Prevalence of infected patients and understaffing have a role in hepatitis C virus transmission in dialysis

Standardized prevalence ratios for chronic hepatitis C virus infection among adult Japanese hemodialysis patients

Background

Many studies have estimated the prevalence of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody among hemodialysis (HD) patients; however, the prevalence of HCV core antigen—which indicates the presence of chronic HCV infection—is not known.

Methods

Standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs) for anti-HCV antibody and HCV core antigen among HD patients (n = 1214) were calculated on the basis of data from the general population (n = 22 472) living in the same area.

Results

The prevalences of anti-HCV antibody and HCV core antigen were 12.5% and 7.8%, respectively, in male hemodialysis patients, and 8.5% and 4.1% in female hemodialysis patients. The SPRs (95% confidence interval) for anti-HCV antibody and HCV core antigen were 8.39 (6.72–10.1) and 12.9 (9.66–16.1), respectively, in males, and 5.42 (3.67–7.17) and 8.77 (4.72–12.8) in females.

Conclusions

The prevalences of chronic HCV infection among male and female HD patients were 13-fold and 9-fold, respectively, those of the population-based controls. Further studies should therefore be conducted to determine the extent of chronic HCV infection among HD patients in other populations and to determine whether chronic HCV infection contributes to increased mortality in HD patients.

Hepatitis C virus screening and clinical monitoring of biomarkers in patients undergoing hemodialysis

In this study, 395 volunteers were enrolled to investigate the seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus, the immunological and the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) biomarkers amongst hemodialysis patients, living in Manaus, Brazil. An overall seroprevalence of 13.9% was found in the hemodialysis patients. Analysis of seroconversion patterns demonstrated that most patients with HCV seroconverted up to 10 years following the first hemodialysis session. Anti-NS5 antibody was detectable in 60.4% of patients with HCV. A lower percentage of circulating CD3(+) and CD4(+) T-cells was found in patients seronegative for HCV, whereas a higher frequency of CD8(+) T-cells was the hallmark of patients with HCV. An overall low activation state of monocytes and eosinophils were observed in hemodialysis patients. In contrast, a higher frequency of activated neutrophils was observed in patients with HCV, selectively in the NS5+ subgroup. All hemodialysis patients had a higher percentage of activated lymphocytes, with the higher activation state in patients with NS5- reactivity. Higher ALT levels were observed in patients with HCV, especially in the NS5+ subgroup. Interestingly, the ALT levels were correlated negatively with the lymphocyte activation state, selectively in the NS5- subgroup, suggesting a protective role of these activated lymphocytes in patients with HCV. These findings reinforce the importance of the transmission of HCV among hemodialysis patients, suggesting that apart from the HCV screening, the serological and ALT biomarkers may represent important predictors of morbidity and/or mortality among patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Determinant roles of environmental contamination and noncompliance with standard precautions in the risk of hepatitis C virus transmission in a hemodialysis unit

BACKGROUND

Nosocomial transmission is the second most frequent cause of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. A prospective observational study was conducted to assess the roles of environmental contamination and noncompliance with standard precautions in HCV cross-transmission in a hemodialysis unit.

METHODS

Patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis in a French university hospital unit were systematically screened, revealing 2 sporadic cases of HCV transmission. An investigation was launched to determine whether the patients were infected in the hemodialysis unit and the possible roles of environmental contamination and noncompliance with standard precautions. We examined possible relationships among new cases of HCV infection, environmental contamination by blood and HCV RNA, and compliance with guidelines on hand hygiene and glove use.

RESULTS

Two patients experienced seroconversion to HCV during the study period. Phylogenetic analyses showed that 1 of these patients was infected with the same strain as that affecting a chronically infected patient also treated in the unit. Of 740 environmental surface samples, 82 (11%) contained hemoglobin; 6 (7%) of those contained HCV RNA. The rate of compliance with hand hygiene was 37% (95% confidence interval, 35%-39%), and gloves were immediately removed after patient care in 33% (95% confidence interval, 29%-37%) of cases. A low ratio of nurses to patients and poor hand hygiene were independent predictors of the presence of hemoglobin on environmental surfaces.

CONCLUSION

Blood-contaminated surfaces may be a source of HCV cross-transmission in a hemodialysis unit. Strict compliance with hand hygiene and glove use and strict organization of care procedures are needed to reduce the risk of HCV cross-transmission among patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Mathematical modeling of hepatitis C virus transmission in hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

A deterministic mathematical model is developed to explain nontransfusion nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) from patient to patient during hemodialysis sessions.

METHODS

The model requires 4 sequential steps for cross-transmission: (1) The dialysis session contains at least 1 patient infected with HCV; (2) a hemodialysis staff member connects an uninfected patient to dialysis after having connected an infected patient; (3) the hemodialysis staff member does not change gloves between an infected patient and an uninfected patient; and (4) the uninfected patient is contaminated after exposure to the blood of an infected patient.

RESULTS

We tested the model by comparing observed incidences of HCV infection from epidemiologic studies with calculated incidences. Calculated incidences are closed to observed incidences. We assessed the impact of prevalence of HCV infection, no glove change between patients, and nurse:patient ratio on the incidence of HCV infection. We found linear relationships between incidence and prevalence and between incidence and no glove change, and an increasing logarithmic relationship between incidence and nurse:patient ratio.

