Phase I-II study of radiopeptide 177Lu-octreotate in combination with capecitabine and temozolomide in advanced low-grade neuroendocrine tumors

Characteristics and outcomes of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms after peptide receptor radionuclide/chemoradionuclide therapy (PRRT/PRCRT) for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasia: a single-institution series

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide/chemoradionuclide therapy (PRRT/PRCRT) is an effective therapy for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN), but therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) remain of concern. The study reviewed the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients who developed t-MN.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with t-MN by 2016 WHO classification, from a cohort of 521 patients who received PRRT/PRCRT over a 12-year period. Molecular next-generation sequencing using an in-house 26-gene panel was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of 521 (4.8%) patients were diagnosed with t-MN, including six acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and 19 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The median time from first cycle PRRT/PRCRT to diagnosis of t-MN was 26 months (range 4-91). Twenty-two of 25 (88%) patients had grade 1-2 pancreatic or small bowel NEN with moderate metastatic liver burden. Six patients (24%) had prior chemotherapy. Median number of PRRT cycles = 5 (22/25 (88%) with concomitant radiosensitising chemotherapy). All 25 patients achieved disease stabilisation (68%) or partial response (32%) on RECIST 1.1 at 3 months post-PRRT. At t-MN diagnosis, all patients presented with thrombocytopenia (median nadir 33 × 10⁹/L, range 3-75) and 17 (68%) remained NEN progression-free. Marrow genetic analysis revealed unfavourable karyotype in 16/25 (66%) patients with tumour protein 53 (TP53) mutation in nine (36%). Azacitidine therapy was utilised in ten eligible patients, while four received induction chemotherapy for AML. The median overall survival from first PRRT was 62 months (19-94), but from t-MN diagnosis was only 13 months (1-56), with death due primarily to haematological disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of t-MN after PRRT/PRCRT is an infrequent but serious complication with poor overall survival. Most patients present with thrombocytopenia; unfavourable genetic mutations have a poor response to t-MN treatment. Prospective data are needed to explore potential pre-existing genetic factors and predictive biomarkers to minimise the risk of t-MN.

Therapy With 177Lu-DOTATATE: Clinical Implementation and Impact on Care of Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to enhance knowledge of the clinical implementation of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and its impact on care of patients with neuroendocrine tumors. CONCLUSION. Most well differentiated and some moderately and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors express large numbers of somatostatin receptors on their cell surfaces. PRRT targets these cells with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, which is a medium-energy beta emitter. Since this agent received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in 2018, tremendous effort has been exerted at institutions throughout the United States toward proper implementation of this promising therapy. This review summarizes clinical implementation of PRRT and its impact on patient care.

Everolimus, lutetium-177 DOTATATE and sunitinib for advanced, unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumours with disease progression: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are a group of heterogeneous cancers that develop in cells in the diffuse neuroendocrine system.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the clinical effectiveness of three interventions [everolimus (Afinitor^®; Novartis International AG, Basel, Switzerland), lutetium-177 DOTATATE (177Lu-DOTATATE) (Lutathera^®; Imaging Equipment Ltd, Radstock, UK) and sunitinib (Sutent^®; Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA)] for treating unresectable or metastatic NETs with disease progression and establish the cost-effectiveness of these interventions.

DATA SOURCES

The following databases were searched from inception to May 2016: MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE Daily, Epub Ahead of Print, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

We systematically reviewed the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness literature on everolimus, 177Lu-DOTATATE and sunitinib for treating advanced, unresectable or metastatic progressive NETs. The following NET locations were considered separately: pancreas, gastrointestinal (GI) tract and lung, and GI tract (midgut only). We wrote a survival partition cohort-based economic evaluation in Microsoft Excel^® 2013 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) from the UK NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. This comprised three health states: (1) progression-free survival (PFS), (2) progressed disease and (3) death.

RESULTS

Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs), RADIANT-3 [RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Third Trial; pancreatic NETs (pNETs): everolimus vs. best supportive care (BSC)], A6181111 (pNETs: sunitinib vs. BSC) and RADIANT-4 (RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Fourth Trial; GI and lung NETs: everolimus vs. BSC), met the inclusion criteria for the clinical effectiveness systematic review. The risk of bias was low. Although the NETTER-1 (Neuroendocrine Tumors Therapy) RCT, of 177Lu-DOTATATE plus 30 mg of octreotide (Sandostatin^®, Novartis) compared with 60 mg of octreotide, was excluded from the review, we nonetheless present the results of this trial, as it informs our estimate of the cost-effectiveness of 177Lu-DOTATATE. The pNETs trials consistently found that the interventions improved PFS and overall survival (OS) compared with BSC. Our indirect comparison found no significant difference in PFS between everolimus and sunitinib. Estimates of OS gain were confounded because of high rates of treatment switching. After adjustment, our indirect comparison suggested a lower, but non-significant, hazard of death for sunitinib compared with everolimus. In GI and lung NETs, everolimus significantly improved PFS compared with BSC and showed a non-significant trend towards improved OS compared with BSC. Adverse events were more commonly reported following treatment with targeted interventions than after treatment with BSC. In the base case for pNETs, assuming list prices, we estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for everolimus compared with BSC of £45,493 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and for sunitinib compared with BSC of £20,717 per QALY. These ICERs increased substantially without the adjustment for treatment switching. For GI and lung NETs, we estimated an ICER for everolimus compared with BSC of £44,557 per QALY. For GI (midgut) NETs, the ICERs were £199,233 per QALY for everolimus compared with BSC and £62,158 per QALY for a scenario analysis comparing 177Lu-DOTATATE with BSC. We judge that no treatment meets the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (NICE) end-of-life criteria, although we cannot rule out that sunitinib in the A6181111 trial does.

LIMITATIONS

A RCT with included comparators was not identified for 177Lu-DOTATATE. The indirect treatment comparison that our economic analysis was based on was of a simple Bucher type, unadjusted for any differences in the baseline characteristics across the two trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Given NICE's current stated range of £20,000-30,000 per QALY for the cost-effectiveness threshold, based on list prices, only sunitinib might be considered good value for money in England and Wales.

