Validation of a neurobehavioral functioning inventory for adults with traumatic brain injury

The overt behaviour scale (OBS): A tool for measuring challenging behaviours following ABI in community settings

OBJECTIVES

The Overt Behaviour Scale (OBS) was designed as a comprehensive measure of common challenging behaviours observed after acquired brain injury (ABI) in community settings. The OBS comprises 34 items in nine categories that measure aggression, inappropriate sexual behaviour, perseveration, wandering, inappropriate social behaviour and lack of initiation. The aim of the current study was to determine the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the OBS.

METHOD

Two adult community-based samples of people with ABI were recruited. Sample 1 (n= 30) were concurrently evaluated on the OBS by two raters and again 1 week later to test stability. Other validating scales were also administered. Sample 2 (n= 28) were clients of the ABI Behaviour Consultancy who were treated for challenging behaviours and were administered the OBS before treatment commenced and then again 4 months later.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability and stability coefficients for the OBS total score was strong (0.97 and 0.77, respectively). Initial evidence of convergent and divergent validity was shown by the differential pattern of correlations with other measures. Moderate-to-strong coefficients (range 0.37-0.66) were observed between the OBS and other measures that had behavioural content (i.e. Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory, Current Behaviour Scale, Neurobehavioural Rating Scale-Revised). Divergent validity was shown by the lack of correlation between the OBS and the sub-scales of these tools that do not measure challenging behaviour. Finally, responsiveness was demonstrated with a significant decrease in OBS scores in the expected direction over the 4-month period. This improvement was confirmed by corroborating evidence from key informants.

CONCLUSION

The OBS shows promise as a reliable, valid and responsive measure that can be used for the systematic assessment of challenging behaviours in community settings.

Comparability of Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory ratings by staff, significant others and people with acquired brain injury

OBJECTIVES

To determine the internal consistency, reliability and comparability of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) and sub-scales completed by people with acquired brain injury (ABI), family and significant others (SO) and rehabilitation staff.

SUBJECTS

134 people with ABI consecutively seen for outpatient rehabilitation evaluation.

METHOD

MPAI-4 protocols based on independent ratings by the people with ABI undergoing evaluation, SO and rehabilitation staff were submitted to Rasch Facets analysis to determine the internal consistency of the overall measure and sub-scales (Ability, Adjustment and Participation indices) for each rater group and for a composite measure based on all rater groups. Rater agreement for individual items was also examined.

RESULTS

Rasch indicators of internal consistency were entirely within acceptable limits for 3-rater composite full scale and sub-scale measures; these indicators were generally within acceptable limits for measures based on a single rater group. Item agreement was generally acceptable; disagreements suggested various sources of bias for specific rater groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The MPAI-4 possesses satisfactory internal consistency regardless of rating source. A composite measure based on ratings made independently by people with ABI, SO and staff may serve as a 'gold standard' for research purposes. In the clinical setting, assessment of varying perspectives and biases may not only best represent outcome as evaluated by all parties involved but be essential to developing effective rehabilitation plans.

The structure of functional and community outcomes following traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the dimensionality of functional and community outcomes following serious TBI. To identify items that fit, misfit or are redundant, as well as to assess person misfit.

METHODS

Rating-scale (Rasch) analysis was applied to 1-year follow-up data from 231 cases in the US National TBI Model Systems database. Items selected for analysis included all items indicative of global outcomes, disability, activity or participation.

RESULTS

A powerful singular measurement dimension was identified. Item reliability was very high (0.98), as was person reliability (0.97). The dimension fit over 90% of cases; that is approximately 10% of cases displayed anomalous patterns of functioning that indicated that their functioning was not measurable in terms of the general dimension identified. There was tension within the dimension between ratings of dependency (FIM) and cognitive functioning in everyday life (NFI). Most-but not all-neuropsychological test scores misfit the outcome dimension.

CONCLUSIONS

Actual dimensionality was distinct from the named scales employed. A unidimensional measure model fit the data much better than expected. This outcome dimension might be called 'general community functioning'. In the future, it should be possible to develop more valid and parsimonious measures of community outcomes following TBI.

