Oral infectious bacteria in dental plaque and saliva as risk factors in patients with esophageal cancer

Variations in oral microbiome and its predictive functions between tumorous and healthy individuals

Introduction. The oral cavity is one of the largest reservoirs of microorganisms and many pathogenic bacteria have been shown to be associated with the aetiology of oral cancers.Gap Statement. Owing to the complexity of oral microbial communities and their unclear relationship with oral cancer, identification of specific bacteria which contribute to oral cancer is a key imperative.Aim. To compare and investigate the variations in the composition of the bacterial microbiome and its functions between patients with oral tumorous lesions and healthy subjects.Methodology. Twenty-seven samples from individuals with oral tumours (five oral benign tumours and 22 oral squamous cell carcinomas) and 15 samples from healthy subjects were collected. Genomic DNA was extracted and the V3-V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced. Subsequently, bioinformatic assessment was conducted using QIIME2, PICRUSt and linear discriminant analysis effect size analyses (LEfSe).Results. The oral microbiota was composed mainly of the phyla Proteobacteria (31.76 %, 35.00 %), Bacteroidetes (30.13 %, 25.13 %) and Firmicutes (23.92 %, 17.07 %) in tumorous and healthy individuals, respectively. Neisseria, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Streptococcus, Capnocytophaga, Veillonella, Haemophilus, Prevotella, Porphyromonas and Leptotrichia were the most abundant genera. Alpha diversity in the tumour group was significantly greater than that in the healthy group (P<0.05). Differential analysis of microbes between groups demonstrated a significantly higher number of Neisseria, Veillonella, Streptococcus, Leptotrichia, Lautropia, Sphingopyxis, Sphingobium, Tannerella, Actinomyces and Rothia in healthy controls compared with the tumour group. However, the genera Treponema, Micrococcus, Pseudomonas, Janthinobacterium, Parvimos, Loktanella, Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter, Catonella, Aggregatibacter and Propionibacterium were significantly higher in the tumour group. Pathways related to cancers, cell motility, environmental adaptation, metabolism and signal transduction were enhanced in the tumour group, while functions associated with immune system diseases, replication, repair and translation were significantly enhanced in the healthy group.Conclusion. Variations in the oral microbiota and its functions showed a correlation with oral tumours. The tumour group showed an increased abundance of some multi-drug-resistant and periodontitis-related pathogens. The significantly altered microbiotas may serve as potential biomarkers or inform combination therapy for oral tumours.

Poor Oral Health and Esophageal Cancer Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Previous research indicates that poor dental health increases risks for certain types of cancers, including esophageal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the association with esophageal cancer using Swedish Dental Health Register.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study. The exposures were dental diagnoses classified into healthy, caries, root canal infection, mild inflammation, and periodontitis, as well as number of remaining teeth, at baseline and during multiple visits. The outcome was the incidence of esophageal cancer, which was further divided into esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and its corresponding confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 5,042,303 individuals were included in the study and 1,259 EAC and 758 ESCC cases were identified. Root canal infection at baseline was associated with 41% higher risk for EAC (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.10-1.82), whereas periodontitis at baseline was linked to 32% and 45% higher risks for respective histopathological subtypes (HR for EAC, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.53; HR for ESCC, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.20-1.75). Fewer remaining teeth at baseline also increased the risks for both histopathological types of esophageal cancer, with a dose-response effect (Ptrend < 0.01). Cox regression analyses with time-varying exposures corroborated the above-mentioned results.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired dental health before cancer diagnosis is associated with excess risks for both histopathological subtypes of esophageal cancer.

IMPACT

Our study provided corroborating evidence for the association between poor oral health and esophageal cancer risk.

