Patient and multidisciplinary team perspectives on watch and wait in rectal cancer

This article adopts a multidisciplinary approach, including surgery, oncology, radiology and patient perspectives, to discuss the key points of debate surrounding a watch and wait approach. In an era of shared decision-making, discussion of watch and wait as an option in the context of complete clinical response is appropriate, although it is not the gold standard treatment. Key challenges are the difficulty in assessing for a complete clinical response, prediction of recurrence and access to timely diagnostics for surveillance. Salvage surgery has good results if regrowth is detected early but does have imperfect outcomes, with only a 90% salvage rate. Good communication with patients about the risks and alternatives is essential. Patients undergoing watch and wait should ideally be enrolled in prospective registries or clinical trials.

Impact of surgeon volume on 18-month unclosed ileostomy rate after restorative rectal cancer resection

AIM

The impact of surgeon volume on 18-month unclosed ileostomy rates after rectal cancer surgery has not been fully explored. The aim of this study was to describe the effect of surgeon volume and evaluate factors predictive of an unclosed ileostomy.

METHOD

Patients undergoing anterior resection with a diverting ileostomy for rectal cancer from March 2004 to October 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The unclosed ileostomy rate was determined by those with an unclosed ileostomy at 18 months. High- and low-volume surgeons (HVS and LVS, respectively) were classed as those performing five or more or fewer than five rectal cancer resections per year, respectively. Data on sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), tumour height, T-stage, anastomotic leak, surgical approach and adjuvant chemotherapy were also collected. Factors predictive of an unclosed ileostomy at 18 months were explored using a multivariate binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 415 patients (62.4% male) with a median age of 67 were eligible for analysis. Of these, 115 (27.7%) had an unclosed ileostomy at 18 months. HVS had an unclosed ileostomy rate of 24.6% (72/292) compared with 34.9% (43/123) for LVS. Volume was associated with an unclosed ileostomy in univariable analysis (p = 0.032) but not in multivariate analysis (OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.92-3.32, p = 0.08). Independent factors predictive of an unclosed ileostomy were anastomotic leak (OR 10.41, 3.95-27.0, p < 0.01), adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 2.23, 1.24-3.96, p < 0.01) and neoadjuvant CRT (OR 2.16, 1.15-5.75, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

LVS were associated with a higher unclosed ileostomy at 18 months compared with HVS. This study adds further weight to the call for adoption of a minimum annual case threshold in rectal cancer surgery.

Quality-of-life outcomes in older patients with early-stage rectal cancer receiving organ-preserving treatment with hypofractionated short-course radiotherapy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TREC): non-randomised registry of patients unsuitable for total mesorectal excision

BACKGROUND

Older patients with early-stage rectal cancer are under-represented in clinical trials and, therefore, little high-quality data are available to guide treatment in this patient population. The TREC trial was a randomised, open-label feasibility study conducted at 21 centres across the UK that compared organ preservation through short-course radiotherapy (SCRT; 25 Gy in five fractions) plus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) with standard total mesorectal excision in adults with stage T1-2 rectal adenocarcinoma (maximum diameter ≤30 mm) and no lymph node involvement or metastasis. TREC incorporated a non-randomised registry offering organ preservation to patients who were considered unsuitable for total mesorectal excision by the local colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team. Organ preservation was achieved in 56 (92%) of 61 non-randomised registry patients with local recurrence-free survival of 91% (95% CI 84-99) at 3 years. Here, we report acute and long-term patient-reported outcomes from this non-randomised registry group.

METHODS

Patients considered by the local colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team to be at high risk of complications from total mesorectal excision on the basis of frailty, comorbidities, and older age were included in a non-randomised registry to receive organ-preserving treatment. These patients were invited to complete questionnaires on patient-reported outcomes (the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life [EORTC-QLQ] questionnaire core module [QLQ-C30] and colorectal cancer module [QLQ-CR29], the Colorectal Functional Outcome [COREFO] questionnaire, and EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Level [EQ-5D-3L]) at baseline and at months 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 postoperatively. To aid interpretation, data from patients in the non-randomised registry were compared with data from those patients in the TREC trial who had been randomly assigned to organ-preserving therapy, and an additional reference cohort of aged-matched controls from the UK general population. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN14422743, and is closed.

