Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Adults: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

Differential impacts of initial treatment status on long-term survival in patients with sarcomas treated in a referral center according to histologic type and anatomic site

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to estimate the magnitude of the differential impacts of initial treatment status relative to the impact of classic clinicopathologic factors on the long-term overall survival (OS) of sarcoma patients in a referral cancer center.

METHODS

From the institutional database, we identified 2185 patients who presented to the institutional multidisciplinary team (MDT) prior to (N = 717, 32.8%) or after (N = 1468, 67.2%) initial treatment, with a first diagnosis of sarcoma from January 1999 to December 2018. Descriptive, univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify the factors related to OS. By performing propensity score matching of each completely MDT-treated patient to a referral patient with similar characteristics, the differential impacts of the identified risk and prognostic factors on OS in the 2 groups were estimated by the Kaplan‒Meier survival curves, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression; the results were compared using calibrated nomograph models and forest plots.

RESULTS

Adjusted for the clinicopathologic factors of patient age, sex, primary site, tumor grade, tumor size, resection margin and histology, hazard ratio-based modeling analysis indicated that the initial treatment status was an independent but intermediate prognostic factor associated with long-term OS. The major impacts of the initial and comprehensive MDT-based management on significant improvement of the 20-year OS of sarcomas were reflected in the subgroup of patients with stromal, undifferentiated pleomorphic, fibromatous, fibroepithelial, or synovial neoplasms and tumors in the breast, gastrointestinal tract, or soft tissues of limb and trunk.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study supports early referral of patients with soft tissue masses of unknown identity to a specialized MDT before biopsy and initial resection to reduce the risk of death but highlights an unmet need for a greater understanding of some of the most difficult sarcoma subtypes and subsites and their management.

Robust VMAT treatment planning for extremity soft tissue sarcomas

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a frequently employed and guideline-recommended radiotherapy (RT) modality for extremity soft tissue sarcomas (eSTS). Prior studies have demonstrated that significant tumor volume changes during treatment result in loss of target volume coverage with highly conformal techniques such as VMAT, but few solutions exist to these issues aside from adaptive replanning. Here, we describe a related but novel phenomenon in which relatively minor changes in surface volume contour (whether due to daily setup uncertainty, edema of peritumoral tissue, or progression or pseudo-progression of tumor volume itself) can result in unexpected subcutaneous hotspots. This phenomenon is of significant clinical concern given the known association between skin dose and major wound complications during preoperative RT for eSTS. By evaluating daily cone-beam CT (CBCT) images from thirteen eSTS patients treated with VMAT RT, we identify daily surface contour changes (range: 2 mm-15 mm, median: 8 mm) which are frequently below conventional adaptive replanning thresholds. When applied under experimental conditions, these external contour changes did not have major impacts on target volume coverage (range: 30.2%-91.2%, mean: 72.5%) but did result in unexpected hotspots of 125.8% on average (range: 110.0%-142.2%) in the subcutaneous tissues. To mitigate this issue, we develop a methodology for VMAT treatment planning using flash PTV and virtual bolus (VB) to produce robust treatment plans that are more resistant to target volume changes, surface contour changes, and setup uncertainties than conventional planning methods. With this methodology, robust plans were equivalent to standard plans at baseline, but, after incorporation of surface volume changes, both maintained target volume coverage (p < 0.001) and prevented development of subcutaneous hotspots (p < 0.001) better than standard plans. As such, this treatment planning methodology may facilitate development of robust VMAT treatment plans that minimize development of subcutaneous hotspots and preserve target volume coverage in the context of routine volumetric changes during preoperative RT.

Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Re-excised Soft-tissue Sarcoma After Unplanned Resection

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) re-excised after unplanned tumor resection (UPR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2000 to 2015, we retrospectively evaluated patients with STS of limb or trunk who underwent post-UPR re-excision in our expert center and received or not aRT.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 121 months (IQR 94-165). Among the 145 patients, 37 were not treated with aRT (no-RT) and 108 received aRT with a median radiation dose of 50 Gy (IQR 50-60). At 10 years, patients in the aRT and no-RT groups showed a cumulative incidence of local failure (10y-LF) of 14.7% and 37.7%, and a local recurrence-free survival (10y-LRFS) of 61.3% and 45.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified aRT and age ≥70 years as independent predictors of both LF and LRFS, while grade 3 and deep-seated tumor were independent predictors of LRFS. In overall population, 10-year distant metastasis-free survival (10y-DMFS) and overall survival (10y-OS) were 63.7% and 69.4%. In multivariate analyses, age ≥70 years, grade 3, and deep-seated lesion were associated with shorter DMFS and OS. Acute severe adverse events were not significantly increased in aRT group (14.8% vs. 18.1%, P = .85) but dramatically increased if radiation dose exceeded 50 Gy (risk ratio 2.96 compared to ≤50 Gy, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

In STS patients re-excised after UPR, 50 Gy aRT was safe and associated with reduced LF and longer LRFS. It seems to be beneficial even in absence of residual disease or in absence of initial adverse prognostic factors.

