Evidence that direct binding of G beta gamma to the GIRK1 G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ channel is important for channel activation

The role of D2-autoreceptors in regulating dopamine neuron activity and transmission

Dopamine D2-autoreceptors play a key role in regulating the activity of dopamine neurons and control the synthesis, release and uptake of dopamine. These Gi/o-coupled inhibitory receptors play a major part in shaping dopamine transmission. Found at both somatodendritic and axonal sites, autoreceptors regulate the firing patterns of dopamine neurons and control the timing and amount of dopamine released from their terminals in target regions. Alterations in the expression and activity of autoreceptors are thought to contribute to Parkinson's disease as well as schizophrenia, drug addiction and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which emphasizes the importance of D2-autoreceptors in regulating the dopamine system. This review will summarize the cellular actions of dopamine autoreceptors and discuss recent advances that have furthered our understanding of the mechanisms by which D2-receptors control dopamine transmission.

Emerging non-canonical functions for heterotrimeric G proteins in cellular signaling

Classically heterotrimeric G proteins have been described as the principal signal transducing machinery for G-protein-coupled receptors. Receptor activation catalyzes nucleotide exchange on the Gα protein, enabling Gα-GTP and Gβγ-subunits to engage intracellular effectors to generate various cellular effects such as second messenger production or regulation of ion channel conductivity. Recent genetic and proteomic screens have identified novel heterotrimeric G-protein-interacting proteins and expanded their functional roles. This review highlights some examples of recently identified interacting proteins and summarizes how they functionally connect heterotrimeric G proteins to previously underappreciated cellular roles.

New insights into the therapeutic potential of Girk channels

G protein-dependent signaling pathways control the activity of excitable cells of the nervous system and heart, and are the targets of neurotransmitters, clinically relevant drugs, and drugs of abuse. G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (K(+)) (Girk/Kir3) channels are a key effector in inhibitory signaling pathways. Girk-dependent signaling contributes to nociception and analgesia, reward-related behavior, mood, cognition, and heart-rate regulation, and has been linked to epilepsy, Down syndrome, addiction, and arrhythmias. We discuss recent advances in our understanding of Girk channel structure, organization in signaling complexes, and plasticity, as well as progress on the development of subunit-selective Girk modulators. These findings offer new hope for the selective manipulation of Girk channels to treat a variety of debilitating afflictions.

Conformational changes underlying pore dilation in the cytoplasmic domain of mammalian inward rectifier K+ channels

The cytoplasmic domain of inward rectifier K⁺ (Kir) channels associates with cytoplasmic ligands and undergoes conformational change to control the gate present in its transmembrane domain. Ligand-operated activation appears to cause dilation of the pore at the cytoplasmic domain. However, it is still unclear how the cytoplasmic domain supports pore dilation and how alterations to this domain affect channel activity. In the present study, we focused on 2 spatially adjacent residues, i.e., Glu236 and Met313, of the G protein-gated Kir channel subunit Kir3.2. In the closed state, these pore-facing residues are present on adjacent βD and βH strands, respectively. We mutated both residues, expressed them with the m₂-muscarinic receptor in Xenopus oocytes, and measured the acetylcholine-dependent K⁺ currents. The dose-response curves of the Glu236 mutants tended to be shifted to the right. In comparison, the slopes of the concentration-dependent curves were reduced and the single-channel properties were altered in the Met313 mutants. The introduction of arginine at position 236 conferred constitutive activity and caused a leftward shift in the conductance-voltage relationship. The crystal structure of the cytoplasmic domain of the mutant showed that the arginine contacts the main chains of the βH and βI strands of the adjacent subunit. Because the βH strand forms a β sheet with the βI and βD strands, the immobilization of the pore-forming β sheet appears to confer unique properties to the mutant. These results suggest that the G protein association triggers pore dilation at the cytoplasmic domain in functional channels, and the pore-constituting structural elements contribute differently to these conformational changes.

Molecular mechanism underlying ethanol activation of G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channels

Alcohol (ethanol) produces a wide range of pharmacological effects on the nervous system through its actions on ion channels. The molecular mechanism underlying ethanol modulation of ion channels is poorly understood. Here we used a unique method of alcohol-tagging to demonstrate that alcohol activation of a G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK or Kir3) channel is mediated by a defined alcohol pocket through changes in affinity for the membrane phospholipid signaling molecule phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. Surprisingly, hydrophobicity and size, but not the canonical hydroxyl, were important determinants of alcohol-dependent activation. Altering levels of G protein Gβγ subunits, conversely, did not affect alcohol-dependent activation, suggesting a fundamental distinction between receptor and alcohol gating of GIRK channels. The chemical properties of the alcohol pocket revealed here might extend to other alcohol-sensitive proteins, revealing a unique protein microdomain for targeting alcohol-selective therapeutics in the treatment of alcoholism and addiction.

Membrane channels as integrators of G-protein-mediated signaling

A variety of extracellular stimuli regulate cellular responses via membrane receptors. A well-known group of seven-transmembrane domain-containing proteins referred to as G protein-coupled receptors, directly couple with the intracellular GTP-binding proteins (G proteins) across cell membranes and trigger various cellular responses by regulating the activity of several enzymes as well as ion channels. Many specific populations of ion channels are directly controlled by G proteins; however, indirect modulation of some channels by G protein-dependent phosphorylation events and lipid metabolism is also observed. G protein-mediated diverse modifications affect the ion channel activities and spatio-temporally regulate membrane potentials as well as of intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations in both excitatory and non-excitatory cells. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Reciprocal influences between cell cytoskeleton and membrane channels, receptors and transporters. Guest Editor: Jean Claude Hervé.

Minireview: Targeting GPCR Activated ERK Pathways for Drug Discovery

It has become clear in recent years that multiple signal transduction pathways are employed upon GPCR activation. One of the major cellular effectors activated by GPCRs is extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Both G-protein and β-arrestin mediated signaling pathways can lead to ERK activation. However, depending on activation pathway, the subcellular destination of activated ERK1/2 may be different. G-protein -dependent ERK activation results in the translocation of active ERK to the nucleus, whereas ERK activated via an arrestin-dependent mechanism remains largely in the cytoplasm. The subcellular location of activated ERK1/2 determines the downstream signaling cascade. Many substrates of ERK1/2 are found in the nucleus: nuclear transcription factors that participate in gene transcription, cell proliferation and differentiation. ERK1/2 substrates are also found in cytosol and other cellular organelles: they may play roles in translation, mitosis, apoptosis and cross-talk with other signaling pathways. Therefore, determining specific subcellular locations of activated ERK1/2 mediated by GPCR ligands would be important in correlating signaling pathways with cellular physiological functions. While GPCR-stimulated selective ERK pathway activation has been studied in several receptor systems, exploitation of these different signaling cascades for therapeutics has not yet been seriously pursued. Many old drug candidates were identified from screens based on G-protein signaling assays, and their activity on β-arrestin signaling pathways being mostly unknown, especially regarding their subcellular ERK pathways. With today’s knowledge of complicated GPCR signaling pathways, drug discovery can no longer rely on single-pathway approaches. Since ERK activation is an important signaling pathway and associated with many physiological functions, targeting the ERK pathway, especially specific subcellular activation pathways should provide new avenues for GPCR drug discovery.