FUTURE WORK

Further analysis of individual patient data from RADIANT-3 would allow assessment of the robustness of our findings. The data were not made available to us by the company sponsoring the trial.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016041303.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Patients With Advanced Lung Carcinoids

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a family of malignancies of diverse origin, including the lung, gastrointestinal tract, and pancreas. Lung NEN include well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) classified as typical carcinoids or atypical carcinoids, and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas classified as small-cell lung carcinoma or large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. According to a recent analysis of a large, population-based registry, approximately one-third of all patients with lung typical/atypical carcinoids have distant metastases at diagnosis, and median survival for these patients is 24 months. At present, only 1 therapy is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with advanced lung typical/atypical carcinoids, everolimus, indicating a clear need for more treatment options in this patient population. Although not yet supported by results from randomized prospective trials, somatostatin analogues are considered an acceptable treatment option for patients with lung typical/atypical carcinoids expressing somatostatin receptors. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic NET; however, the role of PRRT in patients with lung typical/atypical carcinoids remains unclear, because they were not included in the pivotal NETTER-1 (Neuroendocrine Tumors Therapy) trial. Herein we provide a comprehensive review of the available clinical evidence for efficacy and safety of PRRT in patients with lung typical/atypical carcinoids. On the basis of the preliminary evidence of efficacy and the consistent safety profile in this patient group, we propose that experienced multidisciplinary NET teams may consider PRRT alongside everolimus as an option for patients with advanced somatostatin receptor-positive lung typical/atypical carcinoids whose disease is progressing during first-line treatment with somatostatin analogues.

The emerging role of targeted therapies for advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are unique and complex neoplasms, exhibiting a wide spectrum of diverse clinical behaviors. The contemporary management of well-differentiated GEP-NETs is marked by the availability of a wide range of targeted therapies. Areas Covered: For patients with localized or oligometastatic disease, surgical resection remains the preferred approach and is associated with excellent long-term outcomes. For patients with unresectable but isolated liver metastases, multiple liver-directed therapies, including hepatic arterial based therapies and ablative techniques, exist. For patients with metastatic and progressive disease, a number of systemic therapies exist: molecular targeted agents, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and systemic chemotherapy. Furthermore, somatostatin analogs (SSA) are an important component of therapy, both effectively controlling symptoms of hormonal overproduction and contributing to slowing tumor progression. Expert Opinion: In the near future, advances in our understanding of tumor biology, genetics, immunology, nanotechnology, and radiation pharmacology should only continue to expand the availability of targeted therapies, improving the outcomes of patients with GEP-NETs. We herein review the management of advanced well-differentiated GEP-NETS with a particular emphasis on the role of targeted therapies.

Targeted Alpha Particle Therapy for Neuroendocrine Tumours: The Next Generation of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are being seen increasingly frequently, but to date only complete surgical resection is curative. However, among the various therapeutic options, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, linking a radioactive moiety to an octreotide derivative, has been shown to be highly efficacious and a well-tolerated therapy, improving progression-free survival and probably overall survival. Nevertheless, the current radionuclides in use are beta particle emitters with non-optimal radiobiological properties. A new generation of alpha particle-emitting radionuclides is being developed, with advantages in terms of very high energy and a short path length, which should theoretically show higher efficacy. We survey the current developments in this field, emphasising the exciting potential of this novel form of therapy for NETs.

Personalized 177Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours: initial results from the P-PRRT trial

PURPOSE

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is mostly administered using a fixed injected activity (IA) per cycle. This empiric regime results in highly variable absorbed doses to the critical organs and undertreatment of the majority of patients. We conceived a personalized PRRT protocol in which the IA is adjusted to deliver a prescribed absorbed dose to the kidney, with the aim to safely increase tumour irradiation. We herein report on the initial results of our prospective study of personalized PRRT, the P-PRRT Trial (NCT02754297).

METHODS

PRRT-naïve patients with progressive and/or symptomatic neuroendocrine tumour (NET) were scheduled to receive a four-cycle induction course of ¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate with quantitative SPECT/CT-based dosimetry. The IA was personalized according to the glomerular filtration rate and the body surface area for the first cycle, and according to the prior renal Gy/GBq for the subsequent cycles. The prescribed renal absorbed dose of 23 Gy was reduced by 25-50% in case of significant renal or haematological impairment. Responders were allowed to receive consolidation or maintenance cycles, for each of which 6 Gy to the kidney were prescribed. We simulated the empiric PRRT regime by fixing the IA at 7.4 GBq per cycle, with the same percentage reductions as above. Radiological, molecular imaging, biochemical, and quality of life responses, as well as safety, were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients underwent 171 cycles. In 34 patients who completed the induction course, a median cumulative IA of 36.1 (range, 6.3-78.6) GBq was administered, and the median cumulative kidney and maximum tumour absorbed doses were 22.1 (range, 8.3-24.3) Gy and 185.7 (range: 15.2-443.1) Gy respectively. Compared with the simulated fixed-IA induction regime, there was a median 1.26-fold increase (range, 0.47-2.12 fold) in the cumulative maximum tumour absorbed dose, which was higher in 85.3% of patients. In 39 assessable patients, the best objective response was partial response in nine (23.1%), minor response in 14 (35.9%), stable disease in 13 (33.3%) and progressive disease in three patients (7.7%). In particular, 11 of 13 patients (84.6%) with pancreatic NET had partial or minor response. The global health status/quality of life score significantly increased in 50% of patients. Acute and subacute side-effects were all of grade 1 or 2, and the most common were nausea (in 32.7% of patients) and fatigue (in 30.8% of patients) respectively. Subacute grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred in less than 10% of patients, with the exception of lymphocytopenia in 51.9% of patients, without any clinical consequences however. No patient experienced severe renal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Personalized PRRT makes it possible to safely increase tumour irradiation in the majority of patients. Our first results indicate a favourable tolerance profile, which appears similar to that of the empiric regime. The response rates are promising, in particular in patients with NET of pancreatic origin.

Dosimetric analysis of patients with gastro entero pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with PRCRT (peptide receptor chemo radionuclide therapy) using Lu-177 DOTATATE and capecitabine/temozolomide (CAP/TEM)

OBJECTIVE:

Two radiosensitizing chemotherapeutic drugs, capecitabine (CAP) and temozolomide (TEM), are administered concurrently to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This study aims to assess the biodistribution and normal-organ and tumor radiation dosimetry for Lu-177 DOTATATE administered concurrently with CAP/TEM.

