Localization in the II-III loop of the dihydropyridine receptor of a sequence critical for excitation-contraction coupling

The alpha(1S) III-IV loop influences 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor gating but is not directly involved in excitation-contraction coupling interactions with the type 1 ryanodine receptor

In skeletal muscle, coupling between the 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) and the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) underlies excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. The III-IV loop of the DHPR alpha(1S) subunit binds to a segment of RyR1 in vitro, and mutations in the III-IV loop alter the voltage dependence of EC coupling, raising the possibility that this loop is directly involved in signal transmission from the DHPR to RyR1. To clarify the role of the alpha(1S) III-IV loop in EC coupling, we examined the functional properties of a chimera (GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa]) in which the III-IV loop of the divergent alpha(1A) isoform replaced that of alpha(1S). Dysgenic myotubes expressing GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa] yielded myoplasmic Ca(2+) transients that activated at approximately 10 mV more hyperpolarized potentials and that were approximately 65% smaller than those of GFP-alpha(1S). A similar reduction was observed in voltage-dependent charge movements for GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa], indicating that the chimeric channels trafficked less well to the membrane but that those that were in the membrane functioned as efficiently in EC coupling as GFP-alpha(1S). Relative to GFP-alpha(1S), L-type currents mediated by GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa] were approximately 40% smaller and activated at approximately 5 mV more hyperpolarized potentials. The altered gating of GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa] was accentuated by exposure to +/-Bay K 8644, which caused a much larger hyperpolarizing shift in activation compared with its effect on GFP-alpha(1S). Taken together, our observations indicate that the alpha(1S) III-IV loop is not directly involved in EC coupling but does influence DHPR gating transitions important both for EC coupling and activation of L-type conductance.

Sequence differences in the IQ motifs of CaV1.1 and CaV1.2 strongly impact calmodulin binding and calcium-dependent inactivation

The proximal C terminus of the cardiac L-type calcium channel (Ca(V)1.2) contains structural elements important for the binding of calmodulin (CaM) and calcium-dependent inactivation, and exhibits extensive sequence conservation with the corresponding region of the skeletal L-type channel (Ca(V)1.1). However, there are several Ca(V)1.1 residues that are both identical in six species and are non-conservatively changed from the corresponding Ca(V)1.2 residues, including three of the "IQ motif." To investigate the functional significance of these residue differences, we used native gel electrophoresis and expression in intact myotubes to compare the binding of CaM to extended regions (up to 300 residues) of the C termini of Ca(V)1.1 and Ca(V)1.2. We found that in the presence of Ca(2+) (either millimolar or that in resting myotubes), CaM bound strongly to C termini of Ca(V)1.2 but not of Ca(V)1.1. Furthermore, replacement of two residues (Tyr(1657) and Lys(1662)) within the IQ motif of a C-terminal Ca(V)1.2 construct with the divergent residues of Ca(V)1.1 (His(1532) and Met(1537)) led to a weakening of CaM binding (native gels), whereas the reciprocal substitution in Ca(V)1.1 caused a gain of CaM binding. In full-length Ca(V)1.2, substitution of these same two divergent residues with those of Ca(V)1.1 (Y1657H, K1662M) eliminated calcium-dependent inactivation of the heterologously expressed channel. Thus, our results reveal that a conserved difference between the IQ motifs of Ca(V)1.2 and Ca(V)1.1 has a profound effect on both CaM binding and calcium-dependent inactivation.

Accessibility of targeted DHPR sites to streptavidin and functional effects of binding on EC coupling

In skeletal muscle, the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in the plasma membrane (PM) serves as a Ca(2+) channel and as the voltage sensor for excitation-contraction (EC coupling), triggering Ca(2+) release via the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) membrane. In addition to being functionally linked, these two proteins are also structurally linked to one another, but the identity of these links remains unknown. As an approach to address this issue, we have expressed DHPR alpha(1S) or beta(1a) subunits, with a biotin acceptor domain fused to targeted sites, in myotubes null for the corresponding, endogenous DHPR subunit. After saponin permeabilization, the approximately 60-kD streptavidin molecule had access to the beta(1a) N and C termini and to the alpha(1S) N terminus and proximal II-III loop (residues 671-686). Steptavidin also had access to these sites after injection into living myotubes. However, sites of the alpha(1S) C terminus were either inaccessible or conditionally accessible in saponin- permeabilized myotubes, suggesting that these C-terminal regions may exist in conformations that are occluded by other proteins in PM/SR junction (e.g., RyR1). The binding of injected streptavidin to the beta(1a) N or C terminus, or to the alpha(1S) N terminus, had no effect on electrically evoked contractions. By contrast, binding of streptavidin to the proximal alpha(1S) II-III loop abolished such contractions, without affecting agonist-induced Ca(2+) release via RyR1. Moreover, the block of EC coupling did not appear to result from global distortion of the DHPR and supports the hypothesis that conformational changes of the alpha(1S) II-III loop are necessary for EC coupling in skeletal muscle.

Bridging the myoplasmic gap: recent developments in skeletal muscle excitation–contraction coupling

Conformational coupling between the L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel (or 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor; DHPR) and the ryanodine-sensitive Ca(2+) release channel of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (RyR1) is the mechanistic basis for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in skeletal muscle. In this article, recent findings regarding the roles of the individual cytoplasmic domains (the amino- and carboxyl-termini, cytoplasmic loops I-II, II-III, and III-IV) of the DHPR alpha(1S) subunit in bi-directional communication with RyR1 will be discussed.

Agonists and antagonists of the cardiac ryanodine receptor: Potential therapeutic agents?

This review addresses the potential use of the intracellular ryanodine receptor (RyR) Ca(2+) release channel as a therapeutic target in heart disease. Heart disease encompasses a wide range of conditions with the major contributors to mortality and morbidity being ischaemic heart disease and heart failure (HF). In addition there are many rare, but devastating conditions, some of which are either genetically linked to the RyR and its regulatory proteins or involve drug-induced modification of the proteins. The defects in Ca(2+) signalling vary with the nature of the heart disease and the stage in its progress and therefore specific corrections require different modifications of Ca(2+) signalling. Compounds that activate the RyR are potential inotropic agents to increase the Ca(2+) transient and strength of contraction. Compounds that reduce RyR activity are potentially useful in conditions where excess RyR activity initiates arrhythmias, or depletes the Ca(2+) store, as in end stage HF. It has recently been discovered that the cardio-protective action of the drug JTV519 can be attributed partly to its ability to stabilise the interaction between the RyR and the 12.6 kDa binding protein for the commonly used immunosuppressive drug FK506 (FKBP12.6, known as tacrolimus). This has established the credibility of the RyR as a therapeutic target. We explore the possibility that mutations causing the rare RyR-linked arrhythmias will open the door to identification of novel RyR-based therapeutic agents. The use of regulatory binding sites within the RyR complex or on its associated proteins as templates for drug design is discussed.

Bidirectional signaling between calcium channels of skeletal muscle requires multiple direct and indirect interactions

We have defined regions of the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RyR1) essential for bidirectional signaling with dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) and for the organization of DHPR into tetrad arrays by expressing RyR1-RyR3 chimerae in dyspedic myotubes. RyR1-RyR3 constructs bearing RyR1 residues 1-1681 restored wild-type DHPR tetrad arrays and, in part, skeletal-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling (orthograde signaling) but failed to enhance DHPR Ca(2+) currents (retrograde signaling) to WT RyR1 levels. Within this region, the D2 domain (amino acids 1272-1455), although ineffective on its own, dramatically enhanced the formation of tetrads and EC coupling rescue by constructs that otherwise are only partially effective. These findings suggest that the orthograde signal and DHPR tetrad formation require the contributions of numerous RyR regions. Surprisingly, we found that RyR3, although incapable of supporting EC coupling or tetrad formation, restored a significant level of Ca(2+) current, revealing a functional interaction with the skeletal muscle DHPR. Thus, our data support the hypotheses that (i) the structural/functional link between RyR1 and the skeletal muscle DHPR requires multiple interacting regions, (ii) the D2 domain of RyR1 plays a key role in stabilizing this interaction, and (iii) a form of retrograde signaling from RyR3 to the DHPR occurs in the absence of direct protein-protein interactions.