X-ray structure of the mammalian GIRK2-βγ G-protein complex

G protein-gated inward rectifier K⁺ (GIRK) channels allow neurotransmitters, via G protein-coupled receptor stimulation, to control cellular electrical excitability. In cardiac and neuronal cells this control regulates heart rate and neural circuit activity. We present the 3.5 Å resolution crystal structure of the mammalian GIRK2 channel in complex with βγ G protein subunits, the central signaling complex that links G protein-coupled receptor stimulation to K⁺ channel activity. Short-range atomic and long-range electrostatic interactions stabilize four βγ G protein subunits at the interfaces between four K⁺ channel subunits, inducing a pre-open state of the channel. The pre-open state exhibits a conformation that is intermediate between the closed and constitutively active mutant, open conformations. The resultant structural picture is compatible with “membrane delimited” activation of GIRK channels by G proteins and the characteristic burst kinetics of channel gating. The structures also permit a conceptual understanding of how the signaling lipid PIP₂ and intracellular Na⁺ ions participate in multi-ligand regulation of GIRK channels.

Abundance, distribution, mobility and oligomeric state of M₂ muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in live cardiac muscle

M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors modulate cardiac rhythm via regulation of the inward potassium current. To increase our understanding of M2 receptor physiology we used Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy to visualize individual receptors at the plasma membrane of transformed CHO(M2) cells, a cardiac cell line (HL-1), primary cardiomyocytes and tissue slices from pre- and post-natal mice. Receptor expression levels between individual cells in dissociated cardiomyocytes and heart slices were highly variable and only 10% of murine cardiomyocytes expressed muscarinic receptors. M2 receptors were evenly distributed across individual cells and their density in freshly isolated embryonic cardiomyocytes was ~1μm(-2), increasing at birth (to ~3μm(-2)) and decreasing back to ~1μm(-2) after birth. M2 receptors were primarily monomeric but formed reversible dimers. They diffused freely at the plasma membrane, moving approximately 4-times faster in heart slices than in cultured cardiomyocytes. Knowledge of receptor density and mobility has allowed receptor collision rate to be modeled by Monte Carlo simulations. Our estimated encounter rate of 5-10 collisions per second, may explain the latency between acetylcholine application and GIRK channel opening.

The expanding roles of Gβγ subunits in G protein-coupled receptor signaling and drug action

Gβγ subunits from heterotrimeric G proteins perform a vast array of functions in cells with respect to signaling, often independently as well as in concert with Gα subunits. However, the eponymous term "Gβγ" does not do justice to the fact that 5 Gβ and 12 Gγ isoforms have evolved in mammals to serve much broader roles beyond their canonical roles in cellular signaling. We explore the phylogenetic diversity of Gβγ subunits with a view toward understanding these expanded roles in different cellular organelles. We suggest that the particular content of distinct Gβγ subunits regulates cellular activity, and that the granularity of individual Gβ and Gγ action is only beginning to be understood. Given the therapeutic potential of targeting Gβγ action, this larger view serves as a prelude to more specific development of drugs aimed at individual isoforms.

Kir2.4 surface expression and basal current are affected by heterotrimeric G-proteins

Kir2.4, a strongly rectifying potassium channel that is localized to neurons and is especially abundant in retina, was fished with yeast two-hybrid screen using a constitutively active Gαo1. Here, we wished to determine whether and how Gαo affects this channel. Using transfected HEK 293 cells and retinal tissue, we showed that Kir2.4 interacts with Gαo, and this interaction is stronger with the GDP-bound form of Gαo. Using two-electrode voltage clamp, we recorded from oocytes that were injected with Kir2.4 mRNA and a combination of G-protein subunit mRNAs. We found that the wild type and the inactive mutant of Gαo reduce the Kir2.4 basal current, whereas the active mutant has little effect. Other pertussis-sensitive Gα subunits also reduce this current, whereas Gαs increases it. Gβγ increases the current, whereas m-phosducin, which binds Gβγ without affecting the state of Gα, reduces it. We then tested the effect of G-protein subunits on the surface expression of the channel fused to cerulean by imaging the plasma membranes of the oocytes. We found that the surface expression is affected, with effects paralleling those seen with the basal current. This suggests that the observed effects on the current are mainly indirect and are due to surface expression. Similar results were obtained in transfected HEK cells. Moreover, we show that in retinal ON bipolar cells lacking Gβ3, localization of Kir2.4 in the dendritic tips is reduced. We conclude that Gβγ targets Kir2.4 to the plasma membrane, and Gαo slows this down by binding Gβγ.

TREK-1 and Best1 channels mediate fast and slow glutamate release in astrocytes upon GPCR activation

Astrocytes release glutamate upon activation of various GPCRs to exert important roles in synaptic functions. However, the molecular mechanism of release has been controversial. Here, we report two kinetically distinct modes of nonvesicular, channel-mediated glutamate release. The fast mode requires activation of G(αi), dissociation of G(βγ), and subsequent opening of glutamate-permeable, two-pore domain potassium channel TREK-1 through direct interaction between G(βγ) and N terminus of TREK-1. The slow mode is Ca(2+) dependent and requires G(αq) activation and opening of glutamate-permeable, Ca(2+)-activated anion channel Best1. Ultrastructural analyses demonstrate that TREK-1 is preferentially localized at cell body and processes, whereas Best1 is mostly found in microdomains of astrocytes near synapses. Diffusion modeling predicts that the fast mode can target neuronal mGluR with peak glutamate concentration of 100 μM, whereas slow mode targets neuronal NMDA receptors at around 1 μM. Our results reveal two distinct sources of astrocytic glutamate that can differentially influence neighboring neurons.

