Risk of second primary malignancies among cancer survivors in the United States, 1992 through 2008

Risk of second primary malignancy in patients with primary myelofibrosis: a SEER database study

Prior studies report a greater incidence of second primary malignancy (SPM) among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, although the true risk in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) has not been elucidated. We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to evaluate the risk of SPM in PMF patients and analyzed the effects of sociodemographic factors on the risk of SPM. Out of 5273 patients, 385 patients (7.30%) developed SPM. SPM occurred at SIR of 1.95 (95% CI 1.76-2.15) and AER of 149.01 per 10,000 population. A significantly higher incidence of melanoma (SIR 1.76, 95% CI 1.01-2.86), lymphoma (SIR 3.38, 95% CI 2.28-4.83), and leukemia (SIR 27.19, 95% CI 23.09-31.81) was observed. The risk was significantly higher in patients ≤60 years, males, chemotherapy recipients, within 5 years of PMF diagnosis, and for PMF diagnosed after 2009.

Filling the gaps in the research about second primary malignancies after bladder cancer: Focus on race and histology

Purpose

Previous research has shown that bladder cancer has one of the highest incidences of developing a second primary malignancy. So, we designed this study to further examine this risk in light of race and histology.

Patients and methods

Using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) 18 registry, we retrospectively screened patients who had been diagnosed with bladder cancer between 2000 and 2018. We then tracked these survivors until a second primary cancer diagnosis, the conclusion of the trial, or their deaths. In addition to doing a competing risk analysis, we derived standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for SPMs by race and histology.

Results

A total of 162,335 patients with bladder cancer were included, and during follow-ups, a second primary cancer diagnosis was made in 31,746 of these patients. When the data were stratified by race, SIRs and IRRs for SPMs showed a significant difference: Asian/Pacific Islanders (APIs) had a more pronounced increase in SPMs (SIR: 2.15; p 0.05) than White and Black individuals who had an SIRs of 1.69 and 1.94, respectively; p 0.05. In terms of histology, the epithelial type was associated with an increase in SPMs across all three races, but more so in APIs (IRR: 3.51; 95% CI: 2.11-5.85; p 0.001).

Conclusion

We found that race had an impact on both the type and risk of SPMs. Additionally, the likelihood of an SPM increases with the length of time between the two malignancies and the stage of the index malignancy.

Genetic mutation and tumor microbiota determine heterogenicity of tumor immune signature: Evidence from gastric and colorectal synchronous cancers

Both colorectal and gastric cancer are lethal solid-tumor malignancies, leading to the majority of cancer-associated deaths worldwide. Although colorectal cancer (CRC) and gastric cancer (GC) share many similarities, the prognosis and drug response of CRC and GC are different. However, determinants for such differences have not been elucidated. To avoid genetic background variance, we performed multi-omics analysis, including single-cell RNA sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, and microbiome sequencing, to dissect the tumor immune signature of synchronous primary tumors of GC and CRC. We found that cellular components of juxta-tumoral sites were quite similar, while tumoral cellular components were specific to the tumoral sites. In addition, the mutational landscape and microbiome contributed to the distinct TME cellular components. Overall, we found that different prognoses and drug responses of GC and CRC were mainly due to the distinct TME determined by mutational landscape and microbiome components.

Perceptions and practice patterns of cancer survivorship care among Japanese gynecologic oncologists: The JGOG questionnaire survey

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess gynecologic oncologists (GOs)' perceptions and attitudes toward cancer survivorship to help improve survivor care.

METHODS

We conducted a web-based questionnaire survey about survivorship issues for the GOs belonging to the Japan Gynecologic Oncology Group. We analyzed the proactiveness of the participants toward addressing 25 survivor issues. In addition, the practice patterns and barriers to care for survivors' long-term health issues, such as second primary cancer (SPC) and lifestyle-related diseases (LSRD), and return-to-work (RTW) support were assessed.

RESULTS

We received 313 responses. The respondents had a mean of 22 years of physician experience. The ratio of men to women was approximately 7:3, and 84.7% worked at facilities for multidisciplinary cancer treatment. The respondents' proactiveness for addressing psychosocial problems was significantly lower than physical and gynecological issues (p<0.01 by χ² test). However, most GOs tried to contribute to such issues according to patients' demands. Women GOs were more proactively involved in some survivorship issues than the men (p<0.05 by logistic regression analysis). The rates of the respondents who proactively discussed SPC, LSRD, and RTW were unexpectedly high (60.7%, 36.1%, and 52.4%, respectively). However, the GOs only provided verbal support for these issues in many cases.

CONCLUSION

The Japanese GOs were enthusiastic about survivorship care. However, their tendency to deal with survivors' problems through their own knowledge and judgments raises concerns about the quality of care. Therefore, creating survivorship care guidelines and enhancing multidisciplinary collaboration should be prioritized.

Familial risk associated with lung cancer as a second primary malignancy in first-degree relatives

BACKGROUND

Aggregation of lung cancer (LCa) in family members is well-documented. However, little is known on the familial risk of LCa when first-degree relatives (FDRs, parents or siblings) are diagnosed with LCa as a second primary malignancy (LCa-2). We aimed to investigate whether and to what extent a family history of LCa-2 was associated with an increased LCa risk.

METHODS

In this Swedish national cohort we identified 127,865 individuals who had one FDR affected by LCa as a first primary cancer (LCa-1) and 15,490 individuals who had one FDR affected by LCa-2, respectively. We then estimated relative risk (RR) of LCa using those without cancer family history as reference.

RESULTS

The number of LCa-2 has been increasing annually and rather similarly in men and women in the last decade. Familial RR of LCa was 1.96 (95%, 1.85-2.07) for LCa-1 family history and 1.89 for LCa-2 (1.62-2.21). Risk was especially high when FDR was diagnosed with early-onset LCa-2 and when siblings were affected by LCa-2. The RR was 1.53 (1.10-2.12) when LCa-2 in FDR was diagnosed within 26 months after first primary cancer, and it increased to 2.16 (1.62-2.90) when LCa-2 was diagnosed between 74 to 154 months. Higher risk was observed for first primary cancer of the ovary (4.45, 1.85-10.7), nervous system (3.49, 1.45-8.38), upper aerodigestive tract (2.83, 1.78-4.49) and cervix (2.55, 1.41-4.61), and for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (3.13, 1.57-6.27).

CONCLUSIONS

LCa risk is associated with diagnosis of LCa-2 in FDR to a similar degree as LCa-1 in FDRs.

Inherited Germline Cancer Susceptibility Gene Variants in Individuals with Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

PURPOSE

Identification of inherited germline variants can guide personalized cancer screening, prevention, and treatment. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants in cancer predisposition genes are frequent among patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, but their prevalence and significance in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), the most common form of urothelial carcinoma, is understudied.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Germline analysis was conducted on paired tumor/normal sequencing results from two distinct cohorts of patients initially diagnosed with NMIBC. Associations between clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes with the presence of P/LP germline variants in ≥76 hereditary cancer predisposition genes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A similar frequency of P/LP germline variants were seen in our two NMIBC cohorts [12% (12/99) vs. 8.7% (10/115), P = 0.4]. In the combined analysis, P/LP germline variants were found only in patients with high-grade NMIBC (22/163), but none of the 46 patients with low-grade NMIBC (13.5% vs. 0%, P = 0.005). Fifteen (9.2%) patients with high-grade NMIBC had P/LP variants in DNA damage response genes, most within the nucleotide excision repair (ERCC2/3) and homologous recombination repair (BRCA1, NBN, RAD50) pathways. Contrary to prior reports in patients with NMIBC not receiving Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), P/LP germline variants were not associated with worse recurrence-free or progression-free survival in patients treated with BCG or with risk of developing upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support offering germline counseling and testing for all patients with high-grade bladder cancer, regardless of initial tumor stage. Therapeutic strategies that target impaired DNA repair may benefit patients with high-grade NMIBC.

Multi-detector computed tomography evaluation of synchronous hepatocellular carcinoma and other solid malignancies

Aim of the study

To review the findings of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in synchronous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other solid malignancies.