METHODS:

20 patients with non-resectable histologically confirmed gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with normal kidney function, a normal haematological profile and somatostatin receptor expression of the tumor lesions, as scintigraphically assessed by a Ga-68 DOTANOC scan, were included in two groups-case group (n = 10) and control group (n = 10). Patients included in case group were those who were advised concomitant CAPTEM therapy by the treating medical oncologist. Patients were administered CAP orally at a dose of 600mg m-2 bovine serum albumin twice a day for 14 days starting 9 days prior to PRRT and oral TEM as a single dose at a dose of 75 mg m-2 was given concurrently for the last 5 days commencing on the day of PRRT (days 9-14). In the control group, patients were treated with Lu-177 DOTATATE only. For PRRT, 6.4 GBq-7.6 GBq (173-207 mCi) of Lu-177 DOTATATE was administered as infusion into each patient over 10-15 min in a solution with positively charged amino acids for renal protection. Dosimetric calculations were done using the HERMES software.

RESULTS:

Physiological uptake of Lu-177 DOTATATE was seen in all patients in liver, spleen kidneys, and bone marrow. Radiation absorbed doses (mean ± standard deviation) were obtained as 0.29 ± 0.12 mGy/MBq for kidneys, 0.30 ± 0.18 mGy/MBq for liver, 0.63 ± 0.37 mGy/MBq for spleen, 0.019 ± 0.001 mGy/MBq for bone marrow and 3.85 ± 1.74 mGy/MBq for tumours in the case group and they were 0.31± 0.26, 0.24 ± 0.14, 0.64 ± 0.42, 0.017 ± 0.016, 5.6 ± 11.27 mGy/MBq in kidneys, liver, spleen, bone marrow and neuroendocrine tumour, respectively, in the control group. Mann-Whitney U test between the variables of two groups showed an insignificant difference (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

The authors demonstrated no significant difference between the tumor and organ doses with Lu-177 DOTATATE in the patients treated with and without concomitant chemotherapy.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

To our knowledge, this is the first dedicated study exhibiting dosimetric analysis in patients undergoing PRRT in combination with chemotherapy.

Theranostics in neuroendocrine tumours: somatostatin receptor imaging and therapy

Theranostics and its principles: pre-treatment selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment by the use of a related, specific diagnostic test are integral to the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). This is due to NETs' important, but variable, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression, their heterogeneity and variation in site of primary and rate of progression. Only patients whose tumours have sufficient expression of SSTRs will benefit from SSTR-based radionuclide therapy and demonstrating this expression prior to therapy is essential. This article provides a relevant overview of NETs and the multiple facets of SSTR based theranostics, including imaging and therapy radionuclides; clinical efficacy and toxicity; patient selection and treatment and finally emerging radiopharmaceuticals and newer clinical applications.

An introduction to the clinical practice of theranostics in oncology

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana 1905 "If men could learn from history, what lessons it might teach us! But passion and party blind our eyes, and the light which experience gives is a lantern on the stern, which shines only on the waves behind us!" Samuel Taylor Coleridge 1835 The medical speciality of theranostic nuclear oncology has taken three-quarters of a century to move the stern light cast retrospectively by single-centre clinical reports, to the forepeak in the bow of our theranostic craft, where prospective randomised controlled multicentre clinical trials now illuminate the way forward. This recent reorientation of nuclear medicine clinical research practice to align with that of standard medical and radiation oncology protocols, reflects the paradigm shift toward individualised molecular oncology and precision medicine. Theranostics is the epitome of personalised medicine. The specific tumour biomarker is quantitatively imaged on positron emission tomography (PET)/CT or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT. If it is clearly demonstrated that a tumoricidal radiation absorbed dose can be delivered, the theranostic beta or alpha-emitting radionuclide pair, coupled to the same targeted molecule, is then administered, to control advanced metastatic cancer in that individual patient. This prior selection of patients who may benefit from theranostic treatment is in direct contrast to the evolving oncological indirect treatments using immune-check point inhibitors, where there is an urgent need to define biomarkers which can reliably predict response, and thus avoid the high cost and toxicity of these agents in patients who are unlikely to benefit. The immune and molecular treatment approaches of oncology are a recent phenomenon and the efficacy and safety of immune-check point blockade and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies are currently under evaluation in multicentre randomised controlled trials. Such objective evaluation is compromised by the inadequacy of conventional response evaluation criteria in solid tumour (RECIST) CT/MR anatomical/functional imaging to define tumour response, in both immune-oncology and theranostic nuclear oncology. This introduction to the clinical practice of theranostics explores ways in which nuclear physicians can learn from the lessons of history, and join with their medical, surgical and radiation oncology colleagues to establish a symbiotic collaboration to realise the potential of personalised molecular medicine to control advanced cancer and actually enhance quality of life whilst prolonging survival.

Peptide Receptor Radiotherapy Comes of Age

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a form of systemic radiotherapy shown to be effective in treating neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. The NETTER-1 trial was the first randomized phase III clinical trial evaluating a radiolabeled somatostatin analog, and demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival among patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose octreotide. This article discusses the evolution of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, side effects, and potential future treatment approaches.

Molecular Genetic Studies of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: New Therapeutic Approaches

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) arise sporadically or as part of familial syndromes. Genetic studies of hereditary syndromes and whole exome sequencing analysis of sporadic NETs have revealed the roles of some genes involved in PNET tumorigenesis. The multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gene is most commonly mutated. Its encoded protein, menin, has roles in transcriptional regulation, genome stability, DNA repair, protein degradation, cell motility and adhesion, microRNA biogenesis, cell division, cell cycle control, and epigenetic regulation. Therapies targeting epigenetic regulation and MEN1 gene replacement have been reported to be effective in preclinical models.

The Treatment Landscape and New Opportunities of Molecular Targeted Therapies in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that originate from neuroendocrine stem cells and express both neural and endocrine markers. They are found in almost every organ, and while NENs are mostly associated with slow growth, complications due to the uncontrolled secretion of active peptides, and metastatic disease, may significantly impair the quality of life and can ultimately lead to the death of affected individuals. Expanding knowledge of the genetic, epigenetic, and proteomic landscapes of NENs has led to a better understanding of their molecular pathology and consequently increased treatment options for patients. Here, we review the principal breakthroughs in NEN treatment management, owing largely to omics technologies over the last few years, current recommendations of systemic treatment, and ongoing research into the identification of predictive and response biomarkers based on molecular targeted therapies.