Conformational dynamics of Kir3.1/Kir3.2 channel activation via δ-opioid receptors

This study assessed how conformational information encoded by ligand binding to δ-opioid receptors (DORs) is transmitted to Kir3.1/Kir3.2 channels. Human embryonic kidney 293 cells were transfected with bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) donor/acceptor pairs that allowed us to evaluate independently reciprocal interactions among signaling partners. These and coimmunoprecipitation studies indicated that DORs, Gβγ, and Kir3 subunits constitutively interacted with one another. GαoA associated with DORs and Gβγ, but despite being part of the complex, no evidence of its direct association with the channel was obtained. DOR activation by different ligands left DOR-Kir3 interactions unmodified but modulated BRET between DOR-GαoA, DOR-Gβγ, GαoA-Gβγ, and Gβγ-Kir3 interfaces. Ligand-induced BRET changes assessing Gβγ-Kir3.1 subunit interaction 1) followed similar kinetics to those monitoring the GαoA-Gβγ interface, 2) displayed the same order of efficacy as those observed at the DOR-Gβγ interface, 3) were sensitive to pertussis toxin, and 4) were predictive of whether a ligand could evoke channel currents. Conformational changes at the Gβγ/Kir3 interface were lost when Kir3.1 subunits were replaced by a mutant lacking essential sites for Gβγ-mediated activation. Thus, conformational information encoded by agonist binding to the receptor is relayed to the channel via structural rearrangements that involve repositioning of Gβγ with respect to DORs, GαoA, and channel subunits. Further, the fact that BRET changes at the Gβγ-Kir3 interface are predictive of a ligand's ability to induce channel currents points to these conformational biosensors as screening tools for identifying GPCR ligands that induce Kir3 channel activation.

Modulation of cell surface GABA(B) receptors by desensitization, trafficking and regulated degradation

Inhibitory neurotransmission ensures normal brain function by counteracting and integrating excitatory activity. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system, and mediates its effects via two classes of receptors: the GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors. GABA(A) receptors are heteropentameric GABA-gated chloride channels and responsible for fast inhibitory neurotransmission. GABA(B) receptors are heterodimeric G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) that mediate slow and prolonged inhibitory transmission. The extent of inhibitory neurotransmission is determined by a variety of factors, such as the degree of transmitter release and changes in receptor activity by posttranslational modifications (e.g., phosphorylation), as well as by the number of receptors present in the plasma membrane available for signal transduction. The level of GABA(B) receptors at the cell surface critically depends on the residence time at the cell surface and finally the rates of endocytosis and degradation. In this review we focus primarily on recent advances in the understanding of trafficking mechanisms that determine the expression level of GABA(B) receptors in the plasma membrane, and thereby signaling strength.

GPCR mediated regulation of synaptic transmission

Synaptic transmission is a finely regulated mechanism of neuronal communication. The release of neurotransmitter at the synapse is not only the reflection of membrane depolarization events, but rather, is the summation of interactions between ion channels, G protein coupled receptors, second messengers, and the exocytotic machinery itself which exposes the components within a synaptic vesicle to the synaptic cleft. The focus of this review is to explore the role of G protein signaling as it relates to neurotransmission, as well as to discuss the recently determined inhibitory mechanism of Gβγ dimers acting directly on the exocytotic machinery proteins to inhibit neurotransmitter release.

Heterodimerization of serotonin receptors 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 differentially regulates receptor signalling and trafficking

Serotonin receptors 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 are highly co-expressed in brain regions implicated in depression. However, their functional interaction has not been established. In the present study we show that 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 receptors form heterodimers both in vitro and in vivo. Foerster resonance energy transfer-based assays revealed that, in addition to heterodimers, homodimers composed either by 5-HT1A or 5-HT7 receptors together with monomers co-exist in cells. The highest affinity to form the complex was obtained for the 5-HT7-5-HT7 homodimers, followed by the 5-HT7-5-HT1A heterodimers and 5-HT1A-5-HT1A homodimers. Functionally, heterodimerization decreases 5-HT1A receptor-mediated activation of Gi-protein without affecting 5-HT7 receptor-mediated signalling. Moreover, heterodimerization markedly decreases the ability of the 5-HT1A receptor to activate G-protein gated inwardly rectifying potassium channels in a heterologous system. The inhibitory effect on such channels was also preserved in hippocampal neurons, demonstrating a physiological relevance of heteromerization in vivo. In addition, heterodimerization is critically involved in initiation of the serotonin-mediated 5-HT1A receptor internalization and also enhances the ability of the 5-HT1A receptor to activate the mitogen-activated protein kinases. Finally, we found that production of 5-HT7 receptors in hippocampus continuously decreases during postnatal development, indicating that the relative concentration of 5-HT1A-5-HT7 heterodimers and, consequently, their functional importance undergoes pronounced developmental changes.

Two distinct aspects of coupling between Gα(i) protein and G protein-activated K+ channel (GIRK) revealed by fluorescently labeled Gα(i3) protein subunits

G protein-activated K(+) channels (Kir3 or GIRK) are activated by direct interaction with Gβγ. Gα is essential for specific signaling and regulates basal activity of GIRK (I(basal)) and kinetics of the response elicited by activation by G protein-coupled receptors (I(evoked)). These regulations are believed to occur within a GIRK-Gα-Gβγ signaling complex. Fluorescent energy resonance transfer (FRET) studies showed strong GIRK-Gβγ interactions but yielded controversial results regarding the GIRK-Gα(i/o) interaction. We investigated the mechanisms of regulation of GIRK by Gα(i/o) using wild-type Gα(i3) (Gα(i3)WT) and Gα(i3) labeled at three different positions with fluorescent proteins, CFP or YFP (xFP). Gα(i3)xFP proteins bound the cytosolic domain of GIRK1 and interacted with Gβγ in a guanine nucleotide-dependent manner. However, only an N-terminally labeled, myristoylated Gα(i3)xFP (Gα(i3)NT) closely mimicked all aspects of Gα(i3)WT regulation except for a weaker regulation of I(basal). Gα(i3) labeled with YFP within the Gα helical domain preserved regulation of I(basal) but failed to restore fast I(evoked). Titrated expression of Gα(i3)NT and Gα(i3)WT confirmed that regulation of I(basal) and of the kinetics of I(evoked) of GIRK1/2 are independent functions of Gα(i). FRET and direct biochemical measurements indicated much stronger interaction between GIRK1 and Gβγ than between GIRK1 and Gα(i3). Thus, Gα(i/o)βγ heterotrimer may be attached to GIRK primarily via Gβγ within the signaling complex. Our findings support the notion that Gα(i/o) actively regulates GIRK. Although regulation of I(basal) is a function of Gα(i)(GDP), our new findings indicate that regulation of kinetics of I(evoked) is mediated by Gα(i)(GTP).