Material and methods

A total of 74 cases were included in this retrospective analysis, all of them confirmed with a diagnosis of synchronous HCC and other solid malignancies. They were 41 women and 33 men (mean age, 63.36 years). The whole body and triphasic abdominal CT scanning utilized 128 MDCT scanners in all 74 patients. The pathological diagnoses of all 148 malignancies were confirmed in all 74 cases.

Results

Out of 3480 patients with HCC, 74 patients (2.1%) were diagnosed with another synchronous primary solid malignancy. The pathology of all 148 cancers was verified, and each one was correctly characterized, assessed, and staged. Hepatocellular carcinoma was detected in all 74 patients. The most frequent extra-hepatic primary malignant sites were breast (18/74, 24.3%), followed by kidney (15/74, 20.3%), lymphoma (9/74, 12.2%), uterus (7/74, 9.5%), ovary (5/74, 6.8%), colon (5/74, 6.8%), prostate (5/74, 6.8%), urinary bladder (3/74, 4.1%), thyroid (2/74, 2.7%), gall bladder (1/74, 1.4%), stomach (1/74, 1.4%), pancreas (1/74, 1.4%), esophagus (1/74, 1.4%) and lung (1/74, 1.4%).

Conclusions

The possibility of synchronous double malignancies with HCC should always be considered during pretreatment evaluation. Using an MDCT scanner, researchers were able to assess this occurrence accurately. An increased number of such findings may lead to an improved therapeutic method for these patients.

Harvest for Health, a Randomized Controlled Trial Testing a Home-Based, Vegetable Gardening Intervention Among Older Cancer Survivors Across Alabama: An Analysis of Accrual and Modifications Made in Intervention Delivery and Assessment During COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Accelerated functional decline is a concern among older cancer survivors that threatens independence and quality of life. Pilot studies suggest that vegetable gardening interventions ameliorate functional decline through improved diet and physical activity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article was to describe the rationale, recruitment challenges, and enrollment for the Harvest for Health randomized controlled trial (RCT), which will test the impact of a home-based, vegetable gardening intervention on vegetable and fruit consumption, physical activity, and physical functioning among older cancer survivors. Modifications made to the intervention and assessments to assure safety and continuity of the RCT throughout the COVID-19 pandemic also are reported.

DESIGN

Harvest for Health is a 2-year, 2-arm, single-blinded, wait-list controlled RCT with cross-over.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Medicare-eligible survivors of cancers with ≥60% 5-year survival were recruited across Alabama from October 1, 2016 to February 8, 2021.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomly assigned to a wait-list control or a 1-year home-based gardening intervention and individually mentored by extension-certified master gardeners to cultivate spring, summer, and fall vegetable gardens.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Although the RCT's primary end point was a composite measure of vegetable and fruit consumption, physical activity, and physical functioning, this article focuses on recruitment and modifications made to the intervention and assessments during COVID-19.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

χ2 and t tests (α < .05) were used to compare enrolled vs unenrolled populations.

RESULTS

Older cancer survivors (n = 9,708) were contacted via mail and telephone; 1,460 indicated interest (15% response rate), 473 were screened eligible and consented, and 381 completed baseline assessments and were randomized. Enrollees did not differ from nonrespondents/refusals by race and ethnicity, or rural-urban status, but comprised significantly higher numbers of comparatively younger survivors, those who were female, and survivors of breast cancer (P < .001). Although COVID-19 delayed trial completion, protocol modifications overcame this barrier and study completion is anticipated by June 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

This RCT will provide evidence on the effects of a mentored vegetable gardening program among older cancer survivors. If efficacious, Harvest for Health represents a novel, multifaceted approach to improve lifestyle behaviors and health outcomes among cancer survivors-one with capacity for sustainability and widespread dissemination.

Population incidence and characteristics of secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer: a competing risk analysis

PURPOSE

To examine incidence and characteristics of women who developed secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer.

METHODS

This is a population-based retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program from 1973 to 2013. Women with uterine cancer who did not have synchronous or a history of breast cancer were followed after their uterine cancer diagnosis (N = 236,561). A time-dependent competing risk analysis was performed to examine cumulative incidences and clinico-pathological characteristics of those who subsequently developed breast cancer.

RESULTS

There were 7110 (3.0%) women who developed secondary breast cancers after uterine cancer with 5-, 10-, and 20-year cumulative incidence rates of 1.5, 2.8, and 4.7%, respectively. The increase in the rate of secondary breast cancer was particularly high in the first 3 years after a uterine cancer diagnosis (annual percent change [APC] 4.9), followed by 3-7 years (APC 1.6) after diagnosis (P < 0.001). The median time to develop secondary breast cancer was 6.4 years. Older women had significantly shorter time intervals between uterine and breast cancer diagnoses (3.7 years for aged > 71, 5.9 for aged 64-71, 7.6 for aged 56-63, and 9.4 for aged < 56, P < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, older age, White race, married status, endometrioid, serous, and mixed histology types, and early-stage tumors remained as independent factors of developing secondary breast cancer (all, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tumor factors with endometrioid and serous histology types and early-stage disease were the factors associated with secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer diagnosis. Older women had shorter time to develop secondary breast cancer.

Development and validation of a competing risk model for second primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A population-based study

Background

With advances in early diagnosis and treatment, the number of cancer survivors continues to grow, and more and more cancer survivors face the threat of second primary cancer (SPM). Second primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (spPDAC) is an important subclass of SPM, but its prognostic characteristics are poorly understood.

Methods

A total of 5,439 spPDAC samples and 67,262 primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (pPDAC) samples were extracted from the SEER database for this study. Survival differences between spPDAC and pPDAC samples were compared using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. The Fine and Gray proportional subdistributed hazard method was used to analyze potential associations between clinical variables and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-specific death (PDACSD) and death from other causes. After that, the clinical variables significantly related to PDACSD were screened out to construct a competing risk nomogram, which was used to evaluate the probability of the occurrence of PDACSD. The C-index was used to evaluate the discriminative ability of the model. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to verify the discrimination of the model. The calibration curve was used to verify the calibration of the model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to validate the clinical utility of the model.

Results

Compared with patients with spPDAC, the pPDAC sample had a better prognosis (p = 0.0017). Across all spPDAC samples, the three most common sites of first-present cancer were the prostate, breast, and digestive system. Age (p < 0.001), race (p = 0.006), interval (p = 0.016), location (p < 0.001), T stage (p = 0.003), M stage (p < 0.001), chemotherapy (p < 0.001), and radiotherapy (p = 0.006) were the clinical variables associated with PDACSD screened by multivariate competing risks analysis. The concordance index values for the training and validation sets were 0.665 (95% CI, 0.655, 0.675) and 0.666 (95% CI, 0.650, 0.682), respectively. AUC, calibration curve, and DCA indicated that the model we constructed had good discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we first analyzed the impact of previous cancer history on prognosis. We then constructed a competing risk model that can predict the probability of developing PDACSD in spPDAC. This model has good discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical practicability and has certain guiding value for clinical decision-making.

Adherence to Guideline-Recommended cancer screening among Utah cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Adherence to cancer screening is important for cancer survivors because they are at high risk of subsequent cancer diagnoses or recurrence. We assessed adherence to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer-(CRC)-screening guidelines and evaluated demographic disparities among a population-based sample of survivors.

METHODS

A representative sample of Utah survivors diagnosed from 2012-2018 with any reportable invasive cancer was selected from central cancer registry records for a survey about survivorship needs. We estimated the proportion of eligible survivors adhering to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force screening guidelines and calculated risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Analyses were age-adjusted and weighted to account for sample design and nonresponse.

RESULTS

And 1421 survivors completed the survey (57.2% response rate). Screening adherence was 74.4% for breast, 69.4% for cervical, and 79.7% for CRC. Rural residents were more likely to adhere to breast cancer screening than urban residents (86.1% vs. 72.7%; adjusted RR = 1.19, CI = 1.05, 1.36). Higher educational attainment was associated with increased adherence to cervical and colorectal cancer screening. Younger age was associated with greater adherence to cervical cancer screening (p = 0.006) but lower adherence to CRC screening (p = 0.003). CRC screening adherence was lower among the uninsured and those without a primary care provider (45.6%) compared to those with a regular provider (83.0%; adjusted RR = 0.57, CI = 0.42, 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Surveys based on samples from central cancer registries can provide population estimates to inform cancer control. Findings demonstrate work is needed to ensure all Utah cancer survivors obtain recommended cancer screenings. Efforts should focus particularly on increasing uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening and reducing demographic disparities in CRC screening.