Psychiatric disorders and traumatic brain injury

Psychiatric disorders after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are frequent. Researches in this area are important for the patients' care and they may provide hints for the comprehension of primary psychiatric disorders. Here we approach epidemiology, diagnosis, associated factors and treatment of the main psychiatric disorders after TBI. Finally, the present situation of the knowledge in this field is discussed.

The experience of fatigue in the first 2 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: a preliminary report

Fatigue is a well-recognized issue for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This prospective study examined the rate and types of fatigue that are experienced by a cohort of individuals with TBI within the first 2 years, using a multidimensional fatigue scale. The impact of factors such as demographics, injury severity indices, and concomitant psychosocial variables was also examined. Using 2 measures of overall fatigue, 16%-32% at Year 1 and 21%-34% at Year 2 reported significant levels of fatigue. Fatigue did not appear to change between 1 and 2 years post-TBI. Sleep quality was the most prevalent concomitant disturbance followed by depression and pain.

Patterns of fatigue and its correlates over the first 2 years after traumatic brain injury

This study used a prospective longitudinal design to quantify fatigue and associated factors during the first 2 years after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Fifty-one individuals were assessed at 3 time points: within the first 6, 12, and 18-24 months after TBI. Self-reported fatigue improved during the first year, as did pain, sleep quality, cognitive independence, and involvement in productive activity. Further changes up to 2 years after TBI were not observed. The subset of individuals who reported significant increases in fatigue over the first 2 years demonstrated poorer outcomes in cognition, motor symptoms, and general functioning than those with decreased or stable fatigue.

Depressive symptomatology after mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury: a comparison of three measures

Measurement of posttraumatic brain injury depression is problematic. Disagreement exists about the best screening measure, and symptoms of brain injury often overlap those of depression. In an outpatient sample of 75 persons, we compared aspects of Criterion A of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders--Fourth Revision, Text Revision (2000), with three depression subscales: the Neurobehavioral Functioning (NFI-D), Profile of Moods State (POMS-D), and Center for Epidemiologic Studies (CES-D). Nearly 40% of this outpatient sample had significant levels of depressive symptoms. All measures were internally consistent, reliable, and highly correlated. For persons with mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury, the CES-D was the best screening instrument because of its ease in administration, sensitivity in detecting probable major depressive disorders, its established categories of severity, and its comprehensiveness. Further effort in the establishment of depression severity categories using the NFI-D is needed.

A Natural Setting Behavior Management Program for Persons With Acquired Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of a behavior management program delivered in the natural community setting for persons with brain injury and their caregivers.

DESIGN

Three-group randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Homes and other community settings.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-seven persons with traumatic and other acquired brain injury and their caregivers.

INTERVENTIONS

Natural Setting Behavior Management (NSBM) involving education and individualized behavior modification program versus education only versus control group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in frequency of targeted problematic behaviors. Subscale in Questionnaire on Resources and Stress, Maslach Burnout Inventory, and the Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory.

RESULTS

While no significant effects were detected at termination of education only (P<.075) or of NSBM (P<.56), significant treatment effects were found at the main outcome point 3 months after termination of services (P<.002). Rates of disruptive or aggressive behaviors declined significantly in the NSBM group. Differences in caregiver-rated stress, burden, and aggression were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

A program of caregiver education and individualized behavior management in natural settings can decrease the frequency of disruptive behavioral challenges. Larger studies are needed to clarify the duration and intensity of education and individualized treatment required to diminish behavioral challenges and to understand relationships with general stress and burden experienced by caregivers.

Predicting Family Functioning After TBI

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for poor family functioning and neurobehavioral problems after traumatic brain injury (TBI) or orthopedic injuries (OI).

