51
|
Uptake and effectiveness of a self-guided mobile app platform for college student mental health. Internet Interv 2021; 27:100493. [PMID: 35036331 PMCID: PMC8749061 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND College students endorse high rates of mental health problems. While many colleges offer on-campus services, many students who could benefit from mental health services do not receive care. Indeed, nearly half of students who screen positive for depression, for example, do not receive treatment. Digital mental health programs, such as those delivered via mobile apps, may help expand access to mental health care and resources. This mixed-methods study aims to examine the uptake and effectiveness of an implementation of IntelliCare for College Students, a self-guided app-based mental health platform, on two university campuses. METHODS Data on counseling center utilization was collected prior to the implementation of the app (pre-implementation phase) and while the app was available on campus (implementation phase). Data on app usage was collected throughout the implementation phase. A subset of participants (n = 20), along with counseling center staff members (n = 10), completed feedback interviews. RESULTS Overall, uptake of the app platform was low. A total of 117 participants downloaded the app and registered their study ID during the implementation phase. Approximately 24% (28/117) of participants used the app only once. The number of days between the first and last day of app use ranged from 0 to 299, with a mean of 35.01 days and a median of 14 days. A relatively small portion of the sample (26.5%; 31/117) downloaded one or more of the IntelliCare interactive apps. In examining counseling center utilization, there were no significant changes in intake appointments, individual therapy sessions, or crisis appointments observed from the pre-implementation phase to the implementation phase of the study. Feedback interviews highlighted the significant level of disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and shift to remote learning, including challenges disseminating information to students and a preference to spend less time with digital devices outside of class time. CONCLUSIONS Findings from this study indicate that there is an ongoing need to identify ways to reach college students and support student mental health and wellness for the remainder of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.
Collapse
|
52
|
Prakash S, Unnikrishnan V, Pryss R, Kraft R, Schobel J, Hannemann R, Langguth B, Schlee W, Spiliopoulou M. Interactive System for Similarity-Based Inspection and Assessment of the Well-Being of mHealth Users. ENTROPY 2021; 23:e23121695. [PMID: 34946001 PMCID: PMC8700569 DOI: 10.3390/e23121695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Recent digitization technologies empower mHealth users to conveniently record their Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA) through web applications, smartphones, and wearable devices. These recordings can help clinicians understand how the users’ condition changes, but appropriate learning and visualization mechanisms are required for this purpose. We propose a web-based visual analytics tool, which processes clinical data as well as EMAs that were recorded through a mHealth application. The goals we pursue are (1) to predict the condition of the user in the near and the far future, while also identifying the clinical data that mostly contribute to EMA predictions, (2) to identify users with outlier EMA, and (3) to show to what extent the EMAs of a user are in line with or diverge from those users similar to him/her. We report our findings based on a pilot study on patient empowerment, involving tinnitus patients who recorded EMAs with the mHealth app TinnitusTips. To validate our method, we also derived synthetic data from the same pilot study. Based on this setting, results for different use cases are reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subash Prakash
- Knowledge Management and Discovery Lab, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany
- Correspondence: (S.P.); (V.U.); (M.S.)
| | - Vishnu Unnikrishnan
- Knowledge Management and Discovery Lab, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany
- Correspondence: (S.P.); (V.U.); (M.S.)
| | - Rüdiger Pryss
- Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, 97078 Würzburg, Germany;
| | - Robin Kraft
- Institute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
| | - Johannes Schobel
- Institute DigiHealth, Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, 89231 Neu-Ulm, Germany;
| | | | - Berthold Langguth
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (B.L.); (W.S.)
| | - Winfried Schlee
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany; (B.L.); (W.S.)
| | - Myra Spiliopoulou
- Knowledge Management and Discovery Lab, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany
- Correspondence: (S.P.); (V.U.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Sisodia RC, Alimena S, Ferris W, Saini A, Philp L, Sullivan M, Dorney K, Bregar A, Eisenhauer E, Goodman A, Growdon W, Hubbell H, Del Carmen M. Initial findings from a prospective, large scale patient reported outcomes program in patients with gynecologic malignancy. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:113-119. [PMID: 34763938 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are associated with improved overall survival in patients with metastatic malignancy; however, routine collection of PROMs is nascent. Little is known about PROs in women with gynecologic malignancy outside of a trial setting, limiting our understanding of how routine populations experience treatment, disease and morbidity. The goal of this study was to prospectively collect and describe disease-specific PROs in a non-trial population of women with gynecologic malignancy. METHODS PROMs were assigned electronically to all patients presenting for care in our gynecologic oncology clinic. Patients received a general oncology questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30) a disease specific questionnaire (FACT V, EORTC EN24, EORTC OV28, EORTC Cx 24), and questionnaires assessing support at home. Responses were mapped to relevant clinical variables. Descriptive statistics were performed, and comparisons made with parametric and nonparametric analyses. The association between support at home and perioperative complications was assessed via logistic regression. RESULTS In the study period, 3239 unique patients were evaluated at new patient visits, post-operative visits, chemotherapy visits and surveillance visits with a PROMs completion rate of 78.1% (n = 2530 women with 4402 completions). There was no difference in completion rates based on age or self-identified race. The EORTC QLQ C-30 questionnaire was able to adequately discern differences between disease sites. Overall, scores were lower than those obtained in trial populations. PROMs responses were not associated with perioperative complications. CONCLUSION Systematic collection of PROMs is feasible and tech-enabled workflows result in high collection rates. Quality of life scores in our clinic population were lower than published data, indicating caution should be used when extrapolating quality of life data from clinical trials to counseling and decision making around routine patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Sisodia
- Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Drive, Somerville, MA 02145, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Stephanie Alimena
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Winslow Ferris
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | | | - Lauren Philp
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Mackenzie Sullivan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Katelyn Dorney
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Amy Bregar
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Eric Eisenhauer
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Annekathryn Goodman
