51
|
van Donge T, Welzel T, Atkinson A, van den Anker J, Pfister M. Age-Dependent Changes of Kidney Injury Biomarkers in Pediatrics. J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 59 Suppl 1:S21-S32. [PMID: 31502686 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Currently used creatinine-based parameters for monitoring kidney function are not reliable for early detection of kidney injury (KI), particularly tubular damage. Several KI biomarkers allow for early detection of glomerular and tubular damage and may help to prevent drug-related chronic kidney diseases in pediatrics. This literature review describes the state of current research and investigates reference values for these KI biomarkers in neonates, infants, and children to better understand age-related changes. A total of 12 of 237 screened studies fulfilled predefined criteria, including 219 preterm neonates, 70 neonates, 596 infants, and 1726 children. KI biomarkers were analyzed in urine (6 studies), in serum/plasma (5 studies) and in serum and urine (1 study). Four studies (n = 555) measured urinary kidney injury molecule-1, whereas urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin was assessed in 5 studies (n = 888), and 2 studies (n = 203) investigated serum cystatin C. This review of KI biomarkers in different pediatric age groups indicates that (1) the majority of KI biomarkers are measured in urine; (2) the 3 most commonly analyzed KI biomarkers are urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, urinary kidney injury molecule-1, and serum cystatin C; (3) values of KI biomarkers appear to decrease from prematurity to infancy; and (4) there is an unmet need to further enhance knowledge on age-dependent changes of KI biomarkers in pediatrics. Studies are needed to better characterize reference values for these key KI biomarkers in healthy pediatric populations and to evaluate the value of these markers in the early detection of drug-related KI in neonates, infants, and children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara van Donge
- Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tatjana Welzel
- Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andrew Atkinson
- Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - John van den Anker
- Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA.,Intensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Pfister
- Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Accelerated Approval or Risk Reduction? How Response Biomarkers Advance Therapeutics through Clinical Trials in Cystic Fibrosis. Trends Mol Med 2020; 26:1068-1077. [PMID: 32868171 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2020.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Progress in the development of new therapies for cystic fibrosis (CF) has benefited from therapeutically responsive biomarkers to streamline drug development. Paradoxically, these response biomarkers have been proven to be essential even in the presence of data demonstrating a lack of correlation with clinical outcomes across individuals with CF. This finding is unsurprising, particularly in the setting of a rare disease given complex disease processes and an often-limited pool of clinically effective therapies by which to link biomarkers and clinical responsiveness. While many response biomarkers will be unable to progress from their status as markers of biological efficacy to either established correlates of clinical efficacy or surrogate endpoints, they remain critical to the overall success of therapeutic development.
Collapse
|
53
|
Wu Z, Guymer RH. Can the Onset of Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration Be an Acceptable Endpoint for Preventative Trials? Ophthalmologica 2020; 243:399-403. [PMID: 32805732 DOI: 10.1159/000510887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The slowly progressive nature of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) means that establishing the efficacy of novel preventative treatments aiming to slow progression of disease, remains challenging, and where earlier endpoints are needed to improve their feasibility. This review examines whether the onset of atrophic AMD, as seen as anatomical signs on optical coherence tomography termed nascent geographic atrophy, could act as a useful surrogate endpoint for early intervention trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhichao Wu
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, .,Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,
| | - Robyn H Guymer
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Kelly K, West AB. Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers for Emerging LRRK2 Therapeutics. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:807. [PMID: 32903744 PMCID: PMC7438883 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic studies have identified variants in the LRRK2 gene as important components of Parkinson's disease (PD) pathobiology. Biochemical and emergent biomarker studies have coalesced around LRRK2 hyperactivation in disease. Therapeutics that diminish LRRK2 activity, either with small molecule kinase inhibitors or anti-sense oligonucleotides, have recently advanced to the clinic. Historically, there have been few successes in the development of therapies that might slow or halt the progression of neurodegenerative diseases. Over the past few decades of biomedical research, retrospective analyses suggest the broad integration of informative biomarkers early in development tends to distinguish successful pipelines from those that fail early. Herein, we discuss the biomarker regulatory process, emerging LRRK2 biomarker candidates, assays, underlying biomarker biology, and clinical integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaela Kelly
- Duke Center for Neurodegeneration Research, Departments of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Neurology, and Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Andrew B West
- Duke Center for Neurodegeneration Research, Departments of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Neurology, and Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Black DM, Bauer DC, Vittinghoff E, Lui LY, Grauer A, Marin F, Khosla S, de Papp A, Mitlak B, Cauley JA, McCulloch CE, Eastell R, Bouxsein ML. Treatment-related changes in bone mineral density as a surrogate biomarker for fracture risk reduction: meta-regression analyses of individual patient data from multiple randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020; 8:672-682. [PMID: 32707115 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(20)30159-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The validation of bone mineral density (BMD) as a surrogate outcome for fracture would allow the size of future randomised controlled osteoporosis registration trials to be reduced. We aimed to determine the association between treatment-related changes in BMD, assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and fracture outcomes, including the proportion of treatment effect explained by BMD changes. METHODS We did a pooled analysis of individual patient data from multiple randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials. We included data from multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of osteoporosis medications that included women and men at increased osteoporotic fracture risk. Using individual patient data for each trial we calculated mean 24-month BMD percent change together with fracture reductions and did a meta-regression of the association between treatment-related differences in BMD changes (percentage difference, active minus placebo) and fracture risk reduction. We also used individual patient data to determine the proportion of anti-fracture treatment effect explained by BMD changes and the BMD change needed in future trials to ensure fracture reduction efficacy. FINDINGS Individual patient data from 91 779 participants of 23 randomised, placebo-controlled trials were included. The trials had 1-9 years of follow-up and included 12 trials of bisphosphonate, one of odanacatib, two of hormone therapy (one of conjugated equine oestrogen and one of conjugated equine oestrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate), three of PTH receptor agonists, one of denosumab, and four of selective oestrogen receptor modulator trials. The meta-regression revealed significant associations between treatment-related changes in hip, femoral neck, and spine BMD and reductions in vertebral (r2 0·73, p<0·0001; 0·59, p=0·0005; 0·61, p=0·0003), hip (0·41, p=0·014; 0·41, p=0·0074; 0·34, p=0·023) and non-vertebral fractures (0·53, p=0·0021; 0·65, p<0·0001; 0·51, p=0·0019). Minimum 24-month percentage changes in total hip BMD providing almost certain fracture reductions in future trials ranged from 1·42% to 3·18%, depending on fracture site. Hip BMD changes explained substantial proportions (44-67%) of treatment-related fracture risk reduction. INTERPRETATION Treatment-related BMD changes are strongly associated with fracture reductions across randomised trials of osteoporosis therapies with differing mechanisms of action. These analyses support BMD as a surrogate outcome for fracture outcomes in future randomised trials of new osteoporosis therapies and provide an important demonstration of the value of public access to individual patient data from multiple trials. FUNDING Foundation for National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis M Black
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Douglas C Bauer
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric Vittinghoff
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Li-Yung Lui
- California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andreas Grauer
- Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; Corcept Therapeutics, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Fernando Marin
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Research Centre, Windlesham, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jane A Cauley
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Charles E McCulloch
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Richard Eastell
- Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mary L Bouxsein
- Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
van Helvoort EM, van Spil WE, Jansen MP, Welsing PMJ, Kloppenburg M, Loef M, Blanco FJ, Haugen IK, Berenbaum F, Bacardit J, Ladel CH, Loughlin J, Bay-Jensen AC, Mobasheri A, Larkin J, Boere J, Weinans HH, Lalande A, Marijnissen ACA, Lafeber FPJG. Cohort profile: The Applied Public-Private Research enabling OsteoArthritis Clinical Headway (IMI-APPROACH) study: a 2-year, European, cohort study to describe, validate and predict phenotypes of osteoarthritis using clinical, imaging and biochemical markers. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035101. [PMID: 32723735 PMCID: PMC7389775 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Applied Public-Private Research enabling OsteoArthritis Clinical Headway (APPROACH) consortium intends to prospectively describe in detail, preselected patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), using conventional and novel clinical, imaging, and biochemical markers, to support OA drug development. PARTICIPANTS APPROACH is a prospective cohort study including 297 patients with tibiofemoral OA, according to the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria. Patients were (pre)selected from existing cohorts using machine learning models, developed on data from the CHECK cohort, to display a high likelihood of radiographic joint space width (JSW) loss and/or knee pain progression. FINDINGS TO DATE Selection appeared logistically feasible and baseline characteristics of the cohort demonstrated an OA population with more severe disease: age 66.5 (SD 7.1) vs 68.1 (7.7) years, min-JSW 2.5 (1.3) vs 2.1 (1.0) mm and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain 31.3 (19.7) vs 17.7 (14.6), except for age, all: p<0.001, for selected versus excluded patients, respectively. Based on the selection model, this cohort has a predicted higher chance of progression. FUTURE PLANS Patients will visit the hospital again at 6, 12 and 24 months for physical examination, pain and general health questionnaires, collection of blood and urine, MRI scans, radiographs of knees and hands, CT scan of the knee, low radiation whole-body CT, HandScan, motion analysis and performance-based tests.After two years, data will show whether those patients with the highest probabilities for progression experienced disease progression as compared to those wit lower probabilities (model validation) and whether phenotypes/endotypes can be identified and predicted to facilitate targeted drug therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03883568.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Willem E van Spil
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mylène P Jansen
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet Kloppenburg
- Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Rheumatology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Loef
- Rheumatology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Francisco J Blanco
- Servicio de Reumatologia, INIBIC-Hospital Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Ida K Haugen
- Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Jaume Bacardit
- School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | | | - John Loughlin
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | | | - Ali Mobasheri
- Regenarative Medicine, State Research Institute Center of Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | | | - Harrie H Weinans
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Orthopaedics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes Lalande
- Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
57
|
