Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III BRAF-Mutated Melanoma

Advances in Understanding Drug Resistance Mechanisms and Innovative Clinical Treatments for Melanoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Melanoma, a highly invasive skin cancer resulting from melanocyte malignant transformation, is the third most common skin malignancy. Despite accounting for only 4% to 5% of all skin malignancies, it is responsible for 80% of skin cancer-related deaths. Targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved survival rates, yet drug resistance remains a major challenge. In this review, I explore the latest research progress on melanoma drug resistance mechanisms and clinical treatment methods. This aims to provide insights for more effective treatment strategies and improve patient prognosis and quality of life. I also discuss potential strategies to overcome drug resistance based on the latest scientific findings, with a particular focus on the complex and multi-factorial drug resistance mechanisms of melanomas, including genetic mutations, epigenetic changes, and tumor microenvironment factors. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing new drugs and combination therapies targeting drug-resistant tumors. Analyzing complex drug resistance pathways paves the way for personalized medical approaches, which is expected to provide enlightenment on breaking through drug resistance barriers and enhancing the effectiveness of melanoma treatment.

When to stop immunotherapy for advanced melanoma: the emulated target trials

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated their efficacy with a 7.5-year overall survival (OS) close to 50% for advanced stages. The design of clinical trials provides for treatment until progression or toxicity, or for a maximum duration of two years. Prolonged follow-up of responders after treatment cessation shows sustained response and a low risk of relapse in the months following cessation. To date, the optimal duration of anti-PD-1 therapy for metastatic melanoma remains unestablished. The objective of this work was to evaluate the optimal duration of ICI administration.

Methods

We emulated target trials using the cloning, weighting and censoring approach. Each emulation trial aimed to compare the effect of discontinuing versus continuing ICIs at a specific timepoint, among patients still under treatment and with disease control at that time. Patients were from MelBase between 2015 and 2021.

Findings

435 participants in the MelBase cohort were eligible and were included in the 6-month discontinuation emulated trial. The results showed significantly lower OS when treatment was discontinued, than when treatment was prolonged for at least three months. The 48-month survival difference was 37.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.8-60.5), and the corresponding restricted mean survival time difference was 8.3 months (95% CI: 4.1-12.7). Neither the 12-month nor the 18-month discontinuation emulated trials showed evidence of benefit of either discontinuing or continuing ICIs at either of these timepoints. The 24-month discontinuation emulated trial results were more in favor of discontinuing than continuing treatment at that time point, with an absolute 48-month survival rate that was 10.5% higher (95% CI 4.4-18.1).

Interpretation

These results suggest that a one-year course of immunotherapy is both necessary and sufficient for patients with advanced melanoma. Prolonged treatment beyond 2 years does not appear to be beneficial in terms of survival and could even be detrimental.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp Dhome, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Sun Pharm, Regeneron, Sanofi, Nektar, Therapeutics and Oncyte.

Monitoring circulating tumor DNA liquid biopsy in stage III BRAF-mutant melanoma patients undergoing adjuvant treatment

BACKGROUND

The introduction of adjuvant therapies for patients with resected cutaneous melanoma (CM) has increased the need for sensitive biomarkers for risk stratification and disease monitoring. This study aims to investigate the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assessment in predicting and reflecting disease status during adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

We enrolled 32 patients with resected BRAF-mutated stage III CM receiving adjuvant targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Plasma samples of patients were collected at the baseline (treatment initiation) and during the therapy, and BRAF-mutated ctDNA was quantified by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR).

RESULTS

Baseline ctDNA was detected in 11/32 (34.4%) patients and predicted postoperative high risk of relapse [HR 3.79, 95% CI 1.20-12.00, p = 0.023]. The three-year overall survival (OS) rate was 54.6% (95% CI 22.9-77.9) versus 95% (95% CI 69.5-99.3) in ctDNA-positive and negative groups, respectively, with significantly worse OS for ctDNA-positive patients [HR 7.92, 95% CI 1.56-40.36, p = 0.013]. Among the baseline ctDNA-positive group (high-risk patients), longitudinal ctDNA detection during adjuvant therapy reflected the clinical outcomes. Only non-relapsing patients cleared their plasma ctDNA by the end of the treatment, while persistent ctDNA detection provided early evidence of disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

ctDNA detection shows promising results in the post-operative setting for identifying cutaneous melanoma patients at the highest risk of relapse and for real-time monitoring of patients' clinical status and treatment response.

Influence of adjuvant therapies on organ-specific recurrence of cutaneous melanoma: A multicenter study on 1383 patients of the prospective DeCOG registry ADOReg

This study investigated whether adjuvant treatments in stage III cutaneous melanoma (CM) influenced patterns of recurrence. Patients with primary (n = 1033) or relapsed CM (n = 350) who received adjuvant therapies with Nivolumab (N), Pembrolizumab (P), or Dabrafenib and Trametinib (D + T) were extracted from the prospective multicenter real-world skin cancer registry ADOReg. Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), organ-specific DMFS, and overall survival (OS). For primary cases, D + T indicated an improved PFS (1- and 2-year PFS: 90.9%; 82.7%) as compared to P (81.0%, 73.9%; p = .0208), or N (83.8%, 75.2%; p = .0539). BRAF-mutated(mut) CM demonstrated significantly lower PFS (p = .0022) and decreased DMFS (p = .0580) when treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) instead of D + T. Besides, NRAS-mut CM tended to perform worse than wt CM upon ICI (PFS: p = .1349; DMFS: p = .0540). OS was similar between the groups. Relapsed cases showed decreased PFS, DMFS, and OS in comparison to primary (all: p < .001), without significant differences between the subgroups. Organ-specific DMFS was significantly altered for primary cases with bone (p = .0367) or brain metastases (p = .0202). In relapsed CM, the frequency of liver (D + T: 1.5%; P: 12%; N: 9%) and LN metastases (D + T: 1.5%; P: 12%; N: 10.2%) was significantly lower with adjuvant D + T than ICI. NRAS-mut CM showed increased recurrence in primary and relapsed cases. These data show that adjuvant D + T is superior to ICI in primary BRAF-mut CM.

Final Results for Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III Melanoma

BACKGROUND

The 5-year results of this trial showed that adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in longer relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival than placebo among patients with BRAF V600-mutated stage III melanoma. Longer-term data were needed, including data regarding overall survival.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 870 patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations to receive 12 months of dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2 mg once daily) or two matched placebos. Here, we report the final results of this trial, including results for overall survival, melanoma-specific survival, relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival.

RESULTS

The median duration of follow-up was 8.33 years for dabrafenib plus trametinib and 6.87 years for placebo. Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival favored dabrafenib plus trametinib over placebo, although the benefit was not significant (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.01; P = 0.06 by stratified log-rank test). A consistent survival benefit was seen across several prespecified subgroups, including the 792 patients with melanoma with a BRAF V600E mutation (hazard ratio for death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.96). Relapse-free survival favored dabrafenib plus trametinib over placebo (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.63), as did distant metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.71). No new safety signals were reported, a finding consistent with previous trial reports.

CONCLUSIONS

After nearly 10 years of follow-up, adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib was associated with better relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival than placebo among patients with resected stage III melanoma. The analysis of overall survival showed that the risk of death was 20% lower with combination therapy than with placebo, but the benefit was not significant. Among patients with melanoma with a BRAF V600E mutation, the results suggest that the risk of death was 25% lower with combination therapy. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; COMBI-AD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682083; EudraCT number, 2012-001266-15.).

