Membrane electrical excitability is necessary for the free-running larval Drosophila circadian clock

BK calcium-activated potassium channels regulate circadian behavioral rhythms and pacemaker output

Spontaneous action potentials in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) are necessary for normal circadian timing of behavior in mammals. The SCN exhibits a daily oscillation in spontaneous firing rate (SFR), but the ionic conductances controlling SFR and the relationship of SFR to subsequent circadian behavioral rhythms are not understood. We show that daily expression of the large conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channel (BK) in the SCN is controlled by the intrinsic circadian clock. BK channel-null mice (Kcnma1(-/-)) have increased SFRs in SCN neurons selectively at night and weak circadian amplitudes in multiple behaviors timed by the SCN. Kcnma1(-/-) mice show normal expression of clock genes such as Arntl (Bmal1), indicating a role for BK channels in SCN pacemaker output, rather than in intrinsic time-keeping. Our findings implicate BK channels as important regulators of the SFR and suggest that the SCN pacemaker governs the expression of circadian behavioral rhythms through SFR modulation.

Functional analysis of circadian pacemaker neurons in Drosophila melanogaster

The molecular mechanisms of circadian rhythms are well known, but how multiple clocks within one organism generate a structured rhythmic output remains a mystery. Many animals show bimodal activity rhythms with morning (M) and evening (E) activity bouts. One long-standing model assumes that two mutually coupled oscillators underlie these bouts and show different sensitivities to light. Three groups of lateral neurons (LN) and three groups of dorsal neurons govern behavioral rhythmicity of Drosophila. Recent data suggest that two groups of the LN (the ventral subset of the small LN cells and the dorsal subset of LN cells) are plausible candidates for the M and E oscillator, respectively. We provide evidence that these neuronal groups respond differently to light and can be completely desynchronized from one another by constant light, leading to two activity components that free-run with different periods. As expected, a long-period component started from the E activity bout. However, a short-period component originated not exclusively from the morning peak but more prominently from the evening peak. This reveals an interesting deviation from the original Pittendrigh and Daan (1976) model and suggests that a subgroup of the ventral subset of the small LN acts as "main" oscillator controlling M and E activity bouts in Drosophila.

Electrical hyperexcitation of lateral ventral pacemaker neurons desynchronizes downstream circadian oscillators in the fly circadian circuit and induces multiple behavioral periods

Coupling of autonomous cellular oscillators is an essential aspect of circadian clock function but little is known about its circuit requirements. Functional ablation of the pigment-dispersing factor-expressing lateral ventral subset (LNV) of Drosophila clock neurons abolishes circadian rhythms of locomotor activity. The hypothesis that LNVs synchronize oscillations in downstream clock neurons was tested by rendering the LNVs hyperexcitable via transgenic expression of a low activation threshold voltage-gated sodium channel. When the LNVs are made hyperexcitable, free-running behavioral rhythms decompose into multiple independent superimposed oscillations and the clock protein oscillations in the dorsal neuron 1 and 2 subgroups of clock neurons are phase-shifted. Thus, regulated electrical activity of the LNVs synchronize multiple oscillators in the fly circadian pacemaker circuit.

GABA modulates Drosophila circadian clock neurons via GABAB receptors and decreases in calcium

Circadian clocks play vital roles in the control of daily rhythms in physiology and behavior of animals. In Drosophila, analysis of the molecular and behavioral rhythm has shown that the master clock neurons are entrained by sensory inputs and are synchronized with other clock neurons. However, little is known about the neuronal circuits of the Drosophila circadian system and the neurotransmitters that act on the clock neurons. Here, we provide evidence for a new neuronal input pathway to the master clock neurons, s-LN(v)s, in Drosophila that utilizes GABA as a slow inhibitory neurotransmitter. We monitored intracellular calcium levels in dissociated larval s-LN(v)s with the calcium-sensitive dye Fura-2. GABA decreased intracellular calcium in the s-LN(v)s and blocked spontaneous oscillations in calcium levels. The duration of this response was dose-dependent between 1 nM and 100 microM. The response to GABA was blocked by a metabotropic GABA(B) receptor (GABA(B)-R) antagonist, CGP54626, but not by an ionotropic receptor antagonist, picrotoxin. The GABA(B)-R agonist, 3-APMPA, produced a response similar to GABA. An antiserum against one of the Drosophila GABA(B)-Rs (GABA(B)-R2) labeled the dendritic regions of the s-LN(v)s in both adults and larvae, as well as the dissociated s-LN(v)s. We found that some GABAergic processes terminate at the dendrites of the LN(v)s, as revealed by GABA immunostaining and a GABA-specific GAL4 line (GAD1-gal4). Our results suggest that the s-LN(v)s receive slow inhibitory GABAergic inputs that decrease intracellular calcium of these clock neurons and block their calcium cycling. This response is mediated by postsynaptic GABA(B) receptors.