Kim DW, Suh CH, Kim KW, Pyo J, Park C, Jung SC. Technical Performance of Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography for Measuring Liver Stiffness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Korean J Radiol 2020; 20:880-893. [PMID: 31132814 PMCID: PMC6536798 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the technical performance of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) for measuring liver stiffness. Materials and Methods The Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies reporting the technical performance of 2D-SWE, including concerns with technical failures, unreliable measurements, interobserver reliability, and/or intraobserver reliability, published until June 30, 2018. The pooled proportion of technical failure and unreliable measurements was calculated using meta-analytic pooling via the random-effects model and inverse variance method for calculating weights. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore potential causes of heterogeneity. The pooled intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for interobserver and intraobserver reliability were calculated using the Hedges-Olkin method with Fisher's Z transformation of the correlation coefficient. Results The search yielded 34 articles. From 20 2D-SWE studies including 6196 patients, the pooled proportion of technical failure was 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3–3.9%). The pooled proportion of unreliable measurements from 20 studies including 6961 patients was 7.5% (95% CI, 4.7–11.7%). In the subgroup analyses, studies conducting more than three measurements showed fewer unreliable measurements than did those with three measurements or less, but no intergroup difference was found in technical failure. The pooled ICCs for interobserver reliability (from 10 studies including 517 patients) and intraobserver reliability (from 7 studies including 679 patients) were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82–0.90) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89–0.95), respectively, suggesting good to excellent reliability. Conclusion 2D-SWE shows good technical performance for assessing liver stiffness, with high technical success and reliability. Future studies should establish the quality criteria and optimal number of measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Wook Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chong Hyun Suh
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Won Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Junhee Pyo
- WHO Collaborating Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Chan Park
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seung Chai Jung
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Roy B, Yoshino Y, Allen L, Prall K, Schell G, Dwivedi Y. Exploiting Circulating MicroRNAs as Biomarkers in Psychiatric Disorders. Mol Diagn Ther 2020; 24:279-298. [PMID: 32304043 PMCID: PMC7269874 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-020-00464-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Non-invasive peripheral biomarkers play a significant role in both disease diagnosis and progression. In the past few years, microRNA (miRNA) expression changes in circulating peripheral tissues have been found to be correlative with changes in neuronal tissues from patients with neuropsychiatric disorders. This is a notable quality of a biomolecule to be considered as a biomarker for both prognosis and diagnosis of disease. miRNAs, members of the small non-coding RNA family, have recently gained significant attention due to their ability to epigenetically influence almost every aspect of brain functioning. Empirical evidence suggests that miRNA-associated changes in the brain are often translated into behavioral changes. Current clinical understanding further implicates their role in the management of major psychiatric conditions, including major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD), and schizophrenia (SZ). This review aims to critically evaluate the potential advantages and disadvantages of miRNAs as diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers in psychiatric disorders as well as in treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhaskar Roy
- Translational Research, UAB Mood Disorders Program, UAB Depression and Suicide Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, SC711 Sparks Center, 1720 7th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Yuta Yoshino
- Translational Research, UAB Mood Disorders Program, UAB Depression and Suicide Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, SC711 Sparks Center, 1720 7th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Lauren Allen
- Translational Research, UAB Mood Disorders Program, UAB Depression and Suicide Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, SC711 Sparks Center, 1720 7th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Kevin Prall
- Translational Research, UAB Mood Disorders Program, UAB Depression and Suicide Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, SC711 Sparks Center, 1720 7th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Grant Schell
- Translational Research, UAB Mood Disorders Program, UAB Depression and Suicide Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, SC711 Sparks Center, 1720 7th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA
| | - Yogesh Dwivedi
- Translational Research, UAB Mood Disorders Program, UAB Depression and Suicide Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, SC711 Sparks Center, 1720 7th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Hagenbeek FA, Roetman PJ, Pool R, Kluft C, Harms AC, van Dongen J, Colins OF, Talens S, van Beijsterveldt CEM, Vandenbosch MMLJZ, de Zeeuw EL, Déjean S, Fanos V, Ehli EA, Davies GE, Hottenga JJ, Hankemeier T, Bartels M, Vermeiren RRJM, Boomsma DI. Urinary Amine and Organic Acid Metabolites Evaluated as Markers for Childhood Aggression: The ACTION Biomarker Study. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11:165. [PMID: 32296350 PMCID: PMC7138132 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Biomarkers are of interest as potential diagnostic and predictive instruments in personalized medicine. We present the first urinary metabolomics biomarker study of childhood aggression. We aim to examine the association of urinary metabolites and neurotransmitter ratios involved in key metabolic and neurotransmitter pathways in a large cohort of twins (N = 1,347) and clinic-referred children (N = 183) with an average age of 9.7 years. This study is part of ACTION (Aggression in Children: Unraveling gene-environment interplay to inform Treatment and InterventiON strategies), in which we developed a standardized protocol for large-scale collection of urine samples in children. Our analytical design consisted of three phases: a discovery phase in twins scoring low or high on aggression (N = 783); a replication phase in twin pairs discordant for aggression (N = 378); and a validation phase in clinical cases and matched twin controls (N = 367). In the discovery phase, 6 biomarkers were significantly associated with childhood aggression, of which the association of O-phosphoserine (β = 0.36; SE = 0.09; p = 0.004), and gamma-L-glutamyl-L-alanine (β = 0.32; SE = 0.09; p = 0.01) remained significant after multiple testing. Although non-significant, the directions of effect were congruent between the discovery and replication analyses for six biomarkers and two neurotransmitter ratios and the concentrations of 6 amines differed between low and high aggressive twins. In the validation analyses, the top biomarkers and neurotransmitter ratios, with congruent directions of effect, showed no significant associations with childhood aggression. We find suggestive evidence for associations of childhood aggression with metabolic dysregulation of neurotransmission, oxidative stress, and energy metabolism. Although replication is required, our findings provide starting points to investigate causal and pleiotropic effects of these dysregulations on childhood aggression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona A. Hagenbeek
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Peter J. Roetman
- Curium-LUMC, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - René Pool
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Amy C. Harms
- Division of Analytical Biosciences, Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- The Netherlands Metabolomics Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jenny van Dongen
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Olivier F. Colins
- Curium-LUMC, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Eveline L. de Zeeuw
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sébastien Déjean
- Toulouse Mathematics Institute, University of Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France
| | - Vassilios Fanos
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Erik A. Ehli
- Avera Institute for Human Genetics, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
| | - Gareth E. Davies
- Avera Institute for Human Genetics, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
| | - Jouke Jan Hottenga
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thomas Hankemeier
- Division of Analytical Biosciences, Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- The Netherlands Metabolomics Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Meike Bartels
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Robert R. J. M. Vermeiren
- Curium-LUMC, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Dorret I. Boomsma
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Kothari S, Hillengass J, McCarthy PL, Holstein SA. Determination of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Does It Matter? Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2020; 14:39-46. [PMID: 30671912 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-019-0497-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The ability to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) in myeloma has improved due to advances in flow cytometry and sequencing methodologies. Here, we evaluate recent clinical trial data and explore the current and future roles of MRD assessment in the context of clinical trial design and clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS A review of recent phase III studies reveals that achievement of MRD negativity is associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS). Treatment arms that are more effective from a PFS or overall response rate perspective are also associated with superior MRD negativity rates. The current standard MRD methodologies are limited by requiring bone marrow samples and refinement of methodologies that can detect disease outside of the bone marrow is needed. Currently, MRD is a prognostic biomarker and further efforts are required to determine whether it can serve as a surrogate endpoint. The use of MRD status to guide treatment decisions is currently not recommended outside the confines of a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalin Kothari
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jens Hillengass
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Philip L McCarthy
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Sarah A Holstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986840 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Patel CN, Kumar SP, Rawal RM, Patel DP, Gonzalez FJ, Pandya HA. A multiparametric organ toxicity predictor for drug discovery. Toxicol Mech Methods 2020; 30:159-166. [PMID: 31618094 PMCID: PMC7383222 DOI: 10.1080/15376516.2019.1681044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The assessment of major organ toxicities through in silico predictive models plays a crucial role in drug discovery. Computational tools can predict chemical toxicities using the knowledge gained from experimental studies which drastically reduces the attrition rate of compounds during drug discovery and developmental stages. The purpose of in silico predictions for drug leads and anticipating toxicological endpoints of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity, clinical adverse impacts and metabolism of pharmaceutically active substances has gained widespread acceptance in academia and pharmaceutical industries. With unrestricted accessibility to powerful biomarkers, researchers have an opportunity to contemplate the most accurate predictive scores to evaluate drug's adverse impact on various organs.A multiparametric model involving physico-chemical properties, quantitative structure-activity relationship predictions and docking score was found to be a more reliable predictor for estimating chemical toxicities with potential to reflect atomic-level insights. These in silico models provide informed decisions to carry out in vitro and in vivo studies and subsequently confirms the molecules clues deciphering the cytotoxicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics and organ toxicity properties of compounds. Even though the drugs withdrawn by USFDA at later phases of drug discovery which should have passed all the state-of-the-art experimental approaches and currently acceptable toxicity filters, there is a dire need to interconnect all these molecular key properties to enhance our knowledge and guide in the identification of leads to drug optimization phases. Current computational tools can predict ADMET and organ toxicities based on pharmacophore fingerprint, toxicophores and advanced machine-learning techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag N. Patel
- Department of Botany, Bioinformatics and Climate Change Impacts Management, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Sivakumar Prasanth Kumar
- Division of Biological Sciences, Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, India
| | - Rakesh M. Rawal
- Department of Life Sciences, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Daxesh P. Patel
- Laboratory of Metabolism, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Frank J. Gonzalez
- Laboratory of Metabolism, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Himanshu A. Pandya
- Department of Botany, Bioinformatics and Climate Change Impacts Management, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Webb SJ, Shic F, Murias M, Sugar CA, Naples AJ, Barney E, Borland H, Hellemann G, Johnson S, Kim M, Levin AR, Sabatos-DeVito M, Santhosh M, Senturk D, Dziura J, Bernier RA, Chawarska K, Dawson G, Faja S, Jeste S, McPartland J. Biomarker Acquisition and Quality Control for Multi-Site Studies: The Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials. Front Integr Neurosci 2020; 13:71. [PMID: 32116579 PMCID: PMC7020808 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2019.00071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of the Autism Biomarkers Consortium for Clinical Trials (ABC-CT) is to evaluate a set of lab-based behavioral video tracking (VT), electroencephalography (EEG), and eye tracking (ET) measures for use in clinical trials with children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Within the larger organizational structure of the ABC-CT, the Data Acquisition and Analytic Core (DAAC) oversees the standardization of VT, EEG, and ET data acquisition, data processing, and data analysis. This includes designing and documenting data acquisition and analytic protocols and manuals; facilitating site training in acquisition; data acquisition quality control (QC); derivation and validation of dependent variables (DVs); and analytic deliverables including preparation of data for submission to the National Database for Autism Research (NDAR). To oversee consistent application of scientific standards and methodological rigor for data acquisition, processing, and analytics, we developed standard operating procedures that reflect the logistical needs of multi-site research, and the need for well-articulated, transparent processes that can be implemented in future clinical trials. This report details the methodology of the ABC-CT related to acquisition and QC in our Feasibility and Main Study phases. Based on our acquisition metrics from a preplanned interim analysis, we report high levels of acquisition success utilizing VT, EEG, and ET experiments in a relatively large sample of children with ASD and typical development (TD), with data acquired across multiple sites and use of a manualized training and acquisition protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Jane Webb
