Bilateral pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine A and atorvastatin in renal transplant recipients

Impact of OATP transporters on pharmacokinetics

Membrane transporters are now recognized as important determinants of the transmembrane passage of drugs. Organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP) form a family of influx transporters expressed in various tissues important for pharmacokinetics. Of the 11 human OATP transporters, OATP1B1, OATP1B3 and OATP2B1 are expressed on the sinusoidal membrane of hepatocytes and can facilitate the liver uptake of their substrate drugs. OATP1A2 is expressed on the luminal membrane of small intestinal enterocytes and at the blood-brain barrier, potentially mediating drug transport at these sites. Several clinically used drugs have been identified as substrates of OATP transporters (e.g. many statins are substrates of OATP1B1). Some drugs may inhibit OATP transporters (e.g. cyclosporine) causing pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Moreover, genetic variability in genes encoding OATP transporters can result in marked inter-individual differences in pharmacokinetics. For example, a single nucleotide polymorphism (c.521T > C, p.Val174Ala) in the SLCO1B1 gene encoding OATP1B1 decreases the ability of OATP1B1 to transport active simvastatin acid from portal circulation into the liver, resulting in markedly increased plasma concentrations of simvastatin acid and an enhanced risk of simvastatin-induced myopathy. SLCO1B1 polymorphism also affects the pharmacokinetics of many other, but not all (fluvastatin), statins and that of the antidiabetic drug repaglinide, the antihistamine fexofenadine and the endothelin A receptor antagonist atrasentan. This review compiles the current knowledge about the expression and function of human OATP transporters, their substrate and inhibitor specificities, as well as pharmacogenetics.

Dyslipidemia following kidney transplantation: diagnosis and treatment

Lipid abnormalities are a common complication of kidney transplantation, occurring in up to 60% of patients. In fact, impairment of lipid metabolism is often present before renal transplantation due to the uremic state. After transplantation and recovery of renal function, lipid disturbances usually persist but show a different profile due to the various effects of immunosuppressive drugs on lipid metabolism. Actually, steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors usually lead to quantitative and qualitative abnormalities of very low-density, low-density, and high-density lipoproteins. As cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death in renal transplant recipients, management of dyslipidemia and other traditional risk factors, such as smoking, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and obesity, is of great importance to prevent cardiovascular complications and chronic allograft dysfunction. This review addresses the causes of dyslipidemia, the role of immunosuppressive drugs, and current recommendations to manage lipid disorders in renal transplant recipients.

Successful strategy to improve the specificity of electronic statin-drug interaction alerts

PURPOSE

A considerable weakness of current clinical decision support systems managing drug-drug interactions (DDI) is the high incidence of inappropriate alerts. Because DDI-induced, dose-dependent adverse events can be prevented by dosage adjustment, corresponding DDI alerts should only be issued if dosages exceed safe limits. We have designed a logical framework for a DDI alert-system that considers prescribed dosage and retrospectively evaluates the impact on the frequency of statin-drug interaction alerts.

METHODS

Upper statin dose limits were extracted from the drug label (SPC) (20 statin-drug combinations) or clinical trials specifying the extent of the pharmacokinetic interaction (43 statin-drug combinations). We retrospectively assessed electronic DDI alerts and compared the number of standard alerts to alerts that took dosage into account.

RESULTS

From among 2457 electronic prescriptions, we identified 73 high-risk statin-drug pairs. Of these, SPC dosage information classified 19 warnings as inappropriate. Data from pharmacokinetic trials took quantitative dosage information more often into consideration and classified 40 warnings as inappropriate. This is a significant reduction in the number of alerts by 55% compared to SPC-based information (26%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study of pharmacokinetic statin interactions demonstrates that more than half of the DDI alerts that presented in a clinical decision support system were inappropriate if DDI-specific upper dose limits are not considered.

