Failure of a reinforced triple course of hepatitis B vaccination in patients transplanted for HBV-related cirrhosis

Different effect of HBV vaccine after liver transplantation between chronic HBV carriers and non-HBV patients who received HBcAb-positive grafts

BACKGROUND

Combination of nucleos(t)ide analogue and anti-HBs immunoglobulin (HBIg) is the standard protocol for prevention of HBV reactivation after liver transplantation, but because of the extremely high cost of HBIg, HBV vaccine is tried as a much cheaper and potentially safer substitute. Here we show the different effect of HBV vaccine between chronic HBV carrier and non-HBV patients who received grafts from HBc antibody-positive donors.

METHODS

Fifteen chronic HBV carriers and 6 non-HBV patients who received grafts from HBc antibody-positive donors were included in this study. These patients received double dose of pre-S-containing HBV vaccine every month from later than 12 months after liver transplantation. Successful vaccination was defined as HBsAb >100 IU/l without HBIg administration for 3 months.

RESULTS

None of the 15 chronic HBV carriers succeeded in maintaining high enough HBsAb titers. In contrast, 5 of 6 non-HBV patients with HBcAb-positive donors achieved HBsAb >100 IU/l without HBIg coadministration. Recipient HBV status (HBV carrier/non-HBV) was considered to have a stronger effect on vaccine success (p < 0.001) though recipient age (p = 0.006) was also selected as a significant factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Recipient HBV status seems to be the most important factor affecting success of HBV vaccine after liver transplantation. In non-HBV patients who received grafts from HBcAb-positive donors, HBV vaccination is an effective, cost-saving, and safe method for prevention of HBV reactivations. In contrast in chronic HBV patients, response rate was quite poor, so some modifications such as combination with adjuvant or modification of administration schedules should be considered.

One-year vaccination against hepatitis B virus with a MPL-vaccine in liver transplant patients for HBV-related cirrhosis

Conflicting results have been reported on vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) as a prophylaxis against viral recurrence after liver transplantation. We investigated the efficacy of 1-year, monthly vaccination using an adjuvant 3-deacylated monophosphoryl-lipid-A (MPL) recombinant S vaccine initially administered together with hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) in 18 patients transplanted for HBV-related cirrhosis. All received 12 vaccine doses (HBsAg, 20 mcg plus MPL, 50 mcg): the initial six doses (phase I) were administered within 7days after intravenous HBIg (2000IU), while the last 6 (phase II) following HBIg withdrawal. All patients received lamivudine during the study. Anti-HBs titers were determined before each dose and then for 1year after vaccination. After phase I anti-HBs titers were greater than 100IU/l in all patients and in three (16.6%) were greater than 500IU/l. After phase II 10 patients (55.5%) achieved anti-HBs titers greater than 100IU/l and five (27.7%) greater than 500IU/l. One year after vaccination eight patients (44.4%) maintained anti-HBs titers greater than 100IU/l, with a median titer of 234IU/l (102-1205), and 2 (11.1%) greater than 500IU/l. One-year extended monthly vaccination with a MPL-adjuvant recombinant vaccine induces a sustained protective anti-HBs response in approximately half of transplant recipients.

Management of end-stage liver disease in chronic hepatitis B

The consequences of chronic hepatitis B virus infection include hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis. Effective antiviral therapy in patients with hepatitis B with advanced liver disease with viral suppression and sustained HBeAg seroconversion (where applicable) may abort hepatic decompensation, diminish hepatocellular risk, and reduce the risk of viral recurrence after transplantation. Overt hepatic decompensation is an indication for referral to a transplant center.

Long-term efficacy of nucleoside monotherapy in preventing HBV infection in HBsAg-negative recipients of anti-HBc-positive donor livers

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection occurs in up to 87.5% of HBsAg-negative recipients of anti-HBc-positive donor livers in the absence of HBV prophylaxis. There is no standardized prophylactic regimen to prevent HBV infection in this setting. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy of nucleoside analogue to prevent HBV infection in this setting.

METHODS

A retrospective study of HBsAg-negative patients receiving liver transplantation (LT) from anti-HBc-positive donors during a 10-year period.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were studied, mean age was 50.2 ± 8.3 years, 40% were men, and 90% were Caucasian. The median MELD score at the time of LT was 18 (12-40). None of the patients received hepatitis B immune globulin. Eighteen patients received nucleoside analogue monotherapy: 10 received lamivudine and 8 received entecavir. None of these 18 patients developed HBV infection after a median follow up of 32 (1-75) months. One patient received a second course of hepatitis B vaccine 50 months after LT with anti-HBs titer above 1,000 mIU/mL. Lamivudine was discontinued and the patient remained HBsAg negative 18 months after withdrawal of lamivudine. Two patients who were anti-HBs positive before LT were not started on HBV prophylaxis after LT; both developed HBV infection after LT.

CONCLUSIONS

Nucleoside monotherapy is sufficient in preventing HBV infection in HBsAg-negative recipients of anti-HBc-positive donor livers. HBV prophylaxis is necessary in anti-HBs-positive recipients of anti-HBc-positive donor livers.

HBIg discontinuation with maintenance oral anti-viral therapy and HBV vaccination in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B (HBV) is an uncommon indication for liver transplantation in the US accounting for approximately 5% of cases. Recurrence prophylaxis is typically long-term hepatitis B immune-globulin (HBIg) and an oral anti-HBV agent. Because of high HBIg costs and improving efficacy of new oral agents, there is increasing interest in HBIg discontinuation.

AIM

To describe results of a protocol at our center including HBV vaccination and HBIg discontinuation.

METHODS

All patients received HBIg therapy and an oral anti-viral agent from the time of transplant. Patients transplanted for HBV with a stable post-operative clinical course underwent HBV vaccination and HBIg discontinuation. After HBIg discontinuation, patients were monitored for HBV recurrence for at least one year. Recurrence was defined as either viral (HBV-DNA 10(4) copies/ml on two consecutive occasions) or hepatitis (viral recurrence with elevated liver transaminases).