- Center on Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Frederick Shic
- Center on Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Michael Murias
- Duke Center for Autism and Brain Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Catherine A. Sugar
- Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Adam J. Naples
- Yale Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Erin Barney
- Center on Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Heather Borland
- Center on Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Gerhard Hellemann
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Scott Johnson
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Minah Kim
- Center on Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - April R. Levin
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Maura Sabatos-DeVito
- Duke Center for Autism and Brain Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Megha Santhosh
- Center on Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Damla Senturk
- Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - James Dziura
- Yale Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Raphael A. Bernier
- Center on Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
- Center on Human Development and Disability, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | - Geraldine Dawson
- Duke Center for Autism and Brain Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Susan Faja
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Shafali Jeste
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - James McPartland
- Yale Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Adamo JE, Bienvenu Ii RV, Dolz F, Liebman M, Nilsen W, Steele SJ. Translation of Digital Health Technologies to Advance Precision Medicine: Informing Regulatory Science. Digit Biomark 2020; 4:1-12. [PMID: 32399511 PMCID: PMC7204775 DOI: 10.1159/000505289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The proliferation of digital technologies and the application of sophisticated data analysis techniques are increasingly viewed as having the potential to transform translational research and precision medicine. While digital technologies are rapidly applied in innovative ways to develop new diagnostics and therapies, the ultimate approval and adoption of these emerging methods presents several scientific and regulatory challenges. To better understand and address these regulatory science gaps, a working group of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program convened the Regulatory Science to Advance Precision Medicine Forum focused on digital health, particularly examining gaps in the use, validation, and interpretation of data from sensors that collect and tools that analyze digital biomarkers. The key findings and recommendations provided here emerged from the Forum and include the need to enhance areas related to data standards, data quality and validity, knowledge management, and building trust between all stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan E Adamo
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Biomedical Engineering Department, Rochester, New York, USA
| | | | - Felipe Dolz
- Global Regulatory Science and Policy, Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Wendy Nilsen
- Computer and Information Science and Engineering, National Science Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
| | - Scott J Steele
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute and Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Seilie AM, Chang M, Hanron AE, Billman ZP, Stone BC, Zhou K, Olsen TM, Daza G, Ortega J, Cruz KR, Smith N, Healy SA, Neal J, Wallis CK, Shelton L, Mankowski TV, Wong-Madden S, Mikolajczak SA, Vaughan AM, Kappe SHI, Fishbaugher M, Betz W, Kennedy M, Hume JCC, Talley AK, Hoffman SL, Chakravarty S, Sim BKL, Richie TL, Wald A, Plowe CV, Lyke KE, Adams M, Fahle GA, Cowan EP, Duffy PE, Kublin JG, Murphy SC. Beyond Blood Smears: Qualification of Plasmodium 18S rRNA as a Biomarker for Controlled Human Malaria Infections. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 100:1466-1476. [PMID: 31017084 PMCID: PMC6553913 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
18S rRNA is a biomarker that provides an alternative to thick blood smears in controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) trials. We reviewed data from CHMI trials at non-endemic sites that used blood smears and Plasmodium 18S rRNA/rDNA biomarker nucleic acid tests (NATs) for time to positivity. We validated a multiplex quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for Plasmodium 18S rRNA, prospectively compared blood smears and qRT-PCR for three trials, and modeled treatment effects at different biomarker-defined parasite densities to assess the impact on infection detection, symptom reduction, and measured intervention efficacy. Literature review demonstrated accelerated NAT-based infection detection compared with blood smears (mean acceleration: 3.2–3.6 days). For prospectively tested trials, the validated Plasmodium 18S rRNA qRT-PCR positivity was earlier (7.6 days; 95% CI: 7.1–8.1 days) than blood smears (11.0 days; 95% CI: 10.3–11.8 days) and significantly preceded the onset of grade 2 malaria-related symptoms (12.2 days; 95% CI: 10.6–13.3 days). Discrepant analysis showed that the risk of a blood smear–positive, biomarker-negative result was negligible. Data modeling predicted that treatment triggered by specific biomarker-defined thresholds can differentiate complete, partial, and non-protective outcomes and eliminate many grade 2 and most grade 3 malaria-related symptoms post-CHMI. Plasmodium 18S rRNA is a sensitive and specific biomarker that can justifiably replace blood smears for infection detection in CHMI trials in non-endemic settings. This study led to biomarker qualification through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in CHMI studies at non-endemic sites, which will facilitate biomarker use for the qualified context of use in drug and vaccine trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette M Seilie
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ming Chang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Amelia E Hanron
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Zachary P Billman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Brad C Stone
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kevin Zhou
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tayla M Olsen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Glenda Daza
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jose Ortega
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kurtis R Cruz
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nahum Smith
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sara A Healy
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.,Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute (formerly the Center for Infectious Disease Research), Seattle, Washington
| | - Jillian Neal
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Carolyn K Wallis
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lisa Shelton
- Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute (formerly the Center for Infectious Disease Research), Seattle, Washington
| | - Tracie VonGoedert Mankowski
- Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute (formerly the Center for Infectious Disease Research), Seattle, Washington
| | - Sharon Wong-Madden
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sebastian A Mikolajczak
- Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute (formerly the Center for Infectious Disease Research), Seattle, Washington
| | - Ashley M Vaughan
- Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute (formerly the Center for Infectious Disease Research), Seattle, Washington
| | - Stefan H I Kappe
- Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute (formerly the Center for Infectious Disease Research), Seattle, Washington
| | - Matt Fishbaugher
- Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute (formerly the Center for Infectious Disease Research), Seattle, Washington
| | - Will Betz
- Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute (formerly the Center for Infectious Disease Research), Seattle, Washington
| | - Mark Kennedy
- Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute (formerly the Center for Infectious Disease Research), Seattle, Washington
| | - Jen C C Hume
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Angela K Talley
- Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute (formerly the Center for Infectious Disease Research), Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | - Anna Wald
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Kirsten E Lyke
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew Adams
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Gary A Fahle
- Microbiology Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Patrick E Duffy
- Laboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - James G Kublin
- Seattle Malaria Clinical Trials Center, Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.,Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sean C Murphy
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Seattle Malaria Clinical Trials Center, Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.,Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute (formerly the Center for Infectious Disease Research), Seattle, Washington.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Mussap M, Loddo C, Fanni C, Fanos V. Metabolomics in pharmacology - a delve into the novel field of pharmacometabolomics. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2020; 13:115-134. [PMID: 31958027 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2020.1713750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Pharmacometabolomics is an emerging science pursuing the application of precision medicine. Combining both genetic and environmental factors, the so-called pharmacometabolomic approach guides patient selection and stratification in clinical trials and optimizes personalized drug dosage, improving efficacy and safety.Areas covered: This review illustrates the progressive introduction of pharmacometabolomics as an innovative solution for enhancing the discovery of novel drugs and improving research and development (R&D) productivity of the pharmaceutical industry. An extended analysis on published pharmacometabolomics studies both in animal models and humans includes results obtained in several areas such as hepatology, gastroenterology, nephrology, neuropsychiatry, oncology, drug addiction, embryonic cells, neonatology, and microbiomics.Expert opinion: a tailored, individualized therapy based on the optimization of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, the improvement of drug efficacy, and the abolition of drug toxicity and adverse drug reactions is a key issue in precision medicine. Genetics alone has become insufficient for deciphring intra- and inter-individual variations in drug-response, since they originate both from genetic and environmental factors, including human microbiota composition. The association between pharmacogenomics and pharmacometabolomics may be considered the new strategy for an in-deep knowledge on changes and alterations in human and microbial metabolic pathways due to the action of a drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Mussap
- Laboratory Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Claudia Fanni
- Division of Pediatrics, Rovigo Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Vassilios Fanos
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Neonatal Pathology and Neonatal Section, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Cosci F, Mansueto G. Biological and Clinical Markers to Differentiate the Type of Anxiety Disorders. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2020; 1191:197-218. [PMID: 32002931 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-32-9705-0_13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The present chapter is an overview of possible biomarkers which distinguish anxiety disorders as classified by the DSM-5. Structural or activity changes in the brain regions; changes in N-acetylaspartate/creatine, dopamine, serotonin, and oxytocin; hearth rate variability; hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity; error-related negativity; respiratory regulation; and genetic variants are proposed. However, their clinical utility is questionable due to low specificity and sensitivity: the majority does not distinguish subjects with different anxiety disorders, and they might be influenced by stress, comorbidity, physical activity, and psychotropic medications. In this framework, the staging model, a clinimetric tool which allows to define the degree of progression of a disease at a point in time and where the patient is located on the continuum of the course of the disease, is proposed since several DSM anxiety disorders take place at different stages of the same syndrome according to the staging model. Thus, a stage-specific biomarker model for anxiety disorders is hypothesized and illustrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiammetta Cosci
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. .,Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, School for Mental Health & Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Giovanni Mansueto