Evidence for oligomerization between GABAB receptors and GIRK channels containing the GIRK1 and GIRK3 subunits

The stimulation of inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors, such as γ-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B) ) receptors, activates G protein-gated inwardly-rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels, which influence membrane excitability. There is now evidence suggesting that G protein-coupled receptors and G protein-gated inwardly-rectifying K(+) [GIRK/family 3 of inwardly-rectifying K(+) (Kir3)] channels do not diffuse freely within the plasma membrane, but instead there are direct protein-protein interactions between them. Here, we used bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, co-immunoprecipitation, confocal and electron microscopy techniques to investigate the oligomerization of GABA(B) receptors with GIRK channels containing the GIRK3 subunit, whose contribution to functional channels is still unresolved. Co-expression of GABA(B) receptors and GIRK channels in human embryonic kidney-293 cells in combination with co-immunoprecipitation experiments established that the metabotropic receptor forms stable complexes with GIRK channels. Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, we have shown that, in living cells under physiological conditions, GABA(B) receptors interact directly with GIRK1/GIRK3 heterotetramers. In addition, we have provided evidence that the receptor-effector complexes are also found in vivo and identified that the cerebellar granule cells are one neuron population where the interaction probably takes place. Altogether, our data show that signalling complexes containing GABA(B) receptors and GIRK channels are formed shortly after biosynthesis, probably in the endoplasmic reticulum and/or endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi apparatus complex, suggesting that this might be a general feature of receptor-effector ion channel signal transduction and supporting a channel-forming role for the GIRK3 subunit.

The role of G proteins in assembly and function of Kir3 inwardly rectifying potassium channels

Kir3 channels (also known as GIRK channels) are important regulators of electrical excitability in both cardiomyocytes and neurons. Much is known regarding the assembly and function of these channels and the roles that their interacting proteins play in controlling these events. Further, they are one of the best studied effectors of heterotrimeric G proteins in general and Gβγ subunits in particular. However, our understanding of the roles of multiple Gβγ binding sites on Kir3 channels is still rudimentary. We discuss potential roles for Gβγ in channel assembly and trafficking in addition to their known role in cellular signaling.

Emerging roles for G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels in health and disease

G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels hyperpolarize neurons in response to activation of many different G protein-coupled receptors and thus control the excitability of neurons through GIRK-mediated self-inhibition, slow synaptic potentials and volume transmission. GIRK channel function and trafficking are highly dependent on the channel subunit composition. Pharmacological investigations of GIRK channels and studies in animal models suggest that GIRK activity has an important role in physiological responses, including pain perception and memory modulation. Moreover, abnormal GIRK function has been implicated in altering neuronal excitability and cell death, which may be important in the pathophysiology of diseases such as epilepsy, Down's syndrome, Parkinson's disease and drug addiction. GIRK channels may therefore prove to be a valuable new therapeutic target.

HL-1 cells express an inwardly rectifying K+ current activated via muscarinic receptors comparable to that in mouse atrial myocytes

An inwardly rectifying K(+) current is present in atrial cardiac myocytes that is activated by acetylcholine (I(KACh)). Physiologically, activation of the current in the SA node is important in slowing the heart rate with increased parasympathetic tone. It is a paradigm for the direct regulation of signaling effectors by the Gbetagamma G-protein subunit. Many questions have been addressed in heterologous expression systems with less focus on the behaviour in native myocytes partly because of the technical difficulties in undertaking comparable studies in native cells. In this study, we characterise a potassium current in the atrial-derived cell line HL-1. Using an electrophysiological approach, we compare the characteristics of the potassium current with those in native atrial cells and in a HEK cell line expressing the cloned Kir3.1/3.4 channel. The potassium current recorded in HL-1 is inwardly rectifying and activated by the muscarinic agonist carbachol. Carbachol-activated currents were inhibited by pertussis toxin and tertiapin-Q. The basal current was time-dependently increased when GTP was substituted in the patch-clamp pipette by the non-hydrolysable analogue GTPgammaS. We compared the kinetics of current modulation in HL-1 with those of freshly isolated atrial mouse cardiomyocytes. The current activation and deactivation kinetics in HL-1 cells are comparable to those measured in atrial cardiomyocytes. Using immunofluorescence, we found GIRK4 at the membrane in HL-1 cells. Real-time RT-PCR confirms the presence of mRNA for the main G-protein subunits, as well as for M2 muscarinic and A1 adenosine receptors. The data suggest HL-1 cells are a good model to study IKAch.

Inwardly rectifying potassium channels: their structure, function, and physiological roles

Inwardly rectifying K(+) (Kir) channels allow K(+) to move more easily into rather than out of the cell. They have diverse physiological functions depending on their type and their location. There are seven Kir channel subfamilies that can be classified into four functional groups: classical Kir channels (Kir2.x) are constitutively active, G protein-gated Kir channels (Kir3.x) are regulated by G protein-coupled receptors, ATP-sensitive K(+) channels (Kir6.x) are tightly linked to cellular metabolism, and K(+) transport channels (Kir1.x, Kir4.x, Kir5.x, and Kir7.x). Inward rectification results from pore block by intracellular substances such as Mg(2+) and polyamines. Kir channel activity can be modulated by ions, phospholipids, and binding proteins. The basic building block of a Kir channel is made up of two transmembrane helices with cytoplasmic NH(2) and COOH termini and an extracellular loop which folds back to form the pore-lining ion selectivity filter. In vivo, functional Kir channels are composed of four such subunits which are either homo- or heterotetramers. Gene targeting and genetic analysis have linked Kir channel dysfunction to diverse pathologies. The crystal structure of different Kir channels is opening the way to understanding the structure-function relationships of this simple but diverse ion channel family.

G alpha(i) and G betagamma jointly regulate the conformations of a G betagamma effector, the neuronal G protein-activated K+ channel (GIRK)

Stable complexes among G proteins and effectors are an emerging concept in cell signaling. The prototypical G betagamma effector G protein-activated K(+) channel (GIRK; Kir3) physically interacts with G betagamma but also with G alpha(i/o). Whether and how G alpha(i/o) subunits regulate GIRK in vivo is unclear. We studied triple interactions among GIRK subunits 1 and 2, G alpha(i3) and G betagamma. We used in vitro protein interaction assays and in vivo intramolecular Förster resonance energy transfer (i-FRET) between fluorophores attached to N and C termini of either GIRK1 or GIRK2 subunit. We demonstrate, for the first time, that G betagamma and G alpha(i3) distinctly and interdependently alter the conformational states of the heterotetrameric GIRK1/2 channel. Biochemical experiments show that G betagamma greatly enhances the binding of GIRK1 subunit to G alpha(i3)(GDP) and, unexpectedly, to G alpha(i3)(GTP). i-FRET showed that both G alpha(i3) and G betagamma induced distinct conformational changes in GIRK1 and GIRK2. Moreover, GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits assumed unique, distinct conformations when coexpressed with a "constitutively active" G alpha(i3) mutant and G betagamma together. These conformations differ from those assumed by GIRK1 or GIRK2 after separate coexpression of either G alpha(i3) or G betagamma. Both biochemical and i-FRET data suggest that GIRK acts as the nucleator of the GIRK-G alpha-G betagamma signaling complex and mediates allosteric interactions between G alpha(i)(GTP) and G betagamma. Our findings imply that G alpha(i/o) and the G alpha(i) betagamma heterotrimer can regulate a G betagamma effector both before and after activation by neurotransmitters.