Feasibility of simplifying renal dosimetry in 177Lu peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

BACKGROUND

Recently, 177Lu-dotatate therapy for neuroendocrine tumours has received regulatory approval. Dosimetry can be used to optimize treatment on an individual basis, but there is no international consensus as to how it should be done. The aim of this study is to determine a feasible and accurate dosimetry method to guide individualized peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for patients with neuroendocrine tumours. As part of a clinical trial on 177Lu-dotatate therapy, renal dosimetry was performed for all patients in each treatment cycle, using a hybrid planar-SPECT/CT method. In the present study, we use the image data acquired from 22 patients and 119 cycles and define a set of alternative treatment planning strategies, each representing a simplification in terms of image acquisition and dosimetric calculations. The results from the simplified strategies are compared to the results from the protocol-prescribed hybrid planar-SPECT/CT-based method by analysing differences both in per-cycle and total cumulative absorbed dose (AD) analyses.

RESULTS

In general, the SPECT-based methods gave results that were largely consistent with the protocol-specified hybrid method, both in the per-cycle and cumulative AD analyses. Notably, performing one SPECT/CT per cycle at 96 h yielded ADs that were very similar to the protocol method. The methods using planar dosimetry resulted in larger variations, as expected, while giving 4 cycles to all patients resulted in the largest inter-individual differences in cumulative AD.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing one SPECT/CT at 96 h in every treatment cycle gives sufficiently reliable dosimetric results to base individualized treatment planning on, with a reasonable demand on resources.

Novel fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: a clinical update

INTRODUCTION

Patients with advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) who have bulky and/or symptomatic and/or rapidly progressive disease require chemotherapy treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the accumulating evidence for treatment with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in well-differentiated NETs. The main clinical studies, toxicity and predictors of fluorouracil- based chemotherapy regimens in well-differentiated NETs are discussed, along with the current issues, future research directions and therapeutic prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

Somatostatin analogs may control symptoms of hormone excess and tumor growth in patients with well-differentiated metastatic NETs, and biological therapies may improve progression-free survival for these patients. However, chemotherapy leads to higher objective response rates and symptom control by reducing tumor bulk. The low response rate and significant toxicities of conventional chemotherapy regimens limit their widespread use. Fortunately, some novel fluoropyrimidine-based treatment including fluorouracil, capecitabine, or S-1 based chemotherapy with or without antiangiogenic agents have been investigated in recent years. These treatments showed significant efficacy and less toxicity in pancreatic and non-pancreatic metastatic well-differentiated NETs. Additionally, non-pancreatic well-differentiated NETs have also achieved similar tumor response or survival comparable to pancreatic NETs. Moreover, some predictors of response to these treatment regimens have been evaluated.

Current and emerging therapies for PNETs in patients with or without MEN1

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs) might occur as a non-familial isolated endocrinopathy or as part of a complex hereditary syndrome, such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). MEN1 is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by the combined occurrence of PNETs with tumours of the parathyroids and anterior pituitary. Treatments for primary PNETs include surgery. Treatments for non-resectable PNETs and metastases include biotherapy (for example, somatostatin analogues, inhibitors of receptors and monoclonal antibodies), chemotherapy and radiological therapy. All these treatments are effective for PNETs in patients without MEN1; however, there is a scarcity of clinical trials reporting the efficacy of the same treatments of PNETs in patients with MEN1. Treatment of PNETs in patients with MEN1 is challenging owing to the concomitant development of other tumours, which might have metastasized. In recent years, preclinical studies have identified potential new therapeutic targets for treating MEN1-associated neuroendocrine tumours (including PNETs), and these include epigenetic modification, the β-catenin-wingless (WNT) pathway, Hedgehog signalling, somatostatin receptors and MEN1 gene replacement therapy. This Review discusses these advances.

Recent advances in theranostics and challenges for the future

Theranostic nuclear oncology is on the cusp of adoption into routine clinical management of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) following publication of the Phase 3 randomised controlled trial, NETTER-1. For the first time, level 1b evidence of efficacy and safety of 68-gallium/177-lutetium-DOTA-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, of mid-gut neuroendocrine tumours was established. Multicentre Phase 2 studies of 68-gallium/177-lutetium-prostate specific membrane antigen theranostic approaches to management of end-stage metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, are also very encouraging. However, the retrospective uncontrolled data currently available are inadmissible for formal regulatory agency evaluation. The challenge is to engage with oncologists and urologists, and to collaborate with the pharmaceutical industry, to design and perform the controlled clinical trials required for regulatory approval, and eventual reimbursement for theranostic nuclear oncology procedures. Strategies to facilitate timely establishment of an evidence base are considered in this review of theranostic advances over the past year. The prime objective is the provision of novel, effective, safe, personalised, tumour-targeted molecular theranostic management of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, and other cancers, such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma, which express the appropriate molecular receptor tumour targets. It would also be desirable to offer theranostic treatments at an earlier stage of malignant disease when the benefit is likely to be greater. The ultimate goal of theranostic nuclear oncology is to prolong survival and to improve quality of life for cancer patients worldwide. This may only be achieved through close collaboration between oncologists, nuclear physicians, radiologists, dosimetric physicists, Pharma, and, above all, with the patients themselves, in ways which are explored in this review.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy and the Treatment of Gastroentero-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Current Findings and Future Perspectives

Purpose and Methods

Patients with inoperable and metastasized neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), particularly those with grades 1 and 2, usually receive treatment with somatostatin analogues (SSAs). Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has gained momentum over the past two decades in patients who progress on SSAs. 177Lu-DOTATATE is currently the most widely used radiopeptide for PRRT. We reviewed the recent evidence on PRRT and the treatment of gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

Results

¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE can be used as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with inoperable GEP-NETs, who might be candidate for surgery after treatment and as adjuvant therapy after surgical intervention. Combination treatments of PRRT with chemotherapy or targeted agents as well as combinations of radionuclides in patients with NETs have been explored over the last few years. The majority of patients with NETs experience partial response or have disease stabilization, a small percentage has complete response, while some 30% of patients, however, will have disease progression. The safety and efficacy of retreatment with extra cycles of PRRT as salvage therapy have been evaluated in small retrospective series.

