Tranexamic Acid for the Prevention of Blood Loss after Cesarean Delivery

Tranexamic acid for the prevention of postpartum bleeding in women with anaemia: Statistical analysis plan for the WOMAN-2 trial: an international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is responsible for over 50,000 maternal deaths every year. Most of these deaths are in low- and middle-income countries. Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces bleeding by inhibiting the enzymatic breakdown of fibrin blood clots. TXA decreases surgical bleeding and reduces deaths from bleeding after traumatic injury. When given within three hours of birth, TXA reduces deaths from bleeding in women with PPH. However, for many women, treatment of PPH is too late to prevent death. World-wide, over one-third of pregnant women are anaemic and many are severely anaemic. These women have an increased risk of PPH and are more likely to die if PPH occurs. There is an urgent need to identify ways to prevent severe postpartum bleeding in anaemic women. The WOMAN-2 trial will quantify the effects of TXA on postpartum bleeding in women with anaemia. Results: This statistical analysis plan (version 1.0; dated 22 February 2023) has been written based on information in the WOMAN-2 Trial protocol version 2.0, dated 30 June 2022. The primary outcome of the WOMAN-2 trial is the proportion of women with a clinical diagnosis of primary PPH. Secondary outcomes are maternal blood loss and its consequences (estimated blood loss, haemoglobin, haemodynamic instability, blood transfusion, signs of shock, use of interventions to control bleeding); maternal health and wellbeing (fatigue, headache, dizziness, palpitations, breathlessness, exercise tolerance, ability to care for her baby, health related quality of life, breastfeeding); and other health outcomes (deaths, vascular occlusive events, organ dysfunction, sepsis, side effects, time spent in higher level facility, length of hospital stay, and status of the baby). Conclusions: WOMAN-2 will provide reliable evidence about the effects of TXA in women with anaemia. Registration: WOMAN-2 was prospectively registered at the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials registry ( ISRCTN62396133) on 07/12/2017 and ClinicalTrials.gov on 23/03/2018 ( NCT03475342).

Maternal anaemia and the risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a cohort analysis of data from the WOMAN-2 trial

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, more than half a billion women of reproductive age are anaemic. Each year, about 70 000 women who give birth die from postpartum haemorrhage. Almost all deaths are in low-income or middle-income countries. We examined the association between anaemia and the risk of postpartum haemorrhage.

METHODS

We did a prospective cohort analysis of data from the World Maternal Antifibrinolytic-2 (WOMAN-2) trial. This trial enrols women with moderate or severe anaemia giving birth vaginally in hospitals in Pakistan, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Zambia. Moderate anaemia was defined as a haemoglobin concentration of 70-99 g/L and severe anaemia as less than 70 g/L. Hospitals in each country where anaemia in pregnancy is common were identified from a network established during previous obstetric trials. Women who were younger than 18 years without permission provided by a guardian, had a known tranexamic acid allergy, or developed postpartum haemorrhage before the umbilical cord was cut or clamped were excluded from the study. Prebirth haemoglobin, the exposure, was measured after hospital arrival and just before giving birth. Postpartum haemorrhage, the outcome, was defined in three ways: (1) clinical postpartum haemorrhage (estimated blood loss ≥500 mL or any blood loss sufficient to compromise haemodynamic stability); (2) WHO-defined postpartum haemorrhage (estimated blood loss of at least 500 mL); and (3) calculated postpartum haemorrhage (calculated estimated blood loss of ≥1000 mL). Calculated postpartum haemorrhage was estimated from the peripartum change in haemoglobin concentration and bodyweight. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between haemoglobin and postpartum haemorrhage, adjusting for confounding factors.

FINDINGS

Of the 10 620 women recruited to the WOMAN-2 trial between Aug 24, 2019, and Nov 1, 2022, 10 561 (99·4%) had complete outcome data. 8751 (82·9%) of 10 561 women were recruited from hospitals in Pakistan, 837 (7·9%) from hospitals in Nigeria, 525 (5·0%) from hospitals in Tanzania, and 448 (4·2%) from hospitals in Zambia. The mean age was 27·1 years (SD 5·5) and mean prebirth haemoglobin was 80·7 g/L (11·8). Mean estimated blood loss was 301 mL (SD 183) for the 8791 (83·2%) women with moderate anaemia and 340 mL (288) for the 1770 (16·8%) women with severe anaemia. 742 (7·0%) women had clinical postpartum haemorrhage. The risk of clinical postpartum haemorrhage was 6·2% in women with moderate anaemia and 11·2% in women with severe anaemia. A 10 g/L reduction in prebirth haemoglobin increased the odds of clinical postpartum haemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1·29 [95% CI 1·21-1·38]), WHO-defined postpartum haemorrhage (aOR 1·25 [1·16-1·36]), and calculated postpartum haemorrhage (aOR 1·23 [1·14-1·32]). 14 women died and 68 either died or had a near miss. Severe anaemia was associated with seven times higher odds of death or near miss (OR 7·25 [95% CI 4·45-11·80]) than was moderate anaemia.

INTERPRETATION

Anaemia is strongly associated with postpartum haemorrhage and the risk of death or near miss. Attention should be given to the prevention and treatment of anaemia in women of reproductive age.

FUNDING

The WOMAN-2 trial is funded by Wellcome and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Tranexamic acid for the prevention of blood loss after cesarean section: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Tranexamic acid is a cost-effective intervention for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage among women who undergo cesarean delivery, but the evidence to support its use is conflicting. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in low- and high-risk cesarean deliveries.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform portal from inception to April 2022 (updated October 2022 and February 2023) with no language restrictions. In addition, grey literature sources were also explored.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials that investigated the prophylactic use of intravenous tranexamic acid in addition to standard uterotonic agents among women who underwent cesarean deliveries in comparison with a placebo, standard treatment, or prostaglandins were included in this meta-analysis.

METHODS

We used the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) to assess the quality of the included randomized controlled trials. RevMan 5.4 was used to conduct all statistical analyses using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included 50 randomized controlled trials (6 in only high-risk patients and 2 with prostaglandins as the comparator) that evaluated tranexamic acid in our meta-analysis. Tranexamic acid reduced the risk for blood loss >1000 mL, the mean total blood loss, and the need for blood transfusion in both low- and high-risk patients. Tranexamic acid was associated with a beneficial effect in the secondary outcomes, including a decline in hemoglobin levels and the need for additional uterotonic agents. Tranexamic acid increased the risk for nonthromboembolic adverse events but, based on limited data, did not increase the incidence of thromboembolic events. The administration of tranexamic acid before skin incision, but not after cord clamping, was associated with a large benefit. The quality of evidence was rated as low to very low for outcomes in the low-risk population and moderate for most outcomes in the high-risk subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Tranexamic acid may reduce the risk for blood loss in cesarean deliveries with a higher benefit observed in high-risk patients, but the lack of high-quality evidence precludes any strong conclusions. The administration of tranexamic acid before skin incision, but not after cord clamping, was associated with a large benefit. Additional studies, especially in the high-risk population and focused on evaluating the timing of tranexamic acid administration, are needed to confirm or refute these findings.