The time course of dopamine transmission in the ventral tegmental area

Synaptic transmission mediated by G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) is not generally thought to be point-to-point. To determine the extent over which dopamine signals in the midbrain, the present study examined the concentration and time course of dopamine that underlies a D(2)-receptor IPSC (D(2)-IPSC) in the ventral tegmental area. Extracellular dopamine was measured electrochemically while simultaneously recording D(2)-IPSCs. The presence of dopamine was brief relative to the IPSC, suggesting that G-protein dependent potassium channel activation determined the IPSC time course. The activation kinetics of D(2) receptor-dependent potassium current was studied using outside-out patch recordings with rapid application of dopamine. Dopamine applied at a minimum concentration of 10 mum for a maximum of 100 ms mimicked the IPSC. Higher concentrations applied for as little as 5 ms did not change the kinetics of the current. The results indicate that both the intrinsic kinetics of G-protein coupled receptor signaling and a rapidly rising high concentration of dopamine determine the time course of the IPSC. Thus, dopamine transmission in the midbrain is more localized then previously proposed.

N terminus of type 5 adenylyl cyclase scaffolds Gs heterotrimer

According to accepted doctrine, agonist-bound G protein-coupled receptors catalyze the exchange of GDP for GTP and facilitate the dissociation of Galpha and Gbetagamma, which in turn regulate their respective effectors. More recently, the existence of preformed signaling complexes, which may include receptors, heterotrimeric G proteins, and/or effectors, is gaining acceptance. We show herein the existence of a preformed complex of inactive heterotrimer (Galpha(s) x betagamma) and the effector type 5 adenylyl cyclase (AC5), localized by the N terminus of AC5. GST fusions of AC5 N terminus (5NT) bind to purified G protein subunits (GDP-Galpha(s) and Gbetagamma) with apparent affinities of 270 +/- 21 and 190 +/- 7 nM, respectively. GDP-bound Galpha(s) and Gbetagamma did not compete, but rather facilitated their interaction with 5NT, consistent with the isolation of a ternary complex (5NT, Galpha(s), and Gbetagamma) by gel filtration. The AC5/Gbetagamma interaction was also demonstrated by immunoprecipitation and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and the binding site of heterotrimer Galpha(s) x betagamma mapped to amino acids 60 to 129 of 5NT. Deletion of this region in full-length AC5 resulted in significant reduction of FRET between Gbetagamma and AC. 5NT also interacts with the catalytic core of AC, mainly via the C1 domain, to enhance Galpha(s)--and forskolin-stimulated activity of C1/C2 domains. The N terminus also serves to constrain Galpha(i)-mediated inhibition of AC5, which is relieved in the presence of Gbetagamma. These results reveal that 5NT plays a key regulatory role by interacting with the catalytic core and scaffolding inactive heterotrimeric G proteins, forming a preassembled complex that is potentially braced for GPCR activation.

Elucidation of the gating of the GIRK channel using a spectroscopic approach

The traditional view of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signalling puts the players in this signalling cascade, namely the GPCR, the G protein and its effector, as individual components in space, where the signalling specificity is obtained mainly by the interaction of the GPCR and the Galpha subunits of the G protein. A question is then raised as to how fidelity in receptor signalling is achieved, given that many systems use the same components of the G protein signalling machinery. One possible mechanism for obtaining the specific flow of the downstream signals, from the activated G protein to its specific effector target, in a timely manner, is compartmentalization, a spatial arrangement of the complex in a rather restricted space. Here we review our recent findings related to these issues, using the G protein-coupled potassium channel (GIRK) as a model effector and fluorescence-based approaches to reveal how the signalling complex is arranged and how the G protein exerts its action to activate the GIRK channel in intact cells.

A discrete alcohol pocket involved in GIRK channel activation

Ethanol modifies neural activity in the brain by modulating ion channels. Ethanol activates G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K⁺ channels, but the molecular mechanism is not well understood. Here, we used a crystal structure of a mouse inward rectifier containing a bound alcohol and structure-based mutagenesis to probe a putative alcohol-binding pocket located in the cytoplasmic domains of GIRK channels. Substitutions with bulkier side-chains in the alcohol-binding pocket reduced or eliminated activation by alcohols. By contrast, alcohols inhibited constitutively open channels, such as IRK1 or GIRK2 that binds PIP₂ strongly. Mutations in the hydrophobic alcohol-binding pocket of these channels had no effect on alcohol-dependent inhibition, suggesting an alternate site is involved in inhibition. Comparison of high-resolution structures of inwardly rectifying K⁺ channels suggests a model for activation of GIRK channels utilizing this hydrophobic alcohol-binding pocket. These results provide a tool for developing therapeutic compounds that could mitigate the effects of alcohol.

Supramolecular assemblies and localized regulation of voltage-gated ion channels

This review addresses the localized regulation of voltage-gated ion channels by phosphorylation. Comprehensive data on channel regulation by associated protein kinases, phosphatases, and related regulatory proteins are mainly available for voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, which form the main focus of this review. Other voltage-gated ion channels and especially Kv7.1-3 (KCNQ1-3), the large- and small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels BK and SK2, and the inward-rectifying K+ channels Kir3 have also been studied to quite some extent and will be included. Regulation of the L-type Ca2+ channel Cav1.2 by PKA has been studied most thoroughly as it underlies the cardiac fight-or-flight response. A prototypical Cav1.2 signaling complex containing the beta2 adrenergic receptor, the heterotrimeric G protein Gs, adenylyl cyclase, and PKA has been identified that supports highly localized via cAMP. The type 2 ryanodine receptor as well as AMPA- and NMDA-type glutamate receptors are in close proximity to Cav1.2 in cardiomyocytes and neurons, respectively, yet independently anchor PKA, CaMKII, and the serine/threonine phosphatases PP1, PP2A, and PP2B, as is discussed in detail. Descriptions of the structural and functional aspects of the interactions of PKA, PKC, CaMKII, Src, and various phosphatases with Cav1.2 will include comparisons with analogous interactions with other channels such as the ryanodine receptor or ionotropic glutamate receptors. Regulation of Na+ and K+ channel phosphorylation complexes will be discussed in separate papers. This review is thus intended for readers interested in ion channel regulation or in localization of kinases, phosphatases, and their upstream regulators.

