51
|
Abstract
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a treatable chronic disorder with episodes of remission and recurrence characterized by loss of control of opioid use, compulsive use, and continued use despite harms. If untreated, OUD is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Buprenorphine and methadone reduce fatal and nonfatal opioid overdose and infectious complications of OUD and are the first-line treatment options. Physicians have an important role to play in diagnosing OUD and its comorbidities, offering evidence-based treatment, and delivering overdose prevention and other harm reduction services to people who continue to use opioids. Interdisciplinary office-based addiction treatment programs support high-quality OUD care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Taylor
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, and Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey H Samet
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, and Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Eyllon M, Dang AP, Barnes JB, Buresh J, Peloquin GD, Hogan AC, Shimotsu ST, Sama SR, Nordberg SS. Associations between psychiatric morbidity and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: An analysis of electronic health records and patient survey. Psychiatry Res 2022; 307:114329. [PMID: 34910966 PMCID: PMC8648380 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Psychiatric illness confers significant risk for severe COVID-19 morbidity and mortality; identifying psychiatric risk factors for vaccine hesitancy is critical to mitigating risk in this population. This study examined the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy among those with psychiatric illness and the associations between psychiatric morbidity and vaccine hesitancy. Data came from electronic health records and a patient survey obtained from 14,365 patients at a group medical practice between February and May 2021. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds for vaccine hesitancy adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and physical comorbidity. Of 14,365 participants 1,761 (12.3%) participants reported vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy was significantly more prevalent among participants with substance use (29.6%), attention deficit and hyperactivity (23.3%), posttraumatic stress (23.1%), bipolar (18.0%), generalized anxiety (16.5%), major depressive (16.1%), and other anxiety (15.5%) disorders, tobacco use (18.6%), and those previously infected with COVID-19 (19.8%) compared to participants without . After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and physical comorbidities, substance use disorders and tobacco use were significantly associated with increased odds for vaccine hesitancy and bipolar disorder was significantly inversely associated with vaccine hesitancy. Interventions to improve uptake in these populations may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Eyllon
- Practice Research Network, Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, United States.
| | - Alexander P. Dang
- OptumLabs, UnitedHealth Group, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - J. Ben Barnes
- Practice Research Network, Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, United States,Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
| | - John Buresh
- OptumLabs, UnitedHealth Group, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | | | - Annika C. Hogan
- Practice Research Network, Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, United States
| | - Scott T. Shimotsu
- OptumLabs, UnitedHealth Group, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Susan R. Sama
- Practice Research Network, Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, United States,Department of Public Health, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States
| | - Samuel S. Nordberg
- Practice Research Network, Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, United States,Behavioral Health Department, Reliant Medical Group, Worcester, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Gulbransen K, Thiessen K, Pidutti J, Watson H, Winkler J. Scoping Review of Best Practice Guidelines for Care in the Labor and Birth Setting of Pregnant Women Who Use Methamphetamines. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2021; 51:141-152. [PMID: 34914926 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2021.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To use a scoping review to explore the existing literature on best practice guidelines for safe, dignified, and compassionate care in the labor and birth setting for pregnant women who use methamphetamines. DATA SOURCES We conducted a systematic search for articles and best practice guidelines from health-related databases (MEDLINE; CINAHL; and the Web of Science, including the Core Collection and Social Science Citation Index, PsycInfo, Women's Studies International, and Sociological Abstracts) and gray literature. Search terms included substance use disorder, methamphetamine, childbirth, and labor and delivery. STUDY SELECTION We included English-language, peer-reviewed reports of primary research, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines from credible databases and organizations published between 1991 and 2020. We screened 1,297 resources and agreed to review 156 articles and 16 gray literature resources in the full-text analysis. Nine of the 156 articles and 16 gray literature resources met the inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION We used the Joanna Briggs Institute review guidelines (2015) criteria for extraction of the following data: author(s); year of publication; type of study; objectives; country of origin; study population and sample size (if applicable); inclusion of best practice guidelines for the labor and birth setting; care approaches specific to safety, dignity, compassion; and the targeted substance(s) discussed (e.g., methamphetamine, opioids, etc.). We further documented the phenomena of interest to determine if articles or best practice guidelines included safe, dignified, and compassionate care approaches specific to pregnant women who use methamphetamine. DATA SYNTHESIS We summarized the best practice guidelines, which included universal screening, assessment, and management of analgesia during labor, as well as broad guidance regarding the inclusion of a multidisciplinary health care team. Safe, dignified, and compassionate care approaches were focused on communication, shared decision making, and the provision of nonjudgmental care. Although evidence about substance use during the childbearing years is increasing, stronger evidence for clinical care approaches in the labor and birth setting is needed, inclusive of all stakeholder perspectives. CONCLUSION The articles and best practice guidelines reviewed provided broad clinical recommendations that were applicable to pregnant women who use methamphetamine. However, we did not find a complete comprehensive best practice guideline for labor and birth that was specific, was solution focused, and delineated a safe, dignified, and compassionate care approach.
