International consensus recommendations on key outcome measures for organ preservation after (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer

Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2023

The annual Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2023 was held in Quebec City, Quebec 2-4 February 2023. The purpose of the conference was to develop consensus statements on emerging and evolving treatment paradigms. Participants included Canadian medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists and surgical oncologists from across Ontario, Quebec, and the Atlantic provinces. Consensus statements were developed following rapid review presentations and discussion of available literature. The recommendations proposed here represent the consensus opinions of physicians involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies who participated in this meeting.

Rectal cancer lexicon 2023 revised and updated consensus statement from the Society of Abdominal Radiology Colorectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel

The Society of Abdominal Radiology's Colorectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel (DFP) first published a rectal cancer lexicon paper in 2019. Since that time, the DFP has published revised initial staging and restaging reporting templates, and a new SAR user guide to accompany the rectal MRI synoptic report (primary staging). This lexicon update summarizes interval developments, while conforming to the original lexicon 2019 format. Emphasis is placed on primary staging, treatment response, anatomic terminology, nodal staging, and the utility of specific sequences in the MRI protocol. A discussion of primary tumor staging reviews updates on tumor morphology and its clinical significance, T1 and T3 subclassifications and their clinical implications, T4a and T4b imaging findings/definitions, terminology updates on the use of MRF over CRM, and the conundrum of the external sphincter. A parallel section on treatment response reviews the clinical significance of near-complete response and introduces the lexicon of "regrowth" versus "recurrence". A review of relevant anatomy incorporates updated definitions and expert consensus of anatomic landmarks, including the NCCN's new definition of rectal upper margin and sigmoid take-off. A detailed review of nodal staging is also included, with attention to tumor location relative to the dentate line and locoregional lymph node designation, a new suggested size threshold for lateral lymph nodes and their indications for use, and imaging criteria used to differentiate tumor deposits from lymph nodes. Finally, new treatment terminologies such as organ preservation, TNT, TAMIS and watch-and-wait management are introduced. This 2023 version aims to serve as a concise set of up-to-date recommendations for radiologists, and discusses terminology, classification systems, MRI and clinical staging, and the evolving concepts in diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer.

A primer on rectal MRI in patients on watch-and-wait treatment for rectal cancer

Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) for rectal cancer is becoming an accepted treatment paradigm and is changing the landscape of this disease, wherein up to 50% of patients who undergo TNT are able to avoid surgery. This places new demands on the radiologist in terms of interpreting degrees of response to treatment. This primer summarizes the Watch-and-Wait approach and the role of imaging, with illustrative "atlas-like" examples as an educational guide for radiologists. We present a brief literature summary of the evolution of rectal cancer treatment, with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of response. We also discuss recommended guidelines and standards. We outline the common TNT approach entering mainstream practice. A heuristic and algorithmic approach to MRI interpretation is also offered. To illustrate management and common scenarios, we arranged the illustrative figures as follows: (I) Clinical complete response (cCR) achieved at the immediate post-TNT "decision point" scan time; (II) cCR achieved at some point during surveillance, later than the first post-TNT MRI; (III) near clinical complete response (nCR); (IV) incomplete clinical response (iCR); (V) discordant findings between MRI and endoscopy where MRI is falsely positive, even at follow-up; (VI) discordant cases where MRI seems to be falsely positive but is proven truly positive on follow-up endoscopy; (VII) cases where MRI is falsely negative; (VIII) regrowth of tumor in the primary tumor bed; (IX) regrowth outside the primary tumor bed; and (X) challenging scenarios, i.e., mucinous cases. This primer is offered to achieve its intended goal of educating radiologists on how to interpret MRI in patients with rectal cancer undergoing treatment using a TNT-type treatment paradigm and a Watch-and-Wait approach.

Validated Pretreatment Prediction Models for Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

Pretreatment response prediction is crucial to select those patients with rectal cancer who will benefit from organ preservation strategies following (intensified) neoadjuvant therapy and to avoid unnecessary toxicity in those who will not. The combination of individual predictors in multivariable prediction models might improve predictive accuracy. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and critically appraise validated pretreatment prediction models (other than radiomics-based models or image-based deep learning models) for response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with rectal cancer and provide evidence-based recommendations for future research. MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase.com, and Scopus were searched for eligible studies published up to November 2022. A total of 5006 studies were screened and 16 were included for data extraction and risk of bias assessment using Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). All selected models were unique and grouped into five predictor categories: clinical, combined, genetics, metabolites, and pathology. Studies generally included patients with intermediate or advanced tumor stages who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Evaluated outcomes were pathological complete response and pathological tumor response. All studies were considered to have a high risk of bias and none of the models were externally validated in an independent study. Discriminative performances, estimated with the area under the curve (AUC), ranged per predictor category from 0.60 to 0.70 (clinical), 0.78 to 0.81 (combined), 0.66 to 0.91 (genetics), 0.54 to 0.80 (metabolites), and 0.71 to 0.91 (pathology). Model calibration outcomes were reported in five studies. Two collagen feature-based models showed the best predictive performance (AUCs 0.83-0.91 and good calibration). In conclusion, some pretreatment models for response prediction in rectal cancer show encouraging predictive potential but, given the high risk of bias in these studies, their value should be evaluated in future, well-designed studies.

Organ preservation strategies after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has shown a good therapeutic effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which also opens up the possibility of applying organ preservation strategies. This study investigated the feasibility of modified surgery after potent neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in central type NSCLC.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients with central type NSCLC who received 2-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between January 2019 and June 2022 at Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital and Peking University People's Hospital were eligible. Patients were divided into modified and nonmodified groups according to the extent of surgery, after which, the safety and long-term prognosis of surgery were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were enrolled. Of 36 (42.9%) patients who underwent modified surgery, 21 patients underwent lobectomy, 12 patients underwent lobectomy with bronchoplasty, 2 patients underwent sleeve lobectomy, and 1 patient underwent bilobectomy. The modification rate for the initially estimated pneumonectomy, sleeve lobectomy, and bilobectomy was 48.6, 44.8, and 30%, respectively. Grades II-V postoperative complications were found in 5 (13.9%) patients in the modified group and 17 (35.4%) patients in the nonmodified group (relative risk, 0.393; 95% CI, 0.016-0.963; P =0.026). No significant difference was observed regarding the surgical approach, operative duration, blood loss, or R0 resection rate. The 2-year local recurrence rate was 3.7% (95% CI, 0.004-0.175) and 5.2% (95% CI, 0.012-0.168) in the modified group and nonmodified group, respectively. The 1-year PFS rate of modified and nonmodified groups was 97.1% (95% CI, 83.7-99.8) and 86.9% (95% CI, 73.4-94.4), respectively, while 2-year PFS were 89.8% (95% CI, 74.1-96.9) and 71.8% (95% CI, 56.7-83.4), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Applying organ preservation strategies, that is, undergoing modified surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, is feasible for selected central type NSCLC patients with favorable safety and long-term survival.