Divergent regulation of GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits of the neuronal G protein gated K+ channel by GalphaiGDP and Gbetagamma

G protein activated K+ channels (GIRK, Kir3) are switched on by direct binding of Gbetagamma following activation of Gi/o proteins via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Although Galphai subunits do not activate GIRKs, they interact with the channels and regulate the gating pattern of the neuronal heterotetrameric GIRK1/2 channel (composed of GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits) expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Coexpressed Galphai3 decreases the basal activity (Ibasal) and increases the extent of activation by purified or coexpressed Gbegagamma. Here we show that this regulation is exerted by the 'inactive' GDP-bound Galphai3GDP and involves the formation of Galphai3betagamma heterotrimers, by a mechanism distinct from mere sequestration of Gbetagamma 'away' from the channel. The regulation of basal and Gbetagamma-evoked current was produced by the 'constitutively inactive' mutant of Galphai3, Galphai3G203A, which strongly binds Gbetagamma, but not by the 'constitutively active' mutant, Galphai3Q204L, or by Gbetagamma-scavenging proteins. Furthermore, regulation by Galphai3G203A was unique to the GIRK1 subunit; it was not observed in homomeric GIRK2 channels. In vitro protein interaction experiments showed that purified Gbetagamma enhanced the binding of Galphai3GDP to the cytosolic domain of GIRK1, but not GIRK2. Homomeric GIRK2 channels behaved as a 'classical' Gbetagamma effector, showing low Ibasal and strong Gbetagamma-dependent activation. Expression of Galphai3G203A did not affect either Ibasal or Gbetagamma-induced activation. In contrast, homomeric GIRK1* (a pore mutant able to form functional homomeric channels) exhibited large Ibasal and was poorly activated by Gbegagamma. Expression of Galphai3GDP reduced Ibasal and restored the ability of Gbetagamma to activate GIRK1*, like in GIRK1/2. Transferring the unique distal segment of the C terminus of GIRK1 to GIRK2 rendered the latter functionally similar to GIRK1*. These results demonstrate that GIRK1 containing channels are regulated by both Galphai3GDP and Gbetagamma, while GIRK2 is a Gbetagamma-effector insensitive to Galphai3GDP.

Tolerance to repeated morphine administration is associated with increased potency of opioid agonists

Tolerance to the pain-relieving effects of opiates limits their clinical use. Although morphine tolerance is associated with desensitization of mu-opioid receptors, the underlying cellular mechanisms are not understood. One problem with the desensitization hypothesis is that acute morphine does not readily desensitize mu-opioid receptors in many cell types. Given that neurons in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) contribute to morphine antinociception and tolerance, an understanding of desensitization in PAG neurons is particularly relevant. Opioid activity in the PAG can be monitored with activation of G-protein-mediated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) currents. The present data show that opioids have a biphasic effect on GIRK currents in morphine tolerant rats. Opioid activation of GIRK currents is initially potentiated in morphine (EC(50)=281 nM) compared to saline (EC(50)=8.8 microM) pretreated rats as indicated by a leftward shift in the concentration-response curve for met-enkephalin (ME)-induced currents. These currents were inhibited by superfusion of the mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) suggesting that repeated morphine administration enhances agonist stimulation of mu-opioid receptor coupling to G-proteins. Although supersensitivity of mu-opioid receptors in the PAG is counterintuitive to the development of tolerance, peak GIRK currents from tolerant rats desensitized more than currents from saline pretreated rats (56% of peak current after 10 min compared to 15%, respectively). These data indicate that antinociceptive tolerance may be triggered by enhanced agonist potency resulting in increased desensitization of mu-opioid receptors.

Membrane signalling complexes: implications for development of functionally selective ligands modulating heptahelical receptor signalling

Technological development has considerably changed the way in which we evaluate drug efficacy and has led to a conceptual revolution in pharmacological theory. In particular, molecular resolution assays have revealed that heptahelical receptors may adopt multiple active conformations with unique signalling properties. It is therefore becoming widely accepted that ligand ability to stabilize receptor conformations with distinct signalling profiles may allow to direct the stimulus generated by an activated receptor towards a specific signalling pathway. This capacity to induce only a subset of the ensemble of responses regulated by a given receptor has been termed "functional selectivity" (or "stimulus trafficking"), and provides the bases for a highly specific regulation of receptor signalling. Concomitant with these observations, heptahelical receptors have been shown to associate with G proteins and effectors to form multimeric arrays. These complexes are constitutively formed during protein synthesis and are targeted to the cell surface as integral signalling units. Herein we summarize evidence supporting the existence of such constitutive signalling arrays and analyze the possibility that they may constitute viable targets for developing ligands with "functional selectivity".

1-[6-[[(17beta)-3-methoxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-yl]amino]hexyl]-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione (U73122) selectively inhibits Kir3 and BK channels in a phospholipase C-independent fashion

1-[6-[[(17beta)-3-methoxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-yl]amino]hexyl]-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione (U73122) is widely used to inhibit phospholipase C (PLC)-mediated signaling, but we and others have also reported a PLC-independent block of Kir3 channels in native cells. To elaborate on this major side effect, we examined the action of U73122 and 1-[6-[[(17beta)-3-methoxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-yl]amino]hexyl]-2,5-pyrollidinedione (U73343), a structurally related but not PLC-inhibiting analog, on Kir1.1, Kir2.1, or Kir3.1/3.2 channels expressed in HEK293 cells. Both compounds (10 microM) displayed an unusual degree of selectivity for Kir3, superior even to that of tertiapin, which discriminates between Kir3 and Kir2 but also inhibits Kir1.1. Recordings from mutant Kir2 and Kir3 channels showed that U73122 is unlikely to block Kir3 by interfering with binding of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, and U73122 did not seem to act like a pore blocker. U73122 and U73343 also unexpectedly suppressed Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels of the large-conductance type (MaxiK, BK) in a PLC-independent fashion. In single-channel recordings, both compounds significantly decreased open probability of BK channels and slowed their ultrafast gating ("flickering") at very depolarized potentials. Alignment of the amino acid sequences of Kir3 and BK channels suggested that the highly selective effect of U73122/U73343 is mediated by a homologous domain within the long C-terminal ends. In fact, mutations in the C-terminal region of Kir2 and Kir3 channels significantly altered their sensitivity to the two compounds. Our data strongly caution against the use of U73122 when exploring signaling pathways involving Kir3 and BK channels. However, the apparent binding of U73122/U73343 to a common structural motif might be exploited to develop drugs selectively targeting Kir3 and BK channels.

GPCR-Kir channel signaling complexes: defining rules of engagement

Ion channels and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are integral transmembrane proteins vital to a multitude of cell signaling and physiological functions. Members of these large protein families are known to interact directly with various intracellular protein partners in a dynamic and isoform-dependent manner, ultimately shaping their life cycle and signal output. The family of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channels (Kir3 or GIRK) expressed in brain, heart, and endocrine tissues were recently shown to stably associate with several different GPCRs, forming the basis of a macromolecular ion channel-GPCR signaling complex. The molecular determinants that mediate and maintain GPCR-Kir3 channel complexes are currently not well understood. Recent findings and emerging hypotheses on the assembly and stability of multiprotein GPCR-Kir channel signaling complexes are discussed, highlighting distinct mechanisms used by different Kir channel families. These protein-protein interaction processes are crucial in determining both the synaptic response times and the extent of GPCR "cross-talk" in Kir3-mediated inhibitory synaptic transmission.