RESULTS

Of 1182 recipients, 36 (3%) had HBV. Twenty-four were excluded from the protocol, and the remaining 12 patients underwent HBIg withdrawal. Median age at HBIg discontinuation was 56 (range, 36-70) years, median time from transplant to HBIg discontinuation was 62.8 (range, 27.5-128) months, and median time of follow-up after discontinuation was 27.4 (range, 13-69) months. Of the 12 patients vaccinated, no patients maintained HBSAb >or= 10 IU/l at last follow-up. There was no viral or hepatitis recurrence and no deaths or graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

HBIg discontinuation with maintenance oral anti-viral monotherapy is safe and effective for HBV liver transplant recipients. Vaccination is not effective in this population.

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis B reinfection in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients after liver transplantation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are associated with increased graft failure and reduced patient survival. We evaluated the effects of both HCC recurrence and HBV reinfection on the long-term survival of these patients after OLT. One hundred seventy-five patients underwent OLT for HBV-related liver diseases and were the subjects of this retrospective study. We assessed risk factors for HBV reinfection, HCC recurrence, and survival post-OLT using univariate and multivariate analyses. During a mean follow-up of 43.0 +/- 42.0 months, 88 of 175 (50.3%) patients transplanted for HBV-related liver disease had HCC prior to OLT. Thirteen (14.8%) of these patients had HCC recurrence after OLT. The mean time for recurrence of HCC was 26.1 +/- 31.9 months. Twelve of 175 (6.9%) patients developed HBV reinfection after liver transplantation. The mean time for HBV reinfection was 28.7 +/- 26.4 months. Ten of these 12 (83.3%) patients had HCC prior to OLT, and 5 (50%) developed recurrence of HCC. On multivariate analyses, pre-OLT HCC and recurrence of HCC post-OLT were significantly associated with HBV reinfection after transplantation (P = 0.031 and P < 0.001, respectively). HCC recurrence after OLT was associated with lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001) and post-OLT chemotherapy (P < or = 0.001). The 3- and 5-year survival rates were significantly decreased in patients with HBV reinfection (P = 0.007) and in patients with HCC recurrence after OLT (P = 0.03). In conclusion, pre-OLT HCC and HCC recurrence after transplantation were associated with HBV reinfection and with decreased patient survival. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin and antiviral therapy was only partially effective in preventing HBV reinfection in patients with HCC recurrence.

Current management of hepatitis B virus infection before and after liver transplantation

The progress in treatment against hepatitis B virus (HBV) has substantially improved the outcome of all HBV-infected patients. We systematically reviewed the existing data in the management of HBV transplant patients in order to assess the optimal regimen in the pretransplant setting, for post-transplant prophylaxis and for therapy of HBV recurrent infection. All data suggest that an effective pretransplant anti-HBV therapy prevents post-transplant HBV recurrence. Pretransplant therapy has been based on lamivudine with addition of adefovir upon lamivudine resistance, but the use of newer, potent high-genetic barrier agents is expected to improve long-term efficacy. Moreover, it may lead to improvement of liver function, which sometimes removes the need for transplantation, although more objective criteria for removal from waiting lists are required. After liver transplantation, the combination of HBV immunoglobulin and one nucleos(t)ide analogue, mostly lamivudine, is currently the best approach, almost eliminating the probability of HBV recurrence. Treatment of post-transplant HBV recurrence has been mainly studied with lamivudine, but it will be most effective with entecavir and tenofovir, which have a low risk of resistance. In conclusion, the newer anti-HBV agents improve the treatment of HBV both pretransplant and post-transplant. HBV immunoglobulin is still used in combination with an anti-HBV agent for post-transplant prophylaxis. Monoprophylaxis with one of the new anti-HBV agents might be possible, particularly in patients preselected as having a low risk of HBV recurrence, but further data are needed and strategies to ensure compliance must be used.

A review of multiple approaches towards an improved hepatitis B vaccine

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B is a DNA virus that can cause liver inflammation, cirrhosis, and cancer in chronically infected and symptomatic carriers. Antiviral treatments are usually limited in their effectiveness in treating the disease states. Vaccination against hepatitis B in pediatric and adolescent populations has proven to be a generally effective means for preventing diseases that could be potentially caused by this virus. Some 5 - 10% of the vaccinees do not develop protective immunity against the virus. Therefore, a significant amount of effort has been made in many research laboratories across the world to increase the potency of the vaccine by various innovative means, e.g., increasing the immunogenicity of the antigen or through introduction of novel adjuvants that elicit strong humoral and cell-mediated immune responses.

OBJECTIVES/METHODS

The objective of this review is to highlight publications of significant developments that have been made over the past decade and efforts that are continuing towards producing an improved vaccine. A number of patents that protect novel hepatitis B vaccine formulations, including those claiming novel hepatitis B core antigen formulations and combinations of a vaccine with small molecule therapeutics, are discussed.

CONCLUSION

There have been promising developments in the area of new adjuvants and delivery systems. The practical need for reducing the total number of childhood vaccinations has driven development of, and patent filings on, multivalent and combination vaccine formulations in which the hepatitis B vaccine is included as one component. Efforts and some advances have also been made in the critical area of therapeutic application of the vaccine. The existence of a large population of already infected patients and the inadequacy of most of the current antiviral drugs against hepatitis B diseases have also inspired efforts to produce a vaccine that would be efficacious in clearing an exiting infection.

Recombinant interferon-alpha2b improves immune response to hepatitis B vaccination in haemodialysis patients: results of a randomised clinical trial

The use of adjuvants capable of improving the deficient immune response to hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine in haemodialysis patients is highly needed. Among potential adjuvants, type I interferons deserve a special attention in view of their known effects promoting cellular and humoral immune responses. The aim of the present trial was to evaluate the effects of recombinant interferon-alpha2b (IFN) administered as an adjuvant of HBV vaccine in unvaccinated haemodialysis patients. A significant and early enhancing effect on the antibody response was observed in patients receiving IFN. In addition, a predominance of IgG1 anti-HBs along with a transient normalization of circulating Th1 lymphocytes was only found in patients receiving IFN who achieved an early seroprotection. However, 6 months after the last vaccine dose, no significant differences were observed in the seroprotection rate achieved in patients vaccinated with IFN compared to that in patients receiving HBV vaccine alone. Mild to moderate fever, asthenia, and arthromyalgia were the most common reactions that occurred in vaccinees given IFN. In conclusion, addition of IFN to HBV vaccine, under the conditions used in this trial, is safe and achieves an earlier and higher seroprotection rate improving Th1-dependent immune response in haemodialysis patients.

