Oxidation phenotype--a major determinant of metoprolol metabolism and response

Pharmacogenomics of antihypertensive drugs: past, present and future

Hypertension pharmacogenomics holds the promise of leading to individualized drug treatment approaches for the approximately 1 billion individuals worldwide with hypertension. Prior to 2000, the literature on hypertension pharmacogenomics was quite limited. The last decade has seen a substantial growth in the literature, with several examples of genes that appear to play an important role in antihypertensive response. The last decade has also made apparent the numerous challenges in hypertension pharmacogenomics, and addressing those challenges will be important. Moving forward, it seems clear that collaboration among researchers to allow replication or joint analyses will be essential in advancing the field, as will the use of genome-wide association approaches. The next decade should clearly define the clinical potential for hypertension pharmacogenomics.

Pharmacogenomics: a systems approach

Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics involve the study of the role of inheritance in individual variation in drug response, a phenotype that varies from potentially life-threatening adverse drug reactions to equally serious lack of therapeutic efficacy. Pharmacogenetics-pharmacogenomics represents a major component of the movement to 'individualized medicine'. Pharmacogenetic studies originally focused on monogenic traits, often involving genetic variation in drug metabolism. However, contemporary studies increasingly involve entire 'pathways' that include both pharmacokinetics (PKs)--factors that influence the concentration of a drug reaching its target(s)--and pharmacodynamics (PDs), factors associated with the drug target(s), as well as genome-wide approaches. The convergence of advances in pharmacogenetics with rapid developments in human genomics has resulted in the evolution of pharmacogenetics into pharmacogenomics. At the same time, studies of drug response are expanding beyond genomics to encompass pharmacotranscriptomics and pharmacometabolomics to become a systems-based discipline. This discipline is also increasingly moving across the 'translational interface' into the clinic and is being incorporated into the drug development process and governmental regulation of that process. The article will provide an overview of the development of pharmacogenetics-pharmacogenomics, the scientific advances that have contributed to the continuing evolution of this discipline, the incorporation of transcriptomic and metabolomic data into attempts to understand and predict variation in drug response phenotypes as well as challenges associated with the 'translation' of this important aspect of biomedical science into the clinic.

Pharmacogenetic profiling in the treatment of heart disease

Pharmacogenetics is the study of gene-drug interactions. In the post-Human Genome era, and with the realization that personal genotypes differ by millions of bases (gene polymorphisms), the application of genetics to explain interindividual differences in clinical drug response seems to offer great promise. Here, recent basic and translational developments in pharmacogenetic profiling of beta-blocker response in heart failure are reviewed in the context of the possible consequences of such advances on drug development and clinical therapeutics.

Cardiovascular pharmacogenomics and individualized drug therapy

The goal of individualized drug therapy requires physicians to be able to accurately predict an individual's response to a drug. Both genetic and environmental factors are known to influence drug response. 'Pharmacogenetics' is the study of the role of inheritance in variation in drug response phenotypes. Pharmacogenetics is now moving genome-wide to become 'pharmacogenomics', resulting in the recognition of novel biomarkers for individual variation in drug response. This article reviews the development, promise and challenges facing pharmacogenomics, using examples of drugs used to treat or prevent cardiovascular disease.

Massive metoprolol poisoning treated with prenalterol

A case of massive metoprolol poisoning (50 g) is described. Clinical signs included coma, seizures, hypoventilation, unmeasurable blood pressure, nodal bradycardia, and metabolic acidosis. Treatment comprised intubation, assisted ventilation, gastric lavage, atropine, bicarbonate, glucagon and repeated doses of prenalterol (a total of 160 mg over 15 hours). Prenalterol dosage was simple and could be guided by blood pressure response. Pacemaker treatment was not required. Ethanol concentration was 50 mmol/l (2.4%) on admission. Plasma metoprolol was 68 mumol/l (18 000 ng/ml) 2 hours after admission. The patient was awake after 15 hours.

CYP2D6 genotype and its relationship with metoprolol dose, concentrations and effect in patients with systolic heart failure

The aims of this study were to examine the relationships between CYP2D6 genotype and metoprolol dose, S- and R-metoprolol concentrations and clinical effects in patients with systolic heart failure. Data were obtained for 52 subjects, of which 27 had 2 functional alleles (24/27, CYP2D6*1/*1), 22 had 1 functional allele (18/22, CYP2D6*1/*4) and 3 had no functional alleles (CYP2D6*4/*4). Median dose-adjusted concentrations of S-metoprolol (active) were 6.3- and 3.2-fold higher in subjects with zero or one functional allele (P=0.016 and P=0.006), respectively, compared with subjects with two functional alleles. For the R-enantiomer (inactive), these concentrations were 10.7- and 3.7-fold higher (P=0.013 and P=0.003), respectively. Despite clear gene-concentration differences, no relationships between CYP2D6 genotype and dose or clinical effects could be shown. Although the number with no functional alleles was too small (n=3) to show effects, in patients with 1 functional allele other sources of variance are likely to be obscuring differences in clinical effects.

Effects of Polymorphism of the β1 Adrenoreceptor and CYP2D6 on the Therapeutic Effects of Metoprolol

Metoprolol is a lipophilic β1 selective adrenergic receptor antagonist used in antihypertensive therapy. It is metabolized by the protein product of the cytochrome P450 2D6 ( CYP2D6) gene. Few studies have been performed on the association between the β1 adrenoreceptor, CYP2D6 polymorphism and blood pressure. The one reported here is a prospective, observational, clinical study in Chinese Han hypertensive patients on the combined influences of CYP2D6 and β1 adrenoreceptor polymorphisms on the therapeutic effects of metoprolol in 300 out-patients with essential hypertension. The same dose of metoprolol achieved different therapeutic effects in patients with different CYP2D6 and β1 adrenoreceptor polymorphisms. Additionally, different doses of metoprolol could achieve the same therapeutic effects in patients with different CYP2D6 and β1 adrenoreceptor polymorphisms. Knowledge of the combination of CYP2D6 and β1 adrenoreceptor polymorphisms may be used to guide antihypertensive therapy using β1 adrenoreceptor antagonists.