Conclusion

Overall, there is evidence that disease control and quality of life improve significantly after 117Lu PRRT therapy. Clinical trials on this therapy are scarce, and there is a need for further studies to establish proper management guidelines.

Review of Gallium-68 PSMA PET/CT Imaging in the Management of Prostate Cancer

Over 90% of prostate cancers over-express prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and these tumor cells may be accurately targeted for diagnosis by 68Ga-PSMA-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT) imaging. This novel molecular imaging modality appears clinically to have superseded CT, and appears superior to MR imaging, for the detection of metastatic disease. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has the ability to reliably stage prostate cancer at presentation and can help inform an optimal treatment approach. Novel diagnostic applications of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT include guiding biopsy to improve sampling accuracy, and guiding surgery and radiotherapy. In addition to facilitating the management of metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), 68Ga-PSMA can select patients who may benefit from targeted systemic radionuclide therapy. 68Ga-PSMA is the diagnostic positron-emitting theranostic pair with the beta emitter Lutetium-177 PSMA (177Lu-PSMA) and alpha-emitter Actinium-225 PSMA (225Ac-PSMA) which can both be used to treat PSMA-avid metastases of prostate cancer in the molecular tumor-targeted approach of theranostic nuclear oncology.

Lu-177-Based Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic cytotoxic radiation therapy using a compound of β-emitting radionuclide chelated to a peptide for the treatment of tumor with overexpressed specific cell receptor such as somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2) of neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Surgical resection should be performed for the curative treatment for NETs when it is feasible; however, a multi-disciplinary approach is needed when locally advanced or metastasized disease. PRRT with lutetium-177 (Lu-177)-labeled somatostatin analogues, as a new treatment modality targeting metastatic or inoperable NETs expressing the SSTR2, have been developed and successfully used for the past two decades. As Lu-177 emits both β- and γ-radiation, it has the ability as a theragnostic agent for NETs compared with only β-emitting yttrium-90 labeled PRRT. Several recent studies reported that Lu-177 gave an overall positive response and improved the patients' quality of life. To fully exploit its potential, large comparative studies are needed for the assessment of distinct efficacies of Lu-177 labeled PRRT. Additionally, for extending the indications and developing new regimens of Lu-177-based PRRT, more dedicated clinical research is required.

Radionuclide Therapy for Neuroendocrine Tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a form of systemic radiotherapy that allows targeted delivery of radionuclides to tumor cells expressing high levels of somatostatin receptors. The two radiopeptides most commonly used for PRRT, ⁹⁰Y-DOTATOC and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, have been successfully employed for more than a decade for the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Recently, the phase III, randomized NETTER-1 trial has compared ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose octreotide LAR in patients with progressive, metastatic midgut NETs, demonstrating exceptional tolerability and efficacy. This review summarizes recent developments in the field of radionuclide therapy for gastroenteropancreatic and lung NETs and considers possible strategies to further enhance its clinical efficacy.

Hedgehog inhibitor sonidegib potentiates 177Lu-octreotate therapy of GOT1 human small intestine neuroendocrine tumors in nude mice

Background

¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate can be used to treat somatostatin receptor expressing neuroendocrine tumors. It is highly effective in animal models, but clinical studies have so far only demonstrated low cure rates. Hedgehog inhibitors have shown therapeutic effect as monotherapy in neuroendocrine tumor model systems and might be one option to enhance the efficacy of ¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the therapeutic effect of combination therapy using ¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate and the Hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor sonidegib.

Methods

GOT1-bearing BALB/c nude mice were treated with either sonidegib (80 mg/kg twice a week via oral gavage), a single injection of 30 MBq ¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate i.v., or a combination of both. Untreated animals served as controls. Tumor size was measured twice-weekly using calipers. The animals were killed 41 d after injection followed by excision of the tumors. Total RNA was extracted from each tumor sample and then subjected to gene expression analysis. Gene expression patterns were compared with those of untreated controls using Nexus Expression 3.0, IPA and Gene Ontology terms. Western blot was carried out on total protein extracted from the tumor samples to analyze activation-states of the Hh and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways.

Results

Sonidegib monotherapy resulted in inhibition of tumor growth, while a significant reduction in mean tumor volume was observed after ¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate monotherapy and combination therapy. Time to progression was prolonged in the combination therapy group compared with ¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate monotherapy. Gene expression analysis revealed a more pronounced response following combination therapy compared with both monotherapies, regarding the number of regulated genes and biological processes. Several cancer-related signaling pathways (i.e. Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, G-protein coupled receptor, and Notch) were affected by the combination therapy, but not by either monotherapy. Protein expression analysis revealed an activation of the Hh- and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways in tumors exposed to ¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate monotherapy and combination therapy.

Conclusions

A comparative analysis of the different treatment groups showed that combination therapy using sonidegib and ¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate could be beneficial to patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Gene expression analysis revealed a functional interaction between sonidegib and ¹⁷⁷Lu-octreotate, i.e. several cancer-related signaling pathways were modulated that were not affected by either monotherapy. Protein expression analysis indicated a possible PI3K/AKT/mTOR-dependent activation of the Hh pathway, independent of SMO.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3524-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Increased Grade in Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases Negatively Impacts Survival

BACKGROUND

Tumor grade is an important predictor of survival in gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), as determined by Ki-67 expression and mitotic rate. NETs generally grow indolently, but some cells may acquire traits facilitating metastasis. It is unclear how frequently metastases differ in grade from their primary tumors, and whether increasing grade in metastases affects prognosis.

METHODS

Ki-67 immunohistochemistry was performed on resected GEPNET specimens and cases with results for both primary tumors and concurrent metastases were identified. Grade was determined using a modified World Health Organization classification (Ki-67: G1 = 0-2%; G2 > 2-20%; G3 > 20%).

RESULTS

Ki-67 was performed on both the primary tumor and metastases in 103 patients. Tumor grade was higher in metastases from 25 (24%) patients, 24 increased from G1 to G2, and 1 increased from G2 to G3; 68 (66%) patients had no change in grade (42 G1 and 26 G2), and 10 (10%) decreased from G2 to G1. No clinicopathologic factors were predictive of higher grade in metastases. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 55% for patients with stable grade versus 8% of patients with increased grade, while 5-year overall survival (OS) was 92 and 54%, respectively. The 5-year OS of patients who had stable grade with G1 and G2 primaries was 92 and 64%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one-third of patients had metastases with a different grade than their primary, and, when grade increased, both PFS and OS significantly decreased. Determining the grade in both the primary tumor and a metastasis is important for estimating prognosis and to help inform decisions regarding additional therapies.