FINDINGS

Between July 21, 2011, and July 15, 2015, 88 patients were enrolled onto the TREC study to undergo organ preservation, of whom 27 (31%) were randomly allocated to organ-preserving therapy and 61 (69%) were added to the non-randomised registry for organ-preserving therapy. Non-randomised patients were older than randomised patients (median age 74 years [IQR 67-80] vs 65 years [61-71]). Organ-preserving treatment was well tolerated among patients in the non-randomised registry, with mild worsening of fatigue; quality of life; physical, social, and role functioning; and bowel function 3 months postoperatively compared with baseline values. By 6-12 months, most scores had returned to baseline values, and were indistinguishable from data from the reference cohort. Only mild symptoms of faecal incontinence and urgency, equivalent to less than one episode per week, persisted at 36 months among patients in both groups.

INTERPRETATION

The SCRT and TEM organ-preservation approach was well tolerated in older and frailer patients, showed good rates of organ preservation, and was associated with low rates of acute and long-term toxicity, with minimal effects on quality of life and functional status. Our findings support the adoption of this approach for patients considered to be at high risk from radical surgery.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK.

STAR-TREC phase II: Can we save the rectum by watchful waiting or transanal surgery following (chemo)radiotherapy versus total mesorectal excision for early rectal cancer?

3502

Background: No randomised trials have compared non-operative organ preservation (OP) therapy for early-stage rectal cancer versus standard of care (SoC) using total mesorectal excision (TME) alone. STAR-TREC evaluated the feasibility of recruiting to a study comparing contrasting OP therapies, optimised for treatment of early tumours, versus SoC. Methods: STAR-TREC was a prospective, randomised, open-label, feasibility study in the UK, Netherlands and Denmark. Patients with biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum, staged ≤mrT3b N0 M0, ≤40mm diameter, ECOG 0-1 were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to TME, OP via mesorectal short-course radiotherapy (5x5 Gy), or OP via mesorectal chemo-radiotherapy (25x2 Gy + capecitabine) (Peters FP et al. Mesorectal radiotherapy for early stage rectal cancer: A novel target volume. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 21: 104-11). Standardised response assessment classified OP cases as complete response for no further treatment, partial response for transanal endoscopic microsurgery or poor response for TME by 20 weeks. Surveillance following OP consisted of 3-monthly endoscopy/MRI. All cases had CT thorax/abdomen/pelvis at 24 months (m). The primary outcome was recruitment rate over 2 years, with randomisation of 120 international cases calculated as sufficient to support a phase III trial. Secondary outcomes included acute toxicity, stoma and OP rates at 12m, disease free survival (DFS) and non-regrowth DFS (NRDFS) at 24m and EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score at 12 and 24m. Phase II analysis was pre-specified, approved by the data monitoring committee conditional upon grouping of OP arms to inform phase III design, without prejudicing the outcome (STAR-TREC Phase III protocol. Colorectal Disease 2022). Results: Recruitment endpoints were met on 28 Oct 2019. Key secondary outcomes are tabulated by intention to treat. No 6-month mortality occurred. Conclusions: OP pathways optimised for early tumours reduce acute surgical morbidity without introducing substantial radiation toxicity to achieve OP in 60% with no increase in NRDFS at 24m compared to SoC. Overall quality of life was evenly matched. STAR-TREC phase III will determine the optimal strategy for achieving OP (STAR-TREC Phase III protocol. Colorectal Disease 2022). Clinical trial information: NCT02945566. [Table: see text]

The effects of somatostatin analogues on glycaemia in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours

Long-acting somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are the most commonly used drugs in the management of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) because of their ability to control symptoms and prolong survival. SSA use is associated with changes in glucose metabolism. However, the impacts on glycaemic control and body mass index (BMI) caused by SSAs in NETs are largely unknown. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of SSA treatment on BMI and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in our cohort of patients with NETs. We also assessed changes in glycaemic control and BMI before and after SSA treatment. In addition, we assessed the incidence of new diabetes or whether there was worsening of glycaemic control for patients with pre-existing diabetes. The study comprised a retrospective study of 279 patients with NETs who were treated with SSAs between January 2014 and January 2019. Glycaemic control was assessed by measuring changes in Hba1c. A number needed to harm analysis was used to look at new cases of diabetes within the study population. Treatment with SSAs was associated with a mean increase in HbA1c of 3.35 ± 6.30 mmol mol^-1 despite a mean decrease in BMI of -1.04 ± 2.79 kg m^-2 . There were 19 new cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the population of 209 with a number needed to harm of 12.5. Of the 34 patients with pre-existing T2DM, five had worsening of their mean HbA1c. Treatment with SSAs for NETs is associated with an increase in HbA1c, despite a reduction in BMI and, importantly, a risk of developing T2DM with a number needed to harm of 12.5. This project was registered with the National Health Service Clinical Audit and Registries. It has a CARMS number - 17666.