Effect of tranexamic acid administration on intraoperative blood loss during peritonectomy: a single-center retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of tranexamic acid in elective major invasive abdominal surgeries has not yet been established. We investigated the effect of tranexamic acid administration on intraoperative blood loss during peritoneal resection of pseudomucinoma and cancerous peritoneal dissemination.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 20 years old who underwent peritoneal resection for pseudomucinoma or cancerous peritoneal dissemination at the Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital were included in this single-center retrospective observational study. The tranexamic acid group received 1000 mg of tranexamic acid at the start of the operation, while the control group received the same intraoperative management as the tranexamic acid group, except for the tranexamic acid administration. The primary endpoint was intraoperative blood loss, and a multivariate analysis of the contributing factors was performed.

RESULTS

The median volume of intraoperative blood loss was 1372 [interquartile range, 842 - 1877] mL and 907 [516 - 1537] mL in the control and tranexamic acid groups, respectively (p < 0.01). The total volume of blood transfusion during the operation was 2040 [1480 - 2380] mL and 1560 [1000 - 2120] mL in the control and tranexamic acid groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Postoperative blood test results revealed D-dimer values of 7.5 [4.1 - 10.7] µg/mL and 1.8 [1.0 - 3.3] µg/mL in the control and tranexamic acid groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that tranexamic acid administration was significantly associated with decreased intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Tranexamic acid administration may be useful in reducing intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion volume during highly-invasive surgeries such as peritoneal resection of pseudomucinoma and cancerous peritoneal dissemination.

An update to tranexamic acid trends during the peripartum period in the United States, 2019 to 2021

BACKGROUND

Results from the 2017 World Maternal Antifibrinolytic trial found that patients who received tranexamic acid during delivery had significantly lower rates of death and hysterectomy. Several months after the World Maternal Antifibrinolytic trial publication, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists endorsed the consideration of tranexamic acid usage when traditional uterotonics fail during postpartum hemorrhage. Since then, tranexamic acid usage has become more mainstream for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate tranexamic acid trends in obstetrics both temporally and geographically within the United States. Additional outcomes included patient demographics and perinatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included 19 hospitals divided into East, Central, and West geographic regions within the Universal Health Services, Incorporated network. Rates of tranexamic acid use were compared from July 2019 through June 2021. Patient demographics and perinatal outcomes were analyzed for tranexamic acid recipients.

RESULTS

During the two-year study period, 3.2% (1580/50,150) of patients received tranexamic acid during delivery. The western region of the United States demonstrated increased tranexamic acid use over the 2-year study period. Recipients of tranexamic acid were more likely to have a history of postpartum hemorrhage (P<.0001), chronic hypertension (P<.0001), preeclampsia (P<.0001), and/or diabetes (P=.004). Patients who received tranexamic acid did not have an increased likelihood of venous thromboembolism in comparison with those who did not receive tranexamic acid (8 [0.5%] vs 226 [0.5%]; P=.77). Of those who received tranexamic acid, 53.2% (840/1580) had an estimated blood loss <1000 mL.

CONCLUSION

Nationally, a higher percentage of patients received tranexamic acid without a postpartum hemorrhage diagnosis compared with previous studies, and the western region of the United States had an overall increased use of tranexamic acid during delivery compared with previous years. There was no increased risk of venous thromboembolism in those who received tranexamic acid, regardless of postpartum hemorrhage diagnosis.

Coagulation management and transfusion in massive postpartum hemorrhage

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Excessive bleeding during and following childbirth remains one of the leading causes of maternal mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current guidelines differ in definitions and recommendations on managing transfusion and hemostasis in massive postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Insights gained from trauma-induced coagulopathy are not directly transferable to the obstetric population due to gestational alterations and a differing pathophysiology.

SUMMARY

Factor deficiency is uncommon at the beginning of most etiologies of PPH but will eventually develop from consumption and depletion in the absence of bleeding control. The sensitivity of point-of-care tests for fibrinolysis is too low and may delay treatment, therefore tranexamic acid should be started early at diagnosis even without signs for hyperfibrinolysis. Transfusion management may be initiated empirically, but is best to be guided by laboratory and viscoelastic assay results as soon as possible. Hypofibrinogenemia is well detected by point-of-care tests, thus substitution may be tailored to individual needs, while reliable thresholds for fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and specific components are yet to be defined. In case of factor deficiency, prothrombin complex concentrate or lyophilized plasma allow for a more rapid restoration of coagulation than FFP. If bleeding and hemostasis are under control, a timely anticoagulation may be necessary.

Tranexamic Acid to Prevent Obstetrical Hemorrhage after Cesarean Delivery

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic use of tranexamic acid at the time of cesarean delivery has been shown to decrease the calculated blood loss, but the effect on the need for blood transfusions is unclear.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients undergoing cesarean delivery at 31 U.S. hospitals to receive either tranexamic acid or placebo after umbilical-cord clamping. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal death or blood transfusion by hospital discharge or 7 days post partum, whichever came first. Key secondary outcomes were estimated intraoperative blood loss of more than 1 liter (prespecified as a major secondary outcome), interventions for bleeding and related complications, the preoperative-to-postoperative change in the hemoglobin level, and postpartum infectious complications. Adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 11,000 participants underwent randomization (5529 to the tranexamic acid group and 5471 to the placebo group); scheduled cesarean delivery accounted for 50.1% and 49.2% of the deliveries in the respective groups. A primary-outcome event occurred in 201 of 5525 participants (3.6%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 233 of 5470 (4.3%) in the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 0.89; 95.26% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.07; P = 0.19). Estimated intraoperative blood loss of more than 1 liter occurred in 7.3% of the participants in the tranexamic acid group and in 8.0% of those in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.05). Interventions for bleeding complications occurred in 16.1% of the participants in the tranexamic acid group and in 18.0% of those in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.97); the change in the hemoglobin level was -1.8 g per deciliter and -1.9 g per deciliter, respectively (mean difference, -0.1 g per deciliter; 95% CI, -0.2 to -0.1); and postpartum infectious complications occurred in 3.2% and 2.5% of the participants, respectively (relative risk, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.61). The frequencies of thromboembolic events and other adverse events were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic use of tranexamic acid during cesarean delivery did not lead to a significantly lower risk of a composite outcome of maternal death or blood transfusion than placebo. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03364491.).