Current prophylactic strategies against hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation

Prophylactic strategies against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) are essential for patients with HBV-related disease. Before LT, lamivudine (LAM) was proposed to be down-graded from first- to second-line therapy. In contrast, adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) has been approved not only as first-line therapy but also as rescue therapy for patients with LAM resistance. Furthermore, combination of ADV and LAM may result in lower risk of ADV resistance than ADV monotherapy. Other new drugs such as entecavir, telbivudine and tenofovir, are probably candidates for the treatment of hepatitis-B-surface-antigen-positive patients awaiting LT. After LT, low-dose intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG), in combination with LAM, has been regarded as the most cost-effective regimen for the prevention of post-transplant HBV recurrence in recipients without pretransplant LAM resistance and rapidly accepted in many transplant centers. With the introduction of new antiviral drugs, new hepatitis B vaccine and its new adjuvants, post-transplant HBIG-free therapeutic regimens with new oral antiviral drug combinations or active HBV vaccination combined with adjuvants will be promising, particularly in those patients with low risk of HBV recurrence.

The option of liver transplantation for hepatitis B: where are we?

Combination therapy with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) plus nucleos(t)ide analogue have reduced the rate of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence post-transplantation to less than 10% at long-term. HBV recurrence diagnosed after 3 years post-transplantation is extremely rare. Considering the cost and the constraints of HBV prophylaxis it was suggested to decrease the amount of HBIG given and possibly to discontinue HBIG administration. The additional debate was on the need to maintain or not any HBV prophylaxis at long-term or to maintain monoprophylaxis with one or two nucleos(t)ide analogues or to administer HBV vaccine: The supporters of this strategy argued that HBV recurrence can be easily controlled by administration of nucleos(t)ide analogues. However, it was shown that 50-80% of patients maintain HBV DNA in the liver, serum or peripheral mononuclear blood cells long-term after transplantation. In patients receiving monoprophylaxis with nucleos(t)ide analogues the risk of HBV reinfection increases with time due to HBV mutant strains. Vaccine protocols used to replace HBIG prophylaxis gave disappointing results. Combination protocols using low-doses of intramuscular HBIG plus nucleos(t)ide analogues have been associated with a low rate of HBV reinfection. In conclusion, long-term prophylaxis should be maintained in most patients except those with anti-HBs seroconversion.

Hepatitis B vaccination: The key towards elimination and eradication of hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus infection is a global health problem. Worldwide, about 360 million people are chronically infected with the virus. They continue to spread the virus to others and are themselves at risk of chronic liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma. The infection can now be treated by antivirals or interferons and the transmission route can be interrupted. Nevertheless, the most effective means is to immunize all susceptible individuals, especially young children, with safe and efficacious vaccines. The combined efforts of vaccination, effective treatment and interruption of transmission make elimination of the infection plausible and may eventually lead to eradication of the virus. Because hepatitis B vaccination has a key role in the control of hepatitis B, properties of this vaccine, its effectiveness in pre-exposure and post-exposure settings, duration of protection after vaccination and the need of booster doses are discussed. Mass hepatitis B vaccination in children decreases the carriage of the virus, and the diseases associated with acute and chronic infection, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Challenges that need to be solved to expand mass vaccination, and the strategies towards elimination and eventual eradication of hepatitis B in the world are also discussed.

Successful hepatitis B vaccination in liver transplant recipients with donor-specific hyporesponsiveness

Currently, patients are prescribed lifelong treatment with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related diseases in order to prevent reinfection with HBV. Active immunization with an HBV vaccine would be a preferable alternative; however, the immunosuppressive environment in LT recipients is believed to elicit a poor response to vaccination. Minimizing the exposure of the HBV-infected LT recipients to immunosuppressants would be beneficial in inducing adaptive immunity against HBV by vaccination. In this study, in addition to efforts to minimize immunosuppression, prophylaxis with HBV vaccination combined with continuous HBIg administration was performed in 17 LT recipients who had undergone transplantation attributable to HBV-related diseases. During the observation period, the overall response rate to HBV vaccination was 64.7%. The immune status of the recipients was evaluated by a mixed lymphocyte reaction assay in response to allostimulation. Patients showing a donor-specific hyporesponse with a well-maintained response to the third-party stimulus always achieved a sustained immune response to the vaccine, whereas patients showing a hyporesponse to both the donor and the third-party stimulus were unable to do so. Thus, inducing an anti-donor-specific immunosuppressive status by minimizing immunosuppression should enable post-transplant HBV vaccination to be a promising prophylactic strategy.

[Adequate rate of response to hepatitis B virus vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) may have an increased risk of developing hepatitis B virus (HB) infection. Invasive procedures such as colonoscopies and surgery might be some of the reasons for this. Moreover, the use of immunosuppressors may reactivate a latent infection. We assessed the immune status among IBD patients receiving HB vaccine and the circumstances that predicted its results.

AIMS AND METHODS

Serological markers of B and C hepatitis virus in patients with IBD who were referred for consultation were assessed since 2006. The subsequent determination of antibodies against superficial antigen (HBsAb) could differentiate between responders and non responders to the vaccine and an adequate immunity to HB was defined as higher than 10mUI/ml.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty nine patients were included in our study. Fifty-six (43,4%) patients had received immunosuppressive medication before the first vaccine dose. Notably, 85 (65.9%) patients had inadequate levels of HBsAb: 36 had no detectable levels and 49 had less than 10mUI/ml. Younger patients had a better immunity response than older patients (30.91+/-14.8 vs 39.91+/-14.2) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

More than half of the patients had a suboptimal serologic response after vaccination. Only the younger group showed a better rate of response. It was not demonstrated whether an additional fourth dose of vaccination or a complete revaccination improved the rate of responders.

Double-dose double-phase use of second generation hepatitis B virus vaccine in patients after living donor liver transplantation: Not an effective measure in transplant recipients

AIMS

Post-transplant active immunization for chronic hepatitis B patients has been attempted in several studies with controversial results. We assessed the effect of a double-dose double-phase vaccination regimen among partial living donor liver recipients.

METHODS

Eighteen patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for chronic hepatitis B and two non-hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients who received hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive donor organs were recruited 18-78 months after LT. All were on hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) mono-prophylaxis before and throughout vaccination, to maintain hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) titers of more than 100 IU/mL. Recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen vaccine (40 microg) was administered intramuscularly during weeks 0, 4, 8, 24, 28 and 32.

