The amino terminus of the fourth cytoplasmic loop of rhodopsin modulates rhodopsin-transducin interaction

How a small change in retinal leads to G-protein activation: initial events suggested by molecular dynamics calculations

Rhodopsin is the prototypical G-protein coupled receptor, coupling light activation with high efficiency to signaling molecules. The dark-state X-ray structures of the protein provide a starting point for consideration of the relaxation from initial light activation to conformational changes that may lead to signaling. In this study we create an energetically unstable retinal in the light activated state and then use molecular dynamics simulations to examine the types of compensation, relaxation, and conformational changes that occur following the cis-trans light activation. The results suggest that changes occur throughout the protein, with changes in the orientation of Helices 5 and 6, a closer interaction between Ala 169 on Helix 4 and retinal, and a shift in the Schiff base counterion that also reflects changes in sidechain interactions with the retinal. Taken together, the simulation is suggestive of the types of changes that lead from local conformational change to light-activated signaling in this prototypical system.

Monomeric dark rhodopsin holds the molecular determinants for transducin recognition: insights from computational analysis

In this computational study, we have investigated the implications of rhodopsin (Rho) oligomerization in transducin (Gt) recognition. The results of docking simulations between heterotrimeric Gt and monomeric, dimeric and tetrameric inactive Rho corroborate the hypothesis that Rho and Gt can be found coupled already in the dark. Moreover, our extensive computational analysis suggests that the most likely Rho:Gt stoichiometry is the 1:1 one. This means that the essential molecular determinants for Gt recognition and activation are contained in one Rho monomer. In this respect, the complex between one Rho molecule and one heterotrimeric Gt should be considered as the functional unit.

Probing rhodopsin–transducin interaction using Drosophila Rh1–bovine rhodopsin chimeras

Invertebrate and vertebrate rhodopsins share a low degree of homology and are coupled to G-proteins from different families. Here we explore the utility of fly-expressed chimeras between Drosophila rhodopsin Rh1 and bovine rhodopsin (Rho) to probe the interactions between the invertebrate and vertebrate visual pigments and their cognate G-proteins. Chimeric Rh1 pigments carrying individual substitutions of the cytoplasmic loops C2 and C3 and the C-terminus with the corresponding regions of Rho retained the ability to stimulate phototranduction in Drosophila, but failed to activate transducin. Surprisingly, chimeric Rho containing the Rh1 C-terminus was fully capable of transducin activation, indicating that the C-terminal domain of vertebrate rhodopsins is not essential for the functional coupling to transducin.

Bacteriorhodopsin chimeras containing the third cytoplasmic loop of bovine rhodopsin activate transducin for GTP/GDP exchange

The mechanisms by which G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) activate G-proteins are not well understood due to the lack of atomic structures of GPCRs in an active form or in GPCR/G-protein complexes. For study of GPCR/G-protein interactions, we have generated a series of chimeras by replacing the third cytoplasmic loop of a scaffold protein bacteriorhodopsin (bR) with various lengths of cytoplasmic loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin (Rh), and one such chimera containing loop 3 of the human beta2-adrenergic receptor. The chimeras expressed in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum formed purple membrane lattices thus facilitating robust protein purification. Retinal was correctly incorporated into the chimeras, as determined by spectrophotometry. A 2D crystal (lattice) was evidenced by circular dichroism analysis, and proper organization of homotrimers formed by the bR/Rh loop 3 chimera Rh3C was clearly illustrated by atomic force microscopy. Most interestingly, Rh3C (and Rh3G to a lesser extent) was functional in activation of GTPgamma35S/GDP exchange of the transducin alpha subunit (Galphat) at a level 3.5-fold higher than the basal exchange. This activation was inhibited by GDP and by a high-affinity peptide analog of the Galphat C terminus, indicating specificity in the exchange reaction. Furthermore, a specific physical interaction between the chimera Rh3C loop 3 and the Galphat C terminus was demonstrated by cocentrifugation of transducin with Rh3C. This Galphat-activating bR/Rh chimera is highly likely to be a useful tool for studying GPCR/G-protein interactions.

G-protein coupled receptor structure

Because of their central role in regulation of cellular function, structure/function relationships for G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) are of vital importance, yet only recently have sufficient data been obtained to begin mapping those relationships. GPCRs regulate a wide range of cellular processes, including the senses of taste, smell, and vision, and control a myriad of intracellular signaling systems in response to external stimuli. Many diseases are linked to GPCRs. A critical need exists for structural information to inform studies on mechanism of receptor action and regulation. X-ray crystal structures of only one GPCR, in an inactive state, have been obtained to date. However considerable structural information for a variety of GPCRs has been obtained using non-crystallographic approaches. This review begins with a review of the very earliest GPCR structural information, mostly derived from rhodopsin. Because of the difficulty in crystallizing GPCRs for X-ray crystallography, the extensive published work utilizing alternative approaches to GPCR structure is reviewed, including determination of three-dimensional structure from sparse constraints. The available X-ray crystallographic analyses on bovine rhodopsin are reviewed as the only available high-resolution structures for any GPCR. Structural information available on ligand binding to several receptors is included. The limited information on excited states of receptors is also reviewed. It is concluded that while considerable basic structural information has been obtained, more data are needed to describe the molecular mechanism of activation of a GPCR.

Structure and dynamics of dark-state bovine rhodopsin revealed by chemical cross-linking and high-resolution mass spectrometry

Recent work using chemical cross-linking to define interresidue distance constraints in proteins has shown that these constraints are useful for testing tertiary structural models. We applied this approach to the G-protein-coupled receptor bovine rhodopsin in its native membrane using lysine- and cysteine-targeted bifunctional cross-linking reagents. Cross-linked proteolytic peptides of rhodopsin were identified by combined liquid chromatography and FT-ICR mass spectrometry with automated data-reduction and assignment software. Tandem mass spectrometry was used to verify cross-link assignments and locate the exact sites of cross-link attachment. Cross-links were observed to form between 10 pairs of residues in dark-state rhodopsin. For each pair, cross-linkers with a range of linker lengths were tested to determine an experimental distance-of-closest-approach (DCA) between reactive side-chain atoms. In all, 28 cross-links were identified using seven different cross-linking reagents. Molecular mechanics procedures were applied to published crystal structure data to calculate energetically achievable theoretical DCAs between reactive atoms without altering the position of the protein backbone. Experimentally measured DCAs are generally in good agreement with the theoretical DCAs. However, a cross-link between C316 and K325 in the C-terminal region cannot be rationalized by DCA simulations and suggests that backbone reorientation relative to the crystal coordinates occurs on the timescale of cross-linking reactions. Biochemical and spectroscopic data from other studies have found that the C-terminal region is highly mobile in solution and not fully represented by X-ray crystallography data. Our results show that chemical cross-linking can provide reliable three-dimensional structural information and insight into local conformational dynamics in a membrane protein.