DESIGN

Longitudinal analyses of data from an inception cohort.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-five patients with moderate/severe TBI, 47 patients with mild TBI, and 44 patients with OI at discharge; and 49 patients with moderate/severe TBI, 24 patients with mild TBI, and 33 patients with OI at 1-year follow-up.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Measures of family functioning (Family Assessment Device) and Neurobehavioral Functioning Index at hospital discharge and 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

At discharge, patients with moderate/severe TBI had more symptoms of depression, memory/attention problems, and motor impairments than patients with OI and greater communication difficulties than patients with OI or mild TBI. At follow-up, patients with moderate/severe TBI continued to have more problems in memory/attention, depression, and communication. Approximately one third of each group had unhealthy family functioning at each assessment period. Few patients reported both impaired family functioning and clinical depression. Distressed family functioning correlated strongly with increased rates of neurobehavioral symptoms. Family dysfunction at follow-up was best predicted by family dysfunction at discharge and depression or memory/attention deficits at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

After TBI, patients at the greatest risk for distress at follow-up were those with family dysfunction at discharge and continued neurobehavioral problems. High-risk families need to be identified so that necessary referrals and/or treatment can be offered.

Evaluation of the Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory as a Depression Screening Tool After Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

To examine the utility of the Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory (NFI) for diagnosing depression in a rehabilitation setting.

DESIGN

In a prospective study, a structured clinical interview (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR) was used to identify DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder (MDD) symptoms among patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). NFI Depression scale items were compared with DSM-IV diagnosis obtained by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders.

SETTING

Outpatient neuropsychology clinic at a university hospital, private outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic, and a long-term specialized living assistance program.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants consisted of 78 patients with TBI who were at least 3 months postinjury and 18 years of age or older.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders and the NFI.

RESULTS

Psychiatric diagnostic interview with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders indicated that 50% of patients with TBI in our sample had at least one of the following in their lifetime: MDD, MDD due to general medical condition, dysthymia, or adjustment disorder with depressed mood. Thirty percent met diagnostic criteria for current MDD with or without general medical condition. Analyses of the NFI items revealed that individuals with depression endorsed greater levels of problems than did those without depression on 14 of the 32 items related to the DSM-IV symptom domains for depression (P < .00156 with Bonferroni correction). In predicting the diagnosis of depression using individual NFI items, the classification rate based on the Random Forests estimate was 83%.

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate that the NFI items differentiated between depressed and nondepressed patients with TBI. Imposing minimal burden on patients and staff, the NFI appears to have good predictive value in diagnosing major depression. In clinical practice and research, the NFI is a potentially valuable screening tool for identifying major depression in persons with TBI.

Mortality and Morbidity From Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Argentina

After adopting the Guidelines for the Management of Severe Head Injury, critical care physicians in Argentina reduced the mortality rate of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there is no in-hospital or postdischarge rehabilitation services for persons with TBI in Argentina. Thus, severely disabled survivors were being discharged to home without follow-up or long-term care.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this project were to establish a structure for conducting research about TBI in Argentina, and to conduct a prospective, observational study of outcomes from TBI in hospitals that had adopted the acute care guidelines. The goal was to document outcomes for people treated in a medical system that does not provide TBI rehabilitation. The focus of this report is mortality and morbidity during the acute care and hospital ward treatment of TBI in Argentina.

METHODS

We established a data-collection system in 5 hospitals in Argentina, using instruments and protocols developed by the NIDRR-funded TBI Model System program. Data-collection intervals were established to be comparable with intervals used in the TBI Model System program. The Argentine team consists of 11 neurocritical care physicians and 1 project manager/translator. All patient evaluation, data collection and entry, quality control, and local administration were conducted by this group.

RESULTS

Over 31 months, 278 patients were entered into the study. Approximately 61% were discharged from acute care directly to home. The in-hospital mortality rate was 31%. Seventy-six percent of expired patients died from secondary complications such as sepsis and pneumonia, and 93% while in the hospital.

DISCUSSION

TBI is a major public health concern in Argentina. However, rehabilitation for TBI is not a part of this country's medical system. The greatest proportion of expired patients in the Argentine sample died of secondary complications such as pneumonia or sepsis, which may have been avoided employing basic medical rehabilitation. The next research questions to be addressed in this population should be designed to identify solutions to the immediate need for rehabilitation, including treatment efficacy questions as well as questions about systems for delivering treatments.