RESULTS

The patients consisted of 15 males and five females with a median age of 52 (39-59) years. None developed a sufficient HBsAb titer above 500 IU/mL by week 48. In two patients whose maximum HBsAb titer increased to above 300 IU/mL, we attempted to skip HBIG, but shortly thereafter the titer dropped below 100 IU/mL and HBIG administration was resumed. Although the HBIG dose was reduced during and after vaccination, cessation of administration was not achieved.

CONCLUSION

Double-dose double-phase use of second generation recombinant vaccine was not effective in this study population. The selected population should be targeted for a conventional vaccine regimen, and different approaches, such as strong adjuvant or pre-S containing protein, should be further tested in a larger number of patients after LT for chronic hepatitis B.

Cutaneous delivery of prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines: historical perspective and future outlook

The skin has long been recognized as an attractive target for vaccine administration. A number of clinical studies have tested the epidermal and dermal routes of delivery using a variety of vaccines over the years. In many cases, cutaneous administration has been associated with immunological benefits, such as the induction of greater immune responses compared with those elicited by conventional routes of delivery. Furthermore, there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that such benefits may be particularly important for certain higher-risk populations, such as the elderly, the immunocompromised and cancer patients. Despite the potential advantages of vaccination via the skin, results have sometimes been conflicting and the full benefits of this approach have not been fully realized, partly due to the lack of delivery devices that accurately and reproducibly administer vaccines to the skin. The 5-year outlook, however, appears quite promising as new cutaneous delivery systems advance through clinical trials and become available for more widespread clinical and commercial use.

Liver transplantation in viral hepatitis: prevention of recurrence

End-stage liver disease caused by the hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV) are major indications for liver transplantation. Outcome depends largely on the prevention of allograft reinfection. The advent of long-term hepatitis B immune globulin administration and the introduction of new antiviral agents were a major breakthrough in the management of these patients. Today, survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is similar to that of patients transplanted for HBsAg-negative liver disease, and the risk of recurrence is below 10%. In contrast, HCV reinfection is almost constant and significantly impairs patient and graft survival. Factors that may influence disease severity and consequently progression of HCV graft injury remain unclear. Pre-transplantation and prophylactic post-transplantation antiviral treatments are limited by low applicability and poor tolerance. Treatment of established graft lesions with combination therapy gave promising results, with sustained virological response in 25-45% of patients, but indications, modality and duration of treatment should be assessed.

A randomized study of adefovir dipivoxil in place of HBIG in combination with lamivudine as post-liver transplantation hepatitis B prophylaxis

Prior to effective prophylaxis, liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related disease was frequently complicated by recurrence, which could be severe and rapidly progressive. Combination hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and lamivudine prophylaxis reduces this rate of recurrence to <5% at 5 years; however, HBIG administration is costly and inconvenient. We conducted a multicenter randomized study of adefovir dipivoxil substitution for low-dose intramuscular (IM) HBIG in patients without HBV recurrence at least 12 months posttransplantation for HBV-related disease. Thirty-four patients were randomized, 16 to adefovir (1 patient withdrew consent at 3 months and is not considered in the results) and 18 to continue HBIG. All continued lamivudine. Groups were well matched by age, sex, and time since transplantation (median, 4.5 years), and background virological risk for HBV recurrence (30% of patients in the adefovir group, 24% in the HBIG group having detectable HBV DNA at transplantation). All patients were alive at study completion without recurrence. One patient in the adefovir group became hepatitis B surface antigen-positive at 5 months but was persistently HBV DNA undetectable via polymerase chain reaction (sensitivity 14 IU/mL) over the following 20 months. Median creatinine was not significantly changed over the course of the study in either group. One patient in the adefovir group with a background of diabetic and hypertensive nephropathy (baseline creatinine 150 micromol/L) developed increased creatinine leading to dose reduction and ultimately cessation of adefovir at 15 months. Yearly cost of combination adefovir/lamivudine prophylaxis was $8,290 versus $13,718 IM HBIG/lamivudine.

CONCLUSION

Compared with combination HBIG plus lamivudine prophylaxis, combination adefovir plus lamivudine provides equivalent protection against recurrent HBV infection but with better tolerability and less cost.

[Liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B]

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B represents 5-10 % of all liver transplantations performed in Europe. The prognosis after liver transplantation is related to the efficacy of prophylaxis of HBV graft reinfection. The risk of HBV reinfection is directly related to the HBV viral load at transplantation. HBV prophylaxis after transplantation with long-term administration of anti-HBS immune globulins (HBIG) or with monoprophylaxis with lamivudine can reduce significantly the risk of HBV recurrence mainly in patients without active HBV replication. Antivirals such as lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir or tenofovir can control HBV replication in patients with decompensated HBV cirrhosis waiting for transplantation. However, there is a risk of HBV viral breakthrough during nucleo (t) side antiviral treatment. The use of an antiviral alone or in combination should take into account the antiviral efficacy and the risk of viral resistance. The post-transplant combination of antiviral therapy and HBIG prophylaxis is very effective in reducing the rate of HBV reinfection to less than 10 % even in patients with HBV replication at transplantation. In the absence of active viral replication at transplantation, the possibilty to discontinue HBIG prophylaxis at long-term after transplantation with maintenance of antiviral treatment or HBV vaccination is in evaluation. The use of new antiviral therapies (nucleos(t)ide analogues) has dramatically improved the prognosis of patients with HBV reinfection of the graft. The current 5-year survival after liver transplantation for HBV related liver disease is 85 %. In conclusion, the prophylaxis of HBV reinfection combining antiviral therapy prior to transplantation, and combination of HBIG and antiviral therapy post-transplantation is effective in reducing the rate of HBV reinfection to less than 10 %.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B: what is the best hepatitis B immune globulin/antiviral regimen?