Comparative In Silico Analysis of Ultra-Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiotherapy (IMRT) Versus Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in the Pre-Operative Treatment of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

While pre-operative radiation did not improve abdominal recurrence-free survival for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in the randomized STRASS trial, it did reduce rates of local recurrence. However, the risk of toxicity was substantial and the time to surgery was prolonged. A combination of hypofractionation and proton therapy may reduce delays from the initiation of radiation to surgery and limit the dose to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). We conducted a dosimetric comparison of the pre-operative ultra-hypofractionated intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and proton radiotherapy (IMPT).

METHODS

Pre-operative IMRT and IMPT plans were generated on 10 RPS patients. The prescription was 25 Gy radiobiological equivalents (GyEs) (radiobiological effective dose of 1.1) to the clinical target volume and 30 GyEs to the margin at risk, all in five fractions. Comparisons were made using student T-tests.

RESULTS

The following endpoints were significantly lower with IMPT than with IMRT: mean doses to liver, bone, and all genitourinary and gastrointestinal OARs; bowel, kidney, and bone V5-V20; stomach V15; liver V5; maximum doses to stomach, spinal canal, and body; and whole-body integral dose.

CONCLUSIONS

IMPT maintained target coverage while significantly reducing the dose to adjacent OARs and integral dose compared to IMRT. A prospective trial treating RPS with pre-operative ultra-hypofractionated IMPT at our institution is currently being pursued.

Low rate of function-limiting side effects with high-dose adjuvant radiotherapy in high-grade soft tissue extremity sarcomas: a retrospective single-center analysis over 10 years

BACKGROUND

Over the years, radiotherapy has been established as a tool to improve local control for high-grade sarcomas. Although the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines has taken notice of a shift toward a neoadjuvant radiotherapy approach, the American Society for Radiation Oncology guidelines clearly favor a neoadjuvant approach, citing debilitating long-term adverse effects when radiotherapy is applied postoperatively. In this study, we examined these irradiation-associated adverse events for adjuvant radiotherapy and focused on the prognostic factors for disease outcome, including local control.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, data for 106 patients with extremity soft-tissue sarcomas diagnosed between 1997 and 2021, of which 40 received adjuvant radiotherapy, were collected from the clinical and radiological information systems of a high-volume sarcoma treatment center. These data were then analyzed for radiation-associated side effects as well as predictive factors for overall survival, disease-free survival, local control, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy was beneficial to patients improving local control, especially for high-grade sarcomas, even when those were resected with negative margins. Side effects due to radiotherapy occurred in 87.5% of the patients, and these effects primarily included radiation dermatitis in 67.5%; however, only 40.0% had any adverse event of ≥ grade 2 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Long-term function-limiting side effects occurred in 45.0% of the patients; 10% exhibited ≥ grade 2 function-limiting adverse events. Greater time between surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy was beneficial for the patients, whereas joint infiltrating sarcomas were associated with more severe long term, function-limiting adverse events. 28.3% of the patients experienced a recurrence at any location (median time 18.35 months) and in 16% the recurrence was local (median time 16.11 months), resulting in 1, 3, and 5 year disease-free survival rates of 74.1, 58.9, and 38.5% and local control rates of 78.7, 61.6, and 42.8% were observed, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Recurrences may be avoided with high-dose radiation, especially for high-grade G2 and G3 sarcomas, even after complete R0 resection. This resulted in a low rate of severe long-term function-limiting adverse events. Thus, adjuvant radiotherapy should be seriously considered when planning patient treatment, especially when treating patients that present with high-grade sarcomas.

Photon and Proton irradiation in Patient-derived, Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Sarcoma Models

BACKGROUND

Despite their heterogeneity, the current standard preoperative radiotherapy regimen for localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) follows a one fits all approach for all STS subtypes. Sarcoma patient-derived three-dimensional cell culture models represent an innovative tool to overcome challenges in clinical research enabling reproducible subtype-specific research on STS. In this pilot study, we present our methodology and preliminary results using STS patient-derived 3D cell cultures that were exposed to different doses of photon and proton radiation. Our aim was: (i) to establish a reproducible method for irradiation of STS patient-derived 3D cell cultures and (ii) to explore the differences in tumor cell viability of two different STS subtypes exposed to increasing doses of photon and proton radiation at different time points.

METHODS

Two patient-derived cell cultures of untreated localized high-grade STS (an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and a pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLS)) were exposed to a single fraction of photon or proton irradiation using doses of 0 Gy (sham irradiation), 2 Gy, 4 Gy, 8 Gy and 16 Gy. Cell viability was measured and compared to sham irradiation at two different time points (four and eight days after irradiation).

RESULTS

The proportion of viable tumor cells four days after photon irradiation for UPS vs. PLS were significantly different with 85% vs. 65% (4 Gy), 80% vs. 50% (8 Gy) and 70% vs. 35% (16 Gy). Proton irradiation led to similar diverging viability curves between UPS vs. PLS four days after irradiation with 90% vs. 75% (4 Gy), 85% vs. 45% (8 Gy) and 80% vs. 35% (16 Gy). Photon and proton radiation displayed only minor differences in cell-killing properties within each cell culture (UPS and PLS). The cell-killing effect of radiation sustained at eight days after irradiation in both cell cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Pronounced differences in radiosensitivity are evident among UPS and PLS 3D patient-derived sarcoma cell cultures which may reflect the clinical heterogeneity. Photon and proton radiation showed similar dose-dependent cell-killing effectiveness in both 3D cell cultures. Patient-derived 3D STS cell cultures may represent a valuable tool to enable translational studies towards individualized subtype-specific radiotherapy in patients with STS.

Effect of pre-operative radiation therapy on surgical outcome in retroperitoneal sarcoma

Background

A high rate of locoregional recurrence is one of the major difficulties in successful treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Although pre-operative radiation therapy (RT) is considered a potential way to improve local recurrence, concerns about the associated treatment toxicity and risk of peri-operative complications need to be addressed. Hence, this study investigates the safety of pre-operative RT (preRTx) for RPS.

Methods

A cohort of 198 patients with RPS who had undergone both surgery and RT was analyzed for peri-operative complications. They were divided into three groups according to the RT scheme: (1) preRTx group, (2) post-operative RT without tissue expander, and (3) post-operative RT with tissue expander.

Results

The preRTx was overall well tolerated and did not affect the R2 resection rate, operative time, and severe post-operative complications. However, the preRTx group was associated with higher incidence of post-operative transfusion and admission to intensive care unit (p = 0.013 and p = 0.036, respectively), where preRTx was an independent risk factor only for the post-operative transfusion (p = 0.009) in multivariate analysis. The median radiation dose was the highest in preRTx group, although no significant difference was demonstrated in overall survival and local recurrence rate.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the preRTx does not add significant post-operative morbidity to the patients with RPS. In addition, radiation dose elevation is achievable with the pre-operative RT. However, a meticulous intra-operative bleeding control is recommended in those patients, and further high-quality trials are warranted to evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes.

The role of standard and novel radiotherapy approaches in management of retroperitoneal sarcomas

Primary non-metastatic retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma patients can be cured by radical surgery. However there remains a risk for patients to develop a local recurrence. To minimize this risk, patients with low grade liposarcomas might benefit from preoperative radiotherapy. This review summarizes all issues that should be considered for the irradiation of patients with retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma.

Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, and 3D conformal therapy for soft tissue extremity sarcoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

Proton beam therapy (PBT) may provide a dosimetric advantage in sparing soft tissue and bone for selected patients with extremity soft sarcoma (eSTS). We compared PBT with photons plans generated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

Seventeen patients previously treated with pencil beam scanning PBT were included in this study. Of these patients, 14 treated with pre-operative 50 Gy in 25 fractions were analyzed. IMRT and 3D-CRT plans were created to compare against the original PBT plans. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices were evaluated amongst PBT, IMRT, and 3D plans. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests were used to get the statistical significance. A p value smaller than .05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

For the clinical target volume (CTV), D2%, D95%, D98%, D_min, D_max, and V50Gy, were assessed. D_min, D1%, D_max, D_mean, V1Gy, V5Gy, and V50Gy were evaluated for the adjacent soft tissue. D1%, D_max, D_mean, and V35-50% were evaluated for bone. All plans met CTV target coverage. The PBT plans delivered less dose to soft tissue and bone. The mean dose to the soft tissue was 2 Gy, 11 Gy, and 13 Gy for PBT, IMRT, and 3D, respectively (p < .001). The mean dose to adjacent bone was 15 Gy, 26 Gy, and 28 Gy for PBT, IMRT, and 3D, respectively (p = .022).

CONCLUSION

PBT plans for selected patients with eSTS demonstrated improved sparing of circumferential soft tissue and adjacent bone compared to IMRT and 3D-CRT. Further evaluation will determine if this improved dosimetry correlates with reduced toxicity and improved quality of life.

Outcome of patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and trunk treated by (neo)adjuvant intensity modulated radiation therapy with curative intent

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a relatively rare group of malignant tumors. Currently, there is very little published clinical data, especially in the context of curative multimodal therapy with image-guided, conformal, intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients who received preoperative or postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy for STS of the extremities or trunk with curative intent were included in this single centre retrospective analysis. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate survival endpoints. Multivariable proportional hazard models were used to investigate the association between survival endpoints and tumour-, patient-, and treatment-specific characteristics.

RESULTS

86 patients were included in the analysis. The most common histological subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic high-grade sarcoma (UPS) (27) and liposarcoma (22). More than two third of the patients received preoperative radiation therapy (72%). During the follow-up period, 39 patients (45%) suffered from some type of relapse, mainly remote (31%). The two-years overall survival rate was 88%. The median DFS was 48 months and the median DMFS was 51 months. Female gender (HR 0.460 (0.217; 0.973)) and histology of liposarcomas compared to UPS proved to be significantly more favorable in terms of DFS (HR 0.327 (0.126; 0.852)).

CONCLUSION

Conformal, intensity-modulated radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality in the preoperative or postoperative management of STS. Especially for the prevention of distant metastases, the establishment of modern systemic therapies or multimodal therapy approaches is necessary.

New trends in the surgical management of soft tissue sarcoma: The role of preoperative biopsy

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) accounts for 1% of all malignant neoplasms in adults. Their diagnosis and management constitute a challenging target. They originate from the mesenchyme, and 50 subtypes with various cytogenetic profiles concerning soft tissue and bones have been recognized. These tumors mainly affect middle-aged adults but may be present at any age. Half of the patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and require systemic therapy. Tumors above 3-5 cm in size must be suspected of potential malignancy. A thorough history, clinical examination and imaging that must precede biopsy are necessary. Modern imaging techniques include ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography/CT. MRI findings may distinguish low-grade from high-grade STS based on a diagnostic score (tumor heterogeneity, intratumoral and peritumoral enhancement). A score ≥ 2 indicates a high-grade lesion, and a score ≤ 1 indicates a low-grade lesion. For disease staging, abdominal imaging is recommended to detect early abdominal or retroperitoneal metastases. Liquid biopsy by detecting genomic material in serum is a novel diagnostic tool. A preoperative biopsy is necessary for diagnosis, prognosis and optimal planning of surgical intervention. Core needle biopsy is the most indicative and effective. Its correct performance influences surgical management. An unsuccessful biopsy means the dissemination of cancer cells into healthy anatomical structures that ultimately affect resectability and survival. Complete therapeutic excision (R0) with an acceptable resection margin of 1 cm is the method of choice. However, near significant structures, i.e., vessels, nerves, an R2 resection (macroscopic margin involvement) preserving functionality but having a risk of local recurrence can be an acceptable choice, after informing the patient, to prevent an unavoidable amputation. For borderline resectability of the tumor, neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy has a place. Likewise, after surgical excision, adjuvant therapy is indicated, but chemotherapy in nonmetastatic disease is still debatable. The five-year survival rate reaches up to 55%. Reresection is considered after positive or uncertain resection margins. Current strategies are based on novel chemotherapeutic agents, improved radiotherapy applications to limit local side effects and targeted biological therapy or immunotherapy, including vaccines. Young age is a risk factor for distant metastasis within 6 mo following primary tumor resection. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy lasting 5-6 wk and surgical resection are indicated for high-grade STS (grade 2 or 3). Wide surgical excision alone may be acceptable for patients older than 70 years. However, locally advanced disease requires a multidisciplinary task of decision-making for amputation or limb salvage.

Radiation Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Strass-Ful Situation

Locoregional recurrence (LRR) is the predominant pattern of relapse and often the cause of death in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). As a result, reducing LRR is a critical objective for RPS patients. However, unlike soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the superficial trunk and extremity where the benefits of radiation therapy (RT) are well-established, the role of RT in the retroperitoneum remains controversial. Historically, preoperative or postoperative RT, either alone or in combination with intraoperative radiation (IORT), was commonly justified for RPS based on extrapolation from the superficial trunk and extremity STS literature. However, long-awaited results were recently published from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) STRASS study of preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for patients with RPS; there was no statistical difference in the primary endpoint of abdominal recurrence-free survival. However, several subset analyses and study limitations complicate the interpretation of the results. This review explores and contextualizes the body of evidence regarding RT's role in managing RPS.

Hyperthermia in the treatment of high-risk soft tissue sarcomas: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The therapy of high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (STS) remains an interdisciplinary challenge. Regional hyperthermia (RHT) sparked interest as it has been shown to improve overall survival when added to perioperative chemotherapy (CTX). However, questions arise on how RHT should be optimally integrated into current multi-modal therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies written in English and focused mainly on radiative RHT and superficial hyperthermia were evaluated and included. Studies including patients below the age of 18, with metastatic disease or review articles, were excluded.

RESULTS

We identified 15 clinical reports from 1990 until July 2022. Three articles combined RHT + CTX, and twelve focused on combined RHT + radiotherapy (RT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Most treatments were based on invasive thermometry, and less on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based, noninvasive thermometry for STS of the extremities. Perioperative chemotherapy was used for the combination of RHT and CTX, mostly Ifosfamide-based. The effectiveness of RT appeared to be increased by RHT, especially with two RHT sessions/week. The trimodal simultaneous approach of neoadjuvant RHT and CRT was also feasible. No significant toxicity of RHT was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The gathered data strengthen the beneficial role of RHT in the multimodal setting. Further expert consensus and clinical trials are required to determine the optimal integration of RHT in treating STS.

Re-excision After Unplanned Excision of Soft Tissue Sarcoma is Associated with High Morbidity and Limited Pathologic Identification of Residual Disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with unplanned excision (UPE) of trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) present a significant management challenge for sarcoma specialists. Oncologic re-resection has been considered standard practice after UPE with positive or uncertain margins. A strategy of active surveillance or "watch and wait" has been suggested as a safe alternative to routine re-excision. In this context, the current study sought to evaluate short-term outcomes and morbidity after re-resection to better understand the risks and benefits of this treatment strategy.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-institution study reviewed patients undergoing oncologic re-resection after UPE of an STS during a 5-year period (2015-2020), excluding those with evidence of gross residual disease. Short-term clinical outcomes were evaluated together with final pathologic findings.

RESULTS

The review identified 67 patients undergoing re-resection after UPE of an STS. Of these 67 patients, 45 (67%) were treated with a combination of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and surgery. Plastic surgery was involved for reconstruction in 49 cases (73%). The rate of wound complications after re-resection was 45 % (n = 30), with 15 % (n = 10) of the patients experiencing a major wound complication. Radiation therapy and plastic surgery involvement were independently associated with wound complications. Notably, 45 patients (67%) had no evidence of residual disease in the re-resection specimen, whereas 13 patients (19 %) had microscopic disease, and 9 patients (13%) had indeterminate pathology.

CONCLUSION

Given the morbidity of re-resection and limited identification of residual disease, treatment plans and discussions with patients should outline the expected pathologic findings and morbidity of surgery.

The benefit for radiotherapy at specialised sarcoma centres: A systematic review and clinical practice guidelines from the Australia and New Zealand Sarcoma Association

Patients with sarcoma are best managed at specialised sarcoma centres as supported by published literature. Optimal management requires multidisciplinary team input to formulate the diagnosis and treatment sequencing taking into consideration multiple clinical and pathologic factors. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact on outcomes of radiotherapy at specialised sarcoma centres. A systematic review was conducted using the population, intervention, comparison and outcome model. A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central databases for publications from 1990 to February 2022 that evaluated the local control, survival and toxicity of radiotherapy at specialised sarcoma centres. A total of 21 studies were included (17 cancer registry studies, four retrospective comparative studies). Four studies reported the local recurrence endpoint when radiotherapy was part of limb conservation treatment and showed better conformity to clinical practice guidelines and an improved local recurrence free rate when radiotherapy treatment is supported through, but may not be necessarily delivered at a specialised sarcoma centres. Only one retrospective study analysed toxicity specifically and demonstrated that patients who received preoperative radiotherapy at community centres compared to radiotherapy at a specialised sarcoma centre were more likely to develop a major wound complication. Fourteen studies reported overall survival, and 12 of these showed significantly better 5-year overall survival for patients managed at specialised sarcoma centres, however the specific impact of radiotherapy delivered at sarcoma centres could not be determined. In conclusion, patients with sarcoma should be managed through specialised sarcoma centres for better oncological outcomes. Radiotherapy in specialised sarcoma centre is associated with a lower rate of wound complications and may contribute to improved oncological outcomes as part of the limb conservation treatment at a specialised sarcoma centre.

Hypofractionated, 3-week, preoperative radiotherapy for patients with soft tissue sarcomas (HYPORT-STS): a single-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The standard preoperative radiotherapy regimen of 50 Gy delivered in 25 fractions for 5 weeks for soft tissue sarcomas results in excellent local control, with major wound complications occurring in approximately 35% of patients. We aimed to investigate the safety of a moderately hypofractionated, shorter regimen of radiotherapy, which could be more convenient for patients.

METHODS

This single-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial (HYPORT-STS) was done at a single tertiary cancer care centre (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA). We administered preoperative radiotherapy to a dose of 42·75 Gy in 15 fractions of 2·85 Gy/day for 3 weeks (five fractions per week) to adults (aged ≥18 years) with non-metastatic soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities or superficial trunk and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-3. The primary endpoint was a major wound complication occurring within 120 days of surgery. Major wound complications were defined as those requiring a secondary operation, or operations, under general or regional anaesthesia for wound treatment; readmission to the hospital for wound care; invasive procedures for wound care; deep wound packing to an area of wound measuring at least 2 cm in length; prolonged dressing changes; repeat surgery for revision of a split thickness skin graft; or wet dressings for longer than 4 weeks. We analysed our primary outcome and safety in all patients who enrolled. We monitored safety using a Bayesian, one-arm, time-to-event stopping rule simulator comparing the rate of major wound complications at 120 days post-surgery among study participants with the historical rate of 35%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03819985, recruitment is complete, and follow-up continues.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 18, 2018, and Jan 6, 2021, we assessed 157 patients for eligibility, of whom 120 were enrolled and received hypofractionated preoperative radiotherapy. At no time did the stopping rule computation indicate that the trial should be stopped early for lack of safety. Median postoperative follow-up was 24 months (IQR 17-30). Of 120 patients, 37 (31%, 95% CI 24-40) developed a major wound complication at a median time of 37 days (IQR 25-59) after surgery. No patient had acute radiation toxicity (during radiotherapy or within 4 weeks of the radiotherapy end date) of grade 3 or worse (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version 4.0) or an on-treatment serious adverse event. Four (3%) of 115 patients had late radiation toxicity (≥6 months post-surgery) of at least grade 3 (CTCAE or Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme): femur fractures (n=2), lymphoedema (n=1), and skin ulceration (n=1). There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Moderately hypofractionated preoperative radiotherapy delivered to patients with soft tissue sarcomas was safe and could therefore be a more convenient alternative to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Patients can be counselled about these results and potentially offered this regimen, particularly if it facilitates care at a sarcoma specialty centre. Results on long-term oncological, late toxicity, and functional outcomes are awaited.

FUNDING

The National Cancer Institute.

Real-world clinical outcomes with daily image-guided IMRT in extremity soft tissue sarcomas

PURPOSE

We report the clinical outcomes of patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) arising in extremities treated with image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) at our institute. Local control of the tumors treated with RT was the primary end point of this study. Analyzing overall survival and long-term toxicities were the secondary objectives.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The database of the patients with STS who received wide local excision and IG-IMRT at our institution from January 2012 to December 2020 was reviewed. Radiation was offered either preoperatively or postoperatively as part of multi-modality treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-three consecutive patients were identified and included for analysis. Twenty-eight patients (84.8%) received postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. Dedicated MRI simulation studies were performed in 31 patients (93.9%) in the treatment position. RapidArc IMRT technique was used in 31 patients (93.9%). A total of 2954 images were acquired during 991 treatment sessions. Errors exceeding 1 mm in the x, y and z directions were corrected online before the treatment. With a median follow-up of 36 months, two patients (6.1%) developed local recurrence. The 3-year local control was 90.9% (95% CI, 0.76 - 0.98), and the 5-year overall survival was 71.7% (95% CI, 0.44 - 0.88). One patient (3.03%) sustained a pathological fracture during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that IMRT with daily imaging offered excellent local control with acceptable long-term toxicity, as well as being feasible and practical to implement in our routine clinical practice.

Preoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a diverse group of rare malignant tumors. Currently, five to six weeks of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) combined with surgery constitute the mainstay of therapy for localized high-grade sarcomas (G2-G3). Growing evidence suggests that shortening preoperative RT courses by hypofractionation neither increases toxicity rates nor impairs oncological outcomes. Instead, shortening RT courses may improve therapy adherence, raise cost-effectiveness, and provide more treatment opportunities for a wider range of patients. Presumed higher rates of adverse effects and worse outcomes are concerns about hypofractionated RT (HFRT) for STS. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence on preoperative HFRT for the treatment of STS and discusses toxicity and oncological outcomes compared to normofractionated RT.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials describing outcomes for preoperative HFRT in the management of STS using PubMed, the Cochrane library, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and Ovid Medline. We followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Trials on retroperitoneal sarcomas, postoperative RT, and hyperthermia were excluded. Articles published until November 30th, 2021, were included.

RESULTS

Initial search yielded 94 articles. After removal of duplicate and ineligible articles, 13 articles qualified for analysis. Eight phase II trials and five retrospective analyses were reviewed. Most trials applied 5 × 5 Gy preoperatively in patients with high-grade STS. HFRT courses did not show increased rates of adverse events compared to historical trials of normofractionated RT. Toxicity rates were mostly comparable or lower than in trials of normofractionated RT. Moreover, HFRT achieved comparable local control rates with shorter duration of therapy. Currently, more than 15 prospective studies on HFRT + / - chemotherapy are ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

Retrospective data and phase II trials suggest preoperative HFRT to be a reasonable treatment modality for STS. Oncological outcomes and toxicity profiles were favorable. To date, our knowledge is mostly derived from phase II data. No randomized phase III trial comparing normofractionated and HFRT in STS has been published yet. Multiple ongoing phase II trials applying HFRT to investigate acute and late toxicity will hopefully bring forth valuable findings.

Preoperative ultra-hypofractionation radiotherapy in extremity/trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma - A meta-analysis of prospective studies

PURPOSE

The neoadjuvant radiotherapy is now standard treatment in soft tissue sarcoma. Using ultra-hypofractionation radiotherapy shorten the treatment time. In the era of COVID pandemic, using less fraction to treat patient is an urgent need. Thus, we aim to use meta-analysis to investigate the clinical efficacy of preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PRISMA guideline was used in this study. PubMed, Cochrane and Embase were used. We include only prospective study. The main endpoint was set as wound complication rate. Other endpoints include R0 resection rate, overall survival, local control, and distant metastasis free survival.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included. The pooled wound complication rate is 0.30 (95% CI=0.26-0.35). The pooled R0 resection rate is 0.87(95%CI: 0.74-0.94). The pooled 2-year overall survival is 0.86 (95%CI: 0.72-0.94). The pooled 2-year local control rate is 0.96(95%CI: 0.89-0.99). The pooled 2-year distant metastasis free survival is 0.60 (95%CI=0.50-0.70).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant ultra-hypofractionation radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma is a feasible and well tolerable treatment.

The role of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in the management of localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities includes limb-sparing surgery combined with pre- or postoperative radiotherapy (RT). The role of perioperative chemotherapy (CTX) remains uncertain. STS patients with high-risk features for local recurrence, distant metastases, and increased mortality may require additional systemic therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate predictors of outcome regarding local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM) in a large single-center cohort of patients suffering from localized high-grade STS (grade 2/3, G2/G3). Special emphasis was put on a subgroup of patients who received combined neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT).

METHODS

Overall, 115 adult STS patients were included in this retrospective study. The median follow-up was 34 months. Twenty-three patients (20.0%) were treated with neoadjuvant RCT, 92 (80.0%) received other therapies (adjuvant RT alone (n = 58); neoadjuvant CTX + adjuvant RT (n = 17); adjuvant RCT (n = 10), neoadjuvant RT alone (n = 7)). To assess potential prognostic factors on LC, OS, and FFDM, univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazards models were applied.

RESULTS

UVA showed significantly better LC rates in the neoadjuvant RCT group (p = 0.025), with trends in MVA (p = 0.057). The 3-year LC rate was 89.7% in the neoadjuvant RCT group vs. 75.6% in the "other therapies" group. UVA also showed significantly better OS rates in the neoadjuvant RCT group (p = 0.049), however, this was not confirmed in MVA (p = 0.205), the 3-year OS rate was 85.8% for patients treated with neoadjuvant RCT compared to 73.5% in the "other therapies" group. UVA showed significantly better FFDM rates in (p = 0.018) and a trend towards better FFDM rates in MVA (p = 0.059). The 3-year FFDM rate was 89.7% for patients treated with neoadjuvant RCT compared to 65.9% in the "other therapies" group. In the subgroup of patients with G3 STS, neoadjuvant RCT was a significant positive predictor of LC and FFDM in MVA (p = 0.047, p = 0.027) but not for OS. Overall grade 3 and 4 toxicities were significantly higher (p = 0.019) in the neoadjuvant RCT group and occurred in 73.9% vs. 38.0% in patients receiving other therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that neoadjuvant RCT might improve LC and FFDM in patients with localized G3 STS while also being associated with increased acute complication rates. Further prospective research is warranted to confirm these findings.

Modeling the propagation of tumor fronts with shortest path and diffusion models—implications for the definition of the clinical target volume

Objective. The overarching objective is to make the definition of the clinical target volume (CTV) in radiation oncology less subjective and more scientifically based. The specific objective of this study is to investigate similarities and differences between two methods that model tumor spread beyond the visible gross tumor volume (GTV): (1) the shortest path model, which is the standard method of adding a geometric GTV-CTV margin, and (2) the reaction-diffusion model. Approach. These two models to capture the invisible tumor ‘fire front’ are defined and compared in mathematical terms. The models are applied to example cases that represent tumor spread in non-uniform and anisotropic media with anatomical barriers. Main results. The two seemingly disparate models bring forth traveling waves that can be associated with the front of tumor growth outward from the GTV. The shape of the fronts is similar for both models. Differences are seen in cases where the diffusive flow is reduced due to anatomical barriers, and in complex spatially non-uniform cases. The diffusion model generally leads to smoother fronts. The smoothness can be controlled with a parameter defined by the ratio of the diffusion coefficient and the proliferation rate. Significance. Defining the CTV has been described as the weakest link of the radiotherapy chain. There are many similarities in the mathematical description and the behavior of the common geometric GTV-CTV expansion method, and the definition of the CTV tumor front via the reaction-diffusion model. Its mechanistic basis and the controllable smoothness make the diffusion model an attractive alternative to the standard GTV-CTV margin model.

Role of Radiation Therapy in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcoma comprises a small subset of all soft tissue sarcoma and includes various histopathologic subtypes, each with unique patterns of behavior and differential risks for local recurrence and hematogenous metastatic spread. The primary treatment modality is surgery, although even with complete macroscopic resection, recurrence is common. The rationale for the addition of radiotherapy to resection is to improve local control; however, the use of radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma is controversial, and existing data are suboptimal to guide management. Treatment decisions should be determined with multidisciplinary input and shared decision-making. When used in selected patients, radiation therapy should be delivered preoperatively; postoperative treatment is not recommended.

Real-world use of palbociclib monotherapy in retroperitoneal liposarcomas at a large volume sarcoma center

Palbociclib has been evaluated in early phase trials for well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) patients, with reported median progression-free survival (PFS) of 18 weeks. Here, we report on real-world use and surgical outcomes associated with palbociclib treatment. We retrospectively reviewed 61 consecutive patients with retroperitoneal WDLPS (n = 14) or DDLPS (n = 47) treated with palbociclib monotherapy between 1 March 2016 and 28 February 2021 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. At palbociclib initiation, median age was 64 (interquartile range [IQR] 56-72). In WDLPS and DDLPS cohorts, the median number of prior systemic treatments was 0 (IQR 0-0) and 2 (IQR 0-4), respectively. Median number of prior surgeries was 2 (WDLPS IQR 1-2.75) and 2 (DDLPS IQR 1-3). Median PFS was 9.2 (WDLPS IQR 3.9-21.9) and 2.6 months (DDLPS IQR 2.0-6.1), with median time on treatment of 7.4 months (WDLPS IQR 3.5-14.2) and 2.7 months (DDLPS IQR 2.0-5.7). Twelve patients ultimately underwent surgical resection. Resections were macroscopically complete (R0/R1) in half (n = 6/12), among whom only one patient experienced relapse after resection (median follow-up 7.5 months). All patients who underwent macroscopically incomplete resections progressed after surgery with median time to progression of 3.3 months (IQR 2.3-4.4). Surgery after palbociclib treatment was not associated with improved overall survival. Efficacy of palbociclib monotherapy for patients with advanced WDLPS and DDLPS is disappointing. While palbociclib may have been used to delay surgery, there was no clear benefit from treatment and few patients achieved prolonged tumor control.

Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Radiation therapy is an integral component of local management with oncologic resection for soft tissue sarcoma. Radiotherapy is indicated in patients at an increased risk of local recurrence so that improved local control may be achieved. Sequencing of radiotherapy and resection should be determined by multidisciplinary input before treatment initiation. For most patients, preoperative delivery of radiation therapy is preferred. In patients initially thought to be at low risk for local recurrence and found to have unexpected adverse pathologic features at resection, postoperative radiation therapy is indicated. The use of radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma is controversial; when used, preoperative delivery of radiation is recommended.

Primary chondrosarcomas of the larynx treated with proton radiotherapy: A single institutional experience

Background

Primary laryngeal chondrosarcomas are rare entities whose excellent survival rates following resection promote conservative surgical approaches to maintain quality of life without compromising outcomes. There are excellent outcomes in skull base chondrosarcomas treated with maximal safe resection and post‐operative proton therapy. Extrapolating from these findings, we report our institutional experience treating symptomatic or growing laryngeal chondrosarcomas using proton beam therapy.

Cases

Demographic information, clinical characteristics, treatment details, and follow‐up data were collected and summarized. Patients were monitored with serial imaging and examination. Stable disease was defined as no progression of disease on imaging. Two patients underwent subtotal resections followed by post‐operative radiotherapy, while two patients received definitive radiotherapy. All patients are currently alive with stable disease at their last follow‐up.

Conclusion

This case series provides initial evidence for excellent outcomes with maximal safe surgical resection followed by proton beam therapy for patients with symptomatic or growing laryngeal chondrosarcomas. Larger studies are warranted to determine the optimal therapeutic approach.

Dosimetric Comparison of VMAT and IMRT Pre-Operative Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy is a standard part of limb conserving therapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at high risk of recurrence. Toxicities increase with radiation dose and volume of normal tissue irradiated. This study sought to compare dosimetry of volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT), with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and to investigate the optimal planning technique.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty patients with extremity STS who underwent preoperative radiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions) between 2016 and 2020 at a sarcoma specialist centre were included. The original treatment techniques were sliding window IMRT or 3D conformal. VMAT plans were retrospectively generated according to the original tumour and organ at risk constraints. Quality assurance was performed as per departmental protocol. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare dosimetric parameters (for planning target volume, in-field bone, and soft tissue structures), monitor units (MU) and treatment time.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 65 years and majority were male (n=14, 70%). Commonest subtype was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n=14, 70%) and most tumours were located on the thigh (n=12, 60%). Median PTV volume was 1110 cm³ and median volume of in-field bone 236 cm³. VMAT plans had significantly lower average MU (480 vs 862 MU, p<0.001) and overall treatment time (300 vs 153 seconds, p<0.001). PTV coverage favoured VMAT, with marginally higher mean, minimum, and maximum doses, and higher Conformity Index. However, differences were not statistically significant. Dose to infield bone and soft tissue structures were similar or slightly lower with VMAT.

CONCLUSIONS

In extremity soft tissue sarcoma, VMAT plans demonstrated a favourable trend toward tumour coverage and dose conformity compared to IMRT along with significantly lower monitor units and half the overall treatment time.

Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Care in 2021

Soft-tissue sarcomas are biologically heterogenous tumors arising from connective tissues with over 100 subtypes. Although sarcomas account for <1% of all adult malignancies, retroperitoneal sarcomas are a distinct subgroup accounting for <10% of all sarcomatous tumors. There have been considerable advancements in the understanding and treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma in the last decade, with standard treatment consisting of upfront primary surgical resection. The evidence surrounding the addition of radiation therapy remains controversial. There remains no standard with regards to systemic therapy, including immunotherapy. Adjunctive therapy remains largely dictated by expert consensus and preferences at individual centers or participation in clinical trials. In this 2021 review, we detail the anatomical boundaries of the retroperitoneum, clinical characteristics, contemporary standard of care and well as recent advancements in retroperitoneal sarcoma care. Ongoing international collaborations are encouraged to advance our understanding of this complex disease.