Characterization of the residues in helix 8 of the human beta1-adrenergic receptor that are involved in coupling the receptor to G proteins

Several key amino acids within amphipathic helix 8 of the human beta1-adrenergic receptor (beta1-AR) were mutagenized to characterize their role in signaling by G protein-coupled receptors. Mutagenesis of phenylalanine at position 383 in the hydrophobic interface to histidine (F383H) prevented the biosynthesis of the receptor, indicating that the orientation of helix 8 is important for receptor biosynthesis. Mutagenesis of aspartic acid at position 382 in the hydrophilic interface to leucine (D382L) reduced the binding and uncoupled the receptor from G protein activation. Mutagenesis of the basic arginine residue at position 384 to glutamine (R384Q) or to glutamic acid (R384E) increased basal and agonist-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activities. R384Q and R384E displayed features associated with constitutively active receptors because inverse agonists markedly reduced their elevated basal adenylyl cyclase activities. Isoproterenol increased the phosphorylation and promoted the desensitization of the Gly389 or Arg389 allelic variants of the wild type beta1-AR but failed to produce these effects in R384Q and R384E, because these receptors were maximally phosphorylated and desensitized under basal conditions. In contrast to the membranous distribution of the wild type beta1-AR, R384Q and R384E were localized mostly within intracellular punctate structures. Inverse agonists restored the membranous distribution of R384Q and R384E, indicating that they recycled normally when their constitutive internalization was blocked by inverse agonists. These data combined with computer modeling of the putative three-dimensional organization of helix 8 indicated that the amphipathic character of helix 8 and side chain projections of Asp382 and Arg384 within the hydrophilic interface might serve as a tethering site for the G protein.

Role of the PAR1 receptor 8th helix in signaling: the 7-8-1 receptor activation mechanism

The protease-activated receptors are tethered ligand G protein-coupled receptors that are activated by proteolytic cleavage of the extracellular domain of the receptor. The archetypic protease-activated receptor PAR1 strongly activates G(q) signaling pathways, but very little is known regarding the mechanism of signal transference between receptor and internally located G protein. The recent x-ray structure of rhodopsin revealed the presence of a highly conserved amphipathic 8th helix that is likely to be physically interposed between receptor and G protein. We found that the analogous 8th helix region of PAR1 was critical for activation of G(q)-dependent signaling. Engineering an 8th helix alpha-aneurysm with a downwards-directed alanine residue markedly interfered with signal transference to G(q). The 8th helix-anchoring cysteine palmitoylation sites were important for the affinity of ligand-dependent G protein coupling but did not affect the maximal signal. A network of H-bond and ionic interactions was found to connect the N-terminal portion of the 8th helix to the nearby NPXXY motif on transmembrane helix 7 and also to the adjacent intracellular loop-1. Disruption of these pairwise interactions caused additive defects in coupling to G protein, indicating that the transmembrane 7-8th helix-i1 loop may move in a coordinated manner to transfer the signal from PAR1 to G protein. This "7-8-1" interaction network was found to be prevalent in G protein-coupled receptors involved in endothelial signaling and angiogenesis.

Functional domains of the mouse beta3-adrenoceptor associated with differential G protein coupling

Alternative splicing of mouse beta3-adrenoceptor transcripts produces an additional receptor isoform (beta3b-adrenoceptor) with a C terminus comprising 17 amino acids distinct from the 13 in the known receptor (beta3a-adrenoceptor). We have shown that the beta3b-adrenoceptor couples to both Gs and Gi, whereas the beta3a-adrenoceptor couples only to Gs. To define the regions involved in this differential G protein coupling, we have compared wild-type, truncated, and mutant beta3-adrenoceptors. In Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing beta3-adrenoceptors truncated at the splicing point, cAMP accumulation with CL316243 [(R,R)-5-[2-[[2-(3-chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxyethyl]-amino]-propyl]1,3-benzodioxole-2,2-dicarboxylate] increased by 59% following pretreatment with pertussis toxin, suggesting that the C-terminal region of the beta3a-adrenoceptor inhibits coupling to Gi. We next utilized the cell-penetrating peptide Transportan 10 (Tp10) to introduce peptides comprising the different C-terminal tail fragments into cells expressing beta3a-adrenoceptor, beta3b-adrenoceptor, and the truncated beta3-adrenoceptor. Treatment with beta3a-Tp10 (1 microM) caused cAMP responses to CL316243 in the beta3a-adrenoceptor to become pertussis toxin-sensitive and display a 30% increase over control, whereas the other peptides did not affect any receptor. Mutation at a potential tyrosine phosphorylation site (Tyr392Ala beta3a-adrenoceptor) did not alter responses or pertussis toxin sensitivity relative to the parent receptor. Surprisingly, a Ser388Ala/Ser389Ala mutant beta3b-adrenoceptor became unresponsive to CL316243 while retaining an extracellular acidification rate response to SR59230A [3-(2-ethylphenoxy)-1-[(1,S)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronapth-1-ylamino]-2S-2-propanol oxalate]. Our findings suggest that the beta3a-adrenoceptor cannot couple to Gi because of conformational changes induced by a protein(s) that interacts with residues in the C-terminal tail or because this protein(s) affects the intracellular localization of the beta3a-adrenoceptor.

Pronounced Conformational Changes following Agonist Activation of the M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor

The conformational changes that convert G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) activated by diffusible ligands from their resting into their active states are not well understood at present. To address this issue, we used the M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, a prototypical class A GPCR, as a model system, employing a recently developed disulfide cross-linking strategy that allows the formation of disulfide bonds using Cys-substituted mutant M(3) muscarinic receptors present in their native membrane environment. In the present study, we generated and analyzed 30 double Cys mutant M(3) receptors, all of which contained one Cys substitution within the C-terminal portion of transmembrane domain (TM) VII (Val-541 to Ser-546) and another one within the C-terminal segment of TM I (Val-88 to Phe-92). Following their transient expression in COS-7 cells, all mutant receptors were initially characterized in radioligand binding and second messenger assays (carbachol-induced stimulation of phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis). This analysis showed that all 30 double Cys mutant M(3) receptors were able to bind muscarinic ligands with high affinity and retained the ability to stimulate G proteins with high efficacy. In situ disulfide cross-linking experiments revealed that the muscarinic agonist, carbachol, promoted the formation of cross-links between specific Cys pairs. The observed pattern of disulfide cross-links, together with receptor modeling studies, strongly suggested that M(3) receptor activation induces a major rotational movement of the C-terminal portion of TM VII and increases the proximity of the cytoplasmic ends of TM I and VII. These findings should be of relevance for other family A GPCRs.

Identification of Ser153 in ICL2 of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor as a phosphorylation-independent site for inhibition of Gq coupling

Type I gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor (GnRHR) is unique among mammalian G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in lacking a C-terminal tail, which is involved in desensitization in GPCRs. Therefore, we searched for inhibitory sites in the intracellular loops (ICLs) of the GnRHR. Synthetic peptides corresponding to the three ICLs were inserted into permeabilized alphaT3-1 gonadotrope cells, and GnRH-induced inositol phosphate (InsP) formation was determined. GnRH-induced InsP production was potentiated by ICL2 > ICL3 but not by the ICL1 peptides, suggesting they are acting as decoy peptides. We examined the effects of six peptides in which only one of the Ser or Thr residues was substituted with Ala or Glu. Only substitution of Ser153 with Ala or Glu ablated the potentiating effect upon GnRH-induced InsP elevation. ERK activation was enhanced, and the rate of GnRH-induced InsP formation was about 6.5-fold higher in the first 10 min in COS-1 cells that were transfected with mutants of the GnRHR in which the ICL2 Ser/Thr residues (Ser151, Ser153, and Thr142) or only Ser153 was mutated to Ala as compared with the wild type GnRHR. The data indicate that ICL2 harbors an inhibitory domain, such that exogenous ICL2 peptide serves as a decoy for the inhibitory site (Ser153) of the GnRHR, thus enabling further activation. GnRH does not induce receptor phosphorylation in alphaT3-1 cells. Because the phosphomimetic ICL2-S153E peptide did not mimic the stimulatory effect of the ICL2 peptide, the inhibitory effect of Ser153 operates through a phosphorylation-independent mechanism.