Tranexamic acid for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: the TAPPH-1 pilot randomized trial and lessons learned for trials in Canadian obstetrics

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. While tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces bleeding and transfusion requirements in established PPH, we sought to determine the feasibility of conducting a fully powered trial assessing the effect of prophylactic tranexamic acid, prior to PPH onset, in a Canadian Obstetric setting. With institutional and Health Canada approval, consenting, eligible parturients (singleton, > 32 weeks gestation, vaginal or caesarian delivery) were randomly assigned to receive TXA (1 g intravenously) or placebo (0.9% saline) prior to delivery. Participants, investigators, data collectors/adjudicators, and analysis was blinded. The primary outcome was administration of study intervention to > 85% of randomized individuals. Secondary outcomes included recruitment rate (feasibility) and safety outcomes. Over 8 months, 611 were approached, 35 consented, and 27 randomized (14 TXA, 13 placebo). 89% of randomized participants received the assigned intervention. Recruitment fell below feasibility (23% target). No serious adverse outcomes occurred. Our pilot trial in a Canadian Obstetric setting was unable to demonstrate feasibility to conduct a large, multicentre trial to examine prophylactic use of tranexamic for PPH secondary to the complex regulatory requirements associated with a trial for an off-label, but commonly utilized intervention. These challenges should inform stakeholders on the resources and challenges of conducting future trials using off-label interventions.Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT03069859 (03/03/2017).

Association Between Surgeon Gender and Maternal Morbidity After Cesarean Delivery

Importance

The stereotype that men perform surgery better than women is ancient. Surgeons have long been mainly men, but in recent decades an inversion has begun; the number of women surgeons is increasing, especially in obstetrics and gynecology. Studies outside obstetrics suggest that postoperative morbidity and mortality may be lower after surgery by women.

Objective

To evaluate the association between surgeons' gender and the risks of maternal morbidity and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) after cesarean deliveries.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study was based on data from the Tranexamic Acid for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage after Cesarean Delivery (TRAAP2) trial, a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that took place from March 2018 through January 2020 (23 months). It aimed to investigate whether the administration of tranexamic acid plus a prophylactic uterotonic agent decreased PPH incidence after cesarean delivery compared with a uterotonic agent alone. Women having a cesarean delivery before or during labor at or after 34 weeks' gestation were recruited from 27 French maternity hospitals.

Exposures

Self-reported gender (man or woman), assessed by a questionnaire immediately after delivery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the incidence of a composite maternal morbidity variable, and the secondary end point was the incidence of PPH (the primary outcome of the TRAAP2 trial), defined by a calculated estimated blood loss exceeding 1000 mL or transfusion by day 2.

Results

Among 4244 women included, men surgeons performed 943 cesarean deliveries (22.2%) and women surgeons performed 3301 (77.8%). The rate of attending obstetricians was higher among men (441 of 929 [47.5%]) than women (687 of 3239 [21.2%]). The risk of maternal morbidity did not differ for men and women surgeons: 119 of 837 (14.2%) vs 476 of 2928 (16.3%) (adjusted risk ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.77-1.13]). Interaction between surgeon gender and level of experience on the risk of maternal morbidity was not statistically significant. Similarly, the groups did not differ for PPH risk (adjusted risk ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.85-1.13]).

Conclusions and Relevance

Risks of postoperative maternal morbidity and of PPH exceeding 1000 mL or requiring transfusion by day 2 did not differ by the surgeon's gender.

The Role of Thromboelastography during the Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage: Background, Evidence, and Practical Application

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a common cause of significant maternal morbidity and mortality that can be associated with coagulopathy, especially hypofibrinogenemia. There is interest in point-of-care viscoelastic hemostatic assays (POC-VHA) in PPH because prompt knowledge of coagulation status can aid diagnosis, identify cases of severe coagulopathy, and allow ongoing monitoring during rapid bleeding. The incidence of coagulopathy in most cases of PPH is low because of the procoagulant state of pregnancy, including raised fibrinogen levels of around 4 to 6 g/L. A Clauss fibrinogen of >2 g/L or POC-VHA equivalent has been found to be adequate for hemostasis during PPH. POC-VHA has been used successfully to diagnose hypofibrinogenemia (Clauss fibrinogen of ≤2 g/L) and guide fibrinogen treatment which has reduced bleed size and complications of massive transfusion. There are uncertainties about the use of POC-VHA to direct fresh frozen plasma and platelet administration during PPH. Several POC-VHA algorithms have been used successfully incorporated in the management of many thousands of PPHs and clinicians report that they are easy to use, interpret, and aid decision making. Due to the relative cost of POC-VHA and lack of definitive data on improving outcomes, these devices have not been universally adopted during PPH.

Recent trends in tranexamic acid use during postpartum hemorrhage in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) was the second leading cause of maternal death, accounting for approximately 14% of all pregnancy-related deaths between 2017 and 2019 in the United States. Several large multi-center studies have demonstrated decreased PPH rates with the use of tranexamic acid (TXA). Little data exists regarding the prevalence of TXA use in obstetric patients.

METHODS

We identified over 1.2 million US pregnancies between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2021, with and without PPH by International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes using Cerner Real-World Database™. TXA use and patient characteristics were abstracted from the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

During delivery, TXA was used approximately 1% of the time (12,394 / 1,262,574). Pregnant patients who did and did not receive TXA during delivery had similar demographic characteristics. Pregnant patients who underwent cesarean delivery (4,356 / 12,394), had a term delivery (10,199 / 12,394), and had comorbid conditions were more likely to receive TXA during hospitalization for delivery. The majority of TXA was use was concentrated in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming. During the study period the use of TXA increased in both patients with PPH and those without.

CONCLUSION

The data illustrate a rapid increase in the use of TXA after 2017 while the total number of pregnancies remained relatively constant. The observed increase in TXA use may reflect changing practicing patterns as the support for use of TXA in the setting of PPH prophylaxis increases.

Tranexamic acid for bleeding: Much more than a treatment for postpartum hemorrhage

The evidence that early tranexamic acid treatment reduces postpartum hemorrhage deaths has major implications for obstetrical care worldwide. Tranexamic acid may also have a role in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage, but more evidence is needed on the balance of risks and benefits. Most deaths from postpartum hemorrhage are in low- and middle-income countries where tranexamic acid treatment is often unavailable. Several maternal health organizations including the Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Concept Foundation, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Unitaid are working to increase access. However, a wider view of the evidence on tranexamic acid and bleeding shows that it can improve maternal health in many other ways. An appreciation of these other health benefits could facilitate efforts to increase access. By reducing heavy menstrual bleeding, tranexamic acid could reduce the prevalence of maternal anemia, a common and important risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage and other maternal and neonatal outcomes. Further clinical trials of tranexamic acid for the treatment of menstrual bleeding are needed. By reducing surgical bleeding and the need for blood transfusion, tranexamic acid would increase the availability of blood in countries where there is blood shortage so that more blood is available for use in life-threatening bleeding including postpartum hemorrhage. In countries where there is no blood shortage, tranexamic acid use would reduce healthcare costs and prevent transfusion-transmitted infections and reactions. Trauma affects women and men, and violence is a leading cause of death in pregnancy. Increased use of tranexamic acid in trauma would significantly reduce trauma deaths. Efforts to increase the availability and use of tranexamic acid for obstetrical hemorrhage should acknowledge its other health benefits and aim to increase its use across health services more generally.