Transient loss of voltage control of Ca2+ release in the presence of maurocalcine in skeletal muscle

In skeletal muscle, sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) calcium release is controlled by the plasma membrane voltage through interactions between the voltage-sensing dihydropyridine receptor (DHPr) and the ryanodine receptor (RYr) calcium release channel. Maurocalcine (MCa), a scorpion toxin peptide presenting some homology with a segment of a cytoplasmic loop of the DHPr, has been previously shown to strongly affect the activity of the isolated RYr. We injected MCa into mouse skeletal muscle fibers and measured intracellular calcium under voltage-clamp conditions. Voltage-activated calcium transients exhibited similar properties in control and in MCa-injected fibers during the depolarizing pulses, and the voltage dependence of calcium release was similar under the two conditions. However, MCa was responsible for a pronounced sustained phase of Ca(2+) elevation that proceeded for seconds following membrane repolarization, with no concurrent alteration of the membrane current. The magnitude of the underlying uncontrolled extra phase of Ca(2+) release correlated well with the peak calcium release during the pulse. Results suggest that MCa binds to RYr that open on membrane depolarization and that this interaction specifically alters the process of repolarization-induced closure of the channels.

Effects of peptide C corresponding to the Glu724-Pro760 region of the II-III loop of the DHP (dihydropyridine) receptor alpha1 subunit on the domain- switch-mediated activation of RyR1 (ryanodine receptor 1) Ca2+ channels

The Leu720-Leu764 region of the II-III loop of the dihydropyridine receptor is believed to be important for both orthograde and retrograde communications with the RyR (ryanodine receptor), but its actual role has not yet been resolved. Our recent studies suggest that voltage-dependent activation of the RyR channel is mediated by a pair of interacting N-terminal and central domains, designated as the 'domain switch'. To investigate the effect of peptide C (a peptide corresponding to residues Glu724-Pro760) on domain- switch-mediated activation of the RyR, we measured Ca2+ release induced by DP (domain peptide) 1 or DP4 (which activates the RyR by mediation of the domain switch) and followed the Ca2+ release time course using a luminal Ca2+ probe (chlortetracycline) under Ca2+-clamped conditions. Peptide C produced a significant potentiation of the domain-switch-mediated Ca2+ release, provided that the Ca2+ concentration was sufficiently low (e.g. 0.1 microM) and the Ca2+ channel was only partially activated by the domain peptide. However, at micromolar Ca2+ concentrations, peptide C inhibits activation. Covalent cross-linking of fluorescently labelled peptide C to the RyR and screening of the fluorescently labelled tryptic fragments permitted us to localize the peptide-C-binding site to residues 450-1400, which may represent the primary region involved in physical coupling. Based on the above findings, we propose that the physiological role of residues Glu724-Pro760 is to facilitate depolarization-induced and domain-switch-mediated RyR activation at sub- or near-threshold concentrations of cytoplasmic Ca2+ and to suppress activation upon an increase of cytoplasmic Ca2+.

Interaction between the dihydropyridine receptor Ca2+ channel beta-subunit and ryanodine receptor type 1 strengthens excitation-contraction coupling

Previous studies have shown that the skeletal dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) pore subunit Ca(V)1.1 (alpha1S) physically interacts with ryanodine receptor type 1 (RyR1), and a molecular signal is transmitted from alpha1S to RyR1 to trigger excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. We show that the beta-subunit of the skeletal DHPR also binds RyR1 and participates in this signaling process. A novel binding site for the DHPR beta1a-subunit was mapped to the M(3201) to W(3661) region of RyR1. In vitro binding experiments showed that the strength of the interaction is controlled by K(3495)KKRR_ _R(3502), a cluster of positively charged residues. Phenotypic expression of skeletal-type EC coupling by RyR1 with mutations in the K(3495)KKRR_ _R(3502) cluster was evaluated in dyspedic myotubes. The results indicated that charge neutralization or deletion severely depressed the magnitude of RyR1-mediated Ca(2+) transients coupled to voltage-dependent activation of the DHPR. Meantime the Ca(2+) content of the sarcoplasmic reticulum was not affected, and the amplitude and activation kinetics of the DHPR Ca(2+) currents were slightly affected. The data show that the DHPR beta-subunit, like alpha1S, interacts directly with RyR1 and is critical for the generation of high-speed Ca(2+) signals coupled to membrane depolarization. These findings indicate that EC coupling in skeletal muscle involves the interplay of at least two subunits of the DHPR, namely alpha1S and beta1a, interacting with possibly different domains of RyR1.

The alpha1S N-terminus is not essential for bi-directional coupling with RyR1

The dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) alpha(1S) II-III loop has been shown to be critical for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in skeletal muscle, but the importance of other cytoplasmic regions, especially the N-terminus (residues 1-51), remains unclear. In this study, we found that deletion of alpha(1S) residues 2-37 (weakly conserved with N-termini of other L-type Ca(2+) channels) had little effect on the ability of alpha(1S) to serve as a Ca(2+) channel or voltage sensor for EC coupling. Strikingly, deletion of 10 additional residues, which are conserved in L-type channels, resulted in ablation of DHPR function. Specifically, confocal microscopy and measurement of charge movement showed that removal of residues 2-47 resulted in a failure of sarcolemmal insertion. Our results indicate that the weakly conserved, distal alpha(1S) N-terminus is not critical for EC coupling or function as a Ca(2+) channel. However, integrity of the proximal alpha(1S) N-terminus is necessary for sarcolemmal expression of the DHPR.

Ryanodine Receptor Type 1 (RyR1) Mutations C4958S and C4961S Reveal Excitation-coupled Calcium Entry (ECCE) Is Independent of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Store Depletion

Bi-directional signaling between ryanodine receptor type 1 (RyR1) and dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in skeletal muscle serves as a prominent example of conformational coupling. Evidence for a physiological mechanism that upon depolarization of myotubes tightly couples three calcium channels, DHPR, RyR1, and a Ca(2+) entry channel with SOCC-like properties, has recently been presented. This form of conformational coupling, termed excitation-coupled calcium entry (ECCE) is triggered by the alpha(1s)-DHPR voltage sensor and is highly dependent on RyR1 conformation. In this report, we substitute RyR1 cysteines 4958 or 4961 within the TXCFICG motif, common to all ER/SR Ca(2+) channels, with serine. When expressed in skeletal myotubes, C4958S- and C4961S-RyR1 properly target and restore L-type current via the DHPR. However, these mutants do not respond to RyR activators and do not support skeletal type EC coupling. Nonetheless, depolarization of cells expressing C4958S- or C4961S-RyR1 triggers calcium entry via ECCE that resembles that for wild-type RyR1, except for substantially slowed inactivation and deactivation kinetics. ECCE in these cells is completely independent of store depletion, displays a cation selectivity of Ca(2+)>Sr(2+) approximately Ba(2+), and is fully inhibited by SKF-96365 or 2-APB. Mutation of other non-CXXC motif cysteines within the RyR1 transmembrane assembly (C3635S, C4876S, and C4882S) did not replicate the phenotype observed with C4958S- and C4961S-RyR1. This study demonstrates the essential role of Cys(4958) and Cys(4961) within an invariant CXXC motif for stabilizing conformations of RyR1 that influence both its function as a release channel and its interaction with ECCE channels.

Regulation of skeletal ryanodine receptors by dihydropyridine receptor II-III loop C-region peptides: relief of Mg2+ inhibition

The aim of the present study was to explore interactions between surface-membrane DHPR (dihydropyridine receptor) Ca2+ channels and RyR (ryanodine receptor) Ca2+ channels in skeletal-muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The C region (725Phe-Pro742) of the linker between the 2nd and 3rd repeats (II-III loop) of the a1 subunit of skeletal DHPRs is essential for skeletal excitation-contraction coupling, which requires a physical interaction between the DHPR and RyR and is independent of external Ca2+. Little is known about the regulatory processes that might take place when the two Ca2+ channels interact. Indeed, interactions between C fragments of the DHPR (C peptides) and RyR have different reported effects on Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and on RyR channels in lipid bilayers. To gain insight into functional interactions between the proteins and to explore different reported effects, we examined the actions of C peptides on RyR1 channels in lipid bilayers with three key RyR regulators, Ca2+, Mg2+ and ATP. We identified four discrete actions: two novel, low-affinity (>10 microM), rapidly reversible effects (fast inhibition and decreased sensitivity to Mg2+ inhibition) and two slowly reversible effects (high-affinity activation and a slow-onset, low-affinity inhibition). Fast inhibition and high-affinity activation were decreased by ATP. Therefore peptide activation in the presence of ATP and Mg2+, used with Ca2+ release assays, depends on a mechanism different from that seen when Ca2+ is the sole agonist. The relief of Mg2+ inhibition was particularly important since RyR activation during excitation-contraction coupling depends on a similar decrease in Mg2+ inhibition.