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, School for Mental Health & Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Bime C, Casanova N, Oita RC, Ndukum J, Lynn H, Camp SM, Lussier Y, Abraham I, Carter D, Miller EJ, Mekontso-Dessap A, Downs CA, Garcia JGN. Development of a biomarker mortality risk model in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2019; 23:410. [PMID: 31842964 PMCID: PMC6916252 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2697-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a compelling unmet medical need for biomarker-based models to risk-stratify patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Effective stratification would optimize participant selection for clinical trial enrollment by focusing on those most likely to benefit from new interventions. Our objective was to develop a prognostic, biomarker-based model for predicting mortality in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods This is a secondary analysis using a cohort of 252 mechanically ventilated subjects with the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Survival to day 7 with both day 0 (first day of presentation) and day 7 sample availability was required. Blood was collected for biomarker measurements at first presentation to the intensive care unit and on the seventh day. Biomarkers included cytokine-chemokines, dual-functioning cytozymes, and vascular injury markers. Logistic regression, latent class analysis, and classification and regression tree analysis were used to identify the plasma biomarkers most predictive of 28-day ARDS mortality. Results From eight biologically relevant biomarker candidates, six demonstrated an enhanced capacity to predict mortality at day 0. Latent-class analysis identified two biomarker-based phenotypes. Phenotype A exhibited significantly higher plasma levels of angiopoietin-2, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, interleukin-8, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, interleukin-6, and extracellular nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (eNAMPT) compared to phenotype B. Mortality at 28 days was significantly higher for phenotype A compared to phenotype B (32% vs 19%, p = 0.04). Conclusions An adult biomarker-based risk model reliably identifies ARDS subjects at risk of death within 28 days of hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Bime
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Nancy Casanova
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Radu C Oita
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Juliet Ndukum
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Heather Lynn
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Sara M Camp
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Yves Lussier
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Ivo Abraham
- College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, USA
| | | | | | | | - Charles A Downs
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Joe G N Garcia
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Kim K, Jang EH, Kim AY, Fava M, Mischoulon D, Papakostas GI, Kim H, Na EJ, Yu HY, Jeon HJ. Pre-treatment peripheral biomarkers associated with treatment response in panic symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder and panic disorder: A 12-week follow-up study. Compr Psychiatry 2019; 95:152140. [PMID: 31669792 DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Peripheral biomarkers have been studied to predict treatment response of panic symptoms. We hypothesized that depressive disorder (MDD) vs. panic disorder (PD) would exhibit different peripheral biomarkers, and their correlation with severity of panic attacks (PA) would also differ. METHODS Forty-one MDD patients, 52 PD patients, and 59 healthy controls were followed for 12 weeks. We measured peripheral biomarkers along with the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) at each visit-pre-treatment, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks on a regular schedule. Peripheral biomarkers including serum cytokines, plasma and serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), leptin, adiponectin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS Patients with MDD and PD demonstrated significantly higher levels of pre-treatment IL-6 compared to controls, but no differences were seen in plasma and serum BDNF, leptin, adiponectin, and CRP. Pre-treatment leptin showed a significant clinical correlation with reduction of panic symptoms in MDD patients at visit 5 (p=0.011), whereas pre-treatment IL-6 showed a negative correlation with panic symptom reduction in PD patients (p=0.022). An improvement in three panic-related items was observed to be positively correlated with pre-treatment leptin in MDD patients: distress during PA, anticipatory anxiety, and occupational interference. CONCLUSION Higher pre-treatment leptin was associated with better response to treatment regarding panic symptoms in patients with MDD, while higher IL-6 was associated with worse response regarding panic symptoms in PD patients. Different predictive peripheral biomarkers observed in MDD and PD suggest the need for establishing individualized predictive biomarkers, even in cases of similar symptoms observed in different disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiwon Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Veteran Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Psychiatry, Depression Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Hye Jang
- Bio-Medical IT Convergence Research Division, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Republic of Korea
| | - Ah Young Kim
- Bio-Medical IT Convergence Research Division, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Republic of Korea
| | - Maurizio Fava
- Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - David Mischoulon
- Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - George I Papakostas
- Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Hyewon Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Depression Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Jin Na
- Department of Psychiatry, Depression Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Han Young Yu
- Bio-Medical IT Convergence Research Division, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), Republic of Korea
| | - Hong Jin Jeon
- Department of Psychiatry, Depression Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Health Sciences & Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, and Department of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Doussau A, Vinarov E, Barsanti-Innes B, Kimmelman J. Comparison between protocols and publications for prognostic and predictive cancer biomarker studies. Clin Trials 2019; 17:61-68. [PMID: 31588779 DOI: 10.1177/1740774519876912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Method prespecification in study protocols is important for controlling bias in reports. The primary goal of this study was to assess potential for discordance between study protocols and publications reporting predictive or prognostic cancer biomarker research. Secondary objectives included comparing characteristics of publications with accessible protocols compared to those without. METHODS Publications reporting predictive or prognostic cancer biomarker research were identified from 15 major journals, 2012-2015. Protocols were sought online or through repeated queries of corresponding authors. The following four items were extracted: (1) biomarkers, (2) biospecimen/assays, (3) sample size, (4) endpoints. We defined "explicit discordance" as the presence of major inconsistencies on these items. RESULTS Of 149 eligible publications, we obtained 19 eligible protocols online (13%). Out of a random sample of 103 publications where protocols were not available online, 12 protocols (12%) were furnished by corresponding authors; 8 (8% of authors) explicitly stated the absence of a protocol. Among 24 retrospective cohort studies, no protocol could be accessed. We found explicit discordance between publications and protocols for 18 studies (58%), in particular choice of biomarkers (36%), biospecimen/assays (6%), or endpoints (29%). CONCLUSION Protocols are generally not accessible or not used for cancer biomarker studies. Publications were often explicitly discordant with protocols, particularly regarding biomarkers and endpoints. Our findings point to common unaddressed risk of bias in publications of major journals reporting the relationship between cancer biomarkers and clinical endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adelaide Doussau
- Biomedical Ethics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Esther Vinarov
- Biomedical Ethics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Jonathan Kimmelman
- Biomedical Ethics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Park J, Gil JR, Shin Y, Won SE, Huh J, You MW, Park HJ, Sung YS, Kim KW. Reliable and robust method for abdominal muscle mass quantification using CT/MRI: An explorative study in healthy subjects. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0222042. [PMID: 31536542 PMCID: PMC6752777 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Quantification of abdominal muscle mass by cross-sectional imaging has been increasingly used to diagnose sarcopenia; however, the technical method for quantification has not been standardized yet. We aimed to determine an optimal method to measure the abdominal muscle area. Methods Among 50 consecutive subjects who underwent abdominal CT and MRI for possible liver donation, total abdominal muscle area (TAMA) and total psoas muscle area (TPA) at the L3 inferior endplate level were measured by two blinded readers. Inter-scan agreement between CT and MRI and inter-reader agreement between the two readers were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and within-subject coefficient of variation (WSCV). To evaluate the effect of measurement level, one reader measured TAMA and TPA at six levels from the L2 to L4 vertebral bodies. Results TAMA was a more reliable biomarker than TPA in terms of inter-scan agreement (ICC: 0.928 vs. 0.788 for reader 1 and 0.853 vs. 0.821 for reader 2, respectively; WSCV: 8.3% vs. 23.4% for reader 1 and 10.4% vs. 22.3% for reader 2, respectively) and inter-reader agreement (ICC: 0.986 vs. 0.886 for CT and 0.865 vs. 0.669 for MRI, respectively; WSCV: 8.2% vs. 16.0% for CT and 11.6% vs. 29.7% for MRI, respectively). In terms of the measurement level, TAMA did not differ from the L2inf to L4inf levels, whereas TPA increased with a decrease in measurement level. Conclusions TAMA is a better biomarker than TPA in terms of inter-scan and inter-reader agreement and robustness to the measurement level. CT was a more reliable imaging modality than MRI. Our results support the use of TAMA measured by CT as a standard biomarker for abdominal muscle area measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jisuk Park
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jea Ryung Gil
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, VHS Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngbin Shin
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Eun Won
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jimi Huh
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea
| | - Myung-Won You
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Park
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yu Sub Sung
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail: (KWK); (YSS)
| | - Kyung Won Kim
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail: (KWK); (YSS)
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Wu AC, Kiley JP, Noel PJ, Amur S, Burchard EG, Clancy JP, Galanter J, Inada M, Jones TK, Kropski JA, Loyd JE, Nogee LM, Raby BA, Rogers AJ, Schwartz DA, Sin DD, Spira A, Weiss ST, Young LR, Himes BE. Current Status and Future Opportunities in Lung Precision Medicine Research with a Focus on Biomarkers. An American Thoracic Society/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Research Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 198:e116-e136. [PMID: 30640517 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201810-1895st] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thousands of biomarker tests are either available or under development for lung diseases. In many cases, adoption of these tests into clinical practice is outpacing the generation and evaluation of sufficient data to determine clinical utility and ability to improve health outcomes. There is a need for a systematically organized report that provides guidance on how to understand and evaluate use of biomarker tests for lung diseases. METHODS We assembled a diverse group of clinicians and researchers from the American Thoracic Society and leaders from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute with expertise in various aspects of precision medicine to review the current status of biomarker tests in lung diseases. Experts summarized existing biomarker tests that are available for lung cancer, pulmonary arterial hypertension, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, cystic fibrosis, and other rare lung diseases. The group identified knowledge gaps that future research studies can address to efficiently translate biomarker tests into clinical practice, assess their cost-effectiveness, and ensure they apply to diverse, real-life populations. RESULTS We found that the status of biomarker tests in lung diseases is highly variable depending on the disease. Nevertheless, biomarker tests in lung diseases show great promise in improving clinical care. To efficiently translate biomarkers into tests used widely in clinical practice, researchers need to address specific clinical unmet needs, secure support for biomarker discovery efforts, conduct analytical and clinical validation studies, ensure tests have clinical utility, and facilitate appropriate adoption into routine clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS Although progress has been made toward implementation of precision medicine for lung diseases in clinical practice in certain settings, additional studies focused on addressing specific unmet clinical needs are required to evaluate the clinical utility of biomarkers; ensure their generalizability to diverse, real-life populations; and determine their cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
|
72
|
Johnson D, Hughes D, Pirmohamed M, Jorgensen A. Evidence to Support Inclusion of Pharmacogenetic Biomarkers in Randomised Controlled Trials. J Pers Med 2019; 9:E42. [PMID: 31480618 PMCID: PMC6789450 DOI: 10.3390/jpm9030042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmacogenetics and biomarkers are becoming normalised as important technologies to improve drug efficacy rates, reduce the incidence of adverse drug reactions, and make informed choices for targeted therapies. However, their wider clinical implementation has been limited by a lack of robust evidence. Suitable evidence is required before a biomarker's clinical use, and also before its use in a clinical trial. We have undertaken a review of five pharmacogenetic biomarker-guided randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and evaluated the evidence used by these trials to justify biomarker inclusion. We assessed and quantified the evidence cited in published rationale papers, or where these were not available, obtained protocols from trial authors. Very different levels of evidence were provided by the trials. We used these observations to write recommendations for future justifications of biomarker use in RCTs and encourage regulatory authorities to write clear guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Johnson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK.