CONCLUSION

Our model should be able to estimate the likely incidence of infection in hemodialysis centers. Compliance with recommended hand hygiene and glove use practices, especially glove changes between patients, is essential to prevent HCV infection in hemodialysis centers, particularly those with high HCV prevalence. Mathematical modeling can used as a tool for control.

A shield against a monster: Hepatitis C in hemodialysis patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly prevalent among patients on hemodialysis (HD). The prevalence of HCV infection in HD patients varies markedly from country to country. Some factors are especially related to these high prevalence rates, such as blood transfusions and length of dialysis time. Nosocomial routes of transmission including the use of contaminated equipment and patient-to-patient exposure is considered more important. Several prophylactic measures have been suggested to avoid infection by HCV in the HD environment.

KDOQI US commentary on the KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hepatitis C in CKD

KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) is an international initiative with a key mission of developing clinical practice guidelines in the area of chronic kidney disease (CKD). KDIGO recently published evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in individuals with CKD. The process of adaptation of international guidelines is an important task that, although guided by general principles, needs to be individualized for each region and country. Therefore, the National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) convened a multidisciplinary group to comment on the application and implementation of the KDIGO guidelines for patients with CKD in the United States. This commentary summarizes the process undertaken by this group in considering the guidelines in the context of health care delivery in the United States. Guideline statements are presented, followed by a succinct discussion and annotation of the rationale for the statements. Research recommendations that are of particular interest to the United States are then summarized to highlight future areas of inquiry that would enable updating of the guidelines.

Hepatitis C virus and kidney disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains frequent in patients on renal replacement therapy and has an adverse impact on survival in infected patients on chronic hemodialysis as well as renal transplant (RT) recipients. Nosocomial spread of HCV within dialysis units continues to occur. HCV is also implicated in the pathogenesis of renal dysfunction often mediated by cryoglobulins leading to chronic kidney disease as well as impairing renal allograft function. The role of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in patients with renal failure remains unclear. Monotherapy with conventional interferon (IFN) for chronic hepatitis C is probably more effective in dialysis than in non-uraemic patients but tolerance is lower. Limited data only are available about monotherapy with pegylated interferon and combination therapy (pegylated IFN plus ribavirin) for chronic HCV in the dialysis population. Clinical experience with antiviral therapy for acute HCV in dialysis population is encouraging. Interferon remains contraindicated post-RT because of concerns about precipitating graft dysfunction. Sustained viral responses obtained by antiviral therapy in renal transplant candidates are durable after renal transplantation and may reduce HCV-related complications after RT (post-transplant diabetes mellitus, HCV-related glomerulonephritis, and chronic allograft nephropathy).

Hepatitis C infection in patients with chronic kidney disease

The management of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is complex and represents a particular concern since numerous issues, such as antiviral therapy in dialysis patients and post renal transplant, and prevention of HCV spread within dialysis units, remain unresolved. An enormous body of literature has been published on HCV in the CKD population; however, clinical evidence on important issues is mostly based on uncontrolled clinical trials or retrospective surveys. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the literature. Responses to the critical issues have been developed by a consensus of experts, endorsed by the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF) and some clinical recommendations have been added.

Hepatitis C in hemodialysis patients: current global magnitude, natural history, diagnostic difficulties, and preventive measures

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The reported prevalence of HCV among the HD population has varied greatly from 1.9 to 84.6% in different countries in recent years. The length of time on HD is generally believed to be associated with HCV acquisition in HD subjects. Nevertheless, several recent reports failed to recognize any significant role of blood transfusion. Although there are some considerations about the accuracy of serologic testing in detecting HCV in HD patients, the accumulated data in this review suggest the false-negativity rate to be not more than 1.66% (153/9,220). Therefore, substituting virologic for serologic testing in the routine diagnosis of HCV infection in HD patients seems unreasonable. Several phylogenetic analyzes of viral isolates suggested nosocomial patient-to-patient transmission of HCV among HD patients for which the main potential source is believed to be contaminated hands and articles. However, isolation of HCV-infected HD patients and use of dedicated machines are currently unjustified while strict adherence to universal precautions seems to be enough to control disease spread in HD units. The present article is an update on epidemiological and clinical features of HCV in HD population.

[Prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies and seroconversion incidence in five haemodialysis units in Morocco]

Dialysis patients are among groups at risk for development of hepatitis C infection (HCV). The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence and the incidence of seroconversion for HCV in five haemodialysis units in Morocco. The study was conducted during the period from September 2003 to September 2004. We studied 303 patients (148 females), mean age 49+/-16 years; dialysis duration was higher than five years in 64% of the cases. The prevalence of HCV infection was evaluated by using a fourth generation enzyme immunoassays. In the seronegative patients, we performed anti-HCV tests at three and six months intervals and monthly testing of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity and assessment of anti-HCV tests if the ALT activity was elevated. Moreover, risk factors, such as blood transfusion, surgery and other invasive procedures were recorded. Seroprevalence of HCV was 68.3%. Among 85 patients who were tested negative for anti-HCV at the entry of the study, four (4.60%) seroconverted in six month (estimated incidence: 9.41 new cases per year). HCV seropositivity was associated with longer duration of dialysis (p=0.000), and previous blood transfusions (p=0.047). The follow-up of the ALT in the seronegative patients did not show any significant variation. In conclusion, the prevalence and incidence of HCV infection in haemodialysis units in Morocco are dramatically elevated. High incidence seropositivity suggested nosocomial transmission of HCV; the dialysis processes itself, and blood transfusions are important risk factors for HCV transmission in these patients.