Well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic G3 NET: findings from a large single centre cohort

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are known to have heterogeneous biological behavior. G3 neuroendocrine tumours (NET G3) are characterized by well-differentiated morphology and Ki67 > 20%. The prognosis of this disease is understood to be intermediate between NET G2 and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Clinical management of NET G3 is challenging due to limited data to inform treatment strategies. We describe clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in a large single centre cohort of patients with gastroenteropancreatic NET G3. Data was reviewed from 26 cases managed at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK, from 2012 to 2019. Most commonly the site of the primary tumour was unknown and majority of cases with identifiable primaries originated in the GI tract. Majority of cases demonstrated somatostatin receptor avidity. Median Ki67 was 30%, and most cases had stage IV disease at diagnosis. Treatment options included surgery, somatostatin analogs (SSA), and chemotherapy with either platinum-based or temozolomide-based regimens. Estimated progression free survival was 4 months following initiation of SSA and 3 months following initiation of chemotherapy. Disease control was observed following treatment in 5/11 patients treated with chemotherapy. Estimated median survival was 19 months; estimated 1 year survival was 60% and estimated 2 year survival was 13%. NET G3 is a heterogeneous group of tumours and patients which commonly have advanced disease at presentation. Prognosis is typically poor, though select cases may respond to treatment with SSA and/or chemotherapy. Further study is needed to compare efficacy of different treatment strategies for this disease.

Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer is associated with RAS/AKT mutations and high tumour mutational burden

BACKGROUND

Pathological complete response (pathCR) in rectal cancer is beneficial, as up to 75% of patients do not experience regrowth of the primary tumour, but it is poorly understood. We hypothesised that the changes seen in the pre-treatment biopsies of pathCR but not seen in residual tumour after chemoradiotherapy were the determinants of responsiveness.

METHODS

Two groups of patients with either complete response (pathCR group, N = 24) or no response (poor response group, N = 24) were retrieved. Pre-treatment biopsies of cancers from these patients underwent high read depth amplicon sequencing for a targeted panel, exome sequencing, methylation profiling and immunohistochemistry for DNA repair pathway proteins.

RESULTS

Twenty four patients who underwent pathCR and twenty-four who underwent poor response underwent molecular characterisation. Patients in the pathCR group had significantly higher tumour mutational burden and neoantigen load, frequent copy number alterations but fewer structural variants and enrichment for driver mutations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway. There were no significant differences in tumour heterogeneity as measured by MATH score. Methylation analysis demonstrated enrichment for hypomethyation in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway.

DISCUSSION

The phenomenon of pathCR in rectal cancer may be related to immunovisibility caused by a high tumour mutational burden phenotype. Potential therapy resistance mechanisms involve the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway, but tumour heterogeneity does not seem to play a role in resistance.

Radical surgery versus organ preservation via short-course radiotherapy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early-stage rectal cancer (TREC): a randomised, open-label feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Radical surgery via total mesorectal excision might not be the optimal first-line treatment for early-stage rectal cancer. An organ-preserving strategy with selective total mesorectal excision could reduce the adverse effects of treatment without substantially compromising oncological outcomes. We investigated the feasibility of recruiting patients to a randomised trial comparing an organ-preserving strategy with total mesorectal excision.