| | - Dyfrig Hughes
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Bangor LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Munir Pirmohamed
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science and Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK
| | - Andrea Jorgensen
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, 1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Ribeiro AJS, Guth BD, Engwall M, Eldridge S, Foley CM, Guo L, Gintant G, Koerner J, Parish ST, Pierson JB, Brock M, Chaudhary KW, Kanda Y, Berridge B. Considerations for an In Vitro, Cell-Based Testing Platform for Detection of Drug-Induced Inotropic Effects in Early Drug Development. Part 2: Designing and Fabricating Microsystems for Assaying Cardiac Contractility With Physiological Relevance Using Human iPSC-Cardiomyocytes. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10:934. [PMID: 31555128 PMCID: PMC6727630 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Contractility of the myocardium engines the pumping function of the heart and is enabled by the collective contractile activity of its muscle cells: cardiomyocytes. The effects of drugs on the contractility of human cardiomyocytes in vitro can provide mechanistic insight that can support the prediction of clinical cardiac drug effects early in drug development. Cardiomyocytes differentiated from human-induced pluripotent stem cells have high potential for overcoming the current limitations of contractility assays because they attach easily to extracellular materials and last long in culture, while having human- and patient-specific properties. Under these conditions, contractility measurements can be non-destructive and minimally invasive, which allow assaying sub-chronic effects of drugs. For this purpose, the function of cardiomyocytes in vitro must reflect physiological settings, which is not observed in cultured cardiomyocytes derived from induced pluripotent stem cells because of the fetal-like properties of their contractile machinery. Primary cardiomyocytes or tissues of human origin fully represent physiological cellular properties, but are not easily available, do not last long in culture, and do not attach easily to force sensors or mechanical actuators. Microengineered cellular systems with a more mature contractile function have been developed in the last 5 years to overcome this limitation of stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, while simultaneously measuring contractile endpoints with integrated force sensors/actuators and image-based techniques. Known effects of engineered microenvironments on the maturity of cardiomyocyte contractility have also been discovered in the development of these systems. Based on these discoveries, we review here design criteria of microengineered platforms of cardiomyocytes derived from pluripotent stem cells for measuring contractility with higher physiological relevance. These criteria involve the use of electromechanical, chemical and morphological cues, co-culture of different cell types, and three-dimensional cellular microenvironments. We further discuss the use and the current challenges for developing and improving these novel technologies for predicting clinical effects of drugs based on contractility measurements with cardiomyocytes differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells. Future research should establish contexts of use in drug development for novel contractility assays with stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre J S Ribeiro
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translation Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | - Brian D Guth
- Department of Drug Discovery Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.,PreClinical Drug Development Platform (PCDDP), North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
| | - Michael Engwall
- Safety Pharmacology and Animal Research Center, Amgen Research, Thousand Oaks, CA, United States
| | - Sandy Eldridge
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - C Michael Foley
- Department of Integrative Pharmacology, Integrated Sciences and Technology, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Liang Guo
- Laboratory of Investigative Toxicology, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - Gary Gintant
- Department of Integrative Pharmacology, Integrated Sciences and Technology, AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, United States
| | - John Koerner
- Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translation Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | - Stanley T Parish
- Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jennifer B Pierson
- Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Mathew Brock
- Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Khuram W Chaudhary
- Global Safety Pharmacology, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Collegeville, PA, United States
| | - Yasunari Kanda
- Division of Pharmacology, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Brian Berridge
- National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Ewen JB, Sweeney JA, Potter WZ. Conceptual, Regulatory and Strategic Imperatives in the Early Days of EEG-Based Biomarker Validation for Neurodevelopmental Disabilities. Front Integr Neurosci 2019; 13:45. [PMID: 31496945 PMCID: PMC6712089 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2019.00045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Biological treatment development for syndromal neuropsychiatric conditions such as autism has seen slow progress for decades. Speeding drug discovery may result from the judicious development and application of biomarker measures of brain function to select patients for clinical trials, to confirm target engagement and to optimize drug dose. For neurodevelopmental disorders, electrophysiology (EEG) offers considerable promise because of its ability to monitor brain activity with high temporal resolution and its more ready application for pediatric populations relative to MRI. Here, we discuss conceptual/definitional issues related to biomarker development, discuss practical implementation issues, and suggest preliminary guidelines for validating EEG approaches as biomarkers with a context of use in neurodevelopmental disorder drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua B. Ewen
- Department of Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - John A. Sweeney
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - William Z. Potter
- National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Kraus VB. Biomarkers as drug development tools: discovery, validation, qualification and use. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2019; 14:354-362. [PMID: 29760435 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-018-0005-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The 21st Century Cures Act, approved in the USA in December 2016, has encouraged the establishment of the national Precision Medicine Initiative and the augmentation of efforts to address disease prevention, diagnosis and treatment on the basis of a molecular understanding of disease. The Act adopts into law the formal process, developed by the FDA, of qualification of drug development tools, including biomarkers and clinical outcome assessments, to increase the efficiency of clinical trials and encourage an era of molecular medicine. The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have developed similar processes for the qualification of biomarkers intended for use as companion diagnostics or for development and regulatory approval of a drug or therapeutic. Biomarkers that are used exclusively for the diagnosis, monitoring or stratification of patients in clinical trials are not subject to regulatory approval, although their qualification can facilitate the conduct of a trial. In this Review, the salient features of biomarker discovery, analytical validation, clinical qualification and utilization are described in order to provide an understanding of the process of biomarker development and, through this understanding, convey an appreciation of their potential advantages and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia B Kraus
- Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. .,Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Kozak VV. [Determining the risk of dementia in Parkinson's disease: possibilities and perspectives]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2019; 119:137-143. [PMID: 31407694 DOI: 10.17116/jnevro2019119061137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Dementia in Parkinson's disease (D-PD) worsens the course of PD, and it is associated with a decrease in the quality of life of patients and caregivers, as well as with elevated costs for patient care, and, as a consequence, leads to a significant cost increase in the health management. Early detection of the risk of dementia in patients with PD is one of the challenges of modern clinical neurology. Various methods for the detection of morphologic and functional changes associated with D-PD risk (prognostic biomarkers) were suggested. The aim of this article is a brief review of current achievements in the search for and evaluation of the effectiveness of such biomarkers. The review included the following methods: clinical examination, neuroimaging, examination of biological fluids, genetic analysis, neurophysiological methods and combined methods. Biomarkers of D-PD can contribute to optimization of the selection of pharmacological or non-pharmacological methods of preventing cognitive impairment at early stages of PD, and, therefore, to potential improvement of the overall clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V V Kozak
- University of Basel, Hospital of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Kar S, Paglialunga S, Jaycox SH, Islam R, Paredes AH. Assay validation and clinical performance of chronic inflammatory and chemokine biomarkers of NASH fibrosis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0217263. [PMID: 31291245 PMCID: PMC6619600 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis, liver transplant, and even hepatocellular carcinoma. While liver biopsy remains the reference standard for disease diagnosis, analytical and clinical development of non-invasive soluble biomarkers of NASH are of great importance to advance the field. To this end, we performed analytical and clinical validation on a series of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines implicated hepatic inflammation; IL-6, CRP, TNFα, MCP-1, MIP-1β, eotaxin, VCAM-1. Biomarker assays were validated for accuracy and precision. Clinical performance was evaluated in a random sample of 52 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD/NASH. Patients were categorized into three groups according to their fibrosis stage; advanced (F3-F4), mild (F1-2) and no (F0) fibrosis. Serum IL-6 was increased in patients with advanced fibrosis (2.71 pg/mL; 1.26 pg/mL; 1.39 pg/mL p<0.01) compared to patients with mild or no fibrosis respectively. While, there was no significant difference noted in CRP, TNFα, MCP-1, MIP-1β, eotaxin among the three groups, VCAM-1 levels were increased by 55% (p<0.01) and 40% (p<0.05) in the advanced cohort compared to the mild and no fibrosis groups respectively. VCAM-1 also displayed good clinical performance as a biomarker of advanced fibrosis with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.87. The VCAM-1 assay demonstrated robust accuracy and precision, and VCAM-1 outperformed IL-6, CRP, TNFα, and the chemokines MCP-1, MIP-1β, and eotaxin as a biomarker of advanced fibrosis in NASH. Addition of biomarkers such as IL-6 and VCAM-1 to panels may yield increased sensitivity and specificity for staging of NASH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumit Kar
- Bioanalytical Services, Celerion, Lincoln, NE, United States of America
| | | | - Sharon H. Jaycox
- Early Clinical Research, Celerion, Tempe, AZ, United States of America
| | - Rafiqul Islam
- Bioanalytical Services, Celerion, Lincoln, NE, United States of America
| | - Angelo H. Paredes
- Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Services, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Lyne SB, Girard R, Koskimäki J, Zeineddine HA, Zhang D, Cao Y, Li Y, Stadnik A, Moore T, Lightle R, Shi C, Shenkar R, Carrión-Penagos J, Polster SP, Romanos S, Akers A, Lopez-Ramirez M, Whitehead KJ, Kahn ML, Ginsberg MH, Marchuk DA, Awad IA. Biomarkers of cavernous angioma with symptomatic hemorrhage. JCI Insight 2019; 4:128577. [PMID: 31217347 PMCID: PMC6629090 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.128577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDCerebral cavernous angiomas (CAs) with a symptomatic hemorrhage (CASH) have a high risk of recurrent hemorrhage and serious morbidity.METHODSEighteen plasma molecules with mechanistic roles in CA pathobiology were investigated in 114 patients and 12 healthy subjects. The diagnostic biomarker of a CASH in the prior year was derived as that minimizing the Akaike information criterion and validated using machine learning, and was compared with the prognostic CASH biomarker predicting bleeding in the subsequent year. Biomarkers were longitudinally followed in a subset of cases. The biomarkers were queried in the lesional neurovascular unit (NVU) transcriptome and in plasma miRNAs from CASH and non-CASH patients.RESULTSThe diagnostic CASH biomarker included a weighted combination of soluble CD14 (sCD14), VEGF, C-reactive protein (CRP), and IL-10 distinguishing CASH patients with 76% sensitivity and 80% specificity (P = 0.0003). The prognostic CASH biomarker (sCD14, VEGF, IL-1β, and sROBO-4) was confirmed to predict a bleed in the subsequent year with 83% sensitivity and 93% specificity (P = 0.001). Genes associated with diagnostic and prognostic CASH biomarkers were differentially expressed in CASH lesional NVUs. Thirteen plasma miRNAs were differentially expressed between CASH and non-CASH patients.CONCLUSIONShared and unique biomarkers of recent symptomatic hemorrhage and of future bleeding in CA are mechanistically linked to lesional transcriptome and miRNA. The biomarkers may be applied for risk stratification in clinical trials and developed as a tool in clinical practice.FUNDINGNIH, William and Judith Davis Fund in Neurovascular Surgery Research, Be Brave for Life Foundation, Safadi Translational Fellowship, Pritzker School of Medicine, and Sigrid Jusélius Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seán B. Lyne
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Romuald Girard
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Janne Koskimäki
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Hussein A. Zeineddine
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Dongdong Zhang
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ying Cao
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Yan Li
- Center for Research Informatics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Agnieszka Stadnik
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Thomas Moore
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rhonda Lightle
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Changbin Shi
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Robert Shenkar
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Julián Carrión-Penagos
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sean P. Polster
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sharbel Romanos
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Amy Akers
- Angioma Alliance, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Kevin J. Whitehead
- Division of Cardiology and Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Mark L. Kahn
- Department of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Douglas A. Marchuk
- Molecular Genetics and Microbiology Department, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Issam A. Awad
- Section of Neurosurgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Wang YMC, Strauss DG, Huang SM. Use of pharmacodynamic/response biomarkers for therapeutic biologics regulatory submissions. Biomark Med 2019; 13:805-809. [PMID: 31210051 DOI: 10.2217/bmm-2019-0197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yow-Ming C Wang