Enhanced shutoff of phototransduction in transgenic mice expressing palmitoylation-deficient rhodopsin

Palmitoylation is a reversible, post-translational modification observed in a number of G-protein-coupled receptors. To gain a better understanding of its role in visual transduction, we produced transgenic knock-in mice that expressed a palmitoylation-deficient rhodopsin (Palm(-/-)). The mutant rhodopsin was expressed at wild-type levels and showed normal cellular localization to rod outer segments, indicating that neither rhodopsin stability nor its intracellular trafficking were compromised. But Palm(-/-) rods had briefer flash responses and reduced sensitivity to flashes and to steps of light. Upon exposure to light, rhodopsin became phosphorylated at a faster rate in mutant than in wild-type retinas. Since quench of rhodopsin begins with its phosphorylation, these results suggest that palmitoylation may modulate rod photoreceptor sensitivity by permitting rhodopsin to remain active for a longer period.

The conformation of the cytoplasmic helix 8 of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor using NMR and circular dichroism

The cytoplasmic helix domain (fourth cytoplasmic loop, helix 8) of numerous GPCRs such as rhodopsin and the beta-adrenergic receptor exhibits unique structural and functional characteristics. Computational models also predict the existence of such a structural motif within the CB1 cannabinoid receptor, another member of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. To gain insights into the conformational properties of this GPCR component, a peptide corresponding to helix 8 of the CB1 receptor with a small contiguous segment from transmembrane helix 7 (TM7) was chemically synthesized and its secondary structure determined by circular dichroism (CD) and solution NMR spectroscopy. Our studies in DPC and SDS micelles revealed significant alpha-helical structure while in an aqueous medium, the peptide exhibited a random coil configuration. The relative orientation of helix 8 within the CB1 receptor was obtained from intermolecular 31P-1H and 1H-1H NOE measurements. Our results suggest that in the presence of an amphipathic membrane environment, helix 8 assumes an alpha helical structure with an orientation parallel to the phospholipid membrane surface and perpendicular to TM7. In this model, positively charged side chains interact with the lipid headgroups while the other polar side chains face the aqueous region. The above observations may be relevant to the activation/deactivation of the CB1 receptor.

The role of helix 8 and of the cytosolic C-termini in the internalization and signal transduction of B(1) and B(2) bradykinin receptors

Determinants for desensitization and sequestration of G protein-coupled receptors often contain serine or threonine residues located in their C-termini. The sequence context, however, in which these residues have to appear, and the receptor specificity of these motifs are largely unknown. Mutagenesis studies with the B(2) bradykinin receptor (B(2)wt), stably expressed in HEK 293 cells, identified a sequence distal to N338 (NSMGTLRTSI, including I347 but not the basally phosphorylated S348) and in particular the TSI sequence therein, as a major determinant for rapid agonist-inducible internalization and the prevention of receptor hypersensitivity. Chimeras of the noninternalizing B(1) bradykinin receptor (B(1)wt) containing these B(2)wt sequences sequestered poorly, however, suggesting that additional motifs more proximal to N338 are required. In fact, further substitution of the B(1)wt C-terminus with corresponding B(2)wt regions either at C330(7.71) following putative helix 8 (B(1)CB(2)) or at the preceding Y312(7.53) in the NPXXY sequence (B(1)YB(2)) resulted in chimeras displaying rapid internalization. Intriguingly, however, exchange performed at K322(7.63) within putative helix 8 generated a slowly internalizing chimera (B(1)KB(2)). Detailed mutagenesis analysis generating additional chimeras identified the change of V323 in B(1)wt to serine (as in B(2)wt) as being responsible for this effect. The slowly internalizing chimera as well as a B(1)wt point-mutant V323S displayed significantly reduced inositol phosphate accumulation as compared to B(1)wt or the other chimeras. The slow internalization of B(1)KB(2) was also accompanied by a lack of agonist-induced phosphorylation, that in contrast was observed for B(1)YB(2) and B(1)CB(2), suggesting that putative helix 8 is either directly or indirectly (e.g. via G protein activation) involved in the interaction between the receptor and receptor kinases.

Role of the fourth intracellular loop of D1-like dopaminergic receptors in conferring subtype-specific signaling properties

We investigate whether the fourth intracellular loop (IL4) of D1 and D5 dopaminergic receptors (D1R, D5R) confers D1-like subtype-specific signaling properties. Using chimeric receptors (D1R-IL4B and D5R-IL4A), we show that swapping of IL4 leads to a switch in dopamine affinity and constitutive activity of D1R and D5R. Dopamine potency was reduced for both chimeras in comparison with wild-type receptors. Moreover, dopamine-mediated maximal activation was drastically increased in cells expressing D1R-IL4B when compared with those harboring D5R-IL4A or wild-type receptors. In conclusion, IL4 plays a pivotal role in imparting subtype-specific ligand binding and activation properties to highly homologous seven-transmembrane receptors.

Structure of bovine rhodopsin in a trigonal crystal form

We have determined the structure of bovine rhodopsin at 2.65 A resolution using untwinned native crystals in the space group P3(1), by molecular replacement from the 2.8 A model (1F88) solved in space group P4(1). The new structure reveals mechanistically important details unresolved previously, which are considered in the membrane context by docking the structure into a cryo-electron microscopy map of 2D crystals. Kinks in the transmembrane helices facilitate inter-helical polar interactions. Ordered water molecules extend the hydrogen bonding networks, linking Trp265 in the retinal binding pocket to the NPxxY motif near the cytoplasmic boundary, and the Glu113 counterion for the protonated Schiff base to the extracellular surface. Glu113 forms a complex with a water molecule hydrogen bonded between its main chain and side-chain oxygen atoms. This can be expected to stabilise the salt-bridge with the protonated Schiff base linking the 11-cis-retinal to Lys296. The cytoplasmic ends of helices H5 and H6 have been extended by one turn. The G-protein interaction sites mapped to the cytoplasmic ends of H5 and H6 and a spiral extension of H5 are elevated above the bilayer. There is a surface cavity next to the conserved Glu134-Arg135 ion pair. The cytoplasmic loops have the highest temperature factors in the structure, indicative of their flexibility when not interacting with G protein or regulatory proteins. An ordered detergent molecule is seen wrapped around the kink in H6, stabilising the structure around the potential hinge in H6. These findings provide further explanation for the stability of the dark state structure. They support a mechanism for the activation, initiated by photo-isomerisation of the chromophore to its all-trans form, that involves pivoting movements of kinked helices, which, while maintaining hydrophobic contacts in the membrane interior, can be coupled to amplified translation of the helix ends near the membrane surfaces.

Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function

The superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) could be subclassified into 7 families (A, B, large N-terminal family B-7 transmembrane helix, C, Frizzled/Smoothened, taste 2, and vomeronasal 1 receptors) among mammalian species. Cloning and functional studies of GPCRs have revealed that the superfamily of GPCRs comprises receptors for chemically diverse native ligands including (1) endogenous compounds like amines, peptides, and Wnt proteins (i.e., secreted proteins activating Frizzled receptors); (2) endogenous cell surface adhesion molecules; and (3) photons and exogenous compounds like odorants. The combined use of site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling approaches have provided detailed insight into molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, receptor folding, receptor activation, G-protein coupling, and regulation of GPCRs. The vast majority of family A, B, C, vomeronasal 1, and taste 2 receptors are able to transduce signals into cells through G-protein coupling. However, G-protein-independent signaling mechanisms have also been reported for many GPCRs. Specific interaction motifs in the intracellular parts of these receptors allow them to interact with scaffold proteins. Protein engineering techniques have provided information on molecular mechanisms of GPCR-accessory protein, GPCR-GPCR, and GPCR-scaffold protein interactions. Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations have revealed that the inactive state conformations are stabilized by specific interhelical and intrahelical salt bridge interactions and hydrophobic-type interactions. Constitutively activating mutations or agonist binding disrupts such constraining interactions leading to receptor conformations that associates with and activate G-proteins.

Ciliary photoreceptors with a vertebrate-type opsin in an invertebrate brain

For vision, insect and vertebrate eyes use rhabdomeric and ciliary photoreceptor cells, respectively. These cells show distinct architecture and transduce the light signal by different phototransductory cascades. In the marine rag-worm Platynereis, we find both cell types: rhabdomeric photoreceptor cells in the eyes and ciliary photoreceptor cells in the brain. The latter use a photopigment closely related to vertebrate rod and cone opsins. Comparative analysis indicates that both types of photoreceptors, with distinct opsins, coexisted in Urbilateria, the last common ancestor of insects and vertebrates, and sheds new light on vertebrate eye evolution.

Conformational changes in the phosphorylated C-terminal domain of rhodopsin during rhodopsin arrestin interactions

Phosphorylation of activated G-protein-coupled receptors and the subsequent binding of arrestin mark major molecular events of homologous desensitization. In the visual system, interactions between arrestin and the phosphorylated rhodopsin are pivotal for proper termination of visual signals. By using high resolution proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the phosphorylated C terminus of rhodopsin, represented by a synthetic 7-phosphopolypeptide, we show that the arrestin-bound conformation is a well ordered helix-loop structure connected to rhodopsin via a flexible linker. In a model of the rhodopsin-arrestin complex, the phosphates point in the direction of arrestin and form a continuous negatively charged surface, which is stabilized by a number of positively charged lysine and arginine residues of arrestin. Opposite to the mostly extended structure of the unphosphorylated C-terminal domain of rhodopsin, the arrestin-bound C-terminal helix is a compact domain that occupies a central position between the cytoplasmic loops and occludes the key binding sites of transducin. In conjunction with other binding sites, the helix-loop structure provides a mechanism of shielding phosphates in the center of the rhodopsin-arrestin complex and appears critical in guiding arrestin for high affinity binding with rhodopsin.

Electron crystallography reveals the structure of metarhodopsin I

Rhodopsin is the prototypical G protein-coupled receptor, responsible for detection of dim light in vision. Upon absorption of a photon, rhodopsin undergoes structural changes, characterised by distinct photointermediates. Currently, only the ground-state structure has been described. We have determined a density map of a photostationary state highly enriched in metarhodopsin I, to a resolution of 5.5 A in the membrane plane, by electron crystallography. The map shows density for helix 8, the cytoplasmic loops, the extracellular plug, all tryptophan residues, an ordered cholesterol molecule and the beta-ionone ring. Comparison of this map with X-ray structures of the ground state reveals that metarhodopsin I formation does not involve large rigid-body movements of helices, but there is a rearrangement close to the bend of helix 6, at the level of the retinal chromophore. There is no gradual build-up of the large conformational change known to accompany metarhodopsin II formation. The protein remains in a conformation similar to that of the ground state until late in the photobleaching process.

The basic residues in the membrane-proximal C-terminal tail of the rat melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 are required for receptor function

Melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) is a hypothalamic neuropeptide that plays a key role in food intake. It acts through two G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), MCH1R and MCH2R, of which MCH1R is the primary regulator of food intake. We have previously reported that N-linked glycosylation of the extracellular domain of MCH1R is necessary for cell surface expression and signal transduction. We now report a role for the rat MCH1R C-terminal region. We constructed serial C-terminal truncation mutants and determined the resulting changes in protein expression, cell surface expression, ligand binding, and MCH-stimulated calcium influx. By analyzing two mutants, deltaT317 (deletion of 36 C-terminal amino acids) and deltaR321 (deletion of 32 C-terminal amino acids), we found that the region between Phe(318) and Arg(321)) was responsible for signal transduction. A more detailed analysis was performed with single or multiple residue mutations. Single mutations of Arg(319), Lys(320), or Arg(321) exhibited a decrease in the cell surface expression, whereas mutations of either Arg(319) or Lys(320), but not Arg(321), showed a significant reduction in the calcium influx. Furthermore, simultaneous mutations of Arg(319) and Lys(320) produced a pronounced decrease in the efficacy of calcium influx stimulation compared with single mutations. A computational analysis revealed a dibasic amino acid motif that is conserved among many class 1 GPCRs and may be part of the amphiphilic cytoplasmic helix 8 (an eight-cytoplasmic helix). Our results therefore provide new insights into the role of the putative helix 8 in the regulation of GPCR function.

Structural studies of the putative helix 8 in the human beta(2) adrenergic receptor: an NMR study

The recently reported crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin revealed a cytoplasmic helix (helix 8) in addition to the seven transmembrane helices. This domain is roughly perpendicular to the transmembrane bundle in the presence of an interface and may be a loop-like structure in the absence of an interface. Several studies carried out on this domain suggested that it might act as a conformational switch between the inactive and activated states of this G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). These results raised the question whether helix 8 may be an important feature of other GPCRs as well. To explore this question, we determined the structure of a peptide representing the putative helix 8 domain in another receptor that belongs to the rhodopsin family of GPCRs, the human beta(2) adrenergic receptor (hbeta(2)AR), using two-dimensional (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The key results from this structural study are that the putative helix 8 domain is helical in detergent and in DMSO while in water this region is disordered; the conformation is therefore dependent upon the environment. Comparison of data from five GPCRs suggests that these observations may be generally important for GPCR structure and function.

Diversity of visual pigments from the viewpoint of G protein activation--comparison with other G protein-coupled receptors

The visual pigment present in the photoreceptor cells of the retina is a member of the family of G protein-coupled receptors and contains an 11-cis-retinal as a light-absorbing chromophore. Light induces conformational changes in the protein moiety of the visual pigment through cis-trans isomerization of the chromophore, which leads to the activation of a G protein-mediated signal transduction cascade that eventually generates an electrical response of the photoreceptor cells. So far, various types of visual pigments have been identified from a variety of photoreceptor cells and the structure-function relationship of visual pigments has been widely investigated by means of biophysical, biochemical and molecular biological techniques. Recent identifications of visual pigment-like proteins in the extra-ocular cells emphasize the importance of the visual pigment family as the photoreceptive molecules in not only visual but also non-visual photoreception. This article reviews the functional diversity of visual pigments from the viewpoint of the molecular mechanisms of photoreception and G protein activation. In addition, the similarity and difference of G protein activation mechanism between visual pigment and other G protein-coupled receptors are discussed for furthering our understanding of the common mechanism of G protein activation by G protein-coupled receptors.