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Whitfield Growdon
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Harrison Hubbell
- Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Drive, Somerville, MA 02145, USA
| | - Marcela Del Carmen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard T.H.Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Serio C, Gabarda A, Uyar-Morency F, Silfee V, Ludwig J, Szigethy E, Butterworth S. Strengthening the Impact of Digital Cognitive Behavioral Interventions through a Dual Intervention: Proficient Motivational Interviewing-based Health Coaching Plus In-Application Techniques (Preprint). JMIR Form Res 2021; 6:e34552. [PMID: 35544323 PMCID: PMC9133992 DOI: 10.2196/34552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of digital tools to support individuals struggling with their mental health. The use of a digital intervention plus human coaching (“dual” intervention) is gaining momentum in increasing overall engagement in digital cognitive behavioral interventions (dCBIs). However, there is limited insight into the methodologies and coaching models used by those deploying dual interventions. To achieve a deeper understanding, we need to identify and promote effective engagement that leads to clinical outcomes versus simply monitoring engagement metrics. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a collaborative, goal-oriented communication approach that pays particular attention to the language of change and is an effective engagement approach to help people manage mental health issues. However, this approach has been traditionally used for in-person or telephonic interventions, and less is known about the application of MI to digital interventions. Objective We sought to provide a dual intervention approach and address multiple factors across two levels of engagement to operationalize a dCBI that combined cognitive behavioral therapy–based techniques and MI-based interactions between the digital health coach (DHC) and user. Methods We reviewed hundreds of digital exchanges between DHCs and users to identify and improve training and quality assurance activities for digital interventions. Results We tested five hypotheses and found that: (1) users of a dual digital behavioral health intervention had greater engagement levels than users of a noncoached intervention (P<.001); (2) DHCs with a demonstrated competency in applying MI to digital messages had more engaged users, as measured by the DHC-to-user message exchange ratio (P<.001); (3) the DHC-to-user message exchange ratio was correlated with more engagement in app activities (r=0.28, 95% CI 0.23-0.33); (4) DHCs with demonstrated MI proficiency elicited a greater amount of “change talk” from users than did DHCs without MI proficiency (H=25.12, P<.001); and (5) users who were engaged by DHCs with MI proficiency had better clinical outcomes compared to users engaged by DHCs without MI proficiency (P=.02). Conclusions To our knowledge, this pilot was the first of its kind to test the application of MI to digital coaching protocols, and it demonstrated the value of MI proficiency in digital health coaching for enhanced engagement and health improvement. Further research is needed to establish coaching models in dCBIs that incorporate MI to promote effective engagement and optimize positive behavioral outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Serio
- UPMC Health Plan, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- Happify Health, New York, NY, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Eva Szigethy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
Mohr DC, Kwasny MJ, Meyerhoff J, Graham AK, Lattie EG. The effect of depression and anxiety symptom severity on clinical outcomes and app use in digital mental health treatments: Meta-regression of three trials. Behav Res Ther 2021; 147:103972. [PMID: 34600398 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
A large number of trials have consistently shown that guided digital mental health treatments (DMHTs) are effective for depression and anxiety. As DMHTs are adopted by healthcare organizations, payers, and employers, they are often considered most appropriate for people with mild-to-moderate levels of symptom severity. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the effects of symptom severity on depression and anxiety outcomes and app use across three trials of a guided DMHT, IntelliCare. Participants were categorized into mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe symptom severity groups on depression and anxiety. All symptom severity groups showed significant reductions in depression and anxiety in a clear ordinal pattern, with the mild symptom severity group showing the smallest changes and the severe symptom group showing the largest improvements. Those with the lowest levels of educational attainment showed the largest symptom improvement. Baseline symptom severity was not significantly related to app use. App use was significantly related to depression and anxiety outcomes. These findings suggest that depression and anxiety symptom severity is not useful in determining who should be referred to a guided DMHT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Mohr
- Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Mary J Kwasny
- Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jonah Meyerhoff
- Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andrea K Graham
- Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Emily G Lattie
- Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Torous J, Bucci S, Bell IH, Kessing LV, Faurholt-Jepsen M, Whelan P, Carvalho AF, Keshavan M, Linardon J, Firth J. The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality. World Psychiatry 2021; 20:318-335. [PMID: 34505369 PMCID: PMC8429349 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 242] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic has largely increased the utilization of telehealth, mobile mental health technologies - such as smartphone apps, vir-tual reality, chatbots, and social media - have also gained attention. These digital health technologies offer the potential of accessible and scalable interventions that can augment traditional care. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive update on the overall field of digital psychiatry, covering three areas. First, we outline the relevance of recent technological advances to mental health research and care, by detailing how smartphones, social media, artificial intelligence and virtual reality present new opportunities for "digital phenotyping" and remote intervention. Second, we review the current evidence for the use of these new technological approaches across different mental health contexts, covering their emerging efficacy in self-management of psychological well-being and early intervention, along with more nascent research supporting their use in clinical management of long-term psychiatric conditions - including major depression; anxiety, bipolar and psychotic disorders; and eating and substance use disorders - as well as in child and adolescent mental health care. Third, we discuss the most pressing challenges and opportunities towards real-world implementation, using the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to explain how the innovations themselves, the recipients of these innovations, and the context surrounding innovations all must be considered to facilitate their adoption and use in mental health care systems. We conclude that the new technological capabilities of smartphones, artificial intelligence, social media and virtual reality are already changing mental health care in unforeseen and exciting ways, each accompanied by an early but promising evidence base. We point out that further efforts towards strengthening implementation are needed, and detail the key issues at the patient, provider and policy levels which must now be addressed for digital health technologies to truly improve mental health research and treatment in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Torous