G protein βγ subunits: central mediators of G protein-coupled receptor signaling

G protein betagamma subunits are central participants in G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathways. They interact with receptors, G protein alpha subunits and downstream targets to coordinate multiple, different GPCR functions. Much is known about the biology of Gbetagamma subunits but mysteries remain. Here, we will review what is known about general aspects of structure and function of Gbetagamma as well as discuss emerging mechanisms for regulation of Gbetagamma signaling. Recent data suggest that Gbetagamma is a potential therapeutic drug target. Thus, a thorough understanding of the molecular and physiological functions of Gbetagamma has significant implications.

Differential dissociation of G protein heterotrimers

Signalling by heterotrimeric G proteins is often isoform-specific, meaning certain effectors are regulated exclusively by one family of heterotrimers. For example, in excitable cells inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels are activated by G betagamma dimers derived specifically from G(i/o) heterotrimers. Since all active heterotrimers are thought to dissociate and release free G betagamma dimers, it is unclear why these channels respond primarily to dimers released by G(i/o) heterotrimers. We reconstituted GIRK channel activation in cells where we could quantify heterotrimer expression at the plasma membrane, GIRK channel activation, and heterotrimer dissociation. We find that G(oA) heterotrimers are more effective activators of GIRK channels than G(s) heterotrimers when comparable amounts of each are available. We also find that active G(oA) heterotrimers dissociate more readily than active G(s) heterotrimers. Differential dissociation may thus provide a simple explanation for G alpha-specific activation of GIRK channels and other G betagamma-sensitive effectors.

Presynaptic signaling by heterotrimeric G-proteins

G-proteins (guanine nucleotide-binding proteins) are membrane-attached proteins composed of three subunits, alpha, beta, and gamma. They transduce signals from G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) to target effector proteins. The agonistactivated receptor induces a conformational change in the G-protein trimer so that the alpha-subunit binds GTP in exchange for GDP and alpha-GTP, and betagamma-subunits separate to interact with the target effector. Effector-interaction is terminated by the alpha-subunit GTPase activity, whereby bound GTP is hydrolyzed to GDP. This is accelerated in situ by RGS proteins, acting as GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). Galpha-GDP and Gbetagamma then reassociate to form the Galphabetagamma trimer. G-proteins primarily involved in the modulation of neurotransmitter release are G(o), G(q) and G(s). G(o) mediates the widespread presynaptic auto-inhibitory effect of many neurotransmitters (e.g., via M2/M4 muscarinic receptors, alpha(2) adrenoreceptors, micro/delta opioid receptors, GABAB receptors). The G(o) betagamma-subunit acts in two ways: first, and most ubiquitously, by direct binding to CaV2 Ca(2+) channels, resulting in a reduced sensitivity to membrane depolarization and reduced Ca(2+) influx during the terminal action potential; and second, through a direct inhibitory effect on the transmitter release machinery, by binding to proteins of the SNARE complex. G(s) and G(q) are mainly responsible for receptor-mediated facilitatory effects, through activation of target enzymes (adenylate cyclase, AC and phospholipase-C, PLC respectively) by the GTP-bound alpha-subunits.

Specificity of Gβγ Signaling to Kir3 Channels Depends on the Helical Domain of Pertussis Toxin-sensitive Gα Subunits

Acetylcholine signaling through muscarinic type 2 receptors activates atrial G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) (Kir3) channels via the betagamma subunits of G proteins (Gbetagamma). Different combinations of recombinant Gbetagamma subunits have been shown to activate Kir3 channels in a similar manner. In native systems, however, only Gbetagamma subunits associated with the pertussis toxin-sensitive Galpha(i/o) subunits signal to K(+) channels. Additionally, in vitro binding experiments supported the notion that the C terminus of Kir3 channels interacts preferentially with Galpha(i) over Galpha(q). In this study we confirmed in two heterologous expression systems a preference of Galpha(i) over Galpha(q) in the activation of K(+) currents. To identify determinants of Gbetagamma signaling specificity, we first exchanged domains of Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) subunits responsible for receptor coupling selectivity and swapped their receptor coupling partners. Our results established that the G proteins, regardless of the receptor type to which they coupled, conferred specificity to Kir3 activation. We next tested signaling through chimeras between the Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) subunits in which the N terminus, the helical, or the GTPase domains of the Galpha subunits were exchanged. Our results revealed that the helical domain of Galpha(i) (residues 63-175) in the background of Galpha(q) could support Kir3 activation, whereas the reverse chimera could not. Moreover, the helical domain of the Galpha(i) subunit conferred "Galpha(i)-like" binding of the Kir3 C terminus to the Galpha(q) subunits that contained it. These results implicate the helical domain of Galpha(i) proteins as a critical determinant of Gbetagamma signaling specificity.

R4 RGS proteins: regulation of G-protein signaling and beyond

The regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins were initially characterized as inhibitors of signal transduction cascades initiated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) because of their ability to increase the intrinsic GTPase activity of heterotrimeric G proteins. This GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) activity enhances G protein deactivation and promotes desensitization. However, in addition to this signature trait, emerging data have revealed an expanding network of proteins, lipids, and ions that interact with RGS proteins and confer additional regulatory functions. This review highlights recent advances in our understanding of the physiological functions of one subfamily of RGS proteins with a high degree of homology (B/R4) gleaned from recent studies of knockout mice or cells with reduced RGS expression. We also discuss some of the newly appreciated interactions of RGS proteins with cellular factors that suggest RGS control of several components of G-protein-mediated pathways, as well as a diverse array of non-GPCR-mediated biological responses.

Muscarinic potassium channels augment dynamic and static heart rate responses to vagal stimulation

Vagal control of heart rate (HR) is mediated by direct and indirect actions of ACh. Direct action of ACh activates the muscarinic K+ (KACh) channels, whereas indirect action inhibits adenylyl cyclase. The role of the KACh channels in the overall picture of vagal HR control remains to be elucidated. We examined the role of the KACh channels in the transfer characteristics of the HR response to vagal stimulation. In nine anesthetized sinoaortic-denerved and vagotomized rabbits, the vagal nerve was stimulated with a binary white-noise signal (0–10 Hz) for examination of the dynamic characteristic and in a step-wise manner (5, 10, 15, and 20 Hz/min) for examination of the static characteristic. The dynamic transfer function from vagal stimulation to HR approximated a first-order, low-pass filter with a lag time. Tertiapin, a selective KACh channel blocker (30 nmol/kg iv), significantly decreased the dynamic gain from 5.0 ± 1.2 to 2.0 ± 0.6 (mean ± SD) beats·min−1·Hz−1 ( P < 0.01) and the corner frequency from 0.25 ± 0.03 to 0.06 ± 0.01 Hz ( P < 0.01) without changing the lag time (0.37 ± 0.04 vs. 0.39 ± 0.05 s). Moreover, tertiapin significantly attenuated the vagal stimulation-induced HR decrease by 46 ± 21, 58 ± 18, 65 ± 15, and 68 ± 11% at stimulus frequencies of 5, 10, 15, and 20 Hz, respectively. We conclude that KACh channels contribute to a rapid HR change and to a larger decrease in the steady-state HR in response to more potent tonic vagal stimulation.