1. Prophylaxis using the combination of lamivudine and high-dose intravenous hepatitis B immunoglobulin (approximately 10,000 IU monthly) reduces the long-term risk of recurrence of hepatitis B in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive transplant recipients to 5% to 10%. However, this therapy is expensive and inconvenient for patients. 2. Recent studies have shown that similar results can be obtained, at far less cost, with much lower doses of intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin (400-800 IU monthly) in combination with pretransplant and posttransplant lamivudine therapy. 3. The development of lamivudine resistance pre-transplant can lead to hepatic decompensation and increases the risk of posttransplant recurrence in patients receiving hepatitis B immune globulin/lamivudine prophylaxis. Newer nucleos(t)ide analogues with lower resistance rates such as entecavir, adefovir, and tenofovir should therefore replace lamivudine in hepatitis B prophylaxis. 4. Combination therapy with these newer agents and low-dose intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin is likely to be the most cost effective hepatitis B immune globulin-containing regimen for the prevention of hepatitis B recurrence post-transplant. 5. Some form of hepatitis B virus prophylaxis needs be continued indefinitely post-transplant. However, the use of antivirals with very low rates of drug resistance will make it possible to stop hepatitis B immune globulin therapy in many patients currently receiving hepatitis B immune globulin/nucleos(t)ide combination therapy.

Adherence to Lamivudine after an early withdrawal of hepatitis B immune globulin plays an important role in the long-term prevention of hepatitis B virus recurrence

Lamivudine combined with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) is the standard of care for preventing the recurrence hepatitis B virus after liver transplant. To determine the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after early withdrawal of HBIg in patients receiving lamivudine maintenance therapy, 20 patients receiving a course of HBIg and lamivudine after transplantation and long-term maintenance therapy with lamivudine and 9 patients receiving HBIg and lamivudine indefinitely were analyzed. The survival rate was 90% after a mean follow-up of 83 months. The HBV recurrence rate was 14% with a mean period of 91 months free from HBV recurrence. Both groups had similar HBV recurrence rates, 15% for the combination and 11% for lamivudine alone. Four patients, 3 of whom were noncompliant with therapy, experienced posttransplant HBV recurrence. Patients who adhere to long-term prophylaxis with lamivudine after early withdrawal of HBIg have a low risk of HBV recurrence, similar to those who receive combination prophylaxis.

Hepatitis B vaccination after living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of hepatitis B vaccination after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients transplanted anti-HBc-positive grafts or in patients who underwent LDLT for fulminant hepatitis B remains unknown.

METHOD

A total of 11 recipients who underwent LDLT between October 1996 and October 2002 prospectively received hepatitis B vaccination three times within 6 months, starting a few weeks after the cessation of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) prophylaxis. Serial quantification of the hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) was performed.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, six out of 11 patients (54.5%) had seroconversion and were free from HBIG thereafter. Four out of those six responders had a peak HBsAb level of more than 1000 IU/L, while the other two patients had peak HbsAb levels below 1000 IU/L. Five patients never responded to the treatment and were back to HBIG prophylaxis. The average age of the six responders was 25.5 years, which was significantly younger than that of non-responders (44.4 years, P<0.05). None had side effects or hepatitis B infection during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the use of this treatment modality could be used to reduce the cost of HBIG.

Viral hepatitis after liver transplantation

Recurrence of the original liver disease following liver transplantation is a typical complication in viral hepatitis. Recent advances, particularly the development of strategies to prevent or effectively treat hepatitis B, have led to substantial improvements in the post-transplantation outcome of hepatitis B candidates. While the efficacy of antivirals to treatrecurrent hepatitis C has improved in recent years, there is as yet no therapy to universally prevent recurrent infection, and tolerability of antivirals remains a matter of concern.

Induction of anti-HBs in HB vaccine nonresponders in vivo by hepatitis B surface antigen-pulsed blood dendritic cells

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Antigen-pulsed dendritic cells (DCs) are now used for treatment of patients with cancers, however, the efficacy of these DCs has never been evaluated for prophylactic purposes. The aim of this study was (1) to prepare hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-pulsed human blood DCs, (2) to assess immunogenicity of HBsAg-pulsed DCs in vitro and (3) to evaluate the efficacy of HBsAg-pulsed DCs in hepatitis B (HB) vaccine nonresponders.

METHODS

Human peripheral blood DCs were cultured with HBsAg to prepare HBsAg-pulsed DCs. The expression of immunogenic epitopes of HBsAg on HBsAg-pulsed DCs was assessed in vitro. Finally, HBsAg-pulsed DCs were administered, intradermally to six HB vaccine nonresponders and the levels of antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) in the sera were assessed.

RESULTS

HB vaccine nonresponders did not exhibit features of immediate, early or delayed adverse reactions due to administration of HBsAg-pulsed DCs. Anti-HBs were detected in the sera of all HB vaccine nonresponders within 28 days after administration of HBsAg-pulsed DCs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study opens a new field of application of antigen-pulsed DCs for prophylactic purposes when adequate levels of protective antibody cannot be induced by traditional vaccination approaches.

[The prophylaxis against post-liver-transplant hepatitis B re-infection]

OBJECTIVE

To review the prophylaxis against post-liver transplantation hepatitis B reinfection with anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin and nucleoside analogues.

METHOD

A bibliographic search was carried out using Pubmed, entering the following key words: hepatitis B and liver transplantation and (hepatitis B hyperimmune globulin and lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil) up to June 2006. The initial search was filtered using the terms clinical trial, randomized clinical trial and review. The data contained in selected studies were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 53 works were found. Prophylaxis with anti-HB immunoglobulin and lamivudine is the best strategy for avoiding recurrence of the hepatitis B virus in patients undergoing hepatic transplants; achieving very low reinfection rates (0-10%) with follow up periods of between 1-5 years. There is a great degree of variability (dose, duration and method of HBIg administration) in the prophylactic protocols reviewed. The use of low doses of anti-HB immunoglobulin (administered intravenously followed by intramuscular administration, or administered intramuscularly from the anhepatic stage), and lamivudine in patients who receive transplants with a low risk of recurrence, shows prophylactic efficacy comparable to the use of high doses of anti-HB immunoglobulin. Furthermore, it implies a considerable reduction in costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of suitably designed clinical trials is required to design a more cost-effective protocol and reduce variability.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related cirrhosis: recent advances

In the absence of preventative therapy, deceased-donor liver transplantation indicated for hepatitis B virus (HBV) cirrhosis results in dismal graft and patient survival due to HBV infection of the liver graft. Major advances in the management of HBV-infected recipients during the past 15 years have reduced the rate of graft infection, resulting in improved outcomes, comparable to those for patients transplanted for non-HBV indications. Long-term use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin for passive immunotherapy is effective in preventing re-infection. Combination therapy with hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine after liver transplantation reduces HBV recurrence. Adefovir dipoxil is a safe and effective alternative oral antiviral treatment for lamivudine-resistant mutant HBV. The high cost of hepatitis B immunoglobulin remains a problem that must be overcome by the development of HBV vaccines and potent adjuvants.