PRECIS

Despite high risk for subsequent cancer diagnosis, Utah cancer survivors are not all obtaining recommended breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings. This presents a significant healthcare gap.

Metachronous pancreatic cancer 18 years after resection of common bile duct cancer: A case report

We report an extremely rare case of metachronous double cancers of the bile duct and pancreas in a single patient who underwent successful curative resections consecutively. At the age of 57, a woman underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for a lesion that was pathologically diagnosed as moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the distal common bile duct. Eighteen years later, a pancreatic mass was detected during a follow-up examination. Abdominal computed tomography showed a bigger 2.3 cm lesion at the remnant pancreas body, which suggested a diagnosis of primary pancreatic cancer or metastasis. After admission and further work-up confirming no other lesions, completion total pancreatectomy was performed. The pathological diagnosis of the resected specimen was moderately differentiated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and this case highlights the occurrence of metachronous double primary cancers developed in both the distal bile duct and the pancreas with an interval of 18 years. This is the first report on the metachronous primary cancers of the bile duct and pancreas with a long interval within an English review of the literature in the MEDLINE. This case serves as another data point to guide surgeons that they should be vigilant for the postoperative long-term surveillance of patients with pancreatobiliary cancer.

Analysis of prognosis and treatment decisions for patients with second primary lung cancer following esophageal cancer

Introduction

As the long-term prognosis of esophageal cancer (EC) is improving, concerns of a second primary malignancy (SPM) have increased. However, research on lung cancer as the SPM after EC is limited. Therefore, we aimed to explore the prognostic factors and clinical treatment decisions of patients with second primary lung cancer following esophageal cancer (SPLC-EC).

Materials and methods

We identified the data of 715 patients with SPLC-EC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 1975 to 2016. We established a nomogram through Cox regression modelling to predict the prognosis of patients with SPLC-EC. We determined the association between factors and cancer-specific mortality using the Fine-Gray competing risk model. Then, we performed survival analysis to evaluate the benefits of different treatment methods for overall survival (OS).

Results

The multivariate analysis indicated that sex, insurance recode, age, surgery and chemotherapy 0for first primary malignancy (FPM), primary site, stage, and surgery for SPM were independent prognostic factors for OS. Using concordance indices for OS, the nomogram of our cohort showed a higher value than the SEER historic-stage nomogram (0.8805 versus 0.7370). The Fine-Gray competing risk model indicated that surgery for FPM and SPM was the independent prognostic factor for EC-specific mortality (P=0.016, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.532) and LC-specific mortality (p=0.016, HR=0.457), respectively (p<0.001). Compared to the patient group having distant metastasis, patients with localized and regional metastasis benefitted from undergoing surgery for SPM (P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively). For patients without surgery for SPM, radiotherapy (P<0.001) and chemotherapy (P<0.001) could improve OS.

Conclusions

Surgery remains the mainstay for managing SPLC-EC, especially for localized and regional tumors. However, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are recommended for patients who cannot undergo surgery. These findings can have implications in the treatment decision-making for patients with SPLC-EC.

Impact of a previous cancer history on the overall survival of patients with primary gastric cancer: A SEER population-based study

BACKGROUND

The impact of previous cancers on the survival of gastric cancer (GC) patients is still uncertain. To evaluate the impact of a prior cancer history on the overall survival of patients with primary GC.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database provided data on patients diagnosed with GC as the first or second primary malignancy between 2010 and 2015 in this retrospective cohort study. Cox proportional hazards models, Kaplan-Meier curves and forest plots were utilized to analyze overall survival. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age, gender, race and prior cancer type.

RESULTS

Totally 39,379 were eligible for this study, including 7403 (18.8%) with a previous cancer history. A previous cancer was an independent risk factor for overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.103, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.070-1.138]. For GC patients aged 40-60 years (HR = 1.191, 95% CI: 1.084-1.308) and ≥60 years (HR = 1.093, 95% CI: 1.058-1.13) at diagnosis, a previous cancer was significantly associated with worse overall survival. GC patients with previous oral cavity and pharynx cancer (HR = 1.249, 95% CI: 1.038-1.501), respiratory system cancer (HR = 1.177, 95% CI: 1.076-1.286), female genital system cancer (HR = 1.169, 95% CI: 1.011-1.351), or lymphoma cancer (HR = 1.192, 95% CI: 1.023-1.389) had shorter overall survival than GC patients without a previous cancer.

CONCLUSION

A previous cancer adversely affected the overall survival of GC patients. Specifically, GC patients aged ≥40 years, or with oral cavity and pharynx cancer, respiratory system cancer, female genital system cancer, or lymphoma cancer had inferior overall survival. These patients should obtain more attention and get individualized treatment to improve prognosis, and clinical trial eligibility criteria could be reconsidered for particular age and cancer types.

The risk of cancer following high, and very high, doses of ionising radiation

It is established that moderate-to-high doses of ionising radiation increase the risk of subsequent cancer in the exposed individual, but the question arises as to the risk of cancer from higher doses, such as those delivered during radiotherapy, accidents, or deliberate acts of malice. In general, the cumulative dose received during a course of radiation treatment is sufficiently high that it would kill a person if delivered as a single dose to the whole body, but therapeutic doses are carefully fractionated and high/very high doses are generally limited to a small tissue volume under controlled conditions. The very high cumulative doses delivered as fractions during radiation treatment are designed to inactivate diseased cells, but inevitably some healthy cells will also receive high/very high doses. How the doses (ranging from <1 Gy to tens of Gy) received by healthy tissues during radiotherapy affect the risk of second primary cancer is an increasingly important issue to address as more cancer patients survive the disease. Studies show that, except for a turndown for thyroid cancer, a linear dose-response for second primary solid cancers seems to exist over a cumulative gamma radiation dose range of tens of gray, but with a gradient of excess relative risk per Gy that varies with the type of second cancer, and which is notably shallower than that found in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors receiving a single moderate-to-high acute dose. The risk of second primary cancer consequent to high/very high doses of radiation is likely to be due to repopulation of heavily irradiated tissues by surviving stem cells, some of which will have been malignantly transformed by radiation exposure, although the exact mechanism is not known, and various models have been proposed. It is important to understand the mechanisms that lead to the raised risk of second primary cancers consequent to the receipt of high/very high doses, in particular so that the risks associated with novel radiation treatment regimens-for example, intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy that deliver high doses to the target volume while exposing relatively large volumes of healthy tissue to low/moderate doses, and treatments using protons or heavy ions rather than photons-may be properly assessed.

Risk Prediction of Second Primary Malignancies in Primary Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer Survivors: A SEER-Based National Population-Based Cohort Study

Purpose

This study aimed to characterize the clinical features of early-stage ovarian cancer (OC) survivors with second primary malignancies (SPMs) and provided a prediction tool for individualized risk of developing SPMs.

Methods

Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database during 1998-2013. Considering non-SPM death as a competing event, the Fine and Gray model and the corresponding nomogram were used to identify the risk factors for SPMs and predict the SPM probabilities after the initial OC diagnosis. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the clinical utility of our proposed model.

Results

A total of 14,314 qualified patients were enrolled. The diagnosis rate and the cumulative incidence of SPMs were 7.9% and 13.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 13.5% to 13.6%], respectively, during the median follow-up of 8.6 years. The multivariable competing risk analysis suggested that older age at initial cancer diagnosis, white race, epithelial histologic subtypes of OC (serous, endometrioid, mucinous, and Brenner tumor), number of lymph nodes examined (<12), and radiotherapy were significantly associated with an elevated SPM risk. The DCA revealed that the net benefit obtained by our proposed model was higher than the all-screening or no-screening scenarios within a wide range of risk thresholds (1% to 23%).