- Division of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sandra Bucci
- Digital Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Imogen H Bell
- Orygen, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lars V Kessing
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria Faurholt-Jepsen
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pauline Whelan
- Digital Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Andre F Carvalho
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
- IMPACT (Innovation in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment) Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Matcheri Keshavan
- Division of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jake Linardon
- Deakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development and School of Psychology, Burwood, VIC, Australia
| | - Joseph Firth
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Graham AK, Kwasny MJ, Lattie EG, Greene CJ, Gupta NV, Reddy M, Mohr DC. Targeting subjective engagement in experimental therapeutics for digital mental health interventions. Internet Interv 2021; 25:100403. [PMID: 34401363 PMCID: PMC8350581 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Engagement is a multifaceted construct and a likely mechanism by which digital interventions achieve clinical improvements. To date, clinical research on digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) has overwhelmingly defined engagement and assessed its association with clinical outcomes through the objective/behavioral metrics of use of or interactions with a DMHI, such as number of log-ins or time spent using the technology. However, engagement also entails users' subjective experience. Research is largely lacking that tests the relationship between subjective metrics of engagement and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to present a proof-of-concept exploratory evaluation of the association between subjective engagement measures of a mobile DMHI with changes in depression and anxiety. Adult primary care patients (N = 146) who screened positive for depression or anxiety were randomized to receive a DMHI, IntelliCare, immediately or following an 8-week waitlist. Subjective engagement was measured via the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use (USE) Questionnaire. Across both conditions, results showed that individuals who perceived a mobile intervention as more useful, easy to use and learn, and satisfying had greater improvements in depression and anxiety over eight weeks. Findings support our proposed experimental therapeutics framework that hypothesizes objective/behavioral and subjective engagement metrics as mechanisms that lead to changes in clinical outcomes, as well as support directing intervention design efforts for DMHIs to target the user experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea K. Graham
- Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mary J. Kwasny
- Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Emily G. Lattie
- Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Carolyn J. Greene
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
- Translational Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Neha V. Gupta
- Departments of Psychiatry and Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Madhu Reddy
- Department of Communication Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David C. Mohr
- Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Knapp AA, Cohen K, Nicholas J, Mohr DC, Carlo AD, Skerl JJ, Lattie EG. Integration of Digital Tools Into Community Mental Health Care Settings That Serve Young People: Focus Group Study. JMIR Ment Health 2021; 8:e27379. [PMID: 34420928 PMCID: PMC8414307 DOI: 10.2196/27379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital mental health tools have substantial potential to be easily integrated into people's lives and fundamentally impact public health. Such tools can extend the reach and maximize the impact of mental health interventions. Before implementing digital tools in new settings, it is critical to understand what is important to organizations and individuals who will implement and use these tools. Given that young people are highly familiar with technology and many mental health concerns emerge in childhood and adolescence, it is especially crucial to understand how digital tools can be integrated into settings that serve young people. OBJECTIVE This study aims to learn about considerations and perspectives of community behavioral health care providers on incorporating digital tools into their clinical care for children and adolescents. METHODS Data were analyzed from 5 focus groups conducted with clinicians (n=37) who work with young people at a large community service organization in the United States. This organization provides care to more than 27,000 people annually, most of whom are of low socioeconomic status. The transcripts were coded using thematic analysis. RESULTS Clinicians first provided insight into the digital tools they were currently using in their treatment sessions with young people, such as web-based videos and mood-tracking apps. They explained that their main goals in using these tools were to help young people build skills, facilitate learning, and monitor symptoms. Benefits were expressed, such as engagement of adolescents in treatment, along with potential challenges (eg, accessibility and limited content) and developmental considerations (eg, digital devices getting taken away as punishment). Clinicians discussed their desire for a centralized digital platform that securely connects the clinician, young person, and caregivers. Finally, they offered several considerations for integrating digital tools into mental health care, such as setting up expectations with clients and the importance of human support. CONCLUSIONS Young people have unique considerations related to complex accessibility patterns and technology expectations that may not be observed when adults are the intended users of mental health technologies. Therefore, these findings provide critical insights to inform the development of future tools, specifically regarding connectivity, conditional restraints (eg, devices taken away as punishment and school restrictions), expectations of users from different generations, and the blended nature in which digital tools can support young people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley A Knapp
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Katherine Cohen
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Jennifer Nicholas
- Orygen Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David C Mohr
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Andrew D Carlo
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | - Emily G Lattie