Patterns in the prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection at the start of hemodialysis in Japan

BACKGROUND

Although hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a persistent public health concern in hemodialysis patients, there seem to have been only a few reports on the prevalence of HCV at the start of hemodialysis. In this study we investigated whether patients starting on hemodialysis therapy are positive for anti-HCV antibody or not.

METHODS

The 400 patients who began regular hemodialysis between February 2003 and June 2007 were enrolled in this study. Clinical data such as age, anti-HCV antibody and primary cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) were examined. As healthy controls we used 70,717 healthy blood donors in 2005 whose data were obtained from Tokyo Metropolitan Red Cross Blood Center. Anti-HCV antibody was used as an indicator of HCV infection. Since the prevalence of HCV infection is affected by age in Japan, we classified the patients by age group.

RESULTS

The anti-HCV antibody prevalence rate among the patients who were new to hemodialysis was 7.3%, as opposed to 0.15% in the healthy volunteers. The prevalence of HCV in the 31-45-, 46-60-, and 61-year-old groups was significantly higher among the hemodialysis patients than among the healthy volunteers (P = 0.0209, <0.0001, and <0.0001, respectively). The prevalence rate of anti-HCV antibody was higher among men (10.0%) than among women (1.5%, P < 0.0001) in the hemodialysis patients. The anti-HCV-antibody-positive patients were significantly older than the anti-HCV-antibody-negative patients (66.4 +/- 14.3 years versus 58.6+/-16.6 years; P = 0.0152). Diabetic nephropathy was a more frequent cause of ESKD among the anti-HCV-antibody-positive patients (30.4%) than among the anti-HCV-antibody-negative patients (19.9%, P = 0.0122). Among the anti-HCV-antibody-positive patients, 55.2% had received a blood transfusion. The rate was significantly higher than that among the anti-HCV-antibody-negative patients (19.4%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The results showed a much higher rate of anti-HCV antibody positivity in patients new to hemodialysis than in healthy volunteers. Older age, blood transfusion, male gender, and diabetic nephropathy seemed to be risk factors for anti-HCV antibody positivity in Japan.

Managing chronic hepatitis C in the difficult-to-treat patient

Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and disease-related complications - among them cirrhosis and liver failure - pose a particular management challenge. Some of these patients may fail to respond to current therapy (non-responders), and some are affected so severely that treatment puts them at an unacceptable risk for complications. Treatment with pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin improves hepatic enzyme levels and eradicates the virus in approximately 50% of patients; however, a significant number of patients do not respond to therapy or relapse following treatment discontinuation. Several viral, hepatic and patient-related factors influence response to IFN therapy; many of these factors cannot be modified to improve long-term outcomes. Identifying risk factors and measuring viral load early in the treatment can help to predict response to IFN therapy and determine the need to modify or discontinue treatment. Retreatment options for patients who have failed therapy are limited. Retreatment with peg-IFN has been successful in some patients who exhibit an inadequate response to conventional IFN treatment, particularly those who have relapsed. Consensus IFN, another option in treatment-resistant patients, has demonstrated efficacy in the retreatment of non-responders and relapsers. Although the optimal duration of retreatment and the benefits and safety of maintenance therapy have not been determined, an extended duration is likely needed. This article reviews the risk factors for HCV treatment resistance and discusses the assessment and management of difficult-to-treat patients.

Viral hepatitis infections among dialysis patients: Thailand registry report

BACKGROUND

Patients on dialysis are at high risk of acquiring viral hepatitis infections. However, there were only few data from Thailand. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence, incidence and associated risk factors of viral hepatitis infections among dialysis patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate 5179 medical records of dialysis patients from the Thailand Renal Replacement Therapy Registry.

RESULTS

In 2002, the seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections were 6.3% (n = 2454) and 4.8% (n = 2167), respectively. HBV and HCV seroprevalence became 6.5% (n = 2585) and 4.3% (n = 2399) in 2003. The incidence of HBV and HCV infections were 1.5 and 2.4 cases per 1000 patient-years, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that age and gender were significant risk factors for HBV infection, but not for HCV infection.

CONCLUSION

In Thailand, it was not uncommon for dialysis patients to acquire viral hepatitis infections. However, our prevalence is similar to reports from some other South-East Asian countries.

The impact of hepatitis C virus infection on survival in dialysis patients: meta-analysis of observational studies

The impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on mortality of patients receiving regular dialysis remains unclear. The assessment of the natural history of HCV in dialysis population is difficult because of the low progression of HCV-related liver disease over time and the reduced life expectancy in patients with end-stage renal disease. The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review of the published medical literature concerning the impact of HCV infection on the survival of patients undergoing maintenance dialysis. The relative risk of mortality was regarded as the most reliable outcome end-point. Study-specific relative risks were weighted by the inverse of their variance to obtain fixed- and random-effects pooled estimates for mortality with HCV across the published studies. We identified seven studies involving 11 589 unique patients on maintenance dialysis; two (29%) were case-control studies. Pooling of study results demonstrated that presence of anti-HCV antibody was an independent and significant risk factor for death in patients on maintenance dialysis. The summary estimate for adjusted relative risk (aRR) (all-cause mortality) was 1.34 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.13-1.59. Heterogeneity statistics, R(i) = 0.48 (P-value by Q-test = 0.13). In a sensitivity analysis including only (n = 5) cohort studies, the pooled aRR was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.20-1.59); heterogeneity statistics R(i) = 0.46. As a cause of death, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis were significantly more frequent among anti-HCV-positive than -negative dialysis patients. Our meta-analysis indicates that anti-HCV-positive patients on dialysis have an increased risk of mortality compared with HCV-negative patients. The excess risk of death in HCV-positive patients may be at least partially attributed to chronic liver disease with its attendant complications.