Effects of acid and lactone forms of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on the induction of MDR1 expression and function in LS180 cells

In the present study, the ability of inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR), also known as statins, to regulate the gene expression and function of multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1/P-glycoprotein) and differences between their acid and lactone forms were examined in human intestinal epithelial LS180 cells. Some statins had the potential to induce the expression of mRNAs for MDR1 and/or CYP3A in either form. The change in the mRNA expression of MDR1 was accompanied by a change in the CsA-dependent intracellular accumulation of rhodamine 123. Simvastatin lactone, but not the acid form, exhibited a strong inductive effect on the mRNA expression of MDR1 and CYP3A in a dose-dependent manner. Sulforaphane significantly suppressed the expression of MDR1 and CYP3A mRNAs induced by atorvastatin lactone, lovastatin acid, and lovastatin lactone, comparable to the control level, and moderately inhibited that by cerivastatin acid, fluvastatin acid and simvastatin lactone. In the case of pitavastatin acid, sulforaphane had no significant effect on the expression of MDR1 mRNA.These results suggested that some statins could induce MDR1 and CYP3A gene expression and these inductive effects differed between the lactone and active hydroxy acid forms, and that PXR-mediated regulation was rarely associated with the mRNA inducibility by pitavastatin acid, unlike that by other statins.

Drug/Drug interaction between lopinavir/ritonavir and rosuvastatin in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVES

This open-label, single-arm, pharmacokinetic (PK) study in HIV-seronegative volunteers evaluated the bioequivalence of rosuvastatin and lopinavir/ritonavir when administered alone and in combination. Tolerability and lipid changes were also assessed.

METHODS

Subjects took 20 mg of rosuvastatin alone for 7 days, then lopinavir/ritonavir alone for 10 days, and then the combination for 7 days. Intensive PK sampling was performed on days 7, 17, and 24.

RESULTS

Twenty subjects enrolled, and PK data were available for 15 subjects. Geometric mean (+/-SD) rosuvastatin area under the concentration time curve (AUC)[0,tau] and maximum concentration (Cmax) were 47.6 ng.h/mL (+/-15.3) and 4.34 ng/mL (+/-1.8), respectively, when given alone versus 98.8 ng.h/mL (+/-65.5) and 20.2 ng/mL (+/-16.9) when combined with lopinavir/ritonavir (P < 0.0001). The geometric mean ratio was 2.1 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7 to 2.6) for rosuvastatin AUC[0,tau] and 4.7 (90% CI: 3.4 to 6.4) for rosuvastatin Cmax with lopinavir/ritonavir versus rosuvastatin alone (P < 0.0001). There was 1 asymptomatic creatine phosphokinase elevation 17 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) and 1 liver function test elevation between 1.1 and 2.5 times the ULN with the combination.

CONCLUSIONS

Rosuvastatin low-density lipoprotein reduction was attenuated with lopinavir/ritonavir. Rosuvastatin AUC and Cmax were unexpectedly increased 2.1- and 4.7-fold in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir. Rosuvastatin and lopinavir/ritonavir should be used with caution until the safety, efficacy, and appropriate dosing of this combination have been demonstrated in larger populations.

Role of OATP transporters in the disposition of drugs

During recent years, it has become increasingly recognized that drug transporters play important roles in drug absorption and disposition. Organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) are membrane transporters critically involved in the cellular uptake of drugs in tissues important for pharmacokinetics, such as the intestine, liver and kidneys. Recent advances in the pharmacogenomics of OATP1B1 have revealed that OATP transporters can play important roles in explaining interindividual variability in drug pharmacokinetics, and thus contribute to interindividual as well as interethnic variability in drug response. This article will provide an up-to-date review of human OATPs and their substrates, and a current compilation of their DNA sequence variations.

Multiple Inhibition Mechanisms and Prediction of Drug–Drug Interactions: Status of Metabolism and Transporter Models as Exemplified by Gemfibrozil–Drug Interactions

PURPOSE

To assess the consequences of multiple inhibitors and differential inhibition mechanisms on the prediction of 12 gemfibrozil drug-drug interactions (DDIs). In addition, qualitative zoning of transporter-related gemfibrozil and cyclosporine DDIs was investigated.

METHODS

The effect of gemfibrozil and its acyl-glucuronide on different enzymes was incorporated into a metabolic prediction model. The impact of CYP2C8 time-dependent inhibition by gemfibrozil acyl-glucuronide was assessed using repaglinide, cerivastatin, loperamide, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone DDIs. Gemfibrozil and cyclosporine inhibition data obtained in human embryonic kidney cells expressing OATP1B1 and hepatic input concentration ([I]in) were used for qualitative zoning of 14 transporter-mediated DDIs.