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Gude J, Subhedar RV, Zhang MH, Jain P, Bhela J, Bangash F, Veluri N, Hsieh YC, Sheikh BZ, Shah MR, Mansuri Z, Aedma K, Patel UK, Parikh T. Emerging Needs and Viability of Telepsychiatry During and Post COVID-19 Era: A Literature Review. Cureus 2021; 13:e16974. [PMID: 34540384 PMCID: PMC8423321 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in nationwide stay-at-home orders in an effort to slow the spread severely impacting the healthcare sector. Telepsychiatry provides a platform bridging the gap through advanced technologies connecting mental health providers and patients who need their services, overcoming previous barriers of great distances, lack of transportation, and even time constraints. The most obvious benefit is increased accessibility to mental healthcare, especially in underserved and remote areas where there is no easy access for in-person care. It is important to note that benefits are not limited to patients, but also allow clinicians greater flexibility in scheduling and reduced practice overhead costs, both of which aid with physician burnout and burden. Telepsychiatry during COVID-19 provides its own unique advantages over in-person visits. The risk of exposure to healthcare workers and patients receiving care is reduced, allowing immunocompromised patients to receive much-needed psychiatric care. Without the need to meet in person, self-isolating psychiatrists can still provide care, decreasing strain on their co-workers. Although telepsychiatry is relatively new, it has already exhibited considerable success in its effectiveness at treating psychiatric conditions and widespread corollary benefits. Telepsychiatric consults may be carried out synchronously and asynchronously, each having benefits and setbacks. Different mobile application interventions have been explored, which are available for the purpose of both monitoring/assessing patients and/or providing treatment. The scope of conditions these applications address is broad, from anxiety disorders to schizophrenia to depression. As promising and beneficial telepsychiatry may seem, it is necessary to recognize that building the program can be challenging. It involves adapting to new methods in medicine. We highlighted barriers to general telepsychiatry, the most prominent being technological literacy of both physician and patient, and possible negative effects of eliminating the in-person patient-doctor interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayasudha Gude
- Psychiatry, Northwell Health, Zucker Hillside Hospital, New York, USA
| | | | - Michelle H Zhang
- Psychological & Brain Sciences and Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Pratik Jain
- Psychiatry, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA
| | - Jatminderpal Bhela
- Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University/Metrohealth system, Cleveland, USA
| | - Fariha Bangash
- Psychiatry, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA
| | - Nikhila Veluri
- Psychiatry, American University of Integrative Science School of Medicine, St. Michael, BRB
| | - Ya-Ching Hsieh
- Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Batool Z Sheikh
- Psychiatry, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK
- Psychiatry, Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Mansi R Shah
- Psychiatry, The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, USA
| | - Zeeshan Mansuri
- Psychiatry, Boston Children's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | | | - Urvish K Patel
- Public Health and Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Tapan Parikh
- Psychiatry, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Martinengo L, Stona AC, Griva K, Dazzan P, Pariante CM, von Wangenheim F, Car J. Self-guided Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Apps for Depression: Systematic Assessment of Features, Functionality, and Congruence With Evidence. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e27619. [PMID: 34328431 PMCID: PMC8367167 DOI: 10.2196/27619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mental health disorders affect 1 in 10 people globally, of whom approximately 300 million are affected by depression. At least half of the people affected by depression remain untreated. Although cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment, access to mental health specialists, habitually challenging, has worsened because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Internet-based CBT is an effective and feasible strategy to increase access to treatment for people with depression. Mental health apps may further assist in facilitating self-management for people affected by depression; however, accessing the correct app may be cumbersome given the large number and wide variety of apps offered by public app marketplaces. Objective This study aims to systematically assess the features, functionality, data security, and congruence with evidence of self-guided CBT-based apps targeting users affected by depression that are available in major app stores. Methods We conducted a systematic assessment of self-guided CBT-based apps available in Google Play and the Apple App Store. Apps launched or updated since August 2018 were identified through a systematic search in the 42matters database using CBT-related terms. Apps meeting the inclusion criteria were downloaded and assessed using a Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro (Android 9) and iPhone 7 (iOS 13.3.1). Apps were appraised using a 182-question checklist developed by the research team, assessing their general characteristics, technical aspects and quality assurance, and CBT-related features, including 6 evidence-based CBT techniques (ie, psychoeducation, behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, problem solving, relaxation, and exposure for comorbid anxiety) as informed by a CBT manual, CBT competence framework, and a literature review of internet-based CBT clinical trial protocols. The results were reported as a narrative review using descriptive statistics. Results The initial search yielded 3006 apps, of which 98 met the inclusion criteria and were systematically assessed. There were 20 well-being apps; 65 mental health apps, targeting two or more common mental health disorders, including depression; and 13 depression apps. A total of 28 apps offered at least four evidence-based CBT techniques, particularly depression apps. Cognitive restructuring was the most common technique, offered by 79% (77/98) of the apps. Only one-third of the apps offered suicide risk management resources, whereas 17% (17/98) of the apps offered COVID-19–related information. Although most apps included a privacy policy, only a third of the apps presented it before account creation. In total, 82% (74/90) of privacy policies stated sharing data with third-party service providers. Half of the app development teams included academic institutions or health care providers. Conclusions Only a few self-guided CBT-based apps offer comprehensive CBT programs or suicide risk management resources. Sharing of users’ data is widespread, highlighting shortcomings in health app market governance. To fulfill their potential, self-guided CBT-based apps should follow evidence-based clinical guidelines, be patient centered, and enhance users’ data security.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Martinengo
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Anne-Claire Stona
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Konstadina Griva
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Paola Dazzan
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carmine Maria Pariante
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Florian von Wangenheim
- Professor of Technology Marketing, Department of Management, Technology & Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Josip Car
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Gallagher R, Zhang L. Evaluating mobile health technologies: does the traditional randomized controlled trial serve our needs? Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2021; 20:623-626. [PMID: 34269387 DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Mobile health technologies are increasingly used by cardiovascular nurses and allied health clinicians to support behaviour change and self-care in patients. Randomized controlled trials provide rigorous methodology for evaluation but progress slowly, so the technology is often outdated by completion. A helpful modification to the trial design includes identification of the behaviour intervention principles involved and concurrently track in-app usage data, allowing updates to be made. These data collected alongside user experiences enables analysis of effects on outcomes and determination of the relative influence of component parts. Cardiovascular and mental health mHealth strategies are used to exemplify these recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Gallagher
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery/Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.,The Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Ling Zhang