Complete atrioventricular block associated with concomitant use of metoprolol and paroxetine

A 63-year-old woman, who had been treated with 20 mg of paroxetine and 0.5 mg of alprazolam daily for 1 year and with 50 mg of metoprolol daily for 15 days, presented to a facility elsewhere with presyncope and complete atrioventricular block. Three days after her initial presentation and cessation of metoprolol treatment, she was transferred to our clinic to be considered for permanent pacemaker implantation. Paroxetine treatment was discontinued on day 1 and atrioventricular block resolved on day 5, which was confirmed with a 24-hour Holter recording. No bradyarrhythmia was induced with similar doses of either metoprolol or paroxetine alone. At 2- and 3-year follow-up, the patient was still free of bradyarrhythmia documented with electrocardiography and 24-hour Holter recordings. To our knowledge, we report the first case of complete atrioventricular block associated with coadministration of paroxetine and metoprolol. Increasing physicians' awareness of drug-induced severe bradyarrhythmia might prevent unnecessary implantation of permanent pacemakers.

The clinical role of genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes

For most drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs), the functional consequences of genetic polymorphisms have been examined. Variants leading to reduced or increased enzymatic activity as compared to the wild-type alleles have been identified. This review tries to define potential fields in the therapy of major medical conditions where genotyping (or phenotyping) of genetically polymorphic DMEs might be beneficial for drug safety or therapeutic outcome. The possible application of genotyping is discussed for depression, cardiovascular diseases and thromboembolic disorders, gastric ulcer, malignant diseases and tuberculosis. Some drugs used for relief of these ailments are metabolized with participation of genetically polymorphic DMEs including CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, thiopurine-S-methyltransferase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase and N-acetyltransferase type 2. Current evidence suggests that taking genetically determined metabolic capacities of DMEs into account has the potential to improve individual risk/benefit relationship. However, more prospective studies with clinical endpoints are needed before the paradigm of 'personalized medicine' based on DME variants can be established.

Polymorphisms of norepinephrine transporter and adrenergic receptor alpha1D are associated with the response to beta-blockers in dilated cardiomyopathy

Recent clinical trials have clearly demonstrated that the administration with beta-blockers decreases the mortality in the patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, significant heterogeneity exists in the effectiveness of beta-blockers among individual cases. We focused on 39 polymorphisms in 16 genes related to adrenergic system and investigated their association with the response to beta-blockers among 80 patients with CHF owing to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The polymorphisms of NET T-182C (P=0.019), ADRA1D T1848A (P=0.023) and ADRA1D A1905G (P=0.029) were associated with the improvement of left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) by beta-blockers. Furthermore, combined genotype analysis of NET T-182C and ADRA1D T1848A revealed a significant difference in LVFS improvement among genotype groups (P=0.011). These results suggest that NET (T-182C) and ADRA1D (T1848A and A1905G) polymorphisms are predictive markers of the response to beta-blockers. Genotyping of these polymorphisms may provide clinical insights into an individual difference in the response to the beta-blocker therapy in CHF.

Evaluation of probe drugs and pharmacokinetic metrics for CYP2D6 phenotyping

INTRODUCTION

Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) is one of the most important enzymes catalyzing biotransformation of xenobiotics in the human liver. This enzyme's activity shows a high degree of interindividual variability caused in part by its genetic polymorphism, the so-called debrisoquine/sparteine polymorphism. The genetic component influencing CYP2D6 activity can be determined by genotyping. However, genotyping alone is not sufficient to accurately predict an individual's actual CYP2D6 activity, as this is also influenced by other factors. For the determination of the exact actual enzymatic activity ("phenotyping"), adequate probe drugs have to be administered prior to measurements of these compounds and/or their metabolites in body fluids. PROBE DRUGS: Debrisoquine, sparteine, metoprolol or dextromethorphan represent well-established probe drugs while tramadol has been recently investigated for this purpose. The enzymatic activity is reflected by various pharmacokinetic metrics such as the partial clearance of a parent compound to the respective CYP2D6-mediated metabolite or metabolic ratios. Appropriate metrics need to fulfill pre-defined validation criteria.

METHODS

In this review, we have compiled a list of such criteria useful to select the best metrics to reflect CYP2D6 activity. A comprehensive Medline search for reports on CYP2D6 phenotyping trials with the above mentioned probe drugs was carried out.

CONCLUSION

Application of the validation criteria suggests that dextromethorphan and debrisoquine are the best CYP2D6 phenotyping drugs, with debrisoquine having the problem of very limited availability as a therapeutic drug. However, the assessment of the best dextromethorphan CYP2D6 phenotyping metric/procedure is still ongoing.

Pharmacogenetics, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and clinical practice

The application of pharmacogenetics holds great promise for individualized therapy. However, it has little clinical reality at present, despite many claims. The main problem is that the evidence base supporting genetic testing before therapy is weak. The pharmacology of the drugs subject to inherited variability in metabolism is often complex. Few have simple or single pathways of elimination. Some have active metabolites or enantiomers with different activities and pathways of elimination. Drug dosing is likely to be influenced only if the aggregate molar activity of all active moieties at the site of action is predictably affected by genotype or phenotype. Variation in drug concentration must be significant enough to provide "signal" over and above normal variation, and there must be a genuine concentration-effect relationship. The therapeutic index of the drug will also influence test utility. After considering all of these factors, the benefits of prospective testing need to be weighed against the costs and against other endpoints of effect. It is not surprising that few drugs satisfy these requirements. Drugs (and enzymes) for which there is a reasonable evidence base supporting genotyping or phenotyping include suxamethonium/mivacurium (butyrylcholinesterase), and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine methyltransferase). Drugs for which there is a potential case for prospective testing include warfarin (CYP2C9), perhexiline (CYP2D6), and perhaps the proton pump inhibitors (CYP2C19). No other drugs have an evidence base that is sufficient to justify prospective testing at present, although some warrant further evaluation. In this review we summarize the current evidence base for pharmacogenetics in relation to drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics: Development, Science, and Translation

Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics involve the study of the role of inheritance in individual variation in drug response, a phenotype that varies from potentially life-threatening adverse drug reactions to equally serious lack of therapeutic efficacy. This discipline evolved from the convergence of rapid advances in molecular pharmacology and genomics. Originally, pharmacogenetic studies focused on monogenic traits, often involving genetic variation in drug metabolism. However, contemporary studies increasingly involve entire "pathways" encoding proteins that influence both pharmacokinetics--factors that influence the concentration of a drug reaching its target(s)--and pharmacodynamics, the drug target itself, as well as genome-wide approaches. Pharmacogenomics is also increasingly moving across the "translational interface" into the clinic and is being incorporated into the drug development process and the governmental regulation of that process. However, significant challenges remain to be overcome if pharmacogenetics-pharmacogenomics is to achieve its full potential as a major medical application of genomic science.