A Review of Rating Scales for Measuring Behavior Change Due to Frontal Systems Damage

OBJECTIVE

To perform a critical review of scales designed to measure frontal behavior change.

BACKGROUND

Changes in cognition due to frontal disease or damage have been well described, but noncognitive changes in behavior are often more deleterious functionally for frontal patients.

METHOD

The review concentrates on five behavior rating scales: the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF), the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX), the Frontal Behavior Inventory (FBI), the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe), the Iowa Rating Scales of Personality Change (IRSPC), and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Other scales purporting to measure specific aspects of frontal functioning, but having less research support, are described briefly.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The BRIEF and FrSBe have good reliability and large-scale norms. No norms are available for the other scales. The FrSBe and IRSPC have been shown to be valid in discriminating frontal from nonfrontal lesioned patients, but this has not been shown in the other scales. The FBI and NPI require trained raters, whereas the FrSBe, IRSPC, and BRIEF are administered to patients and/or family informants directly. The NPI and FBI are sensitive to certain changes in behavior attributed to frontal systems disruption but have been used primarily in dementia.

Chronic Stress Conditions Do Explain Posttraumatic Brain Injury Depression

Psychosocial and biologic mechanisms are implicated in depression after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Using McEwen's stress theory of allostasis as a guidepost, this study examined whether pre- and postinjury chronic stress conditions could explain post-TBI depressive symptoms. Seventy-five community-dwelling persons who sustained a mild-to-moderate TBI and were within 2 years of the injury participated in this cross-sectional study. The participants completed measures of chronic stress and depression, measured with the Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory. Data were collected also on brain injury severity. Using multiple regression analysis, the frequency of childhood adversities and postinjury stress explained post-TBI depression. When time-since-injury was in the regression model, the frequency of preinjury stressors and postinjury stress significantly explained post-TBI depressive symptoms while the combined effect of childhood adversity with postinjury stress was not significant in explaining depressive symptoms. Pre- and postinjury chronic stress explained post-TBI depressive symptoms. These findings support stress-diathesis theory within the psychiatric literature and a linkage between chronic stress, an indicator of allostatic load, and post-TBI depression. These findings are important for nurse specialists working with persons who sustained brain injury, for chronic stress can be buffered by efficient and effective support systems.

Depression assessment after traumatic brain injury: an empirically based classification method11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated

OBJECTIVES

To describe the patterns of depression in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory (NFI) Depression Scale, and to classify empirically NFI Depression Scale scores.

DESIGN

Depressive symptoms were characterized by using the NFI Depression Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) Depression Scale.

SETTING

An outpatient clinic within a Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems center.

PARTICIPANTS

A demographically diverse sample of 172 outpatients with TBI, evaluated between 1996 and 2000.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The NFI, BDI, and MMPI-2 Depression Scale. The Cronbach alpha, analysis of variance, Pearson correlations, and canonical discriminant function analysis were used to examine the psychometric properties of the NFI Depression Scale.

RESULTS

Patients with TBI most frequently reported problems with frustration (81%), restlessness (73%), rumination (69%), boredom (66%), and sadness (66%) with the NFI Depression Scale. The percentages of patients classified as depressed with the BDI and the NFI Depression Scale were 37% and 30%, respectively. The Cronbach alpha for the NFI Depression Scale was.93, indicating a high degree of internal consistency. As hypothesized, NFI Depression Scale scores correlated highly with BDI (r=.765) and MMPI-2 Depression Scale T scores (r=.752). The NFI Depression Scale did not correlate significantly with the MMPI-2 Hypomania Scale, thus showing discriminant validity. Normal and clinically depressed BDI scores were most likely to be accurately predicted by the NFI Depression Scale, with 81% and 87% of grouped cases, respectively, correctly classified. Normal and depressed MMPI-2 Depression Scale scores were accurately predicted by the NFI Depression Scale, with 75% and 83% of grouped cases correctly classified, respectively. Patients' NFI Depression Scale scores were mapped to the corresponding BDI categories, and 3 NFI score classifications emerged: minimally depressed (13-28), borderline depressed (29-42), and clinically depressed (43-65).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provided further evidence that screening for depression should be a standard component of TBI assessment protocols. Between 30% and 38% of patients with TBI were classified as depressed with the NFI Depression Scale and the BDI, respectively. Our findings also provided empirical evidence that the NFI Depression Scale is a useful tool for classifying postinjury depression.