Beyond the guidelines: how we approach challenging scenarios in the diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease

Although von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, its diagnosis and management are often challenging. Clinical practice guidelines, developed through systematic review of the medical literature and considering the best available evidence, provide guidance for common clinical scenarios. However, in the clinical setting, patients often present with characteristics and nuances that may fall outside the realm of available evidence and guidelines, and hence, shared decision-making will be essential in the evaluation and management of these patients. The challenges in the diagnosis of VWD are mainly attributable to the heterogeneity of the disorder, limitations of laboratory assays, and the significant impact of various physiologic processes on von Willebrand factor. The impact of physiologic normalization of von Willebrand factor, which may occur in various settings such as pregnancy, inflammation, or aging, remains uncertain, as is the optimal management in these scenarios. Multidisciplinary and individualized care, based on evolving evidence supported by clinicians, patients, caregivers, and stakeholders, will be needed to ensure the highest quality care for those who live with VWD.

Preventing postpartum hemorrhage with combined therapy rather than oxytocin alone

Postpartum hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide, with uterine atony estimated to account for 70% to 80% of cases, thereby remaining the single most common cause. Pharmacotherapy remains the first-line preventative therapy for postpartum hemorrhage. These therapies may be single (oxytocin, carbetocin, methylergonovine, ergometrine, misoprostol, prostaglandin analogs, or tranexamic acid) or combination therapies, acting in an additive, infra-additive, or synergistic fashion to prevent postpartum hemorrhage. Evidence is strong for the use of oxytocin, the first-line uterotonic agent in the United States for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. Although carbetocin, a long-acting analog of oxytocin, is not yet available for use in the United States, it is likely the most effective single pharmacologic therapy for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage and need for additional uterotonics. Use of second-line uterotonics such as methylergonovine, misoprostol, and carboprost in combination with oxytocin has an additive or synergistic effect and a greater risk reduction for postpartum hemorrhage prevention compared with oxytocin alone. Therefore, combined therapy rather than oxytocin alone should be advised for preventing postpartum hemorrhage. Tranexamic acid has been found to be both effective and safe for decreasing maternal mortality in women with postpartum hemorrhage, and prophylactic use of tranexamic acid may decrease the need for packed red blood cell transfusions and/or uterotonics. The WOMAN-2 Trial, designed to assess if tranexamic acid prevents postpartum hemorrhage in women with moderate to severe anemia undergoing vaginal delivery, is currently recruiting participants. The additive, infra-additive, or synergistic action of oxytocin in combination with other second-line therapies deserves further study.

High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism During Labor: JACC Patient Care Pathways

While in labor, a 37-year-old woman developed acute dyspnea, hypoxemia, and tachycardia. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated severe right ventricular dilation and dysfunction, raising the suspicion of acute pulmonary embolism. The patient indeed had bilateral pulmonary embolism, necessitating percutaneous thrombectomy. Her course was complicated by another saddle pulmonary embolus, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and COVID-19 infection. This clinical case illustrates the importance of prompt diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in a peripartum female patient, the multidisciplinary approach of management, and how to approach clinical complications such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Furthermore, long-term management in acute pulmonary embolism is presented.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Liver Transplantation Recipients after Tranexamic Acid Treatment and Platelet Transfusion: A Retrospective Single-Centre Experience

Background and Objectives: Patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) often require increased blood product transfusion due to pre-existing coagulopathy and intraoperative fibrinolysis. Strategies to minimise intraoperative bleeding and subsequent blood product requirements include platelet transfusion and tranexamic acid (TXA). Prophylactic TXA administration has been shown to reduce bleeding and blood product requirements intraoperatively. However, its clinical use is still debated. The aim of this study was to report on a single-centre practice and analyse clinical characteristics and outcomes of LT recipients according to intraoperative treatment of TXA or platelet transfusion. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study in which we reviewed 162 patients' records. Characteristics, intraoperative requirement of blood products, postoperative development of thrombosis and outcomes were compared between patients without or with intraoperative TXA treatment and without or with platelet transfusion. Results: Intraoperative treatment of TXA and platelets was 53% and 57.40%, respectively. Patients who required intraoperative administration of TXA or platelet transfusion also required more transfusion of blood products. Neither TXA nor platelet transfusion were associated with increased postoperative development of hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis, 90-day mortality or graft loss. There was a significant increase in the median length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay in those who received platelet transfusion only (2.00 vs. 3.00 days; p = 0.021). Time to extubate was significantly different in both those who required TXA and platelet transfusion intraoperatively. Conclusions: Our analysis indicates that LT recipients still required copious intraoperative transfusion of blood products, despite the use of intraoperative TXA and platelets. Our findings have important implications for current transfusion practice in LT recipients and may guide clinicians to act upon these findings, which will support global efforts to encourage a wider use of TXA to reduce transfusion requirements, including platelets.

Haemostatic support in postpartum haemorrhage: A review of the literature and expert opinion

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) remains the leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths worldwide. Typically, bleeding is controlled by timely obstetric measures in parallel with resuscitation and treatment of coagulopathy. Early recognition of abnormal coagulation is crucial and haemostatic support should be considered simultaneously with other strategies as coagulopathies contribute to the progression to massive haemorrhage. However, there is lack of agreement on important topics in the current guidelines for management of PPH. A clinical definition of PPH is paramount to understand the situation to which the treatment recommendations relate; however, reaching a consensus has previously proven difficult. Traditional definitions are based on volume of blood loss, which is difficult to monitor, can be misleading and leads to treatment delay. A multidisciplinary approach to define PPH considering vital signs, clinical symptoms, coagulation and haemodynamic changes is needed. Moreover, standardised algorithms or massive haemorrhage protocols should be developed to reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality and improve overall clinical outcomes in PPH. If available, point-of-care testing should be used to guide goal-directed haemostatic treatment. Tranexamic acid should be administered as soon as abnormal bleeding is recognised. Fibrinogen concentrate rather than fresh frozen plasma should be administered to restore haemostasis where there is elevated risk of fibrinogen deficiency (e.g., in catastrophic bleeding or in cases of abruption or amniotic fluid embolism) as it is a more concentrated source of fibrinogen. Lastly, organisational considerations are equally as important as clinical interventions in the management of PPH and have the potential to improve patient outcomes.

Postpartum Hemorrhage Trends and Outcomes in the United States, 2000-2019

OBJECTIVE

To analyze temporal trends in and risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage and to analyze the association of risk factors with postpartum hemorrhage-related interventions such as blood transfusion and peripartum hysterectomy.