Acute hepatitis C virus infection assessment among chronic hemodialysis patients in the Southwest Parana State, Brazil

Background

Chronic hemodialysis patients are at higher risk for acquiring hepatitis C virus (HCV). The prevalence varies among different countries and hemodialysis centers. Although guidelines for a comprehensive infection control program exist, the nosocomial transmission still accounts for the new cases of infection. The aim of this study was analyze the follow up of newly acquired acute hepatitis C cases, during the period from January 2002 to May 2005, in the Hemodialysis Center, located in the Southwest region of Parana State, Brazil and to analyze the effectiveness of the measures to restrain the appearance of new cases of acute hepatitis C.

Methods

Patients were analyzed monthly with anti-HCV tests and ALT measurements. Patients with ALT elevations were monitored for possible acute hepatitis C.

Results

During this period, 32 new cases were identified with acute hepatitis C virus infection. Blood screening showed variable ALT levels preceding the anti-HCV seroconversion. HCV RNA viremia by PCR analysis was intermittently and even negative in some cases. Ten out of 32 patients received 1 mcg/kg dose of pegylated interferon alfa-2b treatment for 24 weeks. All dialysis personnel were re-trained to strictly follow the regulations and recommendations regarding infection control, proper methods to clean and disinfect equipment were reviewed and HCV-positive patients were isolated.

Conclusion

Laboratory tests results showed variable ALT preceding anti-HCV seroconversion and intermittent viremia. The applied recommendations contributed importantly to restrain the appearance of new cases of acute hepatitis C in this center and the last case was diagnosed in May 2004.

Infection by the hepatitis C virus in chronic renal failure patients undergoing hemodialysis in Mato Grosso state, central Brazil: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a significant problem for patients undergoing hemodialysis therapy. This situation has never been studied in Mato Grosso state, central Brazil. This study was conducted aiming to estimate the prevalence of the anti-HCV and the incidence of seroconversion in the main metropolitan region of the state.

METHODS

433 patients from the six hemodialysis units were interviewed and anti-HCV was tested by a third-generation enzyme immunoassay. An open cohort of patients who tested negative for anti-HCV at the entry of the study was created and seroconversions was assessed monthly. The staff responsible for the units were interviewed to assess whether the infection control measures were being followed. Logistic and Cox regression analysis were performed in order to assess risk factor to HCV.

RESULTS

The entry on the study took place between January 2002 and June 2005. 73 out of 433 (16.9%, CI 95%: 13.3-20.8) was found to be anti-HCV reactive. The multivariate analysis indicated as risk factors associated to anti-HCV the duration of the hemodialysis treatment, the number of transfusions received, and the unit of treatment. An open cohort of 360 patients who tested negative for anti-HCV was created, with a following average of 24 (+/- 15) months. Forty seroconversions were recorded corresponding to an incidence density of 4.6/1000 patient-months, ranges 0 to 30 among the units. Cox regression indicated the time of hemodialysis (RR = 2.2; CI 95%: 1.1-4.6; p < 0.05) and the unit where treatment was performed (RR = 42.4; CI 95%: 9.9-180.5; p < 0.05) as risk factors for seroconversion. The three units with highest anti-HCV prevalence and incidence were identified as those that more frequently failed to apply control measures.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated high prevalence and incidence of anti-HCV in some of the hemodialysis units. Time on hemodialysis therapy was an independent factor associated to HCV. Blood transfusion was associated with anti-HCV in initial survey but was not important in incident cases. Failure of applying control measures was more evident in units with the highest HCV prevalence and incidence. The results suggest that nosocomial transmission was the main spread factor of HCV in the studied population.

Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus among long-term dialysis patients: a 9-year study in an Italian region

BACKGROUND

Monitoring hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies (anti-HCV) in long-term dialysis patients is an important issue of public health. The aim of the study is to analyze the prevalence, seroconversion rate, and impact of HCV-positive serological test results on survival.

METHODS

We studied 6,412 patients starting long-term dialysis therapy reported to Lazio Dialysis Registry (Italy) between 1995 and 2003. HCV serological status was assessed by using second- or third-generation assays. Patients who were seronegative at the beginning of a period who became seropositive at the end of the same period are defined as seroconverters.

RESULTS

In 1995 to 2003, the overall prevalence of anti-HCV among long-term dialysis patients decreased from 30.6% to 15.1%; we did not observe a decrease in prevalence of anti-HCV in those starting dialysis treatment. After a decrease in the first year, HCV seroconversion rates remained stable at approximately 2 cases/100 person-years. Survival at 9 years was lower for both HCV seroconverters and those already anti-HCV positive at dialysis therapy initiation compared with HCV-negative subjects (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Results of a multiple Cox model showed that subjects who were or became anti-HCV positive had a hazard ratio of 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 1.44) compared with HCV-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe a significant decrease in HCV seroconversion rates in 1995 to 2003. The overall decrease in anti-HCV prevalence could be related to the lower survival probability for both HCV seroconverters and those already HCV positive at long-term dialysis therapy initiation compared with HCV-negative subjects. Our findings confirm that additional efforts should be made to minimize the risk for HCV infection before and during long-term dialysis treatment.