Total Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients: Where Do We Stand?

The therapeutic landscape in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has undergone a significant paradigm shift in recent years with the rising adoption of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). This comprehensive approach entails administering chemotherapy and radiation therapy before surgery, followed by optional adjuvant chemotherapy. To establish and deliver the optimal tailored treatment regimen to the patient, it is crucial to foster collaboration among a multidisciplinary team comprising healthcare professionals from various specialties, including medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, radiology, and pathology. This review aims to provide insights into the current state of TNT for LARC and new emerging strategies to identify potential directions for future research and clinical practice, such as circulating tumor-DNA, immunotherapy in mismatch-repair-deficient tumors, and nonoperative management.

Short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer: real-world evidence in Argentina

Background

Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) of 25 Gy in five daily fractions is a recommended strategy in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), as well as in cases of metastatic disease for local control. There is scarce information regarding the use of SCRT for patients who have received nonoperative management.

Objectives

To describe the characteristics of patients who received treatment with SCRT for LARC and metastatic rectal cancer, toxicity, and the approach after radiation treatment.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent SCRT for rectal cancer at the Alexander Fleming Institute from March 2014 to June 2022.

Results

In total, 44 patients were treated with SCRT. The majority were male (29, 66%), with a median age of 59 years (interquartile range 46-73). Most patients had stage IV disease (26, 59.1%), followed by LARC (18, 40.9%). Most lesions were located in the middle rectum (30, 68%). The majority of LARC patients underwent SCRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy (ChT) (16/18, 89%), while most patients with metastatic disease underwent SCRT followed by consolidation ChT (14/26, 53.8%). A clinical complete response (cCR) was documented in 8/44, 18.2% of patients. Most patients with LARC and cCR were managed by a watch and wait approach (5/18, 27.7%). Local recurrence was observed in LARC cases (2/18, 11.1%). Patients who underwent SCRT following consolidation ChT were more likely to have adverse events (AEs) than those undergoing induction ChT following SCRT (11/30, 36.7% versus 3/12, 25%, p = 0.02).

Conclusion

In a subgroup of patients diagnosed with LARC and treated with SCRT followed by ChT, surgical treatment could be omitted after they achieved a cCR. Local recurrence was similar to that reported in a previous study. SCRT is a reasonable option for local disease control in stage IV disease, yielding low toxicity rates. Therefore, decisions must be made by a multidisciplinary team. Prospective studies are necessary to reach further conclusions.

MRI-based radiomic score increased mrTRG accuracy in predicting rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy

PURPOSE

To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics score, i.e., "rad-score," and to investigate the performance of rad-score alone and combined with mrTRG in predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive patients with LARC who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery from between July 2011 to November 2015. Volumes of interest of the entire tumor on baseline rectal MRI and of the tumor bed on restaging rectal MRI were manually segmented on T2-weighted images. The radiologist also provided the ymrTRG score on the restaging MRI. Radiomic score (rad-score) was calculated and optimal cut-off points for both mrTRG and rad-score to predict pCR were selected using Youden's J statistic.

RESULTS

Of 180 patients (mean age = 63 years; 60% men), 33/180 (18%) achieved pCR. High rad-score (> - 1.49) yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.758, comparable to ymrTRG 1-2 which yielded an AUC of 0.759. The combination of high rad-score and ymrTRG 1-2 yielded a significantly higher AUC of 0.836 compared with ymrTRG 1-2 and high rad-score alone (p < 0.001). A logistic regression model incorporating both high rad-score and mrTRG 1-2 was built to calculate adjusted odds ratios for pCR, which was 4.85 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that a rectal restaging MRI-based rad-score had comparable diagnostic performance to ymrTRG. Moreover, the combined rad-score and ymrTRG model yielded a significant better diagnostic performance for predicting pCR.

New Opportunities for Minimizing Toxicity in Rectal Cancer Management

Advances in multimodal management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), consisting of preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy followed by surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, have improved local disease control and patient survival but are associated with significant risk for acute and long-term morbidity. Recently published trials, evaluating treatment dose intensification via the addition of preoperative induction or consolidation chemotherapy (total neoadjuvant therapy [TNT]), have demonstrated improved tumor response rates while maintaining acceptable toxicity. In addition, TNT has led to an increased number of patients achieving a clinical complete response and thus eligible to pursue a nonoperative, organ-preserving, watch and wait approach, thereby avoiding toxicities associated with surgery, such as bowel dysfunction and stoma-related complications. Ongoing trials using immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mismatch repair-deficient tumors suggest that this subgroup of patients with LARC could potentially be treated with immunotherapy alone, sparing them the toxicity associated with preoperative treatment and surgery. However, the majority of rectal cancers are mismatch repair-proficient and less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors and require multimodal management. The synergy noted in preclinical studies between immunotherapy and radiotherapy on immunogenic tumor cell death has led to the design of ongoing clinical trials that explore the benefit of combining radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy (mainly of immune checkpoint inhibitors) and aim to increase the number of patients eligible for organ preservation.

Watch and wait after neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: comparison of outcomes in patients with and without a complete response at first reassessment in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD)

BACKGROUND

In rectal cancer, watch and wait for patients with a cCR after neoadjuvant treatment has an established evidence base. However, there is a lack of consensus on the definition and management of a near-cCR. This study aimed to compare outcomes in patients who achieved a cCR at first reassessment versus later reassessment.