METHODS

This repeated cross-sectional study analyzed delivery hospitalizations from 2000 to 2019 in the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample. Trends analyses were conducted using joinpoint regression to estimate the average annual percent change (AAPC) with 95% CIs. Unadjusted and adjusted survey-weighted logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the relationship between postpartum hemorrhage risk factors and likelihood of 1) postpartum hemorrhage, 2) postpartum hemorrhage that requires blood transfusion, and 3) peripartum hysterectomy in the setting of postpartum hemorrhage, with unadjusted odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios with 95% CIs as measures of association.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 76.7 million delivery hospitalizations, 2.3 million (3.0%) were complicated by postpartum hemorrhage. From 2000 to 2019, the rate of postpartum hemorrhage increased from 2.7% to 4.3% (AAPC 2.6%, 94% CI 1.7-3.5%). Over the study period, the proportion of deliveries to individuals with at least one postpartum hemorrhage risk factor increased from 18.6% to 26.9% (AAPC 1.9%, 95% CI 1.7-2.0%). Among deliveries complicated by postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusions increased from 5.4% to 16.7% from 2000 to 2011 and then decreased from 16.7% to 12.6% from 2011 to 2019. Peripartum hysterectomy among hospitalized individuals with postpartum hemorrhage increased from 1.4% to 2.4% from 2000 to 2009, did not change significantly from 2009 to 2016, and then decreased significantly from 2.1% to 0.9% from 2016 to 2019 (AAPC -27.0%, 95% CI -35.2% to -17.6%). Risk factors associated with postpartum hemorrhage and transfusion and hysterectomy in the setting of postpartum hemorrhage included prior cesarean delivery with previa or placenta accreta, placenta previa without prior cesarean delivery, and antepartum hemorrhage or placental abruption.

CONCLUSION

Postpartum hemorrhage and related risk factors increased over a 20-year period. Despite the increased postpartum hemorrhage rates, blood transfusions, and hysterectomy rates decreased in recent years.

Tranexamic acid at cesarean delivery: drug-error deaths

The use of tranexamic acid for postpartum hemorrhage has entered obstetrical practice globally with the evidence-based expectation of saving lives. This improvement in the care of women with postpartum hemorrhage has come at a price. For the anesthetist, having tranexamic acid ampoules close at hand would seem an obvious strategy to facilitate its use during cesarean delivery, an important setting for severe hemorrhage. Tragically, we have identified a number of recent instances of inadvertent intrathecal administration of tranexamic acid instead of local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia. Reported cases of this catastrophic error seem to be increasing. The profound neurotoxicity of tranexamic acid causes rapid-onset convulsions, with mortality of 50%. How can these tragic errors be averted? Drug safety alerts have been issued by the US Food and Drug Administration and the World Health Organization, but that is not enough. We recommend extensive dissemination of information to raise awareness of this potential hazard, and local hospital protocols to ensure that tranexamic acid is stored separately from anesthetic drugs, preferably outside the operating room and with an auxiliary warning label. Implementation of safety strategies on a very large scale will be needed to ensure that the life-saving potential of tranexamic acid is not eclipsed by drug-error mortality.

Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in intracranial haemorrhage: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although some studies have shown that tranexamic acid is beneficial to patients with intracranial haemorrhage, the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid for intracranial haemorrhage remain controversial.

METHOD

The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Data were analyzed using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-five randomized controlled trials were included. Tranexamic acid significantly inhibited hematoma growth in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. (ICH: mean difference -1.76, 95%CI -2.78 to -0.79, I2 = 0%, P < .001; TBI: MD -4.82, 95%CI -8.06 to -1.58, I2 = 0%, P = .004). For subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients, it significantly decreased the risk of hydrocephalus (OR 1.23, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.50, I2 = 0%, P = .04) and rebleeding (OR, 0.52, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.79, I2 = 56% P = .002). There was no significance in modified Rankin Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale 3-5, mortality, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or ischemic stroke/transient ischemic.

CONCLUSION

Tranexamic acid can significantly reduce the risk of intracranial haemorrhage growth in patients with ICH and TBI. Tranexamic acid can reduce the incidence of complications (hydrocephalus, rebleeding) in patients with SAH, which can indirectly improve the quality of life of patients with intracranial haemorrhage.

Tranexamic acid at cesarean delivery: Drug-error deaths

The use of tranexamic acid for postpartum hemorrhage has entered obstetrical practice globally with the evidence-based expectation of saving lives. This improvement in the care of women with postpartum hemorrhage has come at a price. For the anesthetist, having tranexamic acid ampoules close at hand would seem an obvious strategy to facilitate its use during cesarean delivery, an important setting for severe hemorrhage. Tragically, we have identified a number of recent instances of inadvertent intrathecal administration of tranexamic acid instead of local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia. Reported cases of this catastrophic error seem to be increasing. The profound neurotoxicity of tranexamic acid causes rapid-onset convulsions, with mortality of 50%. How can these tragic errors be averted? Drug safety alerts have been issued by the US Food and Drug Administration and the World Health Organization, but that is not enough. We recommend extensive dissemination of information to raise awareness of this potential hazard, and local hospital protocols to ensure that tranexamic acid is stored separately from anesthetic drugs, preferably outside the operating room and with an auxiliary warning label. Implementation of safety strategies on a very large scale will be needed to ensure that the life-saving potential of tranexamic acid is not eclipsed by drug-error mortality.

Tranexamic acid for the prevention of blood loss after cesarean among women with twins: a secondary analysis of the TRAnexamic Acid for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage Following a Cesarean Delivery randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Although prophylactic tranexamic acid administration after cesarean delivery resulted in a lower incidence of calculated estimated blood loss of >1000 mL or red cell transfusion by day 2, its failure to reduce the incidence of hemorrhage-related secondary clinical outcomes (TRAnexamic Acid for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage Following a Cesarean Delivery trial) makes its use questionable. The magnitude of its effect may differ in women at higher risk of blood loss, including those with multiple pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effect of tranexamic acid vs placebo to prevent blood loss after cesarean delivery among women with multiple pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of the TRAnexamic Acid for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage Following a Cesarean Delivery trial data, a double-blind, randomized controlled trial from March 2018 to January 2020 in 27 French maternity hospitals, that included 319 women with multiple pregnancies. Women with a cesarean delivery before or during labor at ≥34 weeks of gestation were randomized to receive intravenously 1 g of tranexamic acid (n=160) or placebo (n=159), both with prophylactic uterotonics. The primary outcome was a calculated estimated blood loss of >1000 mL or a red blood cell transfusion by 2 days after delivery. The secondary outcomes included clinical and laboratory blood loss measurements.

RESULTS

Of the 4551 women randomized in this trial, 319 had a multiple pregnancy and cesarean delivery, and 298 (93.4%) had primary outcome data available. This outcome occurred in 62 of 147 women (42.2%) in the tranexamic acid group and 67 of 152 (44.1%) receiving placebo (adjusted risk ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.38; P=.86). No significant between-group differences occurred for any hemorrhage-related clinical outcomes: gravimetrically estimated blood loss, provider-assessed clinically significant hemorrhage, additional uterotonics, postpartum blood transfusion, arterial embolization, and emergency surgery (P>.05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

Among women with a multiple pregnancy and cesarean delivery, prophylactic tranexamic acid did not reduce the incidence of any blood loss-related outcomes.