The relevance of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism on chronic metoprolol therapy in cardiovascular patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

CYP2D6 polymorphisms are well described in normal populations but there are few data on its clinical significance. We therefore investigated the influence of CYP2D6 polymorphism on steady-state plasma concentrations and apparent oral clearance of metoprolol in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

METHODS

Ninety-one patients on metoprolol were recruited. Plasma concentrations of metoprolol and alpha-hydroxy metoprolol were measured at 4-h post-dose. CYP2D6 genotyping (*1, *3, *4, *5, *9, *8, *10, *17 and duplication) were performed on the DNA extracted. Ratio of plasma concentrations of metoprolol and alpha-hydroxy metoprolol and the apparent oral clearance of metoprolol were calculated. The influences of CYP2D6 genotypes were investigated.

RESULTS

A 100-fold variation was noted for both plasma concentrations of metoprolol and alpha-hydroxy metoprolol. There was a weak correlation between the total daily doses and plasma concentrations of both. Plasma concentrations were found to be higher in patients with genotypes that predicted lower enzyme activity. One patient homozygous for CYP2D6*4 had the highest metoprolol concentration per unit dose. With an antimode of 10. Two patients were identified as poor metabolizers (PMs) (2.1%; 95% CI: 2.9). The PMs who had a plasma metabolic ratio (pMR) of 37.8 was homozygous CYP2D6*4 whereas the other with pMR 14.5 was genotyped CYP2D6 *4/*10. There was a 36-fold difference between the highest and lowest clearance values. Large overlaps in the clearance values were noted between most of the genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that pharmacogenetic measures could be used to design a more individualized metoprolol dosage regimen for patients.

Influence of CYP2D6 Genotype on Metoprolol Plasma Concentration and β-Adrenergic Inhibition During Long-Term Treatment

In patients routinely treated with metoprolol, influences of CYP2D6 genotype on the response of heart rate to isoproterenol (IP) were studied at its peak and trough concentrations and were compared with those of bisoprolol. In 72 patients treated with metoprolol or bisoprolol, CYP2D6 genotype (ie, CYP2D6*1, *2, *4, *5, *10, and *14) was determined. No patients except one who was heterozygous for CYP2D6*5 carried the null alleles of CYP2D6. The homozygote frequency for CYP2D6*10 was relatively high (19.4%) and these patients had greater peak and trough plasma concentrations of metoprolol than the other patients. Isoproterenol-induced percentage increases in heart rate were 58% and 38% less at the low and high rate of isoproterenol infusion (0.02 and 0.04 microg/kg/min), respectively, in patients homozygous for CYP2D6*10 than in the other patients at the trough, but not at the peak concentrations. In contrast, CYP2D6 genotype did not affect plasma concentrations of bisoprolol and the extent of its beta-adrenergic inhibition. Thus, in patients routinely treated with metoprolol, CYP2D6 genotype significantly affects circadian variations of beta-adrenergic inhibition induced by metoprolol. In contrast, bisoprolol has a relatively constant beta-adrenergic inhibition independent of CYP2D6 genotype.

Cardiovascular pharmacogenomics

There is large interpatient variability in the response to drugs, including cardiovascular drugs. Thus, while some patients achieve the desired therapeutic response from their drug therapy, others do not. There is also a subset of patients who will experience adverse effects, which can range from bothersome to life threatening. Research in recent years has provided compelling evidence that in many cases, genetics contributes importantly to this variable drug response. Thus, pharmacogenomics is a field focused on unravelling the genetic determinants of variable drug response. Examples from the literature of genetic associations with drug efficacy and toxicity are described to provide insight into the field, including the roles of genetic variability in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug targets. There is also a detailed discussion of the experimental approaches used in cardiovascular pharmacogenomics. Current research is largely focused on a limited candidate gene approach, which allows for description of significant genetic associations with variable response, but often does not explain the genetic basis of variable drug response enough to be useful clinically. As such, there is a move towards genome-wide approaches, and the various technologies available to obtain genomic data are discussed. Cardiovascular pharmacogenomics has the potential for leading to improvements in the use of cardiovascular drug therapy, through selection of the most appropriate drug therapy in an individual based on their genetic information. It will probably be a decade or more before genetic information is widely used in drug therapy decisions, but it seems clear that important findings in the area will continue to expand and the experimental approaches will continue to evolve.

Functional analysis of CYP2D6.31 variant: Homology modeling suggests possible disruption of redox partner interaction by Arg440His substitution

Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) is an important human drug-metabolizing enzyme that exhibits a marked genetic polymorphism. Numerous CYP2D6 alleles have been characterized at a functional level, although the consequences for expression and/or catalytic activity of a substantial number of rare variants remain to be investigated. One such allele, CYP2D6*31, is characterized by mutations encoding three amino acid substitutions: Arg296Cys, Arg440His and Ser486Thr. The identification of this allele in an individual with an apparent in vivo poor metabolizer phenotype prompted us to analyze the functional consequence of these substitutions on enzyme activity using yeast as a heterologous expression system. We demonstrated that the Arg440His substitution, alone or in combination with Arg296Cys and/or Ser486Thr, altered the respective kinetic parameters [Km (microM) and kcat (min(-1))] of debrisoquine 4-hydroxylation (wild-type, 25; 0.92; variants, 43-68; 0.05-0.11) and dextromethorphan O-demethylation (wild-type, 1; 4.72; variants, 12-23; 0.64-1.43), such that their specificity constants (kcat/Km) were decreased by more than 95% compared to those observed with the wild-type enzyme. The rates of oxidation of rac-metoprolol at single substrate concentrations of 40 and 400 microM were also markedly decreased by approximately 90% with each CYP2D6 variant containing the Arg440His substitution. These in vitro data confirm that the CYP2D6*31 allele encodes an enzyme with a severely impaired but residual catalytic activity and, furthermore, that the Arg440His exchange alone is the inactivating mutation. A homology model of CYP2D6 based on the crystal structure of rabbit CYP2C5 locates Arg440 on the proximal surface of the protein. Docking the structure of the FMN domain of human cytochrome P450 reductase to the CYP2D6 model suggests that Arg440 is a key member of a cluster of basic amino acid residues important for reductase binding.