Effect of isolation measures on the incidence and prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in hemodialysis (HD) units is well established. In units with a high prevalence of HCV infection, the implementation of universal precautionary measures may not suffice in order to decrease the incidence and prevalence of HCV. In this setting strict isolation practices can be useful in order to achieve this goal.

METHODS

The incidence and prevalence of HCV infection amongst all HD and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients from the province of Albacete, Spain, have been studied from 1992 to 2003.Through the 1993-1995 period chronic HD patients were treated either in a room exclusively for HCV- patients or in a room shared by HCV+ and HCV- patients. Complete separation of HCV+ and HCV- patients was implemented in 1995. Acute patients have been separated since 1992. The implementation of universal precautions was applied throughout the period.

RESULTS

There has not been a single seroconversion in the rooms where only HCV- patients were dialyzed during the 11 years of follow-up. There were two seroconversions in the rooms shared for 3 years by both HCV+ and HCV- patients. In 1995 the prevalence of HCV+ cases in HD and PD was 21.6 and 23.2%, respectively. Since then it has decreased steadily and in parallel for both therapies, and the current prevalence is 6.8% in HD and 5.7% in PD.

CONCLUSIONS

In HD units with a high prevalence of HCV+ patients, strict isolation in combination with implementation of universal prevention measures can eliminate nosocomial transmission and obtain a long-term reduction in prevalence.

Risk factors for hepatitis B and C in multi-transfused patients in Uruguay

BACKGROUND

In spite of the progress made in the prevention of transfusion-transmitted infections over the last years, these still occur. It was considered that infection by hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) viruses could be a major problem in Uruguay, especially among high-risk individuals, such as multi-transfused patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence of HBV and HCV infection among multi-transfused Uruguayan patients and the impact of serological screening; to evaluate the role of number of transfusions and other potential risk factors for the acquisition of HBV and HCV infection.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of HCV antibodies, HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV core antibodies (HBcAc) in 409 multi-transfused patients.

RESULTS

Of 409 patients studied, 147 (35.9%) received blood products due to acute bleeding, 118 (28.9%) were hemato-oncological, 75 (18.3%) hemophiliacs, 64 (15.6%) were on hemodialysis and 5 (1.2%) suffered sickle cell anemia. Prevalence of HCV antibody was 12.7%. Of the HCV positive patients, 45 were hemophiliacs, for a prevalence rate of 60.0%. The prevalence rates for hemodialysis and acute bleeding patients were 6.3% and 2.0%, respectively. Prevalence of HBsAg was 1.0%; 16.6% of subjects were positive for HBcAc. The prevalence rates of HBcAc were 48.0%, 15.0% and 3.1% among hemophiliacs, acute bleeding and hemodialysis patients, respectively. There was a direct relationship between the number of products transfused and prevalence of both hepatitis C antibodies and HBcAc. Higher prevalence of HCV and HBcAc was observed among the group of patients who received transfusions before the systematic screening of blood donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to blood transfusions was the main risk factor for HCV and HBV infection. The systematic serological screening of blood donors was highly effective in reducing transfusion transmitted infections.

Hepatitis C virus infection among dialysis patients in Tunisia: incidence and molecular evidence for nosocomial transmission

In order to study the incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Tunisian haemodialysis patients and detect its nosocomial transmission, 395 patients were enrolled in a prospective study (November 2001-2003). HCV serological and virological status was determined initially using, respectively a third generation ELISA and an RT-PCR qualitative assay. The genotype of the HCV isolates was determined by sequencing NS5B region. The issue of nosocomial transmission was addressed by sequencing the HVR-1 region of the E2 gene. About 20% of the patients had anti-HCV antibodies and HCV-RNA was detected in 73% of the anti-HCV positive patients. Two cases of de novo HCV infection were identified in two dialysis centers, during virological follow-up of patients susceptible to HCV infection. The incidence of de novo HCV infection was 0.5%. Determining the genotypes in the first center disclosed that all HCV-positive patients were infected with genotype 1b; sequencing of the HVR-1 region of the E2 gene provided strong evidence that the isolate from the newly infected patient and another infected dialysis patient were closely related, confirming nosocomial contamination. The investigation of the second center is pending. Besides, one patient with negative HCV serology had detectable HCV-RNA at the beginning of the study. This case had HCV genotype 1b, two other infected dialysis patients in the same unit had HCV genotypes 4k and 3a; thus precluding nosocomial transmission. Thanks to molecular and phylogenetic methods, one case of nosocomial HCV transmission in haemodialysis was confirmed. Epidemiological investigation suggested nosocomial transmission via the medical and/or nursing staff.