Seven-year analysis of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in stage III melanoma in the EORTC1325 / KEYNOTE-054 trial

In the previously reported primary analyses of this phase 3 trial, 12 months of adjuvant pembrolizumab resulted in significantly longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) than placebo in patients with resected high risk stage III melanoma. Stability of these benefits when the median follow-up was 3.5 and 5 years was published. Here we report results with a longer follow-up.

METHODS

We randomized 1019 patients to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses. RFS in the overall population and in the subgroup of patients with melanoma positive for the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) were co-primary endpoints. DMFS in these two populations was a secondary and progression/recurrence-free survival 2 (PRFS2) an exploratory endpoint.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 6.9 years. In the overall intention-to-treat population, RFS was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (HR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.53 to 0.74). RFS at 7 years was 50 % (95 % CI 46 % to 55 %) in the pembrolizumab and 36 % (95 % CI 32 % to 41 %) in the placebo group. Positive effects were present both for loco-regional recurrences and distant metastases, and across substages IIIA-IIIB-IIIC, and PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative as well as for BRAF mutant and BRAF wild type populations. DMFS was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (HR 0.64, 95 % CI 0.54 to 0.76). DMFS at 7 years was 54 % (95 % CI 50 % to 59 %) in the pembrolizumab and 42 % (95 % CI 37 % to 46 %) in the placebo group. PRFS2 was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (HR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.57 to 0.84). PRFS2 at 7 years was 61 % (95 % CI 57 % to 66 %) in the pembrolizumab and 53 % (95 % CI 49 % to 57 %) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-year analysis of adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab demonstrated a sustained improvement in the long-term RFS, DMFS and PRFS2 compared with placebo in patients with resected stage III melanoma.

SEOM-GEM clinical guidelines for cutaneous melanoma (2023)

Cutaneous melanoma incidence is rising. Early diagnosis and treatment administration are key for increasing the chances of survival. For patients with locoregional advanced melanoma that can be treated with complete resection, adjuvant-and more recently neoadjuvant-with targeted therapy-BRAF and MEK inhibitors-and immunotherapy-anti-PD-1-based therapies-offer opportunities to reduce the risk of relapse and distant metastases. For patients with advanced disease not amenable to radical treatment, these treatments offer an unprecedented increase in overall survival. A group of medical oncologists from the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and Spanish Multidisciplinary Melanoma Group (GEM) has designed these guidelines, based on a thorough review of the best evidence available. The following guidelines try to cover all the aspects from the diagnosis-clinical, pathological, and molecular-staging, risk stratification, adjuvant therapy, advanced disease therapy, and survivor follow-up, including special situations, such as brain metastases, refractory disease, and treatment sequencing. We aim help clinicians in the decision-making process.

Disparities in Receipt of Adjuvant Immunotherapy among Stage III Melanoma Patients

OBJECTIVE

Melanoma survival has greatly improved with the advent of immunotherapy, but unequal access to these medications may exist due to nonmedical patient factors such as insurance status, educational background, and geographic proximity to treatment.

METHODS

We used the National Cancer Database to assess patients with nonmetastatic cutaneous melanoma who underwent surgical resection and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with tumor involvement from 2015 to 2020. We evaluated rates of adjuvant immunotherapy among this patient population based on patient, tumor, and facility variables, including insurance status, socioeconomic status, pathologic stage (IIIA-IIID), and treatment facility type and volume.

RESULTS

Adjuvant immunotherapy was associated with improved survival for stage III melanoma, with a slight increase in 5-year OS for stage IIIA (87.9% vs. 85.9%, P=0.044) and a higher increase in stages IIIB-D disease (70.3% vs. 59.6%, P<0.001). Receipt of adjuvant immunotherapy was less likely for patients who were older, low socioeconomic status, or uninsured. Low-volume and community cancer centers had higher rates of adjuvant immunotherapy overall for all stage III patients, whereas high-volume and academic centers used adjuvant immunotherapy much less often for stage IIIA patients compared with those in stages IIIB-D.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate inconsistent use of adjuvant immunotherapy among patients with stage III melanoma despite a significant association with improved survival. Notably, there was a lower use of adjuvant immunotherapy in patients of lower SES and those treated at high-volume centers. Equity in access to novel standards of care represents an opportunity to improve outcomes for patients with melanoma.

Bespoke ctDNA for longitudinal detection of molecular residual disease in high-risk melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced melanoma has a variable prognosis. Currently, there are no reliable criteria to stratify the risk of disease relapse and identify those patients who will benefit the most from adjuvant therapies. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging biomarker measuring the presence of tumor-derived DNA in blood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used a bespoke, tumor-informed assay (RaDaR®, NeoGenomics, Inc.) to detect ctDNA in 276 prospectively collected plasma samples from 66 melanoma patients receiving definitive treatment. Collection time points included landmark (after completion of local treatment) and every 3-6 months for up to 2 years.

RESULTS

ctDNA was detected in at least one plasma sample in 19 patients (29%), including 6/65 (9%) at landmark (post-surgical sample). Positive ctDNA at landmark was associated with shorter overall survival (OS; median OS 22.7 months versus not reached, log-rank P value = 0.01) and a trend towards a shorter relapse-free survival (RFS; median RFS 15.7 months versus not reached, log-rank P value = 0.07). In 10 patients, ctDNA detection preceded disease relapse by a median of 128 days (range 8-406 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that ctDNA detection after surgery can identify patients with worse prognosis, and serial ctDNA measurements may enable earlier identification of disease recurrence.

Outcomes With Postrecurrence Systemic Therapy Following Adjuvant Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Resected Melanoma in CheckMate 238

PURPOSE

In phase III CheckMate 238, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with ipilimumab in patients with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma without a significant difference in overall survival (OS). Here, we investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and OS after postrecurrence systemic therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients 15 years or older with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma were stratified by stage and tumor PD-L1 status and randomly assigned to receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks for 1 year or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Patients with recurrence in each group were assessed for PFS and OS from subsequent systemic therapy (SST) initiation per recurrence timing (≤12 months [early] v >12 months [late] from initial therapy).

RESULTS

Recurrences occurred in 198 (44%) of 453 nivolumab-treated patients (122 early, 76 late) and 232 (51%) of 453 ipilimumab-treated patients (160 early, 72 late). Median PFS on next-line systemic therapy for nivolumab-treated patients recurring early versus late was 4.7 versus 12.4 months (24-month rates, 16% v 31%); median OS was 19.8 versus 42.8 months (24-month rates: 37% v 73%). In response to subsequent therapy, patients on nivolumab with late versus early recurrence were more likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Nivolumab-treated patients with either an early or late recurrence benefitted from an ipilimumab-based therapy or targeted therapy, each with similar OS.

CONCLUSION

Postrecurrence survival was longer for patients who recurred >12 months. Patients on nivolumab who recurred early benefitted from SST but had better survival with ipilimumab-based regimens or targeted therapy compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Death from Melanoma and Genitourinary Diseases in Male Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma: A Cohort Propensity Score Matching Study

Objective

To analyze the influencing factors of male cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients dying from genitourinary diseases (GUD).

Methods

We searched the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database and extracted data on male CM patients according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including male patients whose cause of death was CM (cohort A) or GUD (cohort B). Comparisons between the two cohorts were performed before and after propensity score matching (PSM). An interaction analysis between age and year of diagnosis was also conducted. Cox regression analysis were performed to find the risk factors for death from GUD.