Poor oral health and risks of total and site-specific cancers in China: A prospective cohort study of 0.5 million adults

BACKGROUND

There is a strong connection between oral health and overall wellness. We aim to examine the association between poor oral health and the risk of developing or dying of cancer, and whether the association differs by residential area.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2008, a total of 510,148 adults free of cancer were included from the China Kadoorie Biobank study and thereafter followed up to 2015. Poor oral health was assessed from a self-reported baseline questionnaire and defined as a combination of rarely brushing teeth and always gum bleeding. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of cancer risk and its associated 95% confidence interval (CI) according to oral health status.

FINDINGS

Overall, 14.9% of participants (19.7% in rural areas and 8.8% in urban areas) reported poor oral health at baseline. After 4,602,743 person-years of follow-up, we identified 23,805 new cancer cases and 11,973 cancer deaths, respectively. Poor oral health was associated with higher risks of total cancer incidence (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.12) and death (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.16). For the site-specific cancers, poor oral health was significantly associated with higher risk of stomach cancer incidence (cases: 2964, HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00-1.22), esophageal cancer incidence (cases: 2119, HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07-1.33), esophageal cancer death (cases: 1238, HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.12-1.49), liver cancer incidence (cases: 2565, HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.06-1.32), and liver cancer death (cases: 1826, HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05-1.36). This positive association was stronger among rural residents compared to urban residents (interaction test P < 0.01).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings indicate that poor oral health is associated with higher risk for cancers, especially digestive system cancers. Promotion of oral health in the general population, especially for rural residents, could have valuable public health significance in preventing major systemic diseases.

FUNDING

Supported by grants (2021YFC2500400, 2016YFC0900500, 2016YFC0900501, 2016YFC0900504) from the National Key Research and Development Program of China, grants from the Kadoorie Charitable Foundation in Hong Kong and grants grants (088158/Z/09/Z, 104085/Z/14/Z, 202922/Z/16/Z) from Wellcome Trust in the UK. CKB is supported by the Kadoorie Charitable Foundation (KCF) in Hong Kong.

Distribution and Risk Factors of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria Infection in Orthopedic Patients

Objective

To study the distribution and risk factors of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDROS) infection in orthopedic patients and to provide reference for clinical prevention and control measures.

Methods

The data of 239 inpatients with orthopedic trauma from June 2019 to December 2020 were selected as the research objects, and the distribution characteristics of MDROS infection were analyzed through the real-time monitoring system of nosocomial infection. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the risk factors causing MDROS infection, and the preventive measures were put forward.

Results

178 strains of pathogens were isolated from 239 patients, including 53 strains of MDROS, and the detection rate was 29.78%. The main pathogenic bacteria were ESBLs, MRSA, CRAB, CRE, and MDR/PDRPA. The main infection sites of MDROS in orthopedic patients were the respiratory tract and wound. No CRE1 was detected, and 64.39%, 17.42%, and 14.39% of ESBL-producing bacteria, MRSA, and MDR/PDRPA, respectively, were detected. Logistic multivariate analysis showed that the length of hospital stay, antibiotic use time, open injury, and serum albumin level were independent risk factors of MDROS infection in orthopedic trauma patients.

Conclusion

To prevent MDROS infection in orthopedic patients, we should start from many aspects, focusing on reducing unnecessary hospitalization days, rationally preventing the use of antibacterial drugs, effectively treating basic diseases, etc., timely and effective thorough debridement, strengthening functional training, reducing bed rest, and strengthening targeted monitoring of related infections which are the keys to reduce MDROS infection in orthopedic patients.