METHODS

TREC was a randomised, open-label feasibility study done at 21 tertiary referral centres in the UK. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older with rectal adenocarcinoma, staged T2 or lower, with a maximum diameter of 30 mm or less; patients with lymph node involvement or metastases were excluded. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) by use of a computer-based randomisation service to undergo organ preservation with short-course radiotherapy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery after 8-10 weeks, or total mesorectal excision. Where the transanal endoscopic microsurgery specimen showed histopathological features associated with an increased risk of local recurrence, patients were considered for planned early conversion to total mesorectal excision. A non-randomised prospective registry captured patients for whom randomisation was considered inappropriate, because of a strong clinical indication for one treatment group. The primary endpoint was cumulative randomisation at 12, 18, and 24 months. Secondary outcomes evaluated safety, efficacy, and health-related quality of life assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 and CR29 in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN14422743.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 22, 2012, and Dec 19, 2014, 55 patients were randomly assigned at 15 sites; 27 to organ preservation and 28 to radical surgery. Cumulatively, 18 patients had been randomly assigned at 12 months, 31 at 18 months, and 39 at 24 months. No patients died within 30 days of initial treatment, but one patient randomly assigned to organ preservation died within 6 months following conversion to total mesorectal excision with anastomotic leakage. Eight (30%) of 27 patients randomly assigned to organ preservation were converted to total mesorectal excision. Serious adverse events were reported in four (15%) of 27 patients randomly assigned to organ preservation versus 11 (39%) of 28 randomly assigned to total mesorectal excision (p=0·04, χ2 test). Serious adverse events associated with organ preservation were most commonly due to rectal bleeding or pain following transanal endoscopic microsurgery (reported in three cases). Radical total mesorectal excision was associated with medical and surgical complications including anastomotic leakage (two patients), kidney injury (two patients), cardiac arrest (one patient), and pneumonia (two patients). Histopathological features that would be considered to be associated with increased risk of tumour recurrence if observed after transanal endoscopic microsurgery alone were present in 16 (59%) of 27 patients randomly assigned to organ preservation, versus 24 (86%) of 28 randomly assigned to total mesorectal excision (p=0·03, χ2 test). Eight (30%) of 27 patients assigned to organ preservation achieved a complete response to radiotherapy. Patients who were randomly assigned to organ preservation showed improvements in patient-reported bowel toxicities and quality of life and function scores in multiple items compared to those who were randomly assigned to total mesorectal excision, which were sustained over 36 months' follow-up. The non-randomised registry comprised 61 patients who underwent organ preservation and seven who underwent radical surgery. Non-randomised patients who underwent organ preservation were older than randomised patients and more likely to have life-limiting comorbidities. Serious adverse events occurred in ten (16%) of 61 non-randomised patients who underwent organ preservation versus one (14%) of seven who underwent total mesorectal excision. 24 (39%) of 61 non-randomised patients who underwent organ preservation had high-risk histopathological features, while 25 (41%) of 61 achieved a complete response. Overall, organ preservation was achieved in 19 (70%) of 27 randomised patients and 56 (92%) of 61 non-randomised patients.

INTERPRETATION

Short-course radiotherapy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery achieves high levels of organ preservation, with relatively low morbidity and indications of improved quality of life. These data support the use of organ preservation for patients considered unsuitable for primary total mesorectal excision due to the short-term risks associated with this surgery, and support further evaluation of short-course radiotherapy to achieve organ preservation in patients considered fit for total mesorectal excision. Larger randomised studies, such as the ongoing STAR-TREC study, are needed to more precisely determine oncological outcomes following different organ preservation treatment schedules.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK.

Patterns and Predictors of Relapse Following Radical Chemoradiation Therapy Delivered Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to describe the patterns and predictors of treatment failure in patients receiving definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), delivered using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Our study was a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients treated with curative intent for ASCC using CRT delivered with a standardized IMRT technique in 5 UK cancer centers. Patients were included from the start of UK IMRT guidance from February 2013 to October 31, 2017. Collected data included baseline demographics, treatment details, tumor control, sites of relapse, and overall survival. Statistical analysis to calculate outcomes and predictive factors for outcome measures were performed using SPSS and R.

RESULTS

The medical records of 385 consecutive patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 24.0 months. Within 6 months of completing CRT, 86.7% of patients achieved a complete response. Three-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 75.6% and 85.6%, respectively. Of all relapses, 83.4% occurred at the site of primary disease. There were 2 isolated relapses in regional nodes not involved at outset. Predictive factors for cancer recurrence included male sex, high N-stage, and failure to complete radiation therapy as planned.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment results compare favorably to published outcomes from similar cohorts using 3-dimensional conformal CRT. The observed patterns of failure support the current UK IMRT voluming guidelines and dose levels, highlighting our prophylactic nodal dose as sufficient to prevent isolated regional relapse in uninvolved nodes. Further investigation of strategies to optimize CR should remain a priority in ASCC because the site of primary disease remains the overwhelming site of relapse.