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery/Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.,The Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Sisodia RC, Rodriguez JA, Sequist TD. Digital Disparities: Lessons learned from a Patient Reported Outcomes Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:2265-2268. [PMID: 34244760 PMCID: PMC8344913 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The collection of patient reported outcomes (PROs) allows us to incorporate the patient's voice within their care in a quantifiable, validated manner. Large scale collection of PROs is facilitated by the electronic health record (EHR) and its portal, though historically patients have eschewed the portal and completed patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) in clinic via tablet. Furthermore, access to and use of the portal is associated with known racial inequities. Our institution oversees the largest clinical PRO program in the world, and has a long history of racially equitable PRO completion rates via tablet. However, when the COVID-19 pandemic forced us to remove tablets from clinics and rely exclusively on portal use for PRO completion, profound racial disparities resulted immediately. Our experience quantifiably demonstrates the magnitude of inequity that the portal, in its current configuration, generates and serves as a cautionary tale to other health care systems and EHRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Sisodia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street Boston MA, 02114.,Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Dr, Somerville, MA, 02145
| | | | - Thomas D Sequist
- Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Dr, Somerville, MA, 02145.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Glass JE, Matson TE, Lim C, Hartzler AL, Kimbel K, Lee AK, Beatty T, Parrish R, Caldeiro RM, Garza McWethy A, Curran GM, Bradley KA. Approaches for Implementing App-Based Digital Treatments for Drug Use Disorders Into Primary Care: A Qualitative, User-Centered Design Study of Patient Perspectives. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e25866. [PMID: 34255666 PMCID: PMC8293157 DOI: 10.2196/25866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Digital interventions, such as websites and smartphone apps, can be effective in treating drug use disorders (DUDs). However, their implementation in primary care is hindered, in part, by a lack of knowledge on how patients might like these treatments delivered to them. Objective This study aims to increase the understanding of how patients with DUDs prefer to receive app-based treatments to inform the implementation of these treatments in primary care. Methods The methods of user-centered design were combined with qualitative research methods to inform the design of workflows for offering app-based treatments in primary care. Adult patients (n=14) with past-year cannabis, stimulant, or opioid use disorder from 5 primary care clinics of Kaiser Permanente Washington in the Seattle area participated in this study. Semistructured interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative template analysis. The coding scheme included deductive codes based on interview topics, which primarily focused on workflow design. Inductive codes emerged from the data. Results Participants wanted to learn about apps during visits where drug use was discussed and felt that app-related conversations should be incorporated into the existing care whenever possible, as opposed to creating new health care visits to facilitate the use of the app. Nearly all participants preferred receiving clinician support for using apps over using them without support. They desired a trusting, supportive relationship with a clinician who could guide them as they used the app. Participants wanted follow-up support via phone calls or secure messaging because these modes of communication were perceived as a convenient and low burden (eg, no copays or appointment travel). Conclusions A user-centered implementation of treatment apps for DUDs in primary care will require health systems to design workflows that account for patients’ needs for structure, support in and outside of visits, and desire for convenience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph E Glass
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Theresa E Matson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Catherine Lim
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Andrea L Hartzler
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Kilian Kimbel
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Amy K Lee
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Tara Beatty
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Rebecca Parrish
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Mental Health & Wellness Services, Renton, WA, United States
| | - Ryan M Caldeiro
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Mental Health & Wellness Services, Renton, WA, United States
| | - Angela Garza McWethy
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Mental Health & Wellness Services, Renton, WA, United States
| | - Geoffrey M Curran
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Katharine A Bradley
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Greenberg PE, Fournier AA, Sisitsky T, Simes M, Berman R, Koenigsberg SH, Kessler RC. The Economic Burden of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder in the United States (2010 and 2018). PHARMACOECONOMICS 2021; 39:653-665. [PMID: 33950419 PMCID: PMC8097130 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01019-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 276] [Impact Index Per Article: 92.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incremental economic burden of US adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) was estimated at $US210.5 billion in 2010 (year 2012 values). OBJECTIVE Following a similar methodology, this study updates the previous findings with more recent data to report the economic burden of adults with MDD in 2018. METHOD This study used a framework for evaluating the incremental economic burden of adults with MDD in the USA that combined original and literature-based estimates, focusing on key changes between 2010 and 2018. The prevalence rates of MDD by sex, age, employment, and treatment status over time were estimated based on the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). The incremental direct and workplace costs per individual with MDD were primarily derived from administrative claims data and NSDUH data using comparative analyses of individuals with and without MDD. Societal direct and workplace costs were extrapolated by multiplying NSDUH estimates of the number of people with MDD by the direct and workplace cost estimates per patient. The suicide-related costs were estimated using a human capital method. RESULTS The number of US adults with MDD increased by 12.9%, from 15.5 to 17.5 million, between 2010 and 2018, whereas the proportion of adults with MDD aged 18-34 years increased from 34.6 to 47.5%. Over this period, the incremental economic burden of adults with MDD increased by 37.9% from $US236.6 billion to 326.2 billion (year 2020 values). All components of the incremental economic burden increased (i.e., direct costs, suicide-related costs, and workplace costs), with the largest growth observed in workplace costs, at 73.2%. Consequently, the composition of 2018 costs changed meaningfully, with 35% attributable to direct costs (47% in 2010), 4% to suicide-related costs (5% in 2010), and 61% to workplace costs (48% in 2010). This increase in the workplace cost share was consistent with more favorable employment conditions for those with MDD. Finally, the proportion of total costs attributable to MDD itself as opposed to comorbid conditions remained stable at 37% (38% in 2010). CONCLUSION Workplace costs accounted for the largest portion of the growing economic burden of MDD as this population trended younger and was increasingly likely to be employed. Although the total number of adults with MDD increased from 2010 to 2018, the incremental direct cost per individual declined. At the same time, the proportion of adults with MDD who received treatment remained stable over the past decade, suggesting that substantial unmet treatment needs remain in this population. Further research is warranted into the availability, composition, and quality of MDD treatment services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul E Greenberg