Guideline No. 431: Postpartum Hemorrhage and Hemorrhagic Shock

OBJECTIVE

This guideline aims to provide evidence for prevention, recognition, and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage including severe hemorrhage leading to hemorrhagic shock.

TARGET POPULATION

All pregnant patients.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Appropriate recognition and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage can prevent serious morbidity while reducing costs to the health care system by minimizing more costly interventions and length of hospital stays.

EVIDENCE

Medical literature, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Database, and grey literature were searched for articles, published between 2012 and 2021, on postpartum hemorrhage, uterotonics, obstetrical hemorrhage, and massive hemorrhage protocols.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

All members of the health care team who care for labouring or postpartum women, including, but not restricted to, nurses, midwives, family physicians, obstetricians, and anesthesiologists.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The role of tranexamic acid in the management of postpartum haemorrhage

In the last decades, tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as an essential tool in blood loss management in obstetrics. TXA prophylaxis for postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) has been studied in double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Given the small observed preventive effect, the systematic use of TXA for vaginal and/or caesarean deliveries remains controversial. The result of a pharmacokinetic modelling suggests that relative to intravenous administration, intramuscular administration may be an equally effective alternative route for preventing PPH and may enable access to this drug in low-resource countries. Prophylaxis is currently studied in high-risk populations, such as women with prepartum anaemia or placenta previa. TXA effectively reduces blood loss and PPH-related morbidity and mortality during active PPH, as demonstrated by high-grade evidence from large RCTs. The drug has a good safety profile: in most cases, only mild gastrointestinal or visual adverse events may be observed. TXA use does not increase the risk of serious adverse events, such as venous or arterial thromboembolism, seizures, or acute kidney injury. The TRACES in vivo analysis of biomarkers of TXA's antifibrinolytic effect have suggested that a dose of at least 1 g is required for the treatment of PPH. The TRACES pharmacokinetic model suggests that because TXA can be lost in the haemorrhaged blood, a second dose should be administered if the PPH continues or if severe coagulopathy occurs. Future pharmacodynamic analyses will focus on the appropriateness of TXA dosing regimens with regard to the intensity of fibrinolysis in catastrophic obstetric events.

Tranexamic acid at cesarean delivery: drug‐error deaths

The use of tranexamic acid for postpartum hemorrhage has entered obstetrical practice globally with the evidence-based expectation of saving lives. This improvement in the care of women with postpartum hemorrhage has come at a price. For the anesthetist, having tranexamic acid ampoules close at hand would seem an obvious strategy to facilitate its use during cesarean delivery, an important setting for severe hemorrhage. Tragically, we have identified a number of recent instances of inadvertent intrathecal administration of tranexamic acid instead of local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia. Reported cases of this catastrophic error seem to be increasing. The profound neurotoxicity of tranexamic acid causes rapid-onset convulsions, with mortality of 50%. How can these tragic errors be averted? Drug safety alerts have been issued by the US Food and Drug Administration and the World Health Organization, but that is not enough. We recommend extensive dissemination of information to raise awareness of this potential hazard, and local hospital protocols to ensure that tranexamic acid is stored separately from anesthetic drugs, preferably outside the operating room and with an auxiliary warning label. Implementation of safety strategies on a very large scale will be needed to ensure that the life-saving potential of tranexamic acid is not eclipsed by drug-error mortality.

High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism During Labor: JACC Patient Care Pathways

While in labor, a 37-year-old woman developed acute dyspnea, hypoxemia, and tachycardia. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated severe right ventricular dilation and dysfunction, raising the suspicion of acute pulmonary embolism. The patient indeed had bilateral pulmonary embolism, necessitating percutaneous thrombectomy. Her course was complicated by another saddle pulmonary embolus, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and COVID-19 infection. This clinical case illustrates the importance of prompt diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in a peripartum female patient, the multidisciplinary approach of management, and how to approach clinical complications such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Furthermore, long-term management in acute pulmonary embolism is presented.

Placenta Accreta Spectrum Part II: hemostatic considerations based on an extended review of the literature

"Placenta accreta spectrum" (PAS) is a rare but serious pregnancy condition where the placenta abnormally adheres to the uterine wall and fails to spontaneously release after delivery. When it occurs, PAS is associated with high maternal morbidity and mortality-as PAS management can be particularly challenging. This two-part review summarizes current evidence in PAS management, identifies its most challenging aspects, and offers evidence-based recommendations to improve management strategies and PAS outcomes. The first part of this two-part review highlighted the general anesthetic approach, surgical and interventional management strategies, specialized "centers of excellence," and multidisciplinary PAS treatment teams. The high rates of PAS morbidity and mortality are often provoked by PAS-associated coagulopathies and peripartal hemorrhage (PPH). Anesthesiologists need to be prepared for massive blood loss, transfusion, and to manage potential coagulopathies. In this second part of this two-part review, we specifically reviewed the current literature pertaining to hemostatic changes, blood loss, transfusion management, and postpartum venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in PAS patients. Taken together, the two parts of this review provide a comprehensive survey of challenging aspects in PAS management for anesthesiologists.

Maternal body weight and estimated circulating blood volume: a non-linear approach

Postpartum haemorrhage continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the obstetric population worldwide, especially in patients at extremes of body weight. Quantification of blood loss has been considered extensively in the literature. However, these volumes must be contextualised to appreciate the consequences of blood loss for individual parturients. Knowledge of a patient's peripartum circulating blood volume is essential to allow accurate interpretation of the significance of haemorrhage and appropriate resuscitation. Greater body weight in obesity can lead to overestimation of blood volume, resulting in inappropriately high thresholds for blood product transfusion and delays in treatment. The most recent Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk through Audits and Confidential Enquiries across the UK (MBRRACE-UK) surveillance report demonstrated the risk to this population, with more than half of all maternal mortality recorded in parturients who were either overweight or obese. Current linear calculations used to estimate circulating blood volumes based on patients' weights could be contributing to this phenomenon, as blood volume increases at a disproportional rate to body composition. In this review, we summarise the relevant physiology and explore the existing literature on the estimation of circulating blood volume, both during pregnancy and in obesity. Building on key works and principal findings, we present a practical, nonlinear approach to the adjustment of estimated blood volume with increasing body mass. This clinical tool aims to reduce the clinical bias influencing the management of obstetric haemorrhage in a population already at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Discussion of the limitations of this approach and the call for further research within this field completes this review.