Polymorphic cytochrome P450 2D6: humanized mouse model and endogenous substrates

Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) is the first well-characterized polymorphic phase I drug-metabolizing enzyme, and more than 80 allelic variants have been identified for the CYP2D6 gene, located on human chromosome 22q13.1. Human debrisoquine and sparteine metabolism is subdivided into two principal phenotypes--extensive metabolizer and poor metabolizer--that arise from variant CYP2D6 genotypes. It has been estimated that CYP2D6 is involved in the metabolism and disposition of more than 20% of prescribed drugs, and most of them act in the central nervous system or on the heart. These drug substrates are characterized as organic bases containing one nitrogen atom with a distance about 5, 7, or 10 A from the oxidation site. Aspartic acid 301 and glutamic acid 216 were determined as the key acidic residues for substrate-enzyme binding through electrostatic interactions. CYP2D6 transgenic mice, generated using a lambda phage clone containing the complete wild-type CYP2D6 gene, exhibits enhanced metabolism and disposition of debrisoquine. This transgenic mouse line and its wild-type control are models for human extensive metabolizers and poor metabolizers, respectively, and would have broad application in the study of CYP2D6 polymorphism in drug discovery and development, and in clinical practice toward individualized drug therapy. Endogenous 5-methoxyindole- thylamines derived from 5-hydroxytryptamine were identified as high-affinity substrates of CYP2D6 that catalyzes their O-demethylations with high enzymatic capacity and specificity. Thus, polymorphic CYP2D6 may play an important role in the interconversions of these psychoactive tryptamines, including a crucial step in a serotonin-melatonin cycle.

A convenient five-drug cocktail for the assessment of major drug metabolizing enzymes: a pilot study

AIMS

To assess the feasibility of administering at the same time low doses of five probe drugs, metoprolol (25 mg), chlorzoxazone (250 mg), tolbutamide (250 mg), dapsone (100 mg) and caffeine (100 mg) to determine simultaneously the activities of CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP1A2, N-acetyltransferase-2 and xanthine oxidase.

METHODS

Ten healthy young non-smoking males received the following drugs or combinations of drugs over a 5-week period: week 1) metoprolol; 2) tolbutamide; 3) caffeine, chlorzoxazone and dapsone; 4) caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dapsone and metoprolol; 5) caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dapsone, metoprolol and tolbutamide. The drugs were self-administered at bedtime and urine was collected for the following 8 h.

RESULTS

Mean molar phenotypic ratios obtained after administering metoprolol (mean change of -11%) or tolbutamide (mean change of -0.3%) alone, were not significantly different from those obtained when other drugs were co-administered (P > 0.05). The mean within-subject coefficients of variation were 33%, 18%, 22%, 13%, 16%, 13% and 5% for CYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, CYP1A2, N-acetyltransferase 2 and xanthine oxidase metabolic ratios, respectively. No significant interactions (P > 0.5) were observed during the simultaneous administration of various combinations of the five probe drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose that this cocktail, composed of five widely available drugs, constitutes a promising means of simultaneously determining the activities of the major CYP enzymes in large populations.

Optimized antiretroviral therapy: the role of therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenomics

The identification of relationships between plasma concentrations of protease inhibitors and later, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and their efficacy and toxicity has caused a growing interest in the concept of therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of HIV infection. Some evidence suggests a beneficial effect of therapeutic drug monitoring of protease inhibitors. More recently, plasma protease inhibitor concentrations have been combined with viral susceptibility into one parameter, the inhibitory quotient, which may be a better predictor of the response to therapy, especially in pretreated patients. This paper reviews the current literature on therapeutic drug monitoring and the inhibitory quotient in the management of HIV infection and speculates on the future role of pharmacogenomics in this therapeutic area.

Pharmacogenetic aspects of drug-induced torsade de pointes: potential tool for improving clinical drug development and prescribing

Drug-induced torsade de pointes (TdP) has proved to be a significant iatro-genic cause of morbidity and mortality and a major reason for the withdrawal of a number of drugs from the market in recent times. Enzymes that metabolise many of these drugs and the potassium channels that are responsible for cardiac repolarisation display genetic polymorphisms. Anecdotal reports have suggested that in many cases of drug-induced TdP, there may be a concealed genetic defect of either these enzymes or the potassium channels, giving rise to either high plasma drug concentrations or diminished cardiac repolarisation reserve, respectively. The presence of either of these genetic defects may predispose a patient to TdP, a potentially fatal adverse reaction, even at therapeutic dosages of QT-prolonging drugs and in the absence of other risk factors. Advances in pharmacogenetics of drug metabolising enzymes and pharmacological targets, together with the prospects of rapid and inexpensive genotyping procedures, promise to individualise and improve the benefit/risk ratio of therapy with drugs that have the potential to cause TdP. The qualitative and the quantitative contributions of these genetic defects in clinical cases of TdP are unclear because not all of the patients with TdP are routinely genotyped and some relevant genetic mutations still remain to be discovered. There are regulatory guidelines that recommend strategies aimed at uncovering the risk of TdP associated with new chemical entities during their development. There are also a number of guidelines that recommend integrating pharmacogenetics in this process. This paper proposes a strategy for integrating pharmacogenetics into drug development programmes to optimise association studies correlating genetic traits and endpoints of clinical interest, namely failure of efficacy or development of repolarisation abnormalities. Until pharmacogenetics is carefully integrated into all phases of development of QT-prolonging drugs and large-scale studies are undertaken during their post-marketing use to determine the genetic components involved in induction of TdP, routine genotyping of patients remains unrealistic. Even without this pharmacogenetic data, the clinical risk of TdP can already be greatly minimised. Clinically, a substantial proportion of cases of TdP are due to the use of either high or usual dosages of drugs with potential to cause TdP in the presence of factors that inhibit drug metabolism. Therefore, choosing the lowest effective dose and identifying patients with these non-genetic risk factors are important means of minimising the risk of TdP. In view of the common secondary pharmacology shared by these drugs, a standard set of contraindications and warnings have evolved over the last decade. These include factors responsible for pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic drug interactions. Among the latter, the more important ones are bradycardia, electrolyte imbalance, cardiac disease and co-administration of two or more QT-prolonging drugs. In principle, if large scale prospective studies can demonstrate a substantial genetic component, pharmacogenetically driven prescribing ought to reduce the risk further. However, any potential benefits of pharmacogenetics will be squandered without any reduction in the clinical risk of TdP if physicians do not follow prescribing and monitoring recommendations.