METHODS

This registry study included patients from the International Watch & Wait Database. Patients were categorized as having a cCR at first reassessment or at later reassessment (that is near-cCR at first reassessment) based on MRI and endoscopy. Organ preservation, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were calculated. Subgroup analyses were done for near-cCR groups based on the response evaluation according to modality.

RESULTS

A total of 1010 patients were identified. At first reassessment, 608 patients had a cCR; 402 had a cCR at later reassessment. Median follow-up was 2.6 years for patients with a cCR at first reassessment and 2.9 years for those with a cCR at later reassessment. The 2-year organ preservation rate was 77.8 (95 per cent c.i. 74.2 to 81.5) and 79.3 (75.1 to 83.7) per cent respectively (P = 0.499). Similarly, no differences were found between groups in distant metastasis-free survival or overall survival rate. Subgroup analyses showed a higher organ preservation rate in the group with a near-cCR categorized exclusively by MRI.

CONCLUSION

Oncological outcomes for patients with a cCR at later reassessment are no worse than those of patients with a cCR at first reassessment.

Restaging rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Correct tumour restaging is pivotal for identifying the most personalised surgical treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, and works to avoid both poor oncological outcome and overtreatment. Digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging are the recommended modalities for local tumour restaging, while chest and abdominal computed tomography are utilised for the assessment of distant disease. The optimal length of time between neoadjuvant treatment and restaging, in terms of both oncological safety and clinical effectiveness of treatment, remains unclear, especially for patients receiving prolonged total neoadjuvant therapy. The timely identification of patients who are radioresistant and at risk of disease progression remains challenging.

[Rectal cancer update: postneoadjuvant staging]

Over the last two decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has continuously been gaining influence in modern management of rectal cancer. Bringing morphological and functional features together improves the differentiation of responders from nonresponders, provides for accurate surgical planning, intensified radiation therapy regimes, and watch-and-wait strategies. A shift from TNM staging towards risk stratification of rectal cancer patients, patient selection to increasingly individualized therapies, and intensified surveillance has contributed to the transformation of rectal MRI into a true gamechanger.

[Interpretation of Rectal MRI after Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients with Rectal Cancer]

MRI is currently the imaging modality of choice to evaluate rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. The purposes of restaging MRI are to assess the resectability of rectal cancer and to decide whether organ preservation strategies can be applied in patients with a complete clinical response. This review article indicates the key MRI features needed to evaluate rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment using a systematic approach. Assessment of primary tumor response including MRI findings to predict a complete response is discussed. Additionally, MRI evaluation of the relationship between the primary tumor and adjacent structures, lymph node response, extramural venous invasion, and tumor deposits after neoadjuvant treatment is presented. Knowledge of these imaging features and their clinical relevance may help radiologists provide an accurate and clinically valuable interpretation of restaging rectal MRI.

Polyphotosensitizer-Based Nanoparticles with Michael Addition Acceptors Inhibiting GST Activity and Cisplatin Deactivation for Enhanced Chemotherapy and Photodynamic Immunotherapy

Glutathione S-transferase (GST), which is a key enzyme in the conjugation reaction of glutathione (GSH), is overexpressed in cancer cells, leading to cisplatin deactivation and ultimately drug resistance. In addition, many tumors are immune "cold tumors," limiting the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive polyphotosensitizer-based nanoparticle (NP2) with Michael addition acceptors inhibiting GST activity and cisplatin deactivation is designed. Under the 808 nm light irradiation, on the one hand, the Michael addition acceptor in NP2 can react with GST and inhibit its activity, thereby decreasing the GSH conjugation and reducing the GSH-mediated deactivation of cisplatin and improving its chemotherapeutic effect. On the other hand, NP2+L induces more ROS production in prostate tumor cells, which can further induce type II immunogenic cell death (ICD) and stimulate a stronger antitumor immune response. It is found that NP2 under the 808 nm light irradiation (NP2+L) can increase PD-L1 expression on the surface of prostate cancer cells. Subsequently, NP2+L combined with PD-L1 treatment is found to simultaneously enhance the efficacies of chemotherapy and photodynamic immunotherapy in prostate tumors, providing a new paradigm for the clinical multimodal treatment of tumors.

Total neoadjuvant treatment and organ preservation strategies in the management of localized rectal cancer: a narrative review and evidence-based algorithm

The multimodal approach with total mesorectal excision preceded by neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy represented the mainstay treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) for a long time. However, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of distant relapse reduction is limited. Recently, chemotherapy regimens administered before surgery and incorporated with (chemo)radiotherapy in total neoadjuvant treatment protocols have been established as new options in the management of LARC. Meanwhile, patients with clinical complete response to neoadjuvant treatment can benefit from organ preservation strategies, aimed at sparing surgery and long-term post-operative morbidities, while preserving an adequate disease control. However, the introduction of a non-operative management in clinical practice is a matter of debate with some concerns regarding the risk of local recurrence and long-term outcomes. In this review, we discuss how these recent advances are reshaping the multimodal management of localized rectal cancer and propose an algorithm to place them in the clinical practice.

Advances in Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

The current preferred standard of care management for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is total neoadjuvant therapy, in which all chemotherapy and radiotherapy is delivered before surgery. Within this approach, developed in response to persistently high distant failure rates despite excellent local control with preoperative chemoradiotherapy, there remains questions regarding the optimal radiotherapy regimen (short course vs long course) and sequencing of chemotherapy (induction vs consolidation).

Watch-and-Wait Approach to Rectal Cancer: The Role of Imaging

The diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer have evolved dramatically over the past several decades. At the same time, its incidence has increased in younger populations. This review will inform the reader of advances in both diagnosis and treatment. These advances have led to the watch-and-wait approach, otherwise known as nonsurgical management. This review briefly outlines changes in medical and surgical treatment, advances in MRI technology and interpretation, and landmark studies or trials that have led to this exciting juncture. Herein, the authors delve into current state-of-the-art methods to assess response to treatment with MRI and endoscopy. Currently, these methods for avoiding surgery can be used to detect a complete clinical response in as many as 50% of patients with rectal cancer. Finally, the limitations of imaging and endoscopy and future challenges will be discussed.