Collapse
|
54
|
Taylor JL, Johnson S, Cruz R, Gray JR, Schiff D, Bagley SM. Integrating Harm Reduction into Outpatient Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Settings : Harm Reduction in Outpatient Addiction Treatment. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:3810-3819. [PMID: 34159545 PMCID: PMC8218967 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06904-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is increasingly recognized as a chronic, relapsing brain disease whose treatment should be integrated into primary care settings alongside other chronic conditions. However, abstinence from all non-prescribed substance use continues to be prioritized as the only desired goal in many outpatient, primary care-based treatment programs. This presents a barrier to engagement for patients who continue to use substances and who may be at high risk for complications of ongoing substance use such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), superficial and deep tissue infections, and overdose. Harm reduction aims to reduce the negative consequences of substance use and offers an alternative to abstinence as a singular goal. Incorporating harm reduction principles into primary care treatment settings can support programs in engaging patients with ongoing substance use and facilitate the delivery of evidence-based screening and prevention services. The objective of this narrative review is to describe strategies for the integration of evidence-based harm reduction principles and interventions into outpatient, primary care-based OUD treatment settings. We will offer specific tools for providers and programs including strategies to support safer injection practices, assess the risks and benefits of continuing medications for opioid use disorder in the setting of ongoing substance use, promote a non-stigmatizing program culture, and address the needs of special populations with ongoing substance use including adolescents, parents, and families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Taylor
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine & Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
- Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Samantha Johnson
- Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ricardo Cruz
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine & Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica R Gray
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Davida Schiff
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah M Bagley
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine & Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Grayken Center for Addiction, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Biello KB, Mimiaga MJ, Valente PK, Saxena N, Bazzi AR. The Past, Present, and Future of PrEP implementation Among People Who Use Drugs. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2021; 18:328-338. [PMID: 33907971 PMCID: PMC8286349 DOI: 10.1007/s11904-021-00556-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Recent HIV outbreaks among people who use drugs (PWUD) necessitate additional HIV prevention tools. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly efficacious yet uptake among PWUD remains exceedingly low. To address multilevel, complex barriers to PrEP use among PWUD, a range of intervention strategies are needed. RECENT FINDINGS The literature on interventions to optimize PrEP use among PWUD is nascent, comprising small pilots and demonstration projects in early phases of intervention development. Initial studies suggest that structural, healthcare, interpersonal, and individual-level interventions can improve PrEP use for PWUD, and a number of efficacy trials are underway. Future studies are needed to optimize the use of new PrEP modalities (e.g., injectable PrEP), simultaneously target multilevel challenges to PrEP use, and evaluate the integration of PrEP into other service settings and substance use treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie B Biello
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
- Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Matthew J Mimiaga
- The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for LGBTQ Advocacy, Research, and Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Pablo K Valente
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Nimish Saxena
- The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Angela R Bazzi
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
A randomized controlled trial of a brief behavioral intervention to reduce skin and soft tissue infections among people who inject drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 221:108646. [PMID: 33677353 PMCID: PMC8055301 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), but few interventions have targeted their reduction. The goal of the current study was to test the effects of a brief skin and needle hygiene behavioral intervention (SKIN) in a two-group randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. METHOD PWID (N = 252) were recruited from inpatient hospital units at a single urban medical center site and randomly assigned to an assessment-only (AO) condition or SKIN, which was a two-session intervention that included psychoeducation, behavioral skills demonstrations, and motivational interviewing. Mixed effects generalized linear models assessed the impact of the intervention on frequency of: 1) self-reported SSTIs, 2) uncleaned skin injections, and 3) injection. RESULTS Participants were 58.3 % male, 59.5 % White, and averaged 38 years of age. SKIN participants had 35 % fewer SSTIs compared to AO (p = .179), a difference of nearly one infection per year. The mean rate of uncleaned skin injections was about 66 % lower (IRR = 0.34, 95 % CI 0.20; 0.59, p < .001) among SKIN participants compared to AO. Almost one-third of participants reported no injection over follow-up and the mean rate of injection during follow-up was about 39 % lower (IRR = 0.61; 95 % CI 0.36; 1.02, p = .058) among persons randomized to SKIN than AO. CONCLUSIONS The SKIN intervention reduced uncleaned skin injections but did not reduce SSTIs significantly more than a control condition. Brief interventions can improve high-risk practices among PWID and lead to clinically meaningful outcomes.
Collapse
|