Probing receptor structure/function with chimeric G-protein-coupled receptors

Owing its name to an image borrowed from Greek mythology, a chimera is seen to represent a new entity created as a composite from existing creatures or, in this case, molecules. Making use of various combinations of three basic domains of the receptors (i.e., exofacial, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic segments) that couple agonist binding into activation of effectors through heterotrimeric G-proteins, molecular pharmacology has probed the basic organization, structure/function relationships of this superfamily of heptahelical receptors. Chimeric G-protein-coupled receptors obviate the need for a particular agonist ligand when the ligand is resistant to purification or, in the case of orphan receptors, is not known. Chimeric receptors created from distant members of the heptahelical receptors enable new strategies in understanding how these receptors transduce agonist binding into receptor activation and may be able to offer insights into the evolution of G-protein-coupled receptors from yeast to humans.

Identification of a novel family of G protein-coupled receptor associated sorting proteins

During the past few years several new interacting partners for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been discovered, suggesting that the activity of these receptors is more complex than previously anticipated. Recently, candidate G protein-coupled receptor associated sorting protein (GASP-1) has been identified as a novel interacting partner for the delta opioid receptor and has been proposed to determine the degradative fate of this receptor. We show here that GASP-1 associates in vitro with other opioid receptors and that the interaction domain in these receptors is restricted to a small portion of the carboxyl-terminal tail, corresponding to helix 8 in the three-dimensional structure of rhodopsin. In addition, we show that GASP-1 interacts with COOH-terminus of several other GPCRs from subfamilies A and B and that two conserved residues within the putative helix 8 of these receptors are critical for the interaction with GASP-1. In situ hybridization and northern blot analysis indicate that GASP-1 mRNA is mainly distributed throughout the central nervous system, consistent with a potential interaction with numerous GPCRs in vivo. Finally, we show that GASP-1 is a member of a novel family comprising at least 10 members, whose genes are clustered on chromosome X. Another member of the family, GASP-2, also interacts with the carboxyl-terminal tail of several GPCRs. Therefore, GASP proteins may represent an important protein family regulating GPCR physiology.

Selective Interaction of ARF1 with the Carboxy-Terminal Tail Domain of the 5-HT2A Receptor

The 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor (5-HT2AR) is a member of the class I family of rhodopsin-related G protein-coupled receptors. The receptor is known to activate phospholipase C via the heterotrimeric G proteins Gq/11, but we showed previously that it can also signal through the phospholipase D (PLD) pathway in an ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)-dependent manner that seems to be independent of Gq/11 (Mitchell et al., 1998). Both coimmunoprecipitation experiments and the effects of negative mutant ARF constructs on 5-HT2AR-induced PLD activation here suggested that ARF1 may play a greater role than ARF6 in the function of this receptor. Furthermore, we demonstrated using glutathione S-transferase (GST)-fusion proteins of receptor domains that ARF1 and ARF6 bind to the third intracellular loop (i3) and the carboxy terminal tail (ct) of the 5-HT2AR. The association of ARF1 with the ct domain of the receptor was stronger than its interaction with i3, or the interactions of ARF6 with either construct. Experiments using ARF mutants that are deficient in GTP loading, and the in vitro addition of GTPgammaS suggested that GTP loading enhances ARF1 binding to the receptor. The N376PxxY motif in the transmembrane 7 domain of the receptor (rather than a N376DPxxY mutant form) was shown to be essential for ARF-dependent PLD signaling and ARF1 coimmunoprecipitation. In GST-fusion proteins of the 5-HT2AR ct domain, mutation of Asn376 to Asp also markedly reduced ARF1-HA binding, although additional motifs in the Asn376-Asn384 sequence and to a lesser extent elsewhere, seem also to contribute to the interaction.

Helix 8 of the leukotriene B4 receptor is required for the conformational change to the low affinity state after G-protein activation

Recent studies have revealed that G-protein-coupled receptors contain a putative cytoplasmic helical domain, helix 8. Leukotriene B4 (LTB4) receptor 1 derivatives with truncated or mutated helix 8 showed much higher LTB4 binding than wild-type (WT) receptors. Similar to the WT receptor, LTB4 promoted guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding in these mutants. Unlike the WT receptor, however, the addition of GTPgammaS did not inhibit LTB4 binding to the mutant receptors. Scatchard analyses revealed that mutants maintained high affinity for LTB4, even in the presence of excess GTPgammaS. Consistently, mutant receptors showed a more prolonged Ca2+ mobilization and cellular metabolic activation than the WT receptor. From mutational studies and three-dimensional modeling based on the structure of bovine rhodopsin, we conclude that the helix 8 of LTB4 receptor 1 plays an important role in the conformational change of the receptor to the low affinity state after G-protein activation, possibly by sensing the status of coupling Galpha subunits as GTP-bound.

Rhodopsin determinants for transducin activation: a gain-of-function approach

Three cytoplasmic loops in the G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin, C2, C3, and C4, have been implicated as key sites for binding and activation of the visual G protein transducin. Non-helical portions of the C2- and C3-loops and the cytoplasmic helix-8 from the C4 loop were targeted for a "gain-of-function" mutagenesis to identify rhodopsin residues critical for transducin activation. Mutant opsins with residues 140-148 (C2-loop), 229-244 (C3-loop), or 310-320 (C4-loop) substituted by poly-Ala sequences of equivalent lengths served as templates for mutagenesis. The template mutants with poly-Ala substitutions in the C2- and C3-loops formed the 500-nm absorbing pigments but failed to activate transducin. Reverse substitutions of the Ala residues by rhodopsin residues have been generated in each of the templates. Significant ( approximately 50%) restoration of the rhodopsin/transducin coupling was achieved with re-introduction of residues Cys140/Lys141 and Arg147/Phe148 into the C2 template. The reverse substitutions of the C3-loop residues Thr229/Val230 and Ser240/Thr242/Thr243/Gln244 produced a pigment with a full capacity for transducin activation. The C4 template mutant was unable to bind 11-cis-retinal, and the presence of Asn310/Lys311 was required for correct folding of the protein. Subsequent mutagenesis of the C4-loop revealed the role of Phe313 and Met317. On the background of Asn310/Lys311, the inclusion of Phe313 and Met317 produced a mutant pigment with the potency of transducin activation equal to that of the wild-type rhodopsin. Overall, our data support the role of the three cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin and suggest that residues adjacent to the transmembrane helices are most important for transducin activation.