Results

Seven thousand seventy-eight CM patients were included, including 6415 (90.6%) in cohort A and 663 (9.4%) in cohort B. Compared with cohort A, cohort B patients were older (median age 74 ys. vs 65 ys.) and were more under the localized stage and had longer survival time no matter before or after PSM (all p<0.001). The stage was an inhibitory factor for cohort B (p <0.001). After PSM, only age and year of diagnosis were found to be cohort B's promoting factors (p<0.001). The interaction analysis showed that older patients diagnosed in later years (2009-2020) had a higher risk of dying from GUD compared to those diagnosed earlier (p<0.05). Patients with a later year of diagnosis (2009-2020) had a lower median survival time than patients with an earlier year of diagnosis (2000-2008) (p<0.001). When the patient's year of diagnosis was earlier (2000-2008), older patients (>75 ys.) had a higher risk of dying from GUD than younger patients (≤75 ys.) (p<0.001).

Conclusion

We first reported a significant interaction between age and year of diagnosis in male CM patients dying from GUD, highlighting the increased risk in older patients diagnosed more recently. We may pay attention to the possibility of dying from genitourinary diseases for CM patients.

Long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant-adjuvant targeted therapy in borderline resectable stage IIIB-D and IV melanoma

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant-adjuvant therapy for locally advanced or potentially resectable metastatic melanoma was expected to improve operability and clinical outcomes over upfront surgery and adjuvant treatment only.

METHODS

Forty-seven consecutive patients were treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi)/MEK inhibitors (MEKi) and surgery.

RESULTS

Twelve (26%) patients achieved a pathological complete response and 10 (21%) patients achieved a near-complete response. In the whole group, median recurrence-free survival was 19.4 months and median distant metastasis-free survival (mDMFS) was 21.9 months. In patients with a pathological complete response (pCR)/near-pCR median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were significantly longer than in patients with minor pathological response with hazard ratio (HR) = 0.37 (p = .005) for RFS and HR = 0.33 (p = .002) for DMFS. After median follow-up of 52.5 months, median progression-free survival since BRAFi/MEKi therapy initiation was 25.1 months. The median time-to-treatment-failure since initiation of neoadjuvant therapy was 22.2 months and was significantly longer in patients with pCR/near-pCR (HR = 0.45; p = .022). Neoadjuvant therapy did not result in any new specific complications of surgery. After 48 months, RFS and overall survival were 36.3% and 64.8% or 20% and 37.4% in patients with pCR/near-pCR and pathological partial response/pathological nonresponse, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors confirmed that BRAFi/MEKi combination is an effective and safe regimen in the perioperative treatment of stage III/IV melanoma. Major pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is a surrogate marker of recurrence including DMFS in these patients.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Our study presents a large comprehensive analysis of neoadjuvant-adjuvant systemic therapy in patients diagnosed with marginally resectable stage III or IV melanoma. Neoadjuvant therapy effectively reduced the volume of the disease, which facilitated subsequent surgical resection. After median follow-up of 52.5 months, median progression-free survival since therapy initiation was 25.1 months. Twelve patients had complete pathological response and 10 patients had a near-complete pathological response-and together they had median recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival significantly longer than in patients with pathological partial response or nonresponse. Complete/near-complete pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is a surrogate marker of recurrence-free, including distant metastasis-free, survival in these patients.

Axillary Lymph Node Malignant Melanoma of Unknown Primary Origin: A Case Report From Japan

Malignant melanoma of unknown primary origin (MUP) is a rare disease predominantly reported in Caucasian individuals. In this paper, we report a rare case of MUP. We treated a 75-year-old Japanese man with an MUP localized to the axillary lymph nodes. The primary tumor could not be identified despite available investigations. We performed radical lymph node dissection and administered postoperative adjuvant therapy using the molecular-targeted drugs dabrafenib and trametinib. Ten months after surgery, the patient experienced a favorable clinical course with no recurrence or complications from surgery or medication. The frequency and clinical characteristics of malignant melanoma differ among ethnic groups, and very few reports of MUP have been documented in East Asia.

Advances in Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Melanoma

Melanoma remains one of the most common cancers diagnosed in the United States, yet there have been substantial advancements in the treatment of resectable disease. Adjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) have now become standard of care for resectable stage IIIB-IV melanoma. In this article, the authors discuss recent scientific developments pertinent to the treatment of resectable melanoma including ICB, targeted therapy with BRAF/MEKi, oncolytic viruses, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, and cancer vaccines.

Progress in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor for Melanoma Therapy

Melanoma has seen the most remarkable therapeutic improvements among all cancers in the past decade, primarily due to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Initially developed in the patients with advanced disease, ICI are now used in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. More recently, the development of LAG-3 blocking antibody and the combination of ICI with a personalized RNA-based vaccine have continued to lead the immunotherapeutic field. Despite these advances, primary and secondary resistances remain problematic and there is a high need for predictive biomarkers to optimize benefit/risk ratio of ICI use.

Nodal Metastases in Stage 3 Head and Neck Melanoma: Patterns of Metastases and Patterns of Failure

OBJECTIVE

Stage 3 patients with clinically positive nodal metastasis are treated with therapeutic neck dissection and adjuvant systemic therapy. The aim of our study was to examined the predictability of pre-operative CT as a nodal drainage assessment tool.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients with clinically positive head and neck cutaneous melanoma between 2010 and 2019. Clinical disease was diagnosed as radiological suspicious, biopsy-proven node. A pre-operative CT evaluation for nodal metastasis was compared to pathology report.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients were included. Forty patients (75.5%) were males with a mean age of 59 (SD 15.52). The majority of patients (26.4%) had an unknown primary site. The most common sites for primary were the cheek in eight patients (15.1%) followed by forehead (9.4%) and lateral neck (9.4%). Preoperative CT predicted nodal disease in 84.6% of cases. The primary region that mainly failed from the previously described clinical prediction was the upper anterior neck with 83.3% parotid involvement. A total of 10 patients (18.9%) were diagnosis with non-clinical nodes on pathology with a median non-clinical node of 1 (range 1-2). Of them, 9 (90%) were in the same clinical levels detected by CT. Pre-operative CT was associated with a neck level accuracy of 98.1%.

CONCLUSION

Stage 3 head and neck melanoma with clinically positive nodal metastasis that are eligible for an adjuvant systemic treatment, may benefit from a highly selective neck dissection according to their pre-operative imaging studies. This should be further evaluated in a large-scale clinical trial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:4292-4297, 2024.

No drug holidays in BRAFV600E glioma patients: An argument for dose reduction of targeted therapies

Background

Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition is effective for some BRAFV600E-altered gliomas, a cancer for which there are few effective therapies. While recent clinical trials demonstrate objective response rates of 30%-40%, tolerable adverse event rates are 70%-90%, and 12%-15% of patients stop therapy for toxicity. There are no clear guidelines regarding the timing and reinitiation of BRAF-targeted therapies following drug holidays. Here, we describe 4 patients with rapid disease progression during periods of treatment interruption. All patients experienced a response upon resumption of targeted therapy.

Methods

This is a multi-institutional, retrospective review of 4 patients.

Results

Three patients were diagnosed with BRAFV600E mutated anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (aPXA) and 1 with epithelioid glioblastoma. The age range was 32 to 46; 3 patients were female and one patient was male. All patients were initially treated with radiation and were subsequently treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors after disease progression. All patients with aPXA required the targeted therapy to be held due to toxicity and 1 patient held the therapy prior to transitioning to a novel BRAF-targeted agent. All patients were restarted on BRAF/MEK inhibitors after a drug holiday. Three patients required a dose reduction and all improved clinically following reinitiation.

Conclusions

Clinical and radiographic progression may occur rapidly upon holding BRAF-targeted therapy, warranting judicious dose reductions and minimization of drug holidays.