RESULTS

Incorporation of time-dependent inhibition by gemfibrozil glucuronide showed no significant improvement in the prediction, as CYP2C8 contributed <65% to the overall elimination of the victim drugs investigated. Qualitative zoning of OATP1B1 DDIs resulted in no false negative predictions; yet the magnitude of observed interactions was significantly over-predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

Time-dependent inhibition by gemfibrozil glucuronide is only important for victim drugs eliminated predominantly (>80%) via CYP2C8. Qualitative zoning of OATP1B1 inhibitors based on [I]in/K (i) is valid in drug screening to avoid false negatives. Refinement of the transporter model by incorporating the fraction of drug transported by a particular transporter is recommended.

Reducing the risks of cardiovascular disease in liver allograft recipients

Liver allograft recipients are at increased risk of death from cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease. We propose the following strategy of risk-reduction, based on currently available literature. Lifestyle: standard advice should be given (avoidance of smoking, excess alcohol and obesity, adequate exercise, reduction of excess sodium intake). Hypertension: target blood pressure should be 140/90 mmHg or lower, but for those with diabetes or renal disease, 130/80 mmHg or lower. For patients without proteinuria, antihypertensive therapy should be initiated with a calcium channel blocker and for those with proteinuria, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker. If monotherapy fails to achieve adequate response, calcium channel blockers and ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers should be combined. If hypertension remains uncontrolled, an alpha-blocker may be added. Consideration should be given to changing immunosuppression and avoiding use of calcineurin inhibitors. Diabetes: recipients should be regularly screened for diabetes. For patients with new-onset diabetes after transplant, stepwise therapy should be guided by HbA1c concentrations, as with type II diabetes mellitus. Hyperlipidemia: annual screening of lipid profile should be undertaken, with treatment thresholds and targets based on those advocated for the high risk general population. Dietary intervention is appropriate for all patients. A statin should be considered as the first line treatment to achieve specified targets. In patients receiving a calcineurin inhibitor, Pravastatin should be commenced at a dose of 10 mg/day. In patients receiving other forms of immunosuppression, pravastatin may be commenced at a dose of 20 mg/day. Liver tests should be monitored and patients warned to report myalgia. If monotherapy is inadequate, ezetimibe or a fibrate may be added. Consideration may be given to change in immunosuppression if combination lipid-lowering therapy proves inadequate.

Role of P-glycoprotein in statin drug interactions

Understanding the mechanisms of drug interactions with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) has become increasingly important because of the potential for serious adverse effects, most notably myopathy. Most of the evidence supports the role of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes in many of these drug interactions. However, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), an efflux protein located in the gastrointestinal tract, placenta, kidneys, brain, and liver, may also play a role. Results of several studies with in vitro models have shown that lovastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin are inhibitors for P-gp and may be substrates for this transporter as well. Pravastatin and fluvastatin consistently demonstrate no significant inhibition of P-gp. Drug interaction studies involving statins and digoxin support a role for P-gp. Many additional drugs such as diltiazem, verapamil, itraconazole, ketoconazole, and cyclosporine, as well as dietary supplements such as St. John's wort and grapefruit juice, interact with statins and are modulators of both CYP3A4 and P-gp. However, the role of P-gp in these specific drug interactions remains unclear.

Effect of Atorvastatin Therapy and Conversion to Tacrolimus on Hypercholesterolemia and Endothelial Dysfunction After Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hypercholesterolemia is a frequent complication in renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine A (CsA). Whether it is preferable to treat hypercholesterolemia with statins or to switch patients from CsA to tacrolimus (TRL) has not been investigated.

METHODS

Twelve CsA-treated kidney transplant recipients with hypercholesterolemia were successively crossed over from CsA alone to: CsA plus atorvastatin; TRL alone; and TRL plus atorvastatin. Total cholesterol (C), Low density lipoprotein (LDL)-C, high density lipoprotein (HDL)-C, LDL and HDL alpha-tocopherol content, lag-time of LDL oxidation, plasma levels of oxidized LDL and the percentage of small dense LDL were assayed at the end of each treatment period. Endothelial function was assessed by high resolution ultrasound measurement of flow-mediated brachial artery vasodilatation (FMD).