Conclusion

The competing risk nomogram can be potentially helpful for assisting physicians in identifying patients with different risks of SPMs and scheduling risk-adapted clinical management. More comprehensive data on treatment regimens and patient characteristics may help improve the predictability of the risk model for SPMs.

Limited Impact of Breast Cancer and Non-breast Malignancies on Survival in Older Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Results of a Large, Single-Centre, Population-Based Study

AIMS

To analyse the disease-free survival and overall survival in older adults with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy, focusing on the relevance of non-breast malignancy (NBM) with respect to survival rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analyses were based on 1205 women aged 65 years and older with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy between 1999 and 2015. Patients were divided into three age categories: 65-70, 71-75 and >75 years. Multivariate survival analysis was carried out using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The two youngest age categories showed excellent results, with a 12-year disease-free survival of 84.6 and 86.3%, respectively. We noted a 17.2% incidence of NBM, particularly for colon cancer and lung cancer. Most (72.9%) occurred after a diagnosis of breast cancer. Of those 72.9%, about 50% died as a result of NBM within 2 years of the diagnosis of NBM. The overall 12-year NBM-specific survival was 92.0%. The 12-year overall survival was 60.0% for all and for the three abovementioned age categories was 73.3, 54.4 and 28.4%, respectively. The cause of death for all was predominantly non-malignancy-related morbidity.

CONCLUSION

The impact of breast cancer on life expectancy was limited, in particularly for women aged 65-75 years. The relevance of NBM on survival was limited.

Risk and prognosis of second primary cancers among ovarian cancer patients, based on SEER database

The purposes of the present study were to elucidate the risk and prognostic effect of second primary cancers (SPCs) development, as well as the factors influencing the prognosis of OC patients with SPCs. A statistically significant increase in SPCs risk was observed among OC patients during 2004-2015. The independent factors were used to construct the SPCs-prediction nomogram and the OS-prediction nomogram. Both nomogram were subjected to internal validation and performed well. OC patients with SPCs have a better prognosis than patients without SPCs. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce confounding.

Better Prognosis and Survival in Esophageal Cancer Survivors After Comorbid Second Primary Malignancies: A SEER Database-Based Study

Background

With the development of surgical techniques and advances in systemic treatments, the survival time of esophageal cancer survivors has increased; however, the chance of developing a second primary malignancy (SPM) has also increased. These patients’ prognosis and treatment plans remain inconclusive.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate and predict the survival of patients with esophageal cancer with second primary tumors, to provide insights and the latest data on whether to pursue more aggressive treatment.

Materials and Methods

We selected esophageal cancer cases from the latest available data from the SEER database on April 15, 2021. We performed life table analysis, Kaplan–Meier analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the patient data. We conducted multiple Cox regression equation analyses under multiple covariate adjustment models, and performed a stratified analysis of multiple Cox regression equation analysis based on different covariates. To describe our study population more simply and clearly, we defined the group of patients with esophageal cancer combined with a second primary malignant tumor (the first of two or more primaries) as the EC-SPM group.

Results

Our analysis of 73,456 patients with esophageal cancer found the median survival time of the EC-SPM group was 47.00 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 43.87–50.13), and the mean survival time was 74.67 months (95% CI, 72.12–77.22). Kaplan–Meier curves of different esophageal cancer survivors showed that the survival of the EC-SPM group was significantly better than that of the other groups (p < 0.01). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that compared with only one malignancy only group, the hazard ratio (HR) of the EC-SPM group was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92–0.99; p < 0.05). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis under different adjustment models, the EC-SPM group had a reduced risk of death compared with the one primary malignancy only group (HR < 1, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Survivors of esophageal cancer with a second primary malignant cancer have a better prognosis, but require more aggressive treatment. This study provided new evidence and new ideas for future research on the pathophysiological mechanism and treatment concepts of esophageal cancer combined with SPM.

Impact of time to distant recurrence on breast cancer-specific mortality in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

Women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive early-stage breast cancer (BC) have five-year survival rates of > 90% but remain at serious risk for developing distant metastases beyond five years from diagnosis. This retrospective cohort study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries to examine associations between distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and risk of BC-specific mortality following distant relapse. The analysis includes 1,057 women with second primary stage IV BC who were initially diagnosed with AJCC stages I-III HR-positive BC between1990 and 2016. Overall, 65% of women had a preceding DRFI of ≥ 5 years. Five-year BC-specific survival following development of distant recurrence was 52% for women with DRFI ≥ 5 years compared to 31% in women with DRFI of < 5 years. In multivariable analyses, risks of cancer-specific mortality following distant recurrence were lower in women with DRFI of 5 years or more (subdistribution hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.89, p = 0.002). The results of this study may inform patient-clinician discussions surrounding prognosis and treatment selection among HR-positive patients who develop a distant recurrence of disease.

Incidence and Survival of Multiple Primary Cancers in US Women With a Gynecologic Cancer

Objectives

To evaluate risk of a second cancer and associated survival times in United States women with diagnosis of cancer.

Methods

The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried for 2 cohorts of women aged 18 - 89 with either an index gynecologic or non-gynecologic cancer diagnosed between 1992 - 2017. Index cases were followed to determine if a second primary cancer was subsequently diagnosed; defined according to SEER multiple primary and histology coding rules. Standard Incident Ratios (SIR) and latency intervals between index diagnosis and second primary diagnosis were evaluated. Among those who developed a second primary cancer, median survival times from diagnosis of second primary cancer were also calculated.

Results

Between 1992 - 2017, 227,313 US women were diagnosed with an index gynecological cancer and 1,483,016 were diagnosed with an index non-gynecologic cancer. Among patients with index gynecologic cancer, 7.78% developed a non-gynecologic subsequent primary cancer. The risk of developing any non-gynecologic cancer following an index gynecologic cancer was higher than the risk in the general population (SIR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04 - 1.07). Organs especially at risk were Thyroid (SIR 1.45), Colon and Rectum (SIR 1.23), and Urinary System (SIR 1.33). Among women diagnosed with an index non-gynecologic cancer, 0.99% were diagnosed with a subsequent gynecologic cancer. The risk of developing a gynecologic cancer following a non-gynecologic cancer was also elevated compared to the average risk of the general population (SIR 1.05, 1.03 - 1.07), with uterine cancer having the highest SIR of 1.13.

Conclusion

The risk of a developing a second primary cancer and the corresponding survival time is based on the order and site of the index and subsequent cancer. Surveillance guidelines should be examined further to optimize survivorship programs.

A predictive model with a risk-classification system for cancer-specific survival in patients with primary osteosarcoma of long bone

•

Seven clinical factors were significantly related to the prognosis of patients with long bone osteosarcoma.

•

The established nomogram can help surgeons evaluate the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients in the most common sites.

•

High-risk individuals can be identified through risk-stratification system.

Background

Osteosarcoma (OS), most commonly occurring in long bone, is a group of malignant tumors with high incidence in adolescents. No individualized model has been developed to predict the prognosis of primary long bone osteosarcoma (PLBOS) and the current AJCC TNM staging system lacks accuracy in prognosis prediction. We aimed to develop a nomogram based on the clinicopathological factors affecting the prognosis of PLBOS patients to help clinicians predict the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of PLBOS patients.

Method

We studied 1199 PLBOS patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015 and randomly divided the dataset into training and validation cohorts at a proportion of 7:3. Independent prognostic factors determined by stepwise multivariate Cox analysis were included in the nomogram and risk-stratification system. C-index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to verify the performance of the nomogram.

Results

Age, Histological type, Surgery of primary site, Tumor size, Local extension, Regional lymph node (LN) invasion, and Distant metastasis were identified as independent prognostic factors. C-indexes, calibration curves and DCAs of the nomogram indicating that the nomogram had good discrimination and validity. The risk-stratification system based on the nomogram showed significant differences (P < 0.05) in CSS among different risk groups.

Conclusion

We established a nomogram with risk-stratification system to predict CSS in PLBOS patients and demonstrated that the nomogram had good performance. This model can help clinicians evaluate prognoses, identify high-risk individuals, and give individualized treatment recommendation of PLBOS patients.