Multiple loops of the dihydropyridine receptor pore subunit are required for full-scale excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle

Understanding which cytosolic domains of the dihydropyridine receptor participate in excitation-contraction (EC) coupling is critical to validate current structural models. Here we quantified the contribution to skeletal-type EC coupling of the alpha1S (CaV1.1) II-III loop when alone or in combination with the rest of the cytosolic domains of alpha1S. Chimeras consisting of alpha1C (CaV1.2) with alpha1S substitutions at each of the interrepeat loops (I-II, II-III, and III-IV loops) and N- and C-terminal domains were evaluated in dysgenic (alpha1S-null) myotubes for phenotypic expression of skeletal-type EC coupling. Myotubes were voltage-clamped, and Ca2+ transients were measured by confocal line-scan imaging of fluo-4 fluorescence. In agreement with previous results, the alpha1C/alpha1S II-III loop chimera, but none of the other single-loop chimeras, recovered a sigmoidal fluorescence-voltage curve indicative of skeletal-type EC coupling. To quantify Ca2+ transients in the absence of inward Ca2+ current, but without changing the external solution, a mutation, E736K, was introduced into the P-loop of repeat II of alpha1C. The Ca2+ transients expressed by the alpha1C(E736K)/alpha1S II-III loop chimera were approximately 70% smaller than those expressed by the Ca2+-conducting alpha1C/alpha1S II-III variant. The low skeletal-type EC coupling expressed by the alpha1C/alpha1S II-III loop chimera was confirmed in the Ca2+-conducting alpha1C/alpha1S II-III loop variant using Cd2+ (10(-4) M) as the Ca2+ current blocker. In contrast to the behavior of the II-III loop chimera, Ca2+ transients expressed by an alpha1C/alpha1S chimera carrying all tested skeletal alpha1S domains (all alpha1S interrepeat loops, N- and C-terminus) were similar in shape and amplitude to wild-type alpha1S, and did not change in the presence of the E736K mutation or in the presence of 10(-4) M Cd2+. Controls indicated that similar dihydropyridine receptor charge movements were expressed by the non-Ca2+ permeant alpha1S(E1014K) variant, the alpha1C(E736K)/alpha1S II-III loop chimera, and the alpha1C(E736K)/alpha1S chimera carrying all tested alpha1S domains. The data indicate that the functional recovery produced by the alpha1S II-III loop is incomplete and that multiple cytosolic domains of alpha1S are necessary for a quantitative recovery of the EC-coupling phenotype of skeletal myotubes. Thus, despite the importance of the II-III loop there may be other critical determinants in alpha1S that influence the efficiency of EC coupling.

Differential effects of maurocalcine on Ca2+ release events and depolarization-induced Ca2+ release in rat skeletal muscle

Maurocalcine (MCa), a 33 amino acid toxin obtained from scorpion venom, has been shown to interact with the isolated skeletal-type ryanodine receptor (RyR1) and to strongly modify its calcium channel gating. In this study, we explored the effects of MCa on RyR1 in situ to establish whether the functional interaction of RyR1 with the voltage-sensing dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) would modify the ability of MCa to interact with RyR1. In developing skeletal muscle cells the addition of MCa into the external medium induced a calcium transient resulting from RyR1 activation and strongly inhibited the effect of the RyR1 agonist chloro-m-cresol. In contrast, MCa failed to affect the depolarization-induced Ca(2+) release. In intact adult fibres MCa did not induce any change in the cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration. However, when the surface membrane was permeabilized and calcium release events were readily observable, MCa had a time-dependent dual effect: it first increased event frequency, from 0.060 +/- 0.002 to 0.150 +/- 0.007 sarcomere(-1) s(-1), and reduced the amplitude of individual events without modifying their spatial distribution. Later on it induced the appearance of long-lasting events resembling the embers observed in control conditions but having a substantially longer duration. We propose that the functional coupling of DHPRs and RyR1s within a Ca(2+) release unit prevents MCa from either reaching its binding site or from being able to modify the gating not only of the RyR1s physically coupled to DHPRs but all RyR1s within the Ca(2+) release unit.

Organization of Ca2+ release units in excitable smooth muscle of the guinea-pig urinary bladder

Ca(2+) release from internal stores (sarcoplasmic reticulum or SR) in smooth muscles is initiated either via pharmaco-mechanical coupling due to the action of an agonist and involving IP3 receptors, or via excitation-contraction coupling, mostly involving L-type calcium channels in the plasmalemma (DHPRs), and ryanodine receptors (RyRs), or Ca(2+) release channels of the SR. This work focuses attention on the structural basis for the coupling between DHPRs and RyRs in phasic smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig urinary bladder. Immunolabeling shows that two proteins of the SR: calsequestrin and the RyR, and one protein the plasmalemma, the L-type channel or DHPR, are colocalized with each other within numerous, peripherally located sites located within the caveolar domains. Electron microscopy images from thin sections and freeze-fracture replicas identify feet in small peripherally located SR vesicles containing calsequestrin and distinctive large particles clustered within small membrane areas. Both feet and particle clusters are located within caveolar domains. Correspondence between the location of feet and particle clusters and of RyR- and DHPR-positive foci allows the conclusion that calsequestrin, RyRs, and L-type Ca(2+) channels are associated with peripheral couplings, or Ca(2+) release units, constituting the key machinery involved in excitation-contraction coupling. Structural analogies between smooth and cardiac muscle excitation-contraction coupling complexes suggest a common basic mechanism of action.

Involvement of a heptad repeat in the carboxyl terminus of the dihydropyridine receptor beta1a subunit in the mechanism of excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle

Chimeras consisting of the homologous skeletal dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) beta1a subunit and the heterologous cardiac/brain beta2a subunit were used to determine which regions of beta1a were responsible for the skeletal-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling phenotype. Chimeras were transiently transfected in beta1 knockout myotubes and then voltage-clamped with simultaneous measurement of confocal fluo-4 fluorescence. All chimeras expressed a similar density of DHPR charge movements, indicating that the membrane density of DHPR voltage sensors was not a confounding factor in these studies. The data indicates that a beta1a-specific domain present in the carboxyl terminus, namely the D5 region comprising the last 47 residues (beta1a 478-524), is essential for expression of skeletal-type EC coupling. Furthermore, the location of beta1aD5 immediately downstream from conserved domain D4 is also critical. In contrast, chimeras in which beta1aD5 was swapped by the D5 region of beta2a expressed Ca(2+) transients triggered by the Ca(2+) current, or none at all. A hydrophobic heptad repeat is present in domain D5 of beta1a (L478, V485, V492). To determine the role of this motif, residues in the heptad repeat were mutated to alanines. The triple mutant beta1a(L478A/V485A/V492A) recovered weak skeletal-type EC coupling (DeltaF/F(max) = 0.4 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.5 for wild-type beta1a). However, a triple mutant with alanine substitutions at positions out of phase with the heptad repeat, beta1a(S481A/L488A/S495A), was normal (DeltaF/F(max) = 2.1 +/- 0.4). In summary, the presence of the beta1a-specific D5 domain, in its correct position after conserved domain D4, is essential for skeletal-type EC coupling. Furthermore, a heptad repeat in beta1aD5 controls the EC coupling activity. The carboxyl terminal heptad repeat of beta1a might be involved in protein-protein interactions with ryanodine receptor type 1 required for DHPR to ryanodine receptor type 1 signal transmission.

Functional interaction of CaV channel isoforms with ryanodine receptors studied in dysgenic myotubes

The L-type Ca(2+) channels Ca(V)1.1 (alpha(1S)) and Ca(V)1.2 (alpha(1C)) share properties of targeting but differ by their mode of coupling to ryanodine receptors in muscle cells. The brain isoform Ca(V)2.1 (alpha(1A)) lacks ryanodine receptor targeting. We studied these three isoforms in myotubes of the alpha(1S)-deficient skeletal muscle cell line GLT under voltage-clamp conditions and estimated the flux of Ca(2+) (Ca(2+) input flux) resulting from Ca(2+) entry and release. Surprisingly, amplitude and kinetics of the input flux were similar for alpha(1C) and alpha(1A) despite a previously reported strong difference in responsiveness to extracellular stimulation. The kinetic flux characteristics of alpha(1C) and alpha(1A) resembled those in alpha(1S)-expressing cells but the contribution of Ca(2+) entry was much larger. alpha(1C) but not alpha(1A)-expressing cells revealed a distinct transient flux component sensitive to sarcoplasmic reticulum depletion by 30 microM cyclopiazonic acid and 10 mM caffeine. This component likely results from synchronized Ca(2+)-induced Ca(2+) release that is absent in alpha(1A)-expressing myotubes. In cells expressing an alpha(1A)-derivative (alpha(1)Aas(1592-clip)) containing the putative targeting sequence of alpha(1S), a similar transient component was noticeable. Yet, it was considerably smaller than in alpha(1C), indicating that the local Ca(2+) entry produced by the chimera is less effective in triggering Ca(2+) release despite similar global Ca(2+) inward current density.