Linear accelerator radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: Updated literature review

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are the leading causing of intra-cerebral haemorrhage. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established treatment for arteriovenous malformations (AVM) and commonly delivered using Gamma Knife within dedicated radiosurgery units. Linear accelerator (LINAC) SRS is increasingly available however debate remains over whether it offers an equivalent outcome. The aim of this project is to evaluate the outcomes using LINAC SRS for AVMs used within a UK neurosciences unit and review the literature to aid decision making across various SRS platforms. Results have shown comparability across platforms and strongly supports that an adapted LINAC based SRS facility within a dynamic regional neuro-oncology department delivers similar outcomes (in terms of obliteration and toxicity) to any other dedicated radio-surgical platform. Locally available facilities can facilitate discussion between options however throughput will inevitably be lower than centrally based dedicated national radiosurgery units.

Wide Variation in the Use of Radiotherapy in the Management of Surgically Treated Rectal Cancer Across the English National Health Service

AIMS

Radiotherapy is an important treatment modality in the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. It is delivered both in the neoadjuvant setting and postoperatively, but, although it reduces local recurrence, it does not influence overall survival and increases the risk of long-term complications. This has led to a variety of international practice patterns. These variations can have a significant effect on commissioning, but also future clinical research. This study explores its use within the large English National Health Service (NHS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Information on all individuals diagnosed with a surgically treated rectal cancer between April 2009 and December 2010 were extracted from the Radiotherapy Dataset linked to the National Cancer Data Repository. Individuals were grouped into those receiving no radiotherapy, short-course radiotherapy with immediate surgery (SCRT-I), short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery (SCRT-D), long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT), other radiotherapy (ORT) and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). Patterns of use were then investigated.

RESULTS

The study consisted of 9201 individuals; 4585 (49.3%) received some form of radiotherapy. SCRT-I was used in 12.1%, SCRT-D in 1.2%, LCCRT in 29.5%, ORT in 4.7% and PORT in 2.3%. Radiotherapy was used more commonly in men and in those receiving an abdominoperineal excision and less commonly in the elderly and those with comorbidity. Significant and substantial variations were also seen in its use across all the multidisciplinary teams managing this disease.

CONCLUSION

Despite the same evidence base, wide variation exists in both the use of and type of radiotherapy delivered in the management of rectal cancer across the English NHS. Prospective population-based collection of local recurrence and patient-reported early and late toxicity information is required to further improve patient selection for preoperative radiotherapy.

Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities for the association of coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

AIM

The modified Delphi approach is an established method for reaching a consensus opinion among a group of experts in a particular field. We have used this technique to survey the entire membership of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) to reach a consensus on prioritizing clinical research questions in colorectal disease.

METHOD

Three rounds of surveys were conducted using a web-based tool. In the first, the ACPGBI membership was invited to submit research questions. In Rounds 2 and 3 they were asked to score questions on priority. A steering group analysed the results of each round to identify those questions ranked as being of highest priority.

RESULTS

Five hundred and two questions were submitted in Round 1. Following two rounds of voting and analysis, a list of 25 priority questions was produced, including 15 cancer-related and 10 noncancer-related questions.

CONCLUSION

It is anticipated that these results will: (i) set the research agenda over the next few years for the study of colorectal disease in the United Kingdom, (ii) promote development and (iii) define funding of new research and prioritize areas of unmet clinical need where the potential clinical impact is greatest.