- Analysis Group, Inc, 111 Huntington Ave., 14th Floor, Boston, MA, 02199, USA
| | | | - Tammy Sisitsky
- Analysis Group, Inc, 111 Huntington Ave., 14th Floor, Boston, MA, 02199, USA
| | - Mark Simes
- Analysis Group, Inc, 111 Huntington Ave., 14th Floor, Boston, MA, 02199, USA
| | - Richard Berman
- Analysis Group, Inc, 111 Huntington Ave., 14th Floor, Boston, MA, 02199, USA
| | - Sarah H Koenigsberg
- Analysis Group, Inc, 111 Huntington Ave., 14th Floor, Boston, MA, 02199, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
65
|
Mohr DC, Azocar F, Bertagnolli A, Choudhury T, Chrisp P, Frank R, Harbin H, Histon T, Kaysen D, Nebeker C, Richards D, Schueller SM, Titov N, Torous J, Areán PA. Banbury Forum Consensus Statement on the Path Forward for Digital Mental Health Treatment. Psychiatr Serv 2021; 72:677-683. [PMID: 33467872 PMCID: PMC8822332 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
A major obstacle to mental health treatment for many Americans is accessibility: the United States faces a shortage of mental health providers, resulting in federally designated shortage areas. Although digital mental health treatments (DMHTs) are effective interventions for common mental disorders, they have not been widely adopted by the U.S. health care system. National and international expert stakeholders representing health care organizations, insurance companies and payers, employers, patients, researchers, policy makers, health economists, and DMHT companies and the investment community attended two Banbury Forum meetings. The Banbury Forum reviewed the evidence for DMHTs, identified the challenges to successful and sustainable implementation, investigated the factors that contributed to more successful implementation internationally, and developed the following recommendations: guided DMHTs should be offered to all patients experiencing common mental disorders, DMHT products and services should be reimbursable to support integration into the U.S. health care landscape, and an evidence standards framework should be developed to support decision makers in evaluating DMHTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Mohr
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Francisca Azocar
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Andrew Bertagnolli
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Tanzeem Choudhury
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Paul Chrisp
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Richard Frank
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Henry Harbin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Trina Histon
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Debra Kaysen
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Camille Nebeker
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Derek Richards
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Stephen M Schueller
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Nickolai Titov
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - John Torous
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | - Patricia A Areán
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| | -
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago (Mohr); Optum, Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Azocar); One Medical and Alliant International University, San Francisco (Bertagnolli); Information Science, Cornell Tech, New York City (Choudhury); National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, England (Chrisp); Department of Health Care Policy (Frank) and Department of Psychiatry (Torous), Harvard Medical School, Boston; health care consultant, Baltimore (Harbin); Care Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California (Histon); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, and National Center for PTSD, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Kaysen); Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego (Nebeker); E-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, and Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Boston (Richards); Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine (Schueller); MindSpot Clinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Titov); Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle (Areán)
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Rauseo-Ricupero N, Henson P, Agate-Mays M, Torous J. Case studies from the digital clinic: integrating digital phenotyping and clinical practice into today's world. Int Rev Psychiatry 2021; 33:394-403. [PMID: 33792463 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1859465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The following case series provides several examples from the Digital Clinic, an outpatient mental health program which uses smartphone technology to augment traditional mental health care. The themes highlighted in this piece, expanding emotional-awareness, symptom tracking, and medication management, provide real-clinical examples of how the Digital Clinic offered remote mental health care to a diverse group of people. Furthermore, the following piece demonstrates to practicing clinicians how digital technologies, like smartphone apps, can diversify methods of clinical engagement, assist with collecting health metrics in a safe and ethical manner, and promote person centred care. With the COVID-19 pandemic forcing re-evaluation of how mental health services are provided, it is critical to ensure that digitally infused systems of care, like the Digital Clinic, are effective, accessible, and scalable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Philip Henson
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mica Agate-Mays
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Smith College School for Social Work, Northampton, MA, USA
| | - John Torous
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Raevuori A, Vahlberg T, Korhonen T, Hilgert O, Aittakumpu-Hyden R, Forman-Hoffman V. A therapist-guided smartphone app for major depression in young adults: A randomized clinical trial. J Affect Disord 2021; 286:228-238. [PMID: 33743385 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meru Health Program (MHP) is a therapist-guided, 8-week intervention for depression delivered via smartphone. The aim was to test its efficacy in patients with clinical depression in a Finnish university student health service. METHODS Patients (n=124, women 72.6%, mean age 25y) were stratified based on antidepressant status, and randomized into intervention group receiving MHP plus treatment as usual (TAU), and control group receiving TAU only. Depression, measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale, was the primary outcome. After baseline (T0), follow-ups were at mid-intervention (T4), immediately post-intervention (T8); 3 months (T20), and 6 months (T32) post-intervention. RESULTS The intervention group and control group did not have significant differences in depression outcomes throughout end of treatment and follow-up. Among secondary outcomes, increase in resilience (d=0.32, p=0.03) and mindfulness (d=0.57, p=0.002), and reduction in perceived stress (d=-0.52, p=0.008) were greater in MHP+TAU versus TAU at T32; no differences were found in anxiety, sleep disturbances, and quality of life between groups. Post-hoc comparisons of patients on antidepressants showed significantly greater reduction in depression at T32 for MHP+TAU versus TAU (d=-0.73, p=0.01); patients not on antidepressants showed no between-group differences. LIMITATIONS Limitations include unknown characteristics of TAU, potential bias from patients and providers not being blinded to treatment group, and failure to specify examination of differences by antidepressant status in the protocol. CONCLUSIONS Most outcomes, including depression, did not significantly differ between MHP+TAU and TAU. Exploratory analysis revealed intervention effect at the end of the 6-month follow-up among patients on antidepressant medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anu Raevuori