Selective interactions between helix VIII of the human mu-opioid receptors and the C terminus of periplakin disrupt G protein activation

Analysis of interactions between the C-terminal tail of the MOP-1 and MOP-1A variants of the human mu-opioid receptor with proteins derived from a human brain cDNA library resulted in identification of the actin and intermediate filament-binding protein periplakin. Mapping of this interaction indicated that the predicted fourth intracellular loop/helix VIII of the receptor interacts with the C-terminal rod and linker region of periplakin. Periplakin is widely expressed in the central nervous system of both man and rat and demonstrated an overlapping but not identical distribution with mu-opioid (MOP) receptors. Co-expression of periplakin with MOP-1 or a MOP-1-eYFP fusion construct in HEK293 cells did not interfere with agonist-mediated internalization of the receptor. When co-expressed with a MOP-1-Gi1 alpha fusion protein periplakin significantly reduced the capacity of the agonist to stimulate binding of 35S-labeled guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) to the receptor-associated G protein. By contrast, periplakin did not interfere with agonist-stimulation of [35S]GTP gamma S binding to either an alpha 2A-adrenoreceptor-Gi1 alpha fusion protein or a beta2-adrenoreceptor-Gs alpha fusion protein, indicating its selectivity of function. This represents the first example of an opioid receptor-interacting protein that functions to disrupt agonist-mediated G protein activation.

Truncation of the A1 adenosine receptor reveals distinct roles of the membrane-proximal carboxyl terminus in receptor folding and G protein coupling

The carboxyl terminus (C-tail) of G protein-coupled receptors is divergent in length and structure and may represent an individualized cytoplasmic domain. By progressively truncating the A1 adenosine receptor, a Gi/o-coupled receptor with short cytoplasmic stretches, we identify two inherent functions of the C-tail, namely a role in receptor export from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and a role in G protein coupling. Deletion of the last 22 and 26 amino acids (of 36) reduced and completely abolished surface expression of the receptor, respectively. The severely truncated receptors were retained in the ER and failed to bind ligands. If overexpressed, even a substantial portion of the full-length receptor was retained in the ER in a form that was not functional. These data indicate that folding is rate limiting in export from the ER and that the proximal segment of the carboxyl terminus provides a docking site for the machinery involved in folding and quality control. In addition, the proximal portion is also important in G protein coupling. This latter role was unmasked when the distal portion of the C-tail (the extreme 18 amino acids, including a palmitoylated cysteine) had been removed; the resulting receptor was functional and transferred the agonist-mediated signal more efficiently than the full-length receptor. Signaling was enhanced because the coupling affinity increased (by 3-fold), which translated into a higher agonist potency. Thus, the distal portion of the carboxyl terminus provides for an autoinhibitory restraint, presumably by folding back and preventing G protein access to the proximal part of the C-tail.

Conformational Changes of G Protein‐Coupled Receptors During Their Activation by Agonist Binding

The superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the largest and most diverse group of transmembrane proteins involved in signal transduction. Many of the over 1000 human GPCRs represent important pharmaceutical targets. However, despite high interest in this receptor family, no high-resolution structure of a human GPCR has been resolved yet. This is mainly due to difficulties in obtaining large quantities of pure and active protein. Until now, only a high-resolution x-ray structure of an inactive state of bovine rhodopsin is available. Since no structure of an active state has been solved, information of the GPCR activation process can be gained only by biophysical techniques. In this review, we first describe what is known about the ground state of GPCRs to then address questions about the nature of the conformational changes taking place during receptor activation and the mechanism controlling the transition from the resting to the active state. Finally, we will also address the question to what extent information about the three-dimensional GPCR structure can be included into pharmaceutical drug design programs.

Role of the conserved NPxxY(x)5,6F motif in the rhodopsin ground state and during activation

In the G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin, the conserved NPxxY(x)(5,6)F motif connects the transmembrane helix VII and the cytoplasmic helix 8. The less geometrically constrained retinal analogue 9-demethyl-retinal prevents efficient transformation of rhodopsin to signaling metarhodopsin (Meta) II after retinal photoisomerization. Here, we demonstrate that Ala replacement mutations within the NPxxY(x)(5,6)F domain, which eliminate an interaction between aromatic residues Y306 and F313, allow formation of Meta II despite the presence of 9-demethyl-retinal. Also a disulfide bond linking residues 306 and 313 in the 9-demethyl-retinal-reconstituted mutant Y306C/F313C/C316S prevented Meta II formation, whereas the reduced form of the mutant readily transformed to Meta II after illumination. These observations suggest that the interaction between residues 306 and 313 is disrupted during the Meta I/Meta II transition. However, this enhancement in Meta II formation is not reflected in the G protein activation, which is dramatically reduced for these mutants, suggesting that changes in the Y306-F313 interaction also lead to a proper realigning of helix 8 after photoisomerization. The E134Q mutation, located in the second conserved motif, D(E)RY, rescues activity in 9-demethyl-retinal-reconstituted mutants to different degrees, depending on the position of the Ala replacement in the NPxxY(x)(5,6)F motif, thus revealing distinct roles for the NP and Y(x)(5,6)F portions. Our studies underscore the importance of the NPxxY(x)(5,6)F and D(E)RY motifs in providing structural constraints in rhodopsin that rearrange in response to photoisomerization during formation of the G protein-activating Meta II. The dual control of the structural rearrangements secures reliable transformation of quiescent rhodopsin to activating Meta II.

G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin: a prospectus

Rhodopsin is a retinal photoreceptor protein of bipartite structure consisting of the transmembrane protein opsin and a light-sensitive chromophore 11-cis-retinal, linked to opsin via a protonated Schiff base. Studies on rhodopsin have unveiled many structural and functional features that are common to a large and pharmacologically important group of proteins from the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily, of which rhodopsin is the best-studied member. In this work, we focus on structural features of rhodopsin as revealed by many biochemical and structural investigations. In particular, the high-resolution structure of bovine rhodopsin provides a template for understanding how GPCRs work. We describe the sensitivity and complexity of rhodopsin that lead to its important role in vision.

Structural studies on rhodopsin

Bovine rhodopsin is the prototypical G protein coupled receptor (GPCR). It was the first GPCR to be obtained in quantity and studied in detail. It is also the first GPCR for which detailed three dimensional structural information has been obtained. Reviewed here are the experiments leading up to the high resolution structure determination of rhodopsin and the most recent structural information on the activation and stability of this integral membrane protein.

Recreating a functional ancestral archosaur visual pigment

The ancestors of the archosaurs, a major branch of the diapsid reptiles, originated more than 240 MYA near the dawn of the Triassic Period. We used maximum likelihood phylogenetic ancestral reconstruction methods and explored different models of evolution for inferring the amino acid sequence of a putative ancestral archosaur visual pigment. Three different types of maximum likelihood models were used: nucleotide-based, amino acid-based, and codon-based models. Where possible, within each type of model, likelihood ratio tests were used to determine which model best fit the data. Ancestral reconstructions of the ancestral archosaur node using the best-fitting models of each type were found to be in agreement, except for three amino acid residues at which one reconstruction differed from the other two. To determine if these ancestral pigments would be functionally active, the corresponding genes were chemically synthesized and then expressed in a mammalian cell line in tissue culture. The expressed artificial genes were all found to bind to 11-cis-retinal to yield stable photoactive pigments with lambda(max) values of about 508 nm, which is slightly redshifted relative to that of extant vertebrate pigments. The ancestral archosaur pigments also activated the retinal G protein transducin, as measured in a fluorescence assay. Our results show that ancestral genes from ancient organisms can be reconstructed de novo and tested for function using a combination of phylogenetic and biochemical methods.