Patients with Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Have an Increased Risk of Second Primary Malignancy

BACKGROUND

While overall colorectal cancer (CRC) rates in the USA are declining, the incidence of early-onset CRC (eoCRC) under age 50 is increasing. The aim of this study was to examine the risk of a second primary malignancy (SPM) in individuals with eoCRC, and how this risk compares to those with late-onset CRC (loCRC).

METHODS

We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database to examine the risk of SPM after a diagnosis of eoCRC. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were used to estimate the risk of SPM after eoCRC and loCRC in comparison with the risk of malignancy in the general population.

RESULTS

Compared to the general population, individuals with eoCRC, but not loCRC, had an increased lifetime risk of SPM (SIR 1.42, 95% CI 1.37-1.48 and SIR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.02, respectively), and locations at highest risk were the small intestine, ureter, rectum, and colon. The risk of SPM after eoCRC was similar in men and women, but higher in non-whites compared to whites and higher in those with a lower area-level median household income. The risk of SPM following eoCRC was high in the first 5 years after diagnosis (SIR 2.44, 95% CI 2.24-2.66) and, in a birth cohort analysis, was found to be increasing over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with eoCRC have a lifetime risk of SPM nearly 50% higher than the general population. The risk of SPM is highest in the first 5 years after diagnosis and is increasing over time.

[Physical long-term consequences of cancer]

The number of long-term survivors of malignant diseases is steadily increasing, which is due to the further development and optimization of multimodal therapy strategies and the mechanisms of new substance classes. These can now be combined with classical treatment methods or used sequentially. At the same time the number of patients who suffer from physical and psychosocial long-term consequences of cancer therapies or have to live with chronic side effects under the long-term therapies increases. Every therapy, whether radiation, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or operation, has undesirable long-term side effects that contribute to the decrease of one's quality of life. These affect all parts of the body. As a result, patients can be heavily burdened. In oncology and in other disciplines involved in aftercare, these consequences must therefore be increasingly addressed and clarified and treatment strategies further developed. Unfortunately, there is still a considerable need for research in this area; moreover, there is a lack of clinical studies examining the evidence of a wide variety of holistic therapy methods.

Trends in the cause of death among patients with bladder cancer in the US SEER population, 1992-2018

BACKGROUND

Bladder cancer (BC) survival has shown no significant improvement. This study investigated the trends in the common causes of death among patients with BC to improve the management and survival of BC.

METHOD

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) (1992-2018) database was utilized to get the data of BC patients. We presented the proportion of six common causes of death in BC patients. We calculated the annual incidence of death due to the six most common causes and analyzed temporal trends in mortality rates using joinpoint regression. The competitive risk model was utilized to analyze the risk factors for death of BC and other causes.

RESULTS

198037 BC patients were enrolled. BC was the most common cause of death (30.62%), followed by other cancers (22.22%), circulatory diseases (20.28%), non-disease causes (11.58%), other non-cancer diseases (8.29%), and respiratory diseases (7.01%). However, the proportion of cases dying from BC gradually decreased from 44.87% in 1992-1996 to 26.74% in 2012-2018. The proportion of deaths due to BC decreased gradually with survival time from diagnosis. Age-standardized temporal trends present an initial increase in BC-specific and other-cause mortality rates. Advanced stage and older age were the most influential risk factors for BC-specific and other-cause death, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although BC was still the leading cause of death, other causes, especially other cancers and circulatory diseases, gradually became more critical. The management of other comorbid conditions will be a crucial part of the treatment for BC patients, especially for those with prolonged survival and NMIBC tumors.

A comprehensive analysis of renal cell carcinoma as first and second primary cancers

Objective

Second primary renal cell carcinoma (2nd RCC) refers to renal cell carcinoma (RCC) diagnosed after another unrelated malignancy. This study aims to compare the clinical manifestation, pathology, treatment, and prognostic features of patients with 2nd RCC and first primary renal cell carcinoma (1st RCC).

Materials and methods

Data of the patients with localized RCC were retrospectively collected. They were classified as 2nd RCC or 1st RCC according to a previously diagnosed cancer, including 113 cases of 2nd RCC and 749 cases of 1st RCC.

Results

The most common types of extrarenal malignancies in patients with 2nd RCC include lung, colorectal, breast, gynecological, and gastric cancers. The age and smoking rate of 2nd RCC patients were significantly higher than in those of 1st RCC patients. For 2nd RCC patients, fewer had clinical symptoms and renal masses tend to be smaller. One hundred and eight (95.6%) patients with 2nd RCC received surgical interventions. All patients with 1st RCC underwent renal surgery. More patients with 2nd RCC underwent a partial nephrectomy. Pathologically, there was no significant difference in postoperative pathological types between the 2nd and 1st RCCs. However, the 2nd RCCs were commonly identified in the early stages. The median overall survival (OS) of 2nd RCC patients was 117 months, which was shorter than that of 1st RCC patients.

Conclusions

Second RCC is not uncommon. More attention should be paid to screening for 2nd RCC in cancer survivors. There are some differences between patients with 2nd and 1st RCCs that should be viewed separately.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02493-6.

The Kaiser Permanente Research Bank Cancer Cohort: a collaborative resource to improve cancer care and survivorship

Background

The Kaiser Permanente Research Bank (KPRB) is collecting biospecimens and surveys linked to electronic health records (EHR) from approximately 400,000 adult KP members. Within the KPRB, we developed a Cancer Cohort to address issues related to cancer survival, and to understand how genetic, lifestyle and environmental factors impact cancer treatment, treatment sequelae, and prognosis. We describe the Cancer Cohort design and implementation, describe cohort characteristics after 5 years of enrollment, and discuss future directions.

Methods

Cancer cases are identified using rapid case ascertainment algorithms, linkage to regional or central tumor registries, and direct outreach to KP members with a history of cancer. Enrollment is primarily through email invitation. Participants complete a consent form, survey, and donate a blood or saliva sample. All cancer types are included.

Results

As of December 31, 2020, the cohort included 65,225 cases (56% female, 44% male) verified in tumor registries. The largest group was diagnosed between 60 and 69 years of age (31%) and are non-Hispanic White (83%); however, 10,076 (16%) were diagnosed at ages 18–49 years, 4208 (7%) are Hispanic, 3393 (5%) are Asian, and 2389 (4%) are Black. The median survival time is 14 years. Biospecimens are available on 98% of the cohort.

Conclusions

The KPRB Cancer Cohort is designed to improve our understanding of treatment efficacy and factors that contribute to long-term cancer survival. The cohort’s diversity - with respect to age, race/ethnicity and geographic location - will facilitate research on factors that contribute to cancer survival disparities.

Effect of prior malignancy on the prognosis of gastric cancer and somatic mutation

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors have a higher risk of developing secondary cancer, with previous studies showing heterogeneous effects of prior cancer on cancer survivors.

AIM

To describe the features and clinical significance of a prior malignancy in patients with gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

We identified eligible patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and compared the clinical features of GC patients with/without prior cancer. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox analyses were used to assess the prognostic impact of prior cancer on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) outcomes. We also validated our results in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort and compared mutation patterns.

RESULTS

In the SEER dataset, of the 35492 patients newly diagnosed with GC between 2004 and 2011, 4,001 (11.3%) had at least one prior cancer, including 576 (1.62%) patients with multiple cancers. Patients with a prior cancer history tended to be elderly, with a more localized stage and less positive lymph nodes. The prostate (32%) was the most common initial cancer site. The median interval from initial cancer diagnosis to secondary GC was 68 mo. By using multivariable Cox analyses, we found that a prior cancer history was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97–1.05). However, a prior cancer history was significantly associated with better GC-specific survival (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.78–0.85). In TCGA cohort, no significant difference in OS was observed for GC patients with or without prior cancer. Also, no significant differences in somatic mutations were observed between groups.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of GC patients with previous diagnosis of cancer was not inferior to that of primary GC patients.

Pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma 13 years after oesophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction: report of a case

Advancements in cancer management have led to improved survival in patients with oesophageal cancer. This has resulted in an increased incidence of second primary malignancies with the pancreas as a common secondary cancer site. Resectable pancreatic and periampullary cancers are treated by pancreatoduodenectomy, including resection of the gastroduodenal artery which provides the blood supply to the gastric conduit in patients who underwent oesophagectomy. A 77-year-old man with a history of distal oesophageal cancer, for which an oesophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction was performed, presented in the emergency department. Extensive workup showed a lesion suspected for a distal cholangiocarcinoma. Pancreatoduodenectomy was deemed feasible after arterial angiography revealed that the gastric conduit was dominantly vascularised by the right gastric artery. Adequate imaging of the blood supply is essential to determine eligibility for pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with a second primary malignancy in the pancreas or periampullary region after oesophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction.

Association of EGFR mutations in second primary lung cancer and HER2 expression in breast cancer survivors

Background

The incidence of second primary lung cancer (SPLC) is increasing with longer survival rates from breast cancer. Despite of studies to suggest the mutual exclusivity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) in several cancers, the effect of HER2 expression in breast cancer on EGFR mutations in SPLC is unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the association between HER2 expression and EGFR mutations.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors diagnosed with SPLC after breast cancer treatment between 1997 and 2018. We investigated the association between HER2 expression in breast cancer and EGFR mutations in SPLC, specifically focusing on negative correlations by using logistic regression analysis.

Results

EGFR mutations in SPLC were detected in 19 of 38 patients. Analysis for HER2 revealed a statistically significant difference in the proportion of EGFR mutations between patients with SPLC and previous HER2 positive breast cancer (43.5%) and those with SPLC and previous HER2 negative breast cancer (90.0%; P=0.021). The ratio of EGFR mutations decreased with the degree of HER2 expression in patients with previous breast cancer (90.0%: for no HER2 expression, 62.5% for HER2 1+, 0.0% for HER2 2+, and 41.7% for HER2 3+; P=0.018). Multivariate logistic analyses revealed that EGFR mutations in SPLC were significantly associated with age [odds ratio (OR): 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-0.23, P=0.039] and HER2 positive status (OR: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01-0.56, P=0.017).

Conclusions

This study suggests that the frequency of EGFR mutations in SPLC may be associated with low HER2 expression in previous breast cancer.

Voxel-level analysis of normalized DSC-PWI time-intensity curves: a potential generalizable approach and its proof of concept in discriminating glioblastoma and metastasis

OBJECTIVE

Standard DSC-PWI analyses are based on concrete parameters and values, but an approach that contemplates all points in the time-intensity curves and all voxels in the region-of-interest may provide improved information, and more generalizable models. Therefore, a method of DSC-PWI analysis by means of normalized time-intensity curves point-by-point and voxel-by-voxel is constructed, and its feasibility and performance are tested in presurgical discrimination of glioblastoma and metastasis.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma or solitary-brain-metastases and presurgical-MR with DSC-PWI (August 2007-March 2020) were retrieved. The enhancing tumor and immediate peritumoral region were segmented on CE-T1wi and coregistered to DSC-PWI. Time-intensity curves of the segmentations were normalized to normal-appearing white matter. For each participant, average and all-voxel-matrix of normalized-curves were obtained. The 10 best discriminatory time-points between each type of tumor were selected. Then, an intensity-histogram analysis on each of these 10 time-points allowed the selection of the best discriminatory voxel-percentile for each. Separate classifier models were trained for enhancing tumor and peritumoral region using binary logistic regressions.

RESULTS

A total of 428 patients (321 glioblastomas, 107 metastases) fulfilled the inclusion criteria (256 men; mean age, 60 years; range, 20-86 years). Satisfactory results were obtained to segregate glioblastoma and metastases in training and test sets with AUCs 0.71-0.83, independent accuracies 65-79%, and combined accuracies up to 81-88%.

CONCLUSION

This proof-of-concept study presents a different perspective on brain MR DSC-PWI evaluation by the inclusion of all time-points of the curves and all voxels of segmentations to generate robust diagnostic models of special interest in heterogeneous diseases and populations. The method allows satisfactory presurgical segregation of glioblastoma and metastases.

KEY POINTS

• An original approach to brain MR DSC-PWI analysis, based on a point-by-point and voxel-by-voxel assessment of normalized time-intensity curves, is presented. • The method intends to extract optimized information from MR DSC-PWI sequences by impeding the potential loss of information that may represent the standard evaluation of single concrete perfusion parameters (cerebral blood volume, percentage of signal recovery, or peak height) and values (mean, maximum, or minimum). • The presented approach may be of special interest in technically heterogeneous samples, and intrinsically heterogeneous diseases. Its application enables satisfactory presurgical differentiation of GB and metastases, a usual but difficult diagnostic challenge for neuroradiologist with vital implications in patient management.

Increased risk of secondary bladder cancer after radiation therapy for endometrial cancer

To investigate the effect of radiation therapy (RT) after endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosis on the risk of occurring secondary bladder cancer (SBC) as well as on the survival outcome of those patients who suffered with SBC. Data was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1973 and 2015. Chi-squared test was utilized to compare clinicopathological characteristics among different groups. The Fine and Gray's competing risk model was utilized to assess cumulative incidence and risk of occurring SBC in EC survivors. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox regression model were used for survival analysis. As a result, a total of 108,060 EC patients were included, among which 37,118 (34.3%) patients received RT while others did not. The incidence of SBC was 1.31%, 1.76% and 0.96% among patients who received prior brachytherapy, external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and others, respectively. Both of the EBRT (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 2.24, 95% CI [1.94-2.58]) and brachytherapy (SIR = 1.76, 95% CI [1.44-2.13]) group had a higher incidence of SBC than the general population in USA. The competing risk analysis demonstrated that receiving EBRT (HR = 1.97, 95% CI [1.64-2.36]) or brachytherapy (HR = 1.46, 95% CI [1.14-1.87]) were all independent risk factors for developing SBC. A survival detriment was only observed in SBC patients who received prior EBRT after EC diagnosis, but not for brachytherapy, when compared with those who did not undergo RT. Additionally, there were no significant survival differences between primary bladder cancer and SBC with or without prior RT history. Patients who underwent RT after EC had an increased risk of developing bladder cancer as secondary primary cancer. The prognosis of these SBC patients varied depending on types of RT that received after EC diagnosis.

Prevalence and Spectrum of Second Primary Malignancies among People Living with HIV in the French Dat’AIDS Cohort

Simple Summary

People who survive primary cancers are at an increased risk for subsequent primary cancers. An increased risk for certain types of primary cancers among people living with HIV (PLWH) was demonstrated in the last few decades. Given the increasing life expectancy of PLWH, a steady increase in SPC has been reported. The main objective of this study was to describe the prevalence and spectrum of second primary cancers (SPCs) stratified by first primary cancers in HIV-positive men and women cancer survivors. We showed that the pattern of SPCs differs from that observed in the general population and according to sex. Yet, further studies are needed to determine the excess risk of SPCs in this population and to confirm the need for more appropriate screening procedures.

Abstract

Background: We aimed to describe the prevalence and spectrum of second primary cancer (SPC) in HIV-positive cancer survivors. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was performed using longitudinal data from the French Dat’AIDS cohort. Subjects who had developed at least two primary cancers were selected. The spectrum of SPCs was stratified by the first primary cancer type and by sex. Results: Among the 44,642 patients in the Dat’AIDS cohort, 4855 were diagnosed with cancer between 1 December 1983 and 31 December 2015, of whom 444 (9.1%) developed at least two primary cancers. The most common SPCs in men were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (22.8%), skin carcinoma (10%) and Kaposi sarcoma (KS) (8.4%), and in women the most common SPCs were breast cancer (16%), skin carcinoma (9.3%) and NHL (8%). The pattern of SPCs differed according to first primary cancer and by sex: in men, NHL was the most common SPC after primary KS and KS was the most common SPC after primary NHL; while in women, breast cancer was the most common SPC after primary NHL and primary breast cancer. Conclusion: The frequency and pattern of subsequent cancers among HIV-positive cancer survivors differed according to the first primary cancer type and sex.