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation & Research, Food & Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| | - David G Strauss
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation & Research, Food & Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| | - Shiew Mei Huang
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation & Research, Food & Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Niu J, Straubinger RM, Mager DE. Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2019; 105:1395-1406. [PMID: 30912119 PMCID: PMC6529235 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) occur when the pharmacological effect of one drug is altered by that of another drug in a combination regimen. DDIs often are classified as synergistic, additive, or antagonistic in nature, albeit these terms are frequently misused. Within a complex pathophysiological system, the mechanism of interaction may occur at the same target or through alternate pathways. Quantitative evaluation of pharmacodynamic DDIs by employing modeling and simulation approaches is needed to identify and optimize safe and effective combination therapy regimens. This review investigates the opportunities and challenges in pharmacodynamic DDI studies and highlights examples of quantitative methods for evaluating pharmacodynamic DDIs, with a particular emphasis on the use of mechanism-based modeling and simulation in DDI studies. Advancements in both experimental and computational techniques will enable the application of better, model-informed assessments of pharmacodynamic DDIs in drug discovery, development, and therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Niu
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Robert M. Straubinger
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Donald E. Mager
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Hardmeier M, Jacques F, Albrecht P, Bousleiman H, Schindler C, Leocani L, Fuhr P. Multicentre assessment of motor and sensory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: reliability and implications for clinical trials. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2019; 5:2055217319844796. [PMID: 31069107 PMCID: PMC6495443 DOI: 10.1177/2055217319844796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Motor and sensory evoked potentials (EP) are potential candidate biomarkers for clinical trials in multiple sclerosis. Objective To determine test -retest reliability of motor EP (MEP) and sensory EP (SEP) and associated EP-scores in patients with multiple sclerosis. Methods In three centres, 16 relapsing and five progressive multiple sclerosis patients had MEPs and SEPs 1-29 days apart. Five neurophysiologists independently marked latencies by central reading. By variance component analysis, we estimated the critical difference (absolute reliability) for cross-sectional group comparison, comparison of longitudinal group changes, within-subject minimal detectable change and defined within-subject improvement. Results Cortical SEP responses and cortico-muscular MEP latencies were more reliable than central conduction times. For comparison of 20 subjects per arm, cross-sectional group difference ranged from 0.7 to 3.9 ms and 1.1 to 1.7, group difference in longitudinal changes from 0.4 to 1.8 ms and 0.36 to 0.62, within-subject minimal detectable change from 1.2 to 5.8 ms and 1.2 to 2.0, within-subject improvement from 0.8 to 3.8ms and 0.8 to 1.3, for single EP modalities and EP scores, respectively. Conclusions Multicentre EP assessment with central EP reading is feasible and reliable. The critical difference is reasonably low to detect significant group changes and to define responders. The results support the concept of using EP and EP-scores as candidate response biomarkers for quantification of disease progression and for studying remyelination in multiple sclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Hardmeier
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Philipp Albrecht
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Habib Bousleiman
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Schindler
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Letizia Leocani
- Departments of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Peter Fuhr
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Kraus VB, Simon LS, Katz JN, Neogi T, Hunter D, Guermazi A, Karsdal MA. Proposed study designs for approval based on a surrogate endpoint and a post-marketing confirmatory study under FDA's accelerated approval regulations for disease modifying osteoarthritis drugs. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2019; 27:571-579. [PMID: 30465809 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
In 1992, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) instituted the accelerated approval regulations that allow drugs or biologics for serious conditions that fill an unmet medical need to be approved on the basis of a surrogate endpoint or an intermediate clinical endpoint. The current definition of a serious condition includes chronic disabling conditions, such as osteoarthritis (OA), and thereby provides expanded opportunities for the use of biomarkers for regulatory approval of drugs for OA. The use of surrogates or intermediate clinical endpoints for initial regulatory approval of a drug or biologic requires confirmation in a post-marketing study of a drug effect on a clinically relevant outcome, such as on how a patient feels, functions or survives. Current FDA guidance requires that the post-marketing approval (PMA) study be ongoing during the time of initial drug approval. This white paper arose out of the need to brainstorm trial designs that might be suitable for PMA of drugs initially approved, on the basis of a surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoint, for treatment of OA to alter disease progression, abnormal function or pathological changes in the morphology of the joint. In this white paper we define the concept and regulations regarding accelerated approval and propose two major study design scenarios for PMA trials in OA. The long-term goal is to discuss and refine these designs in consultation with regulatory agencies in order to facilitate development of drugs to fill the large unmet need in OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V B Kraus
- Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | | | - J N Katz
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - T Neogi
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - D Hunter
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - A Guermazi
- Quantitative Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M A Karsdal
- Nordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev Hovedgade 207, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Regulatory perspective of biomarker bioanalysis during drug development. Bioanalysis 2019; 11:607-610. [DOI: 10.4155/bio-2019-0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
|
84
|
Holstein SA, Ye JC, Howard A, Bhutani M, Gormley N, Hahn T, Hillengass J, Krishnan A, Landgren CO, Munshi NC, Oliva S, Owen RG, Pasquini MC, Puig N, Weinhold N, Weisel K, McCarthy PL. Summary of the Second Annual BMT CTN Myeloma Intergroup Workshop on Minimal Residual Disease and Immune Profiling. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 25:e89-e97. [PMID: 30408566 PMCID: PMC6445685 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The second annual Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) Myeloma Intergroup Workshop on Minimal Residual Disease and Immune Profiling was convened on December 7, 2017, at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) meeting. During this workshop, investigators from around the world presented their latest research involving assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) and immune profiling (IP) in myeloma. This document summarizes the workshop presentations as well as relevant ASH abstracts and focuses on the regulatory issues involved in the integration of MRD and IP assessment in clinical trial design and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Holstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology and Hematology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
| | - J Christine Ye
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Alan Howard
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Manisha Bhutani
- Department of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Nicole Gormley
- US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Theresa Hahn
- The Transplant & Cellular Therapy Center, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Jens Hillengass
- The Transplant & Cellular Therapy Center, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Amrita Krishnan
- Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - C Ola Landgren
- Department of Medicine, Myeloma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nikhil C Munshi
- LeBow Institute for Myeloma Therapeutics and Jerome Lipper Center for Multiple Myeloma Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stefania Oliva
- Division of Hematology, Myeloma Unit, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Roger G Owen
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Marcelo C Pasquini
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Noemi Puig
- Department of Hematology, Universit Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Katja Weisel
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology and Rheumatology, Universitatsklinikum Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Philip L McCarthy
- The Transplant & Cellular Therapy Center, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Holstein SA, Suman VJ, McCarthy PL. Should Overall Survival Remain an Endpoint for Multiple Myeloma Trials? Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2019; 14:31-38. [PMID: 30661162 PMCID: PMC9344397 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-019-0495-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW While the traditional gold standard for demonstrating clinical benefit of a therapy has been to show prolongation of overall survival (OS), there are multiple factors which can hinder the use of OS as a primary endpoint in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Here, we analyze recent myeloma RCTs and evaluate the issues relevant to current and future myeloma RCT design. RECENT FINDINGS A review of recent phase III RCTs that led to approval of new agents/combinations reveals that none were designed with OS as the primary endpoint, but instead utilized time to progression (TTP) or progression-free survival (PFS). These studies illuminate the inherent difficulties of designing trials with the primary endpoint of OS/PFS in a disease characterized by increasingly prolonged survival times, availability of effective salvage therapies, and competing events such as co-morbid conditions. Alternative primary endpoints other than OS or PFS need to be developed for future myeloma RCTs. Validated surrogate endpoints with novel clinical trial designs will help improve the feasibility of conducting comparative clinical trials in a timely manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Holstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology and Hematology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Vera J Suman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Philip L McCarthy
- Department of Medicine, Blood and Marrow Transplant Center, Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Stephenson D, Hill D, Cedarbaum JM, Tome M, Vamvakas S, Romero K, Conrado DJ, Dexter DT, Seibyl J, Jennings D, Nicholas T, Matthews D, Xie Z, Imam S, Maguire P, Russell D, Gordon MF, Stebbins GT, Somer E, Gallagher J, Roach A, Basseches P, Grosset D, Marek K. The Qualification of an Enrichment Biomarker for Clinical Trials Targeting Early Stages of Parkinson's Disease. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2019; 9:553-563. [PMID: 31306141 PMCID: PMC6700608 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-191648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
As therapeutic trials target early stages of Parkinson's disease (PD), appropriate patient selection based purely on clinical criteria poses significant challenges. Members of the Critical Path for Parkinson's Consortium formally submitted documentation to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) supporting the use of Dopamine Transporter (DAT) neuroimaging in early PD. Regulatory documents included a comprehensive literature review, a proposed analysis plan of both observational and clinical trial data, and an assessment of biomarker reproducibility and reliability. The research plan included longitudinal analysis of the Parkinson Research Examination of CEP-1347 Trial (PRECEPT) and the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) study to estimate the degree of enrichment achieved and impact on future trials in subjects with early motor PD. The presence of reduced striatal DAT binding based on visual reads of single photon emission tomography (SPECT) scans in early motor PD subjects was an independent predictor of faster decline in UPDRS Parts II and III as compared to subjects with scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD) over 24 months. The EMA issued in 2018 a full Qualification Opinion for the use of DAT as an enrichment biomarker in PD trials targeting subjects with early motor symptoms. Exclusion of SWEDD subjects in future clinical trials targeting early motor PD subjects aims to enrich clinical trial populations with idiopathic PD patients, improve statistical power, and exclude subjects who are unlikely to progress clinically from being exposed to novel test therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Maria Tome
- European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - John Seibyl
- Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Syed Imam
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR, USA
| | | | - David Russell
- Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kenneth Marek
- Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - on behalf of the Critical Path for Parkinson’s Consortium
- Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA
- University College London, UK
- Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA
- European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Parkinson’s UK, London, UK
- Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA
- Denali Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Pfizer, Groton, CT, USA
- ADM Diagnostics, Northbrook, IL, USA
- UCB, Brussels, Belgium
- CPP Scientific Advisor, PA, USA
- GE Healthcare, London, UK
- Merck & Co., Philadelphia, PA, USA
- University of Glasgow, Scotland
- Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Cosci F, Mansueto G. Biological and Clinical Markers in Panic Disorder. Psychiatry Investig 2019; 16:27-36. [PMID: 30184613 PMCID: PMC6354043 DOI: 10.30773/pi.2018.07.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Classifying mental disorders on the basis of objective makers might clarify their aetiology, help in making the diagnosis, identify "at risk" individuals, determine the severity of mental illness, and predict the course of the disorder. This study aims to review biological and clinical markers of panic disorder (PD). METHODS A computerized search was carried out in PubMed and Science Direct using the key words: "marker/biomarker/clinical marker/neurobiology/staging" combined using Boolean AND operator with "panic." In addition, the reference lists from existing reviews and from the articles retrieved were inspected. Only English language papers published in peer-reviewed journals were included. RESULTS Structural changes in the amygdala, hippocampus, cerebral blood level in the left occipital cortex, serotonin 5-TH and noradrenergic systems activation, aberrant respiratory regulation, hearth rate variability, blood cells and peripheral blood stem cells, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation were identified as potential candidate biomarkers of PD. Staging was identified as clinical marker of PD. According to the staging model, PD is described as follows: prodromal phase (stage 1); acute phase (stage 2); panic attacks (stage 3); chronic phase (stage 4). CONCLUSION The clinical utility, sensitivity, specificity, and the predictive value of biomarkers for PD is still questionable. The staging model of PD might be a valid susceptibility, diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive marker of PD. A possible longitudinal model of biological and clinical markers of PD is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiammetta Cosci