Maurocalcine and domain A of the II-III loop of the dihydropyridine receptor Cav 1.1 subunit share common binding sites on the skeletal ryanodine receptor

Maurocalcine is a scorpion venom toxin of 33 residues that bears a striking resemblance to the domain A of the dihydropyridine voltage-dependent calcium channel type 1.1 (Cav1.1) subunit. This domain belongs to the II-III loop of Cav1.1, which is implicated in excitation-contraction coupling. Besides the structural homology, maurocalcine also modulates RyR1 channel activity in a manner akin to a synthetic peptide of domain A. Because of these similarities, we hypothesized that maurocalcine and domain A may bind onto an identical region(s) of RyR1. Using a set of RyR1 fragments, we demonstrate that peptide A and maurocalcine bind onto two discrete RyR1 regions: fragments 3 and 7 encompassing residues 1021-1631 and 3201-3661, respectively. The binding onto fragment 7 is of greater importance and was thus further investigated. We found that the amino acid region 3351-3507 of RyR1 (fragment 7.2) is sufficient for these interactions. Proof that peptide A and maurocalcine bind onto the same site is provided by competition experiments in which binding of fragment 7.2 to peptide A is inhibited by preincubation with maurocalcine. Moreover, when expressed in COS-7 cells, RyR1 carrying a deletion of fragment 7 shows a loss of interaction with both peptide A and maurocalcine. At the functional level, this deletion abolishes the maurocalcine induced stimulation of [3H]ryanodine binding onto microsomes of transfected COS-7 cells without affecting the caffeine and ATP responses.

Differential contribution of skeletal and cardiac II-III loop sequences to the assembly of dihydropyridine-receptor arrays in skeletal muscle

The plasmalemmal dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) is the voltage sensor in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction (e-c) coupling. It activates calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum via protein-protein interactions with the ryanodine receptor (RyR). To enable this interaction, DHPRs are arranged in arrays of tetrads opposite RyRs. In the DHPR alpha(1S) subunit, the cytoplasmic loop connecting repeats II and III is a major determinant of skeletal-type e-c coupling. Whether the essential II-III loop sequence (L720-L764) also determines the skeletal-specific arrangement of DHPRs was examined in dysgenic (alpha(1S)-null) myotubes reconstituted with distinct alpha(1) subunit isoforms and II-III loop chimeras. Parallel immunofluorescence and freeze-fracture analysis showed that alpha(1S) and chimeras containing L720-L764, all of which restored skeletal-type e-c coupling, displayed the skeletal arrangement of DHPRs in arrays of tetrads. Conversely, alpha(1C) and those chimeras with a cardiac II-III loop and cardiac e-c coupling properties were targeted into junctional membranes but failed to form tetrads. However, an alpha(1S)-based chimera with the heterologous Musca II-III loop produced tetrads but did not reconstitute skeletal muscle e-c coupling. These findings suggest an inhibitory role in tetrad formation of the cardiac II-III loop and that the organization of DHPRs in tetrads vis-a-vis the RyR is necessary but not sufficient for skeletal-type e-c coupling.

The relative position of RyR feet and DHPR tetrads in skeletal muscle

In skeletal muscle, L-type calcium channels (or dihydropyridine receptors, DHPRs) are coupled functionally to the calcium release channels of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (or ryanodine receptors, RyRs) within specialized structures called calcium release units (CRUs). The functional linkage requires a specific positioning of four DHPRs in correspondence of the four identical subunits of a single RyR type 1. Four DHPRs linked to the four binding sites of the RyR1 cytoplasmic domain (or foot), define the corners of a square, constituting a tetrad. RyRs self-assemble into ordered arrays and by associating with them, DHPRs also assemble into ordered arrays. The approximate location of the four DHPRs relative to the four identical subunits of a RyR-foot can be predicted on the basis of the relative position of tetrads and feet within the arrays. However, until recently one vital piece of information has been lacking: the orientation of the two arrays relative to one another. In this work we have defined the relative orientation of the RyR and DHPR arrays by directly superimposing replicas of rotary shadowed images of rows of feet, obtained from isolated SR vesicles, and replicas of tetrad arrays obtained by freeze-fracture. If the orientation for the two sets of images is carefully maintained, the superimposition provides specific constraints on the DHPR-RyR relative position.

Metabolic biotinylation as a probe of supramolecular structure of the triad junction in skeletal muscle

Excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle involves conformational coupling between dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) in the plasma membrane and ryanodine receptors (RyRs) in the sarcoplasmic reticulum. However, it remains uncertain what regions, if any, of the two proteins interact with one another. Toward this end, it would be valuable to know the spatial interrelationships of DHPRs and RyRs within plasma membrane/sarcoplasmic reticulum junctions. Here we describe a new approach based on metabolic incorporation of biotin into targeted sites of the DHPR. To accomplish this, cDNAs were constructed with a biotin acceptor domain (BAD) fused to selected sites of the DHPR, with fluorescent protein (XFP) attached at a second site. All of the BAD-tagged constructs properly targeted to junctions (as indicted by small puncta of XFP) and were functional for excitation-contraction coupling. To determine whether the introduced BAD was biotinylated and accessible to avidin (approximately 60 kDa), myotubes were fixed, permeablized, and exposed to fluorescently labeled avidin. Upon expression in beta1-null or dysgenic (alpha1S-null) myotubes, punctate avidin fluorescence co-localized with the XFP puncta for BAD attached to the beta1a N- or C-terminals, or the alpha1S N-terminal or II-III loop. However, BAD fused to the alpha1S C-terminal was inaccessible to avidin in dysgenic myotubes (containing RyR1). In contrast, this site was accessible to avidin when the identical construct was expressed in dyspedic myotubes lacking RyR1. These results indicate that avidin has access to a number of sites of the DHPR within fully assembled (RyR1-containing) junctions, but not to the alpha1S C-terminal, which appears to be occluded by the presence of RyR1.

Mapping sites of potential proximity between the dihydropyridine receptor and RyR1 in muscle using a cyan fluorescent protein-yellow fluorescent protein tandem as a fluorescence resonance energy transfer probe

Excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle involves conformational coupling between the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) and the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) at junctions between the plasma membrane and sarcoplasmic reticulum. In an attempt to find which regions of these proteins are in close proximity to one another, we have constructed a tandem of cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins (CFP and YFP, respectively) linked by a 23-residue spacer, and measured the fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) of the tandem either in free solution or after attachment to sites of the alpha1S and beta1a subunits of the DHPR. For all of the sites examined, attachment of the CFP-YFP tandem did not impair function of the DHPR as a Ca2+ channel or voltage sensor for excitation-contraction coupling. The free tandem displayed a 27.5% FRET efficiency, which decreased significantly after attachment to the DHPR subunits. At several sites examined for both alpha1S (N-terminal, proximal II-III loop of a two fragment construct) and beta1a (C-terminal), the FRET efficiency was similar after expression in either dysgenic (alpha1S-null) or dyspedic (RyR1-null) myotubes. However, compared with dysgenic myotubes, the FRET efficiency in dyspedic myotubes increased from 9.9 to 16.7% for CFP-YFP attached to the N-terminal of beta1a, and from 9.5 to 16.8% for CFP-YFP at the C-terminal of alpha1S. Thus, the tandem reporter suggests that the C terminus of alpha1S and the N terminus of beta1a may be in close proximity to the ryanodine receptor.

Ca(2+) and K(+) (BK) channels in chick hair cells are clustered and colocalized with apical-basal and tonotopic gradients

Electrical resonance is a mechanism used by birds and many vertebrates to discriminate between frequencies of sound, and occurs when the intrinsic oscillation in the membrane potential of a specific hair cell corresponds to a specific stimulus sound frequency. This intrinsic oscillation results from an interplay between an inward Ca(2+) current and the resultant activation of a hyperpolarizing Ca(2+)-activated K(+) current. These channels are predicted to lie in close proximity owing to the fast oscillation in membrane potential. The interplay of these channels is widespread in the nervous system, where they perform numerous roles including the control of synaptic release, burst frequency and circadian rhythm generation. Here, we used confocal microscopy to show that these two ion channels are clustered and colocalized in the chick hair cell membrane. The majority of Ca(2+) channels were colocalized while the proportion of colocalized BK channels was markedly less. In addition, we report both an apical-basal gradient of these clusters in individual hair cells, as well as a gradient in the number of clusters between hair cells along the tonotopic axis. These results give physical confirmation of previous predictions. Since the proportion of colocalized channels was a constant function of Ca(2+) channels, and not of BK channels, these results suggest that their colocalization is determined by the former. The molecular mechanisms underpinning their clustering and colocalization are likely to be common to other neuronal cells.