New therapeutic approaches to metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A glimpse into the future

Neuroendocrine (NE) gastroenteropancreatic tumors are a heterogeneous group of neoplasias arising from neuroendocrine cells of the embryological gut. Their incidence have increased significantly over the past 3 decades probably due to the improvements in imaging and diagnosis. The recent advances in molecular biology have translated into an expansion of therapeutic approaches to these patients. Somatostatin analogs, which initially were approved for control of hormonal syndromes, have recently been proven to inhibit tumor growth. Several new drugs such as antiangiogenics and others targeting mammalian target of rapamycin pathways have been approved to treat progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) although their role in non-pancreatic is still controversial. The treatment of NETs requires a coordinated multidisciplinary approach. The management of localized NETs primarily involves surgical resection followed by surveillance. However, the treatment of unresectable and/or metastatic disease may involve a combination of surgical resection, systemic therapy, and liver-directed therapies with the goal of alleviating symptoms of peptide release and controlling tumor growth. This article will review the current therapeutic strategies for metastatic gastroenteropancreatic NETs and will take a glimpse into the future approaches.

Clinical and Preclinical Advances in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Therapy

The molecular events leading to gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) formation are largely unknown. Over the past decades, systemic chemotherapies have been replaced by therapies directed at particular molecular targets such as the somatostatin receptors, mTOR complexes or proangiogenic molecules. These approaches have demonstrated some success in subtypes of this heterogeneous tumor group, but responses are still widely varied. This review highlights the clinical trials ongoing for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and includes emerging immunotherapy, which holds great promise for NETs based on successes in other tumor types. Current avenues of preclinical research, including Notch and PI3K/AKT, will lead to additional targeted therapies based on genome-wide studies that have cast a wide net in the search for driver mutations. Future preclinical and clinical investigations are required to identify those mutations predictive of therapeutic response or disease progression. Results of current clinical trials outlined here will better inform patient management with respect to agent selection, timing, duration and combination therapy in the treatment of NETs.

ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians caring for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasia in considering eligibility criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and in defining the minimum requirements for PRRT. It is not these guidelines' aim to give recommendations on the use of specific radiolabelled somatostatin analogues for PRRT as different analogues are being used, and their availability is governed by varying international regulations. However, a recent randomized controlled trial, NETTER-1, has provided evidence that may establish ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LutaThera®) as the first widely approved agent. It also makes recommendations on what minimal patient, tumour, and treatment outcome characteristics should be reported for PRRT to facilitate robust comparisons between studies.

Radionuclides in oncology clinical practice – review of the literature

Radionuclide therapy is a promising type of targeted therapy for cancer and its use is becoming more common in several types of malignant tumors.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogue Therapy Of Gastroenteropancreatic Cancer

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been utilized for more than two decades and has been accepted as an effective therapeutic modality in the treatment of inoperable or metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) or neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The two most commonly used radiopeptides for PRRT, (90)Y-octreotide and (177)Lu-octreotate, produce disease-control rates of 68%-94%, with progression-free survival rates that compare favorably with chemotherapy, somatostatin analogues, and newer targeted therapies. In addition, biochemical and symptomatic responses are commonly observed. In general, PRRT is well tolerated with only low to moderate toxicity in most individuals. In line with the need to place PRRT in the therapeutic sequence of gastroenteropancreatic NENs, a recently sponsored phase III randomized trial in small intestine NENs treated with (177)Lu-octreotate vs high-dose octreotide long-acting release demonstrated that (177)Lu-octreotate significantly improved progression-free survival. Other strategies that are presently being developed include combinations with targeted therapies or chemotherapy, intra-arterial PRRT, and salvage treatments. Sophisticated molecular tools need to be incorporated into the management strategy to more effectively define therapeutic efficacy and for an early identification of adverse events. The strategy of randomized controlled trials is a key issue to standardize the treatment and establish the position of PRRT in the therapeutic algorithm of NENs.

WOMEN IN CANCER THEMATIC REVIEW: Systemic therapies in neuroendocrine tumors and novel approaches toward personalized medicine

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a group of heterogenous neoplasms. Evidence-based treatment options for antiproliferative therapy include somatostatin analogues, the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, the multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177-Lu-octreotate. In the absence of definite predictive markers, therapeutic decision making follows clinical and pathological criteria. As objective response rates with targeted drugs are rather low, and response duration is limited in most patients, numerous combination therapies targeting multiple pathways have been explored in the field. Upfront combination of drugs, however, is associated with increasing toxicity and has shown little benefit. Major advancements in the molecular understanding of NET based on genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic analysis have been achieved with prognostic and therapeutic impact. New insight into molecular alterations has paved the way to biomarker-driven clinical trials and may facilitate treatment stratification toward personalized medicine in the near future. However, an improved understanding of the complexity of pathway interactions is required for successful treatment. A systems biology approach is one of the tools that may help to achieve this endeavor.

NAMPT Inhibitor GMX1778 Enhances the Efficacy of 177Lu-DOTATATE Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be treated by peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. However, the efficacy of such treatment is low and needs to be optimized. Our study evaluated the potential radiosensitizing effects of inhibition of nicotineamide phosphoribosyltransferase on ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE treatment in a NET model.

METHODS

Nude mice xenografted with the human NET cell line GOT1 were treated with semiefficient doses of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE (7.5 MBq, intravenously) or the nicotineamide phosphoribosyltransferase inhibitor GMX1778 (100 mg/kg/wk, orally).

RESULTS

Median time to tumor progression (tumor volume larger than at day 0) was 3 d for controls, 7 d for single-dose GMX1778, 28 d for single-dose ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, 35 d for 3 weekly doses of GMX1778, and 98 d for combined treatment with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE and GMX1778 × 1. After ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE and 3 weekly doses of GMX1778, none of the tumors progressed within 120 d.

