Flow cytometry based detection of HLA alloantibody mediated classical complement activation

Synergistic deposition of C4d by complement-activating and non-activating antibodies in cardiac transplants

The role of non-complement-activating alloantibodies in humoral graft rejection is unclear. We hypothesized that the non-complement-activating alloantibodies synergistically activate complement in combination with complement-activating antibodies. B10.A hearts were transplanted into immunoglobulin knock out (Ig-KO) mice reconstituted with monoclonal antibodies to MHC class I antigens. In allografts of unreconstituted Ig-KO recipients, no C4d was detected. Similarly, reconstitution with IgG1 or low dose IgG2b alloantibodies did not induce C4d deposition. However, mice administered with a low dose of IgG2b combined with IgG1 had heavy linear deposits of C4d on vascular endothelium. C4d deposits correlated with decreased graft survival. To replicate this synergy in vitro, mononuclear cells from B10.A mice were incubated with antibodies to MHC class I antigens followed by incubation in normal mouse serum. Flow cytometry revealed that both IgG2a and IgG2b synergized with IgG1 to deposit C4d. This synergy was significantly decreased in mouse serum deficient in mannose binding lectin (MBL) and in serum deficient in C1q. Reconstitution of MBL-A/C knock out (MBL-KO) serum with C1q-knock out (C1q-KO) serum reestablished the synergistic activity. This suggests a novel role for non-complement-activating alloantibodies and MBL in humoral rejection.

Determinants of the complement-fixing ability of recipient presensitization against HLA antigens

BACKGROUND

The presence of preformed alloantibodies with the ability to activate complement may pose a particular risk for kidney allograft rejection. The aim of this study was to evaluate variables that determine the complement-fixing capability of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization.

METHODS

Sixty-five sensitized patients with > or =10% pretransplant panel-reactive antibody (PRA) levels uncovered by immunoglobulin G [IgG]FlowPRA HLA class I and/or class II screening were included. Applying modified FlowPRA screening, sera were evaluated for patterns of alloreactive IgG subclasses and IgM, and, in parallel, for their complement-activating ability assessed by flow cytometric detection of human complement split product deposition ([C4d]FlowPRA).

RESULTS

Approximately two-thirds (68%) of tested sera were found to contain complement-fixing alloreactivity (> or =10%[C4d]FlowPRA). IgG1 type panel reactivity was predominant (detectable HLA class I and II reactivity in 93% and 91% of IgG-positive sera), followed by IgG3 (49%/44%), IgG2 (44%/27%), and IgG4 (19%/11%). Applying partial correlation we found an independent correlation of both %[IgG1]FlowPRA and %[IgG3]FlowPRA with %[C4d]FlowPRA reactivities (P< or =0.01). In addition, for IgG1 a contribution of the amount of bound alloantibody to complement-fixation was observed. Complement-fixation was also favored by the simultaneous presence of alloreactive IgG1, IgG3, and IgM. Previous grafting, but not pregnancy and transfusion, was independently associated with complement-fixing sensitization (P<0.05), presumably due to increased IgG1 type reactivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-HLA antibody-triggered complement activation is dependent on both the pattern of Ig reactivities and the amount of bound antibody. Previous transplantation represents a major risk factor for the development of complement-fixing sensitization.

Simultaneous detection of antibody binding and cytotoxicity in flow cytometry crossmatch for renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The anti-HLA antibody can be detected using either a complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) assay or a flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) in renal transplantation. Discordant results are often obtained because the two methods detect different reaction phases between the donor lymphocytes and the recipient sera. This study was intended to confirm that antibody binding and cytotoxicity to the lymphocytes can be detected simultaneously in a single FCXM assay, cytotoxic FCXM.

METHODS

In the cytotoxic FCXM, the antibody binding to the lymphocytes was measured using anti-IgG-FITC, and the cytotoxicity using 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) after adding complement. For an evaluation of two test parameters, the cytotoxicity test moiety (dead-cell percentage) was compared with the anti-human globulin (AHG)-CDC, and the antibody-binding test moiety (sample/control fluorescence ratio) with the conventional FCXM in 77 positive and 30 negative crossmatches.

RESULTS

In the cytotoxic FCXM, both antibody binding and cytotoxicity could be assessed in a single anti-IgG-FITC/7-AAD plot. Regarding the correlation between the presence of HLA antibodies and the test result, the cytotoxicity parameter (r = 0.55) appeared to be more suitable than that of the AHG-CDC (r = 0.50) but the antibody-binding parameter (r = 0.83) was worse than that of the conventional FCXM (r = 0.93). The sensitivity of both parameters of the cytotoxic FCXM was not significantly different from each conventional counterpart (P = 0.33 and P = 0.22, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The simultaneous detection of Ab binding and cytotoxicity was possible by the cytotoxic FCXM with the test efficiencies similar to the conventional counterparts. If this new assay is improved through the further studies to optimize the critical assay variables, this may be used as an alternative to the conventional assays to acquire more information on the characteristics of the recipient's HLA alloantibodies.