Restaging MRI of Rectal Adenocarcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Imaging Findings and Potential Pitfalls

Rectal adenocarcinoma constitutes about one-third of all colorectal adenocarcinoma cases. Rectal MRI has become mandatory for evaluation of patients newly diagnosed with rectal cancer because it can help accurately stage the disease, impact the choice to give neoadjuvant therapy or proceed with up-front surgery, and even direct surgical dissection planes. Better understanding of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy effects on rectal tumors and recognition that up to 30% of patients can have a pathologic complete response have opened the door for the nonsurgical "watch-and-wait" management approach for rectal adenocarcinoma. Candidates for this organ-preserving approach should have no evidence of malignancy on all three components of response assessment after neoadjuvant therapy (ie, digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and rectal MRI). Hence, rectal MRI again has a major role in directing patient management and possibly sparing patients from unnecessary surgical morbidity. In this article, the authors discuss the indications for neoadjuvant therapy in management of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, describe expected imaging appearances of rectal adenocarcinoma after completion of neoadjuvant therapy, and outline the MRI tumor regression grading system. Since pelvic sidewall lymph node dissection is associated with a high risk of permanent genitourinary dysfunction, it is performed for only selected patients who have radiologic evidence of sidewall lymph node involvement. Therefore, the authors review the relevant lymphatic compartments of the pelvis and describe lymph node criteria for determining locoregional nodal spread. Finally, the authors discuss limitations of rectal MRI, describe several potential interpretation pitfalls after neoadjuvant therapy, and emphasize how these pitfalls may be avoided. ^© RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Predictive value of modified MRI-based split scar sign (mrSSS) score for pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To measure the diagnostic performance of modified MRI-based split scar sign (mrSSS) score for the prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

The modified MRI-based split scar sign (mrSSS) score, which consists of T2-weighted images (T2WI)-based score and diffusion-weighted images (DWI)-based score. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of modified mrSSS score, endoscopic gross type, and MRI-based tumor regression grading (mrTRG) score, in the prediction of pCR, were compared. The prognostic value of the modified mrSSS score was also studied.

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients were included in the study. The Kendall's coefficient of interobserver concordance of modified mrSSS score, T2WI -based score, and DWI-based score were 0.899, 0.890, and 0.789 respectively. And the maximum and minimum k value of the modified mrSSS score was 0.797 (0.742-0.853) and 0.562 (0.490-0.634). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of prediction of pCR were 0.66, 0.97, and 0.90 for modified mrSSS score; 0.37, 0.89, and 0.78 for endoscopic gross type (scar); and 0.24, 0.92, and 0.77 for mrTRG score (mrTRG = 1). The modified mrSSS score had significantly higher sensitivity than the endoscopic gross type and the mrTRG score in predicting pCR. Patients with lower modified mrSSS scores had significantly longer disease-free survival (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The modified mrSSS score showed satisfactory interobserver agreement and higher sensitivity in predicting pCR after nCRT in patients with rectal cancer. The modified mrSSS score is also a predictor of disease-free survival.

Clinical outcome after total neoadjuvant treatment (CAO/ARO/AIO-12) versus intensified neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment (CAO/ARO/AIO-04) a comparison between two multicenter randomized phase II/III trials

BACKGROUND

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) can enhance local tumor regression, but its survival benefits compared to intensified chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) remain unclear.

METHODS

This is a secondary comparison between 607 patients treated with intensified 5-FU/Oxaliplatin neoadjuvant CRT and adjuvant CT within the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial, and 306 patients treated with TNT within the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 phase II trial. Comparison between clinical-pathological characteristics, surgical quality, and post-surgical complications were analyzed using the Pearson's Chi-squared or Mann-Whitney U test. Oncological outcome was examined with log-rank, Gray's test, and multivariate cox regression. In addition, further subgroup analyses and propensity score matching were performed to optimize the balance of baseline covariates.

FINDINGS

Patients treated with CRT followed by consolidation CT had a significantly higher rate of pathological complete remission (pCR) compared to patients treated within the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial (25.3 % vs 17.3 %, P = 0.04). Post-surgical complications were less common in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial. After a median follow-up of 46 months, clinical outcome did not differ significantly in the overall cohort, in any subgroup or after propensity score matching. In multivariate analysis, disease-free survival (DFS) was similar between the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial and treatments arms of the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial (vs arm A: HR 0.92 [95 % CI 0.62-1.37], P = 0.69; vs arm B: HR 1.06 [95 % CI 0.72-1.58], P = 0.76).

INTERPRETATION

Notwithstanding the limitations of intertrial comparison, TNT did not improve long term oncological outcome in our study compared to the intensified neoadjuvant CRT and adjuvant CT treatment in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial. Improved response rates after TNT offers an attractive option to explore organ preservation in selective patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Rectal MRI Interpretation After Neoadjuvant Therapy

In recent years, several key advances in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer have been made, including the implementation of total mesorectal excision as the standard surgical approach; use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in selected patients with a high risk of local recurrence, and finally, adoption of organ preservation strategies, through either local excision or nonoperative management in selected patients with clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This review aims to shed light on the role of rectal MRI in the assessment of treatment response after neoadjuvant therapy, which is especially important given the growing feasibility of nonoperative management. First, an overview of current neoadjuvant therapies and response assessment based on digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and MRI will be provided. Second, the use of a high-quality restaging rectal MRI protocol will be presented. Third, a step-by-step approach to assessing treatment response on restaging rectal MRI following neoadjuvant treatment will be outlined, acknowledging challenges faced by radiologists during MRI interpretation. Finally, research related to response assessment will be discussed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Assessment of Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer with Organ-Preservation Treatment: Are We There yet?

Rectal cancer is a common cancer and shows an increased incidence with older age. Although the gold standard treatment is surgical excision, minimally invasive approaches are increasingly used and organ preservation is becoming a reasonable approach. The conservative treatment approach includes local excision, external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. However, these all carry a risk of side-effects. It is crucial to provide patients with information to quantify the improvement or detriment in quality of life with their cancer treatment. This can only be done with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as tools within current and future trials. Colorectal cancer has numerous publications with specific PROMs. However, PROMs reporting in rectal cancer is more sparse; PROMs are generally extrapolated from colorectal cancer. Rectal PROMs trials hold small population samples and PROMs as an end point is scarce. We present a review of recent literature based on the PROMs reporting of quality of life for rectal cancer patients and introduce the CITRuS trial as an innovative feasibility study related to electronic PROMs data collection.