Ca2+-dependent excitation-contraction coupling triggered by the heterologous cardiac/brain DHPR beta2a-subunit in skeletal myotubes

Molecular determinants essential for skeletal-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling have been described in the cytosolic loops of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) alpha1S pore subunit and in the carboxyl terminus of the skeletal-specific DHPR beta1a-subunit. It is unknown whether EC coupling domains present in the beta-subunit influence those present in the pore subunit or if they act independent of each other. To address this question, we investigated the EC coupling signal that is generated when the endogenous DHPR pore subunit alpha1S is paired with the heterologous heart/brain DHPR beta2a-subunit. Studies were conducted in primary cultured myotubes from beta1 knockout (KO), ryanodine receptor type 1 (RyR1) KO, ryanodine receptor type 3 (RyR3) KO, and double RyR1/RyR3 KO mice under voltage clamp with simultaneous monitoring of confocal fluo-4 fluorescence. The beta2a-mediated Ca2+ current recovered in beta1 KO myotubes lacking the endogenous DHPR beta1a-subunit verified formation of the alpha1S/beta1a pair. In myotube genotypes which express no or low-density L-type Ca2+ currents, namely beta1 KO and RyR1 KO, beta2a overexpression recovered a wild-type density of nifedipine-sensitive Ca2+ currents with a slow activation kinetics typical of skeletal myotubes. Concurrent with Ca2+ current recovery, there was a drastic reduction of voltage-dependent, skeletal-type EC coupling and emergence of Ca2+ transients triggered by the Ca2+ current. A comparison of beta2a overexpression in RyR3 KO, RyR1 KO, and double RyR1/RyR3 KO myotubes concluded that both RyR1 and RyR3 isoforms participated in Ca2+-dependent Ca2+ release triggered by the beta2a-subunit. In beta1 KO and RyR1 KO myotubes, the Ca2+-dependent EC coupling promoted by beta2a overexpression had the following characteristics: 1), L-type Ca2+ currents had a wild-type density; 2), Ca2+ transients activated much slower than controls overexpressing beta1a, and the rate of fluorescence increase was consistent with the activation kinetics of the Ca2+ current; 3), the voltage dependence of the Ca2+ transient was bell-shaped and the maximum was centered at approximately +30 mV, consistent with the voltage dependence of the Ca2+ current; and 4), Ca2+ currents and Ca2+ transients were fully blocked by nifedipine. The loss in voltage-dependent EC coupling promoted by beta2a was inferred by the drastic reduction in maximal Ca2+ fluorescence at large positive potentials (DeltaF/Fmax) in double dysgenic/beta1 KO myotubes overexpressing the pore mutant alpha1S (E1014K) and beta2a. The data indicate that beta2a, upon interaction with the skeletal pore subunit alpha1S, overrides critical EC coupling determinants present in alpha1S. We propose that the alpha1S/beta pair, and not the alpha1S-subunit alone, controls the EC coupling signal in skeletal muscle.

Peptide fragments of the dihydropyridine receptor can modulate cardiac ryanodine receptor channel activity and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release

We show that peptide fragments of the dihydropyridine receptor II-III loop alter cardiac RyR (ryanodine receptor) channel activity in a cytoplasmic Ca2+-dependent manner. The peptides were AC (Thr-793-Ala-812 of the cardiac dihydropyridine receptor), AS (Thr-671-Leu-690 of the skeletal dihydropyridine receptor), and a modified AS peptide [AS(D-R18)], with an extended helical structure. The peptides added to the cytoplasmic side of channels in lipid bilayers at > or = 10 nM activated channels when the cytoplasmic [Ca2+] was 100 nM, but either inhibited or did not affect channel activity when the cytoplasmic [Ca2+] was 10 or 100 microM. Both activation and inhibition were independent of bilayer potential. Activation by AS, but not by AC or AS(D-R18), was reduced at peptide concentrations >1 mM in a voltage-dependent manner (at +40 mV). In control experiments, channels were not activated by the scrambled AS sequence (ASS) or skeletal II-III loop peptide (NB). Resting Ca2+ release from cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum was not altered by peptide AC, but Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release was depressed. Resting and Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release were enhanced by both the native and modified AS peptides. NMR revealed (i) that the structure of peptide AS(D-R18) is not influenced by [Ca2+] and (ii) that peptide AC adopts a helical structure, particularly in the region containing positively charged residues. This is the first report of specific functional interactions between dihydropyridine receptor A region peptides and cardiac RyR ion channels in lipid bilayers.

The monoclonal antibody mAB 1A binds to the excitation--contraction coupling domain in the II-III loop of the skeletal muscle calcium channel alpha(1S) subunit

Interactions of the II-III loop of the voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel alpha(1S) subunit with the Ca(2+) release channel (RyR1) are essential for skeletal-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. Here, we characterized the binding site of the monoclonal alpha(1S) antibody mAB 1A and used it to probe the structure of the II-III loop in chimeras with different EC coupling properties. Phage-display epitope mapping of mAB 1A revealed a minimal consensus binding sequence X-P-X-X-D-X-P. Immunofluorescence labeling of (1S), alpha(1C), alpha(1D), and of II-III loop chimeras expressed in dysgenic myotubes established that mAB 1A reacted specifically with amino acids 737-744 in the II-III loop of alpha(1S), which is within the domain (D734-L764) critical for bidirectional coupling with RyR1. Comparing mAB 1A immunoreactivity with known structural and functional properties of II-III loop chimeras in which the non-conserved skeletal residues were systematically mutated to their cardiac counterparts indicated a correlation of mAB 1A immunoreactivity and skeletal-type EC coupling.

Functional analysis of the R1086H malignant hyperthermia mutation in the DHPR reveals an unexpected influence of the III-IV loop on skeletal muscle EC coupling

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is an inherited pharmacogenetic disorder caused by mutations in the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RyR1) and the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) alpha(1S)-subunit. We characterized the effects of an MH mutation in the DHPR cytoplasmic III-IV loop of alpha(1S) (R1086H) on DHPR-RyR1 coupling after reconstitution in dysgenic (alpha(1S) null) myotubes. Compared with wild-type alpha(1S), caffeine-activated Ca(2+) release occurred at approximately fivefold lower concentrations in nonexpressing and R1086H-expressing myotubes. Although maximal voltage-gated Ca(2+) release was similar in alpha(1S)- and R1086H-expressing myotubes, the voltage dependence of Ca(2+) release was shifted approximately 5 mV to more negative potentials in R1086H-expressing myotubes. Our results demonstrate that alpha(1S) functions as a negative allosteric modulator of release channel activation by caffeine/voltage and that the R1086H MH mutation in the intracellular III-IV linker disrupts this negative regulatory influence. Moreover, a low caffeine concentration (2 mM) caused a similar shift in voltage dependence of Ca(2+) release in alpha(1S)- and R1086H-expressing myotubes. Compared with alpha(1S)-expressing myotubes, maximal L channel conductance (G(max)) was reduced in R1086H-expressing myotubes (alpha(1S) 130 +/- 10.2, R1086H 88 +/- 6.8 nS/nF; P < 0.05). The decrease in G(max) did not result from a change in retrograde coupling with RyR1 as maximal conductance-charge movement ratio (G(max)/Q(max)) was similar in alpha(1S)- and R1086H-expressing myotubes and a similar decrease in G(max) was observed for an analogous mutation engineered into the cardiac L channel (R1217H). In addition, both R1086H and R1217H DHPRs targeted normally and colocalized with RyR1 in sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR)-sarcolemmal junctions. These results indicate that the R1086H MH mutation in alpha(1S) enhances RyR1 sensitivity to activation by both endogenous (voltage sensor) and exogenous (caffeine) activators.

L-type voltage-gated calcium channels: understanding function through structure

L-type voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) are multisubunit membrane proteins that regulate calcium influx into excitable cells. Within the last two years there have been four separate reports describing the structure of the skeletal muscle VGCC determined by electron microscopy and single particle analysis methods. There are some discrepancies between the structures, as well as reports for both monomeric and dimeric forms of the channel. This article considers each of the VGCC structures in terms of similarities and differences with an emphasis upon translation of data into a biological context.

Removal of clustered positive charge from dihydropyridine receptor II-III loop peptide augments activation of ryanodine receptors

Peptides based on the skeletal muscle DHPR II-III loop have been shown to regulate ryanodine receptor channel activity. The N-terminal region of this cytoplasmic loop is predicted to adopt an alpha-helical conformation. We have selected a peptide sequence of 26 residues (Ala(667)-Asp(692)) as the minimum sequence to emulate the helical propensity of the corresponding protein sequence. The interaction of this control peptide with skeletal and cardiac RyR channels in planar lipid bilayers was then assessed and was found to lack isoform specificity. At low concentrations peptide A(667)-D(692) increased RyR open probability, whilst at higher concentrations open probability was reduced. By replacing a region of clustered positive charge with a neutral sequence with the same predisposition to helicity, the inhibitory effect was ablated and activation was enhanced. This novel finding demonstrates that activation does not derive from the presence of positively charged residues adjacent in the primary structure and, although it may be mediated by the alignment of basic residues down one face of an amphipathic helix, not all of these residues are essential.