Real-world use and outcomes of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for adjuvant treatment of BRAF -mutated melanoma patients in the United States

Using a customized, harmonized US electronic health record database, real-world prescription patterns of first-line adjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy were retrospectively assessed for BRAF V600-mutated melanoma. Adults with BRAF V600 mutation-positive stage IIIA-D cutaneous melanoma who received first-line adjuvant immunotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or targeted therapy (dabrafenib plus trametinib) between 1 January 2014 and 30 August 2020 in the NOBLE database were included. Patients were followed from first-line adjuvant therapy initiation for at least 6 months, until death, progression, follow-up loss, or data cutoff. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients receiving either therapy in first-line and second-line, treatment switching, treatment timing, and status at the end of first-line therapy. Secondary endpoints included discontinuation rates, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Of 318 patients evaluated, 67.6% received nivolumab, 14.2% pembrolizumab, and 18.2% targeted therapy as first-line adjuvant therapy. Median treatment duration was longest for nivolumab (292 days) and shortest for targeted therapy (115 days). Reason for discontinuation was recorded for 195 of 274 patients who discontinued first-line therapy; most common reasons were treatment completion and treatment-related toxicity [87/158 (55.0%) and 29/158 (18.4%), respectively, in immunotherapy-treated patients; 9/37 (24.3%) and 21/37 (56.8%) in targeted therapy-treated patients]. Median RFS and OS for targeted therapy and nivolumab were not reached and were 34.6 and 38.1 months, respectively, for pembrolizumab. These results inform on prescription preferences and clinical outcomes for BRAF V600-mutated melanoma patients in the first-line adjuvant setting.

Access to melanoma drugs in Spain: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

The development of highly active drugs has improved the survival of melanoma patients, but elevated drug prices place a significant burden on health care systems. In Spain, the public health care system is transferred to the 17 autonomous communities (AACC). The objective of this study is to describe the situation of drug access for melanoma patients in Spain and how this decentralized system is affecting equity.

METHODS

From July to September 2023, a cross-sectional survey was sent to members of the Spanish Multidisciplinary Melanoma Group (GEM Group). The questionnaire consulted about the real access to new drugs in each hospital. The responses were collected anonymously and analyzed according to several variables, including the AACC.

RESULTS

The survey was answered by 50 physicians in 15 AACC. No major differences on access between AACC were observed for indications that are reimbursed by the Spanish Health Care System (adjuvant immunotherapy for stage IIIC-IIID and resected stage IV melanoma). Important differences in drug access were observed among AACC and among centers within the same AACC, for most of the EMA indications that are not reimbursed (adjuvant immunotherapy for stages IIB-IIC-IIIA-IIIB) or that are not fully reimbursed (ipilimumab plus nivolumab in advanced stage). Homogeneously, access to adjuvant targeted drugs, TIL therapy and T-VEC, is extremely low or non-existing in all AACC.

CONCLUSIONS

For most indications that reimbursement is restricted out of the EMA indication, a great diversity on access was found throughout the different hospitals in Spain, including heterogeneity intra-AACC.

Targeted Therapy Innovations for Melanoma

Melanoma, a malignant tumor of melanocytes, poses a significant clinical challenge due to its aggressive nature and high potential for metastasis. The advent of targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of melanoma, particularly for tumors harboring specific genetic alterations such as BRAF V600E mutations. Despite the initial success of targeted agents, resistance inevitably arises, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies. This review explores the latest advances in targeted therapy for melanoma, focusing on new molecular targets, combination therapies, and strategies to overcome resistance.

Is primary breast melanoma a true pathological entity? The argument against it

Background

Previous studies have reported cases of primary melanoma of the breast parenchyma (PMBP), but the pathogenesis of this disease remains poorly understood. We review the presentation and outcomes of reported cases and provide detailed pathological analysis of four additional cases. Furthermore, we discuss potential theories regarding the pathogenesis of this clinical presentation.

Results

We identified 29 published studies (n = 95 patients) and report four new cases (n = 99). Ninety-one (92 %) patients were female, with a median age of 50 years. Previous skin melanomas were reported by 56 % of patients, with the trunk being the most common location (32.7 %) followed by the upper extremities (20 %). The most common tumor location reported (n = 73) was the right (49 %) upper outer quadrant (56 %). The median time from skin melanoma diagnosis to the presence of a breast mass was 65 months (1-192). Nodal status at presentation was reported in n = 67 (68 %) patients. Of these, positive nodal metastases were seen in 40.3 %, while distant metastatic disease at presentation was reported in 30 % of patients. Surgery was performed in 66 %, being partial mastectomy (PM) the most common procedure in 82 %. Adjuvant therapy was described in 38 patients. The reported (n = 12) median survival was 11.5 (1-70) months.

Conclusion

Melanomas identified in the breast parenchyma are likely the result of nodal or hematogenous spread from previously known or unknown melanomas, and should not be considered as PMBP. Management should be multidisciplinary, including surgical excision aimed at obtaining negative margins with lymphadenectomy of clinically positive nodes and neoadjuvant/adjuvant immunotherapy.

Adjuvant Therapy in Acral Melanoma: A Systematic Review

Background

Acral melanoma presents distinct biological characteristics compared to cutaneous melanoma. While adjuvant therapeutic strategies for high-risk resected acral melanoma closely resemble those for cutaneous melanoma, the evidence supporting the clinical application of adjuvant therapy for acral melanoma remains inadequate. Our aim was to systematically analyze the efficacy and safety profile of adjuvant therapy in acral melanoma.

Methods

This systematic review adhered to a pre-registered protocol. We comprehensively searched four electronic databases and reference lists of included articles to identify eligible studies. The primary outcome was therapeutic efficacy, and the secondary outcome was adverse events (AEs).

Results

This systematic review included 11 studies with 758 acral melanoma patients undergoing adjuvant therapy. High-dose interferon α-2b (IFN) regimens showed no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS), though the longer regimen was linked to increased hepatotoxicity. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy demonstrated varying efficacy, with improved RFS in patients who experienced immune-related AEs. Targeted therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib achieved high 12-month RFS in patients with BRAF-mutated acral melanoma. Comparative studies suggested that adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy is similarly effective to IFN in prolonging survival for high-risk acral melanoma patients. Additionally, prior treatment with pegylated IFN enhanced RFS in patients receiving adjuvant pembrolizumab.

Conclusion

High-dose IFN was widely used as adjuvant therapy for acral melanoma, but serious AEs prompted the search for alternatives. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy shows promise, though it may be less effective than in non-acral melanoma. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal adjuvant treatment for acral melanoma.

Case report: MEK inhibitor as treatment for multi-lineage mosaic KRAS G12D-associated epidermal nevus syndrome in a pediatric patient

The RASopathies, collectively, are a spectrum of genetic syndromes caused by mutations in genes involved in the RAS/ mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, including but not limited to PTPN11, NRAS, KRAS, HRAS, BRAF, and MAP2K1. Recognized RASopathy conditions include neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), Noonan syndrome, capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation syndrome, Costello syndrome, cardiofacio-cutaneous (CFC) syndrome, LEOPARD syndrome and Legius syndrome. The RASopathies often display overlapping clinical features, presumably owing to common RAS-MAPK signaling pathway activation driving dysregulated cell proliferation. Epidermal nevus syndromes (ENS) are described as the presence of epidermal nevi, in individuals also affected by extra-cutaneous organ system involvement, and there is recent recognition of mosaic RAS mutations as molecular drivers of ENS. Currently, no curative treatments exist for RASopathy driven conditions, but rather symptom-directed management is the currently accepted standard. Here, we detail a unique case of a child exhibiting diffuse spinal nerve root hypertrophy in the context of epidermal nevus syndrome driven by molecularly confirmed KRAS G12D mosaicism, treated with the MEK 1/2 inhibitor selumetinib. Herein, we report the response of this patient to targeted therapy of more than two years' duration, including stabilization of multilevel nerve root hypertrophy as well as significant improvement in epidermal nevi. While the effectiveness of MEK inhibitors such as selumetinib is established in NF1-associated inoperable plexiform neurofibromas, their use in managing hyperactive KRAS-driven epidermal nevi and hypertrophic neuropathy remains unproven, and this case, to our knowledge, is the first such case to be reported. Shared molecular dysregulation and overlapping clinical features between these conditions suggest potential for effective therapeutic application of MEK directed therapy to address a range of conditions resulting from germline and/ or mosaic expression of aberrantly regulated RAS signaling.