Increased Risk of Suicide among Cancer Survivors Who Developed a Second Malignant Neoplasm

Background. Cancer diagnosis entails substantial psychological distress and is associated with dramatically increased risks of suicidal behaviors. However, little is known about the suicide risk among cancer survivors who developed a second malignant neoplasm (SMN). Methods. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we conducted a population-based cohort study involving 7,824,709 patients with first malignant neoplasm (FMN). We measured the hazard ratios (HRs) of suicide death after receiving a SMN diagnosis using Cox proportional hazard models, as compared with patients with FMN. The comparison with the US population was achieved by calculating standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). Results. Totally 685,727 FMN patients received a diagnosis of SMN during follow-up, and we in total identified 10,930 and 937 suicide deaths among FMN and SMN patients, respectively. The HR of suicide deaths was 1.23 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14–1.31) after a SMN diagnosis, compared with FMN patients, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors, tumor characteristics, and cancer treatment. As compared with the general population, while both SMN and FMN patients suffered an increased risk of suicide deaths, the excess risk was higher among SMN patients than FMN patients (age-, sex-, and calendar-year-adjusted SMR 1.65 (95% CI 1.54–1.75) vs. 1.29 (95% CI 1.26–1.31); $P_{\text{difference}}<0.0001$ ). Notably, across different time periods, we observed the greatest risk elevation during the first 3 months after a cancer diagnosis. Conclusions. Compared with either patients with FMN or the general population, cancer survivors who received a SMN diagnosis were at increased risk of suicide death. The risk elevation was most prominent soon after the cancer diagnosis, highlighting the necessity of providing timely psychological support to cancer survivors with a SMN.

Prognosis and Survival Analysis of 922,317 Lung Cancer Patients from the US Based on the Most Recent Data from the SEER Database (April 15, 2021)

Background

On April 15, 2021, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database released the latest lung cancer follow-up data. We selected 922,317 lung cancer patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2017 for survival analysis to provide updated data for lung cancer researchers.

Research Question

This study explored the latest trends of survival time in terms of gender, race, nationality, age, income, address, histological type and primary site.

Study Design and Methods

The SEER database covers 27.8% of the US population. We used life table, Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, Breslow and Tarone-Ware tests to calculate survival rate, time, and curve and to compare differences in survival distribution. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses.

Results

The median survival time of all lung cancer patients diagnosed in 2017 increased by 41.72% compared to 2000. Median survival time of female patients diagnosed in 2017 increased by 70.94% compared to 2000. Median survival time of those diagnosed in 2017 for different primary sites was as follows: right middle lobe was the longest, then left lower lobe, right upper lobe, right lower lobe, and left upper lobe. Lung cancer patients older than 75 years had a significantly shorter median survival time. Patients living in metropolitan areas of 250,000 to 1 million had a longer median survival time. Median survival time in the adenocarcinoma group was significantly greater than other patients. Median survival of Asian and other races diagnosed in 2017 was 97.87% higher than those diagnosed in 2000. Survival rate of lung cancer increased gradually with the year of diagnosis.

Interpretation

The rapid improvement of the prognosis of female and young lung cancer patients contributes to the improvement of the overall prognosis. Primary lung cancer in the right middle lobe has the best prognosis.

Second Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma With Nonrenal Malignancies: An Analysis of 118 Cases and a Review of Literature

Objectives

To evaluate the nature, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of second primary renal cell carcinoma (SPRCC).

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively collected data from 118 patients with SPRCC. Clinical characteristics, imaging features and treatments were analyzed and comparisons between SPRCC and renal metastases (RM) were made.

Results

SPRCC accounts for 11.4% of all RCC. The most common types of extrarenal malignancies included lung, colorectal, breast and gynecological cancers. The median age was 58.5 years old, and 61.0% (72/118) of the patients were male. About 5.1% of the patients presented with symptoms. The average tumor diameter was 4.4 cm (1-8.4 cm). The diagnostic specificity of enhanced computed tomography (CT) was 80.1%. When comparing with RM, more patients with stage I–II extrarenal malignancy and less patients with bilateral, multiple, and endogenic renal masses on computed tomography were found in the SPRCC group. A total of 110 SPRCC patients underwent surgery, including 48 radical nephrectomies and 62 partial nephrectomies. The median overall survival time was 117 months. Female, asymptomatic status, no distant metastasis, and surgical treatment predicted a better survival.

Conclusions

SPRCC are not uncommon, and it should be considered during the follow-up of patients with nonrenal malignancy. The differential diagnosis between SPRCC and RM was mainly based on imaging and puncture biopsy.

Multiple Primary Cancers in Patients Undergoing Tumor-Normal Sequencing Define Novel Associations

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors are developing more subsequent tumors. We sought to characterize patients with multiple (≥2) primary cancers (MPC) to assess associations and genetic mechanisms.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively consented (01/2013-02/2019) to tumor-normal sequencing via a custom targeted panel (MSK-IMPACT). A subset consented to return of results of ≥76 cancer predisposition genes. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) 2004 rules for defining MPC were applied. Tumor pairs were created to assess relationships between cancers. Age-adjusted, sex-specific, standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for first to second cancer event combinations were calculated using SEER rates, adjusting for confounders and time of ascertainment. Associations were made with germline and somatic variants.

RESULTS

Of 24,241 patients, 4,340 had MPC (18%); 20% were synchronous. Most (80%) had two primaries; however, 4% had ≥4 cancers. SIR analysis found lymphoma-lung, lymphoma-uterine, breast-brain, and melanoma-lung pairs in women and prostate-mesothelioma, prostate-sarcoma, melanoma-stomach, and prostate-brain pairs in men in excess of expected after accounting for synchronous tumors, known inherited cancer syndromes, and environmental exposures. Of 1,580 (36%) patients who received germline results, 324 (21%) had 361 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV), 159 (44%) in high penetrance genes. Of tumor samples analyzed, 55% exhibited loss of heterozygosity at the germline variant. In those with negative germline findings, melanoma, prostate, and breast cancers were common.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified tumor pairs without known predisposing mutations that merit confirmation and will require novel strategies to elucidate genetic mechanisms of shared susceptibilities.

IMPACT

If verified, patients with MPC with novel phenotypes may benefit from targeted cancer surveillance.

Cardiovascular mortality among cancer survivors who developed breast cancer as a second primary malignancy

BACKGROUND

To assess the risk of cardiovascular mortality among cancer survivors who developed breast cancer as a second malignancy (BCa-2) compared with patients with first primary breast cancer (BCa-1) and the general population.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we conducted a population-based cohort study including 1,024,047 BCa-1 and 41,744 BCa-2 patients diagnosed from the age 30 between 1975 and 2016, and the corresponding US female population (994,415,911 person-years; 5,403,551 cardiovascular deaths). Compared with the general population and BCa-1 patients, we calculated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of cardiovascular deaths among BCa-2 patients using Poisson regression. To adjust for unmeasured confounders, we performed a nested, case-crossover analysis among BCa-2 patients who died from cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

Although BCa-2 patients had a mildly increased risk of cardiovascular mortality compared with the population (IRR 1.08) and BCa-1 patients (IRR 1.15), the association was pronounced among individuals aged 30-49 years (BCa-2 vs. population: IRR 6.61; BCa-2 vs. BCa-1: IRR 3.03). The risk elevation was greatest within the first month after diagnosis, compared with the population, but comparable with BCa-1 patients. The case-crossover analysis confirmed these results.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that patients with BCa-2 are at increased risk of cardiovascular mortality.

Second primary malignancies associated with radiation therapy in cervical cancer patients diagnosed between 1975 and 2011: a population-based competing-risk study

Background

Cervical cancer is a major health threat for women. Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of cervical cancer. However, its overall benefit has been questioned due to the risk of second primary malignancies.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to search for cervical cancer patients diagnosed between January 1975 and November 2011. Factors that could possibly affect the occurrence of second primary malignancies included the year of diagnosis, gender, ethnicity, histologic type, SEER cancer stage, histology, grade, and whether surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy were used. Age-adjusted and propensity scoring matching (PSM)-adjusted competing-risk analysis was applied for analysis.