RESULTS

Atorvastatin therapy was more efficient in reducing total cholesterol and LDL-C levels than conversion from CsA to TRL. Combining TRL with atorvastatin further reduced LDL-C levels as compared to TRL alone, but was no more efficient than the CsA-statin combination. Neither atorvastatin therapy nor conversion to TRL significantly changed the proportion of dense LDL, lipoprotein alpha-tocopherol contents or the lag time of LDL oxidation. Addition of atorvastatin to CsA increased FMD from 4.0+/-1.8% to 6.5+/-4.0% (P<0.05 vs. CsA). Conversion from CsA to TRL caused a slight improvement in FMD (5.1+/-2.1%, P<0.05 vs. CsA). Adding atorvastatin to TRL had no detectable effect on FMD (5.5+/-2.3%, P=NS vs. TRL).

CONCLUSIONS

Atorvastatin was more efficient in reducing total and LDL cholesterol levels of CsA-treated renal transplant patients than conversion to TRL and significantly improved endothelial dysfunction.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors: drug-drug interactions and interindividual differences in transporter and metabolic enzyme functions

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) are widely used for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Their efficacy in preventing cardiovascular events has been shown by a large number of clinical trials. However, myotoxic side effects, sometimes severe, including myopathy or rhabdomyolysis, are associated with the use of statins. In some cases, such toxicity is associated with pharmacokinetic alterations. In this review, the pharmacokinetic aspects and physicochemical properties of statins are reviewed in order to understand the mechanism governing their pharmacokinetic alterations. Among the statins, simvastatin, lovastatin and atorvastatin are metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) while fluvastatin is metabolized by CYP2C9. Cerivastatin is subjected to 2 metabolic pathways mediated by CYP2C8 and 3A4. Pravastatin, rosuvastatin and pitavastatin undergo little metabolism. Their plasma clearances are governed by the transporters involved in the hepatic uptake and biliary excretion. Also for other statins, which are orally administered as open acid forms (i.e. fluvastatin, cerivastatin and atorvastatin), hepatic uptake transporter(s) play important roles in their clearances. Based on such information, pharmacokinetic alterations of statins can be predicted following coadministration of other drugs or in patients with lowered activities in drug metabolism and/or transport. We also present a quantitative analysis of the effect of some factors on the pharmacokinetics of statins based on a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. To avoid a pharmacokinetic alteration, we need to have information about the metabolizing enzyme(s) and transporter(s) involved in the pharmacokinetics of statins and, along with such information, model-based prediction is also useful.

The role of transporters in drug interactions

Transport proteins play an important role in the adsorption, distribution and elimination of a wide variety of drugs. Therefore, it is not surprising that transporter-based drug interactions can occur in the clinic. These interactions can lead to changes in toxicity and/or efficacy of the affected drug. Here, we review such interactions and ask if these interactions could have been predicted from in vitro data. Conducting such in vitro-in vivo correlation is important for predicting future transporter-based drug interactions.

Effects of fluvastatin treatment on lipid profile, C-reactive protein trend, and renal function in dyslipidemic patients with chronic renal failure

The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the effects of fluvastatin on the lipid pro-file and on renal function, as measured by creatinine clearance, in dyslipidemic patients with chronic renal failure. In this 8-month prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial, 130 patients (70 men and 60 women), after a 2-month washout period following previous lipid-lowering treatments, were randomly assigned to fluvastatin XL 80 mg given once daily (80 patients) or to standard treatment (50 patients). Mean total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride values after 3 and 6 months of treatment with fluvastatin showed statistically significant improvement compared with standard treatment. Improved renal function, as measured by creatinine clearance, was observed at the end of the 6-month treatment period in approximately 65% of patients treated with fluvastatin. The increase in creatinine clearance consistently reached 10% to 15% of baseline values. A statistically significant reduction in C-reactive protein (CRP) over baseline values was observed in approximately 75% of patients treated with fluvastatin. Furthermore, mean values of CRP for the fluvastatin standard treatment groups, respectively, were 6.78 and 10.19 at 3 months and 4.47 and 11 at 6 months. Both treatments were well tolerated. No major adverse events were noted. Results of this study suggest that fluvastatin treatment in patients with chronic renal failure is effective in improving the lipid profile, and it demonstrates good safety and tolerability. Furthermore, fluvastatin may contribute to improved nephroprotection in this patient population.