Hepatitis C infection is acquired pre-ESRD

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is more prevalent in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than in the general population. Previously, infection from nosocomial sources was an important cause for this increase. In the past decade, the risk from these sources has lessened, but the estimated percentage of patients with ESRD with hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody (anti-HCV) has not changed.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study of hemodialysis patients in 4 urban units in Birmingham, AL. Testing for anti-HCV was performed at the initiation of dialysis therapy and then yearly from August 1998 through August 2004. Race, sex, age, ESRD date, comorbid conditions, and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The prevalence of anti-HCV was 16.8% in 860 patients (89% black). Patients new to ESRD had a prevalence of 14.4%. Seroconversion in previously anti-HCV-negative patients was 2.5%. Anti-HCV occurred in black men 3 times more than in black women (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.2 to 5.0). Mean age at ESRD was significantly younger in anti-HCV-positive than HCV-negative patients (47.3 versus 54.1 years; P < 0.0001). Age, race, sex, and history of drug abuse were predictors of anti-HCV positivity.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of anti-HCV among patients with ESRD varies from community to community. New patients are major contributors to the prevalence of anti-HCV in patients with ESRD, particularly those who are younger, male, black, or have a history of drug use. Measuring anti-HCV levels in patients with chronic kidney disease may help identify those at risk for additional disorders.

Incidence of HCV infection in French hemodialysis units: a prospective study

A large prospective study was carried out from 1997 to 2000 in 25 French hemodialysis units including 1,323 patients to determine the incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Monthly testing of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity, and assessment of HCV RNA and anti-HCV antibodies if the ALT activity was elevated, identified 14 new infections in 7 different units, giving an incidence of 0.4% new HCV infections per year. Molecular analyses and epidemiological data indicated that five patients became infected with HCV outside the unit where they were dialyzed, while the nine remaining patients acquired HCV from infected patients on dialysis during the same shift at the same unit. HCV was cleared in six of the seven (85.7%) patients with acute hepatitis C who were given standard doses of alpha-interferon (alpha-IFN). The persistence of nosocomial transmission of HCV in hemodialysis units emphasizes the need to implement infection control practices. Identifying new infections is crucial because alpha-IFN treatment results in long term clearance of HCV RNA in a large proportion of patients.

Incidence and patterns of hepatitis C virus seroconversion in a cohort of hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this multicenter hemodialysis (HD) cohort study is to prospectively investigate the incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Greece from 1993 to 1995 and delineate early virological and serological events associated with HCV seroconversion in the HD setting.

METHODS

Sequential serum samples collected weekly from 562 patients were tested biochemically and serologically by means of a second- (EIA-2) and third-generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA-3). All patients with positive antibody to HCV test results (anti-HCV + ) and sequential samples from seroconverting patients were tested for HCV RNA.

RESULTS

Anti-HCV prevalence at study entry was 29% (163 of 562 patients), and viremia was detectable in 110 of 163 anti-HCV + patients (67.5%). HCV incidence was 6.2 cases/100 person-years. Seroconversions could not be attributed to transfusions after study entry (only 1 patient had been administered transfusion), and HD unit was associated with increased hazard for seroconversion ( P = 0.002), even after adjusting for potential differences among their patients. According to Kaplan-Meier estimation, the median interval by which the HCV RNA assay detected HCV infection earlier than anti-HCV testing was 246 and 154 days for EIA-2 and EIA-3, respectively. Detectable HCV RNA and at least 2 consecutive abnormal alanine aminotransferase levels in the preseroconversion period were observed in 29 of 30 (97%) and 14 of 32 patients (44%), respectively. Reductions in HCV RNA levels immediately after seroconversion were transient or did not occur.

CONCLUSION

On the grounds of apparent nosocomial transmission, the wide window period of HCV infection in HD patients emphasizes the need for strict adherence to specific infection-control measures in this setting.

Decline of hepatitis C infection in hemodialysis patients in Central Brazil: a ten years of surveillance

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been a significant problem for hemodialysis patients. However this infection has declined in regions where the screening for anti-HCV in blood banks and hemodialysis-specific infection control measures were adopted. In Brazil, these measures were implemented in 1993 and 1996, respectively. In addition, all studied units have implemented isolation of anti-HCV positive patients since 2000. In order to evaluate the impact of these policies in the HCV infection prevalence, accumulated incidence, and risk factors in hemodialysis population of Goiânia City, Central Brazil, all patients were interviewed and serum samples tested for HCV antibodies in 1993, 1996, 1999, and 2002. In the first six years (1993-1999), anti-HCV prevalence increased from 28.2 to 37.2%, however a b decrease in positivity was detected between 1999 and 2002 (37.8 vs 16.5%) when the measures were fully implemented. Also, a decrease of the anti-HCV accumulated incidence in cohorts of susceptible individuals during 1993-2002 (71%), 1996-2002 (34.2%), and 1999-2002 (11.7%) was found. Analysis of risk factors showed that length of time on hemodialysis, blood transfusion before screening for anti-HCV and treatment in multiple units were statistically associated with anti-HCV (p < 0.05). Our study showed a significant decline of hepatitis C infection in hemodialysis patients of Central Brazil, gratifying the importance of public health strategies for control and prevention of hepatitis C in the hemodialysis units.

A multicentric survey of the practice of hand hygiene in haemodialysis units: factors affecting compliance

BACKGROUND

This study intended to investigate the degree of compliance with hand hygiene and use of gloves by health workers in haemodialysis (HD) units, and the factors that influenced adherence to hand hygiene protocols.