The cytoplasmic helix of cannabinoid receptor CB2, a conformational study by circular dichroism and (1)H NMR spectroscopy in aqueous and membrane-like environments

The cytoplasmic helix domain (fourth cytoplasmic loop, helix 8) of numerous G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) such as rhodopsin and the beta-adrenergic receptor exhibit unique structural and functional characteristics. Computer models also predict this structure for the cannabinoid CB2 receptor, another member of the GPCR superfamily. In our study, a peptide corresponding to helix 8 of the CB2 receptor was synthesized chemically and its secondary structure determined by circular dichroism (CD) and (1)H NMR spectroscopy. NMR and CD revealed an alpha-helical structure in this region in both dodecylphosphocholine micelles and dimethylsulfoxide, in contrast to a random coil configuration found in aqueous solvent. This finding is in good agreement with other previous GPCR structural studies including X-ray crystallography. By combining our finding with other studies, we further hypothesize that the amphipathic nature of helix 8 can play a significant role in the function and regulation of CB receptors as well as other GPCRs in general.

Rhodopsin: insights from recent structural studies

The recent report of the crystal structure of rhodopsin provides insights concerning structure-activity relationships in visual pigments and related G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The seven transmembrane helices of rhodopsin are interrupted or kinked at multiple sites. An extensive network of interhelical interactions stabilizes the ground state of the receptor. The ligand-binding pocket of rhodopsin is remarkably compact, and several chromophore-protein interactions were not predicted from mutagenesis or spectroscopic studies. The helix movement model of receptor activation, which likely applies to all GPCRs of the rhodopsin family, is supported by several structural elements that suggest how light-induced conformational changes in the ligand-binding pocket are transmitted to the cytoplasmic surface. The cytoplasmic domain of the receptor includes a helical domain extending from the seventh transmembrane segment parallel to the bilayer surface. The cytoplasmic surface appears to be approximately large enough to bind to the transducin heterotrimer in a one-to-one complex. The structural basis for several unique biophysical properties of rhodopsin, including its extremely low dark noise level and high quantum efficiency, can now be addressed using a combination of structural biology and various spectroscopic methods. Future high-resolution structural studies of rhodopsin and other GPCRs will form the basis to elucidate the detailed molecular mechanism of GPCR-mediated signal transduction.

Structure of rhodopsin and the superfamily of seven-helical receptors: the same and not the same

The crystal structure of rhodopsin provides significant insights concerning structure/activity relationships in visual pigments and related G-protein-coupled receptors. The specific arrangement of seven-transmembrane helices is stabilized by a series of intermolecular interactions that appear to be conserved among Family A receptors. However, the potential for structural and functional diversity among members of the superfamily of seven-helical receptors presents a significant future challenge.

Seven-transmembrane receptors: crystals clarify

The X-ray structure of the photoreceptor rhodopsin has provided the first atomic-resolution structure of a seven-transmembrane (7-TM) G-protein-coupled receptor. This has provided an improved template for interpreting the huge body of structure--activity, mutagenesis and affinity labelling data available for related 7-TM receptors, such as muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Ligand contacts, and the intramolecular interactions that stabilize the ground state structure, can be identified with some degree of confidence. We now have a firm basis for attempts to predict the structure of the receptor--G-protein complex, and understand the mechanism by which the agonist--receptor complex activates the G protein.

Functional interaction between bovine rhodopsin and G protein transducin

To elucidate the mechanisms of specific coupling of bovine rhodopsin with the G protein transducin (G(t)), we have constructed the bovine rhodopsin mutants whose second or third cytoplasmic loop (loop 2 or 3) was replaced with the corresponding loop of the G(o)-coupled scallop rhodopsin and investigated the difference in the activation abilities for G(t), G(o), and G(i) among these mutants and wild type. We have also prepared the Galpha(i) mutants whose C-terminal 11 or 5 amino acids were replaced with those of Galpha(t), Galpha(o), and Galpha(q) to evaluate the role of the C-terminal tail of the alpha-subunit on the specific coupling of bovine rhodopsin with G(t). Replacement of loop 2 of bovine rhodopsin with that of the scallop rhodopsin caused about a 40% loss of G(t) and G(o) activation, whereas that of loop 3 enhanced the G(o) activation four times with a 60% decrease in the G(t) activation. These results indicated that loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin is one of the regions responsible for the specific coupling with G(t). Loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin discriminates the difference of the 6-amino acid sequence (region A) at a position adjacent to the C-terminal 5 amino acids of the G protein, resulting in the different activation efficiency between G(t) and G(o). In addition, the binding of region A to loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin is essential for activation of G(t) but not G(i), even though the sequence of the region A is almost identical between Galpha(t) and Galpha(i). These results suggest that the binding of loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin to region A in Galpha(t) is one of the mechanisms of specific G(t) activation by bovine rhodopsin.

The cytoplasmic tail of the D1A receptor subtype: identification of specific domains controlling dopamine cellular responsiveness

In this study the rat D1A receptor (wild-type, WT) and truncation mutants thereof, are utilized to delineate specific cytoplasmic tail (CT) domains responsible for regulating ligand binding and receptor-mediated adenylyl cyclase activation. In human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells, all truncation mutants of the D1A receptor (Delta425, Delta379, Delta351) display cell surface localization and express at high but different receptor numbers. Binding studies suggest that residues located between Cys(351) and Asp(425) may serve to restrain the agonist binding conformation of the D1A receptor. This contention is supported by the observation that the constitutive activation of Delta351 is significantly increased in comparison with WT, Delta425 and Delta379. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the extent of dopamine-mediated maximal activation of adenylyl cyclase is significantly augmented in cells expressing Delta351 when compared with WT or mutants harboring shorter truncations. These results suggest that in addition to restraining receptor conformation, determinants located downstream of Cys(351) may act as negative regulators of the G protein coupling efficiency and adenylyl cyclase activation. Interestingly, all truncated receptors used in the present study display a decrease in dopamine potency when compared with WT. We show that inhibition of protein kinase A (PKA) activity leads also to a reduction in dopamine potency in cells expressing WT but not Delta351 receptors. These results hint at a potential previously unanticipated role for PKA in facilitating D1A receptor coupling efficiency in HEK cells. Overall, the present study has uncovered specific CT domains involved in regulating discrete aspects of the D1A receptor signaling.

Rhodopsin-transducin interface: studies with conformationally constrained peptides

To probe the interaction between transducin (G(t)) and photoactivated rhodopsin (R*), 14 analog peptides were designed and synthesized restricting the backbone of the R*-bound structure of the C-terminal 11 residues of G(t)alpha derived by transferred nuclear Overhauser effect (TrNOE) NMR. Most of the analogs were able to bind R*, supporting the TrNOE structure. Improved affinities of constrained peptides indicated that preorganization of the bound conformation is beneficial. Cys347 was found to be a recognition site; particularly, the free sulfhydryl of the side chain seems to be critical for R* binding. Leu349 was another invariable residue. Both Ile and tert-leucine (Tle) mutations for Leu349 significantly reduced the activity, indicating that the Leu side chain is in intimate contact with R*. The structure of R* was computer generated by moving helix 6 from its position in the crystal structure of ground-state rhodopsin (R) based on various experimental data. Seven feasible complexes were found when docking the TrNOE structure with R* and none with R. The analog peptides were modeled into the complexes, and their binding affinities were calculated. The predicted affinities were compared with the measured affinities to evaluate the modeled structures. Three models of the R*/G(t)alpha complex showed strong correlation to the experimental data.