CONCLUSION

GMX1778 enhances the efficacy of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE treatment and induces a prolonged antitumor response.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a promising new treatment modality for inoperable or metastasized gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors patients. Most studies report objective response rates in 15% to 35% of patients. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compare favorably with that for somatostatin analogues, chemotherapy, or newer, "targeted" therapies. Prospective, randomized data regarding the potential PFS and OS benefit of PRRT compared with standard therapies is anticipated.

Low dose DTIC is effective and safe in pretreated patients with well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors

Background

Streptozocin (STZ) based chemotherapy is recommended for patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET). Temozolomide as mono- or combination therapy has been suggested to be a promising alternative. However, the treatment is costly and not approved for the treatment of pNETs. Dacarbazine (DTIC) shares the active metabolite with temozolomide and is broadly available at a low cost. The aim of this study was a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of a lower dose DTIC-regimen in patients with progressive advanced NETs.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients with NETs predominantly of pancreatic origin treated at our center between 1998 and 2013. 650 mg/m² of DTIC were administered intravenously over 60 min every 4 weeks. Morphological response was assessed according to RECIST1.1 criteria. The median progression free survival (PFS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods, respectively. Univariate analyses of possible prognostic markers were performed.

Results

The objective response rate (ORR) was 27 % for the entire cohort and 32 % in 50 pNET patients, respectively. Stable disease (SD) was documented in 29 patients (39 %). Median PFS (mPFS) in patients receiving DTIC was 7 months (3.9–10; 95 % confidence interval). Radiological and biochemical response were the only significant prognostic markers for longer PFS in univariate analysis. Treatment was well tolerated. Nausea was the most common side effect (31 %), only one case (1.3 %) of grade 3 toxicity (vomiting) occurred.

Conclusion

Low dose DTIC chemotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option in patients with progressive well differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms, especially of pancreatic origin.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2642-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: focus on bronchial neuroendocrine tumors

Well-differentiated bronchial neuroendocrine tumors (B-NETs) are rare. They represent 1-5 % of all lung cancers. The incidence of these neoplasms has risen over the past 30 years and, especially for advanced or metastatic disease, management is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is the most important first-line therapy, in particular in well-differentiated NETs with high somatostatin type receptor (SSTR) expression. In these tumors, the role of mammalian target of rapamycin (m-TOR) inhibitors and the potential utility of other target therapies remain unclear while chemotherapy represents the gold standard treatment only for aggressive forms with low SSTR expression. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging treatment modality for advanced NETs. There are many cumulative evidences about the effectiveness and tolerability of this therapeutic approach, especially in gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP)-NETs. For B-NETs, scientific research is moving more slowly. Here, we performed a review in order to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of PRRT with a focus on patients with inoperable or metastatic well-differentiated B-NETs.

Myelotoxicity of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Decade of Experience

AIM

This review of the literature, and the authors' own decade of experience with lutetium-177-octreotate-capecitabine±temozolomide peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)-chemotherapy of GEPNETs, analyses the risk of both short- and long-term hematotoxicity.

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute leukemia (AL) have been associated with PRRT in heavily pretreated patients with a history of exposure to alkylating agents. Commenced 15 years ago, PRRT is now becoming established as first- and second-line therapy for gastroentero pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs), and early treatment minimizes myelotoxicity, which is the most significant potential adverse event following PRRT.

RESULTS

Sixteen key articles involving primary research were identified. A total of 2225 patients were treated (2104 treated with PRRT monotherapy and 121 with PRRT combined with chemotherapy). The average age of patients in these studies ranged from 53 to 64 years with median duration of follow-up ranging from 6 to 62 months. Short-term myelotoxicity was observed in 221 patients (10%), occurring in 213 of 2104 patients treated with PRRT monotherapy and 8 of 121 patients treated with PRRT combined with chemotherapy. Acute toxicity manifested as modest self-limited grade 3/4 toxicity (CTCAE or WHO), most often affecting platelets during the first cycle of treatment. Toxicity manifesting early was easily managed with dose modification or therapy cessation and was ameliorated by appropriate patient selection. MDS/AL was a rare stochastic event occurring in 32 (1.4%) patients. Where bone marrow biopsy was performed, cases of MDS displayed cytogenetic abnormalities, consistent with secondary MDS. Factors associated with myelotoxicity included age >70 years, impaired renal function, baseline cytopenias, prior number of therapies, prior chemotherapy (alkylating agents), and prior radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Early therapy with PRRT-containing regimens improves outcomes, minimizes myelotoxicity, and renders the risk of MDS and AL negligible.

NeuroEndocrine Tumor Therapy with Lutetium-177-octreotate and Everolimus (NETTLE): A Phase I Study

OBJECTIVE

To establish the optimal safe dose of everolimus in combination with (177)Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of advanced progressive gastro-entero pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and to define dose-limiting toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced unresectable progressive well-differentiated GEP-NETS avid for (68)Ga-octreotate on positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging underwent PRRT with four cycles of 7.8 GBq (177)Lu-octreotate at 8 week intervals. Successive cohorts of 3 patients received escalating doses of everolimus comprising 5, 7.5, and 10 mg daily for 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients comprised 4 at 5 mg, 9 at 7.5 mg, and 3 at 10 mg everolimus. Patient cohorts at 5 and 7.5 mg received 83% and 80% of the total planned dose of everolimus over 24 weeks. All patients required dose reduction or complete cessation of everolimus at the 10 mg level, which induced neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and reduced creatinine clearance. The overall response rate was 44% (7 of 16 patients), and no patient progressed over the 6 month period of treatment. Four of 5 pancreatic NET patients achieved PR 80%. No patient progressed on study.

CONCLUSION

In combination, PRRT with (177)Lu-octreotate, the maximum tolerated dose of everolimus is 7.5 mg daily.

Temozolomide-based combination for advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

In this systematic review, we explored the value of using temozolomide (TMZ)-based combinations for advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs).

METHODS

Database search were conducted using the terms 'NENs' and 'TMZ' and 'systemic therapy.' Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival and overall survival, toxicities and tumor response.

RESULTS

In total, 16 trials including 348 patients were included. Median progression-free survival ranged from 6 to 31 months. The disease control rate ranged from 65 to 100%. Frequently reported grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia, lymphopenia and elevated transaminases.