Treatment resistance to melanoma therapeutics on a single cell level

Therapy targeting the BRAF-MEK cascade created a treatment revolution for patients with BRAF mutant advanced melanoma. Unfortunately, 80% patients treated will progress by 5 years follow-up. Thus, it is imperative we study mechanisms of melanoma progression and therapeutic resistance. We created a scRNA (single cell RNA) atlas of 128,230 cells from 18 tumors across the treatment spectrum, discovering melanoma cells clustered strongly by transcriptome profiles of patients of origins. Our cell-level investigation revealed gains of 1q and 7q as likely early clonal events in metastatic melanomas. By comparing patient tumors and their derivative cell lines, we observed that PD1 responsive tumor fraction disappears when cells are propagated in vitro. We further established three anti-BRAF-MEK treatment resistant cell lines using three BRAF mutant tumors. ALDOA and PGK1 were found to be highly expressed in treatment resistant cell populations and metformin was effective in targeting the resistant cells. Our study suggests that the investigation of patient tumors and their derivative lines is essential for understanding disease progression, treatment response and resistance.

An artificial intelligence-based model exploiting H&E images to predict recurrence in negative sentinel lymph-node melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification and treatment benefit prediction models are urgent to improve negative sentinel lymph node (SLN-) melanoma patient selection, thus avoiding costly and toxic treatments in patients at low risk of recurrence. To this end, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) could help clinicians to better calculate the recurrence risk and choose whether to perform adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

We made use of AI to predict recurrence-free status (RFS) within 2-years from diagnosis in 94 SLN- melanoma patients. In detail, we detected quantitative imaging information from H&E slides of a cohort of 71 SLN- melanoma patients, who registered at Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" in Bari, Italy (investigational cohort, IC). For each slide, two expert pathologists firstly annotated two Regions of Interest (ROIs) containing tumor cells alone (TUMOR ROI) or with infiltrating cells (TUMOR + INF ROI). In correspondence of the two kinds of ROIs, two AI-based models were developed to extract information directly from the tiles in which each ROI was automatically divided. This information was then used to predict RFS. Performances of the models were computed according to a 5-fold cross validation scheme. We further validated the prediction power of the two models on an independent external validation cohort of 23 SLN- melanoma patients (validation cohort, VC).

RESULTS

The TUMOR ROIs have revealed more informative than the TUMOR + INF ROIs. An Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of 79.1% and 62.3%, a sensitivity value of 81.2% and 76.9%, a specificity value of 70.0% and 43.3%, an accuracy value of 73.2% and 53.4%, were achieved on the TUMOR and TUMOR + INF ROIs extracted for the IC cohort, respectively. An AUC value of 76.5% and 65.2%, a sensitivity value of 66.7% and 41.6%, a specificity value of 70.0% and 55.9%, an accuracy value of 70.0% and 56.5%, were achieved on the TUMOR and TUMOR + INF ROIs extracted for the VC cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our approach represents a first effort to develop a non-invasive prognostic method to better define the recurrence risk and improve the management of SLN- melanoma patients.

Synthetic RIG-I agonist-mediated cancer immunotherapy synergizes with MAP kinase inhibition against BRAF-mutated melanoma

The implementation of targeted molecular therapies and immunotherapy in melanoma vastly improved the therapeutic outcome in patients with limited efficacy of surgical intervention. Nevertheless, a large fraction of patients with melanoma still remain refractory or acquire resistance to these new forms of treatment, illustrating a need for improvement. Here, we report that the clinically relevant combination of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib synergize with RIG-I agonist-induced immunotherapy to kill BRAF-mutated human and mouse melanoma cells. Kinase inhibition did not compromise the agonist-induced innate immune response of the RIG-I pathway in host immune cells. In a melanoma transplantation mouse model, the triple therapy outperformed individual therapies. Our study suggests that agonist-induced activation of RIG-I with its synthetic ligand 3pRNA could vastly improve tumor control in a substantial fraction of patients with melanoma receiving MAP kinase inhibitors.

Real-Life Outcomes of Adjuvant Targeted Therapy and Anti-PD1 Agents in Stage III/IV Resected Melanoma

This study was carried out at the Dermatologic Clinic of the University of Turin, Italy, to assess the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant therapy in patients who received either targeted therapy (TT: dabrafenib + trametinib) or immunotherapy (IT: nivolumab or pembrolizumab) for up to 12 months. A total of 163 patients participated, including 147 with stage III and 19 with stage IV with no evidence of disease. The primary outcomes were relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). At 48 months, both TT and IT approaches yielded comparable outcomes in terms of RFS (55.6-55.4%, p = 0.532), DMFS (58.2-59.8%, p = 0.761), and OS (62.4-69.5%, p = 0.889). Whilst temporary therapy suspension was more common among TT-treated patients compared to IT-treated individuals, therapy discontinuation due to adverse events occurred at comparable rates in both groups. Predictors of relapse included mitoses, lymphovascular invasion, ulceration, and positive sentinel lymph nodes. Overall, the proportion of BRAF-mutated patients receiving IT stood at 7.4%, lower than what was observed in clinical trials.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Stage III Melanoma Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: A Real-Life Experience

Background: Advancements in managing stage III melanoma have involved the implementation of adjuvant therapies alongside a simultaneous decrease in the utilization of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following positive sentinel node biopsy (SLNB). Methods: This retrospective study from the University of Turin's Dermatology Clinic analyzed relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among stage III melanoma patients (n = 157) who underwent CLND after positive SLNB versus those who did not receive such procedure. Results: Patients without CLND had a median RFS of 49 months (95% CI 42-NA), while CLND recipients showed 51 months (95% CI 31-NA) (p = 0.139). The 48-month OS for non-CLND patients was 79.8% (95% CI 58.2-91.0) versus 79.2% (95% CI 67.5-87.0) for CLND recipients (p = 0.463). Adjusted Hazard Ratios through inverse probability treatment weighting revealed the impact of CLND to be insignificant on RFS (aHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.37-2.22) and marginal on OS (aHR 0.41, 95% CI 0.13-1.21). Conversely, adjuvant therapy significantly reduced the risk of relapse (aHR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.84), irrespective of CLND. Conclusions: This study corroborates the growing evidence that CLND after positive SLNB does not enhance RFS or OS, while emphasizing the crucial role of adjuvant therapy, be it immunotherapy or targeted therapy, in reducing the risk of relapse in melanoma patients with positive SLNB.

Role of neck dissection in management of patients with clinically apparent parotid metastatic melanoma - systematic review

Patients with cutaneous melanoma with metastatic deposits in the parotid gland have poor prognosis due to the high risk of developing distant metastasis. In the era of effective immunotherapy, there is no consensus amongst head and neck surgeons about the extent of neck dissection required for patients presenting with clinically apparent parotid metastasis. This review aims to determine the incidence and pattern of occult neck disease for patients with parotid metastasis reported in the literature to help guide clinicians on the extent of neck dissection required. The systematic review search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and Medline, using PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria include cases treated with parotidectomy and neck dissection for patients with parotid melanoma metastasis. A narrative synthesis was carried out due to heterogeneity of studies. A total of 14 studies was included. We found no study reporting on outcomes with surgery and adjuvant immunotherapy in this cohort of patients. The incidence of distant metastasis reported was variable but remains high for patients with parotid metastasis. Patients with parotid and neck involvement have poorer prognosis than patients with parotid only metastatic disease. The effect and extent of neck dissection in patients with clinically apparent parotid nodes remains unclear in the era of effective immunotherapy. There is a need for further well-designed studies evaluating the outcomes for such patients following surgery and adjuvant immunotherapy.