Failure of hepatitis B vaccination with conventional HBsAg vaccine in patients with continuous HBIG prophylaxis after liver transplantation

Hepatitis B vaccination after liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related liver disease has been investigated as an alternative strategy to reinfection prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) with conflicting results. In most studies, HBIG treatment was discontinued before vaccination. An outstanding good response was achieved with vaccination under continuous HBIG administration using hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-based vaccine containing special adjuvants. Both, adjuvants and continuous HBIG administration have been discussed as crucial factors for good response. Twenty-four patients were vaccinated with conventional double dose recombinant vaccine containing 40 microg HBsAg up to 12 times at weeks 0, 2, 4 (cycle 1), 12, 14, 16 (cycle 2), 24, 26, 28 (cycle 3), and 36, 38, 40 (cycle 4). All patients received 2,000 IU HBIG every 6 weeks (4 times intravenously and 4 times intramuscularly). A significant response was defined as reconfirmed increase of anti-HBs-antigen (anti-HBs) unexplained by HBIG administration or lack of anti-HBs decrease below 100 IU/L after discontinuation of HBIG treatment after week 48. Only 2 of 24 patients (8.3%) responded significantly. Anti-HBs started to increase after the seventh vaccination (cycle 3, during intramuscular HBIG administration) in 1 patient and after 12th vaccination (cycle 4, during intravenous HBIG administration) in the other. Maximum anti-HBs levels were >1,000 IU/L in both patients and decreased significantly slower as compared to passive prophylaxis during follow-up. In conclusion, the conventional HBsAg vaccine failed to induce a significant humoral immune response in most patients despite continued HBIG treatment. Further studies should address the question, of whether the use of potent adjuvant systems results in higher response rates.

Vaccination against hepatitis B in liver transplant recipients: pilot analysis of cellular immune response shows evidence of HBsAg-specific regulatory T cells

After liver transplantation for hepatitis-B-related diseases, patients currently receive lifelong treatment with hepatitis B immunoglobulin to prevent endogenous reinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Active immunization with hepatitis B vaccine would be a preferable alternative; however, most attempts to immunize these patients with standard vaccine have failed. A recent study with a new adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine was exceptionally successful, leading to a high-titered long-lasting antibody response in 80% of all vaccinees. To identify the immunological mechanisms behind these unexpected results, the successfully vaccinated participants were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-specific T and B cells, and their cellular responses to revaccination with conventional vaccine were studied. HBsAg-specific CD4(+) T lymphocytes could be detected in 13 of 16 patients after immunization with the new vaccine. Unexpectedly, these T cells produced almost exclusively interleukin (IL)-10 and had a CD4(+)/CD25(+) phenotype. They were functionally active, suppressing cytokine secretion in HBsAg-specific (Th1) cells, thus representing antigen-specific regulatory T cells (T(Reg)). Following a booster dose with conventional vaccine 22-31 months after completion of the initial vaccination series, the T-cell pattern in the revaccinated individuals changed substantially: 7 days after revaccination 9 of 11 individuals showed a switch to a Th1-type immune response with HBsAg-specific T cells secreting IL-2, interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha as observed in healthy controls. Four weeks after the booster, 4 patients still showed a Th1-type cytokine pattern, whereas in 5 patients only IL-10-secreting cells were detectable. After 1 year, in 3 of 4 revaccinated individuals only IL-10-secreting cells could be found, whereas the specific T cells of the fourth patient still showed a Th1-type of response. HBsAg-specific T(Reg) cells could be demonstrated in HBV-positive liver transplant recipients successfully immunized with a new adjuvanted vaccine. Revaccination led to immediate disappearance of the these cells and the appearance of HBsAg-specific T cells with a Th1-type cytokine profile, which in most cases were replaced by the IL-10-secreting regulatory cells during the following months. The specific induction of T(Reg) cells could contribute to the poor response of liver transplant recipients to conventional vaccine. In conclusion,, for successful vaccination of these patients, a vaccine with a strong inhibitory effect on T(Reg) cells would be desirable.

Lamivudine plus low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin to prevent recurrent hepatitis B following liver transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

High-dose intravenous hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) may prevent recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but the cost has limited its widespread use in countries with endemic HBV infection. We report on long-term safety and efficacy of an alternative strategy of very low doses (400-800 IU/month) of intramuscular (IM) HBIG plus lamivudine.

METHODS

Australian and New Zealand patients who received low-dose HBIG plus lamivudine following liver transplantation for HBV-related end-stage liver disease were studied. Prior to transplantation, patients with detectable serum HBV DNA received lamivudine 100 mg daily. Posttransplantation, all patients received lamivudine 100 mg daily plus IM HBIG 400 or 800 IU daily for 1 week then monthly thereafter. Serum HBV DNA levels were measured prior to lamivudine, at transplantation, and at 12 months posttransplantation. Serum titers of antibody to HBV surface antigen were measured at 1, 3, and 12 months posttransplantation.

RESULTS

Between February 1996 and October 2004, 147 patients received low-dose HBIG plus lamivudine. Thirty-one percent were hepatitis B e antigen positive, and 85% were HBV DNA+ prior to transplantation. The median duration of pretransplantation lamivudine was 92 days (range, 1-1775). Median follow-up posttransplantation was 1860 days. Kaplan-Meier patient survival was 92% at 1 year and 88% at 5 years. The actuarial risk of HBV recurrence was 1% at 1 year and 4% at 5 years. Baseline HBV DNA titer was associated with HBV recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose IM HBIG plus lamivudine provides safe and effective long-term prophylaxis against recurrent HBV at <10% the cost of the high-dose regimen.