Combined therapy with atorvastatin and calcineurin inhibitors: no interactions with tacrolimus

Increased systemic exposure to statins and consequent risk for complications has been reported in patients concomitantly treated with cyclosporin A (CsA). This has been ascribed to inhibition of drug catabolism by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) or drug transport by P-glycoprotein (PGP) and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP1B1). It is not known whether the combination of statins and tacrolimus (Tac) also suffers from this drawback. Therefore, a pharmacokinetic study of atorvastatin and its metabolites was performed in 13 healthy volunteers after 4 days' treatment, and after short (12 h) concomitant exposure to CsA and Tac. A complementary assessment of overall CYP, and hepatic and intestinal CYP3A4+PGP activity was performed after each treatment episode and compared to baseline (no drugs). Systemic exposure to atorvastatin acid and its metabolites was significantly increased when administered with CsA. In contrast, intake of Tac did not have any impact on atorvastatin pharmacokinetics. Concomitantly, a profound decrease of hepatic and intestinal PGP and an increase of intestinal CYP3A4 were noted with CsA, whereas no effect was seen after atorvastatin therapy with or without Tac. Based on these findings treatment with Tac appears a safer option for patients needing a combination of statins and calcineurin inhibitors.

Statins' dosage in patients with renal failure and cyclosporine drug-drug interactions in transplant recipient patients

Dyslipidemia is frequent in patients with renal failure and in transplant recipient patients. This lead to a wide use of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) in patients with impaired renal function or in patients treated with cyclosporine as post-transplantation immunosuppressive therapy. As a result, it is crucial for those patients' physicians to be aware of how to handle these drugs when renal function is impaired and/or when cyclosporine is co-administered. Most statins have an extensive hepatic elimination and the renal route is usually a minor elimination pathway. However, pharmacokinetic alterations have been described for some of these drugs in patients with renal insufficiency. Cyclosporine is a widely used immunosuppresive therapy in solid organ transplant patients and drug-drug interactions are likely to occur when statins and cyclosporine are administered together. Those interactions may theoretically result in increased statins and/or cyclosporine serum levels with potential muscle and/or renal toxicity. As a result, caution is warranted if concurrent administration is performed. In this review, we synthesized the data from the literature on (1) the pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin in patients with renal failure and (2) the potential drug-drug interactions between these drugs and cyclosporine in transplant recipient patients.

A literature search on pharmacokinetic drug interactions of statins and analysis of how such interactions are reflected in package inserts in Japan

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) are one of the most widely prescribed classes of drugs throughout the world, because of their excellent cholesterol-lowering effect and overall safety profile except for rare but fatal rhabdomyolysis arising either directly or indirectly by pharmacokinetic interactions with certain other drugs. As package inserts in pharmaceuticals are the primary source of information for health care providers, we carried out a literature search to examine how crucial information was provided in package inserts of five statins approved in Japan (simvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin and pitavastatin).

METHODS

A MEDLINE search from 1996 to June 2004 was carried out to identify studies on clinical pharmacokinetic drug interactions for the five statins. We mainly collected information on area under plasma concentration (AUC) following co-administration of statins with other drugs. The current package inserts used in Japan were obtained from the website of the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Agency whereas USA package inserts were obtained from the Food and Drug Administration website.

RESULTS

The majority of package inserts listed the drugs that interacted with statins with most describing the risk of rhabdomyolysis because of the possibility of increases in blood concentration. However, quantitative information such as change in AUC was provided in only a few cases. Instructions for dosage adjustment are seldom provided in the Japanese package inserts. USA package inserts list almost identical drug interactions as the Japanese package inserts, although they contain more quantitative data, especially for typical cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

All pharmacokinetic drug interactions including relevant quantitative data for potential effectors and details on mechanisms of interaction need to be given in package inserts as soon as the information becomes available, to ensure safe and proper use of the drugs concerned. Including such information in the package insert will be an extremely valuable aid for health care providers.

Determination of atorvastatin and metabolites in human plasma with solid-phase extraction followed by LC-tandem MS