Chronic stress, sense of belonging, and depression among survivors of traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE

To test whether chronic stress, interpersonal relatedness, and cognitive burden could explain depression after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

DESIGN

A nonprobability sample of 75 mild-to-moderately injured TBI survivors and their significant others, were recruited from five TBI day-rehabilitation programs. All participants were within 2 years of the date of injury and were living in the community.

METHODS

During face-to-face interviews, demographic information, and estimates of brain injury severity were obtained and participants completed a cognitive battery of tests of directed attention and short-term memory, responses to the Perceived Stress Scale, Interpersonal Relatedness Inventory, Sense of Belonging Instrument, Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory, and Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale;.

FINDINGS

Chronic stress was significantly and positively related to post-TBI depression. Depression and postinjury sense of belonging were negatively related. Social support and results from the cognitive battery did not explain depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Postinjury chronic stress and sense of belonging were strong predictors of postinjury depression and are variables amenable to interventions by nurses in community health, neurological centers, or rehabilitation clinics. Future studies are needed to examine how these variables change over time during the recovery process.

A structured approach to family intervention after brain injury

OBJECTIVE

Given the limitations of the literature, a structured approach to helping families after brain injury is clearly needed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

On the basis of considerable clinical experience and research review, this article describes the Brain Injury Family Intervention (BIFI), developed to address common issues, concerns, and challenges. The foundation of the BIFI is a curriculum that includes 16 intervention topics, self-evaluation tools, and treatment strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite individual differences, families often encounter similar problems in their attempts to resume normal lives. A structured approach to family intervention can help mitigate commonly encountered problems.

Acquired personality disturbances associated with bilateral damage to the ventromedial prefrontal region

Personality changes in 7 participants with bilateral ventromedial prefrontal lesions (PF-BVM), 14 participants with prefrontal lesions but not bilateral ventromedial involvement (PF-NBVM), and 36 with nonprefrontal lesions (NPF) were investigated with the Iowa Rating Scales of Personality Change. Informants rated 30 specific characteristics for degree of disturbance and change from premorbid personality. PF-BVM participants showed a higher rate of acquired disturbances than NPF participants in blunted emotional experience, apathy, low emotional expressiveness, inappropriate affect, poor frustration tolerance, irritability, lability, indecisiveness, poor judgment, social inappropriateness, lack of planning, lack of initiation and persistence, and lack of insight. Differences between the PF-BVM and PF-NBVM groups were significant for several of these characteristics. All 7 PF-BVM participants developed a syndrome, including general dampening of emotional experience; poorly modulated emotional reactions; defective decision making, especially in the social realm; impaired goal-directed behavior; and striking lack of insight. Similarities between this syndrome of "acquired sociopathy" and developmental psychopathy in characteristic personality disturbances and psychophysiological abnormalities suggest that diminished emotionality, impaired decision making, and psychosocial dysfunction may be related to ventromedial prefrontal dysfunction in both groups.

Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals

OBJECTIVES

To determine which outcome measures are best and least suited for assessing long-term functional outcome of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the community.

DESIGN

Survey of participants in the community an average of 5 years after TBI. A battery of outcome measures was given.

SETTING

Community in northern California after inpatient rehabilitation.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-eight adult individuals with prior moderate to severe TBI. All subjects had received inpatient rehabilitation 2 to 9 years previously and could be reached for telephone interview.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Community Integration Questionnaire, Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory (NFI), Patient Competency Rating Scale (PCRS), Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale (LCFS), FIM instrument, Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM), Supervision Rating Scale (SRS), Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Revised Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (R-CHART), and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). The number of maximal scores on each of the surveys was studied to determine which instruments continued to reveal deficits years after TBI.