Caffeine sensitivity of native RyR channels from normal and malignant hyperthermic pigs: effects of a DHPR II-III loop peptide

Enhanced sensitivity to caffeine is part of the standard tests for susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia (MH) in humans and pigs. The caffeine sensitivity of skeletal muscle contraction and Ca(2+) release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum is enhanced, but surprisingly, the caffeine sensitivity of purified porcine ryanodine receptor Ca(2+)-release channels (RyRs) is not affected by the MH mutation (Arg(615)Cys). In contrast, we show here that native malignant hyperthermic pig RyRs (incorporated into lipid bilayers with RyR-associated lipids and proteins) were activated by caffeine at 100- to 1000-fold lower concentrations than native normal pig RyRs. In addition, the results show that the mutant ryanodine receptor channels were less sensitive to high-affinity activation by a peptide (C(S)) that corresponds to a part of the II-III loop of the skeletal dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR). Furthermore, subactivating concentrations of peptide C(S) enhanced the response of normal pig and rabbit RyRs to caffeine. In contrast, the caffeine sensitivity of MH RyRs was not enhanced by the peptide. These novel results showed that in MH-susceptible pig muscles 1). the caffeine sensitivity of native RyRs was enhanced, 2). the sensitivity of RyRs to a skeletal II-III loop peptide was depressed, and 3). an interaction between the caffeine and peptide C(S) activation mechanisms seen in normal RyRs was lost.

Structural requirements of the dihydropyridine receptor alpha1S II-III loop for skeletal-type excitation-contraction coupling

Residues Leu720-Leu764 within the II-III loop of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) alpha1S subunit represent a critical domain for the orthograde excitation-contraction coupling as well as for retrograde DHPR L-current-enhancing coupling with the ryanodine receptor (RyR1). To better understand the molecular mechanism underlying this bidirectional DHPR-RyR1 signaling interaction, we analyzed the critical domain to the single amino acid level. To this end, constructs based on the highly dissimilar housefly DHPR II-III loop in an otherwise skeletal DHPR as an interaction-inert sequence background were expressed in dysgenic (alpha1S-null) myotubes for simultaneous recordings of depolarization-induced intracellular Ca2+ transients (orthograde coupling) and whole-cell Ca2+ currents (retrograde coupling). In the minimal skeletal II-III loop sequence (Asp734-Asp748 required for full bidirectional coupling, eight amino acids heterologous between skeletal and cardiac DHPR were exchanged for the corresponding cardiac residues. Four of these skeletal-specific residues (Ala739, Phe741, Pro742, and Asp744) turned out to be essential for orthograde and two of them (Ala739 and Phe741) for retrograde coupling, indicating that orthograde coupling does not necessarily correlate with retrograde signaling. Secondary structure predictions of the critical domain show that an alpha-helical (cardiac sequence-type) conformation of a cluster of negatively charged residues (Asp744-Glu751 of alpha1S) corresponds with significantly reduced Ca2+ transients. Conversely, a predicted random coil structure (skeletal sequence-type) seems to be prerequisite for the restoration of skeletal-type excitation-contraction coupling. Thus, not only the primary but also the secondary structure of the critical domain is an essential determinant of the tissue-specific mode of EC coupling.

The voltage-dependent calcium channel beta subunit contains two stable interacting domains

Voltage-dependent calcium channels selectively enable Ca2+ ion movement through cellular membranes. These multiprotein complexes are involved in a wide spectrum of biological processes such as signal transduction and cellular homeostasis. alpha1 is the membrane pore-forming subunit, whereas beta is an intracellular subunit that binds to alpha1, facilitating and modulating channel function. We have expressed, purified, and characterized recombinant beta3 and beta2a using both biochemical and biophysical methods, including electrophysiology, to better understand the beta family's protein structural and functional correlates. Our results indicate that the beta protein is composed of two distinct domains that associate with one another in a stable manner. The data also suggest that the polypeptide regions outside these domains are not structured when beta is not in complex with the channel. In addition, the beta structural core, comprised of just these two domains without other sequences, binds tightly to the alpha interaction domain (AID) motif, a sequence derived from the alpha1 subunit and the principal anchor site of beta. Domain II is responsible for this binding, but domain I enhances it.

Amino acids 1-1,680 of ryanodine receptor type 1 hold critical determinants of skeletal type for excitation-contraction coupling. Role of divergence domain D2

To identify domains of the ryanodine receptor (RyR1) that are functionally relevant for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in vivo, we have studied the ability of RyR1/RyR3 chimera to rescue skeletal EC coupling in dyspedic myotubes. In this work we show that chimeric receptors containing amino acids 1-1,680 of RyR1 were able to render depolarization-induced Ca2+ release to RyR3. Within this region, residues 1,272-1,455, containing divergent domain D2 of RyR1, proved to be a critical element because the absence of this region selectively abolished depolarization-evoked Ca2+ transients without affecting chemically induced activation. Although the D2 domain by itself failed to restore skeletal EC coupling to RyR3, the addition of the D2 region resulted in a dramatic enhancement of EC coupling restored by an RyR3 chimera containing amino acids 1,681-3,770 of RyR1. These results suggest that although the D2 domain of RyR1 plays a key role during EC coupling, additional region(s) from the N-terminal end of RyR1 as well as previously identified regions of the central portion of the receptor are needed in order to allow normal EC coupling.

Cardiac-type EC-coupling in dysgenic myotubes restored with Ca2+ channel subunit isoforms alpha1C and alpha1D does not correlate with current density

Ca(2+)-induced Ca(2+)-release (CICR)-the mechanism of cardiac excitation-contraction (EC) coupling-also contributes to skeletal muscle contraction; however, its properties are still poorly understood. CICR in skeletal muscle can be induced independently of direct, calcium-independent activation of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) release, by reconstituting dysgenic myotubes with the cardiac Ca(2+) channel alpha(1C) (Ca(V)1.2) subunit. Ca(2+) influx through alpha(1C) provides the trigger for opening the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) release channels. Here we show that also the Ca(2+) channel alpha(1D) isoform (Ca(V)1.3) can restore cardiac-type EC-coupling. GFP-alpha(1D) expressed in dysgenic myotubes is correctly targeted into the triad junctions and generates action potential-induced Ca(2+) transients with the same efficiency as GFP-alpha(1C) despite threefold smaller Ca(2+) currents. In contrast, GFP-alpha(1A), which generates large currents but is not targeted into triads, rarely restores action potential-induced Ca(2+) transients. Thus, cardiac-type EC-coupling in skeletal myotubes depends primarily on the correct targeting of the voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels and less on their current size. Combined patch-clamp/fluo-4 Ca(2+) recordings revealed that the induction of Ca(2+) transients and their maximal amplitudes are independent of the different current densities of GFP-alpha(1C) and GFP-alpha(1D). These properties of cardiac-type EC-coupling in dysgenic myotubes are consistent with a CICR mechanism under the control of local Ca(2+) gradients in the triad junctions.

The random-coil 'C' fragment of the dihydropyridine receptor II-III loop can activate or inhibit native skeletal ryanodine receptors

The actions of peptide C, corresponding to (724)Glu-Pro(760) of the II-III loop of the skeletal dihydropyridine receptor, on ryanodine receptor (RyR) channels incorporated into lipid bilayers with the native sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane show that the peptide is a high-affinity activator of native skeletal RyRs at cytoplasmic concentrations of 100 nM-10 microM. In addition, we found that peptide C inhibits RyRs in a voltage-independent manner when added for longer times or at higher concentrations (up to 150 microM). Peptide C had a random-coil structure indicating that it briefly assumes a variety of structures, some of which might activate and others which might inhibit RyRs. The results suggest that RyR activation and inhibition by peptide C arise from independent stochastic processes. A rate constant of 7.5 x 10(5) s(-1).M(-1) was obtained for activation and a lower estimate for the rate constant for inhibition of 5.9 x 10(3) s(-1).M(-1). The combined actions of peptide C and peptide A (II-III loop sequence (671)Thr-Leu(690)) showed that peptide C prevented activation but not blockage of RyRs by peptide A. We suggest that the effects of peptide C indicate functional interactions between a part of the dihydropyridine receptor and the RyR. These interactions could reflect either dynamic changes that occur during excitation-contraction coupling or interactions between the proteins at rest.