Pharmacogenetics of hypertension treatment

The extent of blood pressure lowering by anti-hypertensive agents is difficult to predict for individual patients, even when evaluated in the context of biochemical or demographic information. Genetic predictors (mainly single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) have been the focus of several recent studies and are gaining much attention. We have conducted a literature search for studies in which the lowering of ambient blood pressure by specific drugs or drug classes in humans was related to specific genotypes. Twenty-eight studies were identified, of which six had a single-dose design, and the remaining 22 studied drug effects after more than 4 weeks of drug administration. Virtually all were association studies. Prospective trials that compared the prognostic value of genetic methods to routine clinical practice were not identified. Almost all studies used a candidate-gene design, usually with a very small number of SNPs (typically one). Gene-gene and gene-environment interactions were studied only rarely. Only one study targeted genes involved in drug metabolism. Most candidate-genes were part of the renin-angiotensin system. By far the most extensively studied has been the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism (15 studies) but, to date, no clear picture has emerged for this or other genetic variants. Thus, the potential for utility of genetic characterization of individual patients as a predictor of anti-hypertensive response has yet to be realized.

Cytochrome P450 2D6: overview and update on pharmacology, genetics, biochemistry

Of about one dozen human P450 s that catalyze biotransformations of xenobiotics, CYP2D6 is one of the more important ones based on the number of its drug substrates. It shows a very high degree of interindividual variability, which is primarily due to the extensive genetic polymorphism that influences expression and function. This so-called debrisoquine/sparteine oxidation polymorphism has been extensively studied in many different populations and over 80 alleles and allele variants have been described. CYP2D6 protein and enzymatic activity is completely absent in less than 1% of Asian people and in up to 10% of Caucasians with two null alleles, which do not encode a functional P450 protein product. The resulting "poor metabolizer" (PM) phenotype is characterized by the inability to use CYP2D6-dependent metabolic pathways for drug elimination, which affect up to 20% of all clinically used drugs. The consequences are increased risk of adverse drug reactions or lack of therapeutic response. Today, genetic testing predicts the PM phenotype with over 99% certainty. At the other extreme, the "Ultrarapid Metabolizer" (UM) phenotype can be caused by alleles carrying multiple gene copies. "Intermediate Metabolizers" (IM) are severely deficient in their metabolism capacity compared to normal "Extensive Metabolizers" (EM), but in contrast to PMs they express a low amount of residual activity due to the presence of at least one partially deficient allele. Whereas the intricate genetics of the CYP2D6 polymorphism is becoming apparent at ever greater detail, applications in clinical practice are still rare. More clinical studies are needed to show where patients benefit from drug dose adjustment based on their genotype. Computational approaches are used to predict and rationalize substrate specificity and enzymatic properties of CYP2D6. Pharmacophore modeling of ligands and protein homology modeling are two complementary approaches that have been applied with some success. CYP2D6 is not only expressed in liver but also in the gut and in brain neurons, where endogenous substrates with high-turnover have been found. Whether and how brain functions may be influenced by polymorphic expression are interesting questions for the future.

The molecular and enzyme kinetic basis for the diminished activity of the cytochrome P450 2D6.17 (CYP2D6.17) variant. Potential implications for CYP2D6 phenotyping studies and the clinical use of CYP2D6 substrate drugs in some African populations

In this study, the basis for the diminished capacity of CYP2D6.17 to metabolise CYP2D6 substrate drugs and the possible implications this might have for CYP2D6 phenotyping studies and clinical use of substrate drugs were investigated in vitro. Enzyme kinetic analyses were performed with recombinant CYP2D6.1, CYP2D6.2, CYP2D6.17 and CYP2D6.T107I using bufuralol, debrisoquine, metoprolol and dextromethorphan as substrates. In addition, the intrinsic clearance of 10 CYP2D6 substrate drugs by CYP2D6.1 and CYP2D6.17 was determined by monitoring substrate disappearance. CYP2D6.17 exhibited generally higher K(m) values compared to CYP2D6.1. The V(max) values were generally not different except for metoprolol alpha-hydroxylation with the V(max) value for CYP2D6.17 being half that of CYP2D6.1. CYP2D6.1 and CYP2D6.2 displayed similar kinetics with all probe drugs except for dextromethorphan O-demethylation with the intrinsic clearance value of CYP2D6.2 being half that of CYP2D6.1. CYP2D6.17 exhibited substrate-dependent reduced clearances for the 10 substrates studied. In a clinical setting, the clearance of some drugs could be affected more than others in individuals with the CYP2D6(*)17 variant. The CYP2D6(*)17 allele might, therefore, contribute towards the poor correlation of phenotyping results when using different probe drugs in African populations. To investigate effects of CYP2D6(*)17 mutations on the structure of the enzyme, a homology model of CYP2D6 was built using the CYP2C5 crystal structure as a template. The results suggest an alteration in position of active-site residues in CYP2D6.17 as a possible explanation for the reduced activity of the enzyme.