The aim of the present study was to develop a chromatographic method for the analysis of atorvastatin, o- and p-hydroxyatorvastatin (acid and lactone forms) in human plasma after administration of atorvastatin at the lowest registered dose (10 mg) in clinical studies. Sample preparation was performed by solid-phase extraction and was followed by separation of the analytes on an HPLC system with a linear gradient and a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile, water and formic acid. Detection was achieved by tandem mass spectrometry operated in the electrospray positive ion mode. Validation of the method for the compounds for which reference compounds were available (acid forms of atorvastatin, o- and p-hydroxyatorvastatin) showed linearity within the concentration range (0.2-30 ng/ml for atorvastatin acid and p-hydroxyatorvastatin acid, and 0.5-30 ng/ml for o-hydroxyatorvastatin acid) (r2 > or = 0.99, n = 5 for all analytes). Accuracy and precision (evaluated at 0.5, 3 and 30 ng/ml for atorvastatin, p-hydroxyatorvastatin and 1, 3 and 30 ng/ml for o-hydroxyatorvastatin) were both satisfactory. The detection limit was 0.06 ng/ml for atorvastatin and p-hydroxyatorvastatin, and 0.15 ng/ml for o-hydroxyatorvastatin. The method has been successfully applied in a clinical study where atorvastatin, o- and p-hydroxyatorvastatin (both acid and lactone forms) could be detected in a 24-h sampling interval after administration of the lowest registered dose of atorvastatin (10 mg) for one week.

Bayesian estimation of cyclosporin exposure for routine therapeutic drug monitoring in kidney transplant patients

AIMS

AUC-based monitoring of cyclosporin A (CsA) is useful to optimize dose adaptation in difficult cases. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model to describe dose-exposure relationships for CsA in renal transplant patients and applied it to the Bayesian estimation of AUCs using three blood concentrations.

METHODS

A total of 84 renal graft recipients treated with CsA microemulsion were included in this study. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using NONMEM. A two-compartment model with zero-order absorption and a lag time best described the data. Bayesian estimation was based on CsA blood concentrations measured before dosing and 1 h and 2 h post dose. Predictive performance was evaluated using a cross-validation approach. Estimated AUCs were compared with AUCs calculated by the trapezoidal method. The Bayesian approach was also applied to an independent group of eight patients exhibiting unusual pharmacokinetic profiles.

RESULTS

Mean population pharmacokinetic parameters were apparent clearance 30 l h(-1), apparent volume of distribution 79.8 l, duration of absorption 52 min, absorption lag time 7 min. No significant relationships were found between any of the pharmacokinetic parameters and individual characteristics. A good correlation was obtained between Bayesian-estimated and experimental AUCs, with a mean prediction error of 2.8% (95% CI [-0.6, 6.2]) and an accuracy of 13.1% (95% CI [7.5, 17.2]). A good correlation was also obtained in the eight patients with unusual pharmacokinetic profiles (r(2) = 0.96, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our Bayesian approach enabled a good estimation of CsA exposure in a population of patients with variable pharmacokinetic profiles, showing its usefulness for routine AUC-based therapeutic drug monitoring.

Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin in treatment of dyslipidemia

PURPOSE

The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, dosage and administration, and place in therapy of rosuvastatin are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Rosuvastatin, the latest statin to receive approved labeling by the Food and Drug Administration, has shown superior efficacy in lowering low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. At daily doses of 5-40 mg, rosuvastatin produces mean reductions in plasma LDL cholesterol of 45-63%, statistically greater than those achieved with equivalent doses of atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin. Rosuvastatin also improves triglyceride, non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol levels to produce a more favorable lipid profile. Rosuvastatin's safety was studied in more than 10,000 patients, exceeding the number of patients evaluated before the launch of any other statin. Many of these patients took the drug for up to 96 weeks. With regard to muscle, renal, and hepatic toxicity and the withdrawal rate due to adverse events, rosuvastatin demonstrates a safety profile similar to that of the other marketed statins. Rosuvastatin undergoes only minor metabolism (10% of the administered dose) by the cytochrome P-450 2C9 isoenzyme. Significant drug interactions were reported with cyclosporine, gemfibrozil, warfarin, and antacids. Evidence suggests that rosuvastatin will be a valuable addition to the choices for treatment of patients with dyslipidemia.

CONCLUSION

Rosuvastatin has greater efficacy in lowering LDL cholesterol and non-HDL-cholesterol concentrations than the other statins. It has been shown to enable more patients to reach their LDL cholesterol goals than other statins and to do so with an acceptable safety profile.

Evaluation of drug-drug interaction in the hepatobiliary and renal transport of drugs

Recent studies have revealed the import role played by transporters in the renal and hepatobiliary excretion of many drugs. These transporters exhibit a broad substrate specificity with a degree of overlap, suggesting the possibility of transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions with other substrates. This review is an overview of the roles of transporters and the possibility of transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions. Among the large number of transporters, we compare the Ki values of inhibitors for organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) and organic anion transporters (OATs) and their therapeutic unbound concentrations. Among them, cephalosporins and probenecid have the potential to produce clinically relevant OAT-mediated drug-drug interactions, whereas cyclosporin A and rifampicin may trigger OATP-mediated ones. These drugs have been reported to cause drug-drug interactions in vivo with OATs or OATP substrates, suggesting the possibility of transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions. To avoid adverse consequences of such transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions, we need to be more aware of the role played by drug transporters as well as those caused by drug metabolizing enzymes.