The evolving landscape of tissue-agnostic therapies in precision oncology

Tumor-agnostic therapies represent a paradigm shift in oncology by altering the traditional means of characterizing tumors based on their origin or location. Instead, they zero in on specific genetic anomalies responsible for fueling malignant growth. The watershed moment for tumor-agnostic therapies arrived in 2017, with the US Food and Drug Administration's historic approval of pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor. This milestone marked the marriage of genomics and immunology fields, as an immunotherapeutic agent gained approval based on genomic biomarkers, specifically, microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). Subsequently, the approval of NTRK inhibitors, designed to combat NTRK gene fusions prevalent in various tumor types, including pediatric cancers and adult solid tumors, further underscored the potential of tumor-agnostic therapies. The US Food and Drug Administration approvals of targeted therapies (BRAF V600E, RET fusion), immunotherapies (tumor mutational burden ≥10 mutations per megabase, dMMR) and an antibody-drug conjugate (Her2-positive-immunohistochemistry 3+ expression) with pan-cancer efficacy have continued, offering newfound hope to patients grappling with advanced solid tumors that harbor particular biomarkers. In this comprehensive review, the authors delve into the expansive landscape of tissue-agnostic targets and drugs, shedding light on the rationale underpinning this approach, the hurdles it faces, presently approved therapies, voices from the patient advocacy perspective, and the tantalizing prospects on the horizon. This is a welcome advance in oncology that transcends the boundaries of histology and location to provide personalized options.

Circulating tumor DNA-based assessment of molecular residual disease in non-metastatic melanoma

In patients with resected non-metastatic melanoma, the liquid biopsy for the assessment of molecular residual disease (MRD) by circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) represents a promising tool to stratify the risk and to monitor tumour evolution. However, its validation requires the demonstration of analytical validity, clinical validity and utility. Indeed, the development of sensitive and specific assays can optimize prognostication and eventually help clinicians to modulate adjuvant treatments, in order to improve clinical outcomes. Data about ctDNA-guided prognosis stratification is emerging, but clinical trials assessing ctDNA-guided therapeutic decisions are still ongoing. This review aims to depict the role of ctDNA-based MRD assessment in patients with non-metastatic melanoma and to provide a roadmap to face challenges for its introduction into clinical practice.

lnsights into Adjuvant Systemic Treatment Selection for Patients with Stage III Melanoma: Data from the Dutch Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

Patient demographics and shared decision making might influence the choice of adjuvant therapy for stage III melanoma.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors for treatment selection of patients diagnosed with stage III melanoma to better understand current treatment decisions and improve further treatment counseling.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 2007 patients diagnosed with stage III melanoma, between December 2018 and 2021, sourced from the Dutch Cancer Registry, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the cohort, 48.7% received no therapy, 45.8% received checkpoint inhibition, and 5.5% received targeted therapy (TT). Patients foregoing therapy were significantly older [67.0 years (range 53.0-77.0) vs. 62.0 year (range 52.0-72.0)], had poorer performance scores (PS), and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores compared to those receiving therapy (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing therapy had significantly higher median Breslow thickness (3.3 mm vs. 2.2 mm) and higher prevalence of ulceration (49.9% vs. 38.1%). Those with connective tissue disease and/or congestive heart disease were more likely to receive TT [odds ration (OR) 8.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-37.6 and OR 9.3; 95% CI 1.2-72.2, respectively]. Median treatment time among strata for disease recurrence was 4.26 months (3.69-4.82) for immunotherapy and 3.1 months (0.85-5.36) for TT (p = 0.298). Patients who developed recurrent disease were equal across treatment types (p = 0.656). The number of patients with grade 3 complications was different for each treatment type [immunotherapy: 17.8% vs. TT: 37.3% (p < 0.001)].

CONCLUSIONS

Age, PS, and Breslow thickness seem to influence adjuvant treatment decisions. Clinicians' preference for immunotherapy might play a role in counseling BRAF-positive patients for adjuvant therapy, this however, cannot be confirmed in this dataset. Overall, only a small proportion of patients completed adjuvant treatment.

Isolated Limb Perfusion for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Malignant Melanoma

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a regional chemotherapy technique used in the treatment of locally advanced or unresectable extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) or malignant melanoma (MM) of the limbs. It allows for high concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents to be perfused in the limb while minimising the risk of systemic side-effects. While the technique has been utilized for decades, the role of ILP has evolved as other treatment strategies have become available. Current indications for ILP in sarcoma include induction in unresectable ESTS to allow for future definitive limb preservation procedures as well as definitive treatment of unresectable, multifocal ESTS. In MM, ILP is typically used in unresectable in-transit melanoma, and rarely as an alternative to amputation in bulky, symptomatic extremity disease. This review seeks to summarise the current evidence base and indications for ILP as well as present some technical insights from a high-volume United Kingdom (UK) unit.

Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization Technique for Biopsy of Nonpalpable Subcutaneous Lesions in Suspected Metastatic Melanoma

SUMMARY

In patients with a history of melanoma, the risk of recurrence depends on the stage at diagnosis. Patients who present with more advanced disease are more likely to experience recurrence; patients with less advanced disease at presentation have slower progression and lower likelihood of recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a minimally invasive and targeted technique as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for the excision of nonpalpable lesions suspected to be melanoma metastases. The authors evaluated 21 patients with stage IIB, IIC, or III melanoma and subcutaneous nonpalpable lesions with a high risk of malignancy on positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan during oncologic follow-up. To guide biopsy, the authors used the radioguided occult lesion localization technique, using intralesional injection of technetium-99m albumin macroaggregates the day before surgery. During surgery, a handheld gamma probe was used to locate the lesions. Surgical localization of radiolabeled lesions was achieved in all cases. Relapsed melanoma was histologically confirmed in 13 patients. This technique proved to be a simple, safe, and effective method to detect and biopsy nonpalpable or difficult-to-locate lesions in suspected metastatic melanoma. The main advantage was disease restaging (eg, from stage II to III), allowing patients to access adjuvant therapies not approved as early-stage melanoma treatment.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Terphenyllin induces CASP3-dependent apoptosis and pyroptosis in A375 cells through upregulation of p53

BACKGROUND

Melanoma, one of the most lethal forms of skin cancer, has the potential to develop in any area where melanocytes are present. Currently, postoperative recurrence due to the emergence of systemic drug resistance represents a significant challenge in the treatment of melanoma. In this study, terphenyllin (TER), a distinctive inhibitory impact on melanoma cells was identified from the natural p-terphenyl metabolite. This study aimed to elucidate the intrinsic mechanism of this inhibitory effect, which may facilitate the discovery of novel chemotherapeutic agents.

METHODS

A transcriptome sequencing and metabolomic analysis of TER-treated A375 cells was conducted to identify potential pathways of action. The key proteins were knocked out and backfilled using CRISPR-Cas9 technology and molecular cloning. Subsequently, the results of cytosolic viability, LDH release, immunofluorescence and flow cytometry were employed to demonstrate the cell death status of the drug-treated cells.