Effect of the CYP2D6 genotype on metoprolol metabolism persists during long-term treatment

The beta1 selective beta-blocker metoprolol is metabolized predominantly but not exclusively by CYP2D6. Due to the polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene, CYP2D6 activity varies markedly between individuals. Consequently, after short-term administration metoprolol plasma concentrations were found to be several fold higher in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers. However, it is currently not known, whether the impact of the CYP2D6 polymorphism persists during long-term therapy, since alternate mechanisms of elimination or metabolism could be effective in this setting. The study comprised 91 Caucasian patients on long-term treatment with metoprolol (median duration of treatment 12.6 months; median daily drug dose: 47.5 mg/day). Metoprolol and alpha-OH-metoprolol plasma concentrations were assessed by HPLC. Genotyping detected the null alleles (*0): *3, *4, *5, *6, *7, *8, *12, *14, *15, the alleles *9, *10 and *41 associated with reduced enzymatic activity as well as the fully functional alleles *1 and *2. Genotype and allele frequencies were in accordance with published frequencies for the German population. The plasma metabolic ratio of metoprolol/alpha-OH-metoprolol was markedly affected by the genotype (P < 0.0001). In accordance, median adjusted metoprolol plasma concentrations were 6.2- and 3.9-fold higher in patients with *0/*0 genotypes (n = 8) and intermediate genotypes (n = 10), respectively, as compared to those with two fully functional alleles (n = 31; P < 0.01). In summary, the pronounced effect of the CYP2D6 genotype persists during long-term therapy, affecting both metabolic ratio and metoprolol plasma concentration.

The genetic basis of variability in drug responses

It is almost axiomatic that patients vary widely in their beneficial responses to drug therapy, and serious and apparently unpredictable adverse drug reactions continue to be a major public health problem. Here, we discuss the concept that genetic variants might determine much of this variability in drug response, and propose an algorithm to enable further evaluation of the benefits and pitfalls of this enticing possibility.

Prospective crossover comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol in patients with chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the effects of a change of beta-adrenergic blocking agent treatment from metoprolol to carvedilol and vice versa in patients with heart failure (HF).

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers improve ventricular function and prolong survival in patients with HF. It has recently been suggested that carvedilol has more pronounced effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with metoprolol. It is uncertain whether a change from one beta-blocker to the other is safe and leads to any change of left ventricular function.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with HF due to ischemic (n = 17) or idiopathic cardiomyopathy (n = 27) that had responded well to long-term treatment with either metoprolol (n = 20) or carvedilol (n = 24) were switched to an equivalent dose of the respective other beta-blocker. Before and six months after crossover of treatment, echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and dobutamine stress echocardiography were performed.

RESULTS

Six months after crossover of beta-blocker treatment, LVEF had further improved with both carvedilol and metoprolol (carvedilol: 32 +/- 3% to 36 +/- 4%; metoprolol: 27 +/- 4% to 30 +/- 5%; both p < 0.05 vs. baseline), without interindividual differences. There were no changes in either New York Heart Association functional class or any other hemodynamic parameters at rest. Dobutamine stress echocardiography revealed a more pronounced increase of heart rate after dobutamine infusion in metoprolol- compared with carvedilol-treated patients. After dobutamine infusion, LVEF increased in the carvedilol- but not in the metoprolol-treated group.

CONCLUSIONS

When switching treatment from one beta-blocker to the other, improvement of LVEF in patients with HF is maintained. Despite similar long-term effects on hemodynamics at rest, beta-adrenergic responsiveness is different in both treatments.

Use of gene markers to guide antihypertensive therapy

Sequencing of the human genome has elevated the potential for genetic information to aid in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of common chronic diseases. One beneficial application of genetic information is the identification of variants that influence response to pharmaceutical agents used to lower blood pressure and prevent target organ complications of hypertension. Knowledge of genetic variants that influence blood pressure response to antihypertensive drugs may allow more individualized tailoring of antihypertensive drug therapy, and provide greater insight into the molecular mechanisms regulating blood pressure levels and causing hypertension.

Antihypertensive pharmacogenetics: getting the right drug into the right patient

Pharmacogenetic investigation seeks to identify genetic factors that contribute to interpatient and interdrug variation in responses to antihypertensive drug therapy. Classical studies have characterized single gene polymorphisms of drug metabolizing enzymes that are responsible for large interindividual differences in pharmacokinetic responses to several antihypertensive drugs. Progress is being made using candidate gene and genome scanning approaches to identify and characterize many additional genes influencing pharmacodynamic mechanisms that contribute to interindividual differences in responses to antihypertensive drug therapy. Knowledge of polymorphic variation in these genes will help to predict individual patients' blood pressure responses to antihypertensive drug therapy and may also provide new insights into molecular mechanisms responsible for elevation of blood pressure.

Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol enantiomers following single and multiple administration of racemate in rat

The chiral beta-adrenergic blocking agent metoprolol (MET), which is marketed as a racemate, is a highly extracted drug with rapid absorption. The enantiomeric disposition of MET is reported following racemic administration as a single and as multiple oral dosing four times per day for four days in male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=6 in each group). Plasma was collected and enantiomeric concentrations of MET were determined using a stereospecific HPLC assay. The R/S ratio for AUC is not statistically different from unity either after single or after multiple administration of racemate. The oral clearance after single dose was 1.99+/-0.87 and 2. 26+/-0.85 ml min(-1) kg(-1) for R- and S-MET, respectively. These values were decreased to 0.59+/-0.21 and 0.64+/-0.26 ml min(-1) kg(-1) after multiple administration of racemate. The corresponding values for the elimination half-lives were approximately 35 and 33 min after single and multiple dose administration for both enantiomers, respectively. These results may suggest a saturable first pass metabolism of MET as its enantiomers are accumulated in plasma following multiple dosing in the rat model.