Prevalent Pseudoprogression and Pseudoresidue in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) tumors holds promise in reshaping organ preservation in rectal cancer. However, the benefits are accompanied by distinctive patterns of response, introducing a dilemma in the response evaluation for clinical decision-making.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with MSI-H/dMMR tumors receiving neoadjuvant ICI (nICI) treatment (n=13) and matched patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT; n=13) were included to compare clinical response and histopathologic features.

RESULTS

Among the 13 patients receiving nICI treatment, in the final radiologic evaluation prior to surgery (at a median of 103 days after initiation of therapy), progressive disease (n=3), stable disease (n=1), partial response (n=7), and complete response (n=2) were observed. However, these patients were later confirmed as having pathologic complete response, resulting in pseudoprogression and pseudoresidue with incidences of 23.1% (n=3) and 76.9% (n=10), respectively, whereas no pseudoprogression was found in the 13 patients receiving nCRT. We further revealed the histopathologic basis underlying the pseudoprogression and pseudoresidue by discovering the distinctive immune-related regression features after nICI treatment, including fibrogenesis, dense lymphocytes, and plasma cell infiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudoprogression and pseudoresidue were unique and prevalent response patterns in MSI-H/dMMR rectal cancer after nICI treatment. Our findings highlight the importance of developing specific strategies for response evaluation in neoadjuvant immunotherapy to identify patients with a good response in whom sphincter/organ-preserving or watch-and-wait strategies may be considered.

STAR-TREC: An International Three-arm Multicentre, Partially Randomised Controlled Trial Incorporating an External Pilot

AIM

Organ saving treatment for early-stage rectal cancer can reduce patient reported side effects compared to standard total mesorectal excision (TME) and preserve quality of life (QOL). An optimal strategy for achieving organ preservation and longer-term oncological outcomes are unknown, thus there is a need for high quality trials.

METHOD

Can we Save the rectum by watchful waiting or TransAnal surgery following (chemo)Radiotherapy versus Total mesorectal excision for early REctal Cancer (STAR-TREC) is an international 3-arm multi-centre, partially randomised controlled trial incorporating an external pilot. In phase III, patients with cT1-3b N0 tumours, ≤40mm in diameter, who prefer organ preservation are randomised 1:1 between mesorectal long course chemoradiation versus mesorectal short course radiotherapy, with selective transanal microsurgery. Patients preferring radical surgery receive TME. STAR-TREC aims to recruit 380 patients to organ preservation and 120 to TME surgery. The primary outcome is the rate of organ preservation at 30 months. Secondary clinician reported outcomes include acute treatment-related toxicity, rate of non-operative management, non-regrowth pelvic tumour control at 36 months, non-regrowth disease free survival at 36 months, and overall survival at 60 months and patient reported toxicity, health related QOL at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Exploratory biomarker research uses circulating tumour DNA to predict response and relapse.

DISCUSSION

STAR-TREC will prospectively evaluate contrasting therapeutic strategies and implement new measures including a smaller mesorectal target volume, 2-step response assessment and non-operative management for complete response. The trial will yield important information to guide routine management of patients with early-stage rectal cancer.

Rectal Sparing Approaches after Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Local Excision and Watch and Wait

Local Excision (LE) or Watch and Wait (WW) for patients with complete clinical response or near-complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) were proposed to avoid morbidity and impairment of quality of life after rectal resection. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of the literature, and to compare rectal-sparing approaches, in terms of rectum-preservation rate, local control, and distant recurrences. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed of studies published until July 2022 (PROSPERO, registration CRD42022341480), and the quality of evidence was assessed using a GRADE approach. Seven retrospective studies and one prospective trial were included. In six studies, patients were treated with standard long-course nCRT, and in two with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT). Overall, there were 213 and 188 patients in WW and LE group, respectively, and no difference was found between WW and LE when considering rectum-preservation rate (OR 0.80 95%CI 0.31-2.01, p = 0.63), local disease (OR 1.60 95%CI 0.75-3.42, p = 0.22), locoregional failure (OR 0.85 95%CI 0.20-3.66, p = 0.83) and distant recurrence (OR 0.76 95%CI 0.37-1.55, p = 0.45). Studies directly comparing WW and LE are still lacking, even though no differences between WW and LE in terms of rectum-preservation, local control, and distant recurrences have been found.

Achieving a Cure Without Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Adenocarcinoma

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.Rectal cancer is a curable disease, yet curing the disease can be associated with lifelong morbidity because of the nature of the curative-intent treatment strategies. A major focus of modern prospective trials has been to maintain current cure rates, while minimizing lifelong lifestyle alterations and maximizing quality of life. Navigating the complex landscape of therapeutic options for rectal adenocarcinoma with a focus to accomplish this quality-of-life improvement is a critical focus area for future clinical trials. Many challenges remain on the path to optimizing cure and minimizing morbidity, and include improving initial staging accuracy, more precise selection of neoadjuvant therapy used for each patient, choosing the optimal surgical management strategy, and ensuring modern radiation therapy approaches are being used. Finally, organ preservation strategies have moved to the forefront in the management of both early and locally advanced rectal cancers and hold the potential for significant changes to come for patients with rectal cancer. Herein, we highlight some of the challenges remaining in the field, progress made, and how the recent data from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group phase II trial can be put into context with the ACOSOG Z6041, CARTS, and GRECCAR2 trials.