Emergencies in obstetric anaesthesia: a narrative review

We conducted a narrative review in six areas of obstetric emergencies: category-1 caesarean section; difficult and failed airway; massive obstetric haemorrhage; hypertensive crisis; emergencies related to neuraxial anaesthesia; and maternal cardiac arrest. These areas represent significant research published within the last five years, with emphasis on large multicentre randomised trials, national or international practice guidelines and recommendations from major professional societies. Key topics discussed: prevention and management of failed neuraxial technique; role of high-flow nasal oxygenation and choice of neuromuscular drug in obstetric patients; prevention of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia; management of the difficult and failed obstetric airway; current perspectives on the use of tranexamic acid, fibrinogen concentrate and cell salvage; guidance on neuraxial placement in a thrombocytopenic obstetric patient; management of neuraxial drug errors, local anaesthetic systemic toxicity and unusually prolonged neuraxial block regression; and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in maternal cardiac arrest.

Hemostatic Effects of Tranexamic Acid in Cesarean Delivery: An Ancillary Study of the TRAAP2 Study

BACKGROUND

 Fibrinolysis activation during delivery contributes to postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Clot lysis time studied with the global fibrinolytic capacity device (GFC/LT) is a functional test which rapidly assesses fibrinolytic profile. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an efficient antifibrinolytic therapy.

METHODS

 We prospectively studied fibrinolysis and coagulation in 33 women included in the TRAAP2 trial, which aimed to assess the impact of TXA in preventing PPH following a cesarean delivery. TXA or placebo was randomly administered after childbirth as part of the TRAAP2 trial's protocol. Fibrinolytic (GFC/LT, plasma concentration of fibrinolysis activators and inhibitors) and hemostatic parameters were assayed at three sample times (TREF [T-reference] after anesthesia, T15 and T120minutes after TXA, or placebo administration).

RESULTS

 All cesarean deliveries were elective. In the placebo group, the clot lysis time assessed with GFC/LT significantly decreased between TREF and T120, indicating an activated fibrinolysis (44 [interquartile range, IQR: 40-48] vs. 34 [IQR: 30-36] minutes, p<0.001). In both TXA and placebo groups, significant fluctuations of the plasmatic concentrations of fibrinolytic mediators were noticed over time, suggesting fibrinolysis activation. Clot lysis time measured by GFC/LT was significantly increased in women of the TXA group as compared with those in the placebo group at T15 (120 [120-120] vs. 36 [34-41] minutes, p<0.001) and T120minutes (113 [99-120] vs. 34 [30-36] minutes, p<0.001) after drug administration, indicating a decreased in fibrinolysis in those women.

CONCLUSIONS

 GFC/LT evidenced fibrinolysis activation during cesarean delivery, linked to a decrease in fibrinolytic inhibitors. GFC/LT revealed a significant antifibrinolytic effect of TXA compared with placebo.

Trial of Labor Compared With Elective Cesarean Delivery for Low-Lying Placenta

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of women with low-lying placenta by planned mode of delivery and distance from the internal os distance.

METHODS

Six tertiary maternity hospitals in France participated in this retrospective multicenter study of births from 2007-2012. Women with low-lying placenta , defined as an internal os distance of 20 mm or less, who gave birth after 35 weeks of gestation were included and classified in the planned trial-of-labor or elective cesarean delivery groups. The primary endpoint was severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) defined as blood loss exceeding 1,000 mL. Secondary outcomes were composite variables of severe maternal and neonatal morbidity. We used multivariable logistic regression and propensity scores to compare outcomes by planned mode of delivery.

RESULTS

Among 128,233 births during the study period, 171 (0.13%) women had low-lying placenta: 70 (40.9%) in the trial-of-labor group and 101 (59.1%) who underwent elective cesarean delivery. The rate of severe PPH was 22.9% (16/70, 95% CI 13.7-34.4) for the trial-of-labor group and 23.0% (23/101, 95% CI 15.2-32.5) for the cesarean delivery group ( P =.9); severe maternal and neonatal morbidity rates were likewise similar (2.9% vs 2.0% [ P =.7] and 12.9% vs 9.9% [ P =.5], respectively). Trial-of-labor was not significantly associated with a higher rate of severe PPH after multivariable logistic regression and propensity score-weighted analysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.42, 95% CI 0.62-3.24 [ P =.4]; and aOR 1.34, 95% CI 0.53-3.38 [ P =.5], respectively). The vaginal delivery rate in the trial-of-labor group was 50.0% (19/38) in those with an internal os distance of 11-20 mm and 18.5% (5/27) in those with a distance of 1-10 mm.

CONCLUSION

Our results support a policy of offering a trial of labor to women with low-lying placenta after 35 weeks of gestation and an internal os distance of 11-20 mm. An internal os distance of 1-10 mm reduces the likelihood of vaginal birth considerably, compared with 11-20 mm, but without increasing the incidence of severe PPH or severe maternal morbidity.

Update on Applications and Limitations of Perioperative Tranexamic Acid

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a potent antifibrinolytic with documented efficacy in reducing blood loss and allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in several clinical settings. With a growing emphasis on patient blood management, TXA has become an integral aspect of perioperative blood conservation strategies. While clinical applications of TXA in the perioperative period are expanding, routine use in select clinical scenarios should be supported by evidence for efficacy. Furthermore, questions regarding optimal dosing without increased risk of adverse events such as thrombosis or seizures should be answered. Therefore, ongoing investigations into TXA utilization in cardiac surgery, obstetrics, acute trauma, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, pediatric surgery, and other perioperative settings continue. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the current applications and limitations of TXA use in the perioperative period.

Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

Perioperative bleeding is common in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic drug that may safely decrease such bleeding.

METHODS

We conducted a trial involving patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tranexamic acid (1-g intravenous bolus) or placebo at the start and end of surgery (reported here) and, with the use of a partial factorial design, a hypotension-avoidance or hypertension-avoidance strategy (not reported here). The primary efficacy outcome was life-threatening bleeding, major bleeding, or bleeding into a critical organ (composite bleeding outcome) at 30 days. The primary safety outcome was myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, nonhemorrhagic stroke, peripheral arterial thrombosis, or symptomatic proximal venous thromboembolism (composite cardiovascular outcome) at 30 days. To establish the noninferiority of tranexamic acid to placebo for the composite cardiovascular outcome, the upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the hazard ratio had to be below 1.125, and the one-sided P value had to be less than 0.025.

RESULTS

A total of 9535 patients underwent randomization. A composite bleeding outcome event occurred in 433 of 4757 patients (9.1%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 561 of 4778 patients (11.7%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 0.87; absolute difference, -2.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.8 to -1.4; two-sided P<0.001 for superiority). A composite cardiovascular outcome event occurred in 649 of 4581 patients (14.2%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 639 of 4601 patients (13.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.14; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 1.14; absolute difference, 0.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.1 to 1.7; one-sided P = 0.04 for noninferiority).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, the incidence of the composite bleeding outcome was significantly lower with tranexamic acid than with placebo. Although the between-group difference in the composite cardiovascular outcome was small, the noninferiority of tranexamic acid was not established. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; POISE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03505723.).