Human Microbiota in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapeutic Implications

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is one of the main subtypes of esophageal cancer. The incidence rate of EAC increased progressively while the 5-year relative survival rates were poor in the past two decades. The mechanism of EAC has been studied extensively in relation to genetic factors, but less so with respect to human microbiota. Currently, researches about the relationship between EAC and the human microbiota is a newly emerging field of study. Herein, we present the current state of knowledge linking human microbiota to esophageal adenocarcinoma and its precursor lesion—gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus. There are specific human bacterial alternations in the process of esophageal carcinogenesis. And bacterial dysbiosis plays an important role in the process of esophageal carcinogenesis via inflammation, microbial metabolism and genotoxicity. Based on the human microbiota alternation in the EAC cascade, it provides potential microbiome-based clinical application. This review is focused on novel targets in prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Oral Bacterial Microbiota in Digestive Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review

The relation between the gut microbiota and human health is increasingly recognized. Recently, some evidence suggested that dysbiosis of the oral microbiota may be involved in the development of digestive cancers. A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines to investigate the association between the oral microbiota and digestive cancers. Several databases including Medline, Scopus, and Embase were searched by three independent reviewers, without date restriction. Over a total of 1654 records initially identified, 28 studies (2 prospective cohort studies and 26 case-controls) were selected. They investigated oral microbiota composition in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 5), gastric cancer (n = 5), colorectal cancer (n = 9), liver carcinoma (n = 2), and pancreatic cancer (n = 7). In most of the studies, oral microbiota composition was found to be different between digestive cancer patients and controls. Particularly, oral microbiota dysbiosis and specific bacteria, such as Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis, appeared to be associated with colorectal cancers. Current evidence suggests that differences exist in oral microbiota composition between patients with and without digestive cancers. Further studies are required to investigate and validate oral-gut microbial transmission patterns and their role in digestive cancer carcinogenesis.

Bacterial and Parasitic Pathogens as Risk Factors for Cancers in the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Review of Current Epidemiological Knowledge

The oncogenic potential of viral infections is well established and documented for many years already. However, the contribution of (commensal) bacteria and parasites to the development and progression of cancers has only recently gained momentum, resulting in a rapid growth of publications on the topic. Indeed, various bacteria and parasites have been suggested to play a role in the development of gastrointestinal cancer in particular. Therefore, an overview of the current epidemiological knowledge on the association between infections with bacteria and parasites and cancers of the gastrointestinal tract is needed. In this review, we summarized the methodological characteristics and main results of epidemiological studies investigating the association of 10 different bacteria (Bacteroides fragilis, Campylobacter spp., Clostridium spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, non-typhoidal Salmonella, Salmonella Typhi, and Streptococcus spp.) and three parasites (Cryptosporidium spp., Schistosoma spp., and Strongyloides stercoralis) with gastrointestinal cancer. While the large body of studies based on microbiome sequencing provides valuable insights into the relative abundance of different bacterial taxa in cancer patients as compared to individuals with pre-malignant conditions or healthy controls, more research is needed to fulfill Koch's postulates, possibly making use of follow-up data, to assess the complex role of bacterial and parasitic infections in cancer epidemiology. Studies incorporating follow-up time between detection of the bacterium or parasite and cancer diagnosis remain valuable as these allow for estimation of cause-effect relationships.

[Prevention of gastrointestinal cancer]

Throughout the past decades, considerable progress has been made in the (early) diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancers. However, the prognosis for advanced stages of gastrointestinal tumors remains limited for many patients and approximately one third of all tumor patients die as a result of gastrointestinal tumors. The prevention and early detection of gastrointestinal tumors is therefore of great importance.For this reason, we summarize the current state of knowledge and recommendations for the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of esophageal, stomach, pancreas, liver and colorectal cancer in the following.

Quantitative difference of oral pathogen between individuals with gastric cancer and individuals without cancer