Radiotherapy dose escalation using endorectal brachytherapy in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer unsuitable for surgery: Lessons from studies in fit patients and future perspectives

Epidemiological data indicate that more than 50 % of patients with newly-diagnosed rectal cancer are older than 70 years, with rising numbers expected over the next decades. Treatment decision-making is challenging in elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer, whereas standardized treatment guidelines for this patient cohort are lacking. Elderly and frail rectal cancer patients are often considered by surgeons as unfit to undergo radical surgery as the risk of surgical complications and postoperative mortality rises with increasing age and comorbidity. Furthermore, these patients often receive no treatment at all, resulting in local and/or systemic disease progression with associated symptoms and impaired quality of life (QoL). Recent data from randomized trials in young fit patients with early stage rectal cancer indicate that RT dose escalation can be safely delivered using external beam (chemo)radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by endoluminal radiotherapeutic modalities, such as contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) or high-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-BT). However, prospective studies testing this therapeutic concept in elderly and frail patients remain limited. Here, we review the current evidence in the epidemiology and the management of elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer. We summarize the potential of RT dose escalation to achieve long-term local control of the primary tumour, prevent disease-related morbidity, improve QoL and even organ preservation. Future perspectives and open questions will be discussed as well.

Impact of endorectal filling on interobserver variability of MRI based rectal primary tumor delineation

Background

Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy allows for the reduction of safety margins in dose escalated treatment of rectal tumors. With the use of smaller margins, precise tumor delineation becomes more critical. In the present study we investigated the impact of rectal ultrasound gel filling on interobserver variability in delineation of primary rectal tumor volumes.

Methods

Six patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were scanned on a 1.5 T MRI-Linac without (MRI_e) and with application of 100 cc of ultrasound gel transanally (MRI_f). Eight international radiation oncologists expert in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers delineated the gross tumor volume (GTV) on both MRI scans. MRI_f scans were provided to the participating centers after MRI_e scans had been returned. Interobserver variability was analyzed by either comparing the observers' delineations with a reference delineation (approach 1) and by building all possible pairs between observers (approach 2). Dice Similarity Index (DICE) and 95 % Hausdorff-Distance (95 %HD) were calculated.

Results

Rectal ultrasound gel filling was well tolerated by all patients. Overall, interobserver agreement was superior in MRI_f scans based on median DICE (0.81 vs 0.74, p < 0.005 for approach 1 and 0.76 vs 0.64, p < 0.0001 for approach 2) and 95 %HD (6.9 mm vs 4.2 mm for approach 1, p = 0.04 and 8.9 mm vs 6.1 mm, p = 0.04 for approach 2). Delineated median tumor volumes and inter-quartile ranges were 26.99 cc [18.01-50.34 cc] in MRI_e and 44.20 [19.72-61.59 cc] in MRI_f scans respectively, p = 0.012.

Conclusions

Although limited by the small number of patients, in this study the application of rectal ultrasound gel resulted in higher interobserver agreement in rectal GTV delineation. The endorectal gel filling might be a useful tool for future dose escalation strategies.

Feasibility study of a Response Surveillance Program in locally advanced mid and low rectal cancer to increase organ preservation

BACKGROUND

Assessment of tumor response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment by MRI (Tumour Regression Grade, TRG 1-5) is well standardized. The overall timing and method of defining complete response (cCR) remain controversial. The aim of this work was to evaluate the feasibility of a defined Response Surveillance Program (RSP) to increase organ preservation for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment.

METHODS

A standardized program of clinical (CR), radiological (RR) and metabolic (MR) assessment of tumor response is defined over a 6 month period from completion of NACRT with formal assessment performed every 2 months (M). Patients with TRG1-3 at M2 and TRG1-2 at M4 continue in the program up to M6 assessment. Patients managed with this protocol from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was rectal preservation rate. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival and overall survival at 3 years.

RESULT

314 potentially suitable patients were enrolled in the RSP and 50 patients completed the six month program and were successfully enrolled into watch and wait. Fourteen (28%) were T2 tumor stage, 27 (54%) T3 and nine (18%) were T4. During watch and wait, patients with locoregional recurrence (n = 11) were treated with local excision (n = 3), endocavitary radiotherapy (n = 1), TME (n = 5) and APR (n = 2). With a median follow-up of 32 months, the rectal preservation rate was 88%, with a 3-year disease-free survival of 67% and an overall survival of 98%.

CONCLUSION

This study validates the feasibility of the practical implementation of a Response Surveillance Program to increase organ preservation rates without compromising oncological outcomes in rectal cancer.

Quality-of-life outcomes in older patients with early-stage rectal cancer receiving organ-preserving treatment with hypofractionated short-course radiotherapy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TREC): non-randomised registry of patients unsuitable for total mesorectal excision

BACKGROUND

Older patients with early-stage rectal cancer are under-represented in clinical trials and, therefore, little high-quality data are available to guide treatment in this patient population. The TREC trial was a randomised, open-label feasibility study conducted at 21 centres across the UK that compared organ preservation through short-course radiotherapy (SCRT; 25 Gy in five fractions) plus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) with standard total mesorectal excision in adults with stage T1-2 rectal adenocarcinoma (maximum diameter ≤30 mm) and no lymph node involvement or metastasis. TREC incorporated a non-randomised registry offering organ preservation to patients who were considered unsuitable for total mesorectal excision by the local colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team. Organ preservation was achieved in 56 (92%) of 61 non-randomised registry patients with local recurrence-free survival of 91% (95% CI 84-99) at 3 years. Here, we report acute and long-term patient-reported outcomes from this non-randomised registry group.

METHODS

Patients considered by the local colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team to be at high risk of complications from total mesorectal excision on the basis of frailty, comorbidities, and older age were included in a non-randomised registry to receive organ-preserving treatment. These patients were invited to complete questionnaires on patient-reported outcomes (the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life [EORTC-QLQ] questionnaire core module [QLQ-C30] and colorectal cancer module [QLQ-CR29], the Colorectal Functional Outcome [COREFO] questionnaire, and EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Level [EQ-5D-3L]) at baseline and at months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 postoperatively. To aid interpretation, data from patients in the non-randomised registry were compared with data from those patients in the TREC trial who had been randomly assigned to organ-preserving therapy, and an additional reference cohort of aged-matched controls from the UK general population. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN14422743, and is closed.

FINDINGS

Between July 21, 2011, and July 15, 2015, 88 patients were enrolled onto the TREC study to undergo organ preservation, of whom 27 (31%) were randomly allocated to organ-preserving therapy and 61 (69%) were added to the non-randomised registry for organ-preserving therapy. Non-randomised patients were older than randomised patients (median age 74 years [IQR 67-80] vs 65 years [61-71]). Organ-preserving treatment was well tolerated among patients in the non-randomised registry, with mild worsening of fatigue; quality of life; physical, social, and role functioning; and bowel function 3 months postoperatively compared with baseline values. By 6-12 months, most scores had returned to baseline values, and were indistinguishable from data from the reference cohort. Only mild symptoms of faecal incontinence and urgency, equivalent to less than one episode per week, persisted at 36 months among patients in both groups.