CONCLUSION

The published clinical data suggest that TMZ-based combination with some anticancer agents (especially capecitabine) could be an effective treatment option for advanced low-intermediate grade NENs.

[177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]-octreotate in the treatment of midgut neuroendocrine tumors

Midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare and remarkably heterogeneous. Although recent developments for pancreatic NETs have brought multiple new therapies to patients who need them, there has been little observed efficacy against midgut NETs. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy utilizes somatostatin analogs conjugated to radioactive isotopes in order to deliver high doses of radiation directly to tumor cells, which express somatostatin receptors. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotate (DOTATATE) has been reported and investigated for more than a decade, and the randomized controlled NETTER-1 study of this agent has recently been reported to show promising results. In this article, we will summarize and evaluate the rationale and existing clinical data for the activity of DOTATATE in midgut NETs, to give context for the interpretation of NETTER-1 results when they are fully available.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Control: Durable Objective Response to Combination 177Lu-Octreotate-Capecitabine-Temozolomide Radiopeptide Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND/METHODS

Thirty patients with advanced progressive grade 1 or 2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), treated on a prospective phase II single-center study, were followed up for up to 4 years after 4 cycles of 7.9 GBq 177Lu-octreotate combined with chemotherapy. Each 8-week cycle of treatment combined radiopeptide therapy with 14 days of capecitabine at 1,500 mg/m2 and 5 days of temozolomide at 200 mg/m2.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 80% (95% CI 66-93), and there was complete remission in 13% (95% CI 4-30) and partial response in 70% (95% CI 52-83) of the cases. No patient manifested progressive disease on treatment. Median progression-free survival was 48 months. Median overall survival had not been reached at a median follow-up of 33 months. No patient was lost to follow-up, all but 1 received 4 cycles of outpatient therapy, and all were evaluated for response and toxicity. No one required hospital admission. The treatment was well tolerated, and no serious dose-limiting toxicities were seen. The commonest toxicity was transient nausea of grade 2 (33%) or 3 (7%). Hematological toxicity was limited to grade 3 thrombocytopenia (10%) and anemia (10%). There were no grade 4 adverse events, and no renal functional impairment was evident.

CONCLUSION

Combined 177Lu-octreotate-capecitabine-temozolomide radiopeptide chemotherapy is a well-tolerated, highly effective outpatient regimen for control of advanced progressive pNETs, achieving a durable objective response.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours

In the past decades, the number of neuroendocrine tumours that are detected is increasing. A relative new and promising therapy for patients with metastasised or inoperable disease is peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This therapy involves an infusion of somatostatin analogues linked to radionuclides like Yttrium-90 or Lutetium-177. Objective response rates are reported in 15-35%. Response rates may vary between type of tumour and radionuclide. Besides the objective response rate, overall survival and progression free survival increase significantly. Also, the quality of life improves as well. Serious side-affects are rare. PRRT is usually well tolerated, also in patients with extensive metastasised disease. Recent studies combined PRRT with other types of therapies. Unfortunately no randomised trials comparing these strategies are available. In the future, more research is needed to evaluate the best therapy combinations or sequence of therapies.

SPECT- and PET-based patient-tailored treatment in neuroendocrine tumors: a comprehensive multidisciplinary team approach

The overexpression of somatostatin receptors on the tumor cell surface of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) detected by multimodal functional imaging modalities such as SPECT and PET tracers constitutes a therapeutic option using targeting radiolabeled compounds. We will introduce the theranostic concept in general, explain in more detail its development in NETs, and discuss available SPECT and PET tracers regarding their potential for diagnostic imaging, visualization of target expression, and treatment tailoring. Moreover, we will discuss the currently available peptide receptor radionuclide therapy principles and compare them to previously published studies. Finally, we will discuss which new concepts will most likely influence the theranostic treatment approach in NETs in the future.

Optimization of combined temozolomide and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in mice after multimodality molecular imaging studies

BACKGROUND

Successful treatments of patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-overexpressing neuroendocrine tumours (NET) comprise somatostatin-analogue lutetium-177-labelled octreotate ((177)Lu-TATE) treatment, also referred to as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and temozolomide (TMZ) treatment. Their combination might result in additive effects. Using MRI and SPECT/CT, we studied tumour characteristics and therapeutic responses after different (combined) administration schemes in a murine tumour model in order to identify the optimal treatment schedule for PRRT plus TMZ.

METHODS

We performed molecular imaging studies in mice bearing SSTR-expressing H69 (humane small cell lung cancer) tumours after single intravenous (i.v.) administration of 30 MBq (177)Lu-TATE or TMZ (oral 50 mg/kg daily for 14 days). Tumour perfusion was evaluated weekly by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), whereas tumour uptake of (111)In-octreotide was quantified using SPECT/CT until day 39 after treatment. Based on these results, seven different (177)Lu-octreotate and TMZ combination schemes were evaluated for therapy response, varying the order and time interval of the two therapies and compared with single treatments.

RESULTS

PRRT and TMZ both resulted in tumour size reduction, accompanied by significant changes in MRI characteristics such as an enhanced tumour perfusion. Moreover, TMZ treatment also resulted in increased uptake of the SST analogue (111)In-octreotide until day 13. In the subsequent therapy study, 90 % of animals receiving (177)Lu-TATE at day 14 after TMZ treatment showed complete response, being the best anti-tumour results among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular imaging studies indicated that PRRT after TMZ treatment could induce optimal therapeutic effects because of enhanced tumour uptake of radioactivity after TMZ, which was confirmed by therapy responses. Therefore, clinical translation of TMZ treatment prior to PRRT might increase tumour responses in NET patients as well.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of neuroendocrine tumors: current state and future perspectives

The heterogeneous nature of neuroendocrine tumors, their indolent course and lack of therapeutic options for the management of advanced cases – together form the Achilles heel for oncologists. Somatostatin receptor-specific imaging with Ga-68 labeled peptides has provided an opportunity for management of advanced cancers with their therapeutic radionuclide counterparts (Lu-177/Y-90 labeled peptides). Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography is accepted technique for treatment response assessment, since the radiolabels for imaging and therapy are same, thereby depicting accurate response. We have compiled and reviewed our experience of last 8–10 years in the use of these novel radiolabeled peptides in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors, focusing on the survival, toxicity profiles and the recent advances and improvements.