RESULTS

Most individuals obtained maximum scores, ie, functional independence, on these scales: LCFS, FIM motor subscale and total score, R-CHART physical independence subscale, FIM+FAM, GOS, and the SRS. Measures with the fewest maximum scores (<36%, measuring deficits still extant in the group) were the R-CHART cognition subscale and the NFI memory/attention and communication subscales, and employment subscales. Items, subscales, and total scores that showed good variability and correlated most highly and frequently with other scales also demonstrating good variability were the PCRS, the DRS and FIM+FAM employment items, the R-CHART cognition subscale, and the NFI motor, memory/attention, communication, and depression subscales (the R-CHART cognition subscale and NFI memory/attention subscale were highly correlated with the PCRS;.84,.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Measures that appeared to contribute little to assessing functional status of a TBI sample years postinjury were the FIM, FIM+FAM, SRS, GOS, and LCFS. Measures that showed a range of deficits across participants were DRS employability, the NFI, PCRS, and the R-CHART cognition subscale.

Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the glasgow outcome scale

OBJECTIVE

There is current debate over the issue of the best way of assessing outcome after head injury. One criticism of scales of disability and handicap such as the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) is that they fail to capture the subjective perspective of the person with head injury. The aims of the study were to investigate aspects of the validity of structured interviews for the GOS, and address the issue of the relation between the GOS and subjective reports of health outcome.

METHODS

A total of 135 patients with head injury were assessed using the GOS and an extended GOS (GOSE) and other measures of outcome and clinical status at 6 months after injury.

RESULTS

There were robust correlations between the GOS and measures of initial injury severity (particularly post-traumatic amnesia) and outcome assessed by disability scales (particularly the disbility rating scale (DRS)); however, associations with cognitive tests were generally modest. There were also strong correlations with self report measures of health outcome: both the GOS and GOSE were related to depression measured by the Beck depression inventory, mental wellbeing assessed by the general health questionnaire, and to all subscales of the short form-36. The GOS scales were also strongly associated with frequency of reported symptoms and problems on the neurobehavioural functioning inventory.

CONCLUSIONS

The GOS and GOSE show consistent relations with other outcome measures including subjective reports of health outcome; they thus remain useful overall summary assessments of outcome of head injury.

Assessment of neuropsychologic impairments after head injury: interrater reliability and factorial and criterion validity of the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised

OBJECTIVE

To study interrater reliability and factorial and criterion validity of the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised (NRS-R).

DESIGN

Validity study on persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and test-retest reliability study on a randomly selected subset of patients. Factor analyses, kappa statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients, and Cronbach's alphas were used.

SETTING

Inpatients from 15 French hospitals, mainly rehabilitation units. Other recruitment sites included a neurology hospital unit and a psychiatry hospital specifically devoted to TBI rehabilitation.

PATIENTS

Two hundred eighty-six TBI patients ages 16 to 70 years (convenience sample).

RESULTS

For the reliability study, the average of percentages of agreement among the items was 74.3% and the average of kappa statistics was .40. Factor analyses disclosed a maximum likelihood extraction of 5 correlated factors (F), explaining 42.2% of total variance: (F1) deficits in intentional behavior and in memory, (F2) lowering of emotional state, (F3) emotional and behavioral hyperactivation, (F4) lowering of arousal state and of attention, and (F5) language and speech problems. Results support the criterion validity of the factors. Reliability of the factor scores and internal consistencies of factors were very good.

CONCLUSIONS

Results describe some important properties of the NRS-R and, through an understanding of its underlying structure and relationships with the patients' clinical characteristics, contribute to the conceptual framework of neuropsychologic impairments after TBI.