INTERPRETATION

The SCRT and TEM organ-preservation approach was well tolerated in older and frailer patients, showed good rates of organ preservation, and was associated with low rates of acute and long-term toxicity, with minimal effects on quality of life and functional status. Our findings support the adoption of this approach for patients considered to be at high risk from radical surgery.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK.

Chemoradiation and consolidation chemotherapy for rectal cancer provides a high rate of organ preservation with a very good long-term oncological outcome: a single-center cohort series

Aim

To report long-term oncological outcomes and organ preservation rate with a chemoradiotherapy-consolidation chemotherapy (CRT-CNCT) treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Method

Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database was performed. Oncological outcomes of mid-low LARC patients (n=60) were analyzed after a follow-up of 63 (50–83) months. Patients with clinical complete response (cCR) were treated with the watch-and-wait (WW) protocol. Patients who could not achieve cCR were treated with total mesorectal excision (TME) or local excision (LE).

Results

Thirty-nine (65%) patients who achieved cCR were treated with the WW protocol. TME was performed in 15 (25%) patients and LE was performed in 6 (10%) patients. During the follow-up period, 10 (25.6%) patients in the WW group had regrowth (RG) and 3 (7.7%) had distant metastasis (DM). Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 90.1% and 71.6%, respectively, in the WW group. Five-year OS and DFS were 94.9% (95% CI: 88–100%) and 80% (95% CI: 55.2–100%), respectively, in the RG group. For all patients (n=60), 5-year TME-free DFS was 57.3% (95% CI: 44.3–70.2%) and organ preservation-adapted DFS was 77.5% (95% CI: 66.4–88.4%). For the WW group (n=39), 5-year TME-free DFS was 77.5% (95% CI: 63.2–91.8%) and organ preservation-adapted DFS was 85.0% (95% CI: 72.3–97.8%).

Conclusion

CRT-CNCT provides cCR as high as 2/3 of LARC patients. Regrowths, developed during follow-up, can be successfully salvaged without causing oncological disadvantage if strict surveillance is performed.

The Evolving Landscape of Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

At the last 2022 annual ASCO meeting, impressive results of anti-PD1 activity in clinical stage 2 and 3 microsatellite instable rectal cancer patients have been published. Moreover, a growing number of studies assessed the synergism between neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy and immunotherapy in microsatellite stable localized rectal cancer patients. Major findings of immunotherapy activity and efficacy in localized rectal cancer, according to microsatellite status, are discussed in this commentary.

Abstract

Standard treatments of localized rectal cancer are surgery or the multimodal approach with neoadjuvant treatments (chemo-radiotherapy, short-course radiotherapy, induction, or consolidation chemotherapy) followed by surgery. In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now the first choice in patients with a deficient mismatch repair system/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H) and are being explored in combination with chemotherapy to rewire the immune system against malignant cells in subjects with proficient mismatch repair system/microsatellite low (pMMR/MSI-L) cancers, with promising signals of efficacy. Recently, some efforts have been made to translate ICIs in earlier stages of CRC, including localized rectal cancer, with breakthrough efficacy and an organ preservation rate of mono-immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H patients and promising anti-tumor activity of immunotherapy plus neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy in pMMR/MSI-L subjects. Here, we present the rationale, results, and limitations of the most remarkable trials assessing ICIs in dMMR/MSI-H and pMMR/MSI-L localized rectal cancer patients, at the same time highlighting the most promising research perspectives that have followed these studies.

The in-silico feasibility of dose escalated, hypofractionated radiotherapy for rectal cancer

Background and purpose

Short course radiotherapy (SCRT) has a low biological prescription dose. Rectal cancer has a dose response relationship and moderate α/β ratio (∼5). We hypothesise hypofractionated dose escalation has radiobiological advantages. We assessed in-silico dose escalation to the primary tumour using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique.

Materials and methods

Patients who had received 25 Gy/5# were enrolled. GTV was macroscopic tumour including lumen. CTVA was GTV + 10 mm. CTVB included elective nodes. PTV_Low was created from CTVF (CTVA + CTVB) + 7 mm. PTV_High (SIB) was GTV + 5 mm margin. OAR were as per RTOG guidelines. Each patient had 4 plans created at increasing dose levels (27.5 Gy, 30 Gy, 32.5 Gy and 35 Gy) to PTV_High. PTV_Low was 25 Gy/5#.5 test plans were created for each patient in Eclipse™ v15.5 and consisted of 2 VMAT full arcs (6 MV), Varian Truebeam (2.7). Planning objectives were set in the Photon optimiser (PO) and recalculated using Acuros v15.5. A priori feasibility was defined as 90% of plans achieving the planning objectives at 32.5 Gy dose level (EqD2 53.4 Gy).

Results

20 SCRT patients median age 70, F (n = 5), M (n = 15). Rectum level; low (n = 12), mid (n = 3) and upper (n = 5). 100 plans were analysed. Mean volume of PTV_High was 130 cm3 (SD 81.5) and PTV_Low 769.6 cm3 (SD 241.1). 100% plans complied with mandatory planning dose metrics for each structure at the 25 Gy/5# plan and each dose level.

Conclusion

Hypofractionated dose escalation to the primary tumour up to 35 Gy/5# is technically feasible in rectal cancer radiotherapy.

Predictive value of proteomic markers for advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background

Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) has been the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Serum biomarkers to stratify patients with respect to prognosis and response to nCRT are needed due to the diverse response to the therapy.

Methods

Thirteen paired pre- and post-nCRT sera from rectal cancer patients were analyzed by isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) method. Twenty-five proteins were selected for validation by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) in ninety-one patients.