Pivotal role of complement-fixing HLA alloantibodies in presensitized kidney allograft recipients

Recipient presensitization represents a major risk factor for kidney allograft loss. Complement fixation may be a critical attribute of deleterious alloantibodies. We investigated clinical impact of complement-fixing HLA presensitization employing [C4d]FlowPRA, a novel assay permitting selective detection of HLA panel reactive antibody (PRA)-triggered C4 complement split product deposition. A cohort of 338 kidney transplants was evaluated for presensitization applying [C4d]FlowPRA together with [IgG]FlowPRA and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC)-PRA. Analysis of HLA class I alloreactivities revealed a high incidence of C4d-positive graft dysfunction in [IgG]FlowPRA(+)/[C4d]FlowPRA(+) and [IgG]FlowPRA(+)/[C4d]FlowPRA(-) recipients (23% and 22% vs. 3% in [IgG]FlowPRA(-) patients). Only patients with complement-fixing HLA class I immunization had inferior graft survival [75% (3 years) vs. 91% and 89%, respectively (p=0.036)]. Despite frequent finding of capillary C4d deposition (28%), complement-fixing HLA class II immunization was not associated with inferior survival rates. This may have been due to reduction of clinical effects by intense immunosuppression in presensitized patients. Evaluating CDC, 29% of CDC-PRA(+)/[C4d]FlowPRA(+) recipients had C4d-positive graft dysfunction. For these patients 3-year graft survival was worst, followed by CDC-PRA(+)/[C4d]FlowPRA(-) and CDC-PRA(-) patients (76% vs. 81% vs. 90%, p=0.014). Results highlight a strong impact of complement-fixing HLA presensitization. Discerning complement-activating abilities of HLA alloantibodies, [C4d]FlowPRA may help identify recipients at particularly high risk for graft rejection and loss.

Serial ten-year follow-up of HLA and MICA antibody production prior to kidney graft failure

The role of HLA antibodies in chronic allograft rejection was examined utilizing a unique resource of sera collected annually and stored over a 12-year period from patients with rejected or retained grafts. In patients selected for not having preformed HLA antibodies, 679 postoperative serial serum samples from 39 patients who rejected their grafts and 26 with functioning grafts were tested for HLA Class I and Class II antibodies by flow cytometry and for MICA antibodies by cytotoxicity on recombinant cell lines. HLA antibodies were found in 72% of patients who rejected grafts, compared to 46% with functioning transplants (p<0.05). In addition, the incidence of IgG HLA plus MICA antibodies was higher (77%) among those with failed transplants than those with functioning transplants (42%) (p<0.01). Finally, if patients with IgM anti-HLA antibodies were included, 95% of the 39 patients who rejected their grafts had HLA or MICA antibodies, compared to 58% with functioning grafts (p<0.01). Patients who rejected transplants had HLA and MICA antibodies more frequently than those with functioning grafts. These antibodies found in the peripheral circulation, were not necessarily donor-specific, but their association with failure is consistent with a causality hypothesis.

[C4d]FlowPRA Screening—A Specific Assay for Selective Detection of Complement-Activating Anti-HLA Alloantibodies

On waiting lists, transplant candidates are routinely screened for potentially harmful complement-fixing alloantibodies using complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) panel-reactive antibody (PRA) testing. We have recently developed a novel cell-independent assay for assessment of complement-activating panel reactivity ([C4d]FlowPRA), which is based on selective flow-cytometric detection of alloantibody-triggered C4 complement split product deposition to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-coated FlowPRA beads. Serum specimens selected from 120 transplant candidates were evaluated by [C4d]FlowPRA (HLA class I vs II) in comparison with FlowPRA IgG alloantibody screening (HLA class I vs II), a method detecting both complement- and noncomplement-activating alloantibodies, and with CDC-PRA on separated T (T-CDC) or B cells (B-CDC, evaluation on platelet-absorbed sera). For each assay, >/=10% PRA reactivity was considered positive. Comparing complement-dependent PRA assays with standard FlowPRA, the specificity calculated for [C4d]FlowPRA (HLA class I: 92%; class II: 100%) was found to be superior to that of CDC testing (T-CDC-PRA: 79%; B-CDC-PRA: 86%). Because noncomplement-activating alloreactivities were not detected for both techniques, low sensitivities were calculated ([C4d]FlowPRA HLA class I: 61%; class II: 31%; T-CDC-PRA: 70%; B-CDC-PRA: 55%). Compared with CDC-PRA, [C4d]FlowPRA gave a high specificity (HLA class I compared with T-CDC: 89%, HLA class II compared with B-CDC: 95%) but, at least in part because of false-positive CDC results, a modest sensitivity (66% and 38%, respectively). For both HLA classes, we found a highly significant association between absolute [C4d]FlowPRA and CDC-PRA levels (p < 0.0001). Our results suggest that detection of C4 split product deposition to FlowPRA beads may represent an attractive HLA-specific and time-effective alternative to CDC-PRA screening.

Sensitivity, ventricular assist devices, and the waiting game in heart transplantation: what's new?

Orthotopic heart transplantation became more successful with the introduction of cyclosporine in the late 1970s. Although congestive heart failure has become a significant public health issue and the proportion of patients with advanced heart failure has increased, the number of heart transplants performed has not increased substantially in the past decade. Transplant waiting times have been related to many different factors. Unfortunately, implantation of ventricular assist devices (VADS) may provoke antibody responses. These result in the sensitization of patients and increased waiting time prior to transplantation. The purpose of this article is to explore etiologies of waiting times for pre heart transplant and left ventricular assist device pre heart transplant candidates, explain new theories of sensitization, define current methods to detect sensitization, and discuss nursing care implications.