Atorvastatin does not affect the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible influence of atorvastatin on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine (INN ciclosporin) and its main metabolites, AM1 and AM9, in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Whole blood samples from 18 renal transplanted patients on cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy were collected prior to and after 4 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin (10 mg/day) and analysed with regard to both cyclosporine and its main metabolites, AM1 and AM9, using a specific chromatographic method with ultraviolet detection.

RESULTS

On average, AUC(0-12) [area under the whole blood concentration versus time curve in the dosing interval (0-12 h)] of cyclosporine was 5% (-16, 5) (90% confidence interval) lower upon co-administration with atorvastatin. No statistically significant changes in any of the calculated pharmacokinetic variables [AUC(0-12), maximum whole blood concentration (C(max)), whole blood concentration 12 h post dose (C(12)), time to C(max) (t(max)), terminal half-life (t(1/2))] for cyclosporine or the two metabolites, AM1 and AM9, upon atorvastatin treatment were observed. On average, atorvastatin did not affect the ratio between the CYP3A4-mediated metabolite AM9 and cyclosporine, suggesting that atorvastatin does not affect the CYP3A4 metabolism of cyclosporine to any significant extent. However, the influence of atorvastatin on the ratio between AM9 and cyclosporine showed large interindividual variability.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that atorvastatin does not, on average, affect cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients.

Preventing cardiovascular outcome in patients with renal impairment: is there a role for lipid-lowering therapy?

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), ranging from modest renal impairment to dialysis and transplant, have an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients with CKD have both traditional and non-traditional risk factors for CVD. The role of lipids as risk factors for CVD in these populations has not been firmly established. In a recent prospective controlled trial, it was established that atherogenic lipids are indeed strong risk factors for CVD in renal transplant recipients, and that treatment with a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor reduced the incidence of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. For patients receiving dialysis, the association between serum lipid levels and cardiovascular outcome is uncertain and there is no evidence from controlled trials that lipid-lowering therapy does have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular outcome in these patients. Atherogenic lipids are probably a risk factor for patients with mild or moderate CKD, and five subgroup analyses have indicated a favorable effect of lipid-lowering therapy on cardiovascular outcome, although we still lack prospective controlled trials in these patients. CVD in patients with CKD has been a neglected area of research.

Effect of Atorvastatin on Cyclosporine Pharmacokinetics in Liver Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The development of hyperlipidemia after liver transplant is frequently treated with hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) such as atorvastatin. As atorvastatin and the primary immunosuppressant drug, cyclosporine, are metabolized by the same pathway, there is the potential for an interaction.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of atorvastatin on cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

Six stable, long-term adult liver transplant recipients from a single center who developed posttransplant dyslipidemia were recruited to participate in a 14-day, open-label study of atorvastatin 10 mg/d coadministered with standard posttransplant immunosuppression using constant oral doses of cyclosporine and corticosteroids. A 10-point pharmacokinetic profile was performed prior to and on day 14 after commencement of atorvastatin therapy. Cyclosporine concentrations were measured by HPLC-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry. The AUC was calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule, with other parameters determined by visual inspection.

RESULTS

Atorvastatin coadministration increased the cyclosporine AUC by 9% (range 0–20.6%; 3018 vs 3290 ng•h/mL; p = 0.04). No significant change was evident for other cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly lower on day 14 than at baseline (p < 0.02). One patient developed a twofold increase in transaminases after 2 weeks of atorvastatin therapy, but no other clinical or biochemical adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Atorvastatin coadministration increases the cyclosporine AUC by approximately 10% in stable liver transplant recipients. This change in systemic exposure to cyclosporine is of questionable clinical significance. Atorvastatin is effective in reducing cholesterol levels in liver transplant recipients.