Results

Totally, 310 proteins were identified and quantified in sera samples. Reactome pathway analysis showed that the immune activation-related pathways were enriched in response to nCRT. Twenty-five proteins were selected for further validation. PRM result showed that the level of PZP was higher in pathological complete response (pCR) patients than non-pCR patients. The Random Forest algorithm identified a prediction model composed of 10 protein markers, which allowed discrimination between pCR patients and non-pCR patients (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.886 on testing set). Higher HEP2 and GELS or lower S10A8 in baseline sera were associated with better prognosis. Higher APOA1 in post nCRT sera was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS).

Conclusions

We identified and confirmed a 10-protein panel for nCRT response prediction and four potential biomarkers HEP2, GELS, S10A8 and APOA1 for prognosis of rectal cancer based on iTRAQ-based comparative proteomics screening and PRM-based targeted proteomic validation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09960-z.

Multimodal Treatment of Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is one of the three most common types of cancer in Germany. Approximately 30% of these cancers are located in the rectum, corresponding to about 18 000 new cases per year.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed database, including current guidelines and recommendations.

RESULTS

Specialized imaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging, is essential for treatment planning. In very early stages of this disease, tumors without risk factors can be excised locally. Otherwise, radical surgical resection with lymphadenectomy remains the standard treatment, and can be performed either minimally invasive or open. At present, neoadjuvant treatment plans are evolving in the direction of total neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, recent studies investigate whether the improved efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy might now enable patients with a complete clinical remission to be spared from surgical resection (organ-preserving watch-and-wait strategy).

CONCLUSION

The treatment of rectal cancer is a prime example of an interdisciplinary, multimodal approach. In the past, the focus was mainly on improving oncologic outcomes; at present, increasing attention is being devoted to the patients' quality of life as well and the functional aspects of the various modes of treatment.

Organ preservation in rectal cancer: review of contemporary management

BACKGROUND

Organ preservation as a successful management for rectal cancer is an evolving field. Refinement of neoadjuvant therapies and extended interval to response assessment has improved tumour downstaging and cCR rates.

METHODS

This was a narrative review of the current evidence for all aspects of organ preservation in rectal cancer management, together with a review of the future direction of this field.

RESULTS

Patients can be selected for organ preservation opportunistically, based on an unexpectedly good tumour response, or selectively, based on baseline tumour characteristics that predict organ preservation as a viable treatment strategy. Escalation in oncological therapy and increasing the time interval from completion of neaodjuvant therapy to tumour assessment may further increase tumour downstaging and complete response rates. The addition of local excision to oncological therapy can further improve organ preservation rates. Cancer outcomes in organ preservation are comparable to those of total mesorectal excision, with low regrowth rates reported in patients who achieve a complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. Successful organ preservation aims to achieve non-inferior oncological outcomes together with improved functionality and survivorship. Future research should establish consensus of follow-up protocols, and define criteria for oncological and functional success to facilitate patient-centred decision-making.

CONCLUSION

Modern neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer and increasing the interval to tumour response increases the number of patients who can be managed successfully with organ preservation in rectal cancer, both as an opportunistic event and as a planned treatment strategy.

Nonoperative versus Operative Approach According to the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

•

Watch-and-wait patients after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer have good functional outcome.

•

No survival differences were seen between patients undergoing surgery versus patients in a watch-and-wait protocol.

•

There is a subset of patients that has initial favorable response but will recur with distant metastases afterwards.

•

A previously published model predicting (near)-complete response could not be validated.

Purpose

To report on organ preservation following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in a prospective cohort of locally advanced rectal cancer patients.

Methods and materials

Fifty-two patients received CRT. MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT were performed prior to CRT. Response assessment was done 6 and 12 weeks after CRT using digital rectal examination, MRI, ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT and endoscopy. For clinical complete response or minimal residual disease, a watch-and-wait (W&W) protocol was started.

Regrowth-free survival (ReFS), Total Mesorectal Excision-free disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method. Functional outcome was compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test using EORTC QLQ-C30, MSKCC BFI, LARS and IIEF-5/FSFI-5 questionnaires. A previously developed prediction model performance was tested using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results

29/52 patients entered a W&W protocol. There was no difference in two-year DMFS (81.1 % vs 78.8 %, p = 0.82), two-year OS (96.4 % vs 100 %, p = 0.38) and two-year DFS (77.5 % vs 78.8 %, p = 0.87) between W&W patients and those who underwent surgery at 12 weeks after CRT. Two-year DMFS differed between W&W with local regrowth, W&W with sustained response and patients who had surgery (66.7 % vs 88.0 % vs 78.8 %; p = 0.04). At 6 and 12 months, W&W patients reported good QoL and bowel function. The model validation reached an AUC of 0.627.

Conclusion

Good functional outcome in patients with rectal cancer allocated to surveillance after CRT needs to be balanced against potentially worse DMFS in a subset of patients without sustained clinical complete response. Reliable prediction of patients eligible for surveillance programs needs further investigation.

Are We There Yet? The Value of Deep Learning in a Multicenter Setting for Response Prediction of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

This retrospective study aims to evaluate the generalizability of a promising state-of-the-art multitask deep learning (DL) model for predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) using a multicenter dataset. To this end, we retrained and validated a Siamese network with two U-Nets joined at multiple layers using pre- and post-therapeutic T2-weighted (T2w), diffusion-weighted (DW) images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps of 83 LARC patients acquired under study conditions at four different medical centers. To assess the predictive performance of the model, the trained network was then applied to an external clinical routine dataset of 46 LARC patients imaged without study conditions. The training and test datasets differed significantly in terms of their composition, e.g., T-/N-staging, the time interval between initial staging/nCRT/re-staging and surgery, as well as with respect to acquisition parameters, such as resolution, echo/repetition time, flip angle and field strength. We found that even after dedicated data pre-processing, the predictive performance dropped significantly in this multicenter setting compared to a previously published single- or two-center setting. Testing the network on the external clinical routine dataset yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41, 0.65), when using only pre- and post-therapeutic T2w images as input, and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.71), when using the combination of pre- and post-therapeutic T2w, DW images, and ADC maps as input. Our study highlights the importance of data quality and harmonization in clinical trials using machine learning. Only in a joint, cross-center effort, involving a multidisciplinary team can we generate large enough curated and annotated datasets and develop the necessary pre-processing pipelines for data harmonization to successfully apply DL models clinically.