Effects of the bradykinin antagonist Bradycor (deltibant, CP-1027) in severe traumatic brain injury: results of a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. American Brain Injury Consortium Study Group

A phase II prospective, randomized, double blind clinical trial of Bradycor, a bradykinin antagonist, was conducted at 31 centers within North America in severely brain injured patients. Patients of Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) 3-8 (n = 139) with at least one reactive pupil were randomized to receive either Bradycor, 3 microg/kg/min or placebo as a continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days, with the infusion beginning within 12 h of the injury. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of a continuous infusion of Bradycor (3.0 mc/kg/min) in preventing elevation of intracranial pressure (ICP). Other efficacy measures included the effect of Bradycor on the Therapy Intensity Level (TIL), mortality, and functional outcome. A secondary objective was to evaluate the safety of Bradycor in patients with severe brain injury. Randomization was carried out according to a computer generated randomization list. Patients were followed for the first 14 days of hospitalization with long-term outcome assessed at 3 and 6 months after injury. During the infusion and while the ICP monitor was in place, ICP measurements were recorded hourly along with blood pressure and heart rate. A modified version of the TIL was used to record therapeutic interventions hourly, while the ICP was being monitored. Outcome was assessed at 3 and 6 months after injury using the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). Bradycor was well tolerated in this patient population, and no adverse events were attributable to the compound. Although positive trends were seen for both ICP and TIL in the Bradycor group, these differences analyzed on a daily basis were not significant. However, a mixed model of variance which included treatment, day, treatment by day interaction, age and GCS revealed that the percentage time ICP of >15 mm Hg on days 4 and 5 was significantly lower in the Bradycor group compared to placebo (p = 0.035). There were fewer deaths in the Bradycor group, which had a 28-day all cause mortality of 20% versus 27% on placebo. Patients treated with Bradycor showed a 10.3% improvement in favorable outcome at 3 months and a 12% improvement in dichotomized GOS at 6 months (p = 0.26). The consistent positive trends seen in ICP, TIL, neuropsychological tests, and, most importantly, 3- and 6-month GOS provide supportive evidence that a bradykinin antagonist may play a neuroprotective role in severe brain injury.

Concordance of patients' and family members' ratings of neurobehavioral functioning after traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in family and patient evaluation of neurobehavioral functioning in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

DESIGN

Differences were examined by conducting 70 paired sample t tests on scale items and 6 paired sample t tests on scale scores from a neurobehavioral inventory.

SETTING

Medical center outpatient clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred one consecutive adult patients with TBI and 301 informants, primarily family members, completed the neurobehavioral inventory.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory (NFI) comprised of six scales with items describing symptoms and daily living problems.

RESULTS

Paired t test analyses of the six scales indicated that patients reported a significantly greater level of communication problems than did their matched family members. No differences were found for the other five scales. Paired t test analyses of the 70 scale items revealed significant differences in patient and family ratings for only 13 items. In all 13 instances, patients reported greater levels of dysfunction than were reported by their family members. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated a main effect of injury severity for only the Communication and Memory/Attention scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate general agreement between family members and patients regarding patients' everyday problems. Results do not support contentions that patients tend to underestimate difficulties. Agreement levels appear related to injury severity, item specificity, and item content. More research is needed to identify other variables relating to agreement levels, including age, injury severity, and amount of contact between patients and family members.

Personality change following head injury: assessment with the NEO Five-Factor Inventory

We evaluated personality change following head injury in 68 patients at 6 months postinjury using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory to assess the five personality dimensions of the Five-Factor Model of Personality. All items had to be rated twice, once for the preinjury and once for the current status. Twenty-eight trauma patients with injuries to other parts of the body than the head were used as controls. For the head-injured group, 63 relatives also completed the questionnaire. The results showed no differences between the ratings of head-injured patients and the ratings of trauma control patients. Both groups showed significant change in the personality dimensions Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Conscientiousness. Compared to their relatives, head-injured patients report a smaller change in Extraversion and Conscientiousness. Changes were not reported on the Openness and Agreeableness scales, by neither the head-injured or their relatives, nor by the trauma controls.