Clinical practice guidelines for managing dyslipidemias in kidney transplant patients: a report from the Managing Dyslipidemias in Chronic Kidney Disease Work Group of the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative

The incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is very high in patients with chronic kidney (CKD) disease and in kidney transplant recipients. Indeed, available evidence for these patients suggests that the 10-year cumulative risk of coronary heart disease is at least 20%, or roughly equivalent to the risk seen in patients with previous CVD. Recently, the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) published guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemias in patients with CKD, including transplant patients. It was the conclusion of this Work Group that the National Cholesterol Education Program Guidelines are generally applicable to patients with CKD, but that there are significant differences in the approach and treatment of dyslipidemias in patients with CKD compared with the general population. In the present document we present the guidelines generated by this workgroup as they apply to kidney transplant recipients. Evidence from the general population indicates that treatment of dyslipidemias reduces CVD, and evidence in kidney transplant patients suggests that judicious treatment can be safe and effective in improving dyslipidemias. Dyslipidemias are very common in CKD and in transplant patients. However, until recently there have been no adequately powered, randomized, controlled trials examining the effects of dyslipidemia treatment on CVD in patients with CKD. Since completion of the K/DOQI guidelines on dyslipidemia in CKD, the results of the Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplantation (ALERT) Study have been presented and published. Based on information from randomized trials conducted in the general population and the single study conducted in kidney transplant patients, these guidelines, which are a modified version of the K/DOQI dyslipidemia guidelines, were developed to aid clinicians in the management of dyslipidemias in kidney transplant patients. These guidelines are divided into four sections. The first section (Introduction) provides the rationale for the guidelines, and describes the target population, scope, intended users, and methods. The second section presents guidelines on the assessment of dyslipidemias (guidelines 1-3), while the third section offers guidelines for the treatment of dyslipidemias (guidelines 4-5). The key guideline statements are supported mainly by data from studies in the general population, but there is an urgent need for additional studies in CKD and in transplant patients. Therefore, the last section outlines recommendations for research.

[Drug interactions with antilipemics]

The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and fibrates have been associated with myotoxicity, which, in some cases, has been fatal. Rhabdomyolysis is frequently observed during drug interactions with elevated plasma concentrations. Statins have a low oral bioavailability because of their intense first-pass extraction. Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is responsible for the metabolism of atorvastatin and simvastatin which present the highest risk of drug interactions with CYP3A4 inhibitors, such as macrolides, antifungal agents, protease inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, amiodarone, and grapefruit juice. Fluvastatin has a low potential for drug interactions due to its CYP2C9-dependant metabolism. Pravastatin liver extraction does not involve CYPs and presents a low potential for drug interactions. Fibrates have a high oral bioavailability (approximately 100%), and this minimises the risk of drug interactions. However, fibrates alter the pharmacokinetics of some drugs, possibly via CYP2C9 and UDP-glucuronyltransferase (UGT) inhibition. Only three cholesterol-reducing agents have demonstrated their ability to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular death in long-term follow-up randomised trials among patients with atherosclerosis. Simvastatin exhibits the highest potential for drug interactions, pravastatin and gemfibrozil the lowest.

Safety considerations for statins

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors or statins offer important benefits for the large populations of individuals at high risk for coronary heart disease. These drugs have a good safety profile. Nevertheless, differences in physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties between statins may translate into significant differences in long-term safety. This review focuses on long-term adverse effects related to statin use, namely hepatotoxicity and myopathy. Moreover, the most common drugs used in combination with statins in long-term therapies are analyzed in terms of possible drug/drug interactions affecting the safety of statins.

RECENT FINDINGS

The withdrawal of cerivastatin from the global market in 2001, because of severe cases of rhabdomyolysis, highlighted concerns regarding the safety of the entire class. Afterwards, the role of statins and their interactions with other drugs in precipitating this condition have been carefully reviewed. In approximately 60% of the total number of cases, statin-related rhabdomyolysis was found to be related to drug/drug interactions. Recently, all cases of fatal rhabdomyolysis associated with statin use have been reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. This has shown that fatal rhabdomyolysis among statin users is a rare event, the reporting rates being much less than one death per million prescriptions in the case of all statins except cerivastatin.

SUMMARY

The safety and tolerability of the available statins support their use as the first-line treatment of patients at high risk for coronary heart disease, since the clinical benefits greatly outweigh the small risk of myopathy. Nevertheless, clinicians should be aware of the adverse effects possibly related to statin therapy, particularly in patients at high risk for coronary heart disease and requiring long-term multiple-drug therapies.