Latest advances in postpartum hemorrhage management

Hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. A maternal health priority is improving how healthcare providers prevent and manage postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Because anesthesiologists can help facilitate how hospitals develop approaches for PPH prevention and anticipatory planning, we review the potential utility of PPH risk-assessment tools, bundles, and protocols. Anesthesiologists rely on clinical and diagnostic information for initiating and evaluating medical management. Therefore, we review modalities for measuring blood loss after delivery, which includes visual, volumetric, gravimetric, and colorimetric approaches. Point-of-care technologies for assessing changes in central hemodynamics (ultrasonography) and coagulation profiles (rotational thromboelastometry and thromboelastography) are also discussed. Anesthesiologists play a critical role in the medical and transfusion management of PPH. Therefore, we review blood ordering and massive transfusion protocols, fixed-ratio vs. goal-directed transfusion approaches, coagulation changes during PPH, and the potential clinical utility of the pharmacological adjuncts, tranexamic acid, and fibrinogen concentrate.

Tranexamic acid reduced blood transfusions in acute burn surgery: A retrospective case-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Early excision and grafting of burn wounds are key for reducing prevalence of infection and sepsis. However, it is associated with massive blood loss and patients frequently require large numbers of blood transfusions. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) on blood transfusion requirements in acute burn surgery.

METHODS

Patients admitted to the burn intensive care unit between January 2018 and May 2021 and received TXA before first surgery for wound excision and grafting were matched in a 1:2 ratio to patients that did not receive TXA (confounders age,sex,total body surface area (TBSA) burned). Primary endpoint of the analysis was the total number of transfused units of red blood cells (RBC) intra- and postoperatively up to 48 h. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets were evaluated. Endpoints were compared between groups using van Elteren tests adjusting for strata variable age, gender, TBSA.

RESULTS

Twenty-six TXA patients were matched with 52 control patients resulting in similar distributions of gender (77.9%(TXA)vs. 82.7%(control) males, p=0.542), age (51.7±21.3vs.48.3 ±17.4years,p = 0.459) and %TBSA burned (33.5%(IQR34)vs. 38.5% (IQR 30.5),p = 1.000). TXA group received significantly less RBC units intraoperatively (2.5(IQR 2.0)vs.4.0 units (IQR4.0), p = 0.038) and in total (4.0(IQR3.0)vs.6.0(IQR4.0),p = 0.017). TXA patients also received less blood products in general (RBC, FFP, platelets) in each period and in total. We found no significant difference in length of stay (24.0(IQR26.0)vs.33.0 days (IQR 0.5),p = 0.367) or mortality (15.4%vs.21.2%, p = 0.542).

DISCUSSION

This study shows that necessity for blood transfusions in acute burn surgery may be reduced significantly by administration of TXA perioperatively. Randomized-controlled trials are needed to prove these findings.

Tranexamic acid for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in women undergoing cesarean delivery: an updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of prophylactic tranexamic acid administration vs standard uterotonic agents alone among women undergoing cesarean delivery.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from inception to June 30, 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous tranexamic acid administration with placebo in women undergoing cesarean delivery and receiving standard prophylactic uterotonic agents were held eligible.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

The risk of bias of individual studies was appraised with the Risk of Bias 2 tool. Meta-analysis was conducted by fitting random-effects models using restricted maximum likelihood. Subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of country, protocol availability, double-blinding, risk of bias, sample size, and tranexamic acid dose. A 1-stage meta-analysis was performed as a sensitivity analysis. The credibility of outcomes was appraised with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Overall, 36 studies with 10,659 women were included. Tranexamic acid administration was associated with significantly lower total blood loss (mean difference, -189.44 mL; 95% confidence intervals, -218.63 to -160.25), lower hemoglobin drop (mean difference, 8.22%; 95% confidence interval, 5.54-10.90), decreased risk of blood loss of >1000 mL (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.60), transfusion requirement (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.65), and need of additional uterotonics (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.52). Subgroup analysis indicated a greater effect of tranexamic acid on total blood loss reduction in low-middle income countries. The outcomes remained stable by separately evaluating women at low bleeding risk. The 1-stage meta-analysis demonstrated similar outcomes with the primary analysis. The quality of evidence was judged to be moderate regarding total blood loss and hemoglobin percentage change and low for the other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggested that prophylactic tranexamic acid administration is effective among women undergoing cesarean delivery in lowering postpartum blood loss and limiting hemoglobin drop. Further research is needed to test its efficacy in high-risk populations and verify its safety profile.

How I manage pregnancy in women with Glanzmann thrombasthenia

Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT) is a rare inherited platelet function disorder caused by a quantitative and/or qualitative defect of the αIIbβ3 integrin. Pregnancy and delivery is a recognized risk period for bleeding in women with GT. The newborn may also be affected by fetal and neonatal immune thrombocytopenia induced by the transplacental passage of maternal anti-αIIbβ3 antibodies, which can lead to severe hemorrhage and fetal loss. Pregnancy in GT women thus requires a multidisciplinary approach, including prepregnancy counseling, and a treatment plan for delivery for both the mother and child. In this article, we summarize the current knowledge on pregnancy in women with GT and describe how we manage this severe platelet disorder in our clinical practice.

Safety and efficacy of preoperative tranexamic acid in reducing intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in high-risk women undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Objective to assess the value of preoperative tranexamic acid (TXA) in reduction of intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in high-risk cesarean delivery (CD).

Methods

A double blind randomized controlled trial included 160 high risk women who underwent elective lower segment CD. They were equally randomized to receive either 1 g of TXA or placebo 15 min before surgery. The primary outcome was Intraoperative blood loss.

Results

The estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the placebo group when compared to TXA group (896.81 ± 519.6 vs. 583.23 ± 379.62 ml, P < 0.001).

Both postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit were lower (9.2 ± 1.6 and 27.4 ± 4.1 vs. 10.1 ± 1.2 and 30.1 ± 3.4, P values < 0.001and 0.012 respectively) and their change percentages (15.41 vs. 7.11%, P < 0.001) were higher in the placebo group when compared to TXA one.

The need for further ecbolics was higher in placebo group when compared to TXA group (46.25 vs. 13.75%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Preoperative TXA is safe and effective in reducing blood loss during and after high-risk CD.

Trial registration

ClincalTrial.gov ID: NCT03820206.

[Postpartum hemorrhage : Interdisciplinary consideration in the context of patient blood management]

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) nowadays still represents a severe complication of both a vaginal delivery and a cesarean section. In German-speaking areas a new definition of the term has recently become established and the nomenclature with respect to the severe form of PPH was dropped. The handling of misoprostol as a uterotonic during treatment of PPH is also new, which is available in Germany only as a medical direct import. For adequate diagnostics and targeted treatment interdisciplinary and standardized algorithms should be established and the specialist disciplines involved should be sensitized to this problem. In addition to an adequate hemostasis, a developing coagulopathy must be recognized at an early stage and treated with targeted coagulation management. Through implementation concepts, particularly the second pillar (minimization of blood loss) and the third pillar (rational use of blood transfusions) of patient blood management, various aspects for improvement of treatment of a PPH can be identified.