Three-dimensional structure of an invertebrate rhodopsin and basis for ordered alignment in the photoreceptor membrane

Invertebrate rhodopsins activate a G-protein signalling pathway in microvillar photoreceptors. In contrast to the transducin-cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase pathway found in vertebrate rods and cones, visual transduction in cephalopod (squid, octopus, cuttlefish) invertebrates is signalled via Gq and phospholipase C. Squid rhodopsin contains the conserved residues of the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family, but has only 35% identity with mammalian rhodopsins. Unlike vertebrate rhodopsins, cephalopod rhodopsin is arranged in an ordered lattice in the photoreceptor membranes. This organization confers sensitivity to the plane of polarized light and also provides the optimal orientation of the linear retinal chromophores in the cylindrical microvillar membranes for light capture. Two-dimensional crystals of squid rhodopsin show a rectilinear arrangement that is likely to be related to the alignment of rhodopsins in vivo.Here, we present a three-dimensional structure of squid rhodopsin determined by cryo-electron microscopy of two-dimensional crystals. Docking the atomic structure of bovine rhodopsin into the squid density map shows that the helix packing and extracellular plug structure are conserved. In addition, there are two novel structural features revealed by our map. The linear lattice contact appears to be made by the transverse C-terminal helix lying on the cytoplasmic surface of the membrane. Also at the cytoplasmic surface, additional density may correspond to a helix 5-6 loop insertion found in most GPCRs relative to vertebrate rhodopsins. The similarity supports the conservation in structure of rhodopsins (and other G-protein-coupled receptors) from phylogenetically distant organisms. The map provides the first indication of the structural basis for rhodopsin alignment in the microvillar membrane.

Receptor activation: what does the rhodopsin structure tell us?

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large family of seven-transmembrane-helix proteins that mediate responses to hormones, neurotransmitters and, in the case of rhodopsin, photons. The recent determination of the structure of rhodopsin at atomic resolution opens avenues to a deeper understanding of GPCR activation and transmembrane signaling. Data from previous crosslinking, spin labeling and scanning accessibility experiments on rhodopsin have been mapped onto the high-resolution structure. These data correlate well and are consistent with the structure, and suggest that activation by light opens a cleft at the cytoplasmic end of the seven-helix bundle of rhodopsin. Furthermore, lessons learned from rhodopsin might also apply to other members of this essential family of receptors. (For an animation of the crystal structure of rhodopsin see http://archive.bmn.com/supp/tips/tips2211a.html)

Rhodopsin: structural basis of molecular physiology

The crystal structure of rod cell visual pigment rhodopsin was recently solved at 2.8-A resolution. A critical evaluation of a decade of structure-function studies is now possible. It is also possible to begin to explain the structural basis for several unique physiological properties of the vertebrate visual system, including extremely low dark noise levels as well as high gain and color detection. The ligand-binding pocket of rhodopsin is remarkably compact, and several apparent chromophore-protein interactions were not predicted from extensive mutagenesis or spectroscopic studies. The transmembrane helices are interrupted or kinked at multiple sites. An extensive network of interhelical interactions stabilizes the ground state of the receptor. The helix movement model of receptor activation, which might apply to all G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) of the rhodopsin family, is supported by several structural elements that suggest how light-induced conformational changes in the ligand-binding pocket are transmitted to the cytoplasmic surface. The cytoplasmic domain of the receptor is remarkable for a carboxy-terminal helical domain extending from the seventh transmembrane segment parallel to the bilayer surface. Thus the cytoplasmic surface appears to be approximately the right size to bind to the transducin heterotrimer in a one-to-one complex. Future high-resolution structural studies of rhodopsin and other GPCRs will form a basis to elucidate the detailed molecular mechanism of GPCR-mediated signal transduction.

Palmitoylation of CCR5 is critical for receptor trafficking and efficient activation of intracellular signaling pathways

CCR5 is a CC chemokine receptor expressed on memory lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells and also constitutes the main coreceptor for macrophage-tropic (or R5) strains of human immunodeficiency viruses. In the present study, we investigated whether CCR5 was palmitoylated in its carboxyl-terminal domain by generating alanine substitution mutants for the three cysteine residues present in this region, individually or in combination. We found that wild-type CCR5 was palmitoylated, but a mutant lacking all three Cys residues was not. Through the use of green fluorescent fusion proteins and immunofluorescence studies, we found that the absence of receptor palmitoylation resulted in sequestration of CCR5 in intracellular biosynthetic compartments. By using the fluorescence recovery after photobleaching technique, we showed that the non-palmitoylated mutant had impaired diffusion properties within the endoplasmic reticulum. We next studied the ability of the mutants to bind and signal in response to chemokines. Chemokines binding and activation of G(i)-mediated signaling pathways, such as calcium mobilization and inhibition of adenylate cyclase, were not affected. However, the duration of the functional response, as measured by a microphysiometer, and the ability to increase [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding to membranes were severely affected for the non-palmitoylated mutant. The ability of RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted) and aminooxypentane-RANTES to promote CCR5 endocytosis was not altered by cysteine replacements. Finally, we found that the absence of receptor palmitoylation reduced the human immunodeficiency viruses coreceptor function of CCR5, but this effect was secondary to the reduction in surface expression. In conclusion, we found that palmitoylated cysteines play an important role in the intracellular trafficking of CCR5 and are likely necessary for efficient coupling of the receptor to part of its repertoire of signaling cascades.

The function of interdomain interactions in controlling nucleotide exchange rates in transducin

The intramolecular contacts in heterotrimeric G proteins that determine the rates of basal and receptor-stimulated nucleotide exchange are not fully understood. The alpha subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins consists of two domains: a Ras-like domain with structural homology to the monomeric G protein Ras and a helical domain comprised of six alpha-helices. The bound nucleotide lies in a deep cleft between the two domains. Exchange of the bound nucleotide may involve opening of this cleft. Thus interactions between the domains may affect the rate of nucleotide exchange in G proteins. We have tested this hypothesis in the alpha subunit of the rod cell G protein transducin (Galpha(t)). Site-directed mutations were prepared in a series of residues located at the interdomain interface. The proteins were expressed in vitro in a reticulocyte lysate system. The rates of basal and rhodopsin-catalyzed nucleotide exchange were determined using a trypsin digestion assay specifically adapted for kinetic measurements. Charge-altering substitutions of two residues at the interdomain interface, Lys(273) and Lys(276), increased basal nucleotide exchange rates modestly (5-10-fold). However, we found no evidence that interactions spanning the two domains in Galpha(t) significantly affected either basal or rhodopsin-catalyzed nucleotide exchange rates. These results suggest that opening of the interdomain cleft is not an energetic barrier to nucleotide exchange in Galpha(t). Experiments with Galpha(i1) suggest by comparison that the organization and function of the interdomain region differ among various G protein subtypes.