxanes if activity in resistant settings can be confirmed together with an acceptable toxicity profile. Randomized studies are awaited to investigate the utility of epothilones in single-agent and combination regimens.

Complications from vascular disrupting agents and angiogenesis inhibitors: aberrant control of hemostasis and thrombosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications from angiogenesis inhibitors and vascular disrupting agents, pathogenesis, and recommendations for prophylaxis and management of those complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Venous thromboembolism has been a significant complication of the angiogenesis inhibitors thalidomide and lenalidomide. Prophylaxis with aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or warfarin has been shown to decrease rates of venous thromboembolism in patients treated with these agents. Life-threatening hemorrhage and arterial thromboembolism have been observed in patients using treatments that inhibit the vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway. Patients should be screened for arterial thromboembolism and hemorrhage risk prior to using vascular endothelial growth factor signal inhibitors. It is not known how angiogenesis inhibitors and vascular disrupting agents upset normal hemostasis. It is likely that disruption of the function and/or integrity of vascular endothelium leads to an increased risk for thrombosis and/or hemorrhage.

SUMMARY

New angiogenesis inhibitors and vascular disrupting agents have been developed that have significant activity against neoplasms. Potentially life-threatening side effects of hemorrhage and thrombosis have been observed with many of these new agents. As new treatments that disrupt angiogenesis or existing tumor vasculature are developed, attention should be given to these toxicities in clinical practice and clinical trials.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of metastatic renal cancer

For decades, options for the treatment for metastatic renal cancer have been limited and mostly ineffective. During this time, immunotherapy agents, such as IFN-alpha and IL-2, have represented the major treatment options. Over the last 3 years, advances in cancer biology have characterized important signaling pathways that regulate blood vessel growth and cell proliferation. These studies have identified a number of novel 'druggable' targets. Since 2004, this has resulted in regulatory approval of four additional agents that are active against renal cancer (bevacizumab, sorafenib, sunitinib and temsirolimus). A large number of additional candidate molecules that block the vascular endothelial growth factor and mTOR pathways have subsequently been identified. These agents are rapidly progressing through clinical testing in renal cancer and in other malignancies. This paper overviews the status of these investigational agents and anticipates areas of future research and development.

Targeting c-KIT, PDGFR in cancer of unknown primary: a screening study for molecular markers of benefit

AIMS

In view of available targeted therapies, we investigated the presence of c-kit, PDGFR gene mutations and protein expression in cancer of unknown primary (CUP) in order to study their contribution in pathogenesis, their prognostic value and potential as therapeutic targets.

METHODS

Mutations in hot spots c-kit exon 11 and PDGFR exons 12 and 18 were studied in paraffin-embedded tumour samples from 50 patients with CUP by means of PCR-based single-strand conformational polymorphism and protein expression by means of streptavidin-biotin immunoperoxidase assays. Molecular markers were screened for possible correlations with patient outcome.

RESULTS

No shifted band was detected in any of the polyacrylamide gel electrophoreses, indicating absence of c-kit exon 11 and PDGFR exon 12, 18 mutations. Immunohistochemical analysis in 37 tumours revealed positive membranous CD117 expression in 30 samples (81%) of which five exhibited strong (+3), four moderate (+2) and 21 weak (+1) staining. PDGFRa protein staining was seen in 15 out of 30 (50%) cases, mostly weak (13) and rarely moderate (1) or strong (1). The expression of KIT or PDGFRa protein did not correlate with the clinical outcome of the patients in our cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In a moderate-sized CUP patient cohort, KIT or PDGFRa protein overexpression is rare, does not have gross prognostic significance for survival and is not associated with presence of activating mutations.

Clinical factors associated with outcome in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy

BACKGROUND

Therapy targeted against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway is a standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The identification of patients who are more likely to benefit from these agents is warranted.

METHODS

In total, 120 patients with metastatic clear-cell RCC received bevacizumab, sorafenib, sunitinib, or axitinib on 1 of 9 prospective clinical trials at the Cleveland Clinic. Clinical features associated with outcome were identified by univariate analysis; then, a stepwise modeling approach based on Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors and to form a model for progression-free survival (PFS). A bootstrap algorithm was used to provide internal validation.

RESULTS

The overall median PFS was 13.8 months, and the objective response according to the Response Criteria in Solid Tumors was 34%. Multivariate analysis identified time from diagnosis to current treatment <2 years; baseline platelet and neutrophil counts >300 K/microL and >4.5 K/microL, respectively; baseline corrected serum calcium <8.5 mg/dL or >10 mg/dL; and initial Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >0 as independent, adverse prognostic factors (PF) for PFS. Three prognostic subgroups were formed based on the number of adverse prognostic factors present. The median PFS in patients with 0 or 1 adverse prognostic factor was 20.1 months compared with 13 months in patients with 2 adverse prognostic factors and 3.9 months in patients with >2 adverse prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Five independent prognostic factors for predicting PFS were identified and were used to categorize patients with metastatic RCC who received VEGF-targeted therapies into 3 risk groups. These prognostic factors can be incorporated into patient care and clinical trials that use such novel, VEGF-targeted agents.