Classification and pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs

Despite the emergence of several forms of nonpharmacologic therapy for cardiac arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic drugs continue to play an important role in the management of patients with this common clinical problem. The key to the proper use of antiarrhythmic drugs is a thorough knowledge of their mode of action and pharmacology. The pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs is particularly important because patients with cardiac arrhythmias frequently have multiorgan disease, which may influence the metabolism and elimination of antiarrhythmic drugs. The accumulation of toxic amounts of these agents can lead to dire effects including, but not limited to, ventricular proarrhythmia and malignant bradycardia. The goals of pharmacologic therapy of cardiac arrhythmia are to provide the maximum benefit in terms of arrhythmia suppression while maintaining patient safety. To accomplish these goals, a knowledge of the pharmacology of several antiarrhythmic drugs is mandatory.

Effect of gender, sex hormones, time variables and physiological urinary pH on apparent CYP2D6 activity as assessed by metabolic ratios of marker substrates

The effects of gender, time variables, menstrual cycle phases, plasma sex hormone concentrations and physiologic urinary pH on CYP2D6 phenotyping were studied using two widely employed CYP2D6 probe drugs, namely dextromethorphan and metoprolol. Phenotyping on a single occasion of 150 young, healthy, drug-free women and men revealed that the dextromethorphan: dextrorphan metabolic ratio (MR) was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in 56 female extensive metabolizers (0.008+/-0.021) compared to 86 male extensive metabolizers (0.020 +/-0.040). Urinary pH was a significant predictor of dextromethorphan: dextrorphan MRs in men and women (P < 0.001). Once-a-month phenotyping with dextromethorphan of 12 healthy young men (eight extensive metabolizers and four poor metabolizers) over a 1-year period, as well as every-other-day phenotyping with dextromethorphan of healthy, pre-menopausal women (10 extensive metabolizers and 2 poor metabolizers) during a complete menstrual cycle, did not follow a particular pattern and showed similar intrasubject variability ranging from 24.1% to 74.5% (mean 50.9%) in men and from 20.5% to 96.2% (mean 52.0%) in women, independent of the CYP2D6 phenotype (P = 0.342). Using metoprolol as a probe drug, considerable intrasubject variability (38.6+/- 12.0%) but no correlation between metoprolol: alpha-hydroxymetoprolol MRs and pre-ovulatory, ovulatory and luteal phases (mean +/- SD metoprolol: a-hydroxymetoprolol MRs: 1.086+/- 1.137 pre-ovulatory; 1.159+/-1.158 ovulatory and 1.002+/-1.405 luteal phase; P> 0.9) or 17beta-oestradiol, progesterone or testosterone plasma concentrations was observed. There was a significant inverse relationship between physiologic urinary pH and sequential dextromethorphan: dextrorphan MRs as well as metoprolol: alpha-hydroxymetoprolol MRs in men and women, with metabolic ratios varying up to six-fold with metoprolol and up to 20-fold with dextromethorphan (ANCOVA P < 0.001). We conclude that apparent CYP2D6 activity is highly variable, independent of menstrual cycle phases, sex hormones, time variables or phenotype. Up to 80% of the observed variability can be explained by variations of urinary pH within the physiological range. An apparent phenotype shift as a result of variations in urinary pH may be observed in individuals who have metabolic ratios close to the population antimode.

Influence of hydroxychloroquine on the bioavailability of oral metoprolol

AIMS

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is used widely in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. Since there is great interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics of HCQ and chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6-catalysed pathways in vitro, we wished to study the interaction of HCQ with CYP2D6-mediated metabolism of other drugs in vivo.

METHODS

Metoprolol and dextromethorphan (DM) were selected as probe drugs because they are well-studied and widely used test substrates of CYP2D6. In this randomized, double-blind crossover study, seven healthy volunteers with extensive metabolizer phenotype for CYP2D6 ingested either 400 mg hydroxychloroquine or placebo daily for 8 days after which single oral dose pharmacokinetics of metoprolol were investigated. Dextromethorphan metabolic ratio (DM-MR) was also determined at baseline and after the ingestion of HCQ or placebo.

RESULTS

Concomitant administration of HCQ increased the bioavailability of metoprolol, as indicated by significant increases in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (65 +/- 4.6%) and maximal plasma concentrations (72 +/- 6.9%) of metoprolol. While the DM-MR values were not significantly changed, the phenotypic classification of one individual, who was heterozygous for a mutant CYP2D6 allele, was converted to a poor metabolizer by HCQ administration.

CONCLUSIONS

HCQ inhibits metoprolol metabolism most probably by inhibiting its biotransformation by CYP2D6. The inhibitory effect of HCQ on dextromethorphan metabolism was not apparent when DM-MR was used as an indicator, except in an individual with limited CYP2D6 capacity.

Pharmacogenetic diagnostics of cytochrome P450 polymorphisms in clinical drug development and in drug treatment

The current use and future perspectives of molecular genetic characterisation of cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP) for drug development and drug treatment are summarised. CYP genes are highly polymorphic and the enzymes play a key role in the elimination of the majority of drugs from the human body. Frequent variants of some enzymes, CYP2A6, 2C9, 2C19 and 2D6, should be analysed in participants of clinical trials whenever these enzymes may play a role. It is suggested that a CYP genotype certificate is handed out to the volunteers or patients to avoid replicate analyses, and to allow that this information is available for future research and also for treatment with eventually needed drugs. Guidelines on what CYP alleles have to be analysed in drug development, as well as on analytical validation and CYP genotype data handling will be required. Treatment with several drugs may be improved by prior genotyping. The concepts and problems of CYP genotype-based clinical dose recommendations are presented and illustrated for selected drugs. The requirement for prospective trials on the medical and economic benefits of routine CYP genotyping is emphasised. Specific operationally defined recommendations dependent on genotype are a prerequisite for such studies and this review presents tentative CYP genotype-based dose recommendations systematically calculated from published data. Because of the multiplicity of factors involved, these doses will not be the optimal doses for each given individual, but should be more adequate than doses generally recommended for an average total population. Those CYP alleles and polymorphically metabolised drugs which are currently most interesting in drug development and drug treatment are reviewed, and more complete information is available from websites cited in this article.