RESULTS

The p53 signalling pathway was markedly upregulated following TER treatment, leading to the activation of CASP3 via the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. The activated CASP3 initiated apoptosis, while simultaneously continuing to cleave the GSDME, thereby triggering pyroptosis. The knockout of p53, a key protein situated upstream of this pathway, resulted in a significant rescue of TER-induced cell death, as well as an alleviation of the decrease in cell viability. However, the knockout of key proteins situated downstream of the pathway (CASP3 and GSDME) did not result in a rescue of TER-induced cell death, but rather a transformation of the cells from apoptosis and pyroptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The induction of apoptosis and pyroptosis in A375 cells by TER is mediated via the p53-BAX/FAS-CASP3-GSDME signalling pathway. This lays the foundation for TER as a potential anti-melanoma drug in the future. It should be noted that CASP3 and GSDME in this pathway solely regulate the mode of cell death, rather than determine whether cell death occurs. This distinction may prove valuable in future studies of apoptosis and pyroptosis.

Advances in Personalized Oncology

Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have catalyzed a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, steering the focus from conventional, organ-specific protocols to precision medicine. Emerging targeted therapies offer a cutting-edge approach to cancer treatment, while companion diagnostics play an essential role in aligning therapeutic choices with specific molecular changes identified through NGS. Despite these advances, interpreting the clinical implications of a rapidly expanding catalog of genetic mutations remains a challenge. The selection of therapies in the presence of multiple mutations requires careful clinical judgment, supported by quality-centric genomic testing that emphasizes actionable mutations. Molecular tumor boards can play an increasing role in assimilating genomic data into clinical trials, thereby refining personalized treatment approaches and improving patient outcomes.

Gold nanostructures in melanoma: Advances in treatment, diagnosis, and theranostic applications

Melanoma, a lethal form of skin cancer, poses a significant challenge in oncology due to its aggressive nature and high mortality rates. Gold nanostructures, including gold nanoparticles (GNPs), offer myriad opportunities in melanoma therapy and imaging due to their facile synthesis and functionalization, robust stability, tunable physicochemical and optical properties, and biocompatibility. This review explores the emerging role of gold nanostructures and their composites in revolutionizing melanoma treatment paradigms, bridging the gap between nanotechnology and clinical oncology, and offering insights for researchers, clinicians, and stakeholders. It begins by elucidating the potential of nanotechnology-driven approaches in cancer therapy, highlighting the unique physicochemical properties and versatility of GNPs in biomedical applications. Various therapeutic modalities, including photothermal therapy, photodynamic therapy, targeted drug delivery, gene delivery, and nanovaccines, are discussed in detail, along with insights from ongoing clinical trials. In addition, the utility of GNPs in melanoma imaging and theranostics is explored, showcasing their potential in diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and personalized medicine. Furthermore, safety considerations and potential toxicities associated with GNPs are addressed, underscoring the importance of comprehensive risk assessment in clinical translation. Finally, the review concludes by discussing current challenges and future directions, emphasizing the need for innovative strategies to maximize the clinical impact of GNPs in melanoma therapy.

Small molecule inhibitors as adjuvants in cancer immunotherapy: enhancing efficacy and overcoming resistance

Adjuvant therapy is essential in cancer treatment to enhance primary treatment effectiveness, reduce adverse effects, and prevent recurrence. Small molecule inhibitors as adjuvants in cancer immunotherapy aim to harness their immunomodulatory properties to optimize treatment outcomes. By modulating the tumor microenvironment, enhancing immune cell function, and increasing tumor sensitivity to immunotherapy, small molecule inhibitors have the potential to improve patient responses. This review discusses the evolving use of small molecule inhibitors as adjuvants in cancer treatment, highlighting their role in enhancing the efficacy of immunotherapy and the opportunities for advancing cancer therapies in the future.

Five-year analysis of neoadjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib for stage III melanoma

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib has a high pathological response rate and impressive short-term survival in patients with resectable stage III melanoma. We report 5-year outcomes from the phase II NeoCombi trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NeoCombi (NCT01972347) was a single-arm, open-label, single-centre, phase II trial. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed, resectable, RECIST-measurable, American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition clinical stage IIIB-C BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Patients received 52 weeks of treatment with dabrafenib 150 mg (orally twice per day) plus trametinib 2 mg (orally once per day), with complete resection of the pre-therapy tumour bed at week 12.

RESULTS

Between 20 August 2014 and 19 April 2017, 35 patients were enrolled. At data cut-off (17 August 2021), the median follow-up was 60 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 56-72 months]. Overall, 21 of 35 (60%) patients recurred, including 12 (57%) with first recurrence in locoregional sites (followed by later distant recurrence in 6) and 9 (43%) with first recurrence in distant sites, including 3 in the brain. Most recurrences occurred within 2 years, with no recurrences beyond 3 years. At 5 years, recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 40% (95% CI 27% to 60%), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was 57% (95% CI 42% to 76%), and overall survival was 80% (95% CI 67% to 94%). Five-year survival outcomes were stratified by pathological response: RFS was 53% with pathological complete response (pCR) versus 28% with non-pCR (P = 0.087), DMFS was 59% versus 55% (P = 0.647), and overall survival was 88% versus 71% (P = 0.205), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib has high pathological response rates in clinical stage III melanoma, but low rates of RFS, similar to those achieved with adjuvant targeted therapy alone. Patients with a pCR to dabrafenib plus trametinib still had a high risk of recurrence, unlike that seen with immunotherapy where recurrences are rare.

Management of Localized Melanoma in the Anti-PD-1 Era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of cutaneous melanoma has rapidly progressed over the past decade following the introduction of effective systemic therapies. Given the large number of recent clinical trials which have dramatically altered the management of these patients, an updated review of the current evidence regarding the management of localized melanoma is needed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The role of effective systemic therapies in earlier stages (I-III) melanoma, both in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings is rapidly changing the role of surgery in the management cutaneous melanoma, particularly regarding surgical safety margins for wide local excision (WLE), the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and the extent of lymph node dissections. The randomized phase 2 SWOG1801 trial has demonstrated superiority of neoadjuvant-adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy in improving event-free survival by 23% at 2-years over adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy only. Furthermore, the PRADO trial has suggested a more tailored approach both the extent of surgery as well as adjuvant therapy can safely and effectively be done, depending on the response to initial neoadjuvant immunotherapy. These results await validation and it is expected that in 2024 the phase 3 Nadina trial (NCT04949113) will definitively establish neo-adjuvant combination immunotherapy as the novel standard. This will further redefine the management of localized melanoma. The use of effective systemic therapies will continue to evolve in the next decade and, together with new emerging diagnostic and surveillance techniques, will likely reduce the extent of routine surgery for stage I-III melanoma.

Toxicities from BRAF and MEK Inhibitors: Strategies to Maximize Therapeutic Success

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This report highlights several of the recent therapeutic advancements in the treatment of BRAF-mutant tumors, discusses the most common adverse events observed with BRAF-targeted agents, and suggests strategies to manage and mitigate treatment-related toxicities.

RECENT FINDINGS

BRAF and MEK inhibitors represent a significant advancement in the treatment of BRAF-mutated malignancies with data across tumor types demonstrating the anti-tumor efficacy of dual MAPK inhibition. Although these agents have a reasonable toxicity profile, variable side effects across organ systems can develop. The discovery of activating BRAF mutations and subsequent development of BRAF and MEK inhibitors has transformed the treatment algorithms of BRAF-mutant malignancies. With increased application of these targeted regimens, identification and prompt management of their unique adverse events are crucial.

Understanding quality of life issues in patients with advanced melanoma: Phase 1 and 2 in the development of the EORTC advanced melanoma module

AIMS

We aimed to develop a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QoL) module tailored for patients with advanced (resectable or unresectable stage III/IV) melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy.