Maurocalcine and peptide A stabilize distinct subconductance states of ryanodine receptor type 1, revealing a proportional gating mechanism

Maurocalcine (MCa) isolated from Scorpio maurus palmatus venom shares 82% sequence identity with imperatoxin A. Both scorpion toxins are putative mimics of the II-III loop peptide (termed peptide A (pA)) of alpha(1s)-dihydropyridine receptor and are thought to act at a common site on ryanodine receptor type 1 (RyR1) important for skeletal muscle EC coupling. The relationship between the actions of synthetic MCa (sMCa) and pA on RyR1 were examined. sMCa released Ca(2+) from SR vesicles (EC(50) = 17.5 nm) in a manner inhibited by micromolar ryanodine or ruthenium red. pA (0.5-40 microm) failed to induce SR Ca(2+) release. Rather, pA enhanced Ca(2+) loading into SR and fully inhibited Ca(2+)-, caffeine-, and sMCa-induced Ca(2+) release. The two peptides modified single channel gating behavior in distinct ways. With Cs(+)-carrying current, 10 nm to 1 microm sMCa induced long lived subconductances having 48% of the characteristic full open state and occasional transitions to 29% at either positive or negative holding potentials. In contrast, pA stabilized long lived channel closures with occasional burst transitions to 65% (s1) and 86% (s2) of the full conductance. The actions of pA and sMCa were observed in tandem. sMCa stabilized additional subconductance states proportional to pA-induced subconductances (i.e. 43% of pA-modified s1 and s2 substates), revealing a proportional gating mechanism. [(3)H]Ryanodine binding and surface plasmon resonance analyses indicated that the peptides did not interact by simple competition for a single class of mutually exclusive sites on RyR1 to produce proportional gating. The actions of sMCa were also observed with ryanodine-modified channels and channels deficient in immunophilin 12-kDa FK506-binding protein. These results provide evidence that sMCa and pA stabilize distinct RyR1 channel states through distinct mechanisms that allosterically stabilize gating states having proportional conductance.

RyR1/RyR3 chimeras reveal that multiple domains of RyR1 are involved in skeletal-type E-C coupling

Skeletal-type E-C coupling is thought to require a direct interaction between RyR1 and the alpha(1S)-DHPR. Most available evidence suggests that the cytoplasmic II-III loop of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) is the primary source of the orthograde signal. However, identification of the region(s) of RyR1 involved in bidirectional signaling with the alpha(1S)-DHPR remains elusive. To identify these regions we have designed a series of chimeric RyR cDNAs in which different segments of RyR1 were inserted into the corresponding region of RyR3 and expressed in dyspedic 1B5 myotubes. RyR3 provides a preferable background than RyR2 for defining domains essential for E-C coupling because it possesses less sequence homology to RyR1 than the RyR2 backbone used in previous studies. Our data show that two regions of RyR1 (chimera Ch-10 aa 1681-2641 and Ch-9 aa 2642-3770), were independently able to restore skeletal-type E-C coupling to RyR3. These two regions were further mapped and the critical RyR1 residues were 1924-2446 (Ch-21) and 2644-3223 (Ch-19). These results both support and refine the previous hypothesis that multiple domains of RyR1 combine to functionally interact with the DHPR during E-C coupling.

Multiple regions of RyR1 mediate functional and structural interactions with alpha(1S)-dihydropyridine receptors in skeletal muscle

Excitation-contraction (e-c) coupling in muscle relies on the interaction between dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) and RyRs within Ca(2+) release units (CRUs). In skeletal muscle this interaction is bidirectional: alpha(1S)DHPRs trigger RyR1 (the skeletal form of the ryanodine receptor) to release Ca(2+) in the absence of Ca(2+) permeation through the DHPR, and RyR1s, in turn, affect the open probability of alpha(1S)DHPRs. alpha(1S)DHPR and RyR1 are linked to each other, organizing alpha(1S)-DHPRs into groups of four, or tetrads. In cardiac muscle, however, alpha(1C)DHPR Ca(2+) current is important for activation of RyR2 (the cardiac isoform of the ryanodine receptor) and alpha(1C)-DHPRs are not organized into tetrads. We expressed RyR1, RyR2, and four different RyR1/RyR2 chimeras (R4: Sk1635-3720, R9: Sk2659-3720, R10: Sk1635-2559, R16: Sk1837-2154) in 1B5 dyspedic myotubes to test their ability to restore skeletal-type e-c coupling and DHPR tetrads. The rank-order for restoring skeletal e-c coupling, indicated by Ca(2+) transients in the absence of extracellular Ca(2+), is RyR1 > R4 > R10 >> R16 > R9 >> RyR2. The rank-order for restoration of DHPR tetrads is RyR1 > R4 = R9 > R10 = R16 >> RyR2. Because the skeletal segment in R9 does not overlap with that in either R10 or R16, our results indicate that multiple regions of RyR1 may interact with alpha(1S)DHPRs and that the regions responsible for tetrad formation do not correspond exactly to the ones required for functional coupling.

Molecular genetics of ryanodine receptors Ca2+-release channels

The family of ryanodine receptor (RyR) genes encodes three highly related Ca(2+)-release channels: RyR1, RyR2 and RyR3. RyRs are known as the Ca(2+)-release channels that participate to the mechanism of excitation-contraction coupling in striated muscles, but they are also expressed in many other cell types. Actually, in several cells two or three RyR isoforms can be co-expressed and interactive feedbacks among them may be important for generation of intracellular Ca(2+) signals and regulation of specific cellular functions. Important developments have been obtained in understanding the biochemical complexity underlying the process of Ca(2+) release through RyRs. The 3-D structure of these large molecules has been obtained and some regulatory regions have been mapped within these 3-D reconstructions. Recent studies have clarified the role of protein kinases and phosphatases that, by physically interacting with RyRs, appear to play a role in the regulation of these Ca(2+)-release channels. These and other recent advancements in understanding RyR biology will be the object of this review.

Ontogeny of excitation-contraction coupling in the mammalian heart

The neonate mammalian heart is phenotypically different from the adult heart in many respects. Understanding these phenotypic differences are a fundamental component of understanding the mechanisms of congenital heart disease and its treatment. Differences in excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling of the neonatal heart from that of the adult include less reliance on intercellular sources of Ca(2+) such as that from sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). Electron micrographs indicate that these immature cardiomyocytes lack transverse tubules and the SR is sparse. This paper focuses on the changes in the phenotype of E-C coupling during ontogeny in the mammalian heart and the molecular mechanisms underlying these changes.

Cooperation of two-domain Ca(2+) channel fragments in triad targeting and restoration of excitation- contraction coupling in skeletal muscle

The specific incorporation of the skeletal muscle voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channel in the triad is a prerequisite of normal excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. Sequences involved in membrane expression and in targeting of Ca(2+) channels into skeletal muscle triads have been described in different regions of the alpha(1S) subunit. Here we studied the targeting properties of two-domain alpha(1S) fragments, green fluorescent protein (GFP)-I x II (1-670) and III x IV (691-1873) expressed alone or in combination in dysgenic (alpha(1S)-null) myotubes. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that GFP-I x II or III x IV expressed separately were not targeted into triads. In contrast, on coexpression the two alpha(1S) fragments were colocalized with one another and with the ryanodine receptor in the triads. Coexpression of GFP-I x II and III x IV also fully restored Ca(2+) currents and depolarization-induced Ca(2+) transients, despite the severed connection between the two channel halves and the absence of amino acids 671-690 from either alpha(1S) fragment. Thus, triad targeting, like the rescue of function, requires the cooperation and coassembly of the two complementary channel fragments. Transferring the C terminus of alpha(1S) to the N-terminal two-domain fragment (GFP-I x II x tail), or transferring the I-II connecting loop containing the beta interaction domain to the C-terminal fragment (III x IV x beta in) did not improve the targeting properties of the individually expressed two-domain channel fragments. Thus, the cooperation of GFP-I.II and III.IV in targeting cannot be explained solely by a sequential action of the beta subunit by means of the I-II loop in releasing the channel from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and of the C terminus in triad targeting.

Interactions between dihydropyridine receptors and ryanodine receptors in striated muscle

Excitation-contraction coupling in both skeletal and cardiac muscle depends on structural and functional interactions between the voltage-sensing dihydropyridine receptor L-type Ca(2+) channels in the surface/transverse tubular membrane and ryanodine receptor Ca(2+) release channels in the sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane. The channels are targeted to either side of a narrow junctional gap that separates the external and internal membrane systems and are arranged so that bi-directional structural and functional coupling can occur between the proteins. There is strong evidence for a physical interaction between the two types of channel protein in skeletal muscle. This evidence is derived from studies of excitation-contraction coupling in intact myocytes and from experiments in isolated systems where fragments of the dihydropyridine receptor can bind to the ryanodine receptors in sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles or in lipid bilayers and alter channel activity. Although micro-regions that participate in the functional interactions have been identified in each protein, the role of these regions and the molecular nature of the protein-protein interaction remain unknown. The trigger for Ca(2+) release through ryanodine receptors in cardiac muscle is a Ca(2+) influx through the L-type Ca(2+) channel. The Ca(2+) entering through the surface membrane Ca(2+) channels flows directly onto underlying ryanodine receptors and activates the channels. This was thought to be a relatively simple system compared with that in skeletal muscle. However, complexities are emerging and evidence has now been obtained for a bi-directional physical coupling between the proteins in cardiac as well as skeletal muscle. The molecular nature of this coupling remains to be elucidated.