Efficacy of a pre-S containing vaccine in patients receiving lamivudine prophylaxis after liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B

Lamivudine monoprophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation is associated with recurrence due to escape mutants and second generation recombinant HBV vaccine is not effective. We studied the efficacy of two courses each of three double-doses (20 microg) of third-generation recombinant pre-S containing vaccine (Sci-B-Vac) in 20 patients on lamivudine prophylaxis at a median of 637 days (range, 390-2666 days) after transplantation. At enrollment, all patients were seronegative for HBsAg, anti-HBs and HBVDNA (by qPCR). Lamivudine (100 mg/day) was continued throughout the study. Five patients (25%) responded to the first course and five additional patients responded after the second course (overall response rate 50%). The response rate was 88% in patients younger than 50 years old and 25% in older patients (p = 0.02). The median peak anti-HBs titer was 153 mIU/mL with six responders having a titer >100 mIU/mL and seven sustained >6 months. Among seven previous nonresponders to second generation recombinant vaccine, three (44%) responded. At the end of the study, all patients remained seronegative for HBsAg. In conclusion, Sci-B-Vac is effective in about 50% of patients receiving lamividine prophylaxis and may prevent recurrence due to escape mutants.

Hepatitis B virus immunization with an adjuvant containing vaccine after liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related disease: failure of humoral and cellular immune response

Long-term hepatitis B reinfection prophylaxis after liver transplantation with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleoside analogues is expensive and inconvenient. Studies evaluating humoral immune responses to hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccines showed conflicting results. Best results were achieved under continuous HBIG administration with an adjuvant-containing HBsAg vaccine. In the present study, 8 patients who had been HBsAg positive and HBV DNA negative prior to liver transplantation were immunized with HBsAg-vaccine containing the adjuvant 3-deacylated monophosphoryl-lipid-A. Vaccination was started after discontinuation of HBIG. Six vaccinations were administered at weeks 0, 2, 4, 12, 16 and 24. Humoral (anti-HBs titres) and cellular (enzyme-linked immunospot assay and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis) immune responses were studied. Only one of eight patients responded with a humoral immune response (maximum anti-HBs titre 561 U/l). In this patient, decrease of anti-HBs titre before vaccination was significantly slower than in the other seven patients and anti-HBs did not become negative before first vaccination. A T-cell response to HBsAg could not be detected in any of the patients. The responder was the only patient who showed a T-cell response to HBcAg. In conclusion, the adjuvant-containing vaccine did not induce a humoral or a detectable cellular immune response in most patients. Patient-related preconditions and concomitant HBIG administration should be further investigated as possible predictors for response.

Extended double-dosage HBV vaccination after liver transplantation is ineffective, in the absence of lamivudine and prior wash-out of human Hepatitis B immunoglobulins

BACKGROUND

The recommended prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation based on hepatitis B immunoglobulins and lamivudine is highly expensive. A recent study reported a significant anti-HBs (antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen) response after a reinforced vaccination against hepatitis B virus, a result not confirmed in a study from our group. Concomitant lamivudine treatment and the achievement of complete washout of anti-hepatitis B-specific immunoglobulin prior to vaccination in our study could explain the contradiction.

AIMS

To test the efficacy of a reinforced anti-hepatitis B virus vaccination schedule without lamivudine and without previous anti-hepatitis B-specific immunoglobulin washout.

METHODS

A double reinforced course of S-recombinant hepatitis B virus vaccination was given to seven male patients who were transplanted for hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis. Vaccination consisted of two cycles of three intramuscular double doses (40 microg), given at month 0, 1, 2, and 3, 4, 5, respectively. The first dose was given 2 weeks after stopping lamivudine and the intravenous administration of anti-HBs immunoglobulins. The latter was continued throughout the study and follow-up period to maintain an anti-HBs titre >100 IU/L.

RESULTS

At the end of both the first and the second vaccination cycle none of the patients developed an anti-HBs titre greater than the basal anti-HBs titre.

CONCLUSION

These data confirm and expand our previous data on the lack of effectiveness of conventional recombinant hepatitis B virus vaccination in liver transplant recipients.

Prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

The reults of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV) related liver disease are significantly influenced by the HBV recurrence rate. Complete eradication of hepatitis B is rarely possible after liver transplantation and hepatic and extrahepatic reservoirs are a continuous latent source of HBV recurrence. Therefore an adequate prophylaxis is mandatory. By introduction of long term passive immunoprophylaxis the recurrence rate could be markedly reduced and survival rates significantly improved. Due to the approval of antiviral drugs, especially lamivudine as the first approved antiviral agent against HBV, new prophylactic options, including combination prophylaxis, have been introduced. This modern antiviral managemant improved the outcome of hepatitis B patients after liver transplantation. The Results after OLT are nowadays reported to be as good or in a recent UNOS database report even better than in non-HBV patients. The type of recommended prophylaxis has undergone modifications within the last years and is still subject to changes due to the ongoing development of antiviral agents. In addition, due to high costs of hepatitis immunoglobulin alternatives such as prophylaxis with nucleos(t)ide analogues or vaccination are increasingly investigated. In the following, current strategies of reinfection prophylaxis and future perspectives are reviewed.

Review article: hepatitis B and liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is an excellent treatment for hepatitis B virus infected patients who have acute or chronic liver failure and/or primary liver cancer. Advances in antiviral prophylaxis prevent clinically significant graft re-infection for the majority of patients. Graft and patient survival has improved significantly during the past decade, and results of transplantation for hepatitis B virus are now superior to those achieved for most other indications. In particular, the availability of lamivudine and adefovir have transformed outcome. The addition of lamivudine to passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B virus immunoglobulin prevents re-infection in most cases. Adefovir should be added to this combination when the patient develops lamivudine resistance before transplantation. The significance of serum hepatitis B virus DNA positivity in the absence of circulating hepatitis B surface antigen is uncertain. Hepatitis B virus infection of the graft can be observed when prophylaxis is inadequate, when the donor liver contains latent hepatitis B virus infection (so-called de novo infection from the hepatitis B virus core antibody positive donor), and when the donor is exposed to third party infection (sexual or nosocomial transmission). Established hepatitis B virus graft infection is a good indication for combination nucleoside analogue therapy. Combination therapy can achieve sustained suppression of viral replication, and hepatitis B e antigen and hepatitis B surface antigen clearance can also be observed.

[Viral hepatitides infections in transplant recipients]

Hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B (HBV) -related end-stage liver disease are the most common indications for liver transplantation (LTx) in our area. Recurrent HCV infection is universal after LTx and although histological recurrence is variable, the rate of disease progression is more rapid than in non-immunosuppressed patients and this impact graft and patient survival. All anti-HCV treatment strategies have shown limited efficacy so, at the present time, HCV reinfection after LTx represents the most important clinical problem in the follow-up. Regarding HBV, the most important factor in viral recurrence in the allograft is the presence of active viral replication at the time of LTx. The best patient selection (in non-replicative phase), the indefinite use of hyperimmune anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin and the use of the new antiviral drugs have made possible a significant improvement in graft and patient survival.