METHODS

Following the EORTC QoL Group module development guidelines, we conducted phases 1 and 2 of the development process. In phase 1, we generated a list of health-related (HR)QoL issues through a systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients with advanced melanoma. In phase 2, these issues were converted into questionnaire items to create the preliminary module.

RESULTS

Phase 1: we retrieved 8006 articles for the literature review, of which 35 were deemed relevant, resulting in 84 HRQoL issues being extracted to create the initial issue list. Semi-structured interviews with 18 HCPs and 28 patients with advanced melanoma resulted in 28 issues being added to the initial issue list. Following EORTC module development criteria, 26 issues were removed, and two issues were added after review by patient advocates. Phase 2: To ensure uniformity and avoid duplication, 16 issues were consolidated into eight items. Additionally, an independent expert contributed one new item, resulting in a preliminary module comprising 80 HRQoL items.

CONCLUSION

We identified a range of HRQoL issues (dry skin, xerostomia, and arthralgia) relevant to patients with stage III/IV melanoma. Future module development phases will refine the questionnaire. Once completed, this module will enable standardized assessment of HRQoL in patients with (locally) advanced melanoma.

An Automated Real-Time PCR Assay versus Next-Generation Sequencing in the Detection of BRAF V600 Mutations in Melanoma Tissue Samples

BACKGROUND

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the most commonly used method for determining BRAF mutational status in patients with advanced melanoma. Automated PCR-based methods, such as the IdyllaTM system, are increasingly used for mutation diagnostics, but it is unclear what impact the choice of diagnostic method has on the management of melanoma.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the concordance rate of BRAF V600 mutational analysis using IdyllaTM and NGS and to analyze the technical and clinical turnaround time. The clinical relevance is compared by analyzing the impact on the treatment decision.

METHODS

In this monocentric prospective cohort study, the BRAF mutation status of 51 patients was determined using both methods in parallel.

RESULTS

BRAF V600 mutation was detected in 23/51 cases (45%). IdyllaTM showed a 100% concordant result with a faster turnaround time (0.2 days) compared to NGS (12.2 days). In general, less tumor material was required for IdyllaTM than for NGS. Most patients received immunotherapy as a first-line therapy regardless of the BRAF V600 status.

CONCLUSIONS

IdyllaTM testing proved to be a reliable and rapid alternative to NGS in the determination of BRAF V600 mutation. Although BRAF. status was available earlier, this had no influence on the treatment decision in most cases.

Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Stage II Melanoma: Current Paradigms in Management and Future Directions

Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the United States and accounts for the majority of all skin cancer-related deaths, making it the most lethal cutaneous malignancy. Systemic adjuvant therapy for stage IIB-IV melanoma is now approved for patients who have undergone surgical resection, given the appreciable risk of recurrence and mortality in this patient population. Despite the lower stage, high-risk stage II melanoma (stage IIB/IIC) can often exhibit an even more aggressive course when compared to stage IIIA/IIIB disease, thus justifying consideration of adjuvant therapy in these patients. In this review, we highlight the current standard of practice for the treatment of stage IIB/C melanoma, with a focus on adjuvant therapies supported by published landmark clinical trials, including anti-PD-1 therapy. Notably, adjuvant therapies approved thus far in this patient population have demonstrated an improvement in recurrence-free survival, while their impact on overall survival is pending. Finally, this review highlights currently ongoing trials and future directions for research and treatment possibilities for high-risk clinical stage II melanoma.

Advances in Understanding and Management of Erdheim-Chester Disease

Erdheim Chester Disease (ECD) is a rare histiocytic disorder marked by infiltration of organs with CD68+ histiocytes. ECD stems from mutations of BRAF and MAP2K1 in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), which further differentiate into monocytes and histiocytes. Histopathology reveals lipid-containing histiocytes, which test positive for CD68 and CD133 in immunohistochemistry. Signs and symptoms vary and depend on the organ/s of manifestation. Definitive radiological results associated with ECD include hairy kidney, coated aorta, and cardiac pseudotumor. Treatment options primarily include anti-cytokine therapy and inhibitors of BRAF and MEK signaling.

Leveraging single-cell sequencing analysis and bulk-RNA sequencing analysis to forecast necroptosis in cutaneous melanoma prognosis

Cutaneous melanoma, a malignancy of melanocytes, presents a significant challenge due to its aggressive nature and rising global incidence. Despite advancements in treatment, the variability in patient responses underscores the need for further research into novel therapeutic targets, including the role of programmed cell death pathways such as necroptosis. The melanoma datasets used for analysis, GSE215120, GSE19234, GSE22153 and GSE65904, were downloaded from the GEO database. The melanoma data from TCGA were downloaded from the UCSC website. Using single-cell sequencing, we assess the heterogeneity of necroptosis in cutaneous melanoma, identifying distinct cell clusters and necroptosis-related gene expression patterns. A combination of 101 machine learning algorithms was employed to construct a necroptosis-related signature (NRS) based on key genes associated with necroptosis. The prognostic value of NRS was evaluated in four cohorts (one TCGA and three GEO cohorts), and the tumour microenvironment (TME) was analysed to understand the relationship between necroptosis, tumour mutation burden (TMB) and immune infiltration. Finally, we focused on the role of key target TSPAN10 in the prognosis, pathogenesis, immunotherapy relevance and drug sensitivity of cutaneous melanoma. Our study revealed significant heterogeneity in necroptosis among melanoma cells, with a higher prevalence in epithelial cells, myeloid cells and fibroblasts. The NRS, developed through rigorous machine learning techniques, demonstrated robust prognostic capabilities, distinguishing high-risk patients with poorer outcomes in all cohorts. Analysis of the TME showed that high NRS scores correlated with lower TMB and reduced immune cell infiltration, indicating a potential mechanism through which necroptosis influences melanoma progression. Finally, TSPAN10 has been identified as a key target for cutaneous melanoma and is highly associated with poor prognosis. The findings highlight the complex role of necroptosis in cutaneous melanoma and introduce the NRS as a novel prognostic tool with potential to guide therapeutic decisions.

Stage IIA Cutaneous Melanoma: Do Regional Ultrasound and CT scan Improve Detection of Relapses? A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Stage IIA cutaneous melanoma is typified by a Breslow thickness between 1.1 and 2.0 mm with ulceration or between 2.1 and 4.0 mm without ulceration. The role of radiological investigations in staging and follow-up of this intermediate-risk subgroup of patients is still debated.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to investigate the role of imaging procedures in the follow-up of stage IIA melanoma asymptomatic patients.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from two tertiary referral centers in Italy. Among patients with stage IIA melanoma, those who relapsed were investigated concerning type of detection (by patient or by doctor), and modality of detection (clinical examination, ultrasound, CT scan). In addition, false positive data were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 213 patients were retrieved, with 26 patients showing relapse (recurrence rate, 12.2%). The mean follow-up time was 3 years and the mean time to recurrence was 17.8 months. 21/26 (80.7%) recurrences were identified by the doctor and 5/26 (19.2%) by the patient (P < 0.05). Among those identified by the doctor, 16/21 (76,1%) were identified by radiological examinations. Nine out of 15 (60%) lymph node recurrences were detected by ultrasound and 6/7 (85.7%) distant metastases were detected by CT. The false positive rate was 7% (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study the great majority of metastases were detected using imaging procedures. Given the new therapeutic options offered by targeted therapy and immunotherapy in relapsing patients, the role of radiological investigations in the follow-up of stage IIA patients should be reconsidered.

Clinical practice recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing in patients with solid cancer: a joint report from KSMO and KSP

In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.