METHODS

During the month of November 2003, one person observed the health care staff in each of nine different dialysis units, during 495 randomly distributed 30 min observation periods that covered all steps of a haemodialysis session (connection, dialysis and disconnection). The observers noted the number of potential opportunities to implement standard precautions and the number of occasions on which the precautions were actually taken. Adherence to standard precautions was evaluated, analysing the influence of the following variables: the patient-to-nurse ratio, the number of HD shifts scheduled per day, acute HD units vs chronic, whether or not infectious patients were isolated and in-house vs contract cleaning personnel.

RESULTS

There were a total of 977 opportunities to wear gloves for, and to wash the hands following, a patient-oriented activity, and 1902 opportunities to wash hands before such an activity. Gloves were actually used on 92.9% of these occasions. Hands were washed only 35.6% of the time after patient contact, and only 13.8% of the time before patient contact. Poor adherence to hand washing was associated with the number of shifts per HD unit per day and with higher patient-to-nurse ratios. In the acute HD units, there was greater adherence to standard precautions than in the chronic units, although there too it was substandard. The personnel's knowledge of patients' infectious status did not modify their adherence to hand hygiene practices. A higher patient-to-nurse ratio independently influenced hand washing both before and after patient contact.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall adherence of health care workers to recommended hand washing practices is low. Whether or not programmes promoting higher hand hygiene standards and the potential use of alcohol-based hand cleansers will improve hand hygiene practices in HD units requires further investigation.

Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among hemodialysis patients at a tertiary-care hospital in Mexico City, Mexico

We determined the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in hemodialysis patients by antibody testing and HCV RNA determination by PCR. A total of 149 patients with kidney failure with replacement therapy were tested. The prevalence of anti-HCV was 6.7% (10 of 149 patients), and viremia was detectable in 8 of 149 (5%) patients. Three of 149 patients (2%) were anti-HCV negative with detectable HCV RNA.

Patterns of hepatitis C prevalence and seroconversion in hemodialysis units from three continents: the DOPPS

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains a problem within hemodialysis units. This study measures HCV prevalence and seroconversion rates across seven countries and investigates associations with facility-level practice patterns.

METHODS

The study sample was from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), a prospective, observational study of adult hemodialysis patients randomly selected from 308 representative dialysis facilities in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Logistic regression was used to model odds of HCV prevalence, and Cox regression was used to model time from study entry to HCV seroconversion.

RESULTS

Mean HCV facility prevalence was 13.5% and varied among countries from 2.6% to 22.9%. Increased HCV prevalence was associated with longer time on dialysis, male gender, black race, diabetes, hepatitis B (HBV) infection, prior renal transplant, and alcohol or substance abuse in the previous 12 months. Approximately half of the facilities (55.6%) had no seroconversions during the study period. HCV seroconversion was associated with longer time on dialysis, human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS), HBV infection, and recurrent cellulitis or gangrene. An increase in highly trained staff was associated with lower HCV prevalence (OR = 0.93 per 10% increase, P= 0.003) and risk of seroconversion (RR = 0.92, P= 0.07). Seroconversion was associated with an increase in facility HCV prevalence (RR = 1.36, P < 0.0001), but not with isolation of HCV-infected patients (RR = 1.01, P= 0.99).

CONCLUSION

There are differences in HCV prevalence and rate of seroconversion at the country and the hemodialysis facility level. The observed variation suggests opportunities for improved HCV outcomes.

Meta-analysis: Effect of hepatitis C virus infection on mortality in dialysis

BACKGROUND

The natural history of hepatitis C virus infection among patients on long-term dialysis treatment remains incompletely understood. Efforts to elucidate the natural history of hepatitis C virus in this population are difficult because of the slowly progressive nature of hepatitis C virus with often an unrecognized onset in patients whose life-expectancy is substantially diminished by end-stage renal disease.

AIM

To conduct a systematic review of the published medical literature concerning the impact of hepatitis C virus infection on the survival of patients receiving chronic dialysis. The relative risk of mortality was regarded as the most reliable outcome end-point.

METHODS

We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to generate a summary estimate of the relative risk for mortality with hepatitis C virus across the published studies.

RESULTS

We identified four clinical trials (2341 unique patients); three (75%) of them were prospective, cohort studies; the fourth was a case-control study. Pooling of study results demonstrated that presence of antihepatitis C virus antibody was an independent and significant risk factor for death in patients on maintenance dialysis. The summary estimate for relative risk was 1.57 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.33-1.86. A test for homogeneity of the relative risks across the four studies gave a P-value of 0.77. As a cause of death, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis were significantly more frequent among antihepatitis C virus-positive than -negative dialysis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that antihepatitis C virus-positive patients on dialysis have an increased risk of mortality compared with hepatitis C virus-negative patients. The excess risk of death in hepatitis C virus-positive patients may be at least partially attributed to chronic liver disease with its attendant complications. Clinical trials with extended follow-up are currently under way to assess the effect of hepatitis C virus treatment on the excess risk of mortality in this population.

Contamination by hepatitis B and C viruses in the dialysis setting

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis virus infections continue to be a major concern in the dialysis setting. We studied levels of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA contamination in dialysis units to better define the role of the dialysis environment and machines in the nosocomial transmission of hepatitis viruses.

METHODS

Possible contamination by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HCV was studied by collecting environmental samples in 3 dialysis units located in Rome, Italy. Samples and controls were tested for HBsAg by a microparticle enzyme immunoassay, and for HCV RNA, by qualitative transcription-mediated amplification assay.