Diverse Kir modulators act in close proximity to residues implicated in phosphoinositide binding

Inwardly rectifying potassium (Kir) channels were the first shown to be directly activated by phosphoinositides in general and phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate (PIP(2)) in particular. Atomic resolution structures have been determined for several mammalian and bacterial Kir channels. Basic residues, identified through mutagenesis studies to contribute to the sensitivity of the channel to PIP(2), have been mapped onto the three dimensional channel structure and their localization has given rise to a plausible model that can explain channel activation by PIP(2). Moreover, mapping onto the three-dimensional channel structure sites involved in the modulation of Kir channel activity by a diverse group of regulatory molecules, revealed a striking proximity to residues implicated in phosphoinositide binding. These observations support the hypothesis that the observed dependence of diverse modulators on channel-PIP(2) interactions stems from their localization within distances that can affect PIP(2)-interacting residues.

Activation of inwardly rectifying potassium (Kir) channels by phosphatidylinosital-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2): Interaction with other regulatory ligands

All members of the inwardly rectifying potassium channels (Kir1-7) are regulated by the membrane phospholipid, phosphatidylinosital-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP(2)). Some are also modulated by other regulatory factors or ligands such as ATP and G-proteins, which give them their common names, such as the ATP sensitive potassium (K(ATP)) channel and the G-protein gated potassium channel. Other more non-specific regulators include polyamines, kinases, pH and Na(+) ions. Recent studies have demonstrated that PIP(2) acts cooperatively with other regulatory factors to modulate Kir channels. Here we review how PIP(2) and co-factors modulate channel activities in each subfamily of the Kir channels.

Phosphoinositide-mediated gating of inwardly rectifying K(+) channels

Phosphoinositides, such as phosphatidylinositol-bisphosphate (PIP(2)), control the activity of many ion channels in yet undefined ways. Inwardly, rectifying potassium (Kir) channels were the first shown to be dependent on direct interactions with phosphoinositides. Alterations in channel-PIP(2) interactions affect Kir single-channel gating behavior. Aberrations in channel-PIP(2) interactions can lead to human disease. As the activity of all Kir channels depends on their interactions with phosphoinositides, future research will aim to understand the molecular events that occur from phosphoinositide binding to channel gating. The determination of atomic resolution structures for several mammalian and bacterial Kir channels provides great promise towards this goal. We have mapped onto the three-dimensional channel structure the position of basic residues identified through mutagenesis studies that contribute to the sensitivity of a Kir channel to PIP(2). The localization of these putative PIP(2)-interacting residues relative to the channel's permeation pathway has given rise to a testable model, which could account for channel activation by PIP(2).

Galphai3 primes the G protein-activated K+ channels for activation by coexpressed Gbetagamma in intact Xenopus oocytes

G protein-activated K+ channels (GIRK) mediate postsynaptic inhibitory effects of neurotransmitters in the atrium and in the brain by coupling to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In neurotransmitter-dependent GIRK signalling, Gbetagamma is released from the heterotrimeric Galphabetagamma complex upon GPCR activation, activating the channel and attenuating its rectification. Now it becomes clear that Galpha is more than a mere Gbetagamma donor. We have proposed that Galphai3-GDP regulates GIRK gating, keeping its basal activity low but priming (predisposing) the channel for activation by agonist in intact cells, and by Gbetagamma in excised patches. Here we have further investigated GIRK priming by Galphai3 using a model in which the channel was activated by coexpression of Gbetagamma, and the currents were measured in intact Xenopus oocytes using the two-electrode voltage clamp technique. This method enables the bypass of GPCR activation during examination of the regulation of the channel in intact cells. Using this method, we further characterize the priming phenomenon. We tested and excluded the possibility that our estimates of priming are affected by artifacts caused by series resistance or large K+ fluxes. We demonstrate that both Galphai3 and membrane-attached Gbetagamma scavenger protein, m-phosducin, reduce the basal channel activity. However, Galphai3 allows robust channel activation by coexpressed Gbetagamma, in sharp contrast to m-phosducin, which causes a substantial reduction in the total Gbetagamma-induced current. Furthermore, Galphai3 also does not impair the Gbetagamma-dependent attenuation of the channel rectification, in contrast to m-phosducin, which prevents this Gbetagamma-induced modulation. The Galphai3-induced enhancement of direct activation of GIRK by Gbetagamma, demonstrated here for the first time in intact cells, strongly supports the hypothesis that Galphai regulates GIRK gating under physiological conditions.

Interaction of Galphaq and Kir3, G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels

Activation of substance P receptors, which are coupled to Galpha(q), inhibits the Kir3.1/3.2 channels, resulting in neuronal excitation. We have shown previously that this channel inactivation is not caused by reduction of the phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate level in membrane. Moreover, Galpha(q) immunoprecipitates with Kir3.2 (J Physiol 564:489-500, 2005), suggesting that Galpha(q) interacts with Kir3.2. Positive immunoprecipitation, however, does not necessarily indicate direct interaction between the two proteins. Here, the glutathione transferase pull-down assay was used to investigate interaction between Galpha(q) and the K(+) channels. We found that Galpha(q) interacted with N termini of Kir3.1, Kir3.2, and Kir3.4. However, Galpha(q) did not interact with the C terminus of any Kir3 or with the C or N terminus of Kir2.1. TRPC6 is regulated by the signal initiated by Galpha(q). Immunoprecipitation, however, showed that Galpha(q) did not interact with TRPC6. Thus, the interaction between Galpha(q) and the Kir3 N terminus is quite specific. This interaction occurred in the presence of GDP or GDP-AlF(-)(4). The Galpha(q) binding could take place somewhere between residues 51 to 90 of Kir3.2; perhaps the segment between 81 to 90 residues is crucial. Gbetagamma, which is known to bind to N terminus of Kir3, did not compete with Galpha(q) for the binding, suggesting that these two binding regions are different. These findings agree with the hypothesis (J Physiol 564:489-500, 2005) that the signal to inactivate the Kir3 channel could be mainly transmitted directly from Galpha(q) to Kir3.