- Department of Adolescent Psychiatry, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Clinicum, Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Tero Vahlberg
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Tellervo Korhonen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Outi Hilgert
- Meru Health Inc. Palo Alto, The United States & Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
68
|
Landa-Blanco M, Landa-Blanco A, Mejía-Suazo CJ, Martínez-Martínez CA. Coronavirus Awareness and Mental Health: Clinical Symptoms and Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help. Front Psychol 2021; 12:549644. [PMID: 33967872 PMCID: PMC8100327 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.549644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The current study analyzed the relationship between Coronavirus (COVID-19) Awareness, mental health, and willingness to seek professional psychological help. This was made through a quantitative approach, using online questionnaires to collect data from 855 subjects. The questionnaires included the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-53) to measure mental health indicators, the Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help Scale-Short Form, and the Coronavirus Awareness Scale-10 (CAS-10). An Exploratory Factor Analysis suggests that three factors underlie the CAS-10: Coronavirus Concern, Exaggerated Perception, and Immunity Perception. Results indicate a significant positive correlation between Coronavirus Concern and both general anxiety and phobic anxiety symptoms. Immunity Perception is positively related to paranoid ideation and psychotic symptoms. A Mediation Analysis determined that Coronavirus Concern has a significant positive direct effect on Openness to Seeking Psychological Treatment (OSPT), while Exaggerated Perception and Immunity Perception scores have significant direct negative effects on the Value and Need in Seeking Treatment (VNST) scores. Indirectly, the relationship between Coronavirus Concern and OPST is significantly mediated by anxiety symptoms. Similar results were found for the VNST subscale. There is a negative significant effect of Immunity Perception over OSPT mediated by Paranoid Ideation. However, the overall model only achieved small r 2 coefficients for the OSPT (0.060) and VNST (0.095) scores. Comparisons in Coronavirus Awareness between sex, age, and the presence of children and older adults at home were also made. These results are discussed regarding their practical implications for mental health providers and policymakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Landa-Blanco
- Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Psychological Sciences, National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| | - Ana Landa-Blanco
- Social and Economic Research, Faculty of Economy and Management, National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| | - Claudio J. Mejía-Suazo
- Faculty of Sciences, School of Biology, National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| | | |
Collapse
|
69
|
Borghouts J, Eikey E, Mark G, De Leon C, Schueller SM, Schneider M, Stadnick N, Zheng K, Mukamel D, Sorkin DH. Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e24387. [PMID: 33759801 PMCID: PMC8074985 DOI: 10.2196/24387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 249] [Impact Index Per Article: 83.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), which deliver mental health support via technologies such as mobile apps, can increase access to mental health support, and many studies have demonstrated their effectiveness in improving symptoms. However, user engagement varies, with regard to a user’s uptake and sustained interactions with these interventions. Objective This systematic review aims to identify common barriers and facilitators that influence user engagement with DMHIs. Methods A systematic search was conducted in the SCOPUS, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Empirical studies that report qualitative and/or quantitative data were included. Results A total of 208 articles met the inclusion criteria. The included articles used a variety of methodologies, including interviews, surveys, focus groups, workshops, field studies, and analysis of user reviews. Factors extracted for coding were related to the end user, the program or content offered by the intervention, and the technology and implementation environment. Common barriers included severe mental health issues that hampered engagement, technical issues, and a lack of personalization. Common facilitators were social connectedness facilitated by the intervention, increased insight into health, and a feeling of being in control of one’s own health. Conclusions Although previous research suggests that DMHIs can be useful in supporting mental health, contextual factors are important determinants of whether users actually engage with these interventions. The factors identified in this review can provide guidance when evaluating DMHIs to help explain and understand user engagement and can inform the design and development of new digital interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth Eikey
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Gloria Mark
- University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Nicole Stadnick
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Kai Zheng
- University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Dana Mukamel
- University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Dara H Sorkin
- University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Weisberg RB, Gonsalves MA, Ramadurai R, Braham H, Fuchs C, Beard C. Development of a cognitive bias modification intervention for anxiety disorders in primary care. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY 2021; 61 Suppl 1:73-92. [PMID: 33629751 DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is a great need for low-intensity, scalable treatments in primary care, where most anxious patients first present for treatment. We describe Stage IA treatment development and a Stage IB feasibility trial of cognitive bias modification (CBM) for transdiagnostic anxiety in primary care. METHODS The online intervention, Mental Habits, comprised eight sessions of a personalized CBM targeting attention and interpretation biases. Coaches assisted patients in using the website, monitored progress via a dashboard, and shared information with primary care providers. We evaluated Mental Habits in an open trial (N = 14) and a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (N = 40) in primary care patients with anxiety disorders. RESULTS We compared results to a priori benchmarks of clinically meaningful outcomes. In the open trial, Mental Habits met feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy benchmarks. In the pilot RCT, there was greater dropout at one study site which ultimately closed. In the intent-to-treat analyses, Mental Habits met the benchmark for self-report, but not the interview measure of anxiety. Symptom Tracking did not meet the benchmark for self-report or interview measures of anxiety. In per-protocol analyses, Mental Habits exceeded the benchmark for both self-report and interview measures, whereas Symptom Tracking met the benchmark for self-report. Interpretation bias improved in the Mental Habits group, but not in Symptom Tracking. No effects were observed for attention bias. CONCLUSION The online CBM intervention demonstrated good acceptability and, when delivered at a stable primary care clinic, preliminary effectiveness in primary care. A larger RCT is warranted to test effectiveness. PRACTITIONER POINTS A personalized, transdiagnostic Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) intervention for anxiety in primary care is acceptable to primary care patients with social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and/or panic disorder /agoraphobia. With training and supervision from licensed mental health clinicians, bachelor's-level coaches can assist primary care patients to self-administer CBM. Offering a low-intensity, self-directed anxiety intervention in primary care can greatly expand the reach of anxiety treatment, with minimal need for additional resources. Interpretation bias may be an important clinical target for primary care patients with anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Risa B Weisberg