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, School for Mental Health & Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Mansueto
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, School for Mental Health & Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Cummings J. The Role of Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease Drug Development. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2019; 1118:29-61. [PMID: 30747416 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05542-4_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Biomarkers have a key role in Alzheimer's disease (AD) drug development. Biomarkers can assist in diagnosis, demonstrate target engagement, support disease modification, and monitor for safety. The amyloid (A), tau (T), neurodegeneration (N) Research Framework emphasizes brain imaging and CSF measures relevant to disease diagnosis and staging and can be applied to drug development and clinical trials. Demonstration of target engagement in Phase 2 is critical before advancing a treatment candidate to Phase 3. Trials with biomarker outcomes are shorter and smaller than those required to show clinical benefit and are important to understanding the biological impact of an agent and inform go/no-go decisions. Companion diagnostics are required for safe and effective use of treatments and may emerge in AD drug development programs. Complementary biomarkers inform the use of therapies but are not mandatory for use. Biomarkers promise to de-risk AD drug development, attract sponsors to AD research, and accelerate getting new drugs to those with or at risk for AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Cummings
- Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Stevens TW, Matheeuwsen M, Lönnkvist MH, Parker CE, Wildenberg ME, Gecse KB, D'Haens GR. Systematic review: predictive biomarkers of therapeutic response in inflammatory bowel disease-personalised medicine in its infancy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018; 48:1213-1231. [PMID: 30378142 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterised by substantial heterogeneity in treatment response. With an expanding number of therapeutic agents, identifying optimal treatment at the patient level remains a major challenge. AIM To systematically review the available literature on predictive biomarkers of therapeutic response in IBD. METHODS An electronic literature search was performed on 30 January 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Retrospective, prospective, uncontrolled and controlled studies reporting on biomarkers predicting therapeutic response in paediatric and adult IBD populations were eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the QUIPS tool. Due to anticipated heterogeneity and limited data, a qualitative, rather than quantitative, assessment was planned. RESULTS Of the 10 638 citations identified, 92 articles met the inclusion criteria. Several potential DNA, mRNA and protein markers were evaluated as predictive biomarkers. Most studies focused on predicting response to anti-TNF agents. Substantial between-study heterogeneity was identified with respect to both the biomarkers studied and the definition of response. None of the included studies received a low risk of bias rating for all six domains. Currently, none of the biomarkers is sufficiently predictive for clinical use. CONCLUSIONS The search for predictive biomarkers is still in its infancy and current evidence is limited. Future research efforts should take into account the high patient heterogeneity within prospective trials with objective response assessment. Predictive models will most likely comprise a combination of several molecular markers from integrated omics-levels and clinical characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toer W Stevens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mijntje Matheeuwsen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria H Lönnkvist
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Manon E Wildenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Krisztina B Gecse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert R D'Haens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Vinnard C, Mezochow A, Oakland H, Klingsberg R, Hansen-Flaschen J, Hamilton K. Assessing Response to Therapy for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease: Quo Vadis? Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2813. [PMID: 30524407 PMCID: PMC6256187 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Assessing progression of disease or response to treatment remains a major challenge in the clinical management of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections of the lungs. Serial assessments of validated measures of treatment response address whether the current therapeutic approach is on track toward clinical cure, which remains a fundamental question for clinicians and patients during the course of NTM disease treatment. The 2015 NTM Research Consortium Workshop, which included a patient advisory panel, identified treatment response biomarkers as a priority area for investigation. Limited progress in addressing this challenge also hampers drug development efforts. The Biomarker Qualification Program at the FDA supports the use of a validated treatment response biomarker across multiple drug development programs. Current approaches in clinical practice include microbiologic and radiographic monitoring, along with symptomatic and quality-of-life assessments. Blood-based monitoring, including assessments of humoral and cell-mediated NTM-driven immune responses, remain under investigation. Alignment of data collection schemes in prospective multicenter studies, including the support of biosample repositories, will support identification of treatment response biomarkers under standard-of-care and investigational therapeutic strategies. In this review, we outline the role of treatment monitoring biomarkers in both clinical practice and drug development frameworks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Vinnard
- Public Health Research Institute, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States
| | - Alyssa Mezochow
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Hannah Oakland
- Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - Ross Klingsberg
- Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - John Hansen-Flaschen
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Keith Hamilton
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Wells JM, Parker MM, Oster RA, Bowler RP, Dransfield MT, Bhatt SP, Cho MH, Kim V, Curtis JL, Martinez FJ, Paine R, O'Neal W, Labaki WW, Kaner RJ, Barjaktarevic I, Han MK, Silverman EK, Crapo JD, Barr RG, Woodruff P, Castaldi PJ, Gaggar A. Elevated circulating MMP-9 is linked to increased COPD exacerbation risk in SPIROMICS and COPDGene. JCI Insight 2018; 3:123614. [PMID: 30429371 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.123614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP-9) is associated with inflammation and lung remodeling in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We hypothesized that elevated circulating MMP-9 represents a potentially novel biomarker that identifies a subset of individuals with COPD with an inflammatory phenotype who are at increased risk for acute exacerbation (AECOPD). METHODS We analyzed Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study (SPIROMICS) and Genetic Epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) cohorts for which baseline and prospective data were available. Elevated MMP-9 was defined based on >95th percentile plasma values from control (non-COPD) sample in SPIROMICS. COPD subjects were classified as having elevated or nonelevated MMP-9. Logistic, Poisson, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to identify associations with prospective AECOPD in both cohorts. RESULTS Elevated MMP-9 was present in 95/1,053 (9%) of SPIROMICS and 41/140 (29%) of COPDGene participants with COPD. COPD subjects with elevated MMP-9 had a 13%-16% increased absolute risk for AECOPD and a higher median (interquartile range; IQR) annual AECOPD rate (0.33 [0-0.74] versus 0 [0-0.80] events/year and 0.9 [0.5-2] versus 0.5 [0-1.4] events/year for SPIROMICS and COPDGene, respectively). In adjusted models within each cohort, elevated MMP-9 was associated with increased odds (odds ratio [OR], 1.71; 95%CI, 1.00-2.90; and OR, 3.03; 95%CI, 1.02-9.01), frequency (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.45; 95%CI, 1.23-1.7; and IRR, 1.24; 95%CI, 1.03-1.49), and shorter time-to-first AECOPD (21.7 versus 31.7 months and 14 versus 21 months) in SPIROMICS and COPDGene, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Elevated MMP-9 was independently associated with AECOPD risk in 2 well-characterized COPD cohorts. These findings provide evidence for MMP-9 as a prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target in COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01969344 (SPIROMICS) and NCT00608764 (COPDGene). FUNDING This work was funded by K08 HL123940 to JMW; R01HL124233 to PJC; Merit Review I01 CX000911 to JLC; R01 (R01HL102371, R01HL126596) and VA Merit (I01BX001756) to AG. SPIROMICS (Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcomes in COPD Study) is funded by contracts from the NHLBI (HHSN268200900013C, HHSN268200900014C,HHSN268200900015C HHSN268200900016C, HHSN268200900017C, HHSN268200900018C, HHSN268200900019C, and HHSN268200900020C) and a grant from the NIH/NHLBI (U01 HL137880), and supplemented by contributions made through the Foundation for the NIH and the COPD Foundation from AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Bayer; Bellerophon Therapeutics; Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Chiesi Farmaceutici; Forest Research Institute Inc.; GlaxoSmithKline; Grifols Therapeutics Inc.; Ikaria Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Nycomed GmbH; ProterixBio; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Sanofi; Sunovion; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; and Theravance Biopharma and Mylan. COPDGene is funded by the NHLBI (R01 HL089897 and R01 HL089856) and by the COPD Foundation through contributions made to an Industry Advisory Board composed of AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Siemens, and Sunovion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Michael Wells
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.,UAB Lung Health Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.,Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Margaret M Parker
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert A Oster
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Russ P Bowler
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Mark T Dransfield
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.,UAB Lung Health Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.,Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Surya P Bhatt
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.,UAB Lung Health Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Michael H Cho
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Victor Kim
- Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Curtis
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.,Medical Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Fernando J Martinez
- Departments of Medicine and Genetic Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert Paine
- Division of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Occupational Pulmonary Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Medical Service, Salt Lake City VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Wanda O'Neal
- Marsico Lung Institute/Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Wassim W Labaki
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Robert J Kaner
- Departments of Medicine and Genetic Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Igor Barjaktarevic
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - MeiLan K Han
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Edwin K Silverman
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James D Crapo
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - R Graham Barr
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Prescott Woodruff
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, UCSF, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Peter J Castaldi
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amit Gaggar
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.,UAB Lung Health Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.,Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | -
- The SPIROMICS and COPDGene groups are detailed in the Supplemental Acknowledgments
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Leptak C, Menetski JP, Wagner JA, Aubrecht J, Brady L, Brumfield M, Chin WW, Hoffmann S, Kelloff G, Lavezzari G, Ranganathan R, Sauer JM, Sistare FD, Zabka T, Wholley D. What evidence do we need for biomarker qualification? Sci Transl Med 2018; 9:9/417/eaal4599. [PMID: 29167393 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal4599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Biomarkers can facilitate all aspects of the drug development process. However, biomarker qualification-the use of a biomarker that is accepted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-needs a clear, predictable process. We describe a multistakeholder effort including government, industry, and academia that proposes a framework for defining the amount of evidence needed for biomarker qualification. This framework is intended for broad applications across multiple biomarker categories and uses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Leptak
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
| | - Joseph P Menetski
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), North Bethesda, MD 20852, USA
| | - John A Wagner
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | | | - Linda Brady
- National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | - William W Chin
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Washington, DC 20004, USA
| | - Steve Hoffmann
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), North Bethesda, MD 20852, USA
| | - Gary Kelloff
- National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Tanja Zabka
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - David Wholley
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), North Bethesda, MD 20852, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Asthma is a heterogeneous disease consisting of different phenotypes that are driven by different mechanistic pathways. The purpose of this review is to emphasize the important role of precision medicine in asthma management. RECENT FINDINGS Despite asthma heterogeneity, the approach to management has been on the basis of disease severity, with the most severe patients reserved for the maximum treatments with corticosteroids and bronchodilators. At the severe end, the recent availability of biologic therapies in the form of anti-IgE (omalizumab) and anti-IL5 therapies (mepolizumab and reslizumab) has driven the adaptation of precision medicine. These therapies are reserved for severe asthma with defined either allergic or eosinophilic background, respectively. SUMMARY Unbiased definition of phenotypes or endotypes (which are phenotypes defined by mechanisms) is an important step towards the use of precision medicine in asthma. Although T2-high asthma has been defined with targets becoming available for treating allergic or eosinophilic asthma, the definition of non-T2 phenotypes remains a priority. Precision medicine is also dependent on the definition of biomarkers that can help differentiate between these phenotypes and pinpoint patients suitable for specific-targeted therapies. Thus, precision medicine links phenotypes (endotypes) to targeted treatments for better outcomes.