Results

Of the 23,112 patients identified through SEER, 14,800 (64.0%) received radiotherapy. Second malignancies were diagnosed in 2,545 (11.0%) cases. PSM-adjusted competing analysis revealed that patients receiving radiotherapy had a significantly higher risk of developing a second cancer in the colon, rectum and anus [hazard ratio (HR): 1.43; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-1.87; P=0.01], lung and bronchus (HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.13-1.76; P=0.002), corpus uteri (HR: 3.71; 95% CI: 1.71-8.06; P<0.001), ovary (HR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.38-5.64; P=0.004), and urinary bladder (HR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.35-3.54; P=0.002). However, radiotherapy significantly lowered the risk of second cancers in the female breast (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.52-0.86; P=0.002). Age-adjusted competing-risk analysis showed generally consistent results.

Conclusions

Radiotherapy increased the risk of second cancers among cervical cancer patients. Those who underwent radiotherapy had a significantly higher risk of developing a second cancer in the colon, rectum and anus, lung and bronchus, corpus uteri, ovary, and urinary bladder.

Intermittent fasting in the prevention and treatment of cancer

Chronic caloric restriction (CR) has powerful anticarcinogenic actions in both preclinical and clinical studies but may be difficult to sustain. As an alternative to CR, there has been growing interest in intermittent fasting (IF) in both the scientific and lay community as a result of promising study results, mainly in experimental animal models. According to a survey by the International Food Information Council Foundation, IF has become the most popular diet in the last year, and patients with cancer are seeking advice from oncologists about its beneficial effects for cancer prevention and treatment. However, as discussed in this review, results from IF studies in rodents are controversial and suggest potential detrimental effects in certain oncologic conditions. The effects of IF on human cancer incidence and prognosis remain unknown because of a lack of high-quality randomized clinical trials. Preliminary studies suggest that prolonged fasting in some patients who have cancer is safe and potentially capable of decreasing chemotherapy-related toxicity and tumor growth. However, because additional trials are needed to elucidate the risks and benefits of fasting for patients with cancer, the authors would not currently recommend patients undergoing active cancer treatment partake in IF outside the context of a clinical trial. IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, but whether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered.

Occurrence of Second Primary Malignancies in Patients With Primary Optic Nerve Gliomas: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis

BACKGROUND/AIM

Advanced understanding of screening and therapeutic modalities acts as provision for increased survival in patients diagnosed with optic nerve gliomas. Secondary primary malignancies (SPMs) in patients diagnosed with primary optic nerve glioma (OPG) are currently an uncharacterized frontier. This US national database analysis highlights the incidences of SPMs in patients diagnosed with primary OPG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and excess absolute risk (EAR) for SPMs were calculated using the SEER-specific multiple outcome analysis. 95% SIR confidence intervals were calculated with statistical significance achieved at p<0.05.

RESULTS

SPMs originating from soft tissues (including the heart) (SIR=33.23, CI=6.85-97.11; EAR=5.07), breast (SIR=4.99, CI=1.36-12.77; EAR=5.57), female breast (SIR=5.03, CI=1.37-12.89; EAR=5.58), brain (SIR=105.38, CI=65.23-161.08; EAR=36.23), cranial nerves (SIR=103.29, CI=12.51-373.12; EAR=3.45), non-lymphocytic leukemia (SIR=15.05, CI=1.82-54.37; EAR=3.25), myeloid and monocytic leukemia (SIR=16.26, CI=1.97-58.75; EAR=3.27), and Kaposi's sarcoma (SIR=79.88, CI=2.02-445.08; EAR=1.72) demonstrated significantly increased SIR. Overall, the values for cumulative SPM (SIR=6.04, CI=4.33-8.19; EAR=59.60) highlight the overall significance in incidence of SPM in patients diagnosed with OPG.

CONCLUSION

Clinical decision-making should reconcile enhanced propensities for development of SPM.

The effect of primary urological cancers on survival in men with secondary prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

To test the effect of urological primary cancers (bladder, kidney, testis, upper tract, penile, urethral) on overall mortality (OM) after secondary prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, patients with urological primary cancers and concomitant secondary PCa (diagnosed 2004-2016) were identified and were matched in 1:4 fashion with primary PCa controls. OM was compared between secondary and primary PCa patients and stratified according to primary urological cancer type, as well as to time interval between primary urological cancer versus secondary PCa diagnoses.

RESULTS

We identified 5,987 patients with primary urological and secondary PCa (bladder, n = 3,287; kidney, n = 2,127; testis, n = 391; upper tract, n = 125; penile, n = 47; urethral, n = 10) versus 531,732 primary PCa patients. Except for small proportions of Gleason grade group and age at diagnosis, PCa characteristics between secondary and primary PCa were comparable. Conversely, proportions of secondary PCa patients which received radical prostatectomy were smaller (29.0 vs. 33.5%), while no local treatment rates were higher (34.2 vs. 26.3%). After 1:4 matching, secondary PCa patients exhibited worse OM than primary PCa patients, except for primary testis cancer. Here, no OM differences were recorded. Finally, subgroup analyses showed that the survival disadvantage of secondary PCa patients decreased with longer time interval since primary cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

After detailed matching for PCa characteristics, secondary PCa patients exhibit worse survival, except for testis cancer patients. The survival disadvantage is attenuated, when secondary PCa diagnosis is made after longer time interval, since primary urological cancer diagnosis.

The Effect of 10 Most Common Nonurological Primary Cancers on Survival in Men With Secondary Prostate Cancer

Background

This study aims to test the effect of the 10 most common nonurological primary cancers (skin, rectal, colon, lymphoma, leukemia, pancreas, stomach, esophagus, liver, lung) on overall mortality (OM) after secondary prostate cancer (PCa).

Material and Methods

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, patients with 10 most common primary cancers and concomitant secondary PCa (diagnosed 2004–2016) were identified and were matched in 1:4 fashion (age, year at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, treatment type, TNM stage) with primary PCa controls. OM was compared between secondary and primary PCa patients and was stratified according to primary cancer type, as well as according to time interval between primary cancer vs. secondary PCa diagnoses.

Results

We identified 24,848 secondary PCa patients (skin, n = 3,871; rectal, n = 798; colon, n = 3,665; lymphoma, n = 2,583; leukemia, n = 1,102; pancreatic, n = 118; stomach, n = 361; esophagus, n = 219; liver, n = 160; lung, n = 1,328) vs. 531,732 primary PCa patients. Secondary PCa characteristics were less favorable than those of primary PCa patients (PSA and grade), and smaller proportions of secondary PCa patients received active treatment. After 1:4 matching, all secondary PCa exhibited worse OM than primary PCa patients. Finally, subgroup analyses showed that the survival disadvantage of secondary PCa patients decreased with longer time interval since primary cancer diagnosis and subsequent secondary PCa.

Conclusion

Patients with secondary PCa are diagnosed with less favorable PSA and grade. Even after matching for PCa characteristics, secondary PCa patients still exhibit worse survival. However, the survival disadvantage is attenuated, when secondary PCa diagnosis is made after longer time interval, since primary cancer diagnosis.

Risk of second cancer among young prostate cancer survivors

Purpose

About 40% of men diagnosed with prostate cancer (Pca) are ≤65 years of age. This study evaluates the risk of second cancer among young Pca patients treated with surgery or radiation.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective review of 150,915 men aged ≤65 years at Pca diagnosis treated with surgery or radiation registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1973 and 2014. Incidence rates of second rectum/rectosigmoid junction (RJ), bladder, and lung cancer in each treatment group were reported with adjustment for potential confounders. Cumulative incidence functions were used to summarize the risk of second cancer after completing initial treatment.

Results

Men treated with external beam radiation (BEAM), brachytherapy (SEED), or combined radiation all exhibited a statistically significant increased incidence of second bladder cancer compared to men treated with surgery (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 2.09, 1.91, and 2.04, respectively). Incidence of rectum/RJ cancer was also significantly increased in men receiving BEAM and combined radiation (adjusted IRR: 1.58 and 1.98, respectively). There were also significant differences in the cumulative incidence of second bladder cancer after receiving any form of radiation compared to surgery.

Conclusion

Pca survivors ≤65 years of age at Pca diagnosis had an increased risk of second bladder and rectum/RJ cancer after BEAM and combined radiation treatment after adjusting for confounding factors. Second bladder cancer incidence after either form of radiation treatment was increased even at 5 years after a Pca diagnosis.