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Meghan A Gonsalves
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Ramya Ramadurai
- Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Cara Fuchs
- Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts, USA.,Boston Medical Center, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Courtney Beard
- Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
An Introduction to Core Competencies for the Use of Mobile Apps in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2020.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
72
|
Lattie E, Cohen KA, Winquist N, Mohr DC. Examining an App-Based Mental Health Self-Care Program, IntelliCare for College Students: Single-Arm Pilot Study. JMIR Ment Health 2020; 7:e21075. [PMID: 33037874 PMCID: PMC7585772 DOI: 10.2196/21075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, there has been an increase in symptoms of depression, anxiety, and other mental illnesses in college student populations alongside a steady rise in the demand for counseling services. Digital mental health programs, such as those delivered through mobile apps, can add to the array of available services but must be tested for usability and acceptability before implementation. OBJECTIVE This study aims to examine how students used IntelliCare for College Students over an 8-week period to examine the preliminary associations between app use and psychosocial targets and to gather user feedback about usability issues that need to be remedied before a larger implementation study. METHODS IntelliCare for College Students is an app-based platform that provides symptom assessments with personalized feedback, information about campus resources, lessons on mental health and wellness topics, and access to the suite of interactive skill-focused IntelliCare apps. A total of 20 students were recruited to participate in an 8-week study. To test for a broad range of potential users, we recruited a mixed sample of students with elevated symptoms of depression or anxiety and students without elevated symptoms. Participants completed psychosocial questionnaires at baseline, week 4, and week 8. Participants also completed user feedback interviews at weeks 4 and 8 in which they provided feedback on their experience using the app and suggestions for changes they would like to be made to the app. RESULTS Of the 20 students who downloaded the app, 19 completed the study, indicating a high rate of retention. Over the study period, participants completed an average of 5.85 (SD 2.1; range 1-8) symptom assessments. Significant improvements were observed in the Anxiety Literacy Questionnaire scores (Z=-2.006; P=.045) and in the frequency with which participants used both cognitive (Z=-2.091; P=.04) and behavioral (Z=-2.249; P=.03) coping skills. In the feedback interviews, we identified a high degree of usability with minor bugs in the app software, which were quickly fixed. Furthermore, in feedback interviews, we identified that users found the app to be convenient and appreciated the ability to use the program in short bursts of time. CONCLUSIONS The findings indicate that the IntelliCare for College Students program was perceived as largely usable and engaging. Although the program demonstrated usability and preliminary benefits to students, further testing is needed to determine its clinical utility among college students. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04035577; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04035577.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Lattie
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Katherine A Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Nathan Winquist
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - David C Mohr
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Orr LC, Graham AK, Mohr DC, Greene CJ. Engagement and Clinical Improvement Among Older Adult Primary Care Patients Using a Mobile Intervention for Depression and Anxiety: Case Studies. JMIR Ment Health 2020; 7:e16341. [PMID: 32673236 PMCID: PMC7381055 DOI: 10.2196/16341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technology-based mental health interventions are an increasingly attractive option for expanding access to mental health services within the primary care system. Older adults are among the groups that could potentially benefit from the growing ubiquity of technology-based mental health interventions; however, older adults are perceived to be averse to using technology and have reported barriers to use. OBJECTIVE The aim of this paper is to present a case study of 3 participants from a clinical trial evaluating IntelliCare, an evidence-based mobile intervention for depression and anxiety, among adults recruited from primary care clinics. Our report of these 3 participants, who were aged 60 years or older, focuses on their engagement with the IntelliCare service (ie, app use, coach communication) and clinical changes in depression or anxiety symptoms over the intervention period. METHODS The 3 case study participants were offered IntelliCare with coaching for 8 weeks. The intervention consisted of 5 treatment intervention apps that support a variety of psychological skills, a Hub app that contained psychoeducational content and administered weekly assessments, and coaching for encouragement, accountability, and technical assistance as needed. The 3 case study participants were selected to reflect the overall demographics of participants within the trial and because their interactions with IntelliCare provided a good illustration of varied experiences regarding engagement with the intervention. RESULTS The 3 participants' unique experiences with the intervention are described. Despite potential barriers and experiencing some technical glitches, the participants showed proficient ability to use the apps, high levels of participation through frequent app use and coach interaction, and decreased depression and anxiety scores. At the end of the 8-week intervention, each of these 3 participants expressed great enthusiasm for the benefit of this program through feedback to their coach, and they each identified a number of ways they had seen improvements in themselves. CONCLUSIONS These 3 cases provide examples of older individuals who engaged with and benefitted from the IntelliCare service. Although the results from these 3 cases may not generalize to others, they provide an important, informed perspective of the experiences that can contribute to our understanding of how older adults use and overcome barriers to mental health technologies. The findings also contribute toward the ultimate goal of ensuring that the IntelliCare intervention is appropriate for individuals of all ages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Casey Orr
- Center for Health Services Research, Psychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Andrea K Graham
- Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - David C Mohr
- Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Carolyn J Greene
- Center for Health Services Research, Psychiatric Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| |
Collapse
|