Collapse
|
94
|
Blank M, Thompson A, Hausner E, Rouse R. Biomarkers of drug-induced acute kidney injury: a regulatory perspective. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2018; 14:929-936. [DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2018.1511701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Blank
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of New Drugs, Division of Cardiovascular and Renal Products, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Aliza Thompson
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of New Drugs, Division of Cardiovascular and Renal Products, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth Hausner
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of New Drugs, Division of Cardiovascular and Renal Products, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Rodney Rouse
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Translational Sciences, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Applied Regulatory Science, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Accelerating evidence gathering and approval of precision medicine therapies: the FDA takes aim at rare mutations. Genet Med 2018; 21:542-544. [PMID: 29988078 PMCID: PMC6752286 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0099-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
96
|
Mondello S, Sorinola A, Czeiter E, Vámos Z, Amrein K, Synnot A, Donoghue E, Sándor J, Wang KKW, Diaz-Arrastia R, Steyerberg EW, Menon DK, Maas AIR, Buki A. Blood-Based Protein Biomarkers for the Management of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Adults Presenting to Emergency Departments with Mild Brain Injury: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Neurotrauma 2018; 38:1086-1106. [PMID: 29020853 PMCID: PMC8054517 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is critical to effective management and intervention, but can be challenging in patients with mild TBI. A substantial number of studies have reported the use of circulating biomarkers as signatures for TBI, capable of improving diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision making beyond current practice standards. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively and critically evaluate the existing body of evidence for the use of blood protein biomarkers (S100 calcium binding protein B [S100B], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], neuron specific enolase [NSE], ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 [UCH-L1]. tau, and neurofilament proteins) for diagnosis of intracranial lesions on CT following mild TBI. Effects of potential confounding factors and differential diagnostic performance of the included markers were explored. Further, appropriateness of study design, analysis, quality, and demonstration of clinical utility were assessed. Studies published up to October 2016 were identified through searches of MEDLINE®, Embase, EBM Reviews, the Cochrane Library, World Health Organization (WHO), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and clinicaltrials.gov. Following screening of the identified articles, 26 were selected as relevant. We found that measurement of S100B can help informed decision making in the emergency department, possibly reducing resource use; however, there is insufficient evidence that any of the other markers is ready for clinical application. Our work pointed out serious problems in the design, analysis, and reporting of many of the studies, and identified substantial heterogeneity and research gaps. These findings emphasize the importance of methodologically rigorous studies focused on a biomarker's intended use, and defining standardized, validated, and reproducible approaches. The living nature of this systematic review, which will summarize key updated information as it becomes available, can inform and guide future implementation of biomarkers in the clinical arena.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Mondello
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Endre Czeiter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.,János Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.,MTA-PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Vámos
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Krisztina Amrein
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.,János Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.,MTA-PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Anneliese Synnot
- Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group, Centre for Health Communication and Participation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emma Donoghue
- Australian & New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group, Centre for Health Communication and Participation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - János Sándor
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Kevin K W Wang
- Program for Neuroproteomics & Biomarkers Research, Departments of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Center for Clinical Decision Sciences, Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David K Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew I R Maas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Andras Buki
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.,János Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.,MTA-PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group, Pecs, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Izmailova ES, Wagner JA, Perakslis ED. Wearable Devices in Clinical Trials: Hype and Hypothesis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2018; 104:42-52. [PMID: 29205294 PMCID: PMC6032822 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Revised: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The development of innovative wearable technologies has raised great interest in new means of data collection in healthcare and biopharmaceutical research and development. Multiple applications for wearables have been identified in a number of therapeutic areas; however, researchers face many challenges in the clinic, including scientific methodology as well as regulatory, legal, and operational hurdles. To facilitate further evaluation and adoption of these technologies, we highlight methodological and logistical considerations for implementation in clinical trials, including key elements of analytical and clinical validation in the specific context of use (COU). Additionally, we provide an assessment of the maturity of the field and successful examples of recent clinical experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John A. Wagner
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.CambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
98
|
Viglietti D, Bouatou Y, Kheav VD, Aubert O, Suberbielle-Boissel C, Glotz D, Legendre C, Taupin JL, Zeevi A, Loupy A, Lefaucheur C. Complement-binding anti-HLA antibodies are independent predictors of response to treatment in kidney recipients with antibody-mediated rejection. Kidney Int 2018; 94:773-787. [PMID: 29801667 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2017] [Revised: 03/03/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
A major hurdle to improving clinical care in the field of kidney transplantation is the lack of biomarkers of the response to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) treatment. To discover these we investigated the value of complement-binding donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) for evaluating the response to treatment. The study encompassed a prospective cohort of 139 kidney recipients with ABMR receiving the standard of care treatment, including plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab. Patients were systematically assessed at the time of diagnosis and three months after treatment initiation for clinical and allograft histological characteristics and anti-HLA DSAs, including their C1q-binding ability. After adjusting for clinical and histological parameters, post-treatment C1q-binding anti-HLA DSA was an independent and significant determinant of allograft loss (adjusted hazard ratio 2.57 (95% confidence interval 1.29-5.12). In 101 patients without post-treatment C1q-binding anti-HLA DSA there was a significantly improved glomerular filtration rate with significantly reduced glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis, interstitial inflammation, tubulitis, C4d deposition, and endarteritis compared with 38 patients with posttreatment C1q-binding anti-HLA DSA. A conditional inference tree model identified five prognostic groups at the time of post-treatment evaluation based on glomerular filtration rate, presence of cg lesion and C1q-binding anti-HLA DSA (cross-validated accuracy: 0.77). Thus, circulating complement-binding anti-HLA DSAs are strong and independent predictors of allograft outcome after standard of care treatment in kidney recipients with ABMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Viglietti
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Unité mixte de recherche-S970, Paris, France; Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Yassine Bouatou
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Unité mixte de recherche-S970, Paris, France; Division of Nephrology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vissal David Kheav
- Department of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Unité mixte de recherche-S970, Paris, France; Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Suberbielle-Boissel
- Department of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Denis Glotz
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Unité mixte de recherche-S970, Paris, France; Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Unité mixte de recherche-S970, Paris, France; Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Department of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- Department of Transplantation Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Unité mixte de recherche-S970, Paris, France; Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Unité mixte de recherche-S970, Paris, France; Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Brusselle G, Pavord ID, Landis S, Pascoe S, Lettis S, Morjaria N, Barnes N, Hilton E. Blood eosinophil levels as a biomarker in COPD. Respir Med 2018; 138:21-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
100
|
Yang S, Wynn GH, Ursano RJ. A Clinician's Guide to PTSD Biomarkers and Their Potential Future Use. FOCUS: JOURNAL OF LIFE LONG LEARNING IN PSYCHIATRY 2018; 16:143-152. [PMID: 31975909 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20170045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
No clinically validated biomarkers have yet been found to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Innovation in clinical trial design, however, has led to the study of biomarkers as part of testing new medications and psychotherapies. There may soon be viable biomarkers to assist in diagnosis of PTSD and prediction of illness trajectory, severity, and functional outcomes; subtyping; and treatment selection. Processes for the identification and validation of biomarker findings are complex, involving several stages of clinical testing before use. The authors provide an overview of issues regarding the clinical use of PTSD biomarkers and examine a set of genetic, epigenetic, and other blood-based markers along with physiological markers currently proposed as candidate tests for PTSD. Studies that have identified candidate biomarkers with relevance to treatment selection in PTSD are discussed as a promising area of research that may lead to changes in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Yang
- The authors are with the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Yang is also with the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Gary H Wynn
- The authors are with the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Yang is also with the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Robert J Ursano
- The authors are with the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Yang is also with the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|