[Liver transplantation for complications of hepatitis B]

In the absence of prophylaxis, there is an elevated risk of virus recurrence after liver transplantation required because of chronic hepatitis B. Regardless of prophylaxis, the risk of recurrence is associated with pre-graft viral load. Long-term prophylaxis by hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) significantly reduces the risk of recurrence, especially if there was no pre-graft viral replication. Use of antiviral agents such as lamivudine, adefovir, tenofovir, and entecavir, control HBV replication in patients with decompensation of cirrhosis while awaiting transplantation and in patients with HBV recurrence post-graft. The risk of emergence of resistant strains limits the use of these antiviral agents. The choice of one or several combined antiviral agents depends on their resistance profiles. Combining antiviral agents and HBIG after transplantation can reduce the risk of HBV recurrence to less than 10%, even in patients with viral replication pre-graft. If there was no detectable viral load pre-graft, withdrawal of HBIG should be considered at some point, while continuing an antiviral agent or after anti-HBV vaccination.

Immunization with an adjuvant hepatitis B vaccine in liver transplant recipients: antibody decline and booster vaccination with conventional vaccine

Patients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) due to hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related disease are at risk of endogenous hepatitis B reinfection and may receive life long prophylaxis with hepatitis B hyperimmunoglobulin (HBIG). In a previous study 16 of 20 OLT patients were immunized successfully with an adjuvant hepatitis B vaccine. To maintain protective antibody levels under immunosuppressive therapy, 11 of these patients were revaccinated with a double dosed conventional hepatitis B vaccine. Median interval between last vaccination and booster was 24 months (range 22-31 months). Antibody titres against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) were monitored at the day of booster vaccination (day 0), at day 7 and day 28. At day 0, all vaccinees but one had anti-HBs titres greater than 500 IU/L (median 1,925 IU/L, range 196-7,612 IU/L). Maximum antibody titres after previous vaccination declined by a median of 82% (range 47-96%). After booster vaccination the anti-HBs titre increased significantly by a median factor of 2.42 (P<0.05). In conclusion, the majority of liver transplant recipients who previously had responded to adjuvant hepatitis B vaccine exhibited sufficient immunocompetence to produce a substantial antibody response after booster immunization with a conventional vaccine.

Hepatitis B and Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with liver failure secondary to chronic hepatitis B. However, liver transplantation is complicated by the risk of recurrent hepatitis B virus infection, which significantly impairs graft and patient survival. The main risk factor for the development of recurrent hepatitis B virus infection is the virus load at the time of transplantation. The development of antiviral medications, such as lamivudine and adefovir, and the implementation of effective prophylactic regimens using hepatitis B immune globulin have significantly improved the outcomes of hepatitis B after liver transplantation. However, current approaches continue to be hampered by the extremely high cost of treatment and the emergence of drug-resistant viral mutations. Ongoing studies are necessary to establish the most cost-effective approaches to prevent recurrent hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation.

Extended HBV vaccination in liver transplant recipients for HBV-related cirrhosis: report of two successful cases

The effectiveness of hepatitis B virus vaccination in liver transplant recipients for hepatitis B virus-related end-stage liver disease is controversial. We report two successful cases, who developed sustained protection after long-term vaccination. Case 1. A 58-year-old male, transplanted 9 years earlier, received three intramuscular monthly doses of 40 microg of recombinant S vaccine and developed an anti-hepatitis B surface titre of 154 IU/L. After an additional 40 microg dose, he reached an anti-hepatitis B surface peak of 687 IU/L and then maintained a "protective" titre (>100 IU/L) without further vaccinations for the next 40 months. At this time, revaccination with three monthly doses of 40 microg resulted in an anti-hepatitis B surface titre greater than 25,000 IU/L, sustained over time. Case 2. A 56-year-old woman, transplanted 8 years earlier, first received three intramuscular monthly doses of 40 microg of S vaccine without developing any detectable anti-HBs. She was then given multiple intradermal vaccine doses which resulted in a titre of 37 IU/L. Next, after readministration of three 40 microg intramuscular monthly doses, she developed an anti-HBs titre of 280 IU/L. In the following 4 years, the anti-HBs titre dropped below 100 IU/L four times (at month 20, 30, 38 and 44) and readministration of single 40 microg doses of vaccine was always sufficient to restore a protective titre. Conclusion. Extended HBV vaccination may afford valid protection against HBV recurrence in selected liver transplant recipients.

Response to an experimental HBV vaccine permits withdrawal of HBIg prophylaxis in fulminant and selected chronic HBV-infected liver graft recipients

Strategies using lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) for prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation (LT) are expensive since life-long treatment is needed. We evaluated the possibility to obtain protective hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) antibody (anti-HBs) titers after LT and to discontinue HBIg prophylaxis after a reinforced course of vaccination against HBV using an experimental adjuvant HBsAg / AS04 vaccine (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals [GSK], Rixensart, Belgium) in patients transplanted for hepatitis B. Fifteen LT patients on stable low-level immunosuppression were vaccinated with a double dose of the vaccine at 0, 1, 2, 6, and 12 months: 5 patients were transplanted for nonviral diseases and 10 patients were transplanted for HBV on HBIg monotherapy. HBIg were continued during baseline vaccination (0, 1, and 2 months) and when anti-HBs titers determined every 6 weeks dropped below 150 IU/L. Overall follow-up was 18 months. Sustained long-term response to vaccination was defined as anti-HBs titers >500 IU/L without further need for HBIg administration during a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Overall sustained response to vaccination was 53% (8 / 15 patients); 80% (4 / 5 patients) in the nonviral disease group and 40% (4 / 10 patients) in the HBV group (2 /2 fulminant and 2/8 chronically infected patients) developed a sustained long-term response and were completely free of HBIg at the end of the 18-month follow-up. No HBV recurrence, rejection episodes, or side effects occurred during the follow-up. In conclusion, protective anti-HBs titers were obtained in a substantial number of LT patients following a reinforced course of HBV vaccination with vaccines containing new immunostimulating adjuvants. Vaccination seems well tolerated and safe and allows long-term discontinuation of HBIg.