The loss of teeth and lack of oral hygiene have been associated with the risk of developing gastric cancer (GC) in several populations evidenced in epidemiological studies. In this study, we quantitatively compared the proportion of oral pathogens in individuals with gastric cancer and individuals without cancer in a referral hospital in the city of Belém, Brazil. This study evaluated 192 patients with GC and 192 patients without cancer. Periodontal clinical examination was performed, and all individuals were submitted to the collection of salivary and dental biofilms. When comparing the median periodontal indexes in the gastric and cancer-free groups, it was statistically significant (p < 0.001) in the gastric cancer group compared to the probing depth of the periodontal pocket. Levels of bacterial DNA were observed in saliva and dental plaque, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between individuals with cancer and without neoplasia in all the bacteria surveyed. Significant relationships (p < 0.001) between biological agents and GC have been found in bacterial species that cause high rates of periodontal pathology and caries. The results suggest a different quantitative association in the presence of oral pathogens between individuals without cancer and patients with GC. As noted, it cannot be said that the bacteria present in the oral cavity increase the risk of gastric cancer or are aggravating factors of the disease. However, it is worth mentioning that, as it is part of the digestive system, the lack of care for the oral cavity can negatively affect the treatment of patients with gastric cancer.

Association between Oral Microbiome and Esophageal Diseases: A State-of-the-Art Review

BACKGROUND

Esophageal conditions result in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. There is growing enthusiasm for discerning the role of microbiome in esophageal diseases. Conceivably, the focus has been on examining the role of local microbiome in esophageal diseases although this is somewhat limited by the invasive approach required to sample the esophageal tissue. Given the ease of sampling the oral cavity combined with the advances in genomic techniques, there is immense interest in discovering the role of the oral microbiome in esophageal conditions.

SUMMARY

In this review, we aim to discuss the current evidence highlighting the association between the oral microbiome and esophageal diseases. In particular, we have focused on summarizing the alterations in oral microbiome associated with malignant, premalignant, and benign esophageal cancers, inflammatory and infectious conditions, and esophageal dysmotility diseases. Identifying alterations in the oral microbiome is a key to advancing our understanding of the etiopathogenesis and progression of esophageal diseases, promoting novel diagnostics, and laying the foundation for personalized treatment approaches.

KEY MESSAGES

Further studies are needed to unravel the mechanisms by which the oral microbiome influences the development and progression of esophageal diseases, as well as to investigate whether alterations in the oral microbiome can impact the natural history of various esophageal diseases.

Effects of Low Protein Diet on Modulating Gut Microbiota in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of International Studies

Background: Although associations between low protein diet (LPD) and changes of gut microbiota have been reported; however, systematic discernment of the effects of LPD on diet-microbiome-host interaction in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is lacking. Methods: We searched PUBMED and EMBASE for articles published on changes of gut microbiota associated with implementation of LPD in CKD patients until July 2021. Independent researchers extracted data and assessed risks of bias. We conducted meta-analyses of combine p-value, mean differences and random effects for gut microbiota and related metabolites. Study heterogeneity was measured by Tau² and I² statistic. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Five articles met inclusion criteria. The meta-analyses of gut microbiota exhibited enrichments of Lactobacillaceae (meta-p= 0.010), Bacteroidaceae (meta-p= 0.048) and Streptococcus anginosus (meta-p< 0.001), but revealed depletion of Bacteroides eggerthii (p=0.017) and Roseburia faecis (meta-p=0.019) in LPD patients compared to patients undergoing normal protein diet. The serum IS levels (mean difference: 0.68 ug/mL, 95% CI: -8.38-9.68, p= 0.89) and pCS levels (mean difference: -3.85 ug/mL, 95% CI: -15.49-7.78, p < 0.52) did not change between groups. We did not find significant differences on renal function associated with change of microbiota between groups (eGFR, mean difference: -7.21 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI: -33.2-18.79, p= 0.59; blood urea nitrogen, mean difference: -6.8 mg/dL, 95% CI: -46.42-32.82, p= 0.74). Other clinical (sodium, potassium, phosphate, albumin, fasting sugar, uric acid, total cholesterol, triglycerides, C-reactive protein and hemoglobin) and anthropometric estimates (body mass index, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure) did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that the effects of LPD on the microbiota were observed predominantly at the families and species levels but minimal on microbial diversity or richness. In the absence of global compositional microbiota shifts, the species-level changes appear insufficient to alter metabolic or clinical outputs.