Inhibition of CYP2D6 by quinidine and its effects on the metabolism of cilostazol

OBJECTIVE

In vitro results are inconclusive as to whether cilostazol is metabolised by cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 2D6 (CYP2D6). The goals of this study were (1) to assure the dose of quinidine and timing relative to cilostazol used in this study were adequate to cause inhibition of CYP2D6, (2) to evaluate carryover effects of quinidine administration, and (3) to evaluate the effect of CYP2D6 deficiency and administration of quinidine (a CYP2D6 inhibitor) on the pharmacokinetics of a single 100 mg oral dose of cilostazol.

DESIGN

This study was conducted as a single-centre, open-label, randomised sequence, 2-period, crossover pharmacokinetic trial. Water alone (treatment without quinidine) or two 200 mg oral doses of quinidine sulfate with water were administered 25 hours and 1 hour prior to a single 100 mg dose of cilostazol in period 1. Study participants were crossed over to opposite treatment in period 2. Metoprolol 25 mg, used as a positive control, was administered 1 hour after quinidine sulfate with water or using water alone to assess the magnitude of CYP2D6 inhibition by quinidine.

STUDY PARTICIPANTS

22 healthy nonsmoking Caucasian (14 male and 8 female) volunteers participated in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Serial blood and urine samples were collected at predose and after cilostazol administration to characterise cilostazol and its metabolite pharmacokinetics. Additional plasma samples were taken to assess the pharmacokinetics of quinidine. Urine samples were collected to measure metoprolol and hydroxymetoprolol.

RESULTS

Administration of metoprolol with quinidine caused a significant (p < 0.001) decrease in the urinary 4-hydroxymetoprolol/metoprolol ratio compared with administration of metoprolol alone (42-fold decrease, 0.065 vs 2.707). Hence, quinidine effectively converted extensive metabolisers of CYP2D6 to poor metabolisers of CYP2D6. The 21-day washout period was adequate to have complete recovery from quinidine inhibition of CYP2D6. The analysis of variance demonstrated that the mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for cilostazol, both adjusted and unadjusted for the free fraction, was higher in the control group than in the quinidine group (p = 0.023). However, the time to Cmax (p = 0.669), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC infinity; p = 0.133), and the apparent oral clearance (p = 0.135) were unchanged. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) comparing with quinidine (test) and without quinidine (reference) coadministration for Cmax and AUC infinity are 0.86 (0.77, 0.95) and 0.92 (0.84, 1.00), respectively. Similar patterns were observed for OPC-13015 and OPC-13213 with regard to Cmax, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration at time t, and AUC infinity (where determinable). The slight decrease in the systemic availability of cilostazol and its metabolites was thought to be a result of the increased gastrointestinal motility secondary to quinidine.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of quinidine sulfate 200 mg profoundly inhibited CYP2D6-mediated metabolism. The effects of quinidine inhibition of CYP2D6 metabolism were completely reversible during the 21-day washout period. Coadministration of quinidine with cilostazol had no substantial effect on cilostazol or its metabolites (OPC-13015 and OPC-13213). Hence, CYP2D6 does not have a significant contribution in the metabolic elimination of cilostazol.

Lack of interaction between lansoprazole and propranolol, a pharmacokinetic and safety assessment

Due to the prevalence of both gastrointestinal and cardiovascular diseases, it is likely that patients may be coprescribed gastric parietal cell proton pump inhibitors and beta-adrenergic antagonists. Therefore, the objectives of this phase I study were to assess the potential effects of the coadministration of lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics of propranolol and to evaluate the safety of propranolol with concomitant lansoprazole dosing. In a double-blind fashion, 18 healthy male nonsmokers were initially randomized to receive either 60 mg oral lansoprazole, each morning for 7 days, or an identical placebo (period 1). On day 7, all subjects were concomitantly administered oral propranolol, 80 mg. After a minimum of 1 week following the last dose of either lansoprazole or placebo, subjects were crossed over to the opposite treatment for another 7 days (period 2). Subjects were again administered oral propranolol on day 7. During both treatment periods, blood samples for the determination of plasma propranolol and 4-hydroxy-propranolol were obtained just before the dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours postdose. Plasma propranolol and 4-hydroxy-propranolol concentrations were determined by using HPLC with fluorescence detection. The Cmax, tmax, AUC0-infinity, and t1/2 values for propranolol, as well as the AUC0-infinity for 4-hydroxy-propranolol, were calculated and compared between the lansoprazole and placebo regimens. The mean age of the 15 subjects who successfully completed the study was 31 years (range: 24-38 years), and their average weight was 174.8 pounds (range: 145-203 pounds). There were no statistically significant differences between the lansoprazole and placebo regimens for the propranolol Cmax, tmax, AUC0-infinity, and t1/2 values. Also, there were no statistically significant differences between regimens for the 4-OH-propranolol AUC0-infinity. Safety evaluations, which included adverse events, vital signs, clinical laboratory determinations, ECG, and physical examinations, revealed no unexpected clinically significant findings and did not suggest a drug-drug interaction. In conclusion, lansoprazole does not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of propranolol, suggesting that it does not interact with the CYP2D6- or CYP2C19-mediated metabolism of propranolol. Modification of a propranolol dosage regimen in the presence of lansoprazole is not indicated, based on the pharmacokinetic analysis and the lack of a clinically significant alteration in the pharmacodynamic response.

Mechanisms underlying variability in response to drug therapy: implications for amiodarone use

Drug disposition can be described by the traditional processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. A contemporary view of these processes includes the concept that they are determined by the regulated activity of specific gene products. Such a view is an important step to an increased understanding of interindividual variability in drug disposition and in response to drug therapy. In addition, molecular mechanisms underlying common drug interactions are now being elucidated. Despite this new knowledge, little is understood about the molecular mechanisms determining the unusual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of amiodarone. These unusual characteristics include incomplete bioavailability, distribution to multiple tissue sites, extreme lipophilicity, biotransformation to an active metabolite, and very slow elimination of both parent drug and active metabolite. The drug also produces a range of important pharmacologic effects, including antiadrenergic effects that are apparent early during therapy, changes in cardiac repolarization that take longer to develop, and important extracardiac actions, including side effects and drug interactions. As a consequence of these pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic complexities, individualization of dose during long-term therapy with amiodarone has not been systematically explored.