RESULTS

HCV RNA and HBsAg were detected in 1 of 64 (1.6%) and 1 of 64 samples (1.6%), respectively. The only HCV RNA-positive sample was found in 1 dialysis unit on the external surface of the dialysate (inlet-outlet) connector of a dialysis machine used for HCV-negative patients. The only HBsAg-positive sample was found in another dialysis unit on the internal surface of the blood pressure monitor cuff of a dialysis bed dedicated for HBsAg-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

A segregation policy for HBsAg-positive patients is a necessary measure despite its high cost-effectiveness; we found HBsAg contamination in the segregated HBV-infected room. Conversely, the finding of HCV RNA contamination on a dialysis machine not dedicated to HCV-positive patients suggests that isolation of HCV-infected dialysis patients and use of dedicated machines are unjustified. Major attention should be given to strict adherence to infection control measures in the dialysis setting.

Managing occupational risks for hepatitis C transmission in the health care setting

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant contemporary health problem in the United States and elsewhere. Because it is primarily transmitted via blood, hepatitis C infection presents risks for both nosocomial transmission to patients and occupational spread to health care workers. Recent insights into the pathogenesis, immunopathogenesis, natural history, and treatment of infection caused by this unique flavivirus provide a rationale for the use of new strategies for managing occupational hepatitis C infections when they occur. This article reviews this developing information. Recently published data demonstrate success rates in the treatment of "acute hepatitis C syndrome" that approach 100\%, and although these studies are not directly applicable to all occupational infections, they may provide important clues to optimal management strategies. In addition, the article delineates approaches to the prevention of occupational exposures and also addresses the difficult issue of managing HCV-infected health care providers. The article summarizes currently available data about the nosocomial epidemiology of HCV infection and the magnitude of risk and discusses several alternatives for managing exposure and infection. No evidence supports the use of immediate postexposure prophylaxis with immunoglobulin, immunomodulators, or antiviral agents. Based on the very limited data available, the watchful waiting and preemptive therapy strategies described in detail in this article represent reasonable interim approaches to the complex problem of managing occupational HCV infections, at least until more definitive data are obtained.

Nosocomial infections: important acute care nursing-sensitive outcomes indicators

Clinical and cost burdens related to nosocomial infections continue to plague the US healthcare system. Vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and the immunocompromised are especially at risk. Current evidence suggests that because hospital stays are shorter, nosocomial infection rates per 1000 patients have actually increased. Nosocomial infections, specifically bacteremias, have been targeted by the American Nurses Association as outcomes that can be affected by nursing in acute care settings. Nursing staffing and practices recently have been linked to the incidence of nosocomial infections. Participation in national databases and benchmarking techniques can provide data-based evidence that nursing practice influences nosocomial infections. Advanced practice nurses are key to ensuring that evidence-based practice environments, in which data drive decision-making, can flourish so that nurses can identify and implement practices that can reduce the rates of nosocomial infections.

High prevalence of hepatitis C infection among patients receiving hemodialysis at an urban dialysis center

OBJECTIVE

To determine the seroprevalence and risk factors for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among patients at an urban outpatient hemodialysis center.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of 227 patients undergoing hemodialysis at the Rogosin Kidney Center on December 15, 1998, with a response rate of 90% (227 of 253). Laboratory records were used to retrieve the total number of blood transfusions received and serologic study results. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine the relationship among HCV serostatus, patient demographics, and HCV risk factors (eg, intravenous drug use [IVDU], intranasal cocaine use, multiple sexual partners, comorbidities, length of time receiving hemodialysis, and total number of blood transfusions received).

RESULTS

The seroprevalence of antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) was 23.3% (53 of 227) in the population. In univariate analysis, factors associated with HCV seropositivity included male gender, younger age, history of IVDU, history of intranasal cocaine use, history of multiple sexual partners, human immunodeficiency virus coinfection, increased time receiving dialysis, history of renal transplant, and positive antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that longer duration receiving dialysis and a history of IVDU were the only risk factors that remained independently associated with HCV seropositivity

CONCLUSIONS

HCV is markedly more common in our urban cohort of patients receiving hemodialysis compared with patients receiving dialysis nationally and is associated with a longer duration of receiving dialysis and a history of IVDU. Stricter and more frequent enforcement of universal precautions may be required in hemodialysis centers located in areas with a high prevalence of HCV infection or IVDU among the general population.

Organizational and environmental factors that affect worker health and safety and patient outcomes

This article reviews organizational factors that influence the satisfaction, health, safety, and well-being of health care workers and ultimately, the satisfaction, safety, and quality of care for patients. The impact of the work environment on working conditions and the effects on health care workers and patients are also addressed. Studies focusing on worker health and safety concerns affected by the organization and the physical work environment provide evidence of direct positive and/or adverse effects on performance and suggest indirect effects on the quality of patient care. The strongest links between worker and patient outcomes are demonstrated in literature on nosocomial transmission of infections. Transmission of infections from worker to patient and from patient to patient via health care worker has been well documented in clinical studies. Literature on outbreaks of infectious diseases in health care settings has linked the physical environment with adverse patient and worker outcomes. An increasing number of studies are looking at the relationship between improvement in organizational factors and measurable and positive change in patient outcomes. Characteristics of selected magnet hospitals are reviewed as one model for improving patient and worker outcomes.