Neural circuits underlying circadian behavior in Drosophila melanogaster

Circadian clocks include control systems for organizing daily behavior. Such a system consists of a time-keeping mechanism (the clock or pacemaker), input pathways for entraining the clock, and output pathways for producing overt rhythms in behavior and physiology. In Drosophila melanogaster, as in mammals, neural circuits play vital roles in all three functional subdivisions of the circadian system. Regarding the pacemaker, multiple clock neurons, each with cell-autonomous pacemaker capability, are coupled to each other in a network. The outputs of different sets of clock neurons in this network combine to produce the normal bimodal pattern of locomotor activity observed in Drosophila. Regarding input, multiple sensory modalities (including light, temperature, and pheromones) use their own circuitry to entrain the clock. Regarding output, distinct circuits are likely involved for controlling the timing of eclosion and for generating the locomotor activity rhythms. This review summarizes work on all of these circadian circuits, and discusses the broader utility of studying the fly's circadian system.

Modular neuropile organization in theDrosophila larval brain facilitates identification and mapping of central neurons

Elucidating how neuronal networks process information requires identification of critical individual neurons and their connectivity patterns. For this purpose, we used the third-instar Drosophila larval brain and applied reverse-genetic tools, immunolabeling procedures, and 3D digital reconstruction software. Consistent topological definition of neuropile compartments in the larval brain can be obtained through simple fluorescence-immunolabeling methods. The modular neuropiles can be used as a fiducial framework for mapping the projection patterns of individual neurons labeled with green fluorescent protein (GFP). GFP-labeled neurons often exhibit dendrite-like arbors as well as clustered varicose terminals on neurite branches that innervate identifiable neuropile compartments. We identified candidate cholinergic interneurons in genetic mosaic brains that overlap with the larval optic nerve terminus. By using the neuropile framework, we demonstrate that the candidate visual interneurons are not a subset of the previously identified circadian pacemaker neurons that also contact the larval optic nerve terminus; they may represent parallel pathways in the processing of visual inputs. Thus, in the Drosophila larval brain, modular neuropiles can be used as a framework for systematically identifying, mapping, and classifying interneurons; understanding their roles in behavior can then be pursued further.

Circadian pacemaker neurons transmit and modulate visual information to control a rapid behavioral response

Circadian pacemaker neurons contain a molecular clock that oscillates with a period of approximately 24 hr, controlling circadian rhythms of behavior. Pacemaker neurons respond to visual system inputs for clock resetting, but, unlike other neurons, have not been reported to transmit rapid signals to their targets. Here we show that pacemaker neurons are required to mediate a rapid behavior. The Drosophila larval visual system, Bolwig's organ (BO), projects to larval pacemaker neurons to entrain their clock. BO also mediates larval photophobic behavior. We found that ablation or electrical silencing of larval pacemaker neurons abolished light avoidance. Thus, circadian pacemaker neurons receive input from BO not only to reset the clock but also to transmit rapid photophobic signals. Furthermore, as clock gene mutations also affect photophobicity, the pacemaker neurons modulate the sensitivity of larvae to light, generating a circadian rhythm in visual sensitivity.

Membranes, Ions, and Clocks: Testing the Njus–Sulzman–Hastings Model of the Circadian Oscillator

Current circadian clock models based on interlocking autoregulatory transcriptional?translational negative feedback loops have arisen out of an explosion of molecular genetic data obtained over the last decade (for review, see Stanewsky, 2003; Young and Kay, 2001). An earlier model of circadian oscillation was based on feedback interactions between membrane ion transport systems and ion concentration gradients (Njus et al., 1974, 1976). This membrane model was posited as a more plausible alternative at the time to the even earlier "chronon" model, which was based on autoregulatory genetic feedback loops (Ehret and Trucco, 1967). The membrane model has been tested in a number of experimental systems by pharmacologically manipulating either ionic gradients across the plasma membrane or ion transport systems, but with inconsistent results. In the meantime, the scope and explanatory power of the genetic models overshadowed inquiries into the role of membrane ion fluxes in clock function. However, several recently developed techniques described in this article have provided a new glimpse into the essential role that membrane ion fluxes play in the mechanism of the core circadian oscillator and indicate that a complete understanding of the clock must include both genetic and membrane-based feedback loops.