Tumor-related and treatment-related colostomy-free survival (CFS) following chemoradiation (CRT) using mitomycin (MMC) or cisplatin (CisP), with or without maintenance 5FU/CisP chemotherapy (CT) in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA): Results of ACT II

3532

Background: Concurrent CRT is standard treatment for patients (pts) with SCCA. We explore tumor- and treatment-related CFS in a phase III trial (ACT II), which mandated standardised radiation fields and a uniform dose (50.4Gy in 28 daily fractions of 1.8Gy). Methods: The ACT II trial (940 pts) compared both CisP (n=468) versus MMC (n=472) combined with 5-FU/CRT, and 2 cycles of maintenance CT (Maint, n=448) versus none (No-maint, n=446). We investigated the association between CFS and baseline factors (age, sex, T stage, size of tumour, nodal status) and treatment using Cox regression. CFS events included baseline colostomies not reversed at first follow up after treatment and post-treatment colostomies. Results: Median follow-up (all pts) was 5.1 years. Median age: 58 years; tumour site – canal (84%), margin (14%); stage T1-T2 (52%), T3-T4 (46%); N+ (32%), N0 (62%). Of 884 evaluable patients only 20/118 (17%) baseline colostomies were reversed within 8 months, and 37 later. 112 pts had a post-treatment colostomy due to persistent disease (98) or morbidity (14). The 5-year CFS rates by stage were 86% T1, 77% T2, 57% T3 and 47% T4; 72% N0, 60% N+; by treatment arm 68% MMC/Maint, 70% CisP/Maint, 68% MMC/No-maint and 65% CisP/No-maint respectively. The 5-year CFS rates were 72% and 60% for N0 and N+ respectively. The most significant predictors of colostomy in multivariable Cox regression analyses were T stage, sex and baseline haemoglobin (p<0.001 for all). Men were more at risk than women (adjusted HR 1.64; 95% CI: 1.26, 2.14). Age, site of primary or treatment did not impact on CFS. Although significant in univariate analysis, nodal status did not influence CFS when adjusted for other baseline factors. Conclusions: In the largest trial in anal cancer, neither the type of CRT (5FU/CisP vs. 5FU/MMC) nor maintenance chemotherapy improved CFS. 34% (61/177) of all colostomies were baseline fashioned prior to treatment and never reversed after all treatments. The major predictive factors for CFS were T stage, sex and haemoglobin levels. Clinical trial information: NCT00025090.

SCOPE 1: A phase II/III trial of chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer plus or minus cetuximab

LBA3

Background: SCOPE 1 is the largest multicentre trial of definitive chemo-radiotherapy (dCRT) in localised oesophageal cancer (LOC) in the UK and investigated adding cetuximab to standard cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine treatment. Methods: Patients in this phase II/III trial had LOC and been selected to receive dCRT and were randomised to receive cisplatin 60mg/m2 D1 and capecitabine 625mg/m2 daily D1-21 for 4 cycles, cycles 3 and 4 given concurrently with 50Gy in 25 fractions of RT with or without cetuximab 400mg/m2 D1 followed by 250mg/m2weekly. Recruitment continued from 02/2008 until analysis of the phase II endpoint (24 week failure free survival in the cetuximab arm, overall sample size 180: p1=0.60 and p2=0.75, α=0.05, β=0.9) in 01/2012. The phase II endpoint was not met and the IDMC recommended trial closure on the basis of futility. Results: 258 patients were recruited. Median age 67; morphology(%) SCC:ACA 73:27; tumour location(%) upper:middle:lower 11:45:44; stage(%) I:II:III 3:37:60; reason not for surgery(%) disease extent:patient choice:comorbidity 47:38:16. Patients who received cetuximab had: higher non-haematologic toxicity (78 vs 62.8%, p=0.004; primarily dermatological (22 vs 4%) and metabolic (24% vs 11%)); a lower rate of completion of standard therapy (capecitabine 69 vs 85%, p=0.002; cisplatin 77 vs 90%, p=0.005 and radiotherapy (75 vs 86%, p=0.027); reduced failure free survival at 24 weeks (66 vs 77%), median survival (22 vs 25 months, log rank p=0.043) and 2-yr survival (41 vs 56%). Conclusions: In SCOPE 1, disease control and survival in the standard dCRT arm is superior to any previous published multi-centre studies. The use of cetuximab was associated with greater toxicity, lower doses of dCRT and worse survival. Cetuximab cannot be recommended in combination with standard dCRT for unselected patients with oesophageal cancer. Strategies to build on these results should incorporate biomarker driven treatment and latest radiotherapy technologies to safely intensify treatment. This trial was sponsored by Velindre NHS Trust, conducted by Wales Cancer Trials Unit at Cardiff University and supported by CR-UK [grant number C20177/A7256]. Clinical trial information: 47718479.