Insights from mouse models of absence epilepsy into Ca2+ channel physiology and disease etiology

1. Changes in intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) levels provide signals that allow neurons to respond to a host of external stimuli. A major mechanism for elevating [Ca2+]i is the influx of extracellular Ca2+ through voltage-gated channels (Ca(V)) in the plasma membrane. Malfunction in Ca(V) due to mutations in genes encoding channel proteins are increasingly being implicated in causing disease conditions, termed channelopathies. 2. Seven spontaneous mutations with cerebellar ataxia and generalized absence epilepsy have been identified in mice (tottering, leaner, rolling Nagoya, rocker, lethargic, ducky, and stargazer), and these overlapping phenotypes are directly related to mutations in genes encoding the four separate subunits that together form the multimeric neuronal Ca(V) complex. 3. The discovery and systematic analysis of these animal models is helping to clarify how different mutations affect channel function and how altered channel function produces disease.

Imperatoxin a enhances Ca(2+) release in developing skeletal muscle containing ryanodine receptor type 3

Most adult mammalian skeletal muscles contain only one isoform of ryanodine receptor (RyR1), whereas neonatal muscles contain two isoforms (RyR1 and RyR3). Membrane depolarization fails to evoke calcium release in muscle cells lacking RyR1, demonstrating an essential role for this isoform in excitation-contraction coupling. In contrast, the role of RyR3 is unknown. We studied the participation of RyR3 in calcium release in wild type (containing both RyR1 and RyR3 isoforms) and RyR3-/- (containing only RyR1) myotubes in the presence or absence of imperatoxin A (IpTxa), a high-affinity agonist of ryanodine receptors. IpTxa significantly increased the amplitude and the rate of release only in wild-type myotubes. Calcium currents, recorded simultaneously with the transients, were not altered with IpTxa treatment. [(3)H]ryanodine binding to RyR1 or RyR3 was significantly increased in the presence of IpTxa. Additionally, IpTxa modified the gating and conductance level of single RyR1 or RyR3 channels when studied in lipid bilayers. Our data show that IpTxa can interact with both RyRs and that RyR3 is functional in myotubes and it can amplify the calcium release signal initiated by RyR1, perhaps through a calcium-induced mechanism. In addition, our data indicate that when RyR3-/- myotubes are voltage-clamped, the effect of IpTxa is not detected because RyR1s are under the control of the dihydropyridine receptor.

Identification of a region of RyR1 that participates in allosteric coupling with the alpha(1S) (Ca(V)1.1) II-III loop

In skeletal muscle, excitation-contraction (EC) coupling and retrograde signaling are thought to result from direct interactions between the ryanodine receptor (RyR1) and the alpha(1) subunit of the dihydropyridine receptor (alpha(1S)). Previous work has shown that the s53 region of alpha(1S) (residues 720-765 in the II-III loop) and regions R10 (1635-2636) and R9 (2659-3720) of RyR1 are involved in this signaling. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we here report an interaction between s53 and the sR16 region of RyR1 (1837-2168, within R10), whereas no interaction was seen using upstream residues of the alpha(1S) II-III loop (s31, 666-709). The specificity of the s53-sR16 interaction was tested by using fragments of the cardiac RyR (RyR2) and DHPR (alpha(1C)) that correspond to sR16 and s53, respectively. No interaction was observed for sR16 x c53 (alpha(1C) 850-897), but weak interaction was occasionally observed for s53 x cR16 (RyR2 1817-2142). To test the functional significance of the s53 x sR16 interaction, we expressed in dyspedic myotubes a chimeric RyR (chimeraR16) in which sR16 was substituted for the corresponding region of RyR2. ChimeraR16 was found to mediate weak skeletal-type EC coupling. To test the necessity of sR16 sequence for coupling, we used "chimeraR16-rev," in which sR16 and a small upstream region of RyR1 were replaced by RyR2 sequence. ChimeraR16-rev did not differ from RyR1 in its ability to mediate EC coupling. Thus, interaction between residues 720-765 of alpha(1S) and residues 1837-2168 of RyR1 appears to contribute to but is not essential for EC coupling in skeletal muscle.

T-tubule depolarization-induced local events in the ryanodine receptor, as monitored with the fluorescent conformational probe incorporated by mediation of peptide A

There is a considerable controversy about the postulated role of the Thr(671)-Leu(690) (peptide A) region of the dihydropyridine (DHP) receptor alpha1 II-III loop. Here we report that peptide A introduced the fluorescence probe methyl coumarin acetamido (MCA) in a well defined region of the ryanodine receptor (RyR), A-site, in a specific manner. Depolarization of the T-tubule moiety of the triad induced a rapid increase of the fluorescence intensity of the MCA attached to the A-site. Other RyR agonists, which activate the RyR without mediation of the DHP receptor (e.g. caffeine, polylysine, and peptide A), induced Ca(2+) release without producing such an MCA fluorescence increase. Both magnitudes of the fluorescence change and Ca(2+) release increased with the increase in the degree of T-tubule depolarization. MCA fluorescence increase at the A-site and subsequent sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) release were blocked by blocking of the DHP receptor-to-RyR communication. These results may be accounted for by two alternative models as follows. (a) Upon T-tubule depolarization a portion of the DHP receptor comes close to the RyR, forming a hydrophobic interface (within such an interface the A-site is located), or (b) T-tubule depolarization may produce a local conformational change in the A-site-containing region of the RyR that is not necessarily within the DHP receptor/RyR junction.

Ca2+-dependent dual functions of peptide C. The peptide corresponding to the Glu724-Pro760 region (the so-called determinant of excitation-contraction coupling) of the dihydropyridine receptor alpha 1 subunit II-III loop

Both in vivo and in vitro studies suggest that the Glu(724)-Pro(760) (peptide C) region of the dihydropyridine receptor alpha1 II-III loop is important for excitation-contraction coupling, although its actual function has not yet been elucidated. According to our recent studies, peptide C inhibits Ca(2+) release induced by T-tubule depolarization or peptide A. Here we report that peptide C has Ca(2+)-dependent dual functions on the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. Thus, at above-threshold [Ca(2+)]s (> or =0.1 microm) peptide C blocked peptide A-induced activation of the ryanodine receptor (ryanodine binding and Ca(2+) release); peptide C also blocked T-tubule depolarization-induced Ca(2+) release. However, at sub-threshold [Ca(2+)]s (<0.1 microm), peptide C enhanced ryanodine binding and induced Ca(2+) release. If peptide A was present, together with peptide C, both peptides produced additive activation effects. Neither peptide A nor peptide C produced any appreciable effect on the cardiac muscle ryanodine receptor at both high (1.0 microm) and low (0.01 microm) Ca(2+) concentrations. These results suggest the possibility that the in vivo counterpart of peptide C retains both activating and blocking functions of the skeletal muscle-type excitation-contraction coupling.

FKBP12 modulation of the binding of the skeletal ryanodine receptor onto the II-III loop of the dihydropyridine receptor

In skeletal muscle, excitation-contraction coupling involves a functional interaction between the ryanodine receptor (RyR) and the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR). The domain corresponding to Thr(671)-Leu(690) of the II-III loop of the skeletal DHPR alpha(1)-subunit is able to regulate RyR properties and calcium release from sarcoplasmic reticulum, whereas the domain corresponding to Glu(724)-Pro(760) antagonizes this effect. Two peptides, covering these sequences (peptide A(Sk) and C(Sk), respectively) were immobilized on polystyrene beads. We demonstrate that peptide A(Sk) binds to the skeletal isoform of RyR (RyR1) whereas peptide C(Sk) does not. Using surface plasmon resonance detection, we show that 1) domain Thr(671)-Leu(690) is the only sequence of the II-III loop binding with RyR1 and 2) the interaction of peptide A(Sk) with RyR1 is not modulated by Ca(2+) (pCa 9-2) nor by Mg(2+) (up to 10 mM). In contrast, this interaction is strongly potentiated by the immunophilin FKBP12 (EC(50) = 10 nM) and inhibited by both rapamycin (IC(50) = 5 nM) and FK506. Peptide A(Sk) induces a 300% increase of the opening probability of the RyR1 incorporated in lipid bilayer. Removal of FKBP12 from RyR1 completely abolishes this effect of domain A(Sk) on RyR1 channel behavior. These results demonstrate a direct interaction of the RyR1 with the discrete domain of skeletal DHPR alpha(1)-subunit corresponding to Thr(671)-Leu(690) and show that the association of FKBP12 with RyR1 specifically modulates this interaction.