Intravenous amiodarone for acute heart rate control in the critically ill patient with atrial tachyarrhythmias

New-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients

New-onset atrial fibrillation is a common problem in critically ill patients, with reported incidence ranging from 5% to 46%. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The present review summarizes studies investigating new-onset atrial fibrillation conducted in the critical care setting, focusing on the etiology, management of the hemodynamically unstable patient, rate versus rhythm control, ischemic stroke risk and anticoagulation. Recommendations for an approach to management in the intensive care unit are drawn from the results of these studies.

De novo atrial fibrillation post cardiac surgery: the Durban experience

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication post cardiac surgery and results in elevated morbidity and mortality rates and healthcare costs. A pilot, retrospective study of the medical records of all adult patients developing de novo AF post surgery was undertaken at the cardiac surgical unit in Durban between 2009 and 2012. We aimed to describe the local experience of AF with a view to suggesting an adapted local treatment policy in relation to previously published data. Fifty-nine patients developed AF during the study period. AF occurred predominantly three or more days post surgery. Thirty-five patients required cardioversion and amiodarone to restore sinus rhythm. Return to the general ward (RGW) was 4.6 days longer than the institutional norm. Liberal peri-operative β-blocker and statin use is currently preferred to a formal prophylaxis strategy. Randomised, controlled trials are required to evaluate measures curbing prolonged length of stay and morbidity burdens imposed by AF on the local resource-constrained environment.

Efficacy and Safety of Landiolol Compared to Amiodarone for the Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Intensive Care Patients

OBJECTIVE

The authors assessed the efficacy and safety of landiolol, an ultra-short-acting beta-blocker, with those of amiodarone in the restoration of sinus rhythm for postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

DESIGN

A retrospective data analysis.

SETTING

Data were collected from patients admitted to the ICU in a single university hospital between 2012 and 2015.

PARTICIPANTS

Records of a total of 276 patients who developed POAF after ICU admission were collected from hospital records.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Treatment success was defined as restoration of sinus rhythm without concomitant therapy within 24 hours of treatment and lasting for more than an hour. The landiolol dosage was in the range of 0.7 µg/kg/min-to-2.5 µg/kg/min. The authors compared a total of 55 patients with POAF who received either landiolol (n = 32) or intravenous amiodarone (n = 23) in the ICU. The major findings were that the median time required for conversion to sinus rhythm was shorter in landiolol patients compared with amiodarone patients (75 v 150 min respectively, p = 0.0355). However, treatment success rates did not differ significantly after 24 hours (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.17-9.09, p = 0.60). Adverse events with bradycardia leading to drug discontinuation were seen only in the patients receiving amiodarone (n = 3, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Landiolol achieved swift and safe restoration of sinus rhythm in ICU patients with POAF and could be considered as a favorable drug choice over amiodarone in such patients.

Managing arrhythmias in the intensive care unit

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at increased risk for cardiac arrhythmias, the most common of which can be subdivided into tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias. These arrhythmias may be the primary reason for ICU admission or may occur in the critically ill patient. This article addresses the occurrence of arrhythmias in the critically ill patient, and discusses their pathophysiology, implications, recognition, and management.

Epidemiology, prevention, and treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in the ICU. The aim of this review is to summarize relevant information on new-onset AF in non-cardiac critical illness with respect to epidemiology, prevention, and treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a PubMed search in June 2014 and included studies describing the epidemiology, prevention, and treatment of new-onset AF and atrial flutter during ICU stay in non-cardiac adult patients. Selected studies were divided into the three categories according to the extracted information. The methodological quality of selected studies was described according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.

RESULTS

We identified 1,132 citations, and after full-text-level selection, we included 10 studies on etiology/outcome and five studies on treatment. There was no study related to prevention. Overall quality of evidence was mostly low or very low due to their observational study designs, small sample sizes, flawed diagnosis of new-onset AF, and the absence of mortality evaluation. The incidence of new-onset AF varied from 4.5% to 15.0%, excluding exceptional cases (e.g., septic shock). Severity scores of patients with new-onset AF were higher than those without new-onset AF in eight studies, in four of which the difference was statistically significant. Five studies reported risk factors for new-onset AF, all of which used multivariate analyses to extract risk factors. Multiple risk factors are reported, e.g., advanced age, the white race, severity scores, organ failures, and sepsis. Hospital mortality in new-onset AF patients was higher than that of patients without AF in all studies, four of which found statistical significance. Among the five studies on treatment, only one study was randomized controlled, and various interventions were studied.

CONCLUSIONS

New-onset AF occurred in 5%-15% of the non-cardiac critically ill patients. Patients with new-onset AF had poor outcomes compared with those without AF. Despite the high incidence of new-onset AF in the general ICU population, currently available information for AF, especially for management (prevention, treatment, and anticoagulation), is quite limited. Further research is needed to improve our understanding of new-onset AF in critically ill patients.

[Rate and rhythm control in atrial fibrillation : pharmacological approaches]

Atrial fibrillation is the most common form of cardiac arrhythmia, occurring in 1-2 % of the population and due to an increased life expectancy the prevalence will increase further. Pharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation is an important component of basic initial therapeutic options for patients with atrial fibrillation. Independent of an individually adjusted prevention of thromboembolism, rate and rhythm management can also be carried out. While rate control mainly applies to all patients, rhythm control is only indicated in patients who remain clinically symptomatic despite sufficient rate control. Profound knowledge about antiarrhythmic drugs including specific interactions is necessary due to the variable individual effects and sometimes severe side effects.

Current Evidence and Recommendations for Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, which is associated with substantial risk of stroke and thromboembolism. As an arrhythmia that is particularly common in the elderly, it is an important contributor towards morbidity and mortality. Ventricular rate control has been a preferred and therapeutically convenient treatment strategy for the management of AF. Recent research in the field of rhythm control has led to the advent of newer antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation techniques as newer therapeutic options. Currently available antiarrhythmic drugs still remain limited by their suboptimal efficacy and significant adverse effects. Catheter ablation as a newer modality to achieve sinus rhythm (SR) continues to evolve, but data on long-term outcomes on its efficacy and mortality outcomes are not yet available. Despite these current developments, rate control continues to be the front-line treatment strategy, especially in older and minimally symptomatic patients who might not tolerate the antiarrhythmic drug treatment. This review article discusses the current evidence and recommendations for ventricular rate control in the management of AF. We also highlight the considerations for rhythm control strategy in the management of patients of AF.

Optimizing drug therapy in the surgical intensive care unit

This article provides a review of commonly prescribed medications in the surgical ICU, focusing on sedatives, antipsychotics, neuromuscular blocking agents, cardiovascular agents, anticoagulants, and antibiotics. A brief overview of pharmacology is followed by practical considerations to aid prescribers in selecting the best therapy within a given category of drugs to optimize patient outcomes.

Effects of a novel amiodarone-like compound SAR114646A on the pig atrium and susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation in dogs and pigs

Amiodarone is one of the most effective antiarrhythmic drugs. However, poor solubility of this compound has limited its intravenous application. SAR11464A is a water-soluble amiodarone-like drug that lacks iodine and inhibits multiple cardiac ion channels in vitro. This study evaluated the antiarrhythmic efficacy of this drug in vivo. In porcine studies, atrial effective refractory period (AERP) was measured in pentobarbital-anesthetized thoracotomized pigs and atrial fibrillation (AF) was induced by a premature beat. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced via either burst pacing or programmed electrical stimulation (a series of progressively shorter beats, S1-S5). In canine studies, VF was induced by a 2-min occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery during the last minute of exercise in dogs with healed myocardial infarctions (n = 8). One week later, this test was repeated after pretreatment with SAR114646A (3.0 mg/kg, i.v., slow bolus). SAR114646A produced a significant dose-dependent prolongation of AERP, inhibited AF induced by a premature stimulus, and electrically induced VF in anesthetized pigs. At 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg, i.v., it was superior to amiodarone, dofetilide, and flecainide. In dogs, SAR114646A did not alter any ECG parameter including QTc (control, 236.9 ± 8.5 ms vs. SAR, 237.2 ± 3.5 ms) but significantly reduced the incidence of VF, protecting six of eight animals (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.01). SAR114646A was effective against both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias without altering ventricular repolarization. These data suggest that the amiodarone-like drug SAR114646A may be an effective antiarrhythmic intervention that does not adversely prolong ventricular repolarization.

Effects of the novel amiodarone-like compound SAR114646A on cardiac ion channels and ventricular arrhythmias in rats

Amiodarone is the "gold standard" for current antiarrhythmic therapy because it combines efficacy with good hemodynamic and electrophysiological tolerance. Amiodarone is effective against both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias by intravenous (i.v.) or oral route. However, the i.v. formulation has limitations. Therefore, we identified SAR114646A, an amiodarone-like antiarrhythmic agent with good aqueous solubility suitable for i.v. application. Patch-clamp experiments were performed with isolated cardiomyocytes from guinea pigs and rats. In guinea pig ventricular cardiomyocytes, the fast Na(+) channel and the L-type Ca(2+) channels were blocked by SAR114646A with half-maximal concentrations (IC(50)) of 2.0 and 1.1 μM, respectively. The tail current of the fast activating rectifying potassium channel I(Kr) was blocked with an IC(50) value of 0.6 μM, whereas the IC(50) values for inhibition of the I(Ks) and I(K1) channels was >10 μM. ATP-sensitive K(+) channels were evoked by application of the channel opener rilmakalim (3 μM). SAR114646A blocked this current with an IC(50) value of 2.8 μM. In guinea pig atrial cardiomyocytes, carbachol (1 μM) was used to activate the I(KACh) and SAR114646A inhibited this current with IC(50) of 36.5 nM. The transient outward current I(to) and the sustained current I(sus) were investigated in rat ventricular myocytes. SAR114646A blocked these currents with IC(50) of 1.8 and 1.2 μM, respectively. When expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, the currents hKv1.5 and hHCN4 were inhibited with IC(50) values of 1.1 and 0.4 μM, respectively. Micropuncture experiments in isolated rabbit left atria revealed that SAR114646A prolonged the 50% repolarization significantly at 3 and 10 μM. In guinea pig papillary muscle, the APD at 90% of repolarization was slightly prolonged at 3 and 10 μM. SAR114646A demonstrates antiarrhythmic activity in anaesthetised rats, subjected to 5 min ischemia followed by 10 min reperfusion, where 1 mg/kg of SAR114646A applied as i.v. bolus 5 min prior to ischemia, decreased mortality to 0% compared to 80% under control conditions. In conclusion, SAR114646A is a multichannel blocker with improved water solubility, compared to amiodarone. In contrast to amiodarone, SAR114646A also blocks the K(+) channels I(to) and I(sus). A potent antiarrhythmic effect as observed in rats can also be expected in other animal models.

Treating critical supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias

Atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter, AV-nodal reentry tachycardia with rapid ventricular response, atrial ectopic tachycardia and preexcitation syndromes combined with AF or ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) are typical arrhythmias in intensive care patients (pts). Most frequently, the diagnosis of the underlying arrhythmia is possible from the physical examination (PE), the response to maneuvers or drugs and the 12-lead surface electrocardiogram. In unstable hemodynamics, immediate DC-cardioversion is indicated. Conversion of AF to sinus rhythm (SR) is possible using antiarrhythmic drugs. Amiodarone has a conversion rate in AF of up to 80%. Ibutilide represents a class III antiarrhythmic agent that has been reported to have conversion rates of 50-70%. Acute therapy of atrial flutter (Aflut) in intensive care pts depends on the clinical presentation. Atrial flutter can most often be successfully cardioverted to SR with DC-energies <50 joules. Ibutilide trials showed efficacy rates of 38-76% for conversion of Aflut to SR compared to conversion rates of 5-13% when intravenous flecainide, propafenone or verapamil was administered. In addition, high dose (2 mg) of ibutilide was more effective than sotalol (1.5 mg/kg) in conversion of Aflut to SR (70 versus 19%). Drugs like procainamide, sotalol, amiodarone or magnesium were recommended for treatment of VTA in intensive care pts. However, only amiodarone is today the drug of choice in VTA pts and also highly effective even in pts with defibrillation-resistant out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (CA). There is a general agreement that bystander first aid, defibrillation and advanced life support is essential for neurologic outcome in pts after cardiac arrest due to VTA. Public access defibrillation in the hands of trained laypersons seems to be an ideal approach in the treatment of ventricular fibrillation (VF). The use of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) by basic life support ambulance providers or first responder (FR) in early defibrillation programs has been associated with a significant increase in survival rates (SRs). However, use of AEDs at home cannot be recommended.

Concept of the five 'A's for treating emergency arrhythmias

Cardiac rhythm disturbances such as bradycardia (heart rate < 50/min) and tachycardia (heart rate > 100/min) require rapid therapeutic intervention. The supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) are sinus tachycardia, atrial tachycardia, AV-nodal reentrant tachycardia, and tachycardia due to accessory pathways. All SVTs are characterized by a ventricular heart rate > 100/min and small QRS complexes (QRS width < 0.12 ms) during the tachycardia. It is essential to evaluate the arrhythmia history, to perform a good physical examination, and to accurately analyze the 12-lead electrocardiogram. A precise diagnosis of the SVT is then possible in more than 90% of patients. In ventricular tachycardia (VT) there are broad QRS complexes (QRS width > 0.12 s). Ventricular flutter and ventricular fibrillation are associated with chaotic electrophysiologic findings. For acute therapy, we will present the new concept of the five 'A's, which refers to adenosine, adrenaline, ajmaline, amiodarone, and atropine. Additionally, there are the 'B,' 'C,' and 'D' strategies, which refer to beta-blockers, cardioversion, and defibrillation, respectively. The five 'A' concept allows a safe and effective antiarrhythmic treatment of all bradycardias, tachycardias, SVTs, VT, ventricular flutter, and ventricular fibrillation, as well as of asystole.

A practical approach to the management of patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most commonly encountered clinical arrhythmia and continues to grow in incidence. Current management involves highly individualised therapies based on underlying concomitant disease processes and symptoms. Moreover, there are numerous therapeutic permutations involving anticoagulation, rate-limitation and antiarrhythmic strategies. This review serves to update the clinician with a practical approach to each patient population and on current advances in management.

Acute pulmonary edema due to stress cardiomyopathy in a patient with aortic stenosis: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Stress cardiomyopathy is a condition of chest pain, breathlessness, abnormal heart rhythms and sometimes congestive heart failure or shock precipitated by intense mental or physical stress.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 64-year-old male with a known diagnosis of moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis and advised that valve replacement was not urgent, presented with acute pulmonary edema following extraordinary mental distress. The patient was misdiagnosed as having a "massive heart attack" and died when managed by a traditional protocol for acute myocardial infarction/coronary artery disease, irrespective of his known aortic stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Intense mental stress poses a considerable risk, particularly to patients with significant aortic stenosis. As described here, it can precipitate acute pulmonary edema. Importantly, effective management of acute pulmonary edema due to stress cardiomyopathy in patients with known aortic stenosis requires its distinction from acute pulmonary edema caused by an acute myocardial infarction. Treatment options include primarily urgent rhythm and/or rate control, as well as cautious vasodilation.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia that occurs after cardiac surgery. It is associated with an increase in morbidity, length of hospital stay and mortality. Patients who are at higher risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation should receive prophylactic treatment. Atrial fibrillation usually resolves spontaneously after heart rate is controlled; however, if patients are highly symptomatic or hemodynamically unstable, sinus rhythm should be restored by electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion.

Special cases in acute heart failure syndromes: atrial fibrillation and wide complex tachycardia

Hospitalization for acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS) results in substantial in-hospital and postdischarge morbidity and mortality. Management of AHFS presents significant challenges, given the heterogeneity of the patient population and the differing etiologies underlying why patients present with acute decompensation. Arrhythmias in the setting of AHFS, such as atrial fibrillation and wide complex tachycardia, present additional challenges. Compounding this challenge is the paucity of evidence on which to base early management. General principles for the management of atrial fibrillation and wide complex tachycardia in the setting of emergency department AHFS are discussed.

[Rate versus rhythm control with and without heart failure]

Atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure are frequently associated with complex interactions. Patients with both diseases bear a sophisticated therapeutic challenge for the attending physician. The approach to treat atrial fibrillation differs for patients with and without heart failure in several aspects. Basic requirements are the treatment of the underlying diseases and prophylaxis of thromboembolic complications. Rate and rhythm control are the two main therapeutic strategies for atrial fibrillation according to the current guidelines. Large trials including the recently published AF-CHF study (Atrial Fibrillation - Congestive Heart Failure) failed to demonstrate a difference in mortality for both strategies. Thus, the therapeutic decision is mainly based on the patient's symptoms to improve quality of life. Rate control should be applied to asymptomatic patients or if rhythm control has already failed. If beta-blockers and digoxin have failed to control heart rate, His ablation with pacemaker implantation can be considered. In patients without heart disease, class I antiarrhythmic drugs and, in case of ineffectiveness, amiodarone or catheter ablation are recommended for rhythm control. First data concerning catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in heart failure are promising and randomized studies are on the way. Rhythm control remains first-line therapy in recent-onset or highly symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation patients with and without heart failure.

A formula for the stratified selection of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the emergency setting: a retrospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

Amiodarone is a commonly used medication in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) of recent onset.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to identify a possible formula for selecting Emergency Department (ED) patients with paroxysmal AF who will spontaneously restore sinus rhythm (SR), successfully restore SR with the use of loading intravenous (i.v.) amiodarone, or require 24-h maintenance amiodarone infusion.

METHODS

This retrospective pilot study included 141 patients with recent-onset AF. Patients who did not restore SR spontaneously received i.v. amiodarone (5 mg/kg) within a period of 30 min. In case of no response, an additional dosage of 1000 mg of i.v. amiodarone was administered over a period of 24 h. Binary logistic regression models were used to determine the predictors of spontaneous conversion and the response to amiodarone administration.

RESULTS

The formula ([heart rate/systolic blood pressure] + 0.1 × number of past AF incidences) was chosen as the one with the highest combined sensitivity and specificity. This index identified the patients who spontaneously restored SR (cutoff point 1.31 with 78.6% sensitivity and 77.9% specificity), whereas for patients who responded to the loading i.v. amiodarone dose, the use of the index (cutoff point 1.24) exhibited 84.1% sensitivity and 75.3% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

This formula may be a useful and reliable bedside diagnostic tool to identify AF patients most likely to spontaneously convert, or respond to loading amiodarone administration in the emergency setting. The use of this index also can assist in patient risk stratification.

Clinical review: treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation in medical intensive care patients--a clinical framework

Atrial fibrillation occurs frequently in medical intensive care unit patients. Most intensivists tend to treat this rhythm disorder because they believe it is detrimental. Whether atrial fibrillation contributes to morbidity and/or mortality and whether atrial fibrillation is an epiphenomenon of severe disease, however, are not clear. As a consequence, it is unknown whether treatment of the arrhythmia affects the outcome. Furthermore, if treatment is deemed necessary, it is not known what the best treatment is. We developed a treatment protocol by searching for the best evidence. Because studies in medical intensive care unit patients are scarce, the evidence comes mainly from extrapolation of data derived from other patient groups. We propose a treatment strategy with magnesium infusion followed by amiodarone in case of failure. Although this strategy seems to be effective in both rhythm control and rate control, the mortality remained high. A randomised controlled trial in medical intensive care unit patients with placebo treatment in the control arm is therefore still defendable.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia after cardiac surgery. It is associated with an increase in morbidity, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Patients who are at higher risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation should receive prophylactic treatment. Atrial fibrillation usually resolves spontaneously after heart rate is controlled; however, if patients are highly symptomatic or hemodynamically unstable, sinus rhythm should be restored by electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion. Patients with atrial fibrillation of more than 48 hours should receive antithrombotic therapy for thromboembolism prevention.

A practical guide for clinicians who treat patients with amiodarone: 2007

Amiodarone is commonly used to treat supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias in various inpatient and outpatient settings. Over- and under-use of amiodarone is common, and data regarding patterns of use are sparse and largely anecdotal. Because of adverse drug reactions, proper use is essential to deriving optimal benefits from the drug with the least risk. This guide updates an earlier version published in 2000, reviews indications for use of amiodarone and recommends strategies to minimize adverse effects. The recommendations included herein are based on the best available data and the collective experience of the member of the writing committee.

Intravenous and oral administration of amiodarone for the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation after digoxin administration

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a significant contributor to cardiovascular morbidity. Amiodarone is a potent antiarrhythmic drug. The safety and efficacy of oral versus intravenous (i.v.) Amiodarone in the treatment of AF of recent onset (duration <48 h) was investigated.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 223 patients with symptomatic AF, of whom 110 received 600 mg oral Amiodarone (Group A) in three divided doses and 113 received i.v. Amiodarone (5 mg/kg over 30 min followed by 1000 mg over the next 24 h) (Group B). Digoxin was administered to all patients, who had not previously received it. All patients were monitored for 24 h.

RESULTS

Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 85.45% of group A and 82.30% in group B (p=NS). Mean time of cardioversion in group A was 20+/-4.5 h and in group B was 12+/-8 h (p<0,001). However, blood pressure (BP) in group A remained stable for the observation period, whereas it fell significantly in group B. Treatment was not discontinued in any of the patients in either group, however 13 patients in group B developed superficial phlebitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Both forms of the drug are extremely efficient in restoring sinus rhythm in AF of recent onset, although the i.v. form acts quicker. The oral form of the drug does not alter significantly the patients' BP.

The safety of digoxin as a pharmacological treatment of atrial fibrillation

Digoxin has traditionally been the drug of choice for ventricular rate control in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF), with or without heart failure (HF) with systolic dysfunction. In patients with permanent AF, digoxin monotherapy is ineffective to control ventricular rate during exercise, but the combination of digoxin with a beta-blocker or a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist can control heart rate both at rest and during exercise. Only a few randomised, controlled studies have evaluated the adverse effects of digoxin in patients with AF in a systematic way and side effects requiring drug withdrawal have rarely been reported. When reported, the most frequent adverse effects were cardiac arrhythmias (ventricular arrhythmias, AV block of varying degrees and sinus pauses). This evidence suggested that, in contrast to other antiarrhythmic drugs, digoxin is a safe drug in patients with AF. However, this safety profile can be erroneous due to the short follow-up of the studies and patient selection. Because patients with HF have been excluded in most studies, the safety profile of digoxin in this population has not been directly addressed. Early recognition that an arrhythmia is related to digoxin intoxication as well as recognition of concomitant medications or medical conditions that may directly alter the pharmacokinetic profile of digoxin, or indirectly alter its cardiac effects by pharmacodynamic interactions remain essential for safe and effective use of digoxin in patients with AF.

Drug treatment and thrombolytics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

During cardiopulmonary resuscitation, no specific drug therapy has been shown to improve survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest, and only few drugs have a proven benefit for short-term survival. This article reviews recent experimental and clinical data about vasopressor, antiarrhythmic and thrombolytic agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

General use of high-dose epinephrine (>1 mg) can not be recommended, whereas it should be considered during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. No catecholamine superior to epinephrine has been identified. Arginine vasopressin has been shown to be as effective as epinephrine in patients with ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity, and may be more effective in patients presenting with asystole or as the second vasopressor (after epinephrine) in refractory cardiac arrest. Sodium bicarbonate should not be 'blindly' administered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation unless an arterial blood gas analysis can be obtained, or after prolonged unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Amiodarone should be preferred over lidocaine, since it may improve short-term survival. Thrombolytic therapy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation may be beneficial if a pulmonary embolism or acute myocardial infarction is suggested to be the cause of the cardiac arrest.

SUMMARY

Epinephrine still represents the first-line vasopressor during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Arginine vasopressin may be considered in patients presenting with asystole or who are unresponsive to initial treatment with epinephrine. Amiodarone should be preferred to other antiarrythmic agents in patients with cardiac arrest. Thrombolytic therapy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a promising new therapeutic option, but its general use in cardiac arrest cannot be recommended until the results of a large multicentre trial become available.

Selection of drugs in pursuit of rate control strategy

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia. Based on multiple large randomized trials, rate control therapy has been shown to be safe and effective and is gaining greater acceptance as a frontline alternative to drugs to maintain sinus rhythm. Adequate rate control can be achieved by atrioventricular nodal blocking agents both in the acute and chronic settings. In refractory patients, other methods such as atrioventricular node ablation can be used to control rate.

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia as early indicator of a complicated course after esophagectomy

In a group of 89 consecutive patients with a standardized operative procedure, the incidence of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT), predisposing risk factors (preoperative and intraoperative factors and parameters of intensive care strategy) and therapeutic strategies were evaluated. Operative treatment consisted of transthoracic esophagectomy, gastric interposition and intrathoracic anastomosis. Overall hospital mortality was 6.7%. In 32 (37%) patients a new onset SVT occurred. Age and elevated body temperature were the only significant risk factor for SVT in the multivariate analysis, their odds ratios being 1.3 for each year above 58 and 5.6 for each degree above 37.8 degrees C, respectively. Secondary risk factors were history of hypertension and use of epinephrine, the corresponding odds ratios being 6.6 and 10.2. Digitalis (2/32) and calcium-antagonists (2/9) were unsatisfactory, while beta-blockers (13/20) and amiodarone (12/12) were efficient therapeutic agents. Incidence of SVT was significantly correlated with the development of postoperative septic complications.

Errors and pitfalls in the non-invasive management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice while it has a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. The errors and pitfalls in the management of AF patients are not uncommon. These include errors in detection and management of the underlying conditions that promote and perpetuate the arrhythmia, in the selection and monitoring of antithrombotic treatment, in the selection of appropriate strategy for arrhythmia management (rate or rhythm control), in the cardioversion procedure, in the prevention of recurrence after cardioversion, in the acute or chronic control of heart rate, and in the monitoring of drug toxicities. The heterogeneity of the disease along with the diversity of current treatment options mainly account for these problems. Nevertheless, deep knowledge of the evidence-based therapeutic approaches, as well as the development of individualized therapeutic strategies, can substantially improve the effective management of such patients.

Effects of a high dose intravenous bolus amiodarone in patients with atrial fibrillation and a rapid ventricular rate

BACKGROUND

Amiodarone, given as intravenous bolus has not yet been studied in patients with atrial fibrillation and a high ventricular rate.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation and a ventricular rate above 135 bpm were randomized to receive either 450 mg amiodarone or 0.6 mg digoxin given as a single bolus through a peripheral venous access. If the ventricular rate exceeded 100 bpm after 30 min, another 300 mg amiodarone or 0.4 mg digoxin were added. Primary endpoints of the study were the ventricular rate and the occurrence of sinus rhythm after 30 and 60 min. Secondary endpoints were blood pressure during the first hour after drug administration, and safety regarding drug induced hypotension, and phlebitis at the infusion site.

RESULTS

Baseline heart rate was 144+/-19 in the amiodarone group and 145+/-15 in the digoxin group (p=0.72). Following amiodarone, heart rate was 104+/-25 after 30 min compared to 116+/-23 in the digoxin group (p=0.02) and 94+/-22 versus 105+/-22 after 60 min (p=0.03). After 30 min, sinus rhythm was documented in 14 (28%) patients following amiodarone compared to 3 (6%) patients in the digoxin group (p=0.003), and after 60 min in 21 (42%) versus 9 (18%) patients (p=0.012). Asymptomatic hypotension was observed in 4 amiodarone treated patients, and superficial phlebitis in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Amiodarone, given as an intravenous bolus is relatively safe and more effective than digoxin for heart rate control and conversion to sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation and a rapid ventricular rate.

New antiarrhythmic agents for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is a frequent reason for antiarrhythmic therapy. Existing antiarrhythmic drugs have important side effects and presently the therapy to maintain sinus rhythm is not superior to a strategy of controlling excessive heart rate. This review summarises current strategies to improve antiarrhythmic therapy for atrial fibrillation. The most important strategies are: i) to develop drugs without proarrhythmic effects--development of drugs devoid of QT prolonging potential is the main strategy; ii) multiple channel-blocking drugs--inspired by the efficacy of amiodarone, several drugs are being developed that have similar electrophysiological properties as amiodarone, but without the extracardiac side effects; iii) drugs that act exclusively in the atria--the atria contain specific potassium channels, and several drugs that act only on these channels are in development; and iv) antiarrhythmic therapy without effects on ion channels--inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system and steroid therapy has been shown to have some effect in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Many drugs are in development and the therapeutic scenario for treatment of atrial fibrillation may change quickly.

Amiodarone-induced acute lung toxicity in an ICU setting

Amiodarone is a highly effective antiarrhythmic drug, albeit notorious for its serious pulmonary toxicity. The incidence of amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity (APT) appears to be 1% per year (1). We report a case of very acute APT